DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES"

Transcription

1 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2007 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND

2 DoN NWCF Summary, FY 2008 President s Budget

3 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND (NWCF) NWCF activities provide a wide range of goods and services to support the Department s ongoing operations to maintain overall military readiness and in support of the Global War on Terrorism. There are five NWCF activity groups: Supply Management, Depot Maintenance, Research and Development, Base Support, and Transportation. The Department of the Navy (DON) is the only Service that includes Research and Development and Base Support in the working capital fund. The total annual cost of goods and services to be delivered by NWCF activity groups to their customers in FY 2008 and FY 2009 is projected to exceed $24 billion. Supply Management performs inventory management functions that result in the sale of aviation and shipboard components, ship s store stock, and consumables to a wide variety of customers. Costs related to supplying this material to the customer are recouped through stabilized rates that include recovery elements such as inventory management, contract management, receipt and issue of Navy managed material, and the depreciation of capital assets. Ensuring the right material is provided at the proper place, time, and cost is vital to equipping and sustaining our warfighting units. To this end, the Department continues to pursue initiatives to control costs and improve readiness. FY 2007 will be the first full execution year of the Fleet and Industrial Support Center managing and owning Naval Aviation Depot inventory. The transfer facilitates increased inventory management oversight and business process improvements and reflects a significant increase in obligation authority along with a commensurate sales increase. The reduced obligations in FY 2008 are due to decreased demand and customer funding in aviation consumables and repairables. The increased obligation requirement for FY 2009 is a result of outfitting requirements for new aircraft, primarily the H-1 and H-60, as well as an increase in reimbursable partnership agreements. The Navy Enterprise Resource Planning initiative, scheduled to roll-out in FY 2009 for supply, will provide better tools to assess program costs and implement cost reducing procedures. These efforts, along with reducing weapon systems average age, will stem spare parts demand growth and allow the Navy to provide improved logistics support at lower cost. Depot Maintenance provides maintenance, engineering, and logistics support to ensure a core industrial resource base essential for mobilization and includes naval

4 aviation depots, Marine Corps depots for ground combat support equipment, and naval shipyards prior to FY The Naval Aviation Depots (NADEPs) are continuing their vital support for the GWOT including efforts such as repair of crash damaged aircraft and the reactivation of "mothballed" helicopters to replace others lost in Southwest Asia. The NADEPs are also working to shape their workforce to better match the expected workload during the budget years and are beginning the process of merging into the overall Fleet Readiness Center (FRC) organization. Under the FRC concept, some of the component repair that has traditionally been performed at the three NADEP locations will instead be done at the naval air stations where intermediate level maintenance is currently performed. Some NADEP artisans will be relocated to the air stations but no change in their status under the NWCF organizational and financial structures is currently anticipated. The Marine Corps Depots experienced a large influx of unplanned workload for performance in FY 2006 and FY This was largely due to repair of combatdamaged equipment and weapons systems, and the installation of armor plating on combat vehicles. While the workload is projected to level off by FY 2008, operational contingencies could further extend this period of increased effort. In accordance with the FY 2007 President s Budget, the current NWCF estimates reflect the realignment of the Norfolk and Portsmouth public naval shipyards to mission funding beginning in FY 2007 to complete implementation of the Regional Maintenance Plan. A key element of this concept is the consolidation of separate ship maintenance (intermediate and depot maintenance facilities) within a region that results in the ability to best use the total maintenance resources available in the region, share resources between regions, and provide rapid surge capability to respond to Fleet priorities. Mission funding provides the best mechanism by which the Navy can match workforce skills with workload priorities and still meet fiduciary responsibilities. The Puget Sound Naval Shipyard had already transitioned to appropriated funding in FY 2004 under a pilot prototype concept. Research and Development includes the Warfare Centers (Air, Sea, Undersea, and Space applications) and the Naval Research Laboratory. All of these activities provide research and development for warfare systems, engineering support for major weapons systems acquisition programs, or provide scientific research for improving materials, facilities, and services to the DON. Space and Naval Warfare System Centers provide fleet support for command, control, and communication systems, and ocean surveillance, and the integration of those systems that overarch platforms.

5 Naval Air Warfare Centers provide fleet support for naval aircraft engines, avionics, aircraft support systems and ship/shore/air operations. Naval Surface Warfare Centers provide fleet support for hull, mechanical, and electrical systems, surface combat systems, coastal warfare systems, and other offensive and defensive systems associated with surface warfare. Naval Undersea Warfare Centers provide fleet support for submarines, autonomous underwater systems, and offensive and defensive systems associated with undersea warfare. Naval Research Laboratory operates as the DoN s full spectrum corporate laboratory, conducting a broadly based multidisciplinary program of scientific research and advanced technological development directed toward maritime applications of new and improved materials, techniques, equipment, systems, and ocean, atmospheric, and space sciences and related technologies Two of the Warfare Centers will be among the first sites within the Navy where Navy Enterprise Resource Planning will be implemented. Scheduled for roll-out to the Naval Air Warfare Center at the end of FY 2007 and to the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Centers in FY 2008, Navy ERP is the DoN s business initiative to standardize business processes, integrate operations, and optimize management of resources. In the Base Support business area, the Naval Facilities Engineering Command continues with the transformation of its worldwide organization which began in FY By integrating all Public Works Departments (PWDs) into Facilities Engineering Commands (FECs), there will now be one public works delivery model that will be a single touch point for all FEC products and services. The consolidation of these organizations as PWC detachments is expected to help reduce operating costs and standardize delivery of the various utility commodities and other products. Following the integration of 11 PWDs in FY 2007, 5 PWDs in Europe will be added to the NAVFECs in FY Transportation is comprised of the Military Sealift Command (MSC) which supports the Pacific and Atlantic Fleets, Naval Sea Systems Command, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Strategic Systems Programs, and the Air Force with unique vessels and programs. The three programs budgeted by MSC through the Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) are: 1) Naval Fleet Auxiliary Force (NFAF) which provides support utilizing civilian mariner manned non-combatant ships for material support and ocean going tugs and salvage ships; 2) Special Mission Ships (SMS) which provide unique seagoing platforms, operation of Navy Command Ships, and contracted Harbor Tugs; and 3)Afloat Prepositioning Force Navy (APF- N) which deploys advance material for strategic lifts for the Marine Expeditionary Forces. Transportation rates within the Military Sealift Command (MSC) reflect the full implementation of peacetime force protection costs and cost containment

6 measures to ensure more efficient operations. Activation changes include delivery of two additional T-AKE Class Dry Cargo/Ammunition ships in FY 2008 and three T-AKEs in FY Additionally, deactivations include two T-AFS Class Rescue and Salvage vessels in FY 2008 and three T-AFS and one T-AE in FY Finally, the DoN projects the NWCF cash balance to be within the seven-day cash level minimum prescribed in the DoD Financial Management Regulation.

7 (Dollars in millions) Revenue FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy 5, , , ,947.5 Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships 1, Depot Maintenance - Aircraft 1, , , ,748.8 Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps R&D - Air Warfare Center 2, , , ,911.2 R&D - Surface Warfare Center 3, , , ,558.6 R&D - Undersea Warfare Center 1, , , ,095.8 R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center 2, , , ,260.2 R&D - Naval Research Laboratory Transportation - MSC 2, , , ,392.5 Base Support - FECs 1, , , ,598.9 Base Support - NFESC Totals 24, , , ,701.6 Cost of Goods Sold: (Operating) Total obligations for supply functions and cost of good and services sold for industrial functions are as follows: (Dollars in millions) Operating Costs FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy 5, , , ,737.5 Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships 1, Depot Maintenance - Aircraft 1, , , ,748.8 Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps R&D - Air Warfare Center 2, , , ,911.2 R&D - Surface Warfare Center 3, , , ,558.6 R&D - Undersea Warfare Center 1, , , ,095.8 R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center 2, , , ,260.2 R&D - Naval Research Laboratory Transportation - MSC 2, , , ,416.3 Base Support - FECs 2, , , ,598.9 Base Support - NFESC Totals 24, , , ,519.4

8 Net Operating Results: Revenue, excluding surcharge collections and extraordinary expenses, less the cost of goods and services sold to customers is as follows: (Dollars in millions) Net Operating Results FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships Depot Maintenance - Aircraft Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps R&D - Air Warfare Center R&D - Surface Warfare Center R&D - Undersea Warfare Center R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center R&D - Naval Research Laboratory Transportation - MSC Base Support - FECs Base Support - NFESC Totals Accumulated Operating Results (recoverable): (Dollars in millions) Accumulated Operating Results FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships na na na Depot Maintenance - Aircraft Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps R&D - Air Warfare Center R&D - Surface Warfare Center R&D - Undersea Warfare Center R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center R&D - Naval Research Laboratory Transportation - MSC Base Support - FECs Base Support - NFESC Totals

9 Workload: Workload projections for NWCF activities are consistent with Navy force structure and attendant support levels as well as those factors unique to each group. The table below displays year-to-year percentage changes in transportation ship days for MSC, changes in program costs for Base Support PWC, and change in direct labor hours for all other industrial activity groups. For supply business areas, workload changes are indicated by gross sales: (Percent Change) Workload FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy 10.2% -0.5% 1.5% Supply - Marine Corps -2.9% -2.6% -0.3% Depot Maintenance - Ships % na na Depot Maintenance - Aircraft -3.6% -6.6% -6.7% Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps 9.4% -34.6% -21.4% R&D Air Warfare Center 0.7% -1.5% -2.3% R&D - Surface Warfare Center -6.1% 1.1% -2.8% R&D - Undersea Warfare Center -3.3% -1.9% -2.3% R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center 0.8% -0.3% -3.0% R&D - Naval Research Laboratory 1.6% 0.9% -0.4% Transportation - MSC 3.1% 3.6% -2.5% Base Support - FECs 18.2% 6.3% 2.8% Base Support - NFESC -4.8% -0.3% -0.5%

10 Treasury Cash Balance: (Dollars in millions) Treasury Cash FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Beginning Cash Balance , , Collections 23, , , ,631.7 Disbursements 23, , , ,659.1 Supplemental Appropriations Hurricane Fuel MSC Capital Hire Purchases Inventory Augmentation (NAVSUP) Congressional Adjustments Ending Cash Balance 1, ,

11 Customer Rate Changes: Approved composite rate changes from FY 2006 to FY 2007 and proposed composite rate changes from FY 2007 to FY 2008 and FY 2008 to FY 2009 (designed to achieve an accumulated operating result of zero) are as follows: (Percent Change) Customer Rate Change FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply: Navy - Aviation Consumables 1.2% 6.3% 2.1% Navy - Shipboard Consumables 3.8% 4.2% 2.1% Navy - Aviation Repairables 2.2% 1.9% 1.9% Navy - Shipboard Repairables 3.8% 4.2% 2.1% MARCORPS Repairables -13.0% 18.7% 2.2% Depot Maintenance - Ships na na na Depot Maintenance - Aircraft 4.8% 2.5% 2.3% Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps -3.3% 3.1% 13.2% R&D - Air Warfare Center 3.4% 1.4% 4.9% R&D - Surface Warfare Center 3.5% 1.8% 3.3% R&D - Undersea Warfare Center 3.5% 2.2% 3.1% R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center 3.5% 2.7% 4.1% R&D - Naval Research Laboratory 4.1% 2.3% 4.9% Transportation - MSC Fleet Auxiliary 2.7% 8.7% -4.3% Special Mission Ships 13.6% -3.4% 7.6% Afloat Prepositioning Ships -29.5% 42.9% 8.2% Base Support - FECs East Coast Utilities 15.4% 6.0% 4.5% East Coast - Other 3.6% 5.2% 2.2% West Coast Utilities 3.2% 8.5% 2.0% West Coast - Other 1.7% 4.2% 2.3% Base Support - NFESC -0.6% 6.8% 2.6%

12 Unit Costs: Unit Cost is the method established to authorize and control costs. Unit cost goals allow activities to respond to workload changes in execution by encouraging reduced costs when workload declines and allowing appropriate increases in costs when their customers request additional services. Unit Cost FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy (cost per unit of sales 1 ): Wholesale Retail Supply - Marine Corps (cost per unit of sales 1 ): Wholesale Retail Depot Maintenance - Ships ($/Direct Labor Hour 2 ) na na na Depot Maintenance - Aircraft ($/Direct Labor Hour) Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps ($/Direct Labor Hour) R&D - Air Warfare Center ($/Direct Labor Hour 2 ) R&D - Surface Warfare Center ($/Direct Labor Hour 2 ) R&D - Undersea Warfare Center ($/Direct Labor Hour 2 ) R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center ($/Direct Labor Hour 2 ) R&D - Naval Research Laboratory ($/Direct Labor Hour 2 ) Transportation MSC Fleet Auxiliary ($/day) ($000) Special Mission Ships ($/day) ($000) Afloat Prepositioning Ships ($/day) ($000) Base Support - FECs Cost of Services various various various various Base Support - NFESC ($/direct Labor Hour 2 ) excludes inventory augmentation and war reserve material obligations 2 includes direct labor plus overhead costs

13 Staffing: Total civilian and military personnel employed at NWCF activities are displayed in the following tables. (Strength in Whole Numbers) Civilian End Strength FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy 7,676 7,755 7,671 7,658 Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships 11, Depot Maintenance - Aircraft 9,804 9,569 9,010 8,482 Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps 2,118 2,180 2,098 1,557 R&D - Air Warfare Center 9,805 10,011 9,838 9,660 R&D - Surface Warfare Center 14,198 13,665 13,733 13,336 R&D - Undersea Warfare Center 4,059 3,861 3,795 3,708 R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center 6,073 6,116 6,104 5,960 R&D - Naval Research Laboratory 2,447 2,513 2,513 2,513 Transportation - MSC 5,507 6,064 6,449 6,080 Base Support FECs 8,164 8,348 8,912 8,754 Base Support - NFESC Totals 81,915 70,486 70,523 68,108 (Workyears in Whole Numbers) Civilian Workyears FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply Navy 7,315 7,755 7,671 7,658 Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships 11, Depot Maintenance - Aircraft 9,872 9,670 9,070 8,579 Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps 2,161 2,192 2,113 1,673 R&D - Air Warfare Center 9,813 9,904 9,749 9,570 R&D - Surface Warfare Center 14,247 13,713 13,840 13,539 R&D - Undersea Warfare Center 4,026 3,875 3,792 3,717 R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center 5,949 6,052 6,041 5,897 R&D - Naval Research Laboratory 2,375 2,412 2,412 2,412 Transportation - MSC 7,399 8,207 8,369 8,190 Base Support FECs 7,728 8,193 8,757 8,578 Base Support - NFESC Totals 82,841 72,372 72,208 70,207

14 (Strength in Whole Numbers) Military End Strength FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships Depot Maintenance - Aircraft Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps R&D - Air Warfare Center R&D - Surface Warfare Center R&D - Undersea Warfare Center R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center R&D - Naval Research Laboratory Transportation - MSC Base Support - FECs Base Support - NFESC Totals 1,776 1,878 1,827 1,749 (Workyears in Whole Numbers) Military Workyears FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships Depot Maintenance - Aircraft Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps R&D - Air Warfare Center R&D - Surface Warfare Center R&D - Undersea Warfare Center R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center R&D - Naval Research Laboratory Transportation - MSC Base Support - FECs Base Support - NFESC Totals 1,711 1,754 1,700 1,623

15 Performance Budgeting. The NWCF utilizes a wide range of cascading performance information in support of a broad spectrum of financial and program performance metrics employed in the Department of Defense. By its very nature as a revolving fund, the NWCF budget can be viewed as a performance budget that routinely identifies the full cost of specific business activity (such as Naval Aviation Depots or Supply Management) including identification of all financing sources to meet customer driven workload. As such, performance indicators (financial and programmatic) listed throughout the NWCF justification book, as well as the myriad of performance information contained in the various appropriation justification books, support the hierarchical composition starting with the Department of the Navy Balanced Scorecard, and merging with the DoD Balanced Scorecard, the OMB Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART), and culminating with the President s Management Agenda. Key financial/program indicators include: Net Operating Result (NOR), Accumulated Operating Result (AOR), Sources of Revenue, NWCF Cash, Manpower Staffing, Unit Cost, Cost of Goods Sold, and Capital Investment Program. Key NWCF Performance Integration: DON DoD OMB President s Scorecard Scorecard PART Mgmt Agenda Naval Aviation Depots: Combat Capability Operational Risk Aircraft Maintenance Budget Integration Marine Corps Depots: Combat Capability Operational Risk Depot Maintenance Budget Integration R&D Warfare Centers: Tech Insertion Future Challenges Multiple R&D Budget Integration Military Sealift: Combat Capability Operational Risk Ship Operations Budget Integration Facilities Engineering: Improved Business Institutional Risk Base Support Budget Integration Supply Management: Combat Capability Operational Risk Spares & Repair Parts Budget Integration In accordance with the President s Management Agenda, Budget and Performance Integration initiative, these programs will be assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). Remarks regarding program performance improvement can be located at the Expectmore.gov website.

16 (Dollars in Millions) Capital Purchase Program FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Supply - Navy Supply - Marine Corps Depot Maintenance - Ships 22.7 na na na Depot Maintenance - Aircraft Depot Maintenance - Marine Corps R&D - Air Warfare Center R&D - Surface Warfare Center R&D - Undersea Warfare Center R&D - SPAWAR Systems Center R&D - Naval Research Laboratory Transportation - MSC Base Support - FECs Base Support - NFESC Totals Equipment (Non-ADPE/Telecom) ADPE and Telecommunications Equip Software Development Minor Construction Totals

17 Depot Maintenance Six Percent Capital Investment Plan Component: Department of the Navy Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) Depot Maintenance Six Percent Capital Investment Plan Dollars in Millions Revenue 3-Year Average Budgeted Capital Percent of Revenue FY FY FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2008 Revenue 4% 5% Working Capital Fund 2, , Appropriations Total Revenue 2, , Working Capital Fund Depot Maintenance Investment WCF Capital Investment Program Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization Lean Equipment Depot Maintenance Transformation Total WCF Investment Appropriated Funding None Budget Minus Percent Difference Component Total NWCF budgeted amounts reflect data for the Naval Aviation Depots and for the Marine Corps Depots.

18 INSERT TAB Naval Shipyards

19

20 Naval Shipyards

21 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGT ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND DEPOT MAINTENANCE - NAVAL SHIPYARDS ACTIVITY GROUP FUNCTION: Naval Shipyards provide logistics support for assigned ships and service craft; perform authorized work in connection with construction, overhaul, repair, alteration, drydocking and outfitting of ships and craft as assigned; perform design, manufacturing, refit and restoration, research, development and test work, and provide services and material to other activities and units as directed by competent authority. ACTIVITY GROUP COMPOSITION: This budget reflects two naval shipyards operating under the Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) in FY These activities and their locations are: Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Norfolk Naval Shipyard Kittery, ME Portsmouth, VA On 1 October 2006, Portsmouth and Norfolk Naval Shipyards transferred to mission funding as Atlantic Fleet activities. In addition, the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, which had been involved in a pilot effort to validate the mission funding of regional ship maintenance facilities, was permanently designated as a direct funded activity. OVERVIEW FOR NAVAL SHIPYARDS: The naval shipyards demonstrate a strong commitment to productivity improvement and cost. Revenue, costs, and operating results are: Financial Profile: Revenue/Expense/Operating Results ($M) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Revenue $1,732.0 $347.3 $10.8 $0.8 Cost of Goods and Services $1,778.7 $349.4 $10.8 $0.8 Operating Results -$46.7 -$2.1 $0.0 $0.0 Other Changes Affecting AOR -$1.0 +$96.4 $0.0 $0.0 Accumulated Operating Results (AOR) -$94.3 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Revenue/Expense/Operating Results The changes in revenue, expense, and net operating results reflect the impact of updated workload estimates and pricing adjustments as well as the impact of effecting the transition from the NWCF to mission-funding. FY 2006 actual and FY 2007 budget estimates include residual NWCF costs of $59.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively for work that was funded and inducted at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNSY) prior to FY FY 2007 through FY 2009 budget estimates include

22 residual costs for work funded and inducted at Portsmouth and Norfolk Naval Shipyards prior to FY Cash Collections, Disbursements, and Net Outlays: Collections/Disbursements/ Outlays ($M) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Collections $1,640.8 $482.5 $0.5 $0.0 Disbursements $1,705.8 $582.6 $24.6 $5.2 Net Outlays $65.0 $100.1 $24.1 $5.2 The Department of the Navy is committed to ensuring NWCF cash solvency. The FY 2007 outlay estimate noted above includes receipt of $120.0 million from the Operation and Maintenance, Navy appropriation to satisfy a portion of the projected NWCF buyout costs, currently estimated at approximately $282.7 million. In accordance with OMB policy, the shipyard submission also assumes a FY 2007 nonexpenditure NWCF transfer to Treasury of $91.1 million to satisfy the outstanding balance of shipyard civilian leave liability. However, since the overall NWCF cash balance is expected to meet requirements set by OUSD(C), no additional transfer of appropriated funds (beyond the $120 million already funded) is necessary. Workload Direct Labor Hours (000) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2006 Actual 16, Performance Indicators: Stabilized / Composite Rate Changes FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Stabilized Rate $ Change from Prior Year +7.15% Composite Rate Change +5.71% Unit Cost FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Total Stabilized Cost ($M) $1, Workload (DLHs) (000) 16, Unit Cost (per DLH) $ Staffing Civilian/Military ES/Work Years FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Civilian End Strength 11, Civilian Work Years 11,

23 Military End Strength 69 Military Work Years Civilian end strength and workyear estimates are matched to workload and reflect continued streamlining of shipyard processes and increased productivity. Capital Investment Program (CIP) Budget Authority: Capital Investment Program ($M) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Equipment, Non-ADP / Telecommunications $ Equipment, ADPE / Telecommunications $ Software Development $ Minor Construction $ Total $ The capital investment program reflects the financing of essential fleet support equipment and other capital improvements critical to sustaining shipyard operations, improving productivity, meeting health, safety and environmental requirements and lowering production costs. Carryover Compliance Carryover ($M) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 New Orders $1, Less Exclusions: Foreign Military Sales $ Base Realignment and Closure $0.5 - Other Federal Departments/ Agencies $ Non-Federal Agencies & others $ Major Range & Test Facility Base $ Orders for Carryover Calculation $1, Composite Outlay Rate Year #1 65.2% Composite Outlay Rate Year #2 78.6% Carryover Ceiling Rate Year #1 34.8% - Carryover Ceiling Rate Year #2 21.5% Carryover Ceiling $ Balance of Customer Orders at Yr End $ Less Work-in-Process $ Less Exclusions Foreign Military Sales $ Base Realignment and Closure $ Other Federal Departments/ Agencies $

24 Non-Federal Agencies & Others $ Major Range & Test Facility Base $ Carryover Budget $ Budgeted carryover in FY 2006 is for Norfolk and Portsmouth Naval Shipyards. Amounts are within the ceiling allowed by outlay rates.

25 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY / NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND DEPOT MAINTENANCE SHIPYARDS REVENUE AND EXPENSES FEBRUARY 2007 AMOUNT IN MILLIONS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 CON CON CON CON Revenue: Gross Sales Operations 1, Surcharges Depreciation excluding Major Constructio Other Income Total Income 1, Expenses Cost of Materiel Sold from Inventory Salaries and Wages: Military Personnel Civilian Personnel Travel and Transportation of Personnel Material & Supplies (Internal Operations Equipment Other Purchases from NWCF Transportation of Things Depreciation - Capital Printing and Reproduction Advisory and Assistance Services Rent, Communication & Utilities Other Purchased Services Total Expenses 1, Work in Process Adjustment Comp Work for Activity Reten Adjustment Cost of Goods Sold 1, Operating Result Less Surcharges Plus Appropriations Affecting NOR/AOR Other Changes Affecting NOR/AOR Extraordinary Expenses Unmatched Net Operating Result Other Changes Affecting AOR Accumulated Operating Result Exhibit Fund-14 Revenue and Expenses

26 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY / NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND DEPOT MAINTENANCE SHIPYARDS SOURCES OF REVENUE FEBRUARY 2007 AMOUNT IN MILLIONS FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 CON CON CON CON New Orders 1,512 na na na a. Orders from DoD Components 1,454 na na na Department of the Navy 1,440 na na na O & M, Navy 1,096 na na na O & M, Marine Corps 0 na na na O & M, Navy Reserve 0 na na na O & M, Marine Corp Reserve 0 na na na Aircraft Procurement, Navy 0 na na na Weapons Procurement, Navy 2 na na na Ammunition Procurement, Navy/MC 0 na na na Shipbuilding & Conversion, Navy 130 na na na Other Procurement, Navy 206 na na na Procurement, Marine Corps 0 na na na Family Housing, Navy/MC 0 na na na Research, Dev., Test, & Evaluation, Navy 6 na na na Military Construction, Navy 0 na na na National Defense Sealift Fund 0 na na na Other Navy Appropriations 0 na na na Other Marine Corps Appropriations 0 na na na Department of the Army 3 na na na Army Operation & Maintenance 0 na na na Army Res, Dev, Test, Evaluation 0 na na na Army Procurement 0 na na na Army Other 3 na na na Department of the Air Force 3 na na na Air Force Operation & Maintenance 1 na na na Air Force Res, Dev, Test, Evaluation 0 na na na Air Force Procurement 1 na na na Air Force Other 0 na na na DOD Appropriation Accounts 9 na na na Base Closure & Realignment 1 na na na Operation & Maintenance Accounts 11 na na na Res, Dev, Test & Evaluation Accounts 1 na na na Procurement Accounts -4 na na na Defense Emergency Relief Fund 0 na na na DOD Other 0 na na na b. Orders from other WCF Activity Groups 45 na na na c. Total DoD 1,498 na na na d. Other Orders 14 na na na Other Federal Agencies 5 na na na Foreign Military Sales 0 na na na Non Federal Agencies 9 na na na 2. Carry-In Orders 689 na na na 3. Total Gross Orders 2,201 na na na a. Funded Carry-Over before Exclusions 469 na na na b. Total Gross Sales 1,732 na na na 4. End of Year Work-In-Process (-) -36 na na na 5. Non-DoD, BRAC, FMS, Inst. MRTFB (-) -39 na na na 6. Net Funded Carryover 388 na na na Note #1: Line 4 (End of Year Work-In-Process) is adjusted for Non-DoD, BRAC & FMS and Institutional MRTFB. Note #2: FY 2006 data include all transaction at Norfolk and Portsmouth Naval Shipyards and residual transactions (for NWCF workload inducted prior to FY 2004) at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. Note #3: Budget estimates reflect permanent mission-funding for Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Puget Sound Naval Shipyards effective FY Exhibit Fund-11

27 Department of the Navy Depot Maintenance - Naval Shipyards Changes in the Cost of Operations Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates February 2007 ( Dollars in Millions ) Expenses FY 2006 Actual Execution $1,746 FY 2007 Estimate in the FY 2007 President's Budget $250 Price Changes $0 Productivity Initiatives and Other Efficiencies $0 Program Changes $0 Other Changes $74 Increased Residual Navy Working Capital Fund Workload 74 FY 2007 Current Estimate $324 Price Changes $8 Productivity Initiatives and Other Efficiencies $0 Program Changes $0 Other Changes ($330) a. Drawdown Residual NWCF Workload (330) FY 2008 Current Estimate $2 Price Changes $0 Productivity Initiatives and Other Efficiencies $0 Program Changes $0 Other Changes ($1) a. Drawdown Residual NWCF Workload (1) FY 2009 Current Estimate $1 Exhibit Fund-2 Changes in Cost of Operations

28 Navy Working Capital Fund Investment Summary Department of the Navy DEPOT MAINTENANCE / SHIPYARDS Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates February 2007 $ in Millions FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Line # Description Quantity Total Cost Quantity Total Cost Quantity Total Cost Quantity Total Cost 1 Non-ADPE and Telecom Equipment $ Replacement Capability 7 $ Productivity Capability 2 $ New Mission Capability 0 $ Environmental Capability 0 $ ADPE and Telecom Equipment $ Computer Hardware (Production) 2 $ Computer Software (Operating) 0 $ Telecommunications 0 $ Oth Computer & Telecom Spt Equip 0 $ Software Development $ Projects = or > $1M (List Separately) Navy Maintenance Suite Upgrade 1 $2.051 Software NSY Ship Maintenance Corporate SW Dev 1 $1.699 Supervisor's Desk (SUPDESK) 1 $ Projects < $1M 2 $ Minor Construction $ Replacement Capability 0 $ Productivity Capability 1 $ New Mission Capability 0 $ Environmental Capability 0 $0.000 Grand Total 17 $ $ $ $0.000 Total Capital Outlays $ $ $ $5.226 Total Depreciation Expense $ Exhibit Fund-9A Capital Investment Summary

29

30 INSERT TAB Naval Aviation Depots

31

32 Naval Aviation Depots

33 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/FY 2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Narrative Summary of Operation Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 ACTIVITY GROUP FUNCTION To provide responsive worldwide maintenance, engineering, and logistics support to the Naval Aviation Enterprise (NAE). The NAVAIRDEPOTS ensure a core industrial resource base essential for mobilization; repair aircraft, engines, and components, and manufacture parts and assemblies; provide engineering services in the development of hardware design changes, and furnish technical and other professional services on maintenance and logistics problems. ACTIVITY GROUP COMPOSITION Activities NAVAIRDEPOT, Cherry Point NAVAIRDEPOT, Jacksonville NAVAIRDEPOT, North Island Location Cherry Point, NC Jacksonville, FL San Diego, CA BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS General The NAVAIRDEPOTS provide significant support to Fleet operations by overhauling and repairing a wide range of equipment and components. Their efforts include important workload related to the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) such as the repair of crash damaged AV-8B aircraft and a CH-53E helicopter as well as the restoration of mothballed CH-53 helicopters to operational status (to replace CH-53 helicopters that were damaged beyond repair). LEAN/SIX SIGMA and Theory of Constraints have been implemented at the NAVAIRDEPOTS in order to increase throughput and improve efficiency. In FY 2006, the NAVAIRDEPOTS billed $74.2M in surcharges to its aviation maintenance customers in order to offset unplanned losses it was experiencing. FY 2006 Net Operating Results (NOR) were $-7.6M, which was consistent with the estimate in the FY 2007 President s Budget. In FY 2007, the NAVAIRDEPOTS are projected to have a positive NOR of $4.5M and Accumulated Operating Results (AOR) are projected to be -$1.2M by year end. The NAVAIRDEPOTS have been budgeted to a zero AOR in FY 2008 and FY 2009.

34 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/FY 2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Narrative Summary of Operation Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 Implementation of the Fleet Readiness Centers (FRCs) concept, as part of the Department s Base Realignment And Closure (BRAC) effort, will result in the disestablishment of the NAVAIRDEPOTS and the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Departments (AIMDS) and the establishment of six FRCs. This results in reduced workload and personnel at the former NAVAIRDEPOTS from FY 2007 through FY In addition, some artisans will transfer to the former AIMDS locations in order to perform component repairs that have been historically been performed at the NAVAIRDEPOTS as a means of improving efficiency and reducing maintenance costs. Summary of Operations ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Orders 1, , , ,765.5 Revenue 1, , , ,748.8 Cost of Goods and Services 1, , , ,748.8 Revenue less Costs Transfers Net Operating Results (NOR) Accumulated Operating Results (AOR) Orders. FY 2006 New Orders include the receipt of Supplemental funding in the Airframes and Engines programs and $74.2M to fund a rate surcharge to aviation maintenance customers. Orders for FY reflect funded customer requirements. Revenue. Revenue includes the receipt of $74.2M via a FY 2006 rate surcharge implemented to offset unplanned losses. Costs. Costs declined by >$100M over the submission as a result of reduced workload. Revenue less cost. Revenue less cost for FY 2006, FY 2007, FY 2008, and FY 2009 is -$7.6M, $4.5M, $1.2M and $0.0M, respectively. Net Cash Outlays. ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Disbursements 1, , , ,742.4 Collections 1, , , ,744.5 Net Outlays

35 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/FY 2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Narrative Summary of Operation Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 Stabilized Customer Rates. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Composite Hourly Rate $ $ $ $ Percent Year to Year Change.54% 4.8% 2.5% 2.3% The composite rate change reflects both the impact of workload mix changes and pricing changes. Unit Cost Goals. The budget reflects the following FY unit cost goals: ($ and DLHs in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Total Operating Cost $1, $1, $1, $1, Direct Labor Hours (DLH) Unit Cost $ $ $ $ % Change Workload/DLHs % -6.6% -6.7% % Change Unit Cost - 3.3% 5.4% 2.3% DLH includes direct labor hours worked by civilians, contractors and military personnel. SUMMARY OF PERSONNEL RESOURCES. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Civilian Personnel: End Strength 9,804 9,569 9,010 8,482 FTE Workyears 9,872 9,670 9,070 8,579 Military Personnel: End Strength Workyears Contractor Personnel: Workyears ,039 The FY 2008/2009 Biennial Budget for the NAVAIRDEPOTS reflects civilian workforce levels necessary to accommodate firm workload without the use of excessive overtime. Personnel reductions associated with BRAC for FRC have also been incorporated. Contract personnel are used by the NAVAIRDEPOTS to address perturbations in workload.

36 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/FY 2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Narrative Summary of Operation Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 SUMMARY OF WORKLOAD INDICATORS. (Inducted Units) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 AIRFRAMES O&M,N O&M,NR RDT&E Other ENGINES 1,133 1,198 1,088 1,389 O&M,N 982 1, ,266 O&M,NR RDT&E Other PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Goal FY 2006 (UNITS) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Aircraft Scheduled Aircraft Completed on Time % Scheduled Work Completed on Time 90% Components Scheduled 83,533 64,032 45,457 29,455 Components Completed on Time 79,356 60,830 43,184 27,982 % Scheduled Work Completed on Time 95% Engines Scheduled 985 1,208 1,107 1,363 Engines Completed on Time 906 1,111 1,018 1,254 % Scheduled Work Completed on Time 92%

37 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/FY 2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Narrative Summary of Operation Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 PERFORMANCE BUDGETING. In accordance with the President s Management Agenda, Budget and Performance Integration initiative, this program has been assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). Remarks regarding program performance and plans for performance improvement can be located at the Expectmore.gov website. SUMMARY OF CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (CIP). ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Equipment-non ADPE &TELECOM Minor Construction Equipment-ADPE &TELECOM Software Development Total $ $ $ $40.835

38 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/FY 2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Narrative Summary of Operation Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 CARRYOVER. The NAVAIRDEPOTS are budgeted within the prescribed outlay-based carryover ceiling for FY 2007 through FY In FY 2006 additional GWOT related workload required a small amount of additional carryover (Dollars in Millions) Depot Maintenance - Aircraft FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 $1, $1, $1, $1, New Orders Less Exclusions: Foreign Military Sales $35.6 $22.3 $22.7 $23.6 Base Realignment & Closure $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Other Federal Depts & Agencies $5.2 $3.2 $1.3 $1.4 Non-Federal & Others $50.2 $67.1 $73.2 $76.9 Major Range & Test Facility Base $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Orders for Carryover Calculation $1, $1, $1, $1, Composite Outlay Rate 68.9% 68.7% 68.5% 68.3% Carryover Ceiling Rate 31.1% 31.3% 31.5% 31.7% Carryover Ceiling $575.0 $539.7 $533.4 $527.4 Balance of Customer Orders at Yr End $684.5 $635.1 $594.7 $611.4 Less WIP $41.2 $39.5 $41.2 $37.8 Less Exclusions: Foreign Military Sales $24.3 $22.0 $21.0 $20.6 Base Realignment & Closure $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Other Federal Depts & Agencies $14.9 $11.9 $10.7 $10.3 Non-Federal & Others $13.0 $22.1 $27.3 $32.2 Major Range & Test Facility Base $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 Carryover Actual/Budget $591.1 $539.6 $494.5 $510.5

39 Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Navy Working Capital Fund Revenue and Expenses Activity: Naval Aviation Depots (NADEPS) February 2007 ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 CON CON CON CON Revenue: Gross Sales Operations 1, , , ,707.8 Surcharges Depreciation excluding Major Constructio Other Income Total Income 1, , , ,748.8 Expenses Cost of Materiel Sold from Inventory Salaries and Wages: Military Personnel Civilian Personnel Travel and Transportation of Personnel Material & Supplies (Internal Operations Equipment Other Purchases from NWCF Transportation of Things Depreciation - Capital Printing and Reproduction Advisory and Assistance Services Rent, Communication & Utilities Other Purchased Services Total Expenses 1, , , ,745.5 Work in Process Adjustment Comp Work for Activity Reten Adjustment Cost of Goods Sold 1, , , ,748.8 Operating Result Less Surcharges Plus Appropriations Affecting NOR/AOR Other Changes Affecting NOR/AOR Extraordinary Expenses Unmatched Net Operating Result Other Changes Affecting AOR Accumulated Operating Result Exhibit Fund-14 Revenue and Expenses

40 Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Navy Working Capital Fund Source of Revenue Activity: Naval Aviation Depots (NADEPS) February 2007 ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 CON CON CON CON New Orders 1,942 1,816 1,789 1,766 a. Orders from DoD Components 1,214 1,084 1,152 1,187 Department of the Navy 1,177 1,041 1,108 1,144 O & M, Navy O & M, Marine Corps O & M, Navy Reserve O & M, Marine Corp Reserve Aircraft Procurement, Navy Weapons Procurement, Navy Ammunition Procurement, Navy/MC Shipbuilding & Conversion, Navy Other Procurement, Navy Procurement, Marine Corps Family Housing, Navy/MC Research, Dev., Test, & Eval., Navy Military Construction, Navy National Defense Sealift Fund Other Navy Appropriations Other Marine Corps Appropriations Department of the Army Army Operation & Maintenance Army Res, Dev, Test, Eval Army Procurement Army Other Department of the Air Force Air Force Operation & Maintenance Air Force Res, Dev, Test, Eval Air Force Procurement Air Force Other DOD Appropriation Accounts Base Closure & Realignment Operation & Maintenance Accounts Res, Dev, Test & Eval Accounts Procurement Accounts Defense Emergency Relief Fund DOD Other b. Orders from other WCF Activity Groups c. Total DoD 1,851 1,723 1,692 1,664 d. Other Orders Other Federal Agencies Foreign Military Sales Non Federal Agencies Carry-In Orders Total Gross Orders 2,522 2,500 2,424 2,360 a. Funded Carry-Over before Exclusions b. Total Gross Sales 1,837 1,865 1,829 1, End of Year Work-In-Process (-) Non-DoD, BRAC, FMS, Inst. MRTFB (-) Net Funded Carryover Note: Line 4 (End of Year Work-In-Process) is adjusted for Non-DoD, BRAC & FMS and Institutional MRTFB Exhibit Fund-11 Source of Revenue

41 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Changes in the Costs of Operations Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 ($ in Millions) Total Costs FY 2006 Actuals 1,868.2 FY 2007 President's Budget 1,973.3 Pricing Adjustments: 2.0 Annualization of Pay Raises 0.0 Civilian Personnel 0.0 Military Personnel 0.0 Pay Raise 0.0 Civilian Personnel 0.0 Military Personnel 0.0 Fuel Changes 1.0 Material/Supplies/Equipment 0.3 Intrafund 0.0 Travel/Transportation 0.0 Other Purchases 0.7 Productivity Initiatives 0.0 Program Changes: Airframes work Engines work Components work 1.1 Other Support work 0.1 Modification work 0.4 Logistics/Engineering work Other Changes (incl Depreciation): Depreciation -0.6 DFAS -1.0 DISA -0.1 Defense Printing Service -0.3 Printing and Reproduction -0.1 Purchased Utilities -0.7 Travel -0.7 Transportation -1.9 Training -1.3 Equipment Maintenance -0.7 BRAC - FRC FY 2007 Current Estimate: 1,859.2 Exhibit Fund-2 Changes in the Costs of Operations

42 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Changes in the Costs of Operations Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 ($ in Millions) Total Costs FY 2007 Estimate: 1,859.2 Pricing Adjustments: 48.6 Annualization of Pay Raises 4.6 Civilian Personnel 4.5 Military Personnel 0.1 Pay Raise 17.0 Civilian Personnel 16.8 Military Personnel 0.2 Fuel Changes -0.4 Material/Supplies/Equipment 19.0 Intrafund 2.4 Travel/Transportation 0.1 Other Purchases 5.9 Productivity Initiatives 0.0 Program Changes: -8.7 Airframes work 5.4 Engines work Components work 15.1 Other Support work -4.1 Modification work -6.8 Logistics/Engineering work -6.6 Other Changes (incl Depreciation): Depreciation 1.3 IT Costs -4.9 BRAC - FRC FY 2008 Estimate: 1,829.7 Exhibit Fund-2 Changes in the Costs of Operations

43 FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008/2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund Changes in the Costs of Operations Activity Group: Depot Maintenance/NAVAIRDEPOTS February 2007 ($ in Millions) Total Costs FY 2008 Estimate: 1,829.7 Pricing Adjustments: 38.9 Annualization of Pay Raises 6.2 Civilian Personnel 6.1 Military Personnel 0.1 Pay Raise 12.8 Civilian Personnel 12.6 Military Personnel 0.2 Fuel Changes 0.0 Material/Supplies/Equipment 13.8 Intrafund 0.9 Travel/Transportation 0.1 Other Purchases 5.1 Productivity Initiatives 0.0 Program Changes: Airframes work Engines work 21.6 Components work -6.5 Other Support work -0.7 Modification work -5.0 Logistics/Engineering work Other Changes (incl Depreciation): Depreciation -1.8 Travel -1.2 Transportation -0.7 Training -0.5 Purchased Utilities and Other Services -2.1 Purchased Communications -0.2 Printing and Reproduction -0.2 ADP Services / Support -2.4 Goods / Svcs from Other Agencies -1.4 Equipment Maintenance by Contract -3.1 BRAC - FRC FY 2009 Estimate: 1,745.5 Exhibit Fund-2 Changes in the Costs of Operations

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES MAY 2009 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND (NWCF) The NWCF is a revolving fund which finances

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2011 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2011 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2011 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2010 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND February 2010 Navy Working Capital Fund NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND (NWCF)

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) The estimated cost for this report for the Department of Navy (DON) is $68,806. The estimated total cost

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND INTENTIONALLY BLANK February 2012 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND (NWCF) The NWCF is a revolving

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2005 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2005 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2005 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2004 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND DoN NWCF Summary, FY 2005 President s Budget DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2012 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2012 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2012 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND Page Intentionally Blank February 2011 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND (NWCF) The NWCF is a

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2003 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2003 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2003 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2002 NAVY WORKING CAPITAL FUND DoN NWCF Summary FY 2003 President's Budget DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY

More information

Fleet Readiness Centers

Fleet Readiness Centers Fleet Readiness Centers Recommendation: Realign Naval Air Station Oceana, VA, by disestablishing the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department Oceana, the Naval Air Depot Cherry Point Detachment, and

More information

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate July 2011 AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND Budgeting

More information

Department of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003

Department of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003 Department of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1.0 Department of Defense Secondary Supply System Inventories A. Secondary Items - FY 1973 through FY 2003

More information

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY READINESS OF THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE APRIL 6, 2005 1 Chairman

More information

H. R. ll [Report No. 115 ll]

H. R. ll [Report No. 115 ll] TH CONGRESS ST SESSION [FULL COMMITTEE PRINT] Union Calendar No. ll H. R. ll [Report No. ll] Making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 0, 0, and for other

More information

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone: MEDIA CONTACTS Mailing Address: Defense Contract Management Agency Attn: Public Affairs Office 3901 A Avenue Bldg 10500 Fort Lee, VA 23801 Phone: Media Relations: (804) 734-1492 FOIA Requests: (804) 734-1466

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES BUDGET DATA BOOK OFFICE OF BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES BUDGET DATA BOOK OFFICE OF BUDGET DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES BUDGET DATA BOOK OFFICE OF BUDGET April 2016 INTENTIONALLY BLANK INTRODUCTION This document is a compendium of selected budget data and related information

More information

Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective. VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command

Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective. VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command Desired Outcomes Understand NAVSEA role in the Navy Enterprise Understand ship maintenance requirements Understand ship

More information

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M TO MCO 4000.56 dtd MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES 1. Please insert enclosure (1) pages 1 thru 7, pages were inadvertently left out during the printing

More information

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS DOD INSTRUCTION 4151.20 DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Effective: May 4, 2018

More information

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.349 DNS OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.349 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,

More information

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017 Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 01-153 June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 Today, the Army announced details of its budget for Fiscal Year 2002, which runs from October 1, 2001 through September 30,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Navy Page 1 of 17 R-1 Line Item #30 To Program Element 25.144

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5158.04 July 27, 2007 Incorporating Change 2, July 28, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) References: (a) DoD Directive 5158.4,

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 219 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 218 Operation and Maintenance, Navy (OMN) Volume II Data Book The estimated cost for this report is annotated

More information

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2001

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2001 NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2001 OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) MARCH 2000 NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2001 This document is prepared and distributed as

More information

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES MAY 2017 (OMNR) The estimated cost for this report for the Department of Navy (DON) is $13,028. The estimated total

More information

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2005

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2005 NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2005 OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) MARCH 2004 NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2005 This document is prepared and distributed as

More information

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs October 22, 2009 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees

More information

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2004

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2004 NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2004 This document is prepared and distributed as a convenient reference source for the National Defense budget estimates for FY 2004. It also provides selected current

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: SOF Underwater Systems

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: SOF Underwater Systems Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Complete

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2007 BUDGET ESTIMATES February 2006 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE Volume I Section I Section II Section III SAG 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS PBA-19 Appropriation Highlights...1 O-1

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 Base PE 65863N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support OCO Total FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 Navy Page

More information

Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division

Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Division CAPT Mark Vandroff Commanding Officer, NSWCCD February 2018 Dr. Paul Shang Technical Director (Acting), NSWCCD Distribution Statement A: Approved

More information

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES ($ in Millions) FY 2002 Price Program FY 2003 Price Program FY 2004 Price Program FY 2005 Actuals Estimate Estimate Estimate Army Special Ops Command 614.9 +20.3-222.0 413.2 +8.4

More information

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY February 2003 Appropriation Tables MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY Table A-1 Military Personnel, Navy Pay and Allowances of Officers 5,232 5,291 5,594 Pay and Allowances of Enlisted 13,355 14,877 15,914 Pay and

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013

More information

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

More information

SECTION V - IMPROVED BUSINESS PRACTICES

SECTION V - IMPROVED BUSINESS PRACTICES February 2004 Improved Business Practices SECTION V - IMPROVED BUSINESS PRACTICES Providing our Sailors, Marines, and civilians high quality facilities, information technology, and an environment to achieve

More information

BASE VISIT REPORT. Naval Air Depot, North Island, Naval Air Station, Coronado, Ca. June 8,2005

BASE VISIT REPORT. Naval Air Depot, North Island, Naval Air Station, Coronado, Ca. June 8,2005 DCN: 9906 BASE VISIT REPORT Naval Air Depot, North Island, Naval Air Station, Coronado, Ca June 8,2005 LEAD COMMISSIONER: The Honorable Anthony J. Principi, Chairman ACCOMPANYING CONIMISSIONER: None COMMISSION

More information

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is considered to be the appropriate document for this review

More information

Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 322. Study of Future DoD Depot Capabilities

Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 322. Study of Future DoD Depot Capabilities Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 322 Study of Future DoD Depot Capabilities Update for the DoD Maintenance Symposium Monday October 26, 2009 Phoenix, Arizona Goals For Today

More information

THE EFFECT OF CORROSION ON THE COST AND AVAILABILITY OF NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AVIATION WEAPON SYSTEMS

THE EFFECT OF CORROSION ON THE COST AND AVAILABILITY OF NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AVIATION WEAPON SYSTEMS THE EFFECT OF CORROSION ON THE COST AND AVAILABILITY OF NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AVIATION WEAPON SYSTEMS REPORT OSD0GT1 Eric F. Herzberg Trevor K. Chan Paul N. Chang Mitchell L. Daniels Norman T. O Meara

More information

GAO ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Actions Needed to Reduce Carryover at Army Depots

GAO ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Actions Needed to Reduce Carryover at Army Depots GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate July 2008 ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND Actions Needed

More information

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees November 2015 DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1348.30 November 27, 2013 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Secretary of Defense Maintenance Awards References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction reissues DoD Instruction

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 BUDGET ESTIMATES February 2004 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 BUDGET ESTIMATES February 2004 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 BUDGET ESTIMATES February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION Introductory Statement... 1 Congressional Reporting Requirement... 3 Appropriation Summary by Budget

More information

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910 TITLE III PROCUREMENT The fiscal year 2018 Department of Defense procurement budget request totals $113,906,877,000. The Committee recommendation provides $132,501,445,000 for the procurement accounts.

More information

ADC REQUESTED CHANGE: Revisions subsequent to staffing are highlighted in yellow.

ADC REQUESTED CHANGE: Revisions subsequent to staffing are highlighted in yellow. Transaction Copies Required for DLA Support of Navy BRAC SS&D/IMSP DLRs, Navy Program-Managed Materiel, and Nuclear Consumable Support Materiel 1. ORIGINATOR: Defense Logistics Agency, DLA J-331, 703-325-1924

More information

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017 DAU's Acquisition Training Symposium VADM David C. Johnson Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017 Defense Acquisition Organization

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA 5 0604230N Naval Support System Prior Total COST ($ in

More information

OPNAVINST N46 24 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

OPNAVINST N46 24 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.348 N46 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.348 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 75.7 122.481-122.481

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational s Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017

More information

States Pacific Command (USPACOM). Its secondary mission is to transfer the ammunition at sea using the Modular Cargo Delivery System (MCDS).

States Pacific Command (USPACOM). Its secondary mission is to transfer the ammunition at sea using the Modular Cargo Delivery System (MCDS). Statement of John E. Jamian Acting Maritime Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration Hearing on Transforming the Navy Before the Subcommittee on Readiness Committee on Armed

More information

a GAO GAO AIR FORCE DEPOT MAINTENANCE Management Improvements Needed for Backlog of Funded Contract Maintenance Work

a GAO GAO AIR FORCE DEPOT MAINTENANCE Management Improvements Needed for Backlog of Funded Contract Maintenance Work GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives June 2002 AIR FORCE DEPOT MAINTENANCE Management Improvements

More information

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team 1999-2004 Strategic Plan Surface Ships Aircraft Submarines Marine Corps Materiel Surveillance Systems Weapon Systems Command Control & Communications

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Logistics Modernization Program Increment 2 (LMP Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES MAY 2009 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Department of Defense Appropriations Act,

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2016 Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve (OMNR) The estimated cost for this report for the Department

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FY 2001 BUDGET ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2000

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FY 2001 BUDGET ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2000 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FY 2001 BUDGET ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2000 ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND Table of Contents Army Overview Background 3 Army Working Capital Fund Activity... 3 Personnel... 4 Costs... 5 Net

More information

Other Defense Spending

Other Defense Spending 2018 U.S. Defense Budget Other Defense Spending October 2017 l Katherine Blakeley Overview In addition to the major appropriations titles of military personnel; research, development test and evaluation

More information

ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION FOR NAVY SHIPS

ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION FOR NAVY SHIPS ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION FOR NAVY SHIPS FY2008 10 UPDATE REPORT DAC21T1 Eric F. Herzberg Paul N. Chang Mitch L. Daniels Norman T. O'Meara, PhD SEPT EMBER 2012 NOTICE: THE VIEWS, OPINIONS,

More information

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow Department of the Navy FY 26/FY 27 President s Budget Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow 4 February 25 1 1 Our budget resources are aligned to support both present responsibilities and future capabilities.

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4140.25 June 25, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, October 6, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Management Policy for Energy Commodities and Related Services References: See

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #203 To Program Element

More information

Naval VAMOSC Overview

Naval VAMOSC Overview Naval VAMOSC Overview Department of the Navy Cost Analysis Symposium 08 Sep 2011 Naval Center for Cost Analysis Visibility and Management of Operating & Support Costs (VAMOSC) Web-enabled management information

More information

Policy Regarding Performance of Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair

Policy Regarding Performance of Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair Policy Regarding Performance of Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair March 1996 [tm.c QUALITY INSPECTED 8 19961002 073 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT^ Approved for public release; Distribution Unlimited dk THIS

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013

More information

o*6i Distribution Unlimited Z5%u 06V7 E-9 1. Office of the Inspector General. f h IspcorGnea. Ofic. of Defense IN. X.

o*6i Distribution Unlimited Z5%u 06V7 E-9 1. Office of the Inspector General. f h IspcorGnea. Ofic. of Defense IN. X. f::w. 00. w N IN. X.D a INW.. Repor Nube19-"1:Jn13 9 Ofic f h IspcorGnea DITRBUIO SATMET DEPOT-LEVEL REPAIR OF FOREIGN MILITARY SALES ITEMS Report Number 99-174 June 3, 1999 QUAM =p.c7z 4 5 DTC ISEO~ QALTY

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA 23511-2325 CNRMCINST 4790.2 Code 200 CNRMC INSTRUCTION 4790.2 From: Commander, Navy Regional

More information

MCWP Aviation Logistics. U.S. Marine Corps PCN

MCWP Aviation Logistics. U.S. Marine Corps PCN MCWP 3-21.2 Aviation Logistics U.S. Marine Corps PCN 143 000102 00 To Our Readers Changes: Readers of this publication are encouraged to submit suggestions and changes that will improve it. Recommendations

More information

OPNAVINST F N4 5 Jun 2012

OPNAVINST F N4 5 Jun 2012 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 4440.19F N4 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 4440.19F From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: POLICIES

More information

AGC-NAVFAC Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. RADM Kate Gregory, CEC, USN Commander, Naval Facilities Engineering Command

AGC-NAVFAC Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. RADM Kate Gregory, CEC, USN Commander, Naval Facilities Engineering Command AGC-NAVFAC Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. RADM Kate Gregory, CEC, USN Commander, Naval Facilities Engineering Command 23 Apr 2013 We are the Navy s facilities engineering professionals. Fleet, Fighter

More information

BASE VISIT REPORT. Naval Air Station Corpus Christii Naval Station Ingles side. 7-8 July 2005

BASE VISIT REPORT. Naval Air Station Corpus Christii Naval Station Ingles side. 7-8 July 2005 BASE VISIT REPORT Naval Air Station Corpus Christii Naval Station Ingles side LEAD COMMISSIONER: General Hill 7-8 July 2005 COMMISSION STAFF: William Fetzer, Senior NavyIMarine Corps Analyst LIST OF ATTENDEES:

More information

A Ready, Modern Force!

A Ready, Modern Force! A Ready, Modern Force! READY FOR TODAY, PREPARED FOR TOMORROW! Jerry Hendrix, Paul Scharre, and Elbridge Colby! The Center for a New American Security does not! take institutional positions on policy issues.!!

More information

GAO MILITARY BASE CLOSURES

GAO MILITARY BASE CLOSURES GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees June 2007 MILITARY BASE CLOSURES Projected Savings from Fleet Readiness Centers Likely Overstated and Actions Needed

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base FY 213 OCO FY 213 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line

More information

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY Information Operations Enterprise Overview to AFCEA Ms. Kathy Cutler, Director and CIO April 3, 2013 1 We Are Foreign Policy Advisor Mr.

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical

More information

It s All about the Money!

It s All about the Money! 2011 DOD Maintenance Symposium Breakout Session: It s All about the Money! Chien Huo, Ph.D. Force and Infrastructure Analysis Division (FIAD) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Office of the

More information

PRE-DECISIONAL INTERNAL EXECUTIVE BRANCH DRAFT

PRE-DECISIONAL INTERNAL EXECUTIVE BRANCH DRAFT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PRE-DECISIONAL INTERNAL EXECUTIVE BRANCH DRAFT SEC.. EXPANSION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR PILOT PROGRAMS ON CAREER FLEXIBILITY TO ENHANCE RETENTION OF MEMBERS OF THE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 Base PE 65864N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 212 OCO FY 212 Total FY 213 FY 214 FY

More information

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 1 DOD MANAGEMENT OF ENERGY COMMODITIES: OVERVIEW

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 1 DOD MANAGEMENT OF ENERGY COMMODITIES: OVERVIEW DOD MANUAL 4140.25, VOLUME 1 DOD MANAGEMENT OF ENERGY COMMODITIES: OVERVIEW Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Effective: March 2, 2018 Releasability:

More information

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military

More information

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.350 DNS-3/NAVAIR OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.350 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj:

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES MAY 2017 (OMMCR) The estimated cost for this report for the Department of Navy (DON) is $3,176. The estimated total

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBJECT: MISSION OF THE AIR FORCE GLOBAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT

More information

Bath Iron Works Awarded Potential $102 Million Navy Contract for Post Shakedown Availabilities on DDG 51-Class Ships in West Coast Homeports

Bath Iron Works Awarded Potential $102 Million Navy Contract for Post Shakedown Availabilities on DDG 51-Class Ships in West Coast Homeports PRESS RELEASES 2004 Bath Iron Works Awarded Potential $102 Million Navy Contract for Post Shakedown Availabilities on DDG 51-Class Ships in West Coast Homeports General Dynamics Selected for Final-Design

More information

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO OPNAVINST 5450.223B N87 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.223B From: Chief of Naval Operations

More information

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018 Great Decisions 2018 Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018 I. Funding America s four militaries not as equal as they look Times Square Strategy wears a dollar sign*

More information

NAVAIR News Release FRCSW Public Affairs

NAVAIR News Release FRCSW Public Affairs VAST CUTS Group shot Capt. Tim Trainer, NAVAIR Depot North Island commanding officer, and Reggie Donaldson prepare to pull the plug on a VAST machine at NAVAIR Depot North Island, signifying that the VAST

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7 COST ($ in Millions FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost Total PE Cost 20.512 9.280 20.065 NSRP ASE/S2466/S2811 20.512 9.280 20.065 Quantity of RDT&E

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 46.823 63.563 12.906-12.906 15.663 15.125

More information

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDTEN/BA 6 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0605866N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support COST (In Millions) Total PE Cost 0706 / EMC

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY

More information

CNRMC PSSRA Brief. Mr. Kevin Taylor May 19, 2016

CNRMC PSSRA Brief. Mr. Kevin Taylor May 19, 2016 CNRMC PSSRA Brief Mr. Kevin Taylor May 19, 2016 Intent of this information is to provide U.S. DoD industry contractors a general schedule for information and planning purposes for upcoming surface ship

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Order Code RS21305 Updated January 3, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Navy Littoral Combat Ship (LCS): Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O Rourke Specialist in

More information