Missions and Means Framework Tutorial. March 1, 2004

Transcription

1 Missions and Means Framework Tutorial March 1,

2 Agenda Introduction ACSIS Example Missions & Means Framework Transformation 2

3 Context A Blizzard of Guidance: Rumsfeld, Transformation Planning Guidance, April 2003 Wolfowitz, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, DoD , May 2003 Wolfowitz, Department of Defense Readiness Reporting System, DoD Directive , June 2003 Myers, Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, CJCSI C, June 2003 Wolfowitz, DoD Architecture Framework, Version 1, coordination draft DoD Instruction 8800.x, March 2003 Daly, Miller, Seglie, and Wauer, The Test and Evaluation Master Plan, an Operational Overview, ITEA Journal, September/October Hollis and Bolton, Future Combat Systems and Complementary Systems Coordination, Department of the Army, November

4 In the post-9/11 World: *** Opinion *** The United States needs the capability to Counter new, emerging concepts and threats while Retaining the overmatch to deter existing, conventional capabilities. Relative to extant U.S. warfighting capabilities, this requires: Strategic agility in hours/days, not weeks/months; Joint netted lethality in close combat; and Combined and noncombatant survivability in complex terrain. To achieve national security objectives over the long haul: The suitability of total DOTMLPF solutions (life-cycle ownership) and The time to field capabilities must improve. 4

5 Agenda Introduction ACSIS Example Missions & Means Framework Transformation 5

6 Information-Intensive Warfare, Digitization of the Battle blurs distinctions between simulations and operations Simulation of Operations Military Operations Data, Models, and Representations Knowledge Management 6

7 Authoritative Data Sources ACSIS Architecture USAFMSA GSORTS... FIO SA Additional StartEx Data AADS-UP ACSIS DB ASSIGN ORG_IDs AND URNs ACSIS Tool BUILD MISSION-SPECIFIC UTO GENERATE NETWORK DATA EXPORT CBS/RTM EXPORT FIRESIM Partial StartEx Files CBS/RTM Extract FIRESIM Extract Scenario Generation Tools Add/Modify Add/Modify Complete StartEx Files CBS/RTM StartEx FIRESIM StartEx SELECT/ EXTRACT EXPORT JANUS EXPORT EADSIM JANUS Extract EADSIM Extract Add/Modify Add/Modify JANUS StartEx EADSIM StartEx ACSIS DIF (XML) L O A D EXPORT JCATS EXPORT OneSAF EXPORT C2R/LDIF JCATS Extract OneSAF Extract C2R/LDIF Extract Add/Modify Add/Modify JCATS StartEx OneSAF StartEx C2R/LDIF EXPORT FBCB2/TIMS FBCB2/TIMS Extract FBCB2/TIMS EXPORT JCDB JCDB Extract JCDB Army C4I and Simulation Initialization System 7

8 Interoperability Examples (1 st CAV) FIO FIO FBCB2 OPFAC Name [5300] ORG Name [728] ORG ID & Name [427] Mapping Tables Role Abbreviation FBCB2 [255] USAFMSA MTOE ORG Name (ACSIS) [53,000] USAFMSA Entire Army (ACSIS) ORG Name [53,000] ORG ID ACSIS [53,000] JSID URN & Name [92976] URN & Name [17,587] JMUL (AFATDS) JSID URN & Name [92976] URN & Name [4,888] FBCB2 LDIF URN & Name [427] URN & Name [17,587] JMUL Source: Frank Pozio, Symbolics Notes: Not a do once use many J Eliminate duplication, etc. 8

9 Improved Integration and Interoperability between C4I and Simulations Current data product generation process without ACSIS or FBCB2/TOC Planner: NGMS REVIEW FIO SA DATA NGMS GENERATE TIMS/FBCB2 UTI AND LTI DATA NGMS INTEGRATION TESTING AND VALIDATION CTSF INTEGRATION TESTING AND VALIDATION C2R/LDIF GENERATION 4 WEEKS 8 WEEKS 4 WEEKS 4 WEEKS FIO SA RELEASED 20 WEEKS TOTAL RELEASE TO UNIT Process with ACSIS Phase I, TIMS/ACSIS interface, and FBCB2 manual process: 1 W 6 WEEKS 4 WEEKS 1 W FIO SA MRB AND RELEASE 12 WEEKS TOTAL RELEASE TO UNIT PM FBCB2 and TIMS early involvement with FIO, G-6, USAFMSA, and the unit at the SA Material Review Board (MRB). Shifts weeks of review/fixes to before the SA release. Process with ACSIS Phase II and FBCB2/TOC Planner Integration: 1 W 2 Ws 2 Ws 1 W 6 WEEKS TOTAL FIO SA MRB AND RELEASE RELEASE TO UNIT Process improvement- reduce time and cost. Improved coordination and synchronization. Data harmonization in a single-source authoritative database. Improved feedback to authoritative data sources. Automation to enforce rules and data integrity- quality data products. Less re-work time and cost. More responsive to ad-hoc changes. 9

10 Agenda Introduction ACSIS Example Missions & Means Framework Transformation Discussion 10

11 Key Concepts The Principle of Late Binding is a fundamental element of the transformed end-state. Integration Readiness is fundamental to Late Binding in Joint Operational Concepts The Missions and Means Framework (MMF) embraces Late Binding to specify the warfighter s view of the battle space. Executable Mission Content (EMC) is a key enabler to conceive and execute transformation. 11

12 Military Operations and Warfighting Deliberate Planning Require Capability Provide Capability Crisis Response DOTMLPF* Solutions Define Enable Readiness, Training Logistics, Sustainment Research, Experimentation Life Cycle Tactics, Fielding Analysis, Demonstration Acquisition, Test & Evaluation * DOTMLPF: Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities 12

13 Decision Making Knowledge Formation Information Observe, Exercise, Measure, Test Sift, Filter, Analyze, Evaluate Requirements Requirements Information Calculate, Model, Represent, Simulate Abstraction Repeated VV&A Process Abstraction Single, Unified Abstraction 13

14 MMF Status Summary Accomplishments: TRADOC ADCST-W Collective Training Directorate (CTD): Task decomposition for CFLCC Battle Drills Army C4ISR and Simulation Initialization System Interoperable data loads for Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom Army Objective Force: Mission set decomposition in FCS O&O/ORD, ATEC adoption Joint Strike Fighter: JSF Authoritative Modeling Information System, Authoritative Sources DB DoD Architecture Framework: Core Architecture Data Model, Data Architecture Repository Sys, Visual Simulation Objects In Progress: Joint Staff: 5026 mission decomposition, Joint Training Information System acquisition baseline Strategic Analysis: MORS Data Workshop, OSD/Policy workshop, JMEM and TMAP in Joint Data System Mission and Means Framework for Executable Mission Content: Paired Comparison Tests, UA-MBL Experimentation, NAVAIR/AMC MOA, JFT&E 14

15 To Make It Work Need Five Things 1. Composable Framework and supporting Procedures 2. Critical Mass of End-User Content and supporting Access 3. Business Model for Life-Cycle Sustainment and supporting Program Elements 4. Tools, Utilities and supporting Standards 5. Education, Training, and Certification 15

16 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Mission 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 O 3,4 3. Functions, Capabilities BLUFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces O 1,2 O 1,2 2. Components, Forces O 2,3 Planning Employment 16

17 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Why, Wherefore, to What End 17

18 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 6. Under What Circumstances 18

19 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 5. Index: Location & Time 5. When and Where 19

20 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations OWNFOR OPFOR 4. Activity-centric, named with a Verb, Do What -- the Playbook 20

21 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations BLUFOR OPFOR 2. Components, Forces 2. Components, Forces 2. Entity-centric, named with a Noun By Whom -- the Players 21

22 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 3. Functions, Capabilities OWNFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities 2. Components, Forces 2. Components, Forces 1. The (shared) Slings-and-Arrows of Outrageous Fortune -- Science 3. Condition-dependent How Well -- Engineering 22

23 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Mission 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 O 3,4 3. Functions, Capabilities OWNFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces O 1,2 O 1,2 2. Components, Forces O 2,3 Planning Employment Bottom-up, Causal, Time-forward execution and adjudication of outcomes 23

24 Missions and Means Framework 11 Fundamental Elements: Seven Levels, Four Operators 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Mission 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 O 3,4 3. Functions, Capabilities BLUFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces O 1,2 O 1,2 2. Components, Forces O 2,3 Planning Employment Top-Down, Concurrent Synthesis and Decision Making 24

25 Missions and Means Framework 6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. Mission 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 O 3,4 3. Functions, Capabilities BLUFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces O 1,2 O 1,2 2. Components, Forces O 2,3 Planning Employment Architecture defines how Parts are assembled into Packages Capabilities are relationships between Parts and Packages 25

26 MMF Application - Situation Radical elements form new government, seek to force recognition by UN as legitimate government. Road to War Legitimate, pro-western Government of Orangeland is overthrown by radical elements and forced into exile. Majority of Orangeland s conventional military forces are loyal to new government. Orangeland invades neighboring country of Blueland. United States and its coalition partners believe national interests and regional stability are threatened. They take military action to drive Orangeland forces from Blueland; remove rebel government from power; restore legitimate, pro-western government; stabilize region; and protect U.S. and coalition vital interests. Current Situation Coalition forces have commenced offensive ground operations in the region to drive Orangeland forces out of Blueland and continue attacking to isolate rebel government leadership inside capital of Orangeland. Mission CJFLCC intends to isolate rebel government leadership in the capital by defeating majority of conventional forces well outside the capital and preventing them from reinforcing security forces protecting the rebel leadership inside the capital. 26

27 MMF Layered View: SN (SN) 4 Restore legitimate government in order to 7 Protect national interests (SN) 4 Deter use of force in order to 7 Ensure survival of regime (SN) SN 3 Employ forces, SN Decide on (SN) SN 3 Employ forces, SN Decide on need for military action 6. Context, Environment (Physical, Military, need for Civil, military etc.) action 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission C2 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O O 3,4 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 C2 3. Functions, Capabilities OWNFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces SN: National Intel/Communications assets O 1,2 O 1,2 ST/OP-JTF: Establish conditions for restoration of legitimate Pro-Western Gov t 2. Components, Forces O2,3 SN/ST: WMD, SOF forces Synthesis Employment 27

28 MMF Layered View: ST (ST) 4 Establish military and civil conditions to 7 Restore legitimate government (ST) 4 Establish military, civil and political conditions to 7 Deter use of force (ST) ST Conduct operations in depth (ST) ST Conduct operations in depth 6. Context, Environment (Physical, Military, Civil, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission Strategic Fires/ Strategic Maneuver 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O O 3,4 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 Strategic Fires/ Strategic Maneuver 3. Functions, Capabilities OWNFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 1,2 O 1,2 O 2,3 2. Components, Forces OP-JFLCC: Isolate capital 2. Components, Forces O2,3 ST: Joint Task Force SN/ST: WMD, SOF forces Synthesis Employment 28

29 MMF Layered View: OP (OP) 4 Isolate rebel government to 7 Help establish desired conditions (OP) 4 Conduct synchronous ops to 7 Help establish desired conditions (OP) OP Conduct offensive operations (OP) OP Conduct defensive operations 6. Context, Environment (Physical, Military, Civil, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission Operational Maneuver 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O O 3,4 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 Operational Maneuver 3. Functions, Capabilities OWNFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces OP: Air, Ground, Maritime, SOF Elements O 1,2 O 1,2 OP-UE: Secure objectives vicinity of capital (Surround) Defeat conventional opposing forces 2. Components, Forces O2,3 OP: Missile units, elite division w/ newer equipment Synthesis Employment 29

30 MMF Layered View: TA-Joint (TA-Joint) 4 Prevent reinforcement of capital to 7 Help isolate rebel government (TA-Joint) 4 Pre-position forces in key areas to 7 Enable synchronous operations (TA-Joint) ART Conduct an attack (TA-Joint) ART Conduct an area defense 6. Context, Environment (Physical, Military, Civil, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission Tactical Maneuver 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O O 3,4 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 Tactical Maneuver 3. Functions, Capabilities OWNFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces O 1,2 TA-Joint: FCS-equipped Unit of Action (UA) O 1,2 TA-UA: Prevent rebel forces from returning to the capital 2. Components, Forces O2,3 TA-Joint: Conventional brigades w/ old equipment Synthesis Employment 30

31 MMF Layered View: TA-Service (TA-Service) 4 Restore legitimate government in order to 7 Protect national interests (TA-Service) 4 Deter use of force in order to 7 Ensure survival of regime (TA-Service) ART Seize an area (TA-Service) ART Establish a defensive (Objective) 6. Context, Environment (Physical, Military, position Civil, etc.) 7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission Lethal Direct Fire 5. Index: Location & Time 7. Mission 7. Mission 4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations O O 3,4 4,1 O 4,1 O 3,4 Lethal Direct Fire 3. Functions, Capabilities OWNFOR 1. Interactions, Effects OPFOR 3. Functions, Capabilities O 2,3 2. Components, Forces O 1,2 TA-Service: Combined Arms Battalion (CAB) O 1,2 TA-CAB: Seize OBJ Camel in order to prevent rebel forces from crossing bridge 2. Components, Forces O2,3 TA-Service: Infantry battalions w/ old equipment Synthesis Employment 31

32 JTIMS (Operational View) 32

33 UOB DAT Task Organization Corps Aviation Brigade 33

34 Missions & Means Framework implementation of JCIDS (Purdy/Donlin variant) Missions comprise Tasks to accomplish Top-Down decomposition provides the developer with a powerful tool to design the best DOTMPF system. It stems from user validated scenarios, missions and tasks --providing the framework for evaluating and demonstrating the required systems of systems capabilities to perform Answers the So What? Question enabled by Capabilities as supplied by provides System * * System is the integrated Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities (DOTMFPF) readiness solution 34

35 MMF Application Key Tasks JTF 1. Restore legitimate government 2. Achieve air superiority 3. Destroy WMD capability 4. Facilitate control of energy centers Operational to Tactical: Nested Tasks JFLCC 1. Secure capital region in Orangeland 2. Secure key oil and gas pipelines and prod facilities 3. Defeat rebel forces UE 1. Attack to defeat rebel forces in zone 2. Conduct vertical maneuver to disrupt rebel forces 3. Secure key facilities UA1 1. Secure key terrain vic OBJ CAMEL 2. Block enemy reinforcements from reaching capital CAB2 1. Secure OBJ CAMEL in order to facilitate UA2 attack on OBJ BAT 2. Attack to defeat rebel forces attempting to return to capital on MSR 35

36 Sample Army Task Set Applied to OT Model System System-of-Systems Integration Lab RECON NLOS MCS C2V NLOS-CC CL III UAS MCS MTP Conduct UAV Flight Operations Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 2 MTP CGS Mission Activities ART Collect Relevant Information Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 3 ART Process Relevant Information to create COP Task 3 ART Disseminate COP & Execution Information ART Conduct Surface to Surface Atk ART Display COP Tailored to User Needs ART Collect Relevant Information MTP Conduct UAV Flight Operations Task 3 Task 3 Task 3 ART Conduct Lethal Direct Fire Against a Surface Target ART Display COP Tailored to User Needs ART Collect Relevant Information Task 3 Task Unit Mission Lane Conduct Zone Recon Unit Mission Lane FS Conduct Lethal Unit Mission /Position Lane Unit Mission Lane Unit Mission Lane Attack By Fire Unit an Enemy Force Mission Lane Larger ART Unit Conduct Missionan Attack Lane Virtual Loop SUGV XX-XX Conduct Autonomous Surveillance Live Loop 36

37 Sample Navy Task Set Applied to OT Model System-of-Systems SoSIL Integration Lab RECON Fire Support System RQ-2A Pioneer (UAV) CG/DDG C2V NSFS NLOS C CAS CL III UAS RQ-2A NTA Perform Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance Pioneer (UAV) Conduct Amphibious MCS Assault Amphib Assault NTA Collect Target Information Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 1 Task 2 NTA Conduct Airborne Recon and Surv Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 2 Task 3 NTA Perform Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance NTA Maintain Information and Naval Force Status Task 3 NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture NTA Engage Targets NTA Adjust Fires Task 3 Task 3 NTA Coordinate Naval Surface Fire Support (NSFS). NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture NTA Conduct an Amphibious Assault NTA Attack Enemy Land Targets TARPS Task 3 Task 3 Task 3 NTA Maintain Information and Naval Force Status NTA Perform Zone Reconnaissance Unit Mission Lane Unit Mission Lane Unit Attack Mission Lane Unit Mission Lane NTA Unit Conduct Fire Mission Support Lane NTA Conduct Deliberate Unit Mission Lane NTA Conduct Attack Larger Unit Mission Lane Virtual Loop SUGV NTA Perform Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance Live Loop 37

38 Relating Effects to Utility Desired Conditions Strategic MoEs: Legitimate government restored to power Territorial security of Orangeland ensured Operational MoEs: Enemy conventional capabilities defeated Leadership in capital isolated Tactical MoEs: Security forces inside capital defeated Capital surrounded Attack Results: Conventional military forces blocked from reentering capital Not Desired Conditions Strategic MoEs: Rebel government maintains claim to power from an undisclosed location Rebel leaders play up unprovoked West attack and gain support for their government through successful world media campaign Operational MoEs: Capital Defense Corps Security Forces are able to secure rebel leaders and get them out of the capital Tactical MoEs: Conventional forces delay coalition forces from taking key objectives inside the capital and engaging Security Forces from the Capital Defense Corps CAB2 Attack Results: Conventional forces successfully reenter capital before main effort can reach its objective Successful CAB2 Attack Unsuccessful Starting Conditions 38

39 Missions and Means Framework Purpose: Provide a methodology for explicitly specifying the military mission and quantitatively evaluating the mission utility of alternative warfighting Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) services and products. Objective: Provide a disciplined procedure to explicitly specify the mission, allocate means, and assess mission accomplishment by: Unifying the warfighter, engineer, and comptroller understanding of missions and means. Accounting for traditional testing and evaluation factors and traditional warfighter expertise factors that constitute mission success. Being sufficiently credible, timely, and affordable to make hard decisions that stay made. Being consistent, concise, repeatable, and scalable. Providing a disciplined process to implement the Defense Secretary s transformation guidance and associated acquisition reform. 39

40 Agenda Introduction ACSIS Example Missions & Means Framework Transformation 40

41 Joint Training System Requirements Derived From National Military Strategy and Assigned Missions Plans Driven by Training Requirements, Training Audience, and Tools Based on Commander s Intent & Joint Doctrine/JTTP Stated in Terms Of Joint Mission Essential Tasks; Conditions; and Joint Standards Assessments IMPROVE JOINT FORCE READINESS Creates Joint Training Plan Establishes Objectives To Meet Requirements Guidance Provided Schedules Deconflicted by the CJCS and USJFCOM using JTIMS Execution Commander Assesses Training Effectiveness Joint Readiness Joint Training Conducted by CJCS & Combatant Commands Identify Ability to Meet Joint Standard Strengths/Deficiencies in: Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leader Development, People & Facilities The JMETL Addresses: Joint/Interoperability and JTF HQ Tasks Evaluated by Commanders 41

42 CJCSI 3170 (JCIDS ± ) Guidance NSS Strategy & Overarching Concepts Joint Operations Concepts OPLANs and CONPLANs Assessment and Analysis Joint Operating Concepts Defense Planning Scenarios Task Analysis Functional Area Analysis (FAA) Integrated Architecture Overlay what we have with what we need to do COCOM IPLs GAP Analysis Risk Assessment Capability Assessments Joint Functional Concepts Functional Needs Analysis (FNA) Functional Solutions Analysis (FSA) Reconciliation and Recommendation JCIDS Recommendation Capability Needs DOTMLPF Changes Decision and Action Science & Technology Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3170 Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System Acquisition Experimentation ± Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System 42

43 Warfighter Visualizes the operation and capabilities required to accomplish mission. Mission Received MMF enables warfighter to Describe vision using framework to ID key elements and tools to capture elements in data form. Warfighter/Rep. Mission Analysis Situation and Course of Action Development COA Analysis Facts and Assumptions IPB Specified and Implied Tasks Identification of Resources Commander s Intent Analysis of Centers of Gravity Prioritize Critical Vulnerabilities COA Development MMF prompts capture of the elements below: Environment: Physical, military, civil conditions in the AO? Purpose: What is the desired effect? Tasks: What actions are required to achieve purpose? Analyst/Engineer Condition descriptions from UJTL AUTL tactical mission tasks or text UJTL, AUTL, MTP, STP tasks in data form Condition descriptions from UJTL UJTL for Operational Lvl Tasks and EBO UJTL, AFTL, UNTL, EBO COA Comparison COA Selection Capabilities: Required to enable task Capabilities to standard. Warfighter set standards (measures/criteria) Warfighter set standards ORI/TacEval Criteria Joint Air Operations Plan Development JP 3-30 Components: Units (equipment and people) that have required capability. MTOE, TDA, O&O FCS systems book, etc. Wings & Squadrons & Aircraft & Weapons 43

44 Warfighter Visualizes the operation and capabilities required to accomplish mission. Warfighter/Rep. IPB/Estimate Process Commander s Intent Combat Assessment JFC Guidance Mission Received MMF prompts capture of the elements below: Environment: Physical, military, civil conditions in the AO? Purpose: What is the desired effect? MMF enables warfighter to Describe vision using framework to ID key elements and tools to capture elements in data form. Analyst/Engineer Condition descriptions from UJTL AUTL tactical mission tasks or text Condition descriptions from UJTL UJTL for Operational Lvl Tasks Specified, Implied, Essential tasks Target Development Tasks: What actions are required to achieve purpose? UJTL, AUTL, MTP, STP tasks in data form UJTL, AFTL, UNTL, EBO COA analysis Wargaming process Weaponeering Process Capabilities: Required to enable task Capabilities to standard. Warfighter set standards (measures/criteria) Aircraft Tech Orders and JMEM Task OrganizationMaster Air Attack & Request for Plan & ATO higher support Production Components: Units (equipment and people) that have required capability. MTOE, TDA, O&O FCS systems book, etc. Wings & Squadrons & Aircraft & Weapons 44

45 DoD User Needs & Technology Opportunities Process entry at Milestones A, B, or C Entrance criteria met before entering phase Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability A B (Program Initiation) C IOC FOC Concept Refinement Concept Decision Technology Development Pre-Systems Acquisition System Development & Demonstration Design Readiness Review LRIP/IOT&E Systems Acquisition Production & Deployment FRP Decision Review Operations & Support Sustainment 45

46 DoD Architecture Framework Operational View Systems View Relates Capabilities and Characteristics to Operational Requirements Identifies Warfighter Relationships and Information Needs Specific Capabilities Identified to Satisfy Information-Exchange Levels and Other Operational Requirements Technical Criteria Governing Interoperable Implementation/ Procurement of the Selected System Capabilities Technical View Prescribes Standards and Conventions 46 Processing and Levels of Information Exchange Requirements Processing and Inter-Nodal Levels of Information Exchange Requirements Basic Technology Supportability and New Capabilities Systems Associations to Nodes, Activities, Needlines and Requirements

47 OT&E V-Diagram Mission Test via Operational Test Tasks (UJTLs) Force Development/ Experimentation Analyze Interactions Actions Components Technology Interoperability testing Subsystem Test Component Testing Technology Demonstration Synthesize 47

48 FCS Evaluation Strategy Platforms MOPs/MOEs Platform Level (ORD, Spec) FCS MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) MISSION Mission Threads (O&O) Decomposition Red Blue TT OT M&S Data Platform Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks M&S Core Compl Systems FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks M&S SoS, S, S, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Sensitivity Analyses By Thread Mission, S, S, + Unks Capabilities Capabilities & Limitations Limitations By By Mission Mission + Unks Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks Updated as Systems Mature 48