Long Range Master Plan Board Update. June 20, 2018

Transcription

1 Long Range Master Plan Board Update June 20, 2018

2 Timeline Development of Long Range Master Plan October April 2018 CSD Implements 4-year-old Kindergarten B&G Committee Update to Board LT Capital Improvement Trust Fund (Fund 46) Established Instructional Needs Reviewed at B&G Committee June 2017 December January 2016 October 2015 September 2016 B&G Committee presents 5YR Plan on District Campuses B&G = Building & Grounds Committee of the Board T&L = Teaching & Learning team TEPR = Tech. Ed. Program Review team March 2017 B&G Committee Tour Classrooms to determine T&L needs Committee Requested Addt l Information T&L Presentation to Full Board on TEPR Several Recommendations made by TEPR Team

3 Timeline Development of Long Range Master Plan October April 2018 Groth Design Group Approved July BOE Mtg CG Schmidt Managing Firm Approved Sept BOE Mtg August 2017 Start of Staff and Community Focus Groups Confirmed Enrollment Projections April 2018 December October 2017 July 2017 September 2017 Addition of 3 sections at Parkview & Thorson B&G = Building & Grounds Committee of the Board T&L = Teaching & Learning team TEPR = Tech. Ed. Program Review team Initiated Capacity Analysis November 2017 Needs Identified Feb/ Mar 2018 Explore Solutions based on Identified Needs

4 Group Westlawn Webster All Staff High School Thorson Parkview November 10, 2017 Students Dec 18 Jan 3 Nov 20 Jan 4 Nov 27 Parents Dec 5 Nov 27 Nov 20 Nov 28 Nov 29 Teachers/Staff Dec 13 Nov 28 Nov 30 Dec 18 Dec 14 Staff Follow-up Feb 22 Feb 28 Feb 22 Feb 8 Mar 15 C-G Rotary December 21, 2017 Alumni January 3, 2018 Community at Large January 10, 2018 Business Leaders January 8, 2018 FAB, PTOs, etc February 2018 Focus Group Follow-up March 26, 2018

5 Westlawn Staff 26 Parkview Staff 27 CEF 30 District Office Staff 1 Webster Staff 2 High School Staff 3 C-G Rotary 3 CPAC Board 4 Thorson Staff 7 Thorson PTO 8 American Legion 14 City Council 15 Webster PTO MAY April MAY Parkview PTO 21 Westlawn PTO 24 Open Forum CHS IMC 29 Open Forum Public Library 29 Open Forum CHS IMC LRMP Informational Sessions: Cedarburg Lions, Ozaukee Realtors, CHS PTO, Jr. Women s Club, League of Women Voters, Chamber

6 Major Themes Three major themes identified as part of the Long-Range Master Planning process Learning Spaces School Capacity Safety And Security

7 May-June Activity Community Survey Results Reviewed Safety and Security Audit May 29th-31st and June 19th B&G Committee June 7th & June 12th P&F Committee June 13th Reviewed sectioning and monitor enrollments Refined scope of LRMP project Developed a series of articles with the News Graphic on the LRMP Convened Steering Team on Engineering, Innovation & Design Core Team Meetings Continue Continued to Populate Website Populated FAQ on Website

8 Look Ahead Review sectioning and monitor enrollments P&F Meeting July 11 review draft resolutions Board Meeting July 18 consider approval of draft resolutions Develop public relations information campaign on project scope Core Team Meetings Continue to Populate Website Populate FAQ on Website

9 Deeper Dive

10 Long Range Master Plan Refinement of Project Scope As presented to P&F Committee June 13, 2018

11 Key Project Components Teaching And Learning Environments Student Capacity Safety And Security (Including focus on careers in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art, mathematics) and PLTW tracks as well as collaboration and intervention spaces designed for those uses instead of in the hallway.)

12 Noteworthy Milestones First significant investment in teaching and learning spaces or growth capacity since Several existing classrooms and other spaces in the schools have not been significantly upgraded in 30 years.

13 Community Survey Results Survey response rate, which is above industry standards of respondents would advise the School Board to pursue a referendum of respondents believe good schools have a positive impact on their home value of respondents are very satisfied/ satisfied with CSD

14 Survey Results Support for the individual Facilities Improvement Plans for each of the schools in the District was relatively equal across the board, ranging from 56-59% with support for the overall project: 76% of staff residents 65% of parent residents (non-staff)

15 Project Refinement Survey Results Reviewed B&G Committee June 7th Project Reviewed & Refined B&G Committee June 12th P&F Committee June 13th

16 P&F Committee Directive 1. Refined project scope and cost 2. Final cost analysis of tax impact 3. Review of potential draft resolution

17 Priority Setting Strategies 1. Defer capital replacement projects to operational budgets in the next 4-8 years. 2. Eliminate projects that do not compromise overall goals. 3. Utilize existing funding sources to address small, immediate, one-time items with Fund 50, Fund 46 and Fund Balance.

18 Priority Setting Strategies 4. Reduce square foot budgeted costs by simplifying exteriors and finishes. 5. Maintain green space (reduce asphalt work). 6. Reduce cost for furniture/equipment. 7. Focus funds on areas of growth and need.

19 Priority Setting Strategies 8. Remove skylights at Parkview, Thorson, Webster. 9. Eliminate New Drive Configurations at Westlawn, Parkview, Thorson and Webster. 10. Eliminate Parking Configurations Westlawn, Parkview, Thorson, Webster and CHS.

20 Origina l plan

21 Original vs. Revised Plan Building Original Cost Reduction Refined Plan Final Plan Parkview $12.7M $1.24M $11.46M $11.15M Thorson $13.1M $1.32M $11.78M $11.46M Westlawn $7.1M $2.43M $4.67M $4.63M Webster $4.6M $1.50M $3.10M $2.86M High School $34.8M $4.11M $30.69M $29.73M Total = $72.3M $10.61M $61.7M $59.8M

22 Tax Impact Original project of $72.3 million equals $.98 tax impact. Refined Project: $59.8 million would reduce the tax impact to $.58, a 40% reduction from the original project amount.

23 Mill Rate Over the Past 33 Years

24 Cedarburg School District Mill Rate $59.8 Million Project: The cost to address these projects represents an annual estimated tax increase of $58.00 for each $100,000 of a home s value. The District will be paying off debt obligations from past projects, which will assist in reducing the tax impact on the community for these projects. Debt Structuring Assumptions: New borrow would be over three years (2019, 2020, 2021) Interest rates 4.25% Tertiary State Aid negative 35% Equalized Property value 3% in year one, 2% in years two through four, and then 1% thereafter

25 Ozaukee Co. Mill Rate Comparison Mequon $8.07 Cedarburg $9.10 Northern Ozaukee $10.06 Port Washington $10.37 Grafton $11.27 Estimated* Mequon $8.07 Cedarburg $9.68 Northern Ozaukee $10.06 Port Washington $10.37 Grafton $11.27 *assuming mill rate stays the same for all other districts

26 Next Steps 1. Legal team develops draft resolutions 2. P&F Committee consider draft resolutions on July 11, Board of Education approval of resolutions on July 18, 2018

27 Access To More Information

28 Follow Us!

29 Thank You