Cancellation. November.

Transcription

1 MEMORANDUM November 5, 2015 To: Fr: Re: Technical Advisory Committee Members and Interested Parties Diane Nguyen, Deputy Director Cancellation of November 12, 2015, TAC Meeting The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting for November 12, 2015 is cancelled due to lack of action that would warrant a meeting. Attached however, is an information packet for November. The next regularly scheduled meeting for TAC is January 14, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. at SJCOG Office (555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA).

2 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Meeting Cancelled for Thursday, November 12, 2015 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE INFORMATION ONLY PACKET 1. Minutes: October 8, 2015 Information only. 2. Technical Items below are for information only: A. San Joaquin One Voice Call for Projects Gorham B. Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Program Annual Report - Anderson C. Draft 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program - Ripperda D. Transit Operator Regional Transit Systems Plan (RTSP) Vignettes - Niblock E. Fiscal Year 2015/16 Federal-Aid Project Delivery Status Niblock 3. Next Scheduled Meeting is Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

3 1. Call Meeting to Order/Introductions: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 E Weber Ave. Stockton, CA Thursday, October 8, 2015 MINUTES Charles Swimley called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m. and introductions were made. Committee Members Present: Charles Swimley City of Lodi Zabih Zaca City of Tracy Robert Armijo City of Tracy Robin Borre City of Stockton Wes Johnson City of Stockton Michael King City of Lathrop Paula Fernandez City of Lodi John Andoh City of Escalon Steven Martinez Caltrans, District 10 Josh Swearingen Caltrans, District 10 Nicholas Fung Caltrans, District 10 Mahmoud Sagga San Joaquin County Dave Mendoza San Joaquin County Firoz Vohra San Joaquin County Nate Knodt SJRTD Dero Ia SJRTD Max Vargas SJRTD Brian Schimdt SJRRC Gary Taylor SJRRC Bob Schiffler SJRRC Committee Members Not Present: Dameon Flores City of Lathrop Todd Greenwood City of Stockton Eric Alvarez City of Stockton Mike McDowell City of Stockton David Stagnaro City of Stockton James Wong City of Stockton Karla Cervantes City of Stockton Cindy Erdman City of Stockton Ed Lovell City of Tracy Khoder Baydoun City of Tracy

4 Dorothy Kam City of Lodi Juan Villanueva Port of Stockton Kevin Werner City of Ripon James Pease City of Ripon Georgia Lantberger City of Manteca Mark Houghton City of Manteca Tracie Madison City of Manteca Phil Carlson City of Escalon Nabil Hasan Caltrans, District 10 Parminder Singh Caltrans, District 10 Tom Dumas Caltrans, District 10 Darell In SJRTD George Lorente SJRTD Shelehia Mesner SJRRC John Cadrett SJVAPCD Mike Selling San Joaquin County Ian Turner Stockton Metropolitan Airport Ronald Elliott Stockton Metropolitan Airport Harry Mavrogenes Stockton Metropolitan Airport SJCOG Staff Present: Diane Nguyen Kim Anderson Kari McNickle Katy Castro Deputy Director Senior Regional Planner Assistant Program Specialist Administrative Clerk 2. Meeting minutes from September 10, 2015: It was moved/seconded (Fernandez/ Schmidt) to approve minutes from September 10, Motion passed unanimously by voice vote. 3. Public Presentation: None. 4. Technical Items: B through C A. Consent Calendar Item: D through F D Active Transportation Program (ATP) Funding Recommendations for FY 2016/2017, 2017/2018, and 2018/2019 E State Transportation Improvement Program F Regional Transportation Plan Amendment #2, 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment #14, and Corresponding Conformity Analysis It was moved/seconded (Schmidt/Zaca) to approve the consent calendar. Motion passed unanimously by voice vote.

5 B. Commute Connection- New Multi-Modal Commute Trip Planning Systems Demonstration: Ms. McNickle presented this item. The Commute Connection has a new system to help commuters find a better way of commuting. The program has operated a ridematching system to promote the use of alternative transportation options such as carpooling, vanpooling and using transit for San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced Counties. The new system provides the user the opportunity to view side-by-side comparisons of various modes, including biking and walking- all from a single source. Mr. Vorah asked how much the cost of the new system was. Ms. McNickle stated it was approximately $200,000 over a three-year period. C Regional Transit Systems Plan (RTSP) Policy Considerations: Ms. Nguyen commented on the October SJCOG Board workshop to update the Board on the RTSP. In November ITC Committee continues to review chapters and working documents for development of the administrative draft of the RTSP. Release of public review Draft RTSP will be late December/ early January. The SJCOG Board adoption of RSTP will be in February 25, Ms. Nguyen discussed the potential effects of the conceptual policy considerations on transit revenues. Mr. Vargas from SJRTD stated SJRTD has received another legal opinion in regards to discretion over the amount SJRRC is asking for. He said that SJCOG s legal opinion already stated that the SJCOG Board has to approve the request after a determination of consistency with the SJCOG Regional Transportation Plan. Mr. Schmidt asked SJRTD for copies of the legal opinion. Mr. Andoh commented that Santa Clara and Alameda Counties are not paying for their share of the trains. Mr. Schmidt stated that San Joaquin County has 60% of the ridership. Ms. Borre asked that SJRRC to show all the ridership analysis. Mr. Vorah and Ms. Bore stated they do not support recommendation for CMAQ. Mr. Swimley stated that City of Lodi will not support the Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA).

6 5. Other Matters of Business: None. 6. Adjournment: There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 11:36 a.m. to Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

7 STAFF REPORT November 2015 TAC SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: San Joaquin One Voice Call for Projects Information DISCUSSION: SUMMARY: San Joaquin One Voice is SJCOG s regional advocacy effort that assembles a publicprivate delegation to visit our Congressional and federal departmental representatives in Washington, D.C. The goal of this effort is to educate Congressional and federal departmental representatives on federal funding and regulatory relief needs, issues, and projects of regional significance to the San Joaquin region. The San Joaquin One Voice delegation members also receive first-hand information on available grant and other funding available to meet our regional priority needs San Joaquin One Voice -- April 17-21, 2016 Now, more than ever, it is important to advocate for policy and regulatory reform and the preservation of funding programs crucial to projects in the San Joaquin County region. The One Voice approach is positively recognized and viewed as a means of assisting our federal representatives identify, prioritize, and shepherd much needed projects through the federal and state budget process. With that in mind, we are issuing a call for projects for our 2016 San Joaquin One Voice effort. RECOMMENDATION: This in an information item only. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for San Joaquin One Voice is included in the adopted FY SJCOG OWP. Earmarks are not expected in the Federal FY 2016 budget; however discretionary funding allocations are available from departments and through grants. The status of requests for federal funding for some projects will not be known until next fiscal year. Direct costs pertaining to the trip will be offset by sponsor donations. BACKGROUND: This is the 16 th annual trip for SJCOG. Our efforts are positively recognized at the federal level and we have been encouraged to continue our collaborative approach and build upon the relationships and communications established with our federal representatives.

8 Historically, the SJCOG Board endorses 2-3 projects as overall priorities for the region. The Board will review the list of projects submitted in February 2016 and will make the regional priority recommendations at that time. SCHEDULE & LOGISTICS: October 2015 November 2015 to January 2016 January 2016 February 5, 2016 February 2016 March 16, 2016 April 17-21, 2016 San Joaquin One Voice Schedule Call for Projects issued Local jurisdictions, transit agencies, partners, and outside organizations develop project requests and obtain approvals by their local boards and councils Registration materials distributed Deadline to submit project requests Project requests approved and Regional Priorities determined by SJCOG Board Hotel Reservation deadline Travel to Washington, DC Accommodations will be at the Washington Court Hotel, 525 New Jersey Ave., N.W., Washington, DC. Detailed information regarding registration and hotel reservations will be distributed in January. As in years past, the registration fee for SJCOG Board members (or their elected designee) is waived. Also, the Council of Governments will pay one-half of SJCOG Board members travel expenses for the trip. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Instructions for Submitting Regional Priority Project Requests 2. Endorsement Form 3. FY 2016 SJCOG Project Request Form Prepared by: Nicole Gorham, Public Information Officer

9 2016 San Joaquin One Voice Instructions for Submitting Your Regional Priority Project Requests San Joaquin Council of Governments seeks projects that are regionally significant and defined and that provide a community-wide benefit. Please keep this in mind when choosing projects for the One Voice effort. Member Agencies: 1) Complete a project request form for each project submittal. The City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin may submit: o two regional transportation projects; and o one local project, transportation or otherwise The cities of Escalon, Lathrop, Lodi, Manteca, Ripon, and Tracy, the San Joaquin Regional Transit District, the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, the Port of Stockton, and the Stockton Metropolitan Airport may submit: o one regional transportation project; and o one local project, transportation or otherwise 2) Include a digital photo or graphic of your project request to be included on the project brochure page that will be used during the San Joaquin One Voice trip. 3) Include project talking points (these will be included in the participant binder and presented during meetings in Washington, DC). 4) Projects must be approved by your respective city councils or boards prior to submission to SJCOG. Please provide a copy of the minutes or resolution detailing approval. 5) Submit project request form, photo, minutes or resolution, and talking points to SJCOG via . Other Agencies: 1) Follow steps 1 3 as outlined above. 2) Submit your project request to your respective city council or governing board for endorsement. All projects must be endorsed by one of the jurisdictions listed above prior to submission to SJCOG. 3) Upon approval, have the authorizing board or council sign the endorsement form. 4) Submit project request form, photo, talking points, and signed endorsement form to SJCOG via . The deadline for submittal of project application packets is February 5, Projects will be reviewed by SJCOG staff and the SJCOG Executive Committee and will be subject to the recommendation by the full SJCOG Board. Project request forms should be submitted via (in Word format) to: gorham@sjcog.org. Supporting material can be in formats other than Word. Please note: no hard copies are needed.

10 San Joaquin One Voice 2016 Local Jurisdiction Endorsement Form Submitting Organization: Project Name: The following jurisdiction has reviewed and endorsed the above project for submittal to the San Joaquin Council of Governments for inclusion in the federal legislative agenda, San Joaquin One Voice 2016: Jurisdiction: Date: Authorizing Agent for Local Jurisdiction: (signature) Print Name: * Disclaimer: This form is only for use by other organizations wishing to submit a project for consideration by the SJCOG Board. SJCOG partner agencies do not need to submit with their project requests.

11 Requesting Entity: (please include address) FY 2016 One Voice Project Request Add Project Name Requesting Individual: Contact Information for Staff Level: Lobbyist/Governmental Affairs Representative: Congressional District(s) and Member(s): Title of Project: Type of Project: Statement of Purpose: (Please describe the purpose of the project and how it serves the public interest. Example: Funding will be used for highway improvements that reduce traffic congestion and enhance safety.) Project Summary: (Please provide a narrative describing the project including background, specific segment or activity to be funded, the need for funding, desired impact of the project, the current status of the project, and the expected schedule for completion. Also include safety, economic, mobility, and environmental benefits this project would provide to the local community and/or government agency that would provide the funding.) Total Project Cost: (Please include budget breakdown) SJCOG Project Request Form

12 Amount Being Requested: Sources and Amounts of Matching Funds: (Please list all anticipated sources of state, county, and local contribution and the dollar amount you expect to receive from each source.) Funding History: (Please include federal funding OR state, local, or private source funding this project has received.) Current Project Status: Attachments: (Please list any additional files, such as budget projections, reports, letters of support) Additional Information: (Please use the space below if there is any other information you would like to share related to your request.) SJCOG Project Request Form

13 November 2015 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Regional Transportation Impact Fee Program (RTIF) Annual Report Information SUMMARY: The Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program s objective is to mitigate new development s impacts on the Regional Transportation Roadway Network and to integrate RTIF funds with federal, state, and other local funding to make transportation improvements identified in the RTIF Program. This Annual Report highlights the expenditure amounts and projects paid for by the RTIF Program. The report is presented in draft to the TAC for review and comment on allocation of RTIF funds to individual projects and total expenditures of RTIF funds on these projects. BACKGROUND: This RTIF Annual Report represents the period of July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015 and satisfies the requirements under the Fee Mitigation Act (Gov. Code et seq.). The report was developed based on annual RTIF activity reported to SJCOG from all participating agencies. SJCOG staff continues to work with partner agency staff to ensure that the information reported is accurate. All activity involving individual submissions and supplementary information submitted to SJCOG by participating agencies is subject to an annual fiscal audit conducted by an outside independent consulting firm. The report includes all necessary information regarding the RTIF program funds held by SJCOG and the County distributed to the County and SJCOG from each Participating Agency under section 5.2 of the program s executed Operating Agreement. The report documents the collection and expense activities, and land use activities subject to the RTIF for the report period and summarizes activities since program inception. RECOMMENDATION: This staff report is for review and comment; no formal action is requested. SJCOG staff will follow-up with the TAC representatives from each jurisdiction to verify the information provided prior to presenting the FY RTIF Annual Report to the SJCOG Board.

14 FISCAL IMPACT: Staff time related to program administration and annual reporting are covered by the allowable 2% administrative fee calculated on the RTIF funds forwarded to SJCOG by member jurisdictions as called out in the RTIF Operating Agreement and Local Transportation Funds (LTF). These funding sources are outlined in the adopted Overall Work Program for FY 2015/2016. Professional audit activities and consultant services are funded through billing of allocated third-party costs to each member agency. NEXT STEPS: The required five-year AB 1600 update of the RTIF program is ongoing, with anticipated tasks further outlined in the attached annual report. Of particular note is an implementation workshop being planned for early The workshop will aim to standardize the required semi-annual reporting from the individual jurisdictions to SJCOG. With this standardization SJCOG staff can more accurately track expenditures and fund allocations for projects. Currently, many RTIF reports contain inconsistencies or omissions of information, and SJCOG staff has been relying on individual contact for up-to-date information. The 2016 workshop will work to rectify this and lessen the administrative burden on staff for both the jurisdictions and SJCOG. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment A: FY RTIF Annual Report 2. Attachment B: Semi-Annual RTIF Reporting Form Prepared by: Rebecca Parker, Assistant Regional Planner and Kim Anderson, Senior Regional Planner

15 DRAFT FISCAL YEAR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (RTIF) ANNUAL REPORT October 15, 2015

16 Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Annual Report The Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program s objective is to generate funding from new development projects that have an impact upon the Regional Transportation Network and to integrate these funds with federal, State, and other local funding to make transportation improvements identified in the RTIF Program. It is a countywide, multi-jurisdictional capital improvement funding program. SJCOG led the establishmentt of the RTIF program as the agency responsible for regional planning and programmingg of the regional transportation network, the countywide network of highways, regional arterials, and related transit services. The program was established in October In April 2006, SJCOG entered into the RTIF Operating Agreement with the eight local jurisdictions in the county to administer the RTIF program. The first full fiscal year of the RTIF program was A revised Operating Agreement is in the process of being adopted and is expected to fully executed during the fiscal year. Participating agencies have committed in excess of $23 million across 14 eligible RTIF projects. Exhibit A provides a summary off RTIF revenue commitments and expenditures by project and participating agency. BNSF/Navy Drive Project Regional Transportation District Maintenance Facility Since its inception, $43 million of RTIF funding has been generated. Taking into account interest and program administration expenses, a net of $33.5 million has been generated for project delivery. As of June 30, 2015, approximately $ 11.1 million has been expended on 14 regionally significant transportation projects. Sample Projects Advanced Eight Mile Road Widening from West Lane to Holman which includes a Grade Separation Hammer Triangle Regional / Interregional Bus Rapid Transit System

17 Project Eligibility Criteria RTIF is expended on regionally significant capital improvement projects that have met approved criteria. The criteria for highway, interchange, and regional roadway projects include: 1. Falls on the adopted RTIF regional roadway network. 2. Identified in the fiscally constrained project list of the most recent Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). 3. Excluding interchanges, involves a capacity improvement of one or more through travel or passing lanes, or auxiliary lanes (i.e., turn lanes). 4. Modeled and screened consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act criteria for establishing a rational nexus. The criteria for public transit improvement projects include: 1. Must involve an improvement to an existing or a new service/facility which connects at least two (2) or more cities or regions. 2. Identified in the fiscally constrained project list of the most recent Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). 3. Project is modeled and screened consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act criteria for establishing a rational nexus. RTIF Master Capital Project List There were 62 projects identified in the 2011 RTP (the adopted RTP at the time of the last RTIF update in late 2011) eligible for RTIF revenue. Of those projects, 9 were highway widening, 20 were highway interchange, 24 were regional roadway, and 9 were public transit projects. SJCOG is responsible for establishing and maintaining the RTIF Capital Project List. As needs and priorities change over time, an agency can request modifications to an existing project or exchange another project from the fiscally constrained RTP project list for one or more existing projects on the RTIF Project List. - Capital Project List amendments are conducted at minimum on an annual basis. This process takes into consideration the comments received from each participating agency consistent with the project eligibility criteria. The Master RTIF Capital Project List, attached as Exhibit B, provides greater detail regarding each project description and limits. Each project on the project list undergoes a fair share nexus calculation, which identifies the percentage share of the project cost related to the network impacts of new development. These total fair share costs form the basis of the maximum RTIF fee structure. During this report period, as part of an Addendum to the 2011 RTIF Update, two projects have been added to the project list in FY 2014/2015: Navy Drive / BNSF Undercrossing Project (Port of Stockton) Austin Road / SR99 Interim Interchange Improvements (City of Manteca). The Navy Drive project is being funded from the 15% regional share programmed by SJCOG; the Austin Road interchange improvement project is scheduled to receive both RTIF funds retained by the City of Manteca and funds from the SJCOG regional share. The RTIF Roadway Network The RTIF Regional Roadway Network consists of all highway facilities along with select existing and future roadways considered regionally significant. During the 5 th year update of the program in 2011, two major arterials were added to the network: Roth Road from I-5 to Airport Way and the Arch-Sperry Road extension from Performance Drive to I-5. Both of these facilities are regionally significant to the goods movement industry and the region s economy. During this report period, Navy Drive

18 was added to the network. The 2014 Addendum to the 2011 RTIF update details the addition of Navy Drive from the SR4 Extension to Washington Drive. As part of the on-going five-year AB 1600 update several candidate roadways have been identified for addition to the network and will be evaluated for inclusion. RTIF Regional Roadway Network FY New Single Family Residential Activity (In Units) Reported multi-family to three jurisdictions, including City of permit activity was limited Tracy (36 units) ), San Joaquin County (33 units), and the City of Stockton (6 units). Since program inception, 89% of the total residential activity has been single-family. Total new residential permit activity since program inception was 7,,121 units for single-family and 843 for multi-family, for total reported units of 7,964 or an average of 796 units per year. While permit activity is slowly increasing since the recession, it is still well below the historic highs of the early to mid-2000s. Cumulative totals are presented in the chart that follows. Total Residential Permit Activity (In Units) FY 14/15 Development Permit Activity The total single-family residential land-use activity for this report period is 1,0666 units. As has been the case over the last several years, the highest permit activity was reported by the City of Manteca with 455 units. Significant residential activity was also seen in both City of Lathrop at 277 unitsand the City of Tracy at 131units The non-residential land-use activity for this

19 report period included 72,328 square feet of retail, 37,262 square feet of office, and 2,050,1111 square feet of commercial/industrial (including warehouse). Since program inception, a total of 21.7 million square feet of non-residential development has been subject to the RTIF, the majority (80%) has been commercial/industrial/warehouse. FY 06 ~ FY 15 RTIF Non-Residential Activity was maintained,, subject to an annual feee adjustment based on the California Construction Costt Index (CCCI). Due to a mid-year change in the fee adjustment methodology that will be detailed later in the report, two fee schedules weree in place during fiscal year 2014/15: For fiscal year 2014/2015, the fee schedule was as follows: Annual RTIF Programmatic Fee Adjustment FY 2014/ ,460, 332 2,,447,7 88 1,837,7 09 Land Use Type Residential (Single Family DUE) Residential (Multi-Family DUE) Retail (Sq. Ft.) Office (Sq. Ft.) Commercial/ /Industrial (Sq. Ft.) Warehouse (Sq. Ft.) Other (per Trip) FY 13/14 FY 14/15 (July -Oct) FY 14/15 (Nov - June) -1.30% 1.86% $3, $1, $1.21 $1.52 $0.91 $0.38 $ $2, $1, $1.19 $1.50 $0.90 $0.38 $ $3, $1, $1.23 $1.55 $0.93 $0.39 $ Retail (Sq. Feet) Office (Sq. Feet) Comm./Ind (Sq. Feet) It should be noted that the permits subject to RTIF may be different than total permit activity reported by individual jurisdictionss as certain projects (particularly those approved prior to RTIF program implementation) are not subject to the fee. FY 2014/2015 RTIF Structure The RTIF program fee structure is set according to a nexus analysis that links the transportation impacts of new development projects to a fair share of the cost of projects designedd to mitigate those impacts. The fee is uniform across all participating agencies. As noted previously, the fair share nexus findings from the 2011 RTIF update form the basis of the maximum justified fee structure. The required analysis is detailed in the 2005 RTIF Technical Analysis and the 2011 RTIF Update. HISTORICAL RTIF COLLECTION There has been over $43 million of RTIF collected by all the incorporated cities and the County of San Joaquin since program inception. Since this is an impact fee program imposed on new development projects, it comes as no surprise that revenue was substantially reduced during the recent economic downturn, with revenue falling precipitously between 2008 and While development has begun a slow rebound, it remains well below historical highs. Historical Trend of RTIF Collected (in millions) The fee schedule in effect at the time of the 2011 RTIF update was lower than the calculated maximum allowed, thus the existing fee schedulee

20 Historically, the City of Stockton has collected the largest share of RTIF fees countywide; however, Stockton was particularly hard-hit by the economic downturn and has been slower to recover than other cities in the region. Manteca, on the other hand, fared remarkably well, with steady project development throughout the downturn. The following chart graphically displays RTIF collected by jurisdiction. RTIF Funds Collected Since Program Inception $5,984,408 $257,233 $4,891,490 $2,093,442 $5,068,430 FY 2014/2015 RTIF Activity Summary Revenue & Expenditures The RTIF Annual Activity Report is attached as Exhibit C. The following is a summary of the activity for the report period and since program inception: After distributions, operational deductions, and project expenditures, the net RTIF generated across participating agencies for this report period was $3,548,696. FY 14/15 Net RTIF Retained $11,875,355 1 City of Escalon City of Manteca City of Tracy $12,599,17 8 $294,044 City of Lathrop City of Lodi City of Ripon City of Stockton SJ County Revenue Distribution The individual participating jurisdictions are responsible for collection of RTIF fees at the time a building permit is issued. Of the total RTIF collected, the individual incorporated cities retain 75%, 10% is distributed to San Joaquin County and 15% is distributed to the San Joaquin Council of Governments. The County also distributes 15% of total collections to SJCOG. The cumulative net RTIF retained through fiscal yearr 2014/2015 by all participating agencies was $25,,822,557. Cumulative to FY 14/15 RTIF Retained The funds retained by participating agencies are available to cover administrative costs up to 2% of the first million dollars retained annually and 1% of the amount over one million each fiscal year. Remaining funds are expendedd on RTIF eligible projects at the discretion of the jurisdiction.

21 SJCOG Regional Share Of the RTIF collected by participating agencies, 15% is distributed to SJCOG to manage and program on RTIF eligible projects at the regional level. Of the total 15%, by formula 10% is to be expended on highway, interchange, or regional roadways to increase capacity and the remaining 5% is to be expended on public transit projects. Transit Category (5%) $2.112 Million Highway & Interchange Category (10%) $4.223 Million The net RTIF generated and available for highway widening and public transit projects between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015 was $981,502. Since program inception a net of $6.335 million has been generated for programming to eligible projects by the SJCOG Board. The chart below identifies projects previously funded or currently programmed within the transit subcategory and the unprogrammed funding available for future projects: TRANSIT REGIONAL SHARE BALANCES Project (Transit) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Hammer Triangle Project Cabral Station Improvement Project Project Board approved Sponsor Funding Amount SJRTD $800,000 ACE $173,410 Regional Transit Center SJRTD $350,000 Remaining Transit Regional Share Unprogrammed RTIF Regional Share (15%) $6.335 Million $788,119 The Regional Transit Center project is an existing project on the current RTIF Capital Project List; however, funding had not yet been allocated. The SJCOG Board took action in February 2015 to allocate regional share funds to the project. In the highway, interchange, and regional roadway sub-category, the total available funds had previously been programmed to the SR4 Extension project. However, this project is being delivered under budget and these funds have been made available for programming to other eligible projects. The chart below details current programming in this category: REGIONAL ROADWAY SHARE BALANCES Project Navy Drive/BNSF Undercrossing Project SR 99/Austin Road Interchange Improvements Remaining Highway, Interchange, Regional Roadway Share Unprogrammed Project Sponsor Port of Stockton Funding Amount $1,673,000 Manteca $ 350,000 $2,200,060 As will be detailed in the next section of the annual report, the SJCOG Board has approved a new funding category within the RTIF program. Known as the Jobs Balancing Investment Fund, up to $1 million annually from the 15% SJCOG regional share can be utilized for the funding category. Program Changes During FY 2014/2104 Annual Adjustment Methodology Background: In May 2011, the SJCOG Board of Directors approved a temporary suspension of the RTIF annual fee adjustment, due to increasing concerns that the California Construction Cost Index (CCCI) was not the best reflection of real-

22 world construction cost changes for transportation projects. As part of the 2011 RTIF update, an examination of alternatives to the CCCI was included. The Caltrans Highway Cost Index (CHCI) and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) were studied as potential metrics for the RTIF annual fee adjustment. The assessment of these two indexes found that they were too volatile. The RTIF assessment also included an examination of a rolling average of the indices, but this did little to reduce the volatility of the CHCI or the CPI. As a result of the analysis, the RTIF 2011 Update recommended retention of the CCCI as the appropriate index, but recommended an annual fee adjustment procedure based on a rolling three-year average calculation instead of the year over year percentage change. During the administrative annual adjustment process in June 2014, it was noted that the methodology being utilized for the adjustment was having the unintended consequence of producing a negative fee adjustment even though there had been three years of increases in the index. The 2014 Addendum to the 2011 Update addressed this issue and a new annual fee adjustment methodology was included in an ongoing revision to the RTIF Operating Agreement. The annual adjustment calculation will utilize the arithmetic mean of the three most recent annual percentage changes in the California Construction Cost Index (CCCI). Land-Use Category Changes The 2014 Addendum also clarified the definition of the warehouse land-use category as separate from the commercial/industrial category and added additional clarification of the per trip fee. Warehouse- This land use category should be applied to projects whose main function are primarily devoted to the storage of materials, but they may also contain ancillary offices, maintenance, and industrial uses. Examples include; self-storage facilities; distribution centers (used for the storage of finished material prior to shipping) data centers (primarily used for the storage of off-site computer systems, components, and data systems); agricultural storage; refrigerated/cold storage; and wrecking yards. Industrial- This land use category may be properly applied to a wide range of uses containing a mix of manufacturing, industrial, and warehouse uses. This land use category should be applied to projects whose primary function is to produce goods or materials. Examples include; printing; material testing; assembly plants; manufacturing plants (where raw materials or parts are converted to finished products); and, utilities. Per Trip - This category is primarily to be used for land uses which generate large amounts of traffic, but will not have a building on the site, except, for example, an ancillary office that is not used as the primary function of the project. Examples include; quarries; landfills; logging sites. Other Administrative Changes: Changed the timing of program fee payments from quarterly to semi-annual, to be accompanied by semi-annual

23 reporting of fee-generating activities, revenues, reimbursements, and expenditures by project by each jurisdiction to SJCOG. The reporting frequency to the SJCOG Board has been changed from semi- consistency with the current Regional Transportation Plan. annual to an annual. Clarification was added concerning Eligible Projects: A variety of projects meeting the specific criteria indicated in the Jobs Balancing Fund Interim Implementation n Addendum may be funded. Examples include Intersection/Traffic Control Devices, Turn Lanes, STAAA Truck Routes, Transit Facilities, Biking or Walking Facilities on or supporting congestionn relief on the RTIF network. Jobs Balancing Investment Fund Purpose: The purpose of the program is to provide transportationn project funding that may serve as part of a package of economic incentives to encourage job-creating firms to locate in San Joaquin County. The program provides the SJCOG Board, in conjunction with the San Joaquin Partnership and other economic development specialists, with a more tactical tool to attract employers to the region. Investments in transportation infrastructure will be made from this fund in order to supplement or enhance capital or capacity enhancing operational improvements needed by firms to locate in the area. Program guidelines were approved by the SJCOG Board in April Program Funding: SJCOG regional share component of the RTIF program provides the funding mechanism for all projects in this category. The regional share is further divided between transit and highway projects. The type of project proposed will dictate which category of funding is used. The San Joaquin COG Board has full discretion over the investment of these dollars in transportation projects based upon the adopted RTIF Operating Agreement among all member jurisdictions. Anyy funding nott utilized during the year will remain in the regional share pool and be available for funding other projects meeting the inclusion criteria as designated in the RTIF Technical Report and the RTIF Operating Agreement. The project considerationn and approval process is summarized in the graphic below: Project Selection Committee: Annual Program Maximum: $1 million Individual Project Maximum: $500,000 The project selection committee for the JBIF is responsible for reviewing and recommending projects for eventual funding under the program guidelines. In May 2015, the SJCOG Board approved the following individuals to serve on the selection committee: Mike Ammann, CEO of the San Joaquin Partnership; Dr. Jeffrey Michael, Director for the Center for Business & Policy Research at the University of the Pacific; and Brent Ives, former SJCOG Board Chair. The first meeting of the committee will be in September 2015 for a discussion of potential criteria for project selection.

24 Mitigation (such as the Congestion Management Program) any other unplanned criteria FY Tasks: Background: AB 1600 Five-Year Update In January 2015, the SJCOG approved the selection of the Firm Kittelson Associates, Inc. to assist SJCOG in the required five-year review and update of the RTIF program. Every five years, per Section 66001(d)(1) of the Mitigation Fee Act (MFA), impact fee programs are required to undergo a comprehensive review to ensure the nexus analysis and fee schedule reflect current assumptions for growth projections, transportation system impacts, project costs, and anticipated funding sources. The RTIF program was last updated in 2011, with an Addendum to the 2011 Update completed in The RTIF program will complete its 10th year of implementation as of June 30, Government Code (d) (1) states that For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the local agency shall make all the following findings with respect to that portion of the account or fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted: 1. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put; 2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged; 3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a); and, 4. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in paragraph (3) is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund. The following update tasks were completed in FY : Concept, description, and legal justification for new RTIF Jobs Balancing Investment fund project category. Assistance in revising the RTIF operating agreement. Convened RTIF Technical Advisory Committee (RTIF/TAC) comprised of representatives from each participating agency as well as other interested parties (e.g., Building Industry Association of the Delta, San Joaquin Partnership, and Sierra Club). Future FY Tasks: Development & Implementation of Financial Auditing Procedures and Protocols Development of Implementation Handbook & Workshop Review and Update Existing Fee Purpose Review and Update Deficiency List Conduct Nexus Analysis and Fair Share Calculations Review and revise Capital Improvement Projects and Costs Complete Draft Update Document Additional Future Activities and Next Steps The revised Operating Agreement was circulated to all Jurisdictions between May 2015 and the beginning of July 2015 for signatures. The Agreements have been collected by SJCOG, and will provide fully executed agreements to each jurisdiction. SJCOG Staff, after the first meeting of the Jobs Balancing Investment Fund Project Selection Committee, will provide updated project selection criteria and work with the committee to bring forward eligible projects for

25 consideration for funding under the new project category. Documents referenced in this report and other RTIF program information may be accessed here: Questions regarding this report may be directed to Kim Anderson, SJCOG Senior Regional Planner at (209) or

26 Exhibit A RTIF Revenue Commitments and Expenditures by Project and Participating Agency RTP TIER I RTIF PROJECTS Gross Project RTIF Eligible RTIF RTIF Developer ID# Project Project Description Project Cost Nexus Cost Committed Expended Improvemnts New alignment from Fresno Avenue 1 COG SR-4 Extension to Daggett Road 164,848,777 94% 154,957,850 1,723, LAT Lathrop Road Reconstruct Interchange 33,000,000 79% 26,100,000 1,525, ,500 14, LAT Roth Road Reconstruct Interchange 16,800,000 83% 13,900, ,000 13, LOD Harney Lane Reconstruct interchange 39,200,000 54% 21,200,000 1,270,091 1,270, MAN McKinley Reconstruct/Improve interchange 30,200,000 62% 20,500, , , STK Eight Mile Road Reconstruct Interchange 122,000,000 87% 106,200,000 1,100,000 1,100, STK North Stockton I-5 Mainline Interchange Construction of new interchange 80,300,000 76% 61,800,000 1,131,000 1,105, STK Morada Lane Reconstruct interchange 110,800,000 96% 106,400,000 1,100, , STK Eight Mile Road Interchange modification 47,000,000 84% 39,500,000 15,773 15, TRA Lammers Road Construction of new interchange 86,100,000 58% 49,900,000 2,331, , STK Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes, West Lane to Holman (Grade separation 50,000,000 70% 34,750,000 5,217,000 4,717,002 Construct 2 to 8 lanes, I-5 to 42 STK/SJC Arch-Sperry Road Performance Drive 55,000,000 78% 42,900,000 3,483,638 2,064,946 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, I-5 to east 45 LAT Lathrop Road UPRR 2,800,000 71% 2,000, , , LAT Golden Valley Parkway Parallel facility along north/west side of I-5 from Lathrop Road to 59,300,000 86% 51,000, , , ESC Ullrey Intersection Intersection improvement 1,500,000 73% 1,100, , COG Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Regional/Inter-Regional BRT System (Hammer Triangle) 35,000,000 34% 11,900, , , COG ACE Capital Project ACE Maintenance and Facility Expansion 4,000,000 50% 2,000, , COG Navy Drive/BNSF Reconstruct BNSF/Navy Drive Undercrossing 9,097,000 95% 8,642,150 1,673, , COG Austin Reconstruct Interchange 5,376,930 60% 3,226, ,000 0 TOTALS 933,848, ,107,850 24,158,617 13,164, ,393 Agency Net RTIF Committed Expended Net RTIF Balance City of Escalon 189, , ,006 City of Lathrop 2,874,465 2,800, ,321 2,560,144 City of Lodi 1,626,537 1,270,091 1,270, ,446 City of Manteca 9,008, , ,000 8,208,594 City of Ripon 193, ,931 City of Stockton 8,769,826 10,547,411 8,394, ,255 San Joaquin County 8,958,660 1,500,000 1,500,000 7,458,660 City of Tracy 4,134,626 2,331, ,197 3,623,429 SJCOG 6,334,589 2,697, ,000 5,534,589 TOTALS Balance Remaining 42,090,234 13,590,180 28,500,054 28,500,054

27 Exhibit B Master Project List ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Mainline Highway Projects 1 SR-4 Extension New alignment from Fresno Ave. to Navy Drive Fresno Avenue to Navy Drive 2 I-5 Widening Widen and construct HOV lanes in median with auxiliary lanes Hammer Lane to Eight Mile Road 3 I-5 Widening Widen and construct HOV lanes in median from Country Club Blvd. To Hammer Lane and restripe existing median lanes to HOV lanes from Charter Way to Country Club Blvd. Country Club to Hammer Lane 4 I-5 Widening Widen 6 to 8 lanes (Inside) and construct HOV lanes French Camp Road to Charter Way 5 I-5 Widening Widen 6 to 8 lanes (Inside) SR 120 to French Camp Road 6 SR-12 Widen 2 to 4 lanes (Outside), add turn lanes, from SR-99 to SR-88 SR-99 to SR-88 7 SR-99 Widening Widen 4 to 6 lanes using inside median w/ interchange modifications & realignment of the SR-4 east approach & connection to SR-99 Arch Road to Crosstown/SR-99 interchange 8 SR-120 Widening Widen 4 to 6 lanes (Inside) I-5 to SR-99 9 I-205 Widening / HOV Widen 6 to 8 lanes (Inside/Outside) I-580 to I-5 Highway Interchange Projects State 10 Mariposa Road Reconstruct interchange Mariposa Road 11 French Camp Road Reconstruct interchange French Camp Road Lathrop 12 Lathrop Road Reconstruct interchange Lathrop Road 13 Roth Road Reconstruct interchange Roth Road Lodi 14 Harney Lane Reconstruct interchange to provide 6 through lanes on SR 99, 4 lanes on Harney and modify on-ramps and off-ramps Harney Lane Manteca 15 McKinley Exp. Reconstruct/Improve interchange including necessary auxiliary lanes (P.M. McKinley Avenue 2.2/.2) 16 McKinley Exp. Construct new interchange McKinley Exp. Stockton 17 Eight Mile Road Reconstruct Interchange (PM ) Eight Mile Road

28 ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits 18 March Lane/ New interchange - Construct combined Wilson Way, March Lane March Lane/Wilson Wilson Interchange (P.M ) 19 French Camp/Arch Reconstruct existing French Camp Road Interchange, construct auxiliary French Camp/Arch Sperry Road Sperry Road lane on I-5, and realign Manthey Road (P.M ) (HR #2067) 20 Gateway Boulevard Construction of a new interchange and auxiliary lanes (PM 36.0/36.9) Gateway Boulevard 21 Gateway Blvd. Construction of new interchange Gateway Boulevard 22 Morada Lane Reconstruct interchange (PM ) Morada Lane 23 Eight Mile Road Modification of interchange Eight Mile Road 24 Otto Drive Construction of new interchange and auxiliary lanes (PM 33.3/34.2) Otto Drive 25 Hammer Lane Interchange Modification and auxiliary lanes (PM 32.6) Hammer Lane San Joaquin County 26 I-5 and Bird Road Upgrade interchange, lengthen ramps, widen approaches, install signal controls w/ necessary auxiliary lanes (P.M. 2.2/2.2) I-5 and Bird Road Tracy 27 Eleventh Street Construct Interchange Eleventh Street; realign and widen Eleventh Eleventh Street Street to 6 lanes north of Grant Line Road to Byron Road. 28 Chrisman Road Phase 1: Construct new interchange east-west ramps I-205 / Chrisman 29 Grantline Road Modification of existing interchange Grantline Road Regional Roadway Projects Stockton 30 Lower Sacramento Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Eight Mile Road to Grider Way 31 Lower Sacramento Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Grider Way to Armor Drive 32 Lower Sacramento Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Armor Drive to Morada Lane 33 Eight Mile Road Widen from 5 to 8 lanes I-5 to Thornton Road 34 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 8 lanes (involves 1 railroad grade separation) Thornton Road to Lower Sacramento Rd. 35 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Lower Sacramento Road to West Lane 36 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes (Involves 1 railroad grade separation) West Lane to Holman Road 37 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Holman Road to SR Pacific Avenue Widen from 6 to 8 lanes Hammer Lane to March Lane - between the Calaveras River and Hammer Lane 39 March Lane Extension Construct a new 8 lane Road Holman to SR Airport Way Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Arch/Sperry Road to French Camp Road 41 Thornton Road Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Purshing Avenue to Bear Creek Bridge 42 Arch-Sperry Road Construct elevated 4 lane arterial French I-5 Interchange to Sperry Road/Performance Drive intersection

29 ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Lodi 43 Harney Lane Widen from 2 to 4 lanes SR-99 to Lower Sacramento Road Manteca 44 Airport Way Widen from 4 to 6 lanes SR120-Lathrop Road (Manteca) 45 Lathrop Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes From east of UPRR to SR McKinley Expressway Construct new 4 lane expressway SR-120 to SR-99 Lathrop 47 Golden Valley Parkway Parallel facility along north/west side of I-5 Lathrop Road to Paradise Road 48 Lathrop Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes I-5 to east UPRR Tracy 49 Corral Hollow Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Parkside Drive to Linne Road 50 Lammers Road Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes Phase I: I-205 to Old Schulte Road 51 Linne Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Corral Hollow Road to Chrisman Road Escalon 52 Ullrey Intersection Ripon Intersection Improvement Ullrey Intersection including UPRR Crossing 53 River Road, Phase I Widen from 2 to 6 lanes North Ripon Road to Jack Tone Road Transit Projects SJRTD 54 Bus Rapid Transit Vehicles Purchase of buses for service expansion (Intercity/Interregional) San Joaquin County - Capital 55 BRT Phase III: Hammer Lane Corridor improvement costs including traffic signal upgrades, bus stop San Joaquin County - Capital Corridor amenities, and access enhancements 56 BRT Phase III: Hammer Lane Hybrid Diesel - Electric Bus Procurement San Joaquin County - Capital Corridor 57 BRT Phase III: Hammer Lane Hammer Triangle Transfer Station San Joaquin County - Capital Corridor 58 Intercity/Interregional Bus Fleet Expansion San Joaquin County - Capital 59 Regional Transportation Ctr. Expand capacity of Regional Transportation Center from 110 to 250 buses San Joaquin County - Capital SJRRC 60 ACE Corridor Acquisition of ACE Corridor Between Lathrop and Niles Junction 61 ACE Capital: Maintenance Maintenance facility expansion from 9 train sets to 17 train sets Phase I Location to be determined Facility Expansion 62 ACE Capital: Track extension Double track in Lathrop and track extension in Stockton Between Stockton and Lathrop

30 ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits 2014 Addendum Projects 63 Navy Drive Corridor Reconstruct BNSF Navy Drive Undercrossing San Joaquin County 64 Austin Road Reconstruct Interchange Stockton

31 Exhibit C Agencies RTIF Annual Activity Report: July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 Land Use Type RTIF Revenue / Interest / Distribution / Cost 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e Single Family Homes Multi-Family Homes Retail (Sq. Feet) Office (Sq. Feet) Warehouse Comm./Ind (Sq. Feet) RTIF Annual Activity Report: July 1, 2014 ~ June 30, 2015 RTIF Funds Collected Earned Interest on Account RTIF Funds +Interest 10% SJC w/ Interest 15% SJCOG w/ Interest SJCOG Interest Earned Credits, Reimbursements, Refunds, Adj. 15% SJCOG + Interest from Account For Admin. Calc. 3rd Party Cost 2% Admin. Cost Project Costs City of Escalon , ,854 $17,649 $96 $17,745 $1,774 $2,662 $103 $0 $2,765 $13,308 $0 $272 $0 $13,036 $189,006 Report Period Net Total TOTAL Program Net City of Lathrop ,161 4, ,840 $1,632,150 $3,671 $1,635,821 $160,928 $241,410 $1,464 $0 $242,875 $1,233,482 $0 $182,528 $0 $1,050,954 $2,494,289 City of Lodi ,230 2,173 32,539 $121,098 $2,545 $123,643 $21,500 $32,249 $741 $0 $32,990 $69,894 $0 $2,422 $505,815 -$438,343 $297,999 City of Manteca ,080-2,695 6,516 $1,390,384 $0 $1,390,384 $221,224 $331,295 $4,670 $0 $335,965 $837,865 $0 $6,132 $0 $831,733 $8,858,384 City of Ripon City of Stockton ,422 0 $125,557 $0 $125,557 $23,537 $35,305 $57 $0 $35,362 $66,715 $0 $0 $0 $66,715 $193, ,071 23, ,491 $713,422 $16,493 $729,915 $71,463 $107,194 $4,120 $0 $111,314 $551,259 $0 $10,703 $0 $540,556 $1,957,999 City of Tracy ,003 $1,350,654 $1,186 $1,351,840 $135,081 $202,621 $1,449 $0 $204,070 $1,014,139 $0 $20,260 $11,234 $982,645 $3,617,269 SJ County ,100 1,388 2,064 - $325,126 $19,318 $344,444 $48,796 $2,374 -$6,152 $51,170 $295,648 $0 $1,450 $0 $929,703 $7,413,133 SJCOG $1,001,533 $0 $20,031 $0 $981,502 $5,534,589 Totals 1, ,328 37,262 6,932 2,045,243 $5,676,039 $43,309 $5,719,349 $635,506 $1,001,533 $14,978 -$6,152 $1,016,511 $5,083,843 $0 $243,797 $517,049 $4,958,502 $30,556,600 Agencies Single-Family Homes Multi-Family Homes Retail (Sq. Feet) Office (Sq. Feet) Warehouse Comm./Ind (Sq. Feet) RTIF Funds Collected Earned Interest RTIF Funds + Interest 10% SJC 15% SJCOG SJCOG Interest Credits, Reimbursements, Refunds, Adj. 15% SJCOG + Interest For Admin. Calc. 3rd Party Cost 2% Admin. Cost Project Costs City of Escalon ,103 13,418 24,433 $239,584 $1,126 $240,710 $24, $36,844 $191 $0 $37,035 n/a $378 $4,657 $0 City of Lathrop ,549 40, ,425 $3,259,340 $100,943 $3,360,283 $335,495 $487,870 $23,902 $404,407 $511,772 n/a $32,965 $49,119 $380,176 City of Lodi , ,868 1,092,366 $1,972,344 $18,762 $1,991,106 $198,655 $296,579 $6,400 ($9,838) $302,979 n/a $12,104 $30,071 $822,723 City of Manteca 2, ,052, , ,293 $11,208,794 $79,784 $11,288,578 $1,083,961 $1,615,304 $37,875 ($1,304) $1,653,179 n/a $79,330 $147,366 $150,210 City of Ripon ,973 32,846 64,639 $168,487 $1,238 $169,725 $17,002 $25,322 $498 $0 $25,820 n/a $553 $2,331 $0 City of Stockton 1, , ,203 6,771,039 $11,161,929 $63,554 $11,225,483 $1,116,305 $1,669,203 $40,255 ($35,970) $1,709,458 n/a $84,325 $126,380 $6,811,827 City of Tracy ,846 64,112 3,754,075 $3,717,776 $27,078 $3,744,854 $374,486 $558,003 $11,668 $0 $569,671 n/a $12,442 $53,173 $506,123 SJ County , ,889 2,394,887 $5,659,282 $51,484 $5,710,766 $0 $861,374 $15,449 $10,459 $876,823 n/a $48,692 $123,798 $1,545,527 SJCOG n/a $0 $0 $0 $0 $803 $0 $0 n/a $48,132 $104,108 $800,000 Totals 6, ,375,460 1,800,447 15,408,157 $37,387,536 $343,969 $37,731,505 $3,149,986 $5,550,499 $137,041 $367,754 $5,686,737 n/a $318,921 $641,003 $11,016,586 Single Family Homes Multi-Family Homes Retail (Sq. Feet) Land Use Type Land Use Type Office (Sq. Feet) Comm./Ind (Sq. Feet) RTIF Program Summary: Program Inception ~ June 30, 2014 RTIF Program Summary: Program Inception ~ June 30, 2015 RTIF Funds Collected Earned Interest RTIF Funds +Interest 10% SJC 15% SJCOG RTIF Revenue / Interest / Distribution / Cost RTIF Revenue / Interest / Distribution / Cost SJCOG Interest Credits, Reimbursements, Refunds, Adj. 15% SJCOG + Interest n/a 3rd Party Cost 2% Admin. Cost Project Costs Reported Balances as of June 30, 2014 Totals 7, ,447,788 1,837,709 17,453,400 $43,063,575 $387,278 $43,450,854 $3,785,492 $6,552,032 $152,019 $361,603 $6,703,248 - $318,921 $884,800 $11,533,635 $30,556,600 $1,417,443 $2,634,624 $6,483,430 $4,553,087 $25,598,098 NET TOTAL $175,970 $1,443,335 $736, $8,026,651 $127,216

32 Exhibit A RTIF Revenue Commitments and Expenditures by Project and Participating Agency RTP TIER I RTIF PROJECTS Gross Project RTIF Eligible RTIF RTIF Developer ID# Project Project Description Project Cost Nexus Cost Committed Expended Improvemnts New alignment from Fresno Avenue 1 COG SR-4 Extension to Daggett Road 164,848,777 94% 154,957,850 1,723, LAT Lathrop Road Reconstruct Interchange 33,000,000 79% 26,100,000 1,525, ,500 14, LAT Roth Road Reconstruct Interchange 16,800,000 83% 13,900, ,000 13, LOD Harney Lane Reconstruct interchange 39,200,000 54% 21,200,000 1,270,091 1,270, MAN McKinley Reconstruct/Improve interchange 30,200,000 62% 20,500, , , STK Eight Mile Road Reconstruct Interchange 122,000,000 87% 106,200,000 1,100,000 1,100, STK North Stockton I-5 Mainline Interchange Construction of new interchange 80,300,000 76% 61,800,000 1,131,000 1,105, STK Morada Lane Reconstruct interchange 110,800,000 96% 106,400,000 1,100, , STK Eight Mile Road Interchange modification 47,000,000 84% 39,500,000 15,773 15, TRA Lammers Road Construction of new interchange 86,100,000 58% 49,900,000 2,331, , STK Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes, West Lane to Holman (Grade separation 50,000,000 70% 34,750,000 5,217,000 4,717,002 Construct 2 to 8 lanes, I-5 to 42 STK/SJC Arch-Sperry Road Performance Drive 55,000,000 78% 42,900,000 3,483,638 2,064,946 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, I-5 to east 45 LAT Lathrop Road UPRR 2,800,000 71% 2,000, , , LAT Golden Valley Parkway Parallel facility along north/west side of I-5 from Lathrop Road to 59,300,000 86% 51,000, , , ESC Ullrey Intersection Intersection improvement 1,500,000 73% 1,100, , COG Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Regional/Inter-Regional BRT System (Hammer Triangle) 35,000,000 34% 11,900, , , COG ACE Capital Project ACE Maintenance and Facility Expansion 4,000,000 50% 2,000, , COG Navy Drive/BNSF Reconstruct BNSF/Navy Drive Undercrossing 9,097,000 95% 8,642,150 1,673, , COG Austin Reconstruct Interchange 5,376,930 60% 3,226, ,000 0 TOTALS 933,848, ,107,850 24,158,617 13,164, ,393 Agency Net RTIF Committed Expended Net RTIF Balance City of Escalon 189, , ,006 City of Lathrop 2,874,465 2,800, ,321 2,560,144 City of Lodi 1,626,537 1,270,091 1,270, ,446 City of Manteca 9,008, , ,000 8,208,594 City of Ripon 193, ,931 City of Stockton 8,769,826 10,547,411 8,394, ,255 San Joaquin County 8,958,660 1,500,000 1,500,000 7,458,660 City of Tracy 4,134,626 2,331, ,197 3,623,429 SJCOG 6,334,589 2,697, ,000 5,534,589 TOTALS Balance Remaining 42,090,234 13,590,180 28,500,054 28,500,054

33 Exhibit B Master Project List ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Mainline Highway Projects 1 SR-4 Extension New alignment from Fresno Ave. to Navy Drive Fresno Avenue to Navy Drive 2 I-5 Widening Widen and construct HOV lanes in median with auxiliary lanes Hammer Lane to Eight Mile Road 3 I-5 Widening Widen and construct HOV lanes in median from Country Club Blvd. To Hammer Lane and restripe existing median lanes to HOV lanes from Charter Way to Country Club Blvd. Country Club to Hammer Lane 4 I-5 Widening Widen 6 to 8 lanes (Inside) and construct HOV lanes French Camp Road to Charter Way 5 I-5 Widening Widen 6 to 8 lanes (Inside) SR 120 to French Camp Road 6 SR-12 Widen 2 to 4 lanes (Outside), add turn lanes, from SR-99 to SR-88 SR-99 to SR-88 7 SR-99 Widening Widen 4 to 6 lanes using inside median w/ interchange modifications & realignment of the SR-4 east approach & connection to SR-99 Arch Road to Crosstown/SR-99 interchange 8 SR-120 Widening Widen 4 to 6 lanes (Inside) I-5 to SR-99 9 I-205 Widening / HOV Widen 6 to 8 lanes (Inside/Outside) I-580 to I-5 Highway Interchange Projects State 10 Mariposa Road Reconstruct interchange Mariposa Road 11 French Camp Road Reconstruct interchange French Camp Road Lathrop 12 Lathrop Road Reconstruct interchange Lathrop Road 13 Roth Road Reconstruct interchange Roth Road Lodi 14 Harney Lane Reconstruct interchange to provide 6 through lanes on SR 99, 4 lanes on Harney and modify on-ramps and off-ramps Harney Lane Manteca 15 McKinley Exp. Reconstruct/Improve interchange including necessary auxiliary lanes (P.M. McKinley Avenue 2.2/.2) 16 McKinley Exp. Construct new interchange McKinley Exp. Stockton 17 Eight Mile Road Reconstruct Interchange (PM ) Eight Mile Road

34 ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits 18 March Lane/ New interchange - Construct combined Wilson Way, March Lane March Lane/Wilson Wilson Interchange (P.M ) 19 French Camp/Arch Reconstruct existing French Camp Road Interchange, construct auxiliary French Camp/Arch Sperry Road Sperry Road lane on I-5, and realign Manthey Road (P.M ) (HR #2067) 20 Gateway Boulevard Construction of a new interchange and auxiliary lanes (PM 36.0/36.9) Gateway Boulevard 21 Gateway Blvd. Construction of new interchange Gateway Boulevard 22 Morada Lane Reconstruct interchange (PM ) Morada Lane 23 Eight Mile Road Modification of interchange Eight Mile Road 24 Otto Drive Construction of new interchange and auxiliary lanes (PM 33.3/34.2) Otto Drive 25 Hammer Lane Interchange Modification and auxiliary lanes (PM 32.6) Hammer Lane San Joaquin County 26 I-5 and Bird Road Upgrade interchange, lengthen ramps, widen approaches, install signal controls w/ necessary auxiliary lanes (P.M. 2.2/2.2) I-5 and Bird Road Tracy 27 Eleventh Street Construct Interchange Eleventh Street; realign and widen Eleventh Eleventh Street Street to 6 lanes north of Grant Line Road to Byron Road. 28 Chrisman Road Phase 1: Construct new interchange east-west ramps I-205 / Chrisman 29 Grantline Road Modification of existing interchange Grantline Road Regional Roadway Projects Stockton 30 Lower Sacramento Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Eight Mile Road to Grider Way 31 Lower Sacramento Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Grider Way to Armor Drive 32 Lower Sacramento Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Armor Drive to Morada Lane 33 Eight Mile Road Widen from 5 to 8 lanes I-5 to Thornton Road 34 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 8 lanes (involves 1 railroad grade separation) Thornton Road to Lower Sacramento Rd. 35 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Lower Sacramento Road to West Lane 36 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes (Involves 1 railroad grade separation) West Lane to Holman Road 37 Eight Mile Road Widen from 2 to 6 lanes Holman Road to SR Pacific Avenue Widen from 6 to 8 lanes Hammer Lane to March Lane - between the Calaveras River and Hammer Lane 39 March Lane Extension Construct a new 8 lane Road Holman to SR Airport Way Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Arch/Sperry Road to French Camp Road 41 Thornton Road Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Purshing Avenue to Bear Creek Bridge 42 Arch-Sperry Road Construct elevated 4 lane arterial French I-5 Interchange to Sperry Road/Performance Drive intersection

35 ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Lodi 43 Harney Lane Widen from 2 to 4 lanes SR-99 to Lower Sacramento Road Manteca 44 Airport Way Widen from 4 to 6 lanes SR120-Lathrop Road (Manteca) 45 Lathrop Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes From east of UPRR to SR McKinley Expressway Construct new 4 lane expressway SR-120 to SR-99 Lathrop 47 Golden Valley Parkway Parallel facility along north/west side of I-5 Lathrop Road to Paradise Road 48 Lathrop Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes I-5 to east UPRR Tracy 49 Corral Hollow Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Parkside Drive to Linne Road 50 Lammers Road Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes Phase I: I-205 to Old Schulte Road 51 Linne Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Corral Hollow Road to Chrisman Road Escalon 52 Ullrey Intersection Ripon Intersection Improvement Ullrey Intersection including UPRR Crossing 53 River Road, Phase I Widen from 2 to 6 lanes North Ripon Road to Jack Tone Road Transit Projects SJRTD 54 Bus Rapid Transit Vehicles Purchase of buses for service expansion (Intercity/Interregional) San Joaquin County - Capital 55 BRT Phase III: Hammer Lane Corridor improvement costs including traffic signal upgrades, bus stop San Joaquin County - Capital Corridor amenities, and access enhancements 56 BRT Phase III: Hammer Lane Hybrid Diesel - Electric Bus Procurement San Joaquin County - Capital Corridor 57 BRT Phase III: Hammer Lane Hammer Triangle Transfer Station San Joaquin County - Capital Corridor 58 Intercity/Interregional Bus Fleet Expansion San Joaquin County - Capital 59 Regional Transportation Ctr. Expand capacity of Regional Transportation Center from 110 to 250 buses San Joaquin County - Capital SJRRC 60 ACE Corridor Acquisition of ACE Corridor Between Lathrop and Niles Junction 61 ACE Capital: Maintenance Maintenance facility expansion from 9 train sets to 17 train sets Phase I Location to be determined Facility Expansion 62 ACE Capital: Track extension Double track in Lathrop and track extension in Stockton Between Stockton and Lathrop

36 ID Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits 2014 Addendum Projects 63 Navy Drive Corridor Reconstruct BNSF Navy Drive Undercrossing San Joaquin County 64 Austin Road Reconstruct Interchange Stockton

37 Exhibit C Agencies RTIF Annual Activity Report: July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 Land Use Type RTIF Revenue / Interest / Distribution / Cost 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e Single Family Homes Multi-Family Homes Retail (Sq. Feet) Office (Sq. Feet) Warehouse Comm./Ind (Sq. Feet) RTIF Annual Activity Report: July 1, 2014 ~ June 30, 2015 RTIF Funds Collected Earned Interest on Account RTIF Funds +Interest 10% SJC w/ Interest 15% SJCOG w/ Interest SJCOG Interest Earned Credits, Reimbursements, Refunds, Adj. 15% SJCOG + Interest from Account For Admin. Calc. 3rd Party Cost 2% Admin. Cost Project Costs City of Escalon , ,854 $17,649 $96 $17,745 $1,774 $2,662 $103 $0 $2,765 $13,308 $0 $272 $0 $13,036 $189,006 Report Period Net Total TOTAL Program Net City of Lathrop ,161 4, ,840 $1,632,150 $3,671 $1,635,821 $160,928 $241,410 $1,464 $0 $242,875 $1,233,482 $0 $182,528 $0 $1,050,954 $2,494,289 City of Lodi ,230 2,173 32,539 $121,098 $2,545 $123,643 $21,500 $32,249 $741 $0 $32,990 $69,894 $0 $2,422 $505,815 -$438,343 $297,999 City of Manteca ,080-2,695 6,516 $1,390,384 $0 $1,390,384 $221,224 $331,295 $4,670 $0 $335,965 $837,865 $0 $6,132 $0 $831,733 $8,858,384 City of Ripon City of Stockton ,422 0 $125,557 $0 $125,557 $23,537 $35,305 $57 $0 $35,362 $66,715 $0 $0 $0 $66,715 $193, ,071 23, ,491 $713,422 $16,493 $729,915 $71,463 $107,194 $4,120 $0 $111,314 $551,259 $0 $10,703 $0 $540,556 $1,957,999 City of Tracy ,003 $1,350,654 $1,186 $1,351,840 $135,081 $202,621 $1,449 $0 $204,070 $1,014,139 $0 $20,260 $11,234 $982,645 $3,617,269 SJ County ,100 1,388 2,064 - $325,126 $19,318 $344,444 $48,796 $2,374 -$6,152 $51,170 $295,648 $0 $1,450 $0 $929,703 $7,413,133 SJCOG $1,001,533 $0 $20,031 $0 $981,502 $5,534,589 Totals 1, ,328 37,262 6,932 2,045,243 $5,676,039 $43,309 $5,719,349 $635,506 $1,001,533 $14,978 -$6,152 $1,016,511 $5,083,843 $0 $243,797 $517,049 $4,958,502 $30,556,600 Agencies Single-Family Homes Multi-Family Homes Retail (Sq. Feet) Office (Sq. Feet) Warehouse Comm./Ind (Sq. Feet) RTIF Funds Collected Earned Interest RTIF Funds + Interest 10% SJC 15% SJCOG SJCOG Interest Credits, Reimbursements, Refunds, Adj. 15% SJCOG + Interest For Admin. Calc. 3rd Party Cost 2% Admin. Cost Project Costs City of Escalon ,103 13,418 24,433 $239,584 $1,126 $240,710 $24, $36,844 $191 $0 $37,035 n/a $378 $4,657 $0 City of Lathrop ,549 40, ,425 $3,259,340 $100,943 $3,360,283 $335,495 $487,870 $23,902 $404,407 $511,772 n/a $32,965 $49,119 $380,176 City of Lodi , ,868 1,092,366 $1,972,344 $18,762 $1,991,106 $198,655 $296,579 $6,400 ($9,838) $302,979 n/a $12,104 $30,071 $822,723 City of Manteca 2, ,052, , ,293 $11,208,794 $79,784 $11,288,578 $1,083,961 $1,615,304 $37,875 ($1,304) $1,653,179 n/a $79,330 $147,366 $150,210 City of Ripon ,973 32,846 64,639 $168,487 $1,238 $169,725 $17,002 $25,322 $498 $0 $25,820 n/a $553 $2,331 $0 City of Stockton 1, , ,203 6,771,039 $11,161,929 $63,554 $11,225,483 $1,116,305 $1,669,203 $40,255 ($35,970) $1,709,458 n/a $84,325 $126,380 $6,811,827 City of Tracy ,846 64,112 3,754,075 $3,717,776 $27,078 $3,744,854 $374,486 $558,003 $11,668 $0 $569,671 n/a $12,442 $53,173 $506,123 SJ County , ,889 2,394,887 $5,659,282 $51,484 $5,710,766 $0 $861,374 $15,449 $10,459 $876,823 n/a $48,692 $123,798 $1,545,527 SJCOG n/a $0 $0 $0 $0 $803 $0 $0 n/a $48,132 $104,108 $800,000 Totals 6, ,375,460 1,800,447 15,408,157 $37,387,536 $343,969 $37,731,505 $3,149,986 $5,550,499 $137,041 $367,754 $5,686,737 n/a $318,921 $641,003 $11,016,586 Single Family Homes Multi-Family Homes Retail (Sq. Feet) Land Use Type Land Use Type Office (Sq. Feet) Comm./Ind (Sq. Feet) RTIF Program Summary: Program Inception ~ June 30, 2014 RTIF Program Summary: Program Inception ~ June 30, 2015 RTIF Funds Collected Earned Interest RTIF Funds +Interest 10% SJC 15% SJCOG RTIF Revenue / Interest / Distribution / Cost RTIF Revenue / Interest / Distribution / Cost SJCOG Interest Credits, Reimbursements, Refunds, Adj. 15% SJCOG + Interest n/a 3rd Party Cost 2% Admin. Cost Project Costs Reported Balances as of June 30, 2014 Totals 7, ,447,788 1,837,709 17,453,400 $43,063,575 $387,278 $43,450,854 $3,785,492 $6,552,032 $152,019 $361,603 $6,703,248 - $318,921 $884,800 $11,533,635 $30,556,600 $1,417,443 $2,634,624 $6,483,430 $4,553,087 $25,598,098 NET TOTAL $175,970 $1,443,335 $736, $8,026,651 $127,216

38 Regional Transportation Impact Fee: FY Semi/Annual Report Semiannual Report: ( ) July~Dec [due February 28] ( ) Jan.~June [due August 31] Agency Name: Person/Title Completing Report: Finance Approval of Report - Person/Title: Report Period: SUMMARY of RTIF ACCOUNT/FUND End of Report Period Account/Fund Balance Beginning Balance $ Plus Revenues $ Plus Interest $ Adjustments due to Developer Credits/Reinbursements $ Less Expenditures $ Less Distribution to SJCOG $ Less Distribution to SJC $ Less Administration Fees $ Ending Balance $ Total amount of RTIF collected since program inception: $ Total amount of RTIF retained since program inception to be used for project delivery: $ SUMMARY of FEES COLLECTED BY LAND USE TYPE (Attach List of Permits Issued Including Any Projects Deemed Exempt*) Summary of Fees Charged Effective July 1, June 30, 2016 Land Use Type Total DUE/Sq. Ft./Trips Fee Rate Sub Total Residential (Single Family DUE) Residential (Multi-Family DUE) Retail (Sq Feet) Office (Sq. Feet) Commercial/Industrial (Sq. Feet) Warehouse (Sq.Feet) $3, $1, $1.25 $1.58 $0.95 $0.40 Other (Per Trip) 0 $ TOTAL * For RTIF exempt projects, please highlight these in the building permit list attachement and indicate the (1) The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any legal, residential structure and/or the replacement of a previously SUMMARY of DISTRIBUTION OF FEES COLLECTED (To be Completed by each City/County) TOTAL: TOTAL: Total Amount of Fees Distributed to SJCOG (City and San Joaquin County) Amount Distributed Amount Distributed Total Interest in Distribution Total Amount of Fees Distributed to San Joaquin County (City Only) Total Interest in Distribution Date of Distribution Date of Distribution RTIF_SemiAnnual_

39 Total Amount of Fees Received from each City: Agency Name Amount Received Escalon Lathrop Lodi Manteca Ripon Stockton Tracy Developer Name Total San Joaquin County Section Only Interest Received Document any developer credits/reimbursements/refunds issued Description of RTIF Improvement Amount of Note: Provide details of credit/reimbursement/refund in comment section. RTIF Capital Project Description (Note that project description must match project description from the RTIF Capital Project List) Total Project Cost TOTAL APPLICATION OF FEES TO ELIGIBLE RTIF PROJECTS RTIF Fees Programmed to Project Fees Expended During Reporting Page 2 Amount of Total Fees Expended to Date TOTALS RTIF_SemiAnnual_

40 COMMENT SECTION (Please use this section to document all clarifications) Page 3 RTIF_SemiAnnual_

41 November 2015 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Draft 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) Information SUMMARY: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) will consider the 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for adoption in March SJCOG is required to submit this region s programming priorities to the CTC in the form of the 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) by December 15, The 2016 STIP Fund Estimate as adopted by the CTC forecasts there is zero programming capacity available. Therefore, no new projects may be added to the STIP, and several existing projects will be delayed into later years in which there is funding capacity; however, it should be noted that no existing STIP projects are in danger of losing their funding. SJCOG staff has prepared the Draft 2016 RTIP in coordination with the other seven Regional Transportation Planning Agencies in the San Joaquin Valley. This coordination explores ways to keep existing STIP projects (already programmed) from being delayed. One approach is identifying opportunities where one agency s delay can help leverage programming capacity and keep another project on schedule. RECOMMENDED ACTION: SJCOG staff recommends the TAC review the Draft 2016 RTIP and provide any comments to David Ripperda (rippera@sjcog.org) by November 16. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. There is no new funding in the STIP and the action reflects schedule changes only. Specifically, there are no STIP dollar amount changes for existing programmed projects. BACKGROUND: In August 2015, SJCOG staff informed the SJCOG committees and Board of the challenges facing the STIP. The STIP is a funding program that covers a five-year period and is updated every two years. In the last two STIP cycles, approximately $25 million (each cycle) in programming capacity had been made available for various transportation projects in the San Joaquin region. The CTC and Caltrans have notified regional agencies that the reduction in gasoline excise taxes has resulted in an adverse impact on STIP revenue. As a result, the 2016 STIP Fund Estimate, as adopted by the CTC, forecasts zero new programming capacity. Therefore, no new projects may be added to the STIP, and many of the existing projects will need to be reprogrammed into years where funding capacity is available.

42 Existing Commitments of RTIP Funding The 2014 STIP funded projects to be carried over to the 2016 STIP/RTIP include: Project Sponsor Project Title Existing STIP Funding 2014 STIP Programming Year Proposed 2016 STIP Programming Year Lodi SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements $3,061, / /19 Manteca SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange $12,300, / /19 Ripon Stockton Avenue Widening $1,000, / /18 Tracy MacArthur Drive Widening (Schulte Road to Valpico Road) $3,194, / /17 SBCAG Carpenteria Creek-Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOV Lanes (in Santa Barbara County) (1) $8,853, / /19 SJCOG Planning, Programming, and Monitoring $600,000 Multiple Multiple TOTAL = $29,008,000 (1) In November 2012, the SJCOG Board approved the revenue neutral exchange of $8.853 million in SJCOG s 2014 RTIP shares with $8.853 million in State and Local Partnership Program (SLPP) from the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG). This action included the prioritization of the programming of an $8.8 million project for SBCAG in SJCOG s 2014 RTIP. Through this exchange SJCOG was able to immediately exchange the $8.853 million of SBCAG s SLPP funds for $8.853 million of Measure K Renewal funds committed to the State Route 99 South Stockton Widening project. The SJCOG Board subsequently included in their action the dedication of the $8.853 million in Measure K Renewal funds freed from the State Route 99 South Stockton Widening project to fully fund the construction of the County of San Joaquin s Lower Sacramento Road Widening (Pixley Slough to Harney Curve) project. The SJCOG Board approved these reprogramming recommendations on October 22, NEXT STEPS/SCHEDULE The following are the major actions and dates remaining for the completion of the 2016 STIP: August 27, 2015: STIP Fund Estimate and Guidelines adopted by CTC. October 15, 2015: Caltrans submits its draft ITIP (Interregional Improvement Program) to the CTC November 19, 2015: SJCOG Board scheduled to adopt 2016 RTIP (this is the formal planning document that identifies 2016 STIP projects) December 15, 2015: STIPs (Final ITIP and RTIP) are due to the CTC February 19, 2016: CTC staff releases its recommendations March 17, 2016: Following public hearings on January 21 and 26th, the CTC to adopt the STIP ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Prepared By: Ryan Niblock, Senior Regional Planner and David Ripperda, Assistant Regional Planner

43

44 This page is left blank.

45 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 555 E. Weber Avenue Stockton, California (fax) rg Anthony Silva CHAIR Steve DeBrum VICE CHAIR Andrew T Chesley EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Member Agencies CITIES OF ESCALON, LATHROP, LODI, MANTECA, RIPON, STOCKTON, TRACY, AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN December 1, 2015 Mr. Willl Kempton Executive Director California Transportation Commission Mail Station N Street Sacramento, CA SUBJECT: 2016 Regional Transportation Improvementt Program Dear Mr. Kempton: The San Joaquin Council of Governments s (SJCOG) is pleased to submit its 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) as adopted by the SJCOG Board of Directors on November 19, The 2016 RTIP has been developed in partnership between SJCOG, the San Joaquin Valley Regional Transportation Planning Agencies, and Caltrans District 10. SJCOG has reprogrammed projects based upon regional priorities, project deliverability, and financial constraint. In strong consideration of the zero STIP fund estimate and STIP overprogram mming (statewide), SJCOG has reprogrammed several STIP projects to later years. This shift of projects includes delaying the allocation vote of a project originally planned for a Fiscal Year 15/ /16 allocation. We hope this demonstrates our region s efforts to assist the state in developing a financially constrained STIP. Enclosed are two copies for CTC staff. If you have any questions regarding the 2016 RTIP, please contactt Ryan Niblock, Senior Regional Planner, at (209) Sincerely, ANDREW T. CHESLEY Executive Director

46 This page is left blank.

47 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2016 RTIP) San Joaquin Council of Governments Table of Contents Page Number A. Overview and Schedule Section 1. Executive Summary 1 Section 2. General Information 3 Section 3. Background of Regional Transportation Improvement Program 4 Section 4. Completion of Prior RTIP Projects 5 Section 5. RTIP Outreach and Participation 5 B STIP Regional Funding Request Section STIP Regional Share and Request for Programming 7 Section 7. Outside Funding Sources included in RTIP 8 Section 8. Interregional Improvement Program Funding 9 Section 9. Projects Planned Within the Corridor 9 C. Relationship of RTIP to RTP/SCS and Benefits of RTIP Section 10. Regional Level Performance Evaluation 12 Section 11. Regional and Statewide Benefits of RTIP 15 D. Performance and Effectiveness of RTIP Section 12. Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness of the RTIP 16 Section 13. Project Specific Evaluation 17 E. Detailed Project Information Section 14. Overview of Projects Programmed with Regional Funding 18 F. Appendices Section 15. Projects Programming Request Forms Section 16. Board Resolution or Board Documentation of RTIP Approval Section 17. Detailed Project Programming Summary Table Section 18. San Joaquin Valley Coordinated Regional Transportation Improvement Program

48 This page is left blank.

49 A. OVERVIEW AND SCHEDULE Section 1. Executive Summary The San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) is a joint powers authority comprised of the County of San Joaquin and the cities of Stockton, Lodi, Manteca, Tracy, Ripon, Escalon, and Lathrop. SJCOG serves as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), which provides a forum for regional decision making on issues such as growth, transportation, environmental management, housing, open space, air quality, fiscal management, and economic development. SJCOG, as the RTPA for the San Joaquin region, is responsible for developing the region s funding priorities for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and for submitting the projects to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) by way of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) Regional Transportation Improvement Program The 2016 RTIP for San Joaquin County satisfies the STIP requirements for an urbanized county. The RTIP is a listing of state highway and local road projects that the San Joaquin region proposes for funding through the 2016 STIP covering the five year period from Fiscal Year 2016/17 to 2020/21. The primary purpose of the RTIP is to help implement the San Joaquin region s adopted long range Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy. STIP Revenues Available for Programming On August 27, 2015, the California Transportation Commission adopted the 2016 STIP Fund Estimate. Due to a significant reduction in gasoline excise taxes that has resulted in an adverse impact on STIP revenue, the 2016 STIP Fund Estimate as adopted by the CTC forecasts zero new programming capacity. Therefore, the 2016 RTIP does not propose any new projects, and instead reprograms existing RTIP projects to years where funding capacity may be available. STIP Project Recommendations The STIP is comprised of two elements: a Regional Improvement Program (RIP) and an Interregional Improvement Program (IIP). Under Senate Bill 45, regional agencies are responsible for proposing projects with RIP funds and the California Department of Transportation is responsible for proposing projects with IIP funds. Both RIP and IIP funded projects are transmitted to the California Transportation Commission for consideration and approval. SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 1

50 Regional Improvement Program and Interregional Improvement Program Table 1 provides SJCOG s 2016 RTIP Project Summary, including $29,008,000 in existing RIP projects. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 10, has not proposed IIP funding for transportation projects in San Joaquin County for inclusion in the 2016 Interregional Improvement Program (ITIP). Thus, no IIP funding commitments are reflected for any projects in SJCOG s 2016 RTIP. Table 1: 2016 RTIP Project Summary ($1,000s) Project Title Project Sponsor RIP Total SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements City of Lodi $3,061 SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange City of Manteca $12,300 Stockton Avenue Widening City of Ripon $1,000 MacArthur Drive Widening (Schulte Road to Valpico Road) City of Tracy $3,194 Carpinteria Creek-Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOV Lanes (in Santa Barbara County) SBCAG $8,853 Planning, Programming, and Monitoring SJCOG $600 TOTAL $29,008 SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 2

51 Section 2. General Information - Regional Agency Name: San Joaquin Council of Governments SJCOG Website Link: RTIP document link: RTP link: Executive Director Contact Information Name Andrew T. Chesley Title Executive Director chesley@sjcog.org Telephone RTIP Staff Contact Information Name Ryan Niblock Title Senior Regional Planner Address 555 E Weber Avenue City/State Stockton, CA Zip Code niblock@sjcog.org Telephone Fax California Transportation Commission (CTC) Staff Contact Information Name Laurel Janssen Title Deputy Director Address 1120 N Street City/State Sacramento, CA Zip Code laurel.janssen@dot.ca.gov Telephone Fax SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 3

52 Section 3. Background of Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) A. What is the Regional Transportation Improvement Program? The Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is a program of highway, local road, transit and active transportation projects that a region plans to fund with State and Federal revenue programmed by the California Transportation Commission in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The RTIP is developed biennially by the regions and is due to the Commission by December 15 of every odd numbered year. The program of projects in the RTIP is a subset of projects in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a federally mandated master transportation plan which guides a region s transportation investments over a 20 to 25 year period. The RTP is based on all reasonably anticipated funding, including federal, state and local sources. Updated every 4 years, the RTP is developed through an extensive public participation process in the region and reflects the unique mobility, sustainability, and air quality needs of each region. B. SJCOG s Historical and Current Approach to developing the RTIP In August 2013, SJCOG staff issued a call for projects for the 2014 RTIP, and in August and September met with jurisdictions to discuss their 2014 RTIP proposals. In September 2013, the SJCOG Board adopted the 2014 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) Policies and Priorities in order of priority as follows: 1. Project Programming and Monitoring (PPM) 2. Projects leveraging Proposition 1B discretionary funding or other State/Federal discretionary funds 3. Measure K/Measure K Renewal funded projects as identified in the 2011 Measure K Renewal Strategic Plan where the use of STIP funds could allow other projects to be funded directly with Measure K funds 4. Measure K Renewal projects previously anticipated for funding in the 2007 Measure K Renewal Strategic Plan but not included in the first 10 year prioritization of the 2011 Measure K Renewal Strategic Plan 5. Projects ready for construction and eligible for federal funds Consistent with those priorities used in the 2012 RTIP cycle, these priorities were used to guide the investment of approximately $15.4 million of RTIP funds that were available for programming new projects in the SJCOG region for the 2014 RTIP. An additional $8.853 million of SJCOG s 2014 RTIP shares were previously committed to the repayment of the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG). SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 4

53 Due to a significant reduction in gasoline excise taxes that has resulted in an adverse impact on STIP revenue, the 2016 STIP Fund Estimate as adopted by the CTC forecasts zero new programming capacity. Therefore, the 2016 RTIP does not add any new projects. SJCOG staff prepared programming recommendations for the 2016 STIP in coordination with the other seven Regional Transportation Planning Agencies in the San Joaquin Valley and with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments. This coordination explored ways to keep existing STIP projects (already programmed) from being delayed by identifying opportunities where one agency s delay can help leverage programming capacity and keep another project on schedule. Section 4. Completion of Prior RTIP Projects (Required per Section 68) Between the adoption of the 2016 RTIP and the adoption of the previous 2014 RTIP, one RTIP project is nearing completion in the San Joaquin Region: the Route 99 Manteca (Arch Road to Route 120) widening project. This project is widening State Route 99 from four to six lanes between State Route 120 and Arch Road. A detailed summary of the project benefits will be reported once all construction phases are complete. Section 5. RTIP Outreach and Participation A. RTIP Development and Approval Schedule Action Date CTC adopts Fund Estimate and Guidelines August 27, 2015 Caltrans identifies State Highway Needs September 15, 2015 Caltrans submits draft ITIP October 15, 2015 CTC ITIP Hearing, North October 28, 2015 CTC ITIP Hearing, South November 4, 2015 SJCOG adopts 2016 RTIP November 19, 2015 SJCOG submits RTIP to CTC December 15, 2015 Caltrans submits ITIP to CTC December 15, 2015 CTC STIP Hearing Date North Hearing January 21, 2016 CTC STIP Hearing Date South Hearing January 26, 2016 CTC publishes staff recommendations February 19, 2016 CTC Adopts 2016 STIP March 16-17, 2016 B. Public Participation/Project Selection Process The projects previously selected for funding in the 2014 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) were selected using the Policies and Priorities previously described in Section 3B. This selection included a collaborative process with input from the SJCOG committees, members of the public, and the SJCOG board. SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 5

54 In August 2015, the SJCOG staff informed the SJCOG committees and Board of the challenges facing the State Transportation Improvement Program. The 2016 STIP Fund Estimate as adopted by the CTC forecasts zero new programming capacity. Therefore, no new projects may be added to the STIP, and many existing projects will need to be reprogrammed into years where funding capacity is available. In October 2015, SJCOG staff brought forward reprogramming recommendations for the 2016 RTIP to the SJCOG committees and Board for approval. After receiving approval of the programming recommendations, SJCOG staff prepared the draft RTIP document, which was released for public review online for comments by the SJCOG committees and members of the public. Staff will review any submitted comments and respond as appropriate prior to the SJCOG Board adopting the 2016 RTIP. C. Consultation with Caltrans District (Required per Section 17) Caltrans District: 10 On a quarterly basis, Caltrans reviews the status of STIP projects and current news during the SB 45 meetings. For the region s significant transportation projects on the state highway system, Caltrans is either the lead agency or provides project oversight. Also, during these SB 45 meetings, SJCOG and Caltrans discuss funding opportunities and collaborations. For every STIP cycle, SJCOG and Caltrans discuss in greater detail the funding plans for implementing the region s priority projects. As part of this discussion, Caltrans identifies the highway improvement needs that will be included in the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITP), and proposes projects that could be jointed funded with IIP and RIP. Due to a significant reduction in gasoline excise taxes that has resulted in an adverse impact on STIP revenue, the 2016 STIP Fund Estimate as adopted by the CTC forecasts zero programming capacity. Therefore, the 2016 RTIP does not add any new projects. SJCOG has coordinated with Caltrans to confirm the schedule of projects on the state highway system, and delay projects to later years where possible. SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 6

55 B STIP Regional Funding Request Section STIP Regional Share and Request for Programming Per the STIP Guidelines, the 2016 Fund Estimate indicates that the STIP is already fully programmed for the entire 5 years of the 2016 STIP. This is due primarily to the decrease in the price based excise tax. Project currently programmed in the STIP will need to be reprogrammed into later years. The CTC will not be providing regional shares for the 2016 STIP. A Regional Fund Share Per 2016 STIP Fund Estimate Not applicable for the 2016 STIP Period due to the lack of funding available for programming. B. Summary of Requested Programming Project Name Project Sponsor Project Description SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Stockton Avenue Widening MacArthur Drive Widening and Reconstruction Carpinteria Creek- Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOV Lanes Planning, programming, and monitoring City of Lodi Construct operational improvements at interchange Requested RIP Amount $3,061,000 City of Manteca Construct new interchange $12,300,000 City of Ripon City of Tracy SBCAG SJCOG Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from 2 nd Street to Doak Blvd Reconstruct and widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from Schulte Rd to Valpico Rd ROW Phase of widening from 4 lanes to 6 with HOV Lanes (in Santa Barbara County) Planning and programming activities and project development $1,000,000 $3,194,000 $8,853,000 $600,000 SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 7

56 Section 7. Overview of other funding included with delivery of Regional Improvement Program (RIP) projects. Proposed 2016 RTIP Total RTIP Other Funding ITIP RSTP/ CMAQ Local Funds Fed Demo SBCAG Measure A Total Project Cost SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements $3,061 - $ $3,611 SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange $12, $12,470 $3,080 - $27,850 Stockton Avenue Widening $1,000 - $1,050 $2, $4,300 MacArthur Drive Widening and Reconstruction $3, $2, $5,867 Carpinteria Creek- Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOV Lanes (ROW Phase)* $8, $17,397 $26,250 Planning, programming, and monitoring $ $600 Totals ($1,000s) $29,008 - $1,600 $17,393 $3,080 $17,397 $68,478 Notes: *Project located in Santa Barbara County SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 8

57 Section 8. Interregional Improvement Program (ITIP) Funding The purpose of the ITIP is to improve interregional mobility for people and goods in the State of California. As an interregional program, the ITIP is focused on increasing the throughput for highway and rail corridors of strategic importance outside the urbanized areas of the state. A sound transportation network between and connecting urbanized areas ports and borders is vital to the state s economic vitality. The ITIP is prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 14526, Streets and Highways Code Section 164 and the STIP Guidelines. The ITIP is a five year program managed by Caltrans and funded with 25% of new STIP revenues in each cycle. Developed in cooperation with regional transportation planning agencies to ensure an integrated transportation program, the ITIP promotes the goal of improving interregional mobility and connectivity across California. Caltrans, District 10, has not proposed IIP funding for any new transportation projects in San Joaquin County for inclusion in the 2016 ITIP. Thus, no IIP funding commitments are reflected for any projects in SJCOG s 2016 RTIP. Section 9. Projects Planned Within the Corridor (Required per Section 20) SJCOG participates in a wide range of regional and project level planning activities. In conjunction with other Regional Transportation Planning Agencies, Caltrans, and local jurisdictions, SJCOG participates as a member of Project Development Teams and Steering Committees that work towards improving transportation and mobility in the region. The following is an analysis of projects programmed in the 2016 RTIP and their impact on other projects planned or underway in their corridors. SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements The SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements project will construct safety and operational improvements at the existing interchange in the City of Lodi. The preferred alternative proposes to construct a roundabout at the junction of the off ramp connection onto southbound Cherokee Lane and the southbound on ramp from Turner Road, as well as improve the southbound on ramp entrance geometry. Constructing the roundabout will eliminate the weaving movement between the through traffic onto Cherokee Lane and the on ramp traffic. Additionally, realigning the on ramp will improve the geometrics of the existing on ramp and increase the sight distance for onramp traffic prior to merging with mainline traffic. Other projects planned in the State Route 99 corridor through Lodi include: SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 9

58 State Route 99 Lodi 6 Lane Widening Project: The Project Initiation Document for this project is currently being prepared, which will examine widening SR 99 from 4 to 6 lanes between Harney Lane and Turner Road. State Route 99 Victor to Turner Road Auxiliary Lane: This project consists operational and safety improvements that will include realigning the northbound on ramp at Victor Road, increasing the vertical clearance, and constructing an auxiliary lane from the Northbound SR 99/Victor Road onramp to the Turner Road off ramp. This project is currently in the Project Approval & Environmental Documentation phase, and will be programmed for construction in the 2016 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP). SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange The SR120 / McKinley Avenue Interchange Project is located along SR 120 at approximately mile post 2.2 to 3.2 and is within the jurisdictional limits of both the City of Manteca and San Joaquin County. SR 120 is a four lane freeway traversing in an east west direction. McKinley Avenue is a two lane, north south, road which runs between Woodward Avenue on the south to Lathrop Road on the north. Currently, there is no access on or egress off SR120 from McKinley Avenue. Access to SR 120 is achieved via the Airport Road interchange, one mile to the east, or the Yosemite Avenue interchange, one mile to the west. The existing bridges along SR 120 were constructed at the time of the main highway. The south bridge structure is a single span cast inplace pre stressed box girder design supported by abutments with non battered piles. The north bridge structure is a single span cast in place pre stressed box girder supported on abutments with battered piles. The minimum vertical clearances below the south and north bridge structures are 16 ft. and ft. respectively. There are no existing pedestrian or bicycle facilities within the Project area, however the new Interchange will accommodate a Class I bike path in the future. The City of Manteca recently hired a consultant to assist the City with the steps necessary to complete acquisition of necessary Right of Way, development of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), and construction of the interchange. Other projects planned in the State Route 120 corridor through Manteca and Lathrop include: State Route Lane Widening: This project consists of widening SR 120 from 4 to 6 lanes between Interstate 5 and SR 99. SJCOG will be preparing the Project Initiation Document for this Project in cooperation with Caltrans and the Cities of Manteca and Lathrop. SR 120/Union Road Interchange Reconstruction: This project will consist of reconstructing the existing interchange. Currently, the Union Road Interchange provides access to and egress from SR 120 in both the east and west bound directions. The current interchange configuration is a Type L and is planned to be modified to a Type L SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 10

59 9 interchange (design year 2030). However, the City will consider, and if feasible, build a Diverging Diamond Interchange, rather than a Type L 9 interchange. The City of Manteca recently hired a consultant to assist the City with the steps necessary to complete acquisition of necessary Right of Way, development of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), and construction of the interchange. Stockton Avenue Widening The Stockton Avenue Widening project in the City of Ripon will widen Stockton Avenue from Second Street to Doak Boulevard, from a two lane to a four lane roadway. This section of Stockton Avenue serves as the primary route for industrial traffic between the State Route 99/Main Street Interchange and the industrial business corridor in Ripon. No additional projects are planned in this corridor at this time. MacArthur Drive Widening and Reconstruction The MacArthur Drive Widening and Reconstruction project will reconstruct and widen an approximately 5,000 foot segment of MacArthur Drive between Schulte Road and Valpico Road from two lanes to four lanes in the City of Tracy. The proposed project includes modification of three traffic signals at East Lake Drive, Yosemite Avenue, and Schulte Road, including construction Class II bicycle lanes, continuous sidewalks, streetlights, landscaping, traffic marking and striping. One additional project is planned in the MacArthur Drive corridor: New MacArthur Drive Above Grade Crossing: North of the project, MacArthur Drive is proposed to be realigned to a new above grade crossing over the Union Pacific Railroad Mococo line. The above grade crossing will improve the efficiency of transportation within Tracy by ensuring freight train traffic will no longer impede access to emergency services, jobs, and commerce by motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The City of Tracy is currently seeking funding to complete the environmental documents, design, and right of way acquisition for this project. SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 11

60 C. Relationship of RTIP to RTP/SCS and Benefits of RTIP Section 10. Regional Level Performance Evaluation (per Section 19A of the guidelines) The 2016 RTIP furthers the policies and supportive strategies of SJCOG s adopted 2014 RTP and Sustainable Communities Strategy (2014 RTP/SCS). The table below, SJCOG s 2014 RTP/SCS Policy and Supportive Strategies, provides an overarching framework of which the 2016 RTIP fits. The 2016 RTIP funds projects which enhance the environment for existing and future generations; maximize mobility and accessibility; increase safety and security; preserve the efficiency of the existing transportation system, support economic vitality; maximize cost effectiveness; and improve the quality of life for residents. Projects recommended in the 2016 RTIP are consistent with the coordinated transportation and land use scenario adopted in the RTP/SCS. Projects like the SR99/Turner Road Operational Improvement Project, the SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Project, and the Stockton Avenue Widening Project directly address the safety of the transportation network (strategy 10); maximize mobility and accessibility (strategy 4 and 8); and preserve the efficiency of the existing system (strategy 13 and 15). The SR99/Turner Road Operational Improvement Project proposes to realign the on ramp improving site distance for vehicles merging onto Highway 99 and improvements that benefit the operations of the system. The SR120/McKinley Avenue Interchange project, similar to the SR/99 Turner Road Project provides operational improvements to the regional roadway system. The proposed improvements will improve local access to SR 120 relieving congestion on local roadways and improve the efficiency of the existing system. The Stockton Avenue Project serves as the primary route for industrial traffic including a large number of trucks. The project helps relieve congestion and improves the economic vitality in the movement of goods to regional and statewide markets consistent with RTP/SCS strategies 4, 10, 1617, and 18. In an era of just in time logistics, the efficiency of the transportation system is vital. The RTP/SCS also highlights policies and supportive strategies that encourage projects that support improvements to the active transportation network (strategy 7, 27). The proposed project includes the construction of class II bicycle lanes, continuous sidewalks, and streetlights. These improvements, support active healthy lifestyles as envisioned in the RTP/SCS. Improvements to safety, connectivity, and mobility for bicyclist and pedestrians support the SCS SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 12

61 principles by building a safe place for residents to ride their bikes or walk to local destinations reducing pollution and enhancing public health through active transportation projects. Collectively the projects proposed in the RTIP have regional benefits. These projects as demonstrated in Table B1 reduce greenhouse gas emissions on a regional scale and are supportive of SJCOG s efforts to support the successful implementation of SB 375 and AB 32. In addition, by funding projects with complete streets components, the RTIP results in a reduction in per capita VMT with the projects than without them, an indicator that things are moving consistent with the adopted RTP/SCS. The programming of the SJCOG 2016 RTIP is consistent with the policies, procedures, and funding capacity established the RTP/SCS and in the 2016 STIP Guidelines and STIP Fund Estimate. Policy and Supportive Strategies Policy: Enhance the Environment for Existing and Future Generations and Conserve Energy Strategy #1: Strategy #2: Strategy #3: Encourage Efficient Development Patterns that Maintain Agricultural Viability and Natural Resources Enhance the Connection between Land Use and Transportation Choices through Projects Supporting Energy and Water Efficiency Improve Air Quality by Reducing Transportation-Related Emissions Policy: Maximize Mobility and Accessibility Strategy #4: Strategy #5: Strategy #6: Strategy #7: Strategy #8: Improve Regional Transportation System Efficiency Optimize Public Transportation System to Provide Efficient and Convenient Access for Users at All Income Levels Facilitate Transit-Oriented Development to Maximize Existing Transit Investments Provide Transportation Improvements to Facilitate Non-Motorized Travel Improve Major Transportation Corridors to Minimize Impacts on Rural Roads Policy: Increase Safety and Security Strategy #9: Strategy #10: Strategy #11: Facilitate Projects that Reduce the Number of and Severity of Traffic Incidents Encourage and Support Projects that Increase Safety and Security Improve Communication and Coordination between Agencies and Public for Emergency Preparedness Policy: Preserve the Efficiency of the Existing Transportation System Strategy #12: Strategy #13: Optimize Existing Transportation System Capacity through Available a Support the Continued Maintenance and Preservation of the Existing Transportation System SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 13

62 Policy: Policy: Policy: Policy: Strategy #14: Strategy #15: Policy and Supportive Strategies Encourage System Efficiency with Transportation Improvements that Facilitate Great Jobs/Housing Balance Improve Transportation Options Linking Residents to Employment Centers within and out of the County Support Economic Vitality Strategy #16: Strategy #17: Strategy #18: Improve Freight Access to Key Strategic Economic Centers Promote Safe and Efficient Strategies to Improve the Movement of Goods by Water, Air, Rail, and Truck Support Transportation Improvements that Improve Economic Competitiveness and/or Revitalization of Commercial Corridors and Strategic Economic Centers Promote Interagency Coordination and Public Participation for Transportation Decision- Making and Planning Efforts Strategy #19: Strategy #20: Strategy #21: Diverse Provide Equitable Access to Transportation Planning Engage the Public Early, Clearly, and Continuously Use a Variety of Methods to Engage the Public, Encouraging Representation from Income and Ethnic Backgrounds Maximize Cost-Effectiveness Strategy #22: Strategy #23: Strategy #24: Support the Use of State and Federal Grants to Supplement Local Funding and Pursue Discretionary Grant Funding Opportunities from Outside the Region Support Projects that Maximize Cost Effectiveness Maximize Funding of Existing Transportation Options Improve the Quality of Life for Residents Strategy #25: Strategy #26: Strategy #27: Encourage Transportation Investments that Support a Greater Mix of Housing Options at All Income Levels Improve the Connection Between Land Use and Transportation Enhance Public Health through Active Transportation Projects As required per Section 19A of the STIP guidelines, the RTIP must include an evaluation of overall (RTP level) performance using, as a baseline, the region s existing monitored data. The performance measures listed in Table B1 below identify relevant data and tools available to the extent that may be reported: SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 14

63 Table B1 Evaluation Regional Level Performance Indicators and Measures 2040 RTP 2040 RTP SJCOG 2015 RTIP Without RTIP with RTIP Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Capita Percent of VMT at Less Than 35 MPH 31% 31% Commute Mode Share Drive % Commute Mode Share Transit 1.37% 1.37% Commute Mode Share Walk 0.78% 0.78% Commute Mode Share Bike 2.27% 2.27% Daily Transit Mode Share 2.27% 2.27% Percent of Housing Within.5 miles of Transit Stop 33.70% 33.70% Percent of Housing Within.5 miles of Transit Stop 43.70% 43.70% Agricultural Land Acres Consumed 4,645 4,645 CO2 Emissions Reduction Per Capita (compared to 2005 baseline) (in 1000's) Total Lane Miles 5,385 5,390 As shown in Table B1, by the horizon year of the 2014 RTP in 2040, the 2016 RTIP helps reduce daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita while keeping the percent of congested VMT stable. In addition, no additional acres of agricultural land are consumed by the construction of the RTIP projects. Section 11. Regional and Statewide Benefits of RTIP The projects programmed in the 2016 RTIP area geared toward providing a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance the San Joaquin region and California s economy and livability. The programmed projects will widen existing streets, improve interchange safety and operations, and accommodate the future transportation needs of the fastest growing county in California. The region and the state will both benefit from the programmed projects through increased efficiency, mitigating traffic congestion, and ensuring improved mobility and accessibility for the flow of people and goods movement. SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 15

64 D. Performance and Effectiveness of RTIP Section 12. Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness of RTIP (Required per Section 19) The cost effectiveness of the RTIP on a regional level is based upon the following performance metrics (previously identified in Table B1) and summarized again in Table B2. The investments programmed in the 2016 RTIP will help maximize mobility and accessibility, improvement the quality of life for residents, enhance the environment for existing and future generations, and support economic vitality. The reduction in daily vehicle miles traveled per capita, coupled with the reduction of miles traveling at congested speeds (below 35 mph), will directly translate into improvements in mobility for travelers, commuters, and the flow of goods on the regional and state transportation systems. These indicators allow will support the economic vitality of the region by helping people get to jobs, schools, and other activities more efficiently. Improvements in congestion will help the flow of goods throughout the state and the region, improving the reliability of just in time shipment and delivery services. These are key services in San Joaquin County, which is heavily reliant on the transportation and warehousing of goods and agricultural products for distribution to regional and statewide markets and industries. Maximize Mobility and Accessibility Improve the Quality of Life for Residents Enhance the Environment for Existing and Future Generations Support Economic Vitality Table B2 Evaluation Regional Level Performance Indicators and Measures 2040 RTP SJCOG 2015 RTIP Without RTIP 2040 RTP with RTIP Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Capita Percent of VMT at Less Than 35 MPH 31% 31% Commute Mode Share Drive 95.57% 95.57% Commute Mode Share Transit 1.37% 1.37% Commute Mode Share Walk 0.78% 0.78% Commute Mode Share Bike 2.27% 2.27% Daily Transit Mode Share 2.27% 2.27% Percent of Housing Within.5 miles of Transit Stop 33.70% 33.70% Percent of Housing Within.5 miles of Transit Stop 43.70% 43.70% Agricultural Land Acres Consumed 4,645 4,645 CO2 Emissions Reduction Per Capita (compared to 2005 baseline) (in 1000's) Total Lane Miles 5,385 5,390 SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 16

65 While the indicators do not show a change in the mode split for driving, transit, walking, or biking at the regional level, the overall investment strategy contained in the RTP will demonstrate gains in those areas on a community and regional level basis. Qualitatively, this will spur economic development in communities, which in turn will bolster the region and the state as a whole. In addition, the fact that the percent of jobs and housing within 0.5 miles of a transit stop and the fact that the number of acres of agricultural lane consumed by development are not changed with the implementation of the RTIP projects showcase a cost effective regional plan. These indicators demonstrate an effort to hold firm on the land use and transportation strategies as adopted in the 2014 RTP and Sustainable Communities Strategy. This shows the investments programmed in the 2016 RTIP by SJCOG are a cost effective approach to achieving and furthering economic vitality and environmental sustainability for San Joaquin County. Section 13. Project Specific Evaluation (Required per Section 19) Each RTIP shall include a project specific benefit evaluation for each new project proposed that addresses the changes to the built environment, including, but limited to the items listed on page 9 of the STIP Guidelines. As no new projects are proposed in the 2016 RTIP, a project specific evaluation is not required. SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 17

66 E. Detailed Project Information Section 14. Overview of projects programmed with RIPP funding In the 2016 RTIP, $29,008,000 is for projects to be programmed with carry over funds from the 2014 RTIP with no new funding for the two additional years. This section provides an overview of the each project programmed in the 2016 RTIP. Each project s overview identifies the project s location, scope of work, purpose/needs and benefits. SR 99/ /Turner Improvements Road Operational The SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements project will construct safety and operational improvements at the existing interchange in the City of Lodi. The preferred alternative proposess to construct a roundabout at the junction of the off ramp connection onto southbound Cherokee Lane and the southbound on ramp from Turner Road, as well as improve the southbound on ramp entrance geometry. Constructing the roundabout will eliminate the weaving movement between the throughh traffic onto Cherokee Lane and the on ramp traffic. Additionally, realigning the on of ramp will improve the geometrics the existing on ramp and increase the sight distance for onramp traffic prior to merging with mainline traffic. The proposed project will improve safety and operations on a key segment of State Route 99 that experiences a high rate of collisions. The project will additionally help improve the flow of goods on a portion of State Route 99 that carries a largee percentagee of truck traffic. SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange The SR120 / McKinley Avenue Interchange Project is located along SR 120 at approximately mile post 2.2 to 3.2 and is within the jurisdictional limits of both the City of Mantecaa and San Joaquin SJCOG 2016 RTIPP Page 18

67 County. SR 120 is a four lane freeway traversing in an east west direction. McKinley Avenue is a two lane, north south, road which runs between Woodward Avenue on the south to Lathrop Road on the north. Currently, there is no access on or egress off SR 120 from McKinley Avenue. Access to SR 120 is achieved via the Airport Road interchange, one mile to the east, or the Yosemitee Avenue interchange, one mile to the west. The existing bridges along SR 120 were constructed at the time of the main highway. Theree are no existing pedestrian or bicycle facilities within the project area, however the new interchange willl accommodate a Class I bike path in the future, connecting to existing bicycle facilities in the City of Manteca. The proposed new interchange will improve local access on SR 120, thereby relieving congestion on local roads and the existing interchanges on SR 120, and will accommodate forecasted traffic increases near the project area. Stockton Avenue Widening The Stockton Avenue Widening project in the City of Ripon will widen Stockton Avenue from Second Street to Doak Boulevard, from a two lane to a four lane roadway. This section of Stockton SJCOG 2016 RTIPP Page 19

68 Avenue serves as the primary route for industrial traffic, including a large number of trucks, between the State Route 99/Main Street Interchangee and the industrial businesses located along Stockton Avenue in Ripon. The project will help relieve congestion and improve safety on this corridor, and improve the movement of goods to regional and statewide markets. Many of the businesses that are located on or near Stockton Avenue rely on this section of roadway to support their transportation needs. MacArthur Drive Widening and Reconstructi ion The MacArthur Drive Widening and Reconstruction project will reconstruct and widen an approximately 5,000 foot segment of MacArthur Drive between Schulte Road and Valpico Road from two lanes to four lanes in the City of Tracy. The proposed project includes modification of three traffic signals at East Lake Drive, Yosemitee Avenue, and Schulte Road, including construction Class II bicycle lanes, continuous sidewalks, streetlights, landscaping, traffic marking and striping. The purpose of the proposed project is to upgrade MacArthur Drive between Schulte Road and Valpico Road to a four lane major arterial. The proposed project is needed to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by existing, approved, and planned development. The proposed project is also needed to improve safety, connectivity, and mobility for bicyclists, pedestrians, transit users, and motorists of all ages and abilities by upgrading the facility to a complete street. SJCOG 2016 RTIPP Page 20

69 Carpinteria Creek Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOV Laness (in Santa Barbara County) In November 2012, the SJCOG Board approved the revenue neutral exchange of $8.853 million in SJCOG s 2014 RTIP shares with $8.853 million in State and Locall Partnership Program (SLPP) from the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG). This action included the prioritization of the programming of an $8.853 million project for SBCAG in SJCOG s 2014 RTIP. Through this exchange SJCOG was able to immediately exchange the $8.853 million of SBCAG s SLPP funds for $8.853 million of Measure K Renewal funds committed to the State Route 99 South Stockton Widening project. The SJCOG Board subsequently included in their action the dedication of the $8.853 million in Measure K Renewal funds freed from the State Route 99 South Stockton Widening project to fully fund the construction of the County of San Joaquin s Lower Sacramento Road Widening (Pixley Slough to Harney Curve) project. The Carpinteria Creek Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOVV Lanes project will widen US Route 101 from four lanes to six by constructing HOV lanes in each direction from 0.2 miles south of Bailard Avenue in the City of Carpinteria to Sycamore Creek in the City of Santa Barbara. Route 101 within the project limits currently operates with LOS F congested flow conditions for two to four hours daily. In this area, Route 101 serves as a critical link for interregional, goods movement, and coastal access travel between the Los Angeles basin and the San Francisco Bay area. When I 5 closes over the Grapevine, this sectionn of Route 101 becomes the only viable alternative for north south connectivity. Without improvements,, congestionn is projected to increase to over 10 hours a day by The proposed project will reducee congestionn and delay, provide capacity for current and future travel demand, improve travel time, and provide for HOV lane continuity in southern Santa Barbara County. SJCOG 2016 RTIPP Page 21

70 F. Appendices Section 15. Projects Programming Request Forms Section RTIP SJCOG Board Adoption Resolution Section 17. Detailed Project Programming Summary Table Section 18. San Joaquin Valley Coordinated Regional Transportation Improvement Program SJCOG 2016 RTIP Page 22

71 Appendices Section 15 Project Programming Request Forms

72 SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements Project Programming Request

73 Stockton Avenue Widening Project Programming Request

74 MacArthur Drive Widening and Reconstruction Project Programming Request

75 Carpinteria Creek Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOV Lanes Project Programming Request

76 Appendices Section RTIP SJCOG Board Adoption Resolution

77 RESOLUTION SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS R RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN REGION WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Council of Governments is the officially designated Metropolitan Planning Organization and Regional Transportation Planning Agency for San Joaquin County and, as such, is required to prepare and adopt a Regional Transportation Improvement Program every two years; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2015 California Transportation Commission adopted the STIP fund estimate; and WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Council of Governments has prepared a Regional Transportation Improvement Program which respects this fund estimate; and WHEREAS, the proposed program of projects has been circulated and reviewed by the San Joaquin Council of Governments member agencies representing theirr technical and management staffs as well as Caltrans District 10 staff; and WHEREAS, the Draft Regional Transportation Improvement Program wass posted online to allow and encouragee all interested parties to review and comment on thee draft Regional Transportation Improvement Program prior to adoption by the San Joaquin Council of Governments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Joaquin Council off Governments does hereby endorse and adopt the five-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program covering the fiscal years (FY) 2016/17 through FY 2020/21. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November 2015, by the following vote of the Board of the San Joaquin Council of Governments. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ANTHONY SILVA Chairman

78 Appendices Section 17 Detailed Project Programming Summary Table

79