TIP. 5-Year Regional Transportation Improvement Program DRAFT

Transcription

1 TIP 5-Year Regional Transportation Improvement Program DRAFT

2

3 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY FY 22 Pima Association of Governments (PAG) 1 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 41, Arizona 8571 Tel (52) Fax (52) Web

4 Tom Murphy Mayor Town of Sahuarita Satish Hiremath (hair) Mayor Town of Oro Valley Peter Yucuocio (Vice hair) Vice-hair Pascua Yaqui Tribe Michael Ortega ity Manager ity of Gilbert Davidson Manager Town of Marana harles Huckelberry Administrator Keith Brann (hair) Town Engineer Town of Marana Arlan olton, Planning Official, Planning & Dev. Services Scott Robidoux Airport Authority herie ampbell** Deputy Director Pima Association of Governments Roxanne Linsley** Env. Programs oordinator AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality Ildefonso Green Mayor ity of South Edward Manuel (Treasurer) hair Tohono O odham Nation Ed Honea Mayor Town of Marana Sixto Molina ity Manager ity of South Tom Wilson Tribal ouncil Member Pascua Yaqui Tribe Danny Sharp Interim Town Manager Town of Oro Valley Jose Rodriguez Town Engineer Town of Oro Valley PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL OUNIL Jonathan Rothschild Mayor ity of MANAGEMENT OMMITTEE Ramón Valadez Board of Supervisors Kelly Udall Manager Town of Sahuarita Steve Tipton Transportation Engineer Tohono O odham Nation Mark Hoffman* Regional Transportation Planner AZ Dept of Transportation TRANSPORTATION PLANNING OMMITTEE Vacant Planning & Zoning ommission Roderick Lane District Engineer Arizona Dept of Transportation Kate Riley General Manager Sun Tran Ursula Kramer Director PDEQ Air Quality ontrol Dist. Representative Vacant itizens Transportation Advisory ommittee Albert Elias Director, ity of Housing & ommunity Development Priscilla ornelio Director, Dept. of Transportation Maria Arvayo Tribal Planner Pascua Yaqui Tribe MJ Dillard Public Works Director/Town Engineer Town of Sahuarita Farhad Moghimi** Executive Director Pima Association of Governments Michael Hammond* Arizona State Transportation Board herie ampbell** Deputy Director Pima Association of Governments Roderick Lane** District Engineer AZ Dept of Transportation Romare Truly** Engineering Development Federal Highway Administration Mark Novak** Landscape Architect University of Arizona Mark Hoffman Regional Transportation Planner AZ Dept of Transportation Darryl ole Director Dept. of Transportation Joel Gastelum Planning and Zoning Director ity of South Michael Toriello ** Deputy Base ivil Engineer Davis-Monthan AFB Steve Tipton Transportation Engineer Tohono O odham Nation Emily Dawson Project Development oordinator Arizona Dept. of Transportation PAG STAFF Farhad Moghimi Executive Director herie ampbell Deputy Director James R. DeGrood, P.E. Director of Transportation Services Sue otty Sr. Air Quality Planner Sheila Storm ommunications Director James Tokishi Transportation Modeler John Liosatos Transportation Planning Director Phillip yr Graphic Design Manager Nathan Barrett Senior Transportation Planner Zonia Kelley Administrative Support aroline Lueng Senior Research/Statistical Analyst (* for transportation matters only) (** ex-officio members) This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation.

5 TABLE OF ONTENTS HAPTER 1: INTRODUTION OVERVIEW THE FAST AT HAPTER 2: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL MOBILITY AND AESSIBILITY PLAN JURISDITIONAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT HAPTER 3: PAG TIP PROESS OVERVIEW PAG S TIP PROESS HAPTER 4: MP AND PERFORMANE MEASURES REGIONAL TRAFFI SIGNAL SYSTEM ONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROESS PERFORMANE MEASURES HAPTER 5: FINANIAL PLAN HAPTER 6: AIR QUALITY AIR QUALITY OVERVIEW MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS SIP ONTROL MEASURES FEDERAL MOTOR VEHILE ONTROL PROGRAM VOLUNTARY ONTROL MEASURES SIP ONTROL MEASURES OUTLOOK EMISSIONS ANALYSES ONFORMITY OF THE PLAN HAPTER 7: TRANSIT SUN TRAN SUN VAN SUN LINK STREETAR SUN SHUTTLE HAPTER 8 PUBLI INVOLVEMENT PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

6 TABLES TABLE 3-1: INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FATORS TABLE 3-2: TITLE VI ANALYSIS MODELING RESULTS FOR ONENTRATIONS OF PROTETED POPULATIONS TABLE 5-1: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANE OSTS TABLE 6-1: AIR QUALITY AND TRAVEL REDUTION BENEFITS OF THE TRP PROGRAM TABLE 6-2: OVERVIEW OF EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS FROM OMPANIES SELET YEARS TABLE 6-3: SURVEY RESULTS FOR WORKER TRAVEL MODES SELET YEARS TABLE 6-4: SUMMARY OF ARBON MONOXIDE MODELING RESULTS FIGURES FIGURE 6-1: TUSON ARBON MONOXIDE MAINTENANE AREA FIGURE 6-2: SURVEY RESULTS OF REGIONAL EMPLOYERS TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT ATIVITITES FIGURE 6-3: PDEQ S AIR QUALITY PROGRAM S OUTREAH AOMPLISHMENTS FIGURE 6-4: GGES REDUED in 214 IN THE TUSON REGION FIGURE 6-5: GALLONS OF GASOLINE EQUIVALENET REDUED 21 THROUGH FIGURE 7-1: SUN TRAN PASSENGER TRIPS FIGURE 7-2: SUN VAN PASSENGER TRIPS FIGURE 8-3: SUN SHUTTLE MOTHLY RIDERSHIP MAPS TITLE VI MAPS DESIGN AND ONSTRUTION PROJETS APPENDIES APPENDIX 1 FY PROJET LISTING APPENDIX 2 FISAL ONSTRAINT ANALYSIS APPENDIX 3 TIP POLIIES AND PROEDURES APPENDIX 4 PUBLI NOTIES APPENDIX 5 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ARONYMS APPENDIX 6 RESERVE PROJETS APPENDIX 7 PREVIOUS TIP PROJETS AND OBLIGATIONS APPENDIX 8 BIYLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJETS APPENDIX 9 FEDERAL ERTIFIATIONS PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

7 HAPTER 1: INTRODUTION OVERVIEW The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), prepared by Pima Association of Governments (PAG), is a five-year schedule of proposed transportation capital improvements within the, urbanized area. The TIP is typically updated annually through a multi-step process in association with PAG's member jurisdictions or other implementing agencies. The TIP addresses improvements to diverse elements of the regional transportation system including national, state and local highways, transit, aviation, ride sharing, bikeways and pedestrian facilities. The TIP also responds to various state and federal regulatory requirements for development of a transportation improvement program and TIP conformance with air quality implementation plans, including recent transportation legislation such as the Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act. The projects listed in Appendix 1 have an identified source of funding and are presently in some stage of project development. Every project that is federally funded, whether highway or transit, must be included in the TIP. The TIP also includes all regionally significant projects funded from non-federal sources. The current five-year Transportation Improvement Program encompasses fiscal years 218 to 222. The complete project listing by jurisdiction is contained in Appendix 1. THE FAST AT On December 4, 215, the President signed the Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. The act authorizes expenditures from the Highway Trust Fund for five years (216-22), defines how federal funds are to be distributed to the states and MPOs, and outlines the funding programs and categories for which federal funding is available. The FAST act, like its predecessors, contains programs to address transportation needs relating to highway, safety, transit, and other alternative modes. The act provides $35 billion dollars over five years, of which $3.5 billion is expected to be apportioned to Arizona for transportation projects in our state. The four previous authorization bills since 1991have shaped the highway program to meet the nation's changing transportation needs. The Fast Act builds on and refines many of the highway, transit, bike, and pedestrian programs and policies established, expanded, or refined by its predecessors. The FAST act creates a streamlined, performance-based, and multimodal program to address the many challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. These challenges include improving safety, maintaining infrastructure condition, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency of the system and freight movement, protecting the environment, and reducing delays in project delivery. The performance-based component of the FAST Act will require MPO s and state DOT s to work cooperatively to establish performance targets in key areas to help advance national goals. The performance provisions are focused on the areas of: highway safety, highway conditions, system performance/congestion and transit performance. This process will involve the development of performance measures to periodically assess progress towards the performance targets. The details of PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

8 the performance measures and targets are currently under development by FHWA and FTA and PAG is working to integrate them into the transportation planning process. As the designated metropolitan planning organization, Pima Association of Governments has the responsibility to develop a transportation improvement program in cooperation with the State and any affected public transit operator. In developing the program, citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of transportation, representatives of users of public transit, and other interested parties are provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed program. The transportation planning process provides for consideration of projects and strategies that will: Support the economic vitality of the United States, the State of Arizona, and the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity and efficiency; Increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; Increase accessibility and mobility options for people and freight; Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life; Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes throughout the State, for people and freight; Promote efficient system management and operation; and Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Ensure a regional approach to transportation planning by promoting cooperation and coordination across transit agency, MPO, and state boundaries Provide access to essential services The Fast Act will expire on September 3, 22. For programming purposes, this document assumes that the funding levels and programs established by the FAST Act will be renewed or continued by ongress beyond that date. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

9 HAPTER 2: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Projects in the TIP are first included in, or are consistent with, the region s long range transportation plan, the Regional Mobility and Accessibility Plan (RMAP). From the projects and programs included in the RMAP, individual jurisdictions develop candidate projects for proposed inclusion in the TIP. Before project selection even begins as part of the TIP process, the region and the individual jurisdictions have identified their transportation needs and developed a program for addressing those needs. REGIONAL MOBILITY AND AESSIBILITY PLAN Pima Association of Governments 245 Regional Mobility and Accessibility Plan (RMAP) is a blueprint for transportation solutions in the region over the next 3 years. PAG, the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the transportation management area, updates its long-range transportation plan every four years to maintain a 3-year outlook of the region s transportation needs. We look ahead to identify efficient and affordable improvements to our transportation system so that we can build economically viable communities for ourselves and future generations. The 245 RMAP provides a vision for our future transportation network and includes goals to help reach the vision. The plan contains a list of roadway, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian projects along with programs and projects to improve mobility, safety, transportation for persons with disabilities and other services. The plan also includes information on the projected growth in the region, areas of development, environmental considerations, financial projections, tools to address projected congestion and implementation strategies. Purpose of the 245 RMAP The 245 RMAP serves as a guiding document that identifies the priority transportation projects of PAG member jurisdictions and anticipated funding for those projects. Regional projects must be identified in the RMAP in order for jurisdictions to access any federal dollars to implement them. Projects also must be identified in PAG s short-range transportation plan, the Transportation Improvement Program, or TIP, to be eligible for federal funding. The five-year TIP is updated annually by PAG member jurisdictions and verifies the RMAP projects that will be built in the short-term. Development of the 245 RMAP Development of the 245 RMAP included a public involvement process to engage members of the public, jurisdiction staff and elected officials. PAG established the 245 RMAP Task Force, made up of public and private sector representatives, to help provide input into the development of the plan. Information considered included public feedback obtained through open houses, stakeholders sessions and online engagement tools. The task force, which met regularly, included jurisdiction, environmental, freight and economic development interests, among others. In total, more than 3, people participated in the development of the plan. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

10 JURISDITIONAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT The following section describes procedures used by each jurisdiction in developing candidate projects for the regional Transportation Improvement Program. State of Arizona The Arizona State Transportation Board determines state priorities through recommendations from the Arizona Department of Transportation () Priority Planning Advisory ommittee (PPA) (mandated by A.R.S ). The PPA is comprised of key personnel and the hairman of the itizen's Transportation Oversight ommittee, as a nonvoting member. The uses a priority rating system as one of the major criteria in selecting projects for the Five Year Transportation Facilities onstruction Program. The intent is for projects with the highest priority ranking to be constructed first. However, such factors as continuity of improvement, environmental/utility clearances, right-of-way acquisition, and/or funding constraints may cause changes in the priorities. The purpose of the Five Year Transportation Facilities onstruction Program is to comply with A.R.S , and set forth the plan for developing projects and account for the spending of funds for the next five years. The is mandated by state law to be responsible for constructing and maintaining all interstate and state highways in Arizona. Fulfilling this responsibility includes extensive public participation and sophisticated technical evaluation. The Program is developed annually and it is in effect on July 1st, marking the beginning of the State Fiscal Year. When the Five Year Transportation Facilities onstruction Program is adopted by the State Transportation Board, it is filed with the Director of the Department of Transportation and the Governor. Pima Association of Governments PAG is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization for with program areas that include regional transportation planning. Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning ommittee (TP) provides guidance to PAG s overall transportation work program and the products produced. The TP is comprised of the department heads of the local planning and transportation implementing agencies, as well as representatives from the Arizona State Transportation Board, Transportation Planning and Highway Divisions, the Airport Authority (TAA), Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, the Federal Highway Administration, the University of Arizona, itizens Transportation Advisory ommittee (TA), and the local public transit system. The TP reviews the TIP within the framework of the regional transportation planning and air quality conformity process and federal and state regulations. The TIP Subcommittee is comprised of key staff from involved planning and implementing agencies, and other important stakeholders such as freight service providers and was established by the TP to review the TIP. The TIP Subcommittee reviews the composite jurisdictional programs for consistency with both regional needs and the long-range Regional Transportation Plan. The TIP Subcommittee then assembles a recommended program based on the identified needs and the limitations imposed by available resources. A public open house is held to acquire PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

11 input concerning the tentative program and any potential adjustments. The final draft program is then prepared by the TIP Subcommittee and forwarded through the TP and Management ommittee for approval. An official public comment period is scheduled prior to final review and adoption by the Regional ouncil. Regional Transportation Authority The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA), a regional governmental entity established in August 24, developed a 2- year regional transportation plan approved by voters on May 16, 26. The $2.1 billion plan will be implemented over a 2-year period, ending in 226. The RTA will remain the fiscal agent and manager of the RTA plan. As part of the federal transportation requirements, the projects in the RTA plan must be incorporated into the long-range Regional Transportation Plan. Likewise, projects of the RTA must be incorporated into the TIP. The RTA funding source is, by the enabling legislation, restricted to those projects identified in the RTA plan approved by the voters. Therefore, RTA funds are not programmed through the same process as other regional funds. The RTA projects will be paid with funds generated from a ½-cent excise tax over the 2-year life of the plan. The tax is expected to generate $2.1 billion. The mission of the Department of Transportation (PDOT) is To develop, deliver and operate transportation facilities and services for ; valuing the cost-effective, safe, and efficient movement of people and goods in a manner that protects and enhances all natural environments and quality of life. The projects put forth for consideration in the TIP are identified by PDOT staff and are subject to administrative review. PDOT has developed a 5-year plan that focuses on improving the major north-south and east-west corridors of the region. The plan also supports multi-modal transportation including bike lanes, bus pullouts, sidewalks, and safer street crossings. PDOT staff evaluates all projects based on criteria developed by the PAG TIP subcommittee and submits these projects to PAG for consideration to be included in the TIP. These transportation improvement projects typically involve upgrading existing infrastructure where warranted by operational and/or safety needs; however, new facilities are also constructed where warranted. Improvement areas are identified by existing or imminent development trends, land use patterns, present and projected transportation demand, and safety considerations. In addition to the TIP projects identified, PDOT maintains 2,6 miles of roads throughout unincorporated. ity of The ity of develops its transportation improvement projects using funds from various sources: allocated highway user taxes, approved streets and corresponding bond funds, federal-aid funds, FTA funds, the General Fund, and assessments under state statutes. Local general funds are used primarily to provide operating revenue for transit and are minimally programmed for capital improvements. Projects selected for implementation are based on evaluation of many criteria, which define need, consistent with adopted Regional Plan Elements. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

12 The criteria are: 1. Street and Highway Projects riteria for selection involve a highway sufficiency priority rating system involving physical conditions, traffic volume to capacity ratios (existing and future), and safety. The sufficiency index is updated annually. These items combined with professional experience, use data, and modal interfacing, assist in determining the needs for street and highway improvements. Bikeway and pedestrian projects are considered an integral part of street and highway projects. 2. Transit Projects riteria for selection include: balance of public and handicapped transportation; route and service expansion; express service with the inclusion of park-and-ride facilities; and air quality conformity requirements. The Mayor and ouncil of the ity of have formally appointed a itizens Transportation Advisory ommittee (TA) to review and make recommendations to the Mayor and ouncil on all transportation issues. itizen committees work in conjunction with the ity's Transportation Department and in coordination with the Regional Transportation Plan process to develop effective regional transportation programs. Airport Authority The Airport Authority is responsible for implementing projects at International Airport and Ryan Airfield. Projects are identified by the International Airport Master Plan, Ryan Airfield Master Plan, and from the Airport Authority staff. Primary consideration is given to airport needs, available federal and state funds, bonding capacity and the availability of Airport Authority matching funds. Proposed projects are forwarded to the Airline Affairs ommittee and the Operations ouncil for review and recommendation prior to final approval by the Authority's Board of Directors. Town of Marana The Town of Marana prepared its initial Master Transportation Plan in 1989 to guide roadway development within the incorporated limits of the Town. Subsequently, the Town had three significant transportation documents prepared and accepted. ontinental Ranch and Dove Mountain Sub-Regional Transportation Studies were completed in February, 1997 and August 1999 respectively. Marana adopted an updated General Plan on November 5, 22, December 19, 27 and most recently on December 7, 21. The irculation Element of the General Plan contains roadway concepts provided in the Updated Master Transportation Plan adopted June 19, 21 and the collector and arterial roadway network from the Major Routes Plan adopted in 22. The updated Master Transportation Plan contained such components as Existing and Future onditions, Roadway, Bicycle and Pedestrian, Transit and Funding. The update spans the years of Town of Oro Valley Transportation projects for the Town of Oro Valley Development & Infrastructure Services Department fall under the supervision of the Town Engineer. Federal, State and local funding as well as development impact fees, fund these projects. Generally, Town projects involve upgrading and widening arterials in the existing road network while adding turn bays, bicycle and pedestrian facilities and occasionally, traffic signals. In addition to the Development & Infrastructure Services Department staff input, the Town employs a Public Participation Process for development of apital Improvement Projects that are programmed in the Pima Association of Government s PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

13 TIP. Their involvement is an important element of the plan. In this process, citizens participate in Town meetings, community surveys, public hearings and focus group meetings. For some, participation may also include membership on the Technical Advisory ommittee. Additionally, scheduled workshops are held in order to solicit feedback from the attendees. Information gathered from the various modes of public input is used by the citizen s Technical Advisory ommittee to evaluate specific projects. ombining the Development & Infrastructure Services Department assessments with the recommendations of the Technical Advisory ommittee, projects are then selected and sent to the Town s Mayor and ouncil for review and action. ity of South The ity of South, through its Planning and Public Works Departments strives to deliver a safe, reliable and efficient transportation system to meet the mobility needs of its residents and users. Transportation projects for consideration for the TIP are identified by Planning and Public Works staff with the goal to preserve the existing transportation infrastructure in the ity, maximize technology wherever possible and implement transportation improvements that incorporate the unique culture of the ity. South encourages citizen participation via open ouncil meetings, public meetings and hearings. The ity also conducts onsite, open community meetings at the beginning of the design process for each major transportation project. Town of Sahuarita Annually, the Town of Sahuarita evaluates transportation goals and priorities through its apital Improvement Program (IP) and advances its transportation improvement program with consideration of the latest and best available data. The IP is the Town s five-year blueprint for creating and maintaining the crucial infrastructure that will support the continued growth and development of Sahuarita while maintaining regional goals and practices including connectivity through, to and from regional roadways, corridors and destinations. Each year, in conjunction with the annual budgeting process, the Town Manager and Finance Department coordinate the process of revising and updating the long-range IP document. The values, priorities, goals, and objectives established by Sahuarita s elected officials, Town Staff and citizen input determine the broad parameters for incorporating new capital improvement projects into the IP. The Town s General Plan, Pima Association of Governments Transportation Improvement Plan, the 24 Regional Transportation Plan as well as other state and local planning documents, provide valuable information and guidance in the preparation of the Town s IP. Tohono O odham Nation The Tohono O odham Legislative ouncil (TOL) passes resolutions that prioritize BIA road improvement projects based upon priority listings submitted by each of the Nation s eleven Districts. Several years ago the Nation s Planning Department succeeded in acquiring BIA 2% Planning Funds to conduct a system inventory and develop a Transportation Study and TIP. With the associated education process the TOL recently approved joining PAG. The Nation s prioritization process for non-bia projects is under development. urrently the Planning Department coordinates these efforts with the Nation s Executive Office of the hairman, the Districts, and the Tohono O odham Legislative ouncil. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

14 Pascua Yaqui Tribe The Pascua Yaqui Reservation, known as Pascua Pueblo, is located approximately 13 miles southwest of downtown, south of Valencia Road. Transportation improvements and capital projects on the reservation are facilitated through the Development Services Department. The project review process is guided by Tribal ouncil and coordinated with various Tribal departments including the Attorney General s Office, Finance, Land, Housing, and Facilities Management. In the spring of 29, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe updated its Long-Range Transportation Plan in accordance with the Indian Reservation Road (IRR) Program and Inventory. The study resulted in a 5-, 1-, and 2-year plan of prioritized multi-modal improvements that provides a clear road map for future transportation improvements on the Reservation and a basis for developing project funding. ommunity input was essential to the study. Public meetings were held at pivotal stages in the process to gain feedback from residents and direction from Tribal leaders. The IRR Program addresses transportation needs of tribes by providing funds for planning, designing, construction, and maintenance activities. The program is jointly administered by the Federal Highway Administration s Federal Lands Highway Office and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). The IRR Inventory is a database of all the transportation facilities eligible for IRR funding. Information collected for the Inventory includes the classification, route number, bridge number, current and future traffic volumes, maintenance responsibility, and ownership. Data in the Inventory is used to determine 8% of the Tribe s IRR Program Relative Need Distribution Formula (RNDF). The Tribe s transportation needs substantially exceed the IRR Program s formula allocation funds. Regional and State funds, grants, and programs administered by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA), Pima Association of Governments (PAG), and the Arizona Department of Transportation () present alternatives and matching strategies to financing Tribal transportation projects. The Ignacio M. Baumea Road project, the Tribe s first multi-modal roadway completed in 21, is a prime example of utilizing Indian Reservation Road (IRR) Program and Regional funds to fully finance a project. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

15 HAPTER 3: TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING OVERVIEW OVERVIEW The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), prepared by Pima Association of Governments (PAG), is a five-year schedule and budget of proposed transportation improvements within. PAG is the region's federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) and the federally designated Transportation Management Area (TMA). The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) provides funding for 35 regional corridor projects and numerous other projects that are eligible for one of the categorical funds as outlined in the RTA plan. The RTA plan was adopted in May 26 and is funded through an accompanying ½-cent excise tax that runs until FY 226, unless extended by the voters. The RTA enabling state statutes also require the TIP document to include all the RTA-funded projects and to specifically identify all federal, state and local funding needed for the implementation of the voter-approved RTA plan. As such, PAG staff has been delegated the authority to facilitate a regional process to comply with all the funding regulations outlined by the above agencies. PAG/RTA committees providing input on the development of the TIP were consolidated several years ago to provide a more efficient and seamless process. Therefore, for all intents and purposes, the TIP development process and the TIP document are considered a joint PAG/RTA effort while the final approval on an annual basis is the sole responsibility of the PAG Regional ouncil. The TIP development process follows a series of policies and procedures that have been approved by the PAG Regional ouncil or the RTA Board and are incorporated into the TIP document. PAG/RTA staff is authorized to develop an annual "all for Projects" that outlines funding availability and guidance on programming procedures and criteria for meeting regional objectives. PAG/RTA staff is authorized to use any reasonable interpretation of the language used by the Regional ouncil or RTA Board to ensure all the practices, activities, methods and ways of conducting business, circumstances of operating or any other feature of work or process to accomplish assigned tasks adhere to the established policies. PAG/RTA governing bodies rely on staff and the committee(s) established, managed and subject to change by staff, to comply with board/council policies to achieve regional objectives. This responsibility requires ongoing awareness of the policies and procedures while conducting committee functions. An efficient operating process is critical for all committees, specifically for the Transportation Planning ommittee (TP) and its Subcommittees, since the TIP document is a critical tool for implementation of the regional goals and objectives. The development of the TIP encompasses a large number of requirements and standards, from local, state and national regulatory bodies. A well-managed and maintained set of policies is the backbone of successful TIP development. The goal of the transportation improvement programming process is to develop a TIP in a transparent and accountable manner, that makes optimum use of available funds and resources, and that serves the transportation needs of the region, as defined in the long-range Regional Mobility Access Plan (RMAP). PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

16 Federal legislation specifically defines certain aspects of this programming process, including the following: The FAST act requires that MPO s (like PAG) consider performance-based criteria and a congestion management process in the project selection and the development of the TIP. (See hapter 4). Federal law requires that the TIP document includes a financial plan which documents the financial resources available to implement the program. (See hapter 5). Federal laws regarding air quality [42 U.S and 4 FR (d)] require that the regional TIP be analyzed and conform to the air quality implementation plan(s). (See hapter 6). Transit is an essential element of a multi-modal transportation planning process. As such, an overview of the region s transit services is included in the PAG TIP. (See hapter 7). Finally, federal laws also require that various transportation stakeholders have a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed program. (See hapter 8). The primary resource used for formulating the TIP is the RMAP. However, with the passage of the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) Plan in May of 26, the projects and programs outlined in that plan will be included in the TIP. The RTP documents transportation facilities and services required to meet future travel needs. Additional roadway facilities and expanded public transportation services, combined with greater opportunities for ride sharing, bicycling, intermodalism, and alternate modes, are incorporated into the RTP to improve air quality and support the efficiency of the regional transportation network. PAG'S TIP PROESS PAG's TIP covers a 5-year period and describes planned regional transportation projects and improvements, which lead toward implementation of the RMAP. The TIP is the mechanism through which the RMAP is implemented in a manner consistent with local needs and priorities. It is also the mechanism through which the air quality impacts of regionally significant transportation projects can be evaluated and addressed. The TIP is financially constrained and includes only those projects for which funding has been determined to be available. In addition to available federal funding sources, information is also included on projects using State, regional and RTA funding. The TIP includes regionally significant projects whether or not they are Federal Aid Projects. Information on other projects, which are locally funded, is included as available, including the projects identified in the voter approved RTA plan. ontributing Agencies: Information on programmed projects is provided by the following agencies: PAG's eight member governments - the cities of and South ; ; the towns of Oro Valley, Marana and Sahuarita; the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and the Tohono O odham Nation; Regional Transportation Authority (RTA); Airport Authority (TAA); Sun Tran; PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

17 Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ); Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ); Arizona Department of Transportation (); The University of Arizona; and Other agencies or transportation interests. Transportation Planning ommittee PAG's Transportation Planning ommittee (TP) is the standing technical committee responsible for development of the TIP. The TP meets once a month throughout the year, with additional meetings on an as-needed basis, to address technical issues and other matters related to TIP development. Regular meeting notices are provided to committee members and, when requested, to a list of interested parties which includes citizens, neighborhood groups, non-profit organizations and various special interest groups. Key aspects of the cooperative TIP process include maintenance of funding flexibility, recognition of diverse needs, and the ability to respond to changes in the community. Thus, the ability to request and take timely action upon TIP amendments is an important component of the process. Amendments to the TIP document may be processed, where necessary, to reflect changing needs, priorities, or funding scenarios. Schedule PAG's TIP development process typically starts in the summer of each year. The first step in the process consists of revising the existing TIP to reflect the actual obligation or expenditure of funds during the previous year. The TP (or a subcommittee thereof) will then meet in the summer to review past revenues and revise future revenue projections. From these revenue projects, a all for Projects is developed, outlining the available funding from each funding source and the specific requirements for those funding sources. A jurisdiction s representative on the TP works with their agency s staff to develop project applications, which are submitted for review and prioritization by the TP in the fall. That review results in a fiscally-constrained draft project list which is modeled for Title VI compliance and air quality conformity. It is then presented to the public in a series of open houses in the Spring. Following receipt of public comment and any subsequent revision, this draft TIP is re-analyzed for air quality conformity, if necessary. It is then presented for review at the PAG Transportation Planning ommittee and the PAG Management ommittee, and for approval by the PAG Regional ouncil. Revenue Sources The TIP specifies how the projects and programs that will use available federal, state, and regional funding. In addition, any project that adds roadway capacity is also included in the TIP, regardless of the type of funding used. No project is eligible to receive federal funding unless it has been included in the TIP with a finding that the TIP is in compliance with the requirements of the lean Air Act. While revenues available through the TIP are limited, competition for those funds is great. Thus, extensive cooperation between local jurisdictions and other competing agencies is required. Federal sources of funding include the Surface Transportation Program (STP), the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and the Transportation Alternatives (TAP). Federal grants through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) are also a major source of funding for transit projects. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

18 State funding sources include HURF 12.6 and HURF 2.6. HURF 12.6 can be used on any arterial road included in the RMAP, but HURF 2.6 are limited to use on state routes. Regional funding sources include funds from the RTA half-cent sales tax. Since 25, when the RTA was approved by voters, RTA funding has consistently been the largest source of funding in the PAG TIP. For more information about any of these funding sources, please see glossary in Appendix 5. Inflation in the TIP The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has provided guidance to planning organizations across the country to ensure that future years of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) document account for inflation. Sponsoring jurisdictions have been advised to account for the future costs of a project so that expenditures in the TIP reflect costs in the fiscal year of the expenditure. This accounting for inflation is called Year of Expenditure (YOE). For the FY TIP cycle, all fiscal years were to be programmed in 216 dollars. As such, jurisdictional funding requests needed to adjust current construction costs for inflation, using the project annual inflation rate from the World Economic Outlook Database. The table below provides the adjustment factor that was recommended to inflate current estimates to the program year. Table 3-1: Inflation Adjustment Factors Fiscal Year Adjustment with FY 216 as a base Example if a jurisdiction had two projects one in FY18 and the other in FY22, both with a current construction cost of $1 million, it would be appropriate for the jurisdiction to inflate the FY18 project to $1,35,3 and the FY22 project to $1,133,4. all for Projects The annual all for Projects is a document that defines the parameters within which the draft TIP will be crafted. It highlights regional policies and priorities that will be relevant to the project selection process and summarizes the revenue projections recommended by the TIP committee earlier that year. It specifically identifies how much funding, from each funding source, will be available each year of the TIP. Finally, it outlines the process by which jurisdictional TIP representatives can apply for the available funding. The all for Projects covers a wide range of project types and transportation modes. All projects that are proposed for inclusion in the TIP are included in the all for Projects. These projects may include roadway improvements, bridge PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

19 improvements, transit improvements, transportation enhancements, transportation planning studies, bicycle and pedestrian programs, RideShare, Travel Reduction, lean ities, alternate mode programs and airport improvements. Performance Reports and Project Prioritization Jurisdictional requests for funding are made through a web portal which provides applicants with data on system performance in the proposed project area. When requests are received, PAG staff generate a performance report for the project. These reports are included with the project applications that are reviewed by TP. TP evaluates project funding applications against factors that had been developed previously by TP and compare projects to one another to provide a sense of order and priority. The factors considered in this evaluation include safety, system preservation, the number of users to benefit from the project, congestion relief, environmental impacts, accessibility, system continuity, and regional significance. Following this evaluation, additional consideration is given to a variety of other factors, such as previous public comments, jurisdictional priority, project readiness, geographic balance, and historical distributions. Final project selections are based on the melding of these considerations while project schedules are based on readiness and resource availability. Although performance reports are generated for RTA projects, projects that are specifically identified in the voterapproved RTA plan are not subjected to this prioritization criteria during the TIP process. The RTA funding source is fixed by the RTA plan approved by the voters and cannot be overridden by the TIP process. A number of subcommittees may be involved in the selection of projects for inclusion in the TIP. For example, a selection committee was established for the purpose of evaluating project applications for the competitive Regional Transportation Alternatives Grant, and a technical subcommittee was convened to review the raw data in the performance reports. Title VI and Environmental Justice PAG is committed to planning, developing and implementing programs that are in compliance with Environmental Justice regulations and Title VI of the ivil Rights Act of Title VI states that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity. PAG addresses Title VI requirements both quantitatively and qualitatively with extensive public involvement and data analysis techniques. Federal regulations define specific groups as protected populations. In the PAG region, the following groups are considered protected populations: African American, Asian, Hispanic, Native American, disabled, elderly, and low income. Outreach PAG s Public Involvement Program is designed to inform and solicit input from the region s protected populations and engage them in meaningful participation in the transportation planning process. PAG conducted three open houses for public comment on the TIP. They were conducted at central locations throughout the community. One open house was conducted at Reid Park which is located on a bus line and is handicapped accessible. At all the open houses, Spanish translators were available upon request and Spanish translations of the TIP materials were available. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

20 Analysis Overview This TIP analysis is part of a tiered approach that the region employs for Title VI and Environmental Justice compliance. On the broadest level, projects are drawn from the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) for which an overall analysis is conducted. The RTP analysis assesses the impact of all of the projects proposed in the region over the next 2-25 years. On the next level, another regional analysis is performed on the five years of projects included in the TIP. In addition, a more focused assessment is done during project development. Each project sponsor is responsible for Environmental Justice and Title VI compliance as part of the planning and construction of its individual projects. Specific projects are expected to have appropriate public involvement and mitigation techniques applied during their design and development process. For example, a variety of state and federal rules and regulations govern just compensation and relocation assistance for properties that qualify due to the impacts of individual projects. These requirements are administered by the sponsoring agency at an appropriate time during project development and right-ofway acquisition. All of the projects contained in the TIP must be consistent with PAG s long-range transportation plan, the RTP. The RTP has been analyzed and developed to provide an appropriately balanced program of transportation improvements with significant investment in transit, bicycle and pedestrian projects that benefit low income individuals and others who may not own or operate a motor vehicle. Projects within the roadway component of the RTP are distributed throughout the region so as to not place disproportionate impacts on any one area or population group. Methodology PAG has developed maps showing the concentration distribution of protected classes (as defined by federal regulation) within the region. These maps, along with official population statistics, current estimates and projections, and other household data in the PAG region, assist in analyzing the potential impacts of the TIP on these groups. For this analysis, a concentration of a protected group has been defined as those geographic areas where the percentage of a protected population within the area exceeds the average percentage of that same population living within the ounty as a whole. For example, if the county average for a protected population is 5 percent, an area with a population greater than 5 percent would be considered to have a concentration of that protected population. Also, for this analysis, Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ) were used as the geographic area to identify concentrations of the protected groups. The method used for this analysis was a computer model computation for the average travel time in the region with and without the projects identified for construction in the TIP. Additional computer runs were performed for each protected class by areas of geographic concentration (table 3.2) and at the regional level. An analysis of model results then compared average travel times for protected populations. The maps included at the end of this chapter are provided as a graphic representation of the location of the projects in comparison to the location of various concentrations of protected populations. Because the impacts of projects are very subjective, the analysis assumes projects are equal in their benefits and burdens. The goal of this analysis is to attempt to determine if comparable numbers of people are being impacted by the project in PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

21 the protected population as are being impacted in the general population. The TIP strives to provide a balance so that all groups are affected at approximately the same ratio. It should be noted that there are several programs in the TIP that do not lend themselves to being mapped such as RideShare, Job Access Reverse ommute (JAR), purchase of transit vehicles, etc. These, therefore, are not included in this analysis. For the most part, these activities are targeted toward one or more of the protected classes or they are distributed uniformly throughout the region. It is assumed then that these activities are either neutral or would improve the observed benefits of the program for each of the protected populations. Analysis The following table provides the average travel time for the whole region (labeled all ) and each protected population. Table 3.2 provides the travel times for the protected populations in concentrations (labeled protected ) and for the region as a whole. Please note that some individuals may belong to more than one protected population. For example, someone could belong to a protected ethnic population and be elderly, disabled and/or low income as well. Table 3.2: Title VI Analysis Modeling Results for oncentrations of Protected Populations Group Travel Period Average Travel Time 217 (Minutes/Vehicle) Average Travel Time 222 No Build (Minutes/Vehicle) Average Travel Time 222 with projects (Minutes/Vehicle) omparison with and without TIP Projects All African American Asian Hispanic Native American Disabled Elderly (+65) Low Income Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

22 onclusion The analysis shows that, when compared to a baseline travel time of all residents in the urban portion of the county (labeled as all ) the protected populations are expected to experience the same travel time benefits. In both analyses, the average travel time improvement with the TIP projects compared to without was.1 of a minute (6 seconds). This same result was found for all protected populations and classes. Title VI Maps The maps provided at the end of this chapter are provided as a graphic representation of the location of the projects in comparison to the location of various concentrations of protected populations. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

23 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd TITLE VI ANALYSIS African American Population Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd RYAN AIRFIELD q ³ 2 4 Miles Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd 137. Silverbell Rd Mission Rd Moore Rd 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 15.3 La holla Rd Magee Rd Duval Mine Rd Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB q %&'( TUSON INT'L Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave 9.12 q Sahuarita Rd Downtown Sunrise Dr River Rd Tanque Verde Rd Broadway Blvd 787. Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd Box anyon Rd %&'( atalina Hwy Houghton Rd th Ave Old Spanish Tr 36th St 22.5 Broadway Blvd 131. Redington Rd nd St 83 6th St 4.12 Sonoita Hwy TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway African American Population Greater Than ounty Average of 3.62% Based on the American ommunity Survey 5-Year Block Group Data olossal ave Rd PAG Technical Services March 217 Map is for Illustrative Purposes Only E M PAG TIP

24 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd TITLE VI ANALYSIS Hispanic Population Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd RYAN AIRFIELD q ³ 2 4 Miles Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd 137. Silverbell Rd Mission Rd Moore Rd 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 15.3 La holla Rd Magee Rd Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB q %&'( TUSON INT'L Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave 9.12 q Sahuarita Rd Downtown Sunrise Dr River Rd Tanque Verde Rd Broadway Blvd 787. Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd %&'( atalina Hwy Houghton Rd th Ave Old Spanish Tr 36th St 22.5 Broadway Blvd 131. Redington Rd nd St th St 4.12 olossal ave Rd 83 Sonoita Hwy E M Duval Mine Rd TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway Hispanic Population Greater Than ounty Average of 35.71% Based on the Box anyon Rd American ommunity Survey 5-Year Block Group Data PAG Technical Services March 217 Map is for Illustrative Purposes Only PAG TIP

25 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd TITLE VI ANALYSIS Native American Population Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd RYAN AIRFIELD q ³ 2 4 Miles Tohono O'odham Nation State Route kj Sells AZ Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd 137. Silverbell Rd Mission Rd Moore Rd 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 15.3 La holla Rd Magee Rd Duval Mine Rd Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB q %&'( TUSON INT'L Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave 9.12 q Sahuarita Rd Downtown Sunrise Dr River Rd Tanque Verde Rd Broadway Blvd 787. Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd Box anyon Rd %&'( atalina Hwy Houghton Rd th Ave Old Spanish Tr 36th St 22.5 Redington Rd Broadway Blvd nd St TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway Native American Population Greater Than ounty Average of 3.27% Based on the American ommunity Survey 5-Year Block Group Data olossal ave Rd 83 PAG Technical Services March 217 Map is for Illustrative Purposes Only 6th St 4.12 Sonoita Hwy E M PAG TIP

26 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd TITLE VI ANALYSIS Asian Population Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd RYAN AIRFIELD q Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd 137. Silverbell Rd Mission Rd Moore Rd 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 15.3 La holla Rd Magee Rd Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB q %&'( TUSON INT'L Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave 9.12 q Sahuarita Rd Downtown Sunrise Dr River Rd Tanque Verde Rd Broadway Blvd 787. Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd %&'( 1 atalina Hwy Houghton Rd 6th Ave th St Old Spanish Tr 22.5 Broadway Blvd nd St Redington Rd th St 4.12 olossal ave Rd 83 Sonoita Hwy E M 41.7 ³ 2 4 Miles Duval Mine Rd Box anyon Rd TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway Asian Population Greater Than ounty Average of 2.9% Based on the American ommunity Survey 5-Year Block Group Data PAG Technical Services March 217 Map is for Illustrative Purposes Only PAG TIP

27 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd TITLE VI ANALYSIS Elderly Population Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd RYAN AIRFIELD q Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd 137. Silverbell Rd Mission Rd Moore Rd 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 15.3 La holla Rd Magee Rd Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB q %&'( TUSON INT'L Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave 9.12 q Sahuarita Rd Downtown Sunrise Dr River Rd Tanque Verde Rd Broadway Blvd 787. Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd %&'( atalina Hwy Houghton Rd th Ave Old Spanish Tr 36th St 22.5 Broadway Blvd 131. Redington Rd nd St olossal ave Rd 83 6th St 4.12 Sonoita Hwy E M 41.7 ³ 2 4 Miles Duval Mine Rd Box anyon Rd TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway Elderly Population Greater Than ounty Average of 17.15% Based on the American ommunity Survey 5-Year Block Group Data PAG Technical Services March 217 Map is for Illustrative Purposes Only PAG TIP

28 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd TITLE VI ANALYSIS Disabled Population Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd RYAN AIRFIELD q ³ 2 4 Miles Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd 137. Silverbell Rd Mission Rd Moore Rd 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 15.3 La holla Rd Magee Rd Duval Mine Rd Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB q %&'( TUSON INT'L Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave 9.12 q Sahuarita Rd Downtown Sunrise Dr River Rd Tanque Verde Rd Broadway Blvd 787. Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd Box anyon Rd %&'( atalina Hwy Houghton Rd th Ave Old Spanish Tr 36th St 22.5 Broadway Blvd 131. Redington Rd nd St TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway Disabled Population Greater Than ounty Average of 14.37% Based on the American ommunity Survey 5-Year Block Group Data olossal ave Rd 83 6th St 4.12 Sonoita Hwy PAG Technical Services March 217 Map is for Illustrative Purposes Only E M PAG TIP

29 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd TITLE VI ANALYSIS Low Income Population Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd RYAN AIRFIELD q ³ 2 4 Miles Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd 137. Silverbell Rd Mission Rd Moore Rd 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd 15.3 La holla Rd Magee Rd Duval Mine Rd Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB q %&'( TUSON INT'L Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave 9.12 q Sahuarita Rd Downtown Sunrise Dr River Rd Tanque Verde Rd Broadway Blvd 787. Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd Box anyon Rd %&'( atalina Hwy Houghton Rd th Ave Old Spanish Tr 36th St 22.5 Broadway Blvd 131. Redington Rd nd St TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway Low Income Population Greater Than ounty Average of 19.26% Based on the American ommunity Survey 5-Year Block Group Data 6th St 4.12 olossal ave Rd 83 Sonoita Hwy PAG Technical Services March 217 Map is for Illustrative Purposes Only E M PAG TIP

30

31 HAPTER 4: REGIONAL TRAFFI SIGNALS, ONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROESS, AND PERFORMANE MEASURES REGIONAL TRAFFI SIGNAL SYSTEMS The ity of, Arizona Department of Transportation,, Marana, Oro Valley, Sahuarita, the ity of South, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and the Tohono O odham Nation are in partnership to provide "seamless" traffic signal operations across jurisdictional boundaries. This has resulted in the interconnection of traffic signals into a centrally coordinated operation. This system has been expanded to encompass all the traffic signals in the Greater Metropolitan Area, making one of the few, if not only, metropolitan areas of its size with of the majority of its signals from multiple jurisdictions controlled from a single center. urrently over 5 traffic signals from throughout the region are actively monitored and controlled from the ity of Transportation ontrol enter on behalf of the region. In a multi-jurisdictional coordinated effort, the region s signals use multiple signal timing patterns in order to maximize the efficiency of the network as a whole. This type of signal coordination being implemented in the area is providing for improved traffic flow. Such improvements tend to be most effective in locally congested areas, where progressive flows can reduce stops and signal delay. The PAG member agencies have established a formal regional traffic signal program to enhance equipment purchase of necessary signal equipment and to provide evaluation and adjustments of the region s traffic signal operations on a regular basis. ontinuous improvement to equipment and performance of traffic signals improves the ability of the transportation network to move traffic safely and efficiently throughout the region. Additionally, improved signal operations can be completed for lower costs and in shorter time frames than most other capital-intensive transportation improvement options. The regional program has resulted in the establishment of a municipally-owned telecommunications network to support traffic signal and transportation operations throughout the region. The network, known as the Regional Transportation Data Network (RTDN) is an outgrowth of PAG s Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) planning which identified the need to migrate traffic signals and operations off leased line communications and onto a municipally-owned telecommunications network. This work has resulted in significant cost savings resulting from the absence of fee-based communications and has vastly improved communications quality throughout the region for transportation operations and emergency services. All traffic signals from the ity of and DOT are currently in the network and funding has been programmed as part of the 5-year TIP to connect other jurisdictions throughout the region into the network. The municipally-owned network enables agencies to share real-time data and information, expand the network to include additional stakeholder agencies, enhances the region's ability to provide accurate, timely and comprehensive travel information to the public, and vastly improves data transfer rates and quality. The regional traffic signal program has resulted in the updating of over 1 traffic signal time plans throughout the region including I-1 frontage road signals, stand-alone signalized intersections, special event time plans, pedestrian beacon signals and adjustments to accommodate the pedestrian walk speed in the national Manual for Uniform Traffic ontrol Devices (MUTD). These efforts are allowing the jurisdictions of the region to move from a reactive signal timing approach to a proactive one, where signal time plans are reviewed and adjusted regularly. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

32 This program has seen tremendous cooperation from jurisdictions throughout the region allowing for benefits such as reduced delay and congestion for the public, reduced fuel consumption and emissions, improved safety for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists, reduced costs for jurisdictions and the public through grouped procurement opportunities, shared resources and training opportunities, and seamless traffic signal operations throughout the region. Recent retiming efforts of 133 traffic signals throughout the region focusing on extensive timing plan modifications, extra vehicle throughput capacity and smoother traffic flow without negatively impacting pedestrian mobility have resulted in just under 1 percent in reduced vehicle delay and 3 percent in fuel consumption reduction. Reductions in various vehicle emissions from the updated signal timing plans range from 2 percent to 16 percent less output. Insights from the regional traffic signal program are being used to help identify and address areas where excessive traffic congestion is taking place. Information from the program is being used in the identification and selection of projects for potential TIP funding, which helps PAG and its member agencies more effectively manage congestion throughout the region through signal timing improvements and capital projects. THE PAG ONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROESS (MP) PAG s current practice of performance based planning and programming has taken the federally mandated ongestion Management Process (MP) and integrated it into PAG s normal operating procedures. As a result there is significant overlap between the MP and the following section on performance management. A key distinction of PAG s MP from the other performance management components is it more granular focus at the corridor level and project evaluation. The MP serves as an effective tool to address traffic congestion throughout the region by enabling PAG and its partners to define, identify and measure congestion and, develop and select appropriate strategies to reduce it. The PAG MP provides periodic assessment of the effectiveness of implemented strategies and progress towards regionally adopted targets through a series of performance measures. This process assists in identification of system deficiencies, and analysis and selection of alternative strategies to address congestion for inclusion in the Regional Accessibility and Mobility Plan (RMAP), the region s long-range transportation plan, and the short-range transportation program (TIP). In recognition of the Federal requirements for the MP, particularly as they relate to Transportation Management Areas that are in nonattainment for either carbon monoxide or ozone, a procedure has been developed to link the TIP project development process to the MP. In that the PAG planning area is not currently classified as nonattainment, PAG is taking a proactive approach to ensuring that all significant single-occupant vehicle (SOV) capacity projects are developed as part of a MP. The procedure, as described below was developed in close cooperation with the TIP Subcommittee. The MP procedure requires that new significant capacity increasing projects, adding at least one travel lane for a mile or more, provide MP related information as part of the TIP project application. Local jurisdictional project sponsors answer MP questions below and fill out a one-page MP strategies toolbox worksheet to identify those MP-related strategies that will be delivered as part of the project. Project applications that do not meet this capacity threshold are highly encouraged to review and incorporate MP strategies that are appropriate for the project. Is the project considered to be a significant project according to PAG s ongestion Management Process (MP)? Are Federal funds being used or requested to support the project? Is the project a significant increase in single occupant vehicle (SOV) capacity? PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

33 Does the project address a congestion issue as identified by PAG s transportation system reporting or other source? Does the project incorporate congestion management strategies as identified in the PAG MP Strategies Toolbox or otherwise? Please identify the congestion management strategies included as part of the project using the PAG MP Strategies Toolbox Worksheet. The procedure developed to review all significant SOV projects is designed to help: Ensure that significant SOV projects consider, and when applicable include congestion management strategies as part of the project development process. Document the congestion management strategies to be included with the significant SOV project. The PAG ongestion Management Strategies Toolbox Worksheet is a checklist of congestion management strategies that are considered appropriate and applicable to the region. This checklist is designed to easily facilitate the documentation of strategies to be included with the significant SOV project, but it is not necessarily all inclusive of the strategies that may be used. Local agencies have complete flexibility and latitude to include any additional congestion management strategies into their project, and this is encouraged by PAG. Agencies are also encouraged to consider congestion management strategies as part of non-capacity increasing projects. PERFORMANE MANAGEMENT A performance framework is a means to track progress toward desired outcomes. PAG uses a performance framework established in the 245 RMAP. This framework allows periodic monitoring of the region s progress in addition to providing a framework for better assessing anticipated impacts of proposed projects. This framework closely follows the National Performance Goals established by FHWA. The RMAP performance areas are: System Performance, System Maintenance, Transportation Safety, Multimodal hoices, Land Use and Transportation, and Environmental Stewardship. Each of these goal areas consists of objectives, performance measures and targets. Beyond the 245 RMAP performance areas, regional planning and programming is also informed by performance components from the MP, and Federally required measures introduced in MAP-21 and continued in the FAST Act. FHWA and FTA have jointly released final rules on performance management measures in the categories of transportation safety, infrastructure condition and system performance. PAG will continue to work with its Federal and State partners to fully implement these additional measures in the coming years. While the sources may differ, each of these performance components have a common aim of further improving the region s transportation system for all modes and are bought together for periodic performance reviews.. The planning performance framework is further supported by performance based programming. PAG has developed a process where transportation projects can be better evaluated based on the performance of the existing conditions of the proposed project area. This process is facilitated by PAG s Transportation Network Data Portal (NTAD). NTAD is a webbased map viewer that displays regional data in key performance areas. Jurisdictional partners can perform visual network screening of the existing performance of their facilities and can delineate a proposed project extent. Delineating the project extent generates a performance report for the facilities indicated and adjacent areas. Additionally, supplemental questions clarify which performance areas are anticipated to be affected by the proposed project. This process allows region-wide comparison of similar project types to better evaluate their respective benefits to the region. The existing conditions performance report data are organized into the six categories of the 245 RMAP goal areas. The MP criteria protocol is brought in to assign relative scores to project applications to facilitate the regional discussion on programming. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

34 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

35 HAPTER 5: FINANIAL PLAN As mentioned in the previous chapters, PAG is required by federal regulation to include a financial plan in the TIP document that demonstrates how the projects listed can be implemented using current revenue sources. The TIP must be fiscally constrained, which means that the region can only list projects in the TIP document for which funding is reasonably expected to be available. This constraint is determined by adding up total costs, by fund type each year, and comparing those costs to the estimate of anticipated revenues by fund type each year. Fiscal constraint is required for each of the first four years of the plan by fund type. What projects/programs does the region want to do and how much do they cost? Appendix 1 of this document provides a fiscally constrained listing of the projects for which funding is deemed to be available. The projects listed in the first two years of the TIP will have funding available to complete that distinct phase of the project. A phase of a project can be further defined as: Design, denoted with a D in the TIP document, indicates that the sponsoring jurisdiction is developing the plans necessary to complete the project. Right-of-Way Acquisition, denoted with an R in the TIP document, indicates that the sponsoring jurisdiction is using the funding listed to acquire property on which to construct the project. onstruction, denoted with a in the TIP document, indicates that the sponsoring jurisdiction is constructing the project. Project phases that are not fully funded could appear in years three (3) through five (5) of the TIP document. In addition to the notations noted above for specific project phases, the TIP document also contains funding programmed for the repayment of loans and operations of programs and systems such as transit. Repayment of loans, denoted with a PMT in the TIP document, indicates that the sponsoring jurisdiction is repaying loans necessary to have completed the project. Operations, denoted with an O in the TIP document, indicate that the sponsoring jurisdiction is using the funding identified to operate the program or service listed in the TIP document. How much funding do we expect to have? Appendix 2 of the TIP document provides information on historical revenues for both state and federal sources, with the last matrix of that appendix providing a constraint analysis by year, for each fund source. Estimates of funding availability are based upon past funding received by type. PAG has four (4) main types of funding available for programming within the TIP. Federal funding Federal funding available for transportation is set through authorization of federal legislation from ongress. Once a bill has been passed, the federal funding outlined in that bill is used as an estimate for future years of the TIP until a new bill is passed. State funding State-based funding comes from the Arizona Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF). Unlike federal dollars, there is no guaranteed amount of HURF available to the region. HURF is distributed based on fuel sales, vehicle license taxes (VLT) collected and a few other smaller funding sources. Distribution is based on a formula in the Arizona Revised Statues related to population and county of origin of fuel sales. HURF distributions fluctuate on a monthly basis and are directly tied to the health of the State s economy. Estimates of future HURF revenues are based on past receipts. A growth factor is applied to future revenues, as necessary, PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

36 depending on the current economic conditions and trends. Recently the financial estimates in the PAG TIP have been adjusted downward to account for the recession. Regional funding has a ½-cent sales tax in place that funds projects outlined in the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) plan. RTA revenues are based on collections and anticipated bonding schedules. The RTA was passed in 26 for 2 years. ompetitive funding In addition to the funding available to the region to program, the TIP contains projects/programs in/for that have other identified fund sources. These fund sources include, but are not limited to: jurisdictional, private developer, federal earmarks such as High Priority Projects (HPP), and other federal/state competitive funding programs, such as TIGER grants. See Appendix 5 for a glossary of terms and funding sources. Putting it all together for fiscal constraint. hapter 3 describes the TIP programming process and how projects are identified for regional funding and priorities while also ensuring fiscal constraint. More information about fiscal constraint can be found at the following links: Operations and Maintenance osts The region and its jurisdictional partners are aware of the value of maintaining and operating the existing transportation infrastructure in the region. With limited transportation dollars available now and into the foreseeable future, emphasis should be placed on infrastructure maintenance. It is more cost effective to do so than to replace facilities that have failed due to lack of maintenance. Typical maintenance and operations types of activities include but are not limited to: adjustments due to inclement weather (closing flooded roads, de-icing bridges and snow plows at higher elevations), clearing sight-distances, traffic signal maintenance, striping, and warrant studies and pavement management, from filling pot holes to full pavement overlays. The chart below outlines what jurisdictions pay in operations and maintenance in current and future fiscal years. Jurisdictions were asked to provide budget numbers as available for their transportation operations and maintenance activities system wide, so numbers would reflect both local roads as well as roads of regional significance. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

37 Table 5-1: Operations and Maintenance osts Jurisdiction FY17 FY18 FY19 ity of $41,454,73 $47,572,73 $48,65,785 Transit* $73,54,2 $78,84,17 $84,976,1 $14,381,6 $15,381,6 $15,381,6 ity of South $676, $676, $676, Town of Oro Valley $1,139,197 $1,737,957 $1,7, Town of Sahuarita $1,144,42 $1,462,22 $1,462,22 Town of Marana $3,2, $3,2, $3,2, Pascua Yaqui Tribe $5, $5, $5, Tohono O odham Nation $5, $5, $5, * The ity of runs the Sun Tran transit service, which includes the para-transit service known as Van Tran. Operating numbers shown cover the entire O&M budget for SunTran,VanTran,and Transit Services. Note that the arterial roadways within the Tohono O odham Nation are either federal BIA roads, state routes (maintained by ) or county roadways (maintained by ). Not all jurisdictions had numbers available for all fiscal years outlined in the chart. If no future estimates were available, no increase was assumed. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

38 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

39 HAPTER 6: AIR QUALITY EVALUATION AIR QUALITY OVERVIEW To assist local jurisdictions in measuring and improving air quality, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establishes maximum acceptable levels for six common air pollutants known as the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These federal standards apply to outdoor or ambient air and are set to protect public health and the environment. Motor vehicle emissions are a significant contributor to air pollution across the nation and in the urban area, with carbon monoxide (O) being the largest component of these emissions. In 1978, the EPA designated part of the urban area a O nonattainment area (Figure 6-1). This designation meant that this area s ambient O concentration exceeded the NAAQS 1 frequently enough to violate the federal health standard. When an area receives this designation, a plan must be developed and adopted to reduce emissions of that pollutant. This nonattainment area plan then is incorporated into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) as a SIP amendment. The plan must contain effective strategies for curtailing air pollution and allocate financial and resource commitments for carrying out the plan. PAG adopted a SIP revision under the Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP) option 2 which met EPA s requirements for O nonattainment areas. The Air Planning Area (TAPA) was designated O attainment status, effective July 1, 2. ontinuation of this status relies on data obtained from monitoring and modeling procedures. In 28, the PAG Regional ouncil adopted a 1-year O LMP for the TAPA. This LMP, together with a statutory provision extending the State s Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program (VEIP) through 216, were sent as a SIP revision to ADEQ and submitted to the EPA for review. The EPA approved the SIP revision in 29, and, in accordance with the lean Air Act (AA) 17(d.), ensured the maintenance of the NAAQS in the TAPA. The LMP is in effect from Jan. 2, 21, through 22. This plan maintains existing controls and contingency provisions and replaces the previous plan approved by the EPA in 2. The area has not violated the O NAAQS since 1984, and O levels are expected to remain well below the NAAQS for a second 1-year period ending 22. MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS The conformity determination for the 245 Regional Mobility and Accessibility Plan (RMAP) and the FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) were approved by the FHWA and FTA in July 216. PAG continues to comply with all legal requirements for transportation conformity determinations in effect at the time of this TIP report. SIP ONTROL MEASURES The EPA has not imposed any federal control measures for, but has included the State s Vehicle Emissions Inspection (VEIP) and Oxygenated Fuels Program, the PAG Travel Reduction Program (TRP) and the 1 NAAQS for O is 9 parts per million for an 8-hour average. 2 A less rigorous plan authorized by the EPA since O concentrations were below 85 percent of the NAAQS PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

40 Department of Environmental Quality s (PDEQ) Voluntary No Drive Days Program as federally enforceable air quality control measures. Figure 6-1: arbon Monoxide Maintenance Area These programs represent the permanent and enforceable commitments, as required under 17(d) (3) (E) (iii) of the AA, and assist the region in achieving and maintaining attainment status. Since these control measures are included in the Arizona SIP they must continue to be implemented. All legally enforceable commitments to other control measures outlined in the 1987 SIP revision have been completed. A summary of these enforceable control measures follows. Federal Motor Vehicle ontrol Program Emissions Regulations Federal regulations for reducing motor vehicle tailpipe emissions have been in place since Initial standards required major reductions in vehicle tailpipe hydrocarbon and O emissions and eliminated crankcase hydrocarbons, relative to 1963 vehicle model emissions. Subsequent federal regulations continued to lower vehicle emission standards throughout the 197s and 198s. More recent regulations requiring more stringent pollutant reductions are detailed below. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

41 Tier 1 Emission Standards Two sets of tailpipe emissions standards were defined for light-duty vehicles in the lean Air Act Amendments (AAA) of 199: Tier 1 and Tier 2. The Tier 1 standards were published in 1991 and were phased in progressively between 1994 and These standards apply to tailpipe emissions for all new light-duty vehicles up to 8,5 lbs. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) (passenger cars, light-duty trucks, sport utility vehicles, minivans and pick-up trucks). National Low Emission Vehicle Program (NLEV) In 1997, EPA finalized the regulations for the NLEV program, a voluntary agreement between the EPA and auto manufacturers. This program applied to cars and light-duty trucks nationwide starting with the model year 21. It provided more stringent tailpipe emission standards for the transition period before the introduction of Tier 2 regulations. The program was phased in from 21 through 23, and required light-duty car manufacturers to certify that a certain percentage of their vehicle fleets complied with cleaner emission standards. Tier 2 Emission Standards Tier 2 tailpipe emission standards were adopted by the EPA in 1999 and were implemented incrementally from 24 to 29. They applied stricter standards to all vehicles covered in the Tier 1 standards in addition to more rigorous restrictions for larger vehicles (over 8,5 lbs GVWR). Unlike the Tier 1 standards, the Tier 2 regulations applied the same emission standards to all vehicle weight categories and for all fuel types. Increased Vehicle Fuel Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards In 21, the EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) developed regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel economy of light-duty vehicles. This regulation established standards for the model year vehicles and became effective in April 21. In 212, the EPA and NHTSA established additional greenhouse standards to extend the fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emission standards to the model year light-duty vehicles. This rule went into effect in December 212. Although these regulations primarily target fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions, they also reduce other tailpipe air emissions through anticipated changes in driving behavior and reduced fuel use. Tier 3 Emission Standards In 214, the EPA adopted the Tier 3 standards which will reduce tailpipe emissions from new light and medium-duty passenger vehicles, light-duty trucks and some heavy-duty vehicles starting with the model year 217; the new standard also requires a lowering of the sulfur content of gasoline. The tailpipe standards will include phase-in schedules that vary by vehicle class but generally will start between model years 217 and 225. These new tailpipe emission standards coupled with the lower gas sulfur content will reduce O, oxides of nitrogen (NO x) and volatile organic compound (VO) emissions from on-road vehicles. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

42 Improvements in Vehicle Equipment In addition to complying with federal tailpipe emission standards, automobile manufacturers were required to install certain equipment to limit emissions. Starting in the early 197s, new cars were equipped with charcoal canisters and exhaust gas recirculation valves to meet emission standards. One of the more significant innovations was the introduction of the catalytic converter in the mid 197s. atalytic converters significantly reduce O, NO x and hydrocarbon emissions by converting harmful fuel combustion products into less harmful emissions from the vehicle s exhaust system. Beginning with the 1996 models, the EPA required manufacturers of light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks to install onboard diagnostic (OBD) systems. These systems monitor vehicle control components for malfunctions that cause exceedance of emission levels. When a failure occurs, the diagnostic information is stored in the vehicle's computer to assist technicians with diagnosis and repair. Since that time, the EPA has extended OBD requirements to all medium and heavy-duty highway vehicles. Arizona Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program (VEIP) The Arizona VEIP began in 1977, and includes both the and Phoenix metropolitan areas. Vehicle models from 1967 through 212 are subject to emissions testing; exemptions exist in for motorcycles and collectible vehicles. New cars are not required to be tested until they have been registered for five years. Older vehicles (Model years 1967 through 1995) undergo tailpipe emission inspections while newer vehicles (post 1995) undergo OBD testing. The OBD system detects malfunctions in the early stages, often identifying failing components before tailpipe emissions testing would detect them. This earlier detection system helps protect the environment and allows for repair at a much lower cost. Since January 29, vehicle OBD testing in is valid for two years. Vehicles may receive a one-time only repair waiver that is valid for the current year s registration. Once a waiver is granted, the vehicle is ineligible for additional waivers. Failing vehicles that received a waiver must be repaired and pass inspection for subsequent registration in the metro area. Arizona Oxyfuel Program The Oxyfuel Program began in 199 and has been in effect for 27 full seasons in eastern. This program decreases O tailpipe emissions in the winter months by adding ethanol to all grades of motor fuel. The current oxygen content of winter motor fuels is 1.8 percent by weight. Legislation passed in 1996 (SB12) granted PAG the ability to increase oxyfuels under specified conditions. 3 Before making the determination to increase oxyfuel content, a cost-benefit analysis of all reasonable alternative emission reduction measures must be conducted. PAG s Travel Reduction Program (TRP) The Travel Reduction Ordinances (TROs), which created the regional Travel Reduction Program (TRP), are in place for Pima ounty, the cities of and South and the towns of Oro Valley, Marana and Sahuarita. The TROs specify that 3 Up to 6 days before Sept. 3 of each year PAG, with concurrence of the Director of the ADEQ, may notify the Director of the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures to increase the oxyfuel content not less than.3 percent by weight of oxygen and not more than the maximum EPA allowance. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

43 employers with 1 or more full-time equivalent employees at a single or contiguous worksite must participate in the TRP. Employers with fewer than 1 employees can participate voluntarily. The goals of the ordinances are to reduce traffic congestion, reduce fuel consumption and improve air quality. Table 6-1 shows estimates of the program s O emission and travel reduction benefits over the last four years. Vehicle miles saved in 216 increased by.5 percent as compared to 215. Table 6-1: Air Quality 4 and Travel Reduction benefits of the TRP Program arbon monoxide reduced (metric tons per year) Vehicle travel reductions (miles per year) ,636,52 57,357,872 55,382,594 55,653,884 From 21 to 213, the employer survey tracked 25 percent of the employers each year, resulting in a complete survey with all employers occurring after four-years. The TRP returned to an annual survey for all employers in 214. A one-page results report is sent to the employer within two weeks of the survey completion. Tables 6-2 and 6-3 show the employee survey results for the last four years. The results show a decrease in alternative mode usage from 215 to 216 (2 vs. 18 percent), but vehicle miles traveled were unchanged at around 6 miles. All the modes showed a decrease, with the exception of a compressed work week. The response rate increased for the first time in four years. The average response rate was 51 percent, which exceeded the target response rate of 5 percent. This increase may have resulted from the 6 Sigma review of the TRP survey response rate and implementation of several of the recommendations, as well as educating the Transportation oordinators (Ts) on the importance of the employee survey data and the increased effort by staff to work with Ts to improve the response rate. PAG also improved the T training by hiring professional trainers and facilitators in 216. TRP staff continued to conduct one-on-one meetings with new Ts. PAG introduced the TRP Recognition Program in 214. TRP participants are publicly recognized if they achieve one to three of the specified goals. A total of 83 (37 percent) of employers received awards in 214. The number of employers earning an award grew to 1 in 215, which is a 25 percent increase. The number of awardees in 216 increased by 4 percent to 18, representing 5 percent of all TRP employers. 4 O emissions were calculated using MOVES214a PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

44 Table 6-2: Overview of employee survey results for 213 to Average one-way weekly travel per employee (miles) Number of Employers Number of Employees 32,75 124, ,55 12,132 Alternative mode participation (percent) Employee survey response rate (percent) Table 6-3: Survey results for worker travel modes 213 to 216 Trips by mode (percent)* Drive alone arpool/vanpool ompressed work week Bus Bike Walk Telework Streetcar * Yearly totals may not equal 1 percent due to rounding In 216, all TRP employers participated in an online survey of their Travel Demand Management activities called the Activity Inventory Report (AIR). The AIR collects data on each employer s planned and implemented travel reduction activities for the calendar year. The results are used by the TRP staff to assist employers in planning activities, identifying deficiencies and in designing new programs that promote alternative transportation use. Figure 6-2 shows the key results from 213 to 216. With the exception of incentives for alternative mode usage, all the measures showed increases over the 215 results. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

45 Figure 6-2. Survey results of regional employers Travel Demand Management activities 213 to 216 Disseminate TRP info Bus Route Proximity Telework Program Bus Subsidies Alt. Mode Incentives Sell Bus Passes Bike Facilities Adj. Work Schedule Participation (percent) Sun Rideshare and Vanpool Programs The Rideshare program was established in 1974, and has been administered by PAG since that time. In 29, the program was renamed Sun Rideshare, reflecting its assimilation into the regional transit system. Sun Rideshare continues to promote alternative transportation to area employers and residents of through marketing campaigns, public relations, advertising, incentives and outreach to local employers, organizations and commuters. The Sun Rideshare website and marketing materials were revamped in 214 with new graphics and tag line, Drive Less. Save More. Sun Rideshare conducted a comprehensive ad campaign in 215 to introduce the new branding and the 215 Rewards Program. Sun Rideshare ads could be seen on billboards, at movie theaters, inside and outside Sun Tran buses, and in the Arizona Daily Star. A new infomercial, Do Zombies arpool? was produced in late 213 and was distributed in 214 to area employers and social service organizations to increase awareness about Sun Rideshare services and the benefits of alternative transportation. The infomercial is posted on YouTube and has almost 3,3 views. The Sun Rideshare Rewards Program began in January 214 and ended in 216. A new Rewards Program will begin in 217 with Walgreen s as the sponsor. residents earn points by logging in all types of alternative mode travel. These points qualify the participants for monthly prize drawings. The Travel alendar was greatly enhanced in 214 to allow non-commuters to participate and non-commute trips to earn points. In 216, 74 people participated in the Rewards Program and 759 people registered with Sun Rideshare. The vanpool program averages around 3 vanpools each year. Over the last year, PAG has been decaling the new vans placed into service. The Sun Rideshare logo on the vans is great advertising for the program. PAG continues to submit vanpool ridership data to the National Transit Database each year, which brings about $5, to the region for transit capital expenditures. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

46 PDEQ s Voluntary No-Drive Days Program PDEQ s national award-winning program seeks to increase awareness of air quality issues and encourage actions to reduce air pollution by eliminating vehicular trips. PDEQ s lean Air Program (referred to as the Voluntary No-Drive Day Program in the SIP) is a state-mandated program started in 1988 to address O violations in. With the region being so close to violating the new EPA ozone standard, it is even more critical to educate the community about actions that can be taken to reduce air pollution. Severe cuts in state funding starting in 29, have forced the PDEQ lean Air Program to reduce staff and eliminate program elements. However, this program continues to use several methods to achieve its goals and some of these are described below: ommunity Outreach PDEQ provides air quality information and resources to the public through Air Pollution Advisories sent to the media and an extensive list serve of interested parties including healthcare providers and schools, articles and information on the PDEQ Website ( co-sponsorship of community events related to improving the environment and reducing motor vehicle trips, speakers bureau, displays and booths at special events and at major employment centers. In addition, PDEQ staff responds to telephone and electronic inquiries, issues regular media releases pertaining to air quality issues, uses social media to reach the community, provides public service announcements and paid advertising when funding is available (Figure 6-3). Figure 6-3. PDEQ s air quality program s outreach accomplishments from FY213 through FY216 Number of participants (thousands) FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Fiscal Year Mailings/brochures lean Air presentations/booths Attendance community events This year, PDEQ launched the Use the Loop for Your ommute project to encourage employees of major employers located near The Loop to skip vehicle trips and bike to work. Over 6 companies were contacted and the majority of those companies have committed to help promote The Loop among their employees. Staff coordinates employer meetings and PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

47 presentations with PAG s Travel Reduction program staff and Department of Transportation s Bicycle and Pedestrian Program to provide additional resources and bike safety training. PDEQ staff continued its educational campaign called Healthy Air is in Our Hands to encourage actions to reduce vehicle emissions to maintain good air quality. Eye-catching artwork, developed by a graphic designer, was used in a bookmark, a drive-less pledge card, webpage and in transit and internet advertising. The entry form includes the specific action that would be taken to eliminate a vehicle trip and random winners were chosen for the gift cards. This campaign will continue through 217 with prizes available for random drawing winners. lean Air Program staff also helped plan and staff the opening of sections of The Loop multi-use, car-free pathway to provide options to driving. The Loop is now over 1 miles of non-motorized pathways that provide infrastructure for active, low-carbon alternative modes of transportation throughout the metropolitan area. PDEQ continues to co-sponsor the Earth Day Festival each year by helping to plan the event and contact volunteers. PDEQ also co-sponsored yclovia by purchasing advertising for this event that encourages active modes of transportation and fun in the streets. Also, PDEQ sponsored the new Living Streets Alliance Bike Valet Parking program to eliminate motor vehicle trips by providing secure bike parking at local events. PDEQ continued the Eco Nook for Desert Dwellers and Eco-Kids orner projects with the Public Library System as well as multiple ommunity enters and ounty buildings where display areas are set up to display environmental-themed brochures and educational information from multiple agencies. PDEQ created several informational pieces during FY16 including a flyer for businesses along The Loop: Who Knew Our Atmosphere Was So Thin-skinned?; Is the Air Healthy to Breath?; a STEM activity sheet regarding emission reductions, a areer Day flier, a Lorax Activity Sheet, the Desert Dwellers Know bookmark and poster, interior and exterior bus posters/advertising; Is It Smoky Outside?, One Less ar flyer, and Little Green Riding Hood. Each of these pieces targeted a different audience and is being used to broaden the reach of the air quality message. Through the above listed projects and other Voluntary No-Drive Days outreach opportunities, approximately 48, informational items were distributed during the FY16. In addition, PDEQ administers the Travel Reduction Program for approximately 7, employees and provides new employee presentations, contests and regular articles in the all-county employee newsletter containing information to encourage alternative modes of transportation. PDEQ also worked with the Health Department for a special School Nurse Outreach Event and provided the nurses with access to critical air quality and health information and resources. Also, PDEQ continued including the Pump up your MPG campaign message regarding the importance of keeping tires properly inflated during outreach opportunities, however, no funding was available for advertising. Launched in early 214, the program s goal was to encourage monthly tire pressure checks to reduce fuel use and associated vehicle emissions, improve safety, save money, extend tire longevity, and promote healthier air. According to the results of the June 216 FMR Associates community survey, the number of respondents that indicated (on an unaided basis) they were keeping their tires properly inflated rose significantly since the campaign began. From 213 to 216, the number of people reporting they kept their tires properly inflated rose from 7 to 35 percent. Approximately 83 percent of those surveyed mentioned that they had seen or heard information about the importance of keeping tires properly inflated. These 216 results are not as high as those at the completion of the 214 campaign, but are still very encouraging and indicate that PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

48 staff was able to successfully publicize the many benefits of keeping tires inflated, including reducing vehicle emissions. FMR report: Evaluation of the lean Air Program ampaign and lean Stormwater ampaign Survey. ions/pima%2deq% %2full%2report.pdf School and Youth Programs PDEQ s activities include kindergarten to college level classroom presentations and the development and distribution of air quality materials. PDEQ continues to partner with the University of Arizona (UA) in an internship program which assigns students projects related to air quality and the environment and provides work experience and training opportunities for the students prior to graduation. PDEQ consistently co-sponsors and supports the Safe Routes to School Walk to School Day events to encourage active ways for children to get to and from school. This event is held in the fall and spring of each year. Over 5 schools participated in each of the events reaching over 4, students and family members with the drive less and walk and bike more message. VOLUNTARY ONTROL MEASURES In addition to the federally mandated commitments, PAG s voluntary lean ities Program contributes to air pollution reductions through the use of alternative fuels. PAG lean ities Program The lean ities program is a national effort, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE). The program s major goals are to increase the use of clean alternative fuels and alternative fueled vehicles, thereby reducing the country's dependence on fossil fuels and improving air quality. The Program maintains a fuel-neutral position with respect to the support and use of all clean fuels. The lean ities oalition (T) received its USDOE designation in August 1999, and has over 1 members consisting of major utilities, fuel providers, vehicle dealers, fleet owners/operators and a variety of government entities. As required by USDOE, the oalition updates its operating plan annually. The T undergoes re-designation every three years which was last done in May 212. This was due to the process being placed on hold in 215 while DOE revised the program. The next re-designation will occur in the summer of 217. This will designate the T as a USDOE designated oalition for a three-year term. Although consumers are enthusiastic about electric vehicles, fleet managers are opting for compressed natural gas (NG) and propane. A strong focus is being placed on school districts and school buses, with a preference for NG and propane use by school fleet managers. The oalition worked with the Marana Unified School District in applying for the USEPA Rebate Program associated with the Diesel Emissions Reductions Act (DERA) Rebate Program. The District was awarded $465, in rebate money, which was the highest amount in the nation given to a school district for use in its school bus replacement project. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

49 In 216, the oalition assisted the ity of with the opening of a new full-scale NG station to support the current 47 dedicated NG trash haulers and for anticipated expansion in the number of ity s NG vehicles. The T continued to work with the Petrified Forest to implement its National Parks Initiative grant funding for incorporating electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure and electric vehicles, idle reduction and a clean alternative fuel vehicle education initiative. The USDOE and the Department of the Interior placed the project on hold pending a firm commitment from a private donor to contribute1 EV charging stations to the Program. When the donor is announced, USDOE will resume the program and provide a one year extension to the oalition for the Petrified Forest Project. Although clean fueling infrastructure has not kept pace with demand, alternative fuel stations can be found throughout the metropolitan area. Propane refueling stations are widely available in the region. Ape Fuels, a new propane distributor, has recently become a T member. Public-access to NG refueling stations is still limited. Electric vehicle infrastructure was established through the EV Project and the T has seen growth in D fast charging. Two sites are available and two sites are available between and Phoenix. A map of alternative fuel stations for the area and the U.S. can be found at the DOE site- Alternative Fueling Station Locator: Nationally, lean ities has displaced more than 15 billion gallons of petroleum, assisted by the Energy Policy Act of 1992, which mandates federal and state governments to annually procure clean fuel vehicles as part of their fleets. lean fuel vehicles and fuels are gaining acceptance and popularity as fleet managers and the public become aware of their environmental and economic benefits. Locally, the number of private and public clean fuel vehicles is once again increasing. With the reinstatement of tax incentives, the T expects the alternative fuel usage to grow dramatically. Although the uses of E85 and biodiesel have dropped significantly, the use of NG, propane, and EVs have assisted T in significantly expanding interest, and reducing dependence on petroleum. In 215 the oalition displaced 766,471 gallons of petroleum, (Figure 6-4), primarily through the use of ethanol (E-85) (Figure 6-5). PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

50 Figure 6-4. Gallons of Gasoline Equivalents (GGE) Reduced 212 through 215 in the Region 2.5 GGE reduced (millions) Data Source: lean ities Department of Energy 215 Annual Report Figure 6-5. Gallons of Gasoline Equivalent (GGE) Reduced in 215 through the lean ities Program Electric & Plug-In Vehicles 1% LPG 3% Propane 14% Biodiesel 12% E-85 51% NG 19% Data Source: lean ities Department of Energy 215 Annual Report SIP ONTROL MEASURES OUTLOOK The long-range strategy is to continue programs that control mobile emissions and reduce per capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Federal vehicle emission control measures and the Arizona VEIP are primarily responsible for the ounty s consistently low O levels. The continued implementation of PDEQ s lean Air Program and PAG s Sun Rideshare and PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

51 Travel Reduction Programs are the most significant local O reduction strategies, targeting direct VMT reduction, with an added benefit of congestion management. EMISSIONS ANALYSES In reducing air pollutant emissions, the region will continue to be a healthy environment for the region s citizens. Additionally, by conforming to a federally approved air quality plan, the urban area will remain eligible for federally funded transportation projects. To assure compliance with federal clean air standards, an annual program of monitoring and analysis was established in. The principal measure of compliance is the O monitoring program, operated by PDEQ. Each year stationary O monitors are activated at various locations throughout the TAPA for the O season (October through March). In addition, PDEQ can employ mobile monitors at hotspot intersections during the O season if levels approach the health standard. urrent O levels in the TAPA are about 11 percent of the federal health standard largely due to stricter federal tailpipe standards. PAG staff estimated O mobile source emissions using the EPA s Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) 214a model for planning purposes. As with the prior years modeling analyses, local data were used and included seasonal averages for temperature, humidity, traffic counts, gasoline and diesel chemical properties, vehicle inspection and maintenance programs, and 216 ounty vehicle registration data. PAG staff uses current socioeconomic information, transportation and traffic data to generate VMT, vehicle hours traveled (VHT) and congestion levels. PAG s air quality analysis of the TIP estimates O emissions (Table 6-4) show that the O emissions generated if all the planned projects are completed (222 Build scenario) are less than the 218 start year emissions. Therefore, the 222 build activities will not increase O emissions relative to the start year emissions. Table 6-4: Summary of arbon Monoxide Modeling Results Year Total Average Weekday VMT Regional O Emissions (metric tons/weekday) 218 (start year) 22,48, (build) 24,41, (no-build) 24,289, ONFORMITY OF THE PLAN PAG is the designated air quality planning agency and the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the region. As such, PAG maintains cooperative relationships with the U.S. EPA, ADEQ, and PDEQ. oordination of regional transportation planning with air quality planning has been carried out for many years. In April 1993, the procedures, methods and responsibilities for air quality planning were incorporated in a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between PAG, ADEQ, and PDEQ. The MOA was last updated in 2. The AAA of 199 require that the TIP conform to the SIP's purpose of eliminating or reducing the severity and number of NAAQS violations and that it serves to achieve attainment of these standards. Additionally, the AAA stipulate that TIP activities will not cause or contribute to any new NAAQS violations, increase the frequency or severity of any existing PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

52 NAAQS violation, or delay timely attainment of any standard in an area. As demonstrated by the O emission modeling results in Table 6-4, completing the TIP projects as stipulated in the TIP will not increase O emissions as compared to the start year. In the TAPA, the federal standard for O was attained in 199. Therefore, the TIP projects are not expected to contribute to any new violation of the O NAAQS or delay any required emission reductions. The PAG Regional ouncil and the U.S. Department of Transportation made a conformity determination for the 24 PAG RTP in 21. It was found to be in conformity with the SIP following procedures outlined in the federal transportation conformity rule (4 FR Part 93) and the State of Arizona conformity rule (R et seq.). Under the O LMP, regional emissions analysis for O is not required in determining conformity of transportation plans and programs in the TAPA, but serves as a guide to the region for future air quality planning. Monitored O levels continue to remain well below the EPA health standards and, as outlined in the O LMP, transportation control measures continue to be implemented. In summary, approval of this document by PAG s Regional ouncil finds that the TIP and all projects contained within are in conformity with the applicable implementation plan, the Arizona SIP. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

53 HAPTER 7: TRANSIT SUN TRAN Overview: Sun Tran and its more than 6 employees continue to build on its reputation as the region s award-winning public transportation provider. With a fleet of 252 buses, Sun Tran provides fixed route transit service within the ity of, and through intergovernmental agreements, delivers service into, the ity of South, the Town of Marana, the Town of Oro Valley, the Tohono O Odham Nation and the Pascua Yaqui Tribe. The system's 42 fixed routes cover a 296-square-mile area. In FY 215, ridership on Sun Tran experienced a slight decrease of.3 percent when compared to FY 214. Sun Tran FY 216 ridership decreased from the previous year s ridership numbers due to a 42-day work stoppage. Figure 7-1: Sun Tran Passenger Trips 25,, Sun Tran Passenger Trips FY 28 to FY 216 2,, 15,, 1,, 19,491,376 21,648,35 2,483,79 19,746,774 19,971,23 2,352,11 19,713,494 19,657,931 15,743,51 5,, FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

54 Use of RTA Funds to Improve Transit Services: Sun Tran s greatest challenge had been to fund service to meet the increasing demand for transit. Hopes of transit expansion became a reality on May 16, 26, when voters elected to enact a half-cent sales tax to fund transportation improvements. Through 226, the Regional Transportation Authority Plan earmarks nearly $533 million for transit enhancements, including expanded hours of service, new service areas, greater weekday frequencies, more express service, fleet expansion, and the launch of the Sun Link streetcar. Sun Tran implemented the first fixed-route improvements funded by the RTA in fall 26, when buses were deployed on key routes to relieve a portion of the overcrowding. Between February 27 and August 28, Sun Tran launched later weeknight service on 21 routes, extending service to as late as midnight, and implemented expanded weekend service hours on 23 Sun Tran routes. To provide a commuting alternative during the I-1 Widening Project, the Arizona Department of Transportation provided funding for Sun Tran to begin a new express route from Marana to downtown in May 27. Originally identified as a project in the RTA Transit Element, s resources enabled Sun Tran to accelerate implementation of the new service. Additionally, Sun Tran worked with the Town of Marana to secure a Park and Ride lot at Arizona Pavilions. In 29, RTA-funded fleet expansion enabled Sun Tran to launch three express routes serving Oro Valley and Rita Ranch to Downtown, and from Oro Valley to the Aero Park area. Also in 29, Routes 27 and 312X were extended, additional Park and Ride lots were established, and additional trips were provided on Routes 13X and 15X to better meet passenger needs. Additionally, construction was completed on the new Northwest Bus Storage and Maintenance facility designed to accommodate an additional 15 buses. In 21, RTA funding provided additional trips for Sun Express Routes 19X and 11X. In 211, Sun Tran completed construction on phase III of the new bus storage facility, expanding to include an administration building, bus storage for up to 25 buses and expansion of the maintenance building to accommodate the entire fleet. urrently half of the fleet runs out of the new facility and the other half out of the Park Avenue location. In 213, bus frequency was improved on Routes 7 and 16. In May 215, the Broadway/Houghton Park and Ride lot opened, providing a transit hub on the eastside and serving Routes 4, 8 and 18X. To further evaluate potential transit improvements, a omprehensive Operational Analysis (OA) was completed in late 213 to evaluate all transit routes within the region. The OA includes conclusions and specific recommendations toward the continual improvement of the transit services. The OA is an in-depth study designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of the transit systems and develop recommendations for improvement. The recommendations from the OA were reviewed by jurisdictions, community partners and interested passengers and fully evaluated by the ity s Transit Task Force. The Task Force made separate recommendations based on the original OA, which were presented to Mayor and ouncil in December 214 and voted on at a public hearing on January 6, 215. Mayor and ouncil voted to approve the recommendations, which made adjustments to 12 Sun Tran routes and PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

55 discontinued the free Downtown Loop service effective February 15, 215. At that time, Sun Tran went from 4 fixed routes to 43 due to the splitting of Sun Tran s Routes 6, 8 and 16 to improve system efficiency and better meet passenger demand. At the public hearing on August 9, 216, Mayor and ouncil voted to approve the proposed service changes and transfer policy change. At that time the route 9 and 2 also merged so Sun Tran went from 43 to 42 fixed routes. In September 216, there was a public hearing and decision made on the fare increase that went into effect on January 1, 217. Remaining RTA transit improvements will be phased in throughout the life of the plan. Environmental ommitment: Sun Tran demonstrates its commitment to environmental stewardship in many ways, including use of clean-fuel technologies and effective operational management of environmental impacts. A significant achievement was reached in 27 when Sun Tran converted its remaining diesel vehicles to use biodiesel fuel, creating an entire fleet of buses that run on cleaner-burning fuel technologies. Sun Tran placed its first hybrid electric bus into service in 21 to further demonstrate a strong commitment to the importance of our environment. urrently, 196 buses run on biodiesel, which emits significantly fewer particulates than traditional diesel-fueled vehicles. Another 45 buses are fueled by compressed natural gas and 11 utilize hybrid technology. Focus on the ustomer: In order to ensure that new transit services work together as efficiently as possible, and to facilitate ease of use by the customer, the RTA formed a working group in 26 to discuss the best way to retain and attract riders to the growing regional system. One of the goals of the Regional Transportation Authority was realized in January 29 with the introduction of a regional seamless transit system. omponents of the regional system were phased in, with the family of names and corresponding brand for all regional transit vehicles. onsolidated customer information for the seamless system were developed. Elements include a website featuring trip planning, schedules, maps and fare information; and a single customer service center with one phone number. To further enhance the ease of riding the regional system, the RTA Transit Working Group elected to have Sun Shuttle neighborhood circulator fares mirror Sun Tran s. New bus stop signage will be phased in throughout FY 216 and 217 to provide improved information about the integrated system and service connection information. ustomer service representatives utilize the Trapeze OM Module to log customer feedback. With streamlined management of feedback, customers benefit by receiving improved response time in complaint resolution. To ensure continued improvement in transit, Sun Tran and Sun Van staff developed a Five-Year Strategic Plan. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

56 Advanced Technology: Sun Tran is committed to utilizing technologies that boost customer satisfaction, improve efficiency and increase safety. In 215, Sun Tran launched the Go mobile app, which allows individuals to pay their transit fare on their smart phone. This app is accepted on Sun Tran, Sun Express, Sun Link and select Sun Shuttle routes. Passengers just board their transit vehicle and show the operator or fare enforcement officer their active pass on their phone. Sun Tran launched Google Transit, an additional trip planning option available for passengers. Additionally, Sun Tran s website featuring easy navigation, online trip-planning and complete accessibility for users with visual disabilities, has continued to evolve. Sun Tran updated the live bus tracking system to enable passengers to receive up-to-the-minute information about their bus. Also available online is the ability for developers to access GTFS data to create additional web applications to benefit passengers. To date, there are four known apps developed by outside organizations and available for use plus the official Sun Tran app. The SunGO fare payment system, funded by the RTA, introduced the smart card that passengers use on Sun Tran, Sun Express, select Sun Shuttle routes and the Sun Link streetcar. This has simplified the process of transferring from one transit vehicle to another. Sun Tran also utilizes high-visibility LED signs which display individual route scheduled departure times in each bus bay at transit centers. Airport-style plasma signage is mounted in information booths indicating departure times for all routes. Sun Tran s entire fleet is equipped with omputer Aided Dispatching/Automatic Vehicle Locator systems (AD/AVL). This technology facilitates management of transit operations, providing up-to-date information on vehicle locations and schedule adherence. Each bus contains an automated fare collection system, allowing Sun Tran to maximize passenger revenue and ensure accurate rider counts. Other software systems implemented by Sun Tran maximize efficiency by assisting with scheduling, maintenance, customer information, and operations functions. Operator and passenger security is a priority for Sun Tran. All coaches contain digital video recorders, and each transit center is equipped with multiple cameras to monitor activity. On the buses, AD/AVL technology enables operators to trigger a silent alarm system, alerting dispatch if an emergency arises on board. Enhanced Amenities: Improvements have been made at the Tohono Tadai Transit enter, providing improved kiosks to house passenger information. And in 215, the Ronstadt Transit enter received an upgrade, which includes new brick pavers, fencing, additional security cameras for added safety, as well as new bay signage, paint, benches and trash cans. Several other transit amenities have been added to attract riders to the system. Sun Tran boasts expanded service with new Park and Ride lots at Broadway/Houghton and in Rita Ranch, Oro Valley and asino del Sol, all designed to encourage more transit ridership from the outlying communities. Through a contract with AdVision Outdoor, the ity of oversees maintenance of approximately 2,2 bus stops, and hundreds of bus shelters, benches, and trash cans throughout the greater area. To date, a total of 1,2 shelters PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

57 and 77 benches have been installed in, South, Marana, and unincorporated. Approximately half of those shelters and benches generate advertising revenue which pays for routine bus stop maintenance. The ity of also purchases and installs new bus shelters using a combination of local and federal funds from the FTA and HUD programs as well as Tohono O Odham gaming grants when they become available. Approximately $15, a year of FTA Transit Enhancement funds is used to implement the basic ADA bus stop improvements and repairs. The RTA has also provided several bus shelters as part of the RTA bus pullout program. To date, the RTA has completed numerous bus pullout projects throughout the region, all of them meeting ADA standards with basic amenities and connections to adjacent sidewalks. Additionally, commuters can bike and ride on Sun Tran at no additional charge. Each coach is equipped with bike racks, and folding bicycles are accommodated on board. Rental bike lockers are available at a nominal charge at five of the Park and Ride lots and other select bus stop locations. Keeping ommunity Ties: Sun Tran is an integral and necessary part of the community. The organization continues its long-standing associations with businesses, social service organizations, schools, and other governmental bodies. Promoting the system through a variety of events continues to strengthen Sun Tran s image in the region. Most notably, the name Sun Tran is synonymous with Stuff-the-Bus. A highly visible community relations effort, these campaigns generate tremendous media exposure, foster partnerships, and enhance Sun Tran s public image in the community. Since the first event in 21, Sun Tran has helped collect 25, pounds of food, $15, in cash donations and 176, toys and household items to benefit various organizations. The University of Arizona (UA) offers subsidized bus passes to students, faculty and staff through the U-Pass program. Sun Tran and the UA have encouraged use of alternate modes through a successful partnership. In 215 a promotional campaign to promote the use of the Go mobile app as a way to purchase the discounted passes was launched. Through Sun Tran's commuter pass program, Get on Board, 5 employers including most governmental employers offer reduced-cost bus passes as an employee benefit. A partnership with Pima Association of Governments (PAG) enables Sun Tran to offer Guaranteed RideHome, a program which provides a free taxi ride home to passengers if an emergency arises. In addition to Travel Reduction Program companies, Get on Board members are qualified to join the program and are eligible for up to four free taxi vouchers a year. Sun Tran strives to build strong partnerships with the disabled community. All of Sun Tran's fleet is low-floor and wheelchair accessible, which eliminates the need for wheelchair lifts, using instead a ramp to facilitate the movement of persons with disabilities onto or off the bus. To enhance service for persons with visual disabilities, all of Sun Tran s buses provide automatic interior and exterior announcements. With ongoing outreach and education efforts, Sun Tran's long-term relationship with its passengers with disabilities has continued to develop. Free mobility training is offered through the Sun Tran Accessible Rider Training (START) program. Designed to help individuals with disabilities and seniors, these training sessions assist persons with special needs to utilize fixed route services with greater ease and confidence. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

58 SUN VAN Overview: With approximately 25 employees, Sun Van has provided award-winning paratransit service to the Metropolitan area and portions of and South since Sun Van has a fleet of 128 vehicles, which includes 18 cut-away vans, as well as 1 accessible minivans and 1 sedans to transport ambulatory passengers. Sun Van meets the standards set by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 199 by providing demand response public paratransit service for those individuals who, because of their disability, are unable to ride Sun Tran. Sun Van s service area includes points within three-quarters of a mile along each Sun Tran fixed route, excluding express routes, during the days and times that Sun Tran operates. Sun Van also provides Optional Service, which is outside the three-quarters of a mile service area, and beyond the times and days of Sun Tran service and same day ride requests. Of the passenger trips provided by Sun Van, 1.9 percent are utilizing Optional Service. Ridership Trends: Sun Van s ridership has grown steadily over the past several years, demonstrating a 29 percent increase from FY 26 through FY 216. Sun Van revenues have increased 5.8 percent from 215 to 216. Figure 7-2: Sun Van Passenger Trips FY 26 to FY 215 7, 6, Sun Van Passenger Trips FY 28 to FY 216 5, 4, 3, 45, , , ,373 52,32 544,956 56, , ,773 2, 1, FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY214 FY 215 FY 216 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

59 This year and in the future, Sun Van s greatest challenge will be funding service to meet the increasing demand. In FY 215, the cost per trip was $27.66, which is a decrease of $1.4 per trip from the previous year, but increased demand can cost the system significantly. Environmental ommitment & Technology: The use of mini vans and sedans has been implemented to improve system efficiency when full-sized Sun Van vehicles are not necessary. Sun Van is widely recognized as an industry leader in paratransit technology. Like Sun Tran, Sun Van s entire fleet is equipped with global positioning systems. Other software systems that maximize system efficiency include Trapeze, Transit Master and rystal Reports. Sun Van received recognition for a partnership with Trapeze Software Inc. Sun Van helped develop software that provides trip alternatives that fit within the ADA guidelines, and ensures complete and accurate measurement against the comparable fixed route system without added personnel time or cost to perform the comparison. Sun Van is viewed as a leader in the project, with other paratransit systems now utilizing this module as well. Sun Van utilizes a voucherless fare payment system, which allows for automatic deduction from the passenger s account when a trip is scheduled. SUN LINK STREETAR Overview: The Sun Link streetcar launched on July 25, 214 and provides service seven days a week to five of s key entertainment districts, including the Mercado, Downtown, Fourth Avenue, Main Gate Square and the University of Arizona. The $196 million project is part of the 2-year RTA plan and was funded by multiple sources, with the RTA being the single largest contributor. Funding partners included: RTA ($75 million), Federal Transit Administration through a Transportation and Infrastructure Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant ($63 million), New Starts federal grant ($6 million) and other regional and local funding ($9 million). Sun Link operates along a 4-mile route, is managed by RDMT, has a fleet size of eight streetcars, and has 35 employees. Ridership Trends: Since launching in July 214, ridership has exceeded pre-launch projections with an average daily ridership of approximately 4, passenger trips provided. Sun Link s millionth rider was celebrated on May 21, 215, which occurred 44 days ahead of the projected ridership numbers. In the first year of service, Sun Link provided 1.1 million passenger trips, with that number at 95, 34 passenger trips in FY 216. This change is attributed to the 42 day Sun Tran strike. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

60 Figure 7-3: Sun Link Passenger Trips FY215 to FY216 Sun Link Passenger Trips FY 215 to FY 216 1,2, 1,, 8, 1,78,36 95,34 6, 4, 2, FY FY Focus on the ustomer: Since Sun Link passengers are not able to pay on board with cash, they must have a SunGO ard or Ticket loaded with a pass or cash value to ride, or an active pass on their smart phone using the Go mobile app. Ticket vending machines are located at each streetcar stop for easy access to a 1-Day SunGO Ticket. Additional sales outlets along the streetcar line have been solidified and are continuing to be pursued to provide additional locations to purchase SunGO products other than the 1-Day Ticket. Passenger promotions and information have been developed, with a special focus on events in the five entertainment districts to promote the use of transit in general, but a larger focus on encouraging the use of the streetcar. Marketing efforts to encourage ridership for the Gem & Mineral Show, University of Arizona sporting events, and numerous events along the alignment are done to enhance ridership. In partnership with the ity of, Sun Link, Sun Tran and PAG/RTA, other events have been implemented at times when ridership would be expected to decrease during the holidays or summer months. For example, Santa on Sun Link was developed and implemented in partnership with KXI Radio to have Santa and carolers on a streetcar two different Saturdays to encourage ridership. Also, a shop local event was promoted to encourage travel on the streetcar on the Saturday after Thanksgiving. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

61 SUN SHUTTLE Overview: In May 29, with funding provided by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA), Sun Shuttle launched neighborhood fixedroute transit services in Marana, Oro Valley, atalina, Sahuarita and Green Valley. In November 29, the RTA assumed operations of Rural Transit (PRT) routes in San Xavier, Estates and Marana. In December 212, a new Sun Shuttle route was launched serving Southeast and Rita Ranch. Sun Shuttle routes offer transportation to passengers within their own community and connections to Sun Tran and Sun Link services, providing an important link to the Metropolitan area from the rural and suburban communities. Additional services offered by the RTA include the Ajo- connector, operating as Sun Shuttle Route 486, and the Ajo/Why dial-a-ride services, both formerly operated by PRT. The RTA, through a local contractor, also provides Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transit services under the Sun Shuttle Dial-a-Ride brand. Dial-a-Ride transit services are available to ADA certified customers located inside the Dial-a-Ride service area, but outside of areas served by Sun Van. Historically, the RTA Transit Working Group and RTA Board have favored aligning Sun Shuttle fare rates with rates adopted by Sun Tran and Sun Van in order to create a seamless regional transit system. Dial-a-Ride Services: Local jurisdictional funding of transit services for seniors and persons with disabilities has become a critical issue with the elimination of Local Transportation Assistance Funds (LTAF). This funding shortfall has caused communities to look for alternatives to sustain their existing transit services. In May 21, after reviewing one year of service performance, three of the RTA s fixed route neighborhood circulator services, Route 42 in Oro Valley and Routes 42 and 425 in Green Valley/Sahuarita, evolved toward a general public Dial-a-Ride system. The new Sun Shuttle General Public Dial-a-Ride functioned as a demand response service more appropriate to the needs of customers in the Town of Oro Valley and Green Valley/Sahuarita. In July 21, the Town of Oro Valley collaborated with the RTA to consider regional options for its oyote Run service. In February 211, the Town of Oro Valley s oyote Run merged with the regional transit system as part of Sun Shuttle Dial-a-Ride. This merger was cost neutral for the RTA as it removed duplicate optional ADA trips, which were formally being provided by an outside contractor. The merger also provides greater operational efficiencies for the Town of Oro Valley, which helps the Town sustain its senior transit services. In October 215, the Green Valley/Sahuarita Dial-a-Ride service area was expanded to include the new Green Valley Hospital. In 216, an additional stop was added to Route 486 to allow customers to make connections at the Greyhound Terminal in Downtown. Ridership: Ridership on the Sun Shuttle services has continued to mature as many of the routes enter the eighth year of service. Overall Sun Shuttle ridership has remained relatively stable, with an increase in ridership on most routes. The August 215 service strike had an effect on ridership on most of the Sun Shuttle routes. Average monthly ridership on fixed-routes and general public dial-a-ride services for FY 215 was 24,581 trips, and for ADA dial-a-ride services average monthly ridership was 13,641 trips. urrent average monthly ridership on fixed-routes and general public dial-a-ride services for FY 216 was 22,29 trips, and for ADA dial-a-ride services average monthly ridership was 13,551 trips. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

62 Though most routes continue to perform to expectations, the RTA will continue to respond to underperforming services and make changes accordingly. Routes that provide direct connection from outlying areas to one of the three main transit centers, routes that represent the only public transit available in an area, and routes that serve areas with higher transit dependent populations tend to have higher ridership overall. Regional branding, marketing and a focus on customer service have helped increase awareness and boost ridership. Schedules and routing are analyzed and adjusted to improve passenger convenience and productivity. Figure 7-3: Sun Shuttle Monthly Ridership 3, 25, Sun Shuttle/Ajo Monthly Ridership Year 5 (213/214) Year 6 (214/215) Year 7 (215/216) Year 8 (216/217) 2, 15, 1, 5, MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OT NOV DE JAN FEB MAR APR PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

63 HAPTER 8: PUBLI INVOLVEMENT Federal legislation [23 U.S.. 134(i)(6)(A)] sets forth the parameters for the development of the TIP. This law specifies that: Each metropolitan planning organization shall provide itizens; Affected public agencies; Representatives of transportation agency employees; Public Ports Freight shippers; Providers of freight transportation services; Private providers of transportation; Representatives of users of public transit; Representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities Representatives of the disabled; and Other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed program. The primary PAG-sponsored events for regional public involvement in the development of the FY TIP were three open houses and the 3-day public comment period. The open houses provided the public with an opportunity to review the candidate list of projects for the updated TIP, speak with jurisdiction representatives about the projects, and submit written comments; and the 3-day public comment period extended the opportunity to the public to thoroughly review the plan on their own and to provide comments. Other opportunities for public involvement were provided through PAG s Web site ( and TP meetings, which are open to the public. The public notice of public involvement activities and time established for public review and comments on the TIP will satisfy the Federal Transit Administration-required Program of Projects (POP). Three open houses were held. The first open house was held on March 28 at the Wheeler Taft Abbett Library in Marana. The second open house was held on March 29 at the Randolph Golf lub House in central. The third open house was March 3 at the Joyner Green Valley Library in Green Valley. Two of the facilities were accessible by public transportation (Wheeler Taft Abbett Library and Randolph lubhouse) and all had ample parking. Approximately 45 people attended the open houses with 12 of these indicating they work in the transportation field. A total of seven TIP comment sheets were submitted. The comment sheets solicited input on the proposed TIP, project impacts and priorities for selecting projects. Verbatim comments on the proposed TIP and the tabulated results of the rating scale survey questions are included in a separate public involvement report. The TIP display at the open houses featured large boarded maps of TIP projects and Title VI analysis, along with boarded displays on regional transportation funding sources, how to read the TIP projects document, and common acronyms and funding sources in order to interpret the TIP projects document. PAG also provided the public with candidate project PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

64 listings by jurisdiction or agency; background information about the TIP, and other related information, as well as the TIP public comment form. Transportation professionals from PAG member jurisdictions and the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) were available to talk one-on-one with members of the public in attendance regarding TIP projects. The TIP open houses were widely publicized in print and electronic media (see Appendix 7). The open houses were advertised through the Arizona Daily Star s website, in the Star s print edition on Sunday, March 26, 217, and in the March edition of the Arizona Bilingual (in Spanish). In addition, the open houses were promoted on PAG s Web site. A TIP Web page featured the candidate project list, an online public comment form and information about the TIP planning process. Following the open houses, TIP survey results were compiled and analyzed. This documentation was transmitted to the TP for consideration in the development of final recommendations for project selection. Jurisdictions also had the opportunity to develop written response to the comments received. These responses were displayed on PAG s Web site. A 3-day final notice for public comment was issued on April 2, 217, with the comment period ending May 24, 217 in preparation for the May 25, 217, Regional ouncil meeting considering the final TIP for adoption. In addition to the PAG regional public participation process, the individual PAG jurisdictions also conduct public involvement activities which feed into the development of the regional TIP. Most jurisdictions conduct public participation efforts in conjunction with the development of their apital Improvement Programs (IP) prior to beginning the regional TIP development process. Jurisdictional recommendations for projects to be included in the candidate TIP project list are typically based on these IP processes. ` PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

65 The Public omment Form used during the TIP development process is shown below: Pima Association of Governments 1 E. Broadway, Suite 41,, AZ 8571 Annual Regional Transportation Open House March Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) The region s leaders want to know what you think about proposed transportation projects for the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Please take a moment to review the maps and/or lists of proposed TIP projects, or talk to transportation professional, and then please answer the questions below. 1. What specific comments do you have about the projects selected for the proposed Transportation Improvement Program? 2. In what way do you feel the proposed TIP project(s) might affect you or your immediate neighborhood either positively or negatively? 3. Federal regulations require that the TIP be fiscally constrained. In other words the cost of the projects cannot exceed the available funding. Appendix 2 contains the fiscal constraint analysis for the TIP. Please provide any comments or questions you have regarding this analysis. 4. Please provide any other comments or questions you may have regarding the proposed TIP or TIP planning process. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

66 5. Given the region s limited funding for transportation, please rate the relative importance of the following factors if you were making decisions about which transportation projects to fund in the next five years: Factors for project selection Please select one for each Topic: 1= Most Important 5=Least Important Factors for project selection Please select one for each Topic: 1= Most Important 5=Least Important Improve safety Provide air quality benefits Solve specific problems in my neighborhood Maintain and preserve the existing transportation infrastructure Support economic development efforts by improving movement of goods/services and access to jobs, businesses and/or commercial areas Use new technology to gain more capacity from the existing system Relieve congestion Solve major problems on a regional level Widen roads to gain more capacity from the existing system Provide opportunities for alternative modes of transportation such as transit, bicycling, walking or ridesharing Distribute funds equitably among the various political jurisdictions Provide improvements that benefit the greatest number of people ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please provide your five-digit ZIP code (home): Do you work in transportation planning? Yes No Did you find the information you expected at this Open House?? Yes No Did you receive adequate answers to your questions?? Yes No an you suggest ways we might improve the Open House next year? ` PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

67 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY APPENDIX 1 FY Project Listing

68 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

69 APPENDIX 1 - FY TIP TABLES The tables on the following pages present PAG's Regional TIP for the five-year period beginning in FY 218 and ending with FY 222. Project priorities are indicated by the year during which the project is programmed to utilize the designated funds. For federally funded projects, the year programmed refers to the federal fiscal year ending September 3. For state and locally funded projects from sources other than federal, the year programmed refers to the fiscal year ending June 3. The TIP includes federally funded transportation system improvements (highways, transit, airports, etc.) and, for informational purposes, non-federally funded transportation system improvements of regional significance. The project sponsor is the agency responsible for implementation and is identified with each project. The tables present information in columns that cover the following: 1. TIP ID: Each project has a project ID number that is used to identify the projects in the text and on any reference maps. 2. Project Name: Each project is identified by its location and beginning and ending points, where applicable. 3. Project Description: The general scope of each project is described. 4. Length: The length of the project in miles, where applicable. 5. Total ost: The total cost of the project including studies, design and construction in thousands of dollars. 6. Yearly osts: osts associated with the project in the years one to five as applicable in thousands of dollars. 7. Phase: Phase indicates whether the funds are programmed for Study, (D) Design, (R) Right of Way, or () onstruction 8. Funding Source: The funding source or sources. Funding source acronyms are listed in Appendix 3. * Unless otherwise designated, the funding ratio for federal projects (STP funds) is assumed to be 94.3 percent federal and 5.7 percent local match. Transit projects are 8 percent federal and 2 percent local match unless otherwise shown. These ratios conform to historical ratios. The project costs in this section are expressed in thousands of dollars. So, for example, a listing of 12, actually means a project cost of $1,2,. When project cost amounts are rolled from one fiscal year to the next, as happens when a project programmed for the current fiscal year does not expend all the funds programmed for it during that year, then listed TIP amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand. PLEASE NOTE: THE DRAFT TIP ASSUMES ALL 217 FUNDS WILL BE EXPENDED BEFORE THE END OF THE FISAL YEAR. HOWEVER, IN THE FINAL TIP, PROJETS WITH UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN 217 WILL BE ROLLED OVER INTO 218. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

70 How to read the TIP projects list Pima Association of Governments TIP Projects Approved Project Name Project Location Project in thousands Description Project funding amout for year Project tested & analyzed for air quality conformity in the model Project Sponsor Funding Source see codes in appendix Funding Year FY July 1 - June 3 Project phase for year : construction, D: design, etc.

71 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST I-1 Wash Bridge #463 I-1, between Houghton and olossal ave Rd Wash bridge scour retrofit AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = ASTP The sponsor of this project is: 74.7 I-1: ountry lub TI onstruct TI AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: 753. I-1: East orridor Study 2932 I-19 East to ochise ounty Line orridor study AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: I-1: Houghton TI I-1 interchange at Houghton Rd. H8887 Traffic Interchange at Houghton Rd. AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = ASTP 2119 ASTP 8 ASTP D The sponsor of this project is: I-1: Houghton TI Signalization TI at I-1 and Houghton H8897 Signalization of TI AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 6 The sponsor of this project is: 88.3 I-1: Ina Rd. Bridge at Santa ruz Santa ruz River Replace bridge structure SB413 3D 2 BR-MRN- AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = (14)A 2 The sponsor of this project is: I-1: Ina TI Ina Rd. I-1 Reconstruct TI and construct RR overpass H8479 NH-1-D AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = (216)S The sponsor of this project is: 2639 ASTP STP PM 584 STP PM T T RTA PM T -584 RTA PM T Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

72 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID 3.16 I-1: Ina to Ruthrauff I-1: Ina to Ruthrauff Widen I-1 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: I-1: Kino TI I-1 at Kino Rd. Traffic Interchange at Kino Rd. AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 35 The sponsor of this project is: 94.2 I-1: Prince to Ruthrauff H6241 1D Prince to Ruthrauff Widen to 8 lanes 8 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 127 The sponsor of this project is: 5.12 H848 9_a I-1: Ruthrauff TI I-1 and Ruthrauff TI Improve Traffic Interchange at I-1 and Ruthrauff NH-1-D AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = (213)A The sponsor of this project is: I-1: Vail Road and Mtn View Bridge Rehab I-1, near Vail Road Underpass Bridge Rehab AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 375 The sponsor of this project is: I-1: Wilmot Road and Earp Wash Bridge rehab I-1 near Wilmot Road Bridge rehab AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: I-1: Wilmot, Kolb, Rita, Vail TI Signalization TIs on I-1 at Wilmot, Kolb, Rita, and Vail H8896 RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Signalization of TIs AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 318 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR ASTP D 1245 ASTP D 6723 ASTP 8681 STP D STP 15 ASTP U 25 ASTP 8 ASTP D 3 STP U 2187 ASTP ASTP 5932 ASTP D 6559 ASTP D 49 HURF26 D 17 HURF26 15 ASTP APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

73 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID 41.1 I-19: Ajo TI 1127, Ajo Way New TI on Ajo Way H STP-19-A AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 985 (22)S 8 The sponsor of this project is: I-19: anoa Ranch Rest Area to Duval Mine Rd anoa Ranch Rest Area to Duval Mine Rd H8716 Pavement rehabilitation 19-A(228)T AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 139 The sponsor of this project is: I-19: Helmet Peak Bridge Rehab I-19: Near Helmet Peak Underpass Bridge Rehab AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: I-19: Irvington TI I-19 at Irvington Road Traffic Interchange at Irvington Rd. AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 35 The sponsor of this project is: 1.14 I-19: Pima Mine Rd Bridge Rehab I-19 at Pima Mine Road H8178 NH-19-A (28)A RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Bridge Rehabilitation AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 55 The sponsor of this project is: 99 I-19: San Xavier Road Pedestrian Bridge H San Xavier Road at I-19 interchange onstruct Pedestrian Walkway and Bridge over S.. AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3179 The sponsor of this project is: 4.12 I-19: Valencia SB Off-Ramp Expansion H8493 Valencia Off-Ramp Expansion Valencia Off-Ramp Expansion 19-A(NFA)A AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 36 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR ASTP 2 ASTP 139 ASTP 5 ASTP D 4 HURF26 D 6 ASTP APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING D

74 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Red Hill Ranch Rd at UPRR Red Ranch Rd, north of Marsh Station Railroad signal improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 35 The sponsor of this project is: 65.9 Regional Traffic Operations enter SZ84 Region wide Operation of RTO TU-(254)D AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 36 The sponsor of this project is: _f Speedway Blvd.: RR Underpass Reconstruction S19 Speedway Bl. near I-1 Reconstruct RR underpass AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = SR 41: Sonoran orridor Tier 1 EIS Sonoran orridor Tier 1 EIS AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 35 The sponsor of this project is: 2.16 SR 77: alle oncordia to Genematas SR 77, from alle oncordia to Genematas Pavement Preservation AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: SR 77: I-1 to River SR 77, from I-1 to River Road Sidewalks AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1 The sponsor of this project is: bd SR 77: River to Suffolk(Ped Improvement HAWK Las Lomitas) Oracle Road: River Road to Suffolk(HAWK Las Lomitas) Pavement preservation and sidewalk construction AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 854 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR ASTP 1 HURF26 D ASTP APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

75 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID 11.2 SR 77: Tangerine to Pinal o. Line 5.8 Tangerine to Pinal o. Line Widen to 6 lanes H STP-77-A AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 365 (24)T 6 The sponsor of this project is: 9.15 SR 86 Fencing Mile Post 82 - Mile Post 12 Fencing on SR 86 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 4 The sponsor of this project is: 47.6 SR 86: Fresnal Segment H8469 STP-86-A (217)T Widen to 4' AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 115 The sponsor of this project is: SR 86: Fuller to Valencia SR86, from Fuller to Valencia H8792 FA-86-A(218) T RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Pavement Preservation AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 91 The sponsor of this project is: 15.3 H81 42_o SR 86: Kitt Peak Rd Segment MP to MP Reconstruct & widen to 4' 86-A-NFA 2 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 114 The sponsor of this project is: 45.1 SR 86: San Isidro Rd. Segment H MP to MP Reconstruct & widen to 4 ft. 86-A(216)T 2 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 115 The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST 2.2 SR 86: Valencia to Kinney 6.6 MP to MP Widen to 6 lanes H686 2 STP-86-A AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = (21)T 6 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR HURF26 7 ASTP APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

76 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS SR 989: First Ave to SR 77 SR 989 (Tangerine Road): First Ave to SR 77 Resurface design TOTAL OST AQ STATUS = Total ost = 9 Undetermined The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING 5/1/217

77 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Small Business Assistance Small Business Assistance AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1 The sponsor of this project is: Mainstreet 58 RTA O 58 RTA O 58 RTA O 58 RTA O 58 RTA O Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

78 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Adonis Road Extension Adonis: Patton to Tangerine Farms onstruction of new 2-lane roadway AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = PDAF S The sponsor of this project is: Marana oachline: Silverbell North to Silverbell South Pvmnt Pres oachline, from Silverbell North to Silverbell South Pavement reconstruction and drainage repair AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 25 The sponsor of this project is: Marana cu El Rio Park to Avra Valley Road Shared Use Path PK13 El Rio Park to Avra Valley Road onstruct 14 foot wide shared-use path AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Marana Total ost = Luckett Road emetery Access 1. Luckett Road north of Hardin Paved access to Veteran's emetery AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = HURF126 The sponsor of this project is: Marana 6.16 Marana Airport ontrol Tower Marana Airport ontrol Tower AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3 13 LOAL 13 SAF 274 FAA D D D The sponsor of this project is: Marana 3.16 Marana Airport Drainage Improvements Marana Airport Drainage Improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = LOAL 7 SAF 136 FAA D D D 7 LOAL 7 SAF 136 FAA The sponsor of this project is: Marana 5.9 Marana Airport Fire Protection Marana Regional Airport Fire Protection AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: Marana 67 LOAL 67 SAF 1365 FAA Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

79 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes 2.9 Marana Airport Land Acquisition for RPZ's Marana Airport Improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 525 The sponsor of this project is: Marana Marana Airport Noise Study Marana Regional Airport Update part of Airport Noise Study AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3 The sponsor of this project is: Marana 4.16 Marana Airport PAPI Replacements Marana Airport PAPI Replacements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 13 The sponsor of this project is: Marana 7.9 Marana Airport Runway onstruction and Preservation STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Runway construction and preservation AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 11 The sponsor of this project is: Marana Marana Airport Runway Extenstion Marana Regional Airport Design Runway extension AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 62 The sponsor of this project is: Marana 5.16 Marana Airport Rwy & TWY Lighting Upgrades Marana Airport Lighting Upgrades AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 9 The sponsor of this project is: Marana 7.16 Marana Airport RWY 3121 & TWY B Extension Marana Airport Extension of runway and taxiway AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3 The sponsor of this project is: Marana Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR LOAL D 228 LOAL R 15 SAF D 228 SAF R 32 FAA D 4644 FAA R 13 LOAL S 13 SAF S 274 FAA S 6 LOAL 6 SAF 118 FAA 15 LOAL D 15 LOAL D 25 LOAL 15 SAF D 15 SAF D 25 SAF 32 FAA D 32 FAA D 5 FAA 4 LOAL 4 SAF 82 FAA 13 LOAL D 13 SAF D 274 FAA D APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

80 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Marana Airport Taxiway Reconstruction Marana Regional Airport Rehab Taxiway and install MITLs AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1525 The sponsor of this project is: Marana Marana Airport Terminal Building Marana Regional Airport onstruct a public use terminal building AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 8 The sponsor of this project is: Marana Marana Airport Tie Down, Helicopter, Terminal Apron, TWY B Marana Airport Improvements Rehab Apron Transient (446,314 sf), Tiedown (166,579 sf) AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 282 The sponsor of this project is: Marana _c Marana Park-and-Ride Park-and-Ride in Marana Park-and-Ride in Marana AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 245 The sponsor of this project is: Marana 562. Pavement Preservation Program Various Locations Reconstruct & Overlay AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 25 The sponsor of this project is: Marana ST21 42_s Tangerine orridor: Wildlife Linkages Wildlife Linkages along Tangerine orridor: Twin Peaks Rd to La añada Drive AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Marana Total ost = _a Tangerine Rd: I-1 to La anada Dr ST Twin Peaks Rd to La anada Dr Widen to 4 lanes with sidewalks & multi-use lanes 4 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 9258 The sponsor of this project is: Marana Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST 9 LOAL 9 SAF 182 FAA 13 LOAL 13 SAF 274 FAA 31 LOAL 31 SAF 638 FAA RTA D D D D D D D D D O 9 LOAL 9 SAF 182 FAA D D D 5 LOAL 5 SAF 125 FAA 3 LOAL 3 SAF 64 FAA D D D 3 LOAL 3 SAF 64 FAA 1 LOAL 1 LOAL 1 LOAL 1 LOAL 1 RTA DR 465 HURF126 3 RTA DR PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

81 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

82 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS bh La anada and El onquistador HAWK crossing La anada Drive and El onquistador HAWK rossing AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley Total ost = La añada and Moore Intersection Study La añada and Moore Intersection Study AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley _b La holla Blvd. - Tangerine to Overton Overton to Tangerine Widen to 4 lanes 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 255 The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley _t La holla Blvd: Overton to Tangerine Wildlife Linkages La holla Blvd, from Overton to Tangerine Wildlife linkages La holla Blvd, from Overton to Tangerine AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 174 The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley Lambert Lane: La holla to La anada Phase 2 1. La holla to La anada 2 Widen to 4 lanes;la anada to Rancho Sonora. Bike Lns 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 74 The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley 99.1 Naranja: La holla to Shannon Phase La holla to Shannon Reconstruct w/sidewalk & shoulders and drainage structures 3 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 42 The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley TOTAL OST 425 RTA DR PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTA DR 6 RTA DR 685 RTA DR 15 RTA DR 115 HURF RTA DR 8 RTA DR 842 RTA DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

83 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS TOTAL OST _d Oro Valley Park-and-Ride Park & Ride Lot at Rancho Vistoso Rancho Vistoso Lot AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1582 The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley _b Tangerine Rd: Shannon to La anada 2. Shannon to La anada 2 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 216 The sponsor of this project is: Oro Valley PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTA O 7 RTA O 7 RTA O 7 RTA O 7 RTA O 3 HURF126 Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

84 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) OWP #321 RLTAP 6P Training funding for,, et.al. AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 25 The sponsor of this project is: OWP- 5 STP S 5 STP S 5 STP S 5 STP S 5 STP S Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

85 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Transportation Art by Youth - Marana AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 325 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL 766. Transportation Art by Youth - Oro Valley AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 325 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL 19.3 Transportation Art by Youth - Pascua Yaqui AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 175 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL 765. Transportation Art by Youth - Pima o. AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 325 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL 764. Transportation Art by Youth - Sahuarita AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 325 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL 767. Transportation Art by Youth - South AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 325 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL 23 Transportation Art by Youth - Tohono Oodham AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 275 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL 25 HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF126 Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

86 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS TOTAL OST 768. Transportation Art by Youth - AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 325 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-LOAL PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR HURF HURF HURF HURF HURF126 Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

87 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST PAG - Alternative Modes Program Regionwide Outreach & Promotion AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 53 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-PAG 85.1 PAG onsultant Services Misc studies & consultant activities AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 2575 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-PAG 122. Purchase/Operations: Vehicles for elderly and disabled purchsae of vehicles AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3865 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-PAG 96.3 Regional Orthophotos Update imagery & terrain data for the metro area AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1644 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-PAG 851. Regional Traffic ongestion Info System Transview updates and mapping AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 778 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-PAG 659. Transportation Planning Program Operations and ontingency AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 948 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-PAG 635. Travel Demand Management Programs H5224 3X AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1638 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-PAG 1 STP S 1 STP S 1 STP S 1 STP S 1 STP S 2 STP S 2 STP S 2 STP S 2 STP S 2 STP S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 81 FTA FTA FTA FTA FTA531 5 STP S 5 STP S 5 STP S 1 STP S 1 STP S 1 STP S 1 STP S 1 STP S 6 LOAL S 6 LOAL S 6 LOAL S 6 LOAL S 6 LOAL S 235 STP S 235 STP S 235 STP S 235 STP S 235 STP S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 1 HURF126 S 267 ADEQ O 267 ADEQ O 985 STP O 267 ADEQ O 267 ADEQ O 985 STP O 985 STP O 267 ADEQ O 985 STP O 985 STP O Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

88 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Pavement Management System H4115 1X ity portion of PMS Project funded thru PAG AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 2662 The sponsor of this project is: OWP-TDOT 26 LOAL 45 STP S S 26 LOAL 45 STP S S 26 LOAL 45 STP S S 26 LOAL 45 STP S S 26 LOAL 45 STP S S Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

89 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST _d Volunteer Transit Volunteer service coordinated w/ouncil on Aging AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 49 The sponsor of this project is: POA 25 RTA O 25 RTA O 25 RTA O 25 RTA O 25 RTA O Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

90 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST No Drive Days Program AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 351 The sponsor of this project is: PDEQ 194 ADEQ O 194 ADEQ O 194 ADEQ O Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

91 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST ADA Transit Enhancements Various Bus Stop enhancements (sidewalks, ramps, pads, etc) AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 48 The sponsor of this project is: Aerospace Parkway Expansion Nogales Highway to Alvernon Design and onstruction AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 127 The sponsor of this project is: RTAHB 41cx Alvernon and Hughes Access Bike Lanes Valencia>Los Reales & Nogales Hwy>Hoover Rd Bike Lanes AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = HURF HURF126 5 HURF126 D R 16 FTA537 9 LOAL 643 HURF FTA537 9 LOAL 5 FTA537 9 LOAL 5 FTA537 9 LOAL The sponsor of this project is: Benson Highway and olumbus Improvements Benson Highway and olumbus Intersection improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = STP 5 HURF126 D The sponsor of this project is: Benson Highway at Drexel Rd Improvements Benson Highway and Drexel Road Intersection improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = STP 5 HURF126 D The sponsor of this project is: cg Bike Lane Package 3 4TEHBL Various Deisgn and onstruct Bike Lanes AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1974 The sponsor of this project is: 5 RTA DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

92 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Bopp Rd: Sarasota to Kinney Bopp Road, from Sarasota to Kinney Safety Improvements AQ STATUS = Total ost = 2855 Undetermined The sponsor of this project is: db DO River Park and Overton HAWK rossing DO River Park and Overton HAWK rossing AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = bo olossal ave Rd UPRR Success Drive 4RTS olossal ave road from north of RR to south of RR improve vertical profile, add culverts, widen shoulders AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1855 The sponsor of this project is: 137. ortaro Farms: amino de Oeste to Thornydale 1.5 4FOT amino de Oeste to Thornydale Rd. 2 Widen to 4 lanes 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 1839 The sponsor of this project is: cn El Paso Southwest Greenway ROW/Design/onstruct 4REPSW 11th avenue to South 6th avenue ROW Acquisition, Design & onstruction AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = Elemental Level Bridge Inspection TOTAL OST 2655 STP 2 HURF126 D 1328 LOAL 5751 HURF RTA DR PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR Bridge Inspection AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 371 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

93 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Elemental Level ulvert Inspection Program & Load Ratings Regionwide ulvert Inspection AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 53 The sponsor of this project is: 4.14 Gates Pass Road rash DR Gates Pass Road DR for crash mitigation AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Guardrail Selection Tool Upgrade for RSAP ountywide Software upgrade to support and identify guardrail selection AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Ina and Orange Grove orridors SignalTiming Study Ina: I-1 to Oracle, Orange Grove: I-1 to Oracle Signal timing study AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 125 The sponsor of this project is: Ina Rd: Sidewalks from Shannon to La holla Ina Road, from Shannon Rd to La holla Blvd Add sidewalks and ADA accessible ramps AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1436 The sponsor of this project is: 787. Kolb Rd. - Sabino anyon to Sunrise Dr. DOT-32 4KSSD 2.1 Sabino anyon to Sunrise Dr. 2 Widen to 3 lanes 3 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR PDAF S 5 PDAF S 995 STP 6 LOAL 1812 PBonds D 85 STP 3982 PBonds Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

94 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS dh Loop Safety Markings and Signs Bicycle Loop Safety markings and signs for the Loop AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = bb Mary Ann leveland at Kush HAWK 4TAMA South of Kush anyon on Mary Ann leveland at ienega HS Design a HAWK crossing AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: 2.15 Mcain Loop Study Mcain Loop Safety Study Total ost = 246 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Old Spanish Trail and actus Forest Dr. Intersection of Old Spanish and actus Forest Intersection Improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 241 The sponsor of this project is: bd Old Vail Middle School SRTS Project 4OLVMS Mary Ann leveland Way from Nona Ln to Driscoll Mountain Rd onstruct shared use path and crosswalk AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 4 The sponsor of this project is: 81.1 Rillito Riverpath and amino de la Tierra Enhancements 2. amino de la Tierra: River Rd. to DO Riverpath onstruct bike lanes and bike/ped bridge AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1345 The sponsor of this project is: River to Shannon: Paved Shoulders mno, de la Tierra, Highway Dr, urtis Rd Paved Shoulders AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 57 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR HSIP 128 LOAL 425 STP 26 LOAL APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

95 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Rural Road Intersection Safety Study ounty Wide Intersection Safety Study AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Safety: Durable Pavement Marking Regionwide Installation of durable pavement markings AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 625 The sponsor of this project is: dc School Safety Infrastructure Improvements () ounty Wide Infrastructure improvements near schools AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Sign Panel Replacement Regionwide Replacement of Sign Panels Total ost = 362 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 16 The sponsor of this project is: Speedway Blvd: Painted Hills to amino de Oeste Speedway Blvd: Painted Hills to amino de Oeste Paved Shoulders AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1568 The sponsor of this project is: cw Summit View Elementary School Safe Routes to School 4TASVE East Summit Street from Old Nogales Hwy to Epperson Lane Design bicycle and pedestrian path along E. Summit Street AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 17 The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST 551 HSIP 34 LOAL 322 HSIP 2 LOAL 9 HSIP 579 STP 89 LOAL PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTA DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

96 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Sunset Rd: Silverbell to River 4RTSUN.6 Silverbell to I-1 to River Extend roadway & construct new bridge 3 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Tanque Verde Loop Intersection Tanque Verde Rd at Tanque Verde Loop Intersection improvements AQ STATUS = Total ost = 14 Undetermined The sponsor of this project is: 62. Thornydale Rd: ortaro to Linda Vista DOT-23 4TTLV ortaro to Linda Vista Widen to 4 lanes 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 2663 The sponsor of this project is: Valencia Rd.: Alvernon to Kolb 4VAKDP Alvernon to Kolb Widen to 6 lanes 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: _b Valencia Rd: Ajo to Wade 4RTVWE Ajo to Wade Widen to 4 lanes 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 16 The sponsor of this project is: 791. Valencia Road Extension 2.9 Houghton Rd. to Old Spanish Trail onstruct new 2 lane divided roadway & bridge 2 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: bk White Elementary SRTS, anada St 4SSWPI anada St: Hildreth Ave to Forrest Ave sidewalks and traffic calming AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST Total ost = TU 1479 LOAL 2 HURF126 D 84 STP 49 LOAL 1296 HURF126 D 1923 LOAL D 288 DIFO 2793 RTA DR 424 RTA DR 652 DIFO 4195 DIFO 1827 HURF126 1 RTAG 57 RTA (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) DR PROPOSED FUNDING FISAL YEAR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

97 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Wilmot North of Sahuarita Rd 4RTWNS 6. 2 Sahuarita Rd to 6 miles north Pave existing dirt road 2 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 129 The sponsor of this project is: 74 RTA DR PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

98 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST _j Bus Pullout Packages #6 - #15 Region wide onstruct 4 bus pullouts regionwide AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 73 The sponsor of this project is: RTA _l Bus Pullouts: Packages Regionwide Bus Pullouts throughout the region AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 489 The sponsor of this project is: RTA _z Kolb and Valencia intersection reconstruction Kolb and Valencia,.4 miles in all directions 4RTKVI Additional through and turning lanes AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: RTA Total ost = _g Purchase of Sun Shuttle Vehicles Regionwide Transit Purchase Sun Shuttle Vehicles AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 2383 The sponsor of this project is: RTA ar Regional Traffic Signal Program: Equipment Regionwide Equipment for traffic signal program AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: RTA Total ost = _i RTA Special Needs Transit Expansion Expand to include new areas AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: RTA Total ost = _r SR 77: Wildlife rossing off highway fencing SR 77 H Wildlife fencing out of the ROW AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: RTA Total ost = RTA DR 8 RTA DR 8 RTA DR 8 RTA DR 2 RTA DR 75 RTA DR 128 FTA RTA FTA5311 P P P 223 FTA537 P 466 FTA RTA 42 FTA5311 FTA5311 P P P P 162 FTA RTA P P 38 RTA 148 FTA5311 FTA RTA 25 RTA 25 RTA 25 RTA 2 RTA O 328 RTA O 334 RTA O 343 RTA O 356 RTA O 3611 RTA O 35 RTA DR P P P Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

99 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID Sun Shuttle Base Transit Services Base services: 41, 413, 43, 44, Ajo-Dar AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: RTA Total ost = _e Sun Shuttle Expanded Transit Services Regionwide Exp. Svcs: 41, 411, 412, GV, OVDAR, Ajo-Tuc AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 18 The sponsor of this project is: RTA _a Sun Tran - Frequency and Area Expansion Improve frequencies along major routes, extend some routes AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: RTA Transferred Special Needs Transit Service Area 11.8 RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Operating funds for Expanded Transit Services AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: RTA Total ost = _a Valencia: Alvernon to Kolb West side of Intersection project Valencia, from Alvernon to Kolb Widen to six lanes AQ STATUS = Analyzed The sponsor of this project is: RTA Total ost = _a Valencia: Kolb-Houghton - Valencia+Kolb Intersection Valencia, from Kolb to Houghton Widen to six lanes AQ STATUS = Analyzed The sponsor of this project is: RTA TOTAL OST Total ost = 1 PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTA O 679 RTA O 7 RTA O 721 RTA O 742 RTA O 39 FTA5311 O 41 FTA5311 O 413 FTA5311 O 426 FTA5311 O 439 FTA5311 O 1477 RTA O 1522 RTA O 1567 RTA O 1614 RTA O 1663 RTA O 391 FTA5311 O 42 FTA5311 O 414 FTA5311 O 427 FTA5311 O 44 FTA5311 O 2956 RTA O 345 RTA O 3137 RTA O 3231 RTA O 3328 RTA O 488 MOE O 4211 MOE O 4337 MOE O 4467 MOE O 461 MOE O 14 RTA O 17 RTA O 11 RTA O 114 RTA O 117 RTA O 4 RTA DR 6 RTA DR 334 RTA DR 544 RTA DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

100 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Duval Mine Road Sidewalk and Bicycle Lane Duval Mine Road from La anada to Alpha Sidewalk and bike lanes AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita bp La Villita/Rancho Sahuarita Intersection Intersection of La Villita and Rancho Sahuarita construct intersection improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 65 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita 55.1 Pavement Preservation Arterial and ollector Streets Maintenance and Rehibilitation AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 89 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita _d 2 Pima Mine Rd. Bridge Replacement Pima Mine Rd./Santa ruz River Bridge replacement at Santa ruz River 2 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 62 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita Providing Accessibility and Safety Across I- 19 (PASA) Sahuarita Road: La anada to Rancho Sahuarita Blvd Study on feasiblity for safe crossings for all roadway users AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita 41.7 Quail reek onnection 2. Old Nogales Hwy to Nogales Hwy onstruct new roadway 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 57 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita 5 PDAF 355 HURF126 S Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

101 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Roadway and Intersection Safety Enhancements Identified intersections townwide DRs for intersection improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita Roadway Lane and Shoulder Width Study El Toro Road, Twin Buttes, La Villita: La anada to RS Blvd Study of lane and shoulder widths AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita _h Sahuarita Rd: La Villita to ountry lub Wildlife Monitoring La Villita Rd. to ountry lub Rd. Pre and post construction crossing monitoring AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 135 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita 49.1 Sahuarita Road/ Nogales Highway Realignment and RR rossing Nogales Hwy & UPRR Intersection, roadway re-alignment improvement AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 7615 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita _a Sahuarita Road: I-19 to ountry lub I-19 to ountry lub Widen to 4 lanes w/curbs, New bridge over Santa ruz 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita Town Wide: Safety Evaluation of Street Town of Sahuarita Safety evaluation of streets AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR PDAF S Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

102 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Townwide: Intersection Lighting Study Townwide Intersection lighting study AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita _i Wildlife Assessments Sahuarita various locations Pima Mine, Old Nogales Hwy, Nogales Hwy, Quail reek rossin Initial wildlife assessment AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1 The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita _o Wireless signal & controller/equipment upgrades Various intersections Provide upgrades to traffic operations AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Sahuarita TOTAL OST Total ost = 75 PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

103 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST th Ave: 22nd to 44th nd St to 44th St Mill and overlay AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 7 The sponsor of this project is: South ao 26th St and 1th Ave onstruct HAWK signal AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 14 The sponsor of this project is: South bj 36th St: 4th Ave to RR Bike Lane/Greenway.5 36th St. 4th Ave - RR Purchase RR RW for new bike lane AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: South ap ADA Upgrades Various locations Ensure current curb ramps meet ADA specs AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3 The sponsor of this project is: South 33.5 Pavement Preservation ity limits Pavement maintenance AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 134 The sponsor of this project is: South _g Speed Alert Monitor Signs Electronic speed alert signs AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 6 The sponsor of this project is: South 1281 HURF HURF126 D 35 HURF RTA 3 RTA 6 RTA DR DR DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

104 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes 89.1 Ryan Airfield Access Roadway and Parking Lot Rehabilitate Access Roadway and Parking Lot AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 26 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 88.1 Ryan Airfield Airside Auto Road onstruct Airside Auto Road AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 238 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 43.1 Ryan Airfield Apron onstruction Apron construction - Phase 1 & 2 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 497 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 8.16 Ryan Airfield AWOS Replacement Ryan Airfield Replace All Weather Operation System AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 22 The sponsor of this project is: TAA Ryan Airfield TV ameras Ryan Airfield Install TV ameras AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 83 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 87.1 Ryan Airfield Drainage Dike and hannel onstruct Drainage Dike and hannel AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 2175 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 9.1 Ryan Airfield Land Acquisition STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Land Acquisition AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 886 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR LOAL 12 SAF 236 FAA 216 LOAL 11 SAF 11 FAA 183 LOAL 3731 FAA 183 SAF 83 LOAL 218 LOAL 1957 SAF 9 LOAL S 8 LOAL R 81 SAF S 716 SAF R Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

105 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes Ryan Airfield Maintenance and onnector Rds Ryan Airfield Reconstruct Maintenance and onnector Rds AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 442 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 71.8 Ryan Airfield Master Plan Update Plan update AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 75 The sponsor of this project is: TAA Ryan Airfield Pavement Management System Ryan Airfield Pavement Management System AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 884 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TIA Air Freight Apron 1119 TIA Joint seal Air Freight Apron AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 658 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 97.1 TIA Airside Service Road Reconstruction STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Reconstruct Service Road AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 476 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 3.14 TIA Apron Reconstruction TIA Apron Reconstruction AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 597 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TIA ustoms Apron TIA Mill and overlay apron at ustoms AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 326 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR LOAL 6 FAA 75 SAF 13 LOAL 36 LOAL 15 LOAL 121 SAF 323 SAF 138 SAF 29 LOAL 6 FAA 29 SAF 119 LOAL 358 SAF 597 LOAL 293 LOAL 33 SAF Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

106 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS TOTAL OST 25.4 TIA Economy Overflow Lot Upgrade Paving on economy overflow lot Buildout north portion of Economy lot AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3521 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TIA Hermans Road TIA Reconstruct Hermans Road AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 27 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TIA Hydrazine Pad TIA Reconstruct Hydrazine Pad AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 33 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 4.15 TIA Near Parallel Runway TIA Relocate Runway 11R/29 L and assoc. taxiways AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 652 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 73.4 TIA Perimeter Road Upgrade perimiter road from TWY D1 to TWY A13 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1518 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 4.14 TIA Runways and Taxiways TIA Reconstruct runway, taxiway, and shoulder AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: TAA 94.1 TIA Security Master Plan Update Update Security Master Plan AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: TAA PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR LOAL 33 SAF 1878 FAA D 2338 LOAL 534 SAF D FAA 462 ANG D 2338 SAF 534 LOAL D 49 ANG 7 LOAL S 136 FAA S 7 SAF S Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

107 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes TIA Sustainability Management Plan TIA Sustainability Management Plan AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TIA Taxiway A TIA Reconstruct Taxiway A and shoulders AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 7525 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TIA Taxiway D TIA Reconstruct Taxiway D and shoulders AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 6118 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 96.1 TIA Taxiway G - Phase STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS onstruct Taxiway G AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 235 The sponsor of this project is: TAA 9.16 TIA: Fire Truck Replacement TIA Replacement of Fire Trucks AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 19 The sponsor of this project is: TAA TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR LOAL 6853 FAA 336 SAF 8 LOAL 67 LOAL 6 LOAL 1639 FAA 1365 FAA 123 FAA 8 SAF 67 SAF 6 SAF 13 LOAL 13 SAF 299 FAA 4 LOAL 45 LOAL 82 FAA 91 FAA 4 SAF 45 SAF Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

108 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST ci.6 San Xavier Rd: Little Nogales to I-19 San Xavier Rd: Little Nogales to I-19 onstruct pedestrian path AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 452 The sponsor of this project is: Tohono O'odham as San Xavier: Little Nogales Mission Gateway.5 Path Little Nogales Rd. onstruct pathway AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 918 The sponsor of this project is: Tohono O'odham _m 3.7 SR 86: Kitt Peak Linkage Wildlife rossing Retrofit Phase 2 State Route 86 - Mile posts onstruct 3 crossings AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Tohono O'odham Total ost = TEA 19 RTA 12 RTA DR DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

109 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS st Ave: Grant to River SR Grant Rd. to River Rd. Widen to 6 lanes AQ STATUS = Analyzed The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = _a 22nd Street: I-1 to Blvd. SR5A I-1 to Blvd Widen to 6 lanes 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: th/ongress/Toole - Safety Improvements Intersection of 4th Ave/ongress Street/Toole Ave Implement safety improvements based on Road Safety Assessmen AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 38 The sponsor of this project is: Points Pedestrian Improvements Area bounded by 7th Ave, 5th Ave, 15th st, and 21st St. Artistic features, Sidewalks, ADA imp & ped lighting AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 153 The sponsor of this project is: Points Transportation Enhancement Project 5 points design and construct an artistic gateway feature, area bound AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1 The sponsor of this project is: cp 5th St. Bike Boulevard: 7th Avenue to University SP11 5th Street, from 9th Avenue to Highland Design and construct a bike boulevard AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST Total ost = RTA DR 5 HURF126 PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR HURF RTA 466 PBonds DR DR 7 RTA 3 LOAL DR 119 RTA DR 25 HURF PBonds 175 HURF126 DR 865 RTA DR 6332 HURF126 Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

110 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS th Street Traffic Impact Analysis 6th Street Traffic Impact Analysis AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: ADA Transition Plan itywide Solicit a consultant team to prepare an ADA Transition Plan AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 35 The sponsor of this project is: 2.16 SA12 41dd Arcadia and Timrod Bike Boulevards Timrod: Alvernon to Sahuara, Arcadia: Grant to Eastland Bike Boulevards AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = cr Arroyo hico Greenway: ountry lub to Treat SP9 Winsett Blvd between ountry lub and Treat signalized crossing, greenway segment AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Bicyle and Pedestrian Program Region wide Total ost = 6 promotion of bike/ped use and safety AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1272 The sponsor of this project is: cz Bike Boulevard Package I itywide Bike Boulevards AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = bl Bike Lane Package III 49B3 Various Locations TBD Design and onstruction of bike lane package III AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 4 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST 47 LOAL 775 STP 7 RTAG 1 LOAL 4 RTA 51 RTA 2 STP 12 LOAL 212 RTA S S D D DR DR O O DR 2 STP 12 LOAL O O PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTAG 4 LOAL 64 RTA DR 1 RTA DR APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

111 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Bike Share Program Region wide Bike Share Program AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1378 The sponsor of this project is: Broadway Blvd. - Euclid to ountry lub SR3A Euclid to ountry lub widen to 6 lanes, bus pullouts, sidewalks, bike lanes 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Broadway Blvd: amino Seco to Houghton SR amino Seco Blvd to Houghton Rd Widen to 4 lanes divided 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: de olumbus: 22nd to Timrod Pedestrian Path S nd St. to Timrod onstruct 6 ft. wide asphalt ped. path on one side AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 223 The sponsor of this project is: co opper St: Oracle to Swan Bike Boulevard SP1 opper Street, from Oracle to Swan Design/onstruct bike blvd improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: av raycroft/ft. Lowell Park HAWK SH28 raycroft Road at Ft. Lowell Park Install HAWK signal AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: _a Downtown Links: Broadway to I-1 S3N.5 Broadway to I-1 onstruct new 4 lane roadway 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 958 The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST 2332 RTA 13 PBonds 15 DIFO DR R R 2662 HURF RTA DR 15 DIFO 358 RTA DR 7361 RTA DR 71 HURF126 7 PBonds 375 RTA 152 RTA R (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) DR DR PROPOSED FUNDING FISAL YEAR 7677 RTA DR 7323 HURF RTA DR 6 HURF RTA 3652 PBonds DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

112 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS _c Downtown Rail Safety Project Design project Design safety upgrades AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: 72.7 El Paso & Southwestern Greenway: 22nd to.7 Simpson 22nd to Simpson onstruct new bike path AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 486 The sponsor of this project is: _l El Paso & Southwestern Greenway: Kino to University 6. SP1 Ajo/Kino to Speedway/Main Shared use path & trail AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 576 The sponsor of this project is: ce Glenn St: olumbus to ountry lub Pedestrian Path 1.5 S1H Glenn St. from olumbus to ountry lub Rd. onstruct pedestrian path AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = Grant Rd: Oracle Rd to Swan Rd SR2A 5. 4 Oracle Rd to Swan Rd Widen to 6 lanes w/bike lanes & sidewalks 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Grant Rd: RR Underpass Reconstruction SR16 4 Grant Rd near I-1 Reconstruct existing RR underpass 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: _f Houghton UPRR UPRR rossing Reconstruct and widen RR bridge AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST 28 LOAL 458 TEA 3 STP 385 TEA 45 RTA 5 RTAG 3 LOAL 146 RTA 3 DIFO 2225 STP DR DR 2 RTA 2 DIFO 3 HURF126 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) DR PROPOSED FUNDING FISAL YEAR 4 HURF126 6 RTA DR 2 HURF126 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING 318 HURF126

113 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS _h Houghton Rd: Broadway to 22nd, Intersection SR1F Houghton Rd: Broadway to 22nd, Broadway Widen to 6 lanes divided AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = _g Houghton Rd:Irvington to Valencia, Intersect Imp Old Vail Rd 3. SR1E Houghton Rd: Irvington to Valencia, Intersect Old Vail 2 Improve orridor 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = _j Houghton Road: 22nd to Irvington SR1J Houghton Road, from 22nd to Irvington Widen Houghton Road AQ STATUS = Analyzed The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = _e Houghton Road: UPRR Bridge to I-1 SR1G 2. 2 UPRR Bridge to I-1 Widen Houghton Rd. to six-lane divided cross section 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 8519 The sponsor of this project is: SR1H 32_i Houghton: Valencia to Mary Ann leveland Way Houghton:Valencia to Mary Ann leveland Way 2 Widen Road 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed The sponsor of this project is: Inland Port orridor Study Total ost = 1 Feasibility study for new rail and roadway alignment AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR DIFO D 9 RTA DR 7 PBonds 341 STP 2345 RTA DR 1574 STP 9 RTA DR 45 RTA DR 7 RTA DR 2 RTA DR 5 STP S 3 LOAL S Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

114 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Kolb Rd.: onnection to Sabino anyon SR8A.7 Extend Sabino anyon south to Kolb New 4 lane roadway 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: 83.4 Kolb: Escalante to Valencia Escalante to Valencia Widen to 6 lanes AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = 12 The sponsor of this project is: cv Liberty Ave Bicycle Blvd and Safe Routes to School 4.8 SP4 44th St to Los Reales Rd Safe rossing Signals, Traffic alming, Signage and Markings AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1212 The sponsor of this project is: dg Menlo Park and 8th onvent Bike Blvds Menlo Park: Speedway to S river, onvent: ushing to Julian Bike Boulevards AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = Mountain/Helen Mini Roundabout Study Mountain and Helen Mini Roundabout Study AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3 The sponsor of this project is: be Nogales and Olive HAWK rossing Nogales Hwy and Olive St. HAWK rossing AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = Pantano: Escalante to Irvington Pavement SS733D Preservation Various locations Resurface existing streets AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 2678 The sponsor of this project is: Pima Association of Governments /1/217 TOTAL OST 655 TEA 377 SRTS 29 RTA DR 2 STP 114 HURF126 7 LOAL 1 RTAG 6 RTA D D D (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) D DR PROPOSED FUNDING FISAL YEAR APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

115 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS cy Park Ave: Ft Lowell to Speedway Transportation Enhancement 2. S194 Ft. Lowell to Speedway onstruction of path on one side, reconstructed bike lanes AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 67 The sponsor of this project is: Pavement Preservation itywide Rehabilitate and repave city streets AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 37 The sponsor of this project is: bf Pedestrian HAWK crossings Speedway+Beverly Grant+Arcadia 22+ Speedway/Beverly, Grant/Arcadia, 22nd/Belvedere Design and construction of 3 HAWK crossings AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = Pima: olumbus to Alvernon Pathway.5 Pedestrian pathway on Pima between olumbus and Alvernon Way Pedestrian path AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: _s Regional Traffic Operations enter Regionwide Traffic monitoring cameras AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 53 The sponsor of this project is: am Regional Transportation Data Network S71 Various locations Expand WiFi mesh AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST 35 STP 2 LOAL PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTA 15 RTA O 15 RTA O 15 RTA O 15 RTA O 15 RTA O DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

116 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS bj Rio Vista Safe Routes to School Project SP6.5 ampbell Avenue to 2 feet short of First Ave. onstruct a shared-use path on Limberlost AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 4 The sponsor of this project is: bi Robison Elementary School Healthy Street SP8 Near Robison Elementary (Treat Ave and 18th Street) New HAWK, filling sidewalk gaps, ADA ramps, other imprvmnts AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 4 The sponsor of this project is: Safe Routes to School Program () ity of Non-infrastructure education and outreach K-8 schools AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 159 The sponsor of this project is: bg School Safety Infrastructure Improvements () itywide Infrastructure improvements near schools AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Total ost = Silverbell Rd: Grant to Ina SR6A Grant to Ina Widen to 4 lanes w/ bike lanes 4 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: 3 36bn Stone Avenue Gateway: 1st Ave to 5th Ave S14W.2 5 Speedway, from 1st to 5th Ave irculation Study & redesign of intersection 5 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 3923 The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST 244 SRTS 25 RTAG 15 RTA 252 SRTS 3 RTAG 18 RTA DR DR 1 RTA DR 215 RTA DR 64 PDIFO 34 HURF126 D 9 HURF126 D PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

117 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS cq Treat Ave: Rillito River to Barraza-Aviation Bike Boulevard 5.5 SP12 Treat Ave from Rillito River to Barraza-Aviation Design and onstruct Bike Blvd improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: 9.12 UA 2nd Street Bike and Pedestrian Improvements 2nd Street, from Park to Highland Bike and pedestrian safety improvements AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 16 The sponsor of this project is: cc University/3rd Street Bike Boulevard SP5 7. University and 3rd Street onstruct bike boulevard AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 9 The sponsor of this project is: Valencia Rd: Kolb Rd to Houghton Rd SR Kolb Rd to Houghton Rd Widen to 6 lanes 6 AQ STATUS = Analyzed Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: TOTAL OST 92 RTA 7 STP 33 RTA DR D DR PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTA DR 2 RTA DR 121 RTA 9 DIFO DR Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

118 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID RTAID STREET/PROJET NAME PROPOSED FUNDING SponsorID Length LOATION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) StateID ExistingLanes PROJET DESRIPTION FISAL YEAR FedID AfterLanes AQ STATUS TOTAL OST _f Administrative & Maintenance Facility near Prince & Romero Dr. Design & build new facility ALI AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 55 The sponsor of this project is: Transit _b Bus Replacements itywide Replacement buses ALI AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Transit 2.15 Bus Wash Facility Park and Ajo onstruct new automated bus wash Total ost = 71 AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 45 The sponsor of this project is: Transit 3.15 NG Fueling System NW SunTran NW Facility NG Fueling System AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 85 The sponsor of this project is: Transit _e Houghton / Broadway Park-and-Ride Park and Ride O&M AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Transit Total ost = Marana Transit Services Marana, various locations Transit in services in Marana AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 15 The sponsor of this project is: Transit Transit Services Various locations Replace service formally provided by Pima ounty AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Transit 29 RTA O 29 RTA O 29 RTA O 29 RTA O 29 RTA O 227 LOAL P 1869 LOAL P 191 LOAL P 4421 FTA537 P 5523 FTA537 P 5963 FTA537 P 5332 FTA537 P 5459 FTA537 P 1434 FTA5339 P 1434 FTA5339 P 1434 FTA5339 P 1434 FTA5339 P 1434 FTA5339 P 78 FLEX P 78 FLEX P 78 FLEX P 78 FLEX P 78 FLEX P 1641 LOAL P 1917 LOAL P 36 FTA537 9 LOAL 1684 FTA LOAL 52 RTA O 52 RTA O 52 RTA O 52 RTA O 52 RTA O 89 MOE O 92 MOE O 95 MOE O 98 MOE O 11 MOE O 2161 MOE O 2226 MOE O 2293 MOE O 2362 MOE O 2433 MOE O 1414 RTA O 1456 RTA O 15 RTA O 1545 RTA O 1591 RTA O Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

119 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes 68.3 Preventative Maintenance SunTran & VanTran Provide capital maintenance 11.7A. AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 5 The sponsor of this project is: Transit Safety ertification Training Region wide Training on Safety ertification AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 63 The sponsor of this project is: Transit 64.3 Security for Transit 1% of FTA Apportionment Required Install AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 755 The sponsor of this project is: Transit _j South Transit Services STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS Providing transit services in South AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Transit _b Streetcar Operations Streetcar Route Operations of Modern Streetcar AQ STATUS = Exempt The sponsor of this project is: Transit Total ost = 2897 Total ost = Sun Shuttle OV DAR Bus Replacements Region wide Replace sun shuttles on OV DAR rotues AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 758 The sponsor of this project is: Transit _a Sun Tran - Express Service Expansion Expand existing express routes and add new routes AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1158 The sponsor of this project is: Transit TOTAL OST PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR LOAL O 56 FTA537 O 56 FTA537 O 56 FTA537 O 56 FTA537 O 56 FTA537 O 14 LOAL O 14 LOAL O 14 LOAL O 14 LOAL O 71 FTA537 O 71 FTA537 O 71 FTA537 O 71 FTA537 O 71 FTA537 O 18 LOAL O 18 LOAL O 18 LOAL O 18 LOAL O 18 LOAL O 138 FTA537 O 138 FTA537 O 138 FTA537 O 138 FTA537 O 35 LOAL O 35 LOAL O 35 LOAL O 35 LOAL O 474 RTA O 488 RTA O 53 RTA O 518 RTA O 534 RTA O 2 RTA O 12 RTA O 12 RTA O 12 RTA O 1127 RTA O 34 FTA537 P 31 LOAL P 125 FTA537 P 128 FTA537 P 131 FTA P 9 LOAL P 122 FTA537 P 32 LOAL P 32 LOAL P 33 LOAL P 1632 RTA O 1682 RTA O 1732 RTA O 1784 RTA O 1838 RTA O 278 FTA5311 O 287 FTA5311 O 295 FTA5311 O 34 FTA5311 O 313 FTA5311 O Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

120 Pima Association of Governments Tip Projects Proposed Tip ID SponsorID StateID FedID RTAID Length ExistingLanes AfterLanes STREET/PROJET NAME LOATION PROJET DESRIPTION AQ STATUS TOTAL OST Sun Tran - Weekday Evening Service Expansion Expand weekday evening service along major routes AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Transit Sun Tran - Weekend Service Expansion Expand weekend service along major routes AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = The sponsor of this project is: Transit 27.3 Sun Van Replacement Vans itywide Purchase replacement paratransit vehicles ALI AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 1872 The sponsor of this project is: Transit Sun Van/Paratransit Expansion Expand ADA paratransit services regionwide AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 4456 The sponsor of this project is: Transit 77.8 Support Vehicles - Sun Tran Support vehicles for Sun Tran operations Support vehicles for Sun Tran operations AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 941 The sponsor of this project is: Transit 32.3 Transit Enhancements/ADA itywide 1% of FTA Apportionment AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 755 The sponsor of this project is: Transit Transit Grant Administration Transit Grant Administration ALI AQ STATUS = Exempt Total ost = 2714 The sponsor of this project is: Transit PROPOSED FUNDING (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FISAL YEAR RTA O 2346 RTA O 2417 RTA O 251 RTA O 2592 RTA O 1162 RTA O 1197 RTA O 1233 RTA O 127 RTA O 138 RTA O 1788 FTA537 P 1843 FTA537 P 318 FTA537 P 248 FTA537 P 447 LOAL P 461 LOAL P 795 LOAL P 62 LOAL P 1449 RTA O 1493 RTA O 1538 RTA O 1584 RTA O 1631 RTA O 16 FTA537 P 8 FTA537 P 16 FTA537 P 4 LOAL P 2 LOAL P 4 LOAL P 36 LOAL 36 LOAL 36 LOAL 142 FTA FTA FTA FTA FTA LOAL 36 LOAL 4 LOAL O 16 FTA537 O 16 FTA537 O 16 FTA537 O 16 FTA537 O 16 FTA537 O 4 LOAL O 4 LOAL O 4 LOAL O 4 LOAL O Pima Association of Governments /1/217 APPENDIX 1 - PROPOSED FUNDING

121 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Interstate 19 Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd Transportation Improvement Program 218 Projects Pinal ounty Downtown th St Broadway Blvd Mile Wide Rd Ajo Hwy %&'( 1 MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd Tohono O'odham Nation Schuk Toak District Marana Interstate 1 Sahuaro National Park (West) RYAN AIRFIELD q Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd Pascua Yaqui Tribe Moore Rd Irvington Rd Valencia Rd Mission Rd Tohono O'odham Nation San Xavier District 86.6 Magee Rd South Ina Rd Oracle Rd DMAFB Oro Valley 81.6 Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave TUSON INT'L q Sahuarita Rd Sunrise Dr River Rd Broadway Blvd q 19.6 Speedway Blvd nd St Golf Links Rd atalina Hwy Houghton Rd Old Spanish Tr 6th Ave %&'( 1 22nd St South Redington Rd Sahuaro National Park (East) 83 8 Sonoita Hwy th St E MARSH STATIO Tohono O'odham Nation State Route kj Sells AZ Duval Mine Rd %&'( 19 Sahuarita E BOX ANYON RD 218-TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway onstruction Non-onstruction onstruction Non-onstruction ³ Miles PAG TIP

122 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd Transportation Improvement Program 219 Projects Ajo Hwy %&'( Mile Wide Rd MARANA AIRPORT q Sandario Rd Avra Valley Rd Tohono O'odham Nation Schuk Toak District Interstate 1 Sahuaro National Park (West) RYAN AIRFIELD q Marana 86 Kinney Rd Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd Pascua Yaqui Tribe Tohono O'odham Nation San Xavier District Pinal ounty 62. Moore Rd Irvington Rd Valencia Rd Mission Rd Magee Rd Oracle Rd South Oro Valley Ina Rd Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave TUSON INT'L q South Sunrise Dr River Rd Broadway Blvd 61.6 Downtown DMAFB q 787. Speedway Blvd 22nd St Golf Links Rd %&'( 1 6th Ave atalina Hwy nd St 131. Old Spanish Tr 6th St Broadway Blvd th St Redington Rd Sahuaro National Park (East) Duval Mine Rd Interstate 19 %&'( 19 Sahuarita Sahuarita Rd Houghton Rd 219 -TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway onstruction Non-onstruction onstruction Non-onstruction ³ Miles 838 Sonoita Hwy PAG TIP

123 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd Transportation Improvement Program 22 Projects %&'( 1 Pinal ounty 778 Downtown th St Broadway Blvd 22.5 MARANA AIRPORT q Avra Valley Rd Interstate 1 Marana Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd Moore Rd 87.3 Oro Valley South 6th Ave 47 22nd St th St Magee Rd Ina Rd 2.16 Mile Wide Rd Ajo Hwy Sandario Rd Tohono O'odham Nation Schuk Toak District RYAN AIRFIELD Sahuaro National Park (West) q 8 Kinney Rd Pascua Yaqui Tribe Tohono O'odham Nation San Xavier District 5.12 Irvington Rd Valencia Rd Mission Rd Oracle Rd South ampbell Ave TUSON INT'L q Sunrise Dr River Rd Broadway Blvd DMAFB q Speedway Blvd 22nd St Golf Links Rd atalina Hwy 59.6 %&'( 1 Old Spanish Tr Redington Rd Sahuaro National Park (East) Duval Mine Rd Interstate 19 %&'( 19 Old Nogales Hwy Sahuarita Rd Sahuarita Houghton Rd 22 -TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway onstruction Non-onstruction onstruction Non-onstruction ³ Miles 83 Sonoita Hwy PAG TIP

124 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Interstate 19 Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd Transportation Improvement Program 221 Projects %&'( 1 Pinal ounty 8 77 Downtown 6th St Broadway Blvd 22.5 MARANA AIRPORT q Avra Valley Rd Interstate 1 Marana Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd Moore Rd 87.3 Oro Valley South 6th Ave 22nd St th St Magee Rd Mile Wide Rd Ajo Hwy Sandario Rd Sahuaro National Park (West) Tohono O'odham Nation Schuk Toak District RYAN AIRFIELD q 86 Kinney Rd 8. Pascua Yaqui Tribe Tohono O'odham Nation San Xavier District Irvington Rd Valencia Rd Mission Rd Oracle Rd South Ina Rd Old Nogales Hwy ampbell Ave TUSON INT'L q Sunrise Dr Broadway Blvd DMAFB q River Rd Speedway Blvd 22nd St Golf Links Rd %&'( 19 %&'( 1 atalina Hwy Old Spanish Tr Redington Rd Sahuaro National Park (East) Houghton Rd 83 Duval Mine Rd Sahuarita Sahuarita Rd 221 -TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway onstruction Non-onstruction onstruction Non-onstruction ³ Miles Sonoita Hwy PAG TIP

125 SIERRITA MOUNTAIN RD Interstate 19 Wilmot Rd Kolb Rd Transportation Improvement Program 222 Projects %&'( 1 Pinal ounty 8 77 Downtown 6th St Broadway Blvd MARANA AIRPORT q Avra Valley Rd Interstate 1 Marana Tangerine Rd Twin Peaks Rd Moore Rd 87.3 Oro Valley South 6th Ave 22nd St th St Magee Rd Ina Rd Mile Wide Rd Sandario Rd Sahuaro National Park (West) 3.16 Oracle Rd 81.6 ampbell Ave 55.6 Sunrise Dr River Rd Speedway Blvd atalina Hwy Redington Rd Tohono O'odham Nation Schuk Toak District Ajo Hwy RYAN AIRFIELD q 86 Kinney Rd Pascua Yaqui Tribe Tohono O'odham Nation San Xavier District South Irvington Rd Valencia Rd Mission Rd 131. TUSON INT'L q Old Nogales Hwy Broadway Blvd DMAFB q 22nd St Golf Links Rd %&'( 19 %&'( Old Spanish Tr Sahuaro National Park (East) Houghton Rd 83 Duval Mine Rd Sahuarita Sahuarita Rd 222 -TIP Projects Intersection/Airport Roadway onstruction Non-onstruction onstruction Non-onstruction ³ Miles Sonoita Hwy PAG TIP

126

127 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY APPENDIX 2 Fiscal onstraint Analysis

128 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

129 HISTORIAL TIP REVENUES State HURF Revenues Distributed to PAG Fiscal Year 2.6% Funds 12.6% Funds ,774,982 15,12, ,66,93 14,26, ,568,95 16,519, ,879,583 17,845, ,833,927 18,597, ,844,33 17,544, ,441,679 17,542, ,977,717 19,128, ,78,764 15,94, ,866,177 2,765, ,786,329 22,38, ,534,172* 23,413, ,32,453 19,77, 21 4,14, 17,497, 211 3,771,875 16,572, ,86,898 13,421, ,836,69 16,848, ,959,536 17,622, ,46,123 19,468, ,241,596 2,379,729 Estimated Revenues 217 4,75, 22,5, 218 5,, 22,5, 219 5,25, 23,, 22 5,5, 23,5, 221 5,75, 24,, 222 6,, 24,5, * Includes $2,317,653 of STAN Funding PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

130 Federal STP Funds Distributed to PAG Fiscal Year STP Apportionment Obligation eiling Factor Spendable Resources ,256, ,593, ,22, ,979, ,153, ,316, ,17, ,766, ,47, ,132, ,693, ,17, ,96, ,589, ,61, ,792, ,828, ,399,941 26* 16,152, ,71, ,373, ,862, ,749, ,865, ,286, , ,35, ,35, ,444, ,444, ,444, ,444, ,392, ,69, ,398, ,56, ,398, ,333, ,86, ,955,896 Estimated Revenues 217 2,2, 1. 2,2, ,5, 1. 17,5, ,, 1. 18,, 22 18,5, 1. 18,5, ,5, 1. 18,5, ,5, 1. 18,5, * Totals prior to 26 includes PL and SPR funds PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

131 State Discretionary Funds (a combination of state and federal funding, the amounts shown are the amounts provided for programming.) Fiscal Year Amount provided to PAG area 26 57,94, 27 57,275, 28 96,422,* 29 5,5, 21 67,31, ,4, ,8, ,51, ,835, 215 6,1, ,25, 217 5,9, ,941, ,178, 22 88,3, ,354, ,23, * includes $4,6, and $4,32, in supplemental state discretionary and RABA NOTE: Funding does not include additional State Bond (SB) and State Transportation Needs Acceleration (STAN) funding. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

132 Fiscal onstraint Analysis* ( s) Fund type 2.6% 12.6% PDAF STP HSIP RTA FY217 Balance/arryover 17,266 2, ,354 FY218 Revenues 5, 22, ,5 1,62 13, ,177 FY218 Expenses 13,39 22, ,5 1,62 13, ,6 FY218 Balance/arryover 8,957 2,475 5,931 FY219 Revenues 5,25 23, 15 18, 14, ,97 FY219 Expenses 1,7 24,444 18, 14, ,13 FY219 Balance/arryover 12,57 1, ,771 FY22 Revenues 5,5 24, ,5 14, ,968 FY22 Expenses 23,5 18,5 14, ,717 FY22 Balance/arryover 18, ,22 FY221 Revenues 5,75 24, 15 18,5 14, ,982 FY221 Expenses 7, 24,15 18,5 14, ,199 FY221 Balance/arryover 16, ,85 FY222 Revenues 6, 24, ,5 14, ,911 FY222 Expenses 24,65 18,5 14, ,757 FY222 Balance/arryover 22, ,959 * For financial information about the RTA, please see the RTA annual report PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

133 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY APPENDIX 3 TIP Development Policies

134 Pima Association of Governments Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FY 217 Policies and Procedures Introduction: These Policies and Procedures govern the programming of available regional funds through Pima Association of Government s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Projects that are regionally significant a, regardless of fund source, are required to be included in the TIP document and, as such, portions of the TIP Policies and Procedures apply to those projects as indicated. Additionally, funds associated with the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) are governed by the RTA Memorandums of Policy and the Policy, Objectives and Procedures documents. Goal: To provide consistency in the development of the TIP, which creates a common ground from which everyone can work and to provide consistent and efficient use of the regional funds that complies with all applicable state, federal and other guidelines. Nothing in the TIP Policies and Procedures are intended to contradict or supersede federal rules, the Arizona onstitution or Statutes and/or the RTA Memorandum of Policies (MOPs) or Policies, Objectives and Procedures (POPs). Process: It must be stressed that while the PAG programming process strives for consistency, there are fundamental differences in the role, and associated authority, that PAG has in the programming of federal, state and regional funding. The process tries to balance federal requirements for a performance based planning and programming approach overall. Federal regulations state that Metropolitan Planning Organizations shall develop longrange transportation plans and transportation improvement programs through a performance-driven, outcome-based approach to planning for metropolitan areas of the State. At the same time the enabling legislation for the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) calls for expenditures to be consistent with the RTA plan approved by the voters. Definitions: Policies - for the purposes of this document, refers to the consistent rules to be followed by PAG Staff and the jurisdictional sponsors in developing and implementing the TIP. a As defined by 4 FR Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than an exempt project) that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside of the region, major activity centers in the region, major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, etc., or transportation terminals as well as most terminals themselves) and would normally be included in the modeling of a metropolitan area's transportation network, including at a minimum all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer an alternative to regional highway travel. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

135 Procedure - for the purposes of this document, refers to the set processes that are followed by PAG to develop the TIP, update the TIP and manage the regional program. OWP Overall Work Program. The OWP describes the amount of local, state and federal funds programmed for PAG s operations including how they are used for personnel and outside professional services. HURF Highway User Revenue Fund. TP Transportation Planning ommittee. TP is the PAG committee responsible for development of the TIP document. PAG HURF 12.6% Funds Regional funds that come from the state Highway User Revenue Fund set aside for roadway projects PAG HURF 2.6% Funds Regional funds that come from the state Highway User Revenue Fund set aside for roadway projects on the state system. This fund source is cooperatively programmed with. RTA The Regional Transportation Authority is the government entity that manages the $2.1 billion, 2-year RTA plan, which was approved by voters on May 16, 26. RMAP - Regional Mobility and Accessibility Plan is the region s long-range transportation plan. STBGP Funds Federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program funds. Sometimes abbreviated as STP. STPX known as HURF exchange, this is the practice of trading STP funding for HURF funding with at a 9 percent conversion. urrently the HURF Exchange program has been suspended. RTAG: Regional Transportation Alternatives Grant. The portion of statewideapportionments of Transportation Alternatives funds that are suballocated to the PAG region for programming through a competitive selection process. PDAF Project Development Activity Fund. A set-aside of PAG HURF 12.6% funds used to jumpstart projects by doing the necessary study or preliminary design that prepares projects for construction. HELP Loan - Highway Expansion and Extension Loan Program Severability: If any part of these Policies and Procedures does not apply, due to any reason, including but not limited to federal rules, Arizona Revised Statutes, RTA PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

136 policies, to a given set of circumstances, which does not void their application where possible. ompatibility with Existing Legislation: The Arizona State onstitution and Arizona Revised Statutes are already in place for HURF funds; use and reimbursement requirements remain in place and are not impacted by these Policies and Procedures. Existing federal rules for federal funds use, match and obligation requirements remain in place and are not impacted by these Policies and Procedures. These Policies and Procedures will be administratively updated to reflect changes necessitated by changes in federal regulations. ontinuation: The TIP Policies and Procedures are to remain in effect unless modified by action of the PAG Regional ouncil. Additional guidelines and procedures may be modified, added or deleted by the PAG Executive Director acting upon Regional ouncils policies in lieu of Regional ouncil action. hange in FHWA or FTA policy or regulation may also necessitate revision of these Policies and Procedures. Policies: TIP Development PO1. The TIP shall be fiscally constrained in each individual fund source in each of the first four years of the TIP. The region shall establish a fifth year of the TIP; however, it does not need to be fiscally constrained. PO1.1 Only projects that are consistent with the region s long-range transportation plan, the Regional Mobility and Accessibility Plan (RMAP), are eligible to be in the TIP. PO2. The TIP document shall contain an appendix that provides programming for years six through ten for planning purposes. This appendix will be called the Development Program and will allow the jurisdictions to plan and space out projects. Additionally, FHWA may not obligate federal funding for certain studies or design projects unless the PAG TIP shows funding for the construction of said project, or a portion/phase thereof. PO2.1 While fiscal constraint is not required for the development program, the utility of the planning exercise would be diminished if some level of constraint is not used. Years six through ten of the development program shall be constrained within ten (1) percent of the funding estimates for the fourth year of the TIP. PO2.2 The region is not required to advance projects in the Development Program into the 5 th year of the TIP as part of the TIP development process however provided the sponsoring jurisdiction has been developing the project, advancing these projects should be strongly considered. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

137 PO3. No individual jurisdiction may request more funding in any given year from any individual funding source, including STPX funding, which exceeds the total amount available to the region. PO3.1 Privately funded projects must provide evidence of funding to be included in the TIP. The jurisdiction shall confirm in writing to PAG that the private funding is reasonably expected in the year of expenditure programmed in the TIP. PO Jurisdictions shall confirm in writing that their local match and any other funds necessary to complete the project will be made available within the specified timeframe. PO4. Projects may not appear in the first two years of the TIP unless the phase shown within those years is fully funded. PO4.1 onstruction ( ) projects may not be shown in the first two years of the TIP document unless the project is fully funded. onstruction funds should not be shown in year three of the TIP unless the jurisdiction has an Advanced onstruction plan. The funding set-aside (FS) designation shall be used when a jurisdiction is compiling the necessary funding for a phase. The phase of the project shall be included in the FS designation, e.g. design set-aside funds will be labeled as DFS and construction set-aside as FS. PO4.2 Advanced onstruction (A) funds must be sufficient to complete the construction project and are provided at the sponsor s risk. Reimbursement of A funds in later years of the TIP are to be viewed as tentative commitments and are subject to adjustments based on funding availability and other project priorities. PO5. Non-infrastructure programs should be regional in nature and be included in both the TIP and the OWP. PO5.1 Requests to be included in the OWP shall be made to PAG, in writing by November of the year prior to the funding request. PO5.2 Programmatic funding is not guaranteed; no long term commitments should be made by the jurisdiction beyond the first year of the TIP. PO6. - Should HURF funds not be available for a reimbursement request, reimbursements will be done on a first-come, first-serve basis. PO7. For STP and 12.6% projects in excess of $3 million, jurisdictions over 1, in population may request up to three new projects, and jurisdictions under 1, in population may request one new project annually for consideration. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

138 PO8. Jurisdictions can request additional funds for scope increases for projects already in the TIP if those funds are going toward project elements. Such additions should not be more than 1 percent of the budget beyond the original scope, or $2,, whichever is less. Increases, scope or budget beyond that amount requires a review and approval of the project MOU. PO9. All HELP loan applications require approval from PAG prior to submitting application. PO9.1 HELP loan cost savings shall be returned to the region, however, in certain instances HELP loan cost savings should remain with the jurisdiction they were issued to (e.g. STP HELP loan funds shall remain with the jurisdiction because if they are returned, apportionment does not increase and the ability to use these funds by the region would be gone). These funds are reprogrammed as local funds at the direction of the region. PO9.2 To maintain a paper trail for the regional funds, the reprogramming to another regional TIP project shall be done as an action of the Regional ouncil. PO1 Jurisdictions shall not enter into STPX exchanges or loan agreements if other regional resources are available to take their place. PO11. PAG HURF 2.6% Funds are available to the region to cooperatively program with for projects or studies on the State System. The policies below are unique to this fund source. PO11.1 PAG 2.6% Funds shall be programmed using the existing TIP process. The steps shall include: Jurisdictions requesting 2.6% funding should submit that request during the normal TIP process using the TIP application by the established deadline. PAG will cooperatively review the requests with and jointly develop the Plan recommendation for review at the TP TIP development meeting. PO11.2 PAG HURF 2.6% funding should not be programmed more than two years in advance. PO11.3 Priority for 2.6% funding shall be given to projects that: 1. RTA projects that are on a state facility. 2. Supplement funding for a jurisdictional project that is located on an route or highway. 3. over a local share contribution to an project. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

139 4. Fund additional elements in a state project as requested by the region but that were not part of the original project. The additional elements must be HURF eligible, for example rubberized asphalt. 5. Augment the funding of a state project. 6. Fund a study of a state facility. PO 11.4 PAG HURF 2.6% funds shall be prioritized to keep the RTA related time periods on schedule. Project harters PO12. A Project harter document is required for all RTA roadway element projects while in the project planning phase and must be on file before the project move to final design. Project MOUs PO13. - The purpose of the Transportation Improvement Program Memorandum of Understanding is to ensure that all stakeholders have the same understanding of the project that will be delivered. The jurisdictions will commit to delivering the project as scoped in the MOU. PO In the case of federal funding, the jurisdiction will affirm its understanding that federal funds must be authorized in the year for which they are programmed and will commit to deliver federally-funded projects in the years indicated in the MOU. PO A project will be required to have an MOU in place before funds can be programmed in years 1 or 2 of the TIP. A project sponsor may, at its option, enact an MOU for phases in years 3, 4, or 5. PO Projects that already have an RTA IGA in place are not required to also establish an MOU. The RTA IGA is sufficient in these cases. PO An MOU covering the phase in question will be required prior to any project programming regional funding sources for design, construction, right of way, or operations. Regional funding sources include: HURF 12.6%, HURF 2.6%, STP, RTAG, and HSIP funds. PO A single project can have separate MOUs for each project phase, or, at the discretion of PAG and the sponsoring jurisdiction, a single MOU can be amended each time a new project phase would otherwise require a new MOU. PO Programmatic or non-infrastructure projects will require an amended MOU for each fiscal year in which regional funding has been programmed. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

140 PO An MOU amendment may be required when the scope of work or programmed amounts changes as described herein. An MOU amendment may also be used, at the discretion of PAG and the sponsoring jurisdiction, to add a new phase to an existing MOU. A formal TIP amendment may also be required and will be processed concurrently. PO Substantive changes to the scope that would require an MOU amendment include: hange in project end points resulting in a change to the project length of a quarter mile or more. hange in outcomes, deliverables, or affected jurisdictions or organizations. Addition or elimination of key project features. PO A significant change in funding amount is one that changes the total amount programmed of regional funding sources in the TIP by more than 1% of its original programmed amount, or $2,, whichever is less. PO An MOU amendment will also be required if a change requires all funding to be removed from the current fiscal year, or if the project will be removed from the program entirely. PO An MOU amendment is not required to shift funds between phases, as long as the total amount of programmed funding of that source does not change. Likewise, an MOU amendment is not required for end of year roll-overs. PO The MOU amendment will be reviewed by Regional ouncil prior to PAG approval. The sponsoring jurisdiction can advance the MOU amendment through its own approval process concurrently, if so desired. TIP Amendments PO15. PAG has multiple methods by which the TIP may be amended, see the attached matrix for details. PO16. - A jurisdiction can request an expedited approval of an amendment. Expedited approval involves scheduling the item at either TP or Management, and placing the item on the agenda for Regional ouncil. PO17. Amendments, as required of all TIP projects, may not add projects that are not consistent with the adopted RMAP. PO18. Amendments shall not include project funding beyond the current fiscal year unless needed to maintain fiscal constraint and regional balance. PO18.1 hanges for future fiscal years should only be included as part of the annual TIP development process. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

141 PO19. Amendments may not add capacity-increasing projects unless applicable requirements of the MP are met and an air quality conformity analysis is run for the region that includes the proposed project. PO19.1 Amendments that impact the conformity analysis (capacity projects that must be modeled) require the same public notice and opportunity for comment as the original TIP document. PO19.2 Due to the nature of the modeling process, an amendment that requests a new capacity-increasing project will not have the ability to be expedited. Jurisdictions are asked to plan ahead accordingly. PO19.3 For the purposes of these Policies and Procedures, a capacity increasing project is defined as one that adds an additional vehicular travel lane one mile or more per the MP. Turn lanes, road widening (without adding additional travel lanes), bicycle, pedestrian and transit projects are not, for the purposes of this policy, considered capacity increasing. PO2 Amendments must maintain fiscal constraint by fund type and by year. PO21. Excess regional funds that are not required to complete the original or approved scope of the project will be returned to the regional fund balance for reprogramming to other projects. PO21.1 Reprogramming of returned funds shall go through the regular TIP process. PO21.2 Once a jurisdiction is aware of excess funding on a project they should contact PAG with the approximate time frame of the return and funding amount. PO21.3 PAG staff will notify all jurisdictions of the returned funds in an that will serve as a supplemental call for projects. The shall include: the type and amount of funding, the approximate time frame the funding will become available, any deadlines associated with the spending or obligation of the funding, deadline for applications requesting the funding, the day/time of the PAG meeting where the reprogramming of those funds will occur. PO21.4 Jurisdiction returning the funds shall be required to follow the same process as all the other jurisdictions requesting the returned funds. Regional Priorities PO22. Regional planning and programming are dependent on responding to a variety of different factors (e.g. land use, populations, environment and economic) that PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

142 require an understanding of current priorities. The PAG programming process should be consistent with established Regional ouncil or RTA Board priorities. PO22.1 urrent established priorities include: 1 - Payments for HELP Loans for work already completed. 2 RTA orridor projects already under construction to complete work included in the scope of work described in the voter approved RTA ballot 3- RTA orridor projects within two (2) years of the period deadline by which construction was mandated to be started per the RTA ballot language, provided that the funds needed are for work described in the voter approved RTA ballot. 4- Non RTA projects that are already under construction in need of additional funds to complete the original scope of work. 5- Payments for Jurisdictionally bonded projects that are payments for work already completed. 6 RTA corridor projects already in the adopted TIP. 7- Non RTA projects already in the adopted TIP. 8- Major RTA categorical projects, intersections for example, that are in need of additional funding. 9 New regional projects. Procedures: TIP Development PR1. Annually, during the month of August, PAG staff shall work to develop the fund estimate for the upcoming TIP document. Development of these estimates shall be done in conjunction with FHWA and the State of Arizona. These estimates shall reconcile previous estimates vs. actual revenues, if available for previous years, as well as determine estimates for the out year of the upcoming TIP. PR2. Annually, PAG staff shall present the fund estimate outlined in PR1. to TP for their concurrence. PAG staff shall adjust the estimates based on the recommendations of the TP as appropriate for the development of the annual all for Projects. The fund estimates should be in concurrence with s estimates. TP may utilize a limited duration task force or subcommittee to hold a special meeting to go over the funding estimates in detail. PR2.1 Annually, PAG shall reserve up to 1 percent of the estimated HURF 12.6% funds available for the current fiscal year as a contingency. Establishment of this contingency fund will allow the region to assist jurisdictions with projects in construction to cover any cost overruns or unforeseen circumstances. It should be stressed that the intent of the contingency fund is for jurisdictions to provide estimates for projects they are developing that are not overly conservative. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

143 PR2.2 The contingency is not intended to increase the scope of a project beyond what is outlined and agreed upon in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the project. PR3. Annually, on or about September 1, PAG staff shall make available the all for Projects, which outlines the funds available over the next five years that cover the upcoming TIP period, by fund source. PR3.1 - The fund sources included in the all for Projects may include: STP, RTA ategorical funds, HURF 12.6%, HURF 2.6%, STPX (HURF Exchange), HURF PDAF, the region s available HELP Loan Balance, and any other regional funds determined to be specifically available to the region. Specific fund sources that require a competitive selection process may be included in the all for Projects. However, that competitive process will follow separate grant selection requirements (see PR 6.1). PR3.2 The all for Projects will include the Year of Expenditure (YOE) factor to be used in the calculation of expenditures anticipated in future years of the TIP. PR3.3 The all for Projects shall include the due date to receive funding requests from the project sponsors. PR3.4 PAG shall make available, as attachments or Web postings, all of the necessary forms associated with the all for Projects. PR3.5 The all for Projects will provide direction on current regional priorities as set by the PAG Regional ouncil/rta Board. PR4. Annually, each project sponsor shall submit a status update of all current, programmed and requested projects, which shall include a report on progress towards RMAP performance targets. PAG shall distribute a spreadsheet to each jurisdiction with its TIP projects and programs listed by TIP ID number. Information requested shall include: project cost estimate, source and date of that estimate, project status and an estimated (month/year) of project start and completion. The request shall contain the date the completed status report is due back, to PAG. PR4.1 At this time status of MOUs will be noted. PR4.2 Each project sponsor will submit its funding requests with its own prioritized ranking by fund source based on its own priority system for new projects. Project applications may only be submitted to PAG by the jurisdiction s TP representative. Applications submitted by other jurisdictional personnel will not be considered during the programming process. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

144 PR4.3 Because of the implementation of performance measures in federal legislation, it should be noted regional performance measure requirements may take precedence over jurisdictional priorities. PR5. Prior to the TIP development, Staff shall review the status of RTA projects in the current and next period with the project sponsors and identify any opportunities to supplement RTA funding. Outcomes of that review should be reflected in the project sponsor s funding requests. PR5.1 Non-federalized RTA projects should remain non-federalized to maximize regional funding. For example, HURF funds should be considered to supplement non-federalized RTA projects. PR5.2 Federalized RTA projects should maximize the utilization of STP, RTAG, and HSIP funding as opportunities arise, provided obligation deadlines can be accommodated. onsideration should be given to entering into Advance onstruction Agreements, in order to efficiently use the region s entire federal obligation authority. PR5.3 Should STP funding be in jeopardy of not meeting obligation deadlines, the TP shall investigate flexing those STP funds to transit projects, provided that a like amount of RTA funds that would otherwise be committed to RTA transit projects is returned to the RTA to be utilized where it is needed most to keep the RTA plan on schedule or for corridor or categorical projects. PR6. After project applications have been submitted in response to the all for Projects, PAG staff will develop a matrix of project applications and their corresponding impacts on the congestion management process and performance measures. PR6.1 Federal grants that have been identified to be programmed competitively will have a few additional steps to ensure, to the extent practicable, that there is separation between agencies/individuals that are developing the selection criteria, applying for the grant, and making grant award recommendations. PR6.1.1 The competitive selection criteria shall be developed by PAG staff based on federal guidance, applicable performance measures and regional priorities as defined by the PAG Regional ouncil/rta Board. Projects not consistent with these priorities will be returned to the sponsoring agency for revision and will not be considered in the programming process. PR6.1.2 A competitive selection panel may be formed by PAG staff from the existing membership of appropriate PAG committees or subcommittees. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

145 PR Members of the competitive selection panel must not have a conflict of interest, defined for these purposes as: Employed by a jurisdiction that is sponsoring an application Employed by public/private entity that has worked on the project application. Employed by, or has an interest in, a public/private entity that is a sub-contractor or sub-recipient of the requested grant funds. Directly or indirectly benefit as a recipient or subrecipient of the project/program. PR6.1.3 The final recommendation(s) of the selection panel will be forwarded to the TP for inclusion in the draft project list. While TP can alter the recommendation of the panel, it should do so only after giving great weight to the findings of the panel. PR6.1.4 While great weight is given to the recommendation(s) of the panel, it is ultimately the PAG Regional ouncil that makes funding/programming decisions for the region. PR6.2 At the discretion of the PAG Executive Director additional fund sources or types of projects may also follow a compatible competitive process to gather additional input from subject matter experts. PR6.3 Technical related projects may be assigned by PAG staff to the appropriate subcommittee to work through the recommendation process. PR7. The Transportation Planning ommittee is the committee tasked with development of a draft project list. TP may need to hold three special meetings during the TIP development if they do not address these issues during the normally scheduled TP meeting: a meeting to review/develop fund estimates (PR2.), another meeting to provide technical review of the matrix, and a meeting to develop the draft project list. TP may utilize a limited duration task force or subcommittee to conduct these special meetings. PR7.1 TP will review the Performance Measure matrix prior to the TIP Development Meeting. Based on the technical knowledge and expertise of those reviewing the matrix, the performance measure scores may be adjusted, if necessary. PR8. TIP Development Meeting. The TP shall meet annually to develop the draft TIP. The time, day, and duration of the meeting(s) is at their discretion. PR8.1 TP shall review the project matrix populated with each project application and its impact on regional performance measures. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

146 PR8.2 New projects submitted for consideration in the new TIP shall include a TIP riteria form. These forms are used to objectively compare competing projects for the limited available funding. PR8.2.1 The ongestion Management Process (MP), which is required by federal regulation, shall be incorporated into the project selection process. onsideration of congestion mitigation strategies shall be included as part of the TIP application process for capacity-increasing projects. However, congestion mitigation strategies also will be considered for inclusion as part of non-capacity increasing TIP projects when appropriate. PR8.3 After reviewing the funding available, by fiscal year and fund source, TP shall review the funding requests made by fiscal year. PR8.4 Fiscal constraint must be achieved in the first four years of the TIP by fund source. PR8.4.1 Projects that are not programmed in the first five years of the TIP will be placed in years 6-1 of the development program. PR8.4.2 Additional adjustments may need to be made to the development program to maintain the appropriate fiscal constraint. PR8.4.3 Projects and programs included in the development program do not automatically move forward each year; status of the project development and jurisdictional priorities will dictate its location in the development program. PR9. January 1 is the deadline for finalizing the proposed project list. PR9.1 The proposed project list will be reviewed by Management ommittee and Regional council at their January meetings. PR1 Once a proposed project list has been drafted, it will be modeled for air quality conformity and Title VI compliance. PR11. - Development of draft TIP materials shall be scheduled so that TIP public open house(s) to review the proposed project list and the results of the TIP modeling process can occur in March. PR12. After development of the draft TIP, PAG is required to hold at least one open house to solicit public comment. After review of the public comments, TP shall finalize the draft TIP which shall be noticed for a 3-day public comment period while it concurrently moves through the PAG committee process. Both the Public omment PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

147 period and the PAG committee process shall culminate in a PAG Regional ouncil meeting where the TIP is properly noticed for adoption. The Regional ouncil meeting should take place in May or June, prior to the end of the fiscal year, June 3. PR13. Funding resources that are designed to accelerate projects, such as HELP loans, shall not be programmed in the TIP, just the re-payment of these resources, to avoid double counting of regional funds. Memorandums of Understanding PR 14. In April of each year, PAG will identify projects that will require an MOU prior to adoption of the following year s TIP. In general, projects identified will be those that will be in year 2 of the next TIP and are beginning a new project phase, or have not yet been programmed with regional funds. PR At the discretion of PAG, a project that is beginning a new project phase can amend its existing MOU, instead of drafting a separate MOU. PR As part of the annual TIP roll over meetings, the sponsors of the identified projects will submit a detailed scope of work, as outlined in the MOU template. At this time, programmed amounts will be estimates based on current revenue estimates. These amounts may be adjusted later at the TIP Development Meeting. PR 16. Using the submitted scopes of work, PAG will draft MOUs for all identified projects. Draft MOUs will be sent to the project sponsors at the same time as the all for Projects. PR The sponsors of the identified projects will submit comments on the draft MOUs, along with their new project applications. The due date for these comments will be the same due date as the new project applications. PR17.1 If a jurisdiction submits a project application for a project to be inserted directly into years 1 or 2 of the TIP, the project application will include a Scope of Work. PAG staff will use the SOW to draft an MOU for the project, but will not submit the MOU to the jurisdiction for review and approval until and unless the project is selected for inclusion in the TIP at the TIP Development Meeting. PR The TIP Development Meeting will refine revenue projections and adjust programmed project amounts as needed, including those projects in years 1 or 2 of the draft TIP and/or those otherwise requiring an MOU. These adjustments will be made to the draft MOUs. PR18.1 The TIP Development Meeting may result in projects being added directly to years 1 or 2 of the TIP. Jurisdictions will have already submitted scopes of work for these projects, and once they are selected for inclusion in the TIP, PAG staff will submit the previously-prepared draft MOU for jurisdictional review and approval. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

148 PR Based on comments and corrections from the Jurisdictions, PAG will prepare a final MOU for the jurisdictions final approval. The signed MOUs must be in place by the day of the February TP meeting. If there are outstanding MOUs at that time, the TP may, at its discretion, remove a project from the draft TIP. If funds are removed from a project, those funds will be re-programmed as part of the February TP meeting. At the discretion of the committee, the reprogramming of HURF 12.6% and HURF 2.6% may be delayed until the TIP Development Meeting the following year. However, any deprogrammed federal funds (STP, RTAG, HSIP) must be reprogrammed at this time. PR19.1 If projects of regional significance are removed from the proposed project list, PAG staff will re-model the new proposed project list as soon as possible. PR 2 - The PAG regional council will approve the MOUs prior to the start of the TIP Public omment Period. If there are outstanding MOUs at that time, the Regional ouncil may, at its discretion, remove the project(s) that do not have MOUs in place. TIP Amendments PR21. When a TIP amendment is requested by a jurisdiction, PAG staff will first determine if the request follows PAG policies that govern TIP amendments. If so, the request will be presented at the next TP meeting for a vote. If the nature of a TIP amendment request is such that time is of the essence, a jurisdiction can request an expedited approval. PR21.1 If the nature of the request falls within the parameters of an administrative amendment, the PAG Executive Director may, at his/her discretion, administratively approve the amendment. PR21.2 If the request cannot be done administratively, a proposed amendment can be scheduled on the agenda for the next TP or Management committee meeting. If no meetings are scheduled and there is an urgent need, a special TP meeting could be called prior to Regional ouncil to discuss the amendment, provided that the TP special meeting is properly noticed and a quorum is present. PR Ensuring that the policies are complied with is the responsibility of PAG staff and all committee members. However, individual jurisdiction requests may at times require an exception be made to one or more policies. Having a robust and wellmanaged set of policies on how to deal with requested exceptions allows the committee(s) to be proactive, rather than reactive, when it comes to compliance management. PR Following any proposed new TIP funding request(s) or amendment(s) to an already approved TIP, PAG staff shall conduct a compliance review in PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

149 advance of any TP meeting scheduled to consider the request(s) and to present compliance management considerations for the committee s discussion. PR 22.2 Upon completion of compliance management review, any individual funding request that requires an exception to established policy, procedures or manner for inclusion in the TIP shall require a waiver request by the jurisdiction s Management ommittee representative. PAG staff will seek Management ommittee's review and recommendation prior to the request being considered by other committees or the Regional ouncil. The Transportation Planning ommittee (TP) is a technical advisory committee of the RTA Technical Management ommittee (TM) and PAG Management ommittee. The RTA Technical Management ommittee or the PAG Management ommittee may wish to seek input from TP prior to making a recommendation. Special TP Meetings PR23. Deadlines associated with different fund sources necessitate special TP meetings to be held from time to time. Special meetings can be called by PAG staff or the TP committee hair. PR23.1 If the nature of the special meeting is to develop a draft work product, neither notice nor quorum is required. No action may be taken at these working meetings. PR23.2 If action is anticipated to be taken by the committee, the meeting shall be properly noticed with the posting of an agenda within the time period specified by the Open Meeting Law. Payments and Obligations PR24. Regional HURF funds are provided on a reimbursement basis. Thus, if funds appear in the current year of the TIP, a jurisdiction may proceed with the project and submit billings for reimbursement. Federal funds also are provided on a reimbursement basis and projects must first comply with all federal requirements prior to funding. PR24.1 HURF 12.6% funds are reimbursed by submitting a completed drawdown request to PAG, including documentation of work performed. After PAG review/concurrence, the request can either be sent back to the jurisdiction for further explanation/documentation, adjusted by PAG to reflect eligible cost items only or forwarded to for payment. PR24.2 Federal STP reimbursements work differently. A jurisdiction must obligate federal funds before the work starts for design, right-of-way and construction activities. Obligate means PAG and FHWA authorizes the federal funds and moves them from a general PAG account into a project specific account. The jurisdictions then receive reimbursement from that project specific account. onstruction obligation cannot occur until the project plans are PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

150 completed and the PS&E submittal has been approved. This requires all necessary clearances for Right-of-Way, Environmental, Utilities, Railroad, etc. PR Due to the cost and scope of some large infrastructure projects, there will be occasions when a project sponsor needs to obligate more federal funding for a project than is available in the current fiscal year. A jurisdiction may obligate the available funds in the current fiscal year and then obligate the remaining amount(s) in subsequent fiscal year(s). Before the project begins, the sponsoring jurisdiction shall enter into an agreement with or FHWA, known as an "advanced construction agreement, which outlines the estimated total cost of the project and the schedule for subsequent obligations. Within the agreement, the sponsor acknowledges that they are starting the project at "their own risk" as future federal fund availability cannot be guaranteed. PR24.3 For HURF projects, drawdown requests will not be processed if the request does not agree with the scope or budget provided in the MOU. PR24.4 For STP projects, obligations and/or additional obligations will not be supported if the obligation request does not agree with the scope or budget provided in the MOU. PR24.5 For federally funded projects, project closeout follows federal procedure. For RTA and regionally funded HURF projects, jurisdictions should inform RTA and PAG staff when a project is substantially completed and develop a schedule for when the final invoice from the contractor will be processed and the project closed. Additional billings associated with utility bills, staff time, and warranty inspections are considered to be the responsibility of the sponsor and are ineligible for reimbursement. See RTA Policies, Objectives and Procedures (POPs) for specific RTA policies related to the project closeout process. PR25. Federal funds typically become available on an annual basis. The region needs to work cooperatively to make sure that obligations for the coming year are identified early so that no Federal funds are lost because they were not obligated in a timely fashion. PR26. - If a project using Federal funds in the current fiscal year is not ready to obligate, the sponsoring jurisdiction shall notify PAG immediately so that other plans to obligate those funds can be made. PR26.1 If a jurisdiction fails to notify PAG in a timely fashion, and no later than July 1 of that federal fiscal year, and if the federal obligation authority is lost, the jurisdiction in question may be required to make the region whole by providing an amount equal to those lost funds for that project with jurisdictional funds. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

151 PR26.2 Excess obligation of federal funds also may require making the region whole. Jurisdictions should only obligate the amount of federal funds that will be needed for the project, as excess funds must be de-obligated later. De-obligated funds must be re-obligated within the same federal fiscal year in which they were de-obligated or they will be lost. In addition, they will count against the current year s Obligation Authority (OA), meaning the original year of obligation s OA is lost. PR27. Projects showing no progress or activity for five (5) years may be removed from the TIP and the funds reprogrammed. Federal funds in the first two years of the TIP must demonstrate progress towards obligation (completed clearances, approved construction drawings, etc.) in order to avoid losing the funding to the region (see PR26). PR27.1 For obligated funds, federal rules will dictate if previously expended funds would need to be repaid to the region if a project is removed from the TIP or canceled. PR27.2 For regional HURF funds, the expectation is that a jurisdiction may be required to repay any already expended funds if a project is removed from the TIP or not completed per the MOU. PR28. A jurisdiction may appeal to the Management ommittee to have regional HURF repayments waived. The Management ommittee may recommend cancelling the regional HURF project because of extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the jurisdiction. Repayment of federal STP funds previously received for a canceled project cannot be waived. PR29. When a jurisdiction no longer needs funding for a project, they need to notify PAG that the funds are available for reprogramming. PR The TIP is a financial document and even if a project has not yet received its certificate of completion, but the billing activities have significantly ceased, the expectation is that the jurisdiction will notify PAG and return any unused funding. It is acceptable for a jurisdiction to maintain an appropriate amount of funding for landscape establishment remembering that this amount needs to continue in the TIP as it is the mechanism for which the funds can be drawn. PR Within 3 days of bid acceptance, the jurisdiction shall notify PAG and return bid savings funds to the region. Jurisdictions are encouraged to maintain within the project contract an appropriate contingency fund not to exceed 1%. PR Once regional STP funds get obligated to a project, the region has no way of tracking closeout or landscape establishment. When unused STP funds PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

152 are returned to the region after project closeout, the OA must be used in the year it was returned, or it is lost to the region. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

153 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY APPENDIX 4 Public Notices

154 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

155 The following notices were published in print and electronic media during the TIP development process. The Arizona Daily Star Sunday, March 26, 217 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

156 The Arizona Bilingual March 217 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY

157 PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY Bus Posters on SunTran Busses March 217

158 The Arizona Daily Star April 17, 217 PUBLI NOTIE Pima Association of Governments (PAG), the metropolitan planning organization in, is accepting public comments on the proposed FY Transportation Improvement Program, or TIP. The program is a federally mandated capital improvement program of regional transportation projects. It identifies priorities for national, state and local roadways; transit or bus services; aviation, bike and pedestrian facilities; as well as programs such as Sun Rideshare and Transportation Alternatives. The program is updated each year to identify new projects proposed by local and state governments and regional transportation providers. The program also provides a general description of the projects, their funding sources, the agency implementing each project and a general project schedule. PIMA ASSOIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TIP FY