Research Administrators Network (RAN) Meeting Agenda

Transcription

1 Research Administrators Network (RAN) Meeting Agenda September 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. Michigan League Ballroom Welcome Special for this meeting: Sit with other administrators with similar years of experience. Look to signs on the tables for your designated area when you enter the room. Table signs will guide seating at years of experience from: Less than 1 year, 1-5 years, 6-10 years, 11+ years Updates ORSP Update Craig Reynolds (10 minutes) RA Schools/Colleges Update (PDF) Cathy Seay-Ostrowski (10 minutes) Update on Proposed PAF Changes re: Biosafety and other Compliance Areas (PDF) Lori Deromedi (10 minutes) Sponsored Programs Update Thom Madden (10 minutes) Networking Session Putting the N back into RAN (PDF) RAAC Training Subcommittee (20 minutes)

2 New Directions in Michigan Communications United We Brand (PDF) Steve Busch, UM Brand Manager, VP Communication (15 minutes) University of Michigan Public Service Announcement (Video - 60 secs) The University of Michigan Office of Research (and Beyond) (PDF) David Lampe, Executive Director Strategic Communication, UMOR (15 minutes) Web Tools for Faculty - University Development: Foundation Relations (PDF) Maureen Martin, Executive Director, Foundation Relations (15 minutes)

3

4 Identify research administration issues in need of resolution. Make recommendations for policy or system changes in research administration. Share ideas and solutions regarding best practices in the research administration arena. Consolidate School/College opinions regarding issues and share with other University groups

5 Engineering Linda Forsyth ISR Carole Bach LS&A Peggy Westrick Medical School Heather OOaus OVPR Units Cathy Seay- Ostrowski (Chair) SPH Lori Bowden SSCRAG Units Scott Stanfill (Scribe) Group Address:

6

7

8

9

10

11 Proposed PAF Changes Biologics Oversight Task Force: cross- campus group to evaluate and improve U- M biosafety compliance in research PAF changes: Section 5 Research Activity Add new question to identify use of body substances Update questions & help to provide clarity and context Use of: radioactive material, stem cells, rdna or SNA, biological agents/toxins, and infectious agents Containment/biosafety level selection IBC registration look- up available System report to alert IBC & OSEH when answer is Yes.

12

13 Cathy Seay- Ostrowski, UMTRI/Office of Research, Chair Cathy Handyside, ITS, Co- Chair Yvonne Sturt, RAAC Project Manager Lori Deromedi, Office of Research Amalie Helms, UM Flint Teresa Herrick, Ross School of Business Melinda Larocca, College of Engineering Mary Martinowicz, School of Nursing Sharyn Sivyer, ORSP Lea Tune, Sponsored Programs Pat Turnbull, UM Dearborn

14 Launched all- University survey through July 2013 Consolidating and analyzing survey responses Future report on conclusions and training recommendations in RA Wanted to explore some micro training questions from groups of similar experience levels that s you!!

15 1. Introductions at your table 2. Discuss Question and Options Converge on table answers 3. Fill out the Table Responses on Network Exercise Form Together 4. Log iclicker responses as a table. 5. Written additional input accepted!

16 A) Project Management/Organizational Skills B) Leadership/Conflict Resolution/Creative Problem Solving C) Communications/Change Management/Building Relationships D) Contracts/Financial Management/Facilities Management E) Ethical/Legal/Compliance

17 A) 1 hour per month B) 2-4 hours per month C) 8 hours per month D) 2 days per month E) 1 week per month (*including attending classes, watching webinars, e- Learning, reading, mentoring, etc.)

18 A) 1 Year B) 2 Years C) 3 Years D) Pre- requisites are enough E) What is RAIN?

19 A) Training for the new RA B) Renovation of RAIN C) Supplemental RA training, such as listed in question 1 D) RA Mentoring Program E) Something else? (Please list all table suggestions below) Please use worksheet to offer additional input to the RAAC Training Subcommittee

20

21 UNITED WE BRAND Strengthening the University of Michigan s Image

22 Why unify the University of Michigan brand? A brand is the most valuable piece of real estate in the world: A corner of someone s mind. John Hegarty

23 What are the guiding principles for the brand refresh? 1. No logo can bear the full weight of a brand 2. All marketing and communications should utilize the logo 3. Individual units will own their brand expression

24 How will the brand rollout impact the university? 1. Rollout officially June Online support tools are available 3. Use the next 12 months to exhaust existing materials 4. The brand manager is available to help

25 GLOBAL RECOGNITION: The Block M Ann Arbor, Flint & Dearborn Campuses Health System Athletics

26 EXCLUSIVE LIKE US: Victors Font

27 ONE MAIZE, ONE BLUE: One Brand Michigan Maize Michigan Blue

28 BRAND REFRESH: The Official Logo

29 BRAND REFRESH: Regional Campuses

30 ROBUST: The Signature System

31 COMPLEMENTARY FONT: Univers ABCDEFGHIJKLMN OPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghi

32 SIGNATURE SYSTEM: Academic

33 ANN ARBOR DEA RBORN FLINT

34 SIGNATURE SYSTEM: Flexible & Appropriate Formal Signature: Official Identity Informal Signature: Marketing Informal Signature: Horizontal Informal Signature: Vertical Sub-Unit Signature 4

35 SIGNATURE SYSTEM: Administrative

36 ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS

37 SIGNATURE SYSTEM: Flexible & Appropriate 1 1 Formal Signature: Official Identity 2 3 Informal Signature: Marketing Informal Signature: Horizontal Informal Signature: Vertical Sub-Unit Signature 4 4

38 SIGNATURE SYSTEM: Auxiliary

39 AUXILIARY UNITS

40 SIGNATURE SYSTEM: Flexible & Appropriate Formal Signature: Official Identity Informal Signature: Vertical Sub-Unit Signature 2 3

41 STYLE GUIDE: TYPOGRAPHY How to Pick a Typeface Legibility Readability Suitability

42 STYLE GUIDE: COLOR One Maize. One Blue. One Brand. PRIMARY PALETTE SECONDARY PALETTE

43 STYLE GUIDE: PHOTOGRAPHY Because Words Alone Cannot Describe Michigan Emotional Evocative Diverse Global Spirited

44 STYLE GUIDE: Editorial The Voice of the University Expressed through a style of writing a tone that is most appropriate for its audience Confident Contemporary Passionate Clear

45 STYLE GUIDE: Editorial Our Brand Pillars and Key Messaging Academic Prestige World-class elite faculty and students 250 degree programs in 19 schools and colleges Nationally leading research portfolio Comprehensive health system Top-ranked and co-located professional schools: law, medicine, business, engineering Top 25 global university (QS, THE, SJTU) 99 graduate programs in USNWR's top 10 (4th nationally) Public Ethos Priority on diversity and social equity Investment for the common good, not only individual attainment Passion for local and global impact Global engagement: more than 600 worldwide initiatives Commitment to the state of Michigan and its economic well-being Heritage, Tradition, & Culture Thriving, global community of 500K alumni Over 30 Division I national championships in 10 sports Highly collaborative and interdisciplinary environment Transformational learning experiences Deeply embedded arts, culture and creativity Tradition of philanthropy and donors who have enabled transformation Iconic campus

46 STYLE GUIDE: GALLERY

47 DOWNLOADS: U-M LOGO

48 UNIT SIGNATURES SIGNATURE GENERATOR

49 DOWNLOADS: TEMPLATES

50 U-M New PSA (click here)

51 TAKE-AWAYS

52 TAKE-AWAYS: How do I access a signature? Each School/College, Unit, Division, etc. has a designated Gate Keeper Gate Keeper- typically a marke?ng/communica?on s person in your unit. Gate Keeper can create your signature via online tool. Unsure of your unit s Gate Keeper? Contact: idstandards@umich.edu

53 TAKE-AWAYS: U-M Brand Refresh U- M logo freshening up what s always been there Unit signatures leveraging the U- M iden?ty Universal adop?on academic, administra?ve, and auxiliary units Colors one maize, one blue Leadership support President, Provost, and Execu?ve Officers Brand guidelines umich.edu/brand

54 umich.edu/brand

55 The University of Michigan Office of Research (and Beyond)

56 A New Name OVPR è UMOR 2

57 UMOR Identity 3

58 UMOR Units 4

59 Role of the Office of Research Nurture the excellence and integrity of research, scholarship, and creative activity across the entire campus. 5

60 What UMOR Does Catalyzes interdisciplinary research Provides central research administration Oversees compliance and research policy Manages knowledge transfer Coordinates research communication Addresses major issues in research Encourages partnerships with all sectors 6

61 Academic AVPs J. Brian Fowlkes Health Sciences Toni Antonucci Social Sciences & Humanities Volker Sick Natural Sciences & Engineering Eric Michielssen Advanced Research Computing 7

62 Example Initiatives Mobility Transformation Center Society 2030 Advanced research computing Biorepository 8

63 Faculty Grants and Awards Early stage projects Artistic productions Core facilities Cost sharing Interim support Conferences Seminars Fellowship enhancement SJTU 9

64 Business Functions ORSP Compliance Tech Transfer Business Engagement Federal Relations Communications 10

65 Research Website(s) Research at U-M (Gateway) ORSP Compliance UMOR More to come 11

66 Research at U-M Inform and engage target audiences on the importance, impact, and excitement of U-M research, while serving as a resource to the research community. 12

67 Research at U-M (a) Why we do research Relationship to education Impact of research What s special about U-M What have we done in 200 years? What are we doing now? Issues 13

68 Research at U-M (b) What central services and resources are available? How do I access them? What do I need to be aware of, and when? Approach: the research cycle 14

69 ORSP Website Support the processes of proposal development, submission, negotiation, and administration 15

70 Compliance A central portal: Human subject protections Lab animal use and care Biosafety Conflict of interest Responsible conduct of research Human pluripotent stem cell research 16

71 Considerations This is a colossal undertaking The time is right Your support and involvement is crucial Timeline: the new year 17

72 Questions? 18

73 WEBTOOLS FOR FACULTY UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT: FOUNDATION RELATIONS SEPTEMBER 2013 Maureen S Martin, Executive Director Joseph Sutkowi, Assistant Director Foundation Relations, Office of University Development

74 RAN, 2013 BACKGROUND: PEER BENCHMARKING In CFR benchmarked operations with peer institutions and peak performers, and in discussion with APG and other partners One outcome was formation of BEC, investment by units and OVPR Another outcome was increasing and focusing foundations capacity (FR, OVPR, CoE, ISR, SPH, Med), based on key benchmarking findings Peak performers have broader pools of private sector donors MUCH more success at research grants at or below $2M Dedicated staffing in health & sciences Ability to launch strategic initiatives, and Bridges to the research enterprise 2

75 RAN, 2013 MORE STRATEGY: Public and Private Institutions $24,385,703 $42,209,624 $43,630,928 $49,751,748 $77,060,469 $77,626,359 $81,205,188 1,194 $85,469,171 Univ of California, Berkeley (Berkeley, CA) University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA) University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI) University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN) University of Washington (Seattle, WA) Stanford University (Stanford, CA) 558 $126,228,234 Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Chapel Hill, NC) Columbia University (New York, NY) 2, $155,647,909 $189,307,098 Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD) Univ of California, Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA) Univ of California, San Francisco (San Francisco, CA) 3 Number of Donors Foundation Giving

76 RAN, 2013 FOUNDATION RELATIONS: THE STRATEGIC RESPONSE and 4

77 RAN, 2013 THE MORE STRATEGY - BUILD VOLUME PROVIDE RESOURCES AND DECREASE BARRIERS Present faculty workshops (Med, ISR, SNRE, LSA) Introduce foundations, prospecting, strategies Advisory 1:1 meetings with faculty members On demand, timely, thorough, engaging unit MGOs Targeted web presence about opportunities Partner with colleges Med and Engineering to start Increased dedicated staffing 5

78 RAN, 2013 FACULTY OUTREACH WEBTOOLS Project launched in 2010 (Joseph Sutkowi, lead) Internal teambuilding & feedback loops OVPR/ ORSP University Development Engineering Medicine LSA Embed & Market with and through Research Administration development can be invisible Link-strategies broadly placed across the college and research enterprise 6

79 RAN, 2013 STATS ON WEBTOOLS Average 10 visitors per day 27,000 Pageviews 1,687 unique visitors 3,500 total visits Peak was in April immediately following RAD meeting 17% stay more than 10 minutes 7

80 RAN, 2013 FOUNDATION RELATIONS: MORE STRATEGY PERFORMANCE TARGETS Optimize foundation relations performance Serious competitor to the peak performers Break through barriers with largest US foundations Drive foundations to look to Michigan for strategic leadership on key issues Expand capacity to support faculty seeking private sector grants Work with Research Administrators to respond to critical issues (indirects, etc.) MORE: Nurture a faculty culture that is entrepreneurial, energetic and supported in seeking foundation funding for their work Double the number of foundation grants feeding the research operation 8

81 RAN, 2013 FOUNDATION FUNDING FOR FACULTY Foundations.Umich.Edu Our goal is to make foundation and association giving an option for faculty in any and all ways possible. Your feedback is welcome. 9