Appendix B Review Matrix Text & Table Footnotes
|
|
- Margery Allen
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Review Submissions The PDP includes a series of review submissions designed to ensure that all projects are developed in accordance with ODOT policies. The PDP Products Review Matrix found in this Appendix provides a summary of these reviews. The footnotes associated with the matrix provide specific information regarding the timing and content of each submission. The Project Manager is responsible for verifying that required review information is submitted in accordance with the project schedule and that review comments are appropriately addressed. Information on the content of each review submission can be found within this manual, in appropriate technical manuals, and on ODOT office web pages (e.g., Location and Design Manual, Waterway Permits Manual, Construction and Materials Specifications, Right-of-Way Plan Manual, etc.). When significant review comments are generated, ODOT will require that the project team revise the submission and resubmit the modified document to ODOT for a compliance review. Even with electronic submission of documents, review submissions must be coordinated by and are the responsibility of the District office, with the exception of the external agency coordination performed by the Office of Environmental Services (OES), Office of Roadway Engineering (ORE) or others. The submissions may be reviewed by the District Office, Central Office, an external agency, a resource agency, or one contracted by ODOT for all or part of the submission. The Project Manager is responsible for the coordination of the review submissions to assure consistency of comments, scope compliance, and project intent. An exception to this would be when an office in the Central Office has work done directly for that office under a Task Order contract. In those instances, the contracting office would supply any necessary information and documents to the District Office and Project Manager. Due to the relative importance of some activities, a number of submissions or portions of submissions must be reviewed and/or approved by Central Office. Electronic submission of CADD files shall follow the requirements of Location and Design Manual, Volume 3, Section Plan sheet image files may be provided in TIFF format. For additional information on submission of TIFF files, please refer to the information on the Office of Contracts website. Reviews are categorized as follows on the PDP Products Review Matrix in the Appendix: A = Required review and approval. The documents to be reviewed must be submitted to the indicated review office, which is the lead office with approval authority. The Project Manager must resolve all comments to the satisfaction of the involved review office or agency. (Required review and approval decisions may be based on the PDP Path of a project.) C = Required review and comment. The documents to be reviewed must be submitted to the indicated review office. The Project Manager should consider and address all comments. The Project Manager must provide a rationale to the involved 1 Revised September 2, 2016
2 reviewer for any comment not incorporated. (Required review and comment decisions may be based on the PDP Path of a project.) O = Optional review. The Project Manager should decide whether a review is necessary based on project complexity and sensitivity. Note that the Federal Highway Administration may require reviews on any project in accordance with the Federal Oversight Agreement. (Optional review decisions may be based on the PDP Path of a project.) # = Footnote number. Typical project attributes can be found in the footnotes at the end of this text, which is keyed to the review matrix. The Project Manager is responsible for ensuring that all submittals are provided to the appropriate office or agency for review, with the exception of submissions to environmental resource agencies which are handled by OES. Submissions by District Office to Central Office Projects prepared by the District Office should be submitted directly to each involved office or technical specialty area. For projects developed by a consultant, there are two methods for sending review submissions to Central Office: 1) If agreed to by the Project Manager, the consultant submits documents directly to each involved office or technical specialty area. The consultant should provide a copy of the transmittals to the Project Manager. 2) The consultant submits multiple copies of the review documents to the Project Manager. The District reviews these documents and submits them to each involved office or technical specialty area. The consultant scope of services should indicate which method of submission is desired by the District. Submissions to External Agencies For external agencies, review submissions should be submitted as follows: 1) OES will take the lead in coordinating planning and preliminary engineering documents with external environmental resource agencies. This coordination may include Study Area, Stakeholder Consultation/Public Involvement Plan, Purpose and Need Statement, Feasibility Study, Alternative Evaluation Report and other documents. Typically this coordination occurs on Complex Path 3 projects and higher requiring an EA or EIS. Submissions of environmental documents to environmental resource agencies (e.g., the Bureau of Underground Storage Tank Regulation, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio Department of Agriculture, National Park Service, Ohio Historic Preservation Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) must be submitted through OES. 2) Engineering submissions to the FHWA such as Interchange Modification Studies and Design Exceptions must be coordinated through the Office of Roadway Engineering. 2
3 Review Comments Review comments will be coordinated through the Project Manager. For projects using a consultant, the PM will provide all comments back to the consultant and the consultant shall submit a Disposition of Comments back to the PM. (See Disposition of Review Comments Section below.) The PM will be responsible for distributing the Disposition of Comments and revised documents to all reviewers unless otherwise agreed in the project scope that the consultant can directly provide this to the stakeholders. Exceptions are as follows: 1) OES will take the lead in coordinating planning and preliminary engineering documents with external environmental resource agencies. This coordination may include Study Area, Stakeholder Consultation/Public Involvement Plan, Purpose and Need Statement, Feasibility Study, Alternative Evaluation Report and other documents. Typically this coordination occurs on Complex Path 3 projects and higher requiring an EA or EIS. The Office of Environmental Services will coordinate all comments from the environmental resource agencies. Coordination of comments will involve tracking and gathering comments from the involved review agencies, reviewing these comments, resolving any conflicting or impractical comments with the involved review agency, and transmitting pertinent information to the Project Manager and/or project team. Disposition of Review Comments When review comments are received by the Project Manager, a written disposition of these comments (i.e., a response) is required. Each comment should be addressed, either by: 1) Indicating that the comment has been fully incorporated; 2) Providing a rationale as to why the suggested change should or could not be made; or 3) Explaining how the comment has been otherwise addressed. The disposition of review comments should be coordinated by the Project Manager who will forward the review comments to involved project team members, as appropriate, for response. It is required that all comments from reviewers with required review and approval or required review and comment ( A and C above) be provided with a disposition of their review comments. 3 Revised September 2, 2016
4 The Disposition of Review Comments document becomes part of the project documentation, as it comprises review comments from different resource or technical areas which must be addressed, resolved, and/or incorporated prior to the project advancing. The dialog between the Project Manager/team members and the reviewers is documented and combined, resulting in the compilation of the Disposition of Comments document. For engineering studies, the disposition must be submitted along with the next review that covers the involved aspect of project development (e.g., include a disposition of Stage 2 comments with the Stage 3 submission). For environmental documents, OES will work with the Project Manager to coordinate responses to comments from environmental resource agencies. Review comments will be addressed prior to the next phase or step in the environmental project. For example, comments on a Phase I History/Architecture report will be addressed before that report is accepted and before a Phase II survey is initiated. Review Times It is critical that appropriate review times be incorporated into project schedules. A standard review time of 30 days has been established for all reviews by ODOT staff. Once reviews are completed, the review comments should be distributed within 30 days by the Project Manager or by the project management team. Review times for external agencies and organizations (i.e. railroads, utilities, and environmental resource agencies) can sometimes take months depending on the nature of the request. Review times for external agencies should be determined by previous project experience, existing agreements with agencies, or by contacting the review agencies. Project Managers are encouraged to contact the involved review agency to verify the anticipated review time, especially if the review activity falls on the critical path of the project development schedule. Footnotes for the PDP Products Review Matrix: In the matrix, the footnote number is noted in parentheses. 1) OES - required review and approval of Purpose & Need Statements on D2 CE NEPA documents and higher. DEC shall approve P&N Statement for D1 CE NEPA documents. All submissions of P&N Statements for CE NEPA documents shall be completed using the Online CE. 2) OES - required review and comment on Stakeholder Consultation/Public Involvement on D2 CE NEPA documents and above. 3) OES - required review and approval of the Feasibility Study and Alternative Evaluation Report on D1 CE NEPA documents and above. 4) FHWA - required review and approval of Interchange Modification Studies and Interchange Justification Studies on Interstate projects. Please note that Interchange Operations Studies on interstates do not require FHWA review and approval. Refer to LDM, Vol.I, Section
5 5) OES - required review and approval of Waterway Permit Determination Package and Permits if the project is an ODOT project (i.e., not an LPA project). 6) OES is required to review and approve of D2 CE NEPA documents and above. The DEC is a required reviewer and comment of D2 CE NEPA documents and above. The DEC is the required reviewer and approver of D1 CE NEPA documents and below. 7) OES - required review and comment on Stage 2 Plans if project has environmental commitments related to cultural resources and/or waterway permits. 8) OES - required review and comment on Stage 3 Plans if project has environmental commitments related to cultural resources and/or waterway permits. 9) Submit waterway permit determination to OES during the Preliminary Engineering Phase for all work in streams, rivers or wetlands. OES will make a preliminary waterway permit determination and determine if the project requires U.S. Coast Guard coordination or requires a Section 9 Bridge Permit. After incorporating review comments from OES, submit draft waterway permit application to OES. 10) Submit plans involving historic properties, including historic bridges, to OES who will submit to the Ohio Historic Preservation Office for review and comment. 11) Submit final waterway permit applications to OES for agency coordination review and approval. Obtain waterway permit authorization prior to submitting Final Tracings to Central Office. 12) Submit all Path 4 and Path 5 Projects for review and comment. If required by the Pavement Type Selection Process, request pavement design. 13) Submit projects involving railroad work or acquisition of railroad property. 14) Submit projects involving right of way acquisition for verification of right of way acquisition cost estimates and property rights. 15) Submit projects for Value Engineering if required by the Value Engineering Policy and Standard Procedures. A second Value Engineering Study should be conducted during Stage 2 Design. For projects going through a Value Engineering analysis, Final Stage 3 plans should be submitted to the Value Engineering Coordinator for review and comment. 16) For proposed structure types containing non-standard bridge railing types, non-redundant designs or fracture critical designs, a submission shall be made to the Office of Structural Engineering (OSE) for review and comment. Consult the ODOT Bridge Design Manual for other design details which may require OSE consultation, such as friction drilled shafts, MSE walls, foundation types for semi-integral abutments, etc. Submission of other projects not containing design elements require OSE consultation are optional. 17) During Stage 1 Detailed Design development, submit deviations from Pipe Policy and submit storm systems that are oversized to accommodate flow from anticipated development. Approval of these areas is required prior to Stage 1 Detailed Design approval. Submission of other projects is optional. 18) During Stage 2 Detailed Design development, submit projects involving special designs for precast reinforced concrete box culverts, three-sided flat-topped culverts and precast reinforced 5 Revised September 2, 2016
6 concrete arch sections where the usual maximum height of cover is exceeded. Submission of projects that do not contain these items is optional. 19) Submit plans involving State Scenic Rivers, State Wildlife Areas and State Recreational Areas. OES will submit to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources for approval. 20) Submit projects that involve water, sanitary sewer, municipal electric, and/or streamline work to be performed by ODOT contract. Submit all Federal Oversight projects. Submission of other projects is optional. 21) Obtain waterway permit authorization prior to submitting Final Tracings to Central Office. 22) If the Access Point Request Document is for a non-interstate freeway, only two copies are needed. In addition, a PDF file with the capability to search text should be provided. 23) For federally funded projects, Estimating requests review and authorization of P, S, & E Package from FHWA to advertise contract for bids. 24) Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 11, 2015, and executed by FHWA and ODOT, the FHWA only participates in the NEPA process for projects that cross state lines. Please contact OES for further guidance. 6
APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE
More informationQuality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures for Environmental Documents
Environmental Handbook Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures for Environmental s This handbook outlines processes to be used by the project sponsor and department delegate in quality assurance and
More informationSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program
A STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority & Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
More informationState Project No. XXXXXX City Project No. c401807
June 29, 2017 Request for Qualifications Design and Environmental Services for the SLR Parkway Phase III Project also known as a portion of the MBSST (Rail Trail) Segment 8 (San Lorenzo River Railroad
More informationTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016
Regional Transportation Commission TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Contents 1.0 Purpose and Eligibility... 2 2.0 Process... 5 3.0 Implementation of Funded Projects... 5 Attachment
More informationQUALIFICATIONS BASED SELECTION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GUIDELINES FOR QUALIFICATION STATEMENTS INDEPENDENCE, OHIO JANUARY 2014 PREPARED BY:
QUALIFICATIONS BASED SELECTION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GUIDELINES FOR QUALIFICATION STATEMENTS INDEPENDENCE, OHIO JANUARY 2014 PREPARED BY: DONALD J. RAMM, P.E. CITY ENGINEER QUALIFICATION STATEMENT
More informationGuidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014
1 Guidance for Locally Administered Projects Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange August 27, 2013 Revised September 15, 2014 This document establishes guidelines for administering the program
More informationFederal Highway Administration (FHWA)
CHAPTER ONE 1-1.0 CHAPTER ONE OVERVIEW It is critically important that all communications include the Local Public Agency s designated Employee in Responsible Charge (ERC). It is also critical that the
More informationGuidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures
Guidance Historical Studies Review Procedures This guidance document provides instructional material regarding how to review and process project activities in accordance with TxDOT s Section 106 of the
More informationArkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars
Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars January 22, 2015 & February 19, 2015 Program History Guidelines Eligibility Application
More informationTIER 1 CUT OFF GUIDELINES (7/30/12)
TIER 1 CUT OFF GUIDELINES (7/30/12) The attached schedule of steps in the process for advertisement of a project is an update of the schedules distributed previously. As before, this schedule applies to
More information(This page intentionally left blank)
(This page intentionally left blank) 1 INTERSTATE 564 INTERMODAL CONNECTOR PROJECT R000-122-108 FINANCIAL PLAN NOVEMBER 2014 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION VIRGINIA
More informationPlan Quality and Review
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Plan Quality and Review Scott C. Boyer, P.E. LPA Coordinator District 7 Planning & Engineering October 4, 2016 Project Initiation
More informationScope of Services for Environmental Assessment for Projects
Scope of Services for Environmental Assessment for Projects The Consultant shall submit a Scope and Fee for completion of all required studies, and final documentation in compliance with the National Environmental
More informationHighway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual
Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual February 2017 Division of Planning Office of Systems Planning and Program Management Contents Section Page Preface... iii HSIP Program Procedure...
More informationTIER 2 RAAP Cutoff Dates Schedule\Column Descriptions Rev. 3/19/15
TIER 2 RAAP Cutoff Dates Schedule\Column Descriptions Rev. 3/19/15 The attached schedule of steps in the process for advertisement of a project is an update of the schedules distributed previously. As
More informationWHEREAS, Mn/DOT has been asked to participate in consultation for and to be an invited signatory to this Programmatic Agreement (PA); and
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION THE MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS,
More informationUS Army Corps of Engineers Periodic Inspection Report 9 Update. Dallas City Council June 3, 2009
US Army Corps of Engineers Periodic Inspection Report 9 Update Dallas City Council June 3, 2009 1 Briefing Overview Flood Protection is of primary importance to the City. The Dallas Floodway System protects
More informationINTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT: Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 1: To give the Town the maximum amount of input, control, and advisory power with other public agencies for the protection of
More informationCOORDINATION PLAN. As of November 14, 2011
As of November 14, 2011 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF AGENCY ROLES Agency Role Federal Agencies Virginia Agencies Local Agencies Lead Agencies Federal Highway Administration () Virginia Department of Transportation
More informationAPPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES
APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES Broward County Land Use Plan Amendment Requirements Amendments which are not within the rules of flexibility or more
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BIG DARBY ACCORD. Proposals Due by October 25, 2004
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BIG DARBY ACCORD Proposals Due by October 25, 2004 Notification of Intent Due by October 11, 2004 The Importance of the Big Darby Watershed It has been well documented that the Big
More informationSAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background
SAFETEA-LU This document provides information related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) that was previously posted on the Center for
More informationFHWA and Illinois Department of Transportation JOINT PROCESS REVIEW PROGRAM
FHWA and Illinois Department of Transportation JOINT PROCESS REVIEW PROGRAM PRESENTATION OUTLINE Overview of Joint Process Review Program Program intent and process Past reviews and outcomes Discussion
More informationFinal Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX C: COORDINATION PLAN
TABLE 1: AGENCIES AND CONSULTING PARTIES Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Role Federal Federal Tribes Virginia Local / Others Federal Highway Administration N/A N/A Lead Agency Transportation
More informationFOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC
Page 1 of 39 Information on how to comment is available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/planningrule/directives. FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC CHAPTER 1920 LAND
More informationNDOT Local Public Agency Manual April 6, 2017
NDOT Local Public Agency Manual April 6, 2017 State of Nevada Brian Sandoval, Governor Department of Transportation Rudy Malfabon, P.E., Director Design Division Paul Frost, P.E., Chief Design Engineer
More informationCOORDINATION PLAN. September 30, 2011
COORDINATION PLAN September 30, 2011 TABLE 1: AGENCIES AND CONSULTING PARTIES Role Federal Agencies Virginia Agencies Local Agencies / Others Lead Agency Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Transportation
More informationProcedures for Local Public Agency Project Administration (Revised 5/2014)
Procedures for Local Public Agency Project Administration (Revised 5/2014) OVERVIEW A Local Public Agency (LPA) is defined as a county, municipal corporation, state or local authority, board, commission,
More informationACTION TRANSMITTAL No
Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities DATE: March 6, 2017 TO: FROM: ACTION TRANSMITTAL No. 2017-08 Transportation Advisory Board Technical Advisory Committee PREPARED
More informationOhio Department of Transportation. The Process. Errol Scholtz & Chris Brown ODOT District Three LPA Section. September 22, 2016
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director The Process Errol Scholtz & Chris Brown ODOT District Three LPA Section September 22, 2016 Main Phases 1. Application and
More informationMark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH
Mark A. Doctor, PE Professional Profile A career of over 27 years with the Federal Highway Administration in various transportation engineering positions with diverse experiences and accomplishments in
More informationComprehensive Planning Grant. Comprehensive Plan Checklist
Comprehensive Planning Grant Comprehensive Plan Checklist This form was updated April 2010 Comprehensive Planning Grant Program Department of Administration Division of Intergovernmental Relations 101
More informationAssociation of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds
More informationModule 2 Planning and Programming
Module 2 Planning and Programming Contents: Section 1 Overview... 2-2 Section 2 Coordination with MPO... 2-4 Section 3 Functional Classification... 2-6 Section 4 Minute Order for Designation as Access
More informationVILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Issuing Department: Community Development Department Village of Fox Crossing 2000 Municipal Dr. Project Officer: George L. Dearborn Jr.,
More informationBrownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?
Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, 2012 What is FHWA? 2 1 What does FHWA do? The Federal Highway Administration: Improves Mobility on the Nation s highways through National Leadership, Innovation
More informationREQUEST FOR INFORMATION
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY GILCREASE EXPRESSWAY RFI Issue Date: January 2, 2018 RFI Response Due Date: January 31, 2018 The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority ( Authority ) is seeking
More informationArkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2018) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2018) Application Seminars
Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2018) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2018) Application Seminars Central Arkansas February 23, 2018 March 20, 2018 Northwest Arkansas April 3, 2018
More informationBDWW-GP-1 Number Fish Habitat Enhancement Structures N Days 43. BDWM-GP-6 BDWM-GP-7 Agricultural Minor Road Crossings and Ramps N 43
Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands SOP_WET_WOE_03 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Chapter 105 Water Obstruction and Encroachment Program Review of General Permits by Delegated County Conservation
More informationArcheological Sites and Cemeteries
Environmental Handbook Archeological Sites and Cemeteries This handbook outlines the process steps necessary to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the Antiquities Code of Texas,
More informationENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE US 59/LOOP 20/I-69W PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE US 59/LOOP 20/I-69W PROJECT A Brief Overview As Of June 15, 2015 Mike Graham Laredo District Environmental Coordinator June 15, 2015 Projects Locations & Design: Additional
More informationUS-Mexico Border Water Infrastructure Program
US-Mexico Border Water Infrastructure Program Standard Operating Procedures May 2011 These operating procedures have been developed as a tool for all partner organizations to improve and facilitate the
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/ 1 Transportation Alternatives Program Authorized
More informationI-190/SILVER STREET INTERCHANGE (EXIT 1) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA)
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING TRANSCRIPT I-190/Silver Street Interchange (Exit 1) EA I-190/SILVER STREET INTERCHANGE (EXIT 1) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) TRANSCRIPT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING July 2013
More informationCulpeper, VA. Virginia Department of Transportation
Culpeper, VA Virginia Department of Transportation October 2011 FORWARD Greetings from VDOT s Enhancement Program staff! The purpose of this manual is to guide local Sponsors through the project development
More informationIowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.
Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E. Hilton Garden Inn September 29, 2016 Member of the Day Personal Updates M.J. Charlie Purcell Promoted to Project Delivery Bureau Director
More informationMAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions
MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions This paper provides an overview of the project delivery provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). It also briefly summarizes
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018
Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018 Introduction The Region 1 Planning Council, in its capacity as the Metropolitan Planning
More informationSMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.
SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently
More informationValue Engineering Program Administration Manual (05/16/2018)
1. Value Engineering Value Engineering Program Administration Manual (05/16/2018) Value Engineering (VE) is defined by the Society of American Value Engineers International as "the systematic application
More informationBRF-009-9(73) IA 9 Black Hawk Bridge
BRF-009-9(73) 38-03 IA 9 Black Hawk Bridge Request for Proposal Iowa Department of Transportation Introduction The Iowa Department of Transportation s Office of Location and Environment (Department), in
More information2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference
February 20, 2013 Baton Rouge River Center 2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference Partnerships for Progress in Transportation Mega Projects Session (I-12 to Bush) I-12 to Bush Agenda Inclusion into TIMED
More informationSubdivision Presubmittal Conference Submittal Package Cover Page
Subdivision Presubmittal Conference Submittal Package Cover Page The Hillsborough County Development Services Department is pleased to offer a Presubmittal Conference to anyone seeking help in determining
More informationAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Title 23 Refresher. FHWA Federal-Aid Program for Local Public Agencies
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Title 23 Refresher FHWA Federal-Aid Program for Local Public Agencies 1 ARRA Implementation for Local Public Agencies Provide an overview of the fundamental
More informationMAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements
Date: July 13, 2012 Subject: MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements The recently enacted Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) includes a number of substantial changes
More informationMemo. Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN Date: April 24, METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES
Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 Memo Date: April 24, 2017 To: METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES From: Phillip Bergem Metro State Aid RE: MnDOT Fiscal
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program Guidance
Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) partners with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
More informationCoolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan
Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan A Partnership Among the City of Coolidge, Town of Florence, and ADOT FINAL REPORT Kimley-Horn Kimley Kimley-Horn and and Associates, Associates, Inc. Inc.
More information4:00 p.m. on May 6, 2016
Request for Qualifications On-Call General Engineering Services Public Works Department City of Daly City 333 90 th Street Daly City, CA 94015 April 4, 2016 The City of Daly City is accepting proposals
More informationHOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?
HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP? The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, known as the STIP, is a list that shows prioritization, funding, and scheduling of transportation projects and programs
More informationCommonwealth Transportation Board Briefing
Hampton Roads Crossing Study (HRCS) (SEIS) Commonwealth Transportation Board Briefing September 20, 2016 Angel Deem VDOT, Environmental Division Director HRCS History 1991: Federal funding allocated for
More informationPOLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING
Approved: Policy No.: 18-003(P) Effective: April 19, 2002 Responsible Division: Finance and Forecasting Gordon Proctor Director POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING I. POLICY STATEMENT: Accrued
More informationPublic Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Public Notice U.S. Army Corps Permit Application No: SWG-2012-00381 Of Engineers Date Issued: April 27, 2016 Galveston District Comments Due: May 30, 2017 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT
More informationTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) PROGRAM WORKSHOP. Call for Projects 2017 and 2018
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) PROGRAM WORKSHOP Call for Projects 2017 and 2018 WELCOME! Casual atmosphere Please silence your phones Restrooms: turn right when you leave this room and they will be around
More informationFEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM
FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration Sterling, Virginia Lewis G. Grimm, P.E. Planning Team Leader, EFLHD Federal Lands Highway Division Offices
More informationFunding Principles. Years Passed New Revenue Credit Score Multiplier >3 years 0% % % % After Jan %
Funding Principles I. Infrastructure Incentives Initiative: encourages state, local and private investment in core infrastructure by providing incentives in the form of grants. Federal incentive funds
More informationPUBLIC INPUT PROCESS GUIDELINES FOR SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN PROJECTS
PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS GUIDELINES FOR SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN PROJECTS Clallam County.1 PURPOSE The Clallam County Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan (Six-Year TIP) serves as a multiyear financing
More informationTexas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 39 Environmental Review of Transportation Projects
Texas Department of Transportation Page of Proposed Preamble The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes amendments to.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. -.,. -., and. -.0, the repeal of.,., and., and new.,
More informationFiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES
Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. Instructions for Submitting a Transportation Alternatives Program Application. 1 2. Transportation
More informationTOWN OF LENOX COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE APPLICATION FOR CPA FUNDING
CPC Application Overview TOWN OF LENOX COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE APPLICATION FOR CPA FUNDING There are two (2) steps to apply for CPA funding in the Town of Lenox. Only applicants who have successfully
More informationKYOVA Interstate Planning Commission
KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Sub-allocated Funding Process and Application Package This packet includes information and guidance about the process used by KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission to
More informationStewardship and Oversight Agreement. Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department & Federal Highway Administration Arkansas Division Office
Stewardship and Oversight Agreement Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department & Federal Highway Administration Arkansas Division Office October 20, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION.
More informationArkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2017) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2017) Application Seminars
Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2017) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2017) Application Seminars Central Arkansas February 23, 2017 March 15, 2017 Northwest Arkansas March 30, 2017
More informationCity of Somersworth, New Hampshire OFFICE OF THE FINANCE DIRECTOR
SCOTT A. SMITH Finance Director sasmith@somersworth.com One Government Way Somersworth, New Hampshire 03878 Phone: (603) 692-9504 Fax: (603) 692-9570 www.somersworth.com City of Somersworth, New Hampshire
More information2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...
FY 2018 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM INSTRUCTIONS, GUIDELINES AND APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) 1. Instructions for Submitting a Transportation Alternatives Program Application.. 1 2. Transportation
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS. Classification & Documentation
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS Classification & Documentation CLASSIFICATION What s an Environmental Assessment? Not a Categorical Exclusion (CE) Not an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 3 Classification
More informationStandard Operating Procedure (SOP) 1 for Chapter 105 Dam Safety Program Review of Chapter 105 New Dam Permit November 2, 2012
Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 1 for Chapter 105 Dam Safety Program Review of Chapter 105 New Dam Permit This SOP describes the procedures and work flows
More informationWater Trust Board 2019 Application Overview and Frequently Asked Questions
Water Trust Board 2019 Application Overview and Frequently Asked Questions The New Mexico Finance Authority ( NMFA ) administers the application process on behalf of the Water Trust Board ( WTB ). For
More informationRegulation 20 November 2007 ER APPENDIX H POLICY COMPLIANCE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DECISION DOCUMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U. S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CP Washington, DC 20314-1000 Regulation 20 November 2007 ER 1105-2-100 APPENDIX H POLICY COMPLIANCE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DECISION DOCUMENTS TABLE
More informationMegan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer. Federal Highway Administration Washington Division. March 14, 2017
Megan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer Federal Highway Administration Washington Division March 14, 2017 1 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/
More informationMidpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, CA Issued: Friday, January 27, 2017
Request for Qualifications and Proposals (RFQP) for Design Consulting Services for the Webb Creek Bridge Replacement Project, Bear Creek Redwood Open Space Preserve Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
More informationGeneral Permit Number. Description
Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands SOP_WET_WOE_04 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Chapter 105 Water Obstruction and Encroachment Program Review of General Permits not covered by Permit
More information4/14/2017. Green Infrastructure Funding Opportunities
Green Infrastructure Funding Opportunities CDRPC Grant Funding Workshop Hudson Valley Community College, Troy, NY April 12, 2017 EFC Overview Public benefit corporation that provides low-cost capital and
More informationNEW MEXICO WATER TRUST BOARD c/o New Mexico Finance Authority 207 Shelby Street Santa Fe, NM MEMORANDUM
NEW MEXICO WATER TRUST BOARD c/o New Mexico Finance Authority 207 Shelby Street Santa Fe, NM 87501 MEMORANDUM TO: Water Trust Board Applicants FROM: Jana Amacher, NMFA Director of Water Resources DATE:
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY FOR INDUSTRIAL PARK, AGRI-BUSINESS ACCESS, AND COMMUNITY ACCESS GRANT PROGRAMS
DOT-168 Revised 12/22/06 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY FOR INDUSTRIAL PARK, AGRI-BUSINESS ACCESS, AND COMMUNITY ACCESS GRANT PROGRAMS SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 700 EAST BROADWAY PIERRE,
More informationFederal-Aid LPA Design Process Overview. MoDOT St. Louis District Local Programs
Federal-Aid LPA Design Process Overview MoDOT St. Louis District Local Programs November 2017 Local Program Contacts St. Louis District Note: North St. Louis County = Along and north of Page Avenue Programming,
More informationCity of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Public Works Department RFP #68-14 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Public Works Department RFP #68-14 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES NEW CASTLE WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS INVITATION Sealed Proposals, plainly
More informationSTANDARD APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS PACKET FOR FY19 FUNDING CYCLE
STANDARD APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS PACKET FOR FY19 FUNDING CYCLE The City of Malden will award Community Preservation Act (CPA) funding in fiscal year 2019. This packet contains the information an applicant
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC US Army Corps of Engineers CECW-ZB Washington, DC Circular No September 2018
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC 1165-2-220 US Army Corps of Engineers CECW-ZB Washington, DC 20314-1000 Circular No. 1165-2-220 10 September 2018 EXPIRES 30 SEPTEMBER 2020 Water Resource Policies and Authorities
More informationSouth Dakota Transportation Alternatives
South Dakota Transportation Alternatives Program Summary and Application Guide Updated March 2018 Connecting South Dakota and the Nation 1 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Summary 1. Overview Transportation
More informationPOSITION DESCRIPTION
POSITION DESCRIPTION TITLE: ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN Scope Of Responsibility: This is the advanced journey level class in the Engineering Technician classification within the Public Works department. Individuals
More informationProject Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7.
Project Information Application ID 215-D8-1 Date Submitted 6/29/215 Date Revised Project Name Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A County, Route, Section HAM-4/561-2.66/7.1 ODOT District District 8 County Hamilton
More informationMAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective
MAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective Webinar Presentation Sponsored by the National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) March 12, 2013 Bill Malley Washington, DC Presenter: Bill
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE.
US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: January 19, 2017 Comment Deadline: February 17, 2017 Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2011-01243 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
More informationRequest for Qualifications Professional Engineering Services
Page 1 of 7 Combined Sewage Storage Tunnel Preparation of Preliminary Design, Detailed Design, Tender Documents and Services during Construction Requirement: The City of Ottawa, hereinafter referred to
More informationApril 13, 2007 SUBJECT: GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS OF CITY CONNECTING LINKS OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM - FISCAL YEAR 2011
April 13, 2007 SUBJECT: GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS OF CITY CONNECTING LINKS OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM - FISCAL YEAR 2011 The Kansas Department of Transportation is announcing the continuation of its Geometric
More informationFHWA - MODOT DESIGN BUILD PROGRAM AGREEMENT
FHWA - MoDOT Design Build Program Agreement DATE, 2013 FHWA - MODOT DESIGN BUILD PROGRAM AGREEMENT 1 INTRODUCTION Due to the complexities and fast-track reviews and approvals experienced on Design Build
More information2016 I-74 General Engineering Consultant Services
2016 I-74 General Engineering Consultant Services Request for Proposal Iowa Department of Transportation Introduction On behalf of the Illinois DOT and Iowa DOT, the Iowa DOT District 6 Office is interested
More informationQuality Management Guideline July, 2017
Quality Management Guideline July, 2017 Check the Capital Project Delivery website to ensure this is the current version. Table of Contents Quality Management Overview... 1 Interactive Communications...
More information