CERDEC Contributions to Army Battle Command Networking Efforts
|
|
- Barnaby Greer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CERDEC Contributions to Army Battle Comm Networking Efforts Mr. David Jimenez Director, Space & Terrestrial Communications Directorate
2 Evolution Army Networking Civil War World War I U.S. Army Signal Corps (1860) Vietnam Telegraph WWI Pigeon, Mocker Clark Portable Army Radio Set (1906) World War II PRC-77 PRT-4 & PRR-9 WWII Radios United States Army Pigeon Service PRC s Tactical Internet 2014 BCT Architecture SINCGARS 2 Manpack UHF MSE SATCOM EPLRS Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
3 Major Communications Thrusts Connectivity Capacity Security Future Force Comms Systems Mobile Networking Antennas FCS WIN-T JTRS Dismounted Soldier Information Assurance
4 Comparison Commercial & Military Communications Architecture Commercial Mobile Subscriber, Fixed Infrastructure COMMERCIAL TACTICAL Military Mobile Subscriber - Mobile Infrastructure Pre-configured Networks Tall, Fixed Antenna Towers Fiberoptic Internodal Connections Spectrum Availability Fixed Frequency Assignments Protection: None Privacy (single level) Interference Rejection is Somewhat Important High Bwidth Primarily Robust Static Infrastructure Small Bwidth Radio-Based Highly Mobile Comms Ad Hoc, Self Organizing Networks Small, Easily Erectable Masts; Low Prile OTM Antennas Mobile, Wireless, Internodal Connections Restricted Frequency Assignments; Geographically Impacted Protection: None Top Secret/ SI (Multiple, Simultaneous Levels) Interference Rejection Antijam are Critical Low probability Detection (LPD) is not an issue Highly Skilled Large Teams MOS w/multi-duties Low Probability Detection (LPD) is Critical Strategy = Adopt Adapt Modify Develop / or Influence
5 Systems Engineering (SE) Approach SE Processes/Events/Plans/Reports Define Customer Needs Trades Develop Draft Notional Solutions Prepare Draft SE Plan (SEP) Prepare Draft Configuration Mgt Plan Prepare Draft Technology Transition Agreement (TTA) S&T Development Funding Approved Approved ATO Inputs: Draft SEP, Draft CM Plan, Draft TTA, WBS CPIA Interpret Customer Needs. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Audit Document External Internal Interfaces ATO ( D ) SEP SEP, CM IPR CM IPR Risk Mgt, Risk Mgt TTA, TRLA Continuous SE Processes Technology Transition Agreement; Technical Parameter (TP) Critical Technical Elements (CTEs) Tracking; Configuration Management; Analyze Timing & Resources; Technical Risk Management, Regular Technical Interchange Meetings; Decision Analysis Verify Requirements SEP SimP ExP Trades Allocate Functions to System Elements Trades Evolve Functional Performance Specs into CI Functional (Design to) Specs Identify CTEs Performance Analysis Operational Effectiveness Analysis Trades PDR Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Trades Refine WBS Lessons Learned TTA TRLA Individual CI verification using Simulation, Testing, Evaluation Fabricate, Assemble, Code CI to Final Design Specifications CDR SE Process Outputs: Life-cycle concerns, System Performance Specifications, Matrix Support, TPP, SEP, Support TRA, Test Platforms, TRLAR Support User Experimentation Venues Demo & Validate Sys Concepts & Technology Maturity Assemble the Prototype/End-item PM Prog / Spin Out Product Transition Provide support to transition fice Recommended Archived Required CDR = Critical Design Review CPIA = Critical Program Information Assessment ExP = Experimentation Plan SimP = Simulation Plan TPP = Technology Protection Plan TRLA = Technology Readiness Level Assessment TRLAR = TRLA Report TRA = Technology Readiness Assessment WBS = Work Breakdown Structure Analysis Applied to Customers Requirements: FCS BW for BC FCS Voice Architecture Study FCS Network Assumptions Whitepaper Tactical Network Ground Forces Study Etc. PM C4ISR OTM Test & Validation Architecture Network M&S Operational Views OPNET System Views CES/QUALNET Technical Views NETWARS Network Model Development Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Field & Experimental Testing/Evaluation PM C4ISR OTM Data Collection Emulation
6 Technology Development Maturation User Needs & Technology Opportunities Process entry at Milestones A, B, or C Entrance criteria met before entering phase Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability A B C IOC FOC Concept Refinement Concept Decision Technology Development System Development & Demonstration Design Readiness Review Production & Deployment FRP Decision LRIP/IOT&E Review Operations & Support Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment TRL 1-3 TRL 4-6 TRL 7-9
7 PM C4ISR On-The-Move R&D R&D venue venue fering fering the the Tech Tech Base Base Programs Programs Record Record a a continuous continuous enduring enduring evaluation evaluation capability capability for for Network Network Centric Centric Warfare Warfare (NCW) (NCW) concepts concepts Conducts Conducts Live, Live, Virtual, Virtual, Constructive Constructive technology technology demonstrations demonstrations currently currently supporting supporting scales scales on on the the order order live live 3,000 3,000 virtual/constructive virtual/constructive entities entities Provides Provides a a relevant relevant environment environment to to assess assess emerging emerging technologies technologies in in a a C4ISR C4ISR System--Systems System--Systems (SoS) (SoS) Mitigate Mitigate risk risk for for FCS FCS Concepts, Concepts, Future Future Force Force technologies technologies Opportunities Opportunities for for acceleration acceleration technology technology insertion insertion into into the the Current Current Force Force Venue Venue for for validation validation Technology/Stware/ Technology/Stware/ Integration Integration Readiness Readiness Levels Levels Includes Includes a a state--the-art state--the-art instrumentation, instrumentation, data data collection collection & & reduction reduction (IDC&R) (IDC&R) tool tool suite suite that that supports supports the the quantification quantification NCW NCW activities activities Employs Employs system system systems systems engineering engineering methods methods that that promote promote rapid rapid SoS SoS reconfiguration reconfiguration enable enable repeatable repeatable assessments assessments Has Has a a diverse diverse set set experience experience over over the the past past seven seven years years in in working working with with dozens dozens government government industry industry partners partners to to integrate integrate execute execute large-scale, large-scale, distributed distributed Live/Virtual/Constructive Live/Virtual/Constructive events events Fort Dix McGuire AFB Lakehurst NAES Joint Megabase Seamless LVC Integration Seasoned team subject Warfighters scientists matter experts Approved & analysts for public release; working distribution side by is side unlimited. Seven years field experimentation experience SoS engineering processes & procedures rapid prototyping frameworks
8 Linking Battle Comm Metrics Across Multiple Domains Technical Metrics C4ISR System Performance Network Connectivity Message Completion Rate Probability Detection Probability Identification Detection Accuracy Power Usage Visualization Resolution System Knowledge Quality Information Accuracy, Completeness & Timeliness Information about Threat Level Situational Awareness Achieved Number Types Decisions Made Operational Metrics Soldier Unit Performance Time to Execute Mission Blue Losses Red Losses Degree Surprise Ability to Maneuver Undetected Number PIR Satisfied Blue System Knowledge OPFOR Over Time - 20 Sept AM Quality Information :23 10:25 21 Unique Reports 12 OPFOR entities detected at targetable level 59% Targetable - 32% Actionable - 9% Non-actionable 3 58 images viewed 10:27 10:29 10:31 10:33 10:35 10:37 10:39 10:41 10:43 OPFOR repositioning 2% 10:45 10:47 10:49 Time from LD to Dismount 10:51 10:53 10:55 10:57 10:59 11:01 11:03 Quantifying How Technical Performance Impacts Operational Effectiveness
9 Support to PM Programs Tech Base Efforts PM PM WIN-T WIN-T Increment Increment 2 2 Engineering Field Test Engineering Field Test Critical Technology Elements Critical Technology Elements Network Scalability Network Scalability JTRS JTRS SLICE SLICE SRW SRW 2006/7 2006/7 Technical Technical Field Field Tests Tests Waveform maturation Waveform maturation PM PM FCS FCS Technical Technical Field Field Tests Tests SUGV Teleoperation SUGV Teleoperation T-UGS / U-UGS T-UGS / U-UGS NEBC Technology Transition NEBC Technology Transition Natick Natick Soldier Soldier Center Center 2006/7 2006/7 Future Future Force Force Warrior Warrior Exit Criteria Testing Exit Criteria Testing Transition to PEO Soldier Transition to PEO Soldier
10 Networking Technology Transitions Low Prile OTM SATCOM Single Beam Multi Beam Body Wearable Antenna Technologies for SRW 2 Port Low Prile Antenna for Wideb Networking Waveform (WNW)/ Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) bs Antenna optimization Modeling Simulation for Comm & Control Vehicle (C2V) Reconnaissance & Survivability Vehicle (R&SV) Tactical Wireless Network Assurance s - Black Side Intrusion Detection system Soldier Radio Waveform - Mobile AdHoc networking for Soldiers, sensors, munitions Comm Control Robotic Entities (C2ORE) - UAV mission planning execution stware autonomously controls multiple UAVs Enhances planning management unmanned sensor assets (UGS, UAV, UGV, etc)
11 Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) Communications Within the Emerging C4ISR Architecture Ground Soldier System Unmanned Ground Vehicles Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Intelligent Munitions Systems Unattended Ground Sensors JTRS Small Form Fit Radio Non-Line Sight-Launch Systems The Soldier Radio Waveform is a mobile, ad-hoc, networking waveform developed transitioned to provide improved voice data communications, for platforms with Size, Weight, Power constraints. Hosted on Joint Tactical Radio Systems (JTRS) Hheld Manpack Small Form Factor (HMS) Ground Mobile Radio (GMR)
12 Antenna M&S Performance on Vehicles Process Antenna Model Validation Anechoic Chamber Measurement Platform Model Validation Actual Vehicle Vehicle CAD Model xfdtd Antenna Model Overlay Results xfdtd Electromagnetic Meshed Model Vehicle Model with Validated Antennas Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Simulation 360 o Far-Field Field Antenna Gain Pattern Geometrical Theory Diffraction (GTD) Simulation Power Contour Plots Hybrid M&S Results
13 Example: MRAP Antenna Placement Optimization SPAWAR Recommended Location Poor Pattern CERDEC M&S Placement with Optimized Pattern 115 Antenna 2 meters Above Earth Ground
14 D.C / Tactical Network Communications Antennas (TNCA) Purpose: Develop Affordable, Low Prile Solutions For OTM SATCOM Develop Affordable Directional Antennas for Terrestrial Directional Networking Develop Omni-directional Antennas With Higher Gains, Lower Priles with Ballistic Radomes, Multiple Ports to Reduce the Number Platform Antennas Develop Integrated Antennas for Dismounted Soldier Develop Distributed Antennas to Improve Omnidirectional Antenna Performance Reduce Cosite Interference Products: Low Cost Ku/Ka B OTM SATCOM Antenna Systems Low Cost X-b Point Of Presence Efficient Ku Ka B Power Amplifiers Low Prile Single Beam Ku/Ka SATCOM Ant System Low Prile Multibeam Ku/Ka/Q SATCOM Ant Analysis Affordable Terrestrial Directional Antennas WNW High Gain Omni Antennas 2-Port Low Prile Omni Antennas with Ballistic Radome supporting multiple waveforms (Ground/RW) 3-Port Tri-b Omni Antennas Integrated Body Wearable Antennas Distributed Antenna Array Payfs: Affordable OTM SATCOM Terrestrial Directional Ants. Reduced Visual Signatures & Antenna Counts Improved Link Connectivity Ballistic Protection Reduced Platform Power Consumption
15 D.C / Affordable Low Prile Satellite (ALPS) Comms On-the-Move Low Prile OTM SATCOM Single Beam Multi Beam Purpose: Develop, mature, demonstrate low prile antennas for directional satellite communications (SATCOM) on-the-move (OTM) Products: Low-prile, single-beam (Ku/Ka) antenna Low-prile, multi-beam (Ka/Q) antenna Single-beam high capacity communications capability (HC3) (Ka/Q) antenna Small aperture blue force tracking (BFT) antenna C/Ku Affordable Directional Antenna Integrated Ka/Q-b Power Amplifier Payf: Increased Communications Capabilities at all echelons through greater use SATCOM OTM Reduced platform burden through reductions in antenna size, weight, power(swap) Increased survivability through reduced visual signature Affordable SATCOM OTM for the warfighter through antenna cost reductions
16 D.C / Tactical Wireless Network Assurance (TWNA) Purpose: To develop transition wireless network protection solutions for a tactical Mobile Ad-hoc Networking (MANET) environment that is typical WIN-T the Future Force. Product: Tactical security administration tool for mobile wireless environment. Intrusion Detection Algorithms for MANET routing protocols Tactical Public Key Infrastructure (TPKI) Architecture Certificate Issuance Field Replacements Revocation Payf: Prevent threat Information Warfare attacks from damaging mobile networks. Maintain Warfighter trust/confidence in battlefield information. Reduce system network vulnerabilities.
17 D.C / Network Enabled Comm Control (NEC2) NECC/ TBC SATCOM CORPS HQ UAV Battle Comm for Unattended/Unmanned Sensors JTCW/ NECC Account for Political, Religious, Infrastructure Cultural factors in BC WIN-T Node Decision Support Tools UGV Bradley JTCW Brigade DIVISION CORPS Support Urban SASO operations BCT (Urban OPNS) Manage information flow between architectures Purpose: Develop transition stware algorithms that tailor manage the flow Battle Comm (BC) information C2 services between current future systems throughout all phases operations environments Products: Battle Comm Planning/execution/re-planning products for: Dismounted applications in Complex Urban Terrain Current Force Tactical C2 Systems Unmanned systems sensors Decision support tools that account for political, religious, cultural other factors Managed Connectors that govern the flow information between disparate architectures while globally managing resources Payf: Increased speed/quality BC planning execution adjustments Improved commers understing Battlespace related factors Faster decision-making
18 D.C / Tactical Mobile Networks (TMN) Purpose: Develop Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) for Dismounted Soldier manned & unmanned systems. Develop communications networking technologies that address Future Force constraints for bwidth connectivity while on the move. Product: JTRS Stware Communications Architecture (SCA) v2.2 compliant, energy-efficient Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) PILSNER Proactive Diverse Link Selection (PAD-LS) algorithms to enhance OTM connectivity capacity Faster than real time dynamic link estimation for connectivity capacity for Network Management man in the loop experimentation Payf: Energy efficient voice & data tactical communications for Ground Soldier Systems/Future Force Warrior sensor-to-shooter linkages Increased OTM connectivity usable bwidth Enable commers to plan communication coverage for OTM Coarse Of Action (COA) Addresses PM FCS (BCT) Critical Technology #7B (SRW), Risk #93 mitigation (SRW Availability) to support Network Ready COMPOSER: Comms Planner for Operational Simulation Effects with Realism Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
19 Network Intruder Insider Threat Overrun / Capture Malicious Stware Secure Configuration Host & Network Shut f unnecessary Intrusion Detection Tighten Access Control Viruses services ( /web) Identify Attack Source & Trojan Horses Malicious Code Issue file privileges Detection Skill Level Data Insertion / Re-route Traffic Modification / User Identification & Authentication Eliminate Attack Process Deletion Attack Forecasting Passwords/Biometris Damage Assessment / Illegally Advance Threat Analysis Message Authentication Recovery Privileges Malicious Code Denial Service Host S/W Protection Eradication Flooding Protect, Detect, Predict Respond components will be integrated managed by a Security Management architecture Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. D.C / Tactical Information Technologies for Assured Network Operations (TITAN) Secure the network Protect the information Allow information sharing across security domains Operations Order Information Assurance FRAGO C2 Protect Elements Attack Protect Detect/Predict Respond Network Management Commer s Intent Planning/Repla nning Establishing th e network Management, Maintaining an d Reporting (Mo nitoring Fault management) Information Dissemination Find, Management manage di splay informa tion Purpose: Develop, mature, demonstrate modular tools technologies that significantly improve the network planning management the tactical network Develop, mature, demonstrate security tools to protect mobile networks from attacks allow information to be shared across security domains Develop, mature, demonstrate agent enhanced Battle Comm (BC) tools to enable real time situational awareness relevant strategic tactical battlefield information sharing Products: Automated Network Management (NM) Tools Information Assurance (IA) Tools Space/Strategic Tactical Information Dissemination Management (ID&M) Applications COA development Payf: Reduce manpower network management configuration time Share information across security domains while ensuring trust/confidence in information being sent to the Warfighter Improve information sharing by providing relevant information from strategic to a tactical operational unit
20 Future Networking Technologies Affordable Satellite Antennas for Transformation Comm Systems On The Move Multi b, single/multi beam Affordable phased array antennas Advanced Wireless Security Services Integrated Information Assurance (IA) Correlation Response Stware Cross Domain Security Services Cognitive Networking Multi-Function RF systems (Radio / EW) Dynamic Spectrum Access Capabilities Adaptive middleware for applications to adjust to network conditions.
21 Process for Cognitive Network Project Development Req ts Definition HW/SW Architecture Current Knowledge base Inputs: DARPA, Industry, ARL Etc... Disciplined Systems Engineering Approach A. Dynamic Spectrum Process & Sensing B. Networking C. Data Exchange & Dissemination D. Information Assurance E. Applications F. Cognitive Management G. HW Design & Development H. Cross Layering I. System Evaluation Simulation/ Emulation Development Of Prototypes Testing/ Demos Analytical Assessment Using Req t & CBMANET Scenario
22 Cognitive Network & Radio Study Description: A cognitive network consists technologies that can perceive current network conditions, then sense, plan, decide act on those conditions. The network can learn from these adaptations use them to make future decisions, all while taking into account end-to-end performance goals user needs Generic Cognitive Processing Framework An Example Short Term Memory Reflective Deliberative Reactive Long Term Memory Benefits: A cognitive radio has awareness changes in its environment adapts its operating characteristics to improve its performance or to minimize a loss in performance Perception Environment Action Control Configuration Down-conversion, Up-conversion, Frequency translation, channel filtering, sampling, error correction, channel estimation, demodulation, modulation USR ISR Application User Increasing Use Stware HR Hardware Radio SCR Stware Controlled Radio SDR Stware Defined Radio ISR Ideal Stware Radio USR Ultimate Stware Radio SDR SCR HR Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
23 Cognitive Network High-Level Roadmap
24 Example: Cognitive Radio Benefits Current Radio Architectures Extensive planning before deployment Detailed organization structure required accounting for every radio Detailed definition Comm. Circuits static routing procedures Intensive training for network development Static Network Configuration Limited network adjustment Individual nodes unaware conditions experienced by other nodes Unaware context operation Legacy Example: EPLRS Numerous Planning Steps Before Deployment Cognitive Radio R&D Future Cognitive Radio Architectures Automated Policy Planning Policy Adjustment Based on Needs Less Knobs for the Warfighter Lessens training required for operators Decisions made to meet requirements user with minimal interaction Variable network configurations in real-time Automated response fostering optimum network performance Learning from user experiences in entire network to adjust goals Automatic adaptation based on changing context RF environment Bottom Line: Adaptable Ease CR Use for the Warfighter network
25 Questions? Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0603008A Electronic Warfare Advanced Technology ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element
More informationFuture Combat Systems
Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Communications Technology COST (In Thousands) FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY
More informationUNITED STATES ARMY. FCS - Sensors. LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov Army Strong 1
UNITED STATES ARMY FCS - Sensors Army Click Precision Modernization to add Strike Briefing Annual Strategy Review Title and April Approach 15, 2008 LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov 2007 Army Strong 1 AGENDA
More informationMission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division
UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Command, Control, Communications Technology
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationC4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
More informationAn End-to-End Modeling and Simulation Testbed (EMAST) to Support Detailed Quantitative Evaluations of GIG Transport Services
An End-to-End Modeling and Simulation Testbed (EMAST) to Support Detailed Quantitative Evaluations of GIG Transport Services 14 June 2005 Gary Comparetto (703) 983-6571 garycomp@mitre.org Objective: Evaluate
More informationJoint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System
(24 APRIL 2006) Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System MIDS International Review Board JTRS Moving Forward JPEO JTRS 5 May 2006 Mr. Howard Pace Deputy JPEO JTRS 619-524-4498 Howard.Pace@navy.mil
More informationPRODUCT MANAGER C4ISR ON-THE-MOVE EXPERIMENTATION
PRODUCT MANAGER C4ISR ON-THE-MOVE EXPERIMENTATION LTC William Utroska, Product Manager C4ISR On-The-Move Russell Langan, Deputy Product Manager C4ISR On-The-Move Michael Amabile, Senior Systems Engineer,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationFCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR
FCS Update & Testing Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR 3/13/2009 10:36:11 AM 1 Army Leadership s View Future Combat Systems is the core of our modernization
More informationFuture Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing
Future Future Industry Day Briefing MG Joseph L. Yakovac Program Executive Officer, Ground 11 February 2003 Program Manager s Intent: Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability
More informationNETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018
NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018 THE ARMY WILL FIELD A NETWORK THAT IS EASY TO USE, WORKS IN ALL ENVIRONMENTS,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationTest and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationForce 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 2 Introduction Force 2025 Maneuvers provides the means to evaluate and validate expeditionary capabilities for
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Complete F58 NON LINE OF SIGHT
More informationTactical Technology Office
Tactical Technology Office Dr. Bradford Tousley, Director DARPA Tactical Technology Office Briefing prepared for NDIA s 2017 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition March 22, 2017 1 Breakthrough
More informationCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
More information2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT
ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 6.021 8.312 7.963-7.963 8.046 8.146 8.194
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 2 - Applied Research 0602308A - Advanced Concepts and Simulation COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
More informationU.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Briefing for the SAS Panel Workshop on SMART Cooperation in Operational Analysis Simulations and Models 13 October 2015 Release of
More informationSimulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON
UNCLASSIFIED Simulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON NDIA 15 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 25 October 2012 Dr. Nancy Bucher ASA(ALT) OCSE/PoR nancy.bucher@us.army.mil
More informationSingle Integrated Ground Picture
Single Integrated Ground Picture 2003 Interoperability and System Integration Presented by: Anthony Lisuzzo Director, Intelligence and Information Directorate US ARMY CECOM 732-532-5557 Email: anthony.lisuzzo@mail1.monmouth.army.mil
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Integrated Broadcast Service FY 2015
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #36 Complete Total Program Element - 18.216 - - - - - - - - - 18.216 644778:
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 33.896 32.015 43.986-43.986 42.760 41.790
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160404BB Special Operations (SO) Tactical
More informationJoint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview
1 Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview 25 October 2005 Dr. Jerry Hoffman JOEF Acquisition Program Manager jerome.hoffman@navy.mil 2 Background PROGRAM SUMMARY: Enables warfighters
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 03 Advanced Technology Development (ATD) 0603850F Integrated Broadcast
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #82
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013
More informationDoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap
DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap Presented at the Ground Robotics Capability Conference 4 March 2008 Mr. David Ahern OUSD(ATL)/PSA david.ahern@osd.mil Integrated Unmanned Systems Roadmap Integrated
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0602712A Countermine Systems ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 26267 29171 22088 21965
More information2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference
2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #147 Cost To Complete Total
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
More informationAUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
More informationFORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)
FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) Army ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 59,522 TRW Total Program Cost (TY$): $1.8B Average Unit Cost (TY$): $27K Full-rate production:
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 20.396 20.046 19.938-19.938 20.389 20.799 21.255 22.393 Continuing
More informationGOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:
Keynote by Dr. Thomas A. Kennedy Chairman and CEO of Raytheon Association of Old Crows Symposium Marriott Marquis Hotel Washington, D.C. 12.2.15 AS DELIVERED GOOD MORNING THANK YOU, GENERAL ISRAEL FOR
More informationUnclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release
Unclassified/FOUO RAMP UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated
More informationTest and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #156
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019
More informationTeam 3: Communication Aspects In Urban Operations
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Faculty and Researcher Publications Faculty and Researcher Publications 2007-03 Team 3: Communication Aspects In Urban Operations Doll, T. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/35617
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4650.01 January 9, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, October 17, 2017 ASD(NII) DoD CIO SUBJECT: Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum
More informationAMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)
AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development
More informationPlan Requirements and Assess Collection. August 2014
ATP 2-01 Plan Requirements and Assess Collection August 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters, Department of the Army This publication is available
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
More informationACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield
Headquarters Air Combat Command ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield Col Tom Wozniak ACC/A8C 25 July 2006 This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Overview Tactical Level Programs TTNT, TACP,
More informationCHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW)
CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission The IEW support mission at all echelons is to provide intelligence, EW, and CI support to help you accomplish your mission. Elements of Intelligence
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0305192N - JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
More informationFuture Force Capabilities
Future Force Capabilities Presented by: Mr. Rickey Smith US Army Training and Doctrine Command Win in a Complex World Unified Land Operations Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative throughout the range
More informationWARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS)
EXCERPT FROM CONTRACTS W9113M-10-D-0002 and W9113M-10-D-0003: C-1. PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT SW-SMDC-08-08. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT
More informationAGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance
AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance Singapore 2015 Content Overview of Air Defense Overview of Electronic Warfare A practical example Value proposition Summary AMD - a multidisciplinary challenge Geography
More informationNaval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based
More informationAccelerating Networked Sensors & Fires
Accelerating Networked Sensors & Fires October 19, 2005 Precision Engagement Strategic Business Area Providing the Warfighter timely, effective and affordable Mission Solutions that span the breadth and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
More informationA r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y
A r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y C3I Portfolio Overview Mr. Kris Gardner Director C3I Portfolio Office of the Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology Command,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationJoint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description
Overview Mr. Chuck Walker JWARN Acquisition Program Manager Joint Project Manager Information Systems (858) 537-0215 chuck.walker@jpmis.mil 1 2 JWARN Description Connects CBRN sensors directly to Joint
More informationThe Verification for Mission Planning System
2016 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Applications (AITA 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-389-2 The Verification for Mission Planning System Lin ZHANG *, Wei-Ming CHENG and Hua-yun
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Integrated Broadcast Service (DEM/VAL) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 24.438 20.580 20.046-20.046 19.901
More informationSynthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603500F PE TITLE: MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ADV Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Information Systems: The Key to Future Force Success in a CBRN Environment. January 9, 2007
Information Systems: The Key to Future Force Success in a CBRN Environment January 9, 2007 PRESENTED TO: 2007 CBIS Conference Austin, Tx Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release Edward Wack
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationYemen ISR CONOPS and Capabilities
Yemen ISR CONOPS and Capabilities THIS INFORMATION WAS APPROVED FOR PUBLISHING PER THE ITAR AS BASIC MARKETING INFORMATION OF DEFENSE ARTICLES OR PER THE EAR AS ADVERTISING PRINTED MATTER. harris.com Yemen
More informationExpeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head
DCN #: 43-2882-17 Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head 2 ONR 30: Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare N091 Principal Deputy for P&R NRL ONRG Chief of Naval Research
More informationOverview of DoD S&T Networking and IT Research Priorities, Programs and Funding
Overview of DoD S&T Networking and IT Research Priorities, Programs and Funding Federal Networking and IT Research Opportunities FY 2004 2 October 2003 Dr. André van Tilborg andre.vantilborg@osd.mil Director,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Information Systems Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationBriefing for Industry
Professional Aerospace Contractors Association of New Mexico Briefing for Industry Mr. Quentin Saulter Naval Representative High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office August 18, 2015 DISTRIBUTION D: Distribution
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations
More information