Future Combat Systems
|
|
- Verity Murphy
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October
3 Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace Evolutionary Acquisition while Requirements Mature Contracting via Lead Systems Integrator Demonstrate-Live and Virtual-Force Operational Capabilities of the UA Balance Test and Evaluation with Modeling and Simulation Sustain DARPA/Army Collaborative Relationship for the Future Expand to Joint, Interagency, and Coalition Partners Design for Supportability-Performance-Based Logistics Identify and Manage Risk throughout the Program Accelerate fielding of FCS capability to the Current Force It is about the Networked System of Systems and how it enables Dominant Land Combat for Current and Future Forces
4 Key Tenets of the Program Create Opportunity for Best of Industry to Participate Leverage Government Technology Base to Maximum Extent Associate On-Going Enabling Efforts With LSI-Led Activity Collaborative Environment from Design Through Life Cycle As a Minimum, Commonality at Subsystem/Component Level Design/Plan for Technology Integration and Insertion Maintain and Shape the Industrial Base for the Future Retain Competition throughout Future Force Acquisition Appropriate Government Involvement in Procurement Processes Consistent and Continuous Definition of Requirements Maintain and Shape Government Acquisition Community Program Affordability Balance Performance and Sustainment One Team Operating with Partnership and Teamwork The tenets remain constant: Applying them to the Current and Future Force 10/26/ :23:56 AM 4
5 What Are Future Combat Systems Comprised of a family of systems Advanced, networked air- and ground-based maneuver, maneuver support, and sustainment systems Includes manned and unmanned platforms Networked via a Battle Command architecture Will operate as a system of systems Network existing systems, systems already under development, and new systems to be developed Network will enable: improved ISR, battle command, real time sensor-shooter linkages, and increased synergy between echelons and within small units. capabilities available to UA small units enable the UA to connect to UE, joint capabilities, and national assets
6 FCS Family of Systems FCS Network: key foundational integrating capability 8 Manned Ground Vehicle variants 4 Unmanned Air Vehicle classes (from small unit to brigade level) 3 categories of Unmanned Ground Vehicles: Armed Robotic Vehicles (Assault, RSTA, Light variants) MULEs (cargo & countermine variants) Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle (manpackable) Unattended Ground Sensors Unattended Munitions Non-Line of Sight Launch System (missiles in a box) Intelligent Munitions System Each of these systems is designed within a System of Systems Common Operating Environment (common integrating software)
7 Key Objectives Preserve the Systems of Systems focus, and Field all (to include currently deferred systems) FCS Systems plus the network, at threshold capability by 2014 Field Future Force capabilities to Current Force units in discrete spirals starting in FY08, and provide networked capability to UAs ( FCS-equipped UA) by 2014 Prioritize the development and demonstration of the network and SOSCOE, unattended munitions, sensors, and unmanned air and ground vehicles Embrace evolutionary acquisition through Spiral Development employing a design, build, experiment, and test approach in concert with the user, vice the current concurrent developmental construct. Increase Schedule (original scope intact, plus additional scope for experimentation/spiral out), to address internal and external assessment recommendations and provide Army with near-term funds required for current operations Deliberately identify and assess Spiral out candidate technologies/capabilities for integration into Current Force Units of Action. Incorporate a deliberate and robust design, build, experiment, and test approach to Build Knowledge, adequately inform Decision Points, facilitate assessment of spin-offs, provide feedback to software development, integration & verification, user activities and user tests Invest in Technology Maturity and reliability enhancement activities to reduce cost and schedule risk Meet congressional language for NLOS-C with an integrated approach to all MGV System development and production
8 Acceleration Process FCS FCS Core Systems FY08 Spiral 1 M-UAs M-BCTs FY 08 Spiral 1 Protos with Eval BCT FY10 Spiral 2 FY12 Spiral FY 10 Spiral 1 Prod and Spiral 2 Protos with Eval BCT M-UAs M-BCTs M-BCTs M-BCTs S2 S2 S2 L1 S1 L1 S1 L1 S1 L1 S1 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 E1 L1 S1 E2 L1 S1 S2 E3 S2 L1 S1 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 Starting in FY 10 Spiral 1 Prod with M-BCTs 3 of 18 4 of 18 7 of 18 FY 12 Spiral 1, 2 Prod and Spiral 3 Protos with Eval BCT Starting in FY 12 Spiral 1 & 2 Prod with M-BCTs FY14 Spiral 4 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 L4 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 18 of 18 FY 14 Spiral 1, 2, 3 All Prod with Eval BCT ( ) NETWORK UA Battalion (11/36) (01/43) (20/43) (32/43) FY 14 Spiral 1, 2 & Starting in FY 15, Spiral 3 Prod with M-BCTs E Army Bde s Modular Construct Evaluation BCT UA w/ Spiraled Capabilities FCS UA (-) Pending FY06 Decision 10/26/ :23:56 AM 8
9 FCS Revised Program M-BCTs M-BCTs Fielding M-BCTs Support to E-BCT Production Decision Spiral 1 Spiral 2 Spiral 3 EVAL E-BCT Mod E-BCT Initial Product & Post Deployment Support, Including architectural integrity, CM, Commodity & SW support Feedback OT, Field, Sustainment EVAL E-BCT Mod E-BCT EVAL E-BCT Mod E-BCT Spiral 4 EVAL E-BCT Mod E-BCT Spiral 1 integration Assess FCS Main Program Continued Development Spiral 2 integration Assess Spiral 3 integration Continued Development Assess Spiral 4 integration Continued Development Assess FCS UA Thres/Obj Spec UA Unit Set Fielding 10/26/ :23:56 AM 9
10 FCS Program Adjustments Previously deferred FCS systems returned to FCS development UAV Class II UAV Class III Armed Robotic Vehicle (ARV)-Assault ARV-Reconnaissance FCS Maintenance and Recovery Vehicle Experimentation inserted into program to prove revolutionary concepts, mature architecture and components and assist spiral development "Spiral Out" packages start in FY 2008 and will successively insert FCS capability into Current Force Modular Units of Action 10/26/ :23:56 AM 10
11 Organization: FCS-equipped UA Commonality With Current Force Modularity (Less than 4,000 Soldiers in each Brigade) X X X Stryker Heavy Infantry + X FCS FCS Standard maneuver brigades with organic combined arms capabilities Current Future FCS-equipped UA design influenced Heavy and Infantry modular brigades Common design characteristics: Modular Campaign quality with joint and expeditionary capabilities Combined Arms battalions Increased Recon & Surveillance at lower echelons Organic fires battalion Organic logistics support battalion
12 Future Combat Systems Manned Systems Command and Control Vehicle Infantry Carrier Vehicle Mounted Combat System Recon and Surveillance Vehicle Unmanned Air Vehicles Class I Class II Unattended Ground Sensors Class III Class IV Unattended Munitions NLOS LS Intelligent Munitions System Unmanned Ground Vehicles Non-Line of Sight Cannon Non-Line of Sight Mortar FCS Recovery and Maintenance Vehicle Medical Treatment and Evacuation Armed Robotic Vehicle ARV RSTA ARV Aslt ARV-A (L) Small (Manpackable) UGV MULE: MULE: (Countermine) (Transport)
13 FCS Network Centric Architecture A New Way of Warfighting Interoperability Joint Common Database FSB HQ XX FSB Forward Support Battalion Unit of Employment Higher Headquarters Headquarters (UE/HQ) (HHQ) System of Systems Common Operating Environment (SOSCOE) WarfighterI Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) Wideband Network Waveform ( WNW) Battle Command HQ Hierarchical Ad-Hoc Network Wideband Network Waveform ( WNW) Data Images Voice Video FCS Unit of Action/Unit of Employment Joint Tactical Radio Systems (JTRS)
14 FCS Network-Centric Scenario
15 FCS LSI and Partner Opportunities Opportunities for LSI and partners listed or linked to FCS website FCS is pursuing innovative ways for maximizing Small Business involvement in upcoming competitions for previously deferred systems Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Class II, and III RFPs Q1 05 Source Selection Criteria may reward SB content and SB teaming LSI Spiral Development and Technology Planning (SD&TP) IPT will participate in the 8th Annual Army Small Business Conference High interest technologies to the FCS program to be identified Focus on innovative technology enablers for systems that are lightweight, inexpensive, mobile, lethal, reliable, sustainable, network-centric, and interoperable Soliciting technical white papers beginning Q1 05 Logistics (2005) Interoperability Kits Logistics Data Repository Interactive Approved Electronic for Public Release, Technical Distribution Manual Unlimited, (IETM) PM UA 11 October /26/ :23:56 AM 15
16 Opportunities (continued) Opportunities exist for 2 nd and 3 rd tier support to recent, pending and future selections Ground Sensor 2 nd tier suppliers just announced for: Multifunction RF System, Combat ID System, Reconnaissance & Surveillance Mast, Medium Range EO/IR System, and Automated Target Recognition System. MGV Competitions Guns and Ammo Handling Systems (announcement Q3 04) Propulsion (announcement pending) Traction Drive System (Q4, 04) Track Drive System (RFP 05) Liquid Cooled Power Module (RFP 05) Air Sensors (RFP Q4 04) Unmanned Ground Vehicle subsystems/component competitions will begin Q1 05 Air & Ground Communications: Antennas & other equipment RFPs beginning Q4 04 Previously selected Armed Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) with United Defense to enter System Development and Demonstration 10/26/ :23:56 AM 16
17 How to Get Involved with FCS Regularly check the FCS Website Home Page at: Located on this website: - FCS Business Opportunities of the LSI and 23 Partners (Contacts with websites) - Information on Submitting Unsolicited Proposals - Partners Requests for Quotes / Information - FCS Business Opportunities FCS Supplier Information Submittal Form - Supplier Diversity information (specific LSI / Partner Small Business contacts provided in FCS Business Opportunities Brochure) - FCS calendar with upcoming conferences and events - Submit Questions to LSI and Partners 10/26/ :23:56 AM 17
18 Looking Forward Outstanding efforts to date have allowed the Army to accelerate spiral capability to the current force The One Team partnership is working Our mission has been expanded due to confidence in our performance This is a good thing For the Army, for Industry and for the Soldier One Team Equipping our Joint Warfighters with the World s Best Capability 10/26/ :23:56 AM 18
19 Summary Future Combat Systems will provide a significant increase in Army warfighting capability to the Joint Force Commander A key land combat concept supporting joint concepts Enables a greater degree of joint interdependence FCS enables a campaign quality Army with Joint and expeditionary capabilities FCS is underpinned by operational and organizational concepts, documented future capabilities, and an operational architecture FCS is a transformational Acquisition process Program has a sound foundation Worth the risks A Campaign Quality Army with Joint and Expeditionary Capabilities
20 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors. This document contains technical data for Administrative or Operational Use. Date of Determination October 29, Other requests for this document shall be referred to the PMUA Security Office ATTN: SFAE-PMUA-WS / MS #515, 6501 East 11 Mile Road, Warren, MI
Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing
Future Future Industry Day Briefing MG Joseph L. Yakovac Program Executive Officer, Ground 11 February 2003 Program Manager s Intent: Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Complete F58 NON LINE OF SIGHT
More informationUNITED STATES ARMY. FCS - Sensors. LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov Army Strong 1
UNITED STATES ARMY FCS - Sensors Army Click Precision Modernization to add Strike Briefing Annual Strategy Review Title and April Approach 15, 2008 LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov 2007 Army Strong 1 AGENDA
More informationFCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR
FCS Update & Testing Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR 3/13/2009 10:36:11 AM 1 Army Leadership s View Future Combat Systems is the core of our modernization
More informationEighth Annual Army Small Business Conference
Eighth Annual Army Small Business Conference Steve Marion FCS Senior Program Director McLean, VA 17 November 2004 12/8/2004 9:22:08 AM 1 Program Overview What is the FCS-Equipped Unit of Action? In 2003,
More informationAn Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright. Meg Williams
FCS AND THE UNIT OF ACTION ACCELERATING TECHNOLOGY TO THE MODULAR FORCE An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright Meg Williams BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright, Program Manager Unit of Action (PM UA), recently
More information2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT
ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.
More informationFCS Embedded Training: An Overview
FCS Embedded Training: An Overview Chuck Moler FCS LSI Training Systems IPT 12/13/2005 Training is THE factor in determining the victor. - DSB Task Force on Training Superiority and Training Surprise Approved
More informationFCS Program Overview 10 th Annual Army Small Business Conference
FCS Program Overview 10 th Annual Army Small Business Conference Steve Marion Sr. Program Director Combat Systems Supplier Management 2/1/2007 9:43:42 AM 1 FCS Program Status Program keeping pace with
More informationCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0603008A Electronic Warfare Advanced Technology ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element
More informationSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION Joe Pelino ARDEC Director of Technology 18 April 2018 UNPARALLELED COMMITMENT &SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do.
More informationThe Army s Future Combat System (FCS): Background and Issues for Congress
The Army s Future Combat System (FCS): Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces August 3, 2009 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
More informationTest and Evaluation WIPT
Test and Evaluation WIPT 11 December 2003 Mrs. Ellen M. Purdy Acting Director, Combined Test Organization Office: 703-647-1452 ellen.purdy@fcscto.army.mil 1 Analysis Synthesis Model Test via Operational
More informationC4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
More informationTowards a Robotics Strategy
Towards a Robotics Strategy LTG Michael A. Vane Deputy Commanding General, Futures, and Director, Army Capabilities Integration Center US Army Training and Doctrine Command 25 Mar 09 Army Capabilities
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical
More informationArmy Science & Technology Overview. 4 Apr 2007 Dr. Thomas H. Killion Deputy Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology/ Chief Scientist
Army Science & Technology Overview 4 Apr 2007 Dr. Thomas H. Killion Deputy Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology/ Chief Scientist Outline Science and Technology (S&T) Strategy Warfighter Guidance
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
097 513 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 to Total COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Complete FCS Network Hardware
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
More informationFORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)
FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) Army ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 59,522 TRW Total Program Cost (TY$): $1.8B Average Unit Cost (TY$): $27K Full-rate production:
More informationREQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationSingle Integrated Ground Picture
Single Integrated Ground Picture 2003 Interoperability and System Integration Presented by: Anthony Lisuzzo Director, Intelligence and Information Directorate US ARMY CECOM 732-532-5557 Email: anthony.lisuzzo@mail1.monmouth.army.mil
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0604645A Armored Systems Modernization (ASM)-Eng. Dev. ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 to Program Element (PE) 2098130
More informationUnclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release
Unclassified/FOUO RAMP UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7
CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0305205N Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationRECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY AND GENERAL MARK A. MILLEY CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY AND GENERAL MARK A. MILLEY CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE DEFENSE SECOND SESSION,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1506N: Aircraft Procurement, Navy / BA 05: Modification of Aircraft / BSA 1: Modification of Aircraft ID Code (A=Service Ready,
More informationThe Army s Future Combat System (FCS): Background and Issues for Congress
Order Code RL32888 The Army s Future Combat System (FCS): Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 12, 2008 Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade
More informationNOVEL METHODOLOGIES TO PREVENT LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE IN BATTLEFIELD USING SENSORS
NOVEL METHODOLOGIES TO PREVENT LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE IN BATTLEFIELD USING SENSORS *Dr. S.R.BOSELIN PRABHU, **Dr. E.GAJENDRAN, ***N.BALAKUMAR *Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0305208A Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual to Total Total Program Element (PE) 128334 68662 188425 Continuing
More informationCOMMANDER S HANDBOOK DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM ARMY (DCGS-A)
COMMANDER S HANDBOOK DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM ARMY (DCGS-A) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TCM-SP Final Draft March 30, 2009 Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors only
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 MISSILE Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line Item #128 To
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 03 Advanced Technology Development (ATD) 0603850F Integrated Broadcast
More informationJoint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System
(24 APRIL 2006) Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System MIDS International Review Board JTRS Moving Forward JPEO JTRS 5 May 2006 Mr. Howard Pace Deputy JPEO JTRS 619-524-4498 Howard.Pace@navy.mil
More informationDirectorate of Training and Doctrine Industry Day Break out Session
Directorate of Training and Doctrine Industry Day 2018 Break out Session Mr. Chris K. Jaques Chief, Individual and Systems Training Division, DOTD (706) 545-5209 Mr. Richard C. Bell Chief, Simulations
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #208
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 United States Special Operations Command Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost
More informationNETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018
NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018 THE ARMY WILL FIELD A NETWORK THAT IS EASY TO USE, WORKS IN ALL ENVIRONMENTS,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Information Systems: The Key to Future Force Success in a CBRN Environment. January 9, 2007
Information Systems: The Key to Future Force Success in a CBRN Environment January 9, 2007 PRESENTED TO: 2007 CBIS Conference Austin, Tx Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release Edward Wack
More informationExcalibur - a Successful Swedish/U.S. Development Program
Excalibur - a Successful Swedish/U.S. Development Program 09 October 2003 COL Nate Sledge Project Manager for Combat Ammunition Systems (973) 724-2003, sledge@pica.army.mil Purpose Excalibur as a Successful
More informationDISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A
IFPC Inc 2-I DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 31 IFPC Inc 2-I Mission Mission: Primary Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 Intercept (IFPC Inc
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1322.18 January 13, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, Effective February 23, 2017 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Military Training References: (a) DoD Directive 1322.18, subject as
More informationU.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Briefing for the SAS Panel Workshop on SMART Cooperation in Operational Analysis Simulations and Models 13 October 2015 Release of
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
More informationBALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY
BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY 9 TRANSFORMATION Managing risk is a central element of both the Defense Strategy and the Army program. The Army manages risk using the Defense Risk Framework. This risk management
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
More informationTest and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 33.896 32.015 43.986-43.986 42.760 41.790
More informationS&T Community Perspective on Maneuver Support Challenges
S&T Community Perspective on Maneuver Support Challenges Maneuver Support Conference 29 Jul 2008 Dr. Thomas H. Killion Deputy Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology/ Chief Scientist Outline Army
More informationTesting in a Distributed Environment
Testing in a Distributed Environment Mr. Stephen Kreider, SES Acting Deputy Program Executive Office Integration DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case 10-1069.
More informationMISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Presented to: THE SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW Distribution Statement A - Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited. Review completed by AMRDEC Public
More informationFuture Force Capabilities
Future Force Capabilities Presented by: Mr. Rickey Smith US Army Training and Doctrine Command Win in a Complex World Unified Land Operations Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative throughout the range
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationMission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division
UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other
More informationNet-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet 1 LandWarNet (LWN) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) / Network Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) ICD LandISRNet Intel Appendices
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
More informationTactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm
Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm 16 th ICCRTS 22 June 2011 Paper ID 149 Mr. Ken Teske and Mr. Mike Tisdel FGM, Inc. C2OTM Focused Integration Team (FIT) 1 Agenda Define C2OTM
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justification Exhibit R-2 ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) - COST (In Thousands) INTERIM ARMORED VEHICLE (IAV) FAMILY FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 to 8391 143568 108012
More informationTactical Technology Office
Tactical Technology Office Dr. Bradford Tousley, Director DARPA Tactical Technology Office Briefing prepared for NDIA s 2017 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition March 22, 2017 1 Breakthrough
More informationNDIA Air Targets and UAV Division Symposium. LTC Scott Tufts 4 October 2012
NDIA Air Targets and UAV Division Symposium LTC Scott Tufts 4 October 2012 Topics PEO STRI is working numerous force on force initiatives to enhance training Bring indirect fire capability into the force
More informationArmy Vision - Force 2025 White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
Army Vision - Force 2025 White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 1 Problem Statement Force 2025 The future global security environment points to further
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY
More informationLTG Charles S. Mahan Jr. United States Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4. Tactical Wheeled Vehicles 27 January 2003
LTG Charles S. Mahan Jr. United States Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4 Tactical Wheeled Vehicles 27 January 2003 TRUCK HISTORY LESSON The first motor truck was built in 1896 by Gottlieb Daimler Pre-WWI
More informationUSMC Small Arms Modernization Brief
USMC Small Arms Modernization Brief Mr. Chris Woodburn Deputy, Maneuver Branch Marine Corps Capabilities Development Directorate Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited 1 Summary CMC emphasis
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Soldier Systems - Warrior Dem/Val
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 20.602 20.886 48.309-48.309 60.003 53.434
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY 2005 to Force XXI Battle Command, Brigade & Below (FBCB2) 52003* 65176 63601 37699 29154 12179 0 0 264137 * Database presently shows 56328. Internal
More informationCOMMITMENT. & SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do. MUM-T for the Abrams Lethality Enabler UNPARALLELED
MUM-T for the Abrams Lethality Enabler Presented by: Mr. Anand Bahadur U.S. Army Armaments Research Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) Anand.Bahadur.civ@mail.mil Phone: (973) 724-8894 UNPARALLELED
More informationCOL Michael Milner Project Manager Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle
COL Michael Milner Project Manager Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle 1 June 2016 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release. Chart valid 2 Feb 16 Mission and Vision Mission Modernize, sustain and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationRECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAMES O. BARCLAY III DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 BEFORE THE
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAMES O. BARCLAY III DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AIRLAND COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ON ARMY MODERNIZATION
More informationARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2)
ARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Total Number of Systems: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average Unit Cost (TY$): Low-Rate
More informationWEAPONS DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE OVERVIEW SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP 22 SEPTEMBER 2016
Presented to: SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE OVERVIEW Distribution Statement A - Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited. Review completed
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationTank Automotive Research, Development & Engineering Center (TARDEC)
Tank Automotive Research, Development & Engineering Center (TARDEC) A major element of RDECOM and partner in the TACOM Life-Cycle Management Command: Provides full life-cycle engineering support provider-of-first-choice
More informationGAO. FORCE STRUCTURE Capabilities and Cost of Army Modular Force Remain Uncertain
GAO For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT Tuesday, April 4, 2006 United States Government Accountability Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 6.021 8.312 7.963-7.963 8.046 8.146 8.194
More informationVictory Starts Here!
Victory Starts Here! Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS) MAJ Mike Dvorak ARCIC Robotics Branch Victory Starts Here! Robotic and Autonomous Systems Strategy Objective Capabilities: Over the next 25 years,
More informationArmy Experimentation
Soldiers stack on a wall during live fire certification training at Grafenwoehr Army base, 17 June 2014. (Capt. John Farmer) Army Experimentation Developing the Army of the Future Army 2020 Van Brewer,
More informationAMRDEC Fuzing Activities
Presented to: NDIA Fuze Conference 2014 AMRDEC Fuzing Activities DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Control Number: pr0898 29 July 2014 Presented by: Anthony
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Integrated Broadcast Service FY 2015
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #36 Complete Total Program Element - 18.216 - - - - - - - - - 18.216 644778:
More informationSynthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment
More informationSTATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA COMMANDING GENERAL, U.S. ARMY SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND ARMY FORCES STRATEGIC COMMAND BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
More informationNext Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-
Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements - Brief to Industry- 09 January 2018 HQMC, CD&I, Capabilities Development Directorate Fires & Maneuver Integration Division 1 LAV Investment
More information