**PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE** BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER 16, :30 A.M.

Transcription

1 **PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE** BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER 16, :30 A.M. Board of Commissioners Fran Miron, District 1 Stan Karwoski, District 2 Gary Kriesel, Chair, District 3 Jack Lavold, District 4 Lisa Weik, District 5 8:00 10:00 a.m. Employee Recognition Breakfast Hosted by the County Board Lake Elmo Event Center, 3712 Layton Avenue North, Lake Elmo, MN 1. 10:30 Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance 2. 10:30 Comments from the Public Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it to the County Board Clerk or the County Administrator. The County Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and city of residence, and present your comments. Your comments must be addressed exclusively to the Board Chair and the full Board of Commissioners. Comments addressed to individual Board members will not be allowed. You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the right to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant, repetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue that is part of Washington County's Responsibilities :40 Consent Calendar Roll Call Vote 4. 10:40 Human Resources Jan Webster, Director Approval of Well@Work Service Agreement with HealthPartners for On-Site Health Clinic 5. 10:50 Public Works Kevin Peterson, Engineer II Resolution Approve Cooperative Agreement No between the Washington County and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) for Right-of-Way, Infrastructure Maintenance, and Cost of the Gateway State Trail Grade Separation at County State Aid Highway 35 (Hadley Avenue) and Trunk Highway 36 Interchange Project 6. 11:00 Sheriff s Office Sheriff Dan Starry Approval of a Towards Zero Deaths Grant Agreement in the Amount of $201,060 between the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety, and the Washington County Sheriff s Office 7. 11:05 General Administration Molly O Rourke, County Administrator 8. 11:15 Commissioner Reports Comments Questions This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest and information, or raise questions to the staff. This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting. 9. Board Correspondence :30 Adjourn :35-12:20 Board Workshop with Public Works Sara Allen, Planner I Strategic Facilities Plan with RSP Architects :25-12:55 Board Workshop with Administration Colin Kelly, Senior Planner Update on Washington County s 2040 Comprehensive Plan Process 1:00 Personnel Committee Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER

2 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CONSENT CALENDAR * OCTOBER 16, 2018 The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption: DEPARTMENT/AGENCY Administration ITEM A. Approval of October 2, 2018, County Board meeting minutes. B. Approval to appoint Jen Oknich, Scandia, to the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District to a first term expiring September 21, Community Services Sheriff s Office C. Approval of a grant agreement between the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development and Washington County in the amount of $135,000 for the period of June 22, 2018 through October 22, D. Resolution Authorizing an agreement between the Washington County Sheriff s Office and the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), for the period of October 1, 2018 through September 30, E. Approval of a contract with the City of Newport for the provision of law enforcement services, for the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, *Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action. Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER

3 October 16, 2018 Tuesday 8:00 AM 2018 Employee Recognition Breakfast -- Lake Elmo Event Center, 3712 Layton Avenue North, Lake Elmo, MN October 17, 2018 Wednesday 12:30 PM Metropolitan Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) Robert Street South, St. Paul, MN October 18, 2018 Thursday 8:15 AM Washington County Roadway Safety Plan (CRSP) Workshop -- North Shop, Myeron Road North, Stillwater Meeting dates, times and locations may change. Contact the Office of Administration or individual agencies for the most current information. Admin Commissioners Calendar 1 10/8/2018 2:52 PM

4 217 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNTY BOARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 2, 2018 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CONVENES The Washington County Board of Commissioners met in regular session at 9:00 a.m. in the Washington County Government Center, County Board Room. Present were Commissioners Weik, Lavold, Kriesel, Karwoski, and Miron. Board Chair Kriesel presided. Also present were Molly O Rourke, County Administrator; George Kuprian, County Attorney Division Chief; Stephanie Kammerud, Board Clerk; and county staff. The Board recited the Pledge of Allegiance. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC The Board Chair asked for comments from the public; none were heard. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Weik moved, seconded by Commissioner Miron, to adopt the following Consent Calendar: 1. Approval of Resolution No as follows: RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEITED LAND TO THE WHISTLING VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, Parcel ID# , located in the City of Lake Elmo, forfeited to the State of Minnesota for the non-payment of property taxes on July 23, 2018, and WHEREAS, M.S , Subd. 1a, para. (g) provides that The commissioner of revenue shall convey a parcel of non-conservation taxforfeited land to the association of a common interest community by quit claim deed upon the favorable recommendation of the county board if the association certifies to the board that prior to forfeiture the association was entitled to the parcel under a written agreement, but the conveyance failed to occur prior to forfeiture. No compensation or consideration is required for, and no conditions attach to, the conveyance., and WHEREAS, the Whistling Valley Homeowners Association has requested conveyance to them and has provided written documentation showing the association was entitled to the property but the conveyance failed prior to forfeiture, and WHEREAS, no compensation or consideration is required, and no conditions attach to a conveyance under Minnesota statutes , Subd. 1a, para. (g).

5 218 October 2, 2018 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners find that prior to forfeiture the Whistling Valley Homeowners Association was entitled to the land under written agreement, but the conveyance failed to occur prior to forfeiture, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners recommends that the Minnesota Department of Revenue convey the parcel to the Whistling Valley Homeowners Association under Minnesota Statute , Subd. 1a, para (g). 2. Approval of Resolution No as follows: RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEITED LAND BY CONDITIONAL USE DEEDS TO DENMARK TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF LAKE ST. CROIX BEACH WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes , Subd. 1a, para. (e) provides for the conveyance of tax forfeited land by the Minnesota State Department of Revenue to a local governmental subdivision of the state for no compensation or consideration by conditional use deed upon favorable recommendation of the county board, and WHEREAS, parcels and forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non-payment of property taxes on July 23, 2018, and WHEREAS, by resolution, Denmark Township ( ) and City of Lake St. Croix Beach ( ), have requested conveyance to them by conditional use deed for the authorized public use described in , Subd. 1a, para. (e), and WHEREAS, Denmark Township requests use #1, for Road, or right-of-way for a road, for parcel , and WHEREAS, the City of Lake St. Croix Beach request use #3, trails for walking, bicycling, snowmobiling, or other recreational purpose, along with a reasonable amount of surrounding land maintained in its natural state, for parcel , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners find that the requests and resolutions submitted by Denmark Township and the City of Lake St. Croix Beach meet the requirements for an authorized public use, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners recommends that the Minnesota Department of Revenue convey the parcels by conditional use deed to Denmark Township and the City of Lake St. Croix Beach, governmental subdivisions of the state, under provision of MN Statute , Subd. 1a, para (e) (1) , Denmark Township and (3) , Lake St. Croix Beach.

6 219 October 2, Approval of Resolution No as follows: RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE SALE OF TAX FORFEITED LAND TO THE CITY OF STILLWATER FOR AN AUTHORIZED PUBLIC PURPOSE WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater has requested three parcels of tax forfeited land to be sold to them for an authorized public purpose, and WHEREAS, the parcels have been classified as non-conservation, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute provides that non-conservation tax forfeited land may be sold by the county board, for their market value to a governmental subdivision of the state for any public purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners hereby determines the appraised value of parcels Garage Unit 42, Garage Unit 35, and Storage Unit 4 to be $ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Washington County Board of Commissioners hereby approves the sale of parcels Garage Unit 42, Garage Unit 35, and Storage Unit 4 to the City of Stillwater for the appraised value of $ plus extra costs of $ Approval of Resolution No as follows: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SALE OF TAX FORFEITED LAND AT PUBLIC AUCTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Chapter 282 gives the county board the authority to manage tax forfeited property that is located within Washington County, and WHEREAS, each year property forfeits for the non-payment of property taxes and the Property Records and Taxpayer Services Department, on behalf of the county board, works with the local municipalities and others to develop a plan to move the property into public ownership if there is a public use or purpose for the property, or to sell the property and return it to the tax rolls; and WHEREAS the parcels listed on the Public Auction Listing # have been identified to be offered for sale to the general public through a public auction, and the attached terms for the sale have been developed, and WHEREAS, the department will publish a notice once a week for two consecutive weeks of the public auction as required by law and will notify all adjoining owners of the lands to be auctioned. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the basic sale price of each parcel appearing on the list filed with the County Property Records and Taxpayer Services Department be approved; and authorization for public sale be granted, pursuant to M.S ; that the sale be held at 2:00 p.m. Friday, November 9, 2018 in Conference Room LL14, Washington County Government Center, Stillwater Minnesota; and the sale be for not less than the basic sale price, and

7 220 October 2, 2018 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the sale date of November 9, 2018 is hereby confirmed and repurchase applications will no longer be accepted for parcels listed on the 2018 Public Auction Listing #2018-1, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the terms of the sale be set forth in the attached document titled as Terms for the Sale. 5. Approval for ratification of the maintenance and support agreement between Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc. and the Minnesota Counties Computer Cooperative (MCCC). 6. Approval of Resolution No as follows: DONATION TO THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE WHEREAS, Washington County gratefully accepts donations, gifts, and bequests from public and private sources to enhance the programs and services it provides; and WHEREAS, any gift, donation, or bequest becomes the property of Washington County; and WHEREAS, The Washington County Board is authorized to approve donations, gifts, and bequests. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners does hereby approve the donation of a boat trip on the St. Croix River to deputies, officers and volunteers who patrol the St. Croix River. The motion was adopted 5-0 with a Roll Call vote as follows: Ayes, Commissioners Weik, Lavold, Karwoski, Miron, and Kriesel; Nays, none. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Resolution Recognizing October 2018 as Cyber Security Awareness Month Commissioner Miron moved to adopt Resolution No as follows: RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT OF NATIONAL CYBER SECURITY AWARENESS MONTH 2018 WHEREAS, Washington County recognizes that it has a role in identifying and protecting its citizens from, and responding to, cyber threats that may have a significant impact to our individual and collective security and privacy; and WHEREAS, business and governments are increasingly reliant on information systems and technology to support financial services, energy, telecommunications, transportation, utilities, health care, and emergency response systems; and

8 221 October 2, 2018 WHEREAS, in 2018 Washington County required all county employees to complete the Securing the Human security training courses that are designed to address the most common risks; and WHEREAS, the Information Technology Department provided a training workshop with the county board to ensure board members are aware of the most common threats the organization is facing and how to protect themselves and the organization from threats and cyberattacks; and WHEREAS, the STOP. THINK. CONNECT. Campaign serves as the national cyber security public awareness campaign, implemented through a coalition of private companies, nonprofit and government organizations, as well as academic institutions working together to increase the understanding of cyber threats and empowering the American public to be safer and more secure online; and WHEREAS, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework has been developed as a free resource to help organizations (large and small, both public and private) improve their cybersecurity practices through a practical approach to addressing evolving threats and challenges; and WHEREAS, maintaining the security of cyberspace is a shared responsibility in which each of us has a critical role to play, and awareness of computer security essentials will improve the security of Washington County s information, infrastructure, and economy; and WHEREAS, the Federal Government of the United States of America, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( the Multi- State Information Sharing and Analysis Center ( the National Association of State Chief Information Officers ( and the National Cyber Security Alliance ( all recognize October as National Cyber Security Awareness Month; and all citizens are encouraged to visit these websites and the STOP. THINK. CONNECT. Campaign website ( or to learn about cybersecurity to put that knowledge into practice in their homes, schools, workplaces, and businesses. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners recognizes October as National Cyber Security Awareness Month. Commissioner Weik seconded the motion and it was adopted 5-0 with a Roll Call vote as follows: Ayes, Commissioners Weik, Lavold, Karwoski, Miron, and Kriesel; Nays, none. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Approval of Mission Directed Budget (MDB) Savings Program Projects Kevin Corbid, Deputy County Administrator, presented projects to be funded through the county s Mission Directed Budget (MDB) savings program. This program rewards departments for the efficient management of their budget dollars.

9 222 October 2, 2018 The board adopted the program in 1993 and revised it in The MDB program balances the need to continue the strong financial health of the county and providing some resources to fund projects that are innovative, new, or that are cross-departmental collaborations. The program is structured to ensure the financial strength of the county is not compromised. At the end of each budget year, a determination is made of the amount of revenue that exceeds expenditures for the year. Under the MDB program, 50 percent of those savings go toward growing the county s reserves, with the remaining 50 percent split equally between a pool to fund countywide projects and to departmental MDB accounts. The departments are able to spend their departmental funds after receiving approval from the county administrator. Mr. Corbid recommended six projects for funding from the countywide pool in The projects include: Quality Improvement Plan Training; Stepping Up Initiative; Performance Evaluation Training; HRIS Project Phase II; Automated Door Lock Project; and, Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The total cost of these six projects is $313,500. Commissioner Miron moved to approve the 2019 projects for the Mission Directed Budget savings program. Commissioner Weik seconded the motion and it was adopted unanimously. COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMENTS QUESTIONS Commissioners reported on meetings and other events that they attended. Please see archived web streaming of the board meeting for full commissioner reports at under County Board. BOARD CORRESPONDENCE Board correspondence was received and placed on file. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, Commissioner Weik moved to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Karwoski, and it was adopted unanimously. The County Board meeting adjourned at 9:43 a.m. BOARD WORKSHOP COMMUNITY SERVICES The Board met in workshop session for an update on Workforce Development Board membership and regional plans. Present for the workshop session were Commissioners Miron, Karwoski, Kriesel, Lavold, and Weik. Also present were Molly O Rourke, Kevin Corbid, and county staff.

10 223 October 2, 2018 BOARD WORKSHOP PUBLIC WORKS The Board met in workshop session for a presentation of the five-year plan for regional park and trail master plans. Present for the workshop session were Commissioners Miron, Karwoski, Kriesel, Lavold, and Weik. Also present were Molly O Rourke, Kevin Corbid, and county staff. BOARD WORKSHOP ADMINISTRATION The Board met in workshop session for records and information management policies and a SharePoint project initiative. Present for the workshop session were Commissioners Miron, Karwoski, Kriesel, Lavold, and Weik. Also present were Molly O Rourke, Kevin Corbid, and county staff. Gary Kriesel, Chair County Board Attest: Molly O Rourke County Administrator

11 224

12 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3B Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Administration Alyssa Soderlund PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: IS THIS MANDATED BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED Budget Information FUNDING: Approvals Yvonne Klinnert Approval to appoint Jen Oknich, Scandia, to the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District to a first term expiring September 21, Consent ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: Yes Minnesota Chapter 103D.311. The Washington County Board of Commissioners recommend the appointment of Ms. Oknich. Notice to municipalities within Watershed District - 7/12/18. Legal notice published in the Lillie Suburban and Forest Lake Times - 7/12/17. Interview conducted - 9/25/18. NA Yes No COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: Approved COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

13 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3C Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Community Services Robyn DeMars PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: IS THIS MANDATED BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED Rick Roy Approve a grant agreement between the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development and Washington County in the amount of $135,000 for the period June 22, 2018 through October 22, 2020, and authorize its execution pursuant to Minn. Stat Consent No ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT Yes EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: The Department of Labor (DOL) selected the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) agency to submit a proposal to develop a program to assist unemployed, lowincome individuals 55 years old and older find sustainable employment. Minnesota was selected by the DOL for this project due to high performance with other workforce programs for senior adults. DEED is implementing a new pilot project called "Minnesota's Legacy Career Force." DEED will subcontract with four Workforce Development Areas for this project; Washington County Workforce Development Division (formerly known as the Workforce Center), Anoka County Job Training Center, Arrowhead Economic Opportunity Agency and the City of Duluth Workforce Development. The project will focus primarily on targeted services and employer engagement to improve and expand the capacity of the state's public workforce system. This model utilizes Career Navigators to provide intensive one-on-one case management and support. Career Navigators create customized plans based on the unique needs of each person. The grant period runs from June 22, 2018 to October 22, DOL allocated $975,345 for DEED to administer this program with Washington County Workforce receiving $135,000 to serve 15 program participants. The grant funds will cover the costs of program administration and provide participations with career navigation, training and support services. Washington County Community Services is recommending the approval of this contract. Yes Board granted approval for the Workforce Development Division to be a sub-grantee in the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development's pilot project at the September 11, 2018 Board Meeting.

14 Budget Information FUNDING: Other FINANCIAL IMPACT: YEAR: EXPLANATION OF FUNDS: 2018 $45,000 The Department of Labor allocated these funds to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). DEED is subcontracting the money out to four Workforce Development Areas, including the Washington County Workforce Development Division. AMOUNT: BUDGETED: No EXPLANATION OF BUDGET CHANGES: The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development awarded the Workforce Development Division $135,000 to administer "Minnesota's Legacy Career Force" pilot program in Washington County for the time period of June 22, 2018 to October 22, The budget details above add $45,000 to amend the 2018 budget. For 2019, the budget will be amended to add $45,000 and the remaining amount of $45,000, will be included in the annual budget cycle for These funds will cover the cost for program administration and participant expenses related to career navigation, training and support services. Approvals COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: Approved COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

15 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3D Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Sheriff's Office Ronda Anderson PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: IS THIS MANDATED BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED Budget Information Dan Starry Adopt a resolution authorizing an agreement between the Washington County Sheriff's Office and the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Consent No ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT Yes EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: The Washington County Sheriff's Office is partnering with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to staff a task force whose focus is large scale illegal drug operations. This DEA Task Force is housed at DEA headquarters in Minneapolis and investigates high level street narcotics distribution through the source. The DEA will provide equipment, office space, technical and administrative aid and cover overtime costs up to $18, for the deputy. The term of this contract is October 1, 2018 to September 30, Previous agreement approved by County Board on June 5, Yes FUNDING: Other EXPLANATION OF FUNDS: Fees for contracted services. Approvals COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: Approved COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

16 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. DATE October 16, 2018 DEPARTMENT Sheriff s Office MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA) AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE (WCSO) BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Sheriff s Office is authorized to enter into an agreement with the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), allowing the Washington County Sheriff s Office to detail one experienced officer to the Minneapolis/St. Paul District Office Task Force for a period of not less than two years. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Washington County Sheriff, Dan Starry, is hereby authorized to execute and sign the agreement and any amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement this agreement on behalf of the Washington County Sheriff s Office. ATTEST: YES NO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY BOARD CHAIR MIRON KARWOSKI KRIESEL LAVOLD WEIK Updated: April 2018

17 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3E Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Sheriff's Office Jennifer Flores PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: IS THIS MANDATED BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED Budget Information Dan Starry Approve a contract with the City of Newport for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020, for the provision of law enforcement services and authorize its execution pursuant to Minn. Stat Consent No ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT Yes EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: Under this agreement the Washington County Sheriff's Office will continue to provide law enforcement services to the City of Newport. The county will furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, administration, equipment, communication facilities and dispatching, and supplies necessary to provide the services required by this agreement. The City of Newport will pay the county the direct costs and expenses of providing the city with the law enforcement services provided for by this agreement, including the full-time services of one sergeant and five deputies. The term of this agreement is January 1, 2019 through December 31, This agreement will automatically renew for periods of one year following the initial two-year term, up to a maximum of five years total. Yes The City of Newport began contracting with the Washington County Sheriff's Office for law enforcement services on January 1, 2016 (approved by the County Board on January 5, 2016). That contract expires on December 31, FUNDING: Other EXPLANATION OF FUNDS: Fees for contracted services. Approvals COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: Approved COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

18 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 4 Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Human Resources Kevin Corbid PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Jan Webster Jan Webster Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: Approval of Well@Work Service Agreement with HealthPartners for the operation of an on-site health clinic. AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: Board TIME NEEDED: 10 IS THIS MANDATED No BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT Yes EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: Washington County is proposing to partner with HealthPartners to open and operate an on-site health clinic at the Stillwater Government Center campus. The clinic would be another initiative to improve the health of county employees and control the rising cost of health insurance. The clinic would be open to county employees covered under the employer's health plan, retirees covered under the employer's health plan, and the spouses and dependents of employees and retirees who are covered under the employer's health plan. The clinic would be open for 40 hours per week. The agreement establishes the relationship between and the responsibilities of HealthPartners and Washington County. A workshop was held with the County Board on July 24, 2018 to provide an overview of the clinic project. Work has begun on preparing the site for the clinic. The Human Resources Department and the Office of Administration recommend approval of the Well@Work Service Agreement. PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED July 24, 2018 County Board workshop Yes Budget Information FUNDING: Combo EXPLANATION OF FUNDS: Funding for the clinic will be from billing of the health plan for services provided and a county contribution if needed. Approvals COUNTY ATTORNEY: Brent Wartner RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: Approved COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

19 On-site Health Clinic Contract October 16, 2018

20 Health Insurance Provider HealthPartners 5 year contract beginning in 2015 for employee health insurance 2019 will be the 5 th year of the contract County will be rebidding health insurance in 2019 for the 2020 calendar year HealthPartners has partnered with the county to help control costs Plan design changes, wellness, introduction of high deductible/consumer driven plans Promoting lower cost options (i.e. Virtuwell)

21 Health Insurance 2019 Renewal Loss ratio continues to be above 100% with cost of claims exceeding the premiums paid by the employer and employees Renewal quoted at 6.26% increase, with a 2% reduction in the increase if the county opened an onsite clinic Board workshop on July 24, 2018 Discussions with our Insurance Labor Management Committee and bargaining groups

22 Reasons for On-site Health Clinic Return on Investment: Hard savings - Greater control over direct costs such as office visits, non-generic prescriptions; other services Soft savings Reduced absenteeism; improved utilization of preventative care; improved disease management; attraction/retention of employees Complement to our wellness programs and initiatives

23 Services Provided by HealthPartners Medical Expertise & Employee Resources: Professional management of clinic Staffing the clinic with a nurse practitioner or physicians assistant The County will participate in the choosing of the provider Lab & Pharmacy services Administrative Ease: Electronic medical records Scheduling patients Insurance processing IT services for the clinic Reporting and account management for the County Liability insurance for the clinic

24 Health Partners Clinic Locations Currently serving over 65,000 employees Typically 500 employees or more are required to make a clinic successful Local clinics at Stillwater Schools and ISD 622 ISD 622 s averages 11.3 visits per day in 2018

25 Budget/ROI Considerations Fixed Expenses: Provider fee, management fee, medical & lab directors, pharmacy administration, training, initial supplies & medications, equipment Variable Expenses: Lab testing, medication orders, supplies, equipment, laundry, document disposal, marketing Physical Needs: Reduction in 2019 premium increase: Build out of space, furniture, internet connection 2% reduction is $302,000

26 Contract Key Points 3-year term Termination with cause; with mutual agreement; with notice after initial term Eligible participants Employees of the county and dependents on the county s health insurance & retirees covered on county plan Lists primary services Establishes billing to health plan Hours of operation Provides for the indemnification and other typical contractual protections

27 Recommend approval of the Service Agreement with Healthpartners for an on-site health clinic Questions

28 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 5 Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Public Works Mahad Mohamed PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Kevin Peterson Kevin Peterson Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: Adopt a resolution to approve Cooperative Agreement #12086 between Washington County and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) for Right-of-Way, Infrastructure Maintenance, and Cost on County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 35 (Hadley Avenue) and Trunk Highway (TH) 36 interchange project. AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: Board TIME NEEDED: 10 IS THIS MANDATED No BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT Yes EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: Washington County is leading the construction of a grade separated interchange at the intersection of TH 36 and CSAH 35 (Hadley Avenue) (RB-2589). This project includes a grade separated tunnel underpass of the Gateway Trail at CSAH 35 which is being funded by the MnDNR through federal and state funds. To ensure consistency, and successful project delivery Washington County has agreed to be the project sponsor for the federal funding that was secured by the MnDNR. This Cooperative Agreement sets out the funding reimbursement, long-term maintenance, and property access/ownership required for this major improvement project. The MnDNR will execute this agreement when it is returned after Washington County Board signature. The County's cost share of this project is programmed in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2019 under CIP Project # RB Yes 9/8/15 - Board adopts resolution to apply for the Transportation Economic Development (TED) program for partial funding of this project. 12/15/15 - Board adopted the Capital Improvement Plan that identifies this project. 2/9/16 - Board workshop on the Metropolitan Council proposed regional solicitation application for transportation projects that will be constructed in 2020 and /24/16 - Board action approving 2016 Regional Solicitation Candidate Projects. 8/9/2016 Board approves preliminary engineering services contract for the Hadley Avenue (CSAH 35) and TH 36 Interchange Project. 8/8/2017 Board approves final design engineering services contract for the Hadley Avenue (CSAH 35) and TH 36 Interchange Project.

29 11/7/2017 Board approves cooperative agreement No with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) for preliminary and final engineering on the Hadley Avenue (County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 35) and Trunk Highway (TH) 36 Interchange Project. 9/11/18 Board approves Limited Use Permit with MnDOT allowing Washington County to construct, maintain, and operate the proposed non-motorized recreational trail within MnDOT right-of-way. Budget Information FUNDING: NA Approvals COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: Approved COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

30 Trunk Highway (TH) 36 & Hadley Avenue (County State Aid Highway 35) Interchange Project Cooperative Agreement for Right-of-Way, Maintenance, and Cost with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Washington County Board October 16, Kevin Peterson, Engineer II Project Manager

31 Presentation Outline Project Overview Project Schedule Project Partnerships Cooperative Agreement with DNR Questions 2

32 3 Current Traffic: TH 36 = 33,000 vehicles per day (vpd) Hadley Ave = 9,400 vpd 2040 Forecasted Traffic: TH 36 = 40,300 vpd Hadley Ave = 12,000 vpd

33 Project Overview Crash and severity rate double the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Metro District s average Gateway State Trail Underpass Estimated Total Project Cost $26.3M Programmed 2019 Capital Improvement Project Road & Bridge Project #2589 4

34 5

35 Project Schedule Aug 2016 to Oct Public Involvement and Preliminary Design Oct 2017 to Oct 2018 Final Design and Right- Of-Way Nov/Dec Advertise for Bids & Bid Opening March 2019 Begin Construction Fall Construction Complete 6

36 7 Partnerships

37 Cooperative Agreement with DNR Right-of-Way/Property Infrastructure Maintenance Project Costs 8

38 Cooperative Agreement with DNR Right-of-Way/Property 9

39 Cooperative Agreement with DNR Right-of-Way/Property 10

40 Cooperative Agreement with DNR Right-of-Way/Property 11

41 Cooperative Agreement with DNR Infrastructure Maintenance Split by property Right-of-Way/Property Washington County will maintain retaining wall adjacent to trail connection 12

42 Cooperative Agreement with DNR Project Cost $12.3M Grant Funding $8.2M Washington County $4.7M City of Oakdale $1.1M DNR 13

43 Board Action 1 of 2 Recommend Board adopt resolution approving the cooperative agreement with the Department of Natural Resources for Right-of-Way, Infrastructure Maintenance, and Cost on the Highway 36 & Hadley Avenue Interchange Project 14

44 Board Action 2of 2 Recommend the Board enter into Cooperative Agreement No with the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 15

45 16 Questions

46 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. DATE October 16, 2018 DEPARTMENT Public Works MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER AGREEMENT NO WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE GATEWAY STATE TRAIL GRADE SEPARATION AT WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 35 (HADLEY AVENUE) WHEREAS, Washington County and the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, as well as the City of Oakdale and the Minnesota Department of Transportation intend to cooperate in the construction of a new roadway interchange at the intersection of Trunk Highway (TH) 36 and Hadley Avenue/County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 35/Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) 241 in the City of Oakdale, including the development of a tunnel under Hadley Avenue/CSAH 35/MSAS 241 for the Gateway State Trail, and WHEREAS, the County has agreed to be the lead agency for the construction of the new roadway interchange at Hadley Avenue/CSAH 35/MSAS 241 and TH 36, including all construction contracting and contract administration, construction engineering and inspection, from contract award through construction completion and certification, and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources owns lands identified as the Gateway State Trail which is contained within the Project area, and will be conveyed to the County for the Project, and WHEREAS, Washington County owns lands identified as the future Gateway State Trail corridor which is contained within the Project area, and will be conveyed to the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources after project completion, and WHEREAS, Washington County will enter into Agreement No with the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board hereby enters into Agreement No with the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the following purposes: Project cost, infrastructure maintenance, and property acquisition related to a Gateway State Trail grade separation as part of the new roadway interchange at Hadley Avenue/CSAH 35/MSAS 241 and TH 36. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board Chair and the County Administrator are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the County to execute and enter into the Limited Use Permit and any amendments to the permit. ATTEST: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY BOARD CHAIR MIRON KARWOSKI KRIESEL LAVOLD WEIK YES NO Updated: April 2018

47 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6 Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Sheriff's Office Ronda Anderson PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Dan Starry Dan Starry Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: Approve a Towards Zero Deaths grant agreement between the Minnesota Department of Public Safety - Office of Traffic Safety and the Washington County Sheriff's Office in the amount of $201,060 for the period of October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019, and authorize its execution pursuant to Minn. Stat AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: Board TIME NEEDED: 5 IS THIS MANDATED No BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED Budget Information ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT Yes EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: The Towards Zero Deaths grant dollars will be used to reimburse overtime costs associated with traffic enforcement involving driving while intoxicated (DWI), distracted drivers, speed, and seat belts. The overtime cost will cover work performed by the Washington County Sheriff's Office and the Police Departments of Stillwater, Bayport, Woodbury, Forest Lake, Oak Park Heights, Cottage Grove and St. Paul Park. The Washington County Sheriff's Office will act as the fiscal agent for this grant. The grant term is October 1, 2018 through September 30, The previous grant agreement was approved by the County Board on September 12, Yes FUNDING: Other EXPLANATION OF FUNDS: Grant Funding Approvals COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: Approved COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

48 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11 Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Public Works Mahad Mohamed PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: RSP Architects Don Theisen Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: Workshop with the Board to help set Strategic Facility Plan goals that align with County values and mission. AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: Workshop TIME NEEDED: 45 IS THIS MANDATED No BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED Budget Information FUNDING: Approvals ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT No EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: The Strategic Facilities Plan will seek to consider the way Washington County facilities impact employees, visitors, constituents, and the way our services are delivered currently, and in the future. The plan will seek to answer the following: does the County have enough space, of the right type, in the right condition, and in the right places to serve our communities for the next 10 years The project is funded through the Public Works capital repair and operations funds. As part of this project, the RSP Architects consulting firm will meet with each county department, to identify core county services and department adjacencies. The consultants will develop recommendations for board consideration and plan to present those in early Staff from the Department of Public Works and RSP Architects will present information on the strategic facility plan to the board. A summary and feedback from the department leaders workshop will be provided as additional content at this workshop. 8/21/18 - County Board approved a Strategic Facilities Plan with RSP Architects 8/7/18 Board workshop on Strategic Facilities Plan with RSP Architects NA Yes COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: N/A COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

49 Strategic Facility Plan October 16,

50 Agenda Introduction of Team and Project County Snapshot Department Leaders Workshop Summary Discussion 2

51 3 Project Introduction

52 Objective Provide actionable recommendations to position the right services in the right locations, and in the right facilities that meet the needs of County residents and staff. 4

53 Approach Visioning Get everyone together to understand the vision, mission, and business goals to ensure alignment. Discovery Conduct an in-depth assessment to develop a holistic picture of the current state. Analysis Leverage the Vision and Discovery findings to identify gaps, trends, hurdles, and opportunities that can inform strategies and tactical actions. Recommendations Present results and recommendations based on sound research. 5

54 Schedule 6

55 7 County Snapshot

56 County Snapshot Who 248,748 total residents in 95,498 Households; there are an estimated 80,000+ Jobs, and the Median Age is 39 almost 1-year older than 2000; the population is becoming more diverse and 86.6% of the population identifies as white, 13.4% identifies as non-white. $86,689 Median Household Income 4.1% population without health insurance 5.1% population income below poverty level in last 12 months. 8 Source: American Community Survey

57 County Snapshot What By 2040, Washington County is projected to: + 87,045 Residents + 36,902 Households +15,000 Jobs and: Become More Diverse, Become Older (Increasing Median Age), more demand for Affordable Housing by 2030 (+4,954) 9

58 County Snapshot Where The population of Stillwater, Woodbury, Cottage Grove, Oakdale and Forest Lake combined account for more than 67% of the County s total population; but only 30% of the County s land area. 27 Cities, 6 Townships, 9 School Districts, 8 Watershed Districts 10

59 Workplace Context TALENT SHORTAGE SHIFTING WORKFORCE NEW TECHNOLOGY POWER OF ENGAGEMENT EXPERIENCE ECONOMY From 2017 to 2027, the U.S. faces a shortage of 8.2 million workers, the most substantial shortfall in 50 years. In numbers unseen in U.S. history, five generations will be working together, side by side. Rate of technological change means today s workplace is always in beta. It takes 2.4 average employees to match the productive performance of one engaged employee. Customers and employees alike seek out and expect positive and compelling experiences. 11

60 Department Leaders Workshop Summary 12

61 13 Discussion

62 14 Thank You

63 Request for Board Action Commissioner's Report BOARD MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 12 Department Information ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE: Administration Colin Kelly PRESENTER(S): MEDIA CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT PHONE: Colin Kelly, Steph Falkers (SRF) Agenda Item Details BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST: AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: TIME NEEDED: IS THIS MANDATED BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED Colin Kelly Workshop to provide an update on the 2040 Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update. Workshop 30 ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT No EXPLANATION OF MANDATE: Yes The Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Chapter 473) requires a regional planning process - including the development of a local comprehensive plan - after each decennial census. Washington County and Community Development Agency (CDA) staff are working with a consultant to update the county's comprehensive plan, due to the Metropolitan Council by December 31, County and CDA staff are primarily responsible for updating or developing content in seven "plan elements" or chapters of the comprehensive plan, including Land Use; Transportation; Water Resources; Parks, Trails, and Open Space; Housing; Economic Competitiveness; and Resilience and Sustainability. In addition to ensuring compliance with Metropolitan Council requirements and producing a final plan on the county's behalf, the consultant is primarily responsible for gathering public input throughout the planning process. Following the workshop last March, the draft plan was made available to "adjacent and affected jurisdictions" for a required six month review period. The draft plan was also available by the public over the same timeframe. Now that the six month review period has closed, the draft plan has been updated and a copy is available to the public to review. Later this fall, a public hearing will be held on the comprehensive plan before it is submitted to the Metropolitan Council. 3 /13/18 - Workshop to provide an update on the comprehensive plan process. 1 /23/18 - Workshop to provide an update on the comprehensive plan process. 9/26/17 - Workshop to provide an update on the comprehensive plan process. 5/23/17 - Workshop to provide an update on the comprehensive plan process. Yes

64 1/10/17 - Request approval of two contracts with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. to develop the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and a countywide traffic model. 12/6/16 - Workshop to discuss and recommend a consultant to aid in the development of the comprehensive plan and a countywide traffic model. 2/2/16 - Workshop to review responsibilities and timelines for county comprehensive plan update. Budget Information FUNDING: Combo EXPLANATION OF FUNDS: Funds are included in the 2017 Budget and are a combination of levy and Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) funds. Approvals COUNTY ATTORNEY: George Kuprian RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS: N/A COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Molly O'Rourke Approved RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMENTS:

65 Update on the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan October 16, 2018

66 Presentation Overview Process update Who have we heard from What have we heard How have we responded Next steps 2

67 Process Update Six month review by adjacent and affected jurisdictions Public invited to comment over the same timeframe Informational videos County Fair presence 3

68 Who have we heard from Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Adjacent and Affected Jurisdictions National and state agencies Cities and towns Watershed districts Public 4

69 What have we heard The Met Council s preliminary review focused on Transportation and Water Resources requirements. The DNR s preliminary review focused on Land Use, specifically the Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area (MRCCA) requirements. Adjacent and affected jurisdiction and public comments were various. 5

70 How have we responded Effected plan element teams have contacted and/or met with agencies providing input. Plan content has been revised based on the input received, following discussion with department leadership and others, as needed. 6

71 Transportation Added information on Washington County s bicycle and multimodal infrastructure and plans. Added technical information about the airports within Washington County. Overall, many comments were about providing the appropriate level of detail, so minor changes were made throughout the chapter. 7

72 Water Resources Updated language on Water Quality, including references to Minnesota s Impaired Waters List and challenges related to cold water streams. Revised maps for impaired water bodies to reflect the most recent list from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Updated language on Wastewater, including the county s subsurface sewage treatment systems ordinance, last revised in June Clarified some policy language to better define pollutant loading. 8

73 Land Use Significantly expanded the MRCCA component, moved it to the Appendix. Integrated new sections, updated language and added several maps to the MRCCA component Primary Conservation Areas Public River Corridor Views Priorities for Restoration Open Space and Rec. Features Transportation and Public Facilities Surface Water Uses Water oriented Uses Implementation Actions 9

74 Next Steps Planning Advisory Commission meeting County Board, Consent Calendar Set date for Public Hearing on Plan for Dec. 4 Issue public and legal notices Public Hearing on Plan Submit Plan to Met. Council, before Oct. 23 Nov. 6 Dec. 4 Dec

75 Comments Questions 11

76 Comprehensive Plan Aerial view within Washington County towards the Twin Cities Chapter 1 - Executive Summary WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

77 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

78 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Washington County Vision A great place to live, work, and play today and tomorrow. Washington County Mission Providing quality services through responsible leadership, innovation, and the cooperation of dedicated people. Washington County Goals To promote the health, safety, and quality of life of citizens. To provide accessible, high-quality services in a timely and respectful manner. To address today's needs while proactively planning for the future. To maintain public trust through responsible use of public resources, accountability, and openness of government. Washington County Values Ethical: to ensure public trust through fairness, consistency, and transparency. Stewardship: to demonstrate tangible, cost-effective results and protect public resources. Quality: to ensure that services delivered to the public are up to the organization s highest standards. Responsive: to deliver services that are accessible, timely, respectful, and efficient. Respectful: to believe in and support the dignity and value of members of this community. Leadership: to actively advocate for and guide the County toward a higher quality of life. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

79 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table of Contents... 1-i List of Figures... 1-ii Appendices... 1-ii Setting Purpose and Scope County Role Metropolitan Development Framework and Policy Plans Comprehensive Plan Overview Forecasts Comprehensive Plan Intent Priority Planning Principles Plan Public Engagement Phase 1 Discovery Phase 2 Element Review Phase 3 Plan Review Plan Elements County Context Chapter Goals and Policies Chapter Land Use Plan Chapter Transportation Plan Chapter Water Resources Plan Chapter Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan Chapter Housing Plan Chapter Resilience and Sustainability Plan Chapter Economic Competitiveness Plan Chapter Implementation Plan Chapter WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-i

80 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Figures What is your favorite characteristic about Washington County Which amenities provided by Washington County are most valuable to you Appendices Appendix A: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Public Engagement Results Appendix B: Washington County, Minnesota 2017 At-A-Glance Appendix C: 2040 Washington County Projected Population Growth by Community Appendix D: 2040 Washington County Projected Household Growth by Community Appendix E: 2040 Washington County Projected Employment Growth by Community Appendix F: Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Appendix G: National Register of Historic Places Sites in Washington County Appendix H: List of Historic Sites by Community in Washington County Appendix I: Bicycle Planning Memo Appendix J: Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Information Appendix K: Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Map Appendix L: 2040 Base Traffic Forecast Model Methodology Appendix M: Roadway Improvements in 2040 Base Traffic Model Appendix N: Impaired Water Bodies List Appendix O: Watershed Management Organizations (WMO) Summaries Appendix P: Washington County Community Development Agency Economic Development Plan WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-ii

81 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-iii

82 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Setting Washington County is an area of abundant beauty, historical character, and agricultural heritage located on the eastern edge of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The county has historically played a diverse role in the region, serving the Twin Cities with its commercial, industrial, community, natural, and agricultural resources. Today the county is no less diverse. From the corn fields of Denmark Township to the residential communities of Woodbury and Cottage Grove; the office and retail complexes along I-94 to the cooling waters of the St. Croix and Mississippi rivers; the booming industry in St. Paul Park and Bayport to the outdoor recreation in Lake Elmo; and the lake communities around Forest Lake to the pastoral wooded settings of Scandia and May Township, each area plays a unique role in the county and region. Washington County covers 423 square miles, measuring 38 miles from north to south and 14 miles from east to west. The county contains 27 cities and six townships. The western boundary of the county is within 5 miles of St. Paul. The eastern boundary shares the beautiful St. Croix River as a border with the State of Wisconsin. The county is bounded on the south and southwest by 16 miles of the commercially navigable Mississippi River. Purpose and Scope The 2040 Comprehensive Plan describes the analysis, future projections, goals and strategies that Washington County has developed for how decisions will be made over the next twenty years. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan is an official document adopted by the County Board as a guide for policy decisions about the physical development of the county. The plan sets broad policies and strategies to direct the future growth and development in the areas of land use, transportation, water resources, parks, trails, and open space, housing, resilience and sustainability, and economic competitiveness. For each topic, the plan identifies issues, sets goals, establishes policies to achieve the goals, and identifies strategies and actions needed to implement the policies. County Role Washington County, like the other 86 Minnesota counites, provides a variety of essential services to create vibrant, healthy, and safe communities. The role that the county government plays supplements the efforts completed at both the state and local level. Counties support and maintain public infrastructure, transportation and economic development assets; keep residents healthy; ensure public safety to protect its citizens; maintain public information; and implement a broad array of programs in a cost-effective and efficient manner. 1 These efforts are coordinated with many government partners, including: 1 Why Minnesota Counites Matter!, Association of Minnesota Counties WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-1

83 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cities and Townships Washington County cities and townships provide services at the smallest form of government. These local governments provide essential services like those provided by a county, including transportation and utility infrastructure, public safety, public administration. Cities and townships in Washington County provide a majority of land use and zoning authority in an effort to protect the health, safety and welfare of all residents. Metropolitan Council Washington County is one of the seven-counties included within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, referred to as the Metropolitan Council. The Council was established to develop a shared vision and direction and to provide regional planning and guidance for the metro area. The essential services provided by the Metropolitan Council include operation of Metro Transit, Metro Mobility and Transit Link services; collecting and treatment of wastewater; water supply planning; planning for future growth; providing affordable housing options; and planning and developing a regional parks and trails system. State Agencies Washington County coordinates with a variety of state agencies to coordinate planning efforts and implementation. These include agencies such as the Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR). Each of these departments provides for improvement and planning of various systems across the State of Minnesota. Metropolitan Development Framework and Policy Plans The Metropolitan Council was created in 1967 to help ensure the coordinated, orderly and economic development of the seven-county Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (1967 Minnesota Laws, chapter 896). State law requires the Metropolitan Council to adopt a comprehensive Metropolitan Development Guide that establishes parameters for regional infrastructure and local planning. This guide is comprised of a Regional Development Framework and policy plans for water resource management; parks and open space; and transportation, including transit and aviation. Minnesota Statutes section requires local governmental units (Counties, Cities, and Townships) to develop a comprehensive plan, fiscal devices and official controls that conform to the metropolitan policy plans. The 2040 Regional Development Framework, Thrive MSP 2040, was adopted by the Metropolitan Council on May 28th, 2014, and sets out five broad outcomes to guide the region s development: 1. Stewardship: Responsibly managing the region s natural and financial resources, and making strategic investments in our region s future. 2. Prosperity: Fostering investments in infrastructure and amenities that create regional economic competitiveness, attract and retain successful businesses, a talented workforce, and wealth. 3. Equity: Connecting all residents to opportunity and creating viable housing, transportation, and recreation options for people of all races, ethnicities, incomes, and abilities. 4. Livability: Creating and renewing vibrant places and underlying infrastructure, investing in regional parks and affordable housing, and collaborating with partners to achieve the full range of possibilities. 5. Sustainability: Protecting regional vitality for generations to come by preserving our capacity to maintain and support our region s well-being and productivity over the long term. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-2

84 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Thrive MSP 2040 contains the following guiding principles to govern how the region will implement the systems and policy plans to advance the outcomes of the plan. Integration. Thrive MSP 2040 recognizes that a key factor in the success of the region is the ability to integrate its activities to pursue the five overall outcomes, achieve greater efficiencies, and address complex problems that require the input of all involved. Coordinating effectively with stakeholders and partners of all backgrounds, abilities, and desires is crucial in the long-term wellbeing and sustainability of the region. Collaboration. The Metropolitan Council recognizes that the issues and challenges that face the region cannot be solved by a single individual or organization. No single entity has the capacity or authority to take on the burden of working alone. Success is a result of coordinated collaboration between a range of public and private entities and extensive partnerships with residents and local organizations. Accountability. Results matter to the Metropolitan Council. Forming a lasting commitment to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of policies and practices allows governing bodies to adjust course to improve future outcomes. Improved accountability is achieved through data-driven approaches to measuring progress, providing easily accessible information, and actively learning from Thrive indicators. The Metropolitan Council has adopted policy plans to implement Thrive MSP 2040 and to guide the expansion of the four regional systems: transportation, housing, water resources (including wastewater collection and treatment), and regional parks and open space. The 2040 Transportation Policy Plan addresses the need to prepare for expected growth in the region. The transportation policy gives priority to maintaining the existing metro highway system, reducing bottlenecks that impede travel, implementing new strategies to improve the system's efficiency, and adding capacity where possible. It also supports the expansion of the transit system. Aviation is included in the transportation policy plan. The 2040 Housing Policy Plan addresses complex and difficult housing challenges in the region. It recognizes that these challenges demand more innovative strategies, increased inclusion, and greater collaboration. The policies that this plan lays forth strive to manage and preserve the existing housing stock, create and conserve a mix of housing affordability, and expand housing options for people of all life stages and economic means. The 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan establishes policies to ensure the protection of water resources as the region continues to grow. It focuses on assessing the region s water supply, protecting surface water from pollution and ensuring that wastewater flowing into sewer systems is treated efficiently. The 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan recognizes the need to maintain and expand the open spaces that promote the quality of life in the region. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-3

85 2040 Comprehensive Plan Overview 2040 Forecasts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Metropolitan Council projects the following forecasted growth for Washington County between 2015 and 2040: 79,185 people (32 percent increase) 37,421 households (40 percent increase) The Metropolitan Council projects the following forecasted growth between 2010 and ,453 jobs (46 percent increase) 2040 Comprehensive Plan Intent As part of the plan s public engagement efforts, the intent of the Comprehensive Plan emerged. The plan intent is a broad statement that encompasses the overarching aspirations of the plan. More importantly, this statement reflects the public s desire to maintain the County s unique character. To accommodate the county s projected population growth of 79,185 people between 2015 and 2040 while incorporating sustainable growth and preserving the natural, cultural, and historic characteristics of the county. Priority Planning Principles The 2040 Comprehensive Plan supports a development pattern that, as much as practicable, meets current needs without creating environmental, economic, and social burdens on future generations. The County is committed to maintaining or enhancing economic opportunity and community well-being while protecting and restoring the natural environment upon which people and economies depend. Customer service is an important part of county business. Maintaining a high level of satisfaction from citizens about quality of service, knowledge, courteousness, and responsiveness while experiencing an increased demand for services is important to the County. The County uses a performance measurement program to maintain and improve upon its commitment to high-quality service that meets and exceeds the needs and expectations of county residents. Washington County s core functions foster an environment where commerce can develop and thrive. The Washington County Community Development Agency supports a robust business climate by: providing well-planned, essential infrastructure; maintaining a low tax rate; and assisting in creating an ample pool of skilled employees. The County strives to maintain the right blend of services to support a vibrant business sector, be it transportation and transit services, public safety, health and human services, corrections services, workforce housing, or other public services. The County is committed to stewardship of cultural and natural amenities such as land and water resources, parks and opens spaces, and libraries which contribute to a high quality of life for business owners, employees and families. The County s efforts in workforce development provide skilled employees that enable companies to be competitive and successful in the local, regional, and global economies. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-4

86 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1996, the Minnesota Legislature defined sustainable development as development that maintains or enhances economic opportunity and community well-being while protecting and restoring the natural environment upon which people and economies depend. Sustainable development meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Washington County aims to meet current needs without placing environmental, economic, and social burdens on future generations to meet their own needs Plan Public Engagement Public engagement is a key component of the successful implementation of long-range planning efforts. A three-phase engagement strategy was developed to incorporate the public s desires for the future of their community and stakeholder-supported strategies into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The input received throughout this effort is directly connected to the goals, policies and strategies described within each of the plan elements. Phase 1 Discovery The first phase of public engagement set out to gain initial input from residents throughout the County regarding the opportunities and constraints they perceive for the future. Engagement events during this phase were aimed at gathering input that would inform the goals and polices of each plan element. A total of nine pop-up events occurred during the first phase, engaging over 250 residents. This strategy meets people where they are and captures their participation for a short period of time. General questions regarding participants favorite characteristic or valuable amenities were asked (see Figures 1 and 2). Detailed results are included in Appendix A. What is your favorite characteristic about Washington County Which amenities provided by Washington County are most valuable to you WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-5

87 Phase 2 Element Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The second phase was held mid-way through the plan s development to provide an opportunity to share initial findings and strategies with the public. Input gathered during this phase ensured that the draft elements were responding to the public s concerns and began to lay out a path towards achieving the vision. Phase 3 Plan Review The third phase of public engagement set out to gain input from residents regarding the final draft plan, and to confirm and reiterate the results of the first two phases of engagement. This final phase of engagement also set out to provide educational materials to the public regarding each plan element, future trends that may impact the county, and how to Comprehensive Plan will work to address and mitigate potential impacts that may arise. Three open houses were held, directed at the northern, central and southern portions of the county. Participants were invited to review boards that described and outlined the initial findings of each plan element. Input received during these meetings helped to inform the finalization of each plan element of the draft Comprehensive Plan. A Local Government Unit (LGU) forum was also held which gathered together representatives from the 33 cities and townships of Washington County. A presentation was given and covered the plan elements and progress todate. The LGU Forum also offered an opportunity for each agency in attendance to share the status of their Comprehensive Plan and ask questions of the county. Following the release of the draft plan for public review in early 2018, a survey was developed to gain insight into resident s understanding and thoughts of the Comprehensive Plan. The results of this survey allowed for a better understanding of what about the plan residents would like to see improved upon as the plan is being completed. Brief informational videos, covering each plan element and its contents, were produced and made publicly available for comment on the plan s website starting in March Videos were approximately two minutes in length. Lastly, Washington County staff were present for the entirety of the Washington County Fair from August 1 st through August 5 th of 2018 to promote and discuss the Comprehensive Plan. Staff were present with a variety of materials including a full draft copy of the plan, handouts containing information on each plan element and links to the online survey, as well as a screen showcasing the introductory Comprehensive Plan video. In total, nearly 200 visitors stopped by the booth to learn more about the comprehensive plan and provide input. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-6

88 Plan Elements EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2040 Comprehensive Plan contains 11 chapters that are guided by the County s mission, values, goals, vision, and priority planning principles and public engagement findings. Many of the policies and plan elements remain consistent from the previous 2030 plan. New elements, strategies and actions from a decade of planning and projects since the adoption of the last plan include changes to land use regulations and the addition of resilience and sustainability and economic competitiveness chapters. It also includes new policies and strategies to address contemporary issues such as emergency preparedness, healthy communities, transit, and transit-oriented development. Below is a summary of each chapter of the plan and its goals. County Context Chapter 2 This chapter takes a close look at Washington County s people, economy, and important themes that face the County in upcoming years. It contains key data that lays the framework for the plan. Goals and Policies Chapter 3 This chapter outlines the vision, goals, policies, and strategies for the 2040 Washington County Comprehensive Plan. These elements have been refined from the previous versions of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan, and include feedback from public outreach events, to reflect the current desires and concerns of residents. These elements, when utilized together, serve as a guide for how the community acts and grows as the plan is implemented. Beyond inclusion in this chapter, the goals, policies and strategies are integrated into each respective chapter. Land Use Plan Chapter 4 The Land Use Plan describes the areas where the County maintains land use authority, including subsurface sewage treatment systems, the Lower St. Croix River bluff land and shoreland areas, other shorelands, mining, floodplains, and the official map for Big Marine Park Reserve. Land use authority for all other areas is maintained by the respective city or township. The Land Use Plan provides for logical development patterns that preserve the existing natural resources, retain the existing character of the County, and provide a high quality of life. Transportation Plan Chapter 5 A key function of Washington County is to provide a robust transportation system. The transportation system supports the County s land use and development plans, while minimizing the impact on the County s historic and natural resources. The Transportation Plan provides policies and strategies that keep the transportation system functioning safely and efficiently. The plan s overall goal is to increase capacity, improve safety, and reduce congestion within the constraints of the existing infrastructure and to avoid premature roadway widening. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-7

89 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Water Resources Plan Chapter 6 Washington County promotes holistic management of groundwater and surface water resources and strives to work with local and state agencies to maintain a safe and abundant supply of water resources. This chapter summarizes existing conditions related to surface water, water supply, and wastewater, and discusses the structure for managing these resources across multiple agencies and levels of government. Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan Chapter 7 The Washington County park system provides large open spaces that preserve the County s unique and sensitive natural resources, and provides recreational experiences that supplement local, state, or federal parks. The Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan sets the overall goals and policies that guide development of county-controlled sites and facilities. It establishes a direction for land preservation, development, and use of various resources of the county park system. Housing Plan Chapter 8 Washington County directly supports a variety of interrelated resources and service, including first-time homebuyer assistance, financial and budget counseling, transportation assistance, employment services, social services, and housing maintenance. The Housing Plan focuses on promoting a diverse housing supply, ensuring that affordable housing options are available to residents and those who work in the County, and safeguarding the physical quality of housing to provide healthy living environments. Resilience and Sustainability Plan Chapter 9 The Resilience and Sustainability Plan is a new addition to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan which supports the County s vision for the future. Washington County strives to maintain its identity, high quality of life, and access to a healthy lifestyle for current and future residents. A key factor in this is ensuring resilience and sustainability through the County s ability to react, adapt and thrive in the face of environmental, social, and economic changes. The Resilience and Sustainability Plan summarizes the current strategies related to resiliency and sustainability in the County and it presents an implementation plan for future decision making processes. The County s commitment to a resilient and sustainable future is incorporated into all element of the plan. While resilience and sustainability are new concepts to comprehensive planning, these concepts are widely included in current County operations. Strategies and initiatives that support this commitment are highlighted and identified with the symbol to the left, with text highlighted in a light green. Economic Competitiveness Plan Chapter 10 The Economic Competitiveness Plan is another new addition to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, but highlights initiatives that remain a core part of Washington County s planning activities. A large part of these initiatives is recognized in Washington County s Economic Development Plan prepared by the Community Development Agency (CDA). The CDA has created this plan in WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-8

90 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY collaboration with local cities and townships. This is a plan that reflects their vision of the county from an economic development perspective. Implementation Plan Chapter 11 This chapter outlines the tools, funding mechanisms, ordinances, and other plans available to the county that can be utilized to carry out and achieve the goals, policies, and strategies for the 2040 Washington County Comprehensive Plan. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-9

91 Comprehensive Plan Affected and Adjacent Jurisdiction Review Comment Summary Comments were received from the following jurisdictions during the 6-month affected and adjacent jurisdiction review comment period. Jurisdiction General Comment Ch.1 Executive Summary Ch.2 County Context Ch.3 Goals, Policies and Strategies Ch.4 Land Use Ch.5 Transportation Ch.6 Water Resources Ch.7 Parks, Trails and Open Spaces Ch.8 Housing Ch.9 Resilience & Sustainability Ch.10 Economic Competitiveness Ch.11 - Implementation Columbus X Hugo X X X Lake Elmo X X X X Lino Lakes X Newport X X X St. Paul X Stillwater Twp. X X West Lakeland Twp. X Woodbury X Dakota County X Chisago County X X Browns Creek Watershed District X X X X Rice Creek Watershed District X Washington County X MnDNR X MAC X National Park Service (x2, Miss + St Croix) X X X X X Metropolitan Council X X X X WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1

92 The following jurisdictions responded to our request for comments, but provided no specific comments: City of Maplewood City of Oakdale Ravenna Townships City of Wyoming Valley Branch Watershed District The following jurisdictions provided no response or comments on Washington County s Draft Comprehensive Plan: City of Afton City of Bayport Baytown Township City of Birchwood Village City of Cottage Grove City of Dellwood Denmark Township City of Forest Lake City of Grant Grey Cloud Island Township City of Hastings City of Inver Grove Heights City of Lake St. Croix Beach City of Lakeland City of Lakeland Shores City of Landfall City of Mahtomedi City of Marine on St. Croix May Township Nininger Township City of North St. Paul City of Oak Park Heights City of Pine Springs City of Rosemount City of Scandia City of South St. Paul City of Stillwater City of White Bear Lake White Bear Lake Township City of Willernie Anoka County Ramsey County City of Chisago Chisago Lake Township Franconia Township School District 200; Hastings School District 622; North St. Paul- Maplewood School District 624; White Bear Lake School District 831; Forest Lake School District 832; Mahtomedi School District 833; South Washington County School District 834; Stillwater School District 2144; Chisago Lakes Carnelian Marine St. Croix Watershed District Comfort Lake Forest Lake Watershed District Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization Middle- St. Croix Watershed Management Organization Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District South Washington Watershed District Sunrise River Watershed Management Organization Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization MnDOT WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2

93 The following comments were received by affected and adjacent jurisdictions (organized by each jurisdiction). Each comment was reviewed for inclusion in the updated draft plan. Jurisdiction: City of Woodbury Chapter Transportation Comment With regard to the proposed transportation chapter, you may want to reconsider the wording of the section related to the Cost Participation Policy as found on page Historically, the City has been in a financial position to fully participate in the County's cost share program. However, the recent Minnesota Supreme Court ruling will impact our ability to participate in as predictable of a fashion in the future. Jurisdiction: City of Columbus Chapter Transportation Comment The City of Columbus is supportive of considering a new interchange on I-35 at both 170th Street N and 180th Street N, with 180th Street N being the first choice. Jurisdiction: Chisago County Chapter General Parks, Trails and Open Space Comment Overall, a throughout and easy to read plan update. Job well done. On page 7-42, there are two corrections we suggest to the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan of the draft Comprehensive Plan update. 1) The Sunrise Prairie Trail is now designated as a regional trial. Please add the regional designation to wherever the comprehensive plan notes this trail. 2) In the paragraph discussing the development concept, Wyoming Township is no longer as it was disbanded in Please change this reference to the "City of Wyoming". WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1

94 Jurisdiction: City of Hugo Chapter Transportation Transportation Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Economic Competitiveness Transportation Comment Rush Line Corridor. The City supports the connection bus service along with additional feeder bus routes to serve the City of Hugo and Forest Lake. Staff would like to have further discussion with Washington County on planning for the connector bus service and other possible improvements to transit. CSAH 4. The City is interested in cooperating with Washington County to create a corridor management plan for CSAH 4 through the City of Hugo. Since planning for this corridor impacts communities to our east and west, as well as Anoka County, it may be best if Washington County led this effort. We believe this study should occur soon, before land use decision are made within the corridor. In addition, the City supports an interchange location for I-35e at CSAH 4 (170th Street). Elmcrest Avenue. There is a section of Elmcrest Avenue shown on Figure 27 to improve "system continuity". There is very little detail provided that outlines right-of-way needs, the characteristics of this road, and any possible future access restrictions. It would seem that this road is intended to be a County Road shared by Washington and Anoka Counties. As this is now a local road, and development is now occurring along this corridor, it is important to understand the specific of this roadway. Similar to CSAH 4, we recommend that a planning corridor study be initiated by Anoka and Washington Counties including representatives from all cities along the corridor. We are very supportive of the prioritization of trail investments in the Capital Improvement Plan, as identified in the Parks Trails and Open Space strategies on page We are encouraged by the inclusion of the alternative route of Hardwood Creek Trail as identified in the master plan. We recommend that a meeting be set up with Washington County staff to discuss the final route and construction of the trail. We noted that there are no planned county trails identified in the 2040 plan, as there had been in the previous 2030 plan. We would encourage further consideration of this as the planned county trails made up a significant part of the trail network in the northern part of the county. We are supportive of the County's charge to not only protect and provide access to the natural areas but to provide recreational opportunities to enhance residents' wellbeing. We noted that master planning of only two regional trails was included in the strategies. We would encourage a timeline also be made for master planning the Glacial Hills Regional Trail. We note that the trail along CSAH 14 is identified differently in the comprehensive plans of Washington County, the City of Hugo and the Metropolitan Council. We encourage you to review the designations. We may need to talk about how each are labeled and designated. Also, US Bike Route 41/North Start Bicycle Route should be included in the Trail system map in addition to USBR 45. We would like to thank Washington County in its recent economic development efforts. Having the County as a resource is important to the City. We think all five goals related to economic development are good and encourage the County to continue its efforts. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2

95 Jurisdiction: City of Saint Paul Chapter Parks, Trails and Open Space Comment Figure 7 of page 7-9 could be confusing to those not familiar with the visitation study unless updated noting that responses pertain to ability status. Jurisdiction: Dakota County Chapter Transportation Comment Dakota County and Washington County should work with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to prepare transportation forecasts and evaluate capacity needs for I-494, and Trunk Highway 61. Dakota County intends to update its travel demand model with 2040 land use projections once land use projections become available from cities as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update process. Dakota County's draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan is currently using 2030 travel demand projections in the interim until the new information becomes available. Once the new land use forecasts are available, the Dakota County Transportation Plan will be updated. Dakota County and Washington County will be in a better position to evaluate state highway needs when the new data becomes available. Jurisdiction: City of Lino Lakes Chapter Transportation Transportation Comment System Continuity - The County identifies future access to I-35E on CR 4A/CR 140. The City of Lino Lakes concurs and has identified a future interchange at this location. Table 7 and Page 5-45, Figure 21, Candidate Jurisdictional Changes - The County is proposing a change in jurisdiction from local to County of Elmcrest Avenue from CR 8 to TH 97. This is identified in the Lino Lakes plan as the Otter Lake Road Extension and supported by the City. This also affects Anoka County, who does not include it in their plan. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3

96 Jurisdiction: Brown s Creek Watershed District Chapter General General General Executive Summary Goals and Policies Goals and Policies Goals and Policies Goals and Policies Goals and Policies Comment The BCWD commends Washington County on including water conservation and reuse in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. These goals, policies and strategies are consistent with the BCWD s goal to maintain the quantity and quality of groundwater to its numerous groundwater dependent natural resources. Additionally, the BCWD commends the county on allowing land-use patterns that promote open space in the landscape (e.g. cluster development) and acknowledging the need to lead by example by incorporating low impact development practices and green infrastructure on county led projects and at county facilities. The BCWD commends the County for taking the lead in establishing goals, policies and strategies for climate resiliency and sustainability. The BCWD Watershed Management Plan also includes goals and strategies for climate change adaptation and looks forward to partnering with the County on a vulnerability assessment. Under County Role, Washington County acknowledges the role county government plans in supporting and maintaining public infrastructure, transportation and economic development assets, keeping residents healthy, enduring public safety, and maintaining public information. The BCWD recommends adding the watershed management entities that fall within the county s boundaries to the list of government partners included in this section. Land Use Goals, Policies and Strategies - Goal 1. Land Use Policy Promote the proper management of natural, historic, and cultural resources for future generations. Add watershed management organizations to Collaborate with other agencies to implement a variety of strategies to protect the groundwater and surface water quality, and sensitive natural features such as wetlands, steep slopes, and native plant communities when making land use decisions. Transportation GPS - Goal 1. Consider the following revision to strategy under the Policy Ensure broad participation in transportation planning and decision making Complete annual Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) review process to identify fiscally responsible system improvements that are consistent with county priorities, meet the needs of municipalities and meet the requirements of the watershed management organizations. Water Resources GPS - Goal 1. The BCWD appreciates the County s willingness to lead by example. Consider adding a strategy to incorporate operations and maintenance plans for all County BMPs. Water Resources GPS - Goal 1. Consider revising the following Policy so that it encompasses additional pollutants: Encourage activities to reduce pollutant loading (e.g. nutrients, sediment, and thermal) to lakes, streams, and the St. Croix and Mississippi River Basins. Water Resources GPS - Goal 1. According to the BCWD TMDL Implementation Plan The MS4 permit for Washington County and MNDOT applies to areas within the U.S. Census Urban Area, and the Brown s Creek watershed falls outside of the U.S. Census Urban Area. As a result there is no wasteload allocation (WLA) assignment for Washington County or MNDOT in the Implementation Plan. Consider revising the following Water Resources Strategy so that it reads Incorporate Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) goals and requirements into county planning and construction projects. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4

97 Jurisdiction: Brown s Creek Watershed District Chapter Goals and Policies Goals and Policies Land Use Water Resources Comment Water Resources GPS - Goal 2. Water Resources Policy Encourage local governments to consider groundwater and surface water protection when adopting land use plans and zoning ordinances and making land use decisions. The BCWD is encouraged to see the following strategy in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Establish and enforce more stringent standards to protect areas for significant groundwater recharge. The District would be interested in partnering with the County on the identification of groundwater recharge areas and the role they play in supporting the groundwater dependent natural resources located in the Brown s Creek watershed. Parks, Trails, and Open Space GPS - Goal 2. Policy Incorporate principles of public health and sustainability into park and trail planning, operations and maintenance. The BCWD appreciates the County s plans to "evaluate and implement operational best practices to reduce salt and pesticide impact to natural resources." Consider addition "fertilizer use" to this list of best practices. Ordinances under County Jurisdiction - Surface Water: 1) Consider either adding Groundwater here or creating a new Groundwater section. 2) Consider including that local watershed management organizations have standards in place to protect the surface water and groundwater resources of the county. 3)Reconsider the statement Wetlands will be used to pretreat surface water runoff. This statement is inconsistent with the BCWD policies and standards. Page 6-12, second paragraph. The impairment of Brown's Creek is noted incorrectly. A portion of Brown s Creek (from 110th Street to the St. Croix River) does not meet the State s water quality standards and is impaired for aquatic life due to lack of cold water fish assemblage and high turbidity. Through the stressor identification process, the primary stressors to the biota in the impaired reach of Brown s Creek were identified as high suspended solids and high temperatures. Jurisdiction: Valley Branch Watershed District Chapter General Comment On behalf of the VBWD Board of Managers, I have reviewed the Comprehensive Plan for consistency with the VBWD 2015 Watershed Management Plan (VBWD Plan, adopted September, 2015) and the VBWD s Rules and Regulations (adopted December, 2013). Overall, the Comprehensive Plan is very well done and provides good guidance for the County in pursuit of its goals. The Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the VBWD Plan and VBWD Rules. The VBWD Managers have no comments to provide, and look forward to future opportunities to cooperate with Washington County to address water resource issues. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5

98 Jurisdiction: Rice Creek Watershed District Chapter Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Comment Modify sentence to read: "Rice Creek originates at the outlet of Clear Lake, which is in the City of Forest Lake. Watershed Districts also monitoring streams. Does Washington County want to reference here OK if not. Figure 4 - When were these classifications determined This figure doesn't appear to be referenced anywhere in the text. Figure 5 - What about White Bear Lake When were these classifications determined This figure doesn't appear to be referenced anywhere in the report. Figure 6 - Lake grades are available for other lakes - e.g. White Bear, Bald Eagle, Clear. Does Wash. Co. want to reference here There is a proposed (not approved) 2018 list now available (Minnesota's Impaired Waters List). Don't see that Appendix N was provided anywhere for review/comment. Distinguish between draft proposed lists and current approved list (2014). Figure 7 - White Bear Lake is on the approved list for mercury only but is not outlined in red on this figure. Lost Lake is on the proposed (not approved) list for mercury only and is outlined in red on this map. Clarify/correct. Figure 7 - Why is the 2016 proposed list being used for lakes and the approved 2012 list being used for streams Precipitation is misspelled Address is misspelled Jurisdiction: National Park Service Chapter Executive Summary Land Use Comment The BCWD commends Washington County on including water conservation and reuse in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. These goals, policies and strategies are consistent with the BCWD s goal to maintain the quantity and quality of groundwater to its numerous groundwater dependent natural resources. Additionally, the BCWD commends the county on allowing land-use patterns that promote open space in the landscape (e.g. cluster development) and acknowledging the need to lead by example by incorporating low impact development practices and green infrastructure on county led projects and at county facilities. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 6

99 Jurisdiction: National Park Service Chapter Land Use Land Use Land Use Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Implementation Land Use MRCCA MRCCA Comment County Role. There is no mention of Federal Agencies the county coordinates with such as the National Park Service. Washington County coordinates with the National Park Service on zoning and land use within the federally managed zone of the county. St. Croix River Bluffland and Shoreland Management Ordinance. "The upper 10-mile stretch of river is classified as a scenic district, while the lower 42 miles from the City of Marine on St. Croix to the City of Rescott are classified as a recreational district." The split between scenic and recreation occurs approximately 6 miles north of the City of Marine on St. Croix, near the northern boundary of Washington County. " the St. Croix Riverway District extends a quarter mile out from the river " The St. Croix National Scenic Riverway boundary is different from the St. Croix River District. We suggest changing St. Croix Riverway District to St. Croix National Scenic Riverway boundary or Riverway boundary. "Local ordinances may be more restrictive than the Riverway rules " The National Park Service holds scenic easements in the federally managed zone of Washington County as well. We suggest changing this sentence to, "Local ordinances and National Park Service scenic easements may be more restrictive than the Riverway rules, so it is important for landowners to understand local ordinances, National Park Service scenic easements if applicable, and St. Croix River Bluffland and Shoreland Management Ordinances before investing in plans for existing and new development." Figure 3. St. Croix Wild and Scenic River Corridor. We suggest differentiating between the National Park Service federally managed zone and the cooperative state managed zone on the figure. Parks. The last paragraph calls out federal recreation areas but there is not a bullet point for National Parks, we suggest adding one. Wildlife Management Areas. "Rustrum" on the table is spelled incorrectly Blue box on right side. "In 1972, Minnesota enacted the Lower St. Croix Wild and Scenic River Act to protect the river and its values. The St. Croix River is also in the Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers system." These two sentences seem out of place. We suggest moving them to the end of the paragraph. Washington County Protected Lands. The National Park Service protects lands with both fee ownership and scenic easements. The National Park Service protects a total of 2,891 acres in Washington County: 1,175 in fee ownership and 1,715 acres in scenic easements. Chapter 4: Land Use table. We suggest adding a row in the table Plan Tool: Lower St. Croix River Act (P.L ) Purpose: Protect the St. Croix River and its remarkable values Partner/Agency: National Park Service and State of Minnesota Parts of this chapter and the Critical Area Ordinance will likely need to need to be updated/amended in order to be consistent with the new MRCCA rules. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7

100 Jurisdiction: National Park Service Chapter MRCCA MRCCA MRCCA MRCCA MRCCA MRCCA MRCCA Comment The relationship between the MNRRA and the MRCCA is important and often misunderstood. We would appreciate if the plan included a brief paragraph with more information detailing the relationship. Below is example language that may be used: "n 1988, the U.S. Congress established the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA), a unit of the National Park System. The MNRRA shares the same boundary as the MRCCA, and the park s Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP), signed by the Governor and Secretary of the Interior, incorporates by reference the MRCCA program for land use management. Rather than institute a separate layer of federal regulations, the MNRRA largely relies on the MRCCA to manage land use within the park. This reliance establishes a unique partnership and framework for land use management amongst the local, state and federal governments to protect the intrinsic resources of the Mississippi River Corridor." Counties within the MRCCA only need to address the MRCCA requirements for land/facilities that they own and/or operate. It would be helpful fort these land and facilities to be identified in the introduction. "o To our knowledge these lands and facilities include Grey Cloud Island and a portion of Point Douglas Regional Trail. Are there more facilities such as county roads " "Identifying the location of these facilities on a map would also improve the plan." Describing all six of the MRCCA districts is helpful. We think it would be helpful if the plan could further identify which districts are specifically within Washington County. In addition to identifying the land/facilities and their locations as mentioned in Comment #3, it should be identified which MRCCA district they are in. A list of the resources that meet the PCAs definition would be helpful: PCAs include shore impact zones, wetlands, floodplains, confluences with key tributaries, natural drainage routes, bluff impact zones, native plant communities, significant vegetative stands, cultural and historic properties, gorges, and unstable soils and bedrock. Any PCAs on land/facilities owned/operated by the county are required to be mapped and described. After reviewing the Met Council s Community Page for Washington County3, it became clear that the MRCCA maps were not provided for counties like they were for the cities and townships. It is still important for the counties to map and describe the districts and PCAs on county owned/operated lands and facilities. One solution would be for Washington County to identify the PCAs that exist on county owned/operated land and facilities and map and describe them. The necessary data may be found on the Minnesota Geospatial Commons website Another solution would be for Washington County to use the maps developed the cities and townships. For example, the MRCCA maps developed for Cottage Grove could be used for Grey Cloud Island Shoreland Impact Zones: Including the diagram of the SIZ from the MRCCA rules would clearly depict the subject and provide a solution to the difficulty of mapping and displaying the SIZ at a city-wide scale. While we understand that the guidance provided by the DNR/Met Council only requires counties to acknowledge and support the PRCVs identified in city and township plans, we think it would be pertinent for the county to identify PRCVs from county owned lands and facilities. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 8

101 Jurisdiction: National Park Service Chapter MRCCA MRCCA MRCCA MRCCA Comment It is required for the county map vegetation restoration priorities within the MRCCA. This is especially relevant (but not limited) to Grey Cloud Island. Again, the Vegetation Restoration Priorities map created for the City of Cottage Grove could be used to cover most of Grey Cloud Island. Point Douglas County Park is actually not within the MRCCA. It is required for the county to map and describe existing and future planned transportation facilitates within the MRCCA. This may be achieved within the MRCCA element or the Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. If it is within the Transportation element, the MRCCA boundary must be shown. If the county prefers to use the Transportation element to satisfy this requirement, the MRCCA boundary should be added to the existing and planned transportation maps. Otherwise new existing and planned transportation maps could be added in the MRCCA chapter. No implementation actions or policies are provided in the plan Jurisdiction: City Lake Elmo Chapter Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Comment For the most part the City can support the County s Transportation Plan. The plan identifies both Goals as well as Management Tools and Implementation Tools. The executive summary identifies a limitation in funding resources and indicates a requirement, therefore, to collaborate with local and regional partners to leverage available resources. Both the Management Tools and Transportation Goal #1 reference the Cost participation policy #8001 as proposed implementation practices. There is need to revise or eliminate the Cost participation policy #8001 due to a lack of local funding resources needed to participate; due to inequitable distribution of transportation costs across Washington County communities; and due to the inability of the City to utilize assessing authority for the local share due to County implementation practices. The City continues to support the County policy regarding the goal to balance access and mobility. The City could suggest language changes to emphasize that the County maintain flexibility when working with the local government. The City continues to support the County policy regarding right-of-way acquisition strategies. However, the County must emphasize efforts to better define right-of-way corridor needs proactively, both in advance of development applications, and during development applications. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9

102 Jurisdiction: City Lake Elmo Chapter Transportation Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Water Resources Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Implementation Comment The plan indicates that planning efforts regarding TH36 have not yet begun. The Trunk Highway 36 Corridor is important to Lake Elmo and perhaps a set of overall goals should be identified to guide these future planning efforts. Goals could be incorporated from the work completed for the TH36 South Frontage Road Study, Lake Elmo Avenue Interchange Concept Planning, and the Manning Avenue Interchange Concept/Preliminary Design. There are no major comments regarding the Water Resource Plan. The plan addresses several areas of overlap with Watershed and City processes already in place as has always been the case. Prevent future groundwater contamination by ensuring sound management of solid and hazardous waste within the county. Implement sound watershed management practices in cooperation and conjunction with state and local government entities engaged in water management programs. Continue implementing SSTS ordinance in accordance with Minnesota Rules Conduct a countywide assessment for SSTS; Continue to provide financial assistance for SSTS replacement through the SSTS loan program; Explore additional financial assistance options for residents including local and state grants; Strengthen education efforts related to SSTS for homeowners, realtors, and other stakeholders; Promote development of community sewer systems in areas with high rates of noncompliant SSTS or where small groups of homes make such systems feasible. The City continues support for these efforts. Collaborate with state agencies and local communities to promote and support the efficient use of groundwater resources to ensure that drinking water supplies are adequate for projected growth in the county. Groundwater and Surface Water Protection. The County Plan appropriately discusses the need to plan and construct multi-modal transportation infrastructure. However to date, in practice, the County has been unable to provide any type of trail plan upon which the City can rely to coordinate connected trail systems, either through requirements upon private development projects, or through public improvement projects. The City expresses support the County s efforts to develop a master trail plan, both regional park trails, and also along all County roadways. The implementation plan again identifies the Cost Participation Policy as an appropriate division of cost in funding cooperative highway projects, traffic signals, and bridge construction projects with MnDOT, municipalities, and other agencies. The City would like to see this revised or eliminated due to a lack of local funding resources needed to participate; due to inequitable distribution of transportation costs across Washington County communities; and due to the inability of the City to utilize assessing authority for the local share due to County implementation practices. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10

103 Jurisdiction: City of Newport Chapter Transportation Parks, Trails and Open Space Resilience and Sustainability Comment Page 5-60 references the Newport Station Area Plan that was created in The Station Area Plan completed by the County, its recommendations for surrounding land uses and densities, and images of future development were based future commuter rail service at the Transit Station. The Station Area Plan has not been updated to reflect the recent determination that the Red Rock Corridor will be a BRT corridor, not a commuter rail corridor. The City used the 2009 Station Area Plan to develop the Zoning requirements that currently govern the area around the station, including recommended densities, dimensional standards and uses. The zoning requirements were based on the Metropolitan Council s standards for Transit-Oriented Districts with commuter rail stations. As the City updates its Zoning Ordinance based on its 2040 Comprehensive Plan, it will consider new zoning requirements (uses, districts, densities, dimensions, etc.) for this area based on the standards for stations and corridors served by BRT rather than commuter rail. The City of Newport s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies a potential new riverfront park on the Mississippi River. The park will provide a unique opportunity for public access to the river, including canoe and kayak access that may serve a County or Regional audience. The City would like to explore the potential to obtain County Land and Water Legacy Funds to complete the final land acquisition and develop water-access facilities for this park. Waste Management Section The City of Newport receives regular complaints from residents of Newport and adjacent communities about the odors generated by the Washington & Ramsey County Recycling and Energy Center, located in Newport. The odors have a negative impact on City residents, the City s image, and on the City s ability to attract new development and redevelopment. The City recommends that the County add a goal to this section of the Comprehensive Plan to reduce or eliminate the odors that the R&E center generates so that the odors no longer have negative impacts on the community. Jurisdiction: West Lakeland Township Chapter Transportation Transportation Transportation Comment Your Figure 13 map depicts Runway Protection Zones, State Safety Zones and noise contours for the new proposed 3,500-foot runway and not the current 2,849 foot runway. These contours and zones should reflect the current runway and not a proposed one. It should be noted that the MnDOT State Safety Zones are NOT in effect at Lake Elmo today and never have been. I know it states "Model" but that can be deceiving. In the last paragraph on Page 5-24 you state that the 55 DNL contours are shown in the Figure 13 map, which they are not. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 11

104 Jurisdiction: Stillwater Township Chapter Transportation Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails and Open Space Comment Stillwater Township objects strongly to the proposed jurisdictional change for CSAH 5 between CSAH 11 and Highway 96 from Washington County to the Township. The Township has looked at the factors that the County considers for jurisdictional changes (including the data related to trips served on the roadway [purpose and length], traffic volumes, maintenance issues, and functional classification), and has found the following: A) The County s Transportation Plan designates CSAH 5 between Hwy 96 and CSAH 11 as a Major Collector. By comparison, CSAH 11 (Otchipwe) is designated a Minor Collector but is proposed to remain a County roadway. B) MnDOT s latest Traffic Volumes Map that shows data for CSAH 5 (2009) shows an AADT of 3,700 on CSAH 5 north of Highway 96. By comparison, the AADT on Otchipwe north and south of CSAH 5 is 1,250 and 1,150 AADT respectively per data included in the County s Transportation Plan. The AADT on Norell Avenue was 3,200. C) There are approximately 37 parcels of land with current driveway access onto CSAH 5 between 96 and CSAH 11 within the Township. Using the typical # trips per day for single family uses (about 10 per day) the local traffic generation would be about 370 AADT. Therefore, 90% of the traffic on that section of CSAH 5 is probably traffic generated from outside the immediate neighborhood. Nearly all of the trips on CSAH 5 are longer trips to and from locations outside the Township. D)The County s Plan did not show Heavy Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic Counts for Stonebridge. However, the Raleigh mine traffic counts for 2017 showed that the mine generated 22,519 trips on Stonebridge Trail during that year (60% of the total trips to and from the mine). By contrast, 1,489 of the annual trips to and from the mine were on CSAH 11. The mine operates under a County Conditional Use Permit. Nearly all of the mine trips were to and from sites outside the Township and included aggregate hauling for County Highway projects and other projects within Washington County and the Region. The mine operator estimates similar traffic levels for Based on the available traffic information The Township concludes that CSAH 5 between Highway 36 and CSAH 11 is not a local roadway it is a Major Collector serving primarily inter-community commuter and commercial traffic to and from other locations in the County and the Region. It handles a higher level of AADT than nearby County roadways that are not proposed for turn-back to the local unit of government. It handles a far higher level of commercial truck traffic that serves County and Regional projects than nearby County Roads and generates significant road maintenance issues. Given the traffic it carries and the role it serves in the County Transportation system, the roadway should remain a County responsibility. The Township has worked with the County and other organizations to discuss a proposed trail connection between the Brown s Creek State Trail and the St. Croix Boom Site. The Township suggests that this proposed trail connection be shown on maps in the County s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and be included in the text and goals for the plan. The Township s 2040 Comprehensive Plan recommended a future bicycle and pedestrian trail along State Highway 96. The County s Transportation Plan includes a goal to transfer the jurisdiction of Highway 96 to the County. The Township recommends that a future county trail be identified in the County s Comprehensive Plan along Highway 96 within this roadway corridor. WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12

105 Jurisdiction: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Chapter Comment Transportation Text revisions re: Lake Elmo Airport; see PDF markup Transportation Map revisions re: Lake Elmo Airport; see PDF markup Jurisdiction: Washington County Chapter Comment Transportation Typo; remove comma; see PDF markup Transportation Check figures; see PDF markup Transportation Check symbology; what is the blue dot, where indicated See PDF markup Transportation Add item, as suggested; Truck Generator (Raleigh's Pit). See PDF markup Transportation Modify extent of National Preservation Route. See PDF markup Transportation Improve readability; map is hard to read - add colored lines to roads with truck traffic. See PDF markup WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13

106 Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase Phase 1 Public Engagement Result Summary Phase 1 Pop-Up Events Stillwater Chamber Community Showcase, Stillwater - March 25th FOREST LAKE SCANDIA Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hugo - April 22nd Friends in Need Shopping Hours, St. Paul Park - April 25th MARINE ON ST CROIX WIC Clinic, Cottage Grove - April 25th HUGO 61 MAY TOWNSHIP Washington County License Center, Woodbury - April 28th Historic Courthouse 150th Anniversary, Stillwater - June 3rd Hugo Good Neighbor Days, Hugo - June 8th STILLWATER TOWNSHIP DELLWOOD GRANT Kids Night at Arts in the Park, Forest Lake - June 20th 96 MAHTOMEDI Oakdale Summerfest, Oakdale - June 24th STILLWATER PINE SPRINGS 36 OAK PARK HEIGHTS BAYPORT 694 LAKE ELMO 14 BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP OAKDALE WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP 13 LAKELAND 15 LANDFALL LAKELAND SHORES 494 AFTON WOODBURY NEWPORT 95 COTTAGE GROVE ST PAUL PARK GREY CLOUD ISLAND TOWNSHIP DENMARK TOWNSHIP LAKE ST CROIX BEACH ST MARY S POINT

107 Who have we heard from What is your Zip Code Zip Code City Response Count Response Percent Afton 3 1.1% Bayport 2 0.7% Cottage Grove % Forest Lake % Hugo % Lake Elmo % Lakeland 7 2.6% Mahtomedi 7 2.6% Marine on Saint Croix 1 0.4% Newport 7 2.6% Oakdale 4 1.5% Scandia 2 0.7% Stacy 1 0.4% St. Paul Park 8 3.0% Stillwater % Woodbury % Outside Washington County % Total % District % District % Outside Washington County - 7.1% District Response Count District % Response Percent District % District % District % District % District % Outside Washington County % District 2-4.1% District % Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

108 What have we heard What is your favorite place to visit in Washington County TOP RESPONSES Location Response Count Parks 31 Stillwater 18 St. Croix River 18 Lake Elmo Park Res. 14 Big Marine Park Res. 10 Public Libraries 10 Downtown Stillwater 9 William O Brien Park 9 River 8 Afton State Park 7 Lakes 7 Home 6 Trails 6 Respondents enjoy the variety of parks throughout the county, including the variety of amenities provided at each location. Recreation facilities including parks, trails, indoor facilities, and sports facilities are enjoyed by residents. Destinations and services provided by Washington County and Local Municipalities were highlighted within the responses. Proximity to residents favorite recreation, shopping and entertainment destinations is valued. Responses highlighted residents connection to the natural resources and open spaces of the county Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

109 Who have we heard from What is your favorite characteristic about Washington County TOP RESPONSES Favorite Characteristic Response Count Small Town Feel 27 Rural Character 26 Parks 25 Quiet 18 Trails 17 People 13 Community 12 Family 9 Great Neighbors 9 Schools 9 Proximity to Twin Cities 7 Clean 7 Overall, participants value a high quality of life, supported by the rural character and small town feel of the community, while in close proximity to the Twin Cities. Family, quiet, calm atmosphere, a clean environment, parks and trails, and great neighbors are also highly valued. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

110 What have we heard Which amenities provided by Washington County are most valuable to you TOP RESPONSES Valued Amenities Response Count Parks 33 Trails 30 Open Space 12 Community Events 11 Public Libraries 10 Bike Trails 6 WIC Program 5 Amenities 4 Brown s Creek Trail 4 Lakes 4 Natural Resources 4 Police 4 Proximity to Twin Cities 4 Scenic 4 St. Croix River 4 Overall, residents were very satisfied by the services provided by Washington County. Community events sponsored by the County (i.e. hazardous waste recycling) are greatly appreciated. Services provided by the Public Health Department are valued by respondents, and greatly contribute to their quality of life (i.e. WIC Clinic, Early Intervention Program, etc.). Connection to and protection of the natural resources within the County was important to respondents. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

111 Who have we heard from What is a needed amenity in Washington County Connectivity between services, destinations, and residential areas should continue to be improved throughout Washington County. Access to public transportation and improved connections were highlighted in responses. Many residents noted the lack of connections affects their ability to utilize the service. Residents are concerned about continued access to affordable housing. Proper planning for rapid growth throughout the county is a concern for respondents. ImprovedInfrastructure TOP RESPONSES Needed Amenities Response Count Public Transportation 17 Trails 13 Improved Roadways & Bridges 12 Rapid Growth 7 Libraries 4 Roads 4 Senior Transportation 4 Traffic Congestion 4 Bike Trails 3 Land Preservation 3 Parks 3 Public Services 3 Restaurants 3 Senior Housing 3 Current programs aimed at the youth and senior populations are valued, however, additional programs are desired by respondents, particularly for the teen and young adult populations. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

112 What have we heard How do you travel within Washington County Car % How easy is it to move within Washington County Good Transit 2 responses The ease of traveling by car was highlighted by many respondents. The need for additional transit service and improved connections was also discussed. Biking - 5.5% Walking - 5.0% Other - 3.9% Need Additional Transit 8 responses Infrastructure Improvements 5 responses Poor Road Conditions 1 response Need Additional Bike Infrastructure 3 responses Good Travel by Car 131 responses Good Bike Travel 8 responses Transit - 2.8% Many respondents enjoy walking and biking within Washington County as a form of recreation. Walkable 6 responses Traffic Congestion 18 responses Pedestrian Infrastructure 1 response Good Trail Network 3 responses Dangerous Roundabouts 2 responses Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

113 What have we heard Online Engagement Tool Forest Lake!! Scandia! Legend Parks, park reserves, trails, the St. Croix waterway, and other significant public open space and outdoor recreational opportunities, while still being close to the Twin Cities, are a primary draw to Washington County.!!! Marine on May St. Croix! Township Best Characteristic Hugo Dellwood Mahtomedi Grant!!! Stillwater!! Stillwater Township Favorite Place Lake Elmo Park Reserve is a wonderful place to get away and experience nature! Love the trail systems, play area, swimming and picnicking, and nature center! Pine Springs! Oakdale!!! Lake Elmo!!!! Oak Park Heights Bayport Township Bayport! West Lakeland Township Lakeland Shores We need access to trails in Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Oakdale from the Parkview Estates neighborhood. Connecting roads are too dangerous in this area to walk or bike on the shoulder to trail systems. Lakeland Grey Cloud Island Township!!!!!!!!! St. Paul Park!!!! Woodbury Cottage Grove! Hastings Afton Denmark Township! Lake St. Croix Beach St. Marys Point! Valued or Needed Amenity Biggest Concern The I-494/694 and I-94 interchange can be quite dangerous at times with high traffic levels. If the population growth levels continue, especially in Woodbury, it will not be feasible to keep the current interchange in place. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

114 What have we heard Online Engagement Results The lake in Forest Lake itself. Now that we have Zebra Muscles in the lake we need to take care of that. Scandia St. Croix River! Forest Lake Identify Washington County s Best Characteristic Hugo May Township Big Marine Park/Reserve. Great Park, great playground, great beach. Marine on St. Croix Big Marine Park Reserve Dellwood Grant Stillwater Township Mahtomedi Stillwater The St. Croix River is a great characteristic and needs to be protected. Pine Springs Lake Elmo Bayport Township Bayport Oak Park Heights gsrg Oakdale West Lakeland Township Lake Elmo Park Reserve is a beautiful park and green space that adds great value to our area. Woodbury The county library system Afton Lakeland Shores Lakeland Lake St. Croix Beach St. Marys Point Saint Croix River COMMONLY USED WORDS Response Count Lake 5 Park 5 Great 4 St Croix 3 Open Space 2 Grey Cloud Island Township St. Paul Park Cottage Grove Denmark Township Lake Elmo Park Reserve Hastings Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

115 What have we heard Online Engagement Results Identify your favorite place to live, work, and/or play in Washington County Forest Lake Hugo Dellwood Gateway Trail and Pine Point Park Scandia May Township William O Brien State Park Marine on St. Croix Square Lake County Park Beach Stillwater Township AGEMENT Square Lake County Park Grant Mahtomedi Stillwater Stillwater is a hub for history, trails and scenic beauty. Stillwater Pine Springs Oak Park Heights Lake Elmo Bayport Township Bayport Oakdale West Lakeland Township Great parks in Washington County... but this is the Crown Jewel. Woodbury My backyard. Lots of plants, bushes and trees. Lakeland Shores Lakeland Lake St. Croix Beach St. Marys Point Gateway State Trail Afton COMMONLY USED WORDS Response Count Trails 6 Park 6 Gateway 5 Lake 4 Stillwater 2 Reserve 2 Nature 2 St Croix 2 Grey Cloud Island Township St. Paul Park Cottage Grove Denmark Township Great place, but could use more funding for habitat maintenance and enhancement. St. Croix Bluffs Regional Park Hastings Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

116 What have we heard Online Engagement Results Identify a valued or needed amenity in Washington County Various Extending the Gateway Trail Transportation north through Marine and Related Concerns Scandia. I know this idea is in the works, but wanted to Scandia affirm that there is desire. Can t Wait! Forest Lake PHASE 1 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Oneka Parkway should continue to wind in a northerly direction through Hugo/Forest Lake. Hugo Dellwood Grant May Township Marine on St. Croix A trail linking William O Brien and Big Marine would be a great addition. Stillwater Township Hardwood Big Marine Creek Park Reserve Trail COMMONLY USED WORDS Response Count Trail 38 Area 25 Highway 14 Access 13 Lake 13 Dangerous 12 Intersection 10 Connect 9 Dedicated 9 Connection 7 A safe bike/ped crossing of 694 is needed here. Crossing at 120 just isn t safe due to traffic levels. Mahtomedi Oakdale Pine Springs I would like to see kayak rental, or kayak storage racks, available at Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park. Grey Cloud Island Township St. Paul Park Woodbury Lake Elmo Cottage Grove Stillwater Bayport Township More attention is needed to water quality and road maintenance. Hastings West Lakeland Township Afton Denmark Township Preserving the natural river resources. Bayport Oak Park Heights gsrg Lakeland Shores Lakeland Lake St. Croix Beach St. Marys Point Saint Lake Croix Saint River Croix Lake Mississippi Elmo Park River Reserve Paddle Share Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

117 What have we heard Online Engagement Results Identify your biggest concern for the future of Washington County!!!! Scandia!!! Forest Lake PHASE 1 PUBLIC The bike trail north of Forest Lake The lack of wireless/ ENGAGEMENT going up to North Branch is badly digital service. in need of repair. In its present state, it is not usable -- too many!!! bumps, holes, etc. Hugo Sunnybrook Lake and surrounding ponds flood roads and houses. It s been happening for over 30 year with no resolution. The intersection crossing for pedestrian and for drivers is highly dangerous and a majority of the time congested. Dellwood Mahtomedi Pine Springs Grant Lots of turtle mortality. Please do something. May Township Stillwater!!!!! Stillwater Township Lack of local transportation. Marine on St. Croix Square Lake County Park Beach Traffic with the opening of the new bridge. Oak Park Heights Turtle Tunnel south of Big Marine! Lake Elmo Bayport Township Bayport More funding needed to restore old field. Lots of great work happening, but needs more support. Oakdale!!!!! Overcrowding and water resources.! West Lakeland Township Lakeland Shores Lakeland Lake St. Croix Beach Saint Croix River Crossing COMMONLY USED WORDS Response Count County 13 Land 11 Need 7 Traffic 6 Turtle 5 Intersection 4 Houses 4 Trail 4 Reduce/control buckthorn on public lands.!!! Grey Cloud Island Township This entire island should be made into a park. No more houses or mining!!!!!!! St. Paul Park!!! Woodbury Cottage Grove! Hastings Afton Denmark Township!! St. Marys Point More land acquisition is needed in this area to preserve and create green space. It would be great to acquire land so that Lost Valley Prairie SNA and St. Croix Bluffs Regional Park share a boundary. Grey Cloud Island Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 1 Public Engagement - Discovery Phase - Engagement Summary

118 Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 2 Public Engagement - Element Review Phase 2 Public Engagement Result Summary Phase 2 Events FOREST LAKE Local Government Unit Forum, Stillwater - June 15th, 2017 SCANDIA Headwaters Service Center, Forest Lake - October 9th, 2017 Nordic Center, Lake Elmo Park Reserve - October 10th, 2017 MARINE ON ST CROIX Cottage Grove Service Center, Cottage Grove - October 16th, 2017 HUGO 61 MAY TOWNSHIP Washington County Comprehensive Plan STILLWATER TOWNSHIP DELLWOOD Local Government Unit (LGU) Forum, Stillwater - January 11th, 2018 WE WANT YOUR INPUT GRANT 96 MAHTOMEDI STILLWATER PINE SPRINGS 36 OAK PARK HEIGHTS Washington County is updating their Comprehensive Plan which guides future development decisions within the county. Join us to explore and discuss the various elements of the plan including transportation, parks and trails, housing, land use, and more. Your input is key for planning the future of Washington County. Washington County Open House locations FOREST LAKE 1 SCANDIA MARINE ON ST CROIX BAYPORT 694 LAKE ELMO 14 BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP OAKDALE 494 AFTON COTTAGE GROVE GREY CLOUD ISLAND TOWNSHIP LAKE ST CROIX BEACH ST MARY S POINT Tuesday, October 10th Government Center Stillwater DENMARK TOWNSHIP 2 OAK PARK HEIGHTS BAYPORT LAKE ELMO 14 BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP OAKDALE WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP 13 LAKELAND 15 LANDFALL 94 LAKELAND SHORES 494 AFTON WOODBURY NEWPORT 95 COTTAGE GROVE ST PAUL PARK GREY CLOUD ISLAND TOWNSHIP Monday, October 16th Cottage Grove Service Center 3 open houses will be held throughout the county to discuss the comprehensive plan. The same information wil be shared at each location, so join us for the date and location that works best for you! Cottage Grove WOODBURY 61 Monday, October 9th Headwaters Service Center Forest Lake LAKELAND SHORES ST PAUL PARK 96 MAHTOMEDI STILLWATER NEWPORT GRANT 94 LANDFALL 95 STILLWATER TOWNSHIP DELLWOOD PINE SPRINGS LAKELAND 15 MAY TOWNSHIP 15 JOIN US WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP 13 HUGO 61 For more information visit or contact Colin Kelly, Senior Planner at or colin.kelly@co.washington.mn.us DENMARK TOWNSHIP LAKE ST CROIX BEACH ST MARY S POINT

119 Grey Cloud Island Township! This entire island should be made into a park. No more houses or mining!!!!! St. Paul Park!!! Forest Lake Hugo Dellwood Mahtomedi!! Grant! Pine Springs! Lake Elmo Park Reserve is a beautiful park and green Lake space Elmo that adds great value to our area. Oakdale!!!! Woodbury Cottage Grove!!!!!! Extending the Gateway Trail north through Marine and Scandia. I know this idea is in the works, but wanted to Scandia affirm that there is desire. Can t Wait! May Township Stillwater Hastings Bayport Township!! West Lakeland Township! Afton Denmark Township! Bayport! Stillwater Township Marine on St. Croix A trail linking William O Brien and Big Marine would be a great addition. Traffic with the opening of the new bridge. Oak Park Heights Lakeland Shores Lakeland Lake St. Croix Beach St. Marys Point More land acquisition is needed in this area to preserve and create green space. It would be great to acquire land so that Lost Valley Prairie SNA and St. Croix Bluffs Regional Park share a boundary Phase 2 Engagement Results Open House Events Early Engagement Findings What Has Occurred Over the Past Few Months Washington County hosted multiple pop-up events throughout the County last spring and early summer to interact with County residents. A pop-up event differs from a typical planning meeting in that it is smaller in scale, shorter in length, and focuses on gaining feedback from more condensed groups of residents. Additionally, an online mapping tool was available. This was an opportunity for residents to provide input on what makes the County a great place to live, work, play, and express any areas of concern. What Did Residents Say Input received during the early engagement activities were compiled to better understand emerging trends among residents. This considered both issues and opportunities perceived by residents throughout the County. The Wordclouds display the top responses to questions posed to residents during early public engagement efforts. The graphic below shows responses from an online forum using Wikimaps. Residents were asked to place points on a map of the County under one of the four categories listed in the legend below.!! What planning topic are you most interested in TOP RANKING PLANNING TOPICS Topic Rank Land Use 6 Transportation 6 Housing 5 Parks, Trails, and 4 Open Space What interests you most about this topic I am keenly interested in seeing off-road paved trail connections from 1) Stillwater to Point Douglas County Park and Regional Trail and b) the Central Anoka County Regional Trail/Hardwood Creek Trail and the Gateway State Trail. These connections would enable long, safe, and scenic loop trail opportunities connecting counties, local communities, major riverways, state and regional parks, and other amenities.. Favorite Place Favorite Characteristic!!!! Valued Amenity Needed Amenity!!!! Do you have any questions or comments regarding the Washington County Comprehensive Plan Legend Best Characteristic Favorite Place Valued or Needed Amenity Biggest Concern I am interested in more solar and windgenerated power in Washington County. Are there state, county or local incentives for private or public entities to supply and/or install renewable energy sources Why is independent 55+ housing so expensive How many section 42 rentals are there in Washington County Where to find funding resources to help first time home buyers WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Boards were presented with the preliminary findings of each plan element, providing key information for the public to review and comment on. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 2 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

120 Phase 2 Engagement Results Local Government Unit (LGU) Forum Local Government Unit (LGU) forums were held on June 15, 2017 at the Stillwater Library and on January 11, 2018 at the Washington County Government Center in Stillwater. The purpose of the forums was to bring together local municipal representatives from townships and cities within Washington County to discuss the Comprehenisve Plan Update. Topics included: Washington County Planning process (including travel demand model results) Updates regarding local planning efforts (challenges, barriers, public engagement efforts) Outline the next steps and timeline of the Washington County comprehensive plan process DRAFT 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Local Government Unit Forum January 11, 2018 GOALS, POLICIES, AND STRATEGIES Overall, the Draft Comp Plan s goals, policies, and strategies work together to achieve the county s four overarching goals: To promote the health, safety and quality of life of citizens. To provide accessible, high-quality services in a timely and respectful manner. To address today s needs while proactively planning for the future. To maintain public trust through responsible use of public resources, accountability, and openness of government. Goals serve as broad statements for desired outcomes. Policies provide specific direction needed to achieve a goal. Strategies provide detailed actions that policy makers can employ to realize the stated policies. Policies NEXT STEPS Timeframe Task Six month review by cities, towns, etc. Phase 3 public engagement (online - videos, summary, full draft plan, elements, survey) Phase 3 public engagement (open house, County Fair) Incorporate local gov t, public comments Public hearing - Planning Advisory Commission Submit Comp Plan to Metropolitan Council Mar April, 2018 May June, 2018 July Aug, adjacent and affected jurisdictions Sept Oct, 2018 Throughout six-month review and up to plan submittal Nov Dec, 2018 County staff addressed representatives from the 33 municipalities within Washington County at the Government Center The goals and policies of the plan were outlined, and strategies for achieving these goals were discussed. The upcoming plan timeline was discussed, including Phase 3 of public engagement. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 2 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

121 Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase 3 Public Engagement Result Summary Events Washington County Fair, Stillwater - August 1st to 5th FOREST LAKE SCANDIA MARINE ON ST CROIX HUGO 61 MAY TOWNSHIP STILLWATER TOWNSHIP DELLWOOD GRANT 96 MAHTOMEDI STILLWATER PINE SPRINGS 36 OAK PARK HEIGHTS BAYPORT 694 LAKE ELMO 14 BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP OAKDALE LAKELAND 15 LANDFALL LAKELAND SHORES 494 AFTON WOODBURY NEWPORT 95 COTTAGE GROVE ST PAUL PARK GREY CLOUD ISLAND TOWNSHIP Comprehensive Plan Review Online Survey Educational Video Series WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP 13 Activities DENMARK TOWNSHIP LAKE ST CROIX BEACH ST MARY S POINT

122 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Washington County Fair Those who passed by the Washington County booth at the County Fair were asked to provide their input on two questions: What makes Washington County a great place to live, work and play Great State, County and Local Parks! TRAIL SYSTEM Clean lakes for swimming OPEN SPACES Lake Elmo Park Reserve Good Neighborhood ST. CROIX RIVER IT'S NEXT TO THE RIVER! Outdoors and Parks Rural Character GREEN SPACE Access to lots of Retail Close to Minneapolis & St Paul Diverse Development PARKS THE PARK SYSTEM EVERYTHING! Parks and Trees RURAL CHARACTER PARKS Paddle boarding at Lake Elmo Park Reserve THE RIVER Parks and Open Spaces THE NATURE Parks and Trails Parks Love the nature & wildlife Afton Alps TEDDY BEAR PARK Lake Elmo Park RECYCLING CENTER Great Community CLEAN & SAFE Gymnastics in the Parks!! TREES! Walkable neighborhoods Less population in the North! We are not Eden Prairie! St Croix River Parks like Lake Elmo St Croix River What is your biggest concern about the future of Washington County More transit options needed Transit in the North- think Hugo! More trail connections Condition of roads- needs more funding Over Development Weak libraries Increased density 3M pollution Challenges moving around the region CLEAN WATER Water! Aquifer pollution Over-population Littering, singleuse plastics Lack of Transit Options Wider shoulder or trail on CR 7 and a safe connection to a trail Water quality! Ropes course and zipline! Lack of transit and alternative transportation options Multimodal transportation options outside of Woodbury- over I-94 and I-494 Use of salt on roadways Stop developing! Keep our farms! The Indian purchase of land by Oakland Jr. High Infrastructure not keeping up with population growth Sustainability Fee for parks, Dakota County does not charge Overdevelopment Overdevelopment Transportation Funding Maintaining our vintage, rural character i.e. old barns and buildings Vanishing fields now filled with houses Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

123 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Online Survey Results Upon release of the draft plan for public review, an online survey was also made available to collect comments. Respondents were provided an opportunity to provide remarks on the overall plan, followed by specific comments by plan element. A total of 33 individuals participated in the survey and provided the following results: 1. What interests/concerns brought you to reviewing the Washington County 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update (Select all that apply) Interest/Concern Count Pride in my Community 9 Protection of Water Resources 17 Changes in Transportation 11 Recreational Opportunities in the County 12 Affordable Housing Options 6 Economic Growth throughout the County 2 Resilience and Sustainability of County Systems 4 Changes in Land Use and Development 20 Other (please specify) 9 Total 90 Other Responses: climate change mitigation - such as fostering more solar panels and becoming a zero carbon release community I am just interested overall - no concerns Habitat Protection of our natural resources Lack of diversity Preserving large lot sizes and rural character Concern on how public money is being used and how much property tax revenue is being taken away by park land being acquired concern about parks, trails, river corridors, open spaces Cottage Grove Library incorporating a Community Center Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

124 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Online Survey Results 2. What is your overall impression of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Disappointed that it doesn t address climate change mitigation, such as committing ourselves to a zero carbon release community by such things as increasing use of solar power Well done! It was very informative. The transportation plan is stuck in the automobile era. Washington County contributes $750,600 to the Met Council for railroads and gets nothing in return. WE NEED PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE. Our plan for 2040 cannot be to build more and more lanes of road. Easy to read. Thorough I am not happy with some issues, especially with how the county plans on dealing with flooding Well thought out Good Very concerned about the number of homeowners being displaced. The many boats allowed on our lakes that are brining zebra mussels and milfoil into them. I watched the videos - I like all that has been done, and trust the county will continue to make wise choices. Too focused on low income housing. I worked hard to get where I am and pay large taxes. I do NOT want more section 8/low income housing in Washington County. MET COUNCIL DIRECTED MET COUNCIL DIRECTED Interested to see how it progresses IT S WAY TO LONG TO READ THE ENTIRE THING, A SHORTER VERSION WITH HIGHLIGHTS WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL meh. Very detailed; I think it is very important that the new Cottage Grove Library be part of an overall Community Center that is accessible to all; rich or poor, young or old, all religious beliefs, all ethic groups. It s the one place that anyone can go and interact freely with all citizens. It s critical to our community that this be available. Public transportation is important so that people can get to shopping and the library. Would also like to have ability to take organic materials for composting to a central location rather than throwing in the trash. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

125 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Online Survey Results 3. Which plan element are you most interested in Plan Element Count Land Use 6 Transportation 5 Water Resources 3 Parks, Trails and Open Space 16 Housing 1 Resilience and Sustainability 2 Economic Competitiveness 0 Implementation 0 Total 33 Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

126 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Online Survey Results LAND USE What is your overall impression of the Land Use Plan Poor. Too much development in the area SOUNDS GOOD BUT NOT ENFORCEABLE After reviewing the Land Use Plan, do you have any unanswered questions Does the county want to reduce flooding of farm fields In some areas of the county (especially Forest Lake and Hugo), there are farm fields that flood each spring that need what some consider excess water to keep a balanced ecosystem. They provide vital habitat for migrating birds and other biological indicators. Are there any plans in place to protect these habitats COVERS TOWNSHIPS WHY NOT CITIES p and 4-12 Unclear why only Grey Cloud Island Township and Denmark Township are discussed under MRCCA. Does WC have responsibility for them under MRCCA that it doesn t have for the towns (Cottage Grove, St Paul Park, Newport) TRANSPORTATION What is your overall impression of the Transportation Plan It is almost exclusively focused on the automobile A lot of people complain about the round-abouts, but I do feel that they are safer than 4-way stops. More speed limit signs are needed inside the round-abouts. After reviewing the Transportation Plan, do you have any unanswered questions What is the plan for passenger trail service No I don t feel that CG can expand and grow its businesses and shopping area unless we have more ways in and out of the area. We need a new bridge where the old SPP railroad bridge was torn down. The Wakota bridge did not answer the transportation problems. If there was another bridge in SPP, it would relieve the Wakota Bridge, and give our youth a close connection the Inver Hills College. It took 30 years to get the Stillwater bridge moved. If we want another bridge across the Mississippi, the plan needs to start now. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

127 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Online Survey Results See previous comments It seems to flow well and includes necessary components No. WATER RESOURCES What is your overall impression of the Water Resources Plan After reviewing the Water Resources Plan, do you have any unanswered questions HOUSING What is your overall impression of the Housing Plan It looked good so much of the plan in interconnected I only watched the videos. I don t like that I hear low-income housing is being built and it starts at $300,000. I don t like that I have homeless youth moving into my home to stay with my granddaughter, because they can t find rental options in CG. Bad. Way too much concern about low income housing to be available. It s important to have more senior living but if more Section 8 housing is built/supported here, I do not want to be a Washington County resident anymore! I didn t work to get where I am today to be surrounded by people sucking off of the system. After reviewing the Housing Plan, do you have any unanswered questions We need decent apartment buildings in CG where people can rent for under $900 a month. The Legends is great, but only for seniors. What about the youth of the community that non longer get along with parents Why do so many seniors have adult children and grandchildren moving in with them because they cannot afford rent in CG Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary

128 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Online Survey Results PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE What is your overall impression of the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan I d like to see some restoration planned for the large turf ditches along Radio Drive between 4th St. in Oakdale and Valley Creek road. There is over irrigation amongst businesses. And there are way too many geese that congregate in these areas, which cause accidents on the busy road of Radio Drive. Converting part of the ditches to native plants will reduce geese, filter pollutants and provide pollinator habitat by connecting corridors of Lake Elmo Regional Park with La Lake in Woodbury. The change in land use will also soften traffic noise and enhance ascetics for business owners. The majority of traffic commutes down Radio Drive. Enhancing the ditches will remind the community and visitors that Woodbury and the County promote water wise landscaping and restorations. I think of Carver County along their highways and main roads. There have native grasses and flowers along the roads. This adds value to the surrounding communities. Thank you. More trails feeding into main trails for commuters needed need more open space with all of the development Acquiring land on a willing seller is so false. There is so much hassle that is given to a homeowner that they are forced into selling. What about our counties tax revenue. Who is going to make up for the loss. Though there are plans on expanding existing paved/hard trails, I didn t see any mention for developing mountain bike/trailing running systems With the metro area providing nearly 100 miles of single track trails, I am surprised Washington County doesn t appear to have plans to keep pace with this growing demand. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary After reviewing the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan, do you have any unanswered questions Country trails need to be plowed to allow bikers to ease congestion No WHY do we need so much park land. Having more people use the land rather than a homeowner who takes care of the land seems better. Why not develop mountain bike specific trails p under suggestions, can you say more about what is meant by focus group members when they say Address safety. This is likely to be confusing, mis-understood by many readers. p under Existing Development - text refers to Hardwood Creed Trail rather than Point Douglas. p Discuss how WC s portion of the Mississippi River Trail relates to the national effort that is intended to extended from Itasca headwaters to Louisiana p Different kinds of easements (scenic easements, Purchase of Development Rights, conservation easements) are confusing - can you say more about how these differ - maybe just from different funding sources

129 Phase 3 Public Engagement Results What we heard Online Survey Results RESILIENCE & SUSTAINABILITY What is your overall impression of the Resilience and Sustainability Plan Appreciate that it is being considered and included. It needs to be clearer on where and how individual WC citizens need to take responsibility - how what they do is or isn t sustainable. After reviewing the Resilience and Sustainability Plan, do you have any unanswered questions p The bullet points that include comparisons to all Minnesotans are most meaningful. Can this be done for all bullet points Also, the 2 bullet points - 7th & 11th - that discuss obesity seem to contradict each other. p Table 1. What % of all business and all residential Xcel customers are these p I like the optimism, but this might be too rosy. Most of WC citizens are still buying pickup trucks and large SUVs ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS What is your overall impression of the Economic Competitiveness Plan No comments received. After reviewing the Economic Competitiveness Plan, do you have any unanswered questions No comments received. IMPLEMENTATION What is your overall impression of the Implementation Plan No comments received. After reviewing the Implementation Plan, do you have any unanswered questions No comments received. Washington County, Today & Tomorrow Phase 3 Public Engagement - Plan Review Phase - Engagement Summary