METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT S T. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY Forging Into The Future Through Technology

Transcription

1 METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT S T. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY Forging Into The Future Through Technology

2 10 METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI TABLEOFCONTEN REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY T ABLE OF CONTENTS ROTECT ERVE SSIST PROTECT SERVE ASSIST Mission Statement...3 President of Board of Police Commissioners Address...4 Members of the Board of Police Commissioners...6 Message from the Chief of Police...8 Deputy Chiefs of Police...10 Organizational Chart...12 Department Initiatives New Forensic Laboratory...16 Area Patrol Divisions South Patrol Division...25 Central Patrol Division...26 North Patrol Division...27 Statistical Crime Data 2004 & Index Crime By District & Area Index Crime By Month & Cleared by Arrest Person Arrested For Part I & II Crimes Age & Sex Person Arrested For Part I & II Crimes Race & Sex Juvenile Arrest by District & Sex Traffic Enforcement Disbursement Summary Financial Summary...44 Awards Medal of Valor...46 Distinguished Service Citation for Valor...47 Officer and Civilian of the Year...47 METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

3 3 MISSION MISSION STA TEMENT PROTECT SERVE ASSIST The mission of the Metropolitan Police Department is to protect, serve and assist citizens when conditions arise that may affect the well being of the individual or the community. Cooperating with others in the community, police will work to prevent and detect crime, protect life and property, and achieve a peaceful society, free from the fear of crime and disorder. Members of the Department will strive continually for excellence and maintain the peace through service, integrity, leadership and fair treatment to all. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

4 4 5 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERSBOARDOFCOMMISSI PROTECT SERVE ASSIST COLONEL BART SARACINO The Metropolitan Police Department is one of the top law enforcement agencies in the country. That is no overstatement. The information and statistics in the Annual Report validate the strength, determination and pure hard work of the Department s officers and civilian employees. Every second of every day, men and women of this Department demonstrate their commitment to the City of St. Louis by risking their lives to protect and serve citizens. On January 30, 2004, the Department witnessed this commitment firsthand. Police Officer Nicholas Kevin Sloan, a 24-year-old father, made the ultimate sacrifice to the community when he was killed in the line of duty. His loss is mourned by all of St. Louis. On October 14, 2004, another brave young officer nearly lost his life. While conducting a routine arrest, Officer Matthew Browning was injured by a drunken driver, losing both of his legs, but his spirits remain high and his rehabilitation efforts are succeeding. Both Officer Sloan and Officer Browning displayed determination and will. Their acts serve as a great source of pride to everyone in the Department. They also are proof of the pledge to make the community safe. The Department s commitment also is evident in the crime statistics released for The numbers document a 12.6 percent decrease in overall crime in the City of St. Louis compared to Perhaps one of the most dramatic decreases was the 34 percent reduction in vehicle thefts over a two year period. This is a credit to the Department s Anti-Crime Task Force, which works diligently with the Circuit Attorney s Office and the Juvenile Court to prevent and deter auto thefts. Likewise, the Department s investment in technology signals its commitment to the community. The new forensic laboratory distinguishes the Department nationally, with its state-of-the-art technology encompassing 40,000 square feet of space and three floors at the Department s downtown headquarters. The forensic laboratory officially opened in early 2005 and includes Biology, Serology, DNA, Arson, Trace and Drug Chemistry labs. Being at the forefront of forensic investigations has allowed the Department to solve high-profile criminal cases such as the Southside Rapist and serial murderer Maury Travis, and it positions this agency as one of the country s leaders in modern criminal investigations. Updating officers tools also is an essential aspect of crime fighting. In 2004, the Department took the necessary step of issuing officers new high-powered rifles, as criminal weapons have become more sophisticated and dangerous. As a member of the Board of Police Commissioners, I support investing in our officers. St. Louis Mayor Francis G. Slay and St. Louis Police Chief Joseph J. Mokwa have made my job easier. Their commitment to the Department and, as a result, the City of St. Louis is commendable. It is a privilege to present the Annual Report to the Community. I hope it confirms your confidence in the Metropolitan Police Department past, present and future. I hope you realize, as I do, that the Department is one of the finest in the country. Sincerely, The new forensic laboratory distinguishes the Department nationally, with its state-of-the-art technology encompassing 40,000 square feet of space and three floors at the Department s downtown headquarters. Colonel Bart Saracino President, Board of Police Commisioners METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

5 6 7 BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS BOARDOFCOMMIS PROTECT SERVE ASSIST The mission of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department is to protect, serve and assist c itizens when conditions arise that may affect the well beingof the individual or the community. Cooperating with others in the community, Vice President police will work to prevent and detect crime, protect life and property, and achieve a peacef ul society, free from the fear of crime and disorder. Membe rs of the department will strive continually for excellence and maintain the peace through service, integrity, leadership and fair treatment to all BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS Colonel Michael J. Quinn Colonel JoAnn F. Morrow Purchasing Member Colonel Chris Goodson Treasurer Francis G. Slay Mayor Ex-Officio Member Captain Antoinette M.Filla Secretary to the Board METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

6 8 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE CHIEFOFPOLICE PROTECT SERVE ASSIST CHIEF JOSEPH MOKWA Each day, the men and women of the Metropolitan Police Department are committed to making the streets of St. Louis safer. With 79 wonderful and distinct neighborhoods, the City of St. Louis offers something for everyone. The more than 1300 officers of the Department are dedicated to protecting the community they serve and striving to build relationships with residents like you. You, the community are our most valued ally. You are the eyes, the ears and the pillars of our neighborhoods. Your refusal to tolerate crime and your willingness to help bring justice to your neighbors is having a positive impact in our community. Last year, I met with thousands of individuals throughout the City. They shared their thoughts on how we could help them. What I learned is that while violent crime is always a major concern, nuisance crimes affect a greater number of people. Quality of life is your overwhelming concern. To that end, I want you to know that the Department is committed to curtailing those nuisance crimes. Police work is a very complex career. A simple example of this is when we are called to disperse a group of young men and women. Residents complain that people are congregating, but when we intervene, the group complains that we are harassing them. We not only have to know the law, we have to understand each situation and deal with it appropriately. Residents have also expressed concern regarding vehicle break-ins and vehicle theft. It is a problem that you hear about year after year. By working with the community and making this a priority, I am pleased to report that vehicle thefts were down 34 percent during the last two years. This drop is a direct result of solid police work and the cooperation of our community members. The Department serves a diverse, growing population in the City. We work daily to stabilize neighborhoods and to meet the expectations you have regarding your quality of life. Citizens also tell us that our hard work and efforts are paying off and we continue to make our City a great place to live and visit. Residents have expressed their appreciation for our presence in their neighborhoods and value the relationships they have built with us. Keeping the lines of communication open between the community and members of the Police Department fosters cooperation and trust. I encourage all citizens to get involved and become an active part of helping to improve the safety of your streets. We look forward to continuing to build strong relationships with the community and to collaborate with you to address the concerns that are important to us all. When we all work together, we are a powerful force in keeping St. Louis safe. Sincerely, Chief Joseph Mokwa Chief of Police The Department serves a very diverse, growing population in the City. We work daily to stabilize all neighborhoods and to meet the expectations you have regarding the quality of life you expect. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

7 10 DEPUTY CHIEFS OF POLICE DEPUTYCHIEFSOFPOLICE PROTECT SERVE ASSIST DEPUTY CHIEFS OF POLICE Lt.Colonel Stephen Pollihan Assistant Chief of Police Lt.Colonel Roy J. Joachimstaler Bureau of Patrol Support Lt.Colonel David R. Heath Bureau of Professional Standards Lt.Colonel Timothy E. Reagan Bureau of Criminal Investigations Lt.Colonel Gregory R. Hawkins Bureau of Auxiliary Services METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

8 12 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ORGANIZATIONALCHART Board of Police Commissioners Board Secretary Capt. Antoinette Filla Purchasing Carol Shepard Budget & Finance David Daniels Internal Audit Kenneth Stone Chief of Police Col. Joseph Mokwa Chiefís Staff Division Major Paul Nocchiero Lt. John Hayden Sgt. D. Samuel Dotson Public Info./Affairs Richard Wilkes Intelligence Lt. Michael Jarvis Planning & Technology Barbara Wright Legal Jane Shaw Operational Planning Lt. Anthony Russo Human Resources Larry Brockelsby Housing Authority Unit Lt. Gerald Leyshock Special Assignments Sgt. Robert George Lt. Col. Stephen Pollihan Assistant Chief of Police Community Policing Lt. Col. Roy Joachimstaler Deputy Chief Patrol Support Lt. Col. Timothy Reagan Deputy Chief Criminal Investigations Lt. Col. David Heath Deputy Chief Professional Standards Lt. Col. Gregory Hawkins Deputy Chief Auxiliary Services Major Lawrence O Toole South Patrol Major Harry Hegger Central Patrol Major Reggie Harris North Patrol Deputy Commander Cpt. David Dorn Major Alfred Adkins Deputy Commander Major B. Noble-Barnes Prisoner Processing Internal Affairs Capt. Daniel Isom CALEA Lt. Thomas Percich Fleet Services Lt. Edward Messmer Deputy Commander Cpt. Robert Jones Supply Gloria Herman 1st District Capt. Steven Mueller 4th District Capt. Mary Warnecke 6th District Capt. Stephen Hobbs Trraffic Safety/Mounted Patrol/Aviation Lt. Michael Siemers Juvenile Capt. Joe Richardson Crimes Against Persons/Property Capt. James Gieseke Academy Lt. Mary Edwards-Fears Communications Lt. Daniel Howard Records Barbara Palmer 2nd District Capt. Greg Wurm 3rd District Capt. Thomas Magnan Executive Officer Lt. Michael Caruso 5th District Capt. Gwen Spicer 9th District Capt. Robert Oldani Executive Officer Lt. John Podolak 7th District Capt. James Moran 8th District Capt. Leman Dobbins Executive Officer Lt. Arthur Ruehl Mobile Reserve/Canine Lt. Vernon Summers Public Transportation Sgt. Jon Schickendanz Emergency Management Lt. Darla Gray Warrant & Fugitive Lt. Timothy Murphy Laboratory/Identification Lt. Michael Shepard Property/Custody Lt. Robert Dunigan Homicide Lt. Michael Lauer Sex Crimes/ Child Abuse/D.A.R.T Lt. John Harper Bombing & Arson/Auto Theft Sgt. Steven Sorocko Special Services Lt. Michael Lowry Private Security Sgt. Sherri Smith Communications Support Charles Gastler Telephone Reporting/ Teleprocessing Denise Hayes Buildings Kurt Molitor Detectives Detectives Detectives Vice/Narcotics Lt. Joseph Spiess Fraud/Cyber Crimes Sgt. Robert Muffler SOURCE: PLANNING & TECHNOLOGY DIVISION JUNE 30, 2005 METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

9 CRIME LAB EVIDENCE EVALUATION

10 16 DEPARTMENT INTIATIVES FORENSIC LABORATORYFORENSICS LAB PROTECT SERVE ASSIST FORENSIC LABORATORY The Metropolitan Police Department boasts a powerful weapon in its crime-fighting arsenal. The new Forensic Laboratory is a state-of-the-art facility built in 2005 and highly-regarded by criminologists nationwide. The laboratory embodies more than 40,000 square feet on three floors and accommodates 70 employees trained in the latest forensic techniques and methodologies. Cutting-edge technology strengthens the Department s capabilities for testing DNA, blood, drug traces, firearms and other evidence from crime scenes. The Forensic Laboratory is top-of-the-line, spacious and, overall, impressive, St. Louis Police Chief Joseph Mokwa said. But more important than the wow factor is the laboratory s ability to assist police is catching criminals and, ultimately, bringing justice to victims families. The $8.5 million facility more than triples the size of the old lab, which had been housed on the third floor of Police Headquarters. Built in 1934, the old lab was cramped and devoid of special systems like humidity controls and ventilation needed for laboratory work. The new laboratory not only has top-notch equipment, but it provides insurance that the Department s crime-fighting resources will grow with technology. Designed and built by Burns & McDonnell, ERM Technologies, Inc., Health Education + Research Associates (HERA), Inc., and K & S Associates, the Forensic Laboratory offers the fiber-optic wiring and overall ability to support crime-solving technologies not yet developed or discovered. Space was also added to allow for a larger staff and added technologies, such as robotics. We are prepared for the future, said Harold R. Messler, Manager of Criminalistics for the Department. It is an exciting time for us. We are gratified that the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners and the community at large realize the importance of having a state-of-the-art Forensic Laboratory. In 1998, St. Louis voters approved a $10 million bond issue to finance the laboratory. Former United States Congressman Richard Gephardt secured an additional $390,000 grant from the federal Department of Justice for laboratory equipment and instruments. FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

11 18 FORENSIC LABORATORY (CONT D) By all accounts, the expense was worth it. The laboratory is an important civic investment in modern forensics a fast-paced, highly-evolving science that law enforcement officials are relying on more and more, particularly in solving cold and high-profile criminal cases like the Southside Rapist and Maury Travis. The laboratory is an investment in the future of the City of St. Louis, said Bart Saracino, President of the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners. It is an effective tool for making St. Louis safe, now and in years to come. FORENSIC LABORATORY On the first floor, the Forensic Laboratory houses a secure garage where vans from the Department s Evidence Technician Unit (ETU) transport and deliver evidence via an impregnable system that helps to prevent compromising evidence. The first level also comprises the building s mechanical systems and two vehicle processing bays in which the Department s experts in fingerprinting, DNA, and other forensic methods can conduct on-the-spot tests and analyses on crime-scene vehicles. The bays are enclosed and equipped with state-of-the-art technology, including snorkeling vents that take fumes out of the space. Main laboratory spaces, including Biology, Serology, DNA, Trace and Drug Chemistry, call the second floor home. Besides boasting the best and latest technology, the labs were designed to minimize environmental contamination errors. For instance, in the DNA/Biosciences Unit, where forensic scientists analyze body fluids and tissues to identify violent criminals, air flow and pressure are regulated to stop particles like dust or skin from inadvertently tainting evidence. Superb technologies will aide scientists as they resurrect unsolved cases from years ago. We have a backlog of DNA cases, said Lt. Michael Shepard, Commander of the Forensic Lab. The lab will help us to identify suspects in old cases. We have ambitious goals for the next several years. FIREARMS DIVISION

12 20 FORENSIC LABORATORY (CONT D) The floor s Chemistry Unit was designed so scientists can identify controlled substances within minutes. Each work station has its own data terminal, fume hood, sink and testing equipment such as an infrared spectrophotometry. The Department analyzes drugs within 20 hours of an arrest a point of pride considering that in departments nationwide, the average turnaround for drug testing is 14 to 30 days. The third floor consists of the ETU, Photo Lab, CAD/Graphics Area and Firearms. ETU workers collect evidence using a meticulous system that guards against contamination. FORENSIC LABORATORY Small items, for example, are delivered through small slots in the bulletproof glass window in the Evidence Receiving Area, which has a secure elevator, bar coding and other high-tech processing tools. Items larger in size pass through an evidence bay with doors locked on both sides. The evidence is then placed in a secure storage room or climate-controlled vault. The Firearms Unit is another laboratory feature. Used an average of 25 times a day, it has a 40-foot indoor shooting range for the testing of firearms and weapons, a water tank and a ventilation system designed to remove smoke from the space. Walls, ceilings and floors can withstand shots fired. The Department s Forensic Laboratory, one of a handful in the state of Missouri accredited by the American Society of Crime Lab Directors, was profiled recently in Forensic Magazine as a textbook case of a lab that is safe, secure and prepared for what comes next in solving crime. The new laboratory is a great benefit for the Department, Mokwa said. And it is an even greater benefit for St. Louis citizens. FIREARMS DIVISION METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

13 POLICE DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS South Patrol Division includes the 1st, 2nd and 3rd police districts. Central Patrol Division includes the 4th, 5th and 9th police districts. North Patrol Division includes the 6th, 7th and 8th police districts. ooperating with others in the ommunity, police will work to revent and detect crime, protect ife and property, and achieve a eaceful society, free from the ear of crime and disorder. Cooperating with others in the community, police will work to prevent and detect crime, protect life 5and property, 8 and achieve a peaceful society, free from the fear of crime and disorder NATURAL BRIDGE DELMAR VANDEVENTER 3 F AIR 44 EASTBOUND J E FF E R SON MAR KE T MAR KE T G R AVOIS 1 WE BE R Source: Planning & Technology Division, July 7, 2005

14 24 25 AREA PA TROL DIVISIONS SOUTH PA TROL DIVISION MAJOR LARRY O TOOLE PROTECT SERVE ASSIST The South Patrol Division is proud to have launched several successful initiatives from that have helped to reduce total crime in our districts by 14.4 percent, compared to One initiative the South Patrol Community Improvement Area involved meeting with St. Louis City Aldermen to identify areas in the community that are ripe with crime and analyze trends in criminal behavior. The information allowed us to institute successful, cost-effective methods to deter criminals. For example, in some troubled neighborhoods we installed barricades on one end of the street to control unlawful activity by making it difficult for criminals to get away. Another strategy included cutting back trees on high-crime streets. Without a lot of brush, criminals have a harder time hiding and residents having an easier time seeing the suspects and, therefore, providing police with accurate descriptions. We also have urged residents and business owners our eyes and our ears to call police when incidents arise. A second initiative launched was the Metro Crime Exchange. This involved law enforcement officials from the Metropolitan Police Department meeting monthly with nearly a dozen representatives from police departments in surrounding municipalities in St. Louis County to discuss crime trends and share information about suspects. Since criminals ignore city boundaries, we often find that our trends matched. For example, when we experienced a rash of auto thefts, more times than not, the other municipalities did too. By working together, we have apprehended criminals and reduced crime throughout the City of St. Louis and the metropolitan region. Specifically, these two initiatives and the dedicated and skillful men and women in our division have contributed to decreases in crime between 2003 and We recorded drops in the following areas: Auto thefts, 31.2%; aggravated assaults, 18.2%; total burglaries, 12.4%; robberies, 7%; larcenies, 7%. We look forward to carrying out these initiatives during the coming years. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

15 26 27 CENTRAL PA TROL DIVISION MAJOR HARRY HEGGER NORTH PA TROL DIVISION MAJOR REGGIE HARRIS PROTECT SERVE ASSIST AREA PATROL DIVISIONS The Central Patrol Division experienced one of its busiest years in Our Division includes the downtown area, which was the site of high-profile events that attracted hundreds of thousands of people. We had political events related to the U.S. presidential election in November 2004, the World Series, major celebrations to commemorate the centennial of the 1904 World s Fair and the bicentennial of the Louisiana Purchase, the annual Fair St. Louis and six weeks of waterfront activities during River Splash. We are proud to report that there were no major incidents related to these events. We attribute this to the meticulous training and strategic planning by our division, as well as the hundreds of police officers throughout the Department who staffed the activities. It is my hope that the public views these security successes as an affirmation that we are prepared should a catastrophe occur. This is especially important for the community in light of continued threats to national security following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Also, the Central Patrol Division is pleased, in , to have participated in the Downtown Partnership, a consortium of individuals and groups interested in downtown development. There is a tremendous amount of downtown growth as investors convert old office buildings into urban lofts. The mix of residents and businesses creates special policing needs. For example, we have increased foot and bike patrols in the area, allowing for flexible policing while also increasing our visibility. We re instituting similar tactics in our Division s other high-growth, high-development areas, including the Central West End. We will continue addressing these needs in the coming years. The North Patrol Division had prosperous years in We can measure the success in many ways, from new houses being built to new business developments to a renewed and positive interest by residents in their neighborhoods. Much of the success can be attributed to our own North Patrol initiatives. These included partnerships with business owners and developers to secure and to increase the safety of the neighborhoods they re investing in. Uniformed officers worked closely with business owners, developers and residents, listening to their needs and tackling challenges. We ve done a good job because a lot of people want to develop on the Northside. Another one of our initiatives focused on frequent, strategic meetings between neighborhood organizations and our Neighborhood Stabilization Officers. These allowed us to identify and eliminate problems that could cause crime, such as neglected and derelict properties. After receiving community input, we met with the absentee landlords and told them what they needed to do to fix their properties. Most were happy to comply. For those who did not cooperate, we employed all the legal avenues available to us so that we could address the problem. Everyone worked together to improve the city. Every day, we see the successes that these initiatives have had. For me, it s the small things, like driving through once dangerous areas and seeing senior citizens sitting on their porches, waving at us and smiling; or seeing children playing outside of their houses. That s what it is all about. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY

16 45 POSITIVE MATCH 65,321 POSITIVE MATCH 1,209 POSITIVE MATCH METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME STA TISTICS STATISTICAL CRIME DAT A 2004 Index Crime By District & Area Index Crime By Month & Cleared by Arrest Person Arrested For Part I & II Crimes Age & Sex Person Arrested For Part I & II Crimes Race & Sex Juvenile Arrest by District & Sex Traffic Enforcement 34,501 POSITIVE MATCH STATISTICAL CRIME DAT A 2005 Index Crime By Police District & Area Index Crime By Month & Cleared by Arrest Person Arrested For Part I & II Crimes Age & Sex Person Arrested For Part I & II Crimes Race & Sex Juvenile Arrest by District & Sex 6,709 POSITIVE MATCH

17 INDEX CRIME BY POLICE DISTRICT AND AREA JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 INDEX CRIME BY MONTH AND CLEARED BY ARREST JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 CLEARED PERCENT BY ARREST CLEARED INDEX CRIME JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Police Districts Patrol Divisions INDEX CRIMES 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th OTHER TOTAL SOUTH CENTRAL NORTH MURDER PERCENT OF TOTAL FORCIBLE RAPE PERCENT OF TOTAL ROBBERY PERCENT OF TOTAL AGGRAVATED ASSAULT PERCENT OF TOTAL TOTAL CRIME AGAINST PERSONS PERCENT OF TOTAL BURGLARY PERCENT OF TOTAL LARCENY PERCENT OF TOTAL AUTO THEFT PERCENT OF TOTAL ARSON PERCENT OF TOTAL TOTAL CRIME AGAINST PROPERTY PERCENT OF TOTAL TOTAL CRIMES PERCENT OF TOTAL *Crimes under the Other catergory were not coded to a specific district/patrol division. TOTAL INDEX CRIME % PERCENT OF INDEX 2.9% 6.6% 8.0% 10.3% 7.7% 8.7% 9.5% 10.2% 7.6% 9.1% 10.8% 8.6% 100.0% MURDER & NON-NEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER % TOTAL RAPE % FORCIBLE RAPE % RAPE ATTEMPTS % TOTAL ROBBERY % HIGHWAY % BUSINESS % MISCELLANEOUS % WEAPON** % NO WEAPON** % TOTAL AGGR. ASSAULT % GUN % KNIFE/CUTTING INSTR % OTHER WEAPON % HANDS, FISTS, ETC % OTHER ASSAULTS* % TOTAL BURGLARY % RESIDENCE DAY % RESIDENCE NIGHT % BUSINESS DAY % BUSINESS NIGHT % OTHER DAY % OTHER NIGHT % FORCIBLE ENTRY** % NO FORCE ENTRY** % ATTEMPTED** % TOTAL LARCENY THEFT % PICKPOCKET % PURSE SNATCH % SHOPLIFT % FROM MOTOR VEHICLE % MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS % BICYCLES % FROM BUILDING % FROM COIN OPERATED % OTHER % ATTEMPT** % TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT % AUTO % TRUCK/BUS % MOTORCYCLE/OTHER % TOTAL ARSON % * Not included in category totals or grand totals. Figures compiled in compliance with Uniform Crime Reporting Standards. Discrepancies may be noted when figures are compared with those based on PIRS Daily Crime Summaries. ** These totals included in a previous line.

18 PERSONS ARRESTED FOR PART 1 & PART II OFFENSES BY RACE AND SEX JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 BOTH Under & Over CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES MALE FEM SEXES MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL GRAND TOTAL-ALL CLASSES PERCENTAGE-ALL CLASSES 82.3% 17.7% 100.0% % 14.6% 100.0% 88.6% 11.4% 100.0% 83.3% 16.7% 100.0% 77.1% 22.9% 100.0% 81.4% 18.6% 100.0% 89.0% 11.0% 100.0% 88.6% 11.4% 100.0% PART I CRIME PERCENT PART I 83.1% 16.9% 100.0% % 14.5% 100.0% 90.8% 9.2% 100.0% 80.9% 19.1% 100.0% 82.3% 17.7% 100.0% 82.6% 17.4% 100.0% 90.4% 9.6% 3.5% 81.8% 18.2% 23.6% CRIMINAL HOMICIDE a. MURDER & NON-NEGLIGENT MAN b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE FORCIBLE RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED ASSLT BURGLARY LARCENY-THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON PART II CRIME PERCENT PART II 82.0% 18.0% 100.0% % 14.8% 100.0% 87.9% 12.1% 100.0% 84.0% 16.0% 100.0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% 81.0% 19.0% 100.0% 88.5% 11.5% 100.0% 90.6% 9.4% 100.0% OTHER ASSAULTS FORGERY & COUNTERFEITING FRAUD STOLEN PROPERTY-BUYING, RECEIVING, POSSESSING VANDALISM WEAPONS: CARRYING, POSSESSING, ETC PROSTITUTION & COMMERCIAL VICE SEX OFFENSES* NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS GAMBLING OFFENSES AGAINST FAMILY & CHILDREN DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE, ALCOHOL LIQUOR LAWS DRUNKENNESS DISORDERLY CONDUCT VAGRANCY ALL OTHER OFFENSES *Except forcible rape and prostitution. NOTE: Table includes arrests of adults and juveniles.

19 PERSONS ARRESTED FOR PART 1 & PART II OFFENSES BY AGE AND SEX JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 JUVENILES ARRESTED JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL ARRESTED PERCENTAGE ARRESTED CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL GRAND TOTAL- ALL CLASSES % 82.56% 0.19% % PERCENTAGE-ALL CLASSES 13.00% 4.25% 68.75% 13.82% 0.16% 0.03% 17.25% 82.56% 0.19% % 17.25% 82.56% 0.19% % TOTAL PART I CRIME % 85.06% 0.26% % PERCENTAGE PART I 11.75% 2.93% 70.32% 14.74% 0.24% 0.01% 14.68% 85.06% 0.26% % 14.68% 85.06% 0.26% % CRIMINAL HOMICIDE a. MURDER & NON-NEGLIGENT MAN % 88.89% 0.00% % b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE % 66.67% 0.00% % FORCIBLE RAPE % 85.37% 1.22% % ROBBERY % 89.02% 0.20% % AGGRAVATED ASSAULT % 86.39% 0.27% % BURGLARY % 83.45% 1.01% % LARCENY THEFT % 84.03% 0.10% % AUTO THEFT % 81.51% 0.00% % ARSON % 56.67% 0.00% % TOTAL PART II CRIME % 81.74% 0.17% % PERCENTAGE PART II 13.41% 4.68% 68.23% 13.51% 0.13% 0.04% 18.09% 81.74% 0.17% % 18.09% 81.74% 0.17% % OTHER ASSAULTS % 83.82% 0.08% % FORGERY & COUNTERFEITING % 82.23% 0.00% % FRAUD % 67.89% 0.00% % STOLEN PROPERTY-BUYING, RECEIVING, POSSESSING % 89.53% 1.81% % VANDALISM % 87.50% 0.06% % WEAPONS: CARRYING, POSSESSING, ETC % 86.94% 0.31% % PROSTITUTION & COMMERCIAL VICE % 63.26% 0.19% % SEX OFFENSES* % 78.66% 0.14% % NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS % 84.97% 0.05% % GAMBLING % 65.00% 0.00% % OFFENSES AGAINST FAMILY & CHILDREN % 75.91% 0.61% % DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE, ALCOHOL % 48.03% 0.55% % LIQUOR LAWS % 46.46% 0.79% % DRUNKENNESS % 86.04% 0.15% % DISORDERLY CONDUCT % 79.35% 0.27% % VAGRANCY % 86.21% 0.00% % ALL OTHER OFFENSES % 87.01% 0.06% % DISTRICT JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL PERCENT MALE % 1ST FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 2ND FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 3RD FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 4TH FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 5TH FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 6TH FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 7TH FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 8TH FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % 9TH FEMALE % TOTAL % MALE % TOTAL FEMALE % TOTAL % NOTE: Only Juveniles booked by the Juvenile Court are included in this table. *Except forcible rape and prostitution. NOTE: Table includes arrests of adults only.

20 TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT / COMPLAINTS AGAINST POLICE OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL 45 PO TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, ,321 POSITIVE MATCH Total Accidents Total Injured Total Killed Total Hazardous Summons Total Non-Hazardous Summons COMPLAINTS AGAINST POLICE OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 NOT TOTAL CHARGE CATEGORY EXONERATED SUSTAINED SUSTAINED UNFOUNDED WITHDRAWN CHARGES CONDUCT UNBECOMING/UNCIVIL TREATMENT DEPARTMENT ACCIDENT REVIEW BOARD DOMESTIC INCIDENT IMPROPER PERFORMANCE OF DUTY LACK OF POLICE ACTION LOST/STOLEN/CARELESS HANDLING DEPT PROPERTY MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY MISSING PHYSICAL ABUSE RACIAL PROFILING UNJUST ARREST, SUMMONS, ETC VERBAL ABUSE VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE/STATE LAWS VIOLATION OF DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES TOTALS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME STA TISTICS ,501 POSITIVE MATCH EXPLANATION OF COMPLAINT DISPOSITIONS: DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS Sustained: Investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to support the allegation of the complaint. Cautioned Reinstructed Suspended Demotion Not Sustained: Insufficient evidence available to either prove or disprove the allegation. Oral Reprimand Dropped Unfounded: Exonerated: The complaint was not based on facts, as shown by the investigation, or the incident complained of did not occur. The actions complained of did occur, but the investigation disclosed that the actions were reasonable. Written Reprimand Pay/Replacement Time/Days Taken Resigned/Charges License Revoked ,709 POSITIVE MATCH Withdrawn: Complainant withdrew complaint and the investigation was terminated.

21 INDEX CRIME BY POLICE DISTRICT AND AREA JANUARY 1, 2005 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 INDEX CRIME BY MONTH AND CLEARED BY ARREST JANUARY 1, 2005 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 CLEARED PERCENT BY ARREST CLEARED INDEX CRIME JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Police Districts Patrol Divisions INDEX CRIMES 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th OTHER TOTAL SOUTH CENTRAL NORTH MURDER PERCENT OF TOTAL FORCIBLE RAPE PERCENT OF TOTAL ROBBERY PERCENT OF TOTAL AGGRAVATED ASSAULT PERCENT OF TOTAL TOTAL CRIME AGAINST PERSONS PERCENT OF TOTAL BURGLARY PERCENT OF TOTAL LARCENY PERCENT OF TOTAL AUTO THEFT PERCENT OF TOTAL ARSON PERCENT OF TOTAL TOTAL CRIME AGAINST PROPERTY PERCENT OF TOTAL TOTAL CRIMES PERCENT OF TOTAL *Crimes under the Other catergory were not coded to a specific district/patrol division. TOTAL INDEX CRIME % PERCENT OF INDEX 7.9% 6.9% 8.7% 8.1% 8.8% 8.6% 9.3% 8.9% 8.2% 8.7% 8.1% 7.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% MURDER & NON-NEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER % TOTAL RAPE % FORCIBLE RAPE % RAPE ATTEMPTS % TOTAL ROBBERY % HIGHWAY % BUSINESS % MISCELLANEOUS % WEAPON** % NO WEAPON** % TOTAL AGGR. ASSAULT % GUN % KNIFE/CUTTING INSTR % OTHER WEAPON % HANDS, FISTS, ETC % OTHER ASSAULTS* % TOTAL BURGLARY % RESIDENCE DAY % RESIDENCE NIGHT % BUSINESS DAY % BUSINESS NIGHT % OTHER DAY % OTHER NIGHT % FORCIBLE ENTRY** % NO FORCE ENTRY** % ATTEMPTED** % TOTAL LARCENY THEFT % PICKPOCKET % PURSE SNATCH % SHOPLIFT % FROM MOTOR VEHICLE % MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS % BICYCLES % FROM BUILDING % FROM COIN OPERATED % OTHER % ATTEMPT** % TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT % AUTO % TRUCK/BUS % MOTORCYCLE/OTHER % TOTAL ARSON % * Not included in category totals or grand totals. Figures compiled in compliance with Uniform Crime Reporting Standards. Discrepancies may be noted when figures are compared with those based on PIRS Daily Crime Summaries. ** These totals included in a previous line.

22 PERSONS ARRESTED FOR PART 1 & PART II OFFENSES BY AGE AND SEX JANUARY 1, 2005 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 BOTH Under & Over CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES MALE FEM SEXES MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL MALE FEM TOTAL GRAND TOTAL-ALL CLASSES PERCENTAGE-ALL CLASSES 80.4% 19.6% 100.0% 93.3% 6.7% 100.0% 78.2% 21.8% 100.0% 83.5% 16.5% 100.0% 82.0% 18.0% 100.0% 75.7% 24.3% 100.0% 79.2% 20.8% 100.0% 84.1% 15.9% 100.0% 90.0% 10.0% 100.0% PART I CRIME PERCENT PART I 81.5% 18.5% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 80.7% 19.3% 100.0% 84.9% 15.1% 100.0% 80.1% 19.9% 100.0% 80.5% 19.5% 100.0% 82.5% 17.5% 100.0% 85.1% 14.9% 2.8% 81.1% 18.9% 0.0% CRIMINAL HOMICIDE a. MURDER & NON-NEGLIGENT MAN b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE FORCIBLE RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED ASSLT BURGLARY LARCENY-THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON PART II CRIME PERCENT PART II 79.6% 20.4% 100.0% 90.0% 10.0% 100.0% 77.1% 22.9% 100.0% 83.1% 16.9% 100.0% 82.6% 17.4% 100.0% 73.7% 26.3% 100.0% 77.7% 22.3% 100.0% 83.7% 16.3% 100.0% 93.1% 6.9% 100.0% OTHER ASSAULTS FORGERY & COUNTERFEITING FRAUD STOLEN PROPERTY BUYING, RECEIVING, POSSESSING VANDALISM WEAPONS:CARRYING, POSSESSING, ETC PROSTITUTION & COMMERCIAL VICE SEX OFFENSES* NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS GAMBLING OFFENSES AGAINST FAMILY & CHILDREN DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE, ALCOHOL LIQUOR LAWS DRUNKENNESS DISORDERLY CONDUCT VAGRANCY ALL OTHER OFFENSES *Except forcible rape and prostitution. NOTE: Table includes arrests of adults and juveniles.