TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING March 8, :00 P.M. TCRPC Conference Room

Transcription

1 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning I. Call to Order/Introductions TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING March 8, :00 P.M. TCRPC Conference Room Proposed Agenda II. III. IV. Approval of Agenda (Action) Approval of Minutes (Action) Minutes of the February 8, 2017 meeting are enclosed Opportunity for Public Comment V. FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Revisions A. TIP Administrative Revisions (Information) B. MDOT Proposed TIP Amendments (Action) C. City of Lansing Proposed TIP Amendments (Action) D. MSU- Lake Lansing Trail Phase I (Illustrative ) (Action) E. Airport Road (Illustrative ) (Action) VI. VII. VIII. IX Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals and Objectives (Action) Staff has enclosed information related to updated Goals and Objectives for the 2045 MTP. The committee will be asked to review the enclosed information and make a recommendation to the full Commission TCRPC Congestion Mitigation Process (Review/Information) -Staff will present information on the draft TCRPC Congestion Management Process for the region. TRC will be asked to review the document. Approval will be sought in April. Transportation Planning Public Participation Plan (Review/Information) Staff will present an update to the transportation element of the TCRPC Public Participation Plan. TRC will be asked to review the document. Approval will be sought in April. FY 2018 Unified Work Program (Information) - Staff will provide a brief discussion on the transportation budget for next fiscal year. X. Bus Rapid Transit Update (Information) Staff from CATA, will present information on the status of the Lansing Area Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project. XI. XII. Other Business A. Non-Motorized Plan Advisory Work Group Update B. Travel Demand Model forecasting update C. April/May meeting schedule and agenda items Adjourn

2 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MINUTES Meeting: Date: Place: Attendance: Transportation Review Committee (TRC) February 8, 2017 (Wednesday) at 4:00 p.m. Tri-County Regional Planning Commission Office 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing MI See attached attendance sheet. I. Call to Order/Introductions/Introductions Chair Banas called the meeting to order at 4:01 p.m. Ch/Banas welcomed the committee and stated that she was respectful of the members time and wants to encourage thoughtful discussion. II. Approval of Agenda The agenda was amended to delete item VIII. And move all following items up on the agenda. It was MOVED by C/Lewis, SUPPORTED by C/Austin, to approve the agenda as amended. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. III. Approval of Minutes It was MOVED by C/Rodgers, SUPPORTED by C/Austin, to approve the December 7, 2016, meeting minutes with minor grammatical corrections provided. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. Opportunity for Public Comment There was no public comment. V. Election of TRC Vice Chair Ch/Banas asked for nominations for a TRC Vice Chair. C/Austin MOVED to Nominate C/Shirley Rodgers as TRC Vice Chair, C/Watkins SUPPORTED the nomination and MOVED to close the list for nominations and pass a unanimous ballot. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. VI. New Member Welcome Chief Planner Snell welcomed members. Chief Planner Snell provided a summary of tasks that Transportation Planning will be working on over the next year, focusing on our Federal Certification. Chief Planner Snell went over handouts with the group that explained some of the tasks that will go into the Long Range Plan and Federal Certification. At Federal Certificating, TCRPC s practices will be reviewed by Federal Highway Administration. This is an opportunity to learn best practices and improve our program. The committee discussed some of the categories, processes, and schedules of action. TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 1

3 Materials that are available to members were reviewed, including the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan and the FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The project list has changed since the program adoption in June A brochure for the TIP was also available that included a project map and summaries. All interested members are encouraged to take and review a copy of all the materials. C/Rodgers stated that she brings TCRPC information to the City of Lansing s Public Service Board. She suggested that by sharing with this board is an opportunity to encourage public comment and participation. Chief Planner Snell stated that TCRPC does try to get public comment and input first, prior to projects. Ch/Banas stated that she would like the committee to think about actions that could raise public awareness and input, especially what works in their community. Executive Director Pigg stated that TCRPC does have an adopted Public Participation Plan that was last revised around 3 years ago, which is located at Chief Planner Snell lastly reviewed TCRPC s Transportation Committee Structure and Expected Products handout and explained TRC s role in advising the Commission. Chief Planner Snell invited members to meet with Transportation Planning to answer any questions. VII. FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Revisions A. Herbison Road Path I & II TIP Coordinator Strach stated that Clinton County Road Commission received Statewide Transportation Alternative Program funding for $301,578. CCRC request that the funding be applied to FY 2017, which will decrease the amount that will need to be Advanced Construct in FY It was MOVED by C/Watkins, SUPPORTED by C/Austin, to approve CCRC s Amendment request as stated in the FY TIP Revision #6 Memorandum, dated February 1, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Year Name Limits Length Adv. Const. Federal Federal Funding Source Local Match Total Comments 2017 Herbison Road Path Phase I&II BR-127 to 800' W. of Turner AC $161,148 TA $503,901 $176,879* $665,049 $338,027 *includes $109,274 ACC in FY The Total for Phase I&II is $715, Herbison Road Path Phase I&II BR-127 to 800' W. of Turner $301,578 Statewide TA $75,395 $665,049 $376,973 Money awarded from Statewide TAP 2018 Herbison Road Path Phase I&II BR-127 to 800' W. of Turner ACC $368,901 $109,274 TA $0 $368,901 $109,274 AC from FY B. Clark Road Path- New TIP Coordinator Strach reported that CCRC would like the local TAP funding that was provided for the Herbison Road Path I & II to be applied to a new project CCRC is proposing in FY The Clark Road Path is proposed as the following: TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 2

4 2018 Clark Road Path Airport to DeWitt 0.66 $259,627 TA $65,373 $325,000 New, Funding from local TA funding offset by Statewide TA awarded for Herbison Rd. It was MOVED by C/Lewis, SUPPORTED by C/Barnes, to approve CCRC s request for Clark Road Path as presented in the FY TIP Revision #6 Memorandum, dated February 1, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. TIP Administrative Revisions TIP Coordinator Strach stated that TCRPC has implemented a new process for documenting and communicating Administrative Revisions. TCRPC staff tries to bring all TIP amendments to the committees and the Commission for action. In some cases, Administrative TIP Amendment Action, as stated in our FY Transportation Improvement Program, Appendix D, is used to ensure that projects advance and receive timely Federal obligation. The Administrative TIP Amendment Action also allows for staff to make corrections. Memorandums will be included in CARTS and TRC Committee packets so Administrative changes to the TIP are shared. The memorandums also serve to let jurisdictions and MDOT know that changes in the TIP have been made. There was discussion on Administrative Adjustments presented. TCRPC staff answered the specific questions. VIII. IX Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals and Objectives Chief Planner Snell reported that the goals and objectives of the MTP will drive the vision for the transportations system in the region. The goals are not listed in prioritized order, but are equal. Over time the goals and objectives had grown for the region. Chief Planner Snell stated that he had to take them back to basics. The goals and objectives will be acted upon next month by the Commission. Please send any suggestions on the goals and objectives by to Chief Planner Snell. The wording of the goals and objectives is from federal legislation and emphasis. John Watkin, MDOT, stated that some of the terminology used is highly recommended by the Federal Highway Administration to ensure Federal Aid funding comes to all areas of the State of Michigan. FY 2016 Annual Obligated s Report TIP Coordinator Strach that TCRPC had met the federal requirement of providing a FY 2016 annual obligated project list. The report distributed was created to give an in-depth look at the funding that was obligated in FY The report was also created to serve as an informational/public outreach piece. The Tri-County Region had received over $26 million, which leveraged over $82 million in total transportation improvements in FY Data and statics will be tracked for future reporting. If there are suggestions of what to include in a future report, please let TIP Coordinator Strach know. The report is available on our website and TCRPC is willing to print the 11x17 booklet format by request. X. Bus Rapid Transit Update Elizabeth Hude, CATA, stated CATA had received comments on the draft Environmental Assessment document at the end of December. CATA has been reviewing comments and TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 3

5 communicating responses with MDOT. E. Hude stated that CATA is mostly reformatting the Environmental Assessment and verifying the data included. The document will be published and public meetings will be held for public comment. CATA continues to work on the comments and move forward. C/Lewis stated the CATA Board meeting was cancelled for February. Chief Planner Snell stated that TCRPC had committed $2 million dollars towards the BRT project. In December, the Commission provided staff with an alternative Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality plan to accommodate if the BRT project does not move forward in FY E. Hude described the next steps. Once the draft Environmental Assessment is approved, it will be published and CATA will receive public comment. The public comment will then be considered. CATA is hoping that the Federal Transit Administration will have a Finding of No Significant Impact. CATA will then go back and work with local jurisdictions on the final design. CATA is waiting to hear the status on their Small Starts Application very soon. In FY 2018 there will be construction of the BRT and the BRT will be operational in Ch/Banas asked Chief Planner Snell what other points would the TRC Committee make any decisions regarding this projects. Chief Planner Snell stated that once the current construction schedule is determined, the current status of the BRT project in the FY TIP would need to be changed from an illustrative project to a funded/active project. C/Austin asked that if there is anything specific that would not move the BRT project forward. E. Hude stated that if the Small Starts funding is not awarded the BRT will not move forward. She does not foresee a stop due to the Environmental Assessment because the project as proposed is in the current right of way. C/Lewis stated that CATA Board is committed to this project and the public who are providing comments. She stated that she is glad that CATA is on the agenda to provide accurate information to share. At this time all local jurisdictions are in support of the project, but just have concerns about the project design. Ch/Banas thanked CATA for being at the meeting and providing information. XI. Other Business A. Non-Motorized Plan Update Planner Tshirhart stated that there was a kickoff meeting in December. An advisory work group representatives had been determined for the Non-Motorized Plan. The advisory work group will make recommendations to the CARTS Committee. The next meeting for the advisory work group is scheduled to meet on February 15 th to develop the vision, goals, objectives, policies, and measures. C/Rodgers asked if the complete streets policy going to be incorporated in to this non-motorized plan policy. Chief Planner Snell clarified that the complete streets will be incorporated. Ch/Banas asked for a list of the Advisory Work Group Members. The membership list will be provided to TRC. B. FY 2018 Unified work Program and Budget We are beginning to start working the FY 2018 budget for Transportation Planning in the region. Next month, topics will be presented to the committee. TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 4

6 C. March/April meeting schedule and agenda items Chief Planner Snell just stated that we are trying to have information before the committee as soon as possible for review so the committee is ready to act. TIP amendments will be at the next TRC meeting. XII. Adjourn It was MOVED by C/Lewis, SUPPORTED by C/Austin, to adjourn the meeting at 5:33 p.m. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 5

7 2017 Transportation Review Committee Attendance Representing Member MEETING DATE 1/10 2/8 3/8 4/12 5/10 7/12 8/9 10/11 11/8 12/13 Capital Area Transportation Authority (CATA) Clinton County Board of Commissioners Robin Lewis C X Dave Pohl C X Clinton County Road Commission Gail Watkins C X Eaton County Board of Commissioners Eaton Area Transit Authority (EATRAN) Kent Austin C X Christine Barnes C X Eaton County Road Commission Dorothy E. Maxwell C X Ingham County Board of Commissioners & Road Department Teri Banas, Chair C X Ingham County/ Meridian Township Julie Brixie C City of Lansing Shirley Rodgers C X City of Lansing, Council Jessica Yorko C X Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) John Watkin C X Total Voting Members: 10 2/8/2017: Elizabeth Hude, CATA; Chris Gulock, MDOT. TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 6

8 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: Tom Doyle, MDOT; Lynnette Firman, MDOT; Matt Hannahs, ECRC Cc: Dan Armentrout, CARTS Chair; Teri Banas, TRC Chair; Jim Snell, TRC From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 8, 2017 Re: FY TIP Revision # 7- Willow Side Paths, JN Please see the below Administrative TIP Amendment for the Willow Side Paths project. The Total has increased, changing the Local Match. There is no change to the Federal and there is no impact to other projects. This action is allowed under the TCRPC s TIP amendment policy numbers 5, 6, and 7. The Change Request in JobNet was made on today s date. This action will be submitted to MDOT in March as a TIP Amendment. Year Name Limits Length Federal Federal Funding Source Local Match Total MDOT Job # 2017 Willow Side Paths Elmwood to Waverly 1.5 $73,527 CM $18,382 $61,473 $91,909 $135, Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

9 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: Dan Armentrout, CCRC; Cc: Tom Doyle, Dan Armentrout, CARTS Chair; Teri Banas, TRC Chair; Jim Snell, TCRPC From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 27, 2017 Re: FY TIP Revision # 9 TCRPC took Administrative Modification Action on 2/27/2017. The below TCRPC Administrative Amendments will be updated in JobNet within five business days. The Administrative Amendments is scheduled to go to MDOT in March and receive Federal Highway approval in April. Year Name Herbison Road (AC) Limits Turner to Schavey Des. Length Overlay 1.00 Federal $143,993 $0 Fed Source Match Total STU $31,930 $175,923 MDOT Job No. Policy # $175, Herbison Road (ACC) Herbison Road Path Phase III (AC) Herbison Road Path Phase III (ACC) 2018 Clark Road Turner to Schavey DeWitt to Panther DeWitt to Panther Airport Rd. to I-69 DeWitt Rd. Overlay 1.00 $143,993 STU Roadside Facility Roadside Facility Overlay $259,800 $0 $116,479 $259,800 TA TA $31,930 $0 $64,950 $181,429 $64,950 $0 $143, $324,750 6, 11 $324,750 $259, $399,135 STU $129,615 $528, Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

10 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: Matt Hannahs, ECRC Cc: Tom Doyle, MDOT; Dan Armentrout, CARTS Chair; Teri Banas, TRC Chair; Jim Snell, TCRPC From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 27, 2017 Re: FY TIP Revision # 10 TCRPC took Administrative Modification Action on 2/27/2017. The below TCRPC Administrative Amendments will be updated in JobNet within five business days. The Administrative Amendments is scheduled to go to MDOT in March and receive Federal Highway approval in April. Year Name Canal Road (AC)* Canal Road (ACC) Limits Osborn to Northport Osborn to Northport Des. Length Overlay 1.67 Federal $484,058 $0 Fed Source Match Total STU Overlay 1.67 $484,058 STU $258,514 $742,572 $258,514 $0 $258,514 $742,572 MDOT Job No. Policy # $484, *$110,000 also programmed for ACC in FY 2019 Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

11 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: Chris Gulock, MDOT Cc: Tom Doyle, MDOT; Dan Armentrout, CARTS Chair; Teri Banas, TRC Chair; Jim Snell, TCRPC From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 27, 2017 Re: FY TIP Revision # 11- MDOT TCRPC took Administrative Modification Action on 2/27/2017. The below TCRPC Administrative Amendments will be updated in JobNet within five business days. The Administrative Amendments is scheduled to go to MDOT in March and receive Federal Highway approval in April. Fiscal Year I Name I-496 PE for Concrete Inlay I-69BL CMAQ funding for CON for Op Improve ments Trunkline Traffic Op or Safety GPA Trunkline Traffic Op or Safety GPA Limits I-96 to Lansing Road West of Marsh Rd. to east of Old M-78 Primary Work Type Federal State Total Phase MDOT Job No. Recon. $2,250,000 $250,000 $2,500, Traffic ops/safety Regionwide GPA $3,324,566 South Eaton County line to Charlotte Regionwide Bridge restore & rehab. 19 Bridges GPA $978,108 $216,892 $1,195, $49,888,000 $4,988,356 $3,324,566 $3,698,121 $771 $35,144 $554,262 $5,542, $771 $283,123 Comments Move 2019 to 2018 Move from 2018 GPA to 2019; cost increase Policy # 6, 10 6, 10 Add to 6 Fixed cost error $3,991,244 Add to 7 13 Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

12 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: Bob Peterson, ICRD; Stephanie O Donnell, MSU; Andy Kilpatrick, Lansing; Dave Kudwa, City of St. Johns; Tracy Miller, Delhi Township Cc: Tom Doyle, MDOT; Dan Armentrout, CARTS Chair; Teri Banas, TRC Chair; Jim Snell, TCRPC From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 27, 2017 Re: FY TIP Revision # 14 - Corrections The below projects were added to the TIP to correct that they had been inadvertently deleted. Year Juris ICRD 2019 East Lansing /MSU Name Fitchburg Road MSU/Lansing River Trail Connector Limits Leslie city limit to Nims Farm Lane to Bogue Description Length Federal Fed State Match Total Resurface 3.8 $466,588 STL $116,647 $583, Add bike lanes Policy # 0.29 $323,840 CM $0 $76,160 $400, Lansing Forest Akers Pathway Forest Road to Mt Hope Construct Pathway 1.0 $350,000 CM $0 $87,500 $437, East Lansing /MSU MSU/Lansing River Trail Connector Harrison Road to Jenison Building Add bike lanes 0.29 $72,000 CM $0 $12,000 $90, St. Johns Lansing Street Pathway Higham to Lewis. The following s have corrected MDOT Job No.: Construct pathway $375,000 CM $0 $93, Name MDOT Job No. Policy # Elm Road Ram Trail II Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

13 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: CARTS Committee Members, TRC Members, and TCRPC Commissioners From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 27, 2017 Re: Proposed FY TIP Revision # 12- Action Requested MDOT is requesting 26 amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program. Please see the attached spreadsheet and map for project and funding details. Recommended Action: Recommend MDOT s request for amendments to the FY Transportation Improvement Program as presented in the attached spreadsheet to the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission for approval. Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

14 MDOT Proposed Amendments to TCRPC's FY Transportation Improvement Program MDOT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 1 Fiscal Year County Clinton Name Limits Length Primary Work Type Ingham I-69BL at Marsh Rd 0.40 Traffic ops/safety Ingham I-96 Wetland Mitigation At Looking Glass River Southeast corner I- 96 and Williamston Road Wetland mitigation 0.00 Resurface Description Phase Federal Operational improvements Design and construct new wetland mitigation site Resurface existing carpool lot Fed Fund State Total Phase CON $651,000 CM $163,000 $814,000 Comments Move from 2017 to 2019 CON $491,000 ST $109,000 $600,000 Suspended PE $9,004 ST $1,997 $11,000 Add to TIP Clinton Old US-27 Old US-27 at Clark Rd 0.00 Traffic ops/safety Install left turn phasing CON $10,172 NHG $0 $10,172 Add to TIP 12 Prepared for CARTS and TRC. Updated on 2/24/2017

15 MDOT Proposed Amendments to TCRPC's FY Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year MDOT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS County Ingham Old 127/Homer Name Limits Length Primary Work Type Saginaw to Michigan 0.29 Traffic ops/safety Ingham I-96 7 bridges on I Ingham I-96 7 bridges on I Ingham I-496 I-496 WB ramp over CSX Ingham I-496 I-496 WB ramp over CSX Ingham I-496 I-496 WB ramp over CSX Ingham I-BL-96 I-96BL over Horsebrook Creek Ingham I-BL-96 I-96BL over Horsebrook Creek Ingham I-BL-96 I-96BL over Horsebrook Creek Ingham I-96 Southeast corner I-96 and Williamston Rd Trunkline Highway Preservation Regionwide GPA Trunkline Traffic Regionwide Operations or Safety GPA Trunkline Roadside Regionwide Inf Trunkline Bridge Pres. Regionwide Bridge restore & rehabilitate Bridge restore & rehabilitate 0.01 Briddge replacement 0.01 Briddge replacement 0.01 Briddge replacement 0.07 Culvert replacement 0.07 Culvert replacement 0.07 Culvert replacement 0.00 Carpool lot GPA GPA GPA GPA Description Phase Federal Fed Fund State Total Phase 3 to 2 lane reduction CON $17,934 HSIP $1,993 $19,927 Deck patching and superstructure repairs Deck patching and superstructure repairs Comments Move to GPA list PE $112,114 IM $12,457 $124,571 Add to TIP PE-D $216,154 IM $24,017 $240,171 Add to TIP Bridge replacement PE $506,718 IM $56,302 $563,020 Add to TIP Bridge replacement PE-S $929,856 IM $103,317 $1,033,173 Add to TIP Bridge replacement ROW $45,000 IM $5,000 $50,000 Add to TIP Culvert replacement PE $88,858 NH $19,704 $108,562 Add to TIP Culvert replacement PE-S $217,801 NH $48,297 $266,098 Add to TIP Culvert replacement ROW $40,925 NH $9,075 $50,000 Add to TIP Resurface existing carpool lot Trunkline highway preservation Trunkline traffic operations or safety Trunkline Roadside Infrastructure Trunkline Bridge Preservation CON $68,755 ST $15,247 $84,002 Add to TIP $412,007 $2,612,278 $3,324,566 $3,418,807 x $3,765,778 Increase x $771 $103,265 $3,522,072 Increase $192,072 x $21,341 $213,413 Add to TIP $966,899 x $214,407 $1,181,306 Add to TIP 13 Prepared for CARTS and TRC. Updated on 2/24/2017

16 MDOT Proposed Amendments to TCRPC's FY Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year MDOT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS County Ingham I-69 BL Name Limits Length From Lake Lansing Rd to Marsh Rd Trunkline Transportati on Livability Regionwide and Sustainab. Primary Work Type 1.4 Miscellanious GPA Description Phase Federal Fed Fund State Total Phase Comments Median crossover construction CON $517,520 HSIP $57,502 $575,022 Add to TIP Trunkline Transportatoin Livability and $73,666 x $16,334 $90,000 Add to TIP Sustainability Fiscal Year MDOT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS County Name Limits Length Ingham I-96 7 bridges on I Primary Work Type Bridge restore & rehabilitate Clinton US-127 US-127 at M Resurface Description Phase Federal Fed Fund State Total Phase Comments Deck patching and superstructure CON $3,775,072 IM $419,453 $4,194,525 Add to TIP repairs Carpool lot mill and resurface CON $83,951 ST $18,616 $102,567 Add to TIP Clinton US-127 South of M-43 to 875 feet south of Clark Road 2.50 Major Rehab Multiple course asphalt overlay PE $1,880,392 NH $416,972 $2,297,364 Add to TIP Ingham M Ingham M Various Trunkline Bridge Rehab and Replace 1,700 ft. north of Holt Highway to Edgewood 1,700 ft. north of Holt Highway to Edgewood Regionwide 2.40 Rehab/reconstru ct 2.40 Rehab/reconstru ct GPA Mill and 2 course overlay Mill and 2 course overlay Trunkline Bridge Rehab and Replace PE $1,173,345 ST $260,186 $1,433,531 Add to TIP ROW $23,737 ST $5,263 $29,000 Add to TIP $798,862 x $88,763 $887,625 Add to TIP 14 Prepared for CARTS and TRC. Updated on 2/24/2017

17 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: CARTS Committee Members, TRC Members, and TCRPC Commissioners From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 22, 2017 Re: Proposed FY TIP Revision # 8- Action Requested The City of Lansing would like to amend the FY TIP to change total project costs and change the Federal, State, and Local Funding. Year Name Scope Federal Federal Funding Source State Funding State Funding Source Local Match Total MDOT Job Number 2017 Aurelius Road Replace bridge $36,000 $0 BHT $6,750 $64,125 M $2,250 $3,375 $45,000 $67, Elm Street Replace bridge $57,600 $86,400 BHT $10,800 $16,200 M $3,600 $5,400 $72,000 $108, Jolly Road Replace bridge $411,200 $0 BHT $77,100 $732,450 M $25,700 $38,550 $514,000 $771, Cavanaugh Road Preventive maintenance $317,600 $0 BHT $59,550 $377,150 M $19,850 $397, Recommended Action: Recommend City of Lansing s request for amendments to the FY Transportation Improvement Program as presented above to the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission for approval. Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

18 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C, Lansing, Michigan Toll Free: Phone: Fax: Web: Facebook.com/TriCountyPlanning MEMORANDUM To: CARTS Committee Members, TRC Members, and TCRPC Commissioners From: Andrea Strach, TIP Coordinator Date: February 23, 2017 Re: Proposed FY TIP Revision # 13- Action Requested Below are two new projects that would like to be included as illustrative project in the FY Transportation Improvement Program. Jurisdiction Name Limits Des. Length Non- Hagadorn Rd. at Motorized Meridian MSU- Lake Shaw Ln. to Trail along Township Lansing Trail Grand River Ave the North Phase I at Park Lake Rd. Bank of Red Cedar River CCRC Airport Road Herbison East to Herbison West Add bike lanes Federal State Match Total 1.10 $1,638,300 $0 $1,098,200 $2,730, $48,000 $0 $12,000 $60,000 Recommended Action: Recommend the MSU-Lake Lansing Trail Phase I and Airport Road as new illustrative projects to the FY Transportation Improvement Program as presented above to the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission for approval. Planning Mid-Michigan s Future Together Since

19 Proposed TIP Amendments - March 2017 C l i n t o n Old Clark New MDOT 2017 Airport Rd New CCRC Illustrative D e W i t t!"#$ 96 Grand Ledge Pott er ville!( 43 E a t o n!"#$ 69 I-96 BL New MDOT 2018!#!#!#!"#$ 96!"#$!"#$ 69!"#$ !# 127!# Lansing East!( 43 Lansing!#!#!#!( 43!"#$ 496!"#$ 69!#!#!#!#!#!#!#!#!"#$!"#$!( 96!"#$ Meridian New MDOT 2018 & 2020 Dimondale US-127 New MDOT 2020 M-99 New MDOT 2020 CSX RR New MDOT Hagadorn New MDOT 2018 & 2020 Non-Motorized New Meridian Twp Illustrative I-69 BL New MDOT 2019 I n g h a m Williamston!( 43!#!# Zimmer New MDOT 2018 & 2020!( 52 Elm New MDOT 2018 & 2020 Webberville Williamston New MDOT 2018 & 2020 Wallace New MDOT 2018 & 2020!#!#!#!# Waverly 127 Mason !# 2017!# 2018!# 2019!# Miles Recommended Amendments Illustrative Laura Tschirhart - 2/24/2017

20 DRAFT TCRPC GOALS AND OBJECTIVES One of the initial steps in the development of the TCRPC 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) process is to develop goals, objectives, and performance measures. Goals generally define a desired result, or outcome, while objectives support a specific goal and provide additional details, or strategies, on how the goal will be achieved. Performance measures are typically tied to each objective and are used during the project evaluation, or scoring process, to assess the effectives of policies and multimodal projects to address future year transportation issues and deficiencies. The results of the evaluation process help prioritize projects that best support the overall MTP vision Goals and objectives are extremely useful in the planning process as they provide the necessary direction and basic framework upon which future decisions can be made. The goals and objectives of the TCRPC MTP will contribute strongly to the selection and evaluation of alternatives in the transportation system. As goals embody a desired state of affairs to be realized through future efforts, the transportation goals and objectives embraced by TCRPC will affect an overall design for the 2045 MTP. These goals and objectives also influence the development of the short range Transportation Improvement Program, and indeed are meant to guide the entire regional transportation planning process. The goals and objectives of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan are revisited with each MTP development cycle and are developed by the TCRPC Transportation Committees and adopted by the full TCRPC. Several of the goals and objectives are more specific than the final MTP conclusions can support. However, this specificity will become important during subsequent studies which will be completed after the MTP is adopted. It may appear that some of the goals and objectives compete or conflict with each other. This occurs because the list that is presented below is comprehensive in nature and is designed to accommodate several different types of situations. When applying these goals and objectives to any effort, regional decision-makers will need to find balance between different goals and different objectives. The goals and objectives are not ranked or listed in order of importance. Applicable policy statements related to the goals and objectives will be developed and listed in an Appendix of the final MTP. The policy statements are intended to provide the structure and guidelines for transportation planning in the region. In addition, the policy statements improve the overall transportation planning practices currently in use in the area. The combination of the MTP goals, objectives, and policies will help guide the implementation of the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. 1 Draft 2045 TCRPC MTP Goals and Objectives CARTS/TRC Version Revised 2/8/17 18

21 VISION STATEMENT The 2045 MTP establishes a vision of how the future multimodal transportation system will serve the people and businesses of Clinton, Eaton and Ingham counties. The vision statement, adopted by the TCRPC may appear as follows: With an engaged community, equitably provide and maintain a sustainable multi modal transportation system for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the Tri-County region. Enhance the connectivity within the region by establishing an economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable transportation system that offers viable travel choices, enhances public health, and fosters regional inter jurisdictional cooperation. To achieve this vision, the transportation system will be well maintained and the region s agencies and jurisdictions will work cooperatively to develop strategies to effectively distribute transportation funding. As such, the following goals are supported by several measurable objectives that are described in association with specific transportation components. Following the list of goals below is a more detailed outline of full Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures that are to be used in the development of the 2045 TCRPC MTP. The Goals listed are a vast departure from those adopted for past long range planning efforts. They are crafted in a manner meant to directly address the 10 Federal Planning Factors outlined in various federal transportation bills starting with Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) signed into law in 2005, reemphasized with MAP-21 and most recently the FAST Act. The essence of previous Goals and Objectives have been preserved in the proposed Goals that follow. The changes are being proposed in an effort to provide a format conducive to the implementation of measuring the effectiveness of the plan using performance measures tied directly to the objectives listed below TCRPC MTP GOAL LIST Goal 1: Enhance the economic vitality of the region by supporting global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. Goal 2: Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non- motorized users. Goal 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. Goal 4: Equitably provide enhancements to the accessibility, connectivity and mobility of people and for freight. Goal 5: Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. Goal 6: Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, jurisdictions, people and freight. Goal 7: Promote efficient system management and operation. Goal 8: Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Goal 9: Improve the resiliency and reliability of the region s transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation. Goal 10: Enhance travel and tourism. 2 Draft 2045 TCRPC MTP Goals and Objectives CARTS/TRC Version Revised 2/8/17 19

22 2045 TCRPC MTP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTION IN DETAIL Goal 1: Enhance the economic vitality of the region by supporting global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. Objective 1: Maintain, improve, and integrate a multi-modal transportation system that fosters and supports job creation, retention, and investment. Objective 2: Provide transportation services and intermodal connectivity that helps retain and expand existing businesses and attracts new businesses. Objective 3: Foster regional cooperation and transportation management that reduces business costs, increases investments, and improve opportunities. Objective 4: Improve operations by prioritizing projects that enhance all modes and provide balance to the transportation system. Objective 5: Promote the efficient transportation of people, goods and services by supporting the development, maintenance and improvement of multi-modal infrastructure connections between transportation facilities including airports, rail facilities and highways. Action 1: Consider amending the TCRPC Prioritization Process to include emphasis on projects that contribute to enhancing economic vitality Action 2: Consider increasing the presence of representation from the economic development community on TCRPC transportation committees Goal 2: Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users. Objective 1: Design, manage and maintain transportation systems consistent with safety standards, community character, and the Regional Growth plan goals. Objective 2: Encourage traffic control measures and Intelligent Transportation Systems applications, lighting, signage, and innovative construction and design solutions to improve safety for all modes of travelers. Objective 3: Use safety programs to minimize conflicts between modes with traffic calming, pedestrian and rail crossings, paved shoulders, bicycle lanes, safety education, and enforcement. Objective 4: Use accepted management systems to evaluate, prioritize, and develop cost effective strategies to address traffic safety. Action 1: Conduct safety audits for areas of high concentrations of crashes or non-motorized activity. Action 2: Enact the recommendations of the TCRPC Regional Safety Plan through increased emphasis on potential safety improvements within the scope of infrastructure improvements. Action 3: Initiate regional safe routes to school program Goal 3: Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. Identify and maintain appropriate capacity along evacuation corridors Improve transportation security for facilities and in operations Ensure transportation options are available during declared emergencies for the elderly and persons with disabilities 3 Draft 2045 TCRPC MTP Goals and Objectives CARTS/TRC Version Revised 2/8/17 20

23 Objective 4: Ensure security at airports, and major intermodal centers/terminals Action 1: Coordinate planning activities with MDOT and other regional emergency management entities to ensure proper coordination of resources and technology. Goal 4: Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: Objective 4: Objective 5: Action 1: Action 2: Action 3: Action 4: Equitably provide enhancements to the accessibility, connectivity and mobility of all people and for freight. Develop a multi-modal transportation system that maximizes accessibility and offers choices for efficient movements of all and address special needs of persons regardless of economic, physical and social characteristics. Encourage land use planning techniques such as mixed use, infill, and transitoriented-development that enhance access. Encourage connectivity within and across jurisdictions and with statewide systems. Provide a system that serves high travel demand corridors and centers. Offer various opportunities and venues for participation in planning Involve social service and health agencies, underrepresented and minority groups, and other stakeholders to help meet regional goals of inclusion and environmental justice. Prioritize projects that improve access to intermodal facilities Work with economic development entities to develop a regional Freight Advisory Committee as an improved communications line to the freight sector Continue efforts to integrate land use planning into transportation planning efforts Use modern communications media including social media, , and websites along with standard methods to solicit input and feedback. Goal 5: Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: Objective 4: Objective 5: Action 1: Action 2: Action 3: Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. Develop a transportation system that reduces energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and encourages sustainable development Coordinate transportation projects with capital improvement projects to minimize disruption in affected communities. Emphasize context-sensitive designs that preserve historic character. Resize facilities with excess vehicle capacity to achieve community character goals (i.e. road diets). Minimize transportation-generated noise. Evaluate projects for their impacts on greenhouse gases, vehicle miles of travel and energy sustainability. Promote use of cleaner fuels and sustainable energy technologies. Consider the context of land uses and human activity in review and development of transportation project proposals and planning products. 4 Draft 2045 TCRPC MTP Goals and Objectives CARTS/TRC Version Revised 2/8/17 21

24 Goal 6: Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: Objective 4: Objective 5: Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, jurisdictions, people and freight Better integrate aeronautics and rail facilities and services into the regional transportation network. Increase intermodal passenger and freight transportation connections. Encourage passenger and freight facilities and services that provide multi-modal connections. Encourage efficiency in freight movement. Support airports and rail station services and improvements. Improve intermodal access to the region s air and rail facilities Increase intermodal linkages between transit, auto, rail, air, and non-motorized travel modes. Provide stronger connections between all transit services. Action 1: Prioritize projects that improve access to intermodal facilities Action 2: Pursue balanced regional funding for Capital Region International Airport Goal 7: Promote efficient system management and operation. Objective 1: Maximize the transportation system s efficiency by balancing its multi-modal performance and by using integrated management systems Objective 2: Improve operations by prioritizing projects that enhance all modes and provide balance to the transportation system Objective 3: Improve transportation system management during peak periods, special events, incidents, and poor weather. Objective 4: Enhance public transit service and attractiveness with ITS systems Action 1: Form regional traffic operations and safety committee with the charge of coordinating regional traffic operations and ITS implementation Goal 8: Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: Objective 4: Action 1: Action 2: Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Allocate highest funding priority to preserving, enhancing, and wise management of the existing multi-modal system Use accepted management systems to evaluate, prioritize, and develop cost effective strategies to address pavement conditions Consider life cycle costs to maximize long term benefits of transportation improvements. Coordinate transportation projects with capital improvement projects to minimize disruption in affected communities Prioritize roadway projects that improve existing facilities over those that develop new roadways and encourage the use of existing right-of-ways for the development and expansion of the transportation system for all users. Cooperatively work with local, state, and federal officials to educate decision-makers and constituents about transportation funding needs 5 Draft 2045 TCRPC MTP Goals and Objectives CARTS/TRC Version Revised 2/8/17 22

25 Goal 9: Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: Objective 4: Action 1: Action 2: Improve the resiliency and reliability of the region s transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation. Minimize air, noise, and water pollutant emissions and concentrations. Encourage projects and programs that use low-polluting fuels and alternative fuel and engine technology in vehicles and vehicle fleets. Develop the transportation system to minimize disruption of existing neighborhoods, households, prime farmlands, natural habitats, and open spaces. Prioritize transportation projects which reduce the frequency and length of trips, minimize the energy resources consumed for transportation, and promote a reliable and sustainable transportation system. Prioritize projects and programs that contribute to the achievement of federal air and water quality standards Develop report outlining impacts of highway runoff on local water quality Goal 10: Enhance travel and tourism Objective 1: Support cultural travel, tourism and our regional transportation history Objective 2: Minimize negative effects of improvements to the transportation system on historic sites and recreational, cultural, religious and educational activities. Objective 3: Emphasize context-sensitive designs that preserve historic character Objective 4: Provide and maintain economical bicycle, pedestrian and shared-use path facilities in rural, suburban and urban areas that may transform the region into a non-motorized travel destination Objective 5: Integrate water trails into the transportation framework as a means for promoting travel and tourism in the region. Action 1: Strengthen relationship with regional travel and tourism industry. 6 Draft 2045 TCRPC MTP Goals and Objectives CARTS/TRC Version Revised 2/8/17 23