Joint Test & Evaluation Program. Net Centric Operations NDIA Conference Jim Thompson JT&E Program Manager DOT&E March 7, 2007
|
|
|
- Patrick Melton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Joint Test & Evaluation Program Net Centric Operations NDIA Conference Jim Thompson JT&E Program Manager DOT&E March 7, 2007
2 What is the JT&E Program? Joint Warfighter (Services, COCOMs, and DoD agencies) Successful Joint Interoperability Joint Issue Nominated Selected Nominations Chartered Nominator/Sponsor Leads Test Team New joint TTPs, architectures, and processes delivered to the Warfighter JT&E Catalyst for solving Joint interoperability issues DOT&E Managed and Funded Service and COCOM Resourced and Supported Chartered to Produce a Joint Product
3 Joint Test & Evaluation Process and Support DOT&E/JT&E Support Contractor Support, Unique Test Funding, Logistics, Security and Program Oversight and Structure Nominator Any COCOM, Service, Joint Staff, or Agency Relevant Joint Issue Needing a Solution Joint Test 3-year effort lead by the nominating agency. Supported by Services & COCOMs as needed to solve the issue. Quick Reaction Test 6 12 month effort lead by Service OTAs to quickly solve a specific issue. Warfighter Solutions TTPs, Doctrine, Architectures, Methodologies Sponsor Support (COCOM, Service, OSD Agencies) Facilities, Test Assets, Military/Government Personnel
4 Two Avenues to Conduct Joint Testing Quick Reaction Tests Quickly addresses specific and focused warfighter question/issue within scope of JT&E Program purpose Accelerated review, approval, execution Duration: 6-12 months (Nomination-to-Final Report) Sponsors: COCOMs, JFCOM, Services, Joint Staff, OSD Testers: Executed by Service Operational Test Agencies (OTA) Product provides specific answer to a specific question Resourcing for OTA participation in accordance with JT&E guidelines JT&E Projects In-depth, methodical evaluation of issues within scope of JT&E Program purpose Duration: 3 years maximum (Charter-to-Closedown) Sponsors: COCOMs, JFCOM, Services, Joint Staff, OSD Testers: Executed by Service/COCOM-led JT&E test teams Delivers defined and useful products to warfighter Both interim and final products required
5 JT&E Net-Centric History For 35 years, JT&E has taken joint issues from the field and tested solutions in an operational environment to improve joint warfighting capabilities. Over the past 12 years, we have conducted 15 command and control related projects, of which at least seven investigated net-centric improvements: Joint C2, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Joint Warfighter Joint Integrated C2 for Maritime Homeland Defense Joint Close Air Support Joint Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Joint C2 for War on Terror Activities Joint Battle Damage Assessment Joint C2 of Net Enabled Weapons Joint Space Control Operations-Negation Joint Fire Coordination Measures Joint Methodology to Assess C4ISR Architecture Joint Mobile Network Operations Joint Datalink Information Combat Execution Joint Airspace C2 Joint Integration and Interoperability of Special Operations Other areas, including acquisition, test & evaluation, and precision engagement, have resulted in net-centric improvements: Joint Threat Ballistic Missile Early Warning Joint Test and Evaluation Methodology Joint Advanced Distributed Simulation Joint GPS Combat Effectiveness The warfighting community has identified net-centric issues; JT&E has provided a conduit for solving these problems
6 Notable Success Stories Identification, Friend, Foe, or Neutral (IFFN) JT&E, Evaluated the ability of friendly forces to identify airborne targets as friend, foe, or neutral. Test products include: residual national test assets, the development of real time air-to-air and air-to-ground kill removal techniques, recommended changes to man-in-the-loop simulation unique methods for system certification. Theater Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF) was the initial legacy of this JT&E. It was later designated as the Air Force s Distributed Mission Operations Center (DMOC), which continues to support the warfighter. Joint Command, Control, Intelligence, Surveillance, & Reconnaissance (JC2ISR) JT&E, Assisted USCENTCOM, USCENTAF, and Second Fleet in revising the ISR-related portions of time-sensitive targeting concept of operations and related TTP documents by integrating the rigors of operational testing and personnel training into the evaluation of C2ISR architectures. The revised TTPs enhanced the warfighter s ability to utilize diverse national, theater, and tactical information collection sensors and dynamically focus them to identify, track, and engage high-value targets.
7 Notable Success Stories Joint Advanced Distributed Simulation (JADS) JT&E, Investigated the utility of advanced distributed simulation technologies for test and evaluation purposes. Products help to accelerate system development by beginning detailed weapon system integration while the platform is still under development. This system integration can be accomplished by using ADS to capitalize on the high fidelity simulations of existing precision guided munitions without duplicating supporting infrastructure. Joint Methodology To Assess C4ISR Architecture (JMACA) JT&E, Developed and evaluated a methodology to assess C4ISR architectures as they relate to mission outcome. The purpose of JMACA was to validate an integrated C4ISR architecture assessment methodology. Test products were planning and analysis tools for combatant commanders, CJTFs, and Services at the operational level. JMACA became part of JFCOM s Joint Battle Management Command and Control J89 Directorate.
8 Notable Success Stories Joint Data Link Information Combat Execution (JDICE) JT&E, Focused on data link information exchange to improve integration of ISR, C2 and shooter assets. Improved the warfighter s situational awareness by developing joint TTPs that provide critical mission information across platform, regardless if tactical air or ground data link. The four JDICE-developed TTPs applied to: National Assets Army Special Operations Forces Marine Corps JDICE transitioned to Joint Digital Integration for Combat Engagement, a permanent Air Force organization responsible for combat identification, special programs, and emerging capabilities.
9 Current Net Centric Related Projects Joint Test and Evaluation Methodology Col Eileen Bjorkman Joint C2 of Net-Enabled Weapons Col Richard Leibach Joint Mobile Network Operations Col Edmund Mitchell Joint Space Control Operations-Negation Col Chris Daehnick Joint C2 for War on Terror Activities CAPT Tom Wears
10 Joint Test & Evaluation Program Jim Thompson, Program Manager (703) NDIA Net Centric Operations Conference March 7, 2007
Joint Test & Evaluation Program
Joint Test & Evaluation Program Program Overview Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director Air Warfare DOT&E March 22, 2005 Mr. Jim Thompson Joint Test and Evaluation Program Manager 1 What is the JT&E Program? DOT&E
Joint Test and Evaluation Programs
Joint Test and Evaluation Programs The Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) program provides information on joint military capabilities and potential solutions for increasing military effectiveness of fielded
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification May 2009 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 (RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT) OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES (OT&A) PROGRAM ELEMENT
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
Joint Test and Evaluation Program
Joint Test and Evaluation Program The Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) program is designed to provide quantitative information for analysis of existing joint military capabilities and potential options
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 The Joint Staff Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
Data Collection & Field Exercises: Lessons from History. John McCarthy
Data Collection & Field Exercises: Lessons from History John McCarthy jmccarthy@aberdeen.srs.com Testing and Training Objectives Testing Training Prepare for Combat Understand Critical Issues Analyst/Evaluator
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Briefing for the SAS Panel Workshop on SMART Cooperation in Operational Analysis Simulations and Models 13 October 2015 Release of
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 19.610 5.856 8.660-8.660 14.704 14.212
The Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) Program has existed for 30 years and is designed to provide quantitative
Overview The Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) Program has existed for 30 years and is designed to provide quantitative information for analysis of joint military capabilities and potential options for
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
C4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
Single Integrated Ground Picture
Single Integrated Ground Picture 2003 Interoperability and System Integration Presented by: Anthony Lisuzzo Director, Intelligence and Information Directorate US ARMY CECOM 732-532-5557 Email: anthony.lisuzzo@mail1.monmouth.army.mil
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Fires Integration & Interoperability FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
552nd ACW (Air Control Wing), 2000, informal paper defining C2ISR package commander, 552 ACW/552 OSS, Tinker AFB, Okla.
REFERENCES 552nd ACW (Air Control Wing), 2000, informal paper defining C2ISR package commander, 552 ACW/552 OSS, Tinker AFB, Okla. 93rd ACW, 1998, Draft Tactics Techniques and Procedures (TTP) for 93rd
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations
MCWP 3-42.1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations U.S. Marine Corps DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited PCN 143 000141 00 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5141.02 February 2, 2009 DA&M SUBJECT: Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Reissues DoD
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2007 Actual FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Airspace Control in the Combat Zone
Airspace Control in the Combat Zone Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1.7 4 June 1998 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DOCTRINE DOCUMENT 2 1.7 4 JUNE 1998 OPR: HQ AFDC/DR (Maj Chris Larson,
The Cruise Missile Threat: Prospects for Homeland Defense
1 June 2006 NSW 06-3 This series is designed to provide news and analysis on pertinent national security issues to the members and leaders of the Association of the United States Army and to the larger
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3222.4 July 31, 1992 Incorporating Through Change 2, January 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures USD(A)
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5158.04 July 27, 2007 Incorporating Change 2, July 28, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) References: (a) DoD Directive 5158.4,
Joint Warfare System (JWARS)
Joint Warfare System (JWARS) Update to DMSO Industry Days June 4, 1999 Jim Metzger JWARS Office Web Site: http://www.dtic.mil/jwars/ e-mail: jwars@osd.pentagon.mil 6/4/99 slide 1 Agenda Background Development
Joint Test and Evaluation Program
Joint Test and Evaluation Program The primary objective of the Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) program is to provide rapid solutions to operational deficiencies identified by the joint military community.
Department of Defense
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)) NUMBER 5143.01 November 23, 2005 References: (a) Title 10, United States Code (b) Title 50, United States Code
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 27448F PE TITLE: C2ISR Tactical Data Link Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification 27448F C2ISR Tactical Data Link 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Total Actual Complete Total Program Element (PE) Cost
Accelerating Networked Sensors & Fires
Accelerating Networked Sensors & Fires October 19, 2005 Precision Engagement Strategic Business Area Providing the Warfighter timely, effective and affordable Mission Solutions that span the breadth and
STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5250.01 January 22, 2013 Incorporating Change 1, August 29, 2017 USD(I) SUBJECT: Management of Intelligence Mission Data (IMD) in DoD Acquisition References: See
Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association
Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited May 13, 2016 Mr. Richard Matlock Program
UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified
Clinton Administration 1993 - National security space activities shall contribute to US national security by: - supporting right of self-defense of US, allies and friends - deterring, warning, and defending
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1322.18 January 13, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, Effective February 23, 2017 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Military Training References: (a) DoD Directive 1322.18, subject as
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.
Joint Command and Control For Net-Enabled Weapons Joint Test and Evaluation (JC2NEW JT&E)
Joint Command and Control For Net-Enabled Weapons Joint Test and Evaluation (JC2NEW JT&E) 7 March 2007 Col Richard W. Leibach, USAF Director JC2NEW JT&E 20070208001 1 Problem Statement Current operational
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. SEGA DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING
HOLD UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMITTEE TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. SEGA DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 The Joint Staff Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Major T&E Investment. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 Air Force Page 1 of 12 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in
SSC Pacific is making its mark as
5.3 FEATURE FROM THE SPAWAR SYSTEMS CENTER PACIFIC INTERNAL NEWSLETTER SSC Pacific C4I scoring direct hit for shore-based ballistic missile defense SSC Pacific is making its mark as a valued partner in
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years R1 Program
Tactical Technology Office
Tactical Technology Office Dr. Bradford Tousley, Director DARPA Tactical Technology Office Briefing prepared for NDIA s 2017 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition March 22, 2017 1 Breakthrough
United States Air Force
United States Air Force The MathWorks Aerospace and Defense Conference 2006 Innovation Across the Industry Washington, DC 14 June 2006 Dr. Steve Butler Director, Engineering and Technical Management Wright-Patterson
MCO D C Sep 2008
C 19 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3902.1D From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MARINE CORPS STUDIES SYSTEM Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 5223.1C (b) SECNAV M-5214.1 Encl: (1) The Marine Corps Studies
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
Towards a Robotics Strategy
Towards a Robotics Strategy LTG Michael A. Vane Deputy Commanding General, Futures, and Director, Army Capabilities Integration Center US Army Training and Doctrine Command 25 Mar 09 Army Capabilities
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5100.91 October 28, 2008 USD(I) SUBJECT: Joint Intelligence Interoperability Board (JIIB) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes
OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5430.56A From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS,
Delivering Space Capabilities to Enable the Tactical Warfighter
Delivering Space Capabilities to Enable the Tactical Warfighter LTG Richard P. Formica AUSA National Meeting 11 October 2011 1 Our Reporting Chain Our Mission USASMDC/ARSTRAT conducts space and missile
Anti-Ship Missile Defense
Anti-Ship Missile Defense A New Approach Using Unmanned Systems to Save Time and Cost to Field an Effective System : The Next Generation of Intelligent, Automated Systems About Us Unique Systems Engineering
Army Space An Operational Perspective
Army Space An Operational Perspective COL Timothy Coffin Deputy Commander for Operations U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/ Army Forces Strategic Command As Presented to the Space and Cyberspace
6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit March 14-15, 2018 Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria, VA 22314 Program Design
This block in the Interactive DA Framework is all about joint concepts. The primary reference document for joint operations concepts (or JOpsC) in
1 This block in the Interactive DA Framework is all about joint concepts. The primary reference document for joint operations concepts (or JOpsC) in the JCIDS process is CJCSI 3010.02, entitled Joint Operations
Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3430.23C N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3430.23C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: ELECTRONIC
INTRODUCTION. Chapter One
Chapter One INTRODUCTION Traditional measures of effectiveness (MOEs) usually ignore the effects of information and decisionmaking on combat outcomes. In the past, command, control, communications, computers,
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction, issued under the authority of DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144.
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8410.02 December 19, 2008 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: NetOps for the Global Information Grid (GIG) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction, issued
ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call
Electronic Systems Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 Outlook Forecast International projects that the
NGAUS Legislative Workshop. Col Kevin Stubby Campbell Director, Plans & Requirements NGB/A5/8/9 13 Feb 2018
NGAUS Legislative Workshop Col Kevin Stubby Campbell Director, Plans & Requirements NGB/A5/8/9 13 Feb 2018 NGB/A5 Mission Customer = The field / Engineers = Aircraft Program Offices NGB/A5 Mission Rapidly
A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)
A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ) Brigadier General Marc Rogers Director, Standing Joint Force Headquarters United States Joint Forces Command 1 Overview History The Joint Command
COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 99-1 3 JUNE 2014 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
Future Combat Systems
Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment
Conducting Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation in a Distributive Environment Colonel (USA, Ret) Michael R. Gonzales President and Chief Executive Officer
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7
CLASSIFICATION: EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0305205N Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
DoD M-4, August 1988
1 2 FOREWORD TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 CHAPTER 1 - OVERVIEW OF THE JOINT TEST AND EVALUATION PROGRAM 4 C1.1. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 4 C1.2. NOMINATION AND SELECTION PROCESS 5 CHAPTER
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 03 Advanced Technology Development (ATD) 0603850F Integrated Broadcast
New Global Missions for Strategic Command
INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES New Global Missions for Strategic Command David R. Graham, Study Director Richard A. Adams Thomas L. Allen William J. Barlow William Fedorochko Wade P. Hinkle Gregory N.
HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS
HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 44-100 US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FM 44-100 Field Manual No. 44-100
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 The Joint Staff DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 for the Warrior (C4IFTW) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
Power Projection: - Where We Were - Where We Are - Where We Need To Be
Power Projection: - Where We Were - Where We Are - Where We Need To Be Mike McDuffie Group President, Information Systems Group 1 May 18, 2004 Overview NDIA Power Projection Symposium: Then and Now Where
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies
DoD Automatic Test Systems Strategies and Technologies JTEG Forum on ATE/ATS 28 October 2014 Service ATS Participants Bill Ross (Eagle Systems, NAVAIR and DoD ATS Support) Introduction and Background George
STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA COMMANDING GENERAL, U.S. ARMY SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND ARMY FORCES STRATEGIC COMMAND BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration
US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration Maj Gen Dan Dick Director for Requirements and Integration, U.S. Joint Forces Command Unclassified Overview DoD Top Ten Priorities (FY03)
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDTEN/BA 6 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0605866N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support COST (In Millions) Total PE Cost 0706 / EMC
IV. Organizations that Affect National Security Space
IV. Organizations that Affect National Security Space The previous chapters identified U.S. national security interests in space and measures needed to advance them. This chapter describes the principal
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #208
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 United States Special Operations Command Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems
United States Strategic Command David W. Tyner Capability and Resource Integration Directorate - J8 15 April 2010
United States Strategic Command David W. Tyner Capability and Resource Integration Directorate - J8 15 April 2010 UNCLASSIFIED USSTRATCOM Mission Statement USSTRATCOM promotes global security for America
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 9.557 9.876 13.592-13.592
I n t r o d u c t i o n
I was confirmed by the Senate on September 21, 2009, as the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, and sworn in on September 23. It is a privilege to serve in this position. I will work to assure that
GAO. QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW Opportunities to Improve the Next Review. Report to Congressional Requesters. United States General Accounting Office
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters June 1998 QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW Opportunities to Improve the Next Review GAO/NSIAD-98-155 GAO United States General
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 99-106 23 MARCH 2017 Test and Evaluation JOINT TEST AND EVALUATION PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY:
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address August 17, 2004 Glenn F. Lamartin Director, Defense Systems Top Priorities 1. 1. Successfully Successfully Pursue Pursue the the Global
Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing
Future Future Industry Day Briefing MG Joseph L. Yakovac Program Executive Officer, Ground 11 February 2003 Program Manager s Intent: Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability