Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective. VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command

Transcription

1 Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command

2 Desired Outcomes Understand NAVSEA role in the Navy Enterprise Understand ship maintenance requirements Understand ship maintenance decision-making Understand long-term picture 2

3 NAVSEA Customers INTERNAL PEO Aircraft Carriers PEO Ships PEO Submarines PEO Integrated Warfare Systems PEO Littoral and Mine Warfare Systems EXTERNAL Naval Aviation Enterprise Surface Warfare Enterprise Undersea Enterprise Naval Network/ FORCENET Enterprise Naval Expeditionary Combat Enterprise 3

4 Enterprise Model Enterprise Enterprise Behavioral Model Providers/ Enablers Customers Demand Signal Resources ($) Output of the Enterprise is: Readiness Cost Collaboration Data transparency Corporate decision-making Governed by metrics Understanding and strategic management of: Dollars People Assets Decide as team execute via chain of command 4

5 Our Role in the Enterprises PROVIDERS / ENABLERS (SUPPORTING WARFARE ENTERPRISES) WARFARE ENTERPRISES (DELIVERING COMBAT CAPABILITY TO COCOMS) RESOURCES AT EACH ENTERPRISE INTERSECTION MPT&E AT&L INSTALLATIONS HEALTH CARE S&T NAVSEA/ PEOs WARFARE DOMAIN WARFARE DOMAIN WARFARE DOMAIN WARFARE DOMAIN NAE SWE USE NNFE NECE WARFARE DOMAIN PEOPLE DOLLARS STUFF Current...Future Navy After Next READINESS CURRENT.FUTURE Multiple Product Lines - Supporting All 5 Enterprises 5

6 Value Proposition From SYSCOM Provider to the Enterprise Aircraft Carriers ready for tasking at reduced cost Warships ready for tasking at reduced cost Submarines ready for tasking at reduced cost Littoral systems ready for tasking at reduced cost Warfare systems ready for tasking at reduced cost Current Navy Next Navy Navy After Next 6

7 Navy Ship Maintenance Activities Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF) (RMC) Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Nuclear Submarine Support Facility New London SUPSHIP Groton Ship Repair Facility Yokosuka (RMC) Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF (RMC) Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (RMC) San Diego South Central RMC Ingleside Norfolk Naval Shipyard Mid-Atlantic RMC Norfolk SUPSHIP Newport News Trident Refit Facility Kings Bay Southeast RMC Mayport MARMC Det. Naples MARMC Det. Bahrain Mission funded & aligned through One Shipyard construct. AS-39 USS EMORY S La Maddalena AS-40 USS FRANK Guam 7

8 Ship Maintenance Considerations Aircraft Carriers Docking periodicity Nuclear maintenance/refueling Air/Ship interface Surface Ships Docking periodicity MSMO contracts Warfare system modernization Submarines SUBSAFE requirements Nuclear maintenance/refueling Fly-by-wire certification Warfare System modernization 8

9 Class Maintenance Plan Drivers Class Maintenance Plan content differs because of: System certifications (nuclear, SUBSAFE, flight deck) Aging effects Hull life expectancy Maintenance scheduling intervals 9

10 Class Maintenance Share 100% Executed Maintenance Man-days 75% 50% 25% Modernization Corrective Maintenance (CSMP) Class Maint Plan (CMP) Engineered Requirements 21 0% FY98 FY05 Submarine FY98 FY05 FY98 FY05 Carrier Surface 10

11 Ship Maintenance Guiding Principles Statutory requirements: 10 USC 2464 requires a government-owned government operated core logistics capability; organic capability must exist for all weapons systems, including new systems. 10 USC 2466 limits amount of depot maintenance funds that can be contracted out to less than or equal to 50%. 10 USC 2472 requires public depot civilian employment to be managed solely on the basis of available workload and the funds available for such depot maintenance. Navy requirements Schedule maintenance in ships homeport when possible (PERSTEMPO / QOL) Optimize critical skill usage (One shipyard concept) Load public shipyards first to efficiently use organic capacity 11

12 Ship Maintenance Assignment Guidelines Submarine maintenance PNSY preferred site for New London SSNs PHNSY & IMF preferred site for Hawaii and Guam-based SSNs PSNSY & IMF preferred site for CONUS West coast SSNs/Bangor SSBNs NNSY preferred site for Norfolk SSNs / Kings Bay SSBNs Short duration availabilities performed by public yard Tiger Teams in submarine homeports without a public yard 12

13 Ship Maintenance Assignment Guidelines Aircraft Carrier maintenance Refueling overhauls performed at Northrop Grumman Newport News Other depot maintenance performed in public depots closest to homeport Significant private sector support through teaming 13

14 Ship Maintenance Assignment Guidelines Surface ship maintenance Performed in private yards using Multi-Ship / Multi- Option (MSMO) contracts Portion of LHA / LHD depot maintenance required to maintain core maintenance capabilities in public sector performed at NNSY 14

15 The Way Ahead Consolidate Enterprise approach Reduction of requirements wherever possible One Shipyard Lean Six Sigma as a viable tool to drive efficiency Naval Shipyard business plan Preservation improvements Longer docking cycle 15

16 COMNAVSEA My Top Five Drive our behavior to align with the Naval Enterprise Transform NAVSEA to a Competency Aligned Organization Measure our output with customer-driven metrics Focus on diversity Document & improve our processes through Lean Six Sigma 16

17 Back Up 17

18 The Navy Enterprise Construct The Lead Type Commander provides the readiness demand signal in his role to train and equip the Fleet. The Providers are Systems Commands, PEOs, Field Activities, and others who provide material and people resources to the lead Type Commanders. Providers NAVAIR, NAVSEA, NAVSUP, SPAWAR PEOs Requirements NAVSURFOR NAVSUBFOR NAVAIRFOR NETWARCOM NECC The Resource Sponsors provide budget and financial resources to both providers and the Type Commanders, and steward the warfighter s requirements for the acquisition process. Resources OPNAV N8/N4/ BUPERs 18

19 Reduced Requirements Example: SSN 688 Class Lifecycle Evolution DELIVERY Today SSNs (w/ Refueling) P S A P S A P S A END of LIFE 250K 380K 250K 30Y 18K 18K R 18K 18K R 18K 18K R 18K 18K INAC O F OH H X O 70M 22% Depot Time 1,020K Depot Mandays Life Cycle Total 88K 350K 18K 18K D 18K 18K 18K 18K M P INAC X 90M 17% Depot Time 546K Depot Mandays Life Cycle Total 145K 303K 33Y 20 K 20 K D 20 K 20 K E 20 K 17 K INAC M R P O X 120M 12% Depot Time 565K Depot Mandays Life Cycle Total R F O Today SSNs (w/o Refueling) P S A 20 K 20 K 120M 145K D M P 200K 20 K 20 K E 20 K 17 K 11% Depot Time 462K Depot Mandays Lifecycle Total O H INAC X SRA 2M PSA 6M-9M D E R E R M O O RO FO P H H 13M 16M 18M 24M 24M Mandays (K) shown are typical notionals for Type Commanders repairs and services. 19

20 Enterprise Construct monthly Navy ExComm NE BoD RDA VCNO CFFC/CPF CNO Navy Enterprise Strategic Guidance and Fiscal Decisions N8/ FMC Output = Readiness at Cost monthly FRE ExComm FRE BoD ExComm BoD Providers TYCOMs Warfare Enterprises Fleet Readiness Enterprise Ops/ Readiness Direction and Integrated Rqmts Prioritization OPNAV N8/4/1 Integrated Processes and Readiness Execution Resource Sponsors Units Ready for Tasking All Forces Ready for Tasking 20

21 Alignment Shipbuilding & Modernization Ship Repair Technical Authority Contract Authority Life Cycle Mgmt. Class Maint Plans Shipyard Operation PEOs/Platform Sponsor NAVSEA FMBOD CSF CNSF CNAF Warfare Enterprises Units Ready For Tasking CFFC CPF FRP Alignment FRE 21