Originally defined by Lundberg, 1 a critical value represents
|
|
- Brice Knight
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CAP Laboratory Improvement Programs Assessment Monitoring of Laboratory Critical Values A College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks Study of 180 Institutions Elizabeth A. Wagar, MD; Ana K. Stankovic, MD, PhD; David S. Wilkinson, MD, PhD; Molly Walsh, PhD; Rhona J. Souers, MS Context. Critical laboratory value reporting is a highly visible and essential key activity for clinical laboratories. Objective. To measure critical laboratory value reporting in multiple institutions over time and to examine the practice patterns and demographic factors associated with sustained improvement in critical value reporting. Design. A longitudinal cohort study of 180 clinical laboratories that provided quarterly critical values reporting data for 2 to 16 quarters was conducted using a uniform definition of successful caregiver notification. Mixed linear model analysis of the 2001 through 2004 dataset was performed. Results. A decrease in total and inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results was associated with (1) the American Association of Blood Banks inspection within the past 2 years (P.01, for both total and inpatient rates); (2) unit secretary/clerical staff not authorized to accept inpatient critical value notification (P.004 [total] and.001 [inpatient]); and (3) the mandatory practice of requiring notification of health care providers when handling inpatients known to have results repeatedly in the critical range (P.01, for both total and inpatient rates). Continued participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program was associated with significant and progressive improvement in total, inpatient, and outpatient critical value reporting (P.02,.01, and.003, respectively). Conclusions. Critical value reporting improved as the duration of participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program increased. Improved total and inpatient critical value reporting was associated with factors that may be markers for institutions with priorities of quality management and enhanced communication with responsible caregivers. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:44 49) Originally defined by Lundberg, 1 a critical value represents a pathophysiologic state at such variance with normal as to be life-threatening unless something is done promptly and for which some corrective action can be taken. As part of Lundberg s procedure, he identified the term critical (panic) values for results with life-threatening abnormalities. The American Society for Clinical Pathology developed a practice parameter addressing critical value reporting in Other investigators have similarly focused on practices in health care networks or standardized recommendations from other countries. 3,4 The Q-Probes studies, offered by the College of American Pathologists, has been used to examine practices and performance at multiple institutions. 5,6 Critical values, despite their importance in clinical laboratory operations, are infrequently cited in the literature. Accepted for publication July 10, From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Wagar); Becton Dickinson Diagnostics, Preanalytical Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ (Dr Stankovic); Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Department of Pathology, Richmond (Dr Wilkinson); and the College of American Pathologists, Department of Biostatistics, Northfield, Ill (Dr Walsh and Ms Souers). The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article. Reprints: Elizabeth A. Wagar, MD, Professor and Vice Chair, Laboratory Medical Director, UCLA Clinical Laboratories, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Box , AL-206 CHS, Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA ( ewagar@mednet.ucla.edu). In spite of a long history of reporting panic values and the incorporation of critical values into multiple regulations, there is little standardization of procedures. Performance benchmarks and definitions are variable or nonexistent. However, interest in critical values has intensified as various regulatory agencies have incorporated their use into standard operating recommendations. Critical values are described in federal regulations as part of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments Act of A recent example of regulatory adoption is the development by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations of a standard requiring the receiving physician or health care professional to read-back the critical value results with patient identifiers and to assess the critical value turnaround times. 8 A recently described summation of Q-Probes data from 623 institutions indicates that critical value lists vary widely for routine chemistry and hematology analytes among participants. 9 Laboratory practices also varied for outpatient clinic versus inpatient reporting, with most outpatient results received by physicians office staff. A change in therapy resulted from 65% of reported critical values, with 94.9% of physicians indicating that critical results are valuable for patient care. To develop meaningful data and establish a performance benchmark, a critical values study with cumulative data collections was initiated as a Q-Tracks monitoring program by the College of American Pathologists in Voluntary participants in a given institution were instructed to longitudinally monitor the total number of inpatient 44 Arch Pathol Lab Med Vol 131, January 2007 Critical Value Reporting Wagar et al
2 and outpatient laboratory results that qualified as critical values. Participants also documented whether result notification occurred as well as the number of components on the critical value list. Four years of Q-Tracks data provide what we believe to be the most comprehensive continuously recorded data record of critical values. These results demonstrate performance improvement of participants when using multiple-site results as a benchmark. Additionally, innovative techniques used by the best-performing laboratories are described to assist the clinical laboratory community in refining critical value procedures for specific institutional needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Format and Data Collection The study was conducted according to the Q-Tracks monitor format: annual subscribers received mailed data-collection instructions on a quarterly basis. The objective of the monitor was to determine the level of successful critical value reporting in the general laboratory for inpatients and outpatients. The performance indicator was the percentage of critical values with documentation of successful caregiver notification and was calculated as: Number of documented critical value notifications 100 Total number of reportable critical value results For the purpose of this longitudinal study, the rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results was defined as: (1 proportion of documented critical value notifications) 1000 Each institution also identified (1) specific institutional practices of the personnel responsible for reporting critical values, (2) the number of analytes on the critical value list, (3) the policy regarding repeat critical values, and (4) whether confirmation was required for faxed/electronically transmitted results. These principles were adhered to throughout the study. The tracking of institution-specific subgroup information was optional and intended for the internal use of the subscribing institution only. Because they are more consistently listed as critical values in clinical laboratories, 3 results included in this study were for general hematology, coagulation, and chemistry analytes. Clinical microbiology critical values, cardiac markers, drugs of abuse and therapeutic drug levels, urinalysis, and blood gases as well as point-of-care tests and tests performed at reference laboratories were excluded from the study because of the likely variability in the critical value lists at participating institutions resulting from variable patient profiles. Critical values from discharged patients were also excluded. Data collection was performed quarterly, and the numbers of reportable critical values and documented critical value notifications were collected retrospectively. Participating clinical laboratories were requested to evaluate 120 inpatient and 120 outpatient reportable critical values per month. To ensure statistical validity, institutions with more than 20 inpatient and 20 outpatient reportable values per day collected data on 6 specified randomized dates per quarter. For laboratories with less than 20 inpatient and 20 outpatient reportable values per day, data were collected every day starting with the first day of the month until 120 total values were obtained. Similar methods were applied for laboratories that had fewer than 20 inpatient reportable critical values per day matched with more than 20 outpatient reportable critical values and vice versa. If a patient had multiple critical values called as a single notification, they were counted as a single reportable critical value. A questionnaire was also provided regarding the subscribing institution s policies and practices related to notification of critical values. This questionnaire was submitted to the College of American Pathologists with the institution s first data submission. This Table 1. Demographics of Participating Institutions Institution Data Type Voluntary, nonprofit Proprietary hospital State, county, city hospital University hospital Governmental, federal Private, independent laboratory System, integrated delivery network Children s hospital Other, governmental, nonfederal Other, nongovernmental Location City Suburban Rural Federal installation laboratory No. of occupied beds No. (%) of Institutions 97 (58.1) 20 (12.0) 14 (8.4) 7 (4.2) 7 (4.2) 6 (3.6) 5 (3.0) 3 (1.8) 4 (2.4) 4 (2.4) 85 (50.6) 47 (28.0) 34 (20.2) 2 (1.2) 67 (44.7) 45 (30.0) 27 (18.0) 8 (5.3) 3 (2.0) Table 2. Techniques or Processes Used by Best Performers That May Account for Higher Than Average Critical Values Reporting Rates Written report is issued for failure to document critical value communication Three times per day a computer report is generated to verify critical value notification; an additional report is generated the following morning to verify notification of all critical values from the previous day For panic values, the laboratory computer system retrieves the physician s name and telephone number and requires documentation of the notification Frequent training is provided on the importance of critical values and the correct way to document notification, and follow-up on any failures information was updated annually, unless a change occurred before that time. Demographics were collected about the institution type, location, occupied bed size of inpatient facilities, training activities, outpatient services, administrative services such as courier services, level of service, hospital complexity, and whether the institution was a teaching hospital (Table 1). Performance summaries were provided to all annual subscribers from 2001 to In 2003 and 2004, 12 learning assessment questions were provided to the subscribers. Three questions were collected for each quarter. Best-performers data were collected after the third quarter of each year to survey responses to questions regarding procedures that may have contributed to the reporting of improved critical values (Table 2). Definitions To ensure comparability of participant responses across institutions, several definitions were established (Table 3). Statistical Analyses Calculations used to derive the study variables have been described. 10 Quarterly distributions of cumulative quarters for the rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results and quarterly distributions of overall rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results were reported for all 4 years of analysis. An aggregate rate of overall compliance with critical value reporting Arch Pathol Lab Med Vol 131, January 2007 Critical Value Reporting Wagar et al 45
3 Table 3. Term Inpatient Outpatient Successful notifications Institution-specific subgroups List of Definitions Used in This Study Definition Any patient who is admitted to the hospital; laboratories reporting values on emergency department patients should include them in this category Patients who are registered at the hospital, but who are not admitted, as well as patients who are neither registered nor admitted, such as patients drawn in physicians offices, outside nursing homes, and outreach programs Situations in which there is documentation that the critical value was communicated according to a given laboratory s policy Tracking institution-specific subgroup information is optional and intended for internal use only was reported during the 16 quarters since the start of the study. Summaries of general questionnaire responses were compiled as well as a distribution of analytes on participating institutions critical values list. The best-performing 25% of institutions were identified as achieving a rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results, at most, 15 (2001), 13 (2002), 6 (2003), and 5 (2004). As part of this quality assurance monitor, 180 Q-Tracks participants monitored quarterly critical value reporting compliance rates. The number of institutions that participated in each quarter varied from 72 to 99. A total of inpatient and outpatient critical values were included in the study. To investigate whether there was a tendency to attain lower rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results as the length of time spent in the program increased, and if there were any practice variables collected over time associated with lower rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results, data were collected on a quarterly basis for a maximum of 16 quarters and participants were grouped into 3 categories based on how long they had participated in the continuous monitoring program. Participants with only a single observation were excluded from this analysis. The hypothesis that longer participation results in a decrease in the rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results was formally tested using the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS (SAS, Cary, NC). A mixed linear model was used to account for repeated measures taken from the same experimental units. It is intuitive that a current rate may be highly correlated with previous and subsequent time-adjacent rates from the same institution. Another underlying assumption for use of this technique is that the data are normally distributed (Gaussian); the original rates were skewed. To minimize the skewness, data from participants who reported 100% critical values reporting rates for all 16 quarters were excluded. A natural log transformation was applied to the rates to make the distribution approximately Gaussian. There were 180 participants included in the final analysis. Three mixed models were tested using the natural log transformation of the dependent variables, total rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results, inpatient rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results, and outpatient rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results. The independent variables in the 3 models are listed in Table 4. RESULTS Mixed Linear Model Analysis Total Rate of Undocumented Critical Values per 1000 Results. Lower total rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results were significantly associated with longer participation in the program (P.02). The Figure Table 4. Independent Variables in the Three Models Variable Description* Number of quarters since first participation Quarter of participation (ie, 01A, 01B) Institution is inspected/accredited by CAP (Y/N) Institution is inspected/accredited by JCAHO (Y/N) Institution is inspected/accredited by AABB (Y/N) Institution is inspected/accredited by FDA (Y/N) Institution is inspected/accredited by state (Y/N) Teaching hospital (Y/N) Nongovernmental institution (Y/N) Governmental, nonfederal institution (Y/N) Governmental, federal institution (Y/N) Institution trains pathology residents (Y/N) Number of licensed beds LIS used in Anatomic Pathology section (Y/N) LIS used for Chemistry/Hematology section (Y/N) LIS used for Microbiology section (Y/N) LIS used for HIS/LIS interface (Y/N) Who is authorized to accept notification of critical values for inpatients (4 levels) Who is authorized to accept notification of critical values for outpatients (4 levels) How are outpatient critical values handled outside of normal working hours (5 levels) Who is primarily responsible for reporting critical values for inpatients (3 levels) Who is primarily responsible for reporting critical values for outpatients (3 levels) Procedure used for handling inpatients who are known to repeatedly have results in the critical range (4 levels) Procedure used for handling outpatients who are known to repeatedly have results in the critical range (4 levels) For inpatient critical values that are faxed or sent in an electronic format, there is a procedure in place to confirm that the recipient received the notification (Y/N) For outpatient critical values that are faxed or sent in an electronic format, there is a procedure in place to confirm that the recipient received the notification (Y/N) Number of analytes on the critical values list included in this study for inpatients Number of analytes on the critical values list included in this study for outpatients * CAP indicates College of American Pathologists; JCAHO, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; AABB, American Association of Blood Banks; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; LIS, laboratory information system; and HIS, hospital information system. These variables were included in 2 of the 3 models. They were included in model testing the total rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results and in the model for either the inpatient or the outpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results. illustrates the improvement in the total rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results over time. Variables found to be significantly associated with lower total rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results are (1) American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) inspection within the past 2 years (P.01); (2) unit secretary/clerical staff not authorized to accept inpatient critical values notification (P.004); and (3) a policy to always notify health care providers with inpatient critical values, irrespective of whether the patient is known to have results repeatedly in the critical value range (P.01). Table 5 provides the median total rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results for the practice variables. Inpatient Rate of Undocumented Critical Values per 1000 Results. Lower inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results were significantly associ- 46 Arch Pathol Lab Med Vol 131, January 2007 Critical Value Reporting Wagar et al
4 Improvement in the rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results over time. Total, inpatient, and outpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results were significantly lower with longer participation in the program. Years 2 and 3 of participation are shown as combined data. Table 5. Median Total and Inpatient Rates of Undocumented Critical Values per 1000 Results for the Practice Variables Median Rate of Undocumented Critical Values per 1000 Results Practice Variable* Total Inpatient AABB inspection within past 2 years Yes 20.8 (n 86) 15.5 (n 86) No 25.3 (n 68) 19.8 (n 64) Unit secretary/clerical staff authorized to accept notification of inpatient critical values Yes 30.6 (n 51) 25.0 (n 51) No 20.8 (n 98) 16.8 (n 94) Procedure for handling inpatients who are known to have results repeatedly in the critical range Health care providers always notified, regardless of the previous results 17.7 (n 122) 19.7 (n 121) Other policies 19.3 (n 27) 20.6 (n 24) * AABB indicates American Association of Blood Banks. ated with longer participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program (P.01). There was clear improvement in inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results over time (Figure). Because the inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results are highly correlated with the total rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results (r 0.94), the significant associations are similar for the 2 rates. Variables found to be significantly associated with lower inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results are (1) AABB inspection within the past 2 years (P.01); (2) unit secretary/clerical staff not authorized to accept inpatient critical values notification (P.001); and (3) a policy to always notify health care providers with inpatient critical values, regardless of whether the patient is known to have results repeatedly in the critical value range (P.01). Table 5 provides the median inpatient rate Table 6. Distribution of Cumulative Undocumented Critical Value Rates per 1000 Results for 180 Laboratories During the First Year of Participation Rate of Undocumented Critical Values per 1000 Results No. of Institutions Percentile 25th 50th 75th Total Inpatient Outpatent of undocumented critical values per 1000 results for the practice variables. Outpatient Rate of Undocumented Critical Values per 1000 Results. Lower outpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results were significantly associated with longer participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program (P.003). The Figure illustrates the improvement in outpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results over time. No other variables were found to be significantly associated with outpatient rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results. Distribution of Cumulative Undocumented Critical Value Rates per To generate useful comparative data for clinical laboratories, a distribution of cumulative undocumented critical value rates per 1000 results was generated for all 180 laboratories (Table 6). This analysis provides valuable information for benchmarking performance related to total critical values in a given setting. At the 25th percentile (25th percentile being better performance than the 75th percentile), 8.8 undocumented critical values were observed per 1000 events versus 66.4 undocumented critical values observed per 1000 events at the 75th percentile. COMMENT Critical value reporting is increasingly scrutinized by regulatory agencies and quality-management organizations as an important marker for excellence in patient centric care. 8 In 2003, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations listed the read-back of critical values by receiving health care professionals as a key patient safety standard. Two years later, the Commission mandated an additional requirement for monitoring the turnaround time for critical values reporting. This new Arch Pathol Lab Med Vol 131, January 2007 Critical Value Reporting Wagar et al 47
5 emphasis has caused hospital and health care organization administrators to focus with renewed vigor on critical values and their role in safe and effective patient care. There is little consensus or benchmark data about critical values in the clinical laboratory. Procedures are not standardized and the definition of a critical value remains uncertain in the minds of many clinicians and laboratory professionals. A recently described analysis of Q-Probes data from 623 institutions highlights this variability. 9 In the present study, the choice of analytes and high and low critical limits varied considerably. Calling of critical values also varied, depending on patient status, with a mean time of 6.1 minutes for inpatient calls versus 13.7 minutes for outpatient calls. This Q-Tracks monitoring program was designed to determine the rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results in a group of voluntary participants, monitored on a quarterly basis. Three variables were found to be significantly associated with lower total and inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results: (1) unit secretary/clerical staff not authorized to accept inpatient critical values notification; (2) procedures for handling inpatients who are known to have critical values that repeatedly include always notifying the health care provider, regardless of the previous results; and (3) AABB inspection within the past 2 years. The procedure requirement that clerical staff are not authorized to receive critical value results implies that such results are reported instead to licensed or professionally trained health care personnel. An institution making this distinction may be paying close attention to the provision of critical information to personnel capable of interpreting and translating the significance of the results. The presence of such a procedure is, perhaps, an indirect indicator of the direct involvement of the laboratory medical director, laboratory technologists, nurses, and physicians in the critical values reporting process. The role of leaders is to define and communicate the purpose of a procedure. When leadership is involved in a process, more significant progress is attained in achieving patient safety goals. 11 Similarly, the finding that reporting of all critical values, even when they are repeat values on the same patients, may indicate a higher degree of vigilance in the critical value reporting system of a given institution, and may imply that physicians, nurses, and laboratory professionals acknowledge and respect the critical value reporting mechanism. Such vigilance is essential for sustaining patient safety efforts. This result additionally emphasizes the importance of a patient-centered approach and integration of clinical services. The critical values reporting system as initially described by Lundberg 1 may, in fact, be one of the earliest examples of an attempt to coordinate care of patients across different clinical service settings. The significant association of AABB inspections with lower total rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results is an interesting finding. Laboratory services that include transfusion medicine are integrated into a higher level of regulatory oversight. If, in addition to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and/or College of American Pathologists inspections, a clinical laboratory chooses to seek AABB accreditation, it may be demonstrating a knowledge base and confidence in its quality processes that are additionally reflected in its ability to improve total critical values reporting rates. An AABB accreditation indicates compliance with 10 groups of standards that provide the structure for a well-maintained quality management system. 12 Such systems often become models for other areas of a clinical laboratory. When the distribution of cumulative undocumented critical value rate per 1000 results for 180 laboratories was analyzed for the first year of participation, 8.8 events/1000 results occurred in better-performing laboratories (25th percentile) versus 66.4 events/1000 results at the 75th percentile. This represents a 7.5-fold difference in performance. Clinical laboratories may use these data to benchmark their own performance and develop mechanisms by which they can create improvements in documentation of critical value reporting. There was no significant association with other demographics or with responses to questions related to reporting mechanisms for outpatient critical values handled outside normal working hours (physician paged, answering service notified, results faxed or electronically sent, direct patient notification), the primary personnel responsible for reporting critical values (laboratory testing personnel, laboratory clerical staff), and, if critical values are faxed, whether there is a mechanism for confirmation notification. An encouraging finding of this investigation is that continued participation in Q-Tracks monitoring of critical values reporting was associated with a progressive decrease in the rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results for total, inpatient, and outpatient critical values. The institutions that had participated for longer periods of time in the Q-Tracks program had progressively decreased rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results. In the 1930s, early studies of quality in the manufacturing arena noted that subjects under observation perform better than unobserved subjects. 13 It is not possible to determine explicitly whether participation in the Q-Tracks program brought a higher level of participant awareness to critical value reporting. However, data from other clinical disciplines demonstrate increased quality awareness over time. For example, a study of cardiothoracic surgeons using continuous quality improvement to improve their practices reduced combined mortality rates by 24%. 14 Awareness is a key component of quality improvement. This Q-Tracks monitoring program provides consciousness of the significance of quality-enhancing practices in critical value reporting. The mixed linear model used to analyze the Q-Tracks longitudinal dataset provides strong support for the factors that may be associated with improved total and inpatient critical values reporting. Association with explicit reporting to health care professionals, repeat reporting of critical values for the same patients, and AABB accreditation are markers for clinical laboratories that emphasize quality management and patient safety. Most encouraging is the continued decreased rate of undocumented critical values per 1000 results for institutions participating in this Q-Tracks monitoring program for 2 to 4 years, which clearly indicates that clinical laboratories can improve with time. These conclusions provide moral support to laboratory managers and directors as they develop quality-improvement and patient-safety projects in their clinical laboratories. We thank Bushra Yasin, PhD, for her independent assessment and review of this article. 48 Arch Pathol Lab Med Vol 131, January 2007 Critical Value Reporting Wagar et al
6 References 1. Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values. MLO Med Lab Obs. 1972;4: Emancipator K. Critical values: ASCP practice parameter. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;108: Lum G. Critical limits (alert values) for physician notification: universal or medical center specific limits? Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1998;28: Tillman J, Barth JH. A survey of laboratory critical (alert) limits in the UK. Ann Clin Biochem. 2003;40: Novis DA. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years experience with the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes and Q-Tracks programs. Clin Lab Med. 2004;24: Howanitz PJ. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs: regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) HCFA: final rule with comment period. Fed Regist. 1992;57: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations National patient safety goals. Available at: Accessed June 8, Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study in 623 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126: Wilkinson DS. Critical Values Reporting: Q-Tracks Annual Summary Report. Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Building organizational supports for change. In: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001: Blood Bank/Transfusion Service Standards Program Unit. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services. 23rd ed. Bethesda, Md: American Association of Blood Banks; Franke RH, Kaul JD. The Hawthorne experiments: first statistical interpretation. Am Sociol Rev. 1978;43: O Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group: a regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 1996; 275: Arch Pathol Lab Med Vol 131, January 2007 Critical Value Reporting Wagar et al 49
THE VALUE OF CAP S Q-PROBES & Q-TRACKS
THE VALUE OF CAP S Q-PROBES & Q-TRACKS Peter J. Howanitz MD Professor, Vice Chair, Laboratory Director Dept. Of Pathology SUNY Downstate Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA Peter.Howanitz@downstate.edu OVERVIEW Discuss
More informationPhysician Satisfaction With Clinical Laboratory Services. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 81 Institutions
Physician Satisfaction With Clinical Laboratory Services A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 81 Institutions Shannon J. McCall, MD; Rhona J. Souers, MS; Barbara Blond, MBA; Larry Massie,
More informationWristband Errors in Small Hospitals
PHLEBOTOMY J a n e C. Dale, MD Stephen W. Renner, MD Wristband Errors in Small Hospitals A College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes Study of Quality ssues in Patient dentification Although methods of
More informationCAP Laboratory Improvement Programs. Staffing Benchmarks for Clinical Laboratories
CAP Laboratory Improvement Programs Staffing Benchmarks for Clinical Laboratories A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of Laboratory Staffing at 98 Institutions Bruce A. Jones, MD; Teresa
More informationVoluntary national programs to track laboratory quality,
Clinical Laboratory Specimen Rejection Association With the Site of Patient Care and Patients Characteristics Findings From a Single Health Care Organization Azadeh Stark, PhD; Bruce A. Jones, MD; Deborah
More informationPURPOSE: This policy provides an overview of SHANDS Jacksonville Laboratory s commitment to the care and safety of the patients we serve.
PAGE 1 of 5 TITLE: Provision of Care Regarding Laboratory Services PURPOSE: This policy provides an overview of SHANDS Jacksonville Laboratory s commitment to the care and safety of the patients we serve.
More informationTESTIMONY OF THOMAS HAMILTON DIRECTOR SURVEY & CERTIFICATION GROUP CENTER FOR MEDICAID AND STATE OPERATIONS CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
TESTIMONY OF THOMAS HAMILTON DIRECTOR SURVEY & CERTIFICATION GROUP CENTER FOR MEDICAID AND STATE OPERATIONS CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES ON CLIA AND GENETIC TESTING BEFORE THE SENATE SPECIAL
More informationPatient Satisfaction in Phlebotomy
PHLEBOTOMY JaneC. Dale, MD Peter J. Howanitz, MD Patient Satisfaction in Phlebotomy A College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes Study From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic,
More informationBenchmarking Laboratory Quality
Benchmarking Laboratory Quality Paul Valenstein, MD, 1 Frank Schneider, MD 2 ( 1 Department of Pathology, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, 2 Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center,
More informationPolicy Subject Index Number Section Subsection Category Contact Last Revised References Applicable To Detail MISSION STATEMENT: OVERVIEW:
Subject Objectives and Organization Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Index Number Lab-0175 Section Laboratory Subsection General Category Departmental Contact Ekern, Nancy L Last Revised 10/25/2016 References
More informationCAP Companion Society Meeting at USCAP 2009 Quality Assurance, Error Reduction, and Patient Safety in Anatomic Pathology
CAP Companion Society Meeting at USCAP 2009 Quality Assurance, Error Reduction, and Patient Safety in Anatomic Pathology Core Components of a Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program in Anatomic Pathology
More informationCME/SAM. Determination of Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory
Clinical Chemistry / Turnaround Time in a Clinical Laboratory Determination of Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory Accessioning-to-Result Time Does Not Always Accurately Reflect Laboratory Performance
More informationScope of Service. Department Mission
Scope of Service Department Mission Scope of Services Provided The Department of Laboratory Services provides a wide array of testing and other services to Memorial Health System s patients, and to other
More informationFrom customer satisfaction survey to corrective actions in laboratory services in a university hospital
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006; Volume 18, Number 6: pp. 422 428 Advance Access Publication: 26 September 2006 From customer satisfaction survey to corrective actions in laboratory
More informationJoint Commission Laboratory Accreditation: Why It Is Right For Your Organization
Joint Commission Laboratory Accreditation: Why It Is Right For Your Organization Jennifer Rhamy MBA, MA, MT(ASCP)SBB, HP Executive Director, Laboratory Accreditation Program 1 Objectives 1. Define the
More informationAsian Journal of Research in Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences Journal home page:
Research Article ISSN: 2349 4492 Asian Journal of Research in Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences Journal home page: www.ajrbps.com PHYSICIANS SATISFACTION WITH LABORATORY SERVICES AT KING FAISAL HOSPITAL
More informationICSH Guideline for the Communication of Critical FBC Results
ICSH Guideline for the Communication of Critical FBC Results Barbara De la Salle Director, UK NEQAS Haematology On behalf of the ICSH Communication of Critical Results Working Group (Chair: Dr Tee Beng
More informationLow-Income Health Program (LIHP) Evaluation Proposal
Low-Income Health Program (LIHP) Evaluation Proposal UCLA Center for Health Policy Research & The California Medicaid Research Institute Background In November of 2010, California s Bridge to Reform 1115
More informationClinical Laboratories West Virginia University Hospitals. Resident Orientation
Clinical Laboratories West Virginia University Hospitals Resident Orientation Peter L. Perrotta, MD Medical Director Clinical Laboratories pperrotta@hsc.wvu.edu Joseph A. DelTondo, DO Director of Autopsy
More informationDriving Clinical Excellence in Microbiology with Consolidation, Real-Time Dashboards and Physician Concierge Services
Driving Clinical Excellence in Microbiology with Consolidation, Real-Time Dashboards and Physician Concierge Services Executive War College May 1, 2013 David Vinson med fusion, Lewisville, TX Introduction
More informationHandling Amendments in Surgical Pathology. Disclosures
Handling Amendments in Surgical Pathology Corwyn Rowsell, MD, FRCPC Associate Professor, University of Toronto Pathologist, Markham Stouffville Hospital Disclosures None 1 Outline Definitions of amendment/addendum
More informationImproving Your POC Program: An Upside Down Map. Sheila K. Coffman MT(ASCP)
Improving Your POC Program: An Upside Down Map Sheila K. Coffman MT(ASCP) If you have seen ONE Point of Care program You have seen ONE Point of Care Program. If only there was a MapQuest for POC... Or
More informationLow-Income Health Program (LIHP) Evaluation Proposal
Low-Income Health Program (LIHP) Evaluation Proposal UCLA Center for Health Policy Research & The California Medicaid Research Institute BACKGROUND In November of 2010, California s Bridge to Reform 1115
More informationCE Update [generalist compliance/regulation management/administration and training] COLA Accreditation An Educational Experience
your lab focus 284 CE Update [generalist compliance/regulation management/administration and training] COLA Accreditation An Educational Experience Jennifer L. Rivers, Catherine M. Johnson, MT(ASCP) COLA,
More informationImproving Quality of Patient Care in an Emergency Department. A Laboratory Perspective
Clinical Chemistry / Improving Care in an Emergency Department Improving Quality of Patient Care in an Emergency Department A Laboratory Perspective Chelsea Sheppard, MD, 1 Nicole Franks, MD, 2 Frederick
More informationRobert L. Schmidt, MD, PhD, MBA, Jeanne Panlener, MT(ASCP), and Jerry W. Hussong, DDS, MS, MD
An Analysis of Clinical Consultation Activities in Clinical Pathology Who Requests Help and Why Robert L. Schmidt, MD, PhD, MBA, Jeanne Panlener, MT(ASCP), and Jerry W. Hussong, DDS, MS, MD From the Department
More informationCAH PREPARATION ON-SITE VISIT
CAH PREPARATION ON-SITE VISIT Illinois Department of Public Health, Center for Rural Health This day is yours and can be flexible to the timetable of hospital staff. An additional visit can also be arranged
More informationSupervision of Biomedical Support Staff (Assistant and Associate Practitioners)
Supervision of Biomedical Support Staff (Assistant and Associate Practitioners) series IBMS 1 Institute of Biomedical Science Supervision of Biomedical Support Staff (Assistant and Associate Practitioners)
More informationPerformance Measurement of a Pharmacist-Directed Anticoagulation Management Service
Hospital Pharmacy Volume 36, Number 11, pp 1164 1169 2001 Facts and Comparisons PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Performance Measurement of a Pharmacist-Directed Anticoagulation Management Service Jon C. Schommer,
More informationA Publication for Hospital and Health System Professionals
A Publication for Hospital and Health System Professionals S U M M E R 2 0 0 8 V O L U M E 6, I S S U E 2 Data for Healthcare Improvement Developing and Applying Avoidable Delay Tracking Working with Difficult
More informationReference materials are provided with the criteria and should be used to assist in the correct interpretation of the criteria.
InterQual Level of Care Criteria Rehabilitation Criteria Review Process Introduction InterQual Level of Care Criteria support determining the appropriateness of admission, continued stay, and discharge
More informationORIGINAL STUDIES. Participants: 100 medical directors (50% response rate).
ORIGINAL STUDIES Profile of Physicians in the Nursing Home: Time Perception and Barriers to Optimal Medical Practice Thomas V. Caprio, MD, Jurgis Karuza, PhD, and Paul R. Katz, MD Objectives: To describe
More informationThe 1999 Institute of Medicine report increased national
The Value of Monitoring Frozen Section Permanent Section Correlation Data Over Time Stephen S. Raab, MD; Joseph A. Tworek, MD; Rhona Souers, BS; Richard J. Zarbo, MD, DMD Context. The effectiveness of
More informationSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF LABORATORY MEDICINE. Rules and Regulations
SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF LABORATORY MEDICINE Rules and Regulations I Goals and Objectives The goals and objectives of the members of the Department shall be to provide the best possible
More informationUS ): [42CFR ]:
GEN.53400 Section Director (Technical Supervisor) Qualifications/Responsibilities Phase II Section Directors/Technical Supervisors meet defined qualifications and fulfill the expected responsibilities.
More informationCOMMISSION ON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION. Laboratory Accreditation Program TEAM LEADER ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR & QUALITY CHECKLIST
Revised: 09/27/2007 COMMISSION ON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION Laboratory Accreditation Program TEAM LEADER ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR & QUALITY CHECKLIST Disclaimer and Copyright Notice The College of American
More informationDetermining Like Hospitals for Benchmarking Paper #2778
Determining Like Hospitals for Benchmarking Paper #2778 Diane Storer Brown, RN, PhD, FNAHQ, FAAN Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, Nancy E. Donaldson, RN, DNSc, FAAN Department of Physiological
More informationPrepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012
Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID 000001 August 06, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: Benchmarking Your Hospital 3 Section 1: Hospital Operating Costs 5 Section 2: Margins 10 Section 3:
More informationNational Priorities for Improvement:
National Priorities for Improvement: Standardization of Performance Measures, Data Collection, and Analysis Dale W. Bratzler, DO, MPH Principal Clinical Coordinator Oklahoma Foundation Contracting for
More informationPhysician satisfaction and emergency (stat) laboratory turnaround time during various developmental stages
Peer reviewed ORIGINAL ARTICLE Physician satisfaction and emergency (stat) laboratory turnaround time during various developmental stages AJ Groenewald (PhD) HD Potgieter (M Tech) Department of Chemical
More informationInternal Lab Inspections: Are You Inspection Ready? Presented by: Jeanne Mumford, MT(ASCP) Manager, Point of Care Testing, JHM
Internal Lab Inspections: Are You Inspection Ready? Presented by: Jeanne Mumford, MT(ASCP) Manager, Point of Care Testing, JHM Speaker Introductions Jeanne Mumford, MT(ASCP) Manager, Point of Care Testing
More informationCOMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT HINDS, RANKIN, MADISON COUNTIES STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT HINDS, RANKIN, MADISON COUNTIES STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Sample CHNA. This document is intended to be used as a reference only. Some information and data has been altered
More informationuality Management Tools
www.cap.org uality Management Tools The CAP s comprehensive collection of Quality Management Tools (QMT) strengthens your knowledge of key laboratory processes, identifies quality improvement opportunities,
More informationAbout the Report. Cardiac Surgery in Pennsylvania
Cardiac Surgery in Pennsylvania This report presents outcomes for the 29,578 adult patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and/or heart valve surgery between January 1, 2014
More informationPublic Dissemination of Provider Performance Comparisons
Public Dissemination of Provider Performance Comparisons Richard F. Averill, M.S. Recent health care cost control efforts in the U.S. have focused on the introduction of competition into the health care
More informationFulton County Medical Center. Position Description. Pathologist, Laboratory Manager, and Medical Technologist
Fulton County Medical Center Position Description Position Title: Reports To: Medical Laboratory Technician Pathologist, Laboratory Manager, and Medical Technologist Date: September 2004 I Position Summary:
More informationEnhancing the Financial Performance of a Health System Laboratory Network Using an Information System
Enhancing the Financial Performance of a Health System Laboratory Network Using an Information System Ronald D. Workman, MD, 1 Michelle J. Lewis, BS, MT(ASCP), 1 and Bradford T. Hill, DBA 2 Key Words:
More informationThree Steps to Streamline Laboratory Operations:
Three Steps to Streamline Laboratory Operations: A GUIDE FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE AND QUALITY By Richard Walker, MBA, MLS (ASCP), and Kelly Straub, M.S., Huron Healthcare The evolving healthcare environment
More informationTutorial: Basic California State Laboratory Law
Tutorial: Basic California State Laboratory Law This document is meant to cover basic elements of state laboratory law and should not be relied upon in place of legal advice or the official codes of California.
More informationExecutive Summary. This Project
Executive Summary The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has had a long-term commitment to work towards implementation of a per-episode prospective payment approach for Medicare home health services,
More informationThe Business of Antimicrobial Stewardship
The Business of Antimicrobial Stewardship Dr. Andrew Morris Antimicrobial Stewardship ProgramMt. Sinai Hospital University Health Network amorris@mtsinai.on.ca www.idologist.com Disclosures The MSH Antimicrobial
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER BILLING COMPLIANCE PLAN
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER BILLING COMPLIANCE PLAN Revised December 31, 1998 INTRODUCTION This plan is an integral part of the University s ongoing efforts to achieve compliance with federal
More informationCase-mix Analysis Across Patient Populations and Boundaries: A Refined Classification System
Case-mix Analysis Across Patient Populations and Boundaries: A Refined Classification System Designed Specifically for International Quality and Performance Use A white paper by: Marc Berlinguet, MD, MPH
More informationCase Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008
Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008 Duke University Hospital: Organizational and Tactical Strategies to Enhance Patient Satisfaction Sha r o n Si l o w-ca r r o l l, M.B.A.,
More informationUsing the epoc Point of Care Blood Analysis System Reduces Costs, Improves Operational Efficiencies, and Enhances Patient Care
Using the epoc Point of Care Blood Analysis System Reduces Costs, Improves Operational Efficiencies, and Enhances Patient Care Clarke Woods, BS, RRT, FABC, Director, Cardiopulmonary Services, Pinnacle
More informationConnecticut Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program
1. What is the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program? The EHR incentive program was established by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of the American
More informationQ-Tracks. A College of American Pathologists Program of Continuous Laboratory Monitoring and Longitudinal Performance Tracking
Q-Tracks A College of American Pathologists Program of Continuous Laboratory Monitoring and Longitudinal Performance Tracking Richard J. Zarbo, MD, DMD; Bruce A. Jones, MD; Richard C. Friedberg, MD, PhD;
More informationIndividualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Frequently Asked Questions Date: May 5, 2015 (last updated 08/21/2017)
Topic: Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Frequently Asked Questions Date: May 5, 2015 (last updated 08/21/2017) Click on the links below to be taken to a specific section of the FAQs. General
More informationAMERICAN BOARD OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY AND IMMUNOGENETICS Laboratory Director. Content Outline
1. Administration and Management (40 Items) A. Quality Assurance (16 items) 1. Determine if technical staff has received training and continuing education 2. Select external laboratory proficiency testing
More informationBig Data Analysis for Resource-Constrained Surgical Scheduling
Paper 1682-2014 Big Data Analysis for Resource-Constrained Surgical Scheduling Elizabeth Rowse, Cardiff University; Paul Harper, Cardiff University ABSTRACT The scheduling of surgical operations in a hospital
More informationUsing Clinical Criteria for Evaluating Short Stays and Beyond
Using Clinical Criteria for Evaluating Short Stays and Beyond Georgeann Edford I. History A. Social Security Act Medical Necessity and Utilization Review 1. Items or services necessary for the diagnosis
More informationMeasuring Digital Maturity. John Rayner Regional Director 8 th June 2016 Amsterdam
Measuring Digital Maturity John Rayner Regional Director 8 th June 2016 Amsterdam Plan.. HIMSS Analytics Overview Introduction to the Acute Hospital EMRAM Measuring maturity in other settings Focus on
More informationCURRENT OIG ENFORCEMENT INITIATIVES: A ROAD MAP FOR HIGH RISK COMPLIANCE AREAS
10 th Annual HCCA Compliance Institute Session Las Vegas, NV April 25, 2006 CURRENT OIG ENFORCEMENT INITIATIVES: A ROAD MAP FOR HIGH RISK COMPLIANCE AREAS MARK HARDIMAN HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, INC. 1875
More informationReport on the Pilot Survey on Obtaining Occupational Exposure Data in Interventional Cardiology
Report on the Pilot Survey on Obtaining Occupational Exposure Data in Interventional Cardiology Working Group on Interventional Cardiology (WGIC) Information System on Occupational Exposure in Medicine,
More informationHospital Strength INDEX Methodology
2017 Hospital Strength INDEX 2017 The Chartis Group, LLC. Table of Contents Research and Analytic Team... 2 Hospital Strength INDEX Summary... 3 Figure 1. Summary... 3 Summary... 4 Hospitals in the Study
More informationFinal Report No. 101 April Trends in Skilled Nursing Facility and Swing Bed Use in Rural Areas Following the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003
Final Report No. 101 April 2011 Trends in Skilled Nursing Facility and Swing Bed Use in Rural Areas Following the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 The North Carolina Rural Health Research & Policy Analysis
More informationReviewing Short Stay Hospital Claims for Patient Status: Admissions On or After October 1, 2015 (Last Updated: 11/09/2015)
7 Reviewing Short Stay Hospital Claims for Patient Status: Admissions On or After October 1, 2015 (Last Updated: 11/09/2015) Medical Review of Inpatient Hospital Claims Starting on October 1, 2015, the
More informationMaster. Laboratory General Checklist. CAP Accreditation Program
Master Laboratory General Checklist CAP Accreditation Program College of American Pathologists 325 Waukegan Road Northfield, IL 60093-2750 www.cap.org 08.17.2016 2 of 129 Disclaimer and Copyright Notice
More informationAllen D. Leman Swine Conference
Allen D. Leman Swine Conference Volume 39 2012 Published by: Veterinary Continuing Education Sponsors We thank the following sponsors: Platinum Bayer Animal Health Pfizer Animal Health Gold Novartis Animal
More informationPERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS. March 9, 2018
Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 445 G Washington, DC 20201 RE:
More informationSurgical Variance Report General Surgery
Surgical Variance Report General Surgery Table of Contents Introduction to Surgical Variance Report: General Surgery 1 Foreword 2 Data used in this report 3 Indicators measured in this report 4 Laparoscopic
More informationThe following policy was adopted by the San Luis Obispo County EMS Agency and will become effective March 1, 2012 at 0800 hours.
SLO County Emergency Medical Services Agency Bulletin 2012-02 PLEASE POST New Trauma System Policies and Procedures February 9, 2012 To All SLO County EMS Providers and Training Institutions: The following
More informationStandards for Laboratory Accreditation
Standards for Laboratory Accreditation 2017 Edition cap.org 2017 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. [ T y p e t h e c o m p a n y a d d r e s s ] CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program
More informationBasic Skills for CAH Quality Managers
Basic Skills for CAH Quality Managers MARCH 20, 2014 THE BASICS OF DATA MANAGEMENT Data Management Systems COLLECTION AGGREGATION ASSESSMENT REPORTING 1 Some Data Management Terminology Objective data
More informationThe Trauma System. Prevention Pre-hospital care and transport Acute hospital care Rehab Research
An Overview The Trauma System The Office of Emergency Medical Services & Trauma System (OEMSTS) is responsible for oversight of the trauma system. The ideal trauma system includes; Prevention Pre-hospital
More informationQuality Improvement in the Advent of Population Health Management WHITE PAPER
Quality Improvement in the Advent of Population Health Management WHITE PAPER For healthcare organizations whose reimbursement and revenue are tied to patient outcomes, achieving performance on quality
More informationJournal Club. Medical Education Interest Group. Format of Morbidity and Mortality Conference to Optimize Learning, Assessment and Patient Safety.
Journal Club Medical Education Interest Group Topic: Format of Morbidity and Mortality Conference to Optimize Learning, Assessment and Patient Safety. References: 1. Szostek JH, Wieland ML, Loertscher
More informationQuality Laboratory Practice and its Role in Patient Safety
Quality Laboratory Practice and its Role in Patient Safety (Policy Number 06-01) Policy Statement ASCP supports the development and maintenance of high quality practice standards for laboratory testing
More informationWho Cares About Medication Reconciliation? American Pharmacists Association American Society of Health-system Pharmacists The Joint Commission Agency
The Impact of Medication Reconciliation Jeffrey W. Gower Pharmacy Resident Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Objectives Understand the definition and components of effective medication reconciliation
More informationU.S. Healthcare Problem
U.S. Healthcare Problem U.S. Federal Spending GDP (%) Source: Congressional Budget Office This graph shows that government has to spend a lot of more money in healthcare in the future and it is growing
More informationEDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY KEY COMPONENTS OF AN INDIVIDUALIZED QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
Commentary provided by: E Susan Cease MT(ASCP) Laboratory Manager Three Rivers Medical Center Grants Pass, OR EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY KEY COMPONENTS OF AN INDIVIDUALIZED QUALITY CONTROL PLAN Educational
More informationCommunity Health Needs Assessment for Corning Hospital: Schuyler, NY and Steuben, NY:
Community Health Needs Assessment for Corning Hospital: Schuyler, NY and Steuben, NY: November 2012 Approved February 20, 2013 One Guthrie Square Sayre, PA 18840 www.guthrie.org Page 1 of 18 Table of Contents
More informationThe Pain or the Gain?
The Pain or the Gain? Comprehensive Care Joint Replacement (CJR) Model DRG 469 (Major joint replacement with major complications) DRG 470 (Major joint without major complications or comorbidities) Actual
More informationInnovation and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs)
Innovation and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) Kenneth R. White, PhD, FACHE Professor of Health Administration Department of Health Administration Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 23298
More informationExecutive Summary BERKELEY RESEARCH GROUP COMPLIANCE TRENDS WITH HOSPITAL CHARITY CARE REQUIREMENTS
Executive Summary Study Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established new requirements for 501(c)(3) hospitals pertaining to their charity care policies. Hospitals self-report data related to these
More informationHospitals are looking for ways to reduce emergency
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross-classified Random-effect Modeling Approach Ling Li, PhD,
More information06-01 FORM HCFA WORKSHEET S - HOME HEALTH AGENCY COST REPORT The intermediary indicates in the appropriate box whether this is the
06-01 FORM HCFA-1728-94 3204 3203. WORKSHEET S - HOME HEALTH AGENCY COST REPORT The intermediary indicates in the appropriate box whether this is the initial cost report (first cost report filed for the
More informationRe: Proposed Rule; Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System and Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System FY 2018 (CMS 1677 P)
June 9, 2017 Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS 1677 P Mail Stop C4 26 05 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244
More informationTITLE 37. HEALTH -- SAFETY -- MORALS CHAPTER HOSPITALS HOSPITAL MEASURES ADVISORY COUNCIL. Go to the Ohio Code Archive Directory
Page 1 ß 3727.31. Hospital measures advisory council created HOSPITAL MEASURES ADVISORY COUNCIL ORC Ann. 3727.31 (2012) There is hereby created the hospital measures advisory council. The council shall
More informationMERMAID SERIES: SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS: TIPS AND TRICKS
MERMAID SERIES: SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS: TIPS AND TRICKS Sonya Borrero Natasha Parekh (Adapted from slides by Amber Barnato) Objectives Discuss benefits and downsides of using secondary data Describe publicly
More informationOver the past decade, the number of quality measurement programs has grown
Performance improvement Surgeon sees standardization and data as keys to higher value healthcare Over the past decade, the number of quality measurement programs has grown exponentially as hospitals respond
More informationEvaluation of Stat and Routine Turnaround Times as a Component of Laboratory Quality
Evaluation of Stat and Routine Turnaround Times as a omponent of Laboratory Quality LEE H. HILBORNE, M.D., ROBERT K. OYE, M.D., JOSEPH E. McARDLE, M.D., JEFF A. REPINSKI, M.S., MT(ASP), AND DENIS O. RODGERSON,
More informationThe Laboratorian as a Clinical Consultant
The Laboratorian as a Clinical Consultant Anthony A. Killeen, MD, PhD Professor and Vice-Chair Dept. of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology University of Minnesota April 25, 2018 Copyright 2016, Cardinal Health.
More informationHow to Win Under Bundled Payments
How to Win Under Bundled Payments Donald E. Fry, M.D., F.A.C.S. Executive Vice-President, Clinical Outcomes MPA Healthcare Solutions Chicago, Illinois Adjunct Professor of Surgery Northwestern University
More informationPost-analytical factors and their influence on analytical quality specifications
EQALM SYMPOSIUM 2009 Quality requirements and quality goals Kaiserin-Friedrich-Haus, 1.-2. July in Berlin, Germany Post-analytical factors and their influence on analytical quality specifications Henk
More informationINTERQUAL REHABILITATION CRITERIA REVIEW PROCESS
REVIEW RP-1 RP-2 INTERQUAL CRITERIA REVIEW REVIEW The InterQual Criteria provide support for determining the appropriateness of admission, continued stay and discharge destination. The Acute Rehabilitation
More informationCommunity Performance Report
: Wenatchee Current Year: Q1 217 through Q4 217 Qualis Health Communities for Safer Transitions of Care Performance Report : Wenatchee Includes Data Through: Q4 217 Report Created: May 3, 218 Purpose of
More informationFrom Risk Scores to Impactability Scores:
From Risk Scores to Impactability Scores: Innovations in Care Management Carlos T. Jackson, Ph.D. September 14, 2015 Outline Population Health What is Impactability? Complex Care Management Transitional
More informationClinical Laboratory Science Courses
Clinical Laboratory Science Courses 1 Clinical Laboratory Science Courses Courses CLSC 2111. Molecular Diagnostics Lab. This laboratory provides the basic skills necessary for performing and applying molecular
More informationInformation systems with electronic
Technology Innovations IT Sophistication and Quality Measures in Nursing Homes Gregory L. Alexander, PhD, RN; and Richard Madsen, PhD Abstract This study explores relationships between current levels of
More information