SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 10

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 10"

Transcription

1 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2004 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 10 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars 12 Distribution of Cost Changes - Then-Year Dollars 14 Program Funding Status 16 UNCLASSIFIED Department of Defense OUSD(AT&L) AR&A/AM April 8, 2005

2 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS (SARs) - HIGHLIGHTS (As of December 31, 2004) The Department of Defense has released details on major defense acquisition program cost and schedule changes since the September 2004 reporting period. This information is based on the Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) submitted to the Congress for the December 31, 2004 reporting period. SARs summarize the latest estimates of cost, schedule, and technical status. These reports are prepared annually in conjunction with the President's budget. Subsequent quarterly exception reports are required only for those programs experiencing unit cost increases of at least 15 percent or schedule delays of at least six months. Quarterly SARs are also submitted for initial reports, final reports, and for programs that are rebaselined at major milestone decisions. The total program cost estimates provided in the SARs include research and development, procurement, military construction, and acquisition-related operation and maintenance (except for pre-milestone B programs which are limited to development costs pursuant to 10 USC 2432). Total program costs reflect actual costs to date as well as future anticipated costs. All estimates include anticipated inflation allowances. The current estimate of program acquisition costs for programs covered by SARs for the prior reporting period (September 2004) was $1,370,943.2 million. After adding the costs for four new programs (Aerial Common Sensor (ACS), Patriot/Medium Extended Air Defense System Combined Aggregate Program (PATRIOT/MEADS CAP), Standard Missile-6 (SM-6), and B-2 Radar Modernization Program (RMP)) from the September 2004 reporting period, the adjusted current estimate of program acquisition costs was $1,412,567.9 million. Current Estimate ($ in Millions) September 2004 (82 programs) $ 1,370,943.2 Plus four new programs (ACS, PATRIOT/MEADS CAP, +41,624.7 SM-6, and B-2 RMP) Plus two additional programs that result from dividing Chemical 0.0 Demilitarization into three programs (Chemical Materials Agency (CMA), CMA Newport, and Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives (ACWA)) September 2004 Adjusted (88 programs) $ 1,412,

3 Changes Since Last Report: Economic $ +32,127.1 Quantity -24,478.7 Schedule +20,112.9 Engineering +35,203.8 Estimating -6,603.4 Other Support +3,977.1 Net Cost Change $ +59,616.4 December 2004 (88 programs) $1,472,184.3 For the December 2004 reporting period, there was a net cost increase of $59,616.4 million or +4.2 percent for programs that have reported previously, resulting in a new current estimate of $1,472,184.3 million. The net cost increase was due primarily to additional engineering changes (hardware/software) (+$35,203.8 million), the application of higher escalation rates (+$32,127.1 million), a net stretch-out of development and procurement schedules (+$20,112.9 million). These increases were partially offset by a net decrease of planned quantities to be purchased (-$24,478.7 million) and lower program cost estimates (-$6,603.4 million). Further details of the most significant changes are summarized below by program. New SARs (As of December 31, 2004) The Department of Defense has submitted initial SARs for Mission Planning System (MPS), Mobile User Objective System (MUOS), and Ship Self Defense System (SSDS). These reports do not represent cost growth. Baselines established on these programs will be the point from which future changes will be measured. The current cost estimates are provided below: Current Estimate Program ($ in Millions) Mission Planning System (MPS) $ 1,682.4 Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) 5,931.4 Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) 1,460.3 Total $ 9,

4 Summary Explanations of Significant SAR Cost Changes (As of December 31, 2004) Army: ATIRCM/CMWS (Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasure/Common Missile Warning System) Program costs increased $1,418.9 million (+43.0%) from $3,298.1 million to $4,717.0 million, due primarily to an increase in the number of mission ( B ) kits from 631 to 1076 (+$473.8 million), additional modification of the A-kits for ATIRCM to accommodate early installation/acceleration of CMWS (+$241.3 million), the cost of A-kit integration on additional platforms (+$233.3 million), an increase in the production facilities cost due to program acceleration (+$68.7 million), other estimating changes (+$105.0 million), and the application of revised escalation rates (+$91.3 million). Program costs also increased due to an increase in spares to support more storage locations (+$336.9 million), increase for training devices and simulator upgrades to support more platforms ($44.1 million), and system integration lab and test instrumentation package upgrades. These increases were partially offset by the schedule acceleration of the mission kits and A-kits (-$234.3 million). Black Hawk UH-60M Program costs increased by $5,962.6 million (+40.1%) from $14,884.5 million to $20,847.1 million, due primarily to the procurement of new aircraft vice remanufacturing older airframes (+$2,702.5 million), the incorporation of improvements and increased capabilities (+$2,174.4 million), a revised estimate for software support (+$337.5 million, an increase in procurement quantity of 14 helicopters from 1213 to 1227 (+$194.5 million), and revised escalation indices (+$527.5 million). CH-47F Program costs increased by $5,173.9 million (+72%) from $7,182.5 million to $12,356.4 million, due primarily to an increase of 173 helicopters from 337 to 510 (+$3,420.9 million) and associated support costs (+$251.9 million), and the procurement of new airframe structural components rather than remanufacturing the older components (+$1,745.4 million). These increases were partially offset by the acceleration of the annual procurement buy profile (-$209.0 million). EXCALIBUR Program costs decreased $1,692.1 million (-42.9 %) from $3,942.9 million to $2,250.8 million, due primarily to a quantity decrease of 31,483 projectiles from 61,483 to 30,000 projectiles (-$1,879.3 million). The quantity decrease was partially offset by increased cost due to a stretch-out of the annual procurement buy profile (+$164.5 million). FBCB2 (Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below) Program costs increased by $220.0 million (13.9%) from $1,581.9 million to $1,801.9 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of 6,774 units from 21,054 to 27,828 to support Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom ($174.6 million) and associated schedule, engineering, and estimating allocations* (+$19.5 million), and an added requirement for post deployment software support in the Gulf region and the Balkans (+$17.2 million). 3

5 FCS (Future Combat Systems) Program costs increased by $6,277.7 million (+6.8%) from $92,600.9 million to $98,878.6 million due primarily to the FCS Program restructure that the Army announced in July The restructure is to strengthen the FCS Program and simultaneously improve the Current Force through early delivery of selected FCS capabilities. The adjustments maintain the Army s focus on the FCS-equipped Unit-of-Action (UA) development and also substantially reduce program risk. The modifications to the FCS Program acquisition strategy fall into four primary categories of priority program development: 1) Communications/Information Network, 2) Unattended Munitions, 3) Unmanned systems, and 4) Manned Ground Vehicles (MGV). The revised program also now includes the five previously deferred FCS core systems: 1) Unattended Air Vehicle (UAV) Class II, 2) UAV Class III, 3) Armed Robotic Vehicle (ARV) (Assault and Reconnaissance), 4) FCS Recovery and Maintenance Vehicle (FRMV) and 5) the Intelligent Munitions System (IMS). Additionally, the new program includes more robust experimentation and evaluation and the addition of a series of four spiral out packages that will insert FCS capability into the Current Force. These spiral outs will begin in 2008 and continue every two years through The majority of the total cost increase is due to the inclusion of the five previously deferred systems, the addition of more experimentation and evaluation, and the spiral insertion of FCS capabilities into the current force. GMLRS (Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System) Program costs increased $1,421.6 million (+11.6%) from $12,248.9 million to $13,670.5 million, due primarily to a realignment of the buy quantity from FY to FY in order to fund higher priority programs (+$799.5 million). This stretch-out in the annual procurement buy profile also caused a two-year program slip (+$284.5 million). The application of revised escalation rates also contributed to the increased costs (+$352.2 million). JTRS (Joint Tactical Radio System) Cluster 1 Program costs increased by $1,109.9 million (+5.4%) from $20,522.4 million to $21,632.3 million due primarily to the application of revised inflation rates (+$748.1 million), an increase of 985 Air Force and Navy sets from 2,173 to 3,158 (+$191.6 million) and associated schedule, engineering and estimating allocations* (+$52.9 million), a deferment of development effort (+$322.6 million), and a stretch-out of the procurement buy profile (+$121.1 million). These increases were partially offset by revised program estimates (-$286.3 million). JCM (Joint Common Missile) Program costs decreased by $7,848.0 million (-96.4%) from $8,141.3 million to $293.3 million due to program termination. LONGBOW APACHE Program costs increased $1,560.5 million (+20.9%) from $7,481.1 million to $9,041.6 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of 96 aircraft from 501 to 597 aircraft (+$545.9 million) and associated schedule, engineering, and estimating allocations* (+$637.8 million). There were also increases in training requirements, contractor support, and initial spares associated with the additional aircraft (+$115.5 million). Higher estimates for the Modernized Target Acquisition Designation Sight/Pilot Night Vision Sensor (MTADS/PNVS) program (+$163.2 million) and the application of new escalation indices (+$55.7 million) also contributed. 4

6 MCS (Maneuver Control System) Program costs increased by $105.2 million (+16.4%) from $641.7 million to $746.9 million due primarily to a quantity increase of 1,901 units from 4,642 to 6,543 (+$47.1 million), an increase in support and fielding requirements for additional New Equipment Training Teams (+$40.1 million), and an increase for future software integration and testing efforts (+$15.7 million). Stryker Program costs increased by $1,746.8 million (+20.2%) from $8,658.7 million to $10,405.5 million due primarily to the addition of fielding support and retrofit of vehicle changes in FY09-20 (+$927.3 million), an increase of 353 vehicles from 2086 to 2439 resulting from a FY 2005 Congressional plus-up (+$884.2 million), design and hardware configuration changes to the Nuclear Biological Chemical - Reconnaissance Vehicle (NBC-RV) and Mobile Gun System (MGS) variants (+$222.1 million), the application of revised inflation rates (+$65.0 million), and modified MGS Mission Equipment Package (MEP) armor (+$48.9 million). These increases were partially offset by a revised estimate for hardware mix changes (-$211.2 million) and updated testing estimates (-$177.3 million). Navy: Advance SEAL Delivery System (ASDS) Program costs decreased by $755.7 million (-38.6%) from $1,956.7 million to $1,201.0 million, due primarily to a quantity reduction of three ships from five to two ships. CVN 68 Program costs for CVN-77, the last ship in the CVN 68 class, increased by $838.5 million (+15.2%) from $5,511.6 million to $6,350.1 million, due primarily to increased production hours and material costs (+$784.3 million). Other factors included higher costs due to an eight-month schedule slip (+$86.9 million) and the application of revised escalation rates (+$112.9 million). Higher costs were partially offset by a decision to terminate development for the planned contractor furnished warfare system and to revert to a legacy-based government furnished system (-$42.1 million). DD(X) Program costs decreased by $2,252.9 million (-21.8%) from $10,313.7 million to $8,060.8 million, due primarily to Congressional language stipulating that the lead ship be funded with procurement funding, vice development funding as previously planned (-$2,774.8 million). (Note: DD(X) is a pre-milestone B program and reporting is limited to development costs only pursuant to Section 2432, Title 10, United States Code.) The above decrease was partially offset by additional funding for added capability as a result of Operational Requirements Document (ORD) validation (+$360.6 million) and the application of revised escalation rates (+$160.6 million). EFV (Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle) Program costs increased by $1,976.7 million (+18.6%) from $10,602.3 million to $12,579.0 million, due primarily to higher estimates for the suspension, engine, transmission, and marine drive (+$413.7 million) as well as the hull structure, armor, and appendages (+$280.1 million) and initial spares (+$143.1 million). Also, there were increases for a one-year shift in the annual procurement schedule (+$305.3 million), the application of revised escalation rates (+$299.3 million), and additional efforts on the System 5

7 Development and Demonstration contract for test support and design maturation ($ million). H-1 Upgrades Program costs increased $1,177.2 million (+17.2%) from $6,827.3 million to $8,004.5 million, due primarily to costs associated with a four-year extension of the production schedule and revised buy profile (+$413.7 million); increases in initial spares, integrated logistics support, peculiar support equipment, and for interactive electronic technical manual systems (+$265.7 million); various estimating adjustments (e.g., for contractor labor and overhead, systems engineering program management, target sight system, etc.) (+$264.5 million); the application of revised inflation rates (+$151.9 million); and engineering changes associated with turret modification, other configuration changes, and the addition of nonrecurring flyaway to support build new strategy for UH-1Y (+53.5 million). LPD 17 Class Amphibious Transport Dock Ship Program costs decreased by $3,455.0 million (-22.2%) from $15,582.7 million to $12,127.7 million due to a reduction of ship procurement quantities from 12 to 9 ships (-$4,037.6 million). This increase was partially offset by a revised estimate for ship construction, outfitting, and post delivery on the remaining ships ( million). MH-60S (Fleet Combat Support Helicopter) Program costs increased $1,750.0 million (+29.3%) from $5,971.9 million to $7,721.9 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of 34 aircraft from 237 to 271 aircraft (+$682.4 million) and associated estimating allocation* (-$74.0 million), an increase due to the additional of Airborne Mine Countermeasures (AMCM) and Armed Helo kits (+$458.3 million), increases due to the stretch-out of annual buy profile (+$114.1 million), change in the cost quantity methodology (+$120.9 million), increased integration and test requirements for AMCM restructure (+$171.7 million), the application of revised escalation rates (+$98.9 million), and an increase in engineering and logistics support (+$85.8 million). MIDS-LVT (Multifunctional Information Distribution System-Low Volume Terminal) Program costs increased by $233.8 million (+12.6%) from $1,848.8 million to $2,082.6 million, due primarily to additional F/A-18 integration costs (+$145.3 million) and to add a second source for MIDS Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) to ensure continuous competition (+$51.9 million). SSN-774 Virginia Class Submarine Program costs increased by $10,764.6 million (+12.9%) from $83,215.2 million to $93,979.8 million, primarily due to an updated estimate of shipbuilder hours, material costs, profit, and learning (+$4,363.4 million), and the application of revised escalation rates (+$2,832.1 million). There were additional increases related to the delay of three ships from FY to FY (+$3,286.8 million). Tactical Tomahawk Program costs increased by $919.8 million (+28.0%) from $3,290.3 million to $4,210.1 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of 614 missiles from 2,790 to 3,404 missiles (+$440.7 million) and a rephrasing of missile, capsule, and canister procurements in the FY 2006 President s Budget (+$207.8 million). There were additional increases for higher 6

8 pricing to reflect actual multi-year contract data (+$184.3 million) and the application of revised escalation rates (+$54.2 million). V-22 Program costs increased by $2,461.4 million (+5.1%) from $48,024.7 million to $50,486.1 million, due primarily to the additional cost of Block C/20 production for FY 2009 and out (+$1,006.6 million), the application of revised escalation rates (+$895.9 million), and a stretch-out of the annual procurement buy profile (+$415.1 million). There were also increases for Block C development and flight testing (+$365.8 million), the addition of Block 20/30 development (+$174.8 million), and the rephasing of Block 20 capabilities (+$153.2 million). These increases were partially offset by savings from cost reduction initiatives (-$618.9 million). Air Force: AEHF Program costs increased $1,065.6 million (21.2%) from $5,027.6 million to $ million, due primarily to a 12-month slip in the launch schedule ($701.3 million), increased estimate for additional on-orbit operations and anomaly resolution and the radiation hardening program (+$110.5 million), and additional schedule costs to reduce the risk associated with the concurrent payload and cryptographic development (+$171.2 million). Factors contributing to the increased cost and the associated 12-month slip to the launch schedule were delayed delivery of Information Assurance products, added testing of payload electronic components, and the replacement of critical electronic parts. AMRAAM (Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile) Program costs increased $2,419.8 million (+22.5%) from $10,761.3 million to $13,181.1 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of 3,344 Air Force and Navy missiles from 10,999 to 14,343 missiles (+$1,426.3 million) and associated initial spares and peculiar support costs for the additional quantity (+$128.2 million). There were also increased production support costs due to additional production years (+$520.8 million) and higher unit costs to incorporate Phase 4 Follow-On capabilities (+$204.9 million). C-130J Program costs decreased by $10,173.3 million (-62.0%) from $16,396.5 million to $6,223.2 million, due primarily to termination of the Air Force program in the FY 2006 President s Budget. F/A-22 Program costs decreased $10,369.5 million (-14.5%) from $71,693.2 million to $61,323.7 million, due primarily to a decrease of 99 aircraft in the planned procurement quantity from 271 to 172 aircraft (-$8,280.5 million) and associated engineering, schedule, and estimating allocations (-$3,270.4 million), and a decrease in support associated with the quantity decrease (-$1,107.5 million). This decrease was partially offset by revised escalation rates (+$891.6 million), new requirements for lab infrastructure (+$689.0 million), elimination of projected multi-year savings to lots 7-8 (+$458.9 million), and loss of learning due to project line disruptions (+$353.0 million). Wideband Gapfiller Satellite Program costs increased by $281.6 million (+18.1%) from $1,555.8 million to $1,837.4 million, due primarily to the three-year production gap between 7

9 satellite 3 and satellites 4 and 5 that resulted in RDT&E migration cost growth and parts obsolescence (+$110.6 million), procurement cost growth (+$122.0 million), the upgrade of primary injection points for Satellites 4 and 5 ($+27.1 million), and the application of revised escalation rates (+$19.2 million). DoD: BMDS (Ballistic Missile Defense System) Program costs increased $21,003.1 million (+31.8%) from $66,120.3 million to $87,123.4 million, due primarily to field Blocks 08, 10 and 12 capabilities which expand our ability to protect the United States, friends, and allies from a ballistic missile attack. Block 08 adds funding to complete 20 Ground-Based Interceptors (GBIs), 2 Forward Based X-Band Radar - Transportable, 40 Standard Missile 3s, First Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Battery, and an Upgraded Early Warning Radar (UEWR) at Thule, Greenland. Incremental improvements include additional sea-based interceptors, an additional THAAD fire unit, 10 additional (GBI), and UEWRs at Clear Air Station, Eglin Air Force Base, and Otis Air Force Base. Other improvements include funding for a Space Tracking and Surveillance System constellation and contractor logistics support. Funds were also added to address the program's revised escalation rate ($1,152.3 million). Chem Demil-ACWA (Chemical Demilitarization-Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives) Program costs increased $851.2 million (+21.1%) from $4,036.6 million to $4,887.8 million, due primarily to the impact of delaying the ACWA sites to allow for design changes (+$635.5 million) and the application of revised escalation rates (+$106.6 million). Chem Demil -CMA (Chemical Demilitarization-Chemical Materials Agency) Program costs increased $6,788.4 million (+35.5%) from $19,115.8 million to $25,904.2 million, due primarily to increased costs associated a schedule extension due to changes to operations and closure phases, permits, and changes related to concept/design maturation (+$5,617.7 million). There were also cost increases for additional staffing to implement the Safety Improvement Program (+$707.6 million) as well as the application of revised escalation rates (+$338.9 million). Chem Demil -CMA NEWPORT (Chemical Demilitarization-Chemical Materials Agency Newport) Program costs increased $700.4 million (+57.9%) from $1,210.6 million to $1,911.0 million, due primarily to increased cost associated with a schedule extension due to reduced agent-loading impacts and risks associated with first of its kind neutralization process, waste generation, and storage. JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) Program costs increased $11,783.3 million (+4.8 %) from $244,834.3 million to $256,617.6 million, due primarily to increases for application of revised escalation indices (+$7,663.7 million), design maturation (+$5,002.9 million), refined definitions of support requirements (+$3,942.0 million), and a delay in STOVL (Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) initial procurement from FY 2007 to 2008 and revised buy profile for all variants (+$2,281.8 million). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the costs for standard hardware and general equipment based on refined engineering assessments (-$7,289.4 million). 8

10 JTRS (Joint Tactical Radio Set) Waveform Program costs increased by $339.2 million (+34.5%) from $982.3 million to $1,321.5 million, due primarily to additional waveform development requirements (+$344.7 million). * Note: Quantity changes are estimated based on the original SAR baseline cost-quantity relationship. Cost changes since the original baseline are separately categorized as schedule, engineering, or estimating "allocations." The total impact of a quantity change is the identified "quantity" change plus all associated "allocations." 9

11 Program Acquistion Cost Summary In Millions of Dollars As of Date: December 31, 2004 Baseline Estimate Changes To Date Current Estimate Percent Cost Change Weapon System Base Type Cost Cost Cost To Date Adjust for Qty Year of Base Current Quantity Base Current Quantity Base Current Quantity Base Current Baseline Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ ARMY: ACS 03 DE 3, , , , ATIRCM/CMWS 03 PdE 2, , ,668 1, , , , , BLACK HAWK UPGRADE 05 DE/PdE 11, , ,221 5, , , , , BRADLEY UPGRADE 01 PdE 3, , , , , , CH-47F 05 DE/PdE 2, , , , , , EXCALIBUR 03 DE 3, , ,677-2, , ,408 1, , , FBCB2 05 DE/PdE 2, , , ,694 1, , , FCS 03 DE 77, , , , , FMTV 96 PdE 11, , ,488 2, ,303 13, , , GMLRS 03 PdE 9, , , , , , , HIMARS 03 PdE 3, , , , JAVELIN 97 PdE 3, , , ,809 4, , , JCM 04 DE 6, , ,815-6, , , JTRS CLUSTER 1 02 DE 14, , , , ,533 15, , , JTRS CLUSTER 5 04 DE 8, , , , , , LAND WARRIOR 03 DE 2, , ,985 6, , ,427 8, , , LONGBOW APACHE 96 PdE 5, , , , , , LONGBOW HELLFIRE 96 PdE 2, , , , , , MCS 80 DE , , PAT/MEADS CAP 04 DE 22, , , , , , PATRIOT PAC-3 02 PdE 12, , , , , , STRYKER 04 PdE 8, , ,096 1, , , , , WIN-T 03 DE 9, , , , , , , , , , NAVY: AESA (RDT&E) 00 DE AGM-88E (AARGM) 03 1, , , , , , AIM-9X 97 PdE 2, , , , , , ASDS 03 DE 1, , , , CEC 02 PdE 4, , , , COBRA JUDY (RDT&E) 03 DE 1, , , , CVN DE 28, , , , , CVN PdE 4, , , , DD(X) (RDT&E) 96 PE 1, , , , , , DDG PdE 16, , , , , , E-2 ADV HAWKEYE 02 DE 12, , , , E-2C REPRODUCTION 94 PdE 2, , , , , , EA-18G 04 7, , , , EFV (AAAV) 93 DE 6, , ,025 2, , , , , F/A-18E/F 00 PdE 38, , , , , , H-1 UPGRADES 96 DE 2, , , , , , JSOW 90 DE/PdE 6, , ,924-3, , ,590 3, , , LCS 04 1, , , , LHD 1 82 DE 2, , , , , , LPD DE 9, , , , , , MH-60R 93 DE 4, , , , , , MH-60S 98 PdE 5, , , , , , MIDS-LVT 03 PdE 1, , , , , , MMA 04 26, , , , NESP 90 PdE 1, , , , SM-2 84 DE 2, , ,000-1, , , ,748.6 SM-6 04 DE 4, , , , , , SSGN 02 DE/PdE 3, , , , SSN 774 (VA CLASS) 95 DE 45, , , , , , T-45TS 95 PdE 5, , , , , , T-AKE 00 PdE 4, , , , TACTICAL TOMAHAWK 99 PdE 2, , , , , , TRIDENT II MSL 83 PdE 26, , , , ,

12 Program Acquistion Cost Summary In Millions of Dollars As of Date: December 31, 2004 Baseline Estimate Changes To Date Current Estimate Percent Cost Change Weapon System Base Type Cost Cost Cost To Date Adjust for Qty Year of Base Current Quantity Base Current Quantity Base Current Quantity Base Current Baseline Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ Year $ V DE 23, , , , , , , , , , , , USAF: AEHF 02 DE 5, , , , AMRAAM 92 PdE 12, , , ,107 12, , , B-1B CMUP 03 PdE B-2 RMP 04 DE 1, , , , C-130 AMP 00 DE 3, , , , C-130J 96 PdE , , , , C-17A 96 PdE 41, , , , , , C-5 RERP 00 DE 8, , , , EELV 95 DE 13, , , , , , F/A DE 60, , , , , , GBS 97 DE , GLOBAL HAWK 00 DE 4, , , , , , JASSM 95 PdE 4, , , , , , JDAM 95 PdE 2, , ,065 2, , ,254 4, , , JPATS 02 PdE 4, , , , MINUTEMAN III GRP 93 PdE 2, , , , MINUTEMAN III PRP 94 PdE 2, , , , MP RTIP (RDT&E) 00 DE 1, , , , NAS 90 DE , , NAVSTAR GPS 00 PdE 5, , , , , , NPOESS 02 PdE 5, , , , SBIRS HIGH 95 DE 3, , , , , , SDB 01 DE 1, , , , , , TSAT 02 DE 15, , , , , WIDEBAND GAPFILLER 01 PdE , , , , , , , , , DoD: BMDS (RDT&E) 02 PE 44, , , , , , CHEM DEMIL--CMA 94 PdE 11, , ,791 10, , , , , CHEM DEMIL-ACWA 94 PdE 1, , ,134 1, , , , , CHEM DEMIL-NEWPORT 94 PdE ,269 1, , , , , JSF (F-35) 02 DE/PdE 175, , ,866 16, , , , , JTRS WAVEFORM (RDT&E 02 DE , , Grand Total 234, , , , , , , ,229, , , ,179, ,472,

13 Distribution of Cost Changes (Base-Year Dollars) As Of Date: December 31, 2004 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars) Weapon System Base Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Year This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qrt To Date This Qrt To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date ARMY: ACS ATIRCM/CMWS , ,262.5 BLACK HAWK UPGRADE , , , , , ,507.4 BRADLEY UPGRADE ,037.8 CH-47F 05 2, , , , , ,858.1 EXCALIBUR 03-1, , , ,120.6 FBCB FCS , , , , FMTV , , ,328.6 GMLRS HIMARS JAVELIN JCM 04-5, , , ,485.8 JTRS CLUSTER JTRS CLUSTER LAND WARRIOR 03 1, , , , ,288.1 LONGBOW APACHE , , , , ,472.3 LONGBOW HELLFIRE MCS PAT/MEADS CAP PATRIOT PAC STRYKER , ,533.6 WIN-T , , , , , , , , ,735.5 NAVY: AESA (RDT&E) AGM-88E (AARGM) AIM-9X ASDS CEC COBRA JUDY (RDT&E) CVN , , , ,494.8 CVN DD(X) (RDT&E) 96-2, , , , ,276.2 DDG , , , ,885.9 E-2 ADV HAWKEYE E-2C REPRODUCTION ,245.6 EA-18G EFV (AAAV) , ,386.3 F/A-18E/F , ,638.4 H-1 UPGRADES , ,503.7 JSOW , , ,532.4 LCS LHD , ,413.9 LPD , , , , ,286.8 MH-60R , ,544.2 MH-60S , ,304.1 MIDS-LVT MMA NESP SM , ,537.4 SM SSGN SSN 774 (VA CLASS) , , , , , ,695.0 T-45TS ,208.4 T-AKE TACTICAL TOMAHAWK TRIDENT II MSL , ,

14 Distribution of Cost Changes (Base-Year Dollars) As Of Date: December 31, 2004 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars) Weapon System Base Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Year This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qrt To Date This Qrt To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date V , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,353.0 USAF: AEHF AMRAAM 92 1, , B-1B CMUP B-2 RMP C-130 AMP C-130J 96-7, , , , , ,778.3 C-17A , , , , , ,262.3 C-5 RERP EELV , , ,662.7 F/A , , , , , , , , ,680.2 GBS GLOBAL HAWK , ,419.6 JASSM JDAM , ,443.8 JPATS MINUTEMAN III GRP MINUTEMAN III PRP MP RTIP (RDT&E) NAS NAVSTAR GPS ,400.8 NPOESS SBIRS HIGH , ,548.2 SDB TSAT WIDEBAND GAPFILLER , , , , , , , , , , ,876.8 DoD: BMDS (RDT&E) , , , ,406.8 CHEM DEMIL--CMA , , , , ,285.1 CHEM DEMIL-ACWA , ,495.2 CHEM DEMIL-NEWPORT ,140.9 JSF (F-35) , , , , , , , , ,919.0 JTRS WAVEFORM (RDT&E Grand Total - -16, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

15 Distribution of Cost Changes (Then-Year Dollars) As Of Date: December 31, 2004 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate (Current-Year Dollars) Weapon System Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date ARMY: ACS ATIRCM/CMWS , , , ,476.4 BLACK HAWK UPGRADE , , , , , ,185.1 BRADLEY UPGRADE , ,167.9 CH-47F , , , , , , ,241.0 EXCALIBUR , , , ,547.9 FBCB FCS 2, , , , , , , , , ,678.6 FMTV , , , GMLRS , , , ,821.6 HIMARS JAVELIN JCM , , , ,848.0 JTRS CLUSTER , , ,519.4 JTRS CLUSTER LAND WARRIOR , , , , ,090.1 LONGBOW APACHE , , , ,013.8 LONGBOW HELLFIRE MCS , , PAT/MEADS CAP PATRIOT PAC STRYKER , ,870.8 WIN-T , , , , , , , , , , , , ,223.8 NAVY: AESA (RDT&E) AGM-88E (AARGM) AIM-9X ASDS CEC COBRA JUDY (RDT&E) CVN 21 1, , , , CVN , DD(X) (RDT&E) , , , , ,971.8 DDG , , , , ,641.5 E-2 ADV HAWKEYE E-2C REPRODUCTION ,158.9 EA-18G EFV (AAAV) , , , ,853.8 F/A-18E/F , ,345.6 H-1 UPGRADES , , , ,457.0 JSOW , , , , ,427.3 LCS LHD , , ,550.2 LPD , , , , ,365.9 MH-60R , , , ,551.3 MH-60S , ,628.1 MIDS-LVT MMA NESP SM , , ,120.5 SM SSGN SSN 774 (VA CLASS) 2, , , , , , , , ,899.0 T-45TS ,202.9 T-AKE TACTICAL TOMAHAWK TRIDENT II MSL , , , , ,

16 Distribution of Cost Changes (Then-Year Dollars) As Of Date: December 31, 2004 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate (Current-Year Dollars) Weapon System Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date V , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,479.8 USAF: AEHF , , AMRAAM , , , , , , B-1B CMUP B-2 RMP C-130 AMP C-130J , , , , , , ,383.5 C-17A , , , , , , , ,396.3 C-5 RERP EELV , , ,426.5 F/A , , , , , , , , , , ,785.3 GBS GLOBAL HAWK , ,172.0 JASSM JDAM , , ,871.2 JPATS MINUTEMAN III GRP MINUTEMAN III PRP MP RTIP (RDT&E) NAS NAVSTAR GPS ,610.3 NPOESS SBIRS HIGH , ,466.0 SDB TSAT , , , ,259.4 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER , , , , , , , , , , ,933.1 DoD: BMDS (RDT&E) 1, , , , ,906.3 CHEM DEMIL--CMA , , , , ,519.0 CHEM DEMIL-ACWA , ,457.4 CHEM DEMIL-NEWPORT , ,416.3 JSF (F-35) 7, , , , , , , , , , , , ,617.6 JTRS WAVEFORM (RDT&E Grand Total 9, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

17 Program Funding Status (Dollars in Millions) As of Date: December 31, 2004 Weapon Prior FY2006 FY2007 Balance of Total System Years Budget Budget Program ARMY: ACS , ,625.1 ATIRCM/CMWS 1, , ,717.0 BLACK HAWK UPGRADE , ,847.1 BRADLEY UPGRADE 2, ,691.9 CH-47F 1, , ,356.4 EXCALIBUR , ,250.8 FBCB2 1, ,801.9 FCS 4, , , , ,878.6 FMTV 4, , ,053.3 GMLRS , ,670.5 HIMARS , ,673.0 JAVELIN 3, ,223.5 JCM JTRS CLUSTER , ,632.3 JTRS CLUSTER , ,993.2 LAND WARRIOR , ,934.5 LONGBOW APACHE 6, , ,041.6 LONGBOW HELLFIRE 2, ,509.6 MCS PAT/MEADS CAP , ,938.7 PATRIOT PAC-3 9, , ,956.1 STRYKER 6, , , ,405.5 WIN-T , , , , , , ,137.5 NAVY: AESA (RDT&E) AGM-88E (AARGM) , ,556.6 AIM-9X , ,038.5 ASDS ,201.0 CEC 2, , ,524.6 COBRA JUDY (RDT&E) ,481.0 CVN 21 4, , , ,013.2 CVN-68 5, ,350.1 DD(X) (RDT&E) 4, , , ,060.8 DDG 51 61, ,759.0 E-2 ADV HAWKEYE 1, , ,567.5 E-2C REPRODUCTION 3, ,346.8 EA-18G , , ,659.5 EFV (AAAV) 1, , ,579.0 F/A-18E/F 31, , , , ,982.9 H-1 UPGRADES 1, , ,004.5 JSOW 2, , ,778.6 LCS ,313.7 LHD 1 9, ,001.2 LPD 17 8, , , ,127.7 MH-60R 2, , ,187.7 MH-60S 2, , ,721.9 MIDS-LVT 1, ,082.6 MMA , , ,910.6 NESP 1, ,057.9 SM SM , ,977.3 SSGN 3, ,065.2 SSN 774 (VA CLASS) 22, , , , ,979.8 T-45TS 6, ,802.4 T-AKE 3, ,596.9 TACTICAL TOMAHAWK 1, , ,210.1 TRIDENT II MSL 27, , ,

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: September 30, 2007 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 4 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, 2002 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, 2002 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: September 30, 2002 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 4 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2002 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 9 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 9 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

Department of Defense

Department of Defense Department of Defense Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) Summary Tables, 2000-2009 Collected and OCRed by AltGov2 www.altgov2.org/sars SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2001 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 12

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2001 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 12 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2001 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 12 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: September 30, 2010 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 4 Distribution of Cost Changes 7 Distribution of Cost

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, 2011 INDEX. Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars 12

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, 2011 INDEX. Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars 12 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 8 Distribution of Cost Changes - 12 Distribution of Cost Changes - 15 Program Funding

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, 2012 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 9 Distribution of Cost Changes - 12 Distribution of Cost

More information

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2015 (79 programs) $ 1,644,420.5

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2015 (79 programs) $ 1,644,420.5 Department of Defense Comprehensive Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) For the December 31, 2016 Reporting Requirement as Updated by the President s FY 2018 Budget The Department of Defense (DoD) has

More information

Defense Cost and Resource Center

Defense Cost and Resource Center Defense Cost and Resource Center Contractor Cost and Software Data Reporting: An Update Ron Lile April 2004 1 Outline Recent Changes CSDR Status DAES Reporting Automation Training 2 Under Revision DoDD

More information

20 mm PGU-28/B Replacement Combat Round 187 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Insertion for Sonar AN/BQQ-10 (V) (A-RCI) 97 Advanced

20 mm PGU-28/B Replacement Combat Round 187 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Insertion for Sonar AN/BQQ-10 (V) (A-RCI) 97 Advanced CL CD X 20 mm PGU-28/B Replacement Combat Round 187 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Insertion for Sonar AN/BQQ-10 (V) (A-RCI) 97 Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) Satellite Communications

More information

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2016 (87 programs) $ 1,748,659

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2016 (87 programs) $ 1,748,659 Department of Defense Comprehensive Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) For the December 31, 2017 Reporting Requirement as Updated by the President s FY 2019 Budget The Department of Defense (DoD) has

More information

Small Business Contributions to the Transformational Goals of the U.S. Military

Small Business Contributions to the Transformational Goals of the U.S. Military DoD Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization Small Business Contributions to the Transformational Goals of the U.S. Military Frank Ramos, Director DoD Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business

More information

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow Department of the Navy FY 26/FY 27 President s Budget Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow 4 February 25 1 1 Our budget resources are aligned to support both present responsibilities and future capabilities.

More information

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK February 2018 Table of Contents The Fiscal Year 2019 Budget in Context 2 The President's Request 3 Nuclear Weapons and Non-Proliferation 6 State

More information

Defense Cost and Resource Center The Defense Cost and Resource Center: An Update

Defense Cost and Resource Center The Defense Cost and Resource Center: An Update Defense Cost and Resource Center The Defense Cost and Resource Center: An Update Ronald Lile 40 th DoDCAS February 2007 We need good data reporting!! Acquisition Executives need to make decisions based

More information

I n d e x o f P r o g r a m s

I n d e x o f P r o g r a m s A AC-130J Ghostrider... 255 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) Insertion (A-RCI)... 15, 137 Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) Satellite Communications System... 257 Aegis Ballistic Missile

More information

Quick Reference & Background Materials. AV SOA & BI Tools Session

Quick Reference & Background Materials. AV SOA & BI Tools Session Quick Reference & Background Materials AV SOA & BI Tools Session AVSOA-DAMIR Conference 21-22 October 2009 Quick Reference Accessing the AV SOA Portal Go to: https://atl-portal.chs.spawar.navy.mil Enter

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 01-153 June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 Today, the Army announced details of its budget for Fiscal Year 2002, which runs from October 1, 2001 through September 30,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013

More information

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1 the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget William Hartung and Ari Rickman Arms and Security Project Center for International Policy May 2018 Introduction

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003 COST ($ in Thousands) FY 2002 Actual FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Cost to Complete Total Cost 0191 Initial Operational Test & Eval 32,550 26,483 34,646 26,896 27,866 28,399 33,656

More information

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157) Top Line 1 Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157) September 24, 2018 A. Total Appropriations: House: Total discretionary funding: $667.5 billion (an increase of $20.1

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Complete F58 NON LINE OF SIGHT

More information

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910 TITLE III PROCUREMENT The fiscal year 2018 Department of Defense procurement budget request totals $113,906,877,000. The Committee recommendation provides $132,501,445,000 for the procurement accounts.

More information

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY February 2003 Appropriation Tables MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY Table A-1 Military Personnel, Navy Pay and Allowances of Officers 5,232 5,291 5,594 Pay and Allowances of Enlisted 13,355 14,877 15,914 Pay and

More information

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

More information

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 Published on Arms Control Association (

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 Published on Arms Control Association ( Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 20 to December 31, 20 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers, jeff@armscontrol.org

More information

March 9, Subject: Trends in Nunn-McCurdy Cost Breaches for Major Defense Acquisition Programs. Dear Mr. Chairman:

March 9, Subject: Trends in Nunn-McCurdy Cost Breaches for Major Defense Acquisition Programs. Dear Mr. Chairman: United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 March 9, 2011 The Honorable Thomas Carper Chairman Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Federal Financial

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426

More information

Future Combat Systems

Future Combat Systems Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace

More information

A Ready, Modern Force!

A Ready, Modern Force! A Ready, Modern Force! READY FOR TODAY, PREPARED FOR TOMORROW! Jerry Hendrix, Paul Scharre, and Elbridge Colby! The Center for a New American Security does not! take institutional positions on policy issues.!!

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 25 FY 26 R Program Element

More information

TITLE III PROCUREMENT

TITLE III PROCUREMENT TITLE III PROCUREMENT The fiscal year 2008 Department of Defense procurement budget request totals $99,623,010,000. The accompanying bill recommends $99,608,169,000. The total amount recommended is a decrease

More information

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Published on Arms Control Association (

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Published on Arms Control Association ( Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers,

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY1999 Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY2005 to Army Joint STARS (TIARA) 5316 25676 17898 17713 12833 14372 11527 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Justification: The

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1506N: Aircraft Procurement, Navy / BA 05: Modification of Aircraft / BSA 1: Modification of Aircraft ID Code (A=Service Ready,

More information

a GAO SP GAO DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs Report to Congressional Committees

a GAO SP GAO DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs Report to Congressional Committees United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2008 DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs a -08-467SP March 2008 Accountability Integrity

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete

More information

CENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL

CENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL CENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL AND NON-PROLIFERATION MILITARY BUDGET AND OVERSIGHT PROGRAM 322 Fourth Street NE * Washington, D.C. 20002 * (202) 546-0795 Online at http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/ Fiscal Year

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0305205N Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0604261F PE TITLE: Personnel Recovery Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

More information

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman: CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Director April 25, 2005 Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett Chairman Subcommittee on Projection Forces Committee on Armed Services

More information

529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy IC

529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy IC Department of Defense 393 3DELRR Three-Dimensional Expeditionary Long- MDAP Air Force ID Range Radar 529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy

More information

Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council

Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 12 OCT 10 LTG Patrick J. O Reilly, USA Director Missile Defense

More information

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE When I took over my duties as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, I was awed by the tremendous professionalism and ability of our acquisition

More information

Longbow Apache and GMLRS had Nunn McCurdy but did not have any delays

Longbow Apache and GMLRS had Nunn McCurdy but did not have any delays 1 2 3 4 The canceled programs are: EFV VH 71 SADARM Comanche Armed Recon Helo EIBCT DDG 1000 had MS B rescinded (47 programs had performance in DT problems, 35 programs had performance in OT problems,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 57.205 93.145

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget 10 April 2013 National Guidance Aligning to Strategic Guidance DoD

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #216 To Program Element

More information

MEADS DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Army

MEADS DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Army MEADS DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017 RDT&E U.S. Army Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 Cost To COST

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost

More information

Activity Summary. Activity and Oversight 1

Activity Summary. Activity and Oversight 1 Activity Summary DOT&E activity for FY06 involved oversight of 293 programs, including 136 major defense acquisition programs and 45 major automated information systems. Oversight activity begins with

More information

202 AH-64E Remanufacture AH-64E Apache Remanufacture MDAP Army IC

202 AH-64E Remanufacture AH-64E Apache Remanufacture MDAP Army IC 393 3DELRR Three-Dimensional Expeditionary Long- MDAP Air Force IC 529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy IC Increment 1 512 ACWS Army Contract

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #98

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #98 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy : March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 242.669 68.656 70.614 82.195-82.195

More information

GAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009

GAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009 GAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009 Michael Sullivan, Director Cheryl Andrew, Senior Defense Analyst

More information

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018 MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018 Overview Strategic Environment FY19 Budget Priorities FY19 Budget Request FY19 by Appropriation Final Thoughts I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2 Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2007 Actual FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2 Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 2.885

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96

More information

The World Military Market for Connectors

The World Military Market for Connectors The World Military Market for Connectors Bishop & Associates Inc. has just released a new report providing a quantitative analysis of the World Military Connector Market. This 16 chapter, 315-page research

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 12.43 27.63 31.397-31.397 14.19 7.912 8.39

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 United States Special Operations Command : February 2016 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total Program Element - 9.967 8.117-8.117 50.084 104.866 132.174 229.912 Continuing Continuing 675346:

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Navy Page 1 of 26 R-1 Line #87 To Complete Program Element 51.826

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2) February 2000 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY SIX LIVE FIRE TESTING PE 0605131D8Z $'s in Millions FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Initial Operational Test & Evaluation FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Initial Operational Test & Evaluation FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Cost Program Element 25.368 20.665 17.767-17.767

More information

Multiyear Procurement (MYP) and Block Buy Contracting in Defense Acquisition: Background and Issues for Congress

Multiyear Procurement (MYP) and Block Buy Contracting in Defense Acquisition: Background and Issues for Congress Multiyear Procurement (MYP) and Block Buy Contracting in Defense Acquisition: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs Moshe Schwartz Specialist in Defense Acquisition

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Strike Fighter Squadrons

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Strike Fighter Squadrons Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 217.561 47.841-47.841 132.495 131.844

More information

GAO. WEAPONS ACQUISITION Better Use of Limited DOD Acquisition Funding Would Reduce Costs. Report to the Secretary of Defense

GAO. WEAPONS ACQUISITION Better Use of Limited DOD Acquisition Funding Would Reduce Costs. Report to the Secretary of Defense GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Secretary of Defense February 1997 WEAPONS ACQUISITION Better Use of Limited DOD Acquisition Funding Would Reduce Costs GAO/NSIAD-97-23 GAO United

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 174.037 11.276 8.610 1.971-1.971

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0102419A Aerostat Joint Project Office ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Jnt Land Atk Msl Def Elevated Netted Sensor-JLENS Actual

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept (IFPC2)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept (IFPC2) Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 17.754 16.197 13.610-13.610 14.019

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 MISSILE Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line Item #128 To

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 6.021 8.312 7.963-7.963 8.046 8.146 8.194

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 42.067 6.509 5.000-5.000 41.500 30.000

More information

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Peter R. Orszag, Director March 23, 2007 Honorable Gene Taylor Chairman Subcommittee on Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Committee on Armed

More information

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001 A udit R eport ACQUISITION OF THE FIREFINDER (AN/TPQ-47) RADAR Report No. D-2002-012 October 31, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report Documentation Page Report Date 31Oct2001

More information

1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue

1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue 1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue Ffty years ago, Task Force Smith of the 241h Infantry Division- the first American ground forces deployed to defend South Korea - engaged

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Army Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #167 To Program Element - 52.811 20.733

More information

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION Joe Pelino ARDEC Director of Technology 18 April 2018 UNPARALLELED COMMITMENT &SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do.

More information

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASE BY THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES U.S. SENATE STATEMENT BY J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #120

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #120 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line Item #116 To Complete

More information

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in

More information