PSRC Funding Application

Transcription

1 PSRC Funding Application Competition Application Status Submitted: Prepopulated with screening form? Regional FTA Main Competition submitted March 17th, :07 PM Yes Project Information 1. Project Title Shared Mobility Retrofits at King County Metro Park & Rides 2. Transportation 2040 ID 3. Sponsoring Agency King County/Metro 4. Cosponsors 5. Does the sponsoring agency have "Certification Acceptance" status from WSDOT? 6. If not, which agency will serve as your CA sponsor? 7. Is your agency a designated recipient for FTA funds? Yes 8. Designated recipient concurrence Contact Information 1. Contact name Eric Irelan 2. Contact phone Contact eric.irelan@kingcounty.gov Project Description 1. Project Scope The proposal would provide a pilot demonstration project to complete the design and construction of shared mobility hub retrofits to incorporate new modes of transportation at Metro s busiest park and ride facilities (P&Rs). The project would develop shared mobility hub retrofit designs at six P&R locations, and complete construction to fully retrofit four selected locations. Examples of retrofits would include safe and secure short-term parking for dropoffs, pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements, and additional amenities such as lighting, shelters, real-time transit service and parking information, trip planning and service request kiosks. The proposed project would be carried out in three phases: Task 1 Retrofit Feasibility Analysis: For each of the six P&R locations, complete feasibility

2 Task 1 Retrofit Feasibility Analysis: For each of the six P&R locations, complete feasibility analyses developing detailed service and operational integration plans, infrastructure designs for all the proposed retrofits, additions, and construction activities (60%), budgets, and alternatives to carry out the needed investments, including partnerships with different stakeholders including the private sector. Task 2 Detailed Retrofit Designs: Four of the six locations will be selected to carry out the respective detailed design all of integration and retrofit activities, and the capital works and additional investments to fully realize the proposed shared mobility concept. Task 3 Construction: Construct shared mobility retrofits at four locations designed in Task 2. The outcome of the project at the four selected P&R s will be expanded facility access options which will result in increased transit ridership, reduced demand for SOV parking, facilitate greater mode shift to transit and other non-sov modes, and providing even greater benefits to customers. Based on the experience gained with this pilot project, Metro will be poised to apply these design principles to the rest of Metro s P&Rs. 2. Project Justification, Need, or Purpose King County and the greater Puget Sound Region are experiencing unprecedented levels of growth in jobs and population, putting increasing pressure on a Regional Transportation System suffering under high levels of congestion during ever extending peak periods. According to the WSDOT s 2015 Capacity Report, the Central Puget Sound region is already experiencing 19% higher congestion (vehicle hours of delay) than pre-recession levels. King County is expected to accommodate an additional 367,000 new residents and 477,000 workers (2015) by 2040, primarily in designated Regional Growth and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers. Continued rapid population and employment growth will add to existing congestion and delay along travel corridors connecting the Regional Centers. Significant new road capacity is neither financially feasible nor desired because of high costs and negative environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions. Regional Center mode split targets have been adopted that place a higher reliance on transit to provide greater system efficiency and reduce person vehicle trip demand levels. At the same time, mobility options are changing. Shared mobility choices are increasing includes various forms of carsharing, bikesharing, ridesharing (carpooling and vanpooling), and on-demand ride services. With diverse options for mobility on the rise, smartphone apps that aggregate these options and optimize routes for travelers are also proliferating, increasing ease of access and convenience. Shared mobility is having a transformative impact in many cities by enhancing transportation accessibility, while simultaneously reducing driving and personal vehicle ownership. Several studies have documented reduced vehicle use, ownership, and vehicle miles traveled. A number of environmental, social, and transportationrelated benefits have been reported from the use of shared mobility modes. According to the FHWA: Shared mobility can also extend the catchment area of public transit, potentially helping to bridge gaps in existing transportation networks and encouraging multimodality by addressing the first-and-last-mile issue related to public transit access. Shared mobility can also provide economic benefits in the form of cost savings, increased economic activity near public transit stations and multimodal hubs, and increased access by creating connections with origin points not previously accessible via traditional public transportation. Shared Mobility: Current Practices and Guiding Principles Report No. FHWA- HOP published April METRO CONNECTS calls upon the use of transportation network companies (TNCs), often referred to as ridesharing services such as Uber and Lyft, and other shared mobility providers as first/last mile solutions to improve access to Metro s fixed route services. Metro is already in the process of contracting the first of these services, connecting areas with poor transit coverage in Bellevue with Bellevue Transit Center and Wilburton P&R. In Q2 2017, Metro will be soliciting proposals for the provision of first/last services to high-demand P&Rs such as Eastgate, Northgate and South Renton these services should launch in Q Additional services are scheduled to launch in 2018, as part of a regional partnership with Sound Transit. Metro s P&R facilities are generally well utilized across the County, but is aware of numerous issues that limits potential customer s ability to access transit services. The majority of Metro park-and-rides experience overcrowding with limited parking availability. Some lots experience circulation congestion during peak periods, and connecting biking and walk infrastructure to surrounding communities is inadequate in many areas. Metro is engaged in several projects to increase safe walk and bike access and increase the efficiency of P&Rs, however more work is needed to facilitate safe, convenient access for riders utilizing shared mobility services. The objective of this project is to design and construct facility retrofits necessary to develop shared mobility hubs at selected park and rides facilities. Shared mobility hubs provide safe and convenient access, waiting and loading areas for passengers using TNC services and other shared mobility services such as carshare (Zipcar, Car2Go) and bikeshare systems. The project will include supporting pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements, and additional

3 project will include supporting pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements, and additional amenities such as lighting, improved waiting areas, traveler information, and service request kiosks. The project will improve multimodal access to Metro s fixed route services, increase ridership (boardings) at high-demand park and ride lots, reduce increasing parking demand at overcrowded lots, and encourage mode shift to transit. The project will help manage increasing transportation demand to make the most efficient use of existing transit facilities and planned transit service improvements, helping to ensure the continued viability of the region s growth and economic strategy. Project Location 1. Project Location Project locations would be existing Metro P&R facilities. Preliminary selections include: Eastgate, Redmond, Issaquah Highlands, South Kirkland, Northgate, and Tukwila. 2. Please identify the county(ies) in which the project is located. King 3. Crossroad/landmark nearest the beginning of the project 4. Crossroad/landmark nearest the end of the project 5. Map and project graphics Shared_Mobility_at_P_Rs_Map_Final.pdf Plan Consistency 1. Is the project specifically identified in a local comprehensive plan? Yes 2. If yes, please indicate the (1) plan name, (2) relevant section(s), and (3) page number where it can be found. The project is consistent with King County Metro's Strategic Plan for Public Transportation (2015 update) which is incorporated by reference in The County's Comprehensive Plan. Within Metro's Strategic Plan: - Support the expansion of new services and new modes providing access to Metro s fixed route services by enhancing strategic points of intermodal connection. Strategic Plan Strategies found on p.30, on p. 34, on p. 35, on p.35, and on p Improve customers experience at P&Rs through better informational services and enhanced facilities. Strategic Plan Strategies p. 27, p. 41, p. 41, p Support land uses, policies, and practices that promote transit-oriented development and lead to communities that transit can serve efficiently and effectively. Strategic Plan Strategies p. 33 and p If no, please describe how the project is consistent with the applicable local comprehensive plan, including specific local policies and provisions the project supports. Federal Functional Classification 1. Functional class name 00 Not applicable (transit, enhancements, Etc.) Support for Centers 1. Designated center(s) supported Regional Manufacturing/Industrial Centers: Ballard-Interbay, Duwamish, Kent, Paine Field/Boeing Everett, North Tukwila Regional Growth Centers: Auburn, Bellevue, Kent Downtown, Northgate, Redmond, Renton,

4 Regional Growth Centers: Auburn, Bellevue, Kent Downtown, Northgate, Redmond, Renton, Uptown Queen Anne, First Hill/Capitol Hill, Seattle CBD, South Lake Union, University Community, Tukwila, Federal Way, Canyon Park, Totem Lake, SeaTac, Burien, and Redmond- Overlake Local Centers: Sammamish, Crown Hill, Georgetown, Sand Point, Renton Highlands, Juanita, Factoria, North City, Roosevelt, Duvall, Children s Hospital & Medical Center, Shoreline Community College, Harborview Medical Center, Newcastle, Lake City, Greenwood, Crossroads, Oak Tree, SODO, Fremont, Kenmore P&R, Mercer Island P&R, Eastgate P&R, Issaquah Highlands P&R, Aurora Village Transit Center, Kirkland Transit Center, Issaquah Transit Center, South Kirkland P&R, and North Tukwila. Criteria: Benefit to Center 1. Describe how the project will benefit or support the existing and planned housing and employment development of a center or centers. Does it support multiple centers? The project supports existing and planned housing and employment development in multiple designated Regional and Local Centers. Each of the six park and ride facilities is contained within and directly benefits of one of the designated center. Developing shared mobility hubs at these strategic P&R facilities will increase passenger capacity and accessibility at the P&Rs to support increased mobility options to residents, CTR employers, and employees in the surrounding center and other catchment areas. Increasing non-sov travel and transit ridership reduces increasing demand for road/intersection and parking capacity, creating efficiencies that support higher levels of development and more compact development patterns within centers. Park and Ride/Center Location: Eastgate P&R/Eastgate Local Transit Activity Center, Redmond P&R/Redmond Downtown Regional Center, Issaquah Highlands P&R/Issaquah Regional Center, South Kirkland P&R/Kirkland Regional Center, Northgate P&R/Northgate Regional Center, and Tukwila P&R/Tukwila Regional Center. 2. Describe how the project will support the development or redevelopment plans and activities (objectives and aims) of a center or centers. To increase its positive effect, the project would be aligned with proposed development and redevelopment plans within each regional center and the broader comprehensive plans of their responsible local cities. The maturation of shared mobility services is predicted to increase more shift to transit and could act as another tool to mitigate the negative transportation impacts associated with development. Developing shared mobility hubs with active supporting mobility services could also help open the door for mutually beneficial partnerships with local government and the private sector actors to plan for additional growth and services around the P&R location. 3. Describe how the project improves safe and convenient access to major destinations within the center, including enhanced opportunities for active transportation that can provide public health benefits through the following relevant areas: walkability, public transit access, public transit speed and reliability, safety & security, bicycle mobility and facilities, streetscape improvements, etc. The project s main objective is to construct an organized, consolidated mobility hub at four strategic P&R locations to facilitate safe and convenient access to shared mobility service providers and passengers transferring to/from transit services connecting to destinations served by the P&Rs. This project retrofits would enhance broader access to major destinations within and between connected centers, and improve circulation and access safety at the P&R facilities. The project would strengthen the role of biking and walking to P&Rs and throughout the broader center area by ensuring investment alignment and proper integration with local development and non-motorize transportation plans. Improvements in shelter, lighting, and information services at P&R would increase personal security and level of comfort of customers transferring between services at the P&Rs. 4. Describe how the project provides a range of travel modes to users traveling to centers, or if it provides a missing mode. The project s goal is to support and integrate new nontraditional transportation modes and services at P&Rs with existing traditional modes, increasing the functional capacity and circulation efficiency at the facilities. The project will help support and integrate a range of travel modes travelling within and to transit connected centers, and increase regional transit mobility and mode shift. 5. Describe the user groups that will benefit from the project, including commuters, residents, commercial users, those groups identified in the President s Order for Environmental Justice, seniors, people with disabilities, those located in highly impacted communities, and/or areas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment. By supporting integration of new travel modes within existing P&Rs, the project would benefit

5 By supporting integration of new travel modes within existing P&Rs, the project would benefit transit dependent groups including commuters, youth, senior citizens, low-income families, minorities, people with disabilities, and other groups with limited access to private vehicles. These groups will benefit from more trip options, increased access to evening and night transportation services providing at the P&Rs, higher reliability, and better access to employment and education opportunities, shopping and commercial services, health & human service resources, and recreation destinations. The project would also enhance the mobility of travelers trying to access P&R facilities at off peak hours during the day when most parking stalls are occupied. Currently, P&R s primary role is to provide parking capacity and transit access during peak travel times. This project will enhance P&R lot functionality, enhancing mobility continuously throughout the day, benefiting a broader population who have other non-peak period travel needs, including workers with a wider variety of shift times who often represent lower income groups. 6. Describe how the project will support the establishment of new jobs/businesses or the retention of exisitng jobs/businesses including those in the industry clusters identified in the adopted Regional Economic Strategy. This project supports the retention of existing jobs and businesses and provides increased new business opportunities by expanding travel and mobility options within centers and between centers. For example, a destination such as a restaurant near to a P&R, but not adequately served by transit, would be easily accessible from the P&R via the shared mobility hub. In addition, increased mobility options provided by the hub would facilitate easy access to potential riders from nearby residential areas who may have limited transit service to the P&R. These new riders could then access commercial and employment opportunities in other areas of their center and at other centers connected by transit. Public investments in shared mobility hubs themselves will also serve as signal to private sector investors of the region s commitment to realizing new mobility opportunities supporting the vision of growth and development within centers, and could stimulate private sector investment and increased employment opportunity. 7. Does the project promote Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) opportunities? Yes. The overall vision of the retrofit effort is to capitalize on the growth of new transportation services and modes that serve alternatives to SOV travel, both for commute and other types of trips. The project is also expected to increase boardings at P&Rs, thus avoiding or reducing SOV trips to/from these facilities, increasing non-sov mode split. Shared mobility hubs and the services they consolidate represent an exciting new tool in the CTR toolbox which would help support employer CTR programs and local government & nonprofit CTR initiatives. Metro has strong relationships with TMA s and employers that will be leveraged to promote the new services through CTR communication channels. Criteria: System Continuity/Long Term Benefit-Sustainability 1. Describe how this project provides a "logical segment" that serves a center, or allows users to access the system. Some of the most challenging gaps in Metro s services are the first/last miles around existing P&R facilities. The project provides a demonstration of new innovative services and technology solutions that can overcome the challenge of serving these gaps areas in a costefficient way. For instance, walking from a P&R to an office park 2 miles away can easily take 40 minutes, while that same trip can be met in under 10 minutes by a shared TNC. A desired outcome of this pilot project is to advance Metro Transit from a segment (link) solution to a full origin-destination solution (Metro + partner services) that represents a true alternative to SOV travel. Increasing access to transit and extending transit trips can serve more areas with demand, increasing transit mobility and ridership and supports center and regional transit and development goals. 2. Describe how the project fills in a missing link or removes barriers to a center (e.g. congestion, inadequate transit service/facilities.). As discussed above, the project will help fill missing first/last mile trip links to destinations near P&R facilities and remove transit access barriers through providing infrastructure to support trips provided by TNCs, carshare, and bikeshare services. 3. Describe how this project will relieve pressure or remove a bottleneck on the Metropolitan Transportation System and how this will positively impact overall system performance. This project will help relieve increasing SOV demand on the Metropolitan Transportation System and will positively impact overall system performance by increasing access to the regional transit system at P&Rs by non-sov mobility options. Existing transit users who drive and park at the P&R s will have new mobility and time of day access choices, and new transit riders will be attracted who currently drive to destinations not adequately served by transit. In addition, shared mobility hubs at existing P&R facilities will help encourage the consolidation of more efficient land use patterns (higher densities, mixed land uses) around the P&R within centers as non-sov and transit mobility is expanded to serve these areas.

6 the P&R within centers as non-sov and transit mobility is expanded to serve these areas. These development patterns in turn create higher demand for more efficient transit and other non-sov travel which extends the capacity of the MTS to serve more travel demand. 4. Describe how the project improves intermodal connections (e.g. between autos, ferries, commuter rail, high capacity transit, bus, carpool, bicycle, etc.), or facilities connections between separate operators of a single mode (e.g., two transit operators). The project aim to turn existing P&Rs from points of interface between driving and transit, into true multimodal hubs that offer a wide array of services as complement to transit. These services include TNCs (e.g. Uber, Lyft), carshare (e.g. Zipcar, Reach Now, Car 2 Go) and bikeshare; and includes improvement to biking and pedestrian facilities and the provision of additional services to customers (improved waiting areas, information and service request kiosks, etc). By increasing access to P&Rs, mobility in to the larger regional transit system is improved including improved access to Sound Transit LRT, Sounder rail and Express Bus services; Metro RapidRide service; and connections to SeaTac Airport, WSF and King County Water Taxi services, Community Transit routes, Seattle Streetcar, and Amtrak rail service. 5. If applicable, describe how the project provides an improvement in travel time and/or reliability for transit users traveling to and/or within centers. By supporting services that provide on-demand first/last mile access to transit bus and rail fixed route services, the project would improve travel times and service reliability for transit riders using these services over driving. 6. If applicable, describe how the project increases transit use to or within centers. The lack of efficient first/last mile transit services near P&Rs and lack of parking capacity at the lots discourages many potential transit riders and forces them to rely on private cars for everyday mobility. This project will help overcome that challenge by supporting safe and convenient access to P&Rs by TNCs, shuttles, carshare, and bikeshare modes and is expected to increase transit ridership within centers the potential to facilitate and estimated additional 200 daily boardings in the first year at each of the four P&Rs where shared mobility are constructed (800 total trips). Metro estimates that when the retrofits are completed and new first/last mile services have been fully developed at all six P&Rs, transit ridership would increase by 4,080 daily boardings, or 1,060,800 annual boardings. 7. Describe how this project supports a long-term strategy to maximize the efficiency of the corridor? Describe the problem and how this project will remedy it. The project supports a long-term strategy to maximize the efficiency of existing transportation facilities and connecting corridors by supporting increased access to P&R s for new modes of travel that provide first/last mile passenger connectivity from P&Rs. The increased mobility and travel time saving these newer modes provide will reduce traveler dependence on private autos for access to P&Rs and other trip types, reducing demand for parking and lane capacity at the facilities and on the corridors that connect them. Reduced vehicle demand positively impacts corridor performance by maximizing the efficiency of available capacity. Air Quality and Climate Change: Element Selection 1. Please select one or more elements in the list below that are included in the project s scope of work, and provide the requested information in the pages to follow. Transit and Ferry Service Air Quality and Climate Change: Transit and Ferry Service 1. What is the current transit ridership for the affected transit stops or routes? Total 2015 Boarding 15,437. By P&R facility: Eastgate 3,455. Redmond 1,772. Issaquah Highlands 1,112. South Kirkland 1,522. Northgate 7,078, Tukwila What is the average transit trip length for the affected routes? The system wide average trip length is 9.1 miles. The average passenger miles traveled for the system is 4.41 miles. 3. What is the average transit trip length of the entire system? The system wide average trip length is 9.1 miles. The average passenger miles traveled for the system is 4.41 miles.

7 4. If the project includes a park and ride, how many new stalls are being provided? 5. Are there other amenities included to encourage new transit ridership? If so, please describe. Yes. The retrofits would encompass a suite of amenities to encourage new transit ridership. The first element would be pick up/drop off areas for TNC services; additional pick up/drop off areas could be designate for microstransit and/or local shuttle services. The retrofits would also incorporate bikeshare stations (or similar), additional bike parking facilities, and enhanced connections to the local biking infrastructure network. The retrofits would also designate special places for carshare services, vanshares, and carpools. Additionally, the retrofit would also enhance the existing shelter infrastructure, and offer kiosks providing real time information, trip planning tools, and service request tools. 6. What is the expected increase in transit ridership from the project? The analysis below focuses on the impact of adding pick up/drop off areas for TNC services (or similar), even though the project scope is broader. The need for pick up/drop off areas was determined according to current demand at the P&R in question, while the projected capacity of each pick up/drop off area was determined based on Metro s own analysis and modeling. Overall, Metro estimates that when the retrofits are completed and new first/last mile services have been fully developed as a complement to Metro s fixed route services, transit ridership would increase by 4,080 daily boardings, or 1,060,800 annual boardings. See attached shared Mobility Hub Trip Generation Estimates.pdf. 7. If a new or expanded ferry service, what is the length of the driving route being replaced? 8. Please describe the source of the project data provided above (e.g., Environmental Impact Statement, EPA/DOE data, traffic study, survey, previous projects, etc.). Data on current features and usage of the selected P&Rs comes from a recent survey of P&Rs conducted by Metro. Data on capacity of drop off /pick up areas was determined based on Metro s own analysis and modeling. PSRC Funding Request 1. What is the PSRC funding source being requested? 2. Has this project received PSRC funds previously? No 3. If yes, please provide the project's PSRC TIP ID Phase Year Amount planning 2018 $160, PE 2018 $800, construction 2020 $1,600, Total Request: $2,560, Total Estimated Project Cost and Schedule Planning Funding Source Secured/Unsecured Amount 5307 Unsecured $160, Local Secured $40, Expected year of completion for this phase: 2018 PE $200,000.00

8 Funding Source Secured/Unsecured Amount 5307 Unsecured $800, Local Secured $200, Expected year of completion for this phase: 2018 Construction $1,000, Funding Source Secured/Unsecured Amount Local Unsecured $400, Unsecured $1,600, Expected year of completion for this phase: 2020 Summary 1. Estimated project completion date 2/ Total project cost $3,200, Funding Documentation 1. Documents Copy_of_ _464286_Budget.pdf, Budget_-_A00698_MC_P_R_EXPANSION.pdf $2,000, Please describe the secure or reasonably expected funds identified in the supporting documentation. For funds that are reasonably expected, an explanation of procedural steps with milestone dates for completion which will be taken to secure the funds for the project or program should also be included. Local match for the PE phase will be provided in the form of King County Metro staff time assigned to project coordination and supervision, which is included in Project Service Development Grants (464286_Admin_Default) adopted in the budget. Local match for the Construction phase is reasonably expected to be included in the budget. Capital appropriation A00698, MC P&R Expansion. Project Readiness: PE 1. Are you requesting funds for ONLY a planning study or preliminary engineering? No 2. Is preliminary engineering complete? No 3. What was the date of completion (month and year)? 4. Have preliminary plans been submitted to WSDOT for approval? 5. Are there any other PE/Design milestones associated with the project? Please identify and provide dates of completion. You may also use this space to explain any dates above. 6. When are preliminary plans expected to be complete and approved by WSDOT (month and year)? Project Readiness: NEPA 1. What is the current or anticipated level of environmental documentation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for this project?

9 Categorical Exclusion (CE) 2. Has the NEPA documentation been approved? No 3. Please provide the date of NEPA approval, or the anticipated date of completion (month and year). 9/2019 Project Readiness: Right of Way 1. Will Right of Way be required for this project? No 2. How many parcels do you need? 3. What is the zoning in the project area? 4. Discuss the extent to which your schedule reflects the possibility of condemnation and the actions needed to pursue this. 5. Does your agency have experience in conducting right of way acquisitions of similar size and complexity? 6. If not, when do you expect a consultant to be selected, under contract, and ready to start (month and year)? 7. In the box below, please identify all relevant right of way milestones, including the current status and estimated completion date of each. Project Readiness: Construction 1. Are funds being requested for construction? Yes 2. Do you have an engineer's estimate? No 3. Engineers estimate document 4. Identify the environmental permits needed for the project and when they are scheduled to be acquired. CE. 09/ Are Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) approved? 6. Please provide the date of approval, or the date when PS&E is scheduled to be submitted for approval (month and year). 7. When is the project scheduled to go to ad (month and year)? 10/2018 Other Considerations 1. Describe any additional aspects of your project not requested in the evaluation criteria that could be relevant to the final project recommendation and decisionmaking process. Metro is actively engaged in collaborations with Sound Transit and the Seattle Department of Transportation to study and pilot the potential of new mobility services and technology solutions to enhance people s ability to connect to transit and access desired destinations. Last fall, Metro and Sound Transit were awarded a Mobility on Demand Grant by the FTA to pilot the use of TNCs a first/last mile solution to complement their fixed route services. The vision begin this grant is to support that progress in service development with the requisite infrastructure retrofits to maximize their impact.

10 2. Describe any innovative components included in your project: these could include design elements, cost saving measures, or other innovations. The project focuses on improving access to and from fixed route transit services at P&Rs in an innovative approach that is only being currently piloted in a few other metropolitan areas in the country (most notably Los Angeles Metro). The aim is to leverage new mobility services and technology solutions to add capacity at each P&R and better accommodate regional growth without adding any new parking stalls and increasing the overall footprint of each facility. This approach is in line with County goals to encourage a more efficient use of the existing transportation infrastructure and to support more compact development patterns. The retrofits as such, are also meant to encourage further innovations, from private sector providers in the mobility services and additional value that could be offered to transit riders at P&Rs. 3. Describe the process that your agency uses to determine the benefits of projects; this could include formal cost-benefit analysis, practical design, or some other process by which the benefits of projects are determined. Metro uses cost-benefit analysis to determine benefits of projects. Internal and external soft and hard costs are carefully calculated for each project. In addition to direct costs, other indirect costs are considered like customer perceptions, social equity, environmental, agency risk, and long-term maintenance and sustainability. In addition to the primary benefit of increased transit ridership, Metro considers other benefits like improved customer satisfaction, opportunity costs of providing parking by other means, supporting local land use goals, and improving social equity. 4. Final documents Share_Mobility_Hub_Trip_Generation_Estimates.pdf

11 Shared Mobility Retrofits at King County Metro Park & Rids SHORELINE WOODINVILLE LAKE BOTHELL FOREST KENMORE PARK DUVALL Northgate Transit Center P&R KIRKLAND Redmond P&R REDMOND YARROW POINT HUNTS South Kirkland P&R POINT CLYDE HILL SEATTLE MEDINA BELLEVUE BEAUX ARTS SAMMAMISH Eastgate P&R MERCER ISLAND Issaquah Highlands P&R NEWCASTLE ISSAQUAH RENTON Tukwila P&R TUKWILA Legend BURIEN P&R SEATAC 3 Mile service area The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. DES MOINES Routes Serving Centers Other Transit Routes Local Transit Activity Centers Transitsystem163.mxd 0 1 KENT 2 Miles 3 PSRC Regional Growth Center PSRC Industrial/Manufacturing Center COVINGTON MAPLE VALLEY

12 2015/16 Budget - Revenue Details Appropriation Number: A00698 Award Number: Appropriation Name: MC P&R EXPANSION Project Mgr: D. Rowe Budget Holding Project No: Prepared by: Budget Holding Project Name: TDC MC P&R EXPANSION Last Uptaded on: Total Thru LTD thru Exp 2017 Exp 2018 Exp 2019 Exp 2020 Exp 2021 Exp 2022 Exp 2023 Exp 2024 Exp 2025 Exp 2026 Exp Sum 2024 Total Project Expenses (from "Cash Flow" tab) 637,488 2,698,465 4,121,955 2,698,465 6,129,720 16,646,917 11,719, ,226 10,156,373 45,218,147 Grant Funding 1. Grants Awarded Total Thru LTD thru Rev 2017 Rev 2018 Rev 2019 Rev 2020 Rev 2021 Rev 2022 Rev 2023 Rev 2024 Rev 2025 Rev 2026 Rev Grant Name Reimb % Award # Sum 2024 Total Grants Awarded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 % of project funding 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2. Grants Projected Total Thru 2016 Rev 2017 Rev 2018 Rev 2019 Rev 2020 Rev 2021 Rev 2022 Rev 2023 Rev 2024 Rev 2025 Rev 2026 Rev Grant Name Reimb % Award # Sum 2024 Grant TBD tbd tbd 157, ,937 1,020, ,937 1,517,257 4,120,524 2,900, ,908 2,513,954 11,192,610 Total Grants Projected $0 $0 $0 $157,794 $667,937 $1,020,286 $667,937 $1,517,257 $4,120,524 $2,900,968 $139,908 $2,513,954 $11,192,610 % of project funding 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Total Grants (Awarded and Projected) 0 157, ,937 1,020, ,937 1,517,257 4,120,524 2,900, ,908 2,513,954 11,192,610 % of project funding 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Other Revenue Total Thru 2016 Rev 2017 Rev 2018 Rev 2019 Rev 2020 Rev 2021 Rev 2022 Rev 2023 Rev 2024 Rev 2025 Rev 2026 Rev Description Award # Sum 2024 City partner contribution tbd 157, ,937 1,020, ,937 1,517,257 4,120,524 2,900, ,908 2,513,954 11,192,610 Total Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $157,794 $667,937 $1,020,286 $667,937 $1,517,257 $4,120,524 $2,900,968 $139,908 $2,513,954 $11,192,610 % of project funding 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Fund Balance Funding 0 321,901 1,362,591 2,081,383 1,362,591 3,095,206 8,405,870 5,917, ,411 5,128,466 22,832,928 % of project funding 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% \\Dot\transit\GM\GMAKIKI\DATA\Finance\ _BudgetDev\PASS FACIL\A00698 MC P&R EXPANSION

13 Project # Project_Description Final Adopted Final Adopted Service Development Grants (464286_Admin_Default) Project Project YearTotal YearTotal flag orgflag ExpAcct Total Amount Total Amount Biennium Total acct DS_065 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) SALARIES/WAGES (51100) $ 104,395 $ 107,806 $ 212, DS_061 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) REGULAR SALARIED EMPLOYEE (51110) $ (86,050) $ (88,858) $ (174,907) DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) REGULAR SALARIED EMPLOYEE (51110) $ 469,763 $ 485,113 $ 954, DS_061 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) MED DENTAL LIFE INS BENEFITS/NON 587 (51315) $ (17,580) $ (18,288) $ (35,868) DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) MED DENTAL LIFE INS BENEFITS/NON 587 (51315) $ 87,900 $ 91,440 $ 179, DS_065 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) MED DENTAL LIFE INS BENEFITS/NON 587 (51315) $ 17,580 $ 18,288 $ 35, DS_061 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICARE FICA (51320) $ (6,583) $ (6,798) $ (13,380) DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICARE FICA (51320) $ 35,937 $ 37,111 $ 73, DS_065 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICARE FICA (51320) $ 7,986 $ 8,247 $ 16, DS_061 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) RETIREMENT (51330) $ (10,343) $ (11,418) $ (21,761) DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) RETIREMENT (51330) $ 56,465 $ 62,337 $ 118, DS_065 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) RETIREMENT (51330) $ 12,548 $ 13,853 $ 26, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE (51340) $ 515 $ 515 $ 1, DS_065 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE (51340) $ 382 $ 382 $ DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) OFFICE SUPPLIES (52110) $ 12,250 $ 12,250 $ 24, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) SUPPLIES IT (52190) $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ 3, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) SUPPLIES FOOD (52205) $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 8, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) TRANSIT PASSES PERMITS (52240) $ 152,500 $ 152,500 $ 305, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES (52290) $ 13,250 $ 13,250 $ 26, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) ADVERTISING (53100) $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 14, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING BINDING (53101) $ 82,500 $ 82,500 $ 165, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) OTHER CONTRACTUAL PROF SVCS (53105) $ 2,335,459 $ 2,335,459 $ 4,670, DS_065 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) OTHER CONTRACTUAL PROF SVCS (53105) $ 773,782 $ 1,031,710 $ 1,805, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) POSTAGE (53220) $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 15, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) TRAVEL SUBSISTENCE IN STATE (53310) $ 14,500 $ 14,500 $ 29, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) KCETP GENERAL COSTS (53334) $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 180, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) RENT LEASE OTHER EQUIP AND MACH (53713) $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 5, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) DUES MEMBERSHIPS (53803) $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 2, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) MISC SERVICES CHARGES (53890) $ 206,496 $ 206,496 $ 412, DPR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (EN_464286) PRINTING GRAPHIC ARTS SVC (55260) $ 34,558 $ 34,558 $ 69, $ 4,412,012 $ 4,696,755 $ 9,108,767

14 2017 Shared Mobility Retrofits at King County Metro Park & Rides Project Metro Shared Mobility Hub Trip Generation Estimates Park and Ride Locations New Drop Off Stalls AM peak transit trips per stall Non Peak transit trips per stall Total Daily transit trips per stall Total daily transit trips Annual transit trips Eastgate ,9600 South Kirkland Issaquah Highlands , ,4800 Redmond ,4800 Northgate ,440 37,4400 Tukwila ,400 TOTAL ,440 4,080 1,060,800