AGENDA. 2. Minutes: Approve Minutes of November 15, 2017 ACTION. 9. Updates / Requests from the Committee

Transcription

1 P1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Citizens Advisory Committee San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 East Weber Avenue, Stockton, California Wednesday, January 17, :00 p.m. Citizens Advisory Committee Members Richard Blackston (Chair) CITY OF LODI Stephanie Hobbs (Vice Chair) CITY OF RIPON Michael Carouba BUSINESS INDUSTRY Jim Hilson CITY OF LATHROP Bobby Bivens SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Lauren Ah Tye LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Leonard Smith CITY OF MANTECA Gracie Marx CITY OF ESCALON Carol Blevins CITY OF TRACY LaCresia Hawkins NAACP Rick Grewal CITY OF STOCKTON Michael Ballot SIERRA CLUB Albert Nunez TRUCKING INDUSTRY Marty Van Houten UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC Vacant TRANSIT ADVOCATE SJCOG Andrew T. Chesley EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR The San Joaquin Council of Governments is in compliance with the American with Disabilities Act and will make all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to participate in employment, programs and facilities. Persons requiring assistance or auxiliary aid in order to participate should contact Rebecca Calija at at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Note: All items are available for action by the committee. The right hand column identifies staff recommendations. 1. Call to Order AGENDA 2. Minutes: Approve Minutes of November 15, 2017 ACTION 3. Public Comments At this time the public may address the CAC on any non-agenda item that is within the subject matter of this agency. A five-minute maximum time limit will apply to all public comments. 4. Tri-Valley San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority DISCUSSION 5. Report on Local Update of Census Addresses Workshop INFORMATION 6. Measure K Renewal Bicycle Pedestrian, Safe Routes to School INFORMATION and Smart Growth Incentive Program Call for Projects Update Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Amendments INFORMATION 8. SJCOG Staff Update 9. Updates / Requests from the Committee 10. Meeting Adjourned to Wednesday, February 21, 2018.

2 AGENDA ITEM 2 P2

3 P3 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Citizens Advisory Committee 555 East Weber Ave. Stockton, CA Wednesday, November 15, 2017 ACTION MINUTES 1) Call to Order Chair Blackston called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Members Present: Richard Blackston (Chair), City of Lodi; Stephanie Hobbs (Vice Chair), City of Ripon;; Bobby Bivens, San Joaquin County; Gracie Marx, City of Escalon; Carol Blevins, City of Tracy; Rick Grewal, City of Stockton; Michael Ballot, Sierra Club; Marty Van Houten, University of the Pacific SJCOG Staff Present: Kim Anderson, Senior Regional Planner; Ryan Niblock, Senior Regional Planner; Rob Cunningham, Senior Regional Planner; Kari McNickle, Associate Program Specialist; David Ripperda, Associate Regional Planner Others Present: Kelly Mraz, First Five of San Joaquin 2) Minutes: Approve Minutes of October 18, 2017 A motion was made and seconded (Van Houten/Blevins) to approve the minutes of October 18, Motion passed unanimously. 3) Public Comments None. 4) Dibbs Fiscal Year Community Report Ms. Kari McNickle presented this item. She provided a presentation on the accomplishments of Dibbs during Fiscal Year , including a rebranding effort and the launch of a new vanpool program. 5) 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funding Recommendations Mr. Ryan Niblock presented this item. He informed the committee that the SJCOG region would be receiving approximately $39 million over the next five years, and that after a repayment to Santa Barbara County, approximately $30 million would be available for programming to new projects. He noted that SJCOG staff had narrowed the list of projects for programming in the 2018 STIP down to two projects, the SR 99/120 Connector Project and the I-205 Widening

4 P4 Project, and noted the SJCOG staff were also recommending programming SJCOG s formulaic portion of the SB 1 Local Partnership Program to the SR 99/120 Connector Project. Committee discussion included the potential impacts to the STIP if Senate Bill 1 were to be repealed and the need for improvements to I-580 through the Altamont Pass and along International Parkway in Tracy. A motion was made and seconded (Hilson/Hobbs) to approve the staff recommendation. Motion passed unanimously. 6) 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Scenario Performance Update Mr. Bivens arrived during this item. Ms. Kim Anderson presented this item. She noted that selection of a scenario for the RTP/SCS had been pushed back until November to allow additional time for outreach and technical work, and therefore the planned public workshops had been postponed. She informed the committee that the online surveying for the RTP/SCS was showing Scenario 2A as the most preferred, followed by Scenario 1, Scenario 2B, and then Scenario 3. Ms. Anderson informed the committee that SJCOG staff were recommending the selection of Scenario 2A as the preferred scenario for the 2018 RTP/SCS. Committee discussion included the impacts of the scenarios on jobs and the economy and the potential ¼ cent sales tax proposed in Scenario 2B. A motion was made and seconded (Van Houten/Hilson) to recommend to the SJCOG Board that they selected Scenario 2A as the preferred scenario for the 2018 RTP/SCS. Motion passed 8-1, with Ballot dissenting. 7) Authorization of State Transit Assistance Funds for Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Service Mr. Rob Cunningham presented this item. He informed the committee that SJCOG had partnered with RTD to develop the scope of work for the proposed Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Service. Mr. Cunningham described the various types of services available through the new service, including partnering with Stanislaus Area Regional Transit, the existing ACE service, and RTD commuter buses to the Bay Area and Sacramento. He noted that SJCOG staff were now recommending authorizing $250,000 of State Transit Assistance funds to launch a one year pilot program of the new service. Committee discussion included the need for evaluation of the program throughout the period of the pilot program and what would happen to the program after the first year. A motion was made and seconded (Grewal/Hobbs) to approve the staff recommendation with the addition of a requirement for evaluation to be provided every four months. Motion passed 8-1, with Bivens abstaining.

5 P5 8) 2018 San Joaquin One Voice Call for Projects Mr. Ripperda presented this item. He informed the committee that this was the annual process to solicit priority projects from the region to advocate for during the One Voice trip to Washington D.C. Committee discussion included what projects have been funded lately, the non-transportation projects that have been included on past trips, and the need to work with Congressman Denham and Congressman McNerney to advocate for the region s priorities. 9) SJCOG Staff Update Mr. Ripperda reminded the committee that there was not a Citizens Advisory Committee meeting scheduled for the month of December. 10) Committee Updates / Future Agenda Items Mr. Ballot informed the committee that the University of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy Research was holding their annual State of the Northern San Joaquin Valley Conference on November 16 in Modesto. Ms. Marx provided an update to the committee on the low flying airplanes over Escalon on the approach to Stockton Metropolitan Airport, noting that the FAA was now routing planes further south. Mr. Bivens informed the committee that the NAACP was hosting a 5k/10k run and walk on January 13 as a fundraiser for community efforts to improve health. 11) Meeting Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.

6 AGENDA ITEM 4 P6

7 P7 January 2018 CAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Discussion Only DISCUSSION: Mr. Michael Tree of the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) has been invited to address the SJCOG Board of Directors on the Tri-Valley- San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (TVSJV). The Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority was created under AB 758 (2017) and is tasked with the mission to plan and help deliver a cost-effective connection from the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area Rapid Transit District s rapid transit system and the Altamont Corridor Express in the Tri-Valley, to address regional economic and transportation changes. (Section 2 of AB 758 (Chapter747)) The Authority, which meets for the first time on January 17, 2018 at the Livermore Community Center is a 15 member body composed of representatives from: BART The City of Dublin The City of Lathrop The City of Livermore The City of Manteca The City of Pleasanton The City of Stockton The City of Tracy The County of Alameda The County of San Joaquin The Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority The Mountain House Community Services District The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission The City of Danville The City of San Ramon SJCOG staff presented the SJCOG Board at our last meeting with the brochure created by LAVTA, which is acting as staff to the Authority. (See attached)

8 P8 The Authority is tasked with the creation of a project feasibility report which needs to be completed by July 1, The Authority has no specific funding sources and is looking for funding from the regional transportation agencies in the Tri-Valley and San Joaquin County side. The feasibility study is estimated at $1.3 million. Staff from the Authority have requested SJCOG provide up to $300,000 of that amount. The rest will be coming from the west side of the Altamont. The Authority staff is looking to start work as well on a programmatic EIR and if the feasibility report can be completed for less would like to use any remaining funds from the $300,000 contribution to put toward that work. SJCOG staff have discussed this and is agreeable to the request and to the availability of the funding for development of a programmatic EIR. A summary of the bill s requirements from the feasibility report are as follows: 1) Recommendations for expediting the development of cost-effective and responsive transit connectivity between BART and the Altamont Corridor Express. 2) Identification of a preferred entity or entities to deliver transit connectivity, including the role each entity will play in planning, designing, etc. 3) A funding plan 4) A description of revenue sources to be pledged for financing the duration of time to complete the financing and the estimated total cost of financing. 5) Proposed Schedule for completion of transit connectivity. 6) Preliminary design for the project with right of way, routes, stations, equipment, and any other facilities needed. A copy of the chaptered bill is attached. The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff has been active in the early discussion about a DMU/EMU (Diesel Multiple Unit/Electric Multiple Unit) train system that could complement the existing ACE service. ACE is somewhat constrained by the need to secure an agreement with the Union Pacific for additional train sets across the Altamont. UP has been very reluctant to provide for additional train sets due to issues associated with the Niles Canyon and connecting tracks in Alameda County. Those issues are not going to be imminently worked out or set aside. As well, BART is in the process of completing an EIR exploring expanding service to the west to Livermore. The only expansion option that would provide a direct connection to ACE is the Greenville option. However, that is, by this author, an unlikely scenario to be chosen. That leaves a potential DMU/EMU as a possible way to make that connection work. There are a number of decision points on the Alameda County side that need to be made to advance a potential DMU/EMU system. In many ways, the issues are simpler on this side of the Pass but await Alameda decisions. SJCOG intends to include in our Draft Regional Transportation Plan a description of AB 758, the mission of the new Authority and the undertaking of the feasibility report. We also intend to include the identification of the possible environmental document. There will not be the inclusion of the capital or operational costs as these are uncertain and well beyond the existing and reasonable assumption of financial resources for our RTP. With the completion of the feasibility report and progress made on the Alameda side of things, our Regional Transportation

9 P9 Plan can be amended to include a more extensive list of capital and operational improvements. This, of course, would be done in conjunction with our Bay Area partners, the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, and the Authority. It would also be subject to available resources and the policies and objectives of the Regional Transportation Plan. SJCOG staff has been working with the Authority s staff and the Rail Commission staff to address some of the early issues with the formation of a new governing body and its challenging mission. We have also spoken with City of Tracy representatives about their concerns that the RTP proposal from COG staff is not aggressive enough in pursuing the improvements. SJCOG staff is happy to discuss those concerns and why we believe our approach is appropriate and continues to move the ball forward on this potentially beneficial project. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Assembly Bill No ) Connecting Bart and ACE Rail Systems Brochure Prepared by Andrew T. Chesley, Executive Director

10 P10

11 P11

12 P12

13 P13

14 P14

15 P15

16 P16

17 P17

18 P18

19 P19 AGENDA ITEM 5

20 P20 January 2018 CAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Report on Local Update of Census Addresses January 9 th Workshop Information SUMMARY: SJCOG hosted a workshop on January 9, 2018 where the Census Bureau staff discussed the logistics of LUCA. Earlier this year, the Census Bureau prepared for the Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) by mailing out invitations to the highest elected officials in each jurisdiction. In San Joaquin County, Stockton, Lathrop, Tracy, Manteca, Ripon, and Escalon have all registered to participate in LUCA, and San Joaquin County has registered to be a county participant. LUCA is a program used to ensure that all state populations and communities are accounted for. Those who are able to participate include federally recognized tribes with a reservation and/or off-reservation trust lands, states, counties, cities (incorporated place), and townships (minor civil divisions). The LUCA workshop included topics such as a review of the digital address materials, digital materials set up, a review of update strategies, acceptable updates, and address submissions. If you or someone from your jurisdiction were unable to attend the Stockton meeting, here is a list of additional meetings: Please visit our website to view the training material, presentations, and tutorials from the January 9, 2018 Workshop: The PowerPoint for past workshops can be found here: Additional information on LUCA can be found here: and here: A helpful summary PowerPoint of LUCA is available here: RECOMMENDATION: Information only.

21 P21 FISCAL IMPACT: Census Data Center activities are budgeted under the SJCOG Overall Work Program (OWP) under work element SCHEDULE: The following schedule is for the next important dates in the timeline of LUCA. Date January 09, 2018 February- April 2018 March-September 2018 April May 2019 Summer 2019 April 1, 2020 Milestone/Deliverable LUCA In-Person Workshop at SJCOG Participation materials mailed to registered participants Census Bureau processes 2020 Luca submissions Census Bureau validates 2020 LUCA addresses Census Bureau delivers 2020 LUCA feedback. CENSUS DAY NEXT STEPS: What to Do to Prepare You will receive your LUCA materials from the Census Bureau between February and April 2018 but don t wait until then to prepare. There are three things you can do now: Review and assemble your local address sources to compile your residential address list. Sources could include: New housing construction or building permits; Housing inspection records; Local utility records; Annexation records; Assessment or tax files (residential units); etc. Access the Census Address Count List for your jurisdiction online. Your government s Address Count List, which contains the Census Bureau s count of residential addresses for each census block within your jurisdiction, is available on the LUCA Web site. Compare the census counts to your counts to help focus your participation efforts. Attend a LUCA Training Workshop near you. This workshop will cover what to expect when you get your LUCA materials. A review of the GUPS software and how to use your own GIS systems to complete your review. Prepared by: Summer Anderson, Assistant Regional Planner

22 P22 AGENDA ITEM 6

23 P23 January 2018 CAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Measure K Renewal Bicycle, Pedestrian, Safe Routes to School and Smart Growth Incentive Program Call for Projects Status Update RECOMMENDATION ACTION: Information Only SUMMARY: On September 28, 2017 the SJCOG Board approved a Call for Projects for the Measure K Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Competitive Program and the Smart Growth Incentive Program. A total of 40 applications were received by the December 15, 2017 deadline. The applicants requested a total of $30.5 million from the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Program and $8.74 million from the Smart Growth Incentive Program. These 40 projects have a combined total project cost of $59.1 million including matching funds. The applications for the projects are summarized in Attachment 1. A total of $19.66 million of Measure K funding will be available for programming in Fiscal Years 2017/18 through 2020/21, with $3.85 million for the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Competitive Program, $7.78 million for the Smart Growth Incentive Program, and $8 million from the former debt service reserve fund that will be available for either program. SJCOG staff solicited volunteers to participate in a multi-disciplinary advisory scoring committee for the Call for Projects, with a total of eleven persons volunteering as shown in Attachment 2. Towards the end of January, the scoring committee will convene to rank the projects and develop a programming recommendation. This programming recommendation will be taken through the SJCOG committees in February with final approval by the SJCOG Board on February 22, RECOMMENDATION: Information Only. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time.

24 P24 BACKGROUND: As part of the adoption of the 2017 Measure K Strategic plan, the SJCOG Board approved the concept of a Combined Call for Projects for the Measure K Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Competitive Program and the Smart Growth Incentive Program in Fall A total of $19.8 million will be available, with $3.85 million for the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Competitive Program, $7.78 million for the Smart Growth Incentive Program, and $8.17 million from the former debt service reserve fund that will be available for either program. Funding will be available for Fiscal Years 2017/18 through 2020/21. SJCOG staff prepared draft guidelines, application form, and scoring criteria for this Call for Projects. These draft guidelines contain scoring criteria adapted from previously approved documents and funding programs, including the 2012 Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Master Plan, the 2012 Regional Smart Growth Transit Oriented Development Plan, and the 2017 Active Transportation Program. A public workshop was held on August 22, 2017 in the SJCOG Board Room to provide information and solicit comments. Approximately forty people attended the workshop. Based upon comments received at the workshop and questions posed to staff after the workshop, SJCOG staff revised the guidelines to create a final version which were approved by the SJCOG Board on September 28, The final guidelines included two policy recommendations to ensure that all areas of the county can be competitive in this process and share in the benefits of the Measure K Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Program and Smart Growth Incentive Program. These recommendations are described below. Technical Assistance to Local Agency Project Sponsors The SJCOG Board approved setting $170,000 from the program to provide project and application development assistance to local agency project sponsors. These funds were divided with $20,000 each to the cities of Escalon, Lathrop, Lodi, Manteca, Ripon, and Tracy, $25,000 to the City of Stockton, and $25,000 to the County of San Joaquin. SJCOG entered into cooperative agreements with each jurisdiction that identified the projects for which the sponsors would be requesting assistance and the type of project (Bicycle/Pedestrian/SRTS or Smart Growth) so that expenses could be tracked and assigned to each program in the Measure K Strategic Plan. Eligible expenditures included but were not limited to procurement of consultant assistance, staff time, outreach, and preparation of technical studies, exhibits, and plans. Target Amount for Small Projects in Small Jurisdictions The SJCOG Board approved a target amount of $4,000,000 intended for high quality projects in jurisdictions with a population of 200,000 or less. These funds would be limited to projects with a total cost less than $500,000. The intent is to allow small jurisdictions that do not have the resources of larger agencies to compete. If insufficient, suitably high-quality projects are submitted, these funds would be able to be programmed to other Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School Program and Smart Growth Incentive Program projects.

25 P25 A total of ten projects from Escalon, Manteca, Ripon, and San Joaquin County were submitted that could potentially be eligible for this category. The total Measure K amount requested by these ten projects was approximately $2.9 million, however the exact amount for the set aside will be determined as part of the scoring committee s recommendations. SCHEDULE December 15, 2017 Applications Due Late January 2018 Scoring Committee Review of Applications February 22, 2018 SJCOG Board Approval of Project Recommendations ATTACHMENTS 1) Summary of Measure K Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School and Smart Growth Incentive Program Applications 2) SJCOG Measure K Multi-disciplinary Advisory Scoring Committee Members Prepared by: David Ripperda, Associate Regional Planner

26 Attachment 1 P26 Applicant Project Title Total Project Cost Total MK Bike/Ped/SRTS Requested Total MK Smart Growth Requested PA&ED PS&E ROW CON PLAN SRTS DAC Escalon Escalon Road Bike and Pedestrian Improvements 1,390, ,000-89, , ,700 44, ,700 - X Escalon First Street Improvements 730, , , ,800-51,600 51, ,800 - X X Escalon Main Street Class 1 Trail First Street to 4th Street 350, ,000-63, , ,500 31, ,000 - X X Escalon Main Street Bike and Pedestrian Improvements 3rd St. to St. John Rd. 760, ,000-89, ,500-44,500 44, ,500 - X X Escalon Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons: 3 Locations 130, ,000-22, , ,300 11, ,500 - X X X Lathrop Class II Bikeway to ACE Station 1,350,000 1,215, ,000-1,035,000-72, ,000-1,035,000 - X Lathrop Warren Avenue Safe Routes to School 499, ,100-55, ,300-18,900 36, ,300 - X X X Lodi Central Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements 1,512,254 1,361, ,042 1,108, , ,225-1,108,986 - X Lodi Church Street Road Diet Project 1,622,150 1,459, ,358 1,189, , ,215-1,189,577 - X Manteca Union Interchange - Multi-use Path 2,400,000 1,440,000-1,440, ,440,000 - X Manteca Non-motorized Transportation Plan 300, , , ,000 X X Manteca Main Street Pavement Improvement Project - Bike Lanes 350, , , ,000 - X X Manteca Yosemite Avenue Pavement Improvement Project - Bike lanes 240, , , ,000 - X X Ripon Doak Boulevard Shared-Use Path 385, ,165-24, , ,878 17, ,092 - X X Ripon Lower Stanislaus River Multi-Use Trail 498, ,979-27, , , ,169 - X X RTD Stockton Transit Bike Share Study 150, , , ,000 X San Joaquin County Bicycle Master SJ County Plan Update 300, , , , ,000 X SJ County Countywide Class III Bike Routes 1,747,522 1,572,522-1,572, ,572,522 - SJ County Diverting Canal Class I Bikeway 274, , , ,000-9,000 40, ,000 - X X Oro Avenue and Section Avenue SJ County Sidewalk Improvements 1,416,000 1,274, ,000 1,019,000-10, ,000 10,000 1,014,000 - X SJ County Pock Lane Pedestrian Pathway 791, , , ,000 - Thornton Road Sidewalk SJ County Improvements 2,010, , , ,184-17, ,000 10, ,184 - X SJRRC East Channel Street Streetscape and Connectivity Project 5,023,410-2,000, ,500-1,782,500-72, ,000-1,782,500 - X Stockton California Street Road Diet Phase 1 2,200,000 2,000, ,500 1,462, , ,000-1,760,400 - X Stockton Central Stockton Road Diet and Striping Connections Construction 1,240,563 1,116, , ,563-30,944-1,085,563 - X Stockton Bicycle Master Plan East/West Access Road Diets - Alpine & Hazelton 1,024, , , ,694-25, ,694 - X Stockton El Dorado & Center Street Corridor Study and Design 400, , , , ,000 X Stockton Main Street Complete Streets 770, , , , X Potentially Qualifies for Small Project/ Communities Set Aside

27 P27 Applicant Project Title Total Project Cost Total MK Bike/Ped/SRTS Requested Total MK Smart Growth Requested PA&ED PS&E ROW CON PLAN SRTS DAC Stockton Miner Avenue Complete Streets Median Improvements* 13,405,000-3,560, ,000 3,160, ,000-3,160,000 - X Stockton Pacific Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Study 250, , , ,000 X Stockton Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Installations Project 790, , , ,000-60,000 69, ,000 - X Stockton South Airport Way Separated Bikeway* 2,245,000-2,020, ,000-1,912, ,000-1,912,000 - X X Stockton Safe Routes to School Priority Safety Projects 1,547,000 1,242, ,000-1,082,000-52, ,000-1,082,000 X X Stockton Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Network Completion Project 2,445,000 2,200, ,000-1,837,000-14, ,000-1,837,000 X X Stockton West Lane Complete Streets Corridor Study 250, , , ,000 X Tracy Central Avenue Road Diet 945, , , , , , ,605 - X X Tracy Lammers Road Sidewalk 5,584,540 5,026,086-2,338,875 2,687, , ,000 1,645,875 2,605,790 - X Tracy MacArthur Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure 705, , , , , , ,160 - X X Tracy Sports Park to West Valley Mall Trail 400, , , , Tracy Tracy Boulevard Sidewalk 731, , , , , , , ,243-59,163,432 30,497,495 8,738,581 7,009,496 10,777,033 19,688,991 1,742,657 2,183,538 3,573,320 1,865,113 29,824,285 1,560,000 Potentially Qualifies for Small Project/ Communities Set Aside CON: Construction Phase DAC: Benefit to Disadvantaged Communities PA&ED: Project Approval/Environmental Document Phase PLAN: Planning Phase PS&E: Plans, Specifications & Estimate Phase ROW: Right of Way Phase SRTS: Safe Routes to School *Request exceeds maximum amounts allowed for Measure K Smart Growth Incentive Program

28 Attachment 2 P28 SJCOG Measure K Multi-disciplinary Advisory Scoring Committee Name Organization Title Expertise Senior Deputy San Joaquin County Director Public Health Public Health Services Policy & Planning Barb Alberson Richard Blackston SJCOG Citizens Advisory Committee CAC Chair Safe Routes to School Matthew Boga San Joaquin County Health Education Public Health Services Associate Public Health Dorothy Kam City of Lodi Associate Traffic Engineer Traffic Engineering Koosun Kim City of Manteca Deputy Public Works Director Civil Engineering Jasmine Leek Third Cities Coalition / RTD Founder / Public Outreach, Customer Disadvantaged Engagement Communities Analyst Bill Mitchell Bike Lodi / San Joaquin County Public Health, Board Member Public Health Services (retired) Bicycle Advocacy Jordan Petersen San Joaquin Transit Planning, Grants Planner Regional Rail Commission Grant Writing Kathryn Siddle Bike Lodi President Bicycle Advocacy Leonard Smith Manteca Planning Commission / Civil Engineering, Member SJCOG Citizens Advisory Committee Bike/Ped Advocacy Kristine Williams Enterprise Community Partners Affordable Housing, Central Valley Disadvantaged Program Officer Communities, Grant Writing

29 P29 AGENDA ITEM 7

30 P30 January 2018 CAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2018 Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Amendment Process Information SUMMARY: SJCOG is soliciting requests to amend the Measure K Ordinance and/or Expenditure Plan. Interested parties must submit all requests in writing to SJCOG by March 30, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Attachment A describes the overall process and schedule. RECOMMENDATION: Information only. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Fiscal impact will be evaluated as part of the amendment process. BACKGROUND The Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan sets forth the eligible uses of Measure K funds and identifies the funding categories for various projects. The Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan were approved by the voters of San Joaquin County, and can be accessed online at: The Ordinance requires SJCOG to have an annual process (each fiscal year) to solicit proposed changes to the Measure K Ordinance or Expenditure Plan. Such proposed amendments may include, but are not limited to, changes in language of the Measure K Ordinance, changes to the Measure K eligible Program of Projects, and changes to funding categories identified in the Measure K Expenditure Plan. In 2017, the SJCOG Board approved four amendments to the Expenditure Plan: 1. Added the City of Tracy s Interstate 205/Mountain House Parkway Interchange, Interstate 580/International Parkway Interchange, and International Parkway projects to the Congestion Relief, Regional Arterials category of the Measure K program to be eligible for Measure K funding. 2. A scope change to the City of Stockton s Mariposa Road project, which changed the western limits of the project from State Route 99 to 8 th Street.

31 P31 3. Added the City of Stockton s Lower Sacramento Road project to the Congestion Relief, Regional Arterials category of the Measure K program to be eligible for Measure K funding. 4. A scope change to the City of Stockton s Pacific Avenue project, which reduced the scope of the project to include widening to include bicycle facilities and extending the southern limits of the project from the Calaveras River to Harding Way. In January 2018, member agencies will be notified in writing regarding the Call for Amendments to the Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan. Interested parties must submit all requests in writing to SJCOG by March 30, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. ATTACHMENTS: A) 2018 Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Amendment Process Prepared by: David Ripperda, Associate Regional Planner

32 Exhibit A: 2018 Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Amendment Process P32 March 30, 2018 Deadline for Interested parties to submit proposals to amend Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan. May & June Committee input on Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Amendments 45 days following notice of SJCOG Board Action In the event that a local jurisdiction does not agree with the amendments, it must, by majority vote, notify SJCOG via mail, of their intent to obtain an override of the amendments from a majority of the cities representing a majority of the population residing within the incorporated areas of the county and from the Board of Supervisors, 45 days after SJCOG provides notification of amendment... JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC In January SJCOG sends out letter to local jurisdictions soliticting proposals to amend Measure K Ordinance and Expenditure Plan In April SJCOG staff analyzes the proposals and fiscal analysis to develop recommendations for Committees June 28, 2017 SJCOG Board holds a public hearing on the proposed amendments. Upon completion of the hearing, the amendments must be passed by a roll call vote and must - have two thirds majority of concurrence.