Military Construction and Family Housing Program

Transcription

1 Department of the Air Force Military Construction and Family Housing Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 Budget Submission Justification Data Submitted to Congress February 2002

2 NDEX

3 DEPARTMENT OF THE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG FSCAL YEAR 2003 BUDGET REQUEST NDEX SUBJECT FAMLY HOUSNG NARRATVE NDEX FNANCAL SUMMARY PAGE LEGSLATVE LANGUAGE Authorization 215 Appropriation 217 NEW CONSTRUCTON Construction Purpose and Scope & New/Current Mission 219 Peterson AFB, CO 221 Osan AB, Korea 226 Luke AFB, AZ 231 Travis AFB, CA 236 USAF Academy, CO 241 Dover AFB, DE 246 Eglin AFB, FL 251 Eglin AFB, FL 256 MacDill AFB, FL 259 Hickam AFB, H 264 Mountain Home AFB, D 269 McConnell AFB, KS 274 Andrews AFB, MD 277 Andrews AFB, MD 282 Columbus AFB, MS 287 Keesler AFB, MS 289 Whiteman AFB, MO 294 Malmstrom AFB, MT 299 Holloman AFB, NM 304 Pope AFB, NC 309 February 2002 Page No. 209

4 DEPARTMENT OF THE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG FSCAL YEAR 2003 BUDGET REQUEST NDEX SUBJECT Seymour Johnson AFB, NC Grand Forks AFB, ND Minot AFB, ND Minot AFB, ND Vance AFB, OK Ellsworth AFB, SD Ellsworth AFB, SD Dyess AFB, TX Randolph AFB, TX Randolph AFB, TX Langley AFB, VA Ramstein AB, Germany Osan AB, Korea Lakenheath AB, UK PAGE POST ACQUSTON CONSTRUCTON Purpose and Scope 369 Alabama 372 Alaska 372 Arizona 373 California 374 Colorado 374 District of Columbia 375 Florida 375 Georgia 376 Massachusetts 376 Mississippi 377 Missouri 377 New Mexico 377 Ohio 378 South Carolina 378 Texas 379 Virginia 379 Washington 379 February 2002 Page No.

5 1. COMPONENT FY 2003 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROGRAM 2. DATE NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST WALMSTROM BASE. SPACE COST NDEX MONTANA COMMAND Personnel PERMANENlr STUDENTS SUPPORTED Strength inl 1 CV OFF1 ENL 1 CV OFF 1 ENL 1 CV TOTAL 4s OF 30 SEP ) ,155 END FY ) ,15: 3 7. NVENTORY DATA ($000) Total Acreage: 3,675 nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 01) 4uthorization Not Yet in nventory: 4uthorization Requested in this Program: 4uthorization ncluded in the Following Program: anned in Next Three Years Program: qemaining Deficiency: Srand Total: 429, ,79( 3 4,72: (FY 2004) ( 16,41! ( 476,26: 3. PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) ZATEGORY COST DESGN STATUS ZODE PROJECT TTLE SCOPE $.OOO START CMPL Replace Family Housing 18 UN 4,723 Jun-01 Jul-0; aa. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: None (FY 2004) 3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 66 UN 15, Replace Family Housing 6 UN 1,186 )c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation 95,601 O. Mission or Major Functions: AFSPC strategic missile base supporting a Space wing; a RED HORSE ;quadron. CD Form 1390,24 Jul

6 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON MALMSTROM BASE, MONTANA 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE MLTARY HOUSNG PHASE 6A 7. PROJECT NUMBER ) 8. PROJECT COST ($000) COSTE TEM MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG SUPPORTNG FACLTES STE MPROVEMENTS UTLTES STREETS LANDSCAPNG DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL SUBTOTAL CONTNGENCY (5%) TOTAL CONTRACT COST SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (6.0%) TOTAL REQUEST zi T NZAS ,717 -MATE U/M UN LS LS LS LS LS LS QUANTTY UNT COST ,833 COST ($000) 3, (234) (280) (185) (100) (150) 4, , ,717 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: R lace 1 existing military family housi units. ncludes construction, site preparation, utilities, streets, landscaping, and community development. Amenities include heating, air conditioning, carpeting, appliances, patios, and privacy fencing. ncludes removal of existing units, asbestos, and lead-based paint removal and construction of single car garages. Project Cost Per No ($000) Paywade Bedroom plsj GSF GSM Factor GSM Units Total El-E6 3 1,615 2, ,905 E7-E9 3 1,800 2, ,309 Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/l760 GSF); E7-E-913 Bedroom (1650 NSF/2050 GSF) 11. Requirement: 1,949 UN ADEQUATE: 920 UN SUBSTANDARD: 1,029 UN PROJECT: Replace 18 family housing units, Phase 6A (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: Project will provide modem and efficient housing for military members and their families assigned at Malmstrom AFB. All units are required to be upgraded to meet whole house/neighborhood standards, current AF housing size standards, and provide a safe, comfortable and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base zivilian community. Some infrastructure items require repair or replacement, i.e. electrical wiring, water piping and sanitary drain lines. D FORM 1391, DEC 76 AGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED

7 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON MALMSTROM BASE, MONTANA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE MLTARY HOUSNG, PHASE 6A NZAS CURRENT STUATON: Units are Family Housing Facility Assesment Level 1. This project replaces 18 military family housing units constructed in These units are over 35 years old and none of the units meet current AF housing size standards or whole house/neighborhood standards. The units show the effects of age and continuous heavy use. The houses have deteriorated to the point where replacement is the most economical alternative. Wiring and fixtures have been identified as not meeting current codes. Wiring is brittle and exposed in many units and is a fire hazard. There are no Ground Fault Circuit nterruptor protection, and outlets lack proper grounding protection. Lighting systems are inefficient and require replacement. Plumbing systems have succumbed to the effects of hard water and corrosion, resulting in severe constriction and pipe leakage. Plumbing fixtures are worn and discolored and require replacing with new items. Housing interiors are inadequate by any modem criteria. Bedrooms are outdated and energy-inefficient. Kitchens lack sufficient storage and counterspace, cabinets are old and unsightly, and countertops and sinks are badly worn. Flooring throughout the units is outdated and contains asbestos. Additionally, the current unit configuration is inefficient resulting in major congestion. The units have no patio or backyard privacy and in all cases the net floor area of the living unit is below the established guidelines for the grade of occupant. Housing also lacks the attic area that is authorized for northern tier installations. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Air Force members and their families will continue to be housed in inadequate housing units. Low morale and retention problems can be expected since suitable, affordable off-base housing is not readily available. Without this and the subsequent phases of this initiative, Mahnstrom s units will continue to deteriorate resulting in escalating operations, maintenance, and repair costs to the Government. ADDTONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of Military Handbook 1190, Facilities Planning and Design Guide and AFH Facility Requirements. The cost of renovating existing units is 78% of the cost to replace these units. A preliminary economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction, revitalization, leasing and status quo operation. Since this is replacement housing, there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the ability of the local school district to support base dependents. have reviewed this document and certify that it is complete and accurate. have validated the project s cost estimate and work classification. t has been coordinated with all appropriate agencies and approved by the nstallation Commander. - PHLP E. RANFORTH, Lt Col, USAF: Base Civil Engineer, (commercial l-61 88). DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 301

8 MALMSTROM BASE, MONTANA 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE MLTARY HOUSNG, PHASE 6A 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house 5. PROJECT NUMBER NZAS Design/Build 01 Aug 15 N Dee May 15 NO N/A ($450) (4) Construction Start 03Mar (5) Construction Completion 04Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED

9 MONTANA tem lz.a.(l): 1029 on-base units are inadequate. J 303

10 3 1. COMPONENT 1 FY 2003 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROGRAM 12. DATE NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST HOLLOMAN BASE AR COMBAT COMMAND COST NDEX NEW MEXCO Personnel PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED Strength OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV TOTAL AS OF 30 SEP ,974 END FY , NVENTORY DATA ($000) Total Acreage: 52,073 nventory Total as of: (30 Sep 01) 498,60 2 Authorization Not Yet in inventory: Authorization Requested in this Program: 0 20,16 1 4uthorization ncluded in the Following Program: (FY 2004) 0 Planned in Next Three Years Program: 42,07 7 Remaining Deficiency: 0 Srand Total: 560, PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) CATEGORY COST DESGN STATU; ZODE PROJECT TTLE SCOPE $,OOO START CMPL Replace Family Housing 101 UN 20,161 Jun-01 Jul-0: z aa. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: None 3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 120 UN 20, Replace Family Housing 139 UN 21,228 3c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation 97,8713 O. Mission or Major Functions: A fighter wing with 3 squadrons of F-l 17s one which conducts all raining in the aircraft, a s quadron of F-4s and Tornados for German AF training. A space ;utveillance squadron and an AFMC test group. D Form 1390,24 Jul

11 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG HOLLOMAN BASE, NEW MEXCO 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) KWRD , COST ESTMATE COST TEM U/M QUANTTY UNT COST ($000) MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG UN ,980 12,017 SUPPORTNG FACLTES LS 6,149 STE MPROVEMENTS LS (1,500) UTLTES LS (1,000) STREETS LS (1,394) LANDSCAPNG LS (405) RECREATON LS (850) DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL ~1,000) SUBTOTAL 18,166 CONTNGENCY (5%) 908 TOTAL CONTRACT COST 19,074 SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) TOTAL REQUEST 20,161 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Replace 101 Family Housing units. ncludes demolition, site clearing, replacement/upgrade of utility systems, and roads, and construction multi-plex units with garages. Provides normal amenities to include parking, air conditioning, exterior patios, neighborhood playgrounds and recreation areas. Project Cost Per No ($000) Pavqrade Bedroom JdsJ GSF GSM Factor GSM -Units Total El-E6 3 1,315 1, ,524 El-E6 4 1,570 1, ,017 Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF); El-E-6/4 Bedroom (1790 NSF/2220 GSF); l. Requirement: 2,348 UN ADEQUATE: 1,532UN SUBSTANDARD: 816 UN PROJECT: Construct Military Family Housing (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: This project is required to provide modem and efficient replacement housing for military members md their dependents stationed at Holloman AFB. All units will meet whole house standards and are programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Profile. Replacement housing will provide a safe, comfortable and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base community. This is part of a multi-phase initiative to provide adequate nousing for base personnel. The replacement housing will provide a modem kitchen, living room, family room, pedroom and bath configuration with ample interior and exterior storage and a two-car garage. Exterior parking will be 3rovided for a guest vehicle. The basic neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded to meet modem housing reeds. Neighborhood enhancements will include landscaping, playgrounds and recreation areas.. PAGE NO,-t L ULY 11. L\.T\LL UNTL EXHAUSTED

12 .-. L.lJHk HOLLOMAN BASE, NEW MEXCO 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG KWRD CURRENT STUATON: This project replaces 101 housing units constructed in These 50-year-old houses are showing the effects of age and continuous heavy use. They have had no major upgrades since construction, and do not meet the needs of today s families nor do they provide a modem home environment. Roofs, walls, foundations and exterior pavements require major repair or replacement due to the effects of age and the environment. Windows all have single-pane glazing and are inefficient. Foundation and pavements are showing signs of failure owing to settlement. Plumbing and electrical systems are antiquated and do not meet current standards for efficiency or safety. Housing interiors are generally inadequate by any modem criteria. Laundry rooms are only accessible from the outside Bedrooms are small and lack adequate closet space. Bathrooms are small, and fixtures are outdated and energy inefficient. Kitchens have inadequate storage and counter space, cabinets are old and countertops are badly worn. Flooring throughout the house is outdated. Many electrical outlets lack adequate grounding protection. Lighting systems throughout the houses are inefficient and require replacement. Heating and air conditioning systems require upgrade and replacement. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Major morale problems will result if this replacement initiative is not supported. Some people will continue to occupy substandard housing while neighbors and friends are in new, replace units. The housing will continue to be occupied until it becomes totally uninhabitable because adequate, affordable off-base housing is not available. Without this initiative, costly piecemeal repairs will continue to be required with no improvement in the quality of life. ADDTONAL: An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction, improvement and status quo operation. Based on net present values and benefit of the respective alternatives, new construction was found to be the most cost effective over the life of the project. The SOH of 5.7% is due to the Army Corp of Engineers is the design/construction agent. DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76 PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY PAGE NO UNTL EXHAUSTED 306

13 . l,, L. UHC 1 HOLLOMAN BASE, NEW MEXCO REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - KWRD Design/Build 01 Aug 10 N Dee May 10 NO N/A (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house (4) Construction Start 03Mar (5) Construction Completion OUun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 307

14 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG JUSTFCATON 1. DATE OF REPORT Jul DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 5. DATA AS OF HOLLOMAN AFB Mar-01 ANALYSS CURRENT OF OFFCER E9-E7 REQUREMENTS AND ASSETS 6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL GROSS FAMLY HOUSNG REQUREMENTS E6-El (cl 3,265 3, FSCAL YEAR REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL DD-A&L(AR)1716 b. LOCATON NEW MEXCO PROJECTED TOTAL OFFCER E9-E7 E6El TOTAL (d) W (0 (0) (h) 3, ,256 3,970 3, ,256 3,970, 1,, 9.,., a. NVOLUNTARLY SEPARATED, --,.,, e,.sw l. EFFECTVE HOUSNG REQUREMENTS ,829 2,35t ,8$2 12. HOUSNG ASSETS (a + b) e iQ _, ,711 &?47 a. UNDER MLTARY CONTROL f (1). HOUSED N EXSTNG DOD ,019 1, &339 OWNED/CONTROLLED (2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED (3) VACANT (4) NACTVE b. PRVATE HOUSNG (1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED (2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL EFFECTVE HOUSNG DEFCT 14. PROPOSED PROJECT 12.a.(l): A Housing Market Analysis completed since publication of the 2000 Family Housing Master Plan identifies a 56 unit surplus - units are inadequate and will be disposed at end of economic life This project replaces 101 of 616 inadequate units that will be required to meet the remaining on-base requirement

15 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE (computer generated) 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE POPE EASE, NORTH CAROLNA REPLACE HOUSNG MANTENANCE BLDG 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) TMKHO s KOUSNG MANTENANCE BLDG SM 410 1, HOUSNG MANT (W/MPH SELF-HELP) SM 418 1,332 ( 557 SUPPORTNG FACLTES 336 UTLTES LS ( 88 PAVEMENTS LS 1 96 STE MPROVEMENTS LS ( 150: LANDSCAPNG LS ( 3: SUBTOTAL 893 CONTNGENCY (5%) 45 POTAL CONTRACT COST 938 XJPERVSON, NSPHCTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) 53 rotal REQUEST 991 4REA COST FACTOR.a0 LO. Description of Proposed Construction: Reinforced concrete foundation and floor 3lab, masonry walls and standing seam metal roof. nterior includes heating, rentilating, air conditioning and fire protection system. Exterior includes sidewalks,?arking, driveways, curbs, gutters, signage, pavement markings, lighting, and landscaping. 11. REQURHMHNT: 418SM ADEQUATE: OSM SUBSTANDARD : 0 SM PROJECT: Construct a 418 SM (4,500 SF) family housing maintenance facility to include :he family housing self-help store (current mission). ZHQURHMHNl': An adequate family housing maintenance facility with military family lousing (MPH) self-help store located for ease of access for maintenance personnel and lousing residents. -URRHNT STUATON: Pope AFB does not have a housing maintenance facility. The naintenance contractor operates from a temporary wooden facility erected in vicinity of >ase housing. The self-help store is not located near the housing area and does not adequately support family housing self-help requirements. CMPACT F NOT PROVDED: Housing maintenance will continue operations from inadequate zemporary facilities, a hardship that results in added cost to government. The inconvenient location of the base self-help store discourages housing residents,articipation in the program thus, increasing housing maintenance costs and lowering norale. VORR ACCOMPLSHED N PREVOUS THREE YEARS: None. lork PROGRAMMED FOR N'EXT THREE YEARS: None. SDTONAL: The construction agent for this project is the Army Corps of Engineers. resulting in SOH costs of 5.7 percent. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 John R. Cawthorne, 1910) TY UNT COST DD FORM 1391, DEC 76 Previous editions are obsolete. Page No.

16 1. LUMt UNtN 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON POPE BASE, NORTH CAROLNA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE HOUSNG MANTENANCE BLDG 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house (4) Construction Start (5) Construction Completion TMKH Design/Build 01 Aug 20 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($50) Mar 04 Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c. DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 310

17 1. COMPONENT FY 2003 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROGRAM 2. DATE NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST SEYMOUR JOHNSON BASE, AR COMBAT COMMAND COST NDEX VORTH CAROLNA Personnel PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED strength OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV TOTA 4s OF 30 SEP ,41b :ND FY , NVENTORY DATA ($000) rotal Acreage: 4,107 nventoty Total as of : (30 Sep 01) Authorization Not Yet in nventory: quthorization Requested in this Program: quthorization ncluded in the Following Program: anned in Next Three Years Program: qemaining Deficiency: brand Total: 3. PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) 311,46 ;5 12, ,61 5 (FY 2004) 18, , ,27 7 ZATEGORY ZODE PROJECT TTLE Replace Family Housing SCOPE 126 UN COST DESGN STATU: s $,OOO START CMPL 18,615 Jun-01 Jul-02 )a. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: (FY2004) Replace Family Housing 138 UN 18,963 rb. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 139 UN 19, Replace Family Housing 136 UN 19, Replace Family Housing 138 UN 20,119 rc. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This installation 126, Mission or Major Functions: A wing with four F-l 5 fighter squadrons, with two conducting 15E initial qualification training; and an Air Force Reserve Air Refueling Wing with one KC-135R squadron. 2 )D Form 1390,24 Jul

18 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE SEYMOUR JOHNSON BASE, NORTH REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG PHASE 6 CAROLNA 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) COST E! TEM MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG SUPPORTNG FACLTES STE MPROVEMENTS UTLTES STREETS LANDSCAPNG RECREATON DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL OTHER STE WORK SUBTOTAL CONTNGENCY (5%) TOTAL CONTRACT COST SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) TOTAL REQUEST V MATE U/M UN LS LS LS LS LS LS LS u- ig R2 1 18,615 QUANTTY UNT COST ,619 COST ($000) 10,788 5,984 (632) (1,225) (656) (241) (270) (957) ( , , ,615 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Replace 1 housing unit, ncludes demo tion, site clearing, replacement/upgrade of utility systems and roads, construction of town house and duplex housing units and force protection. Provides normal amenities, to include appliances, air conditioning, single car garages, patios, privacy fencing, landscaping, & neighborhood playgrounds. ncludes asbestos & lead based paint removal. Pavarade Bedroom NSF GSF GSM -. Fl-E , El-E6 3 1:310 1, Project Cost Per No woo) Factor GSM -Units Total , Maximumsize: E1-E6/2Bedroom(l210NSF/1500GSF),E1-E6/3Bedroom(1420NSF/1760GSF) 11. Requirement: 2,532 UN ADEQUATE: 1,274 UN SUBSTANDARD: 1,258 UN PROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing, Phase 6 (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: This project is required to provide modem and efficient replacement housing for military members and their dependents stationed at Seymour-Johnson AFB. All units will meet whole house standards and are programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Profile. Replacement housing will provide a safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. The replacement housing will provide a modem kitchen, living room, family room, and bath configuration with ample interior and exterior storage and a single car attached garage. Exterior parking will be provided for a second vehicle. The base neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded to meet modem housing needs. Neighborhood improvements include landscaping and recreation areas. Force protection measures will be incorporated AW DOD Antiterrorism Force Protection Standards for Military Family Housing. This is the sixth phase of a multiple phase initiative to provide adequate housing for base. DD FORM 1391, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 312

19 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON SEYMOUR JOHNSON BASE, NORTH CAROLNA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE 6 VKAG R2 CURRENT STUATON: This project replaces Capehart units that were constructed in These 43-year old houses are showing the effects of age and continuous heavy use. They have had no major upgrades since construction, and do not meet the needs of today s families, nor do they provide a modem home environment. Walls, foundations and exterior pavements require major repair or replacement due to the effects of age and the environment. Wall insulation is inadequate. Foundations and pavements are showing signs of failure due to settlement. Plumbing and electrical systems are antiquated and do not meet current standards for efficiency or safety. Housing interiors are generally inadequate by any modem criteria. Bedrooms are small and lack adequate closet space. Bathrooms are small and fixtures are outdated. Kitchens have insufficient cabinets, storage and counter space. Cabinets are old and unsightly and countertops and sinks are badly worn. Flooring throughout the house is outdated. Plumbing and electrical systems are outdated and require abnormal maintenance and repair. Electrical circuits do not meet National Electric Code requirements. Lighting systems throughout the houses are inefficient and do not meet modem needs. Heating and air conditioning systems require upgrade or replacement. This project demolishes and replaces 126 units. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Air Force members and their families will continue to live in extremely outdated and unsatisfactory housing. The housing will continue to deteriorate with age, resulting in increased maintenance and repair costs, increased inconvenience to the occupants, and will ultimately become uninhabitable. Piecemeal repairs will continue to be accomplished with little or no substantial improvement in occupant s quality of life. These conditions will have an adverse impact on morale and degrade mission execution. ADDTONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of Military Handbook 1190, Facility Planning and Design Guide. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction, revitalization, leasing and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, replacement construction was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. mprovement costs represent 96% of the replacement costs for the two bedroom units and 90% of the replacement costs for the three bedroom units. Since this is replacement housing, there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the ability of the local school district to support base dependents. The construction agent for this project is the Army Corps of Engineers resulting in SOH costs of 5.7%. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Rumsey (919) DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 313

20 1. C;UMl- UNtN L. un,c 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON SEYMOUR JOHNSON BASE, NORTH CAROLNA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house VKAG R2 Design/Build 01 Aug20 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($840) (4) Construction Start 03 Mar (5) Construction Completion 04 Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 314

21 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSlNG JUSTFCATON 1. DATE OF REPORT Ott DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 5. DATA AS OF SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB Phase 6 2. FSCAL YEAR REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL 2003 DD-A&L(AR)1716 b. LOCATON NORTH CAROLNA 2000 ANALYSS CURRENT PROJECTED OF 1 OFFCER1 E9-E7 1 EG-El 1 TOTAL 1 OFFCER 1 E9-E7 1 E6-El 1 TOTAL REQUREMENTS AND ASSETS 6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH (a) W w (d) (e) (0 (9) (h) ,644 4, , PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL 5. GROSS FAMLY HOUSNG QUREMENTS RL _~ , , , , _,_ % TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED (a + b + c) a. NVOLUNTARLY SEPARATED b. N MLTARY HOUSNG TO BE DSPOSED/REPLACED rb_.t\ L hl~ppedtae -Y.-L E f-u l LY,-.2Ei-l M,. r-rll h l... lhll-rv O. VOLUNTARY SEPARATONS 5. REMARKS tem 12.a.(l): 1258 on base units are inadequate.

22 NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST SRAND FORKS BASE AR MOBLTY COMMAND COST NDEX \ORTH DAKOTA 1.Ol 5. Personnel ~- PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED Strength OFF 4s OF 30 SEP ND FY NVENTORY DATA ($000) rotal Acreage: 5,422 nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 01) Authorization Not Yet in nventory: Authorization Requested in this Program: Authorization ncluded in the Following Program: anned in Next Three Years Program: qemaining Deficiency: 3rand Total: ENL 1 CV OFF1 ENL 1 CV 1 OFF [ ENL 1 CV TOTA 396,98 30,14 (FY 2004) 30,56 95,32 553,Ol PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: ZATEGORY ZODE PROJECT TTLE Replace Family Housing aa. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: Replace Family Housing 3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: Replace Family Housing Replace Family Housing Replace Family Housing (FY2003) COST DESGN STATU: SCOPE $,OOO START CMPL 150 UN 30,140 Jun-01 Jul-0 (FY 2004) 150 UN 30,560 (FYO5-07) 152 UN 31, UN 31, UN 32,423 3c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation O. Mission and Major Functions: An air refeuling wing with four KC-l 35 squadrons. 234,ll. rd Form 1390,24 Jul

23 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG PHASE F GRAND FORKS BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) J%D990078R2 30, COSTE MATE- TEM MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG SUPPORTNG FACLTES STE MPROVEMENTS UTLTES STREETS RECREATON DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL GARAGES SUBTOTAL CONTNGENCY (5%) TOTAL CONTRACT COST SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) TOTAL REQUEST U/M UN LS LS LS LS LS LS LS QUANTTY 150 UNT COST 159,333 COST ($000) 23,900 3,257 (448) (632) (48% (544) 27,157 1,358 28, ,140 AREA COST FACTOR _ 10. DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: ReP lace 150 housing units. Site work improvements nclude underground utilities, parking, landscaping, patios, privacy fencing, and community improvements. Amenities include energy efficiency, heating, air conditioning, floor coverings, attached garages, storage, and 5% of the units constructed as handicapped adaptable. ncludes demolition of 150 existing units and environmental hazard remediation. Proiect Cost Per No ($000) Pawrade Bedroom NSF GSF GSM Units &- E7-E9Mll , ,691 E7-E9lWl ; , ,929 2, Maximum size: E7-E9/Wl-0-3 Bedroom ( 1650 NSF/2050 GSF); E7-E9/Wl-03-4 Bedroom (2020 NSF/2500 GSF) Bedroom (1850 NSF/2300 GSF) 11. Requirement: 1,583 UN ADEQUATE: 343UN SUBSTANDARD: 1,240UN PROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing, Phase F (Current Mission). REOUREMENT: Project will provide modem and efficient housing for military members and their families assigned at Grand Forks AFB. All units will meet whole house/ neighborhood standards and provide a safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. Project is programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Plan and Family Housing Master Plan. n accordance with the Air Force Family lousing Guide, 5% will be constructed as handicapped adaptable. Each unit includes additional 28 net square meters NSM) authorized for recreation space at northern tier bases. )D FORM 1391, DEC 76 PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY AGE NO UNTL EXHAUSTED 317

24 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON GRAND FORKS BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE F JFSD990078R2 CURRENT STUATON: This project replaces houses constructed The units are undersized, meet none of the whole house/neighborhood standards, and show the effects of age and continuous heavy use. They have had no major upgrades since construction and do not meet the needs of today s families. Roofs, walls, foundations and exterior pavements require major repair or replacement owing to the effects of age. Roof structures show signs of rot. Plumbing and electrical systems are antiquated and do not meet current standards for efficiency or safety. Housing interiors are inadequate by any modem criteria. Bedrooms are small and lack closet space. Bathrooms are small, fixtures are outdated and energy-inefficient. Kitchens lack sufficient storage and counter space, cabinets are old and unsightly, and countertops and sinks are badly worn. Flooring throughout the house is outdated and contains asbestos. Outlets lack grounding protection, and there is no Ground Fault nterrupter circuit protection. Lighting systems are inefficient and require replacement, and units have no air conditioning. The units have no patio or backyard privacy. Housing lacks additional 28 net square meters for indoor recreation space authorized at northern tier bases. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Air Force members and families will continue to be inadequately housed. Low morale and retention problems can be expected since comparable, affordable off-base housing is not available. Units will continue to deteriorate resulting in escalating operations, maintenance and repair costs to the Government. ADDTONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of Military Handbook 1190, Facilities Planning and Design Guide. Since this is replacement housing, there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the ability of the local school district to support base dependents. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction, revitalization, leasing and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, new construction was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. The cost to improve this housing is 75% of the replacement cost. The construction agent for this project is the Army Corps of Engineers resulting in SOH costs of 5.7%. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Joseph Schwaxz, (701) DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED

25 . COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON GRAND FORKS BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE F JFSD990078R2 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: Design/Build (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d) Contract ( e ) n-house 01 Aug 10 N Dee May 10 NO N/A (1,120) 1, ,120 1,120 (4) Construction Start 03 Mar (5) Construction Completion 04 Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 319

26 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG JUSTFCATON 1. DATE OF REPORT Sep DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 5. DATA AS OF GRAND FORKS AFB Phase F 2001 ANALYSS CURRENT OF 2. FSCAL YEAR REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL 2003 DDA&L(AR)1716 b. LOCATON NORTH DAKOTA PROJECTED OWNED/CONTROLLED (2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED (3) VACANT (4) NACTVE b. PRVATE HOUSNG (1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED (2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL 13. EFFECTVE HOUSNG DEFCT,A,-. PRnPf-SFn,, PRf-.lFET REMARKS item 12.a(l): 1240 on-base units are inadequate. tem 12.a.(l): 280 surplus units are scheduled for demolition. 225 surplus units will be demolished when useful life expires.

27 NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST MNOT BASE, AR COMBAT COMMAND COST NDEX NORTH DAKOTA Personnel PERMANENT T STUDENTS SUPPORTED Strength OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV/ TOTAL AS OF 30 SEP ,69: FND END FY ,60 F; m-r 7. NVENTORY DATA ($000) Total Acreage: 5,383 nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 01) Authorization Not Yet in nventory: Authorization Requested in this Program: Authorization ncluded in the Following Program: Planned in Next Three Years Program: Remaining Deficiency: Grand Total: 8. PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) 373,55: ( 21,421 (FY 2004) 42,52: 132,64: ( 570,15( CATEGORY CODE PROJECT TTLE Replace Family Housing SCOPE 112 UN COST DESGN STATUS $,OOO START CMPL 21,428 Jun-01 Jul-0; 9a. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: (FY2004) Replace Family Housing 185 UN 42,523 9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 161 UN 37, Replace Family Housing 22 UN 5, Replace Family Housing 181 UN 44, Replace Family Housing 141 UN 45,117 c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation O. Mission or Major Functions: A bomb wing with one B-52H squadron and an Air Force Space Command missile group with three Minuteman inter continental ballistic missile squadrons and UH-1 Ns. 283,769 D Form 1390,24 Jul 00

28 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG MNOT BASE, NORTH DAKOTA PHASE 8 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) QJVF 029OOlR2 2 1, COST ESTMATE COST TEM U/M QUANTTY UNT COST ($000) MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG UN ,777 17,111 SUPPORTNG FACLTES LS 2,196 STE MPROVEMENTS LS 078) UTLTES LS (405) STREETS LS (479) RECREATON LS (497) DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL LS (437) SUBTOTAL 19,307 CONTNGENCY (5%) 965 TOTAL CONTRACT COST 20,272 SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) TOTAL REQUEST 21,428 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Construct 112 housing units with all necessary supporting facilities including: garages, patios, fencing, utilities, air conditioning, appliances, exterior storage, roads, parking, sidewalks, playground, landscaping, and all other necessary support facilities. This project will include demolition of 124 units with 112 new being built. Project Cost Per No ($000) Pavarade Bedroom p4sj GSF GSM Factor GSM Units Total El-E6 2 1,381 1, ,067 El-E6 3 1,615 2, ,183 El-E6 4 1,873 2, ,111 Maximum size: El-E6/2 Bedroom (1210 NSF/1500 GSF), El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF) E 1 -E-6/4 Bedroom ( 1790 NSF/2220 GSF) 11. Requirement: 2,591 UN ADEQUATE: 789 UN SUBSTANDARD: 1,802 UN PROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing Phase 8 (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: This project is required to provide modem and efficient housing for military members and their dependents stationed at Minot AFB. All units will be whole house improved to provide a safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. This project is programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Plan. The replacement housing will provide a modem kitchen, living room, and bath configuration with ample interior and exterior storage plus an additional 300 SF per unit to provide an indoor recreation room. Single or double car garages will be provided. Parking will be provided for a second vehicle if a double car garage is not provided. The neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded to meet modem housing needs, to include landscaping, playgrounds, and recreation areas. DD FORM 1391, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED ~.

29 1. C;UMPWNtN L. wilt MNOT BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE 8 QJVF R2 CURRENT STUATON: This project improves Capehart units built in 1962, which are showing the effects of age and continuous heavy use. They have had no major upgrades since construction, do not meet the needs of today s family, nor do they provide a modem home environment. Kitchens are too narrow and dark, and do not provide adequate cabinet and counter top space. The bathrooms are very small and in poor condition. Bathroom fixtures are outdated and inefficient. Lighting in hallways, bathrooms, and bedrooms is inadequate. The exteriors of these units lack landscaping, off-street parking is severely limited, and traffic flow in and around the housing areas is inefficient. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Air Force members and their families will continue to live in extremely outdated, unsuitable, and unsatisfactory housing. The housing will continue to deteriorate, resulting in increasing and unacceptable maintenance costs, and extreme inconvenience to the occupants. Without this and subsequent phases of ~the initiative, repairs of these units will continue in a costly, piecemeal fashion, with little or no improvement in living ~quality. The housing will increasingly become an embarrassment to the occupants as well as the United States Government. Low morale can be expected if such conditions are permitted to continue. ADDTONAL: Units have an average replacement cost of $152,777 per unit. mprovement cost represents 77% of the replacement cost. An economic analysis has been performed considering improvement, replacement, leasing, and status quo operation. Based on the new present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, reconstruction was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of the Military Handbook 1190, Facility Planning Design Guide. Since this is replacement housing, there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the local school district to support base dependents. 5.7% Supervision, nspection, and Overhead (SOH) is being programmed for Army Corps of Engineers. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Les C Martin, (701) DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 323

30 . Z. UAlt MNOT BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d) Contract ( e ) n-house 5. PROJECT NUMBER QJVFO29OOlR2 Design/Build 01 Aug 20 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($860) (4) Construction Start 03Mar (5) Construction Completion 04Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 324

31 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG JUSTFCATON 1. DATE OF REPORT July DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 5. DATA AS OF MNOT AFB Phase ANALYSS CURRENT OF OFFCER E9-E7 REQUREMENTS AND ASSETS (a) (b) 6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH 7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL 8. GROSS FAMLY HOUSNG REQUREMENTS 9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED (a + b + c) a. NVOLUNTARLY SEPARATED b. N MLTARY HOUSNG TO BE DSPOSED/REPLACED c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED N COMMUNTY O. VOLUNTARY SEPARATONS l. EFFECTVE HOUSNG REQUREMENTS 12. HOUSNG ASSETS (a + b) E6-El (c) 2. FSCAL YEAR REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL 2003 DD-ABL(AR)l716 b. LOCATON NORTH DAKOTA PROJECTED TOTAL OFFCER E9-E7 E6-El TOTAL (d) (e) (0 (9) (h) ) , , , , ,753 4, ,677 4,588 An s , ws --- -, n n n t t , zsq A oa l.r ra _, - 55s;r ,760 z= a. UNDER MLTARY CONTROL ,987 2$? ,567 &295 HOUSED N EXSTNG DOD (3) VACANT (4) NACTVE (1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED (2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL 13. EFFECTVE HOUSNG DEFCT PROPOSED PROJECT 15. REMARKS tem lz.a.(l): 1802 on base units are inadequate. tem 13: 12 additional units will be demolished.

32 NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST MNOT BASE, AR COMBAT COMMAND COST NDEX NORTH DAKOTA Personnel PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED Strength OFF ENL 1 CV OFF] ENL 1 CV 1 OFF 1 ENL 1 CV TOTAL AS OF 30 SEP ,6913 END FY _-._ ~..,. \.----, Total Acreage: 5,383 nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 01) Authorization Not Yet in nventory: Authorization Requested in this Program: 373, ,31 5 Authorization ncluded in the Following Program: Planned in Next Three Years Program: Remaining Deficiency: Grand Total: (FY 2004) 42, , , PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) CATEGORY CODE PROJECT TTLE Replace Family Housing SCOPE 102 UN COST DESGN STATU: ; $,OOO START CMPL 20,315 Jun-01 Jul-02 9a. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: (FY2004) Replace Family Housing 9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: 185 UN 42,523 (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 161 UN 37, Replace Family Housing 22 UN 5, Replace Family Housing 181 UN 44, Replace Family Housing 141 UN 45,117 3c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation 283,76! 10. Mission or Major Functions: A bomb wing with one B-52H squadron and an Air Force Space Command missile group with three Minuteman inter continental ballistic missile squadrons snd UH-1 Ns. 9 D Form 1390,24 Jul

33 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON MNOT BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG PHASE 9 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) QJVF 039OOlR2 20, COST ESTMATE COST TEM U/M QUANTTY UNT COST ($000) MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG UN ,098 16,049 SUPPORTNG FACLTES LS 2,255 STE MPROVEMENTS LS (375) UTLTES LS (376) STREETS LS (389) LANDSCAPNG LS (384) RECREATON LS (329) DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL LS (402) SUBTOTAL 18,304 CONTNGENCY (5%) 915 TOTAL CONTRACT COST 19,219 SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) TOTAL REQUEST 20,315 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Construct 102 housing units with all necessary supporting facilities including: garages, patios, fencing, utilities, air conditioning, appliances, exterior storage, roads, parking, sidewalks, playground, landscaping, and all other necessary support facilities. This project will include demolition of 116 units with 102 new being built. Construct 102 housing units with all necessary supporting facilities including: garages, patios, fencing, utilities, air conditioning, appliances, exterior storage, roads, parking, sidewalks, playground, landscaping, and all other necessary support facilities. This project will include demolition of 116 units with 102 new being built. Project Cost Per No ($000) NSF GSF GSM -Factor GSM Units Total Payarade Bedroom El-E6 3 1,615 2, ,486 El-E6 4 1,873 2, s 4, ,049 Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF), El-E6/4 Bedroom (1790 NSF/2220 GSF) 11. Requirement: 2,591 UN ADEQUATE: 789 UN SUBSTANDARD: 1,802 UN PROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing Phase 9 (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: This project is required to provide modem and efficient housing for military members and their dependents stationed at Minot AFB. All units will be whole house improved to provide a safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. This project is programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Plan. The replacement housing will provide a modem kitchen, living room md bath configuration with ample interior and exterior storage plus an additional 300 SF per unit to provide an indoor ecreation room. Single or double car garages will be provided. Parking will be provided for a second vehicle if a louble car garage is not provided. The neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded to meet modem housing Leeds, to include landscaping, playgrounds, and recreation areas.. XJRRENT STUATON: This project improves Capehart units built in 1962, which are showing the effects of age and :ontinuous heavy use. PAGE NO DEC 76 PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 327

34 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON MNOT BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE 9 QJVF 039OOlR2 They have had no major upgrades since construction, do not meet the needs of today s family, nor do they provide a modem home environment. Kitchens are too narrow and dark, and do not provide adequate cabinet and counter top space. The bathrooms are very small and in poor condition. Bathroom fixtures are outdated and inefficient. Lighting in hallways, bathrooms, and bedrooms is inadequate. The exteriors of these units lack landscaping, off-street parking is severely limited, and traffic flow in and around the housing areas is inefficient. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Air Force members and their families will continue to live in extremely outdated, unsuitable, and unsatisfactory housing. The housing will continue to deteriorate, resulting in increasing and unacceptable maintenance costs, and extreme inconvenience to the occupants. Without this and subsequent phases of the initiative, repairs of these units will continue in a costly, piecemeal fashion, with little or no improvement in living quality. The housing will increasingly become an embarrassment to the occupants as well as the United States Government. Low morale can be expected if such conditions are permitted to continue. ADDTONAL: Units have an average replacement cost of $157,343 per unit. mprovement cost represents 77% of the replacement cost. An economic analysis has been performed considering improvement, replacement, leasing, and status quo operation. Based on the new present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, reconstruction was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of the Military Handbook 1190, Facility Planning Design Guide. Since this is replacement housing, there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the local school district to support base dependents. 5.7% Supervision, nspection, and Overhead (SOH) is being programmed for Army Corps of Engineers. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Les C Martin, (701) DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 328

35 1. GUMl-UNtN Z. UAlt 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 1 MNOT BASE. NORTH DAKOTA REPLACE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house QJVF 039OOlR2 Design/Build 01 Aug 20 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($860) (4) Construction Start 03Mar (5) Construction Completion OUun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 329

36 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG JUSTFCATON 1 1. DATE OF REPORT 2. FlscAL YEAR REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL July DD-A&L(AR)l DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 1 b. LOCATON 5. DATA AS OF MNOT AFB Phase 9 NORTH DAKOTA 2000 ANALYSS CURRENT PROJECTED OF OFFCER E9-E7 EG-El TOTAL OFFCER E9-E7 E6-El TOTAL REQUREMENTS AND ASSETS (a) (W (c) (d) (e) (9 (9) W 5. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH , , , , PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL ,753 4, ,677 4sQQ 3. GROSS FAMLY HOUSNG REQUREMENTS 3. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED (a + b + c) a. NVOLUNTARLY SEPARATED b. N MLTARY HOUSNG TO BE DSPOSED/REPLACED c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED N COMMUNTY At37 T-v R!? 1 07s 7RA7.., -, n n n- n _ 0. VOLUNTARY SEPARATONS 1. EFFECTVE HOUSNG REQUREMENTS 2. HOUSNG ASSETS (a + b) a. UNDER MLTARY CONTROL ()., HOUSED N EXSTNG DOD OWNED/CONTROLLED (2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED (3) VACANT (4) NACTVE b. PRVATE HOUSNG (1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED &= 2, *.Q@ zssr -.- A7Q 3nQ 1,863 2ps , ,563 (2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL EFFECTVE HOUSNG DEFCT 4. PROPOSED PROJECT 5. REMARKS tem 12.a.(l): 1802 on base units are inadequate. tem 13: 14 additional units will be demolished.

37 . COMPONENT 1 FY 2003 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROGRAM 12. DATE NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 15. AREA CONST /ANCE BASE AR EDUCATON AND COST NDEX KLAHOMA TRANNG COMMAND 0.91 i. Personnel PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED strength OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV TOTAL 4s OF 30 SEP l ND FY :. NVENTORY DATA ($000) rotal Acreage: 3,270 nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 01) 91,08( iuthorization Not Yet in nventory: ( iuthorization Requested in this Program: 11,42: Authorization ncluded in the Following Program: (FY 2004) ( anned in Next Three Years Program: 12,285?emaining Deficiency: ( brand Total: 114, PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: :ATEGORY :ODE PROJECT TTLE 1 l-142 Replace Family Housing (FY 2003) COST DESGN STATUS SCOPE $,OOO START CMPL 59 UN 11,423 Jun-01 Jul-0; la. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: None lb. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 56 UN 12,289 c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation 22, Mission or Major Functions: A flying training wing which conducts Undergraduate Pilot Training with T-l, T-37, and T-38 aircraft. )D Form 1390,24 Jul 00

38 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG PHASE 1 VANCE BASE, OKLAHOMA 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) XTLF , COST ESTMATE COST TEM U/M QUANTTY UNT COST ($000) MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG UN ,712 6,473 SUPPORTNG FACLTES 3,819 STE MPROVEMENTS LS (925) UTLTES LS (931) STREETS LS (630) RECREATON LS (899) PATOS/GARAGES LS (434) SUBTOTAL 10,292 CONTNGENCY (5%) 515 TOTAL CONTRACT COST 10,807 SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) 616 TOTAL REQUEST 11,423 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Demolish and replace 59 housing units with housing that is commensurate with local standards. Each housing unit will include a safe room and all other amenities identified in the Housing Community Plan (HCP). Project to include site development and preparation, force protection, energy conservation, landscaping, supporting infrastructure to include all of the requirements identified in the HCP. Project Cost Per No ($000) Payarade Bedroom jvsj GSF GSM Factor GSM m Total El-E6 3 1,315 1, ,391 El-E6 4 1,570 1, E7-E9/Wl ,500 1, ,429 E7-E9/Wl ,734 2, ,473 Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF); El-E-6/4 Bedroom (1790 NSF/2220 GSF) E7-E9/Wl-03-3 Bedroom (1650 NSF/2050 GSF); E7-E9/Wl-03-4 Bedroom (2020 NSF/2500 GSF) l. Requirement: 573 UN ADEQUATE: 343 UN SUBSTANDARD: 230 UN PROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing Phase 1 (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: This project is required to provide modern and efficient housing for Non Commissioned Officers mnd their dependents stationed at Vance AFB. All units will meet modern housing standards and are programmed in accordance with the HCP. The housing will provide safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. The design will provide a modem kitchen, living room, family room, Safe room,,edroom and bath configuration, with ample interior and exterior storage. The number of bedrooms will range from kee to four. Units will be provided with garages and additional parking will be provided for an additional vehicles md/or visitors. Adequate support infrastructure of roads and utilities will also be provided. The area is sited directly djacent to the existing Family Housing Area. DD FORM 1391, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 332

39 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON VANCE BASE, OKLAHOMA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE 1 XTFL CURRENT STUATON: These existing Capehart housing units were constructed in 1960 and do not meet the Whole House standards and are below current Air Force square footage allowances. Housing interiors are outdated and generally inadequate by modem criteria. The bedrooms are small and lack adequate closet space. While these units have been well maintained and do not have any health or safety deficiencies, the costs associated with adding on to each unit and reconfiguring the interior spaces to meet current standards exceed 70% of the replacement cost. Per Air Force nstruction (AF) , Family Housing Planning, Programming, Design, and Construction replacement should be pursued when the estimated cost exceeds 70% of the estimated replacement cost. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Residents will continue to live in quarters which do not meet Air Force quality of life standards and the maintenance/utility costs will remain high. Affordable off base housing is not available for our Non- Commissioned Officers due to the large number of officers enrolled in pilot training. Most off base housing units are priced to match the BAH for these officers. For the Non-Commissioned Officer families, the only alternative to living in the existing substandard on-base housing is the expensive off-base housing. This is a major morale and/or financial problem for the affected families. ADDTONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of Military Handbook 1190 Facility Planning and Design Guide. An economic analysis will be prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction and status quo operation. The average cost to improve these housing units is greater than 70% of the replacement cost. Since this is replacement housing, there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the ability of local school district to support base dependents. The construction agent for this project is the Army Corps of Engineers resulting in 5.7% SOH costs. Base Civil Engineer: Mr. John Cole, (580) DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 333

40 . L Ml- NtN L. Jnlt 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON VANCE BASE, OKLAHOMA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house (4) Construction Start (5) Construction Completion XTFL Design/Build 01 Aug 10 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($600) Mar 04Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 334

41 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG JUSTFCATON 1. DATE OF REPORT Apr DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 2. FSCAL YEAR REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL DD-AaL( b. LOCATON 5. DATA AS OF VANCE AFB Phase 1 OKLAHOMA 1997 ANALYSS CURRENT PROJECTED OF OFFCER E9-E7 E6-El TOTAL OFFCER E9-E7 E6El TOTAL REQUREMENTS AND ASSETS (a) (W (c) (d) (e) (0 (9) TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL B. GROSS FAMLY HOUSNG REQUREMENTS a. NVOLUNTARLY SEPARATED b. N MLTARY HOUSNG TO BE DSPOSED/REPLACED c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED N COMMUNTY 0. VOLUNTARY SEPARATONS 5. REMARKS tem 12.a.(l): 230 on-base units are inadequate.

42 1. COMPONENT 1 FY 2003 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROGRAM 12. DATE NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST ELLSWORTH BASE, AR COMBAT COMMAND COST NDEX SOUTH DAKOTA Personnel PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED Strength OFF ENL 1 CV OFF1 ENL 1 CV 1 OFF 1 ENL 1 CV TOTA AS OF 30 SEP ,06 END FY ,13 7. NVENTORY DATA ($000) Total Acreage: 6,395 nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 01) Authorization Not Yet in nventory: Authorization Requested in this Program: Authorization ncluded in the Following Program: Planned in Next Three Years Program: Remaining Deficiency: Grand Total: 8. PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) 460,67 24,44 4,79 (FY 2004) 18,95 39,Ol 547,89 CATEGORY CODE PROJECT TTLE SCOPE Replace Family Housing 22 UN COST DESGN STATU! $,OOO START CMPL 4,794 Jun-01 Jul-0 9a. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: (FY2004) Replace Family Housing 100 UN 18,957 9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 108 UN Replace Family Housing 98 UN 19,334 19,685 9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation 10. Mission or Major Functions: A Wing with two B-l squadrons. 104,09#

43 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE ELLSWORTH BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG PHASE 2 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) COSTE MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG SUPPORTNG FACLTES STE MPROVEMENTS UTLTES STREETS LANDSCAPNG RECREATON DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL GARAGES SUBTOTAL CONTNGENCY (5%) TOTAL CONTRACT COST SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) TOTAL REQUEST s F: MATE U/M UN LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS sm994502b 4,794 COST QUANTTY UNT COST ($000) ,636 2,434 1,885 (196) (222) (178) (193) (125) (624) (347) 4, , ,794 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Rep.lace 22 housing units. ncludes demc ion, site clearing, replacement/upgrade of utility systems and roads, design and construct single and duplex family units with basements. Provides normal amenities to include appliances, garages, parking, air conditioning, patios with privacy fencing, neighborhood playgrounds, and recreation areas. Provides fire detection. Project Cost Per No ($000) Pavwade Bedroom. JlsJ GSF GSM -Factor GSM Units Total El-E6 3 1,315 1, OOl ,434 Maximum size: El -E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/l 760 GSF) l. Requirement: 2,108 UN ADEQUATE: 1,100 UN SUBSTANDARD: 1,008 UN PROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing, Phase 2 (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: This project is required to provide modem and efficient housing for military members and their dependents stationed at Ellsworth AFB. All units will meet whole house standards and are programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Plan. Replacement housing will provide a safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to the off base civilian community. This is the second phase of an initiative to provide adequate housing for base personnel. The replacement housing will provide a modem kitchen, living room family.oom and bath configuration, with ample interior and exterior storage. A double car garage will be provided. The basic neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded to meet modem housing needs. Neighborhood enhancements vi11 include landscaping, playgrounds, and recreation areas. Proper disposal of asbestos and lead-based paint is ncluded. The expansive clay soils require special foundation considerations. AT/FP measures are included. D FORM 1391, DEC 76 AGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 337

44 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON ELLSWORTH BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE 2 FXBM994502B CURRENT STUATON: This project replaces housing that was constructed in They have had no major upgrades or renovation since construction, and do not meet the needs of today s families, nor do they provide a modem home environment. Kitchens are undersized and do not provide adequate cabinet and countertop space. The bathroom are small and in poor condition. Bathroom fixtures and lighting throughout the houses are outdated and energy inefficient. The exterior of these units lack landscaping and recreation space. There are no garages, and vehicles are subjected to extremely cold winters with no protection from the elements. There is inadequate exterior storage. There is no ground fault circuit interrupter protection as required by current National Electrical building codes. There is no air conditioning. Ellsworth includes neighborhoods as an investment in a quality of life initiative. This initiative is a commitment to the Air Force (AF) mission and an improved sense of community or social cohesion among AF personnel and their families. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: AF members and their families will continue to live in extremely outdated, unsuitable and unsatisfactory housing. This 38 to 5 1 year old housing will continue to deteriorate with age, resulting in increasing and unacceptable maintenance and repair costs, and extreme inconvenience to the occupants. Without this and subsequent phases of this initiative, repairs will continue in a costly, piecemeal fashion with little or no improvement in occupant quality of life. These deficiencies will continue to adversely affect the morale of all personnel assigned to Ellsworth AFB. ADDTONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in AF and Military Handbook An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction, revitalization, leasing and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, the status quo operation was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. However, this alternative is unacceptable because it does not repair the deteriorated structures and would force Air Force personnel to continue to live in inadequate housing. Since this is replacement housing there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the ability of the local school to support base dependents. The construction agent for this project is the Army Corps of Engineers resulting in 5.7% SOH costs. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Richard (605) DD FORM 139lc, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 338

45 . L Nll- NtN 1 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON ELLSWORTH BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house FXBM994502B Design/Build 01 Aug20 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($220) (4) Construction Start 03 Mar (5) Construction Completion 04 Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A 1 DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY PAGE NO UNTL EXHAUSTED 339

46 Sep-00 ANALYSS OF REQUREMENTS AND ASSETS 6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH 7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL 8. GROSS FAMLY HOUSNG REQUREMENTS CURRENT OFFCER E9-E7 (a) (W EG-El (c) 2,591 2,591 PROJECTED TOTAL OFFCER E9-E7 E6El TOTAL (d) (e) (0 (9) (h) 3, , , TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED (a + b + c) a. NVOLUNTARLY SEPARATED b. N MLTARY HOUSNG TO BE DSPOSED/REPLACED c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED N COMMUNTY O. VOLUNTARY SEPARATONS / O. _.~...~ 5: d cccc -nve HOUSNG REQUREMENTS 12. HOUSNG ASSETS (a + b) a. UNDER MLTARY CONTROL (1) HOUSED N EXSTNG DOD OWNED/CONTROLLED (2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED (3) VACANT (4) NACTVE ;156 &,,3W > : :,& ,551 S i,68$,.ij% , %,*., 4!$7 ;144 j & ,003 t ,006 1,793 b. PRVATE HOUSNG () ACCEPTABLY HOUSED (2) ACCEPTA3LE VACANT RENTAL 113. EFFECTVE HOUSNG DEFCT 114. PROPOSED PROJECT :. : M!3&.:,i. HBt REMARKS tem 12.a.(l): 1008 on-base units are inadequate. 311 units are surplus and will be demolished when useful life expires. 232 additional units will be retained pending repair of Section 801 housing by owner.

47 1. COMPONENT N 1997 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROJECT DATA 2. DATE (computer generated) 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON 4. PROJECT TTLE ELLSWORTH BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA HOUSNG MANTENANCE FACLTY 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) FXBM C-ESTMATES TEM U/M OUANTTY UNT 3ASE COVERED STORAGE FACLTY SM XTPPORTNG FACLTES SUBTOTAL 3ONTNGENCY (5%) 20 POTAL CONTRACT COST 423 HJPERVSON, NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.5%) 23 POTAL REQUEST 447 m COST FACTOR.95 to. Description of Proposed Construction: Construct single story masonry structure rith low maintenance exterior finish. ncludes heating, ventilation, fire protection, site improvements and extention and connection of utilities. COST REQUREMENT: ADEQUATE: SUBSTANDARD: 'ROJECT: Construct a 557 SM maintenance facility/warehouse for the housing contractor responsible for the daily maintenance of all housing units. EQUREMENT: The responsibility of maintaining all base housing to include leased lousing belongs to a private contractor. The facility needs to provide an mvironmentally controlled storage space and related operating space for the supplies tnd material the contractor uses day-to- day operating, and maitaining the base housing msets. ment STUATON: Currently there is no adquate space nor facility to locate this iunction in. :MPACT F NOT PROVDED: The maintenance contractor will be forced to continue to Nperate in dispersed facilities. One building, built in "53" is very near the end of.ts useful life and is not suited for the forced present use. The potential to reduce operating costs, reduce travel time, and increase interaction with the housing occupanta rill not be realized. SDTONAL: Base Civil Engineer, Lt Co1 Allen J Benefield, (605) DD FORM 1391, DEC 76 Previous editions are obsolete. Page No. 341

48 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON ELLSWORTH AFB, SOUTH DAKOTA 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER HOUSNG MANTENANCE FACLTY FXBM SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: Design/Build (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house 01 Aug 20 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($50) (4) Construction Start 03 Mar (5) Construction Completion 04 Jun 1. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A D FORM 1391c, DEC 76 AGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 342

49 1. COMPONENT FY 2003 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROGRAM 2. DATE NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST DYESS, TEXAS AR COMBAT COMMAND COST NDEX Personnel PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED Strength OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV TOTAL 4s OF 30 SEP ,75 7 END FY , NVENTORY DATA ($000) Total Acreage: 6,342 nventory Total as of: (30 Sep 01) Authorization Not Yet in nventory: 4uthorization Requested in this Program: Authorization ncluded in the Following Program: anned in Next Three Years Program:?emaining Deficiency: 3rand Total: 333, , ,8214 (FY 2004) 15,lO 1 31,424 4 (3 423,17( 5 3. PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) ZATEGORY COST DESGN STATUS ZODE PROJECT TTLE SCOPE $000 START CMPL Replace Family Housing 85 UN 14,824 Jun-01 Jul-0; )a. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program (FY 2004) Replace Family Housing 124 UN 15,101 )b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: (FYO5-07) Replace Family Housing 119 UN 15, Replace Family Housing 85 UN 16,022 c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation 71,85E 10. Mission or Major Functions: A wing with two B-l bomber squadrons, one of which is responsible for raining all B-l aircrews, and two C-l 30 airlift squadrons. j )D Form 1390,24 Jul

50 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON DYESS BASE, TEXAS 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG PHASE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) FNWZ033003R2 14, COST ESTMATE COST TEM U/M QUANTTY UNT COST ($000) MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG UN ,341 8,869 SUPPORTNG FACLTES LS 4,488 STE MPROVEMENTS LS (246) UTLTES LS (953) STREETS LS (1,629 LANDSCAPNG LS (473) RECREATON LS (423) DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL LS (764) SUBTOTAL 13,357 CONTNGENCY (5%) 668 TOTAL CONTRACT COST 14,025 SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) 799 TOTAL REQUEST 14,824 4REA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Replace 85 single and multiplex family housing units with 111 necessary amenities including sound reduction and supporting facilities. Project includes site preparation, attached ;ingle car garages, air conditioning, support infrastructure of roads and utilities, neighborhood playgrounds, recreation tress, and landscaping. ncludes demolition of 85 units, site demolition and asbestos removal. Project Cost Per No WOO) Pavarade Bedroom plsj GSF GSM Factor GSM -Units Total El-E6 2 1,081 1, ,237 El-E6 3 1,315 1, , ,869 vlaximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/l 760 GSF), El -E6/4 Bedroom (1790 NSF/2220 GSF) l. Requirement: 2,489 UN ADEQUATE: 1,670 UN SUBSTANDARD: 819 UN ROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing, Phase (Current Mission). ~QUREMENT: This project is required to provide modem and efficient housing for military members and their lependents stationed at Dyess AFB. All units will meet modern housing standards and are programmed in accordance vith the Housing Community Profile, Phase. The housing will provide safe, comfortable, and appealing living nviromnent comparable to the off-base civilian community. The design will provide a modem kitchen, living room amily room bedroom and bath configuration, with ample interior and exterior storage. The number of bedrooms will ange from two to four, as identified in the most recent housing market analysis. Units will be provided with a single :ar garage and exterior parking for a second vehicle. Land area will be used for adequate infrastructure requirements roads, recreation areas, utilities). This is the third phase of a multiphase initiative to replace all substandard housing nits at Dyess AFB. Single or double car garages will be provided. PAGE NO lr\ Y QL 11 1 L\.rtLL UNTL EXHAUSTED 344

51 1. LUMYUNtN 2. DATE DYESS BASE. TEXAS REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE FNWZ R2 CURRENT STUATON: Existing family housing units were constructed in They show the effects of age and heavy use. These units have had no comprehensive upgrade program since construction, and they do not meet the needs of today s military families, nor do they provide a modem home environment. Budget constrainsts have limited Dyess AFB s ability to maintain and repair these housing units to minimally acceptable occupancy standards. nteriors are generally inadequate by modem criteria. The existing jalousie windows are those originally installed when the housing units were constructed. These windows are difficult to open, are drafty, and latches or cranks are frequently broken. Addition of storm windows 25 years ago makes windows even more difficult to open, and results in unnecessary heating and air conditioning costs in the spring and fall, as well as reduced indoor air quality. These Capehart units were constructed with one bathroom which is small and lacks adequate closet space. Kitchens have insufficient cabinets, storage and counter space. Lighting, heating and air-conditioning systems require upgrade and replacement. Plumbing and electrical systems are antiquated and do not meet current standards for efficiency and safety. Original aged electrical wiring is causing increased faults and potential for fire and safety problems. The existing under-slab piping systems are old and deteriorated. Frequency of leaking pipes under the concrete floor slab is increasing. Roof, wall, foundations, and exterior pavements require major repair or replacement due to age. Severe summer heat, extreme winter freezing ice and snow storms, routine high winds and dust storms, frequent turbulent hail/thunderstorms, occasional tornadoes and highly expansive clay soil conditions, have an adverse aging effect on the units. MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Dyess will continue to spend scarce MFH maintenance and repair dollars on trying to extend the life of these substandard family housing units. Military personnel and their dependents must be required to occupy inadequate housing. The effect of living in a poor housing environment will be detrimental to morale and welfare of the military and family members. ADDTONAL: A rate of 5.7% has been used for supervision, inspection, and overhead for using the Army Corps of Engineers. This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of Military Handbook 1190, Facility Planning and Design Guide. The local school authority indicates a capability exists to accept the increase in the student population generated by this project. No additional school construction will be required. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction, revitalization, leasing and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, the replacement was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. Commander, 7th Civil Engineer Squadron: Lt Co1 Dennis Yates, (915) DD FORM 1391c. DEC 76 PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY PAGE NO UNTL EXHAUSTED 345

52 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON DYESS BASE, TEXAS 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE FNWZ R2 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: Design/Build (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started 01 Aug 20 ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs N ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan ( d ) Date 35% Designed 01 Dee 15 ( e ) Date Design Complete 02 May 10 ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - NO (b) Where design was most recently used - N/A (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ($860) ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications 860 ( b ) All other Design Costs 0 ( c ) Total 860 ( d ) Contract 860 ( e ) n-house (4) Construction Start 03Mar (5) Construction Completion 04Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 346

53 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG JUSTFCATON 1. DATE OF REPORT July DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 5. DATA AS OF DYESS AFB Phase ANALYSS CURRENT OF 2. FSCAL YEAR REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL 2003 DDABL(AR)1716 b. LOCATON TEXAS PROJECTED (3) VACANT (4) NACTVE b. PRVATE HOUSNG (1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED (2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL 14. PROPOSED PROJECT S. REMARKS tem 12.a.(l): 819 on base units are inadequate. 347

54 1. COMPONENT 1 FY 2003 MLTARY CONSTRUCTON PROGRAM 12. DATE NSTALLATON AND LOCATON COMMAND: 5. AREA CONST FWNDOLPH BASE, AR EDUCATON AND COST NDEX 1rExAS TRANNG COMMAND 0.82 zj. Personnel PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED!strength OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV OFF ENL CV TOTAL 4s OF 30 SEP ,66 6 EEND FY ,68 7 i. NVENTORY DATA ($000) 1rotal Acreage: 3,129 nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 01) 218, iuthorization Not Yet in nventory: 0 /Authorization Requested in this Program: 14,31 1 kiuthorization ncluded in the Following Program: (FY 2004) D F anned in Next Three Years Program: D Fqemaining Deficiency: ld (brand Total: 233,17r 3 E. PROJECTS REQUESTED N THS PROGRAM: (FY 2003) (ZATEGORY COST DESGN STATUE; i:ode PROJECT TTLE SCOPE $.OOO START CMPL Replace Family Housing 112 UN 14,311 Jun-01 Jul-0: z 6la. Future Projects: ncluded in the Following Program: None 9lb. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years: None 9tc. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This nstallation 69,47: Mission or Major Functions: Headquarters Air Education and Training Command, a flying training viing which conducts navigator training and AETC instructor pilot training and the AF Personnel Center, tlie AF Services Agency, Headquaters AF Recruiting Service, the AF Manpower and novation Center, and an AMC airlift flight operating C-21s. 0D Form 1390,24 Jul 00 L 348

55 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON RANDOLPH BASE, TEXAS 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 4. PROJECT TTLE REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG PHASE 1 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000) TYMX A 14, COST ESTMATE COST TEM U/M QUANTTY UNT COST ($000) MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG UN ,643 10,152 SUPPORTNG FACLTES LS 2,742 STE MPROVEMENTS LS (325) UTLTES LS (1,523) STREETS LS (394) DEMOLTON & ASBESTOS REMOVAL LS (500) SUBTOTAL 12,894 CONTNGENCY (5%) 645 TOTAL CONTRACT COST 13,539 SUPERVSON NSPECTON AND OVERHEAD (5.7%) 772 TOTAL REQUEST 14,311 AREA COST FACTOR DESCRPTON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON: Replace 56 duplex (112 total units) with all necessary amenities and supporting facilities. The construction includes demolition of existing East Wherry Housing, site preparation, attached car garage, air conditioning, parking, exterior patios, support infastructure of roads and utilities, recreation areas, and all landscaping. Pavarade Bedroom pjsj GSF GSM El-E6 3 1,315 1, Project Cost Per No c OOO) Factor GSM Units Total ,152 Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF) 11. Requirement: 2,860 UN ADEQUATE: 1,841 UN SUBSTANDARD: 1,019 UN PROJECT: Replace-Military Family Housing Phase 1 (Current Mission). REQUREMENT: This project is required to provide 112 modem and efficient housing units for military members and their dependants stationed at Randolph AFB. All units will meet modem housing standards and are programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Plan. The housing will provide safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. The design will provide a modem kitchen, living room, bedroom and bath configuration, with ample interior and exterior storage. Units will be provided with a garage and exterior parking. Adequate support infrastructure of roads and utilities will also be provided. CURRENT STUATON: These Wherry housing units was originally constructed in The houses are well below current AF square footage standards and vary from net square feet per family. Depending on the ages of the children, up to 6 people are forced to live together in this small area. The upstairs/downstairs configuration, hardwood floors, as well as sharing a common wall contribute to a large amount of noise complaints each week. Patio areas are small and storage is very limited. PAGE NO r,\l, U LY U 111n YL LY 1,. L..C\LL UNTL EXHAUSTED

56 . L"Mr"YtlY L.uHlt 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON RANDOLPH BASE, TEXAS 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE 1 TYMX034001A MPACT F NOT PROVDED: Morale in the junior enlisted ranks will continue to decrease due to insufficient housing. Families will be forced to move off base, incurring higher out-of-pocket costs. On-base housing will continues to deteriorate and remain substandard. ADDTONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part of Military Handbook 1190, Facility Planning and Design Guide. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternative of new construction, acquisition and status quo operation. The cost to improve the housing units is 72% of the replacement cost. No school construction will be required since this is a replacement project. The construction agent for this project is the Army Corps of Engineers resulting in 5.7% SOH. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Leonard Patrick, (210) DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76 PAGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 350

57 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE 3. NSTALLATON AND LOCATON RANDOLPH BASE, TEXAS 4. PROJECT TTLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER REPLACE FAMLY HOUSNG, PHASE 1 TYMX034001A 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: a. Estimated Design Data: Design/Build (1) Status: ( a ) Date Design Started ( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs ( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002 ( d ) Date 35% Designed ( e ) Date Design Complete ( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed; (2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where design was most recently used - (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ): ( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications ( b ) All other Design Costs ( c ) Total ( d ) Contract ( e ) n-house 01 Aug 10 N Dee May 10 NO N/A ($570) (4) Construction Start 03Mar (5) Construction Completion 04Jun b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A D FORM 1391c, DEC 76 AGE NO PREVOUS EDTONS MAY BE USED NTERNALLY UNTL EXHAUSTED 351

58 MLTARY FAMLY HOUSNG JUSTFCATON 1 1. DATE OF REPORT Ott DOD COMPONENT 4. REPORTNG NSTALLATON a. NAME 5. DATA AS OF RANDOLPH 2000 ANALYSS CURRENT OFFCER E9-E7 REQUREMENTS AND ASSETS (a) (b) 6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH 1, PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL 4 $70 2. FSCAL YEAR (REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL DDABL(AR)l716 b. LOCATON TEXAS PROJECTED E6-El TOTAL OFFCER E9-E7 E6-El TOTAL (c) (d) (e) (9) 0) 1,236 3,396 1, ,680 3, ,660 3,aal 1 DSPOSED/REPLACED c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED N COMMUNTY n n n n a. UNDER MLTARY CONTROL HOUSED N EXSTNG DOD 1, a #411 1, a47 z74a a (3) VACANT (4) NACTVE (1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED (2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL 3. EFFECTVE HOUSNG DEFCT - - _ , REMARKS 1 tem 12.a.(l): 1019 on-base units are inadequate.