Extensible Battle Management Language

Transcription

1 Extensible Battle Management Language Dr. Michael Hieb Alion Dr. Hieb is an Architect of the US Army Simulation to C4I Interoperability Overarching Integrated Product Team. He can be reached at (703) Also on the XBML Team are: Dr. Mark Pullen - GMU Dr. Andreas Tolk - ODU William Sudnikovich - ACS 1

2 What Is Battle Management Language (BML)? BML is the unambiguous language used to: Command and control forces and equipment conducting military operations, and To provide for situational awareness and a shared, common operational picture. Slide 2 Along with this definition, we offer four principles that guide our discussion of BML though this brief: 1)BML must be unambiguous. 2) BML must not constrain the expression of a commander s intent. 3) BML must use standardized data representations. 4) BML must allow forces to communicate information pertaining to their mission, their status and their environment. 2

3 The Problem Currently, Command and Control is conducted primarily via verbal and textual means, formatted messages are used only in special cases The GIG will provide new abilities to communicate and collaborate Without standard Command and Control formats, this communication will be dependent upon human interpretation As such, it is incapable of transitioning to the full range of automation that the DoD is implementing and will not support the integration of advanced M&S with digitized command and control in the GIG. Slide 3 The current BML is a loosely knit language lacking clearly delineated rules governing its use. Strict application of its meanings is not required due to the give and take between people which leads to an understanding of what is meant, not necessarily what is said. This is particularly true when one has not been precise enough to begin with, or has given conflicting information. As such it does not lend itself to supporting integration of our digitized command and control systems with simulations. 3

4 BML Representation - The 5Ws Tasks to Subordinates Graphics convert to BML Division Mission Division attacks on order in zone to seize OBJ SLAM. Division Concept of Operations Form of maneuver: Penetration Main effort: BLUE-MECH-BDE2, on order BLUE-ARMOR-BDE1 Supporting effort: BLUE-MECH-BDE1 BLUE-ARMOR-BN1 Deep: None Reserve: BLUE-AVN-BDE1 Security: BLUE-CAV-SQN1 Tactical Combat Force: BLUE-MECH-TM1 Who What When Where Why BLUE-MECH-BDE1 Attacks Zone Fix (MRR1) BLUE-MECH-BDE2 Attacks Zone Penetrate (MRR2) BLUE-ARMOR-BDE1 Follows and Assumes (B-M- BDE2) Zone Seize (OBJ SLAM) BLUE-AVN-BDE Occupy AA EAGLE Reserve BLUE-ARMOR-BN1 BLUE-CAV-SQN1 BLUE-MECH-TM1 Follow and Support (B-A- BDE1) Screen Tactical Combat Force Zone Zone (PL AMBER to PL BLUE) DSA Support (B-A-BDE1) Protect (Division left flank) Protect (Division Rear Area) Slide 4 This slide shows an example of a COA sketch. Imagine the graphics being linked to the BML. 1) we can interpret the overall division mission: Division attacks on order in zone to seize OBJ SLAM Note that in place of the general description of Division we could actually identify the specific division by knowing what machine we were logged onto and keying to the ORG ID. Also on order was selected as the when for this example since there is not enough information to determine otherwise. Normally the COA sketch would be accompanied by additional products such as the COA statement and if analysis is complete, a synchronization matrix. 2) we can determine the Division s concept of operation. Since this is an offensive operation we are interested in the chosen scheme of maneuver, in this case a penetration. We can identify the main and supporting efforts as indicated. As well as the reserve, security and tactical combat force. Again without the additional products it is assumed that the Aviation Brigade is the reserve. It is also assumed that the Cavalry Squadron is performing a screen. The graphics shows it doing a security mission by adding an S, a G, or a C to the graphic this would be clarified. 3) we can translate the graphics into specific tasks to subordinates as shown. This could all be linked to the proper paragraphs of the OPORD and completed through auto-fill. Though the simulation may only be able to interpret the message, we can see that it would be fairly easy to include graphics into the BML and translate the graphics to populate the correct fields of a BML message. 4

5 BML in a Standardized Data Model (Command and Control Information Exchange Data Model - C2IEDM) ACTION-OBJECTIVE ACTION-id (FK) ACTION-OBJECTIVE -index ACTION-OBJECTIVE -categorycode WHY ACTION WHAT ACTION-id ACTION-category-code ACTION-name ACTION-category-code ACTION-TASK ACTION-EVENT ACTION-TASK WHAT ACTION-TASK-id (FK) ACTION-TASK -minimum-duration ACTION-TASK -maximum-duration ACTION-TASK -estimated-duration ACTION-TASK -planned-start-date ACTION-TASK -planned-end-date ACTION-TASK -planned-start-time ACTION-TASK -planned-end-time WHEN ORGANISATION-TYPE ORGANISATION-TYPE -id ORGANISATION-TYPE -category-code ORGANISATION-TYPE- CATEGORY-CODE UNIT-TYPE POST -TYPE UNIT-TYPE UNIT-TYPE -id (FK) UNIT-TYPE -category-code UNIT-TYPE -mobility-code UNIT-TYPE -service-code UNIT-TYPE -size-code (echelon) ORGANISATION WHO ORGANISATION-id (FK) ORGANISATION -category-code ORGANISATION -nickname-name ORGANISATION -type-id (FK) LOCATION WHERE LOCATION-id LOCATION -category-code ORGANISATION-ACTION-ASSOCIATION ORGANISATION-id (FK) ACTION-id (FK) ORGANISATION- ACTION-ASSOCIATION-index ORGANISATION- ACTION-ASSOCIATION -category-code ORGANISATION- ACTION-ASSOCIATION -effective-date ORGANISATION- ACTION-ASSOCIATION -effective-time ORGANISATION- ACTION-ASSOCIATION -intent-text ORGANIZATION-POINT FACILITY-LOCATION MATERIAL-POINT FEATURE-LOCATION PERSON-POINT Slide 5 An examination of the LC2IED shows that the 5Ws can be represented to support BML development. 5

6 BML Scope and Uniqueness C4I BML Orders & SA C4I Simulation Robotic Forces Slide 6 Battle Management Language is intended to be used to exchange C2 Information (Orders and Situational Awareness (SA)) between: 1) Individuals using C4I Systems; 2) Simulations; and 3) Future Robotic Forces. While C4I systems can exchange primarily free-text based C2 directives designed for human consumption, Simulations cannot consume such information. Instead, Simulations need a large overhead of trained military experts to translate C4I free-text orders into Simulation Commands. 6

7 BML Methodology Joint International XML/ Data Replication XML/ Data Replication C2IEDM BML C2IEDM BML NATO Doctrine Joint Doctrine Army XML/ Data Replication JCDB Data Model BML FM-1-02 Slide 7 This approach to building the BML into the C4I data model also points the way towards expanding the concept to accommodate joint and international interoperability. BML accommodates Doctrine explicitly in it s methodology. 7

8 XBML Testbed BML GUI OTB XML/ SOAP X M L / S O A P Multi Source DB XBML Presentation to DMSO C4I -Sim TEM X M L / S O A P 3 October 2003 CAPES Slide 8 The XBML project is currently focusing on taking an existing Army BML testbed and using SOAP/XML interfaces to develop a demonstration of XBML s utility. The goal is to develop a testbed for plugging in C4I and Simulation systems. 8

9 What Is XBML? XBML is BML provided as a Web Service via XML/SOAP and the C2IEDM. XBML is being developed as an integral part of the Extensible Modeling and Simulation Framework. Slide 9 Supporting Technologies include: XMSF C2IEDM Structured Representation of Doctrine as in FDMS Doctrinal Definitions and Task Lists: Joint Level Definitions and Task Lists [e.g. Joint Pub 1-02 Dictionary of Terms Joint Universal Task List (UJTL)] Service LevelService Definitions and Dictionaries e.g. FM Operational Terms and Graphics Service Task Lists e.g. FM 7-15, The Army Universal Task List (AUTL) 9

10 Critical M&S Initiatives for the GIG XBML XMSF Sharable M&S Components Operational Node GIG M&S Node Joint Transformation Doctrine Developer 10

11 Backups For more information on XMSF and XBML visit: netlab.gmu.edu/xmsf/pubs 11

12 BML is Key Enabler for GIG Capable Forces Network Centric Know precisely, in real-time, location of all friendly and enemy forces Robotics Integrated into Force Amplify capability of manned elements Multi-functional (RSTA, armed, sustainment) Increased Reliance on Extended Range Engagement Organic plus strategic and tactical support Long range ISR and precision fires Capable of Air-Mobile Operations Commercial and minimum DoD strategic and tactical lift Indirect Fire Function Direct Fire Function Networked Command, Control & Comms Organic & Inorganic RSTA Infantry Carrier + C2 Function Sensor Function Slide 12 The US Army is devoting much effort to defining requirements for a Future Combat System. (FCS). Key to this is performing studies to analyze what C2 configurations and technologies will be needed. This slide portrays a configuration of FCS that is being used for C2 Analysis. The configuration shown is of 2 Infantry Carriers and 2 C2 vehicles with a crew of 4-6 people. The other vehicles are robotic, consisting of Scout Vehicles, Unmanned Ariel Vehicles, and Direct and Indirect Fire Vehicles. Current Operations Orders will not support C2 requirements for these robotic forces. Neither voice (via radio) nor text-based directives, as used today, will be sufficient. Thus we have determined that there is a requirement for a digitized Battle Management Language. We also note that the current requirement for Simulations to receive unambiguous, data-based orders is very similar to the requirements for a FCS force. 12

13 Army, Joint and NATO Doctrine Hierarchies Slide 13 13