NORFOLK COUNTY POLICE SERVICES BOARD MEETING

Transcription

1 NORFOLK COUNTY POLICE SERVICES BOARD MEETING Page 9: am Tuesday, January 19, 21 Council Chambers 2nd Floor County Administration Building 5 Colborne Street South, Simcoe 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. DISCLOSURE OF A PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3-8 a) Minutes of December 1, 4. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 5. CORRESPONDENCE 9 a) Letter from Acting Staff Sergeant Jason Dunn dated November 9, Re: Police Auctions Canada Inc b) Article Toronto Sun dated January 11, 21. REPORTS a) Inspector Horvat 7. OTHER BUSINESS a) 21 Election of Chair and Vice-Chair 8. QUESTION PERIOD 9. CLOSED SESSION 1. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 41

2 Council Agenda Tuesday, January 19, 21 Page 11. NEXT MEETING Page 2 of 41

3 THE CORPORATION OF NORFOLK COUNTY NORFOLK COUNTY POLICE SERVICES BOARD WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 1, The following are the minutes of the Norfolk County Police Services Board held on Wednesday, December 1,, at 9: am in the Council Chambers, County Administration Building, 5 Colborne Street South, Simcoe. MEMBERS PRESENT Peter Hellyer - Chair Dave Douglas - Vice-Chair David Murphy James Oliver John Wells Maureen Chunick - Secretary ALSO PRESENT: Inspector Zvonko Horvat Acting Staff Sgt Jason Dunn Acting Staff Sgt John Fashing 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. DISCLOSURE OF A PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 3. PRESENTATIONS a) Mark Stephens and Kareena Ivanis - Roulston's Pharmacy Re: Patch 4 Patch Initiative Kareena provided an overview of the initiative to the Board members. It was noted that it will take more than Roulston s implementing this program throughout the County. They will follow up with other pharmacies to encourage their involvement. This program will be rolled out in January and will include the media at that time. Acting Staff Sgt Fashing will look at other police services involved in the program and how their community has been involved. OPP concern is that there is no way to determine the pharmacy that dispensed the fentanyl patch. Media Release through Roulston s with OPP involvement in January. 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES a) Minutes of November 25, Moved by: John Wells Seconded by: Dave Douglas THAT the Minutes of November 25, be accepted as read. Carried Minutes of December 1, Page 3 of 41

4 Norfolk County Police Services Board Wednesday, December 1, 5. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES None. CORRESPONDENCE a) Community Policing Minutes Inspector Horvat noted the Community Policing initiative regarding Lock It or Lose It signs that were installed in Simcoe public parking lots. This initiative will expand to other locations in Norfolk County. 7. REPORTS a) Inspector Horvat - November OPP Report Inspector introduced Acting Staff Sgt John Fashing who is with the detachment for three months from Oxford County. He has 25 years experience in various positions throughout the province. Locally Dedicated Overtime hours are within range Auxiliary Policing - 29 hours Alarm calls for service down for 5 year trend 911 hang up calls down for the year Assaults for the year consistent downward trend B&E downward trend 2 hours spent on cottage watch Domestic disturbance slightly up Looking at a counselling initiative program to assist Drugs spike from 9 to 14 monitor with property crime cases Street Team actively involved Fraud up over 5 year period internet and letter fraud Education through media and presentations works well Impaired Driving 5 investigations where people have been arrested Increase in people drinking and driving more RIDE programs RIDE grant was received Mental Health 24 incidents investigated. Mobile Rapid Response Team is effective and getting positive results. Calls going down Norfolk ahead of other communities Spike in Townsend due to resident calling OPP frequently Situation Table has been engaged Mischief Focused Patrol at Panorama to keep mischiefs down Robberies 2 robberies reported in October and 3 in November 2 cleared with arrests and charges Remaining 3 are related with links to robberies in Brant County, City of Brantford and Woodstock Focused patrol in Waterford due to spike of motor vehicle theft in the area Theft under down for 5 year trend Minutes of December 1, Page 4 of 41

5 Norfolk County Police Services Board Wednesday, December 1, Community Policing initiative with Lock It or Lose It signage in the area will drive down numbers Property damage downward trend Fatal Injury - 7 this year - 17 non-fatal injuries New initiative in 21 - O Tolerance O Collisions Will target 4 or 5 collisions areas in the county with a monthly strict enforcement blitz. The most problematic violations will be charged such as distracted, impaired, lack of seat belt use. Foot Patrol - 51 hours Bicycle Patrol - 15 hours RIDE statistics festive RIDE is on now Focused Patrol Vehicle Theft - Waterford Duration: October 27 December 1, This patrol is in response to vehicle thefts that have been occurring in Waterford. Update: December 8, A total of hours by18 officers have been recorded for this patrol. No arrests have been made in relation to auto theft. Numerous vehicles have been stopped and 3 ADLS suspensions have been documented. Project Shutdown is assisting on this patrol as time permits. Since the creation of this focus patrol, no vehicles have been stolen from Waterford. Drugs Simcoe Duration: November 1, December 31, This patrol is in response to numerous calls for service to this location involving domestics and unwanted persons. The unwanted persons are all known to CDSA users. It is believed that drugs are being trafficked from this location. Update: December 8, A total of 83.5 hours by 25 officers have been recorded for this patrol. No arrests have been made in relation to CDSA activity. Several vehicles have been stopped and the occupants identified. Intelligence continues to be collected on this address. A total of 11 unrelated charges have been laid as side result (HTA related). This patrol has been forwarded to the Norfolk County Street Crime Unit for review of the collected intelligence. Break and Enter Cottages Norfolk County Lakefront Cottage areas Duration: November 1 May 21 This patrol is in response to the previous analysis conducted on break and enters to cottages. A similar focus patrol was run last year with successful results. The results from the previous focus patrol saw a reduction from 24 reported break-ins the previous year down to 3 reported break-ins at the Minutes of December 1, Page 5 of 41

6 Norfolk County Police Services Board Wednesday, December 1, conclusion of the patrol. Several arrests were made along with the recovery of property. As this issue was not a one-time problem and occurred quite regularly it was decided to run another patrol with the goal of obtaining similar results. Update: December 8, A total of hours by 29 officers have been recorded for this patrol. Vehicle patrol and foot patrol has been conducted. Nothing out of the ordinary has been observed. Several hunters were observed near some cottages but were there with permission. Mischief Simcoe Panorama November 1, January 3, 21 This patrol is in response to previous mischief/theft occurrences involving the Simcoe Panorama. This will be the second focus patrol for this event as the previous year showed success. Last year, 2 officers spent hours patrolling and monitoring the displays. As a result of this effort, there were no reported incidents of theft or vandalism as seen in previous years. Update: December 8, A total of hours by 12 officers have been recorded for this patrol. Vehicle patrol and foot patrol has been conducted. No acts of mischief or theft have been reported. Norfolk County OPP Auxiliary members have also contributed time to this patrol. A process is being reviewed to collect that data. Speed Spy Wilson Ave and Gage Street Delhi Duration: December 2 December 23, This patrol is in response to a complaint of speeding on Wilson Ave near Gate Street in Delhi. A Speed Spy study confirmed enforcement was required. Further complaints had also been received about vehicles speeding by school buses. Update: December 8, A total of 3.5 hours by 1 officer have been recorded for this patrol. As a result, charges were laid in regards to traffic violations. Speed Spy Teeterville Road and Teeter Street Duration: September 28 November 2, This patrol is in response to a complaint of speeding on Teeterville Road in Teeterville. A Speed Spy study confirmed enforcement was required. Update: November 24, A total of hours by 9 officers have bene recorded for this patrol. No violations were observed during this focus patrol. This patrol is now closed. Speed Spy Hawtrey Road/Wintergreen Crescent - Delhi Duration: September 29 November 2, Minutes of December 1, Page of 41

7 Norfolk County Police Services Board Wednesday, December 1, This patrol is in response to a complaint of speeding on Hawtrey Road in Delhi. A Speed Spy study confirmed enforcement was required. Update: November 24, A total of 12 hours by 9 officers have been recorded for this patrol. As a result, charges were laid in regards to traffic violations. This patrol is now closed. Member Oliver inquired if the OPP is considering the development of a regional firing range. This was confirmed by Inspector Horvat but not known when. We are still waiting for the Bonnie Heath Firing Range lease agreement to be finalized. Member Murphy noted an article in the TO Star regarding the use of medical marihuana in public places and restaurants. Inspector Horvat noted that this is not allowed as yet. Chair Hellyer expressed concern that all officers will have tasers in 21. Inspector Horvat noted that all training is provided based on provincial standards on use of force. Chair Hellyer inquired about terror alerts from the RCMP and how the OPP responds. Inspector Horvat advised that the public are informed through media release and that operational plans would be taken into concern based on the information provided. Moved by Dave Douglas Seconded by John Wells THAT the November OPP Report be accepted as information. Carried 8. OTHER BUSINESS It was noted that the next meeting would be Tuesday, January 19, QUESTION PERIOD 1. CLOSED SESSION Moved by: Member Wells Seconded by: Member Murphy THAT the PSB convenes at 1:3 am in a meeting closed to the public to discuss OPP operations. Carried Moved by: Member Oliver Seconded by: Member Wells Minutes of December 1, Page 7 of 41

8 Norfolk County Police Services Board Wednesday, December 1, THAT the PSB adjourn at 11:3 am this closed meeting and reconvenes in Open Session. Carried 11. ADJOURNMENT 11:3 am 12. NEXT MEETING Tuesday, January 19, 21 Police Services Board Chair Secretary Minutes of December 1, Page 8 of 41

9 Ontario.. Police.. Norfolk County OPP Provincial provlnclale Police de l Ontario P.O. Box Queensway West Simcoe, ON N3Y 4T2 NorfolkGoun pogo!sewwgg Telephone/Teléphone: (519) Facsimlle?éleccpleurt (519) E32i 15 File number/réiérence: an 9 Nov. 15 Norfolk County Police Services Board 5 Colbome Street South Simeoe, ON N3Y 4N5 Atlz Mr. Peter Hellyer. Chair REFERENCE: POLICE AUCTIONS CANADA INC. Attached please find two cheques in the amounts of $22.1 for September and $29.75 for October from the on-line auction. Please do not hesitateto Contact me if you require any additional information. Jason Dunn Acting Staff Sergeant Norfolk County Detachment West Region Letter from Acting Staff Sergeant Jason Dunn dated November... Page 9 of 41

10 Serious police discipline cases often handled in secret: Star investigation Under this secretive system, misbehaving officers do not face public hearings and their names are not released. In September 214, seven constables with the OPP s Caledon detachment were supposed to hold a midnight RIDE check to catch impaired drivers. Under instruction from their sergeant, the officers made false notebook entries claiming they were working when in fact they spent the hour sitting at Tim Hortons. They claimed they checked 4 vehicles. By: Jesse McLean Investigative News reporter, and Jayme Poisson News Reporter, Published on Mon Jan A Durham cop was caught on video threatening to beat up a man and plant cocaine on him, behaviour that prompted a Superior Court judge to say the officer committed several criminal offences in the course of his duties. A Toronto officer refused to help his partner arrest an off-duty cop for drinking and driving. Seven Ontario Provincial Police constables made fake notebook entries claiming they were conducting a RIDE check to catch drunk drivers when they were really hanging out at Tim Hortons. All of these officers were disciplined under a secretive informal process that is supposed to be used only for cases that are not of a serious nature, an ongoing Star investigation has found. Critics say this is serious misconduct that should have been aired in a public hearing. These are not minor offences. To classify it as a minor offence is highly problematic, said Alok Mukherjee, the former chair of the Toronto Police Services Board, after reviewing these cases and others in which officers have been informally disciplined. Under this system, the misbehaving officers do not face public hearings and their names are not released. Often times, their misconduct is also kept secret. And, after two years of good behaviour, the misconduct must be scrubbed from the offending officer s employment record, according to the Police Services Act, which governs policing in Ontario. When somebody s name comes up before the board for promotion, it ll say nothing, Mukherjee said. There is no way of knowing whether this officer had informal discipline. Toronto, Durham and York Region police refused to even say how many of their officers have been disciplined for internal matters under the informal process. The OPP, Peel and Halton released the numbers. The Star s ongoing Breaking Badge investigation has found officers from the GTA and Ontario have been recently disciplined in public hearings for reckless and often criminal behaviour: they drove drunk (sometimes in police cruisers), beat their spouses, invented charges and interfered with investigations to help out friends. The vast majority were allowed to continue being police officers. This article is looking at the cases that never make it to a public hearing. Under Ontario s Police Services Act, a chief can choose to handle a discipline matter through informal resolution if she is of the opinion the misconduct was not of a serious nature. Article Toronto Sun dated January 11, 21 Page 1 of 41

11 The informal system is intended to allow police brass to efficiently deal with minor misconduct without having to hold a costly and time-consuming hearing. In the last five years alone, 4 Peel officers roughly 3 per cent of the force have been sanctioned under the secretive system, some multiple times. The OPP, a force three times the size, informally disciplined almost the same number of officers over that time period. One Peel officer, Const. Shehab Balh, was informally disciplined seven times in four years for misconduct that included shoddy police work resulting in criminal charges being withdrawn and operating his cruiser in an inappropriate manner. He told the Star he felt the force was using the progressive discipline to push him out of the service. So he resigned from Peel police. Manipulated discipline and internal hearings for the disliked officers and uncontested promotions and advancements for the well-liked officers has nothing to do with good or bad policing. That is why I left, Balh said. Many informal sanctions are for benign employer-employee matters, such as showing up for work late or swearing at a supervisor. However, some cases being funneled through the informal system are much more serious. (The Star cannot determine how many because of the secrecy shrouding informal discipline.) In September 214, seven constables with the OPP s Caledon detachment were supposed to hold a midnight RIDE check to catch impaired drivers. Under instruction from their sergeant, the officers made false notebook entries claiming they were working when in fact they spent the hour sitting at Tim Hortons. They claimed they checked 4 vehicles. The sergeant who directed his subordinates to lie in their notebooks was docked hours pay in a formal hearing. The rest of the officers were disciplined informally. One of them, Const. Jason Tardif, was docked 12 hours pay. The Star only knows this because he was formally disciplined for making fake notes about police work he didn t do in a separate incident just hours later. The Star contacted all officers named in this story. None commented. OPP Insp. Charles Young, a prosecutor for police disciplinary cases, said the seven constables were informally disciplined because they were directed to commit the misconduct by a higher ranking officer. They took responsibility for committing the misconduct and all were held accountable, Young said. In November 29, Toronto Const. Suhail Khawaja refused to assist his rookie partner arrest an off-duty Halton cop for drunk driving, according to a court decision from the Halton officer s impaired driving trial. Later that shift, Khawaja repeatedly told others that he wanted nothing to do with the arrest of a fellow police officer, the judge wrote in his decision. The rookie officer, Const. Andrew Vanderburgh, was berated by his colleagues and called a rat for charging one of their own. Const. Khawaja was informally disciplined, as was a staff sergeant who failed to intervene in the harassment of the young officer. A police spokesman previously said two officers were informally Article Toronto Sun dated January 11, 21 Page 11 of 41

12 docked 2 and 15 days pay for their misconduct in the incident, but the force said it could not discuss Khawaja s penalty because it was an employment matter between the chief and one of his officers. Toronto police officials say the severity of the penalties shows the force took the misconduct seriously, even if they dealt with it informally. Toronto police said the informal system allows the force to efficiently deal with misconduct that is serious, but not necessarily so serious that it warrants public airing in a formal hearing and exact meaningful punishment in the process. The officer is willing to agree to a much higher penalty than they get in the tribunal to settle it informally, said Insp. Peter Callaghan, a prosecutor for Toronto police s disciplinary hearing. We want the employee to acknowledge that they ve done wrong and accept responsibility for their misconduct. Under the Police Act, informal discipline can range from a reprimand to 2 days docked pay or 3- day suspension without pay. The informal process also allows the force to discipline officers when they may not feel they have a reasonable chance of getting a guilty verdict at a disciplinary hearing, police said. But critics say the noble quest of getting officers to admit wrongdoing and accept stiff penalties is undermined by the fact that the officers names and misconduct are not publicly reported. It s swept under the rug, said Avvy Go, director of the Metro Toronto Chinese and Southeast Asian Legal Clinic who has dealt with cases of officers being informally disciplined as part of her practice. It defeats the whole purpose of having that system to hold police publicly accountable, she said. Durham police, one of the three GTA forces who refused to say how many officers have been disciplined informally, said they are internal matters between the chief and his members. Durham Const. James Ebdon was caught on video threatening to beat up a man and plant cocaine on him during a one-sided, expletive-filled confrontation. Because the case was handled informally, the force refuses to publicly discuss the officer's case. But Durham Const. James Ebdon s misconduct was caught on hidden camera and posted online for all to see. I hurt people... and then I make their cocaine f---ing appear, the officer tells a young man outside a crack house in the 8 ½-minute, expletive-filled video posted on YouTube. You give me attitude and I m gonna f---ing drag you uptown. I m gonna say you assaulted me. I m gonna say you threatened me, the officer said in a 211 video. In a decision, a Superior Court judge ripped into Const. Ebdon s conduct, calling it reprehensible. The evidence establishes that Constable Ebdon committed several criminal offences in the course of his duties, Justice Laura Bird said in her decision. Const. Ebdon showed a staggering lack of appreciation for the seriousness of his conduct. Perhaps that is not surprising in light of the fact that the only penalty that was imposed on him by the Durham Regional Police Service was the loss of 24 hours pay. Article Toronto Sun dated January 11, 21 Page 12 of 41

13 Because he was disciplined informally, Ebdon s misconduct wasn t required to be disclosed in a court case where he testified as an officer a fact the judge called concerning. Durham police will not publicly discuss Ebdon s case. A spokesman for Durham police said the force looks at each incident in its totality, including any back story that may explain an officer s conduct. This doesn t excuse the behaviour, but it sheds more light on what really happened, Durham spokesman Dave Selby said in an . Based on the totality of this information and a desire for the best solution to change the behaviour of the officer, a decision is made regarding informal or formal discipline. The informal system can be unfair to officers as well, said Randy Henning, president of the Durham Regional Police Association. Some officers are faced with swallowing an exorbitant penalty for not-so serious misconduct without even seeing any of the evidence against them, Henning said. If an officer rejects the informal resolution, he goes to a disciplinary hearing, where if convicted, the misconduct may be brought up in future court cases where he testifies. Const. Jamie Broadstock, an officer with Durham police for 1 years, was demoted in March 212 for discreditable conduct related to a drug conviction. He has been on paid suspension since being arrested in June 211 for trafficking and possession of the painkiller oxycodone for the purpose of trafficking. In December 211, he pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of possession and was given an 18-month suspended sentence. At the criminal trial, he received probation for 18 months and a suspended sentence. It appears he was arrested against in December 214 in relation to two fraud charges. He is no longer with the force. The informal part of the process is the most nontransparent part of the disciplinary system, both from the public and the officers standpoint, Henning said. Speaking about the informal process in general, Toronto Police union head Mike McCormack said he believes penalties doled out are significant and appropriate and part of progressive discipline that focuses on rehabilitation without a long drawn-out process of a hearing. It s not bringing a hammer to swat a fly all the time, he said. The solution, according to former Toronto police board chair Mukherjee, is to create a clear definition in the Police Act of what constitutes serious misconduct. That way, it wouldn t be left to the discretion of the chief whether a matter is dealt with informally or in a public hearing. The province is currently revisiting the Police Services Act with the aim of modernizing the law that governs policing in Ontario. During Mukherjee s tenure on the police board, which provides civilian oversight the Toronto force, he said groups of officers were informally disciplined for removing their name tags during the G2 and turning off their in-car cameras what he calls serious offences that undermine police accountability and integrity. My fear is that an impression is created that the discipline is not serious, he said. The next person who does that (misconduct) will act knowing that his matter is not serious. Article Toronto Sun dated January 11, 21 Page 13 of 41

14 NORFOLK COUNTY POLICE SERVICES BOARD Working In Partnership With The Communities We Serve Zvonko Horvat Inspector, Detachment Commander Ontario Provincial Police, Norfolk County Detachment Inspector Horvat Page 14 of 41

15 Inspector Horvat Page 15 of 41

16 Inspector Horvat Page 1 of 41

17 Inspector Horvat Page 17 of 41

18 Inspector Horvat Page 18 of 41

19 Inspector Horvat Page 19 of 41

20 Inspector Horvat Page 2 of 41

21 Inspector Horvat Page 21 of 41

22 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % 5 8 REDUCTION 1.7% February % 48 7 NO 1.1% March % REDUCTION 12.5% April % 3 82 NO 3.23% May % 3 89 NO % June % 59 9 NO 9.52% July % 9 97 REDUCTION 12.7% August % REDUCTION % September % 9 8 REDUCTION -4.84% October % REDUCTION % November % NO % December % 8 REDUCTION % Total % 98.37% 99.5% Quarter Cleared Quarter Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total % 98.37% 99.5% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 22 of ALARMS ALARMS January February March April May June July August September October November December This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau. 42 YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences Current s ALARMS 5-year Trend ALARMS 247 Contributions by Zone 5 7 Occurrence Type Alarms 3 Zones Sum of Delhi Turkey Point 9 Windham 4 Port Dover 58 Townsend 51 Waterford 28 Woodhouse 15 Simcoe 247 Houghton 5 Langton 7 Middleton 3 North Walsingham Port Rowan 8 South Walsingham 23 Long Point 1 Grand Total Total

23 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % NO -.78% February % NO -1.53% March % 18 1 NO 1.37% April % NO -5.3% May % NO -17.2% June % NO % July % NO -28.8% August % NO -8.28% September % NO -24.9% October % REDUCTION % November % REDUCTION -13.7% December % REDUCTION -48.% Total % 87.28% 97.5% Quarter Cleared Quarter Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total % 87.28% 97.5% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 23 of Call/911 Hang-up Call/911 Hang-up 237 January February March April May June July August September October November December This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences Currenty s 5-year Trend Call/911 Hang-up Call/911 Hang-up Contributions by Zone Occurrence Type 911 Call/911 Hang-up Zones Sum of Delhi 14 Turkey Point 37 Windham 21 Port Dover 11 Townsend 139 Waterford 59 Woodhouse 7 Simcoe 531 Houghton 177 Langton 12 Middleton 74 North Walsingham 78 Port Rowan 18 South Walsingham 9 Long Point 2 Grand Total Total

24 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % NO 3.4% February % 11 2 NO 2.5% March % REDUCTION -37.5% April % NO 9.52% May % NO 84.2% June % 2 31 REDUCTION % July % 3 38 REDUCTION.% August % NO -7.14% September % 27 3 REDUCTION % October % 21 3 NO -17.8% November % NO 14.29% December % REDUCTION % Total % 93.2% 94.14% Quarter Cleared Quarter Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total % 93.2% 94.14% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 24 of ASSAULTS ASSAULTS January February March April May June July August September October November December This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences year Trend Current s ASSAULTS ASSAULTS 121 Contributions by Zone 3 Occurrence Type Assaults Zones Sum of Delhi 24 Turkey Point 4 Windham 8 Port Dover 2 Townsend 1 Waterford 9 Woodhouse 5 Simcoe 121 Houghton 3 Langton 1 Middleton 3 North Walsingham Port Rowan South Walsingham 4 Long Point Grand Total Total

25 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % 9 33 NO -35.9% February % NO 27.27% March % 1 28 NO 7.14% April 1 3.7% 1 22 NO % May % NO.% June % 2 28 REDUCTION % July % NO -4.55% August % YES.% September % REDUCTION % October % REDUCTION -5.% November % NO -38.4% December 17.25% 12 2 NO -19.5% Total % 1.8% 12.% Quarter Cleared Quarter Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total % 1.8% 12.% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 25 of BREAK AND ENTER BREAK AND ENTER 1 January February March April May June July August September October November December This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences Current s 5-year Trend BREAK AND ENTER BREAK AND ENTER Contributions by Zone Occurrence Type Break and Enter Zones Sum of Delhi 13 Turkey Point 5 Windham 9 Port Dover 14 Townsend 7 Waterford 15 Woodhouse Simcoe Houghton Langton 1 Middleton 4 North Walsingham Port Rowan 3 South Walsingham 21 Long Point Grand Total Total

26 Norfolk County Domestic Criminal Analysis Required Domestic Criminal Domestic Criminal /STDEV s January % 25 3 NO -8.82% February % 19 3 NO 4.71% March % 3 39 NO 34.48% April % 21 3 NO 7.19% May % YES 13.1% June % REDUCTION -7.89% July % NO 41.7% August % NO -23.4% September % 3 37 REDUCTION -9.38% October % YES 31.25% November % NO 32.% December % NO -1.% Total by Charge 32.51% 3.52% 3.9% Quarter Cleared Quarter DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total by Charge 32.51% 3.52% 3.9% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 2 of DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE 35 January February March April May June July August September October November December This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences year Trend Current s DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE Domestic Disturbance Contributions by Zone 1 2 Occurrence Type Domestic Disturbance Zones Sum of Delhi 51 Turkey Point 3 Windham 13 Port Dover 37 Townsend 25 Waterford 18 Woodhouse 12 Simcoe 18 Houghton Langton 1 Middleton 2 North Walsingham 5 Port Rowan South Walsingham 1 Long Point 3 Grand Total Total

27 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % 5 11 NO 15.% February % 1 REDUCTION -4.% March % 13 NO 42.8% April % 4 12 NO.% May % 9 13 NO 27.27% June % 7 1 NO -5.25% July % 7 13 YES 33.33% August % 1 NO % September % 7 12 NO 11.11% October % 8 19 NO -42.8% November % NO -12.5% December % 8 17 REDUCTION % Total % 89.92% 92.% Quarter Cleared Quarter Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total % 89.92% 92.% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 27 of DRUGS January February March April May June July August September October November December DRUGS This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences year Trend Current s DRUGS DRUGS 55 Contributions by Zone Occurrence Type Drugs 1 Zones Sum of Delhi 4 Turkey Point 1 Windham 5 Port Dover 5 Townsend 2 Waterford Woodhouse 2 Simcoe 55 Houghton 1 Langton Middleton 3 North Walsingham 2 Port Rowan 2 South Walsingham 3 Long Point Grand Total Total

28 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % 8 13 YES 2.7% February % 9 21 YES 35.% March % 8 19 NO 9.% April % 7 14 NO 44.44% May % 9 15 YES % June % 1 15 NO.% July % 9 15 YES 84.2% August % 8 15 NO % September % NO 53.85% October % 9 19 NO 44.44% November % 8 17 NO % December % 9 1 NO.25% Total % 2.9% 28.33% Quarter Cleared Quarter Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total % 2.9% 28.33% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 28 of FRAUD January February March April May June July August September October November December FRAUD This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences year Trend Current s FRAUD FRAUD 78 Contributions by Zone Occurrence Type Fraud 5 Zones Sum of Delhi 11 Turkey Point 4 Windham Port Dover 27 Townsend Waterford 9 Woodhouse 13 Simcoe 78 Houghton 5 Langton Middleton 9 North Walsingham Port Rowan 5 South Walsingham 3 Long Point Grand Total Total

29 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % 4 NO 33.33% February % 3 7 NO 1.% March % 12 REDUCTION % April % 5 1 NO 5.% May % 1 17 NO % June % 9 11 YES 18.18% July % 9 18 NO -25.% August % 7 15 NO 42.8% September % 3 11 NO 2.% October % 4 1 NO -3.% November % 5 12 NO -37.5% December 5 5.% 4 7 NO -1.7% Total % 99.% 1.% Quarter Cleared Quarter IMPAIRED DRIVING Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % 23 4.% Q % % Total % 99.% 1.% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 29 of IMPAIRED DRIVING This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau January February March April May June July August September October November December YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences year Trend Current s IMPAIRED DRIVING IMPAIRED DRIVING 8 22 Contribtions by Zone 1 Occurrence Type Impaired Driving Zones Sum of Delhi 5 Turkey Point 4 Windham Port Dover 1 Townsend 7 Waterford 2 Woodhouse 8 Simcoe Houghton Langton 212 Middleton 211 North Walsingham 2 Port Rowan 1 21 South Walsingham 1 Long Point Grand Total Total

30 Norfolk County Hours Dedicated Hours/Call Analysis Required Hours Dedicated Hours Dedicated /STDEV s January % NO 2.94% February % NO -3.7% March % NO -51.2% April % YES 32.14% May % NO % June % YES -5.% July % NO % August % 2 4 NO -23.4% September % 3 4 YES 17.5% October % 2 42 NO -4.55% November % 32 3 REDUCTION -2.32% December % YES 13.89% Total Hours/Call Quarter Hours Dedicated Hours/Call Quarter Quarter MENTAL HEALTH Hours Dedicated Hours Dedicated /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total Hours/Call Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 3 of MENTAL HEALTH 5 January February March April May June July August September October November December This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences year Trend MENTAL HEALTH Current s MENTAL HEALTH 3 14 Contributions by Zone Occurrence Type Mental Health Zones Sum of Delhi 2 Turkey Point Windham 25 Port Dover 2 Townsend 131 Waterford 7 Woodhouse 3 Simcoe 14 Houghton 2 Langton Middleton 5 North Walsingham 2 Port Rowan South Walsingham Long Point Grand Total Total

31 Norfolk County Cleared Analysis Required Cleared Cleared /STDEV s January % NO 33.33% February % 11 3 NO 11.% March % NO 3.43% April % 3 48 NO 22.22% May % 31 5 NO 4.% June % NO.% July % 42 5 NO 14.29% August % 3 8 NO 8.97% September % 27 3 NO 4.91% October % 31 NO 48.% November % 2 43 REDUCTION % December % NO -4.% Total % 14.29% 11.54% Quarter Cleared Quarter Cleared Cleared /STDEV 5 s Q % % Q % % Q % % Q % % Total % 14.29% 11.54% Projected vs Inspector Horvat Page 31 of MISCHIEF MISCHIEF This document contains data that was extracted at a single point in time and is subject to change as occurrences are updated. The document is only accurate at the time the data was extracted and is not considered an official report from the Ontario Provincial Police. Any distribution, review, dissemination, or copying of the contents of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. Any requests for official statistical data should be directed to the Business Management Bureau January February March April May June July August September October November December YTD Projected Low Projected High Occurrences Current s MISCHIEF 5-year Trend MISCHIEF Contribitions by Zone Occurrence Type Mischief Zones Sum of Delhi 41 Turkey Point 9 Windham 21 Port Dover 39 Townsend 13 Waterford 3 Woodhouse 1 Simcoe 131 Houghton 1 Langton 2 Middleton 18 North Walsingham 4 Port Rowan 4 South Walsingham Long Point 3 Grand Total Total