Munitions Response Program. PA/SI Overview

Transcription

1 Department of Navy Munitions Response Program PA/SI Overview Munitions Response Forum 4-5 November 2009 Rob Sadorra, P.E. Munitions Response Program Manager Naval Facilities Engineering g Command (NAVFAC) Headquarters

2 Outline DON MRP Status and Overview PA/SI Processes and Procedures Funding gpriorities Underwater Munitions Sites Support, Training, Oversight Communication and Coordination MRSPP 2

3 DON MRP Sites MRP Status and Overview (Mid-Year FY 09) BRAC 33 Sites CTC=$102M ER,N 258 Sites CTC=$940M DON is meeting DoD established metric: PAs completed by 2007 SIs on track for completion in 2010 BRAC Sites to be RIP/RC by 2015 ER,N Sites to be RIP/RC by 2020 DON supporting R&D efforts for terrestrial and underwater detection/response technologies DON applying MRSPP to all sites 3

4 BRAC MRP Installation # of sites Budget ($K) Last RIP/RC Adak 1 $58,000 Oct 2013 Brunswick 3 $6,000 Apr 2012 Cecil Field 1 $0 Nov 2007 Charleston 2 $0 May 2007 Concord 8 $12,000 Aug 2015 Dallas 2 $0 Apr 2005 Millington 2 $0 May 2010 So Weymouth 2 $2,000 Apr 2008 Vallejo 11 $24,000 Aug 2015 Total 32 $102,000 Aug

5 ER,N MRP Cost to Complete MIDY09 EOY08 EOY07 EOY06 EOY05 EOY /19/ EOY03 EOY02 ($B)

6 ER,N Program Funding Profile $ Millions $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 6 $0 FY15 FY14 FY13 FY12 FY11 FY10 FY09 FY08 FY07 FY06 FY05 FY04 FY03 FY02 FY01 FY00 FY99 FY98 FY97 FY96 FY95 FY94 FY93 FY92 Fiscal Year ER,N PROGRAM IRP PROGRAM MRP PROGRAM 05/19/09

7 ER,N MRP Defense Management Goals MRP STATUS PROJECTIONS (MIDYEAR FY09) > EOY07 100% of Sites 100% (100%) Completed Preliminary Assessments x > EOY10-100% of Sites 100% (46%) x completed Site Investigations > EOY20-100% of all Sites 100% (22%) x RIP/RC 05/19/09 7

8 PA Execution In 2007, PAs completed for all sites known at the time Installation-wide basis Additional AOC s identified in the process Program growth 196 sites in sites in

9 Beyond PA Site prioritization requirements collected and initially applied in Munitions Response Prioritization Protocol during PA process Beyond PA requirements, funding now driven by SI goals, with exception of some high concern sites, such as Vieques PA/SI s being completed on any newly discovered d sites 9

10 Goals of the MRP Site SI Build upon PA info by gathering initial field data Refine site boundaries Perform field reconnaissance/surveys according to SI Work Plan Refine CSM using field reconnaissance/survey data and initial hazard and risk screening results Present results and recommend future site actions Evaluate site through MR Site Prioritization Protocol 10

11 SI Scope of Work Template Developed by the Navy MR Workgroup Task Order Requirements SI Work Plan No ESS - standard option Option for RPM to perform intrusive investigation w/ess Conceptual Site Model Field Activities iti (Site Prep, Surveys, Function Checks, MC Sampling) SI Report Full regulator/stakeholder involvement 11

12 SI Work Plan Establish DQOs Determine SI munitions survey design Evaluate and select field reconnaissance instruments Prepare ESS when not using Anomaly Avoidance Techniques Required if expecting to encounter MEC during SI Was not required during PA site visit Write site-specific Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) 12

13 SI Survey Purpose of SI survey is to: Determine types and rough order of magnitude quantities of MEC present Refine site boundaries Refined site boundaries can: Reduce/increase footprint Increase effectiveness of follow-on work SI survey does not have same rigorous geophysical instrument requirements as the RI Use of field screening instruments t and standard d global l positioning system (GPS) is acceptable 13

14 SI report should: Produce SI Report Describe the results of the site inspection; Refine initial Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Refine cost-to-complete (CTC) estimate Refine Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Score Make recommendations (by MRS) for No further removal/remedial action Accelerated action Further investigation and study in the RI/FS 14

15 Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Congress directed that DoD identify and then prioritize their MRSs MRSPP finalized in Oct 05 [32 CFR Part 179] MRSPP is risk based Considers both explosives safety factors for MEC and relative risk factors for MC MRSPP used to: Prioritize munitions response actions Sequence project funding 15

16 MRSPP Implementation Applying Protocol consistently to all MRSs and ensuring regulators and stakeholders the opportunity to participate in scoring and sequencing recommendations 257 ER,N Sites 247 ER,N Sites Evaluated 191 ER,N Sites Prioritized 56 ER,N Sites awaiting Regulatory and Stakeholder Participation 10 New ER,N Sites being evaluated/prioritized 16

17 17