Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2016 (87 programs) $ 1,748,659

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2016 (87 programs) $ 1,748,659"

Transcription

1 Department of Defense Comprehensive Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) For the December 31, 2017 Reporting Requirement as Updated by the President s FY 2019 Budget The Department of Defense (DoD) has released details on major defense acquisition program cost, schedule, and performance changes since the December 2016 reporting period. This information is based on the comprehensive annual Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) for the first quarter of FY 2018, as updated by the President s FY 2019 budget submitted to Congress on February 12, SARs summarize the latest estimates of cost, schedule, and performance status. These reports are prepared annually in conjunction with submission of the President's Budget. Subsequent quarterly exception reports are required only for those programs experiencing unit cost increases of at least 15 percent or schedule delays of at least six months. Quarterly SARs are also submitted for initial reports, final reports, and for programs that are rebaselined at major milestone decisions. The total program acquisition cost estimates provided in the SARs include research and development, procurement, military construction, and acquisition-related operations and maintenance. These totals reflect actual costs to date as well as future anticipated costs. All estimates are shown in fully inflated then-year dollars. The current estimate of program acquisition costs for programs covered by SARs for the prior reporting period (December 2016) was $1,748,659 million. Final reports submitted for the annual December 2016 and for the June 2017 and September 2017 quarterly exception reporting periods were subtracted. Initial reports for the annual December 2016 and for the June 2017 and September 2017 quarterly exception reporting periods were added. Finally, the net cost changes for the June 2017 and September 2017 quarterly exception reporting periods were incorporated. Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2016 (87 programs) $ 1,748,659 Less six final reports on C-5 Reliability Enhancement Re-engining Program (C-5 RERP), Enhanced Polar System (EPS), Global Broadcast Service (GBS), Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS), MH-60R Multi- Mission Helicopter (MH-60R), Warfighter Information-Tactical Increment 3 (WIN-T Inc 3), and the Space Vehicle (SV) 1-4 subprogram of the Advanced Extremely High Frequency Satellite (AEHF).* Plus one initial report on the T-AO 205 John Lewis Class Fleet Oiler (T- AO 205 Class). Includes seven initial reports from December 2016 not included in the previous current estimate. M88A2 Heavy Equipment Recovery Combat Utility Lift Evacuation System (M88A2 HERCULES), Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG), F/A-18 E/F Infrared Search and Track (IRST), -38, , ,595 1

2 Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Increment 1 (Long Range Anti-Ship Missile) (OASuW Inc 1 LRASM)), SSBN 826 COLUMBIA Class Submarine (SSBN 826), F-15 Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (F-15 EPAWSS), and Military Global Positioning System User Equipment Increment (MGUE Inc 1). Net cost changes reported as of June 2017 and September 2017 quarterly exception SARs.** +0.0 *Note: The dollars for the SV 1-4 subprogram were subtracted because a final report for that subprogram was submitted for the December 2016 reporting period. The SV 5-6 subprogram continues to report SARs as the AEHF program. **Note: There were no June 2017 SARs submitted to Congress. There was no cost variance associated with the September 2017 quarterly SARs. Changes Since Last Report: Economic $ -7,516 Quantity +22,923 Schedule +2,932 Engineering +3,947 Estimating Other +13, Support -2,831 Net Cost Change $ +33,216 Plus Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) development, procurement, and construction funding for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023; previous reports limited total funding through FY ,342 New SARs DoD is submitting an initial SAR for the following program. This report does not represent cost growth. The baselines established on this program will be the point from which future changes will be measured. Current Estimate Program ($ in Millions) CH-47F Modernized Cargo Helicopter (CH-47F Block II) $22,437 December 2017 (83 programs) $1,925,000 For the December 2017 reporting period, there is a net cost increase of $33,216 million or percent for the 82 programs that have reported in previous SARs. This cost increase is due primarily to a net increase in the planned quantities to be purchased (+$22,923 million), a net stretch-out of development and procurement schedules (+$2,932 million), engineering changes to hardware and software (+$3,947 million), and increases in program cost estimates (+$13,761 million). These increases were partially offset by a net decrease in the application of higher escalation rates (-$7,516 million) and decreases in support requirements (-$2,831 million). 2

3 Summary Explanations of Selected SAR Cost Changes (As of December 31, 2017) A. Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Breaches for 2017 For the December 2017 reporting period, there are two programs with critical or significant Nunn-McCurdy unit cost breaches to their current or original Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) (see below). In accordance with the provisions of sections 2433 and 2433a of title 10, United States Code, the Department will notify Congress and provide the required unit cost breach information in the SARs for these two programs. Critical Breach: (Unit cost increases of 25 percent or more to the current APB or of 50 percent or more to the original APB) Integrated Defense Electronic Countermeasures (IDECM) (Navy) Blocks 2/3 This subprogram has a critical Nunn-McCurdy unit cost breach. The current estimates for Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC) and Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC) breach both the current APB (PAUC % and APUC +92.6%) and the original APB (PAUC % and APUC %) thresholds. The cost breaches are due to quantity reductions in the IDECM Block 3 program (IDECM Block 2 is 100% delivered/expended). Threat changes have led to the selection of a different material solution to counter future threats. As a result, the quantity projections for the ALE-55 Expendable Fiber Optic Towed Decoy were reduced by -69%, or 8,875 units relative to the baseline. The program costs decreased by $937.5 million (-47.5%) from $1,971.9 million to $1,034.4 million. The FY 2019 President s Budget includes the requirement (both RDT&E and Procurement) for a different material solution to counter future threats, which will not be part of either the IDECM Blocks 2/3 or Block 4 subprograms. Significant Breach: (Unit cost increases of 15 percent, but less than 25 percent, to the current APB or of 30 percent, but less than 50 percent, to the original APB) Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Mission Modules (MM) (Navy) This program has a significant Nunn-McCurdy unit cost breach because the current estimate breached the PAUC against the current APB (+16.6%) due primarily to a reduction to Mission Package (MP) quantities of 16, from 64 to 48 MPs (a mix of 44 deployable and 4 non-deployable engineering development model MPs) which increased the average MP cost. The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment certified these quantities for the FY 2019 President s Budget based upon the Navy LCS MM program of record. Program costs decreased $1,352.4 million (-17.3%) from $7,831.1 million to $6,478.7 million, due primarily to the decrease of MPs (-$1,832.3 million). B. Program Cost Changes Greater than $1B, or 10% Army: Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System/Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System Alternative Warhead (GMLRS/GMLRS AW) Program costs increased $9,192.0 million (+121.5%) from 3

4 $7,568.1 million to $16,760.1 million, due primarily to an increase of 52,670 rockets from 43,936 to 96,606 (+$5,171.5 million) and associated schedule, engineering, and estimating allocations*** (+$3,926.0 million). There were also increases due to a revised estimate based on total rockets required and extension in the procurement buy profile from FY 2024 to FY 2033 (+$227.8 million), and an adjustment for current and prior escalation indices (+$11.8 million). These increases were partially offset by an acceleration of the procurement buy profile due to an increased production capacity in FY 2019 (-$81.5 million), revised escalation indices (-$34.8 million), and a revised estimate to support Extended Range GMLRS development (-$34.0 million). Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Program costs increased $2,752.8 million (+10.9%) from $25,276.1 million to $28,028.1 million, due primarily to an increase in Marine Corps quantities of 1,850 vehicles from 7,241 to 9,091 (+$675.6 million), updates in vehicle configuration and kit mix for Army units (+$1,957.1 million), updates in vehicles and kits based on vehicle configuration mix for Marine Corps units (+$200.5 million), a stretch-out of the procurement buy profile from FY 2015 to FY 2036 for the Army and from FY 2019 to FY 2023 for the Marine Corps (+$41.2 million), and an increase in Other Support and initial spares for the Army and the Marine Corps (+$62.8 million). These cost increases were partially offset by revised escalation indices (-$209.9 million). Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancement (PAC-3 MSE) Program costs increased $2,009.0 million (+28.2%) from $7,114.0 million to $9,123.0 million, due primarily to an increase of 538 missiles from 1,185 to 1,723 (+$2,500.1 million). There were also increases due to a revised estimate of weapon system support costs to reflect the missile quantity increase (+$221.2 million) and an adjustment for current and prior escalation (+$11.9 million). These increases were partially offset by a revised estimate for program increases in FY 2017 FY 2023 and missile production realignment (-$531.3 million), a schedule variance due to missile procurement realignment in FY 2018 FY 2025 (-$151.0 million), and revised escalation indices (-$41.9 million). Warfighter Information Network-Tactical Increment 2 (WIN-T Inc 2) Program costs decreased $7,780.6 million (-63.2%) from $12,311.7 million to $4,531.1 million, due primarily to a quantity variance resulting from a decrease of 2,107 nodes from 3,674 to 1,567 due to changes in the Army Network Modernization Strategy (-$4,885.9 million), revised escalation indices (-$78.4 million), a decrease in Other Support due to a change in fielding, new equipment training, and software maintenance costs (-$2,793.6 million), and a decrease in initial spares (-$310.8 million). These decreases were partially offset by an increase in additional quantity variance to account for non-node configuration items ( million), and a revised estimate to reflect the procurement of Tactical Communications Node Lites (TCN-L) and Network Operations Support Centers- Lite (NOSC-L) configuration items for modernizing previously procured Infantry Brigade Combat Teams ( million). Navy: Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) Program costs increased $206.1 million (+10.1%) from $2,050.2 million to $2,256.3 million, due primarily to fully funding the revised estimate stemming from the Nunn-McCurdy review and certification (+$124.1 million). There were also increases from additional funding for reliability growth testing and full envelope testing requirements (+$53.2 4

5 million), revised estimates to reflect actuals (+$32.4 million). These increases were partially offset by revised escalation indices (-$4.8 million). CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78) Program costs increased $12,160.5 million (+28.3%) from $42,910.6 million to $55,071.1 million, due primarily to an increase of one ship, from three to four, to reflect funding for the CVN 81 (+$12,631.9 million). There were also increases for additional funding for CVN 80 for Integrated Digital shipbuilding (+$275.8 million), the potential shift of Full Ship Shock Trial from CVN 78 to CVN 79 (+$26.3 million), revised estimates to support CVN 78 Class Follow-On Test and Evaluation efforts (+$33.2 million), revised estimate for CVN 78 post delivery (+$33.9 million), a revised estimate for CVN 78 due to extended shipboard and integration testing (+57.0 million), adjustment for current and prior escalation (+$85.5 million), and revised estimates due to application of new out year escalation indices (+$109.1 million). These increases were partially offset by revisions to escalation indices (-$199.0 million), funding adjustments associated with the increase of one ship in FY 2023 (-$87.6 million), revised estimates due to service wide adjustments (-$109.0 million), revised estimates due to efficiency efforts (-$61.3 million), and the reallocation of funds from CVN 81 to EMALS (-$659.4 million). CVN 78 Electromagnetic Aircraft Launching System (EMALS) Subprogram costs increased $743.0 million (+26.3%) from $2,824.9 million to $3,567.9 million, due primarily to a reallocation of funds to EMALS from CVN 81 (+$659.4 million). There were also increases for additional funding for CVN 78 Class EMALS depot planning (+$56.4 million), and additional funding for CVN 78 EMALS interim spares (+$28.1 million). DDG 51 Arleigh Burke Class Guided Missile Destroyer (DDG 51) Program costs increased $10,616.8 million (+9.6%) from $111,131.1 million to $121,747.9 million, due primarily to an increase of six ships from 89 to 95 (+$7,786.6 million) and associated schedule, engineering, and estimating allocations*** (+$3,676.0 million). There were also increases due to revised estimates to reflect the application of new out year escalation indices (+$292.2 million), the cost of incorporating the SPECTRAL Combat Direction Finder System for ships in FY 2020 FY 2023 (+$187.0 million), adjustment for current and prior escalation (+$115.5 million), and a revised estimate for development of future Aegis requirements (+$71.9 million). These increases were partially offset by a revised estimate to refinement of FY 2010 and FY 2023 shipbuilding estimates (-$374.9 million); revised escalation indices (-$301.3 million), a revised shipbuilding estimate for additional ships and Economic Order Quantity in FY 2019 and FY 2021 FY 2024 (-$244.4 million), a revised estimate for economic rate adjustment, which incorporates assumed efficiencies for new procurement buy (-$226.0 million), acceleration of the procurement buy profile resulting in an increase of a total of six ships in FY 2019 and FY 2021 FY 2024 (-$218.8 million), and a revised estimate to reflect refinement of outfitting and post delivery requirements (-$147.0 million). Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare (OASuW) Increment 1 (Inc 1) (Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM)) Program costs increased $236.8 million (+14.5%) from $1,634.2 million to $1,871.0 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of 26 All-Up-Rounds (AURs) across the Navy and Air Force, from 135 to 161 AURs (+$128.3 million), and associated engineering for capability improvement and wholeness requirements (+$129.5 million). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in Navy personnel requirement in production and decrease in other support due to refinement of Air Force estimates (-$9.1 million). 5

6 P-8A Poseidon Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft (P-8A) Program costs increased $1,134.8 million (3.4%) from $33,378.5 million to $34,513.3 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of six aircraft, from 111 to 117 aircraft (+$965.6 million), revised estimate for continued P-8A Increment 3 development and testing activities (+$92.9 million), scope increases to include the Advanced Airborne Sensor capability to address Tactical Operations Center, Fleet Support Activity, and Fleet Maintenance Activity requirements (+$58.9 million). Costs also increased due to re-phasing of aircraft (+$14.7 million), an increase to Non-Recurring Engineering and configuration changes (+$24.8 million), a revised estimate to reflect increases due to cost estimating methodologies for Airframe, Contractor and Government Furnished Equipment, and engineering change orders (+$18.7 million) and adjustments for current and prior year escalation (+$30.4 million). These increases were partially offset by revisions to escalation indices (-$52.4 million), and re-phasing of ancillary equipment (-$19.9 million). Standard Missile-6 (SM-6) Program costs decreased $1,458.6 million (-14.3%) from $10,225.2 million to $8,766.6 million, due primarily to cost reductions associated with the FY FY 2023 Multi-Year procurement (-$692.6 million), decreases to SM-6 Block 1A unit costs to reflect contract negotiations and affordability initiatives (-$245.8 million), and revised estimates to reflect the SM-6 Block 1 and Block 1A procurement mix within the Future Years Defense Program (-$221.2 million). Costs also decreased due to acceleration of the SM-6 procurement buy profile (-$65.1 million), accelerated procurement for spares hardware (-$72.2 million), Congressional reductions (-$42.0 million), decreases in other support equipment due to realignment of funds to support accelerated procurement buy profile (-$50.9 million), and revised escalation indices (-$63.0 million). Air Force: C-130J Hercules Transport Aircraft (C-130J) Program costs decreased -$1,569.5 million (-9.9%) from $15,803.5 million to $14,234.0 million, due primarily to a revised estimate resulting from removal of the Block Upgrade 7.0/8.1 Retrofit modification from the program (-$1,464.1 million), a decrease in Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortage costs and Government Furnished Equipment costs (-$123.3 million), and a decrease in Initial Spares (-$91.6 million). These decreases were partially offset by an increase in Other Support (+$78.0 million), revised estimating (+$23.7 million), and stretch-out of the procurement buy profile due to two Congressionally-added aircraft in FY 2017 and reduction of aircraft buys in FY 2024 (+$14.9 million). Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program costs decreased $2,002.9 million (-3.4%) from $59,226.8 million to $57,223.9 million, due primarily to a quantity decrease of eight launch services, from 168 to 160, based on decreased satellite vehicle requirements (-$2,514.1 million), and revised escalation indices (-$184.2 million). These decreases were partially offset by an RDT&E increase due to a revised estimate to align with the FY 2019 President s Budget for launch systems investment (+$190.1 million), and a procurement increase based on a revised estimate due to changes in satellite vehicle requirements necessitating assignment of missions to different configurations (+$477.0 million), and an adjustment for current and prior escalation (+$35.6 million). Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) Program costs increased $1,197.1 million (+11.8%) from $10,166.5 million to $11,363.6 million, due primarily to a quantity increase of 34,690 tailkits from 6

7 395,532 to 430,222 (+$911.3 million), increased demand for Laser JDAM production ( million), a revised estimate to reflect the funding profile on new Navy budget line item (+$64.9 million), increased need for weapons instrumentation telemetry kits to support Air Force testing (+$38.9 million), and adjustments for current and prior escalation indices (+$15.6 million). These increases were partially offset by revised escalation indices (-$30.2 million), and the acceleration of the procurement buy profile based on Warfighter urgent operational needs (-$52.4 million). Military GPS User Equipment Increment 1 (MGUE Inc 1) Program costs increased $265.1 million (+22.7%) from $1,166.4 million to $1,431.5 million, to align with the approved Milestone B Cost Estimate (+$237.4 million), and a revised estimate to reflect Department-wide funding adjustments (+$29.4 million). Next Generation Operational Control System (OCX) Program costs increased $665.3 million (+12.3%) from $5,394.8 million to $6,060.1 million, due primarily to increased funding to support the Regional Military Protection requirement (+$212.3 million), and increased funding in FY 2019 through FY 2023 to align with the Service Cost Position dated May 25, 2017 (+$496.8 million). These increases were partially offset by revised escalation indices (-$16.9 million), revised estimates to align with the FY 2019 President s Budget (-$16.3 million), and revised estimates to reflect actuals (-$15.9 million). DoD: Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) Program costs increased $7,185.7 million (+4.4%) from $164,994.1 million to $180,522.0 million (includes program adjustment of +$8,342.2 million for BMDS development, procurement, and construction funding for FY 2023 which is not attributed to program cost growth), due primarily to additional funds in RDT&E, Procurement, and MILCON. RDT&E funds were added for a new discriminating radar for the Pacific Theater (+$739.5 million), an increase for improved Hawaii Radar sensitivity capability (+$203.0 million), a transfer of the Israeli Program funding from Procurement to align with the continued development and production profiles ( million), for Special Programs (+$659.5 million), revisions to the BMDS Test Program (+$399.2 million), addition of 20 Ground Based Interceptors (GBIs) and silos at Fort Greely, Alaska (+$1,103.9 million), completion of two silos at Missile Field 1 at Fort Greely, Alaska and six boosters to maintain 44/64 deployed GBIs (+$247.0 million), extension of Sea Based X-Band Radar operational days at sea and necessary software upgrades (+$204.1 million), and funds to continue support of the United States Forces Korea (USFK) Joint Emergent Operational Need (JEON) (+$167.7 million). The increase in RDT&E funding was partially offset by rephasing of the Multi Object Kill Vehicle program to extend risk reduction activities (-$138.2 million), and the deferral of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) III software (-$162.0 million). Procurement funds were added to support the addition of 20 GBIs and silos at Fort Greely, Alaska (+$1,770.0 million), an additional 100 THAAD interceptors (+$910.0 million), 16 additional SM-3 Block IIA missiles (+$451.0 million), support to USFK JEON (+$61.9 million), and implementation of SM-3 Block IB Multi Year Procurement and addition of 62 missiles (+$553.5 million). The increase in Procurement funding was partially offset by a reduction of 20 SM-3 Block IIA missiles starting in FY 2020 (-$504.2 million), and the transfer of the Israeli Program funding to RDT&E (-$756.0 million). MILCON funds were added for Missile Field 4 construction at Fort Greely, Alaska (+$200.0 million), funding for the new discriminating radar in the Pacific Theater (+$409.9 million), for alternative sites for the Hawaii Radar including an In- Flight Interceptor Communications System Data Terminal (+$189.6 million), and for Phase 2 of the 7

8 Long Range Discrimination Radar System Complex (+$24.0 million). The increased MILCON funding was partially offset by a revised Consolidated Test Complex construction start from FY 2022 to FY 2023 (-$177.9 million). C. Other, Key Programs of Interest F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Acquisition costs (RDT&E + Procurement + MILCON) for the overall program decreased $349.9 million (-0.09%) from $406,480.9 million to $406,131.0 million (TY$). The breakdown by subprogram is: F-35 Aircraft Subprogram costs decreased $589.6 million (-0.17%) from $342,081.9 million to $341,492.3 million, due primarily to revised escalation indices (-$1,562.3 million) and decreases due to adjustments in the U.S. procurement quantity schedule profile (-$819.2 million). These decreases were offset by increases due primarily to the application of new outyear escalation indices (+1,020.9 million), revised estimating assumptions ( million), and revised estimates as the result of refined military construction requirements (+$471.4 million). F-35 Engine Subprogram costs increased $239.7 million (+0.37%) from $64,399.0 million to $64,638.7 million, due primarily to the application of new outyear escalation indices (+$297.2 million), revised estimating assumptions (+$64.7 million), and increases in other support due to the maturation of technical baseline, definition of customer requirements, and further definition of Services bed down/fielding plans (+$174.5 million). These increases were offset by decreases due to revised escalation indices (-$307.3 million). Overall, in 2017, the development effort has stabilized with the delivery of full Block 3F Capabilities. In procurement, the program had achieved its planned delivery goals (66 aircraft) and is focusing on aggressively reducing the cost to procure the F-35. Operations and Support cost estimates will be updated at Milestone C/Full-Rate Production, currently planned for April SSBN 826 COLUMBIA Class Submarine (SSBN 826) - Program costs decreased $161.6 million (-0.13%) from $127,036.4 million to $126,874.8 million, due primarily to cost reductions in procurement associated with revised escalation indices (-$889.2 million), and revised estimates in Shipbuilding & Conversion, Navy, based on updated Department-wide adjustments and incorporation of updated escalation assumptions (-$164.2 million). These decreases were partially offset by revised estimates, and increases in Other Support, to reflect application of new out year escalation indices ( million). *** Note: Quantity changes are estimated based on the original SAR baseline cost-quantity relationship. Cost changes since the original baseline are separately categorized as schedule, engineering, or estimating "allocations." The total impact of a quantity change is the identified "quantity" change plus all associated "allocations." 8

9 Army Program Base Year Base Year $ Then Year $ Quantity Base Year $ Then Year $ Quantity AH-64E New Build , , AH-64E Remanufacture , , AMF JTRS , , , AMPV , , , CH-47F , , CIRCM , , , GMLRS/GMLRS AW , , ,606 5, , ,670 HMS , , , IAMD , , JAGM , , , JLTV , , ,306 2, , ,852 M88A2 HERCULES , , MQ-1C Gray Eagle , , PAC-3 MSE , , ,723 1, , PIM , , UH-60M Black Hawk , , , WIN-T Inc , , ,623-5, , ,107 Army SubTotal 147, , , ,738.6 Navy Program Acquisition Cost Summary (Dollars in Millions) As of Date: December 31, 2017 Current Estimate Changes This Quarter AAG , , ACV , , AGM-88E AARGM , , , AIM-9X Blk II , , , AMDR , , CEC , , CH-53K , , CVN 78 - CVN , , , , CVN 78 - EMALS , , DDG , , DDG , , , , E-2D AHE , , EA-18G , , G/ATOR , , H-1 Upgrades , , IDECM - IDECM Blocks 2/ , , , ,875 IDECM - IDECM Block , , IRST , , JPALS , , KC-130J , , LCS , , LCS MM , , , LHA , , LPD , , Page 1 of 3 3/16/2018 2:43 PM

10 Program Acquisition Cost Summary (Dollars in Millions) As of Date: December 31, 2017 Current Estimate Changes This Quarter Program Base Year Base Year $ Then Year $ Quantity Base Year $ Then Year $ Quantity MIDS , , , MQ-4C Triton , , MQ-8 Fire Scout , , MUOS , , NGJ Mid-Band , , NMT , , OASuW Inc 1 (LRASM) , , P-8A , , , SM , , , , SSBN , , SSC , , SSN , , TACTOM , , , T-AO 205 Class , , Trident II Missile , , V , , VH-92A , , Navy SubTotal 659, , , ,103.2 Air Force AEHF , , AMRAAM , , , AWACS Blk 40/45 Upgrade , , B-2 DMS-M , , B61 Mod 12 LEP TKA , , C-130J , , , CRH , , EELV , , , , F-15 EPAWSS , , F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod , , FAB-T - FET , , FAB-T - CPT , , GPS III , , HC/MC-130 Recap , , ICBM Fuze Mod , , JASSM , , , JDAM , , , , ,690 KC-46A , , MGUE Inc , , MQ-9 Reaper , , OCX , , SBIRS High , , SDB II , , , Space Fence Inc , , Air Force SubTotal 201, , ,461.7 DoD Page 2 of 3 3/16/2018 2:43 PM

11 Program Acquisition Cost Summary (Dollars in Millions) As of Date: December 31, 2017 Current Estimate Changes This Quarter Program Base Year Base Year $ Then Year $ Quantity Base Year $ Then Year $ Quantity BMDS , , , , Chem Demil-ACWA - PCAPP , , , Chem Demil-ACWA - PCAPP , , F-35 - F-35 Engine , , , F-35 - F-35 Aircraft , , , DoD SubTotal 484, , , ,835.8 Grand Total 1,493, ,902, , ,215.9 Page 3 of 3 3/16/2018 2:43 PM

12 Distribution of Cost Changes (Base-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Army: Program Base Year This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date AH-64E New Build AH-64E Remanufacture , ,138.0 AMF JTRS , , ,219.9 AMPV CH-47F , ,231.5 CIRCM GMLRS/GMLRS AW , , , , , , , ,807.9 HMS IAMD , ,397.0 JAGM JLTV , , , , ,922.4 M88A2 HERCULES MQ-1C Gray Eagle PAC-3 MSE , , , ,264.0 PIM UH-60M Black Hawk , ,141.6 WIN-T Inc , , , Army Subtotal 2, , , , , , , , ,586.8 Navy: AAG ACV AGM-88E AARGM AIM-9X Blk II AMDR CEC CH-53K Page 1 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

13 Distribution of Cost Changes (Base-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Program Base Year This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date CVN 78 - CVN , , , ,338.6 CVN 78 - EMALS , ,341.8 DDG , , ,627.1 DDG , , , , , ,849.1 E-2D AHE , , , ,785.3 EA-18G , ,443.4 G/ATOR H-1 Upgrades IDECM - IDECM Blocks 2/ IDECM - IDECM Block IRST JPALS KC-130J LCS , , , ,506.8 LCS MM , , , LHA , ,748.5 LPD , , ,310.7 MIDS , ,407.2 MQ-4C Triton MQ-8 Fire Scout MUOS NGJ Mid-Band NMT OASuW Inc 1 (LRASM) P-8A , SM , ,283.2 SSBN SSC Page 2 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

14 Distribution of Cost Changes (Base-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Program Base Year This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date SSN , , , , ,904.7 TACTOM , ,492.9 T-AO 205 Class Trident II Missile , , , ,283.6 V , , , ,525.5 VH-92A Navy Subtotal 8, , , , , , , , , , , ,570.3 Air Force: AEHF AMRAAM , ,050.2 AWACS Blk 40/45 Upgrade B-2 DMS-M B61 Mod 12 LEP TKA C-130J , , ,515.6 CRH EELV , , , ,950.7 F-15 EPAWSS , ,655.2 F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod FAB-T - FET FAB-T - CPT GPS III HC/MC-130 Recap , , , ,568.0 ICBM Fuze Mod JASSM ,731.4 JDAM , ,213.4 KC-46A MGUE Inc MQ-9 Reaper , Page 3 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

15 Distribution of Cost Changes (Base-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Program Base Year This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date OCX , ,320.2 SBIRS High SDB II Space Fence Inc Air Force Subtotal , , , , , ,676.0 DoD: BMDS , , , , , ,866.7 Chem Demil-ACWA - PCAPP Chem Demil-ACWA - BGCAPP , ,446.6 F-35 - F-35 Engine , F-35 - F-35 Aircraft , , , , , ,767.4 DoD Subtotal , , , , , , ,658.1 Grand Total 10, , , , , , , , , , , ,491.2 Page 4 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

16 Distribution of Cost Changes (Then-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Program This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date Army Subtotal: AH-64E New Build AH-64E Remanufacture , ,651.7 AMF JTRS , , ,756.5 AMPV CH-47F , ,504.1 CIRCM GMLRS/GMLRS AW , , , , , , , ,911.2 HMS , ,196.2 IAMD , , ,999.3 JAGM JLTV , , , , ,484.9 M88A2 HERCULES MQ-1C Gray Eagle PAC-3 MSE , , , ,400.7 PIM UH-60M Black Hawk , , ,600.7 WIN-T Inc , , , Subtotal , , , , , , , , , ,128.1 Navy Subtotal: AAG ACV AGM-88E AARGM AIM-9X Blk II ,189.8 AMDR CEC ,408.5 CH-53K CVN 78 - CVN , , , , ,170.7 CVN 78 - EMALS , , ,386.2 DDG , , , ,803.8 Page 1 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

17 Distribution of Cost Changes (Then-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Program This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date DDG , , , , , , , , , ,630.4 E-2D AHE , , , ,425.5 EA-18G , , ,771.9 G/ATOR H-1 Upgrades IDECM - IDECM Blocks 2/ IDECM - IDECM Block IRST JPALS KC-130J LCS , , , , , ,213.3 LCS MM , , , , LHA , ,163.7 LPD , , , ,898.0 MIDS , ,184.7 MQ-4C Triton MQ-8 Fire Scout MUOS NGJ Mid-Band NMT OASuW Inc 1 (LRASM) P-8A , , , , SM , , , ,169.4 SSBN ,363.2 SSC SSN , , , , , ,999.4 TACTOM , , ,633.6 T-AO 205 Class Trident II Missile , , , , ,522.6 V , , ,986.0 Page 2 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

18 Distribution of Cost Changes (Then-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Program This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date VH-92A Subtotal -3, , , , , , , , , , , , ,123.0 Air Force Subtotal: AEHF AMRAAM , , , , ,168.3 AWACS Blk 40/45 Upgrade B-2 DMS-M B61 Mod 12 LEP TKA C-130J , , , , ,394.3 CRH EELV , , , ,105.5 F-15 EPAWSS , ,030.7 F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod FAB-T - FET FAB-T - CPT GPS III ,141.0 HC/MC-130 Recap , , , ,611.9 ICBM Fuze Mod JASSM ,369.4 JDAM , , ,756.9 KC-46A MGUE Inc MQ-9 Reaper , , , , ,327.6 OCX , ,647.1 SBIRS High SDB II Space Fence Inc Subtotal , , , , , , , ,491.3 DoD Subtotal: BMDS , , , , ,359.8 Page 3 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

19 Distribution of Cost Changes (Then-Year Dollars in Millions) As of December 31, 2017 Cost Changes Between the Baseline and Current Estimate Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Total Program This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date This Qtr To Date Chem Demil-ACWA - PCAPP Chem Demil-ACWA - PCAPP , ,779.3 F-35 - F-35 Engine , , F-35 - F-35 Aircraft -1, , , , , , , ,637.1 Subtotal -2, , , , , , , , ,496.3 Grand Total -7, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,238.7 Page 4 of 4 3/16/2018 2:42 PM

20 Program Funding Status (TY $ in Millions) Submission Date: DEC 2017, Include Draft: Yes Army Program Prior Years FY 2018 FY 2019 Balance of Program AH-64E New Build ,964.6 AH-64E Remanufacture 7, , ,548.3 AMF JTRS 1, , ,577.5 AMPV , ,774.6 CH-47F 14, ,651.5 CIRCM , ,052.4 GMLRS/GMLRS AW 4, , , ,760.1 HMS 2, , ,397.2 IAMD 2, , ,790.9 JAGM 1, , ,125.6 JLTV 1, , , , ,028.9 M88A2 HERCULES 2, ,001.7 MQ-1C Gray Eagle 5, ,906.9 PAC-3 MSE 3, , , , ,123.0 PIM 2, , ,105.6 UH-60M Black Hawk 17, , , , ,447.8 WIN-T Inc 2 3, ,531.1 Army Subtotal: 72, , , , ,787.7 Navy AAG 1, ,256.3 ACV ,889.9 AGM-88E AARGM 1, ,656.8 AIM-9X Blk II 1, , ,666.3 AMDR 2, , ,827.7 CEC 4, ,719.2 CH-53K 6, , , , ,165.2 CVN 78 - CVN 78 26, , , , ,071.1 CVN 78 - EMALS 2, ,567.9 DDG , ,492.5 DDG 51 87, , , , ,747.9 E-2D AHE 13, , , , ,456.9 EA-18G 14, ,408.3 G/ATOR 1, , ,124.7 H-1 Upgrades 10, ,284.9 IDECM - IDECM Block ,274.7 IDECM - IDECM Blocks 2/ ,034.4 IRST , ,333.4 JPALS 1, ,854.8 KC-130J 4, , ,895.6 LCS 17, , , , ,225.5 LCS MM 2, , ,478.7 Total Program Funding Status (TY $ in Millions) Page 1 of 3 3/16/2018 8:56:45 AM

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2015 (79 programs) $ 1,644,420.5

Current Estimate (TY$ in Millions) December 2015 (79 programs) $ 1,644,420.5 Department of Defense Comprehensive Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) For the December 31, 2016 Reporting Requirement as Updated by the President s FY 2018 Budget The Department of Defense (DoD) has

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, 2012 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 9 Distribution of Cost Changes - 12 Distribution of Cost

More information

529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy IC

529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy IC Department of Defense 393 3DELRR Three-Dimensional Expeditionary Long- MDAP Air Force ID Range Radar 529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy

More information

202 AH-64E Remanufacture AH-64E Apache Remanufacture MDAP Army IC

202 AH-64E Remanufacture AH-64E Apache Remanufacture MDAP Army IC 393 3DELRR Three-Dimensional Expeditionary Long- MDAP Air Force IC 529 AAG Advanced Arresting Gear MDAP Navy ID 472 ACV 1.1 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 MDAP Navy IC Increment 1 512 ACWS Army Contract

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: September 30, 2007 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 4 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, 2011 INDEX. Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars 12

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of December 31, 2011 INDEX. Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars 12 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 8 Distribution of Cost Changes - 12 Distribution of Cost Changes - 15 Program Funding

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: September 30, 2010 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 4 Distribution of Cost Changes 7 Distribution of Cost

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2002 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 9 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK February 2018 Table of Contents The Fiscal Year 2019 Budget in Context 2 The President's Request 3 Nuclear Weapons and Non-Proliferation 6 State

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, 2002 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, 2002 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: September 30, 2002 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 4 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 9 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 10

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 10 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2004 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 10 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #96

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #96 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO FY 2017 Total FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 8.916 10.476 11.529 0.000 11.529 11.985

More information

I n d e x o f P r o g r a m s

I n d e x o f P r o g r a m s A AC-130J Ghostrider... 255 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) Insertion (A-RCI)... 15, 137 Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) Satellite Communications System... 257 Aegis Ballistic Missile

More information

FY 2018 WEAPON SYSTEMS FACTBOOK JACOB COHN RYAN BOONE AMBER OAR

FY 2018 WEAPON SYSTEMS FACTBOOK JACOB COHN RYAN BOONE AMBER OAR FY 218 WEAPON SYSTEMS FACTBOOK JACOB COHN RYAN BOONE AMBER OAR FY 218 WEAPON SYSTEMS FACTBOOK JACOB COHN RYAN BOONE AMBER OAR 217 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center

More information

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1 the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget William Hartung and Ari Rickman Arms and Security Project Center for International Policy May 2018 Introduction

More information

Department of Defense

Department of Defense Department of Defense Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) Summary Tables, 2000-2009 Collected and OCRed by AltGov2 www.altgov2.org/sars SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES

More information

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2001 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 12

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2001 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 12 SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES As of Date: December 31, 2001 INDEX SUBJECT PAGE SAR Narrative Highlights 1 Program Acquisition Cost 12 Distribution of Cost Changes - Base-Year Dollars

More information

System of Systems (SoS) Systems Engineering in Acquisition Program Planning

System of Systems (SoS) Systems Engineering in Acquisition Program Planning System of Systems () Systems Engineering in Acquisition Program Planning Kristen Baldwin Principal Deputy, Systems Engineering Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering

More information

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157) Top Line 1 Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157) September 24, 2018 A. Total Appropriations: House: Total discretionary funding: $667.5 billion (an increase of $20.1

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 17.754 16.197 13.610-13.610 14.019

More information

20 mm PGU-28/B Replacement Combat Round 187 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Insertion for Sonar AN/BQQ-10 (V) (A-RCI) 97 Advanced

20 mm PGU-28/B Replacement Combat Round 187 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Insertion for Sonar AN/BQQ-10 (V) (A-RCI) 97 Advanced CL CD X 20 mm PGU-28/B Replacement Combat Round 187 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Insertion for Sonar AN/BQQ-10 (V) (A-RCI) 97 Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) Satellite Communications

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Initial Operational Test & Evaluation FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Initial Operational Test & Evaluation FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Cost Program Element 25.368 20.665 17.767-17.767

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910 TITLE III PROCUREMENT The fiscal year 2018 Department of Defense procurement budget request totals $113,906,877,000. The Committee recommendation provides $132,501,445,000 for the procurement accounts.

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003 COST ($ in Thousands) FY 2002 Actual FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Cost to Complete Total Cost 0191 Initial Operational Test & Eval 32,550 26,483 34,646 26,896 27,866 28,399 33,656

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 25 FY 26 R Program Element

More information

Small Business Contributions to the Transformational Goals of the U.S. Military

Small Business Contributions to the Transformational Goals of the U.S. Military DoD Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization Small Business Contributions to the Transformational Goals of the U.S. Military Frank Ramos, Director DoD Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business

More information

A Ready, Modern Force!

A Ready, Modern Force! A Ready, Modern Force! READY FOR TODAY, PREPARED FOR TOMORROW! Jerry Hendrix, Paul Scharre, and Elbridge Colby! The Center for a New American Security does not! take institutional positions on policy issues.!!

More information

Quick Reference & Background Materials. AV SOA & BI Tools Session

Quick Reference & Background Materials. AV SOA & BI Tools Session Quick Reference & Background Materials AV SOA & BI Tools Session AVSOA-DAMIR Conference 21-22 October 2009 Quick Reference Accessing the AV SOA Portal Go to: https://atl-portal.chs.spawar.navy.mil Enter

More information

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow Department of the Navy FY 26/FY 27 President s Budget Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow 4 February 25 1 1 Our budget resources are aligned to support both present responsibilities and future capabilities.

More information

9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference

9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference 9 th Annual Disruptive Conference Navy IAMD Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. (12/05/2012). This Brief is provided for Information Only and does not constitute

More information

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASE BY THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES U.S. SENATE STATEMENT BY J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget 10 April 2013 National Guidance Aligning to Strategic Guidance DoD

More information

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance Arms Control Today For the past five decades, the United States has debated, researched, and worked on the development of defenses to protect U.S. territory against

More information

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Offensive sea control Sea based AAW Weapons development Increasing offensive sea control capacity Addressing defensive and constabulary

More information

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman: CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Director April 25, 2005 Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett Chairman Subcommittee on Projection Forces Committee on Armed Services

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

NAVAIR Overview. 30 November 2016 NAVAIR. PRESENTED TO: Radford University. PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross

NAVAIR Overview. 30 November 2016 NAVAIR. PRESENTED TO: Radford University. PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross NAVAIR Overview PRESENTED TO: Radford University 30 November 2016 PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross NAVAIR NOV 2016 Mission NAVAIR's mission is to provide full life-cycle support of naval aviation

More information

Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council

Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 12 OCT 10 LTG Patrick J. O Reilly, USA Director Missile Defense

More information

DoD Systems Engineering Update

DoD Systems Engineering Update DoD Systems Engineering Update Kristen J. Baldwin Principal Deputy, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering (DASD(SE)), USD(AT&L) AIA Technical Operations Council (TOC)

More information

Ballistic Missile Defense Update

Ballistic Missile Defense Update Ballistic Missile Defense Update DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. To: 2017 Space And Missile Defense Conference By: Lieutenant General Samuel A. Greaves,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013

More information

BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE

BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE MDAA ISSUE BRIEF OCTOBER 2015 WES RUMBAUGH & KRISTIN HORITSKI Missile defense programs require consistent investment and budget certainty to provide essential capabilities.

More information

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total

More information

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT Subtitle A Authorization Of Appropriations Sec. 0. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B Army Programs Sec.. Authority to expedite

More information

CENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL

CENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL CENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL AND NON-PROLIFERATION MILITARY BUDGET AND OVERSIGHT PROGRAM 322 Fourth Street NE * Washington, D.C. 20002 * (202) 546-0795 Online at http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/ Fiscal Year

More information

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018 MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018 Overview Strategic Environment FY19 Budget Priorities FY19 Budget Request FY19 by Appropriation Final Thoughts I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) # FY

More information

FY 2017 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities. February 2018

FY 2017 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities. February 2018 A FY 2017 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities February 2018 This page intentionally left blank. FY 2017 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation

More information

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 Published on Arms Control Association (

Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 Published on Arms Control Association ( Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 20 to December 31, 20 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers, jeff@armscontrol.org

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #181

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #181 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years

More information

The World Military Market for Connectors

The World Military Market for Connectors The World Military Market for Connectors Bishop & Associates Inc. has just released a new report providing a quantitative analysis of the World Military Connector Market. This 16 chapter, 315-page research

More information

TITLE III PROCUREMENT

TITLE III PROCUREMENT TITLE III PROCUREMENT The fiscal year 2008 Department of Defense procurement budget request totals $99,623,010,000. The accompanying bill recommends $99,608,169,000. The total amount recommended is a decrease

More information

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions Topline President s Request House Approved Senate Approved Department of Defense base budget $617.1 billion $616.7 billion

More information

FY 2011 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities

FY 2011 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities FY 2011 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities February 2012 This page intentionally left blank FY 2011 Annual Report on Cost Assessment Activities Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete

More information

International Defense Industry Fair Modernizing the Army Materiel Enterprise

International Defense Industry Fair Modernizing the Army Materiel Enterprise Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) International Defense Industry Fair Modernizing the Army Materiel Enterprise 6 May 2015 Honorable Heidi Shyu Assistant Secretary

More information

GAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009

GAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009 GAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009 Michael Sullivan, Director Cheryl Andrew, Senior Defense Analyst

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 1.352 8.819 11.265-11.265 4.626 4.769 4.93

More information

WikiLeaks Document Release

WikiLeaks Document Release WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20557 Navy Network-Centric Warfare Concept: Key Programs and Issues for Congress Ronald O Rourke, Foreign Affairs, Defense,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 242.669 68.656 70.614 82.195-82.195

More information

a GAO SP GAO DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs Report to Congressional Committees

a GAO SP GAO DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs Report to Congressional Committees United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2008 DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs a -08-467SP March 2008 Accountability Integrity

More information

CNO s. Navigation Plan WARFIGHTING FIRST

CNO s. Navigation Plan WARFIGHTING FIRST CNO s Navigation Plan 2016-2020 A Navigation Plan is drawn from Sailing Directions, which is a foundational document that describes in detail how a ship prepares for and safely and effectively conducts

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Navy Page 1 of 26 R-1 Line #87 To Complete Program Element 51.826

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 42.067 6.509 5.000-5.000 41.500 30.000

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET 2015 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET Mr. Thomas F. Simoes Director, Investment & Development Division (FMB 2) Office of Budget ASMC National PDI 2015 The Foundation Strategic Guidance

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2019 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2019 PRESIDENT S BUDGET DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2019 PRESIDENT S BUDGET February 12, 2018 Agenda Strategic Guidance Operational Context Fiscal Context Balanced Choices Reform 1 1 The Foundation Strategic Guidance National Security;

More information

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150% GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m.,edt Tuesday May 3,1994 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 57.205 93.145

More information

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE

To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE To THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE When I took over my duties as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, I was awed by the tremendous professionalism and ability of our acquisition

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0207134F PE TITLE: F-15E SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS Cost ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 16.397 1.975 1.971-1.971 1.990 1.989 2.023

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 49.457 65.370 118.411 59.826-59.826

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0305205N Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Information Systems Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038

More information

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT 21 DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW The budget request for fiscal year 2012 contained $111.5 billion for procurement. This represents a $300.0 million increase

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral William K. Lescher, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral William K. Lescher, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET Rear Admiral William K. Lescher, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget February 2, 2015 The Foundation Strategic Guidance National Security;

More information

SSC Pacific is making its mark as

SSC Pacific is making its mark as 5.3 FEATURE FROM THE SPAWAR SYSTEMS CENTER PACIFIC INTERNAL NEWSLETTER SSC Pacific C4I scoring direct hit for shore-based ballistic missile defense SSC Pacific is making its mark as a valued partner in

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY

More information

NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL. 29 June 2011 COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND. Presented to: Presented by:

NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL. 29 June 2011 COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND. Presented to: Presented by: NAVAL AVIATION: NOW AND IN THE FUTURE Presented to: Presented by: 29 June 2011 NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND NAVAIR Public

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 Base PE 65863N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support OCO Total FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 Navy Page

More information

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-433 KC-130J Transport Aircraft (KC-130J) As of FY 2016 President's Budget Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 12.43 27.63 31.397-31.397 14.19 7.912 8.39

More information

Ballistic Missile Defense Overview

Ballistic Missile Defense Overview Ballistic Missile Defense Overview DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. To: Center For Strategic And International Studies By: Brigadier General Kenneth Todorov,

More information

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit P-40, BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Aircraft Procurement, Navy/APN-5 Aircraft Modifications Program Element for Code B Items: P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 051100, EA-6 SERIES

More information

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Peter R. Orszag, Director March 23, 2007 Honorable Gene Taylor Chairman Subcommittee on Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Committee on Armed

More information

Longbow Apache and GMLRS had Nunn McCurdy but did not have any delays

Longbow Apache and GMLRS had Nunn McCurdy but did not have any delays 1 2 3 4 The canceled programs are: EFV VH 71 SADARM Comanche Armed Recon Helo EIBCT DDG 1000 had MS B rescinded (47 programs had performance in DT problems, 35 programs had performance in OT problems,

More information