DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies
|
|
|
- Laureen Booker
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies JTEG Forum on ATE/ATS 28 October 2014
2 Service ATS Participants Bill Ross (Eagle Systems, NAVAIR and DoD ATS Support) Introduction and Background George Mitchel (Army, Product Director TMDE) US Army ATS Roadmap Chris Giggey (Navy, Dept. PM for ATS) Naval Aviation ATS Roadmap Mike Heilman (Marine Corps, ATS Team Lead) Ground Marine Corps ATS Roadmap Lt Col Sean Rivera (Air Force, Chief ATS Division) Air Force ATS Roadmap Jay Romania (Army, Competency Manager, ATS Division) Dod ATS NxTest IPT Chair Joint Test Technologies Mike Malesich (Navy, Automatic Test Software Branch Head) DoD ATS Framework IPT Chair ATS Standards
3 Automatic Test Systems Terminology ATE or Automatic Test Equipment = Integrated set of test and measurement instruments able to do weapon system test and diagnostics OTPS or Operational Test Program Set = A set of hardware to physically interface a group of weapon system Unit(s) Under Test (UUTs) to the ATE and the UUTs test program software ATS or Automatic Test System = ATE + its OTPSs OTPS UUT ATS ATE 3
4 Automatic Test Systems Complex electronic test and diagnostics equipment Used at all levels of maintenance from factory to field Hundreds of different types in DoD inventory and tens of thousands of application test programs in use $51B spent on automatic test systems from
5 The DoD ATS Problem --- Over 400 different ATE ---
6 more problems..
7 and there s even more
8 The Major Issues Facing DoD Late 90s % common test capability among the different DoD ATE 2. Most ATE are or are becoming obsolete 3. We pay for similar redesigns multiple times 4. We have NO interoperability among our different ATE types 5. Our ATS does NOT leverage available valuable diagnostic data 6. Combat technologies are being fielded faster than the required support equipment 7. Support costs are rising significantly as DoD combat support systems age 8. Old technology drives huge logistic footprints (volume) 9. Existing ATE does NOT allow for easy and cost effective technology insertion 10.Unique labor skills are required to operate, maintain and support each ATE
9 DoD ATS Executive Directorate (ED) OSD established the DoD ATS ED Office to better coordinate ATS across the DoD DoD IG, Congress, and GAO Tried to Help Goals of the DoD ATS ED: Reduce the total cost of ownership of DoD ATS Provide greater flexibility to the warfighter through Joint Services interoperable ATS Reduce logistics footprint Improve quality of test
10 DoD ATS Executive Directorate Two Primary Organizational Elements DoD ATS Management Board or AMB Senior ATS leader from each Service Joint Services Integrated Product Teams or IPTs Service members interested in the IPT topic
11 DoD ATS Management Board OSD (AT&L) DASN(L) ATS Executive Director Service Acquisition Executives ATS Executive Directorate NAVAIR PMA260 Navy Air Force Army USMC Navy PMA260 CAPT Jacobs (Chair) USAF AFLCMC/WNA LtCol Rivera ARMY PEO CS & CSS Brian McVeigh USMC Product Manager Ed Howell DoD ATS Management Board (AMB) Integrated Product Teams
12 Joint Services Integrated Product Teams TPS Standardization Procedures for standardizing the Test Program Set acquisition process ATS Processes DoD ATS Master Plan; Processes and tools for analyzing ATE selections ATS Framework Defines/selects the elements or standards desired in DoD ATS NxTest Assessing and demonstrating emerging test technologies Defining and managing the DoD ATS Framework (architecture) IT Developing an Information Assurance Framework for ATE
13 DoD ATS Executive Directorate Originally focused on putting internal Service and cross Services ATS Policies and Processes in place Now, more focused on sharing test technologies and leverage ATS investments among the Services
14 DoD ATS ED General Strategy 1. Designate DoD Standard ATS Families 2. Define a Technical Open System Framework for ATS designs 3. Share test technology development and insertion 4. Each Service modernize own Standard ATS Family
15 DoD ATS Technology Demonstration Agile Rapid Global Combat Support (ARGCS) OSD Advance Concept Technology Demonstration project Competitively awarded to Northrop Grumman Investments by OSD, Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force Funding, technical support and material Information exchange with UK MOD
16 Share Investment in Next Generation ATS Demonstrations ARGCS Key Features & Metrics ATS interoperability among weapon systems, Services, and other countries Scalable to need and performance enhancements Smaller footprint, reduced logistics burden Better use of weapon system diagnostics data and historical maintenance data ATE Net-Centric functions Key technologies demonstrated: Common Tester Interface (CTI) Synthetic Instruments stimulus and measurement ATML net-centric diagnostics functions Validation of emerging ATS Technical Framework standards
17 Share Investment in Next Generation ATS Demonstrations Services jointly supported the Agile Rapid Global Combat Support (ARGCS) ACTD system-level demonstration Successfully demonstrated a number of test technologies: ARGCS Architecture ATML Standards ATML (first implementation) Common Tester Interface Net-Centric Diagnostics Synthetic Instrumentation (SI) SI Component Interface Standards LXI standards Multiple Run-time Environments Commercial Instrument Maturity Bus Test Emulation Instrument High Density Digital Instrument High Density Analog Instrument Advanced Power Supplies
18 Share Investment in Next Generation ATS Demonstrations Services jointly supported the Agile Rapid Global Combat Support (ARGCS) ACTD system-level demonstration Successfully demonstrated a number of test technologies: ARGCS Architecture ATML Standards ATML (first implementation) Common Tester Interface Net-Centric Diagnostics Synthetic Instrumentation (SI) SI Component Interface Standards LXI standards Multiple Run-time Environments Commercial Instrument Maturity Bus Test Emulation Instrument High Density Digital Instrument High Density Analog Instrument Advanced Power Supplies These technologies are being incorporated into the current generation of DoD ATS Families
DoD AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE
DoD AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE DoD AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS PROGRAM PLAN 2006 Captain G. F. Kilian, USN Director, DoD ATS Executive Directorate DoD ATS Program Plan 1. Purpose and Background
260D. Chris Giggey NAVAIR PMA260 DPM for ATS 28 Oct 2014
260D Chris Giggey NAVAIR PMA260 DPM for ATS 28 Oct 2014 Introduction Purpose: To share select portions of the Naval Aviation ATS Roadmap Naval Aviation encompasses US Navy and US Marine Corps aviation
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 214 Army DATE: April 213 24: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 212 FY 213 # PE 64746A:
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 R1 Program
DoD AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE
DoD AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE DoD AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS MASTER PLAN 2012 (sanitized) DoD AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS MASTER PLAN 2012 AMB Principals Concurrence: U.S. Navy PMA260 Naval Air
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium Mr. Tom Dee DASN ELM 703-614-4794 Pentagon 4C746 1 Agenda Context Current environment Robotics Way Ahead AAV MRAP Family of Vehicles 2 ELM Portfolio U.S. Marine Corps ground
DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies. JTEG Forum on ATE/ATS
DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies JTEG Forum on ATE/ATS 28 October 2014 Service ATS Participants Bill Ross (Eagle Systems, NAVAIR and DoD ATS Support) Introduction and Background George
THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 227 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE 3.078
NAVAIR Commander s Awards recognize teams for excellence
NAVAIR News Release NAVAIR Commander Vice Adm. David Architzel kicks of the 11th annual NAVAIR Commander's National Awards Ceremony at Patuxent River, Md., June 22. (U.S. Navy photo) PATUXENT RIVER, Md.
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY GOALS. NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY GOALS NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference Rear Admiral David J. Venlet 29 November 2006 Discussion Outline Program Executive
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 MISSILE Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line Item #128 To
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
Joint IETM INTEROPERABILITY
Joint IETM INTEROPERABILITY CALS EXPO INTERNATIONAL 1998 26 October 1998 Joseph Fuller (Chairman) Tri-Service IETM Technology Working Group Outline Background and Sponsorship Objective, Scope, and Approach
We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan
The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team 1999-2004 Strategic Plan Surface Ships Aircraft Submarines Marine Corps Materiel Surveillance Systems Weapon Systems Command Control & Communications
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Office of Secretary
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY
Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
D E PAR TME NT OF THE N A VY OFFICE OF T HE SECRET ARY 1000 NAVY PENT AGON WASHINGT ON D C 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 3900.44 ASN(RD&A) SECNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.44 From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE
6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit March 14-15, 2018 Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria, VA 22314 Program Design
It s All about the Money!
2011 DOD Maintenance Symposium Breakout Session: It s All about the Money! Chien Huo, Ph.D. Force and Infrastructure Analysis Division (FIAD) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Office of the
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 1500.84 N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 1500.84 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: CHIEF OF
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support
C4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4151.22 October 16, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, Effective January 19, 2018 SUBJECT: Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM + ) for Materiel Maintenance References:
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address August 17, 2004 Glenn F. Lamartin Director, Defense Systems Top Priorities 1. 1. Successfully Successfully Pursue Pursue the the Global
Capabilities Presentation
Capabilities Presentation Corporate Profile Established in 1977 Small Business (FAR subpart 19.001) Over 300 Professional Staff Members DUNS Number - 094744138 Cage Code - 1W582 Primary NAICS (541330,
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
Final Marine Corps Cessna Citation Encore Delivered
By Rob Koon, NAVAIR Public Affairs The United States Marine Corps and Naval Air Systems Command took delivery of the thirteenth and last military version of the Cessna Citation Encore, the UC-35D, at the
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
OPNAVINST B N8 7 Nov Subj: NAVY TEST, MEASUREMENT, AND DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, AUTOMATIC TEST SYSTEMS, AND METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3960.16B N8 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3960.16B From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY TEST,
GEOINT Standards Working Group (GWG)
GEOINT Standards Working Group (GWG) General Briefing NCGIS OGMT / Office of the Chief Architect NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Problems to be Solved Uncoordinated GEOINT standards development
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0203761N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Collaborative coordination of fire support mission execution
Negative Impacts of Ignoring Stakeholder Quality Attributes Joint Fire Support (FS) Command and Control (C2) Case Study May 2007 Presented to SATURN By John Andrew Landmesser PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 174.037 11.276 8.610 1.971-1.971
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5100.91 October 28, 2008 USD(I) SUBJECT: Joint Intelligence Interoperability Board (JIIB) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes
DMSMS 2010 Achievement Awards
DMSMS 2010 Achievement Awards The DMSMS 2010 Achievement Awards seek to recognize both teams and individuals who have demonstrated outstanding achievement in providing warfighters with increased operational
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 24.648 42.347 68.325-68.325 66.869 4.46 -
https://www.metricsthatmatter.com/url/u.aspx?0cbf11b3e Guest Presenter Jay Bottelson
Defense Acquisition University Lunch n Learn Navy VAMOSC 12 April 2017 Session will start at 1230 EDT (1130 CDT). Audio will be through DCS there will be a sound check 30 minutes prior to the session.
DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World
Session C: Past and Present T&E Lessons Learned 40 Years of Excellence in Analysis DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World 2 March 2010 Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, U.S. Army Materiel
A Common Interface Language For U nm anned System s Technology to the Warfighter Quicker
Research, Development & Engineering Command Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) Joint Architecture for Unmanned Systems Robert Robert L.L. Wade Wade Software Software
Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress
Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress November 2012 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Preparation of this report/study
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #163
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test &, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
Power Projection: - Where We Were - Where We Are - Where We Need To Be
Power Projection: - Where We Were - Where We Are - Where We Need To Be Mike McDuffie Group President, Information Systems Group 1 May 18, 2004 Overview NDIA Power Projection Symposium: Then and Now Where
THE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 228 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE
Report to Congress on Recommendations and Actions Taken to Advance the Role of the Chief of Naval Operations in the Development of Requirements, Acquisition Processes and Associated Budget Practices. The
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 R E P O R T COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. 5136
111TH CONGRESS 2d Session " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES! REPORT 111 491 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R.
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
Tri-Service Interactive Electronic Technical Manual (IETM) Technology Working Group
Tri-Service Interactive Electronic Technical Manual (IETM) Technology Working Group Joseph J. Fuller, Chairman NSWC, Carderock Division Department of the Navy CALS Expo USA 97, 15 October 1997 1 Tri-Service
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: Distribution Process Owner (DPO) NUMBER 5158.06 July 30, 2007 Incorporating Administrative Change 1, September 11, 2007 USD(AT&L) References: (a) Unified Command
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6015.17 January 13, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, November 30, 2017 SUBJECT: Military Health System (MHS) Facility Portfolio Management References: See Enclosure
GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS)
GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS) DoD ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Receive Suites: 493 Raytheon Systems Company Total Program Cost (TY$): $458M Average Unit Cost (TY$): $928K Full-rate
Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems
Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems Report to Congress March 2012 Pursuant to Section 901 of the National Defense Authorization
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0604633A ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 11676 14167 7578 Continuing Continuing
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5101.14 June 11, 2007 Incorporating Change 1, July 12, 2012 Certified Current Through June 11, 2014 D, JIEDDO SUBJECT: DoD Executive Agent and Single Manager for
Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3430.23C N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3430.23C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: ELECTRONIC
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 5127.01 DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S JOINT FIRE SUPPORT EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose.
Reserve units change leadership at China Lake
Rear Adm. Kirby Miller, NAVAIR vice commander and director of the NAVAIR Reserve Program, and Rear Adm. Paul Sohl, NAWCWD commander, celebrate with the leadership of west coast units of NRP at a change
Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head
DCN #: 43-2882-17 Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head 2 ONR 30: Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare N091 Principal Deputy for P&R NRL ONRG Chief of Naval Research
CRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS21059 Updated May 31, 2005 Navy DD(X) and CG(X) Programs: Background and Issues for Congress Summary Ronald O Rourke Specialist in National
Code 25 Submarine Network Support Services. Pre-Solicitation Conference
Code 25 Submarine Network Support Services Pre-Solicitation Conference NUWC Division Newport Undersea Collaboration & Technology Outreach Center (UCTOC) June 17, 2014 1 Agenda Introduction/Ground Rules
Be clearly linked to strategic and contingency planning.
DODD 4151.18. March 31, 2004 This Directive applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of
Call for Project Proposals for Fiscal Year 2019 New Starts Operational Energy Capabilities Improvement Fund
Call for Project Proposals for Fiscal Year 2019 New Starts Operational Energy Capabilities Improvement Fund Enhanced Energy Storage to Improve Lethality and Warfighting Performance Summary The Office of
I n t r o d u c t i o n
The President and the Congress have given me the opportunity to serve as Director, Operational Test and Evaluation for these last two and a half years. I have been honored and humbled to serve in this
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 The Joint Staff Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4) 1 CSA s Principles, Characteristics and Requirements Principles (Why) Mission: The Army must fight and
Automatic Testing in the United States Air Force
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Computer Science and Computer Engineering Undergraduate Honors Theses Computer Science and Computer Engineering 5-2018 Automatic Testing in the United
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1322.18 January 13, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, Effective February 23, 2017 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Military Training References: (a) DoD Directive 1322.18, subject as
A Perspective from the Corps. Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003
A Perspective from the Corps Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003 EXPEDITIONARY WHAT S IN A WORD? AGILITY AGILITY FLEXIBILITY FLEXIBILITY FORCIBLE FORCIBLE ENTRY ENTRY EXPEDITIONARY SPEED SPEED VERSATILITY
MCO C059 APR Subj: MARINE CORPS MODELING & SIMULATION MANAGEMENT
MARINE CORPS ORDER 5200.28 MCO 5200.28 C059 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MARINE CORPS MODELING & SIMULATION MANAGEMENT Ref: (a) DODD 5000.59, DOD Modeling & Simulation
Government-to-Government (GTGS) Solutions GSA and USMC Partnerships
BLUF: During the past 15 years, the U.S. Marine Corps has shifted from a base-level logistics environment to an enterprise-wide approach. By partnering with GSA, the Corps has achieved cost savings, standardization
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 4: Advanced Component Development
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
Anti-Ship Missile Defense
Anti-Ship Missile Defense A New Approach Using Unmanned Systems to Save Time and Cost to Field an Effective System : The Next Generation of Intelligent, Automated Systems About Us Unique Systems Engineering
Department of Defense MANUAL. DoD Integrated Materiel Management (IMM) for Consumable Items: Operating Procedures for Item Management Coding (IMC)
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER 4140.26-M, Volume 1 September 24, 2010 Incorporating Change 2, November 27, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Integrated Materiel Management (IMM) for Consumable Items: Operating
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST
December 2012 WHEN WINTER MEANT SNOW.
December 2012 WHEN WINTER MEANT SNOW. NOTE: All NEWSLETTERS information, including this one, has been incorporated in the 2012 Baseline posted on the Home Page of the DoD Automatic Test Systems Executive
Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 309 312 Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back Edward R. Greer Director, Developmental Test and Evaluation, Washington, D.C. W ith the Weapon Systems Acquisition
Department of Defense
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5144.1 May 2, 2005 DA&M SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration/ DoD Chief Information Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD CIO) Reference:
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based
Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6th Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium February 13-14, 2018: Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria,
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5160.62 June 3, 2011 Incorporating Change 1, May 15, 2017 SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training
MARINE CORPS ORDER C. From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List. Subj: AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY (AIT)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 IN REPLY REFER TO: MCO 4000.51C LPV-2 MARINE CORPS ORDER 4000.51C From: Commandant of
Making the Case for Distributed Testing
ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 347 354 Making the Case for Distributed Testing Bernard Chip Ferguson Test Resource Management Center, Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Program, Arlington, Virginia
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 35.208 38.447
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 0.000 24.500 23.016-23.016 25.350 26.026
Subj INSTALLATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION AND SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON. DC 20350-3000 MCO 11000.25A S 2013 MARINE CORPS ORDER 11000.25A From Commandant of the Marine Corps
Defense Acquisition Review Journal
Defense Acquisition Review Journal 170 Image designed by TSgt James Smith, USAF, and SPC Kelly Lowery, USA Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 33.896 32.015 43.986-43.986 42.760 41.790
DOD DIRECTIVE DIRECTOR, DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS)
DOD DIRECTIVE 5105.87 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS) Originating Component: Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: January 5, 2017 Releasability:
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #222
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+) #
Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 IT President's Budget Request Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office
Mission Area Business System Breakout Appropriation BMA 0.003 Total 3.293 Defense Business Systems 0.243 EIEMA 3.290 All Other Resources 3.050 FY 2015 ($M) FY 2015 ($M) OPERATIONS 3.293 FY 2015 ($M) FY14