ELECTRONICS TEST CENTRE

Transcription

1 ELECTRONICS TEST CENTRE MPB TECHNOLOGIES INC. Test Report Prepared By: 27 East Lake Hill Airdrie, Alberta Canada T4A 2K Telephone: (40) Facsimile: (40) ETC Report Number P21 p4596 Date: 2011 March 10 Environmental Testing of the PMT-Getac S-400 Docking Station In accordance with Test Personnel: Prepared for: Hasan Shahryar, Dalbir Dhillon Precision Mounting Technologies th Ave S.E. Calgary, Alberta Canada T2B E Telephone: (40) Facsimile: (40) Hasan Shahryar hasan@etc-mpbtech.com Product Integrity Technologist (Airdrie) Authorized Signatory V. Mala Mediboina mmediboina@etc-mpbtech.com Quality Manager (Airdrie) Authorized Signatory Document Control Number PI-RPT-TMP-54.4 Dated Nov 2,2010

2 PMT-Getac S-400 Docking Station TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope 1.2 Applicant 1. Applicability 1A Test Sample Description 1.5 General Test Conditions and Assumptions 1.6 Scope of Testing Variations in Test Methods Test Sample Configuration & Modifications ABBREVIA TIONS 4.0 TEST CONCLUSION Random Vibration - Operational Random Vibration - Non Operational Mechanical Shock TEST FACILITY 4.1 Location 4.2 Grounding Plan 4. Test Configuration 4..1 Test Verification 5.0 TEST EQUIPMENT 5.1 Equipment Calibration 5.2 Calibration Accuracy 5. Test Equipment List Appendix A 26 Document Control Number PI-RPT-TMP-54.4 Dated Nov 2, 2010 Page 2 of27

3 PMT-Getac Docking Station 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope The purpose of this report is to present the findings and results of compliance testing performed in accordance with as set forth in this document. 1.2 Applicant This test report has been prepared for Precision Mounting Technologies, located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 1. Applicability All test procedures, limits, and results defined in this document apply to the Precision Mounting Technologies Docking Station unit, referred to herein as the Equipment Under Test (EUT). The results contained in this report relate only to the item tested. This report does not imply product endorsement by SCC, A2LA, NVLAP, or the Canadian or US Governments. 1.4 Test Sample Description The test sample provided for testing was a PMT -Getac S-400 Docking Station. Product Name: PMT-Getac S-400 Model # DGS400-xxx Serial # S400-1 Power: 19 VDC More detailed information is provided by Precision Mounting Technologies in Appendix A 1.5 General Test Conditions and Assumptions The EUT was set up and exercised using the configurations, modes of operation and arrangements defined in this report only. All inputs and outputs to and from other equipment associated with the EUT were adequately simulated. Where relevant, the EUT was only tested using the monitoring methods and test criteria defined in this report. All testing, unless otherwise noted, was performed under the following environmental conditions: Temperature: 17 to 2 C Humidity: 45 to 75% Document Control Number PI-RPT-TMP-54.4 Dated Nov 2,2010 Page 0f27

4 To~t Samplo: PMT -Getac S-400 Docking Station 1.6 Scope of Testing Testing was performed in accordance with Variations in Test Methods There were no variations from the test procedures outlined above Test Sample Configuration & Modifications The EUT met the requirements without modifications. 2.0 ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations may be used in this document: AC Alternating Current m... milli.... cm centimeter(s) mm millimeter( s) db decibel MHz MegaHertz DC Direct Current MIL-STD Military Standard EUT Equipment Under Test MPBT MPB Technologies Inc. FTP Functional Test Procedure NRCC National Research Council of g A force equivalent to gravity Canada GHz GigaHertz rms. root mean square Hz Hertz s second(s) law In Accordance With TSA Test Support Apparatus khz kilohertz IlF microfarad m meter(s) IlS microsecond W Watts).0 TEST CONCLUSION STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The client equipment referred to in this report was found to comply with the requirements of, as summarized below. The EUT was subjected to the following tests. Compliance status is reported as PASS or FAIL. Test conditions that are not applicable to the EUT are marked n/a. If testing was not performed at this time, the appropriate field is marked nit. The following table summarizes the tests performed in terms of the specification and class or levels applied, the unique test sample identification, and the EUT modification state, the mode of operation and configuration. Document Control Number P/-RPT-TMP-54.4 Dated Nov 2, 2010 Page 4 of27

5 PMT-Getac S-400 Docking Station Test Test Type Basic Standard Test Sample Mod. Case State Configuration Result.1 Random Vibration- MIL STD 810G PMT -Getac S-400 See Simulated PASS Operational Method C1 Docking Station Installation.2 Random Vibration- MIL STD 810G PMT -Getac S-400 See Simulated PASS Non Operational Method E1 Dockinq Station Installation. Mechanical Sock SAE J1455 PMT -Getac S-400 See Simulated PASS Dockinq Station Installation Note 1: Refer to the test data for applicable test conditions. This report shall rot be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of Document CarrOl Number PI-RPT-TMP-54.4 Dated Nov 2,2010 Page 50f27