1 Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, April 2013 Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction The purpose of revalidation is to assure patients and the public, employers and other healthcare professionals that licensed doctors are up to date and fit to practise. In order to maintain your licence to practice you will be expected to have at least one appraisal per year that is based on the General Medical Council s (GMC) core guidance for doctors, Good Medical Practice. 1 Revalidation will involve a continuing evaluation of your fitness to practise and will be based on local systems of appraisal and clinical governance. Licensed doctors will need to maintain a portfolio of supporting information drawn from their practice which demonstrates how they are continuing to meet the requirements set out in the Good Medical Practice Framework for appraisal and revalidation. 2 Some of the supporting information needed will come from organisations' clinical governance systems, and the required information should be made available by the employer. In certain cases it may be appropriate for you to relinquish your licence to practice, while remaining on the GMC Register. This will be determined in part by your individual requirements, according to the needs and specification of your appointment. The GMC has set out its generic requirements for medical practice and appraisal in three main documents. These are supported by guidance from the medical royal colleges and faculties, which give the specialty context for the supporting information required for appraisal. Doctors should therefore ensure they are familiar with the following: 1 GMC (2013). Good Medical Practice 2 GMC (2011). Good Medical Practice framework for appraisal and revalidation.
2 Good Medical Practice Good Medical Practice Framework for appraisal and revalidation Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation 3 Academy core guidance on supporting information for revalidation (this document) Doctors should also have regard for any guidance, relevant to appraisal and revalidation that the employing or contracting organisation may provide concerning local policies. In order to revalidate, you must collect supporting information as set out in the GMC s Supporting Information for appraisal and revalidation: General information about you and your professional work Keeping up to date. o o o Review of practice Quality improvement activity Significant events Feedback on professional practice, o o o Colleague feedback Patient and carer feedback Complaints and compliments You must participate in appraisals when you should expect to discuss with your appraiser your practice, professional performance and supporting information, as well as your professional career aspirations, challenges and development needs. Among other things, your appraiser will want to be assured that you are making satisfactory progress in obtaining appropriate supporting information for revalidation. 3 GMC (2012). Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation.
3 The purpose of this document Supporting Information The medical royal colleges and faculties are responsible for setting the standards of care within their specialty, and for providing specialty advice and guidance on the supporting information required of you to demonstrate that professional standards have been met. This document describes the supporting information required for appraisal and revalidation. It takes the principles of the GMC s guidance and offers practical examples of the information that you should present to demonstrate that you are keeping up to date and fit to practice. We recommend that you read this document along with the GMC s guidance on supporting information for appraisal and revalidation. Although the types of supporting information are the same for all doctors, you will find in this document specific additional advice for Occupational Medicine at the end of some sections. The supporting information required is the same across the UK, although the process by which appraisal is undertaken will differ between the four nations of the UK. For those practising in England, the process is set out in the Medical Appraisal Guide (MAG); for those in Scotland, in the Scottish Guide to Medical Appraisal, and for those in Wales the All Wales Medical Appraisal Policy. Not all of the supporting information described needs to be collected every year, although some elements are required, or should be reviewed, annually. This is stipulated in the document under. If you are unable to provide an element of the core supporting information, and you wish to bring alternative or additional information to your appraisal this will be evaluated by the appraiser and may be accepted, with the agreement of your Responsible Officer. This may be particularly relevant to clinicians practising substantially (if not wholly) in academic disciplines or as medical educators, or as medical managers with little or no patient contact, but by definition substantial vicarious responsibility for the standard of patient care. Some supporting information will not be appropriate for every doctor (for example patient feedback for doctors who do not have direct patient contact). It is the responsibility of the appraiser to make a judgement about the adequacy of the supporting information that you provide. This should be discussed with your appraiser prior to your appraisal, but may also be discussed at other times. In addition to advice from your appraiser and Responsible Officer you should consider seeking advice from the designated person/source in the relevant medical royal college or faculty. A range of forms and templates will be available with which you can record your supporting information. Advice on which to use should be obtained from your appraiser, Responsible Officer, college or faculty. Whichever is chosen must be adequate to enable the appraiser to review, and make a judgement about, your supporting information. In preparing and presenting your supporting information, you must comply with relevant regulations and codes of practice (including those set by your contracting organisations) in handling patient identifiable information. No patient identifiable information should appear in your appraisal documentation.
4 Introduction for Occupational Medicine The core supporting information items, requirements and guidance apply to all doctors in occupational medicine. This document aims to help you plan how to collect and produce the necessary supporting information for appraisal and revalidation. Faculty members whose prescribed connection for revalidation is to the Faculty Responsible Officer will be required to use the guidance in developing their portfolio of supporting information. Comments Please any comments to Rachel Cooper, Head of Professional Standards, e.mail:
5 GENERAL INFORMATION Providing context about what you do in all aspects of your professional work The supporting information in this section should be updated at least annually. Personal Details Your GMC number, demographic and relevant personal information as recorded on the GMC Register. Your medical and professional qualifications should also be included. A self-declaration of no change, or an update identifying changes, including any newly acquired qualifications, since your last appraisal. The supporting information in this section should be updated annually for your appraisal. Scope of Work A description of your whole practice covering the period since your last appraisal is necessary to provide the context for your annual appraisal. Some employers may require you to include your current job plan. Your whole practice description should be updated annually. Any significant changes in your professional practice should be highlighted as well as any exceptional circumstances (e.g. absences from the UK medical workforce, changes in work circumstances). The comprehensive description should cover all clinical and non-clinical activities (e.g. teaching, management and leadership, medico-legal work, medical research and other academic activities) undertaken as a doctor and include details as to their nature (regular or occasional), organisations and locations for whom you undertake this work and any indemnity arrangements in place. The description should detail any extended practice or work outside the NHS, paid or voluntary, undertaken in specialty or sub-specialty areas of practice, the independent healthcare sector, as a locum, with academic and research bodies or with professional organisations. Any work undertaken outside the UK should be identified. An approximate indication of the proportion of time that you spend on each activity should be provided. If appropriate, summarise any anticipated changes in the pattern of your professional work over the next year, so that these can be discussed with your appraiser.
6 Some specialists will be required to present, in summary form, quantitative and qualitative information representing certain areas of their practice. Maintenance of a logbook may help with this, and may be recommended by your college or faculty. You may wish to include details of the size and roles of the team with which you work in order to clarify your own role. The Faculty of Occupational Medicine has not issued any further specialty-specific guidance in relation to this section. Record of annual appraisals Signed-off Form 4 or equivalent evidence (e.g. appraisal portfolio record) demonstrating a satisfactory outcome of your previous appraisal. Evidence of appraisals from other organisations with whom you work. Required for every annual appraisal. Any concerns identified in the previous appraisal should be documented as having been satisfactorily addressed (or satisfactory progress made), even if you have been revalidated since your last appraisal. Doctors working in Occupational Medicine Historically, occupational physicians have been appraised to a wide range of standards. For the purposes of revalidation it is essential that a medical appraisal is quality assured and meets the required standard 4. Personal Development Plans and their review Access to the current personal development plan (PDP) with agreed objectives developed as an outcome of your previous appraisal. Access to previous PDPs. The current PDP will be reviewed to ensure that the agreed objectives remain relevant, have been met or satisfactory progress has been made. Any outstanding PDP objectives that are still relevant should be carried over to the new agreed PDP. If you have made additions to your own PDP during the year, these should be 4 RST Quality assurance of medical appraisers.
7 confirmed with your appraiser as being relevant, and should be carried forward into the next PDP if required. The content of your PDP should where relevant, encompass development needs across any aspect of your work as a doctor. The Faculty of Occupational Medicine has not issued any further specialty-specific guidance in relation to this section. Probity The GMC states that all doctors have a duty to act when they believe patients safety is at risk or that patients care or dignity is being compromised. The GMC expects all doctors to take appropriate action to raise and act on concerns about patient care, dignity and safety. 5 Your supporting information should include a signed self-declaration confirming the absence of any probity issues and stating: That you comply with the obligations placed on you, as set out in Good Medical Practice. That no disciplinary, criminal or regulatory sanctions have been applied since your last appraisal or that any sanctions have been reported to the GMC, in compliance with its guidance Reporting Criminal and Regulatory Proceedings Within and Outside of the UK (2008), and to your employing or contracting organisation if required. 6 That you have declared any potential or perceived competing interests, gifts or other issues which may give rise to conflicts of interests in your professional work - see the GMC document Conflicts of Interest: for Doctors (2008) and those relevant to your employing or contracting organisation if required (e.g. university or company). That, if you have become aware of any issues relating to the conduct, professional performance or health of yourself or of those with whom you work that may pose a risk to patient safety or dignity, you have taken appropriate steps without delay, so that the concerns could be investigated and patients protected where necessary. That, if you have been requested to present any specific item(s) of 5 GMC (2012). Raising and acting on concerns about patient safety. 6 GMC (2008). Reporting Criminal and Regulatory Proceedings Within and Outside the UK.
8 supporting information for discussion at appraisal, you have done so. Required for every annual appraisal. The format of the self-declaration should reflect the scope of your work as a doctor. You should consider the GMC ethical guidance documents relevant to your professional or specialty practice, e.g years: for all Doctors (2007). 7 Health The Faculty of Occupational Medicine has not issued any further specialty-specific guidance in relation to this section. A signed self-declaration confirming the absence of any medical condition that could pose a risk to patients and that you comply with the health and safety obligations for doctors as set out in Good Medical Practice, including having access to independent and objective medical care. Required for every annual appraisal. The scope of the self-declaration should reflect the nature of your work and any specialty-specific requirements. The Faculty of Occupational Medicine has not issued any further specialty-specific guidance in relation to this section. 7 GMC (2007) years: for all doctors. 18_0510.pdf
9 KEEPING UP TO DATE Maintaining and enhancing the quality of your professional work Good Medical Practice requires doctors to keep their knowledge and skills up to date, and encourages them to take part in educational activities that maintain and further develop their competence and professional performance. Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Continuing Professional Development (CPD) refers to any learning outside of undergraduate education or postgraduate training which helps you maintain and improve your performance. It covers the development of your knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviours across all areas of your professional practice. It includes both formal and informal learning activities. 8 CPD may be: Clinical including any specialty, or subspecialty, specific requirements Non-clinical including training for educational supervision, training for management or academic training 9. Employer mandatory training and required training for educational supervisors may be included provided that the learning is relevant to your job plan, and is supported by reflection and, where relevant, practice change. At each appraisal meeting, a description of CPD undertaken each year should be provided including: Its relevance to your individual professional work; Its relevance to your personal development plan 10 ; Reflection and confirmation of good practice or new learning/practice change where appropriate. Normally achievement of at least 50 credits per year of the revalidation cycle 8 GMC (2012) Continuing Professional Development: for all Doctors. 9 Colleges and Faculties have different ways of categorising CPD activities 10 Not all of the CPD undertaken should relate to an element of the PDP, but sufficient should do so to demonstrate that you have met the requirements of your PDP.
10 is expected and at least 250 credits over a 5 year revalidation cycle. Where circumstances make this impossible, please refer to specialty guidance. You should take part in CPD as recommended by your college or faculty 11. The Faculty of Occupational Medicine guidance on CPD is available at Your CPD activity should cover all aspects of your professional work and should include activity that covers your agreed PDP objectives. It is important to recognise that there is much professional benefit to be gained from a wide variety of CPD including some outside of your immediate area of practice and as such this should be encouraged. You should ensure that a balance of different types of educational activity is maintained. Documentation of CPD activity should include a reflection on the learning gained and the likely effect on your professional work. You should present a summary of your CPD activities through the year for your annual appraisal, together with a certificate from your college or faculty if this is available. For revalidation a cumulative 5 year record of your CPD activity should be provided. 11 The ultimate responsibility for determining an individual doctor s CPD rests with the doctor and their appraiser. Many will require specific advice on the type of CPD required (such as in those circumstances where the appraiser is from a different specialty); such guidance can be obtained from the college or faculty most relevant to the doctor s area of practice. Many colleges and faculties also run CPD approval schemes, which doctors may benefit from joining.
11 REVIEW OF YOUR PRACTICE Evaluating and improving the quality of your professional work For the purposes of revalidation, you will have to demonstrate that you regularly participate in activities that review and evaluate the quality of your work. The nature and balance of these activities will vary according to your specialty and the work that you do. These activities should be robust, systematic and relevant to your work. They should include an element of evaluation and action and, where possible, demonstrate an outcome or change. The supporting information in this section should be updated annually. If you work in a non-clinical area you should discuss options for quality improvement activity with your appraiser, college or faculty 12. Audit and other quality improvement activity should reflect the breadth of your professional work over each five-year revalidation period. Quality Improvement Activity Clinical audit You should participate in at least one complete audit cycle (audit, practice review and re-audit) in every 5 year revalidation cycle. If audit is not possible other ways of demonstrating quality improvement activity should be undertaken (see below). National Audits Participation in national audits is expected where these are relevant to the specialty or subspecialty in which you practice. However, in some specialties national audits are few in number and alternative ways of demonstrating the quality of your practice will be required. Your participation in national audits may focus on the professional performance of the team, but there will be elements that reflect your personal practice or the results of your management of, or contribution to, the team or service of which you are part. Your own role, input, learning and response to the audit results should be reflected upon and documented. Personal and Local Audit Improvement in the quality of your own practice through personal involvement in audit is recommended. A simple audit of medical record keeping against agreed standards may be considered, but should be carried out in addition to, and not as a substitute for, other clinical audit activity. 12 For example, if you are working in education or management your Quality Improvement Activity could include (a) auditing and monitoring the effectiveness of an educational programme, (b) evaluating the impact and effectiveness of a piece of health policy or management practice.
12 Where required by the relevant college or faculty, your specialty departments should ensure that formal programmes of audit are in place, reflecting key areas of specialty and/or subspecialty practice. Where this is the case, you should provide evidence demonstrating active engagement in local audit throughout a full audit cycle. Doctors working in Occupational Medicine Quality improvement activity can include participation in national audits but the emphasis must be on improving the quality of one s own practice through personal involvement in audit. Occupational physicians in non-clinical roles are still expected to demonstrate participation in a relevant quality improvement activity. Peer review of clinical output and accreditation through the FOM SEQOHS 13 scheme are particularly relevant. Further guidance on audit is available on the Society of Occupational Medicine website under Tools for Appraisal and Revalidation 14. Review of Clinical Outcomes Clinical outcomes that are used for revalidation should be robust, attributable and well-validated. Even where this is not the case you may still wish to bring appropriate outcome measures to appraisal in order to demonstrate the quality of your practice. Where national registries or databases are in place relevant to your practice you may be expected to participate in the collection and contribution to national, standardised data. Evidence of this participation should be made available for your appraisal. Nationally agreed standards and protocols may also include outcomes, and you should bring these to appraisal where recommended by the specialty. Data should relate, as far as possible, to your own contribution. Comparison with national data should be made wherever possible. There are some specialities, mainly interventionist or surgical but including those academic activities in which clinical trials play a major part, which have recognised outcome measures. Where clinical outcomes are used instead of, or alongside, clinical audit or case reviews, there should be evidence of reflection and commentary on personal input and, where needed, change in 14 SOM members can access at: revalidation 13 For more information go to:
13 practice. Doctors working in Occupational Medicine The majority of occupational physicians will not have clinical outcome data available. Other outcome measures appropriate to your practice should be used instead, particularly where they can be peer reviewed or compared with national data. Case review or discussion The purpose of case reviews is to demonstrate that you are engaging meaningfully in discussion with your medical and non-medical colleagues in order to maintain and enhance the quality of your professional work. Case reviews provide supporting information on your commitment to quality improvement if appropriate audit/registries are unavailable. If you are unable to provide evidence from clinical audit or clinical outcomes, documented case reviews may be submitted as evidence of the quality of your professional work. You should then provide at least two case reviews per year, covering the range of your professional practice over a 5 year revalidation cycle. You should outline the (anonymised) case details with reflection against national standards or guidelines and include evidence of discussion with peers or presentation at department meetings. Identified action points should be incorporated into your personal development plan. Evidence of relevant working party or committee work (internal or external) may be included together with your personal input and reflection, including implementation of changes in practice, where appropriate. Some specialties or subspecialties may recommend case reviews routinely, and a number of different approaches will be acceptable, including documented regular discussion at multidisciplinary meetings or morbidity and mortality meetings. In some specific circumstances case reviews may form the main supporting information in support of quality improvement.
14 Doctors working in Occupational Medicine A Structured Reflective Template (SRT) for case review can be found within the FOM e-portfolio and the SOM Tools for Appraisal and Revalidation. Peer review of correspondence with managers should also be included here if applicable, for example using the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL(OH)) 15. Significant Events Clinical incidents, Significant Untoward Incidents (SUIs) or other similar events. A significant event (also known as an untoward, critical or patient safety incident) is any unintended or unexpected event, which could or did lead to harm of one or more patients. This includes incidents which did not cause harm but could have done, or where the event should have been prevented. 16 You should ensure that you are familiar with your organisation's local processes and agreed thresholds for recording incidents. It is not the appraiser's role to conduct investigations into serious events. If you have been directly involved in any significant incidents (SUIs) since your last appraisal you must provide details based on data logged by you, or on local (e.g. your NHS employer where such data should be routinely collected) or national incident reporting systems (e.g. NRLS). If you have been directly involved in any clinical incidents these should also be summarised, together with the learning and action taken, in order to show that you are using these events to improve your practice. If you are self-employed or work outside the NHS, or in an environment where reporting systems are not in place it is your responsibility to keep a personal record of any incidents in which you have been involved. This could include a brief description of the event, any potential or actual adverse outcomes, and evidence of reflection. A summary reviewing the data and a short anonymised description (with reflection, learning points and action taken) of up to two clinical incidents and all SUIs or root cause analyses in which you have played a part (including as 15 Available on the FOM website at assessments/forms-support-materials-assessor-training GMC (2011). Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation.
15 an investigator) should be presented for discussion at your annual appraisal. If there has been no direct involvement in such incidents since your last appraisal, a self-declaration to that effect should be presented at your annual appraisal. Incidents and other adverse events which are particularly relevant or related to certain areas of specialist practice are identified in the colleges and faculties specialty guidance, together with tools and recommendations when documenting your involvement. You should take care not to include any patient identifiable information in your appraisal documentation. The Faculty of Occupational Medicine has not issued any further specialty-specific guidance in relation to this section.
16 FEEDBACK ON YOUR PRACTICE How others perceive the quality of your professional work Feedback from colleagues and patients (if you have direct contact with patients) must be collected at least once in every five year revalidation cycle and presented to your appraiser. Colleague feedback The result of feedback from professional colleagues representing the range of your professional activities, using a validated multi-source feedback (MSF) tool. The tool should meet the criteria set by the GMC. 17 The results should be reflected upon, and any further development needs should be addressed At least one colleague MSF exercise should be undertaken in the revalidation cycle. You may want to consider undertaking your MSF early in the revalidation cycle in case the exercise has to be repeated. The selection of raters/assessors should represent the whole spectrum of people with whom you work. The results should be benchmarked, where data is available/accessible, against other doctors within the same specialty. Doctors working in Occupational Medicine The Faculty of Occupational Medicine trialled a MSF tool as part of its revalidation pilot which will be available to members. Any MSF tool developed according to GMC guidelines and appropriate to the role of the doctor may be used. Feedback from patients and/or carers The result of feedback from patients and carers, using a validated tool. The tool should meet the criteria set by the GMC. The results should be reflected upon, and any further development needs addressed. At least one patient feedback exercise should be undertaken in the revalidation cycle. You may want to consider gathering your patient feedback early in the revalidation cycle in case the exercise has to be repeated. Some colleges and faculties have identified patient feedback tools, 17 GMC (2011). on colleague and patient questionnaires.
17 instruments and processes which are suitable for doctors with particular areas of specialty practice. For some doctors, only some areas of their whole practice will be amenable to patient and/or carer feedback. Where practicable, a complete spectrum of the patients that you see should be included when seeking this type of feedback, and particular attention should be given to the inclusion of patients with communication difficulties, where relevant. If you do not see patients as part of your medical practice, you are not required to collect feedback from patients. However, the GMC recommends that you think broadly about what constitutes a patient in your practice. Depending on your practice, you might want to collect feedback from a number of other sources, such as families and carers, students, suppliers or customers. If you believe that you cannot collect feedback from patients, you should discuss this (as well as proposed alternatives) with your appraiser. Doctors working in Occupational Medicine Any tool which complies with GMC guidance and is relevant to your particular practice may be used. Feedback from clients who commission your services should also be provided if applicable. Feedback from clinical supervision, teaching and training If you undertake clinical supervision and/or training of others, the results from student/trainee feedback or peer review of teaching skills should be provided for appraisal and revalidation purposes. Evidence of your professional performance as a clinical supervisor and/or trainer is required at least once in a 5 year revalidation cycle. Feedback from formal teaching should be included annually for appraisal. Appropriate supporting information may include direct feedback from those taught in a range of settings. Clinical supervisors and educational supervisors are required to provide evidence that have met the minimum training requirements set by the GMC for these roles. Doctors working in Occupational Medicine Appraisers and FOM examiners should provide evidence of training within the last three years.
18 Formal complaints Details of all formal complaints (expressions of dissatisfaction or grievance) received since your last appraisal with a summary of main issues raised and how they have been managed. This should be accompanied by personal reflection for discussion during the annual appraisal. A formal complaint is one that is normally made in writing and activates a defined complaints response process. Details of formal complaints should be included annually. For your appraisal you are only required to submit details of formal complaints received from patients, carers, colleagues or staff either employed within your clinical area or any other arena in which you work (e.g. University) relating to any of your professional activities or those team members for whom you have direct responsibility. If you have not received any formal complaints since your last appraisal, a self-declaration to that effect should be provided. A complaint may be made about you or your team or about the care that your patients have received from other healthcare professionals. In all such cases an appropriate personal reflection should be provided covering how formal complaints have been managed (with reference, if necessary, to local or national procedures or codes of practice), actions taken, learning gained, and if necessary, potential items for the personal development plan. Rather than the nature of the complaints themselves, your reflection will be the focus for discussion during the appraisal. Some colleges and faculties have developed tools and forms to help to document and structure this reflection. Doctors working in Occupational Medicine A copy of your complaints policy should also be included. Compliments A summary, detailing unsolicited compliments received from patients, carers, colleagues or staff in recognition of the quality and success of your professional work or that of your team. Your summary should be updated annually. Not all compliments that you receive need to be included in your summary and you may opt not to present details of any compliments at all during any of your annual appraisals. This option will not hinder your progress towards revalidation. It is useful to reflect on successes as well as on problems. If compliments are to be useful in revalidation they should be accompanied by relevant reflection
19 highlighting, for example, the value you attach to these compliments in terms of how they have affected your professional practice, relationship with others, learning and development. Some colleges and faculties have developed tools and forms to help document and structure this reflection. The Faculty of Occupational Medicine has not issued any further specialty-specific guidance in relation to this section.
20 Supporting information for revalidation checklist This checklist must be used in conjunction with the full guidance document. All items listed here reflect the full guidance. If you are unable to present one or more items listed please discuss this with your appraiser; alternative items of supporting information may be agreed as appropriate. GENERAL INFORMATION Personal details GMC number demographic and relevant personal information and qualifications self-declaration of no change, or an update identifying changes Annual Scope of work Record of annual appraisals PDPs description of your whole practice covering the period since your last appraisal current job plan (if required for reference) any significant changes in your professional practice extended clinical and non-clinical activities any other relevant information for your field of practice signed-off appraisal portfolio record and satisfactory outcomes of previous appraisal evidence of appraisals (if undertaken) from other organisations confirmation that previous actions/concerns have been addressed current personal development plan (PDP) with agreed objectives from previous appraisal details of any new objectives added since last appraisal or to be added access to previous PDPs Annual Annual Annual Probity signed probity self-declaration Annual Health signed health self-declaration Annual KEEPING UP TO DATE CPD description of CPD undertaken each year as set out in requirements Annual REVIEW OF YOUR PRACTICE Quality improvement activity at least one of the following activities as appropriate for your specialty, see full guidance Clinical audit evidence of demonstrating active engagement in complete audit cycle Minimum 1 in 5 years Review of clinical outcomes documented review of clinical outcomes as where defined by your specialty If available Case review or discussion Significant Events Clinical incidents, Significant Untoward Incidents (SUIs) or other similar events FEEDBACK ON YOUR PRACTICE documented case reviews Summary of all SUIs or root cause analyses that you have been involved in Summary of at least 2 clinical incidents per year OR self-declaration that you have not been involved in any events. See specialty guidance Annual Colleague feedback MSF colleague feedback exercise (normally by the end of year 2). Minimum 1 in 5 years Feedback from patients and/or patient feedback survey or equivalent exercise, normally by the end of year 2. Minimum 1 in 5 years
21 carers Feedback from clinical supervision, teaching and training Formal complaints Evidence of your performance as a clinical supervisor and/or trainer (a) Feedback from formal teaching included annually (b) Documented formal complaints received OR self-declaration that you have not received any since your last appraisal (a) Minimum 1 in 5 years (b) annual Annual Compliments A summary of unsolicited compliments received Annual
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, June 2014 Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction
ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR REVALIDATION FOR SURGERY Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core Guidance for all doctors GENERAL INTRODUCTION JUNE 2012 The purpose of revalidation
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for pharmaceutical medicine Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction The purpose
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for psychiatry Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction The purpose of revalidation
ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR REVALIDATION FOR SURGERY GENERAL INTRODUCTION AUGUST 2011 The purpose of revalidation is to assure patients and the public, employers and other healthcare professionals that
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for doctors in anaesthesia, intensive care and pain medicine Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties core guidance for
Guidance on Revalidation in Intensive Care Medicine Edition 3 February 2014 Guidance on Revalidation in Intensive Care Medicine Edition 3 / 2014 CONTENTS CONTENTS Revalidation in Intensive Care Medicine
2012 Ready for revalidation Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation During their annual appraisals, doctors will use supporting information to demonstrate that they are continuing to meet
Paper 31 14 Revalidation Annual Report 2013-14 Purpose of Document: To provide the Board with a report on the first year s experience with medical revalidation in Public Health Wales. Board/Committee to-
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for pathologists and their appraisers October 2017 Author: Professor Peter Furness, Director of Professional Standards Unique document number
Foundation and specialty, including GP training The duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council Patients must be able to trust doctors with their lives and health. To justify that trust
INTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS This introduction consists of: 1. Introduction to the UK Public Health Register 2. Process and Structures
714 CPD Supporting Delivery of Quality Healthcare I Starke & W Wade Continuing Professional Development Supporting the Delivery of Quality Healthcare I Starke, 1 MD, MSc, FRCP, W Wade, 2 BSc (Hons), MA
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD) www.fph.org.uk CPD POLICIES, PROCESSES AND STRATEGIC DIRECTION CPD Policy 01 CONTENTS Prelude CPD in 2007 and beyond 02 1. Context, definitions and aim of continuing
Page 1 of 8 British Cardiovascular Society Revalidation of cardiologists: Standards and Content of a portfolio for revalidation David Hackett Vice-President, Clinical Standards Division August 2009 Introduction:
Title Document Details Clinical Audit Policy Trust Ref No 1538-31104 Main points this document covers This policy details the responsibilities and processes associated with the Clinical Audit process within
Initial education and training of pharmacy technicians: draft evidence framework October 2017 About this document This document should be read alongside the standards for the initial education and training
Medical Revalidation Responsible Officer Report¹ 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LTHT is a designated body with 1247 doctors assigned to it for the 2016-17 appraisal year, of whom 96% completed their yearly appraisal
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS NHS CONSULTANTS CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS SCHEME (WALES) 2008 AWARDS ROUND Guide for applicants employed by NHS organisations in Wales This guide is available
Medical Revalidation and Commercial Support for CPD Ian Starke. Medical Director, Revalidation, Royal College of Physicians. Licence to Practise Decide by 14 th August Issued November 2009 http://www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/licensing/faq/faq_licence_to_practise.asp
RCGP Example Portfolio: Academic GP Royal College of General Practitioners Royal College of General Practitioners 30 Euston Square, London NW1 2FB RCGP Revalidation Helpdesk: firstname.lastname@example.org Royal
NHS Governance Clinical Governance General Medical Council Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this call for evidence. The GMC has a particular role in clinical governance, as outlined below, and
ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE PRACTITIONERS (ACCP) PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION This document provides information from selection through to qualification for Advanced Critical Care Practitioners (ACCPs) leading towards
Leadership and management for all doctors The duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council Patients must be able to trust doctors with their lives and health. To justify that trust you
TRAINEE CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST GENERIC JOB DESCRIPTION This is a generic job description provided as a guide to applicants for clinical psychology training. Actual Trainee Clinical Psychologist job descriptions
HOSPITAL SERVICES DISCHARGE PLANNING NURSE BAND 6 JOB DESCRIPTION JOB SUMMARY: It is expected that as a result of general training and experience a Band 6 registered nurse is able to lead in the assessment
PROFESSIONAL ISSUES Supporting revalidation: methods and evidence Kirstyn Shaw and Mary Armitage Kirstyn Shaw BSc PhD, Clinical Standards Project Manager, Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal
Post Holder: Contracting Organisation: Job Title: Responsible to: Professionally accountable to: Hours: Duration: Remuneration: Expenses: Status: Dr Philip Anthony Dobson The Designated Body Responsible
Quality of CPD in Dentistry Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) Response to the GDC call for information July 2013 Introduction The FGDP(UK) very much welcomes the opportunity to comment on this review.
Information for Doctors in Training (including LATs) about the Local Revalidation Process 1. What is Revalidation? Medical revalidation is the process by which the General Medical Council (GMC) confirms
Policy for the Removal of Doctors from the NI Primary Medical Performers List (NIPMPL) where they have not provided primary medical services in the HSCB area in the Preceding 24 Months Context GPs cannot
APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 12(2) MENTAL HEALTH ACT 1983 1. INTRODUCTION THE NATIONAL CRITERIA FOR ENGLAND Revised October 2009 by the National Reference Group 1.1 Section 12(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983
Australian Medical Council Limited Procedures for Assessment and Accreditation of Specialist Medical Programs and Professional Development Programs by the Australian Medical Council 2017 Specialist Education
Anthea Mowat MRCA, MInst LM Associate Specialist Anaesthesia and Chronic Pain Pilgrim Hospital (part of ULHT), Lincolnshire Appraiser SAS Clinical Tutor ULHT AAGBI SAS and BMA SAS Committee member Revalidation
Standards of Proficiency for Higher Specialist Scientists July 2015 Version 1.0 Review date: 31 July 2016 Contents Introduction... 3 About the Academy Register - Practitioner part... 3 Routes to registration...
QCF Leadership for Health and Social Care Services Centre Handbook OCR Level 5 Diploma In Leadership for Health and Social Care and Children and Young People's Services (England) (Children and Young People
Job Description Service Job Title Hours Salary Reports to Purpose of Job Specialty Doctor 37.5 hours per week 65,000 to 80,000 per annum based on qualifications, skills and experience Consultant Psychiatrist
Why we have a procedure? Standard Operating Procedure 1 (SOP 1) Revalidation for Nurses An outcome of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry chaired by Robert Francis QC (2013) was NMC
Public Health Skills and Multidisciplinary/multi-agency/multi-professional April 2008 (updated March 2009) Welcome to the Public Health Skills and I am delighted to launch the UK-wide Public Health Skills
QCF Leadership for Health and Social Care Services Centre Handbook OCR Level 5 Diploma In Leadership for Health and Social Care and Children and Young People's Services (England) (Adults Residential Management)
JOB DESCRIPTION DIRECTOR OF SCREENING Author: Dr Quentin Sandifer, Executive Director of Public Health Services and Medical Director Date: 1 November 2017 Version: 0d Purpose and Summary of Document: This
NHS Circular: PCA(M)(2016)(4) Directorate for Population Health Primary Care Division Dear Colleague Performers List National Application Arrangements Summary 1. This Circular directs 1 NHS Boards in relation
25 February 2014 Council 8 To consider Making sure all licensed doctors have the necessary knowledge of English to practise safely in the UK Issue 1 Amendments to our rules and regulations to strengthen
Supervision, Accountability & Delegation reference issuing function PD126 Practice & Development date of issue April 2017 0 Supervision, Accountability & Delegation Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 WHAT IS DELEGATION?...
CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR FULL ACCREDITATION AS A BEHAVIOURAL AND/OR COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPIST Full Accreditation is dependent on submission, 12 months after the date Provisional Accreditation, of an
SMERSET PARTNERSHIP NHS FUNDATIN TRUST ANNUAL MEDICAL APPRAISAL AND REVALIDATIN BARD REPRT 215/16 Report to the Trust Board 26 July 216 Sponsoring Director: Author: Purpose of the report: Dr Andrew Dayani
Managing Poor Performance and Doctors in Difficulty Claire McLaughlan Associate Director National Clinical Assessment Service Overview What is NCAS and how we help in managing and supporting doctors in
Professional Practice Guideline 14: National codes and standards relevant to psychiatry practice and mental health services in Australia and New Zealand April 2017 Authorising Committee: Responsible Committee:
Evidence of English language skills: Guidance for European doctors applying for a licence to practise 1 The GMC (Licence to Practise and Revalidation) Regulations Order of Council Consolidated (the Regulations)
Influences on you as a prescriber A CPD open learning programme for non-medical prescribers DLP 154 Contents iii About CPPE open learning programmes vii About this learning programme x Section 1 The influence
Guidelines on continuing professional development 7982 Introduction These guidelines on continuing professional development (CPD) have been developed by the Occupational Therapy Board of Australia (the
Guidance on Supporting Information for Non- Standard GPs February 2013 Dr Paula Wright: Northern Deanery Lead for Sessional GPs and Dr Steve Blades: GP tutor Who are non-standard GPs for the purpose of
How do nurse prescribers demonstrate prescribing proficiency? Jane Diggle In the second of an occasional series of articles to help members of the multidisciplinary team better understand the roles and
NMC Revalidation Are you ready? Guidance for UNISON members NMC Revalidation Revalidation are you ready? If you are a nurse, midwife or health visitor you need to know about revalidation the new way in
Shape of Training how did we get here, & where are we going? Bill Reid Postgraduate Dean SE Scotland Four Nations.. Four Nations Introduction The Shape of Training Review looked at potential reforms to
Transcript Changes to registration standards and standards for practice 6 February 2017 Slide 1 Cover slide Hello and welcome. My name is Petrina Halloran and I am the Policy Manager for the Nursing and
07.280416 NHS Wales Nursing and Midwifery Council Revalidation and Registration Policy Author: Sian Bolton, Assistant Director of Quality, Nursing and Allied Health Professionals Date: 18 April 2016 Version:
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Guidelines for Approval of Educational Events for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Accreditation Contents What does the
How to Return to Social Work Practice in Wales A Guide for Social Workers March 2016 Contents Background to the Requirements 2 Why the Requirements are being introduced 2 The Requirements for social workers
Good medical practice The duties of a doctor registered with the GMC Patients must be able to trust doctors with their lives and health. To justify that trust you must show respect for human life and make
Revalidation FAQs for Trainees () Q1 What is the purpose of revalidation? The purpose of revalidation of a Doctors Licence to Practice is to give patients greater confidence in the profession and support
APPLYING FOR APPROVED CLINICIAN APPROVAL National Reference Group, June 2010 THE ROLE OF THE APPROVED AND RESPONSIBLE CLINICIAN This document has been prepared by the National Reference Group on Section
GUIDANCE ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR SESSIONAL GPS. March 2016 Paula Wright GP tutor, Health Education North East Who are sessional GPs for the purpose of this GUIDANCE?... 2 Target readership... 2 Supporting
Employing nurses in local authorities RCN guidance Employing nurses in local authorities Acknowledgements The RCN wishes to thank the following for their involvement and support in the development of this
STRENGTHENING RECERTIFICATION FOR VOCATIONALLY-REGISTERED DOCTORS IN NEW ZEALAND A DISCUSSION DOCUMENT September 2018 1 Contents Introduction... 3 What is recertification?... 3 Recertification in New Zealand...
QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA): SOURCES OF EVIDENCE - A MORE DETAILED GUIDE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADS The framework for the quality assurance of Radiology training has been outlined in the RCR document All you ever
Learning from adverse events Learning and improvement summary November 2014 Healthcare Improvement Scotland 2014 Published November 2014 You can copy or reproduce the information in this document for use
Prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections Quality improvement guide Issued: November 2011 NICE public health guidance 36 guidance.nice.org.uk/ph36 NHS Evidence has accredited the process
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Principles Interim Process and Methods of the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme 1. Our guidance production processes are based on key principles,
PHARMACIST INDEPENDENT PRESCRIBING MEDICAL PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK 0 CONTENTS Course Description Period of Learning in Practice Summary of Competencies Guide to Assessing Competencies Page 2 3 10 14 Course
MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY Version 1.3 Version Date July 2017 Policy Owner Medical Director Author Associate Director of Patient Safety & Quality First approval or date last reviewed July 2017 Staff/Groups
National Mortality Case Record Review Programme Using the structured judgement review method A clinical governance guide to mortality case record reviews Supported by: Commissioned by: Dr Andrew Gibson
NES General Practice Nursing Education Supervisor (General Practice, Medical Directorate) APPLICANT GUIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON GENERAL PRACTICE NURSING (GPN) EDUCATION SUPERVISOR ROLE In March 2011
(2017-18): 27 March 2017 2017-18 Specification Level 4 Diploma in Therapeutic Counselling (TC-L4) This RQF 1 qualification is regulated in England, Wales and Northern Ireland Qualification/learning aim
The GMC Quality Framework for specialty including GP training in the UK April 2010 In April 2010 the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) was merged with the General Medical Council
Position Description Directorate / Network: Surgery and Anaesthetic Network Department: Neurosurgery Post Graduate Fellow Neurosurgery Designation: Classification: Award: Location: Hours of Work: Postgraduate
RESEARCH GOVERNANCE POLICY DOCUMENT CONTROL: Version: V6 Ratified by: Performance and Assurance Group Date ratified: 12 November 2015 Name of originator/author: Assistant Director of Research Name of responsible
HEA Accreditation Policy 2017-18 1. Policy statement The Higher Education Academy (HEA) accredits initial and continuing professional development (CPD) programmes delivered by higher education providers
Reference Guide May 2016 Contents 1. Introduction and background... 5 2. Foundation Programme: policy and organisation... 6 THE UK FOUNDATION PROGRAMME OFFICE (UKFPO)... 6 UK HEALTH DEPARTMENTS... 6 HEALTH
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists Principles and processes for externality in specialty education and training Introduction 1. The aims of this document are to: explain why externality is
PAEDIATRICS - ST1 ENTRY CRITERIA ESSENTIAL CRITERIA WHEN EVALUATED i Applicants must have: Qualifications MBBS or equivalent medical qualification Applicants must: Eligibility Be eligible for full registration
ADVANCED NURSE PRACTITIONER STRATEGY 2016-2020 Lead Manager: Chair, GG&C Advanced Practice Group Responsible Director: Board Nurse Director Approved by: NMAHP Group Date approved Date for review: September
JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: LOCATION: ACCOUNTABLE TO: RESPONSIBLE TO: PROFESSIONALLY RESPONSIBLE TO: LEAD PRACTICE BASED PHARMACIST Designated GP Practice in Federation area Federation Chair Practice Prescribing