NEW AND UPGRADED STREETS

Transcription

1 2014 PROPOSITION K 5 YEAR PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM NEW AND UPGRADED STREETS Approved: July 22, 2014 Prepared by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority In cooperation with California Department of Transportation, Department of Public Works, Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain), Port of San Francisco, and San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

2 2014 PROP K 5 YEAR PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM NEW AND UPGRADED STREETS Table of Contents Eligibility Prioritization Criteria Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther Table 2 Project Delivery Snapshot Table 3 Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table Table 4 Prop K 5Year Project List (FY 2014/15 FY 2018/19) Project Information Forms 2009 Prop K 5Year Prioritization Program Program of Projects (as adopted) 2009 Prop K 5Year Prioritization Program Program of Projects (as amended) Eligibility Eligibility as identified in the voter approved Prop K Expenditure Plan is as follows: Upgrading and extension of streets and other vehicular facilities to bring them up to current standards; addition of Transit Preferential Streets (TPS) treatments to transit corridors and construction of major bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The first $24.2 M is Priority 1; and the remainder is Priority 2. Total Funding: $119.7 M; Prop K: $27.5 M. Bernal Heights Street System Upgrading (Priority 1). This is a grandfathered project. Construction of streets in Bernal Heights where existing streets are unimproved or below city standards to ensure adequate emergency vehicle response times. Includes project development and capital costs. Sponsoring Agency: DPW. Total Funding: $1.415M; Prop K: $1.415M. Great Highway Erosion Repair, including bicycle path development. (Priority 1) Includes project development and capital costs. Sponsoring Agency: DPW. Total Funding: $15.0M; Prop K: $2.03M. Visitacion Valley Watershed: San Francisco share of San Francisco/San Mateo Bi County Study projects such as the extension of Geneva Avenue across US 101 to improve multimodal access, including a possible light rail extension to Candlestick Point, or other transportation improvements as identified or refined through a community planning process. (Priority 1). Includes planning, project development and capital costs. Sponsoring Agencies: DPW, MUNI, SFCTA, PCJPB, Caltrans. Total Funding: $46.3M; Prop K: $15M. A new Illinois Street Bridge including multimodal (vehicle, rail, bicycle, and pedestrian) access across Islais Creek (Priority 1). Includes project development and capital costs. Sponsoring Agency: Port of San Francisco. Total Funding: $15.0M; Prop K: $2.0M. A study to identify ways to reduce the traffic impacts of State Route 1 on Golden Gate Park (Priority 1). Includes planning and project development costs. Sponsoring Agency: DPT, Caltrans. Total Funding: $2M; Prop K: $0.2M. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

3 2014 PROP K 5 YEAR PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM NEW AND UPGRADED STREETS Other upgrades to major arterials such as 19th Avenue, to complement traffic calming on adjacent neighborhood streets, including pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements, intersection reconfiguration, transit preferential improvements and landscaping. Includes planning, project development and capital costs. Sponsoring agencies: DPW, DPT, MUNI, Caltrans, SFCTA. Total Funding: $40M; Prop K: $6.9M. Caltrans stands for California Department of Transportation, DPT stands for Department of Parking and Traffic, DPW stands for Department of Public Works, MUNI stand for San Francisco Municipal Railway, PCJPB stands for Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain), and SFCTA stands for San Francisco County Transportation Authority. DPT and MUNI are now under the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA). The Bernal Heights Streets System Upgrading project and the Illinois Street Bridge (part of the Third Street Light Rail Project Phase 1) are both completed projects and have already received all their designated Prop K funds. No funds are currently proposed for advancing the State Route 1 project as it is not a high priority at this time. Thus, the project is not discussed further in the 5YPP. Prioritization Criteria One of the key required elements of the 5YPPs is a transparent process for how projects get selected. Prop K requires at a minimum that each category include prioritization criteria that address project readiness, community support, and relative level of need or urgency. For this 5YPP update, the Citizens Advisory Committee requested that the Transportation Authority and project sponsors develop a userfriendly, transparent scoring table that could apply to all 5YPPs, and that the scoring prioritize safety and community input highly. Table 2 shows the new Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table. Each project can receive a maximum of 20 points, with 10 points allocated for programwide criteria and 10 points allocated for category specific criteria. The Expenditure Plan also requires consideration of geographic equity in terms of project distribution that takes into account the various needs of San Francisco s neighborhoods. Five of the six Expenditure Plan line items in the New and Upgraded Streets category are designated for specific projects (e.g. Great Highway Erosion Repair) or improvements in a defined geographic area (e.g. Visitacion Valley Watershed). The geographic equity criterion only applies to the line item for Other Upgrades to Major Arterials. To date, the Transportation Authority has allocated $673,356 from this line item to 19 th Avenue Corridor Safety Improvements. This arterial is named in the Expenditure Plan, had strong community support and significant safety issues, particularly for pedestrians. The remaining funds in this line item are proposed to be identified through the Transportation Authority s new Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP). The NTIP is designed to support geographic equity by providing $100,000 in Prop K planning funds to each supervisorial district in the next 5years to support communitybased transportation planning, particularly in Communities of Concern (CoCs), as well as a total of $600,000 in local matching funds for two neighborhoodscale capital projects. Local match funds for NTIP capital projects will be included in multiple Prop K categories such as Pedestrian Circulation and Safety, Bicycle Circulation and Safety, New Signals and Signs, and Other Upgrades to Major Arterials. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

4 2014 PROP K 5 YEAR PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM NEW AND UPGRADED STREETS Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther Leveraging Prop K funds against nonprop K fund sources (e.g., federal, state, other local funds) is necessary to fully fund the Expenditure Plan projects and programs. For the New and Upgraded Streets category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that every $1 of sales tax revenue spent would leverage about $4 in nonprop K funds. The table below compares Prop K Expenditure Plan assumptions with proposed leveraging in the year project lists. Table 1. Prop K Leveraging 1 Category Expected Leveraging (NonProp K Funds) Proposed Leveraging (NonProp K Funds) Great Highway Erosion Repair 86% TBD Visitacion Valley Watershed 68% 79% Other Upgrades to Major Arterials 83% TBD 1 This table compares the expected leveraging assumed in the Expenditure Plan with the proposed leveraging assumed in the 5Year Project List. With respect to the Great Highway Erosion Repair project, DPW is currently working with Caltrans to identify a preferred option, at which time DPW will be able to fully develop the scope, schedule, budget, and funding plan (with leveraging), for the Great Highway Restoration project. The proposed leveraging for the Visitacion Valley Watershed funds reflects a combination of defined projects and placeholders for future project development. Leveraging assumptions are consistent with the intent of the BiCounty Transportation Study. Leveraging for the Other Upgrades to Major Arterials category will be known once NTIP projects are identified and prioritized for these funds. The 5YPP includes a placeholder for NTIP projects. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

5 Table 2. Project Delivery Snapshot New and Upgraded Streets Table 2a. Prop K Funds Allocated Programmed 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) Period (Available for Allocation) Total Allocated as of 3/31/2014 % Allocated 2005 SP: (FY 2004/052008/09) $3,768,869 $2,450,960 65% YPP: (FY 2009/ /14) * $6,631,598 $2,027,463 31% Total * $4,478,423 * Funds programmed in the YPP may include programmed but unallocated funds from the YPP, as well as deobligated funds. Table 2b. Percent Complete Tables show allocations and percent complete through March 31, 2014, based on project sponsors' progress reports. Completed Projects/Project Phases (sorted by allocation year, then sponsor, then project name) Sponsor Fiscal Year of Allocation Project Name Phase(s) Funded Total Allocated as of 3/31/2014 % Complete as of 3/31/2014 SF Port 2004/05 Construct Illinois Street InterModal Bridge over Islais Creek Design $ 2,000, % DPW 2005/06 Leland Bayshore Streetscape Planning $ 50, % SFCTA 2005/06 19th Avenue Transportation Plan Planning $ 73, % SFCTA 2006/07 San Francisco/San Mateo Bicounty Study Update Planning $ 100, % SFCTA 2008/09 BiCounty Area Planning and Design Study Planning $ 45, % SFMTA 2008/09 19th Avenue Edge Line Striping Design, Construction $ 159, % SFMTA 2008/09 Mission & Geneva Pedestrian Improvements Environmental, Design $ 23, % DPW 2009/10 Great Highway Emergency Stabilization Construction $ 1,330, % DPW 2011/12 19th Avenue Median Improvements Design $ 100, % DPW 2011/12 19th Avenue Median Improvements Construction $ 292, % Projects/Project Phases Underway (sorted by allocation year, then sponsor, then project name) Fiscal Year of Total Allocated % Complete Sponsor Allocation Project Name Phase(s) Funded as of 3/31/2014 as of 3/31/2014 SFCTA 2010/11 US101 Candlestick Interchange ReConfiguration Project Study Report Planning $ 55,000 90% SFCTA 2012/13 GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study Planning $ 200,000 6% DPW 2013/14 Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Planning $ 49,596 5% For more information on Prop K and other Transportation Authority funded projects, visit to access an interactive map showing projects in your neighborhood and citywide. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2013 Update\3 5YPPs\Project Delivery\Chapter 3 Project Delivery; EPs 2630 Page 1 of 1

6 Table 3. Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table New and Upgraded Streets (EPs 2630) PROP K PROGRAMWIDE CRITERIA CATEGORY SPECIFIC CRITERIA Project Readiness Community Support Time Sensitive Urgency Safety Leveraging Provides Benefits to Multiple Users Total Possible Score Great Highway Erosion Repair Great Highway Restoration Consistent with Project Community Time Sensitive BiCounty Safety Leveraging Readiness Support Urgency Transportation Total Plan Total Possible Score Visitacion Valley Watershed Bayshore Multimodal Facility Location Study GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit Bayshore Caltrain Pedestrian Connections Project BiCounty Interim Solutions Placeholder BiCounty Project Development This is a placeholder. Project sponsor to score when a specific scope is identified. Placeholder Project Readiness Community Support Time Sensitive Urgency Safety Leveraging Provides Benefits to Multiple Users Total Possible Score Other Upgrades to Major Arterials Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program Placeholder This is a placeholder. Project sponsor to score when a specific scope is identified. Total Total P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2013 Update\3 5YPPs\EP 2630\3 Prioritization\EP26 30 Page 1 of 2

7 Table 3. Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table New and Upgraded Streets (EPs 2630) Prioritization Criteria Definitions: Project Readiness: Project likely to need funding in fiscal year proposed. Factors to be considered include adequacy of scope, schedule, budget and funding plan relative to current project status (e.g. expect more detail and certainty for a project about to enter construction than design); whether prior project phases are completed or expected to be completed before beginning the next phase; and whether litigation, community opposition or other factors may significantly delay project. Community Support: Project has clear and diverse community support and/or was it identified through a communitybased planning process. An example of a communitybased plan is a neighborhood transportation plan, but not a countywide plan or agency capital improvement program. Three points for a project in an adopted community based plan with evidence of diverse community support. Two points for a project with evidence of support from both neighborhood stakeholders and groups and citywide groups. One point for a project with evidence of support from either neighborhood stakeholders and groups or citywide groups. Time Sensitive Urgency: Project needs to proceed in proposed timeframe to enable construction coordination with another project (e.g., minimize costs and construction impacts); to support another funded or proposed project (e.g. new signal controllers need to be installed to support TEP implementation); or to meet timely use of funds deadlines associated with matching funds. Great Highway Erosion Repair Category: Safety: (One point for each): Addresses documented safety issue; reduces potential conflicts between modes; benefits users of multiple modes; and increases security. Leveraging: Project leverages nonprop K funds. Provides Benefits to Multiple Users: Project provides multimodal benefits (e.g., safety improvements for people on bikes) in addition to improvements in motorist safety. Projects receives one point each for addressing the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, and/or transit users. Visitacion Valley Watershed Category: Safety: (One point for each): Addresses documented safety issue; reduces potential conflicts between modes; benefits users of multiple modes; and increases security. Leveraging: Project leverages nonprop K funds. Consistent with BiCounty Transportation Plan: Consistent with plan, including costsharing framework. Other Upgrades to Major Arterials Category: Safety: (One point for each): Addresses documented safety issue; reduces potential conflicts between modes; benefits users of multiple modes; and increases security. Leveraging: Project leverages nonprop K funds. Provides Benefits to Multiple Users: Project provides multimodal benefits (e.g., PCS, safety improvements to people on bikes) in addition to improvements in motorist safety. Projects receives one point each for addressing the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, and/or transit users. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2013 Update\3 5YPPs\EP 2630\3 Prioritization\EP26 30 Page 2 of 2

8 Agency Project Name Phase Status 2014/ / / / /19 Great Highway Erosion Repair (EP 26) DPW Great Highway Restoration PA&ED Planned $30,000 $30,000 DPW Great Highway Restoration PS&E Planned $370,000 $370,000 DPW Great Highway Restoration CON Planned $1,300,000 $1,300,000 Total Programmed in 5YPP Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity Visitacion Valley Watershed (EP 27) SFMTA/S FCTA SFMTA/S FCTA SFMTA SFMTA Any eligible Any eligible Bayshore Multimodal Facility Location Study $400,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 $700,000 ($600,000) ($600,000) ($600,000) ($600,000) ($600,000) PLAN/CER Planned $28,830 $28,830 GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit PLAN/CER Planned $200,000 $200,000 GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit Bayshore Caltrain Pedestrian Connections BiCounty Interim Solutions Placeholder BiCounty Project Development Placeholder Table 4. Prop K 5Year Project List (FY 2014/ /19) PLAN/ PA&ED New and Upgraded Streets (EPs 2630) Programming Fiscal Year Planned $1,500,000 $1,500,000 CON Planned $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Any Planned $500,000 $500,000 Any Planned $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Total Total Programmed in 5YPP Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity $228,830 $3,500,000 $500,000 $0 $1,000,000 $5,228,830 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $771,170 ($1,728,830) ($1,228,830) ($228,830) ($228,830) ($228,830) P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2013 Update\3 5YPPs\EP 2630\1 Project List\EP Year Project List xlsx Tab: YPP_2630 Page 1 of 4

9 Table 4. Prop K 5Year Project List (FY 2014/ /19) New and Upgraded Streets (EPs 2630) Programming Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status 2014/ / / / /19 Golden Gate Park/SR1 Traffic Study (EP 29) No Proposed Programming Total Total Programmed in 5YPP Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity Other Upgrades to Major Arterials (EP 30) Any eligible SFMTA, Any eligible SFMTA, Any eligible 19th Avenue Complete Streets PLAN/CER Planned $500,000 Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PS&E, CON Planned $1,000,000 $1,000,000 PS&E, CON Planned $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Total Programmed in 5YPP Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity $500,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $250,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,250,000 ($500,000) ($1,250,000) ($250,000) ($1,250,000) ($1,250,000) ($1,250,000) P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2013 Update\3 5YPPs\EP 2630\1 Project List\EP Year Project List xlsx Tab: YPP_2630 Page 2 of 4

10 Table 4. Prop K 5Year Project List (FY 2014/ /19) New and Upgraded Streets (EPs 2630) Cash Flow Fiscal Year Project Name Phase Total 2014/ / / / /19 Great Highway Erosion Repair (EP 26) Great Highway Restoration PA&ED $30,000 $30,000 Great Highway Restoration PS&E $185,000 $185,000 $370,000 Great Highway Restoration CON $650,000 $650,000 $1,300,000 Cash Flow Programmed in 5YPP Cash Flow Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Cumulative Remaining Cash Flow Capacity Visitacion Valley Watershed (EP 27) $215,000 $835,000 $650,000 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 $885,000 $50,000 ($600,000) ($600,000) ($600,000) ($600,000) Bayshore Multimodal Facility Location Study PLAN/CER $28,830 $28,830 GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit PLAN/CER $200,000 $200,000 GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit PLAN/ PA&ED $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 Bayshore Caltrain Pedestrian Connections CON $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 BiCounty Interim Solutions Placeholder Any $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 BiCounty Project Development Placeholder Any $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Cash Flow Programmed in 5YPP Cash Flow Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Cumulative Remaining Cash Flow Capacity $0 $1,750,000 $2,000,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $250,000 ($750,000) $0 $0 $3,936,213 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2013 Update\3 5YPPs\EP 2630\1 Project List\EP Year Project List xlsx Tab: YPP_2630 Page 3 of 4

11 Table 4. Prop K 5Year Project List (FY 2014/ /19) New and Upgraded Streets (EPs 2630) Cash Flow Project Name Golden Gate Park/SR1 Traffic Study (EP 29) Fiscal Year Phase 2014/ / / / /19 No Proposed Programming Total Cash Flow Programmed in 5YPP Cash Flow Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Cumulative Remaining Cash Flow Capacity Other Upgrades to Major Arterials (EP 30) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 19th Avenue Complete Streets PLAN/CER $250,000 $250,000 Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) PS&E, CON $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 PS&E, CON $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 Cash Flow Programmed in 5YPP Cash Flow Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Cumulative Remaining Cash Flow Capacity $250,000 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $1,250,000 $0 $250,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,250,000 ($250,000) $0 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 $0 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2013 Update\3 5YPPs\EP 2630\1 Project List\EP Year Project List xlsx Tab: YPP_2630 Page 4 of 4

12 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Category: Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EP Line (Primary): Fiscal Year of Allocation: Project Name: Project Location: Project Supervisorial District(s): Project Description: Prop K Expenditure Plan Information C. Street & Traffic Safety i. Major Capital Projects (Streets) b.2 Great Highway Erosion Repair /15 Project Information Great Highway Restoration Great Highway from Sloat to Skyline, Sloat from Great Highway to Skyline, and Skyline from Sloat to Great Highway 4, 7 This project would result in one of two options: Option 1 would reconstruct the Great Highway to reconfigure the existing north bound lanes into a northbound and southbound configuration (shown in red on attached map). Option 2 would divert southbound Great Highway traffic at Sloat to Skyline Blvd (appears in orange on map). Intersection improvements included in both options include curb ramps, pedestrian countdown signals, and contential crosswalks at the Great Highway and Sloat Blvd and at the Great Highway and Skyline Blvd. Option 2 would also construct intersection improvements at Sloat and Skyline. There are no plans to alter the northbound traffic flow, the Zoo entrance on the Great Highway, nor the traffic flow into the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant. DPW is currently working with Caltrans to identify the preferred option. After Caltrans indicates which option it prefers, DPW will then submit a revised Damage Assessment Form to Caltrans, which would enable Caltrans to authorize funds for the permanent restoration project. Caltrans input on design options as included in the forms to be submitted is the key first step to enabling DPW to fully develop the scope, budget, and timeline for a permanent restoration project for the Great Highway south of Sloat Boulevard. Purpose and Need: Community Engagement/Support: Implementing Agency: Project Manager: Phone Number: Type: Status: Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated): In the winter of 2009/2010, a section of the Great Highway was subjected to intense slipout of the supporting bluffs south of Sloat Boulevard. In the area with the most severe bluff slipout, the Great Highway southbound lane was undermined and the pavement collapsed. The Lake Merced Wastewater Tunnel, which is located underneath the southbound lanes of the Great Highway, was left vulnerable. This project will result in the restoration of the Great Highway. While this work is not explicitly in the SPUR Ocean Beach Master Plan, both options are compatible with that vision and recommendations included in the plan. DPW anticipates future community engagement after Caltrans identifes the preferred option. Department of Public Works Frank Filice frank.filice@sfdpw.org Environmental Clearance Final document TBD Underway DPW filed the Preliminary Environmental Studies report and Field Review forms with Caltrans and began the funding request under FHWA Federal Emergency Relief Program in April Project Delivery Milestones Status Work Start Date End Date Phase % Complete Inhouse Contracted Quarter Year Quarter Year Both Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) 100% Inhouse 2 FY 13/14 4 FY 13/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 10% Inhouse 4 FY 13/14 4 FY 14/15 Design Engineering (PS&E) 0% Inhouse 3 FY 14/15 2 FY 15/16 R/W Activities/Acquisition Advertise Construction 0% Inhouse 2 FY 15/16 2 FY 15/16 Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% Contract 3 FY 15/16 End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) 0% Contract 2 FY 16/17 Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Closeout Page 1 of 3

13 Project Name: San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Great Highway Restoration Project Cost Estimate Funding Source Phase Cost Prop K Other Planning/Conceptual Engineering $ 49,596 $ 49,596 $ Environmental Studies (PA&ED) $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ Design Engineering (PS&E) $ 370,000 $ 370,000 $ R/W $ $ $ Construction $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $ $ $ Total Project Cost $ 1,749,596 $ 1,749,596 $ Percent of Total 100% 0% Project Expenditures (Cash Flow) By Fiscal Year Enter Cash Flow Here Phase Fund Source Fund Source Status Fiscal Year Funds Available Previous Funds 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 Total Planning/Conceptual Engineering Prop K Allocated 13/14 $ 49,596 $ 49,596 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Prop K Planned 14/15 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Design Engineering (PS&E) Prop K Planned 14/15 $ 185,000 $ 185,000 $ 370,000 Design Engineering (PS&E) Caltrans Planned 14/15 TBD $ Construction Prop K Planned 15/16 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 1,300,000 Construction Caltrans Planned 15/16 TBD $ $ $ $ Total By Fiscal Year $ 185,000 $ 835,000 $ 650,000 $ $ $ 1,749,596 Comments/Concerns Final costs for design and construction phases will be known after the initial planning and environmental review phases are completed in coordination with Caltrans. DPW will provide appropriate leveraging, based on the final project scope and cost, at the time of allocation request. Page 2 of 3

14 Great Highway Restoration

15 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Category: Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EP Line (Primary): Other EP Line Number/s: Fiscal Year of Allocation: Project Name: Project Location: Project Supervisorial District(s): Prop K Expenditure Plan Information C. Street & Traffic Safety i. Major Capital Projects (Streets) b.3 Visitacion Valley Watershed Area projects (San Francisco share) /15 Project Information Bayshore Multimodal Facility Location Study Potential station sites are located in an area bounded by Tunnel, Blanken, and Bayshore. Range of potential new station could be south, farther into Brisbane, or north, farther into San Francisco and closer to Blanken Avenue. 10 Project Description: The product of this feasibility study will be analyses and a conceptual station design useful for: making prudent decisions regarding the future location of the Bayshore Caltrain station that considers a comprehensive list of related items; determining appropriate next steps for implementing an intermodal Bayshore Caltrain station; and, serving as a basis for seeking support and funding from potential partners. The proposed feasibility study follows on the Bayshore Intermodal Station Access Study and the BiCounty Transportation Study, both of which considered the possible relocation of the station to the south in Brisbane. The study will include an analysis of potential opportunities and challenges with any site under consideration, including: transit ridership potential; access from proximate San Francisco neighborhoods;existing and planned multimodal access infrastructure and adjacent transitoriented land uses; and compatibility with adjacent planned land uses. The study will be led by the Planning Department in coordination with the Mayor's Office, SFCTA, and SFMTA. The requested funds will help provide match to a PDA planning grant and will cover SFCTA and SFMTA staff costs to participate in and support the study. Purpose and Need: Community Engagement/Support: Implementing Agency: Project Manager: Phone Number: Type: Status: Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated): This feasibility study is meant to explore the importance of the location of the Bayshore Caltrain station in light of future growth assumptions and transportation and land use objectives in the surrounding area. A central element of this study is to consider the feasibility and impacts and/or benefits of relocating the Bayshore Caltrain station either to the north or to the south. The purpose of relocating and redesigning the station is to transform it into an intermodal hub connecting Bus Rapid Transit, light rail, local bus service, and pedestrian/bicycle access which will help to achieve a range of policy goals for the southeast neighborhoods of San Francisco, the city atlarge, and region. The location of the station is critical to the success of any potential transit hub. Working with the identified Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the project and others identified by the project sponsor/client, the consultant shall compile additional background and insight on the study topics. Additionally, a limited community outreach effort will be undertaken as part of this scope of work. This will include presentations and feedback from existing stakeholder groups and agency committees, such as: the Geneva/Harney BRT Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), the Caltrain CAC, the Bayview Hunters Point CAC, the Visitacion Valley Planning Alliance, the SFMTA and SFCTA s CACs, the City of Brisbane, the City of Daly City, and the Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure. It will also include a web page hosted by the SF Planning Department. San Francisco County Transportation Authority/San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency David Uniman/Peter Albert / david.uniman@sfcta.org/peter.albert@sfmta.com Environmental Clearance Page 1 of 2

16 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Project Name: Bayshore Multimodal Facility Location Study Project Delivery Milestones Status Work Start Date End Date Phase % Complete Inhouse Contracted Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Both Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) / /15 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Advertise Construction Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Closeout Comments/Concerns Page 2 of 2

17 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Category: Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EP Line (Primary): Other EP Line Number/s: Fiscal Year of Allocation: Project Name: Project Location: Project Supervisorial District(s): Project Description: Purpose and Need: Community Engagement/Support: Implementing Agency: Project Manager: Phone Number: Type: Status: Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated): Prop K Expenditure Plan Information C. Street & Traffic Safety i. Major Capital Projects (Streets) b.3 Visitacion Valley Watershed Area projects (San Francisco share) /15 10, 11 The GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line is envisioned to provide existing and future neighborhoods along the San MateoSan Francisco County border with a rapid bus connection to the border area s key regional transit system hubs. The corridor extends from Balboa Park BART/Muni Station in the west to Hunters Point Shipyard in the east, including a connection to the Bayshore Caltrain Station. The GenevaHarney BRT Feasibility Study is currently underway; this study will screen modal, alignment / route, and crosssection alternatives, and recommend either a single preferred or limited set of feasible mode/alignment/crosssection alternatives. The Feasibility Study will also estimate the conceptual cost for each and identify a conceptual implementation schedule which would provide rapid service in the timeframe. Proposed funding includes up to $200,000 for SFMTA to fully participate in the feasibility study. A portion of these funds (no more than $50,000) may be used to support additional SFCTA staff time, particularly to engage Daly City stakeholders. Provide existing and future neighborhoods along the San MateoSan Francisco County border with rapid a bus connection to the border area s key regional transit system hubs including the Balboa Park BART/Muni Station, the Hunters Point Shipyard, and the Bayshore Caltrain Station. The Geneva Corridor is identified in SFMTA's Rapid Transit network; Bicycle Network; and as a Walk First corridor. The Feasibility Study, currently underway, is advised by a 13member, GenevaHarney BRT Community Advisory Committee that includes representatives from San Francisco and San Mateo Counties. SFMTA, SFCTA Frank Markowitz, David Uniman , frank.markowitz@sfmta.com, david.uniman@sfcta.org TBD not yet started Project Information GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit Geneva Avenue from Balboa Park BART to Bayshore Boulevard; Bayshore Boulevard to Bayshore Caltrain Station; alignment between Bayshore / Caltrain and Harney Boulevard TBD. GenevaHarney BRT will continue on Harney Boulevard to the Hunters Point Shipyard transit terminal. See map. Environmental Clearance Project Delivery Milestones Status Work Start Date End Date Phase % Complete Inhouse Contracted Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Both Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) 5% Both / /17 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 0% Both Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Advertise Construction Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Closeout Comments/Concerns The feasibility study includes a deliverable that will identify next steps in project development, which will aid in refining the schedule. Page 1 of 3

18 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Project Name: GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit Project Cost Estimate Funding Source Phase Cost Prop K Other Planning/Conceptual Engineering $ 750,000 $ 400,000 $ 350,000 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ Design Engineering (PS&E) $ $ $ R/W $ $ $ Construction $ $ $ Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $ $ $ Total Project Cost $ 2,250,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 350,000 Percent of Total 84% 16% Project Expenditures (Cash Flow) By Fiscal Year Enter Cash Flow Here Phase Fund Source Fund Source Status Fiscal Year Funds Available 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 Total Planning/Conceptual Engineering Prop K Allocated 13/14 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Planning/Conceptual Engineering Caltrans Planning G Allocated 13/14 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Planning/Conceptual Engineering C/CAG Allocated 13/14 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Planning/Conceptual Engineering PCJPB Allocated 13/14 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Planning/Conceptual Engineering Prop K Planned 14/15 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Prop K Planned 15/16 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,500,000 Total By Fiscal Year $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ $ $ 2,250,000 Comments/Concerns The underway Feasibility Study has a $550,000 budget, funded by a Caltrans Planning Grant, previously appropriated Prop K funds. Cost and funding for identified alternatives will be a deliverable from the Feasibility Study, which is currently underway. The $1.5 million in FY 15/16 funds are for further planning conceptual engineering/environmental studies (type TBD). Appropriate leveraging consistent with the Bi County Study costsharing framework to be demonstrated at time of allocation. Page 2 of 3

19 GenevaHarney Bus Rapid Transit

20 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Category: Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EP Line (Primary): Other EP Line Number/s: Fiscal Year of Allocation: Project Name: Project Location: Project Supervisorial District(s): Project Description: Prop K Expenditure Plan Information C. Street & Traffic Safety i. Major Capital Projects (Streets) b.3 Visitacion Valley Watershed Area projects (San Francisco share) /16 Project Information Bayshore Caltrain Pedestrian Connections Pathway through the existing Schlage Lock development site connecting the intersection of Leland and Bayshore with the Bayshore Caltrain Station. See attached map. 10 The project would create a new pedestrian connection to the existing Bayshore Caltrain Station from Bayshore Boulevard through the currently vacant Schlage Lock site. This project need has been identified in the Transportation Authority's BiCounty Study as an interim project to support planned growth and existing neighborhoods in the BiCounty area. While the BiCounty Study recommended an ultimate set of priority projects, given the recent economic and regulatory conditions and their impact on land use development, including the Schlage Lock site, the BiCounty partner agencies developed an interim solution strategy focused on providing benefits to the area before full land development buildout. A pedestrian connection to the existing Caltrain station is one of the identified interim solutions. The permanant infrastructure funded by this project includes: 1) The grading, surfacing, and landscaping of new sidewalks and pedestrian pathways within the Schlage Lock Site, providing multiple routes through the Schlage Lock site to the Bayshore Caltrain Station. These sidewalks and pathways will be accepted by the City upon completion, with the exception of several publicly accessible pathways that will be built above privatelyowned underground parking. 2) Pedestrian safety improvements at new intersections within the Schlage Lock Site, including striping, signalization, signage, and construction of trafficcalming raised crosswalks. 3) Sidewalk resurfacing and landscaping and additional pedestrian safety improvements on the east side of Bayshore Boulevard between Blanken Avenue and Sunnydale Avenue. All of these improvements will comply with the Schlage Lock Open Space and Streetscape Masterplan, in addition to all applicable City standards. In addition to the permanent infrastructure, this project will implement a temporary pathway where needed providing continuous access for community members through the site for the duration of construction, a benefit that would otherwise not occur for up to seven years as the site is built out. The Schlage Lock developer will supplement these improvements with offsite intersection improvements with pedestrian safety benefits, as required in the Schlage Lock Project's FEIR. The costs of these improvements are not included in the BiCounty Interim Pedestrian Connection cost estimate as described in this project information form. Purpose and Need: To provide improved pedestrian connectivity from existing San Francisco neighborhoods, including Visitacion Valley, to the pedestrian overcrossing at the existing Bayshore Caltrain Station. Currently, the only way to access the Caltrain station from the west side of the tracks is a roundabout route going north on Bayshore Boulevard, east on Blanken Avenue, and south again on Tunnel Avenue. The Project would provide more direct Caltrain pedestrian connectivity for westside neighborhoods. The Schlage Lock land development project will implement a street network providing this connection, but while its first phase will provide facilities on part of the currentlyvacant site, the project is not scheduled to complete the full path to the station until at least This project, scheduled to be completed by 2016, would leverage developer funds to implement the missing gap to the station before the development's buildout schedule. Page 1 of 4

21 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Project Name: Bayshore Caltrain Pedestrian Connections Community Engagement/Support: Due to the site s central location in the Visitacion Valley neighborhood and its adjacency to transit stops, the Schlage Lock project improvements have been the focus of community interest and support for many years. The BiCounty Study and Bayshore Station Access Study conducted extensive outreach during the planning process in , including public meetings and presentations to community groups, during which time this connection was identified as a community need. In addition, Bayshore Caltrain Station access through the Schlage Lock site has been identified as a neighborhood priority. Extensive community outreach on the Schlage Lock land development project has shaped the design of the street grid and pedestrian realm that will provide the interim pedestrian connection. Multiple series of communitywide workshops, Community Advisory Committee meetings, and Advisory Body meetings have been facilitated by the Redevelopment Agency, the Planning Department, and the Office of Economic and Workforce Development between 2001 and 2013, resulting in a site plan and design controls, including an Open Space and Streetscape Masterplan, that reflect the community's priorities. There is widespread community support for the development project in general and for pedestrian realm and connectivity improvements that it will provide. Implementing Agency: Project Manager: Phone Number: Type: Status: Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated): SFMTA Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Matt Brill (415) matthew.brill@sfmta.com EIR and EIR Addendum Certified Environmental Clearance CEQA certification April 28, 2009; EIR Addendum (finding no additional mitigations to be required) will seek certification in Spring/Summer Project Delivery Milestones Status Work Start Date End Date Phase % Complete Inhouse Contracted Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Both Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) 90% Both 1 10/ /14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 90% Both 3 06/ /14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 0% Contracted 2 14/ /16 R/W Activities/Acquisition 90% Inhouse 4 07/ /14 Advertise Construction 0% Contracted NA NA NA NA Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% Contracted 3 15/16 NA NA End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) 0% Contracted NA NA 1 19/20 Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) NA NA NA NA NA NA Project Closeout 0% Contracted NA NA 2 19/20 Comments/Concerns A $2,000,000 commitment of Prop K funds from this category will be considered by the Transportation Authority Board in June to accommodate the timeline of the overall approvement of the Development Agreement, which is anticipated in July. Schedule reflects full buildout of complete pathway infrastructure, however interim access through the site will be provided beginning in Page 2 of 4

22 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Project Name: Bayshore Caltrain Pedestrian Connections Project Cost Estimate Funding Source Phase Cost Prop K Other Planning/Conceptual Engineering $ 300,000 $ $ 300,000 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) $ 150,000 $ $ 150,000 Design Engineering (PS&E) $ 500,000 $ $ 500,000 R/W $ 3,050,000 $ $ 3,050,000 Construction $ 9,400,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 7,400,000 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $ $ $ Total Project Cost $ 13,400,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 11,400,000 Percent of Total 15% 85% Project Expenditures (Cash Flow) By Fiscal Year Enter Cash Flow Here Phase Fund Source Fund Source Status Fiscal Year Funds Available 14/15 and Prior 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 Total Planning/Conceptual Engineering Developer Allocated 08/09 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Developer Allocated 08/09 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Design Engineering (PS&E) Developer Allocated 13/14 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 R/W Developer Allocated 13/14 $ 3,050,000 $ 3,050,000 Construction Prop K Planned 15/16 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Construction Developer Allocated 15/16 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 400,000 $ 5,900,000 Construction SFMTA Planned 15/16 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ $ $ $ Total By Fiscal Year $ 4,000,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 400,000 $ 13,400,000 Comments/Concerns Page 3 of 4

23 Bayshore Caltrain Pedestrian Connections

24 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Category: Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EP Line (Primary): Other EP Line Number/s: Fiscal Year of Allocation: Project Name: Project Location: Project Supervisorial District(s): Project Description: Purpose and Need: Community Engagement/Support: Implementing Agency: Project Manager: Phone Number: Type: Status: Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated): Prop K Expenditure Plan Information C. Street & Traffic Safety i. Major Capital Projects (Streets) b.3 Visitacion Valley Watershed Area projects (San Francisco share) /17 Project Information BiCounty Interim Solutions Placeholder San Francisco/San Mateo County border The Transportation Authority's BiCounty Study identified seven priority projects to support planned growth in the BiCounty area: US 101 Candlestick Interchange ReConfiguration, Geneva Avenue Extension, Geneva Harney Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Line, TThird Light Rail Extension (Segment "S"), Bayshore Station Re Configuration, BicyclePedestrain Connection Project, and an AreaWide Traffic Calming Program. While all of these projects remain the ultimate solution for the area, given the current economic and regulatory situation and its impact on the timing of land use development, the Transportation Authority and BiCounty partners developed an interim solution strategy that focused on the projects that support the land use growth associated with the developments are moving forward at a faster pace. The interim solution projects are: Geneva Avenue Extension, GenevaHarney BRT Line, and BicyclePedestrain Connection Project (in addition to the Schlage Caltrain pedestrian connection). The BRT Line has become a standalone project and is not included in this project. Prop K funding is a placeholder for phase TBD for the interim solutions. The purpose of this programming is to support ongoing project development work associated with the three interim solutions projects: Geneva Avenue Extension, GenevaHarney BRT, and BicyclePedestrain Connection Project. The intent is to create a multimodal transportation system to support new development and existing residents in the BiCounty area. The BiCounty Study had a modest level of community engagement. As interim solutions move forward, appropriate community outreach will occur. Any eligible sponsor Environmental Clearance Project Delivery Milestones Status Work Start Date End Date Phase % Complete Inhouse Contracted Both Quarter Year Quarter Year Planning Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Conceptual Engineering (30%) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Advertise Construction Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Closeout Comments/Concerns Prop K funds are a placeholder. When a specific project is identified milestones will be developed. Page 1 of 2

25 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Project Name: BiCounty Interim Solutions Placeholder Project Cost Estimate Funding Source Phase Cost Prop K Other Planning $ $ $ Environmental Studies (PA&ED) $ $ $ Conceptual Engineering (30%) Design Engineering (PS&E) $ $ $ R/W $ $ $ Construction $ 2,700,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,200,000 This is a placeholder. Phase TBD. Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $ $ $ Total Project Cost $ 2,700,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,200,000 Percent of Total 19% 81% Project Expenditures (Cash Flow) By Fiscal Year Enter Cash Flow Here Phase Fund Source Fund Source Status Fiscal Year Funds Available 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 Total Construction Prop K Planned 16/17 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 Construction San Mateo County Planned 16/17 $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ 380,000 Construction Private Contributions Planned 16/17 $ 910,000 $ 910,000 $ 1,820,000 $ $ $ $ $ Total By Fiscal Year $ $ $ 1,350,000 $ 1,350,000 $ $ 2,700,000 Comments/Concerns The San Mateo County and private contributions are placeholders that were generated by using the costparticipation framework formula in the BiCounty Study. The majority of the work in the early years of the program will most likely be planning/conceptual engineering and environmental work, but the program needs the flexibility to use on multiple projects and phases. Prop K funding is a placeholder for phase TBD. Page 2 of 2

26 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Category: Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EP Line (Primary): Other EP Line Number/s: Fiscal Year of Allocation: Project Name: Project Location: Project Supervisorial District(s): Project Description: Purpose and Need: Community Engagement/Support: Implementing Agency: Project Manager: Phone Number: Type: Status: Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated): Prop K Expenditure Plan Information C. Street & Traffic Safety i. Major Capital Projects (Streets) b.3 Visitacion Valley Watershed Area projects (San Francisco share) /19 Project Information BiCounty Project Development Placeholder San Francisco/San Mateo County border 10 The Transportation Authority's BiCounty Study identified seven priority projects to support planned growth in the BiCounty area: US 101 Candlestick Interchange ReConfiguration, Geneva Avenue Extension, Geneva Harney Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Line, TThird Light Rail Extension (Segment "S"), Bayshore Station Re Configuration, BicyclePedestrian Connections Project (in addition to the Schlage Caltrain pedestrian connection), and AreaWide Traffic Calming Program. Of these, the BRT Line has been advanced to feasibility study stage and therefore has been described as a standalone project rather than included in this project. Other projects will also become standalone projects as they are advanced further. Prop K funding is a placeholder for phase TBD for project development. The purpose of this programming is to support ongoing project development work associated with the Bi County priority projects. The intent is to create a multimodal transportation system to support new development and existing residents in the BiCounty area. The BiCounty Study had a modest level of community engagement. As projects move forward, appropriate community outreach will occur. Any eligible sponsor Environmental Clearance Project Delivery Milestones Status Work Phase Planning Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Conceptual Engineering (30%) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Advertise Construction Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Closeout % Complete Inhouse Contracted Both Start Date End Date Quarter Year Quarter Year Comments/Concerns Prop K funds are a placeholder. When a specific project is identified milestones will be developed. Page 1 of 2

27 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form Project Name: BiCounty Project Development Placeholder Project Cost Estimate Funding Source Phase Cost Prop K Other Planning $ $ $ Environmental Studies (PA&ED) $ $ $ Conceptual Engineering (30%) $ $ $ Design Engineering (PS&E) $ $ $ R/W $ $ $ Construction $ 11,110,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 9,110,000 This is a placeholder. Phase TBD. Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $ $ $ Total Project Cost $ 11,110,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 9,110,000 Percent of Total 18% 82% Project Expenditures (Cash Flow) By Fiscal Year Enter Cash Flow Here Phase Fund Source Fund Source Status Fiscal Year Funds Available 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 Total Construction Prop K Planned 18/19 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Construction Prop K Planned 19/20 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Construction San Mateo County Planned 18/19 $ 755,000 $ 755,000 Construction San Mateo County Planned 19/20 $ 755,000 $ 755,000 Construction Private Contributions Planned 18/19 $ 3,800,000 $ 3,800,000 Construction Private Contributions Planned 19/20 $ 3,800,000 $ 3,800,000 $ $ Total By Fiscal Year $ $ $ $ $ 5,555,000 $ 5,555,000 $ 11,110,000 Comments/Concerns The San Mateo County and private contributions are placeholders that were generated by using the costparticipation framework formula in the BiCounty Study. The majority of the work in the early years of the program will most likely be planning/conceptual engineering and environmental work, but the program needs the flexibility to use on multiple projects and phases. Prop K funding is a placeholder for phase TBD. Page 2 of 2