NORFOLK DISTRICT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FUTURE CONTRACTS

Transcription

1 NORFOLK DISTRICT PROGRAM OVERVIEW & FUTURE CONTRACTS ODU CEEVC 18 November 2010 US Army Corps of Engineers NORFOLK DISTRICT

2 Agenda Corps of Engineers Overview Program Overview Current & Future Workload Special Focus Areas Centers of Standardization Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) A/E Opportunities

3 The Corps of Engineers Macro Perspective Engagement g Countries Physical Presence - 33 Countries LTG Van Antwerp ARCTIC ANTARCTIC

4 Eight Corps Divisions

5 North Atlantic Division 14 US States + Europe BG Duke DeLuca

6 Civil Works Projects Initiated by Congress Missions: Deep Draft Navigation Shallow Draft Navigation Hurricane Storm Damage Reduction Flood Damage Reduction Water Supply (cooperation and consulting only) Recreation Environmental Restoration ti

7 Environmental Clean-up of ordnance & contaminants DoD and non-dod (EPA & other Federal agencies) Not wetland permits (Regulatory)

8

9 Interagency & International Services (IIS) Non-traditional Corps Customers Other Federal Agencies State and Local Governments

10 Facility Construction Types of projects Military Barracks, Ranges, Dining Facilities, Training Complexes, HQ Buildings, Child Development Centers, Chapels, Fire Stations, Maintenance Facilities Military Construction (MCA) Funding Congressional appropriation; p typically y new construction Customers Army Air Force Navy OMA & other funds

11

12 Installation Overview FY09-13 Fort AP Hill - $152M Langley - $107M Fort Belvoir - $394M Ft Eustis - $308M DSCR - $18M Ft Monroe - $0M Rivanna - $57M Richmond Norfolk Radford - $33M Ft Pickett - $46M Ft Lee - $1,145M 145M Ft Story - $2M

13 Norfolk District Abingdon Radford Ft. Belvoir Warrenton Dumfries Fredericksburg Charlottesville Ft. A.P. Hill White Stone Accomac Gathright Dam Lynchburg DSCR Gloucester Richmond Ft. Pickett Ft. Eustis Langley Ft. Monroe Christiansburg Ft. Lee Craney Is. Norfolk Clarksville Ft. Story Great Bridge Civil Military Regulatory

14 Norfolk District Program Construction Overview ONS MILLIO

15 Fort Lee Program (Million) $600 $550 $500 $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 MILCON BRAC Army BRAC Joint OMA/SRM

16 Fort Eustis Program (Million) $150 $125 $100 $75 $50 $25 $0 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 MILCON BRAC Army

17 Fort A. P. Hill Program (Million) $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 MILCON

18 Defense Supply Center Richmond (DSCR) (Million) $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 MILCON Water Distribution Upgrade

19 Langley Air Force Base (Million) $100 $75 $50 $25 $0 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 MCAF BRAC DOD NAF

20 FY11 MILCON Program Asymmetric Warfare Group Training Facilities, A. P. Hill: $60M; Advertise Aug 10; Award Dec M Indoor Range, A. P. Hill: $6M; Advertise Aug 10; Award Dec M Range, A. P. Hill: $4M; Advertise Aug 10; Award Dec 10 Demolition Range, A. P. Hill: $4M; Advertise Aug 10; Award Dec M Range, A. P. Hill: $15M; Advertise Aug 10; Award Dec 10 Warrior in Transition Facility, Fort Eustis: $28M; Advertise Aug 10; Award Dec 10 Company Ops Facilities, Fort Lee: $5M; Advertise Oct 10; Award Dec 10 Artifact Storage, Fort Lee: $30M; Advertise Oct 10; Award Dec 10 Qualification Training Range, Fort Lee: $7.7M; Advertise Jan 11; Award Feb 11 Training Support Center, Fort Lee: $5.8M; Advertise Oct 10; Award Dec 10 Low Observable/Composite Repair Facility, LAFB: $7M; Advertise Oct 10; Award Feb 11 Solvent Recovery Plant, Radford: $13M; Advertise Nov 10; Award Mar 11

21 Norfolk District Program MILCON Overview FY-12 through16 Form No. Project Description Installation FY PA ($000) Modified Record Fire Fort A P Hill , Multipurpose Machine Gun Range Fort A P Hill , Aviation Training Facility Fort Eustis , AIT Complex, Ph 3 Fort Eustis , AIT Complex, Ph 4 Fort Eustis , Modified Record Fire Fort Eustis , TEMF Hardstand and Storage Fort Eustis , Barracks Complex, Ph 2 Fort Lee , Barracks Complex, Ph 3 Fort Lee , Company Headquarters Building Fort Lee , DSCR Admin DLA Aviation Logistics 2013,16,18 178,000 AM Elementary School MB Quantico ,355 AM0030 Elementary School Addition NS Dahlgren ,780

22 Army CONUS Centers of Standardization Family Housing (Request for Proposals) Dining Facilities Criminal Investigation Division Command Facilities Military Entrance Processing Stations Classroom XXI (Computer Training Facilities) Information System Facilities General Instruction Buildings

23 DoDEA The Department t of Defense Education Activity it (DoDEA) DEA) is responsible for 1 school at the Naval Support Facility Dahlgren, Virginia and 4 schools at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia. The DoDEA Design Center currently has five (5) Architect and Engineering (A/E) Firms on board for the sole purpose of supporting the DoDEA MILCON Program, in designing ghigh performing educational facilities. The current A/E contracts expire in With the recent increase to the DoDEA MILCON Program, the Design Center is anticipating soliciting for additional A/E capacity in 2011.

24 Norfolk District AE Overview Currently Have 5 BRAC $50m IDIQs URS Exp 2011 Black/Veatch Berger Exp 2012 Clark-Nexsen-CH2M HILL Exp 2011 The Benham Companies Exp 2013 GreeneHorne & O Mara -Ewing Cole Exp 2014 Currently Have 5 Multi Disciplines - $12m IDIQs DJG EXP 2013 Waller Todd & Sadler EXP 2013 PB World EXP 2013 Mason and Hangar EXP 2013 HNTB EXP 2013

25 Norfolk District AE Overview Currently Have 3 Specialities Contracts - $3m to $12m IDIQS Cost Estimating/Scheduling Crawford Consulting EXP 2013 FAI Consulting EXP 2013 Surveying Precision Measurements EXP 2013 Geotechnical Terracon EXP 2011 SAME EXP 2011 Schnabel (DAM Safety) EXP 2011

26 Defining Success in Selection Key Point Organization SF-330 or PROPOSAL CONSIDERATION Arrange and Include Specialized Experience Following Announcement Listing Arrange Resume s in a Logical Manner, Either by Discipline or by Consultant Address Selection Criteria Clearly and Obviously Relevancy Clearly l Demonstrate t Your Team s Similar il Experience Discuss How Your Team s Experience is Exceptionally Relevant to the Solicitation Tasks Keep a Focus on Quality, Cost, Schedule on Experience Discussions Presentation Professional, Complete, Easy to Read and Follow. Flashy not Required.

27 Defining Success in Selection Key Point Established Relationships SF-330 or PROPOSAL CONSIDERATION Document Established Relationships With Team Members Define or Discuss Process or Practices in Place for Communication/Consultation If a New Team Member, Identify Them and Address How They Will be Integrated Into the Project Team A New Team Member Could be A Strength Focus on Quality Control Address Design/Engineering and/or Construction Quality Control Define/Discuss Existing Practices or Practices/Processes Anticipated to Used in This Contract Define Some Measures of Quality, and Discuss It s Implications on Performance Include Information from Past Clients

28 Defining Success in Selection Key Point SF-330 or PROPOSAL CONSIDERATION On-Time On-Budget Performance Include Information on Past Performance Concerning Award Cost vs. Final Cost Discuss Results Include Information on Project Completion Meeting Commitments Include Methods and Considerations for Managing Scope and Contract Modifications

29 Norfolk District Advertisements

30 Questions/Comments