SIG CONGRESS 2012 ACTIVITIES EVALUATION RESULTS

Transcription

1 SIG CONGRESS 2012 ACTIVITIES EVALUATION RESULTS 361 Responded Paid SIG Member: 220 Yes 138 No 3 N/A Do you have a leadership position within a SIG? 22 Yes 324 No 15 N/A If yes, specify position within the SIG: 4 Coordinator 1 Historian 2 SIG Council 5 Coordinator-Elect 3 Web administrator 1 Special Project 3 Editor/Co-Editor 2 Ex-Officio Would you be interested in holding a leadership position within the SIG? e.g. (elected position, Editor, Work Group Member, coordinator-elect) (List attached) 41 Yes 263 No 7 Maybe 50 No Response To what extent did the following SIG activities meet your needs: 1. SIG Planning Meeting (not at all) (completely) N/A A. SIG/ONS Update B. Discussion of current trends/ issues related to SIG. C. Discussion of patient care issues. D. Discussion of goals and activities E. Provide a forum for exchange between members. 2. Was an educational presentation given during the planning meeting? 276 Yes 63 No 22 No Response (not at all) (completely) N/A A. Relevancy B. Speaker effectiveness C. Importance of including educational presentation at planning meeting.

2 3. Did time allow your group to complete proposed agenda? 284 Yes 18 No 59 No Response Comments: - Would have been helpful to have more time. - Extremely volatile but important topic. - An agenda was not provided. - No discussion on cervical screening changes. - But no one stayed after the combined presentation except J. Neumann and J. Sorich. 4. Did the scheduling of SIG meetings make it more convenient to attend the meeting(s)? 278 Yes 30 No 53 No Response Comments: - This should not be scheduled at the same time as the valuable sessions (2). Schedule these at 12 Noon or 5 PM. - All SIGs scheduled at same time (9). 5. How many SIG meetings did you attend? N/A Name of SIGs whose meetings attended: 6 Acute & Critical Care 7 Advanced Nursing Research 20 Ambulatory/Office Nursing 48 Bone & Marrow Stem Cell Transplant 10 Breast Care 12 Cancer Genetics 14 Chemotherapy 5 Clinical Nurse Specialist 9 Clinical Trial Nurses 0 Complementary & Integrative Therapies 7 Ethics 8 Home Care & Palliative Care 22 Lymphedema Management 3 Management & Program Development 2 Neuro-Oncology 14 Neutropenia 33 Nurse Navigator 22 Nurse Practitioner 5 Pain Management 1 Pharmaceutical/Industry Nursing 8 Prevention/Early Detection 57 Radiation 5 Spiritual Care 16 Staff Education 8 Surgical Oncology 3 Survivorship, Quality of Life & Rehabilitation 3 Targeted & Biological Therapies 1 Transcultural Nursing Issues

3 6. Networking A. Rate the following (not at all) (completely) N/A - an adequate forum for networking sufficient time allotted for networking was it worthwhile Comments: - Due to poor attendance (2). - I am a new FNP. - CNE was great informative. - Presentation took a long time. - Some of the forums were mechanical and research based presentations were boring. Lymphedema Management presentation was the best. - We had come from a not so interesting session to see what lymphedema is about and were sad that we missed the beginning of the educational forum on lymphedema. 7. General Comments: - Great presentation. (3) - Interesting topic, very accessible information. (2) - Having attended many academic sessions it was surprising the attendance at this, what I see as a very important session. - Very helpful and encouragement from others (participants)( and networking awesome. - This was my first meeting and found it to be very helpful. - It seems strange to approve minutes a year later especially when few in the room were present perhaps an of minutes to members present for the approval. - More time excellent response by attendees. - Would like to have CE s for all courses including SIG meetings. I feel those meetings are very educational. - Nice to know what SIG is interested in opportunities to participate. - Ideas for Congress 2013: What QOPI certification means to you; what juggling various regulatory requirements; Scheduling Guidelines to prevent Chemotherapy rush hour. - Great meeting Thank you! (2) - Many interesting topics discussed food for thought, and possible newsletter topics and planning to become more involved. - Great networking opportunity (2). - Liked the SIG meetings better when not scheduled during major sessions. - Would like meetings a bit more spread out. - Good need a little more time to network. - Navigation SIG very well organized - Thanks! - Very helpful (5). - New to nurse navigator role came to glean infor. - Great chance to talk with other rad/onc. Nurses. - I am new to Rad. Onc. Was offered many ideas, websites, and communication tools thanks! - Great meeting, its fun to connect with other rad nurses. - Great meeting would be great to have nurses at meeting addresses. - Quoting old studies not helpful. Would have like to hear more about US Preventative Task Force guidelines on manes and paps. - I thought it was great how they did real cast studies and made us participate. It gave a better outlook to solving ethical/hospice issues: great job! (2) - It was interesting. I understood the presentation very well. - Great networking and resources gave me hope as a new nurse navigator. - Webinar, , discussion, board, Sunday Worship, Chapel type room CEU type class, posters, SIG specific Congress/readership.

4 7. General Comments (cont.): - I am a total novice. I picked this session because I learn best with case studies. Interesting but I m just not savvy enough to really get it. Very impressive how many questions that arise for their families. I made a list of terms I heard to look up and study on my own. The last care study was pretty amazing. - I would be interested in speaking ran out of business cards (Eileen Dehm). - Sorry I am unable to assist at this time. - Longer session lots to discuss and learn. - Excellent presentation on lymphedema management. Unable to complete most of questions. - Excellent presentation, though further into billing management that I expected. Very informative just not as relevant to my practice at this time. - This is my first meeting and it sparked an interest. Want to keep this SIG ongoing. - Unfortunately I am not a SIG member. I do chemo for some of these patients at home. - Wonderful presentation for caregivers. - It would be nice to develop an ongoing program that supports the caregiver and in practice have time for supporting the caregiver. - M. Bevens awesome great information Thank you! - Wonderful presentation very interesting and enjoyed the websites given for resources. - Great talk, very informative relevant to my practice. - Class was not what I expected this should be required for all ONS nurses. - Separate SIG meetings to help attend more. There were 4 SIGs meetings I wanted to attend that were held at the same time. - Do not like having to choose between a SIG meeting and an educational session. - Excellent information; great resources. Will share with my staff. Especially the educational resources. - Would like more meetings during Congress and breakdown topics. - CTN, great SIG meeting will be a great resource for me in my work setting. - I thought it was interesting. - Very excited to be a new member. - Good. - Very excellent! - I need to be more active in the SIG (Nancy Marou). - No CNEs. - Navigation worked on Saturday. - It would have been helpful if disease specific groups were coordinated instead of having RNs self-network. If we were groups together, we all could have heard the same thing. (2) - I appreciate educational presentation during SIG time as was CNEs also available during the conference. - Having a joint presentation with Home Care & Palliative Care SIG was great but no one stayed at the Ethics planning meeting. List of Attendees Interested in a Leadership Position/Work Group Did not Specify which SIG Julie Rogan julierogan@gmail.com Acute & Critical Care Garol Goetz (workgroup/writing an article/editor if mentored) carolgoetz@hotmail.com Arlene Granados NOT CCS SIG Member abgranad@mdanderson.org Advanced Nursing Research Lanell Bellury (maybe) lmbellury@gmail.com Blood & Marrow Stem Cell Transplant Clara Beaver Beaverc@karmanos.org Arthur Fucanan (coordinator-elect) cfucanan@comcast.net Katrina Perkins kperkins@covhs.org Nancy Shreve (BMT membership expired 5/31/11) nlshreve@yahoo.com Laura Snoussi laura.snoussi@cshs.org

5 Breast Care Amy Malensek Cancer Genetics Ilene Lattimer (coordinator-elect or workgroup) Chemotherapy Clara Beaver Sylvia Danko Kathy Higginbottom (workgroup) CHE SIG membership exp. 4/2011 Lisa Hodges Patricia Jakel Cheryl Steele (possibly) Barb Wilson Clinical Nurse Specialist Clara Beaver Theresa Bodker (workgroup) Barb Wilson Clinical Trial Nurses Chona Gomez (workgroup) Ilene Lattimer (coordinator-elect or workgroup) Ranju Jha Singh (workgroup) Home Care & Palliative Care Arlene Granados NOT HOM SIG Member Aisha Reikow Lymphedema Management Mary Prishtina NOT LYM SIG Member Neutropenia Katherine Grannemann Bethany Ray Barb Wilson Nurse Navigator Sharon Bartelt (workgroup) Eileen Dehm (maybe/speaking) Toni Gerow (maybe) W Michelle Soniat Albina Turner Nurse Practitioner Aaron Begue Pamela James Elaine Sein (workgroup) Pain Management Amy Malensek Radiation Bridget Fonash (maybe) Ruth Greenberg Jennifer Kenderski Donna J. McCoy (newsletter editing/assistance) Ellen Moore Ginger Nix NOT ONS or RAD SIG Member Spiritual Care Megan Sargeant (workgroup) MSargeant@downstate.edu

6 Staff Education Stacie Davis (maybe) Lucia Heylman (maybe) Mary Schueller (maybe) Elizabeth Stavely Mildred Toth Christella Whitcher (maybe) Surgical Oncology Cynthia M. Brown Brenda Nettles Transcultural Nursing Issues Donna Paul Congress 2012