Technical Supplement For Joint Standard Instrumentation Suite Missile Attitude Subsystem (JMAS) Version 1.0
|
|
- Samantha Little
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Technical Supplement For Joint Standard Instrumentation Suite Missile Attitude Subsystem (JMAS) 1. INTRODUCTION Version Scope This Technical Supplement describes the Government s need for a capability to provide 6 Degrees of Freedom (6DOF) attitude data (absolute X,Y,Z position, pitch angle, yaw angle, roll) of a Man-portable air defense system (MANPADS) or track mounted infrared (IR) guided missile while in flight from launch point to a stationary target point against the natural test area background. This need also includes the corresponding pitch angle and yaw angle of the missile plume. 1.2 Background MANPADS employing infrared seekers are the single biggest threat facing slow-moving, low-flying rotary wing and fixed wing platforms. To counter the prevalent MANPADS and related track mounted IR guided missile threat, the Services are developing autonomous infrared countermeasure (IRCM) systems for installation on several helicopters platforms as well as large aircraft platforms. Ground truth data are needed to improve the modeling and simulation of MANPADS and other threats missile attitude being the most critical data need. 1.3 Demonstration The selected vendor will be required to conduct a demonstration of their prototype, prior to each delivery in incremental capability, in a field environment to enable an assessment of progress toward achieving the required capability. The specific objectives of each demonstration will be established jointly by the vendor and Government team. The objectives of the demonstrations will focus on basic system performance to include: gimbal performance, optical subsystem performance, and scintillation mitigation. 2. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS AND OBJECTIVES Certain requirements are specified in terms of minimum and goal values where: a) Minimum - Level of performance that is considered achievable at low-to-moderate risk. b) Goal - Level of performance which is the ultimate, desired operational goal. 2.1 Technical User Interface The interface between the system and the user must include a Graphical User Interface 1
2 (GUI) which allows the user to perform any and all functions necessary to meet the performance requirements of this document. Features that minimize duplicative operator input are highly desired. Storage The system should have the capability to store all shots for a typical event with a reserve capacity of 100%. A typical event is defined as 75 shots with an average shot duration of 15 s [minimum] / 30 s [goal] at the maximum sample rate (where shot duration is defined as 200 ms prior to first light plus 9.8 s). Operator access to system storage media should not require mechanical disassembly. Remote Communications The system should provide a network link over which an operator can monitor and control remote system elements from a system operator station installed within a Government control van. System log The system should include a logging capability to include, at a minimum: System software configuration System hardware configuration Shot designator Log entry time stamp Built-in-Test (BIT) The system should have BIT capabilities to identify problem areas or non-working equipment that requires removing and replacing prior to the start of data collection or during routine maintenance. All BIT messages should be electronically and automatically recorded and logged for future use and diagnostics and should be displayed to the operator. System health, Status and Configuration Monitoring The system should include a function that reports system health, status and configuration monitoring to the operator. Missile Trajectory Coverage The system should provide a solution of the flight position and attitude of single launches of MANPADS missiles while in flight from launch point (0 m downrange) to a stationary target point against the natural test area background. The Missile Trajectory Coverage performance requirements of the system are summarized in Table 1. 2
3 Table 1. System Trajectory Coverage Requirements Requirement Requirement Minimum Goal Number Downrange trajectory coverage 3500 m 7000 m Cross range trajectory coverage +/- 500 m +/ m Altitude trajectory coverage (above ground level) 0 m to 2000 m 0 m to 5000 m Measurement Accuracy Reduced measurement outputs from the system consist of an attitude solution of the missile hard body (5DOF [minimum] and 6DOF [goal]) as well as the pitch angle and yaw angle of the missile exhaust plume for the MANPADS trajectory. The system analysis results will be measured against the accuracy requirements in Table 2. Table 2. System Trajectory Measurement Accuracy Requirements Requirement Requirement Minimum Goal Number Absolute missile +/- 2 m +/- 0.5 m position accuracy Missile Yaw Accuracy +/- 1 +/ Missile Pitch accuracy +/- 1 +/ Roll rate n/a +/- 2 hz within max rotation rate of 20 Hz Roll Position n/a +/ Missile exhaust plume pitch and yaw +/- 2 +/- 1 Sample Rate The system should have the capability to measure/sample and record missile data at 100 Hz [minimum] and 500 Hz [goal]). Data should be recorded with associated time tag values (accurate to 1 ms or better). Relevant test metadata should also be recorded at no less than 1 Hz with associated time tag values of the same accuracy. Data Products The system should include data products which include interim and final missile attitude data as well as operator quick look reports that summarize JMAS data collection status for each missile shot. The system should include a mission planning tool to help determine optimum placement of instruments during system setup based upon user input of event details such 3
4 as downrange trajectories, cross range trajectory, launch locations, target locations, and related information. System Operating Environment The system should support operations in the following lighting conditions: Daytime natural light (between 1 hour after sunrise and 1 hour before sunset) [minimum] to all natural lighting conditions (including dark) [goal] The system should be designed to operate with externally provided shore or generator power of VAC 50/60 Hz and 208VAC 3-phase The system should be capable of operating in an ambient temperature range of 10 F to 125 F The system should be designed to operate in an ambient humidity conditions of 1% to 95% non-condensing The system will not be operated in the rain or snow The system should operate and meet the stated accuracy specifications under the scintillation conditions of 2.0e -14 [minimum] / 1.0e [goal], characterized by C n (meters 2 3) 2 where C n is the refractive index structure parameter (see non-government reference documents) The system should meet missile attitude accuracy requirements when operated in sustained wind conditions of up to 20 kts and gusts of up to 35 kts. System External Interfaces Acquisition Trigger The system should provide the means to accept an external software trigger indicating the projected event time (i.e., MANPADS launch). The system design should be such that data for the entire 15s [minimum] / 30s [goal] MANPADS launch is captured and recorded External Time Standard Interface The system should accept an external time synchronization signal in the form of both analog and digital IRIG B Test and Training Enabling Architecture (TENA) The system should provide a TENA interface to enable interoperability with other TENA enabled systems. Security 4
5 Classified Data Processing The system should have: a) The capability to collect and process data at the levels of both Sensitive but Unclassified (SBU) and SECRET Collateral (S-C). b) The means to operate in a secure mode for collecting classified data and to restore the system to its unclassified configuration Cyber Security JMAS will be operated on DOD ranges so the system should be designed to minimize risks to system operations and data from cyber threats consistent with National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Policy (NSTISSP) No. 11 and DOD Instruction , Cybersecurity. The contractor should design this system consistent with the cybersecurity provisions of the JSIS System Security Plan (SSP) and support the Government in revisions to this SSP and related documents, where necessary, to reflect integration of JMAS into the technical baseline. Transportability and Setup The system should be a self-contained, missile attitude capability that is capable of being deployed at remote test ranges both within the Continental United States (CONUS) (e.g., Dugway Proving Ground, White Sands Missile Range, and Tonopah Test Range) and Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS) via best mode to include commercial air freight. No special permits should be required for CONUS ground shipment of the system. This will generally limit the payload to 13 6 in height, 8 in width, and 53 in length when installed on a commercial trailer (inclusive of any enclosures). 2.2 Program Management The Contractor should accomplish all planning, execution, monitoring and controlling, reporting and related program management activities to ensure that the technical, schedule, and financial requirements of this contract are accomplished. Program Management documentation should include periodic technical, financial, and schedule status. Communication The contractor should establish and maintain regular communication with the Government team (both formal and informal) so that plan deviations are known, assessed, and resolved in a timely manner. This communication should include contractor participation in informal bi-weekly status meeting phone calls with the Government during which the contractor should cover the technical and programmatic status of the project. Reviews The contractor should host and conduct periodic reviews throughout the requirements analysis, design formulation, risk reduction, and test phases of the contract consistent with best commercial practices. The contractor should summarize the review contents and action items and submit to the Government on an IPT-determined basis. 5
6 2.3 System Support Documentation and Spares The contractor should provide support documentation in the operation and maintenance of JMAS. The contractor should also provide all documentation delivered with vendor equipment and software purchased under this contract. The system should be provided with spare parts for initial operations. 2.4 Training The contractor should provide familiarization and training on system operation and maintenance. The training should encompass each of the system operation modes. The Government envisions that training will be conducted at the contractor s facility with provisions for class sizes of 6 to 10 participants. 2.5 Government Responsibilities Input Power The Government will supply power at each location where the system will operate. The power will be provided by the test range using the local power grid or mobile generator(s). Transport Vehicle(s) The Government will be responsible for providing the vehicle(s) to transport the system via public and/or military roadways. Command and Control (C2) Van The Government will be responsible for providing C2 van from which the operator(s) will conduct the test. All operator interface computers and equipment necessary for the conduct of the test will be located in this van. 6
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationRequest for Solutions: Distributed Live Virtual Constructive (dlvc) Prototype
1.0 Purpose Request for Solutions: Distributed Live Virtual Constructive (dlvc) Prototype This Request for Solutions is seeking a demonstratable system that balances computer processing for modeling and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Army Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #167 To Program Element - 52.811 20.733
More informationCommon Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 49 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2011 Mr.
More informationCommon Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 50 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2012 Ms.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014
More informationAMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)
AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Title: Contract Work Breakdown Structure DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Number: DI-MGMT-81334A Approval Date: 20031031 AMSC Number: D7515 DTIC Applicable: Limitation: Office of Primary Responsibility: (D) OSD/PA&E/CAIG
More informationM&S for OT&E - Examples
Example 1 Aircraft OT&E Example 3.4.1. Modeling & Simulation. The F-100 fighter aircraft will use the Aerial Combat Simulation (ACS) to support evaluations of F-100 operational effectiveness in air-to-air
More informationAir Defense System Solutions.
Air Defense System Solutions www.aselsan.com.tr ADSS AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Effective air defense is based on integration and coordinated use of airborne and/or ground
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($
More informationFirst Announcement/Call For Papers
AIAA Strategic and Tactical Missile Systems Conference AIAA Missile Sciences Conference Abstract Deadline 30 June 2011 SECRET/U.S. ONLY 24 26 January 2012 Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
More informationKeywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles
Chapter 5 GUIDED MISSILES Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles 5.1 INTRODUCTION Guided missiles have been in the forefront of modern warfare since
More informationJoint Test & Evaluation Program
Joint Test & Evaluation Program Program Overview Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director Air Warfare DOT&E March 22, 2005 Mr. Jim Thompson Joint Test and Evaluation Program Manager 1 What is the JT&E Program? DOT&E
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY
More informationARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II
ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II Army ACAT ID Program Total Number of BATs: (3,487 BAT + 8,478 P3I BAT) Total Number of Missiles: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average Unit Cost (TY$): Full-rate
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line Item #116 To Complete
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 2.885
More informationBilling Code:
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/08/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-00148, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 5001-06 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 13.134 13.87 13.942-13.942 13.82 14.48 14.827
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8100.1 September 19, 2002 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Global Information Grid (GIG) Overarching Policy ASD(C3I) References: (a) Section 2223
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2016 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($
More informationProposal for the Suicide Bomb Detector Model # RDS400
Proposal for the Suicide Bomb Detector Model # RDS400 Presented From: HSS Development 75 S. Broadway White Plains, NY 10601 USA Office: +1-914-304-4333 Web: www.secintel.com info@secintel.com (Email) 2017
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 2 Page 1 of 9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification February 2006 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY SIX CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM ELEMENT (PE) 0604940D8Z Cost ($
More informationAMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System
AMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System AMPS Where Innovation Meets Performance The Threat Military aircraft, VIP aircraft and commercial airliners are all exposed to the growing threat of Surface to
More informationAdvanced Explosive Ordnance Disposal Robotic System (AEODRS)
Advanced Explosive Ordnance Disposal Robotic System (AEODRS) NDIA Meeting DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED 22 MARCH 2017 Mr. Jim Ryan Assistant Program Manager Joint Service EOD 22 March 2017 Purpose Provide JEOD
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007
More informationThe Four-Element Framework: An Integrated Test and Evaluation Strategy
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. The Four-Element Framework: An Integrated Test and Evaluation Strategy TRUTH Christopher Wilcox Army Evaluation Center Aviation Evaluation Directorate
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 25 FY 26 R Program Element
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 Program Element 16.104 48.666 19.004-19.004 19.950 31.056 31.181 31.730 Continuing Continuing 633150: Advanced Optics
More information2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference
2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution
More informationWARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS)
EXCERPT FROM CONTRACTS W9113M-10-D-0002 and W9113M-10-D-0003: C-1. PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT SW-SMDC-08-08. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 35.208 38.447
More informationTHE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 227 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE 3.078
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 5 - ENG MANUFACTURING DEV 0604768A - BAT COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
More informationThe Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy
The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy Lt. Col. Carlos Wiley, USA Scott Newman Vivek Agnish S tarting in October 2012, the Army began to equip brigade combat teams that will deploy in 2013
More informationTHAAD Program Summary
Program Summary Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Program Overview_1 1 Unique Battlespace High Altitude Area Defense Battlespace SM3 Block 1A Aegis SM3 / SM3 Altitude (km) / SM3 Atmosphere Transition
More informationTM ARMY AH-64A HELICOPTER HELLFIRE MISSILE EQUIPMENT AVIATION INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL TECHNICAL MANUAL
TECHNICAL MANUAL AVIATION INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE MANUAL ARMY AH-64A HELICOPTER HELLFIRE MISSILE EQUIPMENT This copy is a reprint which includes current pages from Changes 1 through 6. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost
More informationCommon Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 48 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2010 Mr.
More informationSubject: The Department of Homeland Security Needs to Fully Adopt a Knowledge-based Approach to Its Counter-MANPADS Development Program
United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 January 30, 2004 The Honorable Duncan Hunter Chairman The Honorable Ike Skelton Ranking Minority Member Committee on Armed Services House of
More informationCHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2003 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E,D BA4 R-1 Item Nomenclature: 0604618D8Z, Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) Cost ($ in millions)
More informationMissile Mathematical Model and System Design
AARMS Vol. 16, No. 1 (2017) 29 35. Missile Mathematical Model and System Design István PAPP 1 Recently, aerospace (flight) engineers, having more solid mathematical backgrounds, have become familiar with
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationForeign Military Sales (FMS) Checklist for Developing Acquisition of Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Letter of Request (LOR)
Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Checklist for Developing Acquisition of Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Letter of Request (LOR) THIS AMRAAM FMS CHECKLIST WILL BE USED IN DEVELOPMENT OF THE
More informationAIR FORCE MISSION SUPPORT SYSTEM (AFMSS)
AIR FORCE MISSION SUPPORT SYSTEM (AFMSS) MPS-III PFPS Air Force ACAT IAC Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 2,900 AFMSS/UNIX-based Systems: Total Program Cost (TY$): $652M+ Sanders (Lockheed
More information2018 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference
2018 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 15 May 2018 Mr. Joseph C. Keelon Program Executive for Advanced
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification May 2009 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 (RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT) OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES (OT&A) PROGRAM ELEMENT
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element JA6: Joint Air-To-Ground Missile (JAGM)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0401318F PE TITLE: CV-22 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 05 System Development and Demonstration (SDD) 0401318F CV-22 Cost ($ in Millions) FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration
More informationAdvanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association
Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited May 13, 2016 Mr. Richard Matlock Program
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #32
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
More informationSubj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO OPNAVINST 5450.223B N87 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.223B From: Chief of Naval Operations
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)
PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5200.39 September 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Security, Intelligence, and Counterintelligence Support to Acquisition Program Protection ASD(C3I) References: (a) DoD Directive
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5134.09 September 17, 2009 DA&M SUBJECT: Missile Defense Agency (MDA) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive, in accordance with the authority vested
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Preparation (MTPS) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM Total PE 92.490 32.552 63.244 64.668
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost
More informationREQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) RFI Number: DHS Robotic Aircraft for Public Safety
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) RFI Number: DHS 13-01 Robotic Aircraft for Public Safety 1. BACKGROUND/PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate is the Department s primary research
More informationAUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.
More informationOUR MISSION PARTNERS DISA S BUDGET. TOTAL DOD COMPONENT/AGENCY ORDERS FOR DISA DWCF FY16 (in thousands)
OUR MISSION PARTNERS Military Services DISA S BUDGET Appropriated (Based on FY17 President s Budget- Not Enacted) Total Appropriated: Defense Working Capital Fund (DWCF) (Based on FY17 President s Budget-
More informationGAO ELECTRONIC WARFARE. The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System. Report to the Secretary of Defense
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Secretary of Defense April 2001 ELECTRONIC WARFARE The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System GAO-01-448 Contents
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationJoint Service Safety Testing Study Phase II Final Presentation
Joint Service Safety Testing Study Phase II Final Presentation October 22, 2008 Prepared for: 11 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference San Diego, CA Paige V. Ripani Booz Allen Hamilton ripani_paige@bah.com
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Navy Date: February 2016 1810N: Other Procurement, Navy / BA 04: Ordnance Support Equipment / BSA 3: Ship Missile Systems Equipment ID Code (A=Service
More informationJoint Electronics Type Designation Automated System
Army Regulation 70 76 SECNAVINST 2830.1 AFI 60 105 Research, Development, and Acquisition Joint Electronics Type Designation Automated System Headquarters Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationPrecision Guided Mortar Munition (PGMM) XM395
Precision Guided Mortar Munition (PGMM) XM395 1999 International Infantry & Small Arms Symposium 22 June 1999 Presented by: Greg Bischer AMSTA-AR-FSP-G Briefing Purpose & Outline Purpose Information briefing
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 16.397 1.975 1.971-1.971 1.990 1.989 2.023
More informationSpeed Measuring Equipment
SNOW HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS DIRECTIVE Speed Measuring Equipment Distribution: All Sworn Index: OPS 03.11 Issued: 03/01/2017 Revised: 03/28/2017 Reviewed: N/A Next Review: 03/01/2018.01 Purpose
More informationCounter-Man-Portable Air Defense Systems. James Tuttle Program Manager U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology
Counter-Man-Portable Air Defense Systems James Tuttle Program Manager U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Threat Background C-MANPADS National Strategy Program Overview Briefing Outline
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element
More informationThis publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 13-216 5 MAY 2005 Space, Missile, Command, and Control EVALUATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL AND LANDING SYSTEMS (ATCALS) COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element 966.537 66.374 29.083 54.838 0.000 54.838 47.369
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
More informationMILITARY STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL RELAY (MILSTAR) SATELLITE SYSTEM
MILITARY STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL RELAY (MILSTAR) SATELLITE SYSTEM Air Force ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 6 satellites Lockheed Martin Total Program Cost (TY$): N/A Average Unit
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationDISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A
IFPC Inc 2-I DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 31 IFPC Inc 2-I Mission Mission: Primary Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 Intercept (IFPC Inc
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0603460A Joint A ir-to-ground Missile (JAGM) ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #19
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, elopment, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Technology elopment (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0602712A Countermine Systems ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 26267 29171 22088 21965
More informationNATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM (NAS)
NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM (NAS) Air Force/FAA ACAT IC Program Prime Contractor Air Traffic Control and Landing System Raytheon Corp. (Radar/Automation) Total Number of Systems: 92 sites Denro (Voice Switches)
More information