A Joint Staff Perspective

Transcription

1 A Joint Staff Perspective Brigadier General Stephen Goldfein Deputy Director Joint Warfighting Capabilities Assessment, J-8 26 June Jul-02 UNCLAS 1

2 PURPOSE Establish a common reference point for where we are and where we re going Why we need Operational Concepts and Architectures Deliverables Intended use What concepts and architectures are How concepts and architectures work What protocols we need 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 2

3 PROBLE - PART 1 - RISK ANAGEENT FYDP Near Term Do you have a way to make resource decisions here... id Term + 10 Far Term to support Strategic Vision here? EA-6B replacement required now Electronic Warfare Space Based? Aerostat? UAV? 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 3

4 PROBLE - PART 1 - RISK ANAGEENT Dollars (CY03) $500B $450B $400B $350B $300B $250B $200B $150B $100B DoD Top Line This dramatic growth fueled by 9/11 attacks our transformation investment... Rqmts Fiscal Year Outyear tails that clash with current program investment Outyear development crowded out by current program Risk in this decade 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 4

5 JR UNCLAS PROBLE - PART 2 - EVOLVING THE Needs Interoperability? Capabilities Based? Impact on: Training? Doctrine? Leadership? Facilities? This process has served us well so far, but can we make it better? QDR, DPG, CPG Systems 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 5

6 PROBLE - PART 3 - TRANSFORATION CJCS Priorities Global war on terrorism ilitary point man in Interagency process Build, maintain, and sustain military coalitions Develop organizational agility Proponent for Joint warfighting Advocate for the warfighters Eliminate gaps/seams between CINCs, Services and C4ISR Proponent for transformation Spread transformation across material and non-material domains Synchronize and support Service modernization Guide and synchronize JFCO experimentation 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 6

7 JOC/JOA GETS AT ALL 3 PARTS CJCS saw this coming (Apr 00) and directed to: Advance joint warfighting and interoperability Get out in front of the requirements process Be proactive rather than reactive Adopt a strategic focus chartered JWCAs to develop key Operational Concepts and Operational Architectures (Dec 00) Dominant aneuver Precision Engagement Joint Task Force Command and Control 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 7

8 STRATEGIC TOPIC ASSUPTIONS Timeframe Originally target 2020 Adjusted Two Concepts -- As is (Budget Year) and DPP (2019) Architecture to support near-term concept Point of view Joint Force Commander looking one level up and below Range of operations Joint Force Operational level Force Baseline Programs of Record within the PO 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 8

9 DELIVERABLES Operational Concepts that describe how we want to conduct future joint operations Integrating Operational Concept ission Area Concepts Integrated Joint Operational Architecture recommendations based on architectural analysis 1st order analysis: qualitative assessment 2nd order analysis: system interface and interoperability assessment 3rd order analysis: cost-benefit trade-offs 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS 9

10 INTENDED USE OF THE ARCHITECTURE Assist in their role as future joint force architects by: Describing a vision for the future Coordinating modernization efforts Infusing transformation when appropriate anaging risk; Inform decision making Integrate with: Vision Development J-7/JFCO Resource management (PPBS) Cost-benefit analysis system Gaps, duplication, interoperability and opportunities Acquisition system Investment strategy Transform the Process 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS10

11 Strategy ARCHITECTURE FOCUSED ANALYSIS Vision Emerging Technology aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Non-aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS11

12 Strategy ARCHITECTURE FOCUSED ANALYSIS Vision Emerging Technology aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Non-aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS12

13 OPERATIONAL CONCEPT End-to-end stream of activities that defines how force elements, systems, organizations and tactics combine to accomplish a military task Jul 01 Defines fundamental actions and interdependencies that will be used to accomplish the mission Establishes a common understanding of what must be accomplished and how it should be done Not tied to a specific material solution, but based in large part on technological capabilities Establishes How We Want to Operate 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS13

14 Strategy ARCHITECTURE FOCUSED ANALYSIS Vision Emerging Technology aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Non-aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Operational Architecture 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS14

15 6 Z UNCLAS OPERATIONAL ARCHITECTURE Propose targets Track JFLCC Targets Phase I, II BDA EA JFLCC (ACE) Caveats: Extract from NODE A USCENTCO Objective Architecture Concerning Targeting November 1997 Draft Nodes; info. exchanges; functions shown do not represent a complete set DCCC Enemy Force Effectiveness Collection Target Nominations AW Phase I, II, III BDA NJIC EA A0 Target nominations Special Studies DIA Target Nominations A1 A2 A3 IDB Changes BDA Reports (imagery/text) Phase II BDA; Combat Assessment CDL, JNFL, Preplanned JTL JFCC JFC Collection JIC JOC Target materials A1.2 A3.1 A3.2 Target nomination JFC NATO Allies JFLCC A1.1 Coalition Coordination BDA Reports NODE B (JOC/JIC) (imagery/text) F2C2 BDA Reports Coalition Allies AADC CWC (imagery/text) A3.2.1 Target materials/analysis BDA Reports (imagery/text) Army SYSTE SYSTE Collection Force AADC FPTOC Control Weapons Target study 1 Pointmensuration 2 BDA Reports No strike lists Target materials (imagery/text) JFACC Phase I, II, III BDA NODES USAF (AOC) Phase I BDA BDA Reports (imagery/text) SYSTEEVENTS/TIE Force Control Weapons 3 JFSOCC AOC E-3 1 CRC F-15 F-16 AAWC CRE Target materials/analysis BDA Reports (imagery/text) CIC SYSTE Weapon System VideoARC 1 ISREPs Combat Reports C2WC 3 unitions Effects Target nominations Target material requests ASUWC SYSTE 2 EXTERNAL CONNECTION ASWC Phase I BDA COS Interface SWC AJ N Z COSInterface AJ N Z AJ N Z AJ N Z AJ N Z One-way SATCO Interface A J A J Weapon System Video ISREPs Combat Reports unitions Effects Target nominations Target material requests Collection AJ AJ N Z A C J N COS Interface WOC A J N Z Activity Hierarchy time 2 Phase I, II BDA; EA Tgt.Folders;weaponeering ATO,JTl A1 EVENT 2 Activity Diagram JFACC Joint Elements National A2 Theater JFSOCC DSP SOF E-3 1 OTHR HFDF U-2R ACA RC- ASW Arrays 135V 2 FOSICs/FOSIFs EP-3 ES-3A A3.2.2 etc UAVs A3 Tankers 4 Ships 6 Subs 6 etc USC Force Control Weapons TACC TAOC / SAAWC / F/A-18 EWC AV-8B HAWKTDD NODE 1 NODE Tactical 2 Surveil NODE 3 P-3C S-3B SH-60 UAVs etc. EVENT 1 JFCC time 1 Navy Tankers 4 AEGIS aritime Cruiser: CTL CG -47 Class Phase I, II BDA E-2C {formula SATCO *(Alternate, relating Interface CV) time 1 to time 2} EA-6B A J N Z A J A J AJ N Z Aircraft AEGIS AEGIS OtherAAW OtherAAW Other F/A-18A/B Carriers Cruisers Destroyers Ships time 3 Ships Ships EVENT 3 CV CG-47 DDG -51 CGN -36/38, DDG-993 FFG-7 Near Term Operations as of SYSTE ajor Regional {formula Conflict relating -- Theater Air and issile Defense functions Sources: Ref J6, J13, J62, J84, J94, J97, N3, 1 N10, N11, time N14, 6, 3 N27, to N1 time F1, B17, 3'} R8, R16, S11, S14 -S24 Notes for Navy Charts 1 AWACS NODE C time 3' EVENT 4 EVENT 5 2 RIVETJOINT 3 4 FormerlyEWC Aerial Refueling Aircraft 5 ay be indirect via Fleet gateway Ships & Subs refers to vessels, which although not an integr al part of the Joint Force, are tasked to provide surveillance SYSTE 4 EVENT 6 A J A time n A J A J N N Z J A C A C J J NN R R A C J Z AC A C J Z CJ CJ C C F-14D F-14A,B F/A -18 C/D, E/F EVENT 7 EVENT 8 Description of the tasks and activities, operational nodes and elements, and information flows required to accomplish or support a military operation C4ISR Framework Guided by an Operational Concept Independent of force structure and technology Operational Architectures are: Frameworks for analysis Vehicles to promote interoperability ethods to identify operational shortfalls 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS15

16 1 ARCHITECTURE 3 VIEWS Physical Perspective Systems View Processing and Internodal Relates Capabilities to Operational Systems Associations to Nodes and Functions Operational View Identifies Warfighting Relationships Specific Capabilities Identified to Satisfy Operational Technical Criteria Governing Interoperability and Procurement Technology Supporting New Capabilities Functional Perspective Levels of Interoperability Technical View Prescribes Standards and Conventions 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS16

17 JOINT OPERATIONAL ARCHITECTURE Service odernization Efforts 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS17

18 Strategy ARCHITECTURE FOCUSED ANALYSIS Vision Emerging Technology aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Non-aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Rapid Prototyping Operational Architecture Wargaming Exercises 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS18

19 Strategy ARCHITECTURE FOCUSED ANALYSIS Vision Emerging Technology aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Non-aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Rapid Prototyping Operational Architecture Wargaming Analysis Exercises 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS19

20 ANALYSIS PROCESS Concept Development OV-1 OV-4 OV-5 System Functional apping SV-3 SV-4 SV-5 1st Order Analysis Functional Assessment Gaps Duplications System Interface apping OV-2 SV-1 SV-2 SV-6 2nd Order Analysis Static Interoperability Assessment Interoperability Architecture Performance OV-6 SV-7 Executable odel 3rd Order Analysis Dynamic Performance Assessment ission Area Performance 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS20

21 Strategy ARCHITECTURE FOCUSED ANALYSIS Vision Emerging Technology aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Non-aterial Solutions (NS / ORD) Rapid Prototyping Operational Architecture Wargaming Analysis Exercises 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS21

22 ARCHITECTURE / PPBS CYCLE F J A J J A S O N D J F A J J A S O N D JS Trips CPR Trips CPA Trips CPR Trips CPA OSD DPG Fiscal Guidance Program Review Budget Review P D B I DPG Fiscal Guidance Program Review Budget Review P D B I SERVICES PO Build Budget Build P O B E S PO Build Budget Build P O B E S Clarifying Analysis Implementation Adjustments Clarifying Analysis Implementation Adjustments 3-Jul-02 Briefing UNCLAS22

23 ARCHITECTURE / PPBS CYCLE F J A J J A S O N D J F A J J A S O N D Experiment Findings Capability Updates Experiment Findings Capability Updates OV Updates CPR Analysis OV Updates CPR Analysis SV Updates CPA Analysis SV Updates CPA Analysis JS Trips CPR Trips CPA Trips CPR Trips CPA OSD DPG Fiscal Guidance Program Review Budget Review P D B I DPG Fiscal Guidance Program Review Budget Review P D B I SERVICES PO Build Budget Build P O B E S PO Build Budget Build P O B E S Clarifying Analysis Implementation Adjustments Clarifying Analysis Implementation Adjustments 3-Jul-02 Briefing UNCLAS23

24 ARCHITECTURE / PPBS CYCLE F J A J J A S O N D J F A J J A S O N D Experiment Findings Capability Updates Experiment Findings Capability Updates OV Updates CPR Analysis OV Updates CPR Analysis SV Updates CPA Analysis SV Updates CPA Analysis JS Trips CPR Trips CPA Trips CPR Trips CPA OSD DPG Fiscal Guidance Program Review Budget Review P D B I DPG Fiscal Guidance Program Review Budget Review P D B I SERVICES PO Build Budget Build P O B E S PO Build Budget Build P O B E S Clarifying Analysis Implementation Adjustments Clarifying Analysis Implementation Adjustments 3-Jul-02 Briefing UNCLAS24

25 PROTOCOLS ust comply with OSD direction DoD Architecture Framework ust ensure common: Format Components Authority Compliance Requires an update to CJCSI 3170 ( Generation System) Regulatory teeth Proper staffing 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS25

26 Current Status Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Concept Concept Concept Architecture SJF HQ JF C2 Architecture Dominant aneuver Implementation Precision Engagement Implementation JF C2 ISR Full Dimensional Protection As-Is Concept / Architecture Analysis Concept Architecture Focused Logistics Concept Architecture Today 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS26

27 BACK-UP SLIDES 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS27

28 PRIARY UNIFYING EFFORTS APPROVE JOINT CONCEPTS/ ARCHITECTURES OSD RESOLVE CROSS- SERVICE ISSUES SERVICES USE JOINT CONCEPTS & ARCHITECTURES JOINT STAFF DEVELOP JOINT CONCEPTS/ ARCHITECTURES JFCO JOINT EXPERIENTATION & INTEROPERABILITY 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS28

29 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Joint Staff JFCO Services OSD Develop integrating concept Approve concepts Develop integrating concept Use joint architecture as a tool supporting requirements definition Ensure systems views are developed to support system engineering Develop mission area concepts Approve architectures Validate key capabilities and characteristics of integrating concept Use joint architecture to identify interoperability requirements Enforce resolution of crossservice interoperability issues Develop mission area architectures Approve architecture validation process Conduct joint experimentation to validate concepts Use joint architecture to identify excess infrastructure or systems Integrate mission area architectures Recommend resource allocation based on architecture analysis Continue effort to correct legacy interoperability issues Use joint architecture to assess impact of program changes Oversee validation of joint architecture Initiate requirements to satisfy shortfalls Ensure ORDs reflect joint requirements Resolve cross-service requirements aintain and update joint architecture 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS29

30 INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSENT Architecture View ajor Defense Systems NODE B SYSTE 1 NODE A SYSTE 1 SYSTE 2 COS Interface COSInterface One-way SATCO Interface SYSTE 2 SYSTE 3 SATCO Interface COS Interface nodal mapping EXTERNAL CONNECTION NODE C SYSTE 1 SYSTE 4 Cut Keep As Is odify (ORDOD) ORD Interoperable Not Interoperable Capability Not Required Capability Required Design Criteria Legacy System New System Inter-nodal analysis Intra-nodal analysis 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS30

31 Z 5 4 UNCLAS FUNCTIONAL ASSESSENT Architecture Views Activity Activity Hierarchy Diagram A0 ajor Defense Systems Propose targets Track JFLCC Targets Phase I, II BDA EA JFLCC (ACE) A1.1 DCCC Enemy Force Effectiveness Collection Target Nominations Caveats: Extract from USCENTCO Objective Architecture Concerning Targeting November 1997 Draft Nodes; info. exchanges; functions shown do not represent a complete set A1 A2 A3 DIA A1.2 A3.1 A3.2 AW IDB Changes Collection A3.2.1 BDA Reports (imagery/text) Weapon System Video ISREPs Combat Reports unitions Effects Target nominations Target material requests Phase I BDA A1 Coalition Allies Phase I, II, III BDA NJIC EA Target nominations Special Studies Army Force AADC FPTOC Control Weapons Target A2 Nominations USAF BDA Reports Phase II BDA; Force Control (imagery/text) Combat Assessment CDL, JNFL, Pre- E-3 1 CRC Weapons AOC F-15 F-16 CRE A3.2.2 planned JTL Target materials Target nomination JFC BDA Reports (JOC/JIC) ARC (imagery/text) F2C2 C2WC 3 Target materials/analysis BDA Reports (imagery/text) ASUWC WOC Coalition Coordination Collection ASWC Target study Pointmensuration BDA Reports No strike lists SWC Target materials (imagery/text) JFACC Phase I, II, III BDA Aircraft (AOC) Phase AEGIS I BDA AEGIS OtherAAW OtherAAW Other Carriers Cruisers Destroyers Ships Ships Ships BDA Reports (imagery/text) CV CG-47 DDG-51 CGN-36/38, DDG -993 FFG-7 JFSOCC Target materials/analysis Near Term Operations as of --ajor 2003 Regional Conflict --Theater Air and issile Defense functions BDA Reports (imagery/text) Sources: Ref J6, J13, J62, J84, J94, J97, N3, 6, N10, N27, N11, F1, B17, N14, R8, N1R16, -S24 S11, S14 Notes for Navy Charts AWACS RIVETJOINT JFCC 3 FormerlyEWC Aerial Refueling Aircraft ay be indirect via Fleet gateway Ships & Subs refers to vessels, which although not al part an of integr the Joint Force, are tasked to provide surveillance Weapon System Video aritime CTL ISREPs Phase I, II BDA Combat Reports unitions Effects Target nominations Target material requests Collection NATO Allies AJN Z AJN Z AJ N Z AJ N Z AJ N Z AJ AJN N Z Phase I, II BDA; EA Tgt.Folders; weaponeering ATO, JTl AADC A C J N A J JFLCC A J A J N Z JFCC CWC A J JFC JIC JOC A J A J AAWC CIC A3 AEGIS Cruiser: -47 CG *(Alternate, Class CV) A A J N N Z AJ N N Z A JFACC A J JFSOCC A J N Z J N ACA A J C J N N R A C J Z Joint Elements National Theater DSP SOF E-3 1 U-2R OTHR HFDF RC- ASW Arrays 135V 2 FOSICs/FOSIFs EP-3 ES-3A etc UAVs Tankers Ships Subs 6 USC 6 etc Force Control Weapons TACC TAOC / SAAWC / F/A-18 EWC AV-8B HAWKTDD Tactical Surveil P-3C S-3B SH-60 UAVs etc. Navy Tankers4 AC AC A C J Z CJ CJ C C E-2C EA-6B F-14D F-14A,B F/A-18 C/D, E/F F/A-18A/B functional mapping Develop Improve aintain Delete Necessary Unnecessary Capability Gaps Deficient Capability Sole Capability Duplicate Capability Non-Critical Capability 3-Jul-02 UNCLAS31 A s s e s s m e n t s