Recent Activities of ANSN Steering Committee and Topical Group on EPR

Transcription

1 Regional Workshop on Observing a Nuclear Emergency Response Exercise of a Local Government Hokkaido, Japan; 7-10 October 2013 Recent Activities of ANSN Steering Committee and Topical Group on EPR OKUNO Hiroshi Coordinator of IAEA/ANSN/EPRTG

2 Background and Objectives of ANSN There is a strong need of nuclear safety Capacity Building and Infrastructure Development in Asia to establish robust scientific and technological expertise as well as practical problem solving expertise to support dynamic development of nuclear programmes in the region. The Asian Nuclear Safety Network (ANSN) was launched in 2002 as a strong human and advanced IT network to pool, analyse and share nuclear safety knowledge and practical experience in Asia. The ANSN provides a Member States-driven platform with support of the IAEA for facilitating sustainable regional cooperation on continuously improving nuclear safety Capacity Building and Infrastructure Development in Asia to meet challenges of dynamically developing nuclear power programmes October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 2

3 Structure of Asian Nuclear Safety Network (ANSN) Plenary Steering Committee Capacity Building Management Group (CBMG) Topical Groups (TGs) Topical Groups (TGs) Education and Training (ETTG) Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPRTG) Governmental and Regulatory Infrastructure (GRITG) Operational Safety of Nuclear Power Plants (OSTG) Radioactive Waste Management (RWMTG) Safety Analysis (SATG) Safety Management of Research Reactors (SMRRTG) Siting (STG) Communication (new CTG) Leadership and Management for Safety of Regulatory Bodies (new LMSTG) The ANSN currently has 10 Topical Groups (TGs). The ANSN TGs are the forefront of the ANSN activities for capacity building and nuclear safety infrastructure development. ITSG 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 3

4 16th Steering Committee Meeting Date: November 2012 Place: Quezon-City, Philippines Participants: 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency 4

5 Topics of 16th Steering Committee Meeting Plan for the Revision of Vision 2020 Approval of the draft Terms of Reference of Capacity Building Management Group Technical tour to Bataan Nuclear Power Plant 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 5

6 17th Steering Committee Meeting Date: April 2013 Place: Vienna, Austria Participants: Steering Committee members from Bangladesh, China, France, Germany, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, U.S.A, Vietnam Representative from ENSTTI (European Nuclear Safety Training and Tutoring Institute), Coordinator of CBMG (Capacity Building Management Group), Coordinator of PReSA (Peer Review and Support Arrangement), ANSN Programme Management Officers (PMO), ANSN Scientific Secretary and other IAEA technical officers 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 6

7 Topics of 17th Steering Committee Meeting Inclusion of Russian Federation as a Supporting state for ANSN Discussion on revision of the ANSN Vision Discussion on how to proceed with CBMG work Self-assessment based on SSG-16 Establishing a new topical group for Radiation Safety 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 7

8 Background Information on ANSN/EPRTG The Topical Group on Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPRTG) started in The EPRTG is in the 2nd year of the 3rd phase. The members and EPRTG activities have been more or less affected by the Fukushima Accident October 2013 Activities of ANSN/EPRTG 8

9 Activities of ANSN/EPRTG in 2013 Period Place Event June 1-4 October 7-10 October Hanoi, Vietnam Chiba, Japan Sapporo, Japan WS on Optimization of Radiation Emergency Preparedness and Response Annual Meeting of ANSN/EPRTG; WS on Medical Response to Radiological Emergency Handling Complex Situations WS on Observing Nuclear Emergency Exercise of Local Government 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 9

10 Regional Workshop on Optimization of Radiation Emergency Preparedness and Response Date: June 2013 Place: Hanoi, Vietnam Participants: 22 from Australia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, The Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and the IAEA 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 10

11 Regional Workshop on Optimization of Radiation Emergency Preparedness and Response (1) Lectures from the IAEA Radiobiological Basis of Modern Radiation Protection Framework of Emergency Preparedness and Response International Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response to Radiation Emergency Strategy for Protection of the Public in Radiation Emergency Optimization of Protection of the Public and Environment Optimization of Protection of the Emergency Workers 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 11

12 Regional Workshop on Optimization of Radiation Emergency Preparedness and Response (2) Participant presentations Optimization of radiation emergency preparedness and response following Fukushima: lessons learned From Japan and Korea Optimization and harmonization of radiation emergency preparedness and response with other non-radiation emergencies From Australia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, and Vietnam Discussion to propose actions for optimization of EPR at a regional level ---> next slide 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 12

13 Proposed Actions for Optimization of EPR at a Regional Level (1) Integrate all radiation monitoring networks. Provide atmospheric transport modeling training to the region to learn how to do plume modeling and to know when to use it, mostly for planning purposes. Develop a regional database of capabilities for intra-regional cooperation. Establish points of contact in the region for normal and emergency situations. Adopt IAEA safety standards on a regional basis, for compatibility and harmonization, waiting for GSR part 7 to be published October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 13

14 Proposed Actions for Optimization of EPR at a Regional Level (2) Use or enhance mechanisms for the coordination and integration of non-nuclear emergency management agencies on a regional level. This is based on the IAEA recommendation to integrate nuclear and radiological emergency plans with other emergency plans. Harmonize the way exercises are conducted on a regional level. Conduct regional exercises, integrating all organizations that must respond to a nuclear or radiological emergency. Adopt a common regional language for information sharing. Conduct joint regional training at all levels. Establish a joint strategy for educating the public about radiation emergencies. This should be coordinated with the Communication Topical Group October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 14

15 Annual Meeting of ANSN/EPRTG 1. Response to Fukushima Accident 2. Self-evaluation based on IAEA's nuclear safety infrastructure guide, SSG Progress achieved in EPR 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 15

16 Response to Fukushima Accident The process used by the IAEA to collect information from Japan and post it on ENAC was very helpful to ANSN Member States. During an emergency, all personnel are so busy that information exchange is often the unfortunate victim of other priorities, and suggested that Identifying a coordinator for information exchange could be a way to address this issue. Posting all monitoring results on the Member State s own website would also be a useful step in improving information exchange. However, the need to standardize units and monitoring data presentation was identified as an important element in effective information sharing between Member States. The frequency and method of measurements should also be harmonized and optimized to avoid undue effort and resources (taking into account individual needs and socio-political contexts). A hope to receive more up-to-date information from the IAEA during emergencies. A need for international guidance on contamination levels for imported goods October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 16

17 Self-evaluation based on IAEA's Nuclear Safety Infrastructure Guide: SSG-16 A better guidance similar to those for ISE is needed on how to complete the assessment. SSG-16 EPR questions should be revised to be more complete October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 17

18 Progress Achieved in Emergency Preparedness and Response (1) Vietnam presented the schedule for the construction of the first NPPs. The regulatory body has already received the site application dossier and is reviewing it. Approval is expected to be delayed by about two years. Regulations are being developed. In EPR, Vietnam is in the process of developing the plans. The national plan is expected to be completed in The action plan for was also presented. Thailand explained that the government has not yet decided to establish an NPP and therefore focuses on EPR threat categories III, IV and V. Thailand has developed a National Nuclear And Radiological Emergency Plan and an Integral Operational Disaster Plan For Nuclear And Radiological Disasters. A national radiation-monitoring network has been established and includes underwater detectors at strategic locations. Thailand plans to conduct a national radiation emergency exercise in 2014, based on a research reactor emergency, to take place in Bangkok October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 18

19 Progress Achieved in Emergency Preparedness and Response (2) The Philippines have a new law for the coordination of disaster management. The emergency management framework is allhazard. The Incident Command System is in the process of being implemented pursuant to a 2012 Circular. The presentation described in detail the national emergency management framework. There is a plan to conduct a national exercise within two or three years. Malaysia is currently considering embarking on an NPP programme but has not formally declared its intention. The national nuclear emergency team structure, centres, systems and equipment were described. Malaysia presented the results of their self-assessment, showing that most requirements are met but that improvements are required in some areas October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 19

20 Progress Achieved in Emergency Preparedness and Response (3) In Korea, due to the large number of nuclear and radiological facilities, they have adopted a graded approach to EPR, covering all threat categories. The national EPR structure was presented. In Korea, off-site emergency operations centres are located outside the UPZ. Major EPR decisions are made at the national level. Local governments execute national instructions. The exercise programme was described; it follows a multi-level, graded approach. The restructuring of the regulatory organization in Japan was presented; it includes more independence, more integration and a revised emergency management structure. The new strategy on the implementation of urgent protective actions was also discussed and reflects the IAEA guidance on the subject. Japan has also developed OILs, which are an adaptation of the ones recommended by the IAEA October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 20

21 Progress Achieved in Emergency Preparedness and Response (4) Indonesia s presentation demonstrated that the State is well advanced in the preparation of threat assessment, emergency response plans and supporting procedures for emergency worker protection and medical response. It also identified challenges for which efforts are in progress. The plan remains to have an NPP in operation in However, the plan is pending a final decision on the embarking programme. The global nuclear EPR system was described. It was pointed out that the organizational structure changes depending on the nature of the nuclear or radiological emergency. Bangladesh s presentation focused on the response to the Fukushima accident and provided details on the sampling, measurements and analysis results. A description of the Nuclear Control and Safety Act was also provided, including the regulatory infrastructure related to the EPR programme. The results of the self-evaluation indicate that Bangladesh takes the development of an EPR infrastructure seriously and has taken some positive steps in that direction. Programmes and procedures remain to be implemented October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 21

22 Progress Achieved in Emergency Preparedness and Response (5) Australia provided a brief update on the status of reviews of the OPAL (Open Pool Australian Light water research reactor) safety, security and EPR reviews, recognizing that EPR is the area that ties safety and security together. Exercise requirements and programmes were presented; they cover a broad range of EPR functional requirements. Australia also stated that they intend to invite an EPREV for October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 22

23 Regional Workshop on Medical Response to Radiological Emergency Handling Complex Situations Date: 1-4 October 2013 Place: National Institute of Radiation Sciences (NIRS), Chiba, Japan Participants: 29 from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, The Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam and the IAEA 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 23

24 Lectures from NIRS Basic items; some including case reports from Fukushima accident Radiation emergency medicine Biological effects of ionizing radiation Health effects of radiation (acute and late effects) Dose assessment of internal/external exposure Dose assessment cytogenetic analysis 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 24

25 Lectures/Practice from NIRS Practical items; including case reports from Fukushima accident Medical management on-site in a radiation emergency Hospital management for handling accidentally exposed/contaminated patients Practice Body-surface screening with a GM counter Handling of contaminated patient at hospital 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 25

26 Lessons-Learned Lectures from NIRS, KIRAMS, IAEA and JAEA TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident Tokai-mura criticality accident [n and γ radiations] Accidents about internal contamination of Polonium [α radiation] Goiania accident Accidents in Peru and Chile 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 26

27 Discussion based on Presentation from Each Country and ANSN/EPRTG Medical preparedness and response on radiation emergency; before and after Fukushima Education about radiation emergency medicine Capacity building and support from foreign country on radiation emergency medicine Involvement of ANSN for capacity building in the field of medical response to radiological emergencies 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 27

28 Planned Activity of ANSN/EPRTG in 2014 Period Place Event?? Australia or Indonesia Malaysia or Japan WS on public awareness and communication related to a nuclear or radiological emergency Annual Meeting of ANSN/EPRTG; WS on long-term issues following a nuclear emergency 7-10 October 2013 Regional WS on Observation of Nuclear Emergency Exercise 28

29 Members of ANSN/EPRTG Country Family / First Name Affiliation Australia Mr. SOLOMON, Stephen ARPANSA Bangladesh Dr. Md. Mamunur, Rashid BAEC, Dhaka Indonesia Mr. Syahrir, BATAN Indonesia Mr. SUHARYANTA, BAPETEN Japan Mr. ITOYA, Seihiro JNES Japan Mr. Okuno, Hiroshi JAEA Korea Mr. KWON, Jeong Wan KINS Malaysia Mr. MOHD ALI, Hamrah AELB Malaysia Mr. IDROSE, Alzamani bin Mohammad Hospital Kuala Lumpur Philippines Mr. LEONIN, Teofilo V. PNRI Philippines Mr. BACAREZA, Joseph B. Bureau of Fire Protection Philippines Dr. RIVERA, Arnel Z. Department of Health Philippines Ms. CASERIA, Estrella S. PNRI Thailand Mr. SAIYUT, Kittiphong OAP Vietnam Mr. NGUYEN, Hao Quang VARANS Vietnam VUONG, Thu Bac VINATOM 1-4 October 2013 Activities of ANSN/EPRTG 29