Army Transformation. and the Network Enterprise Technology Command (NETCOM)

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Army Transformation. and the Network Enterprise Technology Command (NETCOM)"

Erik Myron McBride
6 years ago
Views:

1 Army Transformation and the Network Enterprise Technology Command (NETCOM) By Dr. Michael L. Gentry Senior Technical Director/Chief Engineer U. S. April 24, /4/2002

2 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 25 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 204, Arlington, VA , and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project ( ), Washington, DC AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 4/24/ TITLE AND SUBTITLE Army Transformation and the Network Enterprise Technology Command (NETCOM) 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED Briefing 4/24/ FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Gentry, Dr. Michael L. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER U.S. 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 0. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER IATAC 390 Fairview Park Drive Falls Church, VA SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 2a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; Distribution unlimited 2b. DISTRIBUTION CODE A 3. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 Words) Breifing from the Phoenix Challenge SUBJECT TERMS IATAC Collection, knowledge management, NETCOM, asymmetrical warfare 5. NUMBER OF PAGES 2 6. PRICE CODE 7. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT UNCLASSIFIED 8. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE UNCLASSIFIED 9. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT UNCLASSIFIED 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UNLIMITED NSN Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z

3 Transforming the Army... Requires Evolutionary Changes Requires Evolutionary Changes Processes Institutions Culture Philosophy Technology Our Leaders are The Army s Strategic Change Agents for achieving a network centric, knowledge-based Objective Force # 2 2

stewards in the battlespace, 6/4/2002 3 The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command Army Knowledge

battlespace, in our organizations, and in our mission practices.

4 stewards in the battlespace, 6/4/ The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command Army Knowledge Management AKM is intended to improve decision dominance by our warfighters and business stewards in the battlespace, in our organizations, and in our mission practices. ASLC SCIO (8 MAR 02) The Army strategy to transform itself into a network-centric, knowledge-based force. This effort is an integral part of Army Transformation. 3

5 Reshaping the Investment Strategy Other IA Reserves S&T $5B FY02 C4/IT BUDGET Computing Office Automation MILSATCOM Comms. Infrastructure Functional Area Apps. Leadership will change the balance! Warfighting Capabilities Business Overhead Warfighting Capabilities Business Overhead Traditional Transitional Transformed 6/4/ ASLC SCIO (8 MAR 02) 4

6 AKM Strategic Goals. Adopt governance and cultural changes to become a knowledge-based organization 2. Integrate knowledge management concepts and best business practices into Army processes to improve performance 3. Manage the Infostructure as an Enterprise to enhance capabilities and efficiencies 4. Scale Army Knowledge Online (AKO) as the Enterprise Portal to provide universal, secure access for the entire Army 5. Harness 4/7/2002 our 2:human capital for the knowledge-based Army 6/4/2002 5

7 Army Transformation Contracting Agency Army Transformation Information Realignment Installation Management MACOM Redesign Obj A Obj B End State Final Objective Acquisition 6/4/2002 6

8 IM Realignment Background (Objectives) Army CIO is the single corporate leader responsible for the Army Enterprise Infostructure (AEI) Provide policy and oversight at the HQDA level to insure consistent IM policy across the Army Realign operation and management functions under a single Operating Agency (NETCOM) responsible to the Army CIO at the Enterprise Level Achieve IM resource equities across the Army Flatten the organizational structure of IM operations clear chain of command 6/4/2002 7

9 CURRENT ARMY SIGNAL COMMAND MISSIONS Provide a warfighting competent strategically responsive Signal force support to: Combatant CINCs Army Service Component Commanders Joint and Combined Operations Establish, operate, protect, sustain, integrate, and manage the Army s portion of the Global Information Grid Protect and provide for the well-being of our people. The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command Evolving Missions NEW AKM MISSIONS: U.S. (USASC) is the Army's single authority to operate and manage the enterprise level infostructure. USASC will have technical command and control and configuration management authority for the Army's critical networks and systems, and will have operational review/coordination authority for any standards, system, architecture, design, or device that impacts enterprise level Army infostructure and Network Operations (NETOPS). 8 September 200 AKM Implementing Guidance NETCOM/9 th Mission Statement NETCOM is the single authority to operate, manage, and protect the Army s enterprise level infrostructure. NETCOM 4/7/2002 will 2: deliver seamless enterprise level C4/IM common user services and warfighting forces in support of the Commanders in Chief (CINC) and Army Service Component Commanders (ASCC). NETCOM operates, sustains, and protects the Army s portion of the Global Information Grid, enabling force projection and the delivery of decisive combat power. 28 November 200 6/4/2002 Based Info Mgt Implementation Plan - Phase I 8

10 FORSCOM OPCON of CONUS Forces For Theater Forces The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command NETCOM/TIM Relationships for C4IM SA/CSA Army CIO/G-6 NETCOM/9 th ASC NETCOM (NE, NW, SE, SW) 3 OCONUS ACSIM Installation Management Activity REG DIR MACOM CIO/G-6 Intermediate HQ CIO/G-6 Army CIO/G-6 & MACOM CIO Have Normal Staff Relationships COE RCIO Command Staff Supervision Direct/General Support Requirements/Staff Supervision OPCON TECHCON 6/4/ ARNG RCIO USAR RCIO Commander Ft. Warfighter DOIM Tenant IMO Activity DOIM WCF Installation DOIM

11 Fort Lewis Vancouver Barracks Sierra Army Depot Riverbank AAP Presidio of Monterey West (0) Camp Parks (USAR) Hawthorne AD Fort Hunter Liggett (USAR) Fort Irwin Shafte 6/4/2002 r 0 Schofield Barracks Yakima Training Center IX - Yuma Proving Ground Fort X - Fort Hauchuca Fort Wainwright Ft. Greely Fort Richardson Dugway Proving Ground Deseret Chem Depot Tooele AD Fort Carson White Sands Missile Testing Center The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command Northwest (20) VIII Pueblo Depot VI Fort Bliss TIM Regions Fort Sill McAlester AAP Red River AD Lone Star AAP Fort Hood Fort Sam Houston VII Fort Riley Fort Leavenworth Kansas AAP Camp Stanley Storage Actv Fort McCoy (USAR) Iowa AAP Lake City AAP Pine Bluff Ars Louisiana AAP Fort Polk V Fort Leonard Wood Rock Island Arsenal USAG Selfridge Detroit Ars Fort Knox Fort Campbell Milan AAP Lima Army Tank Plt Redstone Arsenal Southwest Corpus Christi AD (9) V = Federal Region Northeast Anniston AD Fort Rucker Tobyhanna Army Depot West Point Charles E. Kelly Spt Fac (USAR) Carlisle Barracks Letterkenny AD Ft Detrick Blue Grass AD Fort Benning Mississippi AAP Adelphi Lab Ctr Holston AAP IV (23) III Radford AAP II Fort Lee Fort Drum Watervliet Ars Fort Dix (USAR) Aberdeen Proving Ground Walter Reed Fort McNair Fort Myer Fort Belvoir Fort Gordon Fort McPherson Ft. Gillem Hunter Army Airfield Fort Stewart Fort Jackson USA Cold Reg Lab Ft. AP Hill Fort Eustis Fort Monroe Fort Story Ft Buchanan, PR Southeast (9) I Natick R & D Ctr Fort Devens RFTA (USAR) Ft. Hamilton Picatinny Arsenal Fort Monmouth Ft. Meade Fort Bragg MOT Sunny Point Plus Europe Region and Korea Region

12 Our Vision The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command ARMY CIO/G6 C2 Oversight (incl rating) NETOPS Reporting Located in DC NETCOM/9 TH ASC DCG Sr Tech Dir Personal Staff & Special Staff DCG FWD Coordinating G-Staff (Rear) FWD EUR SES Enterprise Systems Technology Activity X X X CENT SOUTH KOR PAC X ANOSC C-TNOSC COP and Enterprise Support NETCOM NE NW Knowledge Mgmt Infostructure Plans Spectrum Mgmt Service Mgmt 6/4/2002 ATD SE SW CTO Operational Engineers IA Governance & NETOPS

13 Road Ahead Stand up NETCOM Regions with the TIM RD Same time Same places Stand up NETCOM FWD and Rear Incorporate new missions Reorganize staff Continue to execute/implement new enterprise initiative Gain visibility on health and security of all Army networks. Issue Enterprise Systems Management CONOPS Implement Active Directory/Exchange 2000 across the enterprise Establish networthiness process for additions to the infostructure Develop Service Level Agreements for common user services across the Enterprise 6/4/2002 2

14 Infostructure Operations Objective State Enable universal (and secure) access to authorized infostructure services to all Army customers within the Army infostructure PKI enables single sign-on plug & play capability Accurately display a total and integrated Situation Awareness of the AEI Predict impacts on the AEI of new/changed systems and operational contingencies Redirect and reallocate AEI resources in near real-time to support Army response to crisis or unplanned event anywhere within the Army infostructure Area of Operations (AOR) Provide a consistent, robust, base-level of infostructure services to all authorized Army customers at the least cost feasible within Army operational constraints Provide additional (above base level) infostructure services to Army customers on a reimbursable basis Perform continuing and non-intrusive technology insertion based on improving service levels or reducing cost of providing current base-level services 6/4/2002 3

15 AKM Enterprise Operations Requires Single Voice: Secure, reliable networks Standard architectures Joint interoperability Real world situational awareness Strategic links to the National Command Authority Seamless Information Systems for the Unified CINCs and Army Component Commanders The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command ADDING CONTINUED VALUE TO OUR ARMY NETCOM added benefits: Worldwide, rapid deployment Tailored communication solutions Specialized comms engineering Global Network Operations & Information Assurance Rapid technical insertion (COTS) Integrated Enterprise Operations Army Network Common Operational Picture Provide Single NETOPS Operational Crew Chief for all levels of war to Army Operationally focused, responsive 40 X X X I X X 7 72 X Global Nodal Network X Enabling Strategic Dominance through Global and Regional Communications 6/4/2002 4

16 The TheArmy ArmySignal SignalCommand Command Why NETOPS is Critical! NETOPS is a key enabler ensuring the proper operation and protection of the Information Environment (IE) supporting the warfighter. The Information Environment is a center of gravity for US Military Operations. The IE is a prime target of Asymmetric Warfare. 6/4/2002 5

17 Army / Joint NETOPS / CND GNOSC JTF- CNO ANOSC ACERT RNOSC CINC TCCC RNOSC CINC TCCC RNOSC CINC TCCC RNOSC CINC TCCC RNOSC CINC TCCC RNOSC CINC TCCC C-TNOSC TNOSC RCERT-C E-TNOSC P-TNOSC K-TNOSC S-TNOSC SWA TNOSC RCERT-E RCERT-P RCERT-K RCERT-S RCERT-SWA ANOSC Army Network Operations and Security Center (NETCOM/9 th ASC) TNOSC Theater Network Operations and Security Center (Signal Command/Brigade RNOSC Regional Network Operations and Security Center (Battalion/Deployed Units/Others) ACERT Army Computer Emergency Response Team 6/4/ RCERT Regional Computer Emergency Response Team

18 Asymmetrical Warfare and NETOPS Defeated: Maginot Line, Berlin Wall, US Borders (and the INS), and the National Transportation System on 9/ Not (yet) Defeated: The Al Queda and The Drug Trade Reason: Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Offensive and Defensive actions Basic Questions to Consider: Do we treat our networks Symmetrically or Asymmetrically? Does our enemy treat cyber warfare Symmetrically or Asymmetrically? If the enemy uses Asymmetric Offenses, can our Symmetric Defense defeat the enemy? 6/4/2002

19 Friendly Asymmetrical NETOPS Warfare Facts: The networks (military and civilian) are battlefields TODAY. Our greatest strength (Information Superiority) can also be our greatest weakness. DoD currently has a Symmetrical Defense in Depth strategy for our networks. We depend on COTS products (created by US and foreign nationals) in our defense. Skilled people are at the heart of our success. Asymmetric NETOPS threats are a reality each day. Cultural, legal and doctrinal barriers inhibit our NETOPS. Assumption: To battle the Asymmetrical threat to our infostructure, we must think in terms of asymmetrical defenses; remember the best defense is a good offense. 6/4/2002 8

20 Enemy Asymmetrical NETOPS Warfare The Threat: Knows that we are dependent on military and commercial networks during peace and war. Will adjust to focus on where we are least defended. Attacks just under our detection thresholds, with more powerful tools and techniques. Enemy Cyber-Attack: High payoffs, little expenditure. Examples: Solar Sunrise, Moonlight Maze, etc. Melissa Virus - $80 million Nimda $635 million CodeRed $2.62 billion SirCam - $.5 billion Love Bug - $8.75 billion Pentagon 9/ Repairs - $700 million 6/4/2002 9

21 Possible Friendly Asymmetrical Warfare NETOPS Mitigating Solutions TLA-Redesign Variable reactions to keep the enemy guessing Coordinated NETOPS between military, government, private, and allies / coalitions Decrease reliance on the commercial world s infostructure Develop / resource contingency capabilities Use of deception techniques ( honey pots ) Recon of the Enemy AO BEFORE they attack Develop and legalize the use of asymmetrical offensive capabilities Don t treat our infostructure like a business treat it like a weapon system. 6/4/

22 Standup of NETCOM The The Army Army Signal Signal Command Command Friendly Asymmetrical NETOPS Warfare Army Improvements Signal Command Improved Event Correlation Across Data Sources ACERT and ASC LNO Exchanges Enhanced Information Dissemination Management (IDM): - NETOPS COP at theater and global levels: provides relevant reports, status, directives, guidance, queries, and IA information. - Vertical and horizontal information sharing 6/4/2002 2

Transformational Change at the Top. Sustainability Institutionalized by Army Leadership

Transformational Change at the Top Institutionalized by Army Leadership Overview This presentation discusses key Headquarters Army milestones on the road to Army sustainability. We begin in October 2004,