Briefing for Industry
|
|
|
- Elvin Norton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Professional Aerospace Contractors Association of New Mexico Briefing for Industry Mr. Quentin Saulter Naval Representative High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office August 18, 2015 DISTRIBUTION D: Distribution authorized to Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only, administrative or operational use, 11 May Further dissemination only as approved by the High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office, 801 University Blvd SE, Albuquerque NM or higher DoD authority. 1
2 HEL-JTO: Coordinates Approach for HEL Weapon Development Advocates HEL development & transition Addresses joint technology requirements Report of the High Energy Laser Executive Review Panel Department of Defense Laser Master Plan March 24, 2000 Stimulates inter-service research Orchestrates portfolio of R&D projects across government/industry/academia Establishes community standards & tools Educates next generation of HEL technical, policy, & program leaders Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2000 established the HEL JTO to support the designated senior official for high energy laser programs to implement the DoD Laser Master Plan Distribution D: DoD Components & U.S. DoD Contractors Only BFI 2015_HEL JTO Final 2
3 HEL JTO Organization ASD (R&E) Operational Oversight Air Force S&T Executive Technology Council S&T Executives (Army, Navy, AF, MDA, DARPA, DTRA) Admin Oversight AFRL/RD Support Contracting Financial Public Affairs Security Director & Deputy Director Technical Advisor Executive Assistant/ Network/DE2AC Budget/Finance Army Representative Navy Representative Air Force Representative Tech Area, Contracts Monitor Tech Area, Contracts Monitor Tech Area, Contracts Monitor Contractor Technical and Administrative Support MDA DARPA Technology Area Working Groups (TAWG) Resourced by JTO BFI 2015_HEL JTO Final Distribution D: DoD Components & U.S. DoD Contractors Only 3
4 Thermal Management Target HEL-JTO Technology Thrust Areas Heat Laser Sources Beam Combining Beam Control Pointing Windows & Mirrors Atmospheric Propagation Thermal Blooming & Turbulence Lethality Laser-Target Interaction Heat Beam Conditioning & Adaptive Optics Power Conditioning Wavefront Sensor Illuminator Example: Solid State Laser Advanced Concepts Fire Control Modeling and Simulation 4
5 New TAWG Alignment Increased Interaction/Communication M&S Modeling & Simulation Warfighter Tools LETH Lethality LS Laser Sources BCT Beam Control Technology AP Atmospheric Propagation AC Advanced Concepts 5
6 Laser Sources Component Development FY16 Focus Laser types Reason for investment Technical topics / # projects Less than 1 µm 1 µm 1.5 µm µm µm Diodes Critical component of HEL systems Linewidth Narrowing / 3 High Temperature Operation / 3 Fiber Bulk SS Component maturation High Power Fiber Interfaces / 2 Fiber Diodes Fibers Eye-safer HELs, Illuminators High Average Power, Eye Safer Lasers / 2 Pump lasers for 2μm fiber lasers Eye-safer HELs, Illuminators High Average Power, Eye Safer Lasers / 1 FY12 BAA FY14 BAA FY15 S&A Component robustness to facilitate transition from laboratory devices to systems 6
7 Beam Control Technology Beam Control TAWG Objectives Beam Control investments focused on ABLE Component Requirements ABLE Technical Configuration trades in work ABLE consists of sub-system test and demonstrations to meet Service requirements TAWG will support ABLE to ensure technical performance objectives are met BCSS Identified Eight Major Areas Wave front control(wfc) / adaptive optics systems (AOS) Tracking / aim point, selection & maintenance Position, alignment & line of sight stabilization Aero-optics (AO) Light weight beam director Operational / harsh environments Fire control support (kill assessment) Phased array technology 7
8 Advanced Beam Control for Locating & Engagement (ABLE) What Is It? Beam Control System is responsible for identifying the target, pointing and maintaining the beam at the proper aimpoint, effectively delivering the laser beam (accuracy and atmospheric compensation), assessing a target kill, and rapidly engaging the next target in the cue. What Does It Offer? An effective beam control subsystem that can be integrated onto a relevant military platform Goals: Beam-train loss 5% (Gaussian laser beam) Improved tracking and aimpoint maintenance Enhanced compensation for atmospheric turbulence Technical Approach: Invest in key component development Build subsystem from components for demonstrations Current Technology Advanced Beam Control & Enhanced Atmospheric Compensation Partners: HEL JTO, Army, Navy, Air Force, Industry partners TBD Next Generation Beam Control Will Greatly Improve System Effectiveness 8
9 Warfighter Tools Beam Control Development Laser Source Development HEL JTO Technology Roadmap FY Milestone / Knowledge point RELI (Fiber & Bulk SSL) Service Transition - Current program SSL Near Term Development Future Development Advanced Laser Source Research & Development Advanced Beam Control for Locating and Engagement (ABLE) Propagation and Deep Turbulence Mitigation Enhanced ABLE (En-ABLE) Service Sponsored Demo (s) Advanced Beam Control Research & Development - Future option - Ongoing investment ** Adaptive Optics System Demonstration FY21 Service (s) Demo HELCoMES V&V Vulnerability Module (s) UAV Dynamic Targets PA Pgm for Adv Prototype Development Warfighter tools Capability enhancements that enable component integration/demonstrations will lead to advanced system development and fielding 9
10 HEL JTO Acquisition Methods Broad Agency Announcement Call to industry for HEL technology development (6.2) Task Order awarded with potential for additional task orders Traditionally one, now considering FY14 BAA s awarded Service and Agency Call Call to Service, Agencies, and FFRDCs for HEL technology development (6.1 & 6.2) Awards are for one year with an option year 13 awards in FY15 selected (6.1) 5 awards (1st year) (6.2) 3 awards (1st year), 5 awards (2nd year) Multi-disciplinary Research Initiatives Call to U.S. Universities for basic HEL research Grants awarded for three years with a two-year option Option is evaluated to determine whether to continue 14 awards in FY15 selected ($9.86M Total) FY10 MRI - 4 awards FY12 MRI - 10 awards 10
11 HEL JTO Acquisition Opportunities JTO 2016 BAA Topics Solid State Laser Technologies Address HEL System Field-ability, Robustness, Standardization Beam Control Technology Address next generation beam control components Spiral upgrade technology in support of ABLE Standardize instrumentation/diagnostics for ABLE Advanced Concepts High risk / high payoff technologies for the generation after next HEL systems BAA call for topics early FY16 Awards by early FY17 (end of calendar 2016) 11
12 Summary HEL JTO is focusing on highest priority Service requirements Fundamental HEL Systems Have Been Demonstrated Enhancements are Required in Laser Sources and Beam Control to Achieve Robust HEL ABLE is next step Engagement at Greater Ranges to Expand Keep Out Zone More Robust, Advanced, Asymmetric Threats Saturation Raid Threats Increased availability for Predictive Avoidance and Airspace De-confliction ABLE Program balanced with Other HEL JTO Priorities Service specific mission capabilities are being addressed: ABLE hardware development JTO lead ABLE Follow on Program Service or Agency lead ABLE Joint Service Technology Investments are Needed to Develop the Next Generation HEL Weapons Systems 12
13 BACK UP 13
14 ABLE Notional Diagram Integrated Beam Control System Integrated Subsystems Development - Telescope - Tracking - Atmospheric compensation Components to be improved Unobscured telescope for high throughput Improved aimpoint maintenance Cameras higher speed for reduced track jitter and longer range Illuminator lasers higher pulse power for tracking Enhanced atmospheric compensation Wavefront sensor Compensation beacon Deformable mirrors high speed and larger stroke Assess Kill Output Beam Unguided Axis Pump Guided Axis Core Laser System Cladding Input Signal Beam 14
15 ABLE Program Development Goal Maximize Throughput HEL-JTO Tech Development OA DPM OAT HEL - BDS Advanced Adaptive Optics Algorithms BILL WFS AO Components Enhanced Tracking System TILL SWIR Algorithms Advanced Atmospheric Compensation System Enhanced Tracking System Integrated Optical Bench Advanced Beam Control Test Bed Field Configuration Mobile - Transportable to Multiple Sites Supports Multiple Service Requirements 15
16 Notional ABLE Program Schedule Major Task FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 Design, Build, Test & Deliver Components Design, Integration & Test Subsystems Subsystem Integration & Alignment Component Development Subsystem Integ / Test System Integ ABLE Advanced Beam Control Demonstration ABLE Test Bed Configuration ABLE Demo ABLE TB 16
17 ABLE Program Block Diagram Maximize Throughput OA DPM OAT HEL - BDS HEL-JTO Tech Development Service Demonstration 30kW HEL Advanced Adaptive Optics Algorithms BILL WFS AO Components Enhanced Tracking System TILL SWIR Algorithms Advanced Atmospheric Compensation System Enhanced Tracking System Integrated Test Bed JLDSS ABLE Integration Fire Control / Operator Station ABLE Hi Pwr Demo 17
18 Joint Laser Deconfliction Safety System (JLDSS) Prototype Description Commercial Air Tactical Air Manned Spacecraft Unmanned Aircraft System Satellites HEL Threat Engagement Required HEL Clear Path Space Assets Tactical/Commercial Assets JLDSS provides Predictive Avoidance (PA)/Airspace Deconfliction (AD) for HEL Weapons Platform Use Ground Based Vehicles Commercial Vessels Threat Vessels Moves in a Dynamic HEL Engagement Overall HEL Beam Accuracy HEL Pointing Accuracy and Specifications Platform Position Accuracy Surface Combatants Surface Contacts Proposed prototype development and testing executed by Navy as a Joint Service Initiative Methodology and Platform Agnostic Deconfliction Capability will support fielding of all laser systems Architecture supports laser testing, training and warfighter operations under DODI Identify/mature HEL PA/AD for integration into future mobile/disadvantaged platforms Creates standardized range operations for HEL testing and demonstrations JLDSS provides for 24/7 laser engagement capability with automated space data dissemination Increases automation in deconfliction process for direct effect on battlefield ops, minimizing closures-- creates common interface to battle management/fire control structures X X X Blue/Gray/White Forces Satellite PA Systems Integration (Fire Control & C4ISR Interfaces) AD in Commercial and Battlefield Operations 18
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603500F PE TITLE: MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ADV Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Navy Date: February 2016 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based
Special Program Announcement for 2013 Office of Naval Research. Ground-Based Air Defense Directed Energy On-The-Move
I. INTRODUCTION: Special Program Announcement for 2013 Office of Naval Research Ground-Based Air Defense Directed Energy On-The-Move This announcement describes an advanced technology development opportunity,
Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association
Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited May 13, 2016 Mr. Richard Matlock Program
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 2 - Applied Research 0602308A - Advanced Concepts and Simulation COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 Program Element 16.104 48.666 19.004-19.004 19.950 31.056 31.181 31.730 Continuing Continuing 633150: Advanced Optics
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($
Missile Defense Agency Advanced Research Overview Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Missile Defense Agency Advanced Research Overview Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The Increasing Ballistic Missile Threat Increasing theater threat capabilities
AIRBORNE LASER (ABL)
AIRBORNE LASER (ABL) Air Force ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 7 aircraft Boeing Total Program Cost (TY$): $6335M Average Unit Cost (TY$): $528M Full-rate production: FY06 SYSTEM
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Navy Date: February 2016 1319:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 9.557 9.876 13.592-13.592
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Navy Page 1 of 17 R-1 Line Item #30 To Program Element 25.144
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
First Announcement/Call For Papers
AIAA Strategic and Tactical Missile Systems Conference AIAA Missile Sciences Conference Abstract Deadline 30 June 2011 SECRET/U.S. ONLY 24 26 January 2012 Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Complete NIGHT VISION SYS A/DEV
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A
IFPC Inc 2-I DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 31 IFPC Inc 2-I Mission Mission: Primary Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 Intercept (IFPC Inc
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Operational Energy Capability Improvement. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways
Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways Pete Modigliani Su Chang Dan Ward Contact us at accelerate@mitre.org Approved for public release. Distribution unlimited 17-3828-2. 2 Purpose
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 35.208 38.447
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
Department of Defense Technology Transfer, Transition, and Manufacturing 2007 Beyond SBIR Phase II: Bringing Technological Edge to the Warfighter
Labs Warfighters Companies Department of Defense Technology Transfer, Transition, and Manufacturing 2007 Beyond SBIR Phase II: Bringing Technological Edge to the Warfighter August 23, 2007 Cynthia E. Gonsalves,
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-5 Program Element (PE) No. and Name: 0604218N Air/Ocean
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #216 To Program Element
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Review completed by the AMRDEC Public Affairs Office 16 Nov 2009; FN4324. DISCLAIMER: Reference
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Review completed by the AMRDEC Public Affairs Office 16 Nov 2009; FN4324. DISCLAIMER: Reference herein to any specific commercial, private or public
Radar Open Systems Architectures
Radar Open Systems Architectures Don Scott Lucero DDRE/Systems Engineering Deputy Director, Strategic Initiatives 13 th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference San Diego, CA October 28, 2010 Oct 2010
2018 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference
2018 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 15 May 2018 Mr. Joseph C. Keelon Program Executive for Advanced
AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)
AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Army
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #19
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, elopment, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Technology elopment (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD)
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Office of Secretary
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 21 R-1 Line #20
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference
2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Communications Technology COST (In Thousands) FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
MEADS MEDIUM EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM
MEADS MEDIUM EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM MEADS WORLD CLASS THEATER AIR & MISSILE DEFENSE MEADS has been developed to defeat next-generation threats including tactical ballistic missiles (TBMs), unmanned
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE BB / SOF Visual Augmentation, Lasers and Sensor Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 United States Special Operations Command Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2016 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 685 Boeing Platform Integration Total Program Cost (TY$): $180M Data Link Solutions FDL Terminal Average
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 6.021 8.312 7.963-7.963 8.046 8.146 8.194
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Briefing to CBIS
1 Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Briefing to CBIS January 2007 Ms. Kathy Houshmand JOEF Deputy Acquisition Program Manager kathy.houshmand@jpmis.mil 2 Background PROGRAM SUMMARY: Enables Warfighter
Air Defense System Solutions.
Air Defense System Solutions www.aselsan.com.tr ADSS AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Effective air defense is based on integration and coordinated use of airborne and/or ground
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY
Test and Evaluation/ Science and Technology (T&E/S&T) Program
Test and Evaluation/ Science and Technology (T&E/S&T) Program 8th Annual Science & Engineering Technology Conference/DoD Technology Exposition April 17-19, 19, 2007 Mr. Derrick Hinton T&E/S&T Program Manager
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0603747N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles
Chapter 5 GUIDED MISSILES Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles 5.1 INTRODUCTION Guided missiles have been in the forefront of modern warfare since
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 4: Advanced Component Development
Time Critical Targeting
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Time Critical Targeting Brig Gen Jim Morehouse Director of Command & Control DCS, Air & Space Operations 1 Definition Performance Threshold The Kill Chain Closing the Seams
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 75.7 122.481-122.481
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 3.350 3.874 - - - 1.977 - - - Continuing Continuing 645121: Physical
Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program Cyber Security Workshop January 2015 Dan Cundiff Deputy Director, Comparative Technology Office OASD (R&E) Emerging Capabilities & Prototyping E-mail: thomas.d.cundiff.civ@mail.mil
DOD INSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF LASER ILLUMINATION OF OBJECTS IN SPACE
DOD INSTRUCTION 3100.11 MANAGEMENT OF LASER ILLUMINATION OF OBJECTS IN SPACE Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Effective: October 24, 2016 Releasability: Reissues
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Human, Social and Culture Behavior (HSCB) Modeling Advanced Development FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2010 0400: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide BA 4: Advanced Component & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. 1 Weapons Systems Integration and Software Support (WSISS)
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0203761N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
aselsan EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT
EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT November 2014 CONTENTS What Is The Problem? Common Picture? (EW Spectrum) Area of Interest Preemptive Operations EW Spectrum Management Steps For EW Spectrum Management Planning,
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, DefenseWide / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes
UNCLASSIFIED. RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST (Dollars in Millions) FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Cost to Complete
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE FEBRUARY 2004 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 3 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160402BB Special Operations (SO) Advanced
The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective
Naval Sea Systems Command Supporting Expeditionary Warfare Participating in the War on Terrorism Dr. David P. Skinner Executive Director D A H L G R E N N A V A L http://www.ncsc.navy.mil D I V I S I O
Tactical Satellite 3 Mission Overview and Lessons Learned
Tactical Satellite 3 Mission Overview and Lessons Learned 10 August 2010 STANLEY D. STRAIGHT TacSat-3 Chief Engineer / Deputy Program Manager Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory Kirtland
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 146.789 129.723 185.043-185.043 193.011
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2007 Actual FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 31 R-1 Line #27
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions) Prior