Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017)"

Transcription

1 Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017) Program Description The Smart Growth Transportation (SGT) program was established offered by the Lancaster County Transportation Coordinating Committee (LCTCC; also referred to as the Lancaster MPO) in The SGT program helps to achieve the goals of the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan and the county s commitment to smart growth. The program funds transportation projects and studies located in the county s designated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) and Village Growth Areas (VGAs) that support smart growth, encourage economic development and help build the infrastructure for safer, more walkable, bikeable and transitfriendly communities. The program funds transportation and land use corridor studies as well as construction projects that meet the program s smart growth transportation criteria. Since it is the intent of the program to fund projects that provide tangible benefits in the near future, at least 80% of the funding will be directed each funding cycle to smart growth construction projects and no more than 20% to studies. Projects funded through the program must be open to the general public and ADA accessible. The goals of the program are: (1) Fund transportation studies and construction projects that are consistent with the goals and objectives of the County Comprehensive Plan (and its Long Range Transportation Plan element) and with multi-municipal and local comprehensive plans of the jurisdictions in which the projects are located. (2) Fund transportation projects that link smart transportation principles with smart growth land use to create more livable communities that will improve the quality of life for Lancaster County residents and visitors. (3) Fund public projects that have the ability to leverage private dollars and expand the total dollars available for transportation investment. (4) Implement transportation solutions that reduce single-occupant vehicle usage and improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. (5) Implement transportation solutions that create more complete streets that are designed for all roadway users. (6) Fund transportation projects that are designed to be context-sensitive and right-sized to the needs of the particular situation (financial, land use, environmental needs). (7) Fund transportation projects that have been planned in collaboration with the community. (8) Support transportation projects that result in a desire to go to a place rather than through it. Lancaster County recognizes three degrees of smart transportation projects: (1) Smart transportation projects where funds are invested to preserve the existing transportation infrastructure and address critical safety problems; (2) Smarter transportation projects where funds are invested in operations and management projects and in strategic capacity improvements such as intersection improvements, improved signalization and other improvements with the potential to incentivize growth in designated growth areas; and 1

2 (3) Smartest transportation projects where funds are targeted to catalytic high-leverage projects with the potential for stimulating appropriate development in designated growth areas, and particularly in concentrated building areas. These projects deliver high returns in economic development and improved quality of life and have the potential to leverage other sources of funding to create a larger public benefit than would otherwise be possible. Smartest transportation projects are those that combine all of the five Weighted Criteria in these guidelines and score well on all of them. The SGT program only funds projects that exemplify the Smartest transportation projects. Who Can Apply? (1) The applicant must be a Lancaster County municipality, transportation service provider or organization located in Lancaster County and that serves Lancaster County citizens. (2) If the applicant is a municipality, it must have a Comprehensive Plan or be part of a Regional Comprehensive Plan that has been adopted by the governing body within the past ten years or be in the process of updating their plan. (3) The Municipal or Regional Comprehensive Plan must have a land use component that is generally consistent with the County s Growth Management Plan. (4) The Municipal or Regional Comprehensive Plan must have a transportation element. (5) The applicant must be familiar with the concept of smart growth transportation and be committed to the successful implementation and ongoing maintenance of the smart growth transportation project proposed for funding. (6) The applicant must have as part of its responsibilities the provision of transportation facilities and/or services. Eligible Types of Projects Eligible projects include transportation and land use corridor studies, feasibility studies and construction projects (in which all phases of preconstruction--preliminary engineering, final design, utilities, right-of-way are paid by the project sponsor), as exemplified by the following types of transportation projects: (1) Investments that assist local jurisdictions with preparation and implementation of master transportation and land use plans for priority corridors within designated growth areas. (2) Non-motorized transportation facilities that provide a transportation benefit and could also provide a recreational benefit (trails, bike networks). Projects of just recreational value will not be funded under this program. Projects that involve sidewalk installation require the municipality to have a sidewalk ordinance (see Application Elements). (3) Investments that make transit service more viable and convenient to project sites and countywide and provide safe connections to access transit (sidewalks, interconnected streets that reduce walking distances). (4) Urban streetscape projects that incorporate traffic calming. (5) Projects that provide non-motorized connections between neighborhoods and nearby commercial and retail districts, regional parks, transit centers, libraries or schools. (6) Improved roadway connections that provide a more interconnected transportation net- work and reduce travel distances for motorists, transit users, bicyclists and pedestrians. (7) Redevelopment of existing streets into neighborhood streets that enhance a community s quality of life, utilizing traffic calming and other techniques. 2

3 (8) Curb extensions for pedestrian safety, green infrastructure and ADA accessibility. (9) Low-cost investments such as retiming and coordination of traffic signals. (10) Turning lanes that provide crosswalks and median strips to keep pedestrians safe. (11) Studies that would result in any of the project types listed above. Applicants may submit more than one application for SGT funding in any funding cycle. How Much Funding is Available? The SGT program is funded through federal Surface Transportation Urban (STU) funds. Applications are accepted every two years, with the goal of a total program level of $3 million each funding cycle. The SGT Task Force is not obligated to expend all of the funds available in a funding cycle. Unexpended funds are returned to the SGT Reserve on the TIP for use in the next round of funding. There are two possible options for municipalities or transportation service providers to pursue in providing matching funds for the SGT applications, depending on the type of project they submit: (1) For Construction Projects: The applicant shall pay all of the preconstruction costs for a Project, with the federal funds used to pay all of the construction costs for the project; (2) For Studies: The applicant shall provide at least a 20% municipal match for the federal funds which will pay up to 80% of the study cost. Studies will need to comply with PennDOT and federal requirements for process and procedures. Project sponsors are encouraged to think about how their project might be phased if the SGT Task Force finds that there isn t sufficient funding available for the entire project at one time and to be prepared to discuss this at their interview with the SGT Task Force. TIP Placement Projects that are selected for funding under the SGT program will be placed on the Lancaster County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) by the LCTCC. The SGT Program will be updated every two years in coordination with the TIP update. Application Elements Applications should include all the information requested on the Application Form. At a minimum, applications should include: (1) Description of the project or study and how it meets the smart growth transportation criteria (2) How the project or study is consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and its Long Range Transportation Plan and Growth Management element and with the comprehensive plan and transportation element of the jurisdiction(s) in which the project is located (3) Public involvement in planning of and support for the project or study. (4) Implementation strategy: This is important for construction projects as well as corridor studies as the intent of the SGT program is to fund projects that will be successfully implemented. (5) Studies funded under the SGT Program must include a NEPA Purpose and Need Statement since the purpose of the study is to prepare for and lead to a construction project. A link to the federal NEPA Purpose and Need Statement is found under Frequently Asked Questions. (6) Local Preconstruction Funds or 20% Study Match: A description of the sources of 3

4 state and local funding that will be used to match the federal funds. (7) Costs for All Project Phases: A reliable estimate, prepared and signed by a licensed Engineer, of the expected costs for each phase of the SGT project (preliminary engineering, final design, utilities, right-of-way, construction) must be part of the application. In arriving at a reliable estimate, the applicant is encouraged to recognize that compliance with federal requirements generally adds costs beyond the costs of locally-funded projects. The applicant should factor in a 30% contingency cost for construction projects. See also, Other Program Information, Budget. (8) Projects sponsored by more than one municipality shall include a Resolution of Project Support approved by the Board of Supervisors or Borough Council of each municipality participating in the project that affirms the municipality s support of the project and commitment to its local share of the funding. (9) If the application includes construction of sidewalks, all municipalities in which they will be located shall have adopted a sidewalk ordinance covering at least the Urban/Village Growth Areas in the municipality, that requires the installation and maintenance (including snow removal) of sidewalk at the municipality s direction. Further budget preparation information is found under Other Information of these Guidelines. Planning Timeframe The following time frame is expected to be attainable by applicants for funding under the SGT program: (1) Transportation and land use corridor studies and feasibility studies: completion within 24 (twenty-four) months. (2) Pre-construction phases of a construction project: completion within 1-2 (one to two) years, depending on the complexity of the project; and (3) Construction work: completion within 3 years of preliminary engineering. Project Lead: The municipality that is the lead sponsor of a project shall be the lead on the project. Consultant selection must be done in compliance with PennDOT requirements for all projects. Some upfront costs may accrue to the sponsor prior to selecting consultants for studies or design work. Reporting Requirement: All projects that are funded under the SGT program are expected to demonstrate that they are making continuous progress. The lead sponsor of each project will submit quarterly progress reports to the Lancaster County Planning Commission (LCPC) to demonstrate the progress that was made during the quarter and confirm that the project is adhering to the schedule submitted in the approved application. If the project is not adhering to the schedule in the application, the applicant will furnish an explanation of the reasons for the delay and actions being taken to address the situation. Project Evaluation Criteria All studies and projects that are submitted for funding under the SGT program must meet four Core Criteria. Projects that fail to meet these core criteria will not advance further in the process. Projects that meet the core criteria are then further evaluated by five weighted criteria. 4

5 CORE CRITERIA (1) Project is consistent with and implements goals and policies of the County Comprehensive Plan and Long Range Transportation Plan and regional plans. (2) Project is located within a designated growth area. (3) Demonstration of applicant s ability to pay preconstruction costs for construction projects or 20% match for studies. (4) The project has viable implementation strategy that includes long-term funding and maintenance and a design that meets generally accepted federal and state standards (smaller locally funded projects may propose alternative standards if they can demonstrate that they meet or surpass the state and federal standards). WEIGHTED CRITERIA (1) Supports development and/or redevelopment in designated growth areas throughout the county that implement aspects of the County Comprehensive Plan, Envision, and the Long Range Transportation Plan, Connections 2040: 2016 Update, and regional plans like the Lancaster Inter-municipal Comprehensive Plan, Growing Together. Examples of project types: Preparation and implementation of regional master transportation plans for corridors within the designated growth areas Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) Redevelopment of existing streets into neighborhood streets Urban streetscape projects (2) Increases mobility options by providing alternatives to single-occupant driving, focusing on multi-modal service, facilities and/or infrastructure, particularly for environmental justice populations (low-income, elderly, disabled and minority). Examples of project types: New services and/or facilities that make transit more viable and convenient Non-motorized transportation facilities such as trails, bike networks, sidewalks that provide connections to other transportation facilities and utilize context-sensitive design and lighting Park and ride lots Link affordable housing with job centers and services Link neighborhoods with local retail/commercial centers, schools or libraries with improved transit service or pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. (3) Preserves or enhances the environmental, natural, historic and cultural integrity of Lancaster County through context-sensitive design. Examples of projects: Transit shelters and benches with historical, cultural design Bridge restoration projects with context-sensitive design Storm water management projects to protect the environment from excessive run-off (4) Implements or furthers a goal, objective or strategy of a current (within last 5-10 years) 5

6 and approved transportation study within a priority transportation corridor. Examples of projects: Intersection improvements and added turning lanes on Harrisburg Pike (5) Encourages public-private partnerships to extend the reach of public dollars and leverage private development in designated growth areas Project that has a financial commitment by local businesses or institutions such as the school district, water authority, health institutions, others. BONUS POINTS Projects in municipalities that have adopted one or more of the following planning regulations or management procedures will receive bonus points for each policy or procedure, as indicated below, except that municipalities that have adopted all four of the following regulations or procedures will receive 12 bonus points. 4 points: Complete Streets Policy and regulation 3 points: Smart Growth, Mixed Use or Density Bonus Option in the Municipality s zoning ordinance. 2 points: Adopted official map (in accordance with the MPO) with a transportation element. 1 point: Access Management Ordinance. Notice of Funding Availability/Informational Forum In order to inform municipalities and other interested parties about the availability of the SGT Program, the county will hold a workshop to present the SGT program s purpose, eligible projects and application process. The workshop will be held on April 12, Notice of the program application will be further disseminated by s sent to officials in all 60 municipalities in the county alerting them to the availability of the program. Application Review Process The MPO s Smart Growth Transportation Task Force (SGTTF) serves as the review panel for applications for funding under the program. It consists of municipal officials and planners, representatives of the South Central Transit Authority, non-profit organizations and Lancaster County Planning Commission (LCPC) staff. Transparency and Conflict of Interest: Any task force member that has a direct interest in a project application submitted for funding (for example, they work for the municipality or for a major employer that will benefit from the project in the municipality that has submitted the application or have some other financial or other major involvement in the project) will inform the other task force members of this conflict and recuse himself/herself from any discussions by the task force of that project and will not rank the project in which they have an interest on the project evaluation form. They may, however, participate in the presentation of the project to the task force. Rankings of all task force members will be reviewed by all other task force members to ensure that there isn t a bias in the ratings for any of the other projects by those who have an interest in one (or more) of them. The summary scores of the task force rankings for all eligible projects that were submitted for funding under the SGT Program are provided to TTAC and the MPO for their review. 6

7 Notice of Intent: As stated under Notice of Funding Availability, Notice of Intent (NOI) will be issued for the SGT Program to Lancaster County municipalities and transportation service providers on April 12, LCPC staff will review the NOIs that are received by the due date to determine if the proposed project meets the SGT Program Core criteria. If the NOI indicates a project does not meet the SGT core criteria, the applicant will be notified that the proposed project is ineligible. Projects that meet the Core criteria will be sent an FY SGT Program Application. Applications: LCPC staff will review all applications received by the due date to determine if projects submitted by more than one municipality include a Resolution of Project Support from each involved municipality and that municipalities that submit projects for construction or restoration of sidewalks have an approved Sidewalk Ordinance, as required by these Guidelines (see Application Elements). Applications that pass this initial review, will then be evaluated by the SGT Task Force by the Weighted Criteria. The task force will score each project on the criteria, with a maximum number of points for each criteria as follows: Scoring of Weighted Criteria Criteria Maximum Points Criteria 1 30 points Criteria 2 25 points Criteria 3 25 points Criteria 4 5 points Criteria 5 10 points Bonus Points points Applicant Interviews: Prior to ranking the SGT projects, the SGT Task Force will hold interviews with each applicant to provide an opportunity for the applicant to provide further details about their project. All applicants will be required to include at least the following in their presentation: a visual presentation, maps of the project site and surrounding area, photos of the project site, description of the project, names of the project sponsors and a discussion of how the project is consistent with the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan and comprehensive plan of the municipality (ies) in which it is located. No later than five days before the interview, the task force will provide each applicant with a specific outline they are to follow and questions they should be prepared to answer during the interview. After all of the interviews have been completed, task force members will meet to discuss any remaining questions they might have about any of the projects. Then, individually, each task force member will rank each project on the weighted evaluation criteria. LCPC staff will compile the results of the project scores by all of the task force members into a summary chart. Projects that receive the highest total scores will be recommended to the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) and to the MPO for funding. 7

8 Application Process April 12, 2017 May 24, 2017 June 5, 2017 July 17, 2017 August 7-18, 2017 September 6-15, 2017 Week of Sept. 18 th October2017 November 2017 December 2017 June 2018 SGT Workshop is held for municipalities. Program Guidelines and Notices of Intent are issued. Notice of Intent forms are due at the LCPC by 5:00 pm. Applications are issued. Applications are due at the LCPC by 5:00 pm. All attachments, maps and appendices must be submitted as part of the application packet. Applications received after this date will not be reviewed. Application review: LCPC staff will coordinate with applicants on any adjustments that are needed. SGT Task Force interviews with applicants. Meeting of SGT Task Force to discuss any remaining questions. Applications are evaluated and scored. Recommendations are made. Funding recommendations are presented to TTAC and MPO. Funding recommendations are made part of the TIP. TIP is adopted by the MPO. MPO Approval of SGT Task Force Recommendations After the SGT Task Force has completed its scoring and arrived at a recommendation, it will present the recommendation to the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC). The TTAC will then make a recommendation to the Lancaster MPO. The Lancaster MPO is the decision-making body that will act on the SGT project funding recommendation at its November 2017 meeting. After the Lancaster MPO has taken action, the projects approved for funding will be added to the FY TIP adopted by the Lancaster MPO at its June 2018 meeting. Applicants whose projects are selected will be provided with additional guidance from the Lancaster County MPO and PennDOT and can then proceed with work on their projects. PennDOT will assign a Project Manager to each project. All SGT corridor studies and preliminary engineering studies must be completed within 24 months; construction projects must be completed within 36 months from the date of the start of preliminary engineering. Applications for funding under the SGT program will be accepted in electronic form or hard copy format. Applications submitted by electronic form should be ed to: hparcells@co.lancaster.pa.us ; Applications submitted by hard copy, should be mailed to: Harriet Parcells, Senior Transportation Planner Lancaster County Planning Commission 150 N. Queen Street, Suite 320, Lancaster, PA Other Program Information (1) Reimbursement Agreement The project sponsor must execute a standard legal agreement with PennDOT prior to proceeding with any work on the project. Any project costs incurred prior to the execution of a reimbursement agreement for which federal dollars are requested will not be eligible for 8

9 reimbursement. Interest payments made by municipalities or other project sponsors to finance any portion of the project costs are not reimbursable. (2) Budget It must be demonstrated that there is an acceptable implementation strategy for the project. The budget shall contain itemized activities with an estimated cost of each of these. Estimates shall include labor costs, supplies and materials and other anticipated costs. An accurate and up-todate budget will help define the scope of work proposed in your project. The budget must be prepared and signed by a licensed engineer and demonstrate the most accurate estimated costs. The budget should be divided into project development phases that include: preliminary design, final design, environmental clearance, right-of-way, and construction phases. The budget should identify all sources of funding and how each itemized activity will be funded. Budgets for construction projects should include a 30% contingency factor. Estimated funding for the project that may be from other sources should be identified as other federal funds (not from the USDOT), state, local, donated services, in-kind services, volunteer and Youth Service and Conservation Corps. Even though the preliminary engineering and rightof- way costs are not funded by SGT funds, a complete budget is needed to ensure that the applicant has the money to fund these phases, or document what was already spent as the local contribution. (3) Environmental Clearance All projects will require an environmental clearance document as part of the preliminary engineering phase of work. The level of effort varies by the type of project, the amount of impacts and the degree of public controversy. Except in unusual circumstances, a SGT project should be processed as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under the NEPA process. (4) Project Engineering and Inspection Projects must follow standard federal/state procedures for all phases of work. Project sponsors should acquire the services of a qualified project manager to oversee the development and implementation of the project (including project inspection) and ensure compliance with all state and federal requirements. This professional may be an architect, landscape architect, or engineer depending upon the nature and scope of the project. The acquisition of consultant services must be in accordance with an acceptable process. In the case of municipally sponsored projects, municipalities may choose to use their municipal engineers with PennDOT approval, or follow an approved consultant selection process. It is important to recognize that the project sponsor, not PennDOT, employs the design and/or construction professionals. (5) Right-of-Way Clearance All right-of-way acquisition must follow federal regulations, including the Uniform Act (Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies of 1970). Right-of-way certification will be required for all projects prior to advertising for construction bids. (6) Utility Clearance 9

10 All projects must have a utility clearance form processed prior to the advertisement for bids. This procedure requires that the sponsor certify that all necessary arrangements have been completed for the relocation of any affected utility. (7) Permits It will be the responsibility of the project sponsor to secure all necessary permits to design or implement the project. These may involve permits from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as well as local municipal permits, PennDOT highway occupancy agreements (HOA), highway occupancy permits (HOP) etc. (8) Public Utility Commission (PUC) Involvement Certain projects may require the involvement of the Public Utility Commission. It will be the responsibility of the project sponsor to contact the Public Utility Commission to secure the necessary actions by that agency. (9) Construction Project sponsors may proceed with the construction phase of the project only upon receipt of PennDOT's written authorization (notice to proceed). This will ensure that all necessary approvals have been secured. An approved contractor must perform construction. All material used in conjunction with the project must meet project specifications and special provisions included in the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate package. 15% of the estimated construction cost is used for project inspection and must be included in the total construction costs. (10) Cost Increases/Changes in Scope of Work Each programmed project has been approved for a specific scope of work and funding level based on the information submitted by the project sponsor. All changes in the scope of work for increases in federal funding are the responsibility of the applicant. (11) Maintenance The project sponsor will be responsible for the maintenance of the project after completion of construction. The project sponsor should develop a plan for maintenance, upkeep and operation of a project constructed with federal funding. For projects that involve sidewalk construction, an adopted municipal sidewalk ordinance is required. Program funds are not to be used for the operation and/or maintenance of projects. (12) Project Cancellation A project sponsor may, at any time in the project development process, decide to cancel the project and drop out of the Program. The project sponsor will be responsible for the reimbursement of all federal funds received as of that date. The sponsor will also be responsible for payment of all outstanding invoices to all project contractors. Frequently Asked Questions (1) How much funding is available during this SGT project solicitation round? During this SGT funding round, approximately $3.0 million in FFY is available. 10

11 (2) Design for my project is nearly complete. May I include these costs in my application total? Yes - Design costs incurred in advance of project approval can be used to meet the share for funding (if the value of these expenses is determined to be reasonable). Federal funds may not, however, be provided to retroactively reimburse a sponsor for design costs incurred. (3) Can the members of our organization, staff or equipment be used to construct the project, and use the value of our labor as our share of the project? Yes - Credit for donations of funds, materials, land or services can be used/given, but no match is required for the construction phase. Projects that are not located in the highway right-of-way and are not directly related to a highway have been given more flexibility, so project sponsors may keep costs to a minimum. (4) Can I use a grant from another federal program as part of the local share (preconstruction phase) or to blend with the federal funds I receive under the SGT Program? Yes - Funds from other federal agencies (not other U.S. Department of Transportation funds) may be used for the non-federal or local share (pre-construction phase) for the project or be blended with the federal SGT funds for the construction phase. (5) My project will obviously have positive benefits to the environment. Why do I have to obtain environmental clearance? All federally funded projects must have an environmental document, which quantifies the impacts of the project (both positive and negative) on the environment. There are three levels of an environmental document: Categorical Exclusion (CE), Environmental Assessment (EA), and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Most SGT projects will fall under the Categorical Exclusion. (6) Where do I find information about the NEPA Purpose and Need Statement? Information about the NEPA Purpose and Need Statement is found on the following federal and state websites: er/safetyandnepa.pdf. _Guidance.pdf (7) Why do I need a construction inspector for my project? Federal and state regulations require that an individual who is familiar with federal and state construction requirements review the project during the construction phase to assure that it is constructed in accordance with those regulations. 11

12 (8) Do the project design and construction inspection have to be conducted by separate consulting firms? It depends on the project. For projects approved at $1 million or less in construction costs, the final design consultant may be considered for construction inspection. Sponsors will want to check with the PennDOT District offices for the specific provisions and selection processes to follow in allowing the same consultant to be used for both design and construction inspection services. (9) Can construction inspection be paid for out of the SGT construction funding award? Yes - Sponsors should assume that 15% of their construction cost estimate will be the amount needed for inspection services. Sponsors are able to use SGT funds to pay for inspection costs, and should fill out their application accordingly. (10) Can SGT funds be matched with (use for the pre-construction phase) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes - If CDBG funds are used to pay for the sponsor's pre-construction costs, there is no issue. However, sponsors will want to closely coordinate with their PennDOT District office contact on the process and forms necessary to enable blending SGT funds with CDBG funds for construction contract activities. An exception needs to be sought when jointly funding construction with SGT and CDBG funds due to different bidding guidelines used for these funding sources. (11) Will local letting be allowed for SGT projects? No - All projects of all types will be advertised and let through PennDOT s ECMS (Engineering and Construction Management System). This will require the project sponsors for all project types to become registered as business partners in ECMS to administer payments, and for the sponsor's engineer to prepare the materials for the ECMS letting. (12) If the sponsor has a completed environmental clearance for another agency, will that expedite the clearance required for the SGT Program? Maybe - It may help the review move forward, but the clearances completed under FHWA procedures by PennDOT may consider separate or additional factors that take considerable time to complete. Adopted by the Lancaster County Transportation Coordinating Committee June 27, 2011 Amended September 24, 2012 Updated: May 1, 2013 Updated: February 2015 Updated: March

Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance

Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program Guidance Two Chatham Center 112 Washington Place Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-3451 Voice: 412.391.5590 Fax: 412.391.9160 www.spcregion.org February,

More information

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Regional Transportation Commission TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Contents 1.0 Purpose and Eligibility... 2 2.0 Process... 5 3.0 Implementation of Funded Projects... 5 Attachment

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) partners with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

More information

Chester County Vision Partnership Grant Program January 2017

Chester County Vision Partnership Grant Program January 2017 Chester County Vision Partnership Grant Program January 2017 Municipal Planning Grant Manual Bringing i growth and preservation together for Chester County Vision Partnership Program Grant Manual 1.0 Program

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/ 1 Transportation Alternatives Program Authorized

More information

APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE

More information

LAND PARTNERSHIPS GRANT PROGRAM. PROGRAM GUIDELINES April 2018

LAND PARTNERSHIPS GRANT PROGRAM. PROGRAM GUIDELINES April 2018 LAND PARTNERSHIPS GRANT PROGRAM PROGRAM GUIDELINES April 2018 Cumberland County Planning Department 310 Allen Road, Suite 101 Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 240-5362 www.ccpa.net/landpartnerships TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018 Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018 Introduction The Region 1 Planning Council, in its capacity as the Metropolitan Planning

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area FFY 2015-2016 Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area A Grant Program of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) U.S. Department of Transportation

More information

South Dakota Transportation Alternatives

South Dakota Transportation Alternatives South Dakota Transportation Alternatives Program Summary and Application Guide Updated March 2018 Connecting South Dakota and the Nation 1 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Summary 1. Overview Transportation

More information

PROGRAM GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES: TRANSPORATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM

PROGRAM GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES: TRANSPORATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM PROGRAM GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES: TRANSPORATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM SEPTEMBER, 2015 Background: This document will serve as the program guidance for the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission s Transportation

More information

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for 2018-19 Introduction The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program

More information

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY MOVE LV Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY Services PLANNING DATA + ANALYSIS EDUCATION PROJECTS + LAWS FUNDING Federal Government State Government Regional

More information

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items... FY 2018 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM INSTRUCTIONS, GUIDELINES AND APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) 1. Instructions for Submitting a Transportation Alternatives Program Application.. 1 2. Transportation

More information

Megan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer. Federal Highway Administration Washington Division. March 14, 2017

Megan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer. Federal Highway Administration Washington Division. March 14, 2017 Megan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer Federal Highway Administration Washington Division March 14, 2017 1 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/

More information

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects SMART SCALE is a statewide program that distributes funding based on a transparent and objective evaluation of projects that will determine how effectively they help the state achieve its transportation

More information

Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES

Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. Instructions for Submitting a Transportation Alternatives Program Application. 1 2. Transportation

More information

Jackson MPO Transportation Alternatives (TA)

Jackson MPO Transportation Alternatives (TA) Jackson MPO Transportation Alternatives (TA) The following information must be completed for all Jackson MPO proposed Transportation Alternatives projects. MPO staff will use the information contained

More information

Port of Long Beach Community Grants Program. Community Infrastructure

Port of Long Beach Community Grants Program. Community Infrastructure Port of Long Beach Community Grants Program Community Infrastructure Guidelines for Implementation of the COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Port of Long Beach Community Grants Program March 2017 CONTENTS

More information

2016 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) General Information

2016 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) General Information Housing & Community Development Services 1690 W. Littleton Blvd. Suite 300 Littleton, CO 80120 (303) 738-8040 2016 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) General Information The Community Development

More information

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

SMALL CITY PROGRAM.  ocuments/forms/allitems. SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently

More information

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM APPROVED PER RESOLUTION 08-304 ON DECEMBER 10, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Summary... 1 Procedures... 2 Project Eligibility... 2 Project Funding &

More information

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) 10 Joint Development This chapter describes potential long-term direct and indirect and short-term (construction) direct and indirect effects that would result from the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT)

More information

Planning Sustainable Places Program

Planning Sustainable Places Program Planning Sustainable Places Program ADVANCING A SUSTAINABLE REGION PLACE BY PLACE Pre-application Workshop May 17, 2016 Planning Sustainable Places Background Program to build on previous regional planning

More information

VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Issuing Department: Community Development Department Village of Fox Crossing 2000 Municipal Dr. Project Officer: George L. Dearborn Jr.,

More information

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County The transportation system serves Cambria County communities because people make decisions and take action toward the stated goals of the long-range transportation plan. Locally, these people include officials

More information

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process 2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process Available Funding: (In Millions) CMAQ STP Preservation TOTAL 2021 2022 2021 2022 2021 2022 Regional $14.27 (project cap)$7.13 Countywide $2.41 (project cap)$1.2

More information

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Title VI: Public Participation Plan Whatcom Council of Governments Public Participation Plan Adopted October 14, 2009 Updated November 12, 2014 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 East Champion Street Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 676 6974 Whatcom

More information

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NO. 6.C.3 Mission Statement We Care for Our Residents by Working Together to Build a Better Community for Today and Tomorrow. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November

More information

EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 9

EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 9 Page 2 of 9 Page 3 of 9 EXHIBIT 2 Page 4 of 9 Page 5 of 9 PROJECT NARRATIVE The purpose for applying for these funds is to advance the City's revitalization efforts in Historic Miramar.

More information

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements Date: July 13, 2012 Subject: MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements The recently enacted Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) includes a number of substantial changes

More information

OahuMPO Transportation Alternatives Program

OahuMPO Transportation Alternatives Program OahuMPO Transportation Alternatives Program Guide for Sponsors and Applicants Approved by the OahuMPO Policy Committee May 19, 2015 This guide focuses upon the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

More information

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of August 2, 2017.

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of August 2, 2017. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2017, 9:00 AM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NORTH CHAMBER 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Order of Business

More information

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop October 4 th, 2016 1 What are TA Projects? Federally funded community based projects o Expand travel choices o Integrate modes o Improve cultural,

More information

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guide

Transportation Alternatives Program Guide VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Alternatives Program Guide August 2016 Trail to Monticello Charlottesville, VA Contents Program Background.. 1 Program Structure Funding... 2 Eligible

More information

Memo. Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN Date: April 24, METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES

Memo. Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN Date: April 24, METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 Memo Date: April 24, 2017 To: METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES From: Phillip Bergem Metro State Aid RE: MnDOT Fiscal

More information

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Sub-allocated Funding Process and Application Package This packet includes information and guidance about the process used by KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission to

More information

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation Enhancements Implementation Manual

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation Enhancements Implementation Manual PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Enhancements Implementation Manual Updated October 2008 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction... 2 Chapter 2: Legal (Reimbursement) Agreement...

More information

Façade Improvement Program

Façade Improvement Program Policy Guidelines for the Façade Improvement Program Neighborhood Economic Development Entrepreneurs Discovering Opportunities Through Neighborhood Revitalization Community Development Department 2008

More information

2017 Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

2017 Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program 2017 Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program Introduction: The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) was authorized by the Federal transportation funding Act - the Moving Ahead for Progress

More information

COALINGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION

COALINGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION COALINGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION The Parking Lot Improvement Program (PIP) is designed to stimulate building improvements and upgrade the appearance

More information

Culpeper, VA. Virginia Department of Transportation

Culpeper, VA. Virginia Department of Transportation Culpeper, VA Virginia Department of Transportation October 2011 FORWARD Greetings from VDOT s Enhancement Program staff! The purpose of this manual is to guide local Sponsors through the project development

More information

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION Support Division Planning & Community Zoning Administration Review & Compliance Land Use & Design Rezoning & Permitting Plan Review Community LDO Management Zoning &

More information

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources Appendix I. Funding Sources FUNDING SOURCES planning and related efforts can be funded through a variety of local, state, and federal sources. However, these revenues have many guidelines in terms of how

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guide

Transportation Alternatives Program Guide VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Alternatives Program Guide August 2017 Interim Update Bicycle Parking Arlington, VA Contents Program Background.. 1 Program Structure Funding... 3 Eligible

More information

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: May 17, 2016 To: The Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395 Attention: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee From: Seleta

More information

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) CHAPTER ONE 1-1.0 CHAPTER ONE OVERVIEW It is critically important that all communications include the Local Public Agency s designated Employee in Responsible Charge (ERC). It is also critical that the

More information

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT I. PURPOSE The purpose of this Element is to identify and resolve incompatible goals, objectives, policies and development proposed by other governmental entities,

More information

APA/PAW 2013 Joint Awards Program Submittal

APA/PAW 2013 Joint Awards Program Submittal May 30, 2013 APA/PAW Awards Committee Washington APA Office 603 Stewart Street, Suite 610 Seattle, WA 98101 Dear APA/PAW Awards Committee: RE: APA/PAW 2013 Joint Awards Program Submittal Enclosed is a

More information

VIRGINIA SAFE ROUTES to SCHOOL. Non-Infrastructure Grant GUIDELINES

VIRGINIA SAFE ROUTES to SCHOOL. Non-Infrastructure Grant GUIDELINES VIRGINIA SAFE ROUTES to SCHOOL Non-Infrastructure Grant GUIDELINES 2018-2019 December 2017 Virginia Safe Routes to School Non- Infrastructure Grant Program Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...

More information

Status Report on LVRT Activities

Status Report on LVRT Activities Status Report on LVRT Activities PennDOT/DCNR/Lebanon County/LVRT, Inc. Initiative Inwood Iron Bridge: Current Phase: Planning to relocate and to rehabilitate the historic Inwood Iron Bridge over the Swatara

More information

Managing Access along Pennsylvania s Highways in the Delaware Valley

Managing Access along Pennsylvania s Highways in the Delaware Valley Managing Access along Pennsylvania s Highways in the Delaware Valley Lower Providence Township Planning Commission 28 March 2012 Michael Becker, Senior Transportation Planner Amy Bernknopf, Transportation

More information

ATTACHMENT A PDA PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM Information and Evaluation Criteria

ATTACHMENT A PDA PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM Information and Evaluation Criteria PDA PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) has created a planning grant program for Santa Clara County jurisdictions that will provide significant support for Priority

More information

LPA Programs How They Work

LPA Programs How They Work LPA Programs How They Work Ann Wills, P.E. Transportation Engineering Conference 2018 www.dotd.la.gov Requirements For ALL LPA Projects 1. Risk Assessment 2. Entity-State Agreement 3. Responsible Charge

More information

Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014

Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014 1 Guidance for Locally Administered Projects Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange August 27, 2013 Revised September 15, 2014 This document establishes guidelines for administering the program

More information

NEIGHBORHOOD BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

NEIGHBORHOOD BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SALT LAKE CITY NEIGHBORHOOD BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Now Targeting the Poplar Grove and Central Ninth Neighborhoods Program Guidelines SALT LAKE CITY Housing and Neighborhood Development (HAND) A Division

More information

San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form

San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form FY 2004/05 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Illinois Street Inter-modal Bridge over Islais Creek

More information

2014 Application Packet

2014 Application Packet City of Boise 2014 Application Packet Neighborhood Reinvestment Grant Program Neighborhood Reinvestment Grant Program 2014 Application Packet What is the Neighborhood Reinvestment Grant Program? The Neighborhood

More information

Appendix 4. Potential Greenway Funding Sources. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Appendix 4. Potential Greenway Funding Sources. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan Appendix 4 Potential Greenway Funding Sources The following provides information on the various funding sources that may be utilized to implement individual greenway projects. These funding sources are

More information

Objective 1. Research current housing issues in Avon to gain a deeper understanding of the housing market Type: Program Priority: 1 Cost: Medium

Objective 1. Research current housing issues in Avon to gain a deeper understanding of the housing market Type: Program Priority: 1 Cost: Medium Overall Comprehensive Plan Goals: Encourage growth in more suitable areas within town boundaries. These areas include sites close to existing residential, commercial, or industrial areas that are already

More information

The Division expects to let the following FTA/ USDOT-assisted projects in FFYs :

The Division expects to let the following FTA/ USDOT-assisted projects in FFYs : Suffolk County Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Overall Goal and Goal Setting Methodology for Federal Transit Administration Assisted Contracts FFY 2017-2019 Amount of goal The Suffolk County Department

More information

Community & Economic Development Functions

Community & Economic Development Functions Community & Economic Development Functions Total County Budget Perspective * Community & Economic Development.5% All Other 99.5% * Graph does not reflect operating transfers out since these expenditures

More information

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013 KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013 January 16, 2014 PROJECT TYPE: Multimodal (bicycle, pedestrian, roadway, transit) LOCATION: Kansas

More information

NCR Streetscape Revitalization Grant Program FAQ. 1. Q. What is the NCR Streetscape Revitalization Grant Program?

NCR Streetscape Revitalization Grant Program FAQ. 1. Q. What is the NCR Streetscape Revitalization Grant Program? NCR Streetscape Revitalization Grant Program FAQ 1. Q. What is the NCR Streetscape Revitalization Grant Program? A. The NCR Streetscape Revitalization Grant Program offers grants to municipalities to assist

More information

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Summary of Study Outreach Efforts... 3 Figure No. Description Page

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Summary of Study Outreach Efforts... 3 Figure No. Description Page Oak Ridge Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Program Public Involvement and Agency Coordination Summary T Table of Contents Introduction... 1 1.1 Overview of the Project... 1 1.2 Purpose of this Report...

More information

NOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement:

NOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement: Interlocal Agreement Between the Board of County Commissioners of St. Johns County, Florida, City of St. Augustine, City of St. Augustine Beach, Town of Hastings and the School Board of St. Johns County,

More information

Community Revitalization Fund Tax Credit Program (CRFP) Overview and Request for Proposals (RFP)

Community Revitalization Fund Tax Credit Program (CRFP) Overview and Request for Proposals (RFP) Community Revitalization Fund Tax Credit Program (CRFP) Overview and Request for Proposals (RFP) The Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (PHFA or Agency) announces a Request for Proposals (RFP) to participate

More information

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Public School Facilities Element (PSF) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Public School Facilities Element (PSF) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal (PSF) Goal Work closely with the School District of Nassau County to ensure a high quality, fiscally sound public school system which meet the needs of Nassau County s population by providing and maintaining

More information

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING APPLICATION

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING APPLICATION CAPITAL PROJECT PLAN FY 2019 FY 2021 APPLICATION DEADLINE: FEBRUARY 5, 2018 Jonathan B. Brown, Director 100 Australian Avenue,

More information

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet FY 2019

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet FY 2019 Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet FY 2019 Table of Contents 1. Program Background... 4 a. Introduction... 4 b. Legislative History... 4 c. Performance Management... 5 2.

More information

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year 2008-09 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HISP) 23 USC Section 148 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program (BPSP) Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety

More information

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: May 26, 2016

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: May 26, 2016 COUNCIL AGENDA: 06-07-16 ITEM: A. CI CITY OF C: 3- SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Barry Ng SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: Approved IL2_PS^ Date 5 ^ lip

More information

2016 Legislative Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

2016 Legislative Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program 2016 Legislative Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program Introduction: The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) was authorized by the Federal transportation funding Act - the Moving Ahead

More information

4. IMPLEMENTATION. 4.1 Implementation Matrix

4. IMPLEMENTATION. 4.1 Implementation Matrix 4. IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 Implementation Matrix IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX The Implementation Matrix includes the implementation items, proposed time line, potential participating parties and potential funding

More information

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars January 22, 2015 & February 19, 2015 Program History Guidelines Eligibility Application

More information

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS APPENDIX A Note: Not yet edited by DCPD. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS 6 Transportation Funding Programs The following provides a brief description of transportation related funding programs that are

More information

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures Guidance Historical Studies Review Procedures This guidance document provides instructional material regarding how to review and process project activities in accordance with TxDOT s Section 106 of the

More information

North Second Street Multimodal Project Design OCTOBER 2017

North Second Street Multimodal Project Design OCTOBER 2017 North Second Street Multimodal Project Design OCTOBER 2017 Agenda Project Description Master Agreement Task Orders Comprehensive Multimodal Network Evaluation Grant Writing & Support Services NACTO Early

More information

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

FFY Transportation Improvement Program Lawton Metropolitan Planning Organization DRAFT FFY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program Approved, 2017 The Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated

More information

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Environmental Services Solid Waste 4200 4200 06CON 4200 SWM01 Balance $13,753,504.00 Balance $4,631,754.00 Balance $2,738,918.00 ing Source Total: $21,124,176.00

More information

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Program Announcement, Call for Projects, and NDOT Guidance for Potential Applications for 2019-2020 Funding www.nevadadot.com/tap

More information

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO: All Prospective Providers FROM: Kevin Keller, Planning and Development Director RE: Request for Proposals Town Green and Streetscape Improvements Consulting and Engineering

More information

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO: All Prospective Providers FROM: Kevin Keller, Planning and Development Director RE: Request for Proposals Streetscape Improvements Consulting and Engineering Services for

More information

SPC SMART and TAP Project Updates

SPC SMART and TAP Project Updates SPC SMART and TAP Project Updates Livability Through Smart Transportation (SMART) Program SPC initiated program in 2014 Based on Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative (PCTI) $3.0 allocated in

More information

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B Regional Transportation Plan: 2007-2030 Appendix B APPENDIX B POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources for transportation improvement projects are needed if the recommended projects of the Transportation

More information

State of Florida Department of Transportation. DISTRICT SIX Attachment A Scope of Services 1/19/2018

State of Florida Department of Transportation. DISTRICT SIX Attachment A Scope of Services 1/19/2018 State of Florida Department of Transportation DISTRICT SIX Attachment A Scope of Services 1/19/2018 District Six Signal Retiming Continuing Consultant Services Financial Project Number(s): 435201-4-32-01

More information

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM APRIL 2009 14.228 State Project/Program: Federal Authorization: State Authorization: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

More information

NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ACTIVITIES OF THE NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST

NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ACTIVITIES OF THE NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST BOARD TITLE 137 RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ACTIVITIES OF THE NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST February 2005 1 TITLE 137 RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ACTIVITIES OF THE NEBRASKA

More information

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 12/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 12/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 12/05/2017 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action to approve the proposed FY18-19 Community

More information

Michigan Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Michigan Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Michigan Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Program Overview Matt Wiitala Grant Coordinator, MDOT Office of Economic Development TAP Overview Federal funding program created by MAP-21 Eligibility

More information

City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner

City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner The City of Edina has a rich history of innovative developments that have become

More information

Right-of-Way Improvement Standard Chapter 2 Streets Department Plan Review Standards. Right-of-Way Unit March 2015 Rev. June 2015

Right-of-Way Improvement Standard Chapter 2 Streets Department Plan Review Standards. Right-of-Way Unit March 2015 Rev. June 2015 2.1 General Review Standards Right-of-Way Unit March 2015 Rev. June 2015 The Streets Department review standards were implemented both to enforce the Complete Streets standards (Section 11-900 of the Philadelphia

More information

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act) Memorandum Subject: INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act) Date: May 13, 2016 / Original signed by / From: Gloria M. Shepherd Associate

More information

Non-Federal Cost Share Match Program Grant Implementation Checklist

Non-Federal Cost Share Match Program Grant Implementation Checklist Non-Federal Cost Share Match Program Grant Implementation Checklist Non-Federal Cost Share Match Program Grant Implementation Checklist Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2.0 Grant Implementation Process

More information

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM GRANT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION PACKAGE

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM GRANT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION PACKAGE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM GRANT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION PACKAGE INTRODUCTION The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 included

More information

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m. Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:00 p.m. Please Note the Location: Ferguson Township Municipal Building 1. Call to Order

More information

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers Below are some common questions received in TxDOT s 2017 TA Set-Aside Call for Projects. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Texas Administration

More information

07/01/2010 ACTUAL START

07/01/2010 ACTUAL START PAGE, 1/27/21 6:18:42PM Grant Number: SC2224 Activity: Municipal Facility Energy Conservation Program Quarter: 1/1/29-12/31/29 Metric Activity: Building Retrofits Status: Active % of Work Complete: Activity

More information