Figure 1.1 Black-White Ratio in Democratic Vote for President, Selected States, 2004 and 2008 (N=25)
|
|
|
- Henry Arnold
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Figure 1.1 Black-White Ratio in Democratic Vote for President, Selected States, 2004 and 2008 (N=25) Alabama Arkansas California Delaware Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia Wisconsin Source: Authors compilation based Roper Center (2004, 2008).
2 Figure 1.2 White-Black Median Income Ratios, Selected States, 2000 and 2010 (N=37) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
3 Figure 1.3 White-Black Median Professional-Class Income Ratio, Selected States, 2000 and 2010 (N=37) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
4 Figure 1.4 White-Black Median Working-Class Income Ratio, Selected States, 2000 and 2010 (N=37) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
5 Figure 1.5 Group Presence: Ratio of Percentage of Whites in Professional Class to Percentage of Blacks in Professional Class, Selected States, 2000 and 2010 (N=37) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
6 Figure 1.6 total Income Inequality as Measured by Total Theil Index, Selected States, 2000 and 2010 (N=37) Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin
7 Figure 1.7 Between-Race Theil as Percentage of Total Theil (Percentage of Total Income Inequality Attributable to Black-White Income Disparity), Selected States, 2000 and 2010 (N=37) Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin
8 Table 1A.1 Black-White Gap in Democratic Vote for President, Selected States, 2004 and 2008 White (%) Black (%) Difference (%) Ratio White (%) Black (%) Difference (%) Ratio Change in difference (%) Alabama Alaska 33 n.a. n.a. n.a. 33 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Arizona 41 n.a. n.a. n.a. 40 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Arkansas California Colorado n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Connecticut 51 n.a. n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii 58 n.a. n.a. n.a. 70 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Idaho 29 n.a. n.a. n.a. 33 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Illinois Indiana Iowa 49 n.a. n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. Kansas 34 n.a. n.a. n.a. 40 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Kentucky Louisiana Change in ratio
9 Table 1A.1 (Continued) White (%) Black (%) Difference (%) Ratio White (%) Black (%) Difference (%) Ratio Change in difference (%) Maine 53 n.a. n.a. n.a. 58 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Maryland Massachusetts 59 n.a. n.a. n.a. 59 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Michigan Minnesota n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Mississippi Missouri Montana 39 n.a. n.a. n.a. 45 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Nebraska 33 n.a. n.a. n.a. 39 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Nevada New Hampshire 50 n.a. n.a. n.a. 54 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. New Jersey New Mexico 43 n.a. n.a. n.a. 42 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. New York North Carolina North Dakota 35 n.a. n.a. n.a. 42 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Ohio Change in ratio
10 Oklahoma n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Oregon 50 n.a. n.a. n.a. 57 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Pennsylvania Rhode Island 57 n.a. n.a. n.a. 58 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. South Carolina South Dakota 37 n.a. n.a. n.a. 41 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Tennessee Texas Utah 24 n.a. n.a. n.a. 31 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Vermont 58 n.a. n.a. n.a. 68 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Virginia Washington n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. West Virginia n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Wisconsin Wyoming 28 n.a. n.a. n.a. 32 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Mean (unweighted) Median Standard deviation (unweighted) N Correlation Source: Authors compilation of data from Roper Center (2004, 2008).
11 Table 1A.2 White-Black Gap in Median Income, Selected States, 2000 and (dollars) Difference 2010 (dollars) Ratio Change (%) Change (%) Alabama 13,197 15, Alaska 17,931 8, Arizona 13,526 14, Arkansas 8,901 12, California 19,092 20, Colorado 14,190 15, Connecticut 23,478 24, Delaware 15,480 13, Florida 14,190 15, Georgia 14,448 15, Hawaii 11,404 5, Illinois 17,338 18, Indiana 9,675 12, Kansas 11,610 15, Kentucky 6,063 10, Louisiana 17,196 21, Maryland 16,770 18, Massachusetts 19,866 21, Michigan 11,610 14, Minnesota 19,350 21, Mississippi 14,577 16, Missouri 10,062 12, Nebraska 9,056 17, Nevada 14,190 15, New Jersey 23,220 24, New York 17,802 17, North Carolina 11,610 12, Ohio 12,900 15, Oklahoma 9,417 13, Pennsylvania 13,145 15, Rhode Island 17,415 20, South Carolina 12,900 15, Tennessee 7,482 10, Texas 16,383 18, Virginia 14,190 18, West Virginia 9,411 7, Wisconsin 15,480 19, Mean 14,177 15, Median 14,190 15, Standard deviation 4,096 4, N Correlation Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
12 Table 1A.3 Black-White Gap in Median Professional-Class Income, Selected States, 2000 and (dollars) Difference 2010 (dollars) Change (%) 2000 (dollars) Ratio 2010 (dollars) Change (%) Alabama 19,866 14, Alaska 17,415 21, Arizona 15,609 7, Arkansas 21,285 17, California 24,510 26, Colorado 18,060 28, Connecticut 19,350 41, Delaware 19,092 3, Florida 23,336 20, Georgia 24,510 24, Hawaii 31,734 28, Illinois 24,252 14, Indiana 11,610 17, Kansas 13,739 15, Kentucky 9,701 10, Louisiana 22,962 24, Maryland 19,737 20, Massachusetts 29,025 26, Michigan 14,267 10, Minnesota 12,900 17, Mississippi 16,641 23, Missouri 17,415 11, Nebraska 27,735 24, Nevada 15,196 16, New Jersey 32,250 33, New York 25,800 25, North Carolina 19,350 19, Ohio 19,350 19, Oklahoma 19,350 20, Pennsylvania 21,414 20, Rhode Island 15,480 24, South Carolina 21,414 24, Tennessee 23,220 16, Texas 20,640 26, Virginia 25,800 20, West Virginia 25,155 25, Wisconsin 3,870 11, Mean 20,082 20, Median 19,737 20, Standard deviation 5,941 7, N Correlation Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
13 Table 1A.4 White-Black Gap in Median Working-Class Income, Selected States, 2000 and (dollars) Difference 2010 (dollars) Change (%) 2000 (dollars) Ratio 2010 (dollars) Change (%) Alabama 9,546 12, Alaska 12,513 3, Arizona 8,720 10, Arkansas 6,450 10, California 12,745 14, Colorado 9,030 10, Connecticut 15,609 18, Delaware 11,868 10, Florida 10,320 11, Georgia 10,320 10, Hawaii 5, Illinois 12,771 15, Indiana 8,385 9, Kansas 7,740 12, Kentucky 4,167 7, Louisiana 14,706 16, Maryland 10,320 11, Massachusetts 15,480 17, Michigan 10,315 12, Minnesota 15,480 16, Mississippi 12,900 12, Missouri 7,043 10, Nebraska 6,192 13, Nevada 10,320 11, New Jersey 17,222 15, New York 12,900 11, North Carolina 7,740 8, Ohio 11,223 13, Oklahoma 6,708 10, Pennsylvania 10,965 10, Rhode Island 13,003 14, South Carolina 9,804 11, Tennessee 5,805 7, Texas 11,223 14, Virginia 9,030 10, West Virginia 7,353 5, Wisconsin 13,803 16, Mean 10,406 11, Median 10,320 11, Standard deviation 3,221 3, N Correlation Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
14 Table 1A.5 Group Presence: Ratio of Percentage of Whites in Professional Class to Percentage of Blacks in Professional Class, Selected States, 2000 and 2010 Difference (%) Ratio Change (%) Change (%) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Mean Median Standard deviation N Correlation Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and ACS 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
15 Table 1A.6 total Income Inequality as Measured by Total Theil Index, Selected States, 2000 and Change (%) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Mean Median Standard deviation N Correlation 0.87 Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
16 Table 1A.7 Between-Race Theil as Percentage of Total Theil (Percentage of Total Income Inequality Attributable to Black-White Income Disparity), Selected States, 2000 and (%) 2010 (%) Change (percentage points) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Mean Median Standard deviation N Correlation 0.96 Source: Authors compilation of Census 2000 and 2010 IPUMS Microdata (U.S. Census Bureau n.d.).
17 Table 2.1 american State Responses to the Race Inequity Crises of the 1950s and 1960s Response Creating new state standards Coercive state power State-led societal reform Source: Author s compilation. Crisis Civil Rights Act of 1964; Voting Rights Act of 1965; Fair Housing Act of 1968 Fair Employment Practices Commission, 1941; Little Rock, Arkansas, 1957; Public order in cities, 1965 and 1966; Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Alabama; Mississippi university education School desegregation; housing desegregation Does crisis overcome separated powers? Yes Yes No Is policy activism sufficient to end crisis? No Yes No
18 Figure 3.1 Black-White Gap in SAT Scores, to Verbal Math Year Source: Authors compilation based on U.S. Department of Education (2009, 208, table 143); U.S. Department of Education (1996, 127, table 126). Note: Figures for all years represent average black scores minus average white scores. Data are not available for , , , and
19 Table 3.1 average Percentage of Black Students Enrolled Full-Time at Selective Institutions, by Type of Institution, 1951 to 1998 Type of institution Private universities (N = 11) Liberal arts colleges (N = 10) Public universities (N = 4) Source: Authors adaptation of Clotfelter (2004, 159). Note: Private universities: Columbia, Duke, Emory, Northwestern, Princeton, Rice, Tufts, Tulane, University of Pennsylvania, Vanderbilt, and Yale. Private liberal arts colleges: Bryn Mawr, Denison, Hamilton, Kenyon, Oberlin, Smith, Swarthmore, Wellesley, Wesleyan, and Williams. Public universities: Miami of Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania State, and the University of North Carolina. For the year 1976, we report data from Clotfelter s column labeled 1976b. Further details on his exact sources are available in Clotfelter (2004, 159).
20 Table 3.2 Black-White Achievement Gap at the Sixth, Ninth, and Twelfth Grades, Fall 1965, by Region Standard deviations below Grade levels behind Region Verbal ability Northeast Midwest South West Reading comprehension Northeast Midwest South West Math achievement Northeast Midwest South West Source: Authors compilation of data from Coleman (1966, ). Note: The reference group is whites living in the metropolitan Northeast.
21 Table 3.3 Peer Characteristics in Selected Metropolitan Areas, by Race and Level, Fall 1965 (percentage) Northeast Midwest West Peer characteristic Black White B W Black White B W Black White B W Mother completed high school or more education Elementary Secondary Biological father living at home Elementary Schoolmates have following items in home Car Elementary Secondary Telephone Elementary Secondary Vacuum cleaner, secondary Household receives a daily newspaper Elementary Secondary One hundred or more books in home, secondary Drop-out rate, secondary College attendance rate of preceding year s graduating class Source: Authors compilation of data from Coleman (1966: 188, 190, 196). Notes: The data for whites are drawn from Coleman s W/N columns, which basically report information on white children living in counties with the highest concentration of black children. This has the tendency to understate any racial differences that may exist.
22 Table 3.4 Black Students Attending Segregated and Highly Segregated Schools, Various Years, 1968 to 2001 (percentage) Region percent minority South Border Northeast Midwest West percent minority South Border Northeast Midwest West Source: Orfield and Lee (2004, 20), reprinted with permission.
23 Table 3.5 Percentage Distribution of Students at Schools of Varying Poverty Levels, by Race, 2005 to 2006 Percentage poor students White Black % 5% Source: Orfield and Lee (2007, 22) a portion of which is reprinted with permission. Note: Poverty levels are measured by Orfield and Lee as the percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch.
24 Table 3.6 standardized Measures of the Black-White Achievement Gap in Selected Studies for Selected Grades Raw differences in means Grade Study Math Reading K (fall) Fryer-Levitt (2006) K Fryer-Levitt (2006) K Murnane et al. (2006) Fryer-Levitt (2006) Bali-Alvarez (2004) Fryer-Levitt (2006) Hanushek-Rivkin (2009) Clotfelter, Ladd, and Vigdor (2009) Phillips-Chin (2004) Bali-Alvarez (2004) Clotfelter, Ladd, and Vigdor (2009) Hanushek-Rivkin (2009) Murnane et al. (2006) Stiefel et al. (2007) Clotfelter, Ladd, and Vigdor (2009) Phillips-Chin (2004) Hanushek-Rivkin (2009) Stiefel et al. (2007) Clotfelter, Ladd, and Vigdor (2009) Source: Authors compilation of data from Clotfelter, Ladd, and Vigdor (2009, 399, 402). Notes: This table includes the gaps reported in Clotfelter, Ladd, and Vigdor (2009).
25 Figure 7.1 Prison Admissions, by Race, 1926 to 1996 (percentage) Source: Author s compilation based on Eckberg (2006, table Ec309 27). Note: For prison admissions from 1970 to 1985, blacks is actually nonwhites Year Black White
26 Figure 7.2 sentenced Prisoners in State and Federal Prisons, by Race, 1960 to 2008 Sentenced prisoners 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000, , , , ,000 0 Black males per 100,000 population White males per 100,000 White Black Sources: Author s compilation based on U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (various years); Cahalan (1986). Note: Sentenced prisoners are those sentenced to a year or more. Data for the years 1981 and 1998 are not available. The reason for the drop in incarceration for whites and blacks from 1997 to 1999 is that before 1999, the Bureau of Justice Statistics did not distinguish Hispanics by race; in 1999 and forward, Hispanics are enumerated separately and so are not counted as black or white in the figure after that date Year ,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1, Sentenced prisoners per 100,000 population
27 Figure 7.3 current or Former Felons and Prisoners among the Adult Population (percentage) Black males All males Current felons and ex-felons Current and ex-prisoners Source: Author s compilation based on Uggen, Manza, and Thompson (2006, tables 1 and 2).
28 Figure 7.4 median Time Served, by Race and Offense, 1964 and 2005 (months) 120 Median time served (months) White Black 0 Homicide Rape Robbery Assault Burglary Larceny Motor vehicle theft Drug offenses Homicide Rape Robbery Assault Burglary Larceny Motor vehicle theft Drug offenses Source: Author s compilation based on Bonczar (2003, table 11); Cahalan (1986, table 3-28).
29 Figure 7.5 Blacks Share of Arrests and Prison Admissions, 1926 to 2006 (percentage) Sources: Author s compilation based on Eckberg (2006, table Ec ); Bonzcar (2011); U.S Census Bureau (various years); Maguire (n.d.). Note: For prison admissions from 1970 to 1985, blacks is actually nonwhites. For prison admissions after 1997, includes both new court commitments and parole revocations but does not include federal prison admissions. Arrests by race are the number of individuals, not the number of arrests. The results do not depend on which of these units of measurement is used Year Admissions Arrests
30 Figure 7.6 state and Local Criminal Justice Expenditures, 1960 to 1979 (millions of dollars) Police 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 Before Safe Streets After Safe Streets Year Police Corrections ,000 29,000 27,000 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 17,000 15,000 Source: Statistical Abstract (U.S. Census Bureau, various years). Compiled by author and converted into 2005 constant dollars using the GDP. Corrections
31 Figure 7.7 state and Local Criminal Justice Employees, 1960 to , , ,000 Police Corrections 305, ,000 Police 450, , , , , Year Source: Author s compilation of U.S. Census Bureau (various years) , , ,000 55,000 Corrections
32 Figure 7.8 sentencing Reforms in the States, by Type Repeat offender laws Penalties Parole eligibility Good time More severe No change/both Less severe Source: Author s compilation based on Shane-DuBow, Brown, and Olsen (1985).
33 Figure 7.9 Fathers Contact with Welfare State and Criminal Justice System (percentage), 2003 to Percent of respondents Stopped by police Arrested Convicted Incarcerated Child care Government help paying rent Welfare Public housing SSI Head start Aid from welfare office Aid from employment office Free meals Unemployment/worker s comp Food stamps WIC Medicaid EITC Criminal justice contact Welfare state contact Source: Author s analysis of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study ( ).
34 Figure 10.1 structural Factors Underlying Vice Product Marketing, Inequality, and Health Agents Practices Mediators Health outcomes Industries (for example, fast food, alcohol) Advertising agencies Developers Policy makers Racial representations Promotion and place Land use Neighborhood socioeconomic position and reputation Increased physical health risk and morbidity Increased race-related stress Reshaping of norms Source: Author s compilation.
35 Figure 10.2 Black-Owned McDonald s Franchises in Chicago, 2010 Source: Map created by author. Data from Black McDonald s Operators Association, Our Locations (
36 Figure 10.3 ramshackle Fast Food Outlets in Brooklyn, 1980s Source: PropertyShark.com, reprinted with permission.
37 Figure 10.4 annual Expenditures on Liquor for Home Consumption in Selected New York City Neighborhoods, 2006 Source: The data in this figure, which are based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey 2006, were purchased by the author and form the basis of the map, which was created by the author.
38 Figure 10.5 community Responses to Alcohol Advertising, Brooklyn, 2005 Source: Author s collection.
39 Figure 10.6 outdoor Advertising for Colt 45 Malt Liquor, Harlem, New York City Source: Author s collection.
40 Figure 10.7 outdoor Advertising for Courvoisier Cognac, Harlem, New York City Source: Author s collection.
TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**
living Alaska 00 47,808 21,213 44.4 Alabama 01 20,661 3,288 15.9 Alabama 02 23,949 6,614 27.6 Alabama 03 20,225 3,247 16.1 Alabama 04 41,412 7,933 19.2 Alabama 05 34,388 11,863 34.5 Alabama 06 34,849 4,074
TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**
Rank State District Count (HTC) 1 New York 05 150,499 141,567 94.1 2 New York 08 133,453 109,629 82.1 3 Massachusetts 07 158,518 120,827 76.2 4 Michigan 13 47,921 36,145 75.4 5 Illinois 04 508,677 379,527
3+ 3+ N = 155, 442 3+ R 2 =.32 < < < 3+ N = 149, 685 3+ R 2 =.27 < < < 3+ N = 99, 752 3+ R 2 =.4 < < < 3+ N = 98, 887 3+ R 2 =.6 < < < 3+ N = 52, 624 3+ R 2 =.28 < < < 3+ N = 36, 281 3+ R 2 =.5 < < < 7+
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by February 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Alabama 3.7 33 Ohio 4.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Missouri 3.7 33 Rhode Island 4.5
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by November 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Indiana 4.4 37 Georgia 5.6 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Ohio 4.5 37 Tennessee 5.6
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by April 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Colorado 2.3 17 Virginia 3.8 37 California 4.8 2 Hawaii 2.7 20 Massachusetts 3.9 37 West Virginia
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by August 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.3 18 Maryland 3.9 36 New York 4.8 2 Colorado 2.4 18 Michigan 3.9 38 Delaware 4.9
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by March 2016 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 South Dakota 2.5 19 Delaware 4.4 37 Georgia 5.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Massachusetts 4.4 37 North
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by September 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.4 17 Indiana 3.8 36 New Jersey 4.7 2 Colorado 2.5 17 Kansas 3.8 38 Pennsylvania
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by December 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.0 16 South Dakota 3.5 37 Connecticut 4.6 2 New Hampshire 2.6 20 Arkansas 3.7 37 Delaware
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by September 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.8 17 Oklahoma 4.4 37 South Carolina 5.7 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Indiana 4.5 37 Tennessee
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by November 2014 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Pennsylvania 5.1 35 New Mexico 6.4 2 Nebraska 3.1 20 Wisconsin 5.2 38 Connecticut
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by July 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Massachusetts 3.6 37 Kentucky 4.3 2 Iowa 2.6 19 South Carolina 3.6 37 Maryland 4.3
The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD
The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD www.legion.org 2016 The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD 1920-1929 Department 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 Alabama 4,474 3,246
2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15
2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15 www.hospiceanalytics.com 2 2013 Demographics & Hospice Utilization National Population 316,022,508 Total Deaths 2,529,792 Medicare Beneficiaries
Index of religiosity, by state
Index of religiosity, by state Low Medium High Total United States 19 26 55=100 Alabama 7 16 77 Alaska 28 27 45 Arizona 21 26 53 Arkansas 12 19 70 California 24 27 49 Colorado 24 29 47 Connecticut 25 32
MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008
MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008 Seriously Delinquent Rate Greater than 6.93% 5.18% 6.93% 0 5.17% Source: MBA s National Deliquency Survey MAP 2: Foreclosure Inventory Rate by State
5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12
5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12 Magnets 2½ 3½ Magnet $1.75 - MOQ - 5 - Add $0.25 for packaging Die Cut Acrylic Magnet $2.00 - MOQ - 24 - Add $0.25 for packaging 2535-22225 California AM-22225
Rutgers Revenue Sources
Rutgers Revenue Sources 31.2% Tuition and Fees 27.3% State Appropriations with Fringes 1.0% Endowment and Investments.5% Federal Appropriations 17.8% Federal, State, and Municipal Grants and Contracts
Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018
Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018 NEA RESEARCH April 2018 Reproduction: No part of this report may be reproduced in any form without permission from NEA Research, except
Interstate Pay Differential
Interstate Pay Differential APPENDIX IV Adjustments for differences in interstate pay in various locations are computed using the state average weekly pay. This appendix provides a table for the second
Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:
MEMORANDUM May 8, 2018 Subject: TANF Family Assistance Grant Allocations Under the Ways and Means Committee (Majority) Proposal From: Gene Falk, Specialist in Social Policy, gfalk@crs.loc.gov, 7-7344 Jameson
Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report
Regional Economic Models, Inc. Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report Prepared by Frederick Treyz, CEO June 2012 The following is a summary of the Estimated
Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016
Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016 Doctorate 4% PN/VN 3% MSN 15% ADN 28% BSRN 22% Diploma 2% BSN 26% n = 279,770 Percentage of Graduations by Program Type, 2016 MSN 12% Doctorate 1%
Nicole Galloway, CPA
Office of State Auditor Nicole Galloway, CPA Statewide Performance Indicators: A National Comparison Report No. 2017-050 June 2017 auditor.mo.gov Statewide Performance Indicators: A National Comparison
Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?
Topic: Question by: : Forfeiture for failure to appoint a resident agent Kathy M. Sachs Kansas Date: January 8, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION
BY STATE INFORMATION This information is being provided to assist in your 2016 tax preparations. The information is also mailed to applicable Columbia fund non-corporate shareholders with their year-end
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016 March 2017 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) is the leading national organization working for more effective public and private
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017 February 2018 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) is the leading national organization working for more effective public and
Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations
Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 Able to Make Share of Determinations System determines eligibility for: 2 State Real-Time
Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017
Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 State Applications Can be Submitted Online at the State Level 1 < 25% 25% -
Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations
Current Advantage Enrollment : State and County-Level Tabulations 5 Slide Series, Volume 40 September 2016 Summary of Tabulations and Findings As of September 2016, 17.9 million of the nation s 56.1 million
Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission
Sentinel Event Data General Information 1995 2015 Data Limitations The reporting of most sentinel events to The Joint Commission is voluntary and represents only a small proportion of actual events. Therefore,
Fiscal Research Center
January 2016 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
How North Carolina Compares
How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics March 2017 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Preface The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina General
Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 2013, 2014, and 2015
Exhiit 1 Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 13, 14, and 15 13 14 15
FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic
Special Analysis 15-03, June 18, 2015 FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic 202-624-8577 ttomsic@ffis.org Summary Per capita federal
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014 1200 18th St NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 986-2200 / www.frac.org February 2016 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC)
Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)
Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: All dates in 2018 unless otherwise noted STATE REG DEADLINE ABSENTEE BALLOT REQUEST DEADLINE Alabama November 1 ABSENTEE
Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission
Sentinel Event Data General Information 1995 2Q 2014 Data Limitations The reporting of most sentinel events to The Joint Commission is voluntary and represents only a small proportion of actual events.
States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted
States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) 1 Texas 316,100 19 Nevada 36,600 37 Hawaii 7,100 2 California 256,800 20 Tennessee 34,800 38 Mississippi
STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship
Exhibit D -- TRIP 2017 FUNDING SOURCES -- February 3, 2017 CORPORATE $ 12,000 Construction Companies $ 5,500 Consulting Engineers Equipment Distributors Manufacturer/Supplier/Producer 6,500 Surety Bond
Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)
Revised February 22, 2005 WHERE WOULD THE CUTS BE MADE UNDER THE PRESIDENT S BUDGET? Data Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education Includes Education for the Disadvantaged, Impact Aid, School Improvement
HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016
BACKGROUND HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016 Federal legislation (42 CFR 484.36) requires that Medicare-certified home health agencies employ home health aides who are trained and evaluated
Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources
Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources Right to Food: Whereas in the international assessment the percentage of
PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;
PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, 585.327.7075; jstefko@cgr.org Highest Paid State Workers in New Jersey & New York in 2010; Lowest Paid in Dakotas and West Virginia
VOCA Assistance for Crime Victims
VOCA Assistance for Crime Victims What is VOCA? Enacted in 1984, the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) is the central source of federal financial support for direct services to victims of crime. VOCA is administered
CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM
CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM This file contains detailed projections and information from the article: Eric A. Hanushek, Jens Ruhose, and Ludger Woessmann, It pays to improve school
Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]
![Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]](/thumbs/83/87461560.jpg "Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]")
Topic: Question by: : Statutory change to name availability standard Michael Powell Texas Date: April 8, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
FACT SHEET. The Nation s Most Punitive States. for Women. July Research from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Christopher Hartney
FACT SHEET The Nation s Most Punitive States for Women Christopher Hartney Rates, as opposed to prison and jail population numbers, allow for comparisons across time and across states with different total
YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING
2 3 4 MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE CONDITIONS ARE COMMON MOST AMERICANS LACK ACCESS TO CARE OF AMERICAN ADULTS WITH A MENTAL ILLNESS DID NOT RECEIVE TREATMENT ONE IN FIVE REPORT AN UNMET NEED NEARLY
Fiscal Research Center
January 2018 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
Weights and Measures Training Registration
Weights and Measures Training Registration Please fill out the form below to register for Weights and Measures training and testing dates. NIST Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances and other Technical
Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only
Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only January 2002 1 2 published annually by: The Minnesota Taxpayers Association
State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation
Appendixes Appendix A State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation Hazardous Materials Transportation: Regulatory, Enforcement, and Emergency Response* Alabama E Public Service Commission ER
The Regional Economic Outlook
The Regional Economic Outlook Presented by: Mark McMullen, Director of Government Svcs Prepared for: FTA Revenue Estimating Conference September 15, 2008 Recent Economic Performance 2 1 The Job Market
STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Business in Nebraska Bureau of Business Research 12-2013 STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX Eric Thompson University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY
2011-12 HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY Conducted By THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS Based on Competition at the High School Level in the 2011-12 School Year BOYS GIRLS
In the District of Columbia we have also adopted the latest Model business Corporation Act.
Topic: Question by: : Reinstatement after Admin. Dissolution question Dave Nichols West Virginia Date: March 14, 2014 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY
FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY MOST PUISSANT GENERAL GRAND MASTER GENERAL GRAND COUNCIL OF CRYPTIC MASONS INTERNATIONAL 1996-1999 -
How North Carolina Compares
How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics January 2013 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Program Evaluation Division North Carolina General Assembly Legislative
Fiscal Research Center
January 2017 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLE ATTENDANCE REPORTING AT IADC 2012 TRIAL ACADEMY Attorney Reporting Method After the CLE activity, fill out the Certificate of Attendance
ANCHOR INSTITUTION STRATEGIES IN THE SOUTHEAST
ANCHOR INSTITUTION STRATEGIES IN THE SOUTHEAST Presentation for: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Policy Summit on Housing, Human Capital, and Inequality Sameera Fazili, Senior Visiting CED Advisor, Federal
Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:
Welcome to the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action Dashboard About This Dashboard: These graphs and charts show goals by which the Campaign evaluates its efforts to implement recommendations in the
FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT
FOOD STAMP PROGRAM ACTIVITY REPORT Federal Fiscal Year 2004 Food Stamps Make America Stronger United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Program Accountability Division February
Table of Contents Introduction... 2
Snapshot Missouri: A National Comparison Report 9-212 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Economy 3 Median Household Income 21... 4 Unemployment Rate 211... 5 Job Growth Rate 29.. 6 Cigarette Tax per Pack
Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis
1 Date: 5/25/2012 To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia From: Christos Siderelis Chuck Wyatt with the DCR in Virginia inquired about the classification of state parks having resort type characteristics and, if
November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org November 24, 2008 TANF BENEFITS ARE LOW AND HAVE NOT KEPT PACE WITH INFLATION But Most
Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation
The Colorado River supports a quarter million jobs and produces $26 billion in economic output from recreational activities alone, drawing revenue from the 5.36 million adults who use the Colorado River
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 - Repayment
Drunk Driving Fatalities IN AMERICA
2016 State of Drunk Driving Fatalities IN AMERICA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Bacardi U.S.A., Inc. Beam Suntory Inc. Brown-Forman Constellation Brands, Inc. DIAGEO Edrington Mast-Jägermeister US, Inc. Hood River
GROWING THE MIDDLE: SECURING THE FUTURE LOS ANGELES
GROWING THE MIDDLE: SECURING THE FUTURE LOS ANGELES 02.21.18 MANUEL PASTOR @Prof_MPastor THE WIDENING GAP 1 THE WIDENING GAP INEQUALITY: HOW CALIFORNIA RANKS Household* Gini Coefficient, 1969 Mississippi
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016 Food and Nutrition Service Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Program Accountability and Administration Division September
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 -
Senior American Access to Care Grant
Senior American Access to Care Grant Grant Guidelines SENIOR AMERICAN (age 62 plus) ACCESS TO CARE GRANT GUIDELINES: The (ADAF) is committed to supporting U.S. based organizations exempt from taxation
Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)
Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC) Mark Mayhew NYSERDA for Val Stori Clean Energy States Alliance SWAT 4/25/12 Today CESA ITAC, LLC - What, who and why The Unified List - What, why, how and
Page 1 of 11 NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS SR-193, Section 4 Section 4 Table of Contents: 4. Variations by State Weighted by Population A. Death and Injury (Casualty) Rate per Population B. Death Rate
Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)
VOL. 8 NO. 28 JULY 13, 2015 LOAD AVAILABILITY Up 7% compared to the Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI) Note: MDI Measures Relative Truck Demand LOAD SEARCHING Up 18.3% compared to the TRUCK AVAILABILITY
Alabama Okay No Any recruiting or advertising without authorization is considered out of compliance. Not authorized
No recruitment should take place if the state is red in this column. General Guidelines: Representatives of the University of Utah, whether directly engaged as recruiters or not, must follow the regulations
Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth
Larry DeBoer Purdue University September 2011 Real GDP Growth Real Consumption Spending Growth 1 Index of Consumer Sentiment 57.8 Sept 11 Savings Rate (percent of disposable income) Real Investment Spending
Food Stamp Program State Options Report
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Fifth Edition Food Stamp Program State s Report August 2005 vember 2002 Program Development Division Food Stamp Program State s Report
TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS
ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA
Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies
Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies Key findings 1. Student outcomes in Arizona lag behind
Students Serving on Local School Boards February 2009 (39 Responding State Associations)
Students Serving on Local School Boards February 2009 (39 Responding State Associations) Does your state have students serving on local school boards? State Yes How are the student board members selected/elected?
Salary and Demographic Survey Results
Salary and Demographic Survey Results Executive Summary In July of 2010, Grant Professionals Association (GPA formerly AAGP) conducted a salary and demographic survey of grant professionals. The survey
Acm762 AG U.S. VITAL STATISTICS BY SECTION, 2017 Page 1
Acm762 AG U.S. VITAL STATISTICS BY SECTION, 2017 Page 1 District Summary Major Worship Total Total -------------------- Adherents -------------------- Service District Churches Membership Boys Girls Men
Food Stamp Program State Options Report
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Fourth Edition Food Stamp Program State s Report September 2004 vember 2002 Program Development Division Program Design Branch Food Stamp
2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS
2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: 2014 Marketing General Incorporated 625 North Washington Street, Suite 450 Alexandria, VA 22314 800.644.6646 toll free 703.739.1000 telephone
F O R E S T R I V E R M A R I N E
F O R E S T R I V E R M A R I N E Regional Sales Manager - Eric Rose Cell: (574) 361-8673 E-mail: erose@forestriverinc.com Sales Coordinator - Neil Massing (574) 825-8168 Cell: (574) 825-6180 E-mail: nmassing@forestriverinc.com
Fiscal Year 2005 Comparisons. Includes Fiscal Year 2006 Rankings for State Taxes Only
Fiscal Year 2005 Comparisons Includes Fiscal Year 2006 Rankings for State Taxes Only October 2007 Published annually since 1969 (except FY2001 and FY2003) by: The Minnesota Taxpayers Association 85 East
EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project
EXHIBIT A List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project Alabama Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce
CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?
CRMRI White Paper #3 August 7 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing? Marci Harris, Julia Greene, Kilee Jorgensen, Caren J. Frost, & Lisa H. Gren State Refugee Services
Nielsen ICD-9. Healthcare Data
Nielsen ICD-9 Healthcare Data Healthcare Utilization Model The Nielsen healthcare utilization model has three primary components: demographic cohort population counts, cohort-specific healthcare utilization
Name: Date: Albany: Jefferson City: Annapolis: Juneau: Atlanta: Lansing: Augusta: Lincoln: Austin: Little Rock: Baton Rouge: Madison: Bismarck:
Albany: Annapolis: Atlanta: Augusta: Austin: Baton Rouge: Bismarck: Boise: Boston: Carson City: Charleston: Cheyenne: Columbia: Columbus: Concord: Denver: Des Moines: Dover: Frankfort: Harrisburg: Hartford:
THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET
1 THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET ORG ANIZATIONAL COMPARISO N BY C ENSUS DIV ISION S PRING 2013 The State of Grantseeking Spring 2013 is the sixth semi-annual informal survey of nonprofits conducted
Appendix A: Carnegie 2010 Classifications and SHEEO Groupings 2010 Carnegie Classification
Appendix A: Carnegie 2010 Classifications and SHEEO Groupings 2010 Carnegie Classification SHEEO Code Description Sector Groupings 0 (Not classified Not Classified 1 Assoc/Pub-R-S: Associate's--Public
national assembly of state arts agencies
STATE ARTS AGENCY GRANT MAKING AND FUNDING Each of America's 50 states and six jurisdictions has a government that works to make the cultural, civic, economic and educational benefits of the available
NURSING HOME STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 2015
NURSING HOME STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 2015 C. MCKEEN COWLES COWLES RESEARCH GROUP Acknowledgments We extend our appreciation to Craig Dickstein of Tamarack Professional Services, LLC for optimizing the SAS
NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update
NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update Released June 10, 2016 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Mortgage Industry Report: 2016Q1