UNMANNED SYSTEMS T&E Challenges & Opportunities. Dr. James Streilein February 2008
|
|
|
- Ezra Clarke
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNMANNED SYSTEMS T&E Challenges & Opportunities Dr. James Streilein February 2008
2 Agenda ATEC Mission Achieving Balance (Traditional & Rapid) Common Rapid Acquisition Challenges Unmanned Systems ATEC Involvement Unmanned Systems Unique Challenges T&E Opportunities 2
3 ATEC Mission: Does it Work?...How Do I Know? EFFECTIVENESS SUITABILITY SURVIVABILITY 3
4 Mission Statement Facilitate equipment procurement/fielding decisions through testing and analysis to ensure our Army s Warfighters have the right capabilities for success across the entire spectrum of operations. Conduct rapid testing in direct support of the Global War on Terror, providing capabilities and limitations analyses of weapon systems to enable employment decisions for rapid fielding to the Combat Soldier. 4
5 How We Fit GWOT Secretary of Defense Director, OTE DUSA T&E Executive Secretary of the Army Chief of Staff Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L), Director Defense Systems/ DD Developmental T&E Assistant Secretary for AL&T ARH MGS TEMA Vice Chief of Staff FMTV Army Test and Evaluation Command MRAP MG Nadeau Army Evaluation Center Developmental Test Command Operational Test Command Mr. Simmons BG Turner COL(P) Potts JNN FCS Legend T&E Policy and Oversight Independent Reporting Mandated by by US Code, OMB, and OSD 5
6 Achieving Balance PAST Strong methodical testing Requires Time/Money CURRENT Two pronged Continue traditional testing Added rapid testing (Capabilities & Limitations) TRADITIONAL ACQUISITION Slow, sequential (years) Risks Mitigated Fully Synchronized Bureaucratic All data Robust DT Full OT Expensive FUTURE A different degree of normalcy What is it? Where does it apply? RAPID ACQUISITION Quick, overlapping (months) Higher Risk Opportunistic Less bureaucratic Limited Data Constrained DT Limited OT C&L Report to User Less Expensive Relatively Fast 6
7 Common Rapid Acquisition Challenges Requirements are technology-driven vice user-driven Often unclear concept of operations Reliance on contractor test data and informal unit feedback Unknown COTS suitability for operational environmental conditions Immature system supportability considerations prior to deployment Indefinite contractor logistics support 7
8 Unmanned Systems Wide ATEC Involvement AIR ER/MP (Extended Range/Multi-Purpose) FCS Class I (MAV Heavy Fuel) FCS Class IV (Fire Scout) Joint Tactical UAS (Hunter) Small UAS (Raven) Tactical UAS (Shadow) Warrior A GMAV (Gas Micro Air Vehicle) Telluride Rapid Acquisition GROUND FCS Small UGV IMS LKMD MDAR Outpost SWORDS Spider NMS ANDROS Robot Concorde Husky & RG-31 Interrogation Arms MV-4 Mine Roller LVUSS Robot MARCBot Mini-EOD Robot ODIS Pipe Robots Rabbit Routerunner Talon 3B Tactibot / Throwbot / Toughbot xbot (PackBot FasTac) Rapid Acquisition 8
9 Unmanned Systems Unique Challenges Increased operator workload Manning & organization considerations Balancing manned and unmanned system tasks Remote spatial orientation Complex supportability considerations Remote condition monitoring Self-recovery and transportability Mission creep increases logistics burden 9
10 Unmanned Systems Unique Challenges Weaponized robots Fail-safe design required for system safety Reliability dependent on software & command link Rapid target detection/identification needed System-of of-system interoperability Airspace management Spectrum management Network management 10
11 T&E Opportunities Aid requirements and system development T&E community has enduring, diverse knowledge Integrated contractor/government testing Learn early; test within operational context; minimize duplication Forward Operational Assessment Team Feedback loop for system changes or updates to employment considerations & TTPs Mission-based T&E System contribution to mission accomplishment 11
12 TEST & EVALUATION A Critical Enabler to Capabilities-Based Acquisition Dr. James Streilein Technical Director, ATEC james.streilein@us.army.mil
ATEC Overview and the AEC Logistics Mission
ATEC Overview and the AEC Logistics Mission Brian M. Simmons Director, US Army Center 23 January 2008 Presentation to SOLE Aberdeen Proving Ground MD Agenda ATEC Mission & Roles in Acquisition Army Center
FCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR
FCS Update & Testing Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR 3/13/2009 10:36:11 AM 1 Army Leadership s View Future Combat Systems is the core of our modernization
Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and
ATEC Testing In Support of the War
ATEC Testing In Support of the War James B. Johnson U.S. Army Developmental Test Command 6 Feb 07 1 Understand Who We Are Full Spectrum Testing All phases of testing; developmental, operational & evaluation
UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES UPDATE
UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES UPDATE Jeffrey Jaczkowski, Deputy Project Manager June 2012 Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. RS JPO Robots Currently in Combat
PEO GCS Unmanned Ground Vehicle Overview. Mr. Scott Davis, PEO GCS 23 March 2011
PEO GCS Unmanned Ground Vehicle Overview Mr. Scott Davis, PEO GCS 23 March 2011 1 Outline Program Executive Office for Ground Combat Systems (PEO-GCS) Overview Strategic Environment PEO-GCS Robotic Systems
Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment
Conducting Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation in a Distributive Environment Colonel (USA, Ret) Michael R. Gonzales President and Chief Executive Officer
Mission Based T&E Progress
U.S. Army Evaluation Center Mission Based T&E Progress Christopher Wilcox Deputy/Technical Director Fires Evaluation Directorate, US AEC 15 Mar 11 2 Purpose and Agenda Purpose: To review the status of
US Special Operations Command
US Special Operations Command Operational Test & Evaluation Overview HQ USSOCOM LTC Kevin Vanyo 16 March 2011 The overall classification of this briefing is: Agenda OT&E Authority Mission and Tenants Responsibilities
FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)
FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) Army ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 59,522 TRW Total Program Cost (TY$): $1.8B Average Unit Cost (TY$): $27K Full-rate production:
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium Mr. Tom Dee DASN ELM 703-614-4794 Pentagon 4C746 1 Agenda Context Current environment Robotics Way Ahead AAV MRAP Family of Vehicles 2 ELM Portfolio U.S. Marine Corps ground
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 14.114 15.018-15.018 15.357 15.125
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)
U.S. ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMAND The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) MG John W. Charlton 8 November 2017 Mission What does ATEC do for the Army? ATEC plans, integrates,
F oreword. Working together, we will attain the greatest degree of spectrum access possible for the current and future Navy/Marine Corps team.
F oreword In today s Global War On Terror (GWOT), our Sailors and Marines are using every available and necessary asset to assure mission success and safety. These assets include cellular tactical satellite
AGENDA ARMY DEVELOPMENTAL AND OPERATIONAL TEST PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. How Does ATEC FIT IN? Developmental Testing What:
AGENDA ARMY DEVELOPMENTAL AND OPERATIONAL TEST PLAN REVIEW PROCESS Dal M. Nett Safety Director US Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) 27 June 08 ATEC/DTC/OTC DT 101 What is Developmental Testing? Why
Future Combat Systems
Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace
DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap
DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap Presented at the Ground Robotics Capability Conference 4 March 2008 Mr. David Ahern OUSD(ATL)/PSA david.ahern@osd.mil Integrated Unmanned Systems Roadmap Integrated
ARMY / MARINE CORPS GROUND ROBOTICS MASTER PLAN
ARMY / MARINE CORPS GROUND ROBOTICS MASTER PLAN Version 3 Information Cutoff Date: 04 May 2007 PREPARED BY PROJECT MANAGER ROBOTIC SYSTEMS JOINT PROJECT OFFICE COLONEL TERRY GRIFFIN, USMC Office of the
2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT
ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.
UNITED STATES ARMY. FCS - Sensors. LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov Army Strong 1
UNITED STATES ARMY FCS - Sensors Army Click Precision Modernization to add Strike Briefing Annual Strategy Review Title and April Approach 15, 2008 LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov 2007 Army Strong 1 AGENDA
Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry April 5-7, Robotic Systems Joint Project Office. Jeffrey Jaczkowski, Deputy Project Manager
Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry April 5-7, 2010 Robotic Systems Joint Project Office Jeffrey Jaczkowski, Deputy Project Manager April 7, 2010 COMMANDER Organization Chart PEO Land Systems PM Expeditionary
Logistics 101 Today s Battlefield Reality 21 March Todd Ostheller AAI Corporation
Logistics 101 Today s Battlefield Reality 21 March 2007 Todd Ostheller AAI Corporation 1 AAI UAS Warfighter Support Pioneer 400 600 Max GW: 463 lbs. Max payload wt: 100 lbs. Endurance: 5 hrs Max GW: 447
I n t r o d u c t i o n
I was confirmed by the Senate on September 21, 2009, as the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, and sworn in on September 23. It is a privilege to serve in this position. I will work to assure that
Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Soldier Systems - Warrior Dem/Val
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 20.602 20.886 48.309-48.309 60.003 53.434
Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
Prepared for Milestone A Decision
Test and Evaluation Master Plan For the Self-Propelled Artillery Weapon (SPAW) Prepared for Milestone A Decision Approval Authority: ATEC, TACOM, DASD(DT&E), DOT&E Milestone Decision Authority: US Army
SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) 1. References. A complete
SUBJECT: U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Interim Policy Guidance (IPG) 08-1, Test and Evaluation Document Name Changes
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMAND 4501 FORD AVENUE ALEXANDRIA VA 22302-1458 CSTE-TTP 4 April 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION 1. References: a. ATEC Regulation 73-1,
US Air Force Perspective: Rapid or Urgent Acquisition ESOH Management Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicle Program Lessons Learned
US Air Force Perspective: Rapid or Urgent Acquisition ESOH Management Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicle Program Lessons Learned Sherman Forbes, SAF/AQXA NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright. Meg Williams
FCS AND THE UNIT OF ACTION ACCELERATING TECHNOLOGY TO THE MODULAR FORCE An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright Meg Williams BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright, Program Manager Unit of Action (PM UA), recently
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2015-42 (Army Contingency Basing Policy) 1. References. A complete list of references is
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
Victory Starts Here!
Victory Starts Here! Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS) MAJ Mike Dvorak ARCIC Robotics Branch Victory Starts Here! Robotic and Autonomous Systems Strategy Objective Capabilities: Over the next 25 years,
Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference
United States Army Combined Arms Support Command Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference 26 March 2009 Mr. Bill Moore, SES Deputy to the Commanding General CASCOM Supporting a Campaign Quality Army with
NDIA Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference March 24, 2009
NDIA Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference March 24, 2009 U.S Army, Maneuver Support Center Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri Dr. Rebecca Johnson Deputy Commanding General 1 U.S Army, MANSCEN Topics Maneuver
Joint Test & Evaluation Program
Joint Test & Evaluation Program Program Overview Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director Air Warfare DOT&E March 22, 2005 Mr. Jim Thompson Joint Test and Evaluation Program Manager 1 What is the JT&E Program? DOT&E
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 685 Boeing Platform Integration Total Program Cost (TY$): $180M Data Link Solutions FDL Terminal Average
Test and Evaluation WIPT
Test and Evaluation WIPT 11 December 2003 Mrs. Ellen M. Purdy Acting Director, Combined Test Organization Office: 703-647-1452 ellen.purdy@fcscto.army.mil 1 Analysis Synthesis Model Test via Operational
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3222.4 July 31, 1992 Incorporating Through Change 2, January 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures USD(A)
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 R1 Program
OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605804D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 9.155 18.550 20.396
STATEMENT BY DR. A. MICHAEL ANDREWS II DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY AND CHIEF SCIENTIST BEFORE THE
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY DR. A. MICHAEL ANDREWS II DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY AND CHIEF SCIENTIST BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES
Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 309 312 Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back Edward R. Greer Director, Developmental Test and Evaluation, Washington, D.C. W ith the Weapon Systems Acquisition
FY 2010 Annual Report
FY 2010 Annual Report In my first report to you last year, I discussed four initiatives I was undertaking as Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. In this Introduction, I describe the progress I
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 19.610 5.856 8.660-8.660 14.704 14.212
Joint Unmanned Aircraft System Center of Excellence
Joint Unmanned Aircraft System Center of Excellence NDIA CONFERENCE 26 Oct 06 1 Background Jun 05 JROC directs creation of two organizations: JUAV COE and JUAV MRB Sep 05 JROC approves JUAS COE re-stated
Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E
Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E Chris DiPetto 12 th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Agenda DT&E Title 10 USC overview Organization DDR&E imperatives What Title 10 means for
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #71
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release
Unclassified/FOUO RAMP UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address August 17, 2004 Glenn F. Lamartin Director, Defense Systems Top Priorities 1. 1. Successfully Successfully Pursue Pursue the the Global
Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed
Invited Article ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 7 10 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed Steven J. Hutchison, Ph.D. Defense
U.S. Army Munitions HQ DA G-3/5/7
U.S. Army Munitions HQ DA G-3/5/7 Richard J. Mason, Jr. COL, GS Chief, DA G3 Munitions NIPR: richard.mason@us.army.mil SIPR: richard.mason@hqda-s.army.smil.mil Agenda DA G-3/5/7 Munitions Mission Army
ARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2)
ARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Total Number of Systems: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average Unit Cost (TY$): Low-Rate
Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing
Future Future Industry Day Briefing MG Joseph L. Yakovac Program Executive Officer, Ground 11 February 2003 Program Manager s Intent: Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability
DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System
Report No. DODIG-2012-005 October 28, 2011 DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No.
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification May 2009 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 (RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT) OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES (OT&A) PROGRAM ELEMENT
August 2, Subject: Cancellation of the Army s Autonomous Navigation System
United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 August 2, 2012 The Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett Chairman The Honorable Silvestre Reyes Ranking Member Subcommittee on Tactical Air and
Enabling Greater Productivity
Enabling Greater Productivity An Imperative to Improve Materiel Readiness Panel Discussion June 2017 Productivity Defined Productivity* [proh-duhk-tiv-i-tee, prod-uhk ] noun 1. the quality, state, or fact
An Overview of PEO AVIATION. Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association. Paul Bogosian PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER AVIATION
An Overview of PEO AVIATION Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association Paul Bogosian PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER AVIATION 1 1 Army Global Commitments AC STATIONED OVERSEAS 103,000 AC STATIONED STATESIDE
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST
United States Special Operations Command. Science and Technology
United States Special Operations Command Science and Technology Capabilities to the SOF Operator Ms. Lisa Sanders Deputy Director, Science and Technology Directorate (SORDAC-ST) June 2011 Our World Has
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 22.63 3.676 32.789-32.789 35.932
TWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges
TWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges 2012 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Conference 6 February 2012 Mr. Christopher Lowman Maintenance Directorate, G-4 Headquarters, Department of the Army
Equipping the Joint Warfighter with Unmanned Ground System Capabilities
Equipping the Joint Warfighter with Unmanned Ground System Capabilities Mark Mazzara, Systems Engineering Team Lead Robotic Systems Joint Project Office Army Spectrum Management Conference 11 March 2010
Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract
Report No. D-2011-066 June 1, 2011 Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No.
JOINT RAPID ACQUISITION CELL
Presentation to the 39 th Annual DoD Cost Analysis Symposium Dr. Robert L. Buhrkuhl, Director February 15, 2006 1 The Challenge We Face Smother Smother Innovation Innovation Resist Change Embrace Status
Questions are welcome during the session, please type them into the DCS Chat Window
Lunch n Learn Operating and Support Management Information System (OSMIS) 18 OCT 17 Session will start at 1230 EDT (1130 CDT). Audio will be through DCS there will be a sound check 30 minutes prior to
Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association
Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: 121 124 Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Enhancing Operational Realism in Test & Evaluation Ernest Seglie, Ph.D. Office of the
MILENG contribution to C-IED in art 5 & NATO Response ops
MILITARY ENGINEERING CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE MILENG contribution to C-IED in art 5 & NATO Response ops Major (OF-3) Ole Holøyen (NOR A) Staff officer Movement & Manoeuvre Policies, Concepts & Doctrine Branch
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 214 Army DATE: April 213 24: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 212 FY 213 # PE 64746A:
AFTER MILESTONE C DECISION- WHAT S NEXT? by Rick Decker Director, Engineering - 8 March 2006
AFTER MILESTONE C DECISION- WHAT S NEXT? by Rick Decker Director, Engineering - 8 March 2006 1 OUTLINE Chemical Biological Defense Program Environment Big A Acquisition DoD OSD Acquisition, Technology
Towards a Robotics Strategy
Towards a Robotics Strategy LTG Michael A. Vane Deputy Commanding General, Futures, and Director, Army Capabilities Integration Center US Army Training and Doctrine Command 25 Mar 09 Army Capabilities
Integrating System Safety into Forward Deployed Theater Operations
UNCLASSIFIED Integrating System Safety into Forward Deployed Theater Operations NDIA Conference 31 October 2013 Presented by: Michael H. Demmick Naval Ordnance Safety and Security Activity 301-744-4932
Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems
Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems Contingency Basing and Operational Energy Initiatives SUSTAINING WARFIGHTERS AWAY FROM HOME LTC(P) James E. Tuten Product Manager PM FSS Report Documentation Page
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 3.350 3.874 - - - 1.977 - - - Continuing Continuing 645121: Physical
Strategic Cost Reduction
Strategic Cost Reduction American Society of Military Comptrollers May 29, 2014 Agenda Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Budget Uncertainty Efficiencies History Specific Efficiency Examples 2 Cost
Improving Army Test and Evaluation: A Team Sport
Improving Army Test and Evaluation: A Team Sport by Mr. Michael J. Karwatka Department of the Army Civilian United States Army War College Class of 2013 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: A Approved for Public Release
Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training
Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training Auto Launch Auto Recovery Accomplishing tomorrows training requirements today. Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost
APPENDIX: FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITIES Last Updated: 21 December 2015
FUNCTIONAL Acquisition APPENDIX: FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITIES Last Updated: 21 December 2015 ROLE Plans for, develops, and procures everything from initial spare parts to complete weapons and support systems,
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) Total Program Element (PE) Cost 64312 68659 71079 72540 77725 77145 78389 Continuing Continuing DV02 ATEC Activities 40286 43109 44425 46678 47910 47007
Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs
Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs Chris Yunker MEFFV JCIDS Team Lead Marine Corps Combat Development Command 703-432-4042 (MCSC) 703-784-4915 (MCCDC) Yunkerc@mcsc.usmc.mil Chris.Yunker@usmc.mil This
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0603460A Joint A ir-to-ground Missile (JAGM) ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 0.051-3.926-3.926 4.036 4.155 4.236 4.316 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #146
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 0.992 0.350 0.883-0.883 0.791 0.637 0.650 0.662 Continuing Continuing
Acquisition Modernization: Transitioning Technology into Warfighter Capability
Acquisition Modernization: Transitioning Technology into Warfighter Capability By Karl l.vandentop The purpose of this article is to analyze the rapid acquisition programs that have emerged to equip warfighters
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
Mission & Capabilities Overview
U.S. ARMY DUGWAY PROVING GROUND Mission & Capabilities Overview May 2018 Agenda and Purpose Mission and Vision Organization Quality of Life Location Test Center Capabilities Recent & Future Activities
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 4 Page 1 of 6
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification February 2007 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY SIX LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION (LFT&E) PROGRAM ELEMENT (PE) 0605131OTE Cost ($
Defense Science Board Task Force Developmental Test and Evaluation Study Results
Invited Article ITEA Journal 2008; 29: 215 221 Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Defense Science Board Task Force Developmental Test and Evaluation Study Results Pete
Testing in a Joint Environment. Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army
Testing in a Joint Environment Value Added and Considerations Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army June 2008 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Why do we test?
Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell
Product Support Manager Workshop Rapid Capabilities Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell June 8, 2017 17-S-1832 Deliberate Requirements vs. Urgent / Rapid Requirements Lanes Urgent
Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities Topic 9: C2 Architectures and Technologies Mr. José Carreño Mr. George Galdorisi Mr. Steven Koepenick Ms. Rachel Volner May 14, 2010 2 My view is that technology
US Army Combined Arms Center SOLDIERS AND LEADERS - OUR ASYMMETRIC ADVANTAGE. Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT Forward to STE As Is 1980s technology limits ability to train Combined Arms operations 47 terrain formats Concurrency challenges and not designed