Interoperability Testing in a NetCentric Environment
|
|
|
- Scarlett Holmes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Interoperability Testing in a NetCentric Environment Use of DoDAF & SysML Profile in the Flight Test Environment F. C. Alvidrez MTSI - Edwards AFB
2 Topics Background, Introduction & Acknowledgements Why are we here? Transformation & the Growth of NetCentric Warfare Growth of NetCentric Warfare System of Systems Engineering Interoperability Requirements Integrated Architectures NR-KPPs DISA & JITC Approach to Testing Example Summary
3 Background & Introduction Some Acknowledgements DAU DISA DoDAF Working Group OMG Some Caveats QuickTime and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Not an official USAF or USG presentation All Material is available on line through DAU, DISA, and other public DoD Sources
4 The Warfighters Perspective Interoperability VIR IBUS M A RI VICTORIA If you are not interoperable, you are Not on the net Not contributing Not benefiting Not part of the information age Source: USN War College NetCentric Warfare Presentation
5 Why DoDAF and Interoperability Test? Increasing NetCentric upgrades and modifications since 9/11 (actually starting after Iraq 1) Link-16, FAB-T, B-1B FIDL, B-52 CONECT, B-2A EHF, etc., Requirement to shorten the Kill Chain and to increase Situational Awareness Interoperability is about Integrated Architectures DoDAF is the language of Integrated Architectures in DoD DoDAF Integrated Architectures is the blueprint for Interoperability Test Requirements
6 Interoperability Concept OV-1 Source: DARPA J-UCAS 2004
7 Type of Problems Interoperability - Systems work at the subsystem level but do not work when in an operational environment Integration problems with legacy systems - Systems work but interfere with legacy systems such as IFF, TACAN or Defensive Avionics Lack of NetCentric & Interoperability Test expertise for early Test Planning -
8 DoDAF and DoD Policy DoD All IT & NSS must be tested for interoperability before fielding, and the test results evaluated and system certified by DISA (JITC)
9 DoDAF & Mandatory Interoperability DoD Dir Interoperability and Supportability of Information (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS) DoD 5000 Series Defensive Acquisition System Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) CJCS 3710 Series CJCSI Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) Programmatic Process for Joint Experimentation and Joint Resource Change Recommendations Others How do you ensure interoperability? Compliant DoDAF Architectures
10 DoD Architecture Framework Purpose & Scope Provide guidance on describing architectures Warfighting Operations Business Operations & Processes Provides guidance, rules & product descriptions for developing and presenting Integrated architectures Defines three views Operational View System View Technical Standards
11 Source: DoDAF Ver. 1 The Linkages Between Views
12 DoD Architecture Framework: One Architecture Three Views Operational View Systems View Technical View The Operational View describes and interrelates the operational elements, tasks and activities, and information flows required to accomplish mission operations. The Systems View describes and interrelates the existing or postulated technologies, systems, and other resources intended to support the operational requirements. The Technical View describes the profile of rules, standards, and conventions governing systems implementation. Source: DoD AF 1.0 Draft 12
13 Analyzing DoDAF Products and Relationships 2 AVs 9 OVs 16 SVs 2 TVs
14 DoDAF When to Start the Process
15 Interoperability Governance
16 Timeline for Planning Integrated Architectures in Place Interoperability Tests in Place
17 Timing and Interoperability DoDAF Integrated Architectures Initial SE Requirements Full Interoperability Demonstration (JITC Certification) Critical Test Planning
18 Critical DoDAF Products for Interoperability Test OV-1 OV-2 OV-5 SV-1 SV-6 TV-1 SV-2 OV-3 CONOPS
19 Example OV-1 OV-1 Source: DARPA J-UCAS 2004
20 Example OV-2
21 Important References DAU NR-KPPs Web Course (CLM 029) DAU Fundamentals of Test & Evaluation Web Course (TST 102) DISA / JITC ( / ( DARS DoD Architecture Repository System (
22 Summary Interoperability modifications and upgrades are increasing Interoperability is System of Systems Engineering Interoperability Testing has special considerations (other nodes and players) Can use simulations as well as hardware in the loop. Will require flight demonstrations in a representative environment (JITC Certification) DoDAF Architectures are required in all phases of Interoperability Testing (TES - TEMP - Flight Test Plan - JTIC Certification) Recommendation - Have a DoDAF Architect on the TRWG (Test Requirements Working Group) early
Implementing the Joint Battle Management Command & Control Roadmap Panel
JO INT CH I E FS OF S TA FF The Joint Staff C4 Systems Directorate Implementing the Joint Battle Management Command & Control Roadmap Panel Colonel Rob Gearhart, USMC Joint Staff J6I, Integration & Information
JITC Joint Interoperability Test, Evaluation, and Certification Overview
JITC Joint Interoperability Test, Evaluation, and Certification Overview November 2016 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Agenda Joint Interoperability Policy and Guidance Requirements and Evaluation Framework Joint Interoperability
OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605804D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 9.155 18.550 20.396
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 33-401 14 MARCH 2007 Communications and Information IMPLEMENTING AIR FORCE ARCHITECTURES ACCESSIBILITY: COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION
Modeling and Simulation Synergies in Acquisition, Test and Evaluation, and Training
Modeling and Simulation Synergies in Acquisition, Test and Evaluation, and Training Rafael Vila, Major, USAF Fort Huachuca, AZ rafivila@aol.com ABSTRACT Modeling and Simulations (M&S) capabilities are
Capability Integration
SoS/Interoperability IPT Integrating Lockheed Martin Strengths Realizing Military Value Integration Framework for Developing C4ISTAR Solutions Dr David Sundstrom Director, Network Centric 21 September
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8330.01 May 21, 2014 Incorporating Change 1, December 18, 2017 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Interoperability of Information Technology (IT), Including National Security Systems
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 The Joint Staff Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
Abstract. 1 The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of our sponsoring agency, the United States Northern Command.
1 The USNORTHCOM Integrated Architecture: Developing and managing a capabilities-based architecture as a program to enhance the Homeland Defense and Military Assistance to Civil Authorities Mission Areas
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4630.8 June 30, 2004 SUBJECT: Procedures for Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS) ASD(NII)/DoD
JOINT STAFF FY 2006/2007 Budget Estimates Submissions Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide
Exhibit R-3, Project Analysis Exhibit R-3, Project Analysis : February 2005 RDT&E, Defense Wide, Joint Staff 0400 / BA 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0902298J Management Headquarters PROJECT NAME: FCB Studies Categories
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 6241.04C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR MANAGEMENT AND USE OF UNITED STATES MESSAGE TEXT FORMATTING Reference(s): See Enclosure
Joint Interoperability Certification
J O I N T I N T E R O P E R B I L I T Y T E S T C O M M N D Joint Interoperability Certification What the Program Manager Should Know By Phuong Tran, Gordon Douglas, & Chris Watson Would you agree that
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 8010.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C JOINT COMMUNITY WARFIGHTER CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER Reference: See Enclosure B. 1. Purpose. This instruction
UNCLASSIFIED OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justification Exhibit R-2 0605804D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Actual Total Program Element (PE)
Department of Defense Enterprise Architecture (EA) Modernization Blueprint/ Transition Plan
Department of Defense Enterprise Architecture (EA) Modernization Blueprint/ Transition Plan 25 February 2011 Prepared by: Director, Architecture & Infrastructure Office of the Department of Defense Chief
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)
PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
U.S. DoD Insensitive Munitions Program. Anthony J. Melita
U.S. DoD Insensitive Munitions Program Anthony J. Melita Deputy Director, Defense Systems, Land Warfare and Munitions OUSD (AT&L) / DS, LW & M Room 3B1060 3090 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-3090
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP)
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP) JDEP Strategy Final Report Dr. Judith S. Dahmann John Tindall The MITRE Corporation March 2001 March 2001 Table of Contents page Executive Summary 1 Introduction
Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities
34 th Annual International Test and Evaluation Symposium T&E in a Time of Risk and Change Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities John Auborn, NAVAIR Paola Pringle, NAVAIR This Presentation
MOTION IMAGERY STANDARDS PROFILE
MOTION IMAGERY STANDARDS PROFILE Department of Defense/Intelligence Community/ National System for Geospatial Intelligence (DoD/IC/NSG) Motion Imagery Standards Board MISP-2017.1: U.S. Governance October
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST
Operational Realism Via Net-Centric Test & Evaluation: From Concept Development to Full-Rate Production and Sustainment
Operational Test Agencies: Enhancing operational realism in T&E ITEA Journal 2008; 29: 147 155 Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Operational Realism Via Net-Centric Test
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4630.8 May 2, 2002 SUBJECT: Procedures for Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS) ASD(C3I) References:
Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
NG-J6/CIO CNGBI A DISTRIBUTION: A 26 September 2016 NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION NG-J6/CIO CNGBI 6000.01A DISTRIBUTION: A NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT References: See Enclosure A. 1. Purpose. This instruction
JOINT STAFF FY 2005 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification : February 2004 RDT&E, Defense Wide, Joint Staff 0400 / BA7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE: 194 PE: 0902298J Management
MOTION IMAGERY STANDARDS PROFILE
MOTION IMAGERY STANDARDS PROFILE Department of Defense/Intelligence Community/ National System for Geospatial Intelligence (DoD/IC/NSG) Motion Imagery Standards Board MISP-2015.2: U.S. Governance February
When and Where to Apply the Family of Architecture- Centric Methods
When and Where to Apply the Family of - Centric Methods Mike Gagliardi Tim Morrow Bill Wood Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Copyright 2015 Carnegie Mellon
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8100.1 September 19, 2002 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Global Information Grid (GIG) Overarching Policy ASD(C3I) References: (a) Section 2223
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 The Joint Staff DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 for the Warrior (C4IFTW) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete
Relationship of the DOD Information Technology Standards Registry (DISR) with the Defense Standardization Program
Relationship of the DOD Information Technology Standards Registry (DISR) with the Defense Standardization Program Michael O Connor DISA, GE33 9 March 2005 Agenda Responsibilities of the DOD Executive Agent
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 3170.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, J, S JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM References: See Enclosure C 1. Purpose. The purpose
ASN (RDA) Chief Engineer
ASN (RDA) Chief Engineer Naval Power 21 Integration & Interoperability Improvement 21 October 2008 Mr. Carl Siel ASN(RDA) Chief Engineer carl.siel@navy.mil Unclassified Mr. J. Kevin Smith Technical Director
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.02 August 5, 2013 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Sharing Data, Information, and Information Technology (IT) Services in the Department of Defense References: See Enclosure
JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition
JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition By Gregory P. Cook Colonel, USAF (Ret) INTRODUCTION The past decade has seen significant change in the way the Department of Defense
Department of Defense. Enterprise Roadmap
Department of Defense Enterprise Roadmap August 31, 2012 Prepared by: Director, Architecture & Interoperability Office of the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer DoD Enterprise Roadmap, 31
CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)
CJCSI 3170.01B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later) Colonel Michael T. Perrin Chief, Requirements and Acquisition Division, J-8 The Joint Staff 1 Report Documentation Page Report Date 15052001
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0101113F PE TITLE: B-52 SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0101113F B-52 SQUADRONS ($ in Millions) FY
Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Command and Control. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Program Element 3.140 0.000 0.000 0.000
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 3170.01F DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, J, S JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM References: See Enclosure D 1. Purpose. The purpose
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 5721.01B DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, J, S THE DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED LEGACY MESSAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS REFERENCES: See Enclosure B.
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3150.09 April 8, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, Effective January 16, 2018 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: The Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Survivability
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 0.000 24.500 23.016-23.016 25.350 26.026
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 99-1 3 JUNE 2014 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
COST ($ in Millions) All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Complete Program Element 0.000 0.000 5.013 12.652-12.652 12.895 12.982 13.020 13.231 Continuing Continuing
DoD Biometrics Architecture Briefing to Industry
DoD Biometrics Architecture Briefing to Industry Ms Virginia Wiggins Biometrics Task Force Technical Integration Division 28 Feb 08 1 Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited. November 2006
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: SATCOM Ground Environment (SPACE) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 33142A: SATCOM Ground Environment Total
46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview
46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview Prepared for ITEA Test & Evaluation (T&E) of System of Systems (SoS) Conference 24-27 January 2012 Mr Jesse Flores Test Engineer / JICO 46TS/OGEJ (Jacobs/TYBRIN)
AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)
AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 5116.05 DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C MILITARY COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND COMPUTERS EXECUTIVE BOARD 1. Purpose. This instruction establishes
The Four-Element Framework: An Integrated Test and Evaluation Strategy
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. The Four-Element Framework: An Integrated Test and Evaluation Strategy TRUTH Christopher Wilcox Army Evaluation Center Aviation Evaluation Directorate
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #203
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information Systems Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
Aeronautical Systems Center
Aeronautical Systems Center Engineering for War Fighter Integration of Net- Centric Systems Presentation to the 13 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 27 October 2010 Ms. Eileen Bjorkman SAF/A6W Pentagon,
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 22.113 15.501 10.448-10.448 19.601 18.851
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support
This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!
1 The Capability Production Document (or CPD) is one of the most important things to come out of the Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase. It defines an increment of militarily useful, logistically
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5100.91 October 28, 2008 USD(I) SUBJECT: Joint Intelligence Interoperability Board (JIIB) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSTIVE 26 June 2012 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK INTEROPERABLE SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND REQUIREMENTS TRANSFORMATION (ismart) PROCESS THIS HANDBOOK IS FOR GUIDANCE ONLY. DO NOT CITE THIS
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element - 4.208 2.245 5.830 0.000 5.830 17.932 35.734
UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. RDT&E Defense-Wide/BA D8Z Common Joint Tactical Information
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RDT&E Defense-Wide/BA-5 0604771D8Z Common Joint Tactical Information February 2005 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Fires Integration & Interoperability FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 25-1 15 JANUARY 2015 Logistics Staff WAR RESERVE MATERIEL COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Mission Planning System Increment 5 (MPS Inc 5) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory MIT and ONR Objectives Office of Naval Research (ONR), PMR-51 Coordinates, executes, and promotes the S&T programs of the Navy and Marine Corps.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY AFI17-140_AFGM2017-01 2 November 2017 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION C MAJCOMs/FOAs/DRUs FROM: SAF/CIO A6 1480 Air Force Pentagon Washington,
THE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 228 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #89
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
First Announcement/Call For Papers
AIAA Strategic and Tactical Missile Systems Conference AIAA Missile Sciences Conference Abstract Deadline 30 June 2011 SECRET/U.S. ONLY 24 26 January 2012 Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration
US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration Maj Gen Dan Dick Director for Requirements and Integration, U.S. Joint Forces Command Unclassified Overview DoD Top Ten Priorities (FY03)
Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm
Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm 16 th ICCRTS 22 June 2011 Paper ID 149 Mr. Ken Teske and Mr. Mike Tisdel FGM, Inc. C2OTM Focused Integration Team (FIT) 1 Agenda Define C2OTM
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 9.557 9.876 13.592-13.592
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 109.887 133.105 148.297-148.297
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed
Invited Article ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 7 10 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed Steven J. Hutchison, Ph.D. Defense
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell
Product Support Manager Workshop Rapid Capabilities Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell June 8, 2017 17-S-1832 Deliberate Requirements vs. Urgent / Rapid Requirements Lanes Urgent
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+)
NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE ACQUISITION POLICY
NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE ACQUISITION POLICY GUIDANCE for DoD Space System Acquisition Process NUMBER 03-01 27 DECEMBER 2004 SAF/USA 1. PURPOSE This document provides acquisition process guidance for the
NET-CENTRIC CONVERSATIONS: THE UNIT OF WORK FOR NETWORK CENTRIC WARFARE AND NETWORK CENTRIC OPERATIONS
NET-CENTRIC CONVERSATIONS: THE UNIT OF WORK FOR NETWORK CENTRIC WARFARE AND NETWORK CENTRIC OPERATIONS Harvey Reed, MITRE, Chief Engineer, Global Combat Support System-Air Force Fred Stein, Col (Ret),
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION. CAPT Norbert Doerry, USN and Howard Fireman Fleet Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA) Approved for Public Release 1
CAPT Norbert Doerry, USN and Howard Fireman Fleet Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA) ABSTRACT Several recent Analyses of Alternatives (AOAs) have demonstrated issues with the AOA process that have limited
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #36 To Program Element - 7.074 10.429 28.764-28.764 21.717 22.687 20.902 20.383 Continuing
MCO B C March Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS)
C 061 10 March 2008 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3900.15B From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS) Ref: (a) MROC Decision Memorandum
System of Systems Implications for Operational Test
Air Force Institute of Technology System of Systems Implications for Operational Test John Colombi, Ph.D Dave Jacques, Ph.D NDIA 10th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 22-25 Oct 07 1 Are we test planning
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Processes and Enabling Policy for Compliance with Materiel International Standardization Agreements (ISA) Mr. Chris Ptachik SAF/AQRE Contractor Engineering Policy Branch 23
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 4.846 3.825 4.316-4.316 3.813 3.582 3.336 3.379 Continuing Continuing
Making the Case for Distributed Testing
ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 347 354 Making the Case for Distributed Testing Bernard Chip Ferguson Test Resource Management Center, Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Program, Arlington, Virginia
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, JS-LAN References: See Enclosure C CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODERNIZATION PLANNING 1. Purpose. Given the authority by reference a, this
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification : May 2009 R-1 Item Nomenclature Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems/PE 0305208K ($ in millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
An Approach to Achieving Digital Interoperability for the DoD: A discussion of the Joint Staff J6 Coordinated Implementation Methodology
An Approach to Achieving Digital Interoperability for the DoD: A discussion of the Joint Staff J6 Coordinated Implementation Methodology Marsha Mullins, JS J6 DDC5I Joint Fires Division marsha.d.mullins4.civ@mail.mil
February 2009 Updated 31 July 2009 MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM 1. Purpose. This manual sets forth guidelines and procedures for operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083