Aeronautical Systems Center

Transcription

1 Aeronautical Systems Center Aeronautical Systems Center Aircraft & Weapons: Today & Tomorrow Lt Gen Tom Owen Commander AFPEO /AC

2 Overview ASC Snapshot Aircraft/Weapon Success Stories On The Horizon Way Ahead Warfighter Support ASC Imperatives 2

3 ASC Snapshot Aeronautical Systems Center Lt Gen Tom Owen, Commander Air Force Acquisition Programs FMS Programs - $29.8B DoD, $22.8B FMS, $6.7B other - Largest ABW in the USAF - Support for Airborne Laser Test Bed 88 ABW - 27K mil/civ, 60+ on-base/100+ off-base units - $391M wing annual budget (FY11) -- $121M Base Operations & Maintenance -- $132M Civilian Pay -- $135M Defense Health Program -- $ 3M Military Family Housing PEO/AC - F-22, F-35 LCSO, F-15SA, Rotary Wing, Future Systems, Special Programs - 7 AML Programs PEO/Agile Combat Support - Simulators, Propulsion, Combat Electronics, JPATS, Trainers, Human Systems - 23 AML Programs - 1,104 Assigned Personnel PEO/KC-46-1 AML Program Assigned Personnel PEO/ISR & SOF - Global Hawk, Predator/Reaper, CV AML Programs - 1,232 Assigned Personnel PEO/Fighters & Bombers - B-1, B-2, B-52, F-15, F-16, Avionics - 48 AML Programs - 1,155 Assigned Personnel PEO/ Mobility - C-5, C-17, C-27, C-130, LAIRCM - 14 AML Programs Assigned Personnel 3

4 Aircraft/Weapon Success Stories (Small Diameter Bomb (SDB)) GBU-39 (SDB I) IOC declared 6 months ahead of schedule F-15E integration completed in 2005 F-16 Block 40/ st successful SDB I released in Apr 2011 F-16 Block Nine successful SDB I drops completed to date F-22A -- SDB capability added under increments 3.1 and 3.2 BRU-61/A four-place carriage Increases platform combat capability Reduces aircraft weapons maintenance turn time GBU-53 (SDB II) in Engineering & Manufacturing Development Critical Design Review completed after only 6 months Control Test Vehicle (CTV-1) accomplished Weapon integration ongoing Guided Test Vehicle on track for FY12 Faring Overbody AFT Section Seeker Section Live Payload Dome Cover 4

5 Aircraft/Weapon Success Stories (AIM-9X/AIM-120) AIM-9X Block I operational on F-15C/D Suite 5 & F-16 Block 30/40/50 F-22A integration underway in increment 3.2 Block II MS C approval obtained in Jul 2011 AIM-120 F-15 C/D AIM-120C initial integration completed in 2005 F-22A/AIM-120C integration AIM-120D Initial Operational Capability (IOC) planned for

6 Aircraft/Weapon Success Stories Industry-Gov t team success (Universal Armament Interface (UAI)) F-15E/LJDAM out-of-cycle integration done in 3 months/$2.5m vice normal 3-5 years for OFP and $20-25M! Significant operational capability 100% F-15E Strike Eagles = UAI Within 3+ years, all F-16 40/50 (M6/6+) to include 287 EPAF/NATO jets = UAI JSF All JDAM variants = UAI JASSM: UAI fielding w/in year SDB I/II: UAI/to be UAI UAVs: Army testing UAI NATO/Coalition warfare game changer -- OSD $$ NATO weapons on U.S. jets Rapid deployment of capability through commonality! 6

7 Aircraft/Weapon Success Stories (Other Notable Achievements) F-16 Operational Flight Program M5/M5+ M5.2 released to field last year -- M5.2+ release anticipated in late Dec F-16 Combat Avionics Programmed Extension Suite All weather DEAD capability -- Enhanced air-to-air targeting Large High Res Display for SAR images & target pod video Streamlines multiple intel broadcasts -- A system of systems Single-point access -- Automated/Hands-on EW control 5th Gen Weapons Roadmap in development Documents current & future weapons programs Ensures synergy between weapons and aircraft 7

8 The Budget Challenge The Federal Budget Defense Entitlements Interest Other 7% 42% 31% 20% 34% 11% 30% 20% 7% 40% 6% 52% 1970 $0.9 Trillion 2010 $3.5 Trillion Source: Air Force Magazine, Oct 2010, p. 28 (from Defense Business Board, July 22, 2010) 2040 (Projected) $12.3 Trillion 8

9 On The Horizon (The Budget Challenge) The time of great fiscal challenge is now! 2010, a year of AF efficiencies -- $33B identified , DoD spending further reduced by $450B Future impacts -- Budget Control Act of 2011 Joint Committee on Deficit Reduction -- Potential $1T in cuts Must still remain true to our service priorities The Air Force must not break faith with Airmen and families Ensure continued regional overseas presence Maintain air superiority -- The F-35 must succeed! Sustain ISR advances made over the past decade Commitment to Long Range Strike family of systems DoD s way ahead evolving -- impacts are still unknown 9

10 30 On The Horizon (Policies Issued by Month) New or Revised Acquisition Policies Issued by Month (January July 2011) Total 525 Policies (Does not include Federal Register entries) 10

11 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Manpower & Contract Actions B 8.3K On The Horizon (ASC Acquisition Workforce) CIV MIL CME Funding Contract Actions 6133 Organic Authorizations in Organic Authorizations in % Cut in ASC Organic Strength! 52B 8.0K ? Funding Billions FY93-06 Data (Manpower Report); FY07-10 Data (Historical UMDs); FY11-15 Data (EOM Aug 2011 UMD) * Data includes FMS authorizations 11

12 Established in 1991 between ASC and AAC, ESC joined in 2010 Provide forcing function and streamlined decision-making Purpose: Ensure Integrated Weapon System Capabilities Are Delivered When Components Are Fielded Platforms, Weapons, Command and Control, Combat Support Programs, GPS, Mission Planning, UAVs, Miniature Munitions, Etc Battle rhythm Semi-annual forum hosted by ASC, ESC, & AAC Tri-chaired by CC or CA from ASC, ESC, & AAC WINTER -- AAC Lead SUMMER -- ASC / ESC Lead Way Ahead (Executive Weapons System Review) Cutting through bureaucracy, Speeding up resolution on tough issues! 12

13 Way Ahead Executive Weapons System Review Why EWSR Integration Seams -- Find & Fix Problems Identify and Mitigate Risks Strengthen Relationships Expected outcomes Increased Probability of On-Time, On-Cost Delivery of Integrated System Capabilities Stronger Teams and Better Communications VISION War-winning capabilities.on time, on cost The right folks, the right decisions on a way forward! 13

14 Way Ahead (High Velocity Acquisition) Right Solutions People Processes Right LC Support Tools & Training Right LC Strategies 14

15 Life Cycle Costs ($) Empirical LCC Analysis and Policy Effects Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Committed Life Cycle Cost Actual/ Expended CBA MDD AoA ASR M/S A SRR SFR PDR M/S B CDR TRR SVR M/S C PCA Concept & Material Solutions Analysis Technology Development Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support Several Research Questions to Explain LCC changes (AFIT proposal) How can empirical data be used to characterize the concept of Committed LCC? How has new acquisition policy affected LCC (new Pre M/S B Estimated Costs)? What are the significant policy drivers/ factors which most influence LCC? How can early SE Reviews/Milestones be used to effect LCC (shape, schedule)? What tools/methods could be developed to aid decision makers with improved LCC estimates? 15

16 Decision Framework Structured Assessment Concept Development Governing Core Enabling MDD Material Solution Analysis A B C Technology Development Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Minimum, programmatically aligned governing requirements Information (reviews) required by decision makers What are the critical exit criteria to address over time? Foundational Standardized tasks required to effectively manage & respond Processes required to provide decision makers with data required resulting in products Standard, efficient business practices Practices owned by functionals, that when consistently executed, result in consistent results IOC Right people, skills, training, and tools/environments Infrastructure to accomplish the mission FOC Operations & Support Timely communication of the intent of policy Define the work to meet intent of current policies Evaluate integrated flow-down impacts prior to implementation Understand intended and unintended consequences Adjust processes to implement changes Measure effectiveness over time Assess Within Maturing HVA Construct 16

17 Way Ahead (Integrated Life Cycle Management Focus) INTEGRATED LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT (ILCM) ENTERPRISE ILCM EXECUTIVE COUNCIL PORTFOLIO PLANNING SYSTEM DELIVERY PRODUCT SUPPORT Integration of the Materiel Enterprise through life cycle 17

18 Way Ahead (Integrated Life Cycle Management Focus) How do we measure ILCM status? Logistics Health Assessment (LHA) on 100% of ASC programs on the Master List Material Availability KPP for ACAT I programs Ensure SORA and DSOR completion prior to RFP ASC Process Guide updated for LHA requirement Enterprise Review Senior Steering Committee reviews metrics monthly Statistics 100% of ASC AML programs have an LHA 100% of new ACAT I programs have Material Availability KPP Since Apr 2011, SORA completed on 75% of new programs prior to RFP release Robust planning upfront = Reduced life cycle costs! 18

19 Warfighter Support Committed response to COCOM urgent operational needs 488 of 544 F-16 Secure Line of Sight mods complete 150+ in theater now 313 of 538 F-16 Beyond Line of Sight mods completed 170+ in theater now B-1 Laptop Controlled Targeting Pod -- Phase II on-track to deliver Laser JDAM! LAIRCM Next Gen MWS OT&E complete -- C-17 upgrades to begin in FY13 SNIPER Pod 3.5 operational -- Fielded w/ F-16 Blk 40/50 OFP M5.1+ in Sep C-27Js deployed! 378 sorties flown -- 92% mission capable in Sep 11 Achieved SECDEF-directed 50 MQ-1/MQ-9 CAPs 6 months ahead of schedule Gorgon Stare deployed to Afghan AOR -- Critical imagery at 90% MC rates B-2 headlines: 14 of 20 RMP mods complete -- Tail 0332 recovered 16 Aug 19

20 Warfighter Support HH-60 Op Loss -- Teamed w/ Army RDEC; surged delivery of two UH-60Ms Combat Rescue HELO RFI issued Aug Long-term fix for aging HH-60 F-22 fleet is back in the air! 174 / 188 jets delivered with zero defects C-5 RERP -- LRIP complete, 6 C-5M aircraft back to AMC Final C-5A inducted for Avionics Modernization Program C-130J production underway at a 15 year high aircraft per year! HC/MC-130J DT&E complete -- 1st HC/MC modified and delivered 8 of 27 Dyess AFB C-130Js delivered -- 1st squadron on ramp by end of 2011 KC-46 Gov/Boeing IBR completed 31 days ahead of schedule 20

21 ASC Imperatives Get technologically superior capability into the hands of the warfighter faster Launch high confidence programs Demands close partnership on requirements/development planning Implement Integrated Life Cycle Management (ILCM) into our program planning and execution Partner with Industry -- Create Better Business Deals Identify and use the best contract type with right incentives Reduce dependence on Undefinitized Contract Actions Reduce Acquisition Lead Time Comply with Core and 50/50 mandates Execute dollars in the year appropriated Promote real competition Invest in the future and our people Communicate Imperatives Win Ownership Internally! 21

22 What it means to you Gov/Industry partnership is essential to continued success Re-evaluate the old ways of doing business Targeting affordability Balancing risk and opportunity Tighter cost control from program inception Reduce non-value-added overhead imposed on industry Closer scrutiny of cost -- Dissecting overheads and indirect costs Greater emphasis on tie between profit and performance Incentivizing industry -- Drive out COST; preserve PROFITABILITY FPIF in production contracts -- 50/50 share line & target cost Payments -- Improve cash flow as a win-win IRAD -- Improve return on investment Life Cycle Supportability -- Government rights to data Affordability & Efficiency in a Fiscally Constrained Environment 22

23 The Challenge Find Opportunities To communicate and share information Expand partnerships to reduce redundancy Identify technologies which are militarily useful and commercially lucrative Get technologically superior capability into the our warfighter hands -- Faster & for less Seek & suggest efficient ways to achieve cost reductions / affordable systems Help us to understand what incentivizes you! 23

24 AF MISSION Fly, Fight Birthplace, and Home Win in & Future Air, of Aerospace Space and Cyberspace 24

25 25