CERDEC Contributions to Army Battle Command Networking Efforts

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CERDEC Contributions to Army Battle Command Networking Efforts"

Transcription

1 CERDEC Contributions to Army Battle Comm Networking Efforts Mr. David Jimenez Director, Space & Terrestrial Communications Directorate

2 Evolution Army Networking Civil War World War I U.S. Army Signal Corps (1860) Vietnam Telegraph WWI Pigeon, Mocker Clark Portable Army Radio Set (1906) World War II PRC-77 PRT-4 & PRR-9 WWII Radios United States Army Pigeon Service PRC s Tactical Internet 2014 BCT Architecture SINCGARS 2 Manpack UHF MSE SATCOM EPLRS Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

3 Major Communications Thrusts Connectivity Capacity Security Future Force Comms Systems Mobile Networking Antennas FCS WIN-T JTRS Dismounted Soldier Information Assurance

4 Comparison Commercial & Military Communications Architecture Commercial Mobile Subscriber, Fixed Infrastructure COMMERCIAL TACTICAL Military Mobile Subscriber - Mobile Infrastructure Pre-configured Networks Tall, Fixed Antenna Towers Fiberoptic Internodal Connections Spectrum Availability Fixed Frequency Assignments Protection: None Privacy (single level) Interference Rejection is Somewhat Important High Bwidth Primarily Robust Static Infrastructure Small Bwidth Radio-Based Highly Mobile Comms Ad Hoc, Self Organizing Networks Small, Easily Erectable Masts; Low Prile OTM Antennas Mobile, Wireless, Internodal Connections Restricted Frequency Assignments; Geographically Impacted Protection: None Top Secret/ SI (Multiple, Simultaneous Levels) Interference Rejection Antijam are Critical Low probability Detection (LPD) is not an issue Highly Skilled Large Teams MOS w/multi-duties Low Probability Detection (LPD) is Critical Strategy = Adopt Adapt Modify Develop / or Influence

5 Systems Engineering (SE) Approach SE Processes/Events/Plans/Reports Define Customer Needs Trades Develop Draft Notional Solutions Prepare Draft SE Plan (SEP) Prepare Draft Configuration Mgt Plan Prepare Draft Technology Transition Agreement (TTA) S&T Development Funding Approved Approved ATO Inputs: Draft SEP, Draft CM Plan, Draft TTA, WBS CPIA Interpret Customer Needs. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Audit Document External Internal Interfaces ATO ( D ) SEP SEP, CM IPR CM IPR Risk Mgt, Risk Mgt TTA, TRLA Continuous SE Processes Technology Transition Agreement; Technical Parameter (TP) Critical Technical Elements (CTEs) Tracking; Configuration Management; Analyze Timing & Resources; Technical Risk Management, Regular Technical Interchange Meetings; Decision Analysis Verify Requirements SEP SimP ExP Trades Allocate Functions to System Elements Trades Evolve Functional Performance Specs into CI Functional (Design to) Specs Identify CTEs Performance Analysis Operational Effectiveness Analysis Trades PDR Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Trades Refine WBS Lessons Learned TTA TRLA Individual CI verification using Simulation, Testing, Evaluation Fabricate, Assemble, Code CI to Final Design Specifications CDR SE Process Outputs: Life-cycle concerns, System Performance Specifications, Matrix Support, TPP, SEP, Support TRA, Test Platforms, TRLAR Support User Experimentation Venues Demo & Validate Sys Concepts & Technology Maturity Assemble the Prototype/End-item PM Prog / Spin Out Product Transition Provide support to transition fice Recommended Archived Required CDR = Critical Design Review CPIA = Critical Program Information Assessment ExP = Experimentation Plan SimP = Simulation Plan TPP = Technology Protection Plan TRLA = Technology Readiness Level Assessment TRLAR = TRLA Report TRA = Technology Readiness Assessment WBS = Work Breakdown Structure Analysis Applied to Customers Requirements: FCS BW for BC FCS Voice Architecture Study FCS Network Assumptions Whitepaper Tactical Network Ground Forces Study Etc. PM C4ISR OTM Test & Validation Architecture Network M&S Operational Views OPNET System Views CES/QUALNET Technical Views NETWARS Network Model Development Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Field & Experimental Testing/Evaluation PM C4ISR OTM Data Collection Emulation

6 Technology Development Maturation User Needs & Technology Opportunities Process entry at Milestones A, B, or C Entrance criteria met before entering phase Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability A B C IOC FOC Concept Refinement Concept Decision Technology Development System Development & Demonstration Design Readiness Review Production & Deployment FRP Decision LRIP/IOT&E Review Operations & Support Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment TRL 1-3 TRL 4-6 TRL 7-9

7 PM C4ISR On-The-Move R&D R&D venue venue fering fering the the Tech Tech Base Base Programs Programs Record Record a a continuous continuous enduring enduring evaluation evaluation capability capability for for Network Network Centric Centric Warfare Warfare (NCW) (NCW) concepts concepts Conducts Conducts Live, Live, Virtual, Virtual, Constructive Constructive technology technology demonstrations demonstrations currently currently supporting supporting scales scales on on the the order order live live 3,000 3,000 virtual/constructive virtual/constructive entities entities Provides Provides a a relevant relevant environment environment to to assess assess emerging emerging technologies technologies in in a a C4ISR C4ISR System--Systems System--Systems (SoS) (SoS) Mitigate Mitigate risk risk for for FCS FCS Concepts, Concepts, Future Future Force Force technologies technologies Opportunities Opportunities for for acceleration acceleration technology technology insertion insertion into into the the Current Current Force Force Venue Venue for for validation validation Technology/Stware/ Technology/Stware/ Integration Integration Readiness Readiness Levels Levels Includes Includes a a state--the-art state--the-art instrumentation, instrumentation, data data collection collection & & reduction reduction (IDC&R) (IDC&R) tool tool suite suite that that supports supports the the quantification quantification NCW NCW activities activities Employs Employs system system systems systems engineering engineering methods methods that that promote promote rapid rapid SoS SoS reconfiguration reconfiguration enable enable repeatable repeatable assessments assessments Has Has a a diverse diverse set set experience experience over over the the past past seven seven years years in in working working with with dozens dozens government government industry industry partners partners to to integrate integrate execute execute large-scale, large-scale, distributed distributed Live/Virtual/Constructive Live/Virtual/Constructive events events Fort Dix McGuire AFB Lakehurst NAES Joint Megabase Seamless LVC Integration Seasoned team subject Warfighters scientists matter experts Approved & analysts for public release; working distribution side by is side unlimited. Seven years field experimentation experience SoS engineering processes & procedures rapid prototyping frameworks

8 Linking Battle Comm Metrics Across Multiple Domains Technical Metrics C4ISR System Performance Network Connectivity Message Completion Rate Probability Detection Probability Identification Detection Accuracy Power Usage Visualization Resolution System Knowledge Quality Information Accuracy, Completeness & Timeliness Information about Threat Level Situational Awareness Achieved Number Types Decisions Made Operational Metrics Soldier Unit Performance Time to Execute Mission Blue Losses Red Losses Degree Surprise Ability to Maneuver Undetected Number PIR Satisfied Blue System Knowledge OPFOR Over Time - 20 Sept AM Quality Information :23 10:25 21 Unique Reports 12 OPFOR entities detected at targetable level 59% Targetable - 32% Actionable - 9% Non-actionable 3 58 images viewed 10:27 10:29 10:31 10:33 10:35 10:37 10:39 10:41 10:43 OPFOR repositioning 2% 10:45 10:47 10:49 Time from LD to Dismount 10:51 10:53 10:55 10:57 10:59 11:01 11:03 Quantifying How Technical Performance Impacts Operational Effectiveness

9 Support to PM Programs Tech Base Efforts PM PM WIN-T WIN-T Increment Increment 2 2 Engineering Field Test Engineering Field Test Critical Technology Elements Critical Technology Elements Network Scalability Network Scalability JTRS JTRS SLICE SLICE SRW SRW 2006/7 2006/7 Technical Technical Field Field Tests Tests Waveform maturation Waveform maturation PM PM FCS FCS Technical Technical Field Field Tests Tests SUGV Teleoperation SUGV Teleoperation T-UGS / U-UGS T-UGS / U-UGS NEBC Technology Transition NEBC Technology Transition Natick Natick Soldier Soldier Center Center 2006/7 2006/7 Future Future Force Force Warrior Warrior Exit Criteria Testing Exit Criteria Testing Transition to PEO Soldier Transition to PEO Soldier

10 Networking Technology Transitions Low Prile OTM SATCOM Single Beam Multi Beam Body Wearable Antenna Technologies for SRW 2 Port Low Prile Antenna for Wideb Networking Waveform (WNW)/ Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) bs Antenna optimization Modeling Simulation for Comm & Control Vehicle (C2V) Reconnaissance & Survivability Vehicle (R&SV) Tactical Wireless Network Assurance s - Black Side Intrusion Detection system Soldier Radio Waveform - Mobile AdHoc networking for Soldiers, sensors, munitions Comm Control Robotic Entities (C2ORE) - UAV mission planning execution stware autonomously controls multiple UAVs Enhances planning management unmanned sensor assets (UGS, UAV, UGV, etc)

11 Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) Communications Within the Emerging C4ISR Architecture Ground Soldier System Unmanned Ground Vehicles Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Intelligent Munitions Systems Unattended Ground Sensors JTRS Small Form Fit Radio Non-Line Sight-Launch Systems The Soldier Radio Waveform is a mobile, ad-hoc, networking waveform developed transitioned to provide improved voice data communications, for platforms with Size, Weight, Power constraints. Hosted on Joint Tactical Radio Systems (JTRS) Hheld Manpack Small Form Factor (HMS) Ground Mobile Radio (GMR)

12 Antenna M&S Performance on Vehicles Process Antenna Model Validation Anechoic Chamber Measurement Platform Model Validation Actual Vehicle Vehicle CAD Model xfdtd Antenna Model Overlay Results xfdtd Electromagnetic Meshed Model Vehicle Model with Validated Antennas Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Simulation 360 o Far-Field Field Antenna Gain Pattern Geometrical Theory Diffraction (GTD) Simulation Power Contour Plots Hybrid M&S Results

13 Example: MRAP Antenna Placement Optimization SPAWAR Recommended Location Poor Pattern CERDEC M&S Placement with Optimized Pattern 115 Antenna 2 meters Above Earth Ground

14 D.C / Tactical Network Communications Antennas (TNCA) Purpose: Develop Affordable, Low Prile Solutions For OTM SATCOM Develop Affordable Directional Antennas for Terrestrial Directional Networking Develop Omni-directional Antennas With Higher Gains, Lower Priles with Ballistic Radomes, Multiple Ports to Reduce the Number Platform Antennas Develop Integrated Antennas for Dismounted Soldier Develop Distributed Antennas to Improve Omnidirectional Antenna Performance Reduce Cosite Interference Products: Low Cost Ku/Ka B OTM SATCOM Antenna Systems Low Cost X-b Point Of Presence Efficient Ku Ka B Power Amplifiers Low Prile Single Beam Ku/Ka SATCOM Ant System Low Prile Multibeam Ku/Ka/Q SATCOM Ant Analysis Affordable Terrestrial Directional Antennas WNW High Gain Omni Antennas 2-Port Low Prile Omni Antennas with Ballistic Radome supporting multiple waveforms (Ground/RW) 3-Port Tri-b Omni Antennas Integrated Body Wearable Antennas Distributed Antenna Array Payfs: Affordable OTM SATCOM Terrestrial Directional Ants. Reduced Visual Signatures & Antenna Counts Improved Link Connectivity Ballistic Protection Reduced Platform Power Consumption

15 D.C / Affordable Low Prile Satellite (ALPS) Comms On-the-Move Low Prile OTM SATCOM Single Beam Multi Beam Purpose: Develop, mature, demonstrate low prile antennas for directional satellite communications (SATCOM) on-the-move (OTM) Products: Low-prile, single-beam (Ku/Ka) antenna Low-prile, multi-beam (Ka/Q) antenna Single-beam high capacity communications capability (HC3) (Ka/Q) antenna Small aperture blue force tracking (BFT) antenna C/Ku Affordable Directional Antenna Integrated Ka/Q-b Power Amplifier Payf: Increased Communications Capabilities at all echelons through greater use SATCOM OTM Reduced platform burden through reductions in antenna size, weight, power(swap) Increased survivability through reduced visual signature Affordable SATCOM OTM for the warfighter through antenna cost reductions

16 D.C / Tactical Wireless Network Assurance (TWNA) Purpose: To develop transition wireless network protection solutions for a tactical Mobile Ad-hoc Networking (MANET) environment that is typical WIN-T the Future Force. Product: Tactical security administration tool for mobile wireless environment. Intrusion Detection Algorithms for MANET routing protocols Tactical Public Key Infrastructure (TPKI) Architecture Certificate Issuance Field Replacements Revocation Payf: Prevent threat Information Warfare attacks from damaging mobile networks. Maintain Warfighter trust/confidence in battlefield information. Reduce system network vulnerabilities.

17 D.C / Network Enabled Comm Control (NEC2) NECC/ TBC SATCOM CORPS HQ UAV Battle Comm for Unattended/Unmanned Sensors JTCW/ NECC Account for Political, Religious, Infrastructure Cultural factors in BC WIN-T Node Decision Support Tools UGV Bradley JTCW Brigade DIVISION CORPS Support Urban SASO operations BCT (Urban OPNS) Manage information flow between architectures Purpose: Develop transition stware algorithms that tailor manage the flow Battle Comm (BC) information C2 services between current future systems throughout all phases operations environments Products: Battle Comm Planning/execution/re-planning products for: Dismounted applications in Complex Urban Terrain Current Force Tactical C2 Systems Unmanned systems sensors Decision support tools that account for political, religious, cultural other factors Managed Connectors that govern the flow information between disparate architectures while globally managing resources Payf: Increased speed/quality BC planning execution adjustments Improved commers understing Battlespace related factors Faster decision-making

18 D.C / Tactical Mobile Networks (TMN) Purpose: Develop Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) for Dismounted Soldier manned & unmanned systems. Develop communications networking technologies that address Future Force constraints for bwidth connectivity while on the move. Product: JTRS Stware Communications Architecture (SCA) v2.2 compliant, energy-efficient Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) PILSNER Proactive Diverse Link Selection (PAD-LS) algorithms to enhance OTM connectivity capacity Faster than real time dynamic link estimation for connectivity capacity for Network Management man in the loop experimentation Payf: Energy efficient voice & data tactical communications for Ground Soldier Systems/Future Force Warrior sensor-to-shooter linkages Increased OTM connectivity usable bwidth Enable commers to plan communication coverage for OTM Coarse Of Action (COA) Addresses PM FCS (BCT) Critical Technology #7B (SRW), Risk #93 mitigation (SRW Availability) to support Network Ready COMPOSER: Comms Planner for Operational Simulation Effects with Realism Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

19 Network Intruder Insider Threat Overrun / Capture Malicious Stware Secure Configuration Host & Network Shut f unnecessary Intrusion Detection Tighten Access Control Viruses services ( /web) Identify Attack Source & Trojan Horses Malicious Code Issue file privileges Detection Skill Level Data Insertion / Re-route Traffic Modification / User Identification & Authentication Eliminate Attack Process Deletion Attack Forecasting Passwords/Biometris Damage Assessment / Illegally Advance Threat Analysis Message Authentication Recovery Privileges Malicious Code Denial Service Host S/W Protection Eradication Flooding Protect, Detect, Predict Respond components will be integrated managed by a Security Management architecture Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. D.C / Tactical Information Technologies for Assured Network Operations (TITAN) Secure the network Protect the information Allow information sharing across security domains Operations Order Information Assurance FRAGO C2 Protect Elements Attack Protect Detect/Predict Respond Network Management Commer s Intent Planning/Repla nning Establishing th e network Management, Maintaining an d Reporting (Mo nitoring Fault management) Information Dissemination Find, Management manage di splay informa tion Purpose: Develop, mature, demonstrate modular tools technologies that significantly improve the network planning management the tactical network Develop, mature, demonstrate security tools to protect mobile networks from attacks allow information to be shared across security domains Develop, mature, demonstrate agent enhanced Battle Comm (BC) tools to enable real time situational awareness relevant strategic tactical battlefield information sharing Products: Automated Network Management (NM) Tools Information Assurance (IA) Tools Space/Strategic Tactical Information Dissemination Management (ID&M) Applications COA development Payf: Reduce manpower network management configuration time Share information across security domains while ensuring trust/confidence in information being sent to the Warfighter Improve information sharing by providing relevant information from strategic to a tactical operational unit

20 Future Networking Technologies Affordable Satellite Antennas for Transformation Comm Systems On The Move Multi b, single/multi beam Affordable phased array antennas Advanced Wireless Security Services Integrated Information Assurance (IA) Correlation Response Stware Cross Domain Security Services Cognitive Networking Multi-Function RF systems (Radio / EW) Dynamic Spectrum Access Capabilities Adaptive middleware for applications to adjust to network conditions.

21 Process for Cognitive Network Project Development Req ts Definition HW/SW Architecture Current Knowledge base Inputs: DARPA, Industry, ARL Etc... Disciplined Systems Engineering Approach A. Dynamic Spectrum Process & Sensing B. Networking C. Data Exchange & Dissemination D. Information Assurance E. Applications F. Cognitive Management G. HW Design & Development H. Cross Layering I. System Evaluation Simulation/ Emulation Development Of Prototypes Testing/ Demos Analytical Assessment Using Req t & CBMANET Scenario

22 Cognitive Network & Radio Study Description: A cognitive network consists technologies that can perceive current network conditions, then sense, plan, decide act on those conditions. The network can learn from these adaptations use them to make future decisions, all while taking into account end-to-end performance goals user needs Generic Cognitive Processing Framework An Example Short Term Memory Reflective Deliberative Reactive Long Term Memory Benefits: A cognitive radio has awareness changes in its environment adapts its operating characteristics to improve its performance or to minimize a loss in performance Perception Environment Action Control Configuration Down-conversion, Up-conversion, Frequency translation, channel filtering, sampling, error correction, channel estimation, demodulation, modulation USR ISR Application User Increasing Use Stware HR Hardware Radio SCR Stware Controlled Radio SDR Stware Defined Radio ISR Ideal Stware Radio USR Ultimate Stware Radio SDR SCR HR Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

23 Cognitive Network High-Level Roadmap

24 Example: Cognitive Radio Benefits Current Radio Architectures Extensive planning before deployment Detailed organization structure required accounting for every radio Detailed definition Comm. Circuits static routing procedures Intensive training for network development Static Network Configuration Limited network adjustment Individual nodes unaware conditions experienced by other nodes Unaware context operation Legacy Example: EPLRS Numerous Planning Steps Before Deployment Cognitive Radio R&D Future Cognitive Radio Architectures Automated Policy Planning Policy Adjustment Based on Needs Less Knobs for the Warfighter Lessens training required for operators Decisions made to meet requirements user with minimal interaction Variable network configurations in real-time Automated response fostering optimum network performance Learning from user experiences in entire network to adjust goals Automatic adaptation based on changing context RF environment Bottom Line: Adaptable Ease CR Use for the Warfighter network

25 Questions? Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Exhibit R-2 0603008A Electronic Warfare Advanced Technology ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element

More information

Future Combat Systems

Future Combat Systems Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Communications Technology COST (In Thousands) FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY

More information

UNITED STATES ARMY. FCS - Sensors. LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov Army Strong 1

UNITED STATES ARMY. FCS - Sensors. LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov Army Strong 1 UNITED STATES ARMY FCS - Sensors Army Click Precision Modernization to add Strike Briefing Annual Strategy Review Title and April Approach 15, 2008 LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov 2007 Army Strong 1 AGENDA

More information

Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division

Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Command, Control, Communications Technology

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Command, Control, Communications Technology Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

C4I System Solutions.

C4I System Solutions. www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate

More information

An End-to-End Modeling and Simulation Testbed (EMAST) to Support Detailed Quantitative Evaluations of GIG Transport Services

An End-to-End Modeling and Simulation Testbed (EMAST) to Support Detailed Quantitative Evaluations of GIG Transport Services An End-to-End Modeling and Simulation Testbed (EMAST) to Support Detailed Quantitative Evaluations of GIG Transport Services 14 June 2005 Gary Comparetto (703) 983-6571 garycomp@mitre.org Objective: Evaluate

More information

Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System

Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System (24 APRIL 2006) Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System MIDS International Review Board JTRS Moving Forward JPEO JTRS 5 May 2006 Mr. Howard Pace Deputy JPEO JTRS 619-524-4498 Howard.Pace@navy.mil

More information

PRODUCT MANAGER C4ISR ON-THE-MOVE EXPERIMENTATION

PRODUCT MANAGER C4ISR ON-THE-MOVE EXPERIMENTATION PRODUCT MANAGER C4ISR ON-THE-MOVE EXPERIMENTATION LTC William Utroska, Product Manager C4ISR On-The-Move Russell Langan, Deputy Product Manager C4ISR On-The-Move Michael Amabile, Senior Systems Engineer,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

More information

FCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR

FCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR FCS Update & Testing Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR 3/13/2009 10:36:11 AM 1 Army Leadership s View Future Combat Systems is the core of our modernization

More information

Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing

Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing Future Future Industry Day Briefing MG Joseph L. Yakovac Program Executive Officer, Ground 11 February 2003 Program Manager s Intent: Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability

More information

NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018

NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018 NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018 THE ARMY WILL FIELD A NETWORK THAT IS EASY TO USE, WORKS IN ALL ENVIRONMENTS,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program

More information

Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems

Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program

More information

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 2 Introduction Force 2025 Maneuvers provides the means to evaluate and validate expeditionary capabilities for

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Complete F58 NON LINE OF SIGHT

More information

Tactical Technology Office

Tactical Technology Office Tactical Technology Office Dr. Bradford Tousley, Director DARPA Tactical Technology Office Briefing prepared for NDIA s 2017 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition March 22, 2017 1 Breakthrough

More information

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation

More information

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 6.021 8.312 7.963-7.963 8.046 8.146 8.194

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 2 - Applied Research 0602308A - Advanced Concepts and Simulation COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

More information

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Briefing for the SAS Panel Workshop on SMART Cooperation in Operational Analysis Simulations and Models 13 October 2015 Release of

More information

Simulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON

Simulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON UNCLASSIFIED Simulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON NDIA 15 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 25 October 2012 Dr. Nancy Bucher ASA(ALT) OCSE/PoR nancy.bucher@us.army.mil

More information

Single Integrated Ground Picture

Single Integrated Ground Picture Single Integrated Ground Picture 2003 Interoperability and System Integration Presented by: Anthony Lisuzzo Director, Intelligence and Information Directorate US ARMY CECOM 732-532-5557 Email: anthony.lisuzzo@mail1.monmouth.army.mil

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Integrated Broadcast Service FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Integrated Broadcast Service FY 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #36 Complete Total Program Element - 18.216 - - - - - - - - - 18.216 644778:

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 33.896 32.015 43.986-43.986 42.760 41.790

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical

More information

Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview

Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview 1 Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview 25 October 2005 Dr. Jerry Hoffman JOEF Acquisition Program Manager jerome.hoffman@navy.mil 2 Background PROGRAM SUMMARY: Enables warfighters

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 03 Advanced Technology Development (ATD) 0603850F Integrated Broadcast

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #82

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #82 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED (U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

More information

DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap

DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap Presented at the Ground Robotics Capability Conference 4 March 2008 Mr. David Ahern OUSD(ATL)/PSA david.ahern@osd.mil Integrated Unmanned Systems Roadmap Integrated

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Exhibit R-2 0602712A Countermine Systems ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 26267 29171 22088 21965

More information

2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference

2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference 2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #147 Cost To Complete Total

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426

More information

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16

More information

FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)

FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) Army ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 59,522 TRW Total Program Cost (TY$): $1.8B Average Unit Cost (TY$): $27K Full-rate production:

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 20.396 20.046 19.938-19.938 20.389 20.799 21.255 22.393 Continuing

More information

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS: Keynote by Dr. Thomas A. Kennedy Chairman and CEO of Raytheon Association of Old Crows Symposium Marriott Marquis Hotel Washington, D.C. 12.2.15 AS DELIVERED GOOD MORNING THANK YOU, GENERAL ISRAEL FOR

More information

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release Unclassified/FOUO RAMP UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated

More information

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #156

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #156 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019

More information

Team 3: Communication Aspects In Urban Operations

Team 3: Communication Aspects In Urban Operations Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Faculty and Researcher Publications Faculty and Researcher Publications 2007-03 Team 3: Communication Aspects In Urban Operations Doll, T. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/35617

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4650.01 January 9, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, October 17, 2017 ASD(NII) DoD CIO SUBJECT: Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

More information

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development

More information

Plan Requirements and Assess Collection. August 2014

Plan Requirements and Assess Collection. August 2014 ATP 2-01 Plan Requirements and Assess Collection August 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters, Department of the Army This publication is available

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR

More information

ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield

ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield Headquarters Air Combat Command ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield Col Tom Wozniak ACC/A8C 25 July 2006 This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Overview Tactical Level Programs TTNT, TACP,

More information

CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW)

CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW) CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission The IEW support mission at all echelons is to provide intelligence, EW, and CI support to help you accomplish your mission. Elements of Intelligence

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0305192N - JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655

More information

Future Force Capabilities

Future Force Capabilities Future Force Capabilities Presented by: Mr. Rickey Smith US Army Training and Doctrine Command Win in a Complex World Unified Land Operations Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative throughout the range

More information

WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS)

WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS) EXCERPT FROM CONTRACTS W9113M-10-D-0002 and W9113M-10-D-0003: C-1. PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT SW-SMDC-08-08. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT

More information

AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance

AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance Singapore 2015 Content Overview of Air Defense Overview of Electronic Warfare A practical example Value proposition Summary AMD - a multidisciplinary challenge Geography

More information

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based

More information

Accelerating Networked Sensors & Fires

Accelerating Networked Sensors & Fires Accelerating Networked Sensors & Fires October 19, 2005 Precision Engagement Strategic Business Area Providing the Warfighter timely, effective and affordable Mission Solutions that span the breadth and

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533

More information

A r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y

A r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y A r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y C3I Portfolio Overview Mr. Kris Gardner Director C3I Portfolio Office of the Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology Command,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

More information

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description Overview Mr. Chuck Walker JWARN Acquisition Program Manager Joint Project Manager Information Systems (858) 537-0215 chuck.walker@jpmis.mil 1 2 JWARN Description Connects CBRN sensors directly to Joint

More information

The Verification for Mission Planning System

The Verification for Mission Planning System 2016 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Applications (AITA 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-389-2 The Verification for Mission Planning System Lin ZHANG *, Wei-Ming CHENG and Hua-yun

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Integrated Broadcast Service (DEM/VAL) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Integrated Broadcast Service (DEM/VAL) FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 24.438 20.580 20.046-20.046 19.901

More information

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0603500F PE TITLE: MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ADV Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. Information Systems: The Key to Future Force Success in a CBRN Environment. January 9, 2007

UNCLASSIFIED. Information Systems: The Key to Future Force Success in a CBRN Environment. January 9, 2007 Information Systems: The Key to Future Force Success in a CBRN Environment January 9, 2007 PRESENTED TO: 2007 CBIS Conference Austin, Tx Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release Edward Wack

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate

More information

Yemen ISR CONOPS and Capabilities

Yemen ISR CONOPS and Capabilities Yemen ISR CONOPS and Capabilities THIS INFORMATION WAS APPROVED FOR PUBLISHING PER THE ITAR AS BASIC MARKETING INFORMATION OF DEFENSE ARTICLES OR PER THE EAR AS ADVERTISING PRINTED MATTER. harris.com Yemen

More information

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head DCN #: 43-2882-17 Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head 2 ONR 30: Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare N091 Principal Deputy for P&R NRL ONRG Chief of Naval Research

More information

Overview of DoD S&T Networking and IT Research Priorities, Programs and Funding

Overview of DoD S&T Networking and IT Research Priorities, Programs and Funding Overview of DoD S&T Networking and IT Research Priorities, Programs and Funding Federal Networking and IT Research Opportunities FY 2004 2 October 2003 Dr. André van Tilborg andre.vantilborg@osd.mil Director,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Information Systems Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program

More information

Briefing for Industry

Briefing for Industry Professional Aerospace Contractors Association of New Mexico Briefing for Industry Mr. Quentin Saulter Naval Representative High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office August 18, 2015 DISTRIBUTION D: Distribution

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations

More information