COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA (510)

Transcription

1 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA (510) October 4, 2011 AGENDA ITEM #November 1,2011 The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Alameda 1221 Oak Street, Suite 536 Oakland, CA Dear Board Members: SUBJECT: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY TO SUBMIT THE CROW CANYON ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND THE NILES CANYON ROAD, PALOMA ROAD, AND PLEASANTONSUNOL ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDfNG APPLICATIONS TO THE METROPOLlTAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE 2012 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNTS OF $1,000,000 AND $1,500,000, RESPECTIVELY. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt and approve the resolution authorizing the Public Works Agency to submit two applications to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for funding the Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvement Project, in the amount of $1,000,000 and the Niles Canyon Road, Paloma Road, and PleasantonSunol Road Intersection Improvement Project, in the amount of $1,500,000. SUMMARYIDISCUSSION: The Public Works Agency submitted two projects to the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) for funding consideration: the Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvement Project and the Niles Canyon Road, Paloma Road, and PleasantonSunol Road Intersection Improvement Project. These projects were approved for inclusion in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) of the 2012 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) by the Acre. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is responsible for programming projects eligible for Regional Transportation Improvement Program Flmds. The MTC requires a resolution approved by the Board of Supervisors be included with the filing of any funding applications. "To Serve and Preserve Om Community"

2 Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 2 October 4, 2011 Upon approval of the Board Resolution, the Public Works Agency will submit these two project funding applications to the Metropolitan Transportation Conunission (MTC) for Regional Transportation Improvement Program funds in the amounts of $1,000,000 and $1,500,000, respectively. FINANCING: There will be no impact on the General Fund as a result of submitting this funding application. Yours truly, Dan ~PhD'PE Director of Public Works DWIPKJrk Enclosure

3 . Approved as to Form :;NN~~:::[y THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY, STAT OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER: R A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY TO SUBMIT THE CROW CANYON ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND THE NILES CANYON ROAD, PALOMA ROAD, AND PLEASANTONSUNOL ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDING APPLICATIONS TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE 2012 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNTS OF $1,000,000 AND $1,500,000, RESPECTIVELY. WHEREAS, the County of Alameda (herein referred to as "APPLICANT") is submitting two applications to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for funding from the 2012 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) for the Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvement Project ($1,000,000) and the Niles Canyon Road, Paloma Road, and Pleasanton~Sunol Road Intersection Improvement Project ($1,500,000) (herein referred to as "PROJECTS") as authorized by MTC by Resolution No (herein referred to as "PROGRAM"); and WHEREAS, in accordance with SB 45 (Chapter 622, Statutes 1997), MTC is responsible for programming projects eligible for Regional Improvement Program funds, pursuant to California Government Code Section l4527(b), for inclusion in the RTIP, and submission to the California Transportation Commission, for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, MTC will review and include, if approved, 2012 RTIP projects in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and WHEREAS, MTC has requested eligible transportation project sponsors to submit applications nominating projects to be programmed for Regional Improvement Program funds in the RIlP; and WHEREAS, applications to MTC must be submitted consistent with procedures, conditions, and forms it provides transportation project sponsors; and WHEREAS, APPLICANT is a sponsor of transportation projects eligible for Regional Improvement Program funds; and WHEREAS, the RTlP Project Programming Request (PPR) form of the project application, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth at length, lists the project, purpose, schedule and budget for which APPLICANT is requesting that MTC program Regional Improvement Program funds for inclusion in the RTIP; and WHEREAS, Part 2 of the project application, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth at length, includes the certification by APPLICANT of assurances required by sa 45 in order to qualify the project listed in the RTIP project nomination sheet of the project application for programming by MTC; and

4 WHEREAS, as part of the application for 2012 RTLP funding, MTC requires any resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency to state that the project will comply with the procedures specified in the "Timely Use of Funds Provisions and Deadlines" (MTC Resolution No. 4028, Attachment 1, Page 14, and as may be further amended). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that APPLICANT approves the assurances set forth in Part 2 of the project application, attached to this resolution; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that APPLICANT will comply with the provisions and requirements of the "Timely Use of Funds Provisions and Deadlines" (MTC Resolution No. 4028, Attachment 1, Page 14, and as may be further amended), that PROJECTS will be implemented as described in the complete application and in this resolution and, if approved, for the amount prograrruned in the MTC federal TIP, and that APPLICANT and PROJECTS will comply with the requirements as set forth in the 2012 RTIP Policies and Procedures (MTC Resolution No. 4028); and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that APPLICANT will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Transit Coordination Implementation Plan, as set forth in MTC Resolution No. 3866; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that APPLICANT has reviewed the project and has adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the project within the schedule set forth in the RTlP Project Programming Request (PPR) form of the project applications, attached to this resolution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLYED, that APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor of projects in the State Transportation Improvement Program; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that APPLICANT is authorized to submit the applications for State Transportation Improvement Program funds for PROJECTS; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that APPLICANT has and will retain the expertise and knowledge necessary to deliver STIP and federallyfunded projects, and has assigned a single point of contact for all STIP and FHWAfunded projects to work with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), MTC, and Caltrans on any questions or issues that may arise during the STIP and/or federal progranuning and delivery process; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for Regional Improvement Program funds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation which might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECTS, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECTS; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that APPLICANT authorizes the Director of Public Works to execute and file the applications with MTC to program Regional Improvement Program funds into the RTlP, for the projects, purposes and amounts included in the project applications attached to this resolution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to MTC in conjunction with the filing of the APPLICANT applications referenced herein, along with the name and contact infonnation fot the APPLICANT's single point ofcontact. 2

5 RTIP Project Application Part 2: Certification of Assurances The implementing agency certifies that the project for which Regional Improvement Program funding is requested meets the following project screening Criteria. Please initial each. 1. The project is eligible for consideration in the RTiP. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section l64 (e), eligible projects include improving state highways, local roads, public transit, intercity rail, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities, and grade separation, transportation system ~gernrnt, transportation demand management, soundwall projects, intermodal facilities, and safety....j;?z",l 2. ~ds requested, no costs have/will be incurred prior to adoption into the STIP by ~he CTC. 3. A Project Study Report (PSR) or PSR equivalent has been prepared for the project. ~ 4. The project budget included in Part 2 orthe project applic~~cts current costs updated as of the date of application and escalated to the appropriate year. _~ ~_ 5. The project is included in a local congestion management program (CMP). (Note: For those counties that have opted out of preparing a CMP in accordance with Government Code Section , the project must be consistent with the capital improvement program '8<iQpted PIJl~hant to MTC's funding agreement with the countywide transportation planning agency.) _=~=.;:~ 6. The year of funding for any design, rightofway andlor construction phases has taken into con.sider~ime necessary to obtain environmental clearance and permitting approval for the project. _~'./._ 7. The project is fully funded.:aj 8. For projects with STIP federal funds, the implementing agency agrees to contact Caltrans and schedule~~lete a field review within six months of the project being adopted or amended into the TIP. ~~=_ 9. For STIP construction funds, the implementing agency agrees to send a copy of the Caltrans LPP 01 ~d Information for STIP Projects Attachment A" to MTC and the CMA, upon award. 10. The implementing agency agrees to be available for an audit of STIP funds, if requested. ~ The implementing agency also agrees to abide by all statutes, rules and regulations applying to the State Transportation Improvement Program (S~ to follow all requirements associated with the funds programmed to the project in the STJP. These include, but are not limited to: I. Environmental requirements: NEPA standards and procedures for all projects with Federal funds; CEQA standards and procedures for all projects programmed with State funds. 2. California Transportation Commission (CTC) requirements for transit projects, formerly associated with the Transit Capital Improvement (TCI) program. These include rules governing rightofway acquisition, hazardous materials testing, and timely use of funds. 3. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requirements for transit projects as outlined in FTA regulations and circulars. 4. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans requirements for highway and other roadway projects as outlined in the Caltrans Local Programs Manual. 5. Federal air quality confonnity requirements, and local project review requirements, as outlined in the adopted Bay Area Conformity Revision of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). POoROES R=lul;on REVISED Crow Canyon.Niles Canyon PrO) MlC 20) 2 RTiP J I IIl.doc 3

6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DTP0001 (REV. 6/11) General Instructions o New PrOject o Amendment (Existing Project) I Date: I 10/18/12 District EA Project 10 PPNO MPOID TCRPNo. 04 ALA County Route/Corridor PMBk PMAhd Project Sponsor/Lead Agency ALA Alameda County Public Works Agency MPO Element MTC Capital Outlay Project Mgr/Contact Phone Address I James Chu (510) james@acpwa.org Project TItle Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvement Project Location, Project Limits, Description, Scope of Work, Leaislative Description The Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvements project along Crow Canyon Rd. between E. Castro Valley Blvd. and the vicinity of Alameda County Mile Marker 2.15 includes roadway realignment. shoulder widening, retaining wall systems, and guardrail modifications. Implementing Agency Reimbursements I PA&ED Alameda County Public Works Agency AB 3090 Alameda County Public Works Agency AB 3090 [Right of Way Alameda County Public Works Agency AB 3090 Construction Alameda County PUblic Works Agency AB 3090 Legislative Districts l Assembly: 18,20 Senate: 10 Congressional: 9 Purpose and Need Crow Canyon Road serves as a twolane major regional route between Contra Costa and Alameda County carrying approximately 25,000 vehicles per day Because there is a significant travel time savings in using Crow Canyon Rd. versus 1680 and 1580 during commute hours when the freeways are congested, many commuters choose to travel on Crow Canyon Road. Crow Canyon Road was not designed to carry this high volume of traffic. As a result, there have been numerous collisions on the roadway over the past few years. Project Benefits Overall, the realignment of various curves, shoulder widening, and retaining wall systems will facilitate traffic operations and reduce congestion for residents and goods movemnets traveling between Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, Project Milestone Proposed Project Study Report Approved 03/01/92 Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase 03/01/12 Circulate Draft Environmental Document Document Type IN/A 01/01/13 Draft Project Report 06/30/13 End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone) 12/31/13 Begin Design () Phase 01/01/12 End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone) 06/30/14 Begin Right of Way Phase 01/01114 End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone) 06/30/15 Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone) 08/01/15 End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone) 12/31/16 Begin Closeout Phase 12/31/16 End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report) 03/31/12 ADA Notice... For md,vlduals With sensory (I,sab,hlles, this document IS available In alternate formals For Information call (916) or TOO or wrote Records and Forms Manaaement 1120 N Slreel MS89, Sacramento. CA

7 .'_h,_" ;"~.".~_.~~~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DTP0001 (REV. 6/11) Date' 10/18/12 District County I Route I EA I Proiect 10 I PPNO I TCRP No. 04 ALA I I I I 1 Proiect TItle: Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvement Project Proposed Total Project Cost Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total 1, ,270 RJW SUp(Cn.. SUP (Cn.. RJW 1,000 1, , Notes 2, ,350 5,800 15,420 Fund No.1: STIP Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total ~., ~_.'." _. RJW SUP (Cn ~.?N SUP (CT) _ RJW _ ,000 II 1,000 1,000. _. Fund No.2: Prop 18 a.". A...._. _... _.. ',... _ "..._..."_,. Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total FundIng Agency RIW SUP (CT) SUP (CT).. ~.~.". ~._~~~.'~'.~, RIW 1,000 1,000. n _~_,,_,".. ~ 1,000 1,000 Fund No.3: Prop 42 Prior 12/13 13/ /16 16/17 17/18+ Total._.._ ,._.._ RJW SUP (CT) _._... ~_._.~~ SUP (CT).. _._._ Rf\N...~_ _ of 2

8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DTP0001 (REV. 6111) Date' District County I Route I EA I Proiect 10 I PPNO I TCRP No. 04 ALA I I I I I Project Title; Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvement Project Fund No.4; LOCAL FUNDS Prior /14 14/ /17 17/18+ Total _._ RfW SUP (Cn _... _. SUP (Cn RJW _.._._ '_._...._..._ _._. _._'._.. _~'._,_. 4,800 4,800 5,800 5,800 no Fund NO.5; TriValley Tranportation Development Fees RJW SUP (Cn 11 SUP (CTl RJW 1 Prior 12/ /15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total ,550 1,550 1,550 Fund NO.6; Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total _.._._... RJW SUP (Cn SUP (Cn 11 RJW Fund NO.7; Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total._"_.._._~. _..._._.., _..._.. ~1.""" _.. 11 Rf\N SUP (CT) _.... ~.. '0_... _'...._._._..._. _. _ SUP (Cn RJW 1. 2 of 2

9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DTP0001 (REV. 6/11) o New Project o Amendment (Existing Project) I General Instructions Date: I 10/18112 District EA Project 10 PPNO.MPOID TCRP No. J 04 County Route/Corridor PM Bk PMAhd Project Sponsor/Lead Agency I ALA 84 Alameda County Public Works Agency MPO Element I MTC Capital Outlay Project Mgr/Contact Phone Address I James Chu (510) james@acpwa.org Project Title I Niles Canyon Road, Paloma Road, and PleasantonSunol Road Intersection Improvement Project [2C..a.tloti;Proie.cJJ:iiniJs D.e..scl'ipjjo.n. SCQP_LOI. work, [egislilive Description 1 The project is located near Sunol at the intersection of Niles Canyon Road (State Route 84), Paloma Road, and PleasantonSunol Road. The project includes the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 84 and PleasantonSunol Road as well as widening the approaches including the bridge over the Arroyo de la LaQuna to provide needed turn lanes. The preliminary analysis indicates that approximately 400' should be Implementing Agency Reimbursements I PA&ED Alameda County Public Works Agency Alameda County Public Works Agency Right of Way Alameda County Public Works AQency Construction Alameda County Public Works Agency Legislative Districts I Assembly: 18,20 Senate: 10 Congressional: 13 Purpose and Need The project was initiated in response to input from Sunol residents concerned with the high traffic volumes from PleasantonSunol Road through downtown Sunol. Foothill Road is parallel to 1680 and carries overflow regional commute traffic when 1680 is congested. County staff identified the potential to relieve traffic delays on PleasantonSuno! Road as a means of reducing regional traffic in the Sunol area. I Proiect Benefits The project includes the following benefits: 1) Traffic Signal would improve intersection operations over the existing allway Stop control; 2) Signal would improve intersection safety by providing protected left turns for all approaches, 3) Addition of left turn lane would provide vehicle storage and decrease queue length for eastbound approach, and 4) No rig htofway acquisition required. Project Milestone Proposed I Project Study Report Approved 01/01/06 Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase 05/01/12 Circulate Draft Environmental Document Document Type"'N/A 01/01/13 Draft Project Report 06/30/13 End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone) 09/30/13 Begin Design () Phase 11/01/12 End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone) 09/30/13 Begin Right of Way Phase 09/01/13 End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone) 10/31/13 Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone) 01/01/14 End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone) 01/01/15 Begin Closeout Phase 01/01/15 End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report) 03/31/15... ADA Notice For mdlvlduals wllh sensory olsaolhbes. lh,s documenlls available III alternate formats. For Informa(lon call (916) or TOO 1916\ or wnle Records and Fonns Manaoemelll 1120 N Street MS S9. Sacramento CA 95814

10 _.~ ~~ _., ~_. _.~~~..._~ ".~ ~ ~._~~ ~. '.' ".. ~.. n~n. ~_..._._ ~.~_. ~~._ ~~...._~._~~_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DTP0001 (REV. 6/11) Date' 10/18/12 I District County I Route I EA I Proiect 10 I PPNO I~CRPNn 04 ALA I 84 I I I I Project Title: I Niles Canyon Road, Paloma Road, and PleasantonSunol Road Intersection Improvement Project RNo/ SUP (CT) RIW Notes.. Proposed Total Project Cost Prior /14 14f15 15/16 16/17 17f18+ Total SUP (CT) RNo/ 1,500 1, ,500 1,900 Fund No.1: RNo/ SUP (CT) SUP (CT) STIP Prior /14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total 1.._. ~~.._._po..'' _... _. _.~_._ i 1,500 1,500 1,500 Fund No.2: Local Funds Prior /14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total ~~,..."...,. ~~,~.~ RIW SUP (CT)._~ ~_.._ SUP (Cn. RIW _.. t. ~ ~ _._..... ' Fund No.3: RIW SUP (CT) SUP (Cn R!W... _. Prior /14 14/15 15f16 16/17 17/18+ Total... _.. _._ 2 of 3

11 ~.. ~.~....&& ~_._,._~. ~_._". ~~~.. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DTp 0001 (REV. 6/11) Date 10/18/12 District 04 County I Route I EA ~IPrciiecno T PPNO I TCRP No. ALA I 84 I I I I Project Tifle: Niles Canyon Road, Paloma Road, and PleasantonSunol Road Intersection Improvement Project Fund No.4: Prior 12/13 13/14 14f15 15/16 16/17 17f18+ Total _._... t ~...~.,. RIW SUP (CT) _. SUP (CT) ~..,,~ 1. RIW _. _._... _ _.... Fund No.5: Prior 12/13 13f14 14/15 15f16 16/17 17/18+ Total ~_~.a_..._ ,... RfW SUP (et) _... _.. SUP (CT) _._... ' ""_0< _. RIW._ ~..... Fund No.6: RIW SUP (CI) SUP (CT) _._. Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16f17 17/18+ Total ~''. '~'.'. ~, RfW... _. _. _... L ~ Fund No.7: Prior 12/13 13/14 14f15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total... _._...', RfW SUP (CT) SUP (CT) _._~_.... FWJ _._. I..,... 3 of 3