"Just as the Marine Corps has traditionally used the air, fand and sea to close with and destroy the enemy, it must now look at the EMS environment
|
|
- Vernon Dean
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 "Just as the Marine Corps has traditionally used the air, fand and sea to close with and destroy the enemy, it must now look at the EMS environment as an equally relevant 'Maneuver Space.'"
2 Air-Land EW The US Marine Corps is a uniquely agile fighting force, an important consideration wher\ evaluating its approach to fielding an EW battle management capability. Unlike its brethren Services, which must often co-address strategic and geo-political concerns like global force projection and winning potential wars, the Marine Corps focuses on seizing objectives and winning battles. This is why, when the Marine Corps officially identifies securing the Electromagnetic Spectrum (EMS) as a critical mission objective, you can expect that there are already Corps boots and brains moving out on the target. Even so, they have a long way to go, with many of the wellknown obstacles, challenges and questions still to be addressed. In June of last year, the Marine Corps Capabilities Development Directorate (Quantico, VA) released a Concept of Operations (CONOPS) document for Marine Air-Ground Task Force Electronic Warfare, (MAGTF-EW). In it, the USMC defined the EMS as a warfighting environment that must be fully integrated into the complete battlefield awareness and management activities of the MAGTF Commander, with Marines at all echelons relying on EW as an integral component to their operations. "Just as the Marine Corps has traditionally used the air, land and sea to close with and destroy the enemy, it must now look at the EMS environment as an equally relevant 'Maneuver Space,'" the document states. In truth, there's not much new or different, if anything, about the Marine Corps strategy. It includes all the familiar buzzwords - interoperability, networking, cross-discipline cooperation, system of systems (SOS), increased training, etc. What is different, however, is that the Marine Corps has put its plan on paper, in detail, and most importantly, it has linked it directly to existing capabilities and assets and to other technologies and systems that are already in advanced development for realistic, near-term deployment - specifically the timeframe. According to the Marines, the timeframe accounts for capabilities which are currently in development, the "sundown" of the EA-6B, potential deployment of a Group 4 UAS, and the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter. EW FOR THE MARINE RIFLEMAN Whatever EW capabilities the Marines ultimately implement, it must in parallel address a change in Marine Corps operational thinking. To adapt to a changing threat environment, the Marine Corps is gradually shifting from a battalion-centric approach to one in which the Marine rifle company is seen as the lowest tactical unit capable of independent operations. To accomplish this, however, the rifle companies will need to have increased network access and situational-awareness information. As described by LtCol Shawn Cunningham of the Networking/Connectivity Division (APW-74), Weapons Requirements Branch at USMC Headquarters, "The intent is that the MAGTF Commander will have the necessary organic assets at his disposal to control the EMS at the time and place of his choosing, but also to have the ability at the tactical level for Marines to request capabilities such as ISR and non-kinetic fires in real time." The CONOPS explains this shift: "Historically, the Marine Corps focused separately on airborne and ground based platforms, using them to conduct Electronic Attack (EA), Electronic Protection (EP), Electronic Warfare Support (ES), and Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) as required by each individual MAGTF element. In order to better support the Marine rifleman and provide him access to the full EW network, the MAGTF EW concept must allow for the coordinated management of action of each element of EW, spectrum management and now cyber, rather than a mutually exclusive approach." It goes on to say that "traditional EMS users (EA, ES, EP, SIGINT, Force Protection, and spectrum management) must collaborate with cyber and information operations in order to counter the threat and provide the desired effects in direct support to not only the Marine rifleman but all echelons within the MAGTF." The CONOPS cites a 2010 White House fact sheet that states, "the use of the spectrum has grown at over 250 percent per year, with some estimates indicating that the next five years will see an increase in wireless data of between 20 and 45 times 2009 levels." In parallel with this trend, dedicated command and control systems will continue to incorporate new, sophisticated waveforms, encryption methods and other technologies and tactics that will allow 3 I I
3 them to blend into the global information environment. Enemy combatants in low-intensity conflict areas have already begun to exploit a multitude of cheap, readily-available commercial communication technologies, and this trend will undoubtedly continue as commercial use of the spectrum continues to grow at a rapid rate. ALL IN THE FAMILY To deal with this disparate range of future threats and requirements, the Marine Corps plan calls for the deployment and integration of a scalable "EW Family of Systems (FOS)," organic to each unit, combined with the creation of Electronic Warfare Coordination Cells (EWCC) within each MAGTF. Says LtCol Robert Kudelko, EW Aviation Requirements Officer (APW-41) at USMC Headquarters, "We've clearly seen the demand from Iraq and Afghanistan, and we're trying to align the FOS/SOS to address these demands and provide the needed organic EW assets. The ground, air and command and control pieces all have to advance together for this to be effective. All are equally important." The cornerstone of this capability will be a "services oriented architecture (SOA)" working across an IP-based network. This "EW Net" is planned to be compatible with Tactical Targeting Network Technology (TTNT), Advanced Network Wideband Waveform (ANW2), Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW), Common Data Link (CDL) and other future waveforms and networks, and includes network capabilities resident in the Radio Battalions, UAV squadrons (VMUs), and spectrum management communities as well as future networks supporting the F-35B. Testbed demonstration projects, like the recently completed Collaborative Online Reconnaissance Provider/ Operationally Responsive Attack Link (CORPORAL), are aimed at enabling this access and will be the foundation for the Electronic Warfare Services Architecture (EWSA). The EWCC will host the Marine Corps' EW brainpower, "responsible for refining the Electronic Order of Battle (EOB)" and for making available and coordinating both tactical ground and airborne EW assets in real time for the MAGTF commander. As described by Lieutenant Colonel Cunningham, "Using the EW Net, the EWCC will provide the personnel and subject-level expertise to deliver a truly integrated EW capability at the tactical level. Tactical Commanders will be able to request and receive both kinetic and non-kinetic fires, with the non-kinetic piece controlled by the EWCC." IN THE AIR Historically, Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs) have not had their own organic, dedicated aviation EW elements, but this is expected to change. The capability will be provided by a combination of manned and unmanned platforms. Though the venerable EA-6B is currently slated for retirement, it is still expected to be a major EW asset for the remainder of the decade. Transition to the ICAP III version of the Prowler will be complete by June 2012, and the Marines plan to receive 32 ICAP III aircraft and maintain the program into Eventually, many of Prowler's existing missions are expected to be handed off to the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), as well as other multirole manned and unmanned aircraft. The Intrepid Tiger IIALQ-231 communications electronic attack pod is one example of an EW capability planned for integration on multi-role airframes including the AV-8B, F/A-18 and AH-IZ.
4 "Historically, Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs) have not had their own organic, dedicated aviation EW elements, but this is expected to change." The KC-130J, with its extended loiter time and payload capacity, is another platform under consideration as an airborne MAGTF EW asset. The Intrepid Tiger II ALQ-231 communications electronic attack pod is one example of an EW capability planned for integration on multi-role airframes including the AV-8B, F/A-18 and AH-IZ. The Intrepid Tiger II program is itself an example of a novel and streamlined approach to acquisition. Acting as its own prime contractor, each pod is integrated by the USMC itself. At a cost of less than $600,000 per unit, the system makes extensive use of off-the-shelf components, which should provide for relatively easy upgrade and maintainability. In addition to communications intelligence and jamming functions, the Intrepid Tiger II pod is following an upgrade path that should enable it to perform electronic support as well. Says Lieutenant Colonel Kudelko, "In this time of budget uncertainty, one of the things we can offer, particularly with programs like Intrepid Tiger II, is fiscal conservatism. It's a pennies-on-the-douar solution while providing an increased capability. Though it can really only provide a portion of the EA-6B's fullspectrum capability, the quantity of systems that we can potentially make available is a big offset." According to Kudelko, the Intrepid Tiger II pod is currently three quarters of the way through its test program, which should be completed in the early part of this year. "Pending the test report," he said, "we'll know the feasibility and timing of getting the pod deployed in theater, but thus far, the tests have been going well." ON THE GROUND A number of systems, mixing fixedsite, man-portable and vehicle-mounted units, will comprise the ground-based element of the MAGTF EW capability. Based on experience over the past decade, remotely controlled improvised explosive devices (RCIEDs) will continue to be a central focus of Marine Corps efforts. Currently, the Marines rely on the Counter RCIED Electronic Warfare (CREW) family of systems. CREW is a high-power, modular, programmable multiband RF jammer that denies selected portions of the EM spectrum to an enemy. The latest version, the Thor III man-pack system, built by Sierra Nevada Corp. (Sparks, NV), is expected to be the standard dismounted system in the 2012 timeframe. Each standard Thor III system consists of three, manpack subsystems each containing either a low, mid or high-band receiver/ 2. Information Operations Europe 2012 Conference The Rise of Extrexnism and the Role of Information Operations February 22-23,2012 NATO School, Oberammergau, Germany INFOWñR The events surrounding "Arab Spring" awakened Western countries to the plight of disenfranchised populations in the Arab Region and Northern Africa. Large groups of disaffected people coalesced their anger to overthrow long-standing governments. These groups leveraged the information environment to communicate on a world stage while garnering support within their home nation, across their region, and from the entire world. This same information environment is available to other groups to advance their goals and objectives. This conference will explore how individuals and groups use the information environment to advance extremism within nation states. Visit for more information and to register.
5 .Sä transmitter; antenna and remote control unit (RCU). The scanning-receiverbased jammer has multiple jamming signal sources for countering multiple simultaneous threats. The vehicular version, the CREW Vehicle Receiver/Jammer (CVRJ) manufactured by ITT Exelis Electronic Systems (Clifton, NJ), will completely replace the "Chameleon" system as the Marines' vehicle mounted system this year. Further down the road, future Joint CREW (JCREW) capabilities, now in development, will include mounted, dismounted, and fixed site versions that the Marines will field in the timeframe. The Marines also expect new CREW capabilities to evolve into other EW mission areas in support of force protection, including masking thermal imaging, disrupting enemy position-navigationand-timing (PNT) and deception of RF fused or guided munitions. CREW capabilities are also expected to serve in an electronic support role, feeding sensor information back into the EW battle management network. intercept signals. The system's current EA capability is provided by the MJ-08 jammer, which is planned for replacement by upgraded THOR III systems later this year. The Marine Corps also depends on several vehicle-mounted EW systems. The newest of these is the AN/ULO-30 Communication Emitter Sensing and The Marines also expect new CREW capabilities to evolve into other EW mission areas in support of force protection, including masking thermal imaging, disrupting enemy position-navigation-and-timing(pnt) and deception of RF fused or guided munitions. Already, a number of new man-pack and vehicle-mounted EA and ES systems are giving Marine Corps' Radio Battalions (RadBns) substantial additional EW punch. RadBn Radio Recon Teams (RRTs) and Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) Direct Support Teams (DSTs) are already equipped with the man-pack Radio Reconnaissance Equipment Program (RREP SS-3) SIGINT/EW system to support Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) commanders, as well as provide indication and warning (I&W) support to other adjacent advance-force units. The RREP SS-3 is the fourth generation of RREP, which is continuously updated to maintain its ability to prosecute low-probability-of- Attack System (CESAS), which will be followed by the Marine Corps Ground Electronic Attack System (MCGEAS). CESAS is a mobile digital EA system integrated in a Mine Resistant Impact Protected (MRAP) vehicle for detection and denial of threat communications. Employed by small teams of Radio Battalion Marines, the system can operate both as a stationary site and on the move. Another EW asset available to the MAGTF commander is the Mobile EW Support System (MEWSS) (B). Mounted in a light armored vehicle (LAV) autohull, the MEWSS (B) provides SIGINT, DF, and I&W to operational maneuver units. ES is conducted via the Team Portable Collection System (TPCS), while the RREP MJ-08 jammer provides an EA capability. Ground-based EW systems will be networked with airborne capabilities and managed via the EWCC. According to the EW CONOPS, the Corps expects UAS will be an important element of these EW capabilities, which together with manned aircraft will "work together with radio battalion ground assets to extend the reach of SIGINT, EW support and EA capabilities." Currently, unmanned capabilities are provided by the Group 3 Small Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Systems (STUAS) and the AAI (Hunt Valley, MD) R0-7B "Shadow" platforms. For example, the Boeing/Insitu (Bingen, WA) "Scan Eagle," STUAS are being used to extend the operational range and capabilities of RadBns, and can be re-tasked via the network in real time. Currently in service with the Marines in Iraq, the ScanEagle carries a nosemounted camera and can be fitted with a number of other sensor packages including, EO/IR, Biological and Chemical, Magnetometer, and high-resolution radar for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. Capable of flight times in excess of 15 hours, it has a 900-MHz UHF datalink and 2.4-GHz S- band downlink for video transmission, A next-generation STUAS platform is planned for Initial Operating Capability with the Navy and Marine Corps in the fourth quarter of FY2013. Also from Boeing/Insitu, the "Integrator," which will have a multiple-payload capability.
6 is considerably larger and more powerful than the Scan Eagle, with a maximum speed of 90kt (166km/h). The Marines are also currently considering investment in a Group 4 UAS. According to Kudelko, "The Marine Corps is still evaluating the full requirements for Group IV, so it remains to be seen whether we will go down that road or not. If we decide to, obviously a larger platform will give us the greatest degree of flexibility for mounting multiple payloads, but it's too soon to tell right now if the Group IV is the Marine Corps requirement." TRAINING AND MANPOWER As the Marine Corps moves forward with its plan for EW battle management, there are still a host of challenges and questions that remain to be answered. One major area is the question of where the EW expertise needed to actually manage and implement the new system capabilities will come from. The CONOPS states that "successful implementation [of the SOS] will require a significant focus on training throughout the EW Enterprise,... and will require personnel knowledgeable in basic EW fundamentals at all organizational levels." It identifies the radio battalions, UAS squadrons and attack squadrons as the building blocks from which existing capabilities can be expanded. Lieutenant Colonel Kudelko says a manpower study is currently underway to examine this issue and provide an initial assessment as to the number of Marines that will be required to serve in the role of MAGTF EW Coordinator, "but we won't have much of this structure available until the EA-6B begins to sundown." The Marines envision a number of the necessary EW experts to come from EA-6B aircrews, at least initially, but with the sundown of the EA-6B triggering the possible loss of the 7588 MOS (Electronic Counter Measures Officer) expertise, there will need to be an alternative path for RadBn personnel to acquire this training. The Corps is currently assessing multiple "schoolhouses" in the other Services, as well as working to establish its own requirements, "but we haven't yet defined where we would conduct our training or what the syllabus will look like. We don't see a formal MOS designation for several years still," says Kudelko. Another big question is where EWCC personnel will actually be located, their specific roles and responsibilities, and the command structure in which they will operate. Lieutenant Colonel Cunningham says that the Service's Operational Analysis Division has recently presented the results of a year-long study effort looking at just that. "Our next step is to review and evaluate these recommendations, but the leadership decision will still have to be made, before anything is actually implemented." Lieutenant Colonel Kudelko adds that "it's too soon to tell if there will be an EW specialist at the company level. We don't currently have the manpower or structure that some of the other Services might have. One proposal is to maintain a central EW command of sorts that would potentially detach to deployed units, similar to the way we support our Forward Air Controller (FAC) responsibilities." MARCHING FORWARD The Marines have outlined a vision for EW that they had already started to build well before they published their recent MAGTF EW CONOPS. It is a document that is cognizant of the lessons learned over the past decade, and at the same time it illustrates a forward-leaning vision for air-land EW. Ultimately, it will provide the MAGTF with a better understanding of how to successfully fight and win in the EM environment. 4r
7 Copyright of Journal of Electronic Defense is the property of Association of Old Crows and its content may not be copied or ed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or articles for individual use.
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY
More informationGOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:
Keynote by Dr. Thomas A. Kennedy Chairman and CEO of Raytheon Association of Old Crows Symposium Marriott Marquis Hotel Washington, D.C. 12.2.15 AS DELIVERED GOOD MORNING THANK YOU, GENERAL ISRAEL FOR
More informationThe Western UAS Symposium
The Western UAS Symposium http://www.ttcus/com @Techtrain Linkedin/Groups: Technology Training Corporation MARINE AVIATION USMC Future UAS Programs and Weapons LtCol James Tuck Compton HQMC Aviation, Deputy
More informationDefense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel
Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel 4 November 2014 Dr. Richard Wittstruck PEO IEW&S Acting DPEO Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit 4 NOV 2014 1 IEWS Concept of Operations IEWS CONOPS:
More informationDetect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success
Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success Countering Smart and Adaptive Threats Military pilots and aircrews must be prepared to
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationSTATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationC4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationMCWP Electronic Warfare. U.S. Marine Corps PCN
MCWP 3-40.5 Electronic Warfare U.S. Marine Corps PCN 143 000104 00 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, D.C. 20380-1775 10 September 2002 FOREWORD Marine Corps Warfighting
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 13.134 13.87 13.942-13.942 13.82 14.48 14.827
More informationAGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance
AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance Singapore 2015 Content Overview of Air Defense Overview of Electronic Warfare A practical example Value proposition Summary AMD - a multidisciplinary challenge Geography
More informationSpectrum contest: RAAF boosts electronic warfare capabilities
Spectrum contest: RAAF boosts electronic warfare capabilities Jane's Defence Industry As the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) begins to beef up its capabilities in the electronic warfare spectrum, Charles
More informationCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
More informationForce 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 2 Introduction Force 2025 Maneuvers provides the means to evaluate and validate expeditionary capabilities for
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationColonel Laurie Moe Buckhout Department of the Army Chief, Army Electronic Warfare Division
Colonel Laurie Moe Buckhout Department of the Army Chief, Army Electronic Warfare Division Electronic Warfare Conference 2010 April 2010 This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED Army Electronic Warfare Establishing
More informationCOUNTER-RADIO-CONTROLLED IMPROVISED-EXPLOSIVE-DEVICE EWSYSTEMS
ELECTRONIC WARFARE in OPERATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION ARMY The Army is currently expanding its electronic warfare (EW) capability. It maintains several EW systems in its inventory. Currently, all units whose
More informationLand Forces Situational Awareness
Land Forces Situational Awareness Tactical EW to listen, understand and determine enemy intent to safeguard against current and emerging threats in the most challenging environments. Staying one step ahead
More informationSTATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA COMMANDING GENERAL, U.S. ARMY SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND ARMY FORCES STRATEGIC COMMAND BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
More informationDenied, Degraded and Disrupted
Denied, Degraded and Disrupted By William T. Coffey Jr., Joan Rousseau and Lt. Col. Scott Mudge For Your Consideration Jamming of space-enabled operational systems is expected. Commanders and staffs need
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3222.4 July 31, 1992 Incorporating Through Change 2, January 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures USD(A)
More informationCHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW)
CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission The IEW support mission at all echelons is to provide intelligence, EW, and CI support to help you accomplish your mission. Elements of Intelligence
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Task Number: 71-8-3510 Task Title: Plan for a Electronic Attack (Brigade - Corps) Distribution Restriction: for public release; distribution is unlimited. Destruction
More informationAutonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities Topic 9: C2 Architectures and Technologies Mr. José Carreño Mr. George Galdorisi Mr. Steven Koepenick Ms. Rachel Volner May 14, 2010 2 My view is that technology
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationNext Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-
Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements - Brief to Industry- 09 January 2018 HQMC, CD&I, Capabilities Development Directorate Fires & Maneuver Integration Division 1 LAV Investment
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
More informationSTATEMENT OF RADM ANTHONY L. WINNS DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE AND BGEN MARTIN POST ASSISTANT DEPUTY COMMANDANT
---------------------------------------------------------------- The United States Navy on the World Wide Web A service of the Navy Office of Information, Washington DC send feedback/questions to comments@chinfo.navy.mil
More informationORGANIZATION AND FUNDAMENTALS
Chapter 1 ORGANIZATION AND FUNDAMENTALS The nature of modern warfare demands that we fight as a team... Effectively integrated joint forces expose no weak points or seams to enemy action, while they rapidly
More informationNon-Traditional Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: A Challenge to USMC Fixed Wing Tactical Aircraft
Non-Traditional Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: A Challenge to USMC Fixed Wing Tactical Aircraft Captain KW Bucklew Maj JK Kelley, CG1 20 Feb 2009 Report Documentation Page Form Approved
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 6.021 8.312 7.963-7.963 8.046 8.146 8.194
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
More informationSIGNALS INTELLIGENCE
MCWP 2-15.2 SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE U.S. Marine Corps Coordinating Draft of 14 June, 1999 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, D.C. 20380-1775 22 February 1999 FOREWORD
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationFIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 685 Boeing Platform Integration Total Program Cost (TY$): $180M Data Link Solutions FDL Terminal Average
More informationUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations
MCWP 3-42.1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations U.S. Marine Corps DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited PCN 143 000141 00 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 3.350 3.874 - - - 1.977 - - - Continuing Continuing 645121: Physical
More informationComprehensive 360 Situational Awareness for the Crew Served Weapons Leader
Comprehensive 360 Situational Awareness for the Crew Served Weapons Leader May 16, 2012 Tim Eagleson- L-3 KEO 0 Situation Threat: Multitude of asymmetric threats across full spectrum of operations, to
More informationMarine Corps Warfighting Laboratory
Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 25 October 2017 22d Expeditionary Warfare Conference The overall classification level of this brief is: Strategic Transition Point We are turning the corner from over
More informationAUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 16.397 1.975 1.971-1.971 1.990 1.989 2.023
More informationUnited States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC)
United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC) AAAA Aircraft Survivability Equipment Symposium BG John R. Evans, Jr. USASOAC Commanding General 14 November 2017 Overall Classification:
More informationFuture Expeditionary Armor Force Needs
Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs Chris Yunker MEFFV JCIDS Team Lead Marine Corps Combat Development Command 703-432-4042 (MCSC) 703-784-4915 (MCCDC) Yunkerc@mcsc.usmc.mil Chris.Yunker@usmc.mil This
More informationU.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center
U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center A Leader in Command and Control Systems By Kevin Gilmartin Electronic Systems Center The Electronic Systems Center (ESC) is a world leader in developing and fielding
More informationTactical Technology Office
Tactical Technology Office Dr. Bradford Tousley, Director DARPA Tactical Technology Office Briefing prepared for NDIA s 2017 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition March 22, 2017 1 Breakthrough
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationNETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018
NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018 THE ARMY WILL FIELD A NETWORK THAT IS EASY TO USE, WORKS IN ALL ENVIRONMENTS,
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationPROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY GOALS. NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY GOALS NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference Rear Admiral David J. Venlet 29 November 2006 Discussion Outline Program Executive
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
More informationDoctrine Update Mission Command Center of Excellence US Army Combined Arms Center Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1 May 2017
Mission Command Center of Excellence US Army Combined Arms Center Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1 May 2017 Doctrine Update 2-17 The United States Army Combined Arms Center publishes the Doctrine Update periodically
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: C2ISR Tactical Data Link FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 1.604 1.584 1.536-1.536 1.626
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 0.051-3.926-3.926 4.036 4.155 4.236 4.316 Continuing Continuing
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1506N: Aircraft Procurement, Navy / BA 05: Modification of Aircraft / BSA 1: Modification of Aircraft ID Code (A=Service Ready,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 19.610 5.856 8.660-8.660 14.704 14.212
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in
More informationMC Network Modernization Implementation Plan
MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan Mission Command Center of Excellence 1 Principles (Why) Warfighting Requirements CSA s Mission, Principles, Characteristics of the Network & Requirements Network
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #156
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationEMPLOYING INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECON- NAISSANCE: ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING TO GET IT RIGHT
We encourage you to e-mail your comments to us at aspj@maxwell.af.mil. We reserve the right to edit your remarks. EMPLOYING INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECON- NAISSANCE: ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING
More informationSTATEMENT OF GENERAL BRYAN D. BROWN, U.S. ARMY COMMANDER UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF GENERAL BRYAN D. BROWN, U.S. ARMY COMMANDER UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES
More informationElectronic Warfare. US Marine Corps. MCRP 3-32D.1 (Formerly MCWP ) PCN
MCRP 3-32D.1 (Formerly MCWP 3-40.5) Electronic Warfare US Marine Corps DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. PCN 144 000246 00 CD&I (C 116) 2 May 2016 ERRATUM
More information2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT
ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.
More informationFuture Combat Systems
Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace
More informationThe Necessity of Human Intelligence in Modern Warfare Bruce Scott Bollinger United States Army Sergeants Major Academy Class # 35 SGM Foreman 31 July
The Necessity of Human Intelligence in Modern Warfare Bruce Scott Bollinger United States Army Sergeants Major Academy Class # 35 SGM Foreman 31 July 2009 Since the early days of the Revolutionary War,
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years R1 Program
More informationExpeditionary Energy. David P. Karcher Director, Energy Systems SIAT, MCSC
Expeditionary Energy David P. Karcher Director, Energy Systems SIAT, MCSC Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry 5-7 April 2010 1 Expeditionary Energy Challenges An every day challenge in our operations
More informationFORWARD, READY, NOW!
FORWARD, READY, NOW! The United States Air Force (USAF) is the World s Greatest Air Force Powered by Airmen, Fueled by Innovation. USAFE-AFAFRICA is America s forward-based combat airpower, delivering
More informationVictory Starts Here!
Victory Starts Here! Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS) MAJ Mike Dvorak ARCIC Robotics Branch Victory Starts Here! Robotic and Autonomous Systems Strategy Objective Capabilities: Over the next 25 years,
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0602712A Countermine Systems ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 26267 29171 22088 21965
More informationEmerging Nuclear Detection Technologies in the Department of Defense
Emerging Nuclear Detection Technologies in the Department of Defense Lt Col Steven WEBB Webber Deputy Chief, Nuclear Detection Division Defense Threat Reduction Agency April 2018 Distribution Statement
More informationChapter 1. Introduction
MCWP -. (CD) 0 0 0 0 Chapter Introduction The Marine-Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) is the Marine Corps principle organization for the conduct of all missions across the range of military operations. MAGTFs
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationAGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 000 and available online at https:federalregister.govd0-66, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 500-06 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0603008A Electronic Warfare Advanced Technology ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
More informationFighter/ Attack Inventory
Fighter/ Attack Fighter/ Attack A-0A: 30 Grounded 208 27.3 8,386 979 984 A-0C: 5 Grounded 48 27. 9,274 979 984 F-5A: 39 Restricted 39 30.7 6,66 975 98 F-5B: 5 Restricted 5 30.9 7,054 976 978 F-5C: 7 Grounded,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 33.896 32.015 43.986-43.986 42.760 41.790
More informationaselsan EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT
EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT November 2014 CONTENTS What Is The Problem? Common Picture? (EW Spectrum) Area of Interest Preemptive Operations EW Spectrum Management Steps For EW Spectrum Management Planning,
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 27448F PE TITLE: C2ISR Tactical Data Link Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification 27448F C2ISR Tactical Data Link 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Total Actual Complete Total Program Element (PE) Cost
More informationJAGIC 101 An Army Leader s Guide
by MAJ James P. Kane Jr. JAGIC 101 An Army Leader s Guide The emphasis placed on readying the Army for a decisive-action (DA) combat scenario has been felt throughout the force in recent years. The Chief
More informationNAVAIR Commander s Awards recognize teams for excellence
NAVAIR News Release NAVAIR Commander Vice Adm. David Architzel kicks of the 11th annual NAVAIR Commander's National Awards Ceremony at Patuxent River, Md., June 22. (U.S. Navy photo) PATUXENT RIVER, Md.
More informationELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNIQUES. December 2014
ATP 3-36 (FM 3-36) ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNIQUES December 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: This manual is approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters, Department of the Army This
More informationNDIA Ground Robotics Symposium
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium Mr. Tom Dee DASN ELM 703-614-4794 Pentagon 4C746 1 Agenda Context Current environment Robotics Way Ahead AAV MRAP Family of Vehicles 2 ELM Portfolio U.S. Marine Corps ground
More informationSTATEMENT OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL MICHAEL W. WOOLEY, U.S. AIR FORCE COMMANDER AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL MICHAEL W. WOOLEY, U.S. AIR FORCE COMMANDER AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE HOUSE
More informationCHIEF OF AIR FORCE COMMANDER S INTENT. Our Air Force Potent, Competent, Effective and Essential
CHIEF OF AIR FORCE COMMANDER S INTENT Our Air Force Potent, Competent, Effective and Essential Air Marshal Leo Davies, AO, CSC 4 July 2015 COMMANDER S INTENT Air Marshal Leo Davies, AO, CSC I am both
More informationOVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) OVERVIEW submitted to the Congress in June 2014. The Navy and Marine Corps approach to support the comprehensive strategy to degrade, and ultimately, defeat, the Islamic
More information