2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process"

Transcription

1 2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process Available Funding: (In Millions) CMAQ STP Preservation TOTAL Regional $14.27 (project cap)$7.13 Countywide $2.41 (project cap)$1.2 $14.27 (project cap)$7.13 $2.41 (project cap)$1.2 $9.51 (project cap)$4.75 $5.05 (project cap)$2.52 Target for Rural STP is a minimum of $0.36m per year or $0.72m total. Target for Non-Motorized STP or CMAQ is $3.0m. $9.51 (project cap)$4.75 $5.05 (project cap)$2.52 $2.01 (project cap) $750,000 N/A N/A $47.57 $2.01 (project cap) $750,000 $18.95 Funding Year Dates Funds are Available Obligation Date /01/2020 June 1, /01/2021 June 1, 2022 You must complete and submit an accurate obligation package to WSDOT by June 1 st of your funding year to allow processing time for obligation by the end of the federal fiscal year, September 30th. Important Dates: PSRC Regional STP/CMAQ ICC Countywide STP/CMAQ STP/CMAQ Workshop March 7 th March 9th Call for Projects February 22 nd March 23 rd Screening Forms Due March 12 th April 9 th Applications Due April 19 th May 18 th Sponsor Presentations April 26th-27th N/A Committee Recommendation Meeting RPEC May 24 th -May 25th ICC Meeting June 8 th Executive Committee Approval TPB Meeting July 12 th SCT Steering June 13 th Approval October 25 th

2 Changes to the PSRC Regional Competition Only two years of funding for this competition Funding must be balanced by year CAPS for amount of money will apply for each funding source CAPS for amount of money will apply for each funding source CAP for Regional CMAQ Requests are $7.13 million CAP for Regional STP requests is $4.75 million Project Readiness/Financial Plan worth 5 points, using the PSRC Regional Criteria Remaining points were reallocated to Mobility & Accessibility Benefit for Cat A & B and System Continuity for Cat B Proposed Changes to the Countywide 2018 Project Selection Process: Only two years of funding for this competition Funding must be balanced by year CAPS for amount of money will apply for each funding source CAP for CMAQ Requests are $1.2 million CAP for STP requests is $2.52 million CAP for Preservation Requests is: $750,000 Project Readiness Criteria has changed in definition and points Project Readiness/Financial Plan worth 5 points, using the PSRC Regional Criteria Project Match max of 15 points for Centers and Connection Projects, Max of 5 points for Preservation Projects. Remaining points from Project Readiness we spread equally between categories Important things to remember: You must pick either 2021 or 2022 funding in your application obligation by June 1 st of the year chosen Applicants may apply for more than one phase, funding awards are limited to Preliminary Engineering phase + one (i.e. PE + ROW, or PE + CN. ROW + CN are not eligible for funding) Screening forms must be completed and approved by PSRC before you can submit an application to the PSRC Regional or ICC Countywide competitions.

3 Snohomish County Tomorrow Infrastructure Coordinating Committee 2018 Call for Projects FHWA STP & CMAQ Countywide Funds ICC Project Selection Process Every two years the Puget Sound Regional Council conducts a competitive grant program to award FHWA Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. These funds are awarded at the Regional level by PSRC and at the countywide level by the Infrastructure Coordinating Committee (ICC). The ICC is a standing sub-committee of Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT) comprised of public works representatives of the cities, the County and the Tulalip Tribe; representatives from the PUD, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Port of Everett, and local transit agencies. The ICC is responsible for coordinating a competitive process to recommend projects to receive the countywide portions of estimated STP and CMAQ funds available for programming. The countywide allocations include non-motorized-transportation funds, roadway preservation funds, and the minimum amount of STP Rural (STP/R) funds to be programmed to projects located outside the federal-aid urbanized and federal-aid urban areas. Funding recommendations from the ICC for the countywide allocations of the STP and CMAQ funds are forwarded through SCT to PSRC s Transportation Policy Board for review/discussion and approval for the draft Regional TIP. For the Countywide STP/CMAQ competitions the policy focus is on providing transportation improvements to a center or centers and the corridors that serve them. Centers are defined as regional growth and regional manufacturing/industrial centers, centers as designated through countywide processes, town centers, military bases/facilities and other local centers. Materials included in the Call for Projects include: PSRC Policy Framework PSRC Screening Form Call for Projects Schedule Application Evaluation Process Projects must meet the following criteria: Must be consistent with Transportation 2040 Must meet the support for centers and the corridors they serve policy focus Must be consistent with a jurisdiction s most recently amended or updated comprehensive plan certified by PSRC. 1

4 All matching funds must be secured or reasonably expected to be secured for the phase being applied for Countywide STP & CMAQ Funding Amounts (estimates): (in millions, rounded) CMAQ STP Preservation TOTAL $2.41 Project Cap $1.2 $2.41 Project Cap $1.2 $5.05 Project Cap $2.52 $5.05 Project Cap $2.52 $2.01 Project Cap $750,000 $2.01 Project Cap $750,000 $18.95 Evaluation Process: Operating Procedures An ICC Sub-Committee will score all applications and provide a draft list of ranked projects to the ICC Committee. Scores will be based on the criteria and point distribution as identified in the scoring matrix The ICC Committee may revise the ranked order of the list after consideration of available funding sources, geographic equity, multiple funding to one agency and full phase funding. A separate list will be compiled to reflect different sources of funding The ICC Committee recommends a final list of projects for SCT review and approval. The SCT approved list of ranked projects is forwarded to the Puget Sound Regional Council s Transportation Policy Board for award of funds. The ICC will conduct a competitive grant process every 2 years for a 2 year funding cycle upon direction of the PSRC. It is the intention of the committee to reach consensus on a ranked list of projects, in the event that consensus is not met a majority vote will be taken. Each jurisdiction present is allowed one (1) vote. Screening forms for all applications must be submitted and projects approved by PSRC prior to submitting an application. Applications will be reviewed and a ranked list will be generated. All projects screened and approved by PRSC and submitted shall be included on the ranked list of projects An agency may accept partial funding for their project if they can complete a full phase of the project and they commit all additional funding needed for that phase at the time of acceptance/award. If funding is not available for all projects on the list, a contingency list of projects will be created and maintained in the event that additional funds become available. Projects on the contingency list will remain in ranked order. 2

5 Countywide Project Evaluation Process Instructions for STP/CMAQ Funding The purpose of this application process is to assist the ICC in selecting projects to receive Countywide STP and CMAQ funding under the Federal FHWA Program (through PSRC). This application should be used for all STP and CMAQ funding requests. Please review the instructions below thoroughly: Application Checklist PSRC Countywide Screening Form *Screening forms must be submitted to PSRC and approved prior to submitting an Application Screening Forms Due April 9th PSRC Countywide Online Application Applications Due May 18th Questions, please contact Doug McCormick at (425) or Melissa (425) melissa.cauley@commtrans.org Application Tips Applicants may apply for more than one phase, funding awards are limited to: Preliminary engineering phase plus one, (i.e. PE + ROW, or PE + CN. ROW + CN are not eligible for funding. Things to keep in mind if funds are requested for Right-of-Way What is the status of Preliminary Engineering/Design? Is the PE/Design phase complete? If not, identify all relevant milestones, including the current status and estimated completion date of each. For example: o What is the level of environmental documentation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for this project? Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Environmental Assessment (EA) Documented Categorical Exclusion (DCE) Categorical Exclusion (CE) o Has the NEPA documentation been approved? Please provide the date of approval, or the anticipated date of completion. o At what stage of completion is your design? Have Preliminary Plans been submitted to WSDOT for approval? If not, when is this milestone scheduled to be complete? When are Preliminary Plans expected to be approved? o Are there any other PE/Design milestones not listed above? Please identify and provide estimates dates of completion. 3

6 What is the status of Right of Way? How many parcels do you need? What is the zoning in the project area (e.g., commercial, residential, etc.)? Discuss the extent to which your schedule reflects the possibility of condemnation and the actions needed to pursue this. Does your agency have experience in conducting right of way acquisitions of similar size and complexity? If not, when do you expect a consultant to be selected, under contract, and ready to start? Identify all relevant right of way milestones, including the current status and estimated completion date of each. For example: o True cost estimate of Right of Way o Right of Way Plans (stamped) o Relocation Plan (if applicable) o Right of Way Certification o Right of Way Acquisition o Certification Audit by WSDOT Right of Way Analyst o Relocation Certification, if applicable Things to keep in mind if funds are requested for Construction Funds What is the status of the milestones for the construction phase? Do you have an Engineer s Estimate? Please provide a copy if available. Identify the environmental permits needed for the project and when they are scheduled to be acquired. Is PS&E approved? Please provide the date of approval, or the date when PS&E is scheduled to be submitted for approval. When is the project scheduled to go to ad? 4

7 A. Centers A1. Problem Significance Describe the nature and magnitude of the problem (safety, concurrency, congestion, incomplete sidewalk, bicycle or trail network, inadequate transit service or access to facilities, freight delays, economic development constraints etc.) that your project is seeking to address a. 15 points Project addresses a problem with county-wide effects AND impacts a significant number and variety of users and/or modes. b points Project addresses a predominantly local problem with limited countywide benefits AND affects a moderate number and variety of users and/or modes. c. 0-8 points Project addresses a local problem with no countywide benefits AND affects a limited number and variety of users and/or modes. A2. Project Impact Identify how your project will remedy the existing or anticipated problem (i.e. improves safety conditions, raises the level of service, completes a missing sidewalk, bicycle path or trail, adds transit capacity in an underserved area, reduces travel time or modal conflict, promotes economic development etc.) a. 15 points Project provides a long-term solution that will substantially address the targeted problem; b points Project partially addresses the targeted problem with a long-term solution, but relies upon other measures for full improvement; c. 0-8 points Project provides a short-term solution that marginally addresses the targeted problem; A3. Circulation within A Locally Designated Center, Designated Regional Growth Center, or Manufacturing or Industrial Center, Describe how the project will provide access to a major destination or significantly improve circulation, movement of people and/or goods to destinations (i.e. employment sites) within the designated center... If appropriate, describe how the project contributes to transportation demand management and commute trip reduction opportunities. a points Project significantly improves access within a center AND benefits a variety of travel modes AND benefits a large number of users; b. 6-9 points Project improves circulation for one or more modes within a center AND benefits a moderate number of users; c. 0-5 points Project offers limited improvement to circulation for one or more modes within a center AND benefits a limited number of users; 5

8 A4. Center Development Describe how the project will assist the center to develop in a manner consistent with adopted policies and or plans. Describe how the project will support increased activity in the center and otherwise implement adopted development plans. Describe how the project results in more reliable travel for various user groups, including residents, transit riders, employees, goods transporters and customers. a points Project significantly increases activities and densities within a center; OR significantly streamlines the efficient movement of freight AND implements specific policies in locally adopted plan; b. 6-9 points Project will moderately increase activity and densities within a center; OR moderately streamlines the efficient movement of freight AND implements general policies in locally adopted plan; c. 0-5 points Project supports a limited amount of increased activity OR provides minimal or no demonstrated improvements to efficient movement of freight AND is consistent with locally adopted goals; A5. Populations served by this Project Describe the user groups that will benefit from the project, including commuters, residents, commercial users, highly impacted communities and those groups identified in the President s Order for Environmental & Social Justice, seniors, people with disabilities and/or areas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment. 6

9 B. Connections B1. Problem Significance Describe the nature and magnitude of the problem (safety, concurrency, congestion, incomplete sidewalk, bicycle or trail network, inadequate transit service or access to facilities, freight delays, economic development constraints etc.) that your project is seeking to address. a points Project addresses a problem with county-wide effects AND; affects a facility with a level of service of F for two or more hours OR affects a significant number and variety of users and/or modes. b points Project indirectly addresses a county-wide problem by targeting a significant local issue AND; affects a facility with a level of service of E for two or more hours OR affects a moderate number and variety of users and/or modes. c. 0-8 points Project addresses a predominantly local problem with countywide benefits AND; affects a facility with a level of service of D for two or more hours OR affects a limited number and variety of users and/or modes. B2. Project Impact Identify how your project will remedy the existing or anticipated problem (i.e. raises the level of service, completes a missing walkway, adds transit capacity in an underserved area, reduces travel time or modal conflict etc.) and will provide long-term improvements to safety or congestion. a points Project provides a long-term solution that will substantially address the targeted problem; b points Project partially addresses the targeted problem with a long-term solution, but relies upon other measures for full improvement; c. 0-8 points Project provides a short-term solution that marginally addresses the targeted problem; B3. Mobility Benefits Describe how the project benefits centers and connecting corridors by providing for a range of travel modes, if appropriate, describe how the project contributes to transportation demand management and commute trip reduction opportunities. a points Project expands person carrying capacity between centers OR helps a center meet its development goals OR improves access for multiple modes; b. 6-9 points Project improves and/or benefits developments along a major corridor leading to and from a center OR improves circulation for two or more modes;; 7

10 c. 0-5 points Project improves and/or benefits developments in minor roadways that connect to major corridors leading to and from a center OR provides limited improvements for one mode; B4. System Connectivity Describe how the project creates more reliable and efficient travel flows along the corridor by filling missing links or removing barriers along connecting corridors and to/from centers. a points Project addresses critical linkages in a major connecting corridor OR eliminates a significant bottleneck in system performance; b. 6-9 points Project addresses important (not critical) gaps in the development of a corridor OR provides limited relief to a bottleneck in system performance; c. 0-5 points Project addresses marginal gaps/barriers with limited efficiency improvements; OR minimal or no demonstrated improvement to identified bottleneck in system performance; B5. Populations served by this Project Describe the user groups that will benefit from the project, including commuters, residents, commercial users, highly impacted communities and those groups identified in the President s Order for Environmental & Social Justice, seniors, people with disabilities and/or areas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment. 8

11 C. Preservation o o Eligible roadways must be at least an urban collector (or above) or a minor collector (or above) to be eligible for STP funds; It is assumed that sponsors have an existing PMS rating systems in place, which evaluates roadway segments on a scale of 1 to 100. If sponsor does not have a PMS system in place, alternate methods may be available to evaluate roadways for grant purposes. C1. Pavement Preservation Level of Effort: Does your agency have a pavement management program? Yes (5 pts.) No (0 pts.) If yes provide a short description of your program: Does your agency have identified sources of funding for pavement preservation projects? Yes (5 pts.) No (0 pts.) If yes provide a brief description of these sources: Provide average PCI of agency s system wide roadway system. System wide PCI C2. Roadway Condition a. 15 points 70 or above b. 10 points Between 50 and 69 c. 0 points 49 or below Describe the preservation priorities of the agency and the nature and magnitude of the problem that the project is attempting to solve. What preservation method will be used on this road and how was it determined? What is the most recent PCI for this road? (For projects covering several roadways, provide the average or median score and provide a brief summary of each.) If PCI is less than 50, provide justification for minimum 7 year extended pavement life. Proposed Treatment Proposed Treatment Points Asphalt Surface Points Overlay PCI Treatment PCI 0 80 to to to to to to to 49* to to to 39 *Double chip seal must be proposed. 9

12 C3. Project Significance Describe how the project will benefit a locally recognized center. Include the type and number of users benefited, the ADT, and the federal functional classification. Centers & Corridors (Circle correct category) 15 points Within Centers 10 points Connecting Corridor within ½ mile of center 5 points Connecting Corridor outside ½ mile of center Transit Service 5 points Project area has transit service 0 points Project area does not have transit service Identify transit route(s) that serve your project area: ADT 10 points >15,000 8 points >10,000 6 points > 5,000 4 points 5,000 or less Federal Functional Classification (Circle classification) Points Rural Functional Classification (under 5,000 population) Urban Functional Classification (Over 5,000 population) 5 02 Principal Arterial 14 Principal Arterial 5 06 Minor Arterial 16 Minor Arterial 3 07 Major Collector 17 Collector (Major/Minor) 3 08 Minor Collector C5. Populations served by this Project Describe the user groups that will benefit from the project, including commuters, residents, commercial users, highly impacted communities and those groups identified in the President s Order for Environmental & Social Justice, seniors, people with disabilities and/or areas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment 10

13 Part 2 Questions for All Projects D1 Project Readiness/Financial Plan Funding Request: Sponsors may request funding for any single project phase, but requests for multiple phases are limited to preliminary engineering plus the subsequent phase necessary. i.e, a sponsor may request funding for both preliminary engineering and right of way phases, or preliminary engineering and construction phases, but not both right of way and construction phases. (i.e. PE + ROW, or PE + CN. ROW + CN are not eligible for funding.) Funding Requirements: A minimum of 13.5% of local matching funds is required for STP and CMAQ funds. The combination of the requested PSRC funds plus all other identified funding must be adequate to fully fund that phase. Requests that do not result in a phase being fully funded will be considered ineligible for PSRC funding. Sponsors will be asked to provide more detail on their financial plan in the next section. Obligation Requirements: Funding is awarded by year, and sponsors are asked to select their first and second preference for the year of funding requested. Per PSRC's project tracking policies, all project phases awarded PSRC funds must obligate by June 1st of the program year selected. For more information, see PSRC s project tracking policies: check link PSRC recognizes that the complexity of some projects can trigger a variety of prerequisites that must be satisfied before federal funding is typically eligible to be obligated. These questions are designed to identify those requirements and assist sponsors to: Identify which obligation prerequisites and milestones apply to their specific project. Identify which of these have already been satisfied at time of application. Provide an explanation and realistic completion date for all obligation prerequisites and milestones not yet completed. NOTE: Sponsors applying for funds for only planning studies or preliminary engineering/design phases are not required to provide further information for project readiness Total Estimated Project Cost and Schedule Please include all funding amounts by source (including the requested PSRC funds) and status of each. If funds are not yet fully secure but are anticipated to be available for the project, please select reasonably available and identify the specific source on the next page, along with the current status of the funds and the steps you ll take to secure them by the requested obligation date. If funds are not secure and there is not yet a plan in place to obtain them by the requested obligation date, please select unsecure, and provide additional information on the next page. PSRC's definitions and guidance for determining secure and reasonably expected funds may be found on PSRC s website. 11

14 D2 Project Match Information from the Budget & Schedule worksheet will be used to score this question. What percentage of matching funds is provided for this project? Category A &B Category C 15 points 5 points 50% matching funds and above 12 points 4 points 40% matching funds 9 points 3 points 30% matching funds 6 points 2 points 20% matching funds 3 points 1 points 13.5% matching funds Note: A minimum match of 13.5% for each project phase is required. For example, if CN is $100,000, a minimum of $13,500 of local agency match is required. E Air Quality Please select all of the elements in the list below that are included in the project s scope of work, and provide the requested information below. Diesel Particulate Emissions Reduction Projects (e.g. diesel engine retrofits) Roadway Capacity (general purpose and high occupancy lanes) Transit Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities Intelligent Transportation Systems (signalization, etc.) Alternative Fuels or Vehicle Technology Other Diesel Particulate Emissions Reduction Projects: Describe the types of vehicles, vessels, engines, duty cycles, etc. being addressed. Describe the emissions vintage of the existing engines, and the number of vehicles to be addressed. Describe how often they are used, where they are used, how much fuel is consumed annually and when the benefits from this project will occur. Roadway Capacity (general purpose and high occupancy lanes): Describe the roadway and travel conditions before and after the proposed project, including average daily traffic and travel speeds. Describe the potential for multimodal connections, shorter vehicle trips, etc. Describe the transit routes currently using the facility and anticipated in the future. Does this project connect to or expand an existing high occupancy vehicle or business access transit lane system? What is the length of the project and the population served? What source of data indicates the expected conversion of single occupant vehicle trips to transit or carpool? Transit (park-and-ride lots, new or expanded transit service, transit amenities, etc.): Describe the current transit ridership in the project area. Describe the current transit routes serving the project area, including average trip length. If a park-and-ride lot, how many stalls are being added? Describe how the amenities (or other components of the project) are expected to encourage new transit ridership and shift travel from single occupant vehicles to multimodal options. Describe the population served that will be expected to use the new/improved service. What source of data indicates the expected conversion of single occupant vehicle trips to transit? 12

15 Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities: Describe the length of the proposed facility, including connections to other non-motorized facilities and to the larger non-motorized system. Describe the expected travel shed (i.e., land use and population surrounding the project). Does the facility connect to transit? What is the expected population served, and what source of data indicates the expected conversion of single occupant vehicle trips to this mode? Intelligent Transportation Systems: Describe the existing conditions in the area, including level of service, average daily traffic, average speed, etc. Describe how the project is expected to improve traffic flow through improved speeds, reducing idling, reducing accidents, etc. What is the percentage of heavy trucks using the facility? Does the project improve traffic flow for particular modes ( e.g. HOVs) or types of vehicles ( e.g. transit buses or freight trucks)? What are the transit routes along the corridor, and will this project improve transit reliability on the corridor? Alternative Fuels or Vehicle Technology: Describe the change in fuel or vehicle technology. How many vehicles are affected? What are the current conditions? Other: Describe how your project has the potential to reduce emissions through technology, improved management or other means, e.g. no idling signage & enforcement, auxiliary power units to operate heating, cooling & communications equipment, truck stop electrification, etc. Other Considerations (innovations, addressing practical design, etc.): Please describe any innovative components included in your project: these could include design elements, cost saving measures, or other innovations. Please describe the process that your agency has used to determine the benefits of projects. Please describe any additional aspects of your project not previously addressed in the application that could be relevant to the final project recommendation and decision-making process. 13

16 2018 STP Snohomish County ICC Countywide Process Scoring Matrix STP Funding Maximum Points Per Question Maximum Points Available Category Category Specific Choose only one (A, B or C) A. Centers B. Connections C. Preservation Problem Significance 20 Project Impact 15 Circulation Within a Center 15 Center Development 15 Problem Significance 20 Project Impact 15 Mobility Benefits 15 System Connectivity 15 Level of Effort/System wide condition 25 Roadway Condition 30 Project Significance 35 D. Project Readiness Project Match Cat A & B =15 Cat C =5 Project Readiness/Financial Plan 5 E. Air Quality Cat A & B = 15 Cat C = 0 Cat. A or B Maximum Points Available 100 Cat. C Maximum Points Available

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds 2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds INTRODUCTION As described in the adopted 2018 Policy Framework for PSRC s Federal Funds, the policy focus for the 2018 project selection

More information

2018 Project Selection Process

2018 Project Selection Process 2018 Project Selection Process Workshop Agenda PSRC Funds Federal Requirements Overall Schedule Overview of Process Project Selection Details Project Evaluation Criteria Project Tracking and Delivery Requirements

More information

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS 2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Background... 3 A. Policy Framework... 3 B. Development of the 2019-2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)..

More information

Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC)

Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC) Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC) January 26, 2018 9:30 11:00 a.m. PSRC Board Room 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 9:30 1. Introductions and Announcements Don Cairns, Chair

More information

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program Overview of the 2017-2020 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Table of Contents What is the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)?... 1 What is the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)?... 1

More information

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018 2018 Project Selection Process Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018 Presentation Overview Overview of the Project Selection Task Force Background on PSRC Funds and Project Selection Task Force

More information

Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC)

Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC) Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC) July 28, 2017 9:30 11:30 a.m. Note extended time PSRC Board Room 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 9:30 1. Introductions and Announcements Don

More information

Approve summary for the Regional FTA Caucus meeting held January 16, 2018.

Approve summary for the Regional FTA Caucus meeting held January 16, 2018. Regional FTA Caucus February 13, 2018 10:30 a.m. 12:00 p.m. PSRC Conference Room 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 10:30 1. Welcome and Introductions Melissa Cauley, Chair 10:35 2. Public

More information

Approve summary for the Regional FTA Caucus meeting held December 12, 2017.

Approve summary for the Regional FTA Caucus meeting held December 12, 2017. Regional FTA Caucus January 16, 2018 10:30 a.m. 12:00 p.m. PSRC Conference Room 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 10:30 1. Welcome and Introductions Melissa Cauley, Chair 10:35 2. Public

More information

2018 Project Selection Process. Regional Project Evaluation Committee July 28, 2017

2018 Project Selection Process. Regional Project Evaluation Committee July 28, 2017 2018 Project Selection Process Regional Project Evaluation Committee July 28, 2017 2018 Project Selection Process Overview PSRC is kicking off the 2018 project selection process in September 2017 with

More information

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE... 2 SECTION I: LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION CONTEXT... 3 SECTION II: MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR GROWTH AND TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY CENTERS... 5 SECTION

More information

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Regional Transportation Commission TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Contents 1.0 Purpose and Eligibility... 2 2.0 Process... 5 3.0 Implementation of Funded Projects... 5 Attachment

More information

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application 2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application PROJECT TITLE: INTERCITY TRANSIT BUS STOP ENHANCEMENTS TRPC use only GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Agency

More information

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs 5. Chapter Heading Appendix 5 Freight Programs Table of Contents 4.1 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG);... 5-1 4.2 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Discretionary Grant Program

More information

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014 H.R. 4348, THE MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY ACT CONFERENCE REPORT Summary of Key Highway and Research Provisions The following summary is intended to highlight thee highway and research

More information

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects This document is available in accessible formats when requested five days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization and is prepared in cooperation

More information

Washington State Department of Transportation

Washington State Department of Transportation Washington State Department of Transportation Executive Order 14-04 Washington Carbon Pollution Reduction and Clean Energy Action Review of state grant programs to identify and implement opportunities

More information

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding ITEM 7B Staff Report Subject: Contact: Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding Eric Cowle, Transportation Program Manager (ecowle@cvag.org) Recommendation: Consider

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area FFY 2015-2016 Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area A Grant Program of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) U.S. Department of Transportation

More information

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds

More information

Ohio Statewide Urban Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) Program 2013

Ohio Statewide Urban Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) Program 2013 Ohio Statewide Urban Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) Program 2013 Contents Page Preface 2 Background and Purpose 2 General Guidelines 3 Eligibility 4 Policies 5 Administration 6 Solicitation and

More information

Funding Application. Project Information. Contact Information. Project Description. 1 of 6. September 20th, :55 AM

Funding Application. Project Information. Contact Information. Project Description. 1 of 6. September 20th, :55 AM 1 of 6 Funding Application Competition Application Type Status Submitted: Regional TAP Bicycle and Pedestrian submitted September 20th, 2017 9:55 AM Project Information 1. Project Title Interurban Trail/Trailhead

More information

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Sub-allocated Funding Process and Application Package This packet includes information and guidance about the process used by KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission to

More information

MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET

MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET SFY 2022-2023 Illustrative Projects 2018-2021 INDIANAPOLIS REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (IRTIP) MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization October 2017 This

More information

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012 05.18.12 Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012 Citizens Advisory Committee Maria Lombardo Chief Deputy Director for Policy and Programming OneBayArea Grant Program Strategy, Schedule and Prioritization

More information

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department 2 Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council 3 4 Transportation Improvement

More information

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA Catherine McCreight, MBA Senior Transportation Planner Texas Department of Transportation - Houston District Houston-Galveston Area Council Bringing

More information

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding

More information

2018 Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) Grant Application - Limit One Proposal per Applicant

2018 Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) Grant Application - Limit One Proposal per Applicant 2018 Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) Grant Application - Limit One Proposal per Applicant PROJECT TITLE: TRPC use only GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Agency or Organization Contact Person Phone

More information

2018 Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) Grant Application PROJECT TITLE:

2018 Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) Grant Application PROJECT TITLE: 2018 Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) Grant Application PROJECT TITLE: Case Road Fish Barrier Removal TRPC use only If the proposal is programmed in the STIP, please use the same title. GENERAL

More information

2015 Five-Year County Highway and Bridge Improvement Plan Guide

2015 Five-Year County Highway and Bridge Improvement Plan Guide 2015 Five-Year County Highway and Bridge Improvement Plan Guide Table of Contents A. What is the Five-Year County Highway and Bridge Improvement Plan?... 1 B. State Requirements 1 C. Developing and Updating

More information

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for 2018-19 Introduction The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program

More information

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects 2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects Regional Solicitation Workshop April 17 2018 Regional Solicitation Purpose To distribute federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP)

More information

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Title VI: Public Participation Plan Whatcom Council of Governments Public Participation Plan Adopted October 14, 2009 Updated November 12, 2014 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 East Champion Street Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 676 6974 Whatcom

More information

FAMPO RSTP AND CMAQ FUNDING PROJECT SELECTION AND PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA METHODOLOGY

FAMPO RSTP AND CMAQ FUNDING PROJECT SELECTION AND PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA METHODOLOGY FAMPO RSTP AND CMAQ FUNDING PROJECT SELECTION AND PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION This document describes the process the Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (FAMPO)

More information

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Environmental Services Solid Waste 4200 4200 06CON 4200 SWM01 Balance $13,753,504.00 Balance $4,631,754.00 Balance $2,738,918.00 ing Source Total: $21,124,176.00

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1 Article 19. Congestion Relief and Intermodal 21 st Century Transportation Fund. 136-250. Congestion Relief and Intermodal Transportation 21 st Century Fund. There is established in the State treasury the

More information

2018 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

2018 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application 2018 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SPONSOR Agency or Organization Contact Person OLYMPIA CAPITOL CAMPUS TAMING THE DRAGONS

More information

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories This page left blank intentionally. Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E E 3 Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Highway Programs

More information

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

FFY Transportation Improvement Program Lawton Metropolitan Planning Organization DRAFT FFY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program Approved, 2017 The Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated

More information

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

SMALL CITY PROGRAM.  ocuments/forms/allitems. SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently

More information

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook 2018 Call for Projects Guidebook Project Selection for the NFRMPO CMAQ, STBG, and TA Programs in FY2022 and FY2023 October 8, 2018 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Section 1 - Call Overview... 2 1.1

More information

Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017)

Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017) Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017) Program Description The Smart Growth Transportation (SGT) program was established offered by the Lancaster County Transportation

More information

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background SAFETEA-LU This document provides information related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) that was previously posted on the Center for

More information

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised December 22, 2017

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised December 22, 2017 Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process For the Tulsa Urbanized Area Revised December 22, 2017 Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization and Selection

More information

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Module 2 Planning and Programming Module 2 Planning and Programming Contents: Section 1 Overview... 2-2 Section 2 Coordination with MPO... 2-4 Section 3 Functional Classification... 2-6 Section 4 Minute Order for Designation as Access

More information

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1 FINAL Draft Fresno Council of Governments January 2018 1 Introduction Fresno Council of Governments is simultaneously soliciting Regional

More information

2015 call for projects draft application package

2015 call for projects draft application package BIKE BIKE Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2015 call for projects draft application package 183 93 BIKE BIKE BIKE working document Call for Projects Applicant Workshop Experts

More information

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20002-4290 (202) 962-3310 Fax: (202) 962-3202 Item #5 MEMORANDUM January 8, 2010 To: From:

More information

System Access & Parking. Citizens Oversight Panel March 1, 2018

System Access & Parking. Citizens Oversight Panel March 1, 2018 System Access & Parking Citizens Oversight Panel March 1, 2018 System Access Program assumptions 21,000 sf/.48 ac System Access Fund Allocated based on an evaluation of customer needs at ST s existing

More information

LPA Programs How They Work

LPA Programs How They Work LPA Programs How They Work Ann Wills, P.E. Transportation Engineering Conference 2018 www.dotd.la.gov Requirements For ALL LPA Projects 1. Risk Assessment 2. Entity-State Agreement 3. Responsible Charge

More information

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY MOVE LV Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY Services PLANNING DATA + ANALYSIS EDUCATION PROJECTS + LAWS FUNDING Federal Government State Government Regional

More information

SMART SCALE Application Guide

SMART SCALE Application Guide SMART SCALE Application Guide prepared for Commonwealth Transportation Board Date, revised September 9, 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 3 1.1 Purpose of this Document... 3 1.2 Application Process...

More information

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES Revised and Approved May 25, 2017 Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study 806 CitiCenter 146 South High Street Akron, Ohio 44308 This document was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan

More information

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS What is Bus Rapid Transit?... 2 BRT Features... 2 BRT Variations... 3 Where is BRT Currently Located?... 4 How Much Does BRT Cost?... 4

More information

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1 Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1 State Fiscal Year 2017 July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017 I. Work Program Purpose Each year the Arizona Department of Transportation Multimodal

More information

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018 Cass County Rural Task Force 2020-2023 Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018 The Southwest Michigan Planning Commission (SWMPC) is pleased to announce the Call for Projects for the Cass County

More information

CIRTPA Small Community Fund Application

CIRTPA Small Community Fund Application CIRTPA Small Community Fund Application November 2017 2 P a g e Schedule and Decision Making Process November 16, 2017 January 18, 2018 Application process approved by CIRTPA Policy Committee and posted

More information

Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By:

Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By: Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor Submitted By: Robert P. Williams District Construction Engineer Salem District Virginia Department of Transportation Submitted

More information

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage. 5 Implementation 5.1 Anticipated Caltrans Review Process... 2 5.1.1 Project Initiation Document and Project Report... 2 5.1.2 Environmental Review Process... 4 5.1.3 Right of Way Acquisition Process...

More information

Transit Operations Funding Sources

Transit Operations Funding Sources Chapter 7. Funding Operations Funding Funding has increased about 56% in absolute terms between 1999 and 2008. There have been major variations in individual funding sources over this time, including the

More information

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program Introduction 1.1 Metropolitan Area Planning Agency Overview The Omaha-Council Bluffs Metropolitan Area Planning Agency (MAPA) is a voluntary

More information

Comprehensive Plan 2009

Comprehensive Plan 2009 Comprehensive Plan 2009 2.14 PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES Goal: Coordinate and maintain a high quality education system. Collaborate and coordinate with the Okaloosa County School Board (School Board) to

More information

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011 Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011 What is a New or Small Start? New fixed guideways and extensions to existing systems Includes light rail, heavy rail, commuter

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CATEGORY: DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING/ZONING TITLE: TRANSPORTATION PROPORTIONATE SHARE CALCULATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS CODE NUMBER: AC-13-16 ADOPTED:

More information

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) 10 Joint Development This chapter describes potential long-term direct and indirect and short-term (construction) direct and indirect effects that would result from the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT)

More information

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised July 31, 2013

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised July 31, 2013 Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process For the Tulsa Urbanized Area Revised July 31, 2013 Surface Transportation Program(STP) Project Prioritization and Selection

More information

Puget Sound Gateway Program

Puget Sound Gateway Program Puget Sound Gateway Program SR 167 Completion Project Tacoma Transportation Commission April 18, 2018 THOMAS SLIMAK, PE SR 167 ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER Agenda Puget Sound Gateway Program Overview Program

More information

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation December 9, 2015 Planning has begun for an extension of METRO Orange Line south from Burnsville to the Kenrick Avenue park and ride in Lakeville.

More information

Ohio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs

Ohio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs Ohio Department of Transportation Transportation Funding for LPAs Christopher L. Brown, P.E., District Three LPA Errol R. Scholtz, E.I., District Three LPA John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director

More information

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Call

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Call Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2019-2022 Project Call Project Selection Criteria November 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Overview... 3 Timeline... 4 Schedule... 5 Scoring

More information

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017 2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017 What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)? Long-range transportation plan for the region Required under state and

More information

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7.

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7. Project Information Application ID 215-D8-1 Date Submitted 6/29/215 Date Revised Project Name Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A County, Route, Section HAM-4/561-2.66/7.1 ODOT District District 8 County Hamilton

More information

PROJECT SPONSOR INFORMATION

PROJECT SPONSOR INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 PROJECT SPONSOR INFORMATION Sponsoring Agency: ODOT District 6 Project Contact Steve Fellenger, PE, Project Manager Address 400 E. William Street City Delaware State Ohio Zip Code 43015 Phone:

More information

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003 Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003 Why Transportation Demand Management (TDM)? Demand management measures support a sustainable

More information

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan A Partnership Among the City of Coolidge, Town of Florence, and ADOT FINAL REPORT Kimley-Horn Kimley Kimley-Horn and and Associates, Associates, Inc. Inc.

More information

TIP Regional Share Framework Eligibility and Funding Split Allocation

TIP Regional Share Framework Eligibility and Funding Split Allocation Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style 2020-2023 TIP Regional Share Framework Eligibility and Funding Split Allocation Presented by: Douglas W. Rex Board of Directors December

More information

FY Transportation Improvement Program

FY Transportation Improvement Program (CHATS) Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010-2015 June 8, 2009 1 Amendment Adopted: _September 24, 2009_ Amendment Adopted: _February 5, 2010 Amendment Adopted: May 17, 2010 Amendment Adopted: June

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018 Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018 Introduction The Region 1 Planning Council, in its capacity as the Metropolitan Planning

More information

A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES

A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Purpose The South Florida Commuter services vendor (hereinafter referred to as Vendor ) for

More information

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 SUMMARY OF THE ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) submitted the Generating Renewal, Opportunity, and Work with Accelerated Mobility, Efficiency,

More information

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County The transportation system serves Cambria County communities because people make decisions and take action toward the stated goals of the long-range transportation plan. Locally, these people include officials

More information

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM APPROVED PER RESOLUTION 08-304 ON DECEMBER 10, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Summary... 1 Procedures... 2 Project Eligibility... 2 Project Funding &

More information

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS 9. REVENUE SOURCES This Chapter summarizes multimodal revenue sources and estimates that are applicable to the City of Coolidge and the Town of Florence, together with financial constraints and opportunities

More information

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016 Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation September 2016 SMART SCALE Safety Factors Evaluation 1. Using Crash Modification Factors for SMART SCALE Safety Evaluation

More information

NAPA COUNTY GRAND JURY

NAPA COUNTY GRAND JURY NAPA COUNTY GRAND JURY 2016-2017 June 22, 2017 FINAL REPORT NAPA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY VISION 2040 PLAN County Traffic Problems Need a Comprehensive Plan with Measurable Results 2 NAPA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION

More information

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion. 2014 TRAC Funding Application TRAC is responsible for committing development and construction funding towards projects that meet the criteria the of Major New Capacity Program. TRAC Policy defines Major

More information

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT Background As the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for Greater Kansas City, MARC is responsible for facilitating the development of long-range transportation

More information

State of Florida Department of Transportation. DISTRICT SIX Attachment A Scope of Services 1/19/2018

State of Florida Department of Transportation. DISTRICT SIX Attachment A Scope of Services 1/19/2018 State of Florida Department of Transportation DISTRICT SIX Attachment A Scope of Services 1/19/2018 District Six Signal Retiming Continuing Consultant Services Financial Project Number(s): 435201-4-32-01

More information

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items... FY 2018 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM INSTRUCTIONS, GUIDELINES AND APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) 1. Instructions for Submitting a Transportation Alternatives Program Application.. 1 2. Transportation

More information

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions This paper provides an overview of the project delivery provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). It also briefly summarizes

More information

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan (2018-2028) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION Halff Staff Matt Bucchin, AICP, LEED-GA Director of Planning Josh Donaldson, AICP Planner / Landscape Designer

More information

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D11-02 Date Submitted 6/30/2015. County, Route, Section. BEL-CR /Commons Mall Crossing

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D11-02 Date Submitted 6/30/2015. County, Route, Section. BEL-CR /Commons Mall Crossing Project Information Application ID 2015-D11-02 Date Submitted 6/30/2015 Date Revised 7/20/2015 Project Name BEL-70-Mall Road Connector County, Route, Section BEL-CR 29-0.04/Commons Mall Crossing ODOT District

More information

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS Introduction The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and North Carolina General Assembly

More information

One Bay Area Grant (OBAG): Local Program Development - Criteria ACTION ITEM

One Bay Area Grant (OBAG): Local Program Development - Criteria ACTION ITEM 8.1 Date: September 26, 2012 Current Meeting: October 4, 2012 Board Meeting: October 4, 2012 BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors

More information

Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance

Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance Two Chatham Center 112 Washington Place Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-3451 Voice: 412.391.5590 Fax: 412.391.9160 www.spcregion.org February,

More information

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements Date: July 13, 2012 Subject: MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements The recently enacted Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) includes a number of substantial changes

More information

07/01/2010 ACTUAL START

07/01/2010 ACTUAL START PAGE, 1/27/21 6:18:42PM Grant Number: SC2224 Activity: Municipal Facility Energy Conservation Program Quarter: 1/1/29-12/31/29 Metric Activity: Building Retrofits Status: Active % of Work Complete: Activity

More information

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation and the Federal Government The Role of the Federal Government in State Transportation Programs U.S. Highway 290 BACKGROUND The Federal-Aid Highway Program

More information

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B Regional Transportation Plan: 2007-2030 Appendix B APPENDIX B POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources for transportation improvement projects are needed if the recommended projects of the Transportation

More information