MASH Implementa.on 2016 Traffic Safety Conference June 7, 2016 College Sta.on, TX. Dick Albin FHWA Resource Center

Transcription

1 MASH Implementa.on 2016 Traffic Safety Conference June 7, 2016 College Sta.on, TX Dick Albin FHWA Resource Center

2 Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Crash Tes)ng Background Implementa)on Agreement Eligibility Le=ers What are they? FAQ s Status Submi=al Form 2

3 Background of Crash Tes.ng Crash Tes)ng has been used as a tool for evalua)ng roadside hardware since the 1930 s

4 Evolu.on of Crash Test Procedures MASH

5 Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Update of the evalua)on procedures Published as AASHTO document in October, 2009 MASH is NOT an FHWA document FHWA forwards ques)ons on interpreta)on to AASHTO

6 AASHTO/FHWA Implementa.on Agreement for NHS Highways Agencies are urged to establish a process to replace exis)ng highway safety hardware that has not been successfully tested to NCHRP Report 350 or later criteria. Agencies are encouraged to upgrade exis)ng highway safety hardware to comply with the 2016 edi)on of MASH either when it becomes damaged beyond repair, or when an individual agency's policies require an upgrade to the safety hardware.

7 AASHTO/FHWA Implementa.on Agreement for NHS Highways For contracts on the Na)onal Highway System with a le]ng date a^er the dates below, only safety hardware evaluated using the 2016 edi)on of MASH criteria will be allowed for new permanent installa)ons and full replacements: W-beam barrier and cast-in-place concrete barrier: December 31, 2017 W-beam terminals: June 30, 2018 Cable barrier, cable barrier terminals, and crash cushions: December 31, 2018 Bridge rails, transi)ons, all other longitudinal barriers (including portable barriers installed permanently), all other terminals, sign supports, and all other breakaway hardware: December 31, 2019

8 FHWA Hardware Eligibility LeXers h=p://safety.dwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/policy_guide/road_hardware/ 8

9 FHWA Role What is an Eligibility LeXer? Service to the FHWA Division Offices and States since the 1980 s Review of crash tests and evalua)ons If device meets crash test criteria, FHWA issues le=er indica)ng that it is eligible for FHWA reimbursement Effec)ve December 31, 2015 FHWA no longer accepts requests for modifica)ons to NCHRP 350 hardware. 2 reviews are ongoing by the GAO and Volpe that may recommend changes to this process (due in summer of 2016). 9

10 FHWA Role Eligibility LeXers FAQ s Q1: Does all roadside safety hardware need a FHWA Eligibility LeXer in order to be eligible for reimbursement on projects on the NHS? A1. No. Eligibility Le=ers are provided as a service to the States and are not a requirement for roadside safety hardware to be eligible for reimbursement. h=p://safety.dwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/policy_guide/road_hardware/faq_eligibility_le=ers.cfm 10

11 FHWA Role Eligibility LeXers FAQ s Q2: If a State does not request an FHWA Eligibility LeXer for a safety hardware device, what documenta.on can a Division Office rely on that the device is eligible for Federal-aid reimbursement? A2: When approving the State's standard plans or qualified products lists (QPLs), the Division Office may rely on a cer)fica)on from the State DOT indica)ng that the hardware sa)sfies MASH or NCHRP 350 criteria. The State DOT should keep on file documenta)on suppor)ng this cer)fica)on. h=p://safety.dwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/policy_guide/road_hardware/faq_eligibility_le=ers.cfm 11

12 FHWA Role Eligibility LeXers FAQ s Q5: All modifica.ons to an NCHRP 350-tested device will require tes.ng under MASH in order to receive a Federal-aid reimbursement eligibility lexer from FHWA." Does this mean that any modifica.on to a previously eligible NCHRP 350 device will now require MASH tes.ng for crashworthiness? If the answer is no, if a state or manufacturer wants to make a modifica.on to a device, what documenta.on should be maintained by the State DOT as evidence that the device is eligible for Federal-aid reimbursement? A5. No, the memo only serves as no)ce that the FHWA Office of Safety will no longer provide the service of issuing eligibility le=ers for modified NCHRP 350 devices. If a State DOT chooses to make or accept a nonsignificant modifica)on to a previously eligible NCHRP 350 device (generic or proprietary), the State DOT should keep on file adequate documenta)on indica)ng that the modified hardware sa)sfies NCHRP 350 criteria. If the State DOT or manufacturer deems the modifica)on as a significant modifica)on, a modifica)on that has the poten)al to affect the device's ability to meet crash test criteria, then the device should be crash tested per MASH tes)ng criteria. h=p://safety.dwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/policy_guide/road_hardware/faq_eligibility_le=ers.cfm 12

13 Eligibility LeXer Status - Barriers Le=ers Issued as of 5/25/16 W-beam Guardrail 13 Devices Guardrail Transi)ons 3 Devices Cable Barrier 3 Devices Concrete Barrier 3 Devices Bridge Rail 3 Devices Portable Barriers 9 Devices Other 3 devices Note- There has been addi)onal tes)ng conducted (NCHRP projects) but Eligibility le=ers have not been requested 13

14 Eligibility LeXer Status Terminals and Le=ers Issued as of 5/25/16 W-Beam terminals 2 devices Crash Cushions 1 device 1 addi)onal under review Crash Cushions 14

15 Eligibility LeXer status Breakaway Supports Le=ers Issued as of 5/25/16 Dual post support 2 devices Luminaire Supports - 0 Note: MASH now requires tes)ng with the PU truck that was not required under NCHRP 350 There has been addi)onal tes)ng conducted (NCHRP projects) but Eligibility le=ers have not been requested 15

16 Eligibility LeXer status Work Zone Le=ers Issued as of 5/25/16 Portable Sign Stands 2 devices Barricades 5 devices Longitudinal Channelizers 6 devices Other 2 devices Devices Note MASH now requires tes)ng with the PU truck that was not required under NCHRP

17 Eligibility LeXer Submission New form (version 10.0) posted in May, 2016 New form has a place for an engineer affiliated with the lab to sign. Form needs to be complete with all required signature before a le=er is issued 17

18 Eligibility LeXer Submission Fill out this por)on from right to le^ so that the form will generate the appropriate boxes for the device

19 Eligibility LeXer Submission The submi=er cer)fies that the product was tested in conformance with MASH and discloses any financial interests of the test lab.

20 Eligibility LeXer Submission This box is used to describe the product in detail. If a modifica)on, the changes should be iden)fied here. Note the box expands as text is added.

21 Eligibility LeXer Submission This box is signed by an engineer affiliated with the Test lab agreeing that the cri)cal and relevant tests were conducted.

22 Eligibility LeXer Submission These boxes appear a^er the test info is filled in above (system type, test level, etc.). Narra)ve should include a summary of test condi)ons and results. If a test is determined to be non-cri)cal, the basis of this determina)on should be included here. Note FHWA does not waive tests. The submi=er and test lab determine the cri)cal and relevant tests and provide an engineering basis is a test is determined to be non-cri)cal.

23 Eligibility LeXer Submission The test Lab cer)fies that the tests were conducted in accordance with MASH and provides Accredita)on Cer)ficate number and period. Note the Lab needs to be accredited at )me of the test. Submi=er signs and submits form.

24 Questions? 24