STATE OF INDIANA. Elkhart City. South Bend. 65 J. Edward Roush Lake. Kokomo. C.M. Harden Lake Indianapolis. Columbus. Monroe Lake

Transcription

1 STATE OF INDIANA DLA Lighting & Electrical Systems Upgrade Gary Hammond South Bend Elkhart City Fort Wayne IN Silver Jackets Program 65 J. Edward Roush Lake Salamonie Lake Grissom AFB, IN Projects Dam Safety Program (All COE Indiana Dams) 74 Lafayette Kokomo Mississinewa Lake 69 Muncie Salamonie River, Portland, IN Jay County (CAP Sec 205) White River, Anderson, IN (CAP Sec 205) White Lick Creek, Avon, IN (CAP Sec 14) C.M. Harden Lake Indianapolis 70 White River, Indianapolis North NCA Crown Hill Indy Columbarium Terre Haute Cagles Mill Lake Brookville Lake Young's Creek, Franklin, IN (CAP Sec 205) Gill Township, IN, Levee Rehab FY13 Flood Repair Bloomington Columbus 74 Crane Army Ammunition Activity Projects Monroe Lake Markland Evansville 64 Patoka Lake Jeffersonville / Clarksville New Albany McAlpine Silver Creek Floodplain Management Study John T. Myers Newburgh Cannelton Falling Run Creek, New Albany, IN (CAP Section 205) John T. Myers Locks and Dam Lock Improvements Project, GRR Olmsted Locks & Dam Jacobsville Neighborhood Soil Contamination Superfund Site, IN Legend "/ Lock & Dam Interstate Highway Military Installation µ LRL Civil Works Boundary Levee / Floodwall City Major Stream Waterbody Watershed County Boundary Civil Project Military Project

2 Dam Safety, Indiana Indiana Dams - Special Studies As of 2/13/2018 Dam Safety Special Studies are part of a national program with funds distributed by the Corps of Engineers (USACE) Headquarters Dam Safety Office on a priority basis. Plan is established while further investigations are conducted and/or remedial actions are implemented as necessary. Brookville Dam, IN Study Project Location: Brookville Lake Dam, Cagles Mill Lake Dam, CM Harden Lake Dam, Mississinewa Lake Dam, Monroe Lake Dam, Patoka Lake Dam, J.E. Roush Lake Dam & Markle Levee, and Salamonie Lake Dam (See below for site specific information) Study and Program Information: During normal operations, these dams are routinely inspected daily, weekly, and monthly by USACE operations staff and annually by Louisville District dam safety staff. The dams also receive a comprehensive inspection every five years by a multi-discipline team of Louisville District engineers. The USACE has instituted a risk informed dam safety program. The initial step was conducting a Screening Portfolio Risk Assessment (SPRA). A team of engineers conducted a screening level review of the dam s construction, performance history, and instrumentation to evaluate current dam behavior, as well as economic consequences and the population at risk of potential dam failure. After the initial screening, the risk is reevaluated every ten years as part of a routine Periodic Assessment (PA) in conjunction with the 5 year comprehensive site inspection. The findings are reviewed by the Dam Senior Oversight Group (DSOG) and a Dam Safety Action Classification (DSAC) rating is assigned based upon confirmed or unconfirmed dam safety issues and the combination of life or economic consequences should failure occur. The DSAC ratings are used to prioritize further study to confirm the proposed dam safety issues. If the DSAC rating is 1 through 3, an Interim Risk Reduction Measures (IRRM) The first study phase is an Issue Evaluation Study (IES) which confirms the dam safety issue. Should more information be necessary to confirm the issues, an IES Phase II study may be undertaken to gather the necessary data to reduce the uncertainty. The results of these studies are presented to the USACE Risk Management Center (RMC) and the DSOG. The results may indicate the need to progress to the next phase of study or reduce the DSAC rating for the dam. If the case is made that the dam is in need of remedial construction then the project moves to the Dam Safety Modification Report (DSMR). The DSMR report analyzes potential remedial construction elements to determine the best fix to reduce the overall project risk. These studies and remedial construction are prioritized based upon the relative risk estimates at each stage to best make use of the available funding and resources. Congressional Interests: Senator Joe Donnelly Senator Todd Young

3 Individual Project Status: As of 2/13/2018 Brookville Dam, IN * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2007 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 4 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): N/A since it is DSAC 4. * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): The findings of the Phase 2 IES risk analysis were presented to the Risk Management Center (RMC) in November 2011 and to the Dam Senior Oversight Group (DSOG) in February The RMC and DSOG agreed with the report recommendation that the project be reclassified to a DSAC 4 based on the results of the risk analysis. * FY2018 Planned Activities: Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program. Cagles Mill Dam, IN * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2007 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 4 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): N/A since it is DSAC 4 * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): Not required since it is a DSAC 4 * FY2018 Planned Activities: Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program. Cecil M Harden Dam, IN * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2009 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 3 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): Completed 30 June 2010 * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): The findings of the IES risk analysis were presented to the Risk Management Center (RMC) in September 2013 and to the Dam Senior Oversight Group (DSOG) in October The RMC and DSOG agreed with the report recommendation that the project be reclassified from a DSAC 2 to a DSAC 3 based on the results of the risk analysis. Remedial construction is not warranted at this time. This structure has been reprioritized in the risk study queue. * FY2018 Planned Activities: Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program. Mississinewa Dam, IN * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2009 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 2 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): Completed 27 July 2010 * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): As a result of the 2014 Periodic Assessment, the dam was rated as a DSAC 2. The IES Phase 2 was initiated in August 2015 and will address concerns with unacceptable foundation conditions and associated seepage in order to remove uncertainty and lower project risk. This will determine if the work needs to continue to complete a full Dam Safety Modification Report (DSMR).

4 As of 2/13/2018 * FY2018 Planned Activities: IES Phase 2 work was initiated in August Additional drilling and piezometer installation was performed in FY 2017 to collect additional data to evaluate potential risk driving failure modes. Additional field surveys have also been performed. After all of the additional data is obtained and analyzed, a risk assessment will be performed and is currently scheduled to begin in April Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program will also continue. Monroe Dam, IN * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2006 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 5 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): N/A since it is DSAC 5 * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): Not required since it is a DSAC 5 * Note: The DSAC rating was revised to a 5 in 2017 based on the results from a Periodic Assessment. * FY2018 Planned Activities: Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program. Patoka Dam, IN * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2008 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 4 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): N/A since it is DSAC 4 * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): Not required since it is a DSAC 4 * Note: The previous Phase 2 IES was initiated in February The IES terminated at an early stage and a Semi Quantitative Risk Assessment (SQRA) was completed in August The DSAC rating was changed from a DSAC 2 to a DSAC 4. Remedial construction is not warranted at this time. This structure has been reprioritized in the risk study queue. * FY2018 Planned Activities: Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program. J.E. Roush Dam, IN * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2005 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 3 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): Completed 6 November 2007 * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): The findings of the Dam Safety Modification Report (DSMR) were presented to the Risk Management Center (RMC) in March 2010 and the Dam Senior Oversight Group (DSOG) in June Based on the reviews, the study was converted from the existing DSMR to a Phase 2 Issue Evaluation Study (IES). * The findings of the Phase 2 IES risk analysis were presented to the RMC in March 2013 and to the DSOG in April The RMC and DSOG agreed with the report recommendation that the project be reclassified to a DSAC 3 based on the results of the risk analysis. Other recommendations were to continue the increased instrumentation monitoring and collecting of performance data and to update the current IRRMs. Remedial construction is not warranted at this time. This structure has been reprioritized in the risk study queue. * FY2018 Planned Activities: Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program.

5 Salamonie Dam, IN As of 2/13/2018 * SPRA (Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis): 2005 * DSAC (Dam Safety Action Classification) Rating: Class 4 * IRRMP (Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan): N/A since it is DSAC 4 * IES (Issue Evaluation Study): Not required since it is a DSAC 4 * Note: The Dam Safety Modification Report (DSMR) was reviewed by the Risk Management Center (RMC) in March 2010 and the Dam Senior Oversight Group (DSOG) in June Based on the reviews, the title of the study was changed to an Issue Evaluation Study (IES). The report was revised and the IES was completed in April The DSOG re-classified this dam from a DSAC 2 to a DSAC 4. Remedial construction is not warranted at this time. This structure has been reprioritized in the risk study queue. * FY18 Activities: Routine O&M surveillance and monitoring program.

6 As of 2/13/2018 City of Portland, Jay County, Indiana Flood Risk Management Study Study Estimated Federal Cost $254,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $154,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $408,000 Allocation thru FY17 $100,000 Balance to Complete after FY17 $154,000 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation (thru JAN 2018) $154,000 FY19 President s Budget $0 City of Portland Central Business District Feasibility The study is located in northeast Indiana in the City of Portland, which is the county seat of Jay County, Indiana. Portland is approximately 75 miles northeast of Indianapolis. The most recent flood events occurred in February 2011, twice in June of 2015, and again in July Numerous business and government offices were impacted by these flood events and suffered several million dollars in damages. The July 2015 flood event is approximately equal to a 3.3% Annual Chance flood (30-yr flood event). This study will evaluate possible flood risk management solutions. FY19 Planned Activities: Selection of the recommended alternative, completion of environmental documentation, and completion of the feasibility study detailed project report. None. As of February 2018, all Federal and non-federal funds have been received. Rep. Jim Banks Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act (P.L ), as amended. Completion of modeling for the existing conditions is scheduled to be complete in March The Focused Array of Alternatives Milestone Meeting is scheduled for April 2018 and will identify a potential list of alternative flood risk management strategies.

7 White River, Anderson, Indiana Flood Risk Management Project As of 2/13/2018 Estimated Federal Cost $4,993,630 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $2,688,878 Total Estimated Project Cost $7,682,508 Allocation thru FY17 $0 Balance to Complete after FY17 $0 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation (thru JAN 2018) $0 FY19 President s Budget $0 The Louisville District is currently working with the City of Anderson and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to complete a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). Completion of the LOMR is anticipated in FY18. Floodwall and levee Anderson, Indiana This project is located along the White River in Athletic and Edgewater Parks within the city limits of Anderson, Indiana. Anderson is approximately 50 miles northeast of Indianapolis, Indiana. of the levee was completed in December 2014 and the project provided to the sponsor for OMRR&R on September 10, 2015 when the City of Anderson received the notice of completion and interim OMRR&R manual. FY19 Planned Activities: None. None at this time. Rep. Susan Brooks The completed Project consists of the reconstruction of approximately 3,260 linear feet of existing levee by adding earthen embankment to increase the cross sectional area and height. A realignment of an extension of the levee at the upstream end added approximately, 500 feet to the levee system. Approximately 417 linear feet of low concrete I-wall were also constructed. The total length of the levee system is approximately 5,180 feet. Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act (P.L ), as amended.

8 Indianapolis, White River (North), Indiana Flood Risk Management (FRM) Project As of 8FEB18 Estimated Federal Cost $40,917,939 Estimated Non Federal Cost $13,639,313 Total Estimated Project Cost $54,557,252 Allocation thru FY17 $37,746,166 Balance to Complete After FY17 $ 3,171,773 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation (thru January 2018) $0 FY19 President s Budget $0 View of Phase 3A Floodwall The project is located in northern Indianapolis, IN, along a 3.5 mile reach of the White River. The project consists of construction of earthen levees and floodwalls in three sections Warfleigh (Phase 3A), South Warfleigh (Phase 3B; further broken into 3 distinct contracts known as Phase 3B-1, 3B-2, and 3B-3) and Broad Ripple (Phase 3C).. All three sections must be completed to achieve project benefits within the designated areas of protection. Flood Control Act (FCA) of 1936, as amended, Section 10 of FCA 1946, and subject to cost sharing provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of FY 2017 Activities: Multiple construction contracts were ongoing in FY Phase 3A/3C, Phase 3B-2, and Phase 3B-3 were all underway. Phase 3A/3C is a contract to remove vegetation on/near portions of the levee system and this contract was substantially complete by the end of Phase 3B-2 is an earthen levee contract to construct one portion of the overall Phase 3B section and was also substantially complete at the end of The final contract for this overall project, Phase 3B-3, was awarded in August of The Phase 3A/3C and Phase 3B-2 contracts referred to above are both scheduled to be completed in The Phase 3A/3C contract, scheduled for completion in March 2018, will be closed out and turned over to the local sponsor. Phase 3B-2 is scheduled to be completed by the end of FY will take place all of FY 2018 for the Phase 3B-3 contract. FY 2019 Planned Activities: The Phase 3B-2 contract will be closed out and that portion of the project will be turned over to the local sponsor. The Phase 3B-3 contract will continue into FY 2019 and is scheduled for completion in August The Phase 3B-3 contract consists of an option to construct the last section of the levee that ties the entire system into high ground. The option was established because additional Federal funds are needed and the real estate was not available at that time. Due to escalation, Section 106 mitigation, and additional labor required for coordination and design, sufficient funds are not available to exercise the option and complete the project. The required funds will be used to exercise the option and complete the project. The project is sponsored by the Indianapolis Department of Public Works at a cost share of 75% Federal and 25% non-federal. It was designed to provide flood damage reduction for approximately 1,500 residential and commercial structures that would be inundated by an annual 0.35 percent chance flood event (300-year flood event). Absent completion of the project, critical facilities, such as a fire station, waterworks pumping station, and large sewage lift stations would be inundated in major flood events. In addition, portions of the Butler University property, including student housing and a child development/ daycare facility, would be inundated in a 100-year flood event. During such events, structures would be submerged in up to 7 1/2 feet of water. Congressional Interests: Senator Joe Donnelly Senator Todd Young Representative Andre Carson (IN-7)

9 Young s Creek Flooding, Franklin, Indiana Study Estimated Federal Cost $300,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $200,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $500,000 Allocation thru FY17 $200,000 Balance to Complete After FY17 $0 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation (thru JAN 2018) $0 FY19 President s Budget $0 As of 2/13/ flood event in Franklin, Indiana Feasibility The study examines the Young s Creek and Hurricane Creek watersheds within the corporate city limits of Franklin, Indiana. The city regularly experiences flooding from heavy rainfall events in region every two to three years. The most recent event occurred in the spring of The 2008 flood event caused over $180M in damages to government services, residences, and businesses. FY19 Planned Activities: Prepare environmental compliance documentation and complete detailed project report. None Rep. Trey Hollingsworth Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act (P.L ), as amended. Model of existing, future without and future with project conditions is complete. Structural measures include detention basins, channel widening, and bridge modifications are being evaluated. Nonstructural measures including flood proofing and relocations, are being examined as well. Selection of economic and environmentally preferred alternative is anticipated in June 2018.

10 Silver Creek, Indiana Floodplain Management Study As of 2/13/2018 Estimated Federal Cost $282,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $0 Total Estimated Project Cost $282,000 Allocation thru FY17 $282,000 Balance to Complete After FY17 $0 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation $0 FY19 President s Budget $0 Location of erosion at Clarksville, Indiana Study The project is located in town of Clarksville near the confluence of Silver Creek and the Ohio River. This study examine the effects of stream flow through and around the McAlpine Lock and Dam and the erosion on the occurring on the adjacent shoreline. The erosion has severely affected the town, a boat ramp near the George Rogers Clark cabin, bordering county roads, and the Ohio River Greenways project. FY19 Planned Activities: None None Rep. Trey Hollingsworth Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (PL ), as amended. A two-dimensional hydrologic model and draft report of findings are complete. Results indicate that the present lock and dam configuration and its stream flow patterns increase the potential for erosion in the area of concern.

11 New Albany, Indiana Section 205 Study Estimated Federal Cost $175,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $175,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $350,000 Allocation thru FY17 $155,000 Balance to Complete After FY17 $20,000 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation (thru JAN 2018) $0 FY19 President s Budget $0 As of 2/13/2018 Stream flow through Fall Run in New Albany, Indiana. Feasibility The study examines the Falling Run and Fall Run watersheds within the corporate city limits of New Albany, Indiana. Approximately 112 structures are located in the floodway and exposed to localized flood risks. Rep. Trey Hollingsworth Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act (P.L ), as amended. Model of existing and future without project is complete. Structural measures being evaluated include small detention basins, channel widening, and bridge modifications. Nonstructural measures including flood proofing and relocations, are being examined as well. FY19 Planned Activities: Select recommend alternative plan, prepare environmental documentation, complete final detailed project report. Project may result in non-structural measures only based on estimated damages and project net benefits.

12 John T. Myers Locks and Dam, IN and KY As of 2/14/2018 Estimated Federal Cost $226,561,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $216,239,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $442,800,000 Allocation thru FY17 1/ $19,456,946 Balance to Complete After FY17 $423,343,054 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation (thru January 2018) $0 FY19 President s Budget $0 1/ Includes funds ($10,110,000) provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Public Law 111-5, which are not cost shared with IWTF appropriations. J.T. Myers 600 Lock Extension The project is located on the right bank of the Ohio River at river mile approximately 3.5 miles downstream of Uniontown, KY, with the lock chambers towards the Indiana shore. The John T. Myers Lock Extension Project will extend the existing 600-foot long auxiliary lock chamber to a 1,200-foot long lock chamber. This effort will give the navigation facility twin 1,200-foot locks for inland navigation tow traffic. This additional lock capacity will enable the facility, in operation since 1969, to manage tow traffic during planned and unscheduled main lock closures without significant delays to inland navigation. Many contracts are required to design and construct the project. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) efforts since 2000 have included hydraulic model studies and engineering analysis and foundation explorations towards preparation of project plans and specifications. Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 2000, Public Law FY 2017 Activities: No activities were completed in FY2017 since no Federal funds were available. Awaiting funds to re-evaluate the cost and economics of the current approved plan. FY 2019 Planned Activities: If funds are not received in FY2018, funds in FY 2019 would be used to re-evaluate the cost and economics of the current approved plan. In September 2004, the Corps awarded the first site preparation contract for construction of an Operations Support Facility. Those construction activities were completed in late The remaining site preparation contracts will include: a) excavation of the river bank to widen the upper lock approach; b) construction of a Resident Engineer s building; c) miter gate storage area, with spare gate; and d) implementation of aquatic mitigation. Based upon physical modeling, it is necessary to widen the upper approach area for downbound entry of commercial towing vessels into the extended auxiliary lock chamber. The spare miter gate will allow the Corps to expedite both scheduled maintenance activities and emergency repairs to the existing lock miter gates. Environmental mitigation will involve installation of a series of in-water features, over three consecutive summer and fall low water seasons, to enhance aquatic habitat in the nearby vicinity of the project. Upon receipt of additional funding the District would proceed towards award of the remaining contracts. The District plans to award two contracts to construct the lock extension and its new approach walls. The Corps of Engineers has suspended design of the project until receipt of additional funds. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provided the Corps of Engineers with funding to award the contracts for construction of the upper lock approach widening and Resident Engineer s building. The approach widening contract was awarded on December 17, 2009 and was substantially complete in July The Resident Engineer s Building was awarded on March 31, 2010, and was substantially complete in December of the remaining work will be accomplished by award of both fully and incrementally-funded contracts. The schedule will be developed upon receipt of additional funds. The John T. Myers project passes the highest tonnage of all the Ohio River high lift locks with a 600-foot

13 auxiliary chamber. Approximately 73 million tons of commodities were shipped through the J. T. Myers locks in The project authorization was a product of the Ohio River Mainstem Systems Study, which used a regional systems approach to address the investments needed to provide an efficient navigation system on the Ohio River Mainstem through This project represents a reinvestment in the river transportation infrastructure. As of 2/14/2018 Congressional Interests: Senator Mitch McConnell Senator Rand Paul Senator Todd Young Senator Joe Donnelly Senator Richard J. Durbin Senator Tammy Duckworth Representative John Shimkus (IL-15) Representative Larry Bucshon (IN-8) Representative James Comer (KY-1)

14 As of 2/16/2018 7:44 AM Locks and Dam 52 and 53 Replacement Project (Olmsted Locks and Dam), IL and KY Tainter Gate 5 installed The project is located in Olmsted, IL near Ohio River Mile The project consists of two 110 x1200 locks adjacent to the Illinois bank, and a dam comprised of five tainter gates, 1400 of boat-operated wickets and a fixed weir. The proposed replacement structure will eliminate Ohio River Locks and Dams 52 & 53. Locks & Dams 52 & 53 were completed in 1929 and the temporary 1,200 long lock chambers were added in 1969 at Locks & Dam 52 and 1979 at Locks and Dam 53. The Olmsted Locks & Dam project was authorized by Section 3(a)(6) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of The authorized project cost was increased on 17 October 2013 as part of a Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014 to $2,918,000,000. The project was funded 50%/50% from the General Treasury and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund (IWTF) through FY2013. The FY2014 Omnibus Appropriation Act changed the split of the IWTF and General Treasury funds to 25%/75% for FY2014 only. Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 changed the IWTF and General Treasury shares to 15%/85% beginning 1 October Estimated Federal Cost $1,940,324,000 Estimated IWTF Cost $1,118,942,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $3,059,266,000 Allocations thru FY17 $2,565,404,000 Balance to Complete after FY17 $210,000,000 President s Budget for FY18 $175,000,000 FY18 Allocations thru Jan 2018 $2,602,662,000 FY19 President s Budget $35,000,000 Activities for FY 2018: Dam becomes operational NLT Oct 2018 Partial Demo of L&D 53 Upstream Mooring Cells River Dikes Operations Buildings Site Restoration FY19 Planned Accomplishments: Dam contract ends March 2019 Demo Locks & Dams 52 and 53 $35M in FY19 are Funds to Completion, resulting in $329M in savings. Senator Mitch McConnell Senator Rand Paul Senator Todd Young Senator Joe Donnelly Senator Richard J. Durbin Senator Tammy Duckworth Representative John Shimkus (IL-15) Representative Larry Bucshon (IN-8) Representative James Comer (KY-1)

15 As of 8FEB2018 Gill Township, Indiana Levee Rehabilitation (2013 & 2015 Flood Events) Design and Estimated Federal Cost $ 1,100,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $ 0 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1,100,000 Allocation thru FY17 $521,620 Balance to Complete after 2017 $578,380 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation (thru January2018) $15,000 FY 19 President s Budget $0 Engineering and Design The Gill Township Levee Rehabilitation Project is located in Sullivan County, Indiana on the left bank of the Wabash River. The project consists of rehabilitation work to the existing levee, which was damaged in the 2013 and 2015 flood events. schedule is 6 months in duration to include the four months (July- October) that historically have favorable weather for this type of repair. Congressional Interests: Rep. Larry Buschon (IN-8) Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996, Public Law FY 2017 Activities: Design was initiated in FY2017. The repairs being evaluated at this time include construction of a blanket drain and foundation repairs (grouting) to the existing pump station. Design is scheduled for completion in February Once all the necessary real estate requirements are met by the local sponsor, the contract will be advertised and is scheduled for award in April FY 2019 Planned Activities: will continue into FY 2019, and is scheduled for completion in the 1 st Quarter. Original Ready to Advertise (RTA) date was delayed due to weather related impacts (ground was too saturated to perform geotechnical borings).

16 Avon, Indiana Section 14 Feasibility Estimated Federal Cost $100,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $0 Total Estimated Project Cost $100,000 Allocation thru FY17 $75,000 Balance to Complete After FY17 $25,000 FY18 President s Budget $0 FY18 Allocation $25,000 FY19 President s Budget $0 As of 2/13/2018 Location of erosion just south of the Avon Bridge. Feasibility The project is located within the corporate city limits of Avon in Hendricks County, Indiana along South County Road 625 East. Specifically, the project is located near the Haunted Bridge of Avon, an active double track CSX railroad bridge. The project is located in the 4th Congressional District of Indiana. The project examines measures of bank stabilization for slope failures west of South County Road 625 East along the White Lick Creek. The principal cause of the erosion is the scouring of the bank due to the high velocities that concentrate along the left bank of the creek during high flow conditions. FY 2019 Planned Activities: Initiate design and implementation phase. The estimated cost for the bank stabilization effort is $1.2M. Additional federal funds needed to initiate design and implementation phase. Rep. Todd Rokita Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended The final feasibility study Detailed Project Report and associated NEPA document are currently under review and are expected to be completed in summer of Recommended alternative includes a combination soil nails and natural revegetation.

17 As of 2/13/2018 Indiana Silver Jackets Program USACE Flood Risk Management Program Indiana Silver Jackets Projects o o City of Salem Salem was ravaged by flooding in May 2017, reaching a depth of 10 feet in some areas. This project would provide a flood inundation map and flood response plan to the City of Salem. Indiana Map Flood Mitigation Planner This platform will provide a searchable database for flood risk and mitigation related data. It will inform residents about flood hazard risks and equip decision makers, officials and developers with information in support of risk-informed choices to make their projects resilient today and into the future. Active Projects are located throughout the State of Indiana. Silver Jackets teams in states across the United States bring together multiple state, federal, and sometimes tribal and local agencies to learn from one another in reducing flood risk and other natural disasters. By applying their shared knowledge, the teams enhance response and recovery efforts when such events do occur. While some states do not use the Silver Jackets name, there are a growing number of states applying the Silver Jackets approach the ultimate goal is a state-led interagency team in every state. No single agency has all the answers, but leveraging multiple programs and perspectives can provide a cohesive solution. Although each state Silver Jackets team is unique, common agency participants include state agencies with mission areas of hazard mitigation, emergency management, floodplain management, natural resources management or conservation, etc. Federal participation typically includes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency and often others such as the National Weather Service and the U.S. Geological Survey. Non-Federal Sponsor: Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Indiana Department of Homeland Security (IDHS) Indiana Department of Environmental Management Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs Indiana Air National Guard Indiana University Purdue University of Indianapolis Purdue University Indiana Association of Floodplain and Storm water Management (ASFPM) Indiana Geographic Information Council Multiple Local Governments and agencies Federal Sponsors: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Weather Service (NWS) Activities for FY 2018: Finalize LiDAR Data Assessment, complete Indiana Map Flood Mitigation Planner, and initiate City of Salem hydrologic mapping. None

18 Grissom Air Force Base, IN Hydrant Fuel System As of 2/14/2018 Activities in FY18 include commissioning, final pavement work, installation of the pumphouse fire suppression and final BOD. FY19 Planned Activities: Fiscal closeout. Contractor is currently past the Contract Required Completion Date (CRCD). Project Delivery Team is negotiating Requests for Equitable Adjustment (REA)s that could potential have high cost impacts to the Government. Construct a pressurized hydrant fuel system with 16 hydrants outlets and two 556-kiloliter (kl) (3,500-barrel) above ground fuel storage tanks at Grissom Air Force Base, IN. Construct a pumphouse to accommodate 113 liter-per-second (1,800 gallon-per minute) pumps, fuel filters and separators. Construct a four position truck offload and two position truck load facility with canopy; hydrant hose truck checkout; product recovery system; and a transfer pipeline with pig launcher and receiver. Work also includes all necessary pumps, valves, filters, control systems, cathodic protection, fire protection, emergency generator and enclosure, utility and sewer connections, access pavements, fencing, and security lighting. Site preparation and improvements are included. Demolish or decommission the existing hydrant system pumphouse, underground tanks, piping and associated facilities. Estimated Federal Cost $41,200,000 Rep. Susan Brooks FY13 Military

19 Grissom Air Reserve Base, Peru, IN Repair Taxiway C, Facility 998 As of 2/14/2018 Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Estimated Federal Cost $8,000,000 This is a Design-Bid-Build project, and design is scheduled to be complete by April This project will be advertised utilizing a General Small Business set-aside procurement method. The target award date is 31 August FY 2019 Activities: Continued support to the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Design This project is located in Peru, Indiana at Grissom Air Reserve Base, which is about 12 miles north of Kokomo in Cass and Miami counties. The Installation was initially established as Naval Air Station Bunker Hill in 1942 and was an active Air Force Base from 1954 to Grissom Air Reserve Base is home to the 434th Air Refueling Wing, the largest KC-135R Stratotanker wing in the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC). Grissom also serves units from the US Army Reserve and the US Marine Corps Reserve. NSTR Rep. Jackie Walorski This project consists of a full depth concrete replacement of Taxiway C to accommodate the KC-46A aircraft. The purpose of this project is to reconstruct Taxiway C in order to improve the operational level of the pavement and extend its expected life span to maintain mission capability. The pavements specified in the scope of this project are weathered and deteriorating with hair line cracks throughout. There is also severe spalling occurring along the joints. Aircraft will be placed at risk of engine damage if the pavement is allowed to deteriorate further.

20 Crane Army Ammunition Act, IN Railcar Holding Area FY19 Military As of 2/14/2018 AE selection and design start expected Mar Remainder of FY18 will include continued design efforts that will carry over into FY19. FY19 Planned Activities: FY19 will see design efforts completed and followed by advertisement and eventual award, currently projected for late Sep NSTR Design The project will construct a railcar holding yard and relocate Defense Logistics Agency Disposition functions outside of munitions operation area facility at Crane Army Ammunition Activity, IN. Work will include the installation of new rail lines to create a rail holding yard, installation of lightning protection, relocation of the operations facility, scale house, vehicle scale and storage areas. The project will include the installation of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV), Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), building information systems, and fire protection and alarm systems. Supporting facilities include site development and utilities as well as construction of an access road, gravel yards for equipment storage and increased earthwork. Heating and air conditioning will be provided by selfcontained systems. The facility will provide accessibility for individuals with disabilities and antiterrorism measures. Demolish 4 buildings at Crane Army Ammo Activity, IN (11,239 Total SF). Estimated Federal Cost $16,000,000 Rep. Larry Bucshon

21 Crane Army Ammunition Act, IN Shipping and Receiving Bldg As of 2/14/2018 Project was advertised on 17 Jan. The construction contract is anticipated to be awarded by 20 Jul FY19 Planned Activities: FY19 activities will be comprised entirely of construction activities. is expected to continue into FY20. NSTR Estimated Federal Cost $24,000,000 Design Rep. Larry Bucshon Design and construction of an Ammunition Shipping and Receiving facility at Crane Army Ammunition Activity, IN. The project will provide 55,860 SF of space for shipping and receiving as well as 615 LF of railroad tracks. FY18 Military

22 Hammond, IN DLA Lighting Upgrades Design and FY19 Planned Activities: Project Closeout NSTR As of 2/8/2018 Estimated Federal Cost $500K Rep. Peter Visclosky Design Build Design, work, materials, and labor required to replace / upgrade designated light fixtures on Warehouse buildings 100E, 100W, 200E, Vehicle Garage Building, Breakroom/Shop Building and Pump House with LED fixtures and associated electrical systems at DLA Strategic Materials, Hammond, IN.

23 Jacobsville Neighborhood Soil Contamination Superfund Site, Indiana As of 2/8/2018 Estimated Federal Cost TBD Estimated Non-Federal Cost TBD Allocation thru FY18 $9,000,000 President s Budget for FY19 TBD Balance to Complete After FY17 $50,000,000 Contract procurement, work planning, field mobilization, and commencement of remedial activities (pending additional funding increments from EPA). FY19 Planned Activities: Remedial activities (pending additional funding increments from EPA). Priority and funding issues at USEPA delayed formal initiation of the Interagency Agreement. USEPA is the lead agency with USACE assisting with the remedial execution. Rep. Larry Buschon Figure: Current remedial status Remedial Action The project area is located in Evansville, Indiana. Airborne dust, soot and smoke from industrial operations from the late 1800 s to the mid 1900 s resulted in lead-contaminated soil at approximately 4,000 residential properties. Site cleanup is ongoing, with approximately 2,000 properties still requiring remediation. EPA has a current remediation contract nearing completion, and has requested USACE support to complete remediation at the remaining 2,000 properties over an estimated five (5) years. Interagency Agreement between EPA and USACE dated 2/2/2018.

24 Indianapolis, IN Crown Hill Indy Columbarium As of 2/14/2018 USACE start design for the new site. VA/NCA to concurrently acquire new site and perform NEPA documentation and site due diligence. FY19 Planned Activities: Award and execute the contract NCA/VA hosted a public meeting in Indianapolis on 23 JAN to discuss the draft Environmental Assessment and new site selection. The meeting went very well. Members of IFA, among other groups, were in attendance as well as the USACE PM. Estimated Federal Cost $6.0M Design Rep. Andre Carson The project will provide additional columbarium space as a satellite facility to the existing Marion National Cemetery in Indianapolis, IN. The initial construction project will include columbarium walls providing 2,500 niches to accommodate cremated remains and the necessary support facilities to provide for cemetery operations and maintenance. Plans and specification documents will be prepared for the columbarium and improvements to the cemetery site including: US flagpole, cortege staging area, committal service shelter, memorial marker wall, and a public restroom building with electronic gravesite locator, administrative work area, and maintenance storage area. Interagency Agreement between National Cemetery Agency (NCA) and USACE.