Collaborative coordination of fire support mission execution
|
|
|
- Bertina Pope
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Negative Impacts of Ignoring Stakeholder Quality Attributes Joint Fire Support (FS) Command and Control (C2) Case Study May 2007 Presented to SATURN By John Andrew Landmesser PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 1 Overview of Joint Automated Deep Operations Coordination Problem Space Collaborative coordination of fire support mission execution Interagency Multinational Cross service components Cross intra-service staffs Targeting engagements Surface-to-surface Air-to-surface Maritime-to-surface PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 2 1
2 Historical Background of Current System Evolution for Joint Automated Deep Operations Coordination Operational capability fielded from Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) and used by all DoD service components and coalition CENTCOM EUCOM PACOM USFK Used in all service components and in Army at all echelons Brigade and above for mission coordination Lightweight and agile development and support structure with no rules; ad-hoc (level 1) but effective process areas Support includes field support, 24/7 Help Desk, training, and surge support for exercises and special events Systems Supported by 14 dedicated Field Support Engineers PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 3 Historical Background of Attempted Replacement Solution for Joint Automated Deep Operations Coordination Tasked to replace current capability with same UI but web-enabled tightly coupled with existing C2 programs; why? Not all stakeholders value proposition addressed; focused on functionality for one military service paying the bills Not all deployment environments considered; unsupportable hardware and software license dependencies Different data models employed with no plan for backward compatibility PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 4 2
3 Abbreviated Version History and Parallel Development Current System Version History Replacement Parallel Development Current system evolving in response to Warfighter needs OIF Version ( ) v (Spring 2003) v (Summer 2003) v P2 (Summer 2004) Joint v (Spring 2005) Joint v (Spring 2006) Joint v (Fall 2006) Current source code provided to replacement (Summer 2003) Transition to PM BC And so on Current source code provided to replacement (Fall 2005) Current source code provided to replacement (Summer 2006) Replacement Development initially based on Replacement Design/Development Always playing catch-up to stay in-sync with changes for evolving Operational needs PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 5 SEI Architectural Comparison Replacement System Fielded System PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 6 3
4 SEI Recommendations ITA Task to provide specific actionable recommendations to: achieve transition from current system and net-centric recommend final state based on DoD emerging Command and Control net-centric architecture ITA Assessment (account for joint service needs) Transition and deploy newly developed web services software on modernized current system architecture Use quality attributes as a driver for architecture migration (QAW on contract with SEI planned for June 07) Document architecture, architecture drivers, decisions, and design (Architecture improvement workshops on contract with SEI for FY07) PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 7 Army Migration Plan Key Drivers and Goals Directives Army at War Modularity Joint Goals ABCS Sustainment Battle Command Migration Plan Team produces requirements, architecture, and schedule NetCentricity Lower lifecycle cost Smaller footprint Common User Interface Reduced training and cognitive burden Less manpower needed to run/maintain the System of Systems Technology Insertions PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 8 4
5 Army Battle Command Systems (ABCS) Quality Attributes Workshop (QAW) Initial quality attribute to architectural strategy mapping based on ABCS QAW results: Usability Data Management Performance Reliability/Availability Interoperability Configurability Testability Maintainability Trainability Security Scalability Reusability PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 9 FY06 Architecture Objectives Supporting the War-Fighters, through Capability Enhancements and Additions Continue to inter-operate with external systems, via legacy communication services Maintain current system functionality to support end-users daily work Introduce Modernized Architectural components Open-source JBoss Web Application Server RDBMS for data repository behind open-source Hybernate Upgrade interfaces with existing systems to new web service APIs PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 10 5
6 FY07 Architecture Objectives Integrate BCCS Common Viewer components Common map engine (ESRI CJMTK) Common overlay and symbology services (MOLE) Support 3 rd party developed user interface components Implement OSGi Plug-in framework Implement OGC standards (i.e. Web Feature Services and Web Mapping Services) Migrate Server Capabilities Expand the Domain Information Model Entities Continue to inter-operate with legacy systems Enable deployment in a Virtual Machine Enable remote server administration Utilize Army Data Dissemination Services (DDS) for DDMS compliant interoperability Exchange data with other ABCS and joint systems Initial Inter-nodal replication for low volume/critical missions PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 11 FY08 Architecture Objectives Expose and integrate common services Integrating software from replacement system into modernized current system architecture Migrate select high-use functionality to web services Use open-source Eclipse RCP for Common Viewer integration Introduce thin-client managers deployed as thin and thick-client Modify to interact with new server components for migrated capabilities and data Integrate common User Authentication and Role Based Access Control using Enterprise Security and Policy Services Define users, roles, permissions associated responsibilities Control user access, via centralized unit controlled user permissions (Active Directory within Army units) Permissions to data are granted at field level PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 12 6
7 Long-Term Architecture Objectives for NECC All system components are fully modernized with no loss of functionality to the Warfighter Finely grained services are integrated into BC SoS and NECC physical and software architectures Data architecture aligned with NECC Supports majority of users through web browser interface with OSGi compliant smart clients for heavy lifting roles All business logic encapsulated in Web Services System configuration and administration fully integrated with NECC Technical Operations architecture PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 13 Lessons learned for future ABCS migration to Net-Enabled Command Capability (NECC) Other areas of systems architecture must be addressed by analyzing quality attributes, not just software Physical Data IA/Security Technical Operations/Support Economic realities must ground the technical solution; projected Total Cost of Ownership Backward compatibility during transition period must be well-planned Universal fielding? Run in parallel? PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 14 7
8 Conclusions All stakeholders concerns with different business drivers and value propositions must be addressed Perfect technical solution may not be affordable, deployable, nor supportable Web services and SOA do not magically solve all problems, actually can cause more from quality attribute areas PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND Slide 15 8
COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet 1 LandWarNet (LWN) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) / Network Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) ICD LandISRNet Intel Appendices
THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 227 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE 3.078
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 4.846 3.825 4.316-4.316 3.813 3.582 3.336 3.379 Continuing Continuing
THE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 228 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0604633A ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 11676 14167 7578 Continuing Continuing
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training Joint Theater Level Simulation Global Operations Don Weter, CIV Joint Staff J7 Environment Operations Division JTLS & JCATS Program Manager M&S Analysis
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST
Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama
Cybersecurity As the birthplace of the Internet, the United States has a special responsibility to lead a networked world. Prosperity and security increasingly depend on an open, interoperable, secure,
Army IAMD Modular Open Systems Approach
Army IAMD Modular Open Systems Approach Presented to the Defense Daily OA Summit The Power of Modularity and New Open Business Models Panel Presented by Mr. Charley Robinson, Director, System Engineering,
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5100.91 October 28, 2008 USD(I) SUBJECT: Joint Intelligence Interoperability Board (JIIB) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes
Collaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems
Collaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems May 21, 2008 Mr. Richard Lee ADUSD (Information Integration & Operations) ODUSD (Advanced Systems & Concepts Defense Research & Engineering 703-695-7938
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total Program Element 9.334 6.602 - - - - - - - 0.000 15.936 9.334 6.602 - - - - - -
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Navy Date: February 2016 1810N: Other Procurement, Navy / BA 04: Ordnance Support Equipment / BSA 3: Ship Missile Systems Equipment ID Code (A=Service
Coalition Operations With the Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System (CENTRIXS) Brad Carter Debora Harlor
Coalition Operations With the Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System (CENTRIXS) Brad Carter Debora Harlor Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command San Diego C4I Programs Hawaii Code 2424
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP)
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP) JDEP Strategy Final Report Dr. Judith S. Dahmann John Tindall The MITRE Corporation March 2001 March 2001 Table of Contents page Executive Summary 1 Introduction
Responsive Decision Making through Automated Policy-Enabled Systems
Responsive Decision Making through Automated Policy-Enabled Systems Anne-Marie Buibish Amy Lange Michael Woitalla Raytheon Company Network Centric Systems 1010 Production Road Fort Wayne, IN 46808-4106
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 0.000 24.500 23.016-23.016 25.350 26.026
US Army Europe Joint Multinational Training Command
US Army Europe Joint Multinational Training Command TSAE Tap In: Disseminating US Army Europe Training and Exercise Capability with ArcGIS Esri IUC 2016 28 Jun 2016 Sustainable Range Program Responsible
Joint Command and Control (JC2) Capability & C2 Data Model
Joint Command and Control (JC2) Capability & C2 Data Model December 1, 2003 Mr. Richard Lee ADUSD (Network Centric Warfare & Interoperability) ODUSD (advanced Systems & Concepts) 703-695-7938 1 Agenda
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 3528A: Distributed Common Ground/ FY
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 24.648 42.347 68.325-68.325 66.869 4.46 -
UNCLASSIFIED. COST (in millions) FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE C4I for the Warrior/PE 0303149K COST (in millions) FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Total Program Element (PE) 0 19.914 37.100
Army Identity and Access Management (IdAM)
Army Identity and Access Management (IdAM) 3 APR 18 Sergio Alvarez Product Lead Enterprise Content Collaboration and Messaging (EC2M) 703-704-3788 sergio.m.alvarez.civ@mail.mil Purpose and Vision Purpose:
Achieving Information Dominance: Unleashing the Ozone Widget Framework
Achieving Information Dominance: Unleashing the Ozone Widget Framework 19 th International Command and Control Research Symposium C2 Agility: Lessons Learned from Research and Operations Track: 3 Presenters:
Federal Demonstration Partnership. January 12, 2009 Michael Pellegrino
Federal Demonstration Partnership January 12, 2009 Michael Pellegrino Agenda Participation Update Current System Issues Real Simple Syndication (RSS Feed) Adobe Transition Build 2008 03 Request for Proposal
SPECTRUM & SERVICES ENTERPRISE CAPABILITIES
SPECTRUM ENTERPRISE CAPABILITIES & SERVICES Today, access to the electromagnetic spectrum enables our warfighters to use many Spectrum is a finite resource and its use must be carefully managed. DISA's
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 6241.04C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR MANAGEMENT AND USE OF UNITED STATES MESSAGE TEXT FORMATTING Reference(s): See Enclosure
DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies
DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies JTEG Forum on ATE/ATS 28 October 2014 Service ATS Participants Bill Ross (Eagle Systems, NAVAIR and DoD ATS Support) Introduction and Background George
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / International Intelligence Technology and Architectures. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1322.18 January 13, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, Effective February 23, 2017 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Military Training References: (a) DoD Directive 1322.18, subject as
DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World
Session C: Past and Present T&E Lessons Learned 40 Years of Excellence in Analysis DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World 2 March 2010 Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, U.S. Army Materiel
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 3.997 3.72 3.773-3.773 3.327 3.424 3.539 3.69
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Military Engineering Advanced Technology
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division
UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other
COMMANDER S HANDBOOK DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM ARMY (DCGS-A)
COMMANDER S HANDBOOK DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM ARMY (DCGS-A) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TCM-SP Final Draft March 30, 2009 Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors only
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+)
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Adv Field Artillery Tactical Data System
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Program Element 29.127 24.622 29.546-29.546 24.448 24.593 24.444
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #203 To Program Element
Risk themes from ATAM data: preliminary results
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Risk themes from ATAM data: preliminary results Len Bass Rod Nord Bill Wood Software Engineering Institute Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense 2006 by Carnegie Mellon
COE. COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES CONNECTING OUR SOLDIERS EXAMPLE SERVICES. COE Enables. EcoSystem. Generating Force
COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES Generating Force COE Enables Increased Capability Agility Reduced Life Cycle Costs Flexible Standards-based Infrastructure Enhanced Cyber Protection Command Post Data
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN VERSION 1 A COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCY
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN 2013 2018 VERSION 1 A COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCY Direct D E F E N S E I N F O R M A T I O N S Y S T E M S A G E N C Y Intent 2 or s S T R A T E G I C P L A
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Health Program Date: February 2015 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Complete Total
Managing Dynamic Collaborative Action Teams in a Net-Centric Environment
Page 1 Managing Dynamic Collaborative Action Teams in a Net-Centric Environment Christine O. Salamacha Christine.Salamach@jhuapl.edu Dr. Steve Forsythe Steve.Forsythe@jhuapl.edu N. Ray Briscoe Ray.Briscoe@jhuapl.edu
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment
Moving from HASP HL to Sentinel LDK Migration Guide
Moving from HASP HL to Sentinel LDK Migration Guide Migration Guide: HASP HL to Sentinel LDK Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2013 SafeNet, Inc. All rights reserved. HARDLOCK, HASP, SENTINEL, SUPERPRO
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description
Overview Mr. Chuck Walker JWARN Acquisition Program Manager Joint Project Manager Information Systems (858) 537-0215 chuck.walker@jpmis.mil 1 2 JWARN Description Connects CBRN sensors directly to Joint
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #90
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4) 1 CSA s Principles, Characteristics and Requirements Principles (Why) Mission: The Army must fight and
Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
DOD INSTRUCTION DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (DL)
DOD INSTRUCTION 1322.26 DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (DL) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Effective: October 5, 2017 Releasability: Reissues and Cancels:
NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018
NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018 THE ARMY WILL FIELD A NETWORK THAT IS EASY TO USE, WORKS IN ALL ENVIRONMENTS,
Public Key Infrastructure Roadmap for the Department of Defense
Public Key Infrastructure Roadmap for the Department of Defense 18 December, 2000 Version 5.0 Prepared By: DoD Public Key Infrastructure Program Management Office Approved: Assistant Secretary of Defense
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
Joint Information Environment. White Paper. 22 January 2013
White Paper "To fight and conquer in all bottles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." -Sun Tzu "Some people think design means how
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
Chuck Campbell, SES, Military Health System Chief Information Officer. Using Service Oriented Architecture to Support Meaningful Use
Chuck Campbell, SES, Military Health System Chief Information Officer Using Service Oriented Architecture to Support Meaningful Use 07/14/10 0 Agenda Military Health System (MHS) Military s Electronic
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
Mr. Vincent Grizio Program Manager MISSION SUPPORT SYSTEMS (MSS)
RSC SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES INDUSTRY CONFERENCE Win Transform People Mr. Vincent Grizio Program Manager MISSION SUPPORT SYSTEMS (MSS) DISTRIBUTION A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Program Manager Mission
Sanilac County Community Mental Health Authority
Sanilac County Community Mental Health Authority 227 E. Sanilac Ave, Sandusky Michigan 48471 (810) 648-0330 Fax: (810) 648-0319 Request for Proposal Phone System and IP Phones Due Date: Wednesday, July
bd.com Pyxis Enterprise Server
Pyxis Enterprise Server Flexible enterprise-ready server deployment options The Pyxis Enterprise Server provides hospitals and health systems a scalable, flexible foundation for managing Pyxis ES platform
Defense Travel Management Office
Defense Travel System Modernization & Sustainment Initiatives GovTravels 2017 Department of Defense Session Description Defense Travel System Modernization & Sustainment Initiatives Working with the U.S.
Mission Thread Workshop
Mission Thread Workshop Lessons Learned SATURN 2012 Mike, Bill Wood 1 Copyright 2012 Carnegie Mellon University This material is based upon work funded and supported by the Department of Defense under
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support
Courts Service ICT Strategy Statement
2011 2014 March 2012 INTRODUCTION The ICT Strategy 2011 2014 supports and compliments the recently published Courts Service Strategic Plan 2011-2014. At a high level the strategy is to maintain provision
Siebel Installation Guide for Microsoft Windows. Siebel Innovation Pack 2015, Rev. D November 2015
Siebel Installation Guide for Microsoft Windows Siebel Innovation Pack 2015, Rev. D November 2015 Copyright 2005, 2015 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This software and related documentation
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #142 To Complete Total
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 46.823 63.563 12.906-12.906 15.663 15.125
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
The Evolution of the Conference Room and the Technology Behind it
WHITEPAPER The Evolution of the Conference Room and the Technology Behind it How a Shift in Demand Will Impact Technology, Support, and Users Bill Haskins Andy Nilssen Andrew Davis October 2013 Paper sponsored
A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)
A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ) Brigadier General Marc Rogers Director, Standing Joint Force Headquarters United States Joint Forces Command 1 Overview History The Joint Command
MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan
MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan Mission Command Center of Excellence 1 Principles (Why) Warfighting Requirements CSA s Mission, Principles, Characteristics of the Network & Requirements Network
Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3430.23C N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3430.23C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: ELECTRONIC
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY1999 Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY2005 to Program Element (PE) 33993 38970 33420 37335 35713 23230 23441 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Theater Battle Management (TBM) C4I FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 18.374 15.170 15.528-15.528 15.817 15.217
COMMON OPERATING ENVIRONMENT COE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. OCTOBER 2015
COMMON OPERATING ENVIRONMENT COE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. OCTOBER 2015 > COE: WHAT IT MEANS TO THE SOLDIER Ten years ago, chances are you had a calculator, a calendar and
Sentinel LDK. Migration Guide HASP HL to Sentinel LDK
Sentinel LDK Migration Guide HASP HL to Sentinel LDK All information herein is either public information or is the property of and owned solely by Gemalto NV. and/or its subsidiaries who shall have and
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.02 August 5, 2013 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Sharing Data, Information, and Information Technology (IT) Services in the Department of Defense References: See Enclosure
Navy Medicine Strategic Plan FY14 U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine & Surgery
Navy Medicine Strategic Plan FY14 U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine & Surgery V7 1 1 Navy Medicine-Guiding Principles Ship Shipmate - Self SHIP Take care of the ship. The ship is the mission, the environment
When and Where to Apply the Family of Architecture- Centric Methods
When and Where to Apply the Family of - Centric Methods Mike Gagliardi Tim Morrow Bill Wood Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Copyright 2015 Carnegie Mellon
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #203
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information Systems Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 15.31 15.787 13.926-13.926 13.92 14.19 14.43
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND TRAINING (ART) GRANTS PROGRAM Proposal Response Guidance
Introduction The purpose of the Administrative Reviews and Training (ART) Grants Program Proposal Response Guidance is to increase the consistency and understanding of program planning prior to grant award.
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total
Information Systems & Infrastructure Product Group 10 Overview
Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry 2006 Information Systems & Infrastructure Product Group 10 Overview Ms. Elizabeth Sedlacek Product Group Director 4/17/2006 APBI 2006 1 Advanced Planning Briefing
DOD INSTRUCTION ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF INTERNAL USE SOFTWARE (IUS)
DOD INSTRUCTION 5000.76 ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF INTERNAL USE SOFTWARE (IUS) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Effective:
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 20.396 20.046 19.938-19.938 20.389 20.799 21.255 22.393 Continuing
COMBINED ENTERPRISE REGIONAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE SYSTEM (CENTRIXS); SUPPORTING COALITION WARFARE WORLD-WIDE
COMBINED ENTERPRISE REGIONAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE SYSTEM (CENTRIXS); SUPPORTING COALITION WARFARE WORLD-WIDE Jill L. Boardman Lockheed Martin Information Technologies Donald W. Shuey Department of the
Moving from Sentinel SuperPro to Sentinel LDK Migration Guide
Moving from Sentinel SuperPro to Sentinel LDK Migration Guide Copyrights and Trademarks Copyright 2013 SafeNet, Inc. All rights reserved. HARDLOCK, HASP, SENTINEL, SUPERPRO and ULTRAPRO are registered
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 64715A: Non-System Training Devices