Battle Management Language (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning
|
|
- Georgina Nelson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Geospatial Battle Management Language (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning Presented to the 11th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium Paper I-110 Michael Powers Topographic Engineering Center US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Alexandria, Virginia Dr. Michael Hieb Dr. Mark Pullen Martin Kleiner Center for C4I George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia
2 Outline Assumptions, Requirements and Challenges Geo-Centric Force Centric Net-Centric Necessary Conditions for Success Architectural Framework Representational Consistency Battle Management Language Computational Semantic Implementing Geospatial Information in a Net-Centric Enterprise Development of Net-Centric Geospatial Services Focus on Shared Semantics Experimentation with Geospatial Information in a Mission Context
3 geo-centric View of Information Beliefs and Assumptions 1. Possesses a ubiquitous quality across C2 Use is often very similar Stable, sufficient representations is a goal 2. Deserves the same rigor of quality, consistency of representation applied to other battlefield information Foundation for shared, common awareness 3a.Terrain and weather are fundamental enabler/constraint to Combatant and non-combatant behavior Force, system, sensor and soldier performance 3b.Military operations and behaviors are not random Basis for relationships among battlespace entities and actors/actions Organizing the Battlespace in space, time and tactical intent 4. Value F(x) of geo information: Knowledge > Information > Data Hierarchy of Abstraction Get out of the data ASAP too many reasons to count Enabling the the Commander, Warrior Warrior and and C 2 2 systems through embeddable geospatial information Engineer Research and Development Center
4 Battle Command Centric (Geospatial Information, Technology) Engineer Research and Development Center Intelligent Services Role Manager Agent Authorizer Intelligent Operator Monitor Collaborator Translation Interface Text-Voice, etc) Report Generator WMI Services I/O Services Presentation Services Presentation Tailor Presentation Builder Presentation Manager WMI Primitives Visualizer WMI Element Services Task Integration Network Editor Situation Understanding Planning & Preparation Battle State Assessor Weather Service Object Refinement Situation Refinement Threat Refinement Readiness Monitor Assessor Services Fusion Process Refinement Battlespace Object Priority Manager BSO Understanding Services SU Toolset SU Presentation SU Tool Services Airspace Plan Assessor Objective COA Tactical Planning Sensor Maneuver Assessor Survivability Ground Space Fires & Effects Comms Network Resource Planning Terrain Analyzer Security Air Defense Planning Analysis Services Rehearsal Services AAR Services PPS Support Services SoS COE Simulation Battle Command & Mission Execution Incoming Order Processor Policy Editor Order, Report & Authorizer Action Requester Task Organization Notification Command Services Manned Ground Vehicle Remote Operation Unattended Munitions Control Unmanned Payloads Control UAV Control UGV Control Common Vehicle Control Airspace Control Fires & Effects Control UGS Control Ground Space Control Tactical Control Embedded Sustainment Platform Soldier Mission Readiness System Maintenance Supply & Distribution Force Health Protection Maintenance Manager Supply Manager Distribution Manager Force Health Protection Manager Administrative Services Sustainment Info Services Human Resource Services Threat Monitor Service Sustainment Planning Services Human Resource Services Manager Rear Area Security Manager Sustainment Control Services Interactive / Computational Info Services Geo-based Decision Tools GeoBML and JC3IEDM
5 Bandwidth Network Centric Challenges Design impact on actionable geospatial information products Minimize the size of all information products Achieve the best ratio of information value to bandwidth Minimize the frequency of network transmissions Design a persistent quality into product.responsive to dynamic info Design information products with the broadest application/recipient set Computation and Storage Design impacts Computational abstraction.. develop base information products supporting a broad range of applications Build information products with the broadest application / recipient set
6 Network Centric Challenges (Design Constraints) Potential value of a Net-centric force is theoretically N 2 Metcalf s Law So the bigger the force the better my situational awareness..right? There are some assumptions that must be met 1. There is real potential in all transactions Geo-information product has utility to the functional C4ISR processes of the recipient. automated systems and soldiers 2. All interactions have positive value As a function of value: Knowledge > Information > Data Maximize OHIO / information should be ready to use 3. N-way interactions create the most value Design geo-information product utility for the broadest set of Battlefield Functional Areas (BFAs), their systems and processes 4. There will be both dense and sparse islands of interaction Design for varying organizational topologies Derived from: Network Centric Warfare, Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority Alberts, Garstka and Stein, 1999 Engineer Research and Development Center
7 Architectural Framework (Terrain and Weather) Battle Command/Mission Execution Planning and Preparation Situation Understanding C4ISR Sensor Fusion C2 Training / Modeling and Simulation Fusion Level Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit Net Centric Enterprise Services Enterprise GIS Architecture Photogrammetry And Spectral Technology Format / Encoding R A W D A T A Exploitation Technology Analytic Technologies Decision Tools Decision Tools I Geographic Context Tactical Context Mission Context K Situational Context N Representation Representation Information N Knowledge F O Format/Encoding F Format/Encoding O Format/Encoding W Format/Encoding A R L Models C Models M Models Models T S A T I O N Tier 1 E D G E Tier 2 U N D E R S T A N D I N G Tier 3 Bandwidth Actionable Information
8 Spatial Objects and Representation (Consistent Computational Representation) Engineer Research and Development Center Spatially Discrete Organization of the Battlespace Physical properties of terrain, organized to stable qualities as related to: Spatial hierarchy of tactical employment within the battlescape OCOKA, compartment or a position of advantage Positions: Def / Attack, Blocking and Battle; Engagement areas, ambush Task or Mission (C2IEDM) Geo-Complex Battle Compartment OCOKA!. Direct Fire Positions!. Temporal / Relational Objects Movement graphs attributes Task - to - mission relationships Wx Effects-mobility & sensors Every 3 Hrs out to 36 Hrs with 12 Hr updates (IMETS/BFM) T + 3n.. T 0 Movement Graph!. Mobility Overwatch!.
9 Current Spatial Objects for geobml Tier 1 Products (Terrain/Military Context) Natural Obstacles Concealment Fields of Fire Cross Country Movement Maneuver Network Mobility Corridors Chokepoints Tier 2 products (Mission Context) /Tier 3 products (Planned) Avenues of approach Assembly Areas Engagement Areas Tier 2 Routes Battle Positions Attack positions Axis of Advance Indirect Fire Firing Position Assault Positions Attack by Fire Positions Drop Zones Helicopter Landing Zones
10 Semantic Consistency (Potential of a Battle Management Language) Engineer Research and Development Center Formal Language with Syntax and Semantics Doctrine BML Protocols XML Web Services/ Grid Services Representation Command & Control Information Exchange Data Model (C2IEDM)
11 Why a BML is needed Its vocabulary is found in FM 1-02, but it lacks clearly delineated rules governing its use (semantics and syntax). It is riddled with ambiguity and overlapping definitions. As such, it is incapable of transitioning to the full range of automation that the Army is implementing. It will not support the integration of advanced modeling and simulation with digitized command and control.
12 Semantic Consistency (Potential of a Battle Management Language) Engineer Research and Development Center Definition BML is an unambiguous language used for the command and control of forces and equipment conducting military operations. BML is being developed as a standard representation of digitized C2 information for executable plans, orders, Requests and reports for military units, for simulated forces, and for future robotic forces. C2 Systems C2 Systems Simulation Systems Robotic Forces
13 Command and Control Information Exchange Data Model (C2IEDM) Engineer Research and Development Center Provides Core C2 Semantics Comprehensive Very well documented Tables Attributes Relations Allows for Extension Action Reporting Data Location Capability Object-Type Object-Item OBJECT-TYPE OBJECT-ITEM ORGANIZATION -TYPE ORGANIZATION MATERIAL-TYPE MATERIAL PERSON -TYPE PERSON FACILITY-TYPE FACILITY FEATURE-TYPE FEATURE
14 Development of Formal Grammars to Support Coalition Command and Control: A Battle Management Language for Orders, Requests and Reports Presented to the 11th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium Paper I-069 Dr. Ulrich Schade Dr. Michael Hieb FGAN-FKIE GERMANY schade@fgan.de George Mason University US mhieb@gmu.edu
15 Semantic Consistency (geospatial Battle Management Language (geobml)) Engineer Research and Development Center geobml is an Unambiguous Language Both domain specific and cross-cutting Defined by the role of actionable geo-information in the C2 Provides Unification across Doctrine and terms Explicit vocabulary and grammar Specific context mapped to operations, missions and tasks Explicit Representation Consistent extension to the C2IEDM Standard framework and exchange model Computational structure Both necessary and sufficient for shared, common understanding Protocols Explicit structure for transmission / sharing Terrain, Weather and Military Eng Terms Doctrine geobml Protocols Representation Geo-Environmental Extension to Command & Control Information Exchange Data Model (C2IEDM / JC3IEDM) XML Web Services Grid Services Explicit Computational Representation For Actionable Geospatial Information
16 Evolving a geobml Table of Organization and Equipment (TO&E) Physical Account of the Force Vehicle Type and Count # of units Spacing Weapons Relationships F (+) F (T) F (-) Assumptions 1. Cohesive Formations occur to execute a tactical task or mission creating a situation 2. Grouping of objects. So there are subordinate forces (children) forces comprising the Force (target) 3. Cohesive Formation and tasks argue that there are operational relationships required for the task (e.g. fire: complimenting angles and range fans) 4. Possible that there is parent to the target force (F (+)) Situation F (+) Situation F (T) Situation F (-) Syntax and Semantics 1. Understand the elements and qualities of the force being evaluated Possible Tasks, Activities and Missions C2IEDM 2. Field Manuals TO&E, Physical Conditions and Behaviors Universal Joint Task List (UJTL) Language of Command Battlefield Operating Systems (BOS) Tactical Tasks and Missions Engineer Research and Development Center
17 Evolving a geobml Table of Organization and Equipment (TO&E) Physical Account of the Force Vehicle Type and Count # of units Spacing Weapons Relationships Situation F (T) F (+) F (T) F (-) Situation F (-) What Dynamics Impact the Representation 1. Weather 2. Other Battlefield information 3. Persistence of Operational Value Computation Constraints 1. Data and Information Dependencies Product Generation Time Sensitivity Computational Time Allowed 1 Time, Intervals or at Run Time Sensitivity to locally held data Situation F (+)
18 C2IEDM Implementation of Spatial Objects Engineer Research and Development Center An individually identified object that has military significance. object-item-category-code feature feature-id category-code feature-category-code control-feature control-feature-id category-code control-feature-category-code object-item object-item-id category-code name alternate-identification-text symbol-code An OBJECT-ITEM that encompasses meteorological, geographic, and control features of military significance. A nontangible FEATURE of military interest that is administratively specified, may be represented by a geometric figure, and is associated with the conduct of military operations. object-item-type object-item-id object-type-id object-item-type-index reporting-data-id A record of the perceived condition of a specific OBJECT-ITEM as a specific OBJECT-TYPE object-type object-type-id category-code dummy-indicator-code name object-type-category-code feature-type feature-type-id category-code feature-type-category-code Key Currently Exists in C2IEDM BML additions Additions to capture SOs An individually identified class of objects that has military significance. An OBJECT-TYPE that encompasses meteorological, geographic, and control features of military significance. spatial-object spatial-object-id A nontangible FEATURE- TYPE of military interest that may be represented as a geometric figure and is associated with the conduct of military operations. control-feature-type control-feature-type-id category-code
19 C2IEDM Implementation (Spatial Objects defined) spatial-object spatial-object-id category-code access-to-objective-area area-of-interest (object item id) concealment direction-of-attack effected-control-measure (action effect item) engagement-area (object item id) exclusion friendly-maneuver-plan (action functional association index) geometry location (location id) LOS-to-objective-area maneuver-graph mobility-network object-item-association subject-object-item-id object-object-item-id object-item-association-index category-code subcategory-code task-id object-item-status object-item-id object-item-status-ix category-code hostility-code booby-trap-indicator-code emission-control-code reporting-data-id control-feature-status control-feature-status-id object-item-status-index investigation-status-code mine-presence-code recirculation-indicator-code surface-condition-code Key Currently Exists in C2IEDM BML additions Additions to capture SOs spatial-object-status spatial-object-status-id object-item-status-index Etc. objective-area (action objective item) observation-field-of-fire orientation reference-id size (unit type size code) type-solver unit-type (unit type echelon code) vehicle-type (equipment type) weapon-type (equipment type) weighted-cost object-item-location object-item-id location-id accuracy-quantity bearing-angle speed-rate speed-accuracy-rate use-category-code reporting-id status-code surface-firmness-code control-feature-status-category-code location location-id location-category-code
20 SO Product Usage Tier 1 Products Division 7 Step MDMP Tier 2 SO s Tier 3 SO s Bde 7 Step MDMP Tier 2 SO s Bn TF 7 Step MDMP Tier 3 SO s Tier 2 SO s MDMP Military Decision Making Process Tier 3 SO s
21 Demonstration Architecture (Proof of Concept) Engineer Research and Development Center Web Service Interface Commanders Support Environment Battlespace Terrain Reasoning & Analysis System geobml C2IEDM BML GUI Tasks Graphics Units OTB Route
22 Example Spatial Objects Simulation Digital Plan / OPORDER (geobml) Enemy Situation (Tier 2 Engagement Areas) C2 System Courses of Action (Tier 2 Routes)
23 What this can mean for a Coalition US Systems A Common Operational Picture Coalition Systems Web Services C2 Business Logic Other Business Logics Embedded Simulation Web Services HLA / DIS MIP Services Layer C/JMTK HLA / DIS BML GML MIPDEM COTS / NGA / CJMTK geobml MIP / COTS / DoD JC3IEDM Operational DBs Geodatabase
24 Partial BML Portfolio Growing community of investment Shared belief that BML is a necessary component of Net-Centric Operations Challenges Technological infrastructure enabling distributed, multi-national development and extension of BML Operational Domains and specific requirements of National entities Capability to maintain the integrity of the JC3IEDM Specification Ground Air Naval Implementation Software Services International Coalition BML X X X X X X NATO-WG X X X JBML X X X X X X geobml X X X XBML X X X X Army BML X X AO BML X X MIP/JC3IEDM X X X X X
25 Summary Network-Centric Operations require a change in paradigm for the employment of actionable geospatial information Digital Maps are not enough Move beyond concepts of maps as the wallpaper of the COP Actionable geo-information and decision tools need to empower C2 activities at the appropriate level of semantic and syntax representation BML / geobml is a formalization of C2 Information and representation Allows Commanders to access the right environmental information to accomplish their intent Spatial Objects forming geobml will enable reasoning to adapt to both changed missions and a variety of terrain and environmental data Geospatial information and implementation concepts have achieved a state of maturity that merits inclusion in the Net-Centric Enterprise Carry the right battlespace knowledge you carry the day
Geospatial Battle Management Language (geobml)
Geospatial Battle Management Language () Geo-environmental Information Response to et-centric and Distributed Operations Objective of Geo-environmental Information To increase the agility of Battle Command
More informationExtensible Battle Management Language
Extensible Battle Management Language Dr. Michael Hieb Alion Dr. Hieb is an Architect of the US Army Simulation to C4I Interoperability Overarching Integrated Product Team. He can be reached at (703) 933-3376.
More informationC4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
More informationUS Army CIO/G6 Battle Management Language (BML) Architecture Project ISSUE
US Army CIO/G6 Battle Management Language (BML) Architecture Project Dr. Stanley H. Levine for the BML Conference 2/4/2009 ISSUE There are many Army, Joint, and Coalition BML efforts completed, ongoing,
More informationFuture Battle Command: Geospatially-Enabled
Future Battle Command: Geospatially-Enabled ESRI Federal User Conference 21 February, 2008 John J. Day Director, Defense Business Development ESRI, Inc. 1 Outline Geospatially-enabled Battle Command What
More informationAdding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048
Adding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048 Dr. Mark Pullen, Douglas Corner, Samuel Singapogu and Nicholas Clark, GMU C4I Center, USA Nicolas Cordonnier and Mohammad Mennane,
More informationSingle Integrated Ground Picture
Single Integrated Ground Picture 2003 Interoperability and System Integration Presented by: Anthony Lisuzzo Director, Intelligence and Information Directorate US ARMY CECOM 732-532-5557 Email: anthony.lisuzzo@mail1.monmouth.army.mil
More informationTest and Evaluation WIPT
Test and Evaluation WIPT 11 December 2003 Mrs. Ellen M. Purdy Acting Director, Combined Test Organization Office: 703-647-1452 ellen.purdy@fcscto.army.mil 1 Analysis Synthesis Model Test via Operational
More informationU.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Briefing for the SAS Panel Workshop on SMART Cooperation in Operational Analysis Simulations and Models 13 October 2015 Release of
More informationLESSON 2 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD OVERVIEW
LESSON DESCRIPTION: LESSON 2 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD OVERVIEW In this lesson you will learn the requirements and procedures surrounding intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB).
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Task Number: 07-6-1063 Task Title: Conduct a Linkup (Battalion - Brigade) Distribution Restriction: for public release; distribution is unlimited. Destruction Notice:
More informationBattle Management Language Transformations
Battle Management Language Transformations Major Frederic Bernard CDEF / DSRO 1 Place Joffre 75005 Paris France frederic.bernard@cdef.terre.defense.gouv.fr Lionel Khimeche Délégation Générale pour l Armement
More informationGeographic Intelligence
MCWP 2-12.1 Geographic Intelligence U.S. Marine Corps 6 July 2000 PCN 143 000067 00 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, DC 20380-1775 6 July 2000 FOREWORD Marine
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationIntegrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation
Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation Dr. J. Mark Pullen and Dr. Stanley Levine C4I Center, George Mason University Dr. Kevin Heffner, Pegasus Simulation Lionel Khimeche,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Military Engineering Advanced Technology
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 2 - Applied Research 0602308A - Advanced Concepts and Simulation COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
More informationTactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm
Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm 16 th ICCRTS 22 June 2011 Paper ID 149 Mr. Ken Teske and Mr. Mike Tisdel FGM, Inc. C2OTM Focused Integration Team (FIT) 1 Agenda Define C2OTM
More informationTHE STRYKER BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM INFANTRY BATTALION RECONNAISSANCE PLATOON
FM 3-21.94 THE STRYKER BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM INFANTRY BATTALION RECONNAISSANCE PLATOON HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
More informationEvaluating the Proposed Coalition Battle Management Language Standard as a Basis for Enhanced C2 to M&S Interoperability
J. Mark Pullen, D.Sc. Michael R. Hieb, PhD. Center of Excellence in C4I George Mason University 4400 University Drive Fairfax, VA 22030 USA Voice: (1) 703-993-3682 Fax: (1) 703-993-1706 mpullen@gmu.edu
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0305192N - JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM Prior
More informationMission Definition. Joint: Army:
Its About the Mission Mission Definition Joint: 1. The task, together with the purpose, that clearly indicates the action to be taken and the reason for the action. 2. In common usage, especially when
More informationOn the Formal Representation of Enemy Courses of Action. June 15, 2009 VIStology ICCRTS '09 Washington, DC
On the Formal Representation of Enemy Courses of Action 1 Outline of Talk Problem Statement Background: ECOAs, JC3IEDM Representing ECOAs in JC3IEDM Issues with Representing ECOAs in JC3IEDM Conclusions
More informationJoint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training Joint Theater Level Simulation Global Operations Don Weter, CIV Joint Staff J7 Environment Operations Division JTLS & JCATS Program Manager M&S Analysis
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY
More informationFrom Stove-pipe to Network Centric Leveraging Technology to Present a Unified View
From Stove-pipe to Network Centric Leveraging Technology to Present a Unified View Medhat A. Abuhantash U.S. Army, Communications and Electronics Command (CECOM), Software Engineering Center (SEC), Battlespace
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8320.2 December 2, 2004 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Data Sharing in a Net-Centric Department of Defense References: (a) DoD Directive 8320.1, DoD Data Administration,
More informationSubj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3430.23C N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3430.23C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: ELECTRONIC
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationINTRODUCTION. Chapter One
Chapter One INTRODUCTION Traditional measures of effectiveness (MOEs) usually ignore the effects of information and decisionmaking on combat outcomes. In the past, command, control, communications, computers,
More informationMission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division
UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other
More informationCollaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems
Collaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems May 21, 2008 Mr. Richard Lee ADUSD (Information Integration & Operations) ODUSD (Advanced Systems & Concepts Defense Research & Engineering 703-695-7938
More informationIntelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Cpt.instr. Ovidiu SIMULEAC
Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Cpt.instr. Ovidiu SIMULEAC Intelligence Preparation of Battlefield or IPB as it is more commonly known is a Command and staff tool that allows systematic, continuous
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
More informationThe 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium
The 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium Extensible Battle Management Language (XBML): A Methodology for Web Enabling Command and Control for Network Centric Warfare
More informationCHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW)
CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission The IEW support mission at all echelons is to provide intelligence, EW, and CI support to help you accomplish your mission. Elements of Intelligence
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
More informationCommon to all Engineer Senior Leader Courses
Common to all Engineer Senior Leader Courses Army Physical Fitness Test / Height and Weight Write a paper (APA format) Write a memorandum Physical Readiness Training and Physical Readiness Training Plan
More informationObstacle Planning at Task-Force Level and Below
Chapter 5 Obstacle Planning at Task-Force Level and Below The goal of obstacle planning is to support the commander s intent through optimum obstacle emplacement and integration with fires. The focus at
More informationRepresentability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM
12th ICCRTS Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM Brian Ulicny a, Christopher J. Matheus a, Gerald Powell b Robert Dionne a and Mieczyslaw M. Kokar a,c a VIStology, Inc., 5 Mountainview Drive,
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0602784A MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 52477 50318
More informationTeam 3: Communication Aspects In Urban Operations
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Faculty and Researcher Publications Faculty and Researcher Publications 2007-03 Team 3: Communication Aspects In Urban Operations Doll, T. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/35617
More informationJoint Command and Control (JC2) Capability & C2 Data Model
Joint Command and Control (JC2) Capability & C2 Data Model December 1, 2003 Mr. Richard Lee ADUSD (Network Centric Warfare & Interoperability) ODUSD (advanced Systems & Concepts) 703-695-7938 1 Agenda
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 15.31 15.787 13.926-13.926 13.92 14.19 14.43
More informationJoint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training Joint Theater Level Simulation Global Operations Don Weter, CIV Joint Staff J7 Environment Operations Division Program Manager M&S Analysis Larry Hose,
More information21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability
21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability Topics Interoperability/Integration and Security Names of Authors Dr. Kenneth
More informationEnemy-Oriented Tactical Tasks. Exploit Feint Fix Interdict Neutralize. Terrain-Oriented Tactical Tasks. Retain Secure
Terms and Graphics References FM 101-5-1 Operational Terms and Graphics is the key reference for operations orders. JP 1-02 DoD Dictionary and MCRP 5-12C Marine Corps Supplement to the DoD Dictionary are
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationObstacle Planning at Corps, Division, and Brigade Levels
Chapter 4 Obstacle Planning at Corps, Division, and Brigade Levels Commanders and staffs consider the use of obstacles when planning offensive, defensive, and retrograde operations. This chapter describes
More informationThe 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine
1923 1939 1941 1944 1949 1954 1962 1968 1976 1905 1910 1913 1914 The 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine 1982 1986 1993 2001 2008 2011 1905-1938: Field Service Regulations 1939-2000:
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Status: Approved 20 Mar 2015 Effective Date: 15 Sep 2016 Task Number: 71-8-5715 Task Title: Control Tactical Airspace (Brigade - Corps) Distribution Restriction:
More informationExpeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head
DCN #: 43-2882-17 Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head 2 ONR 30: Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare N091 Principal Deputy for P&R NRL ONRG Chief of Naval Research
More informationPlan Requirements and Assess Collection. August 2014
ATP 2-01 Plan Requirements and Assess Collection August 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters, Department of the Army This publication is available
More informationAPPENDIX A. COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF OFFICER COURSE CURRICULUM DESCRIPTION C3 ILE, ATRRS Code (Bn Option) Academic Year 05 06
APPENDIX A COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF OFFICER COURSE CURRICULUM DESCRIPTION 701 1 250 C3 ILE, ATRRS Code (Bn Option) C100 Foundations Block Academic Year 05 06 These modules are designed to make students
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationTACTICAL EMPLOYMENT OF ANTIARMOR PLATOONS AND COMPANIES
(FM 7-91) TACTICAL EMPLOYMENT OF ANTIARMOR PLATOONS AND COMPANIES HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DECEMBER 2002 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. (FM
More informationThis publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (https://armypubs.us.army.mil/doctrine/index.html). To receive publishing updates, please
This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (https://armypubs.us.army.mil/doctrine/index.html). To receive publishing updates, please subscribe at http://www.apd.army.mil/adminpubs/new_subscribe.asp.
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical
More informationCapturing Commander s Intent in User Interfaces for. Net-centric Operations
Capturing Commander s Intent in User Interfaces for AN OBSTACLE COURSE EVALUATION OF AWACS 40/45 HMI OPTIONS Net-centric Operations 30 July 02 Jun 2007 Brian P. Donnelly Warfighter Interface Division Human
More informationDetect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success
Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success Countering Smart and Adaptive Threats Military pilots and aircrews must be prepared to
More informationEXAMPLE SQUAD OPERATION ORDER FORMAT. [Plans and orders normally contain a code name and are numbered consecutively within a calendar year.
EXAMPLE SQUAD OPERATION ORDER FORMAT OPERATION ORDER (OPORD) [Plans and orders normally contain a code name and are numbered consecutively within a calendar year.] References: The heading of the plan or
More informationOPERATIONAL TERMS AND GRAPHICS
FM 1-02 (FM 101-5-1) MCRP 5-12A OPERATIONAL TERMS AND GRAPHICS SEPTEMBER 2004 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This
More informationDeveloping a Tactical Geospatial Course for Army Engineers. By Jared L. Ware
Developing a Tactical Geospatial Course for Army Engineers By Jared L. Ware ESRI technology, such as the templates, gives the Army an easy-to-use, technical advantage that helps Soldiers optimize GEOINT
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More information150-LDR-5012 Conduct Troop Leading Procedures Status: Approved
Report Date: 05 Jun 2017 150-LDR-5012 Conduct Troop Leading Procedures Status: Approved Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Destruction Notice: None Foreign
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Task Number: 01-6-0416 Task Title: Conduct Aviation Missions as part of an Area Defense Supporting Reference(s): Step Number Reference ID Reference Name Required
More informationCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Status: Approved 20 Feb 2018 Effective Date: 23 Mar 2018 Task Number: 71-CORP-5119 Task Title: Prepare an Operation Order Distribution Restriction: Approved for public
More informationRED ZONES: IMPROVING THE ENEMY GROUND FORCE SITUATION DISPLAY IN DIGITAL BATTLE COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS. Ray M. Ceralde Major, United States Army
RED ZONES: IMPROVING THE ENEMY GROUND FORCE SITUATION DISPLAY IN DIGITAL BATTLE COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS by Ray M. Ceralde Major, United States Army 10 th International Command and Control Research
More information(QJLQHHU 5HFRQQDLVVDQFH FM Headquarters, Department of the Army
FM 5-170 (QJLQHHU 5HFRQQDLVVDQFH Headquarters, Department of the Army DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. *FM 5-170 Field Manual No. 5-170 Headquarters Department
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Status: Approved 18 Feb 2015 Effective Date: 30 Sep 2016 Task Number: 71-9-6221 Task Title: Conduct Counter Improvised Explosive Device Operations (Division Echelon
More informationFM AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS
Field Manual No. FM 3-01.7 FM 3-01.7 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 31 October 2000 FM 3-01.7 AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS Table of Contents PREFACE Chapter 1 THE ADA BRIGADE
More information20th ICCRTS C2-Simulation Interoperability. Identifying Command Post Staff Tasks for Simulation Augmentation (Paper 047)
20th ICCRTS C2-Simulation Interoperability Identifying Command Post Staff Tasks for Simulation Augmentation (Paper 047) Topics C2-Simulation Interoperability Modeling and Simulation Names of Authors James
More informationMobile Subscriber Equipment (MSE) Operations
Headquarters, Department of the Army FIELD MANUAL 11-55 Mobile Subscriber Equipment (MSE) Operations Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. *FM 11-55 Field Manual
More informationGLOBAL INFORMATION GRID NETOPS TASKING ORDERS (GNTO) WHITE PAPER.
. Introduction This White Paper advocates United States Strategic Command s (USSTRATCOM) Joint Task Force Global Network Operations (JTF-GNO) and/or AF Network Operations (AFNETOPS) conduct concept and
More informationChapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY
Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense This chapter addresses air and missile defense support at the operational level of war. It includes a brief look at the air threat to CSS complexes and addresses CSS
More informationTHE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 228 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
More informationHeadquarters, Department of the Army
ATP 3-34.80 GEOSPATIAL ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2017 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This publication supersedes ATP 3-34.80, dated 23 June 2014. Headquarters,
More informationEXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDTEN/BA 6 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0605866N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support COST (In Millions) Total PE Cost 0706 / EMC
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
More information2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT
ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.
More informationTest and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
More informationCLASSES/REFERENCES TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE
CLASSES/REFERENCES TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE Day 1: Operational Terms ADRP 1-02 Operational Graphics ADRP 1-02 Day2: Movement Formations &Techniques FM 3-21.8, ADRP 3-90 Offensive Operations FM 3-21.10,
More informationFuture Force Capabilities
Future Force Capabilities Presented by: Mr. Rickey Smith US Army Training and Doctrine Command Win in a Complex World Unified Land Operations Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative throughout the range
More informationSynthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment
More informationPreparing to Occupy. Brigade Support Area. and Defend the. By Capt. Shayne D. Heap and Lt. Col. Brent Coryell
Preparing to Occupy and Defend the Brigade Support Area By Capt. Shayne D. Heap and Lt. Col. Brent Coryell A Soldier from 123rd Brigade Support Battalion, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division,
More informationAUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Task Number: 01-6-0029 Task Title: Maintain the BCT Current Situation for Aviation Supporting Reference(s): Step Number Reference ID Reference Name Required Primary
More informationTHE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 227 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE 3.078
More informationIntroduction RESPONSIBILITIES
Introduction Throughout history, the knowledge and physical effects of terrain have played a dominant role in the development of society during both peace and war. Terrain is a portion of the earth s surface
More informationArmy Airspace Command and Control in a Combat Zone
FM 3-52 (FM 100-103) Army Airspace Command and Control in a Combat Zone AUGUST 2002 HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
More informationNet-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet 1 LandWarNet (LWN) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) / Network Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) ICD LandISRNet Intel Appendices
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2016 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Status: Approved 30 Mar 2017 Effective Date: 14 Sep 2017 Task Number: 71-CORP-1200 Task Title: Conduct Tactical Maneuver for Corps Distribution Restriction: Approved
More information