UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES LONG TERM TRENDS ( )
|
|
|
- Ashlee Wood
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES LONG TERM TRENDS ( ) Based on ARL and IPEDS Statistics Prepared by Strategic Assessment Unit, ULS August
2 2 Summary University of Pittsburgh data includes ULS, Law and Health Services libraries Most analyses show data for Small number of analyses include data for or 2015 only (to reflect new data points collected by ARL* and IPEDS) Pitt data is also shown in context of selected peer and aspirational peer institutions *ARL Statistics Analytics. ARL Statistics August 10, Distributed by the Association of Research Libraries: Washington, DC, analytics. The data presented in these charts is not an attempt to measure a library s services, quality of collections, or success in meeting the needs of users. In comparing any individual library to ARL medians or other ARL members, evaluations must always be made within the context of local goals and characteristics."
3 ARL INVESTMENT INDEX 3
4 4 ARL Investment Index University of Pi.sburgh ARL Investment Index Rank: Rank Linear (Rank) ARL Rank
5 5 ARL Investment Index Ranking AspiraDonal Peers ARL Investment Index Rank: Rank ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA 26 PITTSBURGH 31 VIRGINIA 36 WISCONSIN
6 6 ARL Investment Index Ranking Peers ARL Investment Index Rank: DELAWARE MARYLAND Rank OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 81 SUNY-BUFFALO
7 EXPENDITURES 7
8 8 Expenditures 1 $35,000, Pitt Nominal and Inflation Adjusted (CPI) Total Expenditure $30,000, $25,000, $20,000, $15,000, $10,000, $5,000, Total Expenditure (Nominal) Expenditure adjusted for inflation (to 2004 values) $
9 9 Expenditures 2 Pi. Nominal Expenditures by Category: $18,000,000 $16,000,000 Collections Staff Operations $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0
10 10 Expenditures 3 Pi. Expenditure by Category as Percentage of Total: Collections Staff Operations % of Total Expenditure
11 11 Expenditures 4 InflaDon Adjusted Expenditure per Student, , adjusted to 2006 values) Total Expenditure Linear (Total Expenditure) $1,000 $800 $ $400 $200 $0
12 12 Expenditures: peer comparison 1 $60,000,000 Peers: Total Expenditure DELAWARE $50,000,000 MARYLAND $40,000,000 OHIO STATE $30,000,000 $20,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $10,000,000 RUTGERS $0 SUNY-BUFFALO
13 13 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 1 AspiraDonal Peers: Total Expenditure $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH $20,000,000 VIRGINIA $10,000,000 WISCONSIN $0
14 14 Expenditures: peer comparison 2 Peers: Total Materials Expenditure $25,000,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND $20,000,000 OHIO STATE $15,000,000 $10,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $5,000,000 RUTGERS $0 SUNY-BUFFALO
15 15 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 2 $30,000,000 AspiraDonal Peers: Total Materials Expenditure $25,000,000 $20,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA $15,000,000 $10,000,000 PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $5,000,000 $0
16 16 Expenditures: peer comparison 3 Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages $14,000,000 DELAWARE $12,000,000 MARYLAND $10,000,000 OHIO STATE $8,000,000 $6,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $4,000,000 RUTGERS $2,000,000 SUNY-BUFFALO $0
17 17 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 3 $16,000,000 AspiraDonal Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $0
18 Expenditures: peer comparison 4 18
19 19 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 4
20 COLLECTIONS 20
21 21 Collections 1 Pittsburgh Collections 2015* Collections Physical Digital Books 5,854,062 1,367,915 Databases N/A 565 Media 455,126 73,695 *as reported to IPEDS
22 22 Collections 2 Peers: Volumes Held Volumes Held 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 1,000,000 0 SUNY-BUFFALO
23 23 Collections 3 AspiraDonal Peers: Volumes Held ,000,000 14,000,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN 12,000,000 Volumes Held 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA 0 WISCONSIN
24 24 Collections 4 Peers: E-book Holdings ,400, ,200,000 1,000, , , , ,000 0 PITTSBURGH MARYLAND OHIO STATE SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS PENNSYLVANIA STATE
25 25 Collections 5 AspiraDonal Peers: E-book Holdings ,500,000 3,000,000 2,500, ,000,000 1,500,000 1,000, ,000 0 MICHIGAN NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH WISCONSIN ILLINOIS, URBANA MINNESOTA VIRGINIA
26 26 COLLECTIONS USE AND DELIVERY
27 27 Circulation 1 Pittsburgh Circulation in 2015 Physical items E-books and digital media 175,898* 2,932,028+ *excludes ILL, reserves and renewals + as reported to IPEDS
28 28 Circulation Pi. Library CirculaDon per Student: circulation of E-books and digital media was 83.9 per student
29 29 Circulation 3 700, , ,000 Peers IniDal CirculaDons: DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE Circulations 400, , ,000 PENNSYLVAN IA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 100,000 0 SUNY- BUFFALO % change since 2006 Delaware Maryland Ohio State Pennsylvania State Pittsburgh Rutgers SUNY- Buffalo
30 30 Circulation 4 AspiraDonal Peers IniDtal CirculaDons: , , , , , , , ,000 0 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN % change since 2006 Illinois, Urbana Michigan Minnesota North Carolina Pi.sburgh Virginia Wisconsin
31 31 Inter Library Loans Pi.sburgh ILL Lending and Borrowing: Lending Borrowing Number of ILL transactions * *2013 data not available
32 32 Inter Library Loans 2 Peers: ILL Lending: ,000 DELAWARE ILL Transactions 160, , , ,000 80,000 60,000 MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANI A STATE PITTSBURGH 40,000 20,000 RUTGERS 0 SUNY- BUFFALO 2013 Pittsburgh data not available
33 33 Inter Library Loans 3 AspiraDonal Peers: ILL Lending: ILL Transactions 200, , , , , ,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA 20,000 0 WISCONSIN 2013 Pittsburgh data not available
34 34 Inter Library Loans 4 Peers: ILL Borrowing: ILL Transactionsis 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 10,000 0 SUNY-BUFFALO 2013 Pittsburgh data not available
35 35 Inter Library Loans 5 AspiraDonal Peers: ILL Borrowing: ILL Transactions 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURG H VIRGINIA 10,000 0 WISCONSIN 2013 Pittsburgh data not available
36 36 Downloads 1 10,000,000 9,000,000 Peers: Successful Full-text ArDcle Requests ,000, ,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 - PITTSBURGH MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS DELAWARE
37 37 Downloads 2 AspiraDonal Peers: Full-text ArDcle Requests ,000,000 10,000, ,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH WISCONSIN NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA MINNESOTA ILLINOIS, URBANA
38 38 Downloads 3 Peers: Successful Full-text ArDcle Requests per Patron PITTSBURGH MARYLAND SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A DELAWARE
39 39 Downloads 4 AspiraDonal Peers: Successful Full-text ArDcle Requests per Patron PITTSBURGH MICHIGAN WISCONSIN ILLINOIS, URBANA #N/A NORTH CAROLINA #N/A VIRGINIA #N/A MINNESOTA
40 40 Database searches 1 Peers: Database Searches ,000,000 12,000, ,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - MARYLAND OHIO STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO PENNSYLVANIA STATE DELAWARE
41 41 Database searches 2 AspiraDonal Peers: Database Searches ,000,000 50,000, ,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 ILLINOIS, URBANA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA MINNESOTA
42 42 Database searches 3 Peers: Databse Searches per Patron MARYLAND PITTSBURGH SUNY-BUFFALO OHIO STATE DELAWARE RUTGERS PENNSYLVANIA STATE #N/A 5.2
43 43 Database searches 4 AspiraDonal Peers: Database Searches per Patron , , WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH NORTH CAROLINA #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A VIRGINIA MINNESOTA ILLINOIS, URBANA
44 44 INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTION SERVICES
45 45 Reference 1 200,000 Pi.sburgh Reference TransacDons, , , ,000 PITTSBURGH Linear (PITTSBURGH) 120, ,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 -
46 46 Reference 2 Peers: Reference TransacDons: Transactions DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANI A STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY- BUFFALO 0 % change from 2006 or earliest available data* DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE* PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO
47 47 Reference 3 AspiraDonal Peers: Reference TransacDons: , ,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Transactions 200, , ,000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH 50,000 VIRGINIA - WISCONSIN % change from 2006 or earliest available data* ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN* MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN*
48 48 Presentations 1 Peers: PresentaDons to Groups: Presentations DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO
49 49 Presentations 2 AspiraDonal Peers: PresentaDons to Groups: ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Presentations MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH 500 VIRGINIA 0 WISCONSIN
50 50 Presentations 3 Peers: PresentaDon ParDcipants: ,000 90,000 DELAWARE Participants 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 10,000 - SUNY-BUFFALO
51 51 Presentations 4 AspiraDonal Peers: PresentaDon ParDcipants: ,000 40,000 35,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Participants 30,000 25,000 20,000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA 15,000 PITTSBURGH 10,000 5,000 VIRGINIA - WISCONSIN
52 STAFF 52
53 53 Staff 1 Pi. Staffing Levels, Support Staff Professional Staff 250 Number of Staff
54 54 Staff 2 Peers: Professional and Support Staff DELAWARE 500 MARYLAND 400 OHIO STATE Totstf PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 100 SUNY-BUFFALO 0
55 55 Staff 3 $16,000,000 AspiraDonal Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $0
56 56 Staff 4 Peer insdtudons: % professional staff DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO 0.0
57 57 Staff 5 AspiraDonal peer insdtudons: % professional staff ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN 50.0 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN 0.0
ARL ACADEMIC LAW LIBRARY STATISTICS
ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES WASHINGTON, D.C. 2006 ARL ACADEMIC LAW LIBRARY STATISTICS 2004-05 Compiled and Edited by MARK YOUNG MARTHA KYRILLIDOU Downloaded from publications.arl.org ARL Academic
ARL ACADEMIC HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY STATISTICS
ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES WASHINGTON, D.C. 2006 ARL ACADEMIC HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY STATISTICS 2004-05 Compiled and Edited by MARK YOUNG MARTHA KYRILLIDOU Downloaded from publications.arl.org
ARL SUPPLEMENTARY STATISTICS A COMPILATION OF STATISTICS FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES
ARL SUPPLEMENTARY STATISTICS 1997-98 A COMPILATION OF STATISTICS FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1. Summary Statistics for University Libraries...4 Table
Student Tuition & Fees
2005-06 Student Tuition & Fees UK Achievements Since 2000: Enrollment has increased by 2,693 students (11.3%). First-year student class increased by 1,033 students (35%). Governor s Scholars and Governor
Tuition, Fees, and Room & Board Rates Academic Year
Tuition, Fees, and Room & Board Rates Academic Year 2018-2019 Presentation to the Board of Trustees January 18, 2018 TUITION GOAL: Protect access and affordability, while sustaining academic quality and
CAIR Conference Anaheim, CA, Nov. 6-9, 2012
CAIR 2012 Best Presentation CAIR Conference Anaheim, CA, Nov. 6-9, 2012 John Stanley Institutional Analyst University of Hawaii at Mānoa jstanley@hawaii.edu Presentation Outline What are peers and why
U.S. Patents Awarded in 2005 Top 20 Universities
U.S. Awarded in 2005 1 California Institute of Technology 172 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 133 3 U. of Wisconsin at Madison 89 4 Johns Hopkins U. 81 5 U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor 80 6 U. of
Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018
Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018 NEA RESEARCH April 2018 Reproduction: No part of this report may be reproduced in any form without permission from NEA Research, except
Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments
Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments Introduction FFIS has been in the federal grant reporting business for a long time about 30 years. The main thing we ve learned
2013 U. of Iowa 86% 85% 87% 2014 U. of Colorado Boulder 84% 86% 86% U. of Nebraska Lincoln 84% 83% 82%
IU Bloomington Peer Retention & Graduation Rate Comparisons Northwestern U. 97% 97% 98% U. of Michigan Ann Arbor 97% 97% 97% U. of California Berkeley 96% 96% 97% University of Maryland College Park 96%
Fiscal Research Center
January 2018 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
Institutional Directions and Challenges:
Institutional Directions and Challenges: A Discussion with Academic Department Chairs, School Directors, and Deans March 14, 2012 $600,000,000 MSU Financial Data Grants Received $500,000,000 $400,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Office of Institutional Research and Planning
3/17 TABLE 4-401 FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT ENROLLMENT FALL 2006-2016 Lawrence State* Wichita State Emporia State Fort Hays State Pittsburg State Total 2006 23,942 19,784 10,549 5,224 6,156 6,371 72,026 2007
Fiscal Research Center
January 2017 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 - Repayment
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 -
How North Carolina Compares
How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics January 2013 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Program Evaluation Division North Carolina General Assembly Legislative
Fiscal Research Center
January 2016 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by February 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Alabama 3.7 33 Ohio 4.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Missouri 3.7 33 Rhode Island 4.5
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by November 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Indiana 4.4 37 Georgia 5.6 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Ohio 4.5 37 Tennessee 5.6
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by April 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Colorado 2.3 17 Virginia 3.8 37 California 4.8 2 Hawaii 2.7 20 Massachusetts 3.9 37 West Virginia
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by August 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.3 18 Maryland 3.9 36 New York 4.8 2 Colorado 2.4 18 Michigan 3.9 38 Delaware 4.9
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by March 2016 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 South Dakota 2.5 19 Delaware 4.4 37 Georgia 5.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Massachusetts 4.4 37 North
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by September 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.4 17 Indiana 3.8 36 New Jersey 4.7 2 Colorado 2.5 17 Kansas 3.8 38 Pennsylvania
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by December 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.0 16 South Dakota 3.5 37 Connecticut 4.6 2 New Hampshire 2.6 20 Arkansas 3.7 37 Delaware
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by September 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.8 17 Oklahoma 4.4 37 South Carolina 5.7 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Indiana 4.5 37 Tennessee
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by November 2014 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Pennsylvania 5.1 35 New Mexico 6.4 2 Nebraska 3.1 20 Wisconsin 5.2 38 Connecticut
Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by July 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Massachusetts 3.6 37 Kentucky 4.3 2 Iowa 2.6 19 South Carolina 3.6 37 Maryland 4.3
Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, FY 2002
Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, APPENDIX A Table A.1: Lottery Sales Excluding Sales From Video Lottery Terminals, Table A.2: Sales from Video Lottery Terminals Table A.3:
How North Carolina Compares
How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics March 2017 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Preface The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina General
Rutgers Revenue Sources
Rutgers Revenue Sources 31.2% Tuition and Fees 27.3% State Appropriations with Fringes 1.0% Endowment and Investments.5% Federal Appropriations 17.8% Federal, State, and Municipal Grants and Contracts
Washburn University. Faculty Salary Analysis
Washburn University Faculty Salary Analysis 2012-13 Office of Institutional Research Washburn University May 15, 2013 Washburn University Faculty Salary Analysis 2012-13 This report provides an overview
US News and World Report Rankings Graduate Economics Programs Ranked in 2001
The following list reports the rankings done in 1995 by William H. Kaempfer and Chao Jing of the University of Colorado at Boulder. Their list compiles six earlier studies into an aggregate ranking. Rankings
REPORT ON THE STATUS OF FACULTY SALARIES AT KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Attachment 1 REPORT ON THE STATUS OF FACULTY SALARIES AT KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Prepared by the Office of Planning & Analysis June 2009 Staff: Kelli Cox, Director Nancy Baker, Computer Information Specialist
HathiTrust Shared Print Program Report to PAN Meeting 6/23/2017. Lizanne Payne Shared Print Program Officer
HathiTrust Shared Print Program Report to PAN Meeting 6/23/2017 Lizanne Payne Shared Print Program Officer elpayne@hathitrust.org Key Attributes of the HathiTrust Shared Print Program Secure retention
The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD
The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD www.legion.org 2016 The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD 1920-1929 Department 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 Alabama 4,474 3,246
Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies
Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies Key findings 1. Student outcomes in Arizona lag behind
President Dennis Assanis
President Dennis Assanis Strategic Planning Where are we now? Where do we want to go? Identify peer institutions for comparison current and aspirational Articulate shared vision and identify cross-cutting
TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS
ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA
N A S S G A P Academic Year. 43rd Annual Survey Report on State-Sponsored Student Financial Aid
N A S 43rd Annual Survey Report on State-Sponsored Student Financial Aid 2011-2012 Academic Year National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs S G A P About NASSGAP and this Report The National
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PEER INSTITUTION ANALYSIS February 27, 2004
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF INFORMATION SERVICES UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 15 LIPPITT ROAD KINGSTON, RI 02881-2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PEER INSTITUTION ANALYSIS February 27, 2004 In November, 2003 the
Illinois Higher Education Executive Compensation Analysis
Illinois Higher Education Executive Analysis July 2015 Illinois Board of Higher Education Notes on sources and methods: The peer information used in this analysis was obtained from the Chronicle of Higher
Table 2 Overall Heterodox-Adjusted Rankings for Ph.D.-Granting Institutions in Economics
ing Economics Departments in a Contested Discipline 23 Heterodox-Adjusted ings for Ph.D.-Granting Institutions in Economics ) ) Harvard U 43 1 (1) 5.47 1 (1) UC Berkeley 56 2 (2) 4.08 4 (4) Princeton U
PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;
PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, 585.327.7075; jstefko@cgr.org Highest Paid State Workers in New Jersey & New York in 2010; Lowest Paid in Dakotas and West Virginia
STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Business in Nebraska Bureau of Business Research 12-2013 STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX Eric Thompson University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008
MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008 Seriously Delinquent Rate Greater than 6.93% 5.18% 6.93% 0 5.17% Source: MBA s National Deliquency Survey MAP 2: Foreclosure Inventory Rate by State
3+ 3+ N = 155, 442 3+ R 2 =.32 < < < 3+ N = 149, 685 3+ R 2 =.27 < < < 3+ N = 99, 752 3+ R 2 =.4 < < < 3+ N = 98, 887 3+ R 2 =.6 < < < 3+ N = 52, 624 3+ R 2 =.28 < < < 3+ N = 36, 281 3+ R 2 =.5 < < < 7+
Assist users with FAEIS Generate reports for users
1 Provides human interface component to FAEIS. Collaborate with reporting institution s data entry users to collect data Verify data collection with Deans of reporting institutions Assist users with FAEIS
Index of religiosity, by state
Index of religiosity, by state Low Medium High Total United States 19 26 55=100 Alabama 7 16 77 Alaska 28 27 45 Arizona 21 26 53 Arkansas 12 19 70 California 24 27 49 Colorado 24 29 47 Connecticut 25 32
2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15
2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15 www.hospiceanalytics.com 2 2013 Demographics & Hospice Utilization National Population 316,022,508 Total Deaths 2,529,792 Medicare Beneficiaries
University of Maryland-Baltimore County
Selected Comparison Groups August 2008 Reviewing Your NSSE 2008 Selected Comparison Groups Report NSSE participants are able to customize their Institutional Reports by tailoring up to three comparison
Saint Louis University Library Collections: Usage and Expenditures Present
Saint Louis University Library Collections: Usage and Expenditures 2000 Present Prepared by Pius/Medical Center Libraries Assessment Committee May 6, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Purpose and Approach
Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017
Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 State Applications Can be Submitted Online at the State Level 1 < 25% 25% -
2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION
BY STATE INFORMATION This information is being provided to assist in your 2016 tax preparations. The information is also mailed to applicable Columbia fund non-corporate shareholders with their year-end
TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**
living Alaska 00 47,808 21,213 44.4 Alabama 01 20,661 3,288 15.9 Alabama 02 23,949 6,614 27.6 Alabama 03 20,225 3,247 16.1 Alabama 04 41,412 7,933 19.2 Alabama 05 34,388 11,863 34.5 Alabama 06 34,849 4,074
Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,
26 Reason Foundation Part 3 Spending As with state revenue, there are various ways to look at state spending. Total state expenditures, obviously, encompass every dollar spent by state government, irrespective
Initial (one-time) Membership Fee 10,000 Renewal Fee (every 8 years) $3500
November 25, 2013 UCAR Membership Fees Process and Schedule Fee assessment process: 1. UCAR Members vote at the Annual Meeting to approve new or renewing applications for UCAR membership. 2. After the
TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**
Rank State District Count (HTC) 1 New York 05 150,499 141,567 94.1 2 New York 08 133,453 109,629 82.1 3 Massachusetts 07 158,518 120,827 76.2 4 Michigan 13 47,921 36,145 75.4 5 Illinois 04 508,677 379,527
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Aspirational and Operational Peers
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Aspirational and Operational Peers April 5, 2007 In Spring 2006, the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS) conducted a study comparing CLAS with its College aspirational
Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth
Larry DeBoer Purdue University September 2011 Real GDP Growth Real Consumption Spending Growth 1 Index of Consumer Sentiment 57.8 Sept 11 Savings Rate (percent of disposable income) Real Investment Spending
Appendix A: Carnegie 2010 Classifications and SHEEO Groupings 2010 Carnegie Classification
Appendix A: Carnegie 2010 Classifications and SHEEO Groupings 2010 Carnegie Classification SHEEO Code Description Sector Groupings 0 (Not classified Not Classified 1 Assoc/Pub-R-S: Associate's--Public
IU Bloomington Peer Retention & Graduation Rate Comparisons
IU Bloomington Peer Retention & Graduation Rate Comparisons Northwestern U. 98% 97% 97% U. of Michigan Ann Arbor 97% 97% 97% U. of California Berkeley 96% 96% 96% U. of Wisconsin Madison 95% 95% 96% The
How. January. Prepared by
How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statisticss January 2011 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Prefacee The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina
FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT
FOOD STAMP PROGRAM ACTIVITY REPORT Federal Fiscal Year 2004 Food Stamps Make America Stronger United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Program Accountability Division February
Fiscal Year Tuition and Fee Comparisons for UNC Peer Institutions
Fee Comparisons and 1 California State University at Fresno $2,933 $13,103 2 California State University at Chico $3,370 $13,540 3 Appalachian State University $3,436 $13,178 4 Georgia Southern University
EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project
EXHIBIT A List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project Alabama Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce
Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations
Current Advantage Enrollment : State and County-Level Tabulations 5 Slide Series, Volume 40 September 2016 Summary of Tabulations and Findings As of September 2016, 17.9 million of the nation s 56.1 million
The Welding Industry: A National Perspective on Workforce Trends and Challenges (Updated in February 2010)
The Welding Industry: A National Perspective on Workforce Trends and Challenges (Updated in February 2010) Prepared by Jongyun Kim, Ph.D. Joint Center for Policy Research Lorain County Community College
November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org November 24, 2008 TANF BENEFITS ARE LOW AND HAVE NOT KEPT PACE WITH INFLATION But Most
The Regional Economic Outlook
The Regional Economic Outlook Presented by: Mark McMullen, Director of Government Svcs Prepared for: FTA Revenue Estimating Conference September 15, 2008 Recent Economic Performance 2 1 The Job Market
Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:
Welcome to the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action Dashboard About This Dashboard: These graphs and charts show goals by which the Campaign evaluates its efforts to implement recommendations in the
Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis
1 Date: 5/25/2012 To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia From: Christos Siderelis Chuck Wyatt with the DCR in Virginia inquired about the classification of state parks having resort type characteristics and, if
Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)
Revised February 22, 2005 WHERE WOULD THE CUTS BE MADE UNDER THE PRESIDENT S BUDGET? Data Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education Includes Education for the Disadvantaged, Impact Aid, School Improvement
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016 Food and Nutrition Service Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Program Accountability and Administration Division September
2014 Salary and Benefits Report
University Senate Faculty Compensation and Benefits Committee 115 Independence Hall 1923 Neil Ave. Columbus, OH 43210 614-292-2423 Phone 2014 Salary and Benefits Report senate.osu.edu University Senate
Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 2016
Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 5 Slide Series September, 2015 Summary of Findings This edition projects Medicaid spending in each state and the percentage of spending paid via
The number of masters degrees awarded for all program areas at Land-grant institutions rose by 11,318 degrees (18%).
In This Edition >>> Graduate degrees awarded within agriculture. Graduate degrees awarded by the largest programs. Graduate degrees awarded by gender. Graduate degrees awarded by ethnicity. Summer 214
States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted
States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) 1 Texas 316,100 19 Nevada 36,600 37 Hawaii 7,100 2 California 256,800 20 Tennessee 34,800 38 Mississippi
Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only
Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only January 2002 1 2 published annually by: The Minnesota Taxpayers Association
Selection & Retention Of State Judges. Methods from Across the Country
Selection & Retention Of State Judges Methods from Across the Country Formal Methods of Selecting State Judges COURTS OF LAST RESORT............................. 3 INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS....................
Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)
VOL. 8 NO. 28 JULY 13, 2015 LOAD AVAILABILITY Up 7% compared to the Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI) Note: MDI Measures Relative Truck Demand LOAD SEARCHING Up 18.3% compared to the TRUCK AVAILABILITY
Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations
Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 Able to Make Share of Determinations System determines eligibility for: 2 State Real-Time
Valuing the Invaluable: A New Look at State Estimates of the Economic Value of Family Caregiving (Data Update)
Valuing the Invaluable: A ew Look at State Estimates of the Economic Value of Family Caregiving (Data Update) This update includes comparisons to FY 2006 Medicaid. At the time of the original release,
List of Association of American Universities (AAU) Member Institutions
List of Association of American Universities (AAU) Member Institutions 1997/98 PUBLIC University of Arizona - Tucson University of California - System Administration University of California - Berkeley
Sharing of Data Between Agencies. Date: August 31, 2011 [ INSERT TOPIC NAME ] [ INSERT YEAR MONTH DD ]
![Sharing of Data Between Agencies. Date: August 31, 2011 [ INSERT TOPIC NAME ] [ INSERT YEAR MONTH DD ]](/thumbs/71/65784909.jpg "Sharing of Data Between Agencies. Date: August 31, 2011 [ INSERT TOPIC NAME ] [ INSERT YEAR MONTH DD ]")
Topic: Question by: : Sharing of Data Between Agencies Mandy Harlan Louisiana Date: August 31, 2011 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California An automated process of exchange
THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET
1 THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET ORG ANIZATIONAL COMPARISO N BY C ENSUS DIV ISION S PRING 2013 The State of Grantseeking Spring 2013 is the sixth semi-annual informal survey of nonprofits conducted
Fathers of Neoliberalism:
Fathers of Neoliberalism: The Academic and Professional Performance of the Chicago School, 1960-1985 Lasse Folke Henriksen Leonard Seabrooke Kevin L Young Copenhagen Business School Copenhagen Business
National Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles
www.urban.org Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles Sarah L. Pettijohn, Elizabeth T. Boris, and Maura R. Farrell Data presented for each state: Problems with Government
Louisville Cardinal Editors. Dr. James Ramsey, President, University of Louisville
Louisville Cardinal Editors Dr. James Ramsey, President, University of Louisville August 27, 2015 A little history Some important milestones in the life of UofL Jefferson Seminary Postsecondary Education
5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12
5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12 Magnets 2½ 3½ Magnet $1.75 - MOQ - 5 - Add $0.25 for packaging Die Cut Acrylic Magnet $2.00 - MOQ - 24 - Add $0.25 for packaging 2535-22225 California AM-22225
Interstate Pay Differential
Interstate Pay Differential APPENDIX IV Adjustments for differences in interstate pay in various locations are computed using the state average weekly pay. This appendix provides a table for the second
Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016
Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016 Doctorate 4% PN/VN 3% MSN 15% ADN 28% BSRN 22% Diploma 2% BSN 26% n = 279,770 Percentage of Graduations by Program Type, 2016 MSN 12% Doctorate 1%
Registration Priority for Athletes -- Survey of Universities Updated February 2007 Alice Poehls, UNC Chapel Hill
Registration Priority for -- Survey of Universities Updated February 2007 Alice Poehls, UNC Chapel Hill Questions were originally asked by Bruce Cunningham, Duke University, to the AAU group in 2000 and
50 STATE COMPARISONS
50 STATE COMPARISONS 2014 Edition DEMOGRAPHICS TAXES & REVENUES GAMING ECONOMIC DATA BUSINESS HOUSING HEALTH & WELFARE EDUCATION NATURAL RESOURCES TRANSPORTATION STATE ELECTION DATA Published by: The Taxpayers
WIA STATE ALLOCATION REPORT
ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM HAWAII IDAHO ILLINOIS INDIANA IOWA NATIONAL KANSAS ASSOCIATION KENTUCKY LOUISIANA OF STATE
Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report
Regional Economic Models, Inc. Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report Prepared by Frederick Treyz, CEO June 2012 The following is a summary of the Estimated
Yes, institutions can nominate a person who was previously nominated, provided they still meet the eligibility requirements of the program.
Frequently Asked Questions As an institution eligible to participate in the Moore Inventor Fellows program, is there a specific process for internal solicitation and selection we should follow? There is
Artist Grant Program 2018
Artist Grant Program 2018 Randall Frank Contemporary Art Collection Artist Grant Program (rev. 7/17) 2018 Randall Frank Contemporary Art Collection Artist Grant Guidelines About the Randall Frank Contemporary
Education and Related Spending per Completion
This analysis presents information on the education and related spending per total number of degrees or completions awarded at Illinois State University and at the University s IBHE designated peer institutions
COMPARING COLLEGES. Allergic Living compares the food allergy and celiac practices of 32 universities and colleges across the United States.
by ALLISON INSERRO and PATRICK BENNETT A - R Doctor's te required for accommodations? Registration with disabilities office required? Dietitian or dining services staff available for a meeting before applying?