How can SLPs embed Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) into their routine clinical practice? Dr Hazel Roddam Dr Jemma Skeat Dr Paula Leslie

Transcription

1 How can SLPs embed Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) into their routine clinical practice? Dr Hazel Roddam Dr Jemma Skeat Dr Paula Leslie

2 Disclosure Statement We have no financial or nonfinancial interest in any organization whose products or services are described, reviewed, evaluated or compared in the presentation. 2

3 Learning Outcomes At the end of this presentation, attendees will be able to: 1. Explain a range of initiatives that support EBP 2. Identify a factor in their own workplace that restricts EBP 3. Integrate ideas from others experiences to facilitate EBP within their own services 3

4 What are the challenges? What is EBP and what is it not? Is our routine clinical practice evidencebased? Is our education evidence-based? Is the training we deliver to others evidencebased? 4

5 Workshop aim To facilitate participants to explore the implications for SLT professional education and professional practice, through highlighting international examples. 5

6 Workshop outline What do we mean by Evidence-Based Practice? What are the challenges? Where are the opportunities? Professional Associations Educators Clinicians Consideration of factors promoting/constraining EBP Discussion of good practice examples 6

7 Where are we as a profession? 7

8 What are the international drivers for EBP? Political Professional Clinical Things are not working Facing unfamiliar territory Skeat & Roddam,

9 What is EBP? It is not expected that all clinicians will be research-active, but it is expected that all clinicians will be active users of research Supporting Research and Development in the NHS A.Culyer,

10 What is not EBP? Anecdotes /testimonials The plural of anecdotes is not evidence (Reilly 2010) Media headlines Cost savings Expert opinion Intuition Pseudo-science 10

11 What do we mean by pseudo-science? Lack of critical evaluation Un-testable/not open to testing Belief-based Reliance on Unjustified claims for effectiveness Authority figures Generalised claims Dramatic claims 11

12 How does pseudo-science threaten our practice? Risk of harm to patients Waste of client s and clinician s time Not effective Denigration of scientific basis of the profession 12

13 Most used definition of EBP Research The conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients Sackett et al 1997 Clinician Client 13

14 What does research evidence give us? Answers specific questions Rigour greatest strength lies in the fact that it removes bias Reilly 2004: p30 14

15 Research evidence challenges Absence of evidence An approach such as EBP relies on the clinician being able to locate high quality research to inform clinical decision making. Elman Ease of use Clinical applicability 15

16 What counts as evidence? Highest level of rigour Systematic Reviews, Metaanalyses, well designed randomised controlled studies Well designed controlled study without randomisation Well designed non-experimental studies Expert committee report, conference, consensus, case series Lowest level of rigour Clinical experience of respected authorities, single cases 16

17 Mismatch in research agendas Under-representation in clinical trials of certain populations of patients, including those with severe problems or co-morbidities (Elman 2006) Only a small proportion of articles pertaining to the efficacy of treatments used for individuals with developmental disabilities (Koenig & Gunter 2005) 17

18 Practitioners perceive researchers do not appreciate the nature of their daily work research lacks utility McGinnis Kuster & Poburka 1998 treatments being deemed as evidence based required adherence to strict treatment protocols thus also requiring attendance at sessions in a manner that is not realistic Nelson et al

19 The 5 step model of EBP 1. Frame a clinically-focused question 2.Search for the best quality evidence 3.Appraise the evidence 4.Implement changes if appropriate 5.Evaluate effectiveness of practice Sackett,

20 What do we mean by embedding Evidence-Based Practice? Package of care for each client/patient Planning for service delivery & developments Therapy resources: assessment tools and intervention approaches 20

21 What are the challenges to embedding EBP? Skills and confidence Construction of EBP Resources and facilities SLT culture Research evidence base 21

22 Implications for every SLP The first step is to become reflective and critical reviewers of our own practice Professor Pam Enderby,

23 Skills & Confidence in EBP Low levels of understanding about EBP itself among allied health professionals (Upton and Upton 2006) Research related competencies (Kajermo et al 2000, Haynes 2002 McCluskey 2003, Kahmi 2006) Lack of skills to conduct computerised searches, and low levels of knowledge about electronic databases (Rappolt & Tassone 2002, McCluskey 2003) SLTs report research as difficult to read and interpret (Pennington 2001, O Connor & Pettigrew 2009) 23

24 Recency of training, including higher degree involving exposure to EBP and research, predicted better attitudes to EBP among SLTs (Zipoli & Kennedy 2005), physiotherapists (Jette et al 2003, Turner 2001) and OTs (Bennett et al 2003) The most experienced practitioners expressed the least favourable attitudes about EBP, age and years since graduation predicting the tendency to use EBP (Aaron 2004). Familiarity with, and confidence in search strategies, use of databases and critical appraisal tend to be associated with younger therapists with fewer years since graduation (Jette et al 2003) 24

25 Exposure to research & EBP Exposure to research and EBP during training Experience Highest degree held Desire for learning Practicality Bridges et al 2007; Zipoli & Kennedy 2005; Aaron 2004; Turner

26 Impact of resources Perceived lack of evidence Time Resource issues Clinician skills Large caseloads Difficulty accessing journals McCluskey 2003 High staff turnover, staff shortages Curtin & Jaramazovic 2001 Organizational structures Upton &Upton

27 But most of all Time Lack of, McCluskey 2003, Bennett et al 2003, Curtin & Jaramazovic 2001 Only 8% were happy with the time they had to do this Pollock et al 2000 To keep abreast GP have to read on average 19 articles a day, 365 days of the year Sackett et al years - 20,000 articles Bernstein-Ratner 2006 GPs (89%) Hospital docs (91%) would do if more time Upton & Upton

28 EBP requires change to habits, routines, and sometimes personal and philosophical preferences and ideals (Skeat & Roddam 2010) 28

29 Strategies to support EBP Taking time to reflect Developing effective personal reading routines Maximising the use of pre-appraised sources Learning and practising EBP skills Communicating with colleagues Involving clients in practice Evaluating the impact of changes in clinical practice 29

30 Participants examples What are we already doing well? What could we do better? How can that be achieved? 30

31 Where are the opportunites to promote embedding EBP? Pre-licence professional education Continuing professional development Clinical skills training opportunities Development of therapy resources & approaches Delivery of training to others 31

32 Who has responsibility for embedding EBP? Professional associations Educators Academic Faculty & Clinical supervisors Individual therapists 32

33 The challenges for the future of our profession If we are committed to embedding EBP, we need to recognise the implications for the training we receive our practice behaviour the training we provide to others 33

34 Useful References Bury & Mead, 1998, Evidence-Based Healthcare: A Practical Guide for Therapists. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Dopson, Fitzgerald, Ferlie, Gabbay & Locock, 2002, No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence-based. Health Care Management Review 27(3): Estabrooks, Floyd, Scott-Findlay, O Leary & Gushta, 2003, Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 43 (5): Roddam & Skeat, 2010, Embedding Evidence-Based Practice in Speech and Language Therapy: International Examples Vallino-Napoli & Reilly, 2004, Evidence-based health care: A survey of speech pathology practice. Advances in Speech and Language Pathology 6 (2): Zipoli & Kennedy, 2005, Evidence-based practice among speechlanguage pathologists: Attitudes, utilisation and barriers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 14:

35 Contact us Dr Hazel Roddam, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK Dr Paula Leslie, University of Pittsburgh, USA 35