APP NVITAT ON LETTERS COOPERATING AGENCY - Agency Categories:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "APP NVITAT ON LETTERS COOPERATING AGENCY - Agency Categories:"

Transcription

1 APP COOPERATING AGENCY - NVITAT ON LETTERS Agency Categories: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Federal Highway Administration California Department of Transportation Distribution List (total of 7 7 issued)

2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

3 Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi3.gzz.2000 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net February 4, Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD 7-4) San Francisco, CA Re: Invitation to be a Cooperating Agency in the Environmental Review Process for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), is initiating the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project. The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project proposes to provide a transit connection to the Metro Cold Line Eastside Extension, linking communities farther east of Los Angeles to the regional transit network. The proposed project area consists of portions of eight jurisdictions, including the cities of Commerce, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Santa Fe Springs, South El Monte, Whittier, and portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County which includes east Los Angeles and west Whittier-Los Nieto. The purpose of the project is to provide improved high-capacity transit service to an area challenged by increased travel demand and traffic congestion. The overall goal of the project is to improve the mobility within the project area and enhance the connectivity ofthe transit system. This transit guideway investment would provide improved access and connect communities to jobs and major activity centers in Los Angeles County. The enclosed scoping information packet provides more details, including a preliminary schedule. FTA seeks the US. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) cooperation in coordinating and determining effects of the proposed construction of the build alternatives under study and associated facilities on the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project, including those related to other project alternatives, environmental consequences, and mitigation. We are requesting your agency to be a cooperating agency because a potion of one ofthe build alternatives, the State Route 60 (SR-60) Light Rail Transit (LRT) alternative, crosses through the former Operating Industries Inc. Landfill, current EPA Superfund site. You can expect that the EIS will, to the greatest extent possible, satisfy the EPA statutory responsibilities and concerns. The environmental documentation will address environmental and programmatic concerns identified by the EPA and will be sufficiently detailed to enable the EPA to grant necessary permits or other approvals that may ensue from the build alternatives under study. If at any point in the process your needs are not being met, please let us know. We expect that at the end of the process the EIS will satisfy your NEPA requirements.

4 An Alternatives Analysis and an Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis have been completed for this project and the final reports may be found at Through the Alternatives Analysis process and further refinement subsequently conducted in the Addendum, as well as with input from the public and agencies, the range of alternatives has been refined. Two build alternatives along with a No Build and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative were adopted by the Metro Board of Directors in October 2009 for further analysis. The project area and alternatives identified in the Alternatives Analysis and the Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis will be the subject ofthe Draft EISIEIR. If your agency does not wish to be a cooperating agency, your agency still has the opportunity to become a participating agency in the environmental review process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU establishes an enhanced environmental review process for certain FTA projects, increasing the transparency of the process, as well as opportunities for participation. The requirements of Section 6002 apply to the project that is the subject ofthis letter. As part ofthe environmental review process for this project, the lead agencies must identify, as early as practicable, any other Federal and non-federal agencies that may have an interest in the project, and invite such agencies to become participating agencies in the environmental review process.' As a participating agency, you will be afforded the opportunity, together with the public, to be involved in defining the purpose of and need for the project, as well as in determining the range of alternatives to be considered for the project. These opportunities will build on the early participation opportunities that were provided during the Alternatives Analysis process. In addition, you will be asked to: Provide input on the impact assessment methodologies and level of detail in your agency's area of expertise; and Participate in coordination meetings, conference calls, and joint field reviews, as appropriate. Review and comment on sections ofthe pre-draft or pre-final environmental documents to communicate any concerns of your agency on the adequacy of the document, the alternatives considered, and the anticipated impacts and mitigation. ' Designation as a "participation agency" does not imply that the participating agency supports the proposed project or has any jurisdiction over, or special expertise concerning the proposed project or its potential impacts. A "participating agency" differs from a "cooperating agency," which is defined in regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act as "any Federal agency other than a lead agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in a proposal (or a reasonable alternative) for legislation or other major Federal action significantly affecting the quality ofthe human environment." 40 C.F.R. $ i rno r

5 Your agency does not have to accept this invitation to be a cooperating agency or a participating agency. If, however, you elect not to become either a cooperating agency or participating agency, you must decline this invitation in writing, indicating that your agency has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the project, no expertise or information relevant to the project, and does not intend to submit comments on the project. The declination may be transmitted electronically to Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at ray.tellis@dot.aov; please include the title ofthe official responding. In order to give your agency adequate opportunity to weigh the relevance of your participation as either a cooperating agency or a participating agency or both in this environmental review process, written response to this invitation is not due until Wednesday, April 14,2010, after the interagency scoping meeting. The interagency scoping meeting will be held on the following date and location: Thursday, February 18 at 10:OO a.m. at LACMTA, in the Windsor Conference Room, 1 sth lo or, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA We are providing scoping information materials with this letter that include description of the project area and proposed alternatives. We have also enclosed a copy ofthe Federal Register Notice of Intent (NOl), which provides details on how to submit initial scoping comments ifyou would like to do so. As noted in the NOI, all scoping comments should be submitted on or before April 14, We will also provide a copy ofthe Coordination Plan for the project in the future. Scoping materials are also available on the project website at We look forward to your response to this request and your role as a cooperating or participating agency on this p,roject. If you have questions or would like to discuss in more detail the project or our agencies' respective roles and responsibilities during the preparation of this EIS, please contact Mr. Ray Tellis of the FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at (213) If you have any questions regarding this invitation, please contact Ms. Kimberly Yu, Project Manager, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, address yuki@metro.net. Sincerely, Arthur T. Leahy Chief Executive Officer

6 Enclosures (2): 1. Scoping Information Packet 2. Federal Register NO1 cc: Federal Transit Administration

7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

8 Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi3.g Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooiz-2952 metro.net February 4, Mr. Thomas H. Magness, IV District Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 91 5 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 980 Los Angeles, CA Re: Invitation to be a Cooperating Agency in the Environmental Review Process for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project Dear Mr. Magness: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), is initiating the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project. The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project proposes to provide a transit connection to the Metro Cold Line Eastside Extension, linking communities farther east of Los Angeles to the regional transit network. The proposed project area consists of portions of eight jurisdictions, including the cities of Commerce, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Santa Fe Springs, South El Monte, Whittier, and portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County which includes east Los Angeles and west Whittier-Los Nieto. The purpose of the project is to provide improved high-capacity transit service to an area challenged by increased travel demand and traffic congestion. The overall goal of the project is to improve the mobility within the project area and enhance the connectivity ofthe transit system. This transit guideway investment would provide improved access and connect communities to jobs and major activity centers in Los Angeles County. The enclosed scoping information packet provides more details, including a preliminary schedule. FTA seeks the US. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) cooperation in coordinating and determining effects of the proposed construction of the build alternatives under study and associated facilities on the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project, including those related to other project alternatives, environmental consequences, and mitigation. We are requesting your agency to be a cooperating agency because the location ofthe Santa Anita Station, as part of the State Route 60 (SR-60) Light Rail Transit (LRT) alternative, is on property owned by the USACE to accommodate flood control. You can expect that the EIS will, to the greatest extent possible, satisfy the USACE statutory responsibilities and concerns. The environmental documentation will address environmental and programmatic concerns identified by the USACE and will be sufficiently detailed to enable the USACE to grant necessary permits or other approvals that may ensue from the build alternatives under study. If at any point in the process your needs are not being met, please let us know. We expect that at the end of the process the EIS will satisfy your NEPA requirements.

9 An Alternatives Analysis and an Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis have been completed for this project and the final reports may be found at Through the Alternatives Analysis process and further refinement subsequently conducted in the Addendum, as well as with input from the public and agencies, the range of alternatives has been refined. Two build alternatives along with a No Build and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative were adopted by the Metro Board of Directors in October 2009 for further analysis. The project area and alternatives identified in the Alternatives Analysis and the Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis will be the subject of the Draft EISJEIR. If your agency does not wish to be a cooperating agency, your agency still has the opportunity to become a participating agency in the environmental review process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU establishes an enhanced environmental review process for certain FTA projects, increasing the transparency of the process, as well as opportunities for participation. The requirements of Section 6002 apply to the project that is the subject of this letter. As part ofthe environmental review process for this project, the lead agencies must identify, as early as practicable, any other Federal and non-federal agencies that may have an interest in the project, and invite such agencies to become participating agencies in the environmental review process.' As a participating agency, you will be afforded the opportunity, together with the public, to be involved in defining the purpose of and need for the project, as well as in determining the range of alternatives to be considered for the project. These opportunities will build on the early participation opportunities that were provided during the Alternatives Analysis process. In addition, you will be asked to: Provide input on the impact assessment methodologies and level of detail in your agency's area of expertise; and. Participate in coordination meetings, conference calls, and joint field reviews, as appropriate. Review and comment on sections of the pre-draft or pre-final environmental documents to communicate any concerns ofyour agency on the adequacy of the document, the alternatives considered, and the anticipated impacts and mitigation. ' Designation as a "participation agency" does not imply that the participating agency supports the proposed project or has any jurisdiction over, or special expertise concerning the proposed project or its potential impacts. A "participating agency" differs from a "cooperating agency," which is defined in regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act as "any Federal agency other than a lead agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in a proposal (or a reasonable alternative) for legislation or other major Federal action significantly affecting the quality ofthe human environment." 40 C.F.R

10 Your agency does not have to accept this invitation to be a cooperating agency or a participating agency. If, however, you elect not to become either a cooperating agency or participating agency, you must decline this invitation in writing, indicating that your agency has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the project, no expertise or information relevant to the project, and does not intend to submit comments on the project. The declination may be transmitted electronically to Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at ray.tellis@dot.~ov; please include the title ofthe official responding. In order to give your agency adequate opportunity to weigh the relevance of your participation as either a cooperating agency or a participating agency or both in this environmental review process, written response to this invitation is not due until Wednesday, April 14,2010, after the interagency scoping meeting. The interagency scoping meeting will be held on the following date and location: Thursday, February 18 at 10:OO a.m. at LACMTA, in the Windsor Conference Room, 15'~ lo or, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA We are providing scoping information materials with this letter that include description of the project area and proposed alternatives. We have also enclosed a copy ofthe Federal Register Notice of Intent (NOI), which provides details on how to submit initial scoping comments ifyou would like to do so. As noted in the NOI, all scoping comments should be submitted on or before April 14, We will also provide a copy of the Coordination Plan for the project in the future. Scoping materials are also available on the project website at We look forward to your response to this request and your role as a cooperating or participating agency on this p.raject. If you have questions or would like to discuss in more detail the project or our agencies' respective roles and responsibilities during the preparation ofthis EIS, please contact Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at (21 3) If you have any questions regarding this invitation, please contact Ms. Kimberly Yu, Project Manager, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, address yuki@metro.net. Sincerely, Arthur T. Leahy Chief Executive Officer

11 Enclosures (2): 1. Scoping Information Packet 2. Federal Register NO1 cc: Federal Transit Administration

12 Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 213.9~2.zooo Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooiz-2g52 metro.net February 4, Ms. Phuong Trinh U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division 915 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 980 Los Angeles, CA Re: Invitation to be a Cooperating Agency in the Environmental Review Process for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project Dear Ms. Trinh: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), is initiating the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project. The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project proposes to provide a transit connection to the Metro Cold Line Eastside Extension, linking communities farther east of Los Angeles to the regional transit network. The proposed project area consists of portions of eight jurisdictions, including the cities of Commerce, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Santa Fe Springs, South El Monte, Whittier, and portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County which includes east Los Angeles and west Whittier-Los Nieto. The purpose ofthe project is to provide improved high-capacity transit service to an area challenged by increased travel demand and traffic congestion. The overall goal ofthe project is to improve the mobility within the project area and enhance the connectivity of the transit system. This transit guideway investment would provide improved access and connect communities to jobs and major activity centers in Los Angeles County. The enclosed scoping information packet provides more details, including a preliminary schedule. FTA seeks the US. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) cooperation in coordinating and determining effects of the proposed construction of the build alternatives under study and associated facilities on the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project, including those related to other project alternatives, environmental consequences, and mitigation. We are requesting your agency to be a cooperating agency because the location of the Santa Anita Station, as part ofthe State Route 60 (SR-60) Light Rail Transit (LRT) alternative, is on property owned by the USACE to accommodate flood control. You can expect that the EIS will, to the greatest extent possible, satisfy the USACE statutory responsibilities and concerns. The environmental documentation will address environmental and programmatic concerns identified by the USACE and will be sufficiently detailed to enable the USACE to grant necessary permits or other approvals that may ensue from the build alternatives under study, If at any point in the process your needs are not being met, please let us know. We expect that at the end of the process the EIS will satisfy your NEPA requirements.

13 An Alternatives Analysis and an Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis have been completed for this project and the final reports may be found at Through the Alternatives Analysis process and further refinement subsequently conducted in the Addendum, as well as with input from the public and agencies, the range of alternatives has been refined. Two build alternatives along with a No Build and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative were adopted by the Metro Board of Directors in October 2009 for further analysis. The project area and alternatives identified in the Alternatives Analysis and the Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis will be the subject of the Draft EIS/EIR. If your agency does not wish to be a cooperating agency, your agency still has the opportunity to become a participating agency in the environmental review process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU establishes an enhanced environmental review process for certain FTA projects, increasing the transparency ofthe process, as well as opportunities for participation. The requirements of Section 6002 apply to the project that is the subject of this letter. As part of the environmental review process for this project, the lead agencies must identify, as early as practicable, any other Federal and non-federal agencies that may have an interest in the project, and invite such agencies to become participating agencies in the environmental review proce~s.~ As a participating agency, you will be afforded the opportunity, together with the public, to be involved in defining the purpose of and need for the project, as well as in determining the range of alternatives to be considered for the project. These opportunities will build on the early participation opportunities that were provided during the Alternatives Analysis process. In addition, you will be asked to: Provide input on the impact assessment methodologies and level of detail in your agency's area of expertise; and Participate in coordination meetings, conference calls, and joint field reviews, as appropriate. Review and comment on sections ofthe pre-draft or pre-final environmental documents to communicate any concerns of your agency on the adequacy of the document, the alternatives considered, and the anticipated impacts and mitigation. Designation as a "participation agency" does not imply that the participating agency supports the proposed project or has any jurisdiction over, or special expertise concerning the proposed project or its potential impacts. A "participating agency" differs from a "cooperating agency," which is defined in regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act as "any Federal agency other than a lead agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in a proposal (or a reasonable alternative) for legislation or other major Federal action significantly affecting the quality ofthe human environment." 40 C.F.R. fi

14 Your agency does not have to accept this invitation to be a cooperating agency or a participating agency. If, however, you elect not to become either a cooperating agency or participating agency, you must decline this invitation in writing, indicating that your agency has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the project, no expertise or information relevant to the project, and does not intend to submit comments on the project. The declination may be transmitted electronically to Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at ray.tellis@dot.gov; please include the title ofthe official responding. In order to give your agency adequate opportunity to weigh the relevance of your participation as either a cooperating agency or a participating agency or both in this environmental review process, written response to this invitation is not due until Wednesday, April 14,2010, after the interagency scoping meeting. The interagency scoping meeting will be held on the following date and location: Thursday, February 18 at 10:OO a.m. at LACMTA, in the Windsor Conference Room, 1 5th lo or, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA We are providing scoping information materials with this letter that include description of the project area and proposed alternatives. We have also enclosed a copy ofthe Federal Register Notice of Intent (NOI), which provides details on how to submit initial scoping comments if you would like to do so. As noted in the NOI, all scoping comments should be submitted on or before April 14, We will also provide a copy ofthe Coordination Plan for the project in the future. Scoping materials are also available on the project website at We look forward to your response to this request and your role as a cooperating or participating agency on this p.roject. If you have questions or would like to discuss in more detail the project or our agencies1 respective roles and responsibilities during the preparation ofthis EIS, please contact Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Ofice at (21 3) If you have any questions regarding this invitation, please contact Ms. Kimberly Yu, Project Manager, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, address yuki@metro.net. Sincerely, Arthur T. Leahy Chief Executive Officer

15 Enclosures (2): 1. Scoping Information Packet 2. Federal Register NO1 cc: Federal Transit Administration

16 Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeies, CA rnetro.net February 4, Mr. Alex C. Dornstauder Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 441 C. Street, N.W. Washington, DC Re: Invitation to be a Cooperating Agency in the Environmental Review Process for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project Dear Mr. Dornstauder: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), is initiating the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project. The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project proposes to provide a transit connection to the Metro Cold Line Eastside Extension, linking communities farther east of Los Angeles to the regional transit network. The proposed project area consists of portions of eight jurisdictions, including the cities of Commerce, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Santa Fe Springs, South El Monte, Whittier, and portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County which includes east Los Angeles and west Whittier-Los Nieto. The purpose of the project is to provide improved high-capacity transit service to an area challenged by increased travel demand and traffic congestion. The overall goal of the project is to improve the mobility within the project area and enhance the connectivity of the transit system. This transit guideway investment would provide improved access and connect communities to jobs and major activity centers in Los Angeles County. The enclosed scoping information packet provides more details, including a preliminary schedule. FTA seeks the US. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) cooperation in coordinating and determining effects of the proposed construction of the build alternatives under study and associated facilities on the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project, including those related to other project alternatives, environmental consequences, and mitigation. We are requesting your agency to be a cooperating agency because the location of the Santa Anita Station, as part ofthe State Route 60 (SR-60) Light Rail Transit (LRT) alternative, is on property owned by the USACE to accommodate flood control. You can expect that the EIS will, to the greatest extent possible, satisfy the USACE statutory responsibilities and concerns. The environmental documentation will address environmental and programmatic concerns identified by the USACE and will be sufficiently detailed to enable the USACE to grant necessary permits or other approvals that may ensue from the build alternatives under study. If at any point in the process your needs are not being met, please let us know. We expect that at the end ofthe process the EIS will satisfy your NEPA requirements.

17 An Alternatives Analysis and an Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis have been completed for this project and the final reports may be found at Through the Alternatives Analysis process and further refinement subsequently conducted in the Addendum, as well as with input from the public and agencies, the range of alternatives has been refined. Two build alternatives along with a No Build and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative were adopted by the Metro Board of Directors in October'2009 for further analysis. The project area and alternatives identified in the Alternatives Analysis and the Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis will be the subject ofthe Draft EIS/EIR. If your agency does not wish to be a cooperating agency, your agency still has the opportunity to become a participating agency in the environmental review process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU establishes an enhanced environmental review process for certain FTA projects, increasing the transparency ofthe process, as well as opportunities for participation. The requirements of Section 6002 apply to the project that is the subject of this letter. As part ofthe environmental review process for this project, the lead agencies must identify, as early as practicable, any other Federal and non-federal agencies that may have an interest in the project, and invite such agencies to become participating agencies in the environmental review process.) As a participating agency, you will be afforded the opportunity, together with the public, to be involved in defining the purpose of and need for the project, as well as in determining the range of alternatives to be considered for the project. These opportunities will build on the early participation opportunities that were provided during the Alternatives Analysis process. In addition, you will be asked to: Provide input on the impact assessment methodologies and level of detail in your agency's area of expertise; and Participate in coordination meetings, conference calls, and joint field reviews, as appropriate. Review and comment on sections of the pre-draft or pre-final environmental documents to communicate any concerns of your agency on the adequacy of the document, the alternatives considered, and the anticipated impacts and mitigation. ' Designation as a "participation agency" does not imply that the participating agency supports the proposed project or has any jurisdiction over, or special expertise concerning the proposed project or its potential impacts. A "participating agency" differs from a "cooperating agency," which is defined in regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act as "any Federal agency other than a lead agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in a proposal (or a reasonable alternative) for legislation or other major Federal action significantly affecting the quality ofthe human environment." 40 C.F.R

18 Your agency does not have to accept this invitation to be a cooperating agency or a participating agency. If, however, you elect not to become either a cooperating agency or participating agency, you must decline this invitation in writing, indicating that your agency has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the project, no expertise or information relevant to the project, and does not intend to submit comments on-the project. The declination may be transmitted electronically to Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at ray.tellis@dot.gov; please include the title ofthe official responding. In order to give your agency adequate opportunity to weigh the relevance of your participation as either a cooperating agency or a participating agency or both in this environmental review process, written response to this invitation is not due until Wednesday, April 14,2010, after the interagency scoping meeting. The interagency scoping meeting will be held on the following date and location: Thursday, February 18 at 10:OO a.m. at LACMTA, in the Windsor Conference Room, isth lo or, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA We are providing scoping information materials with this letter that include description of the project area and proposed alternatives. We have also enclosed a copy ofthe Federal Register Notice of Intent (NO]), which provides details on how to submit initial scoping comments ifyou would like to do so. As noted in the NOI, all scoping comments should be submitted on or before April 14, We will also provide a copy ofthe Coordination Plan for the project in the future. Scoping materials are also available on the project website at We look forward to your response to this request and your role as a cooperating or participating agency on this p.roject. If you have questions or would like to discuss in more detail the project or our agencies1 respective roles and responsibilities during the preparation ofthis EIS, please contact Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at (21 3) If you have any questions regarding this invitation, please contact Ms. Kimberly Yu, Project Manager, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, address yuki@metro.net. Sincerely, Arthur T. Leahy Chief Executive Officer

19 Enclosures (2): 1. Scoping Information Packet 2. Federal Register NO1 cc: Federal Transit Administration

20 Federal Highway Administration

21 @ Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net February 4, Mr. Walter C. Waidelich Jr. Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration 650 Capitol Mall, Ste Sacramento, CA Re: Invitation to be a Cooperating Agency in the Environmental Review Process for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project Dear Mr. Waidelich Jr.: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), is initiating the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project. The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project proposes to provide a transit connection to the Metro Cold Line Eastside Extension, linking communities farther east of Los Angeles to the regional transit network. The proposed project area consists of portions ofeight jurisdictions, including the cities of Commerce, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Santa Fe Springs, South El Monte, Whittier, and portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County which includes east Los Angeles and west Whittier-Los Nieto. The purpose of the project is to provide improved high-capacity transit service to an area challenged by increased travel demand and traffic congestion. The overall goal of the project is to improve the mobility within the project area and enhance the connectivity of the transit system. This transit guideway investment would provide improved access and connect communities to jobs and major activity centers in Los Angeles County. The enclosed scoping information packet provides more details, including a preliminary schedule. FTA seeks the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) cooperation in coordinating and determining effects of the proposed construction of the build alternatives under study and associated facilities on the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project, including those related to other project alternatives, environmental consequences, and mitigation. We are requesting your agency to be a cooperating agency because the alignment of one of the build alternatives, the State Route 60 (SR-60) Light Rail Transit (LRT) alternative, is proposed within the Caltrans' SR-60 right-of-way. You can expect that the EIS will, to the greatest extent possible, satisfy the FHWA statutory responsibilities and concerns. The environmental documentation will address environmental and programmatic concerns identified by the FHWA and will be sufficiently detailed to enable the FHWA to grant necessary permits or other approvals that may ensue from the build alternatives under study. If at any point in the process your needs are not being met, please let us know. We expect that at the end of the process the EIS will satisfy your NEPA requirements.

22 An Alternatives Analysis and an Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis have been completed for this project and the final reports may be found at Through the Alternatives Analysis process and further refinement subsequently conducted in the Addendum, as well as with input from the public and agencies, the range of alternatives has been refined. Two build alternatives along with a No Build and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative were adopted by the Metro Board of Directors in October 2009 for further analysis. The project area and alternatives identified in the Alternatives Analysis and the Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis will be the subject ofthe Draft EIS/EIR. Ifyour agency does not wish to be a cooperating agency, your agency still has the opportunity to become a participating agency in the environmental review process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU establishes an enhanced environmental review process for certain FTA projects, increasing the transparency of the process, as well as opportunities for participation. The requirements of Section 6002 apply to the project that is the subject of this letter. As part ofthe environmental review process for this project, the lead agencies must identify, as early as practicable, any other Federal and non-federal agencies that may have an interest in the project, and invite such agencies to become participating agencies in the environmental review process.' As a participating agency, you will be afforded the opportunity, together with the public, to be involved in defining the purpose of and need for the project, as well as in determining the range of alternatives to be considered for the project. These opportunities will build on the early participation opportunities that were provided during the Alternatives Analysis process. In addition, you will be asked to: Provide input on the impact assessment methodologies and level of detail in your agency's area of expertise; and Participate in coordination meetings, conference calls, and joint field reviews, as appropriate. Review and comment on sections of the pre-draft or pre-final environmental documents to communicate any concerns ofyour agency on the adequacy of the document, the alternatives considered, and the anticipated impacts and mitigation. ' Designation as a "participation agency" does not imply that the participating agency supports the proposed project or has any jurisdiction over, or special expertise concerning the proposed project or its potential impacts. A "participating agency" differs from a "cooperating agency," which is defined in regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act as "any Federal agency other than a lead agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in a proposal (or a reasonable alternative) for legislation or other major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment." 40 C.F.R. $

23 Your agency does not have to accept this invitation to be a cooperating agency or a participating agency. If, however, you elect not to become either a cooperating agency or participating agency, you must decline this invitation in writing, indicating that your agency has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the project, no expertise or information relevant to the project, and does not intend to submit comments on the project. The declination may be transmitted electronically to Mr. Ray Tellis of the FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Ofice at ray.tellis@dot.gov; please include the title ofthe official responding. In order to give your agency adequate opportunity to weigh the relevance of your participation as either a cooperating agency or a participating agency or both in this environmental review process, written response to this invitation is not due until Wednesday, April 14,2010; after the interagency scoping meeting. The interagency scoping meeting will be held on the following date and location:. Thursday, February 18 at 10:OO a.m. at LACMTA, in the Windsor Conference Room, 1 5th lo or, One Cateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA We are providing scoping information materials with this letter that include description of the project area and proposed alternatives. We have also enclosed a copy ofthe Federal Register Notice of Intent (NOI), which provides details on how to submit initial scoping comments ifyou would like to do so. As noted in the NOI, all scoping comments should be submitted on or before April 14, We will also provide a copy ofthe Coordination Plan for the project in the future. Scoping materials are also available on the project website at We look forward to your response to this request and your role as a cooperating or participating agency on this project. If you have questions or would like to discuss in more detail the project or our agencies' respective roles and responsibilities during the preparation of this EIS, please contact Mr. Ray Tellis of the FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Ofice at (21 3) If you have any questions regarding this invitation, please contact Ms. Kimberly Yu, Project Manager, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, One Cateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, address yuki@metro.net. Sincerely, Arthur T. Leahy Chief Executive Officer

24 Enclosures (2): 1. Scoping Information Packet 2. Federal Register NO1 cc: Federal Transit Administration

25 California Department of Transportation

26 ' Metro February 4, Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zo00 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net Mr. Gary lverson Senior Environmental Planner California Department oftransportation 120 S. Spring St. Los Angeles, CA Re: Invitation to be a Cooperating Agency in the Environmental Review Process for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project Dear Mr. Iverson: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), is initiating the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project. The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project proposes to provide a transit connection to the Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension, linking communities farther east of Los Angeles to the regional transit network. The proposed project area consists of portions of eight jurisdictions, including the cities of Commerce, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Santa Fe Springs, South El Monte, Whittier, and portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County which includes east Los Angeles and west Whittier-Los Nieto. The purpose of the project is to provide improved high-capacity transit service to an area challenged by increased travel demand and traffic congestion. The overall goal of the project is to improve the mobility within the project area and enhance the connectivity ofthe transit system. This transit guideway investment would provide improved access and connect communities to jobs and major activity centers in Los Angeles County. The enclosed scoping information packet provides more details, including a preliminary schedule. FTA seeks California Department oftransportationls cooperation in coordinating and determining effects of the proposed construction of the build alternatives under study and associated facilities on the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project, including those related to other project alternatives, environmental consequences, and mitigation. We are requesting your agency to be a cooperating agency because the alignment of one of the build alternatives, the State Route 60 (SR-60) Light Rail Transit (LRT) alternative, is proposed within the California Department oftranspo'rtationls SR-60 right-of-way. You can expect that the EIS will, to the greatest extent possible, satisfy California Department of Transportation statutory responsibilities and concerns. The environmental documentation will address environmental and programmatic concerns identified by California Department oftransportation and will be sufficiently detailed to enable California Department of Transportation to grant necessary permits or other approvals that may ensue from the build alternatives under study. If at any point in the process your needs are not being met, please

27 let us know. We expect that at the end of the process the EIS will satisfy your NEPA requirements. An Alternatives Analysis and an Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis have been completed for this project and the final reports may be found at Through the Alternatives Analysis process and further refinement subsequently conducted in the Addendum, as well as with input from the public and agencies, the range of alternatives has been refined. Two build alternatives along with a No Build and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative were adopted by the Metro Board of Directors in October 2009 for further analysis. The project area and alternatives identified in the Alternatives Analysis and the Addendum to the Alternatives Analysis will be the subject ofthe Draft EIS/EIR. If your agency does not wish to be a cooperating agency, your agency still has the opportunity to become a participating agency in the environmental review process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU establishes an enhanced environmental review process for certain FTA projects, increasing the transparency ofthe process, as well as opportunities for participation. The requirements of Section 6002 apply to the project that is the subject of this letter. As part of the environmental review process for this project, the lead agencies must identify, as early as practicable, any other Federal and non-federal agencies that may have an interest in the project, and invite such agencies to become participating agencies in the environmental review process.' As a participating agency, you will be afforded the opportunity, together with the public, to be involved in defining the purpose of and need for the project, as well as in determining the range of alternatives to be considered for the project. These opportunities will build on the early participation opportunities that were provided during the Alternatives Analysis process. In addition, you will be asked to: Provide input on the impact assessment methodologies and level of detail in your agency's area of expertise; and Participate in coordination meetings, conference calls, and joint field reviews, as appropriate. ' Designation as a "participation agency" does not imply that the participating agency supports the proposed project or has any jurisdiction over, or special expertise concerning the proposed project or its potential impacts. A "participating agency" differs from a "cooperating agency," which is defined in regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act as "any Federal agency other than a lead agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in a proposal (or a reasonable alternative) for legislation or other major Federal action significantly affecting the quality ofthe human environment." 40 C.F.R

28 Your agency does not have to accept this invitation to be a cooperating agency or a participating agency. If, however, you elect not to become either a cooperating agency or participating agency, you must decline this invitation in writing, indicating that your agency has no jurisdiction or authority with respect to the project, no expertise or information relevant to the project, and does not intend to submit comments on the project. The declination may be transmitted electronically to Mr. Ray Tellis ofthe FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at ray.tellis@dot.gov; please include the title ofthe official responding. In order to give your agency adequate opportunity to weigh the relevance ofyour participation as either a cooperating agency or a participating agency or both in this environmental review process, written response to this invitation is not due until Wednesday, April 14,2010, after the interagency scoping meeting. The interagency scoping meeting will be held on the following date and location: Thursday, February 18 at 10:OO a.m. at LACMTA, in the Windsor Conference Room, isth lo or, One Cateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA We are providing scoping information materials with this letter that include description of the project area and proposed alternatives. We have also enclosed a copy ofthe Federal Register Notice of Intent (NOI), which provides details on how to submit initial scoping comments ifyou would like to do so. As noted in the NOI, all scoping comments should be submitted on or before April 14, We will also provide a copy ofthe Coordination Plan for the project in the future. Scoping materials are also available on the project website at We look forward to your response to this request and your role as a cooperating or participating agency on this p.roject. If you have questions or would like to discuss in more detail the project or our agencies' respective roles and responsibilities during the preparation of this EIS, please contact Mr. Ray Tellis of the FTA Los Angeles Metropolitan Office at (21 3) If you have any questions regarding this invitation, please contact Ms. Kimberly Yu, Project Manager, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, One Cateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA , address yuki@metro.net. Sincerely, Arthur T. Leahy Chief Executive Officer

APPEND PARTICIPATING AGENCY - INVITATION LETTER. Sample Letter - Federal Sample Letter - Non-Federal

APPEND PARTICIPATING AGENCY - INVITATION LETTER. Sample Letter - Federal Sample Letter - Non-Federal APPEND PARTICIPATING AGENCY - INVITATION LETTER Sample Letter - Federal Sample Letter - Non-Federal Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi~.g22.2000 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los

More information

Appendix H Invitation Letters

Appendix H Invitation Letters Appendix H Invitation Letters Mr. Title Agency Address City, CA 90zip Re: Invitation to Participate in the Environmental Review Process for the Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project Dear Mr. : The

More information

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft EIS/EIR Public Hearings

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft EIS/EIR Public Hearings Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft EIS/EIR Public Hearings Agenda Registration/Open House (30 minutes) Draft EIS/EIR Presentation (30 minutes) Public Comment (90 minutes) 1 Purpose of Today s Meeting

More information

0. US. Department pf Transportation Federal Transit Administration

0. US. Department pf Transportation Federal Transit Administration 0. US. Department pf Transportation Federal Transit REGION IX Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada; Guam Ameritan Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands :201 Mission Street Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94105-1039

More information

CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC AND AGENCY OUTREACH

CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC AND AGENCY OUTREACH CHAPTER 6 PUBLIC AND AGENCY OUTREACH This chapter documents the Westside Purple Line Extension Project (the Project) Public Participation Plan for the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

More information

ATTACHMENT G-1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE CONSISTENCY SELF-CERTIFICATION FORM

ATTACHMENT G-1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE CONSISTENCY SELF-CERTIFICATION FORM ATTACHMENT G-1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE CONSISTENCY SELF-CERTIFICATION FORM This form should be completed and executed for all ITS Projects or Projects with ITS elements. The form should

More information

Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zo~-.,. Los Angeles, CA g0012-2g52 rnetro.net

Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zo~-.,. Los Angeles, CA g0012-2g52 rnetro.net @ Metro Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zo~-.,. Los Angeles, CA g0012-2g52 rnetro.net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 20,2012 SUBJECT: FUNDING AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS

More information

Metro REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 18, 2014

Metro REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 18, 2014 Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi3.922.z000 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority los Angeles, CA 9ooiz-z952 metro.net REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 18, 2014 SUBJECT:

More information

Proposed Connector between Airline Highway (US 61) and Interstate 10 in St. John the Baptist Parish

Proposed Connector between Airline Highway (US 61) and Interstate 10 in St. John the Baptist Parish DRAFT COORDINATION PLAN Proposed Connector between Airline Highway (US 61) and Interstate 10 in St. John the Baptist Parish OCTOBER 2, 2009 State Project No. 70-48-0101 Federal Aid No. HP-TO21(517) RPC

More information

SUBJECT: REGIONAL RAlL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING BENCH AND REGIONAL RAlL UPDATE. INITIATE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL RAlL BENCH

SUBJECT: REGIONAL RAlL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING BENCH AND REGIONAL RAlL UPDATE. INITIATE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL RAlL BENCH @ Metro Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 2i3.9z2.zooo Tel Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 metro.net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE April 18, 2012 SUBJECT: REGIONAL RAlL PLANNING AND

More information

CRENSHAW/LAX TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT: A New Beginning for the Crenshaw Corridor Through Use of Innovative Procurement Strategies

CRENSHAW/LAX TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT: A New Beginning for the Crenshaw Corridor Through Use of Innovative Procurement Strategies CRENSHAW/LAX TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT: A New Beginning for the Crenshaw Corridor Through Use of Innovative Procurement Strategies Robert Ball, PE Kimberly Ong, PE Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation

More information

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zooo Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooi2-zp52 metro.net

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zooo Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooi2-zp52 metro.net @ Metro 9 Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zooo Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooi2-zp52 metro.net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE OCTOBER 14,2009 SUBJECT: PUBLIC-PRIVATE

More information

3. Award and execute contract modifications for up to $1,200,000.

3. Award and execute contract modifications for up to $1,200,000. One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213 922.2C metro.net REGULAR BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 23,2010 SUBJECT: ACTION: 1-605 "HOT SPOTS" FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROJECT STUDY REPORTS (PSRs) APPROVE RECOMMENDATIONS

More information

FISCAL YEAR TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW REPORT RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR TRIENNIAL REVIEW REPORT

FISCAL YEAR TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW REPORT RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR TRIENNIAL REVIEW REPORT 16 One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro. net FINANCE, BUDGET AND ADUlT COMMITTEE JUNE 19, 2013 SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2010-2012 TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW REPORT ACTION:

More information

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background SAFETEA-LU This document provides information related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) that was previously posted on the Center for

More information

Long Range Transportation Plan

Long Range Transportation Plan Summary of Policy Governor in 2000. The baseline can The purpose of the Long Range also be considered as the scenario in Transportation Plan (LRTP) is to which no new transportation projects provide decision

More information

Metro REGULAR BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2014 SUBJECT: PROVIDING TRANSIT PASSES AND FARE EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL

Metro REGULAR BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2014 SUBJECT: PROVIDING TRANSIT PASSES AND FARE EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 9ooiz-z95z 2i3.g22.2o0o Tel metro.net REGULAR BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2014 SUBJECT: PROVIDING TRANSIT

More information

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Mark Linsenmayer Director Presentation Agenda Overview of Metro Public Private

More information

Metro. REVISED FINANCE, BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE May 14, 2014 SUBJECT: FUNDING FOR FARE SUBSIDY PROGRAMS APPROVE RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS

Metro. REVISED FINANCE, BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE May 14, 2014 SUBJECT: FUNDING FOR FARE SUBSIDY PROGRAMS APPROVE RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS Metro Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza zi3.gzz.z000 Tel los Angeles, CA gooiz-z95z metro.net REVISED FINANCE, BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE May 14, 2014 SUBJECT: FUNDING FOR FARE SUBSIDY

More information

Public and Agency Involvement. 8.1 Scoping Meetings and Noticing. Chapter 8

Public and Agency Involvement. 8.1 Scoping Meetings and Noticing. Chapter 8 8.1 Scoping Meetings and Noticing Chapter 8 As described in Chapter 1, Section 1.7, Scope and Content of this Environmental Impact Report, the scoping process for this EIR was formally initiated on June

More information

ATTACHMENT A: DRAFT PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK

ATTACHMENT A: DRAFT PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK 6 Harris Court Monterey, CA 93940 831 649-5225 Fax 831 373-5065 ATTACHMENT A: DRAFT PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK FORA has prepared this proposed scope of work to be used as a guide for consultants as they submit

More information

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Matt Machado Director 1010 10 th Street, Suite 3500, Modesto, CA 95354-0847 Phone: 209.525.6550 Date «FirstName» «LastName» «Company» «Address1» «City», «State» «PostalCode»

More information

A. Amend the FY LACMTA Budget to add $3,000,000 from Measure R 3% Commuter Rail funds for the Rancho Vista Grade Separation Project

A. Amend the FY LACMTA Budget to add $3,000,000 from Measure R 3% Commuter Rail funds for the Rancho Vista Grade Separation Project 17 One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro. net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 SUBJECT: ACTION: RANCHO VISTA GRADE SEPARATION AND REGIONAL RAIL UPDATE

More information

MEMORANDUM. February 12, Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties. Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner

MEMORANDUM. February 12, Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties. Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner MEMORANDUM February 12, 2014 To: Fr: Re: Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner Cancellation of February 19, 2014 ITC Meeting The Interagency

More information

Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program

Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program December 10, 2014 Bruce Roberts, Chief Division of Rail and Mass Transportation California Department of Transportation P.O. Box 942873 Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for

More information

Special Meeting Agenda

Special Meeting Agenda Special Meeting Agenda Thursday, April 14, 2016 Time: 9:00 a.m. to 10 a.m. THIS IS A PHONE CONFERENCE MEETING Teleconference Number: 1-712- 432-1212 Participant Code: 432-600- 639 A. CALL TO ORDER AND

More information

Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting #52. February 16, :00 PM - 8:00 PM Progress Park Downey Ave, Paramount, CA MEETING SUMMARY

Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting #52. February 16, :00 PM - 8:00 PM Progress Park Downey Ave, Paramount, CA MEETING SUMMARY Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting #52 February 16, 2017 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM Progress Park 15500 Downey Ave, Paramount, CA 90723 INTRODUCTION On Thursday, February 16, 2017, the Corridor Advisory Committee

More information

SUBRECIPIENT CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE FOR FEDERAL GRANTS

SUBRECIPIENT CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE FOR FEDERAL GRANTS ~ Los Angeles County ~..._.T,. One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro. net 34 Metro PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JANUARY 16, 2013 SUBJECT: ACTION: SUBRECIPIENT CIVIL

More information

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea Planning Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 7, 2015 Subject Summary of Issues Approval of Resolution 15-4-G and Transmittal of Recommended Project Lists to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission

More information

SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT WBS ID:

SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT WBS ID: FINAL REPORT SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT WBS ID:165.05.10-100 Prepared for Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority December 22, 2008 Prepared by: 2020 East First Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana,

More information

Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to award and execute the following contracts for the Eastside Phase I1 Transit Corridor Project:

Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to award and execute the following contracts for the Eastside Phase I1 Transit Corridor Project: @ Metro lob Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 213.922 2000 Tt Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 rnetro.net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMIlTEE June 20,2007 SUBJECT: ACTION:

More information

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS What is Bus Rapid Transit?... 2 BRT Features... 2 BRT Variations... 3 Where is BRT Currently Located?... 4 How Much Does BRT Cost?... 4

More information

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region Connie Kozlak Metropolitan Transportation Services Mark Fuhrmann Metro Transit Ed Petrie Metro Transit Metropolitan Council

More information

MAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective

MAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective MAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective Webinar Presentation Sponsored by the National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) March 12, 2013 Bill Malley Washington, DC Presenter: Bill

More information

Los Angeles: GLENDALE 4600 Colorado Blvd. Los Angeles, CA Hours of Operation: Saturdays and Sundays. 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.

Los Angeles: GLENDALE 4600 Colorado Blvd. Los Angeles, CA Hours of Operation: Saturdays and Sundays. 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. S.A.F.E. Collection Centers throughout the County LA County DPH - http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/php/docs/sharps_disposal_resources.pdf.pdf In Los Angeles County, residents may bring containerized household

More information

Apologies Michael, but lets work off of the attached update version. James Bass came back with a few additional minor tweaks to the language.

Apologies Michael, but lets work off of the attached update version. James Bass came back with a few additional minor tweaks to the language. REFERENCE ITEM 3.16 RTC Handout March 8, 2018 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Marc Williams Michael Morris Bill Hale; Kelly Selman; Mo Bur; Brian Barth RE: Recommended RTC Action for LBJ/IH 635

More information

VRE Gainesville Haymarket Extension Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis

VRE Gainesville Haymarket Extension Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis VRE Gainesville Haymarket Extension Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis Public Workshop Wednesday, July 30 th, 2008 6:30 9:00 pm Stonewall Jackson High School Presentation Overview Introduction

More information

CRENSHAW/LAX PILOT BUSINESS SOLUTION CENTER (BSC} and METRO'S PILOT BUSINESS INTERRUPTION FUND (BIF} MONTHLY REPORT

CRENSHAW/LAX PILOT BUSINESS SOLUTION CENTER (BSC} and METRO'S PILOT BUSINESS INTERRUPTION FUND (BIF} MONTHLY REPORT One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro. net CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE January 15, 2015 SUBJECT: ACTION: CRENSHAW/LAX PILOT BUSINESS SOLUTION CENTER

More information

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR 29 One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 l metro. net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE MARCH 20, 2013 SUBJECT: ACTION: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR RECEIVE

More information

A-3 RECLAMATION NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY

A-3 RECLAMATION NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY A-3 RECLAMATION NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project February 2009 Draft EIS/EIR 4310-MN-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion,

More information

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002 TPB SR22-2017 May 5, 2017 RESOLUTION ON AN AMENDMENT TO THE FY 2017-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT

More information

Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal

Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Public-Private Partnership Program August 16, 2012 Transportation and Infrastructure Summit Michael

More information

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region The Prospectus Transportation Planning in the Denver Region TAC Draft (as of June 16, 2011) Approved December 2004 Revised November 2006 Revised August 2007 Revised March 2009 Revised 2011 Key revisions

More information

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ?/2W/(T. Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ?/2W/(T. Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal CITY OF 7 S3 SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 3/30/2017 Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal SUBJECT: DIRIDON STATION PLAN AND REGIONAL RAIL PROJECTS

More information

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements Date: July 13, 2012 Subject: MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements The recently enacted Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) includes a number of substantial changes

More information

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA? Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, 2012 What is FHWA? 2 1 What does FHWA do? The Federal Highway Administration: Improves Mobility on the Nation s highways through National Leadership, Innovation

More information

Met r 0 Met"'fKK'ibn Transportation Authority

Met r 0 Met'fKK'ibn Transportation Authority ~ Los Angeles County Met r 0 Met"'fKK'ibn Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro.net CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MARCH 19, 2015 SUBJECT: ACTION: ROSECRANS/MARQUARDT

More information

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO. September 14, 2010

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO. September 14, 2010 DANIELL. CARDOZO THOMAS A. ENSLOW TANYA A. GULESSERIAN JASON W HOLDER MARC D. JOSEPH ELIZABETH KLEBANER RACHAEL E. KOSS LOULENA A. MILES ROBYN C. PURCH IA OF COUNSEL THOMAS R. ADAMS ANN BROADWELL GLORIA

More information

To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both

To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both September 8, 2010 To: From: Subject: Transportation 2020 Committee Will Kempton, Chief Executive Officer Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Overview The Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program continues to

More information

8/9/2012. SWLRT Community Advisory Committee. Today s Agenda. CAC Issue Topics: Survey Results

8/9/2012. SWLRT Community Advisory Committee. Today s Agenda. CAC Issue Topics: Survey Results SWLRT Community Advisory Committee August 9, 2012 2 Today s Agenda Welcome/Approve Minutes Project Updates CAC Issues Survey Results DEIS Process Overview and Outreach Plan FEIS/Next Steps Reports CAC

More information

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FEASIBILITY REPORT In November 2008, Measure R was approved by a significant two-thirds majority, committing a projected $40 billion to traffic relief and transportation upgrades

More information

May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background

May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background May 17, 2010 To: From: Subject: Transportation 2020 Committee Will Kempton, Chief Executive Officer Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Overview The Go Local Fixed-Guidewaof the program, the City of

More information

PHILLIP A. WASHINGTON CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PHILLIP A. WASHINGTON CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Metro Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 213.922.2000 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 metro.net February 9, 2018 TO: THROUGH: BOARD OF DIRECTORS PHILLIP A. WASHINGTON

More information

Corridor Management Committee. September 5, 2012

Corridor Management Committee. September 5, 2012 Corridor Management Committee September 5, 2012 2 Today s Topics SWLRT DEIS Process Overview and Outreach Preliminary Engineering Services Procurement Update Communications and Outreach Update BAC Report

More information

Brooke County Access I, L.L.C., Brooke County Access Project Monthly Pre-filing Status Report #5 Docket No. PF

Brooke County Access I, L.L.C., Brooke County Access Project Monthly Pre-filing Status Report #5 Docket No. PF April 26, 2018 Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: Brooke County Access I, L.L.C., Brooke County Access Project Monthly Pre-filing

More information

Funding Safe Routes to School in California

Funding Safe Routes to School in California Funding Safe Routes to School in California Patti Horsley, MPH SRTS Technical Assistance Resource Center California Active Communities California Department of Public Health / UCSF Funding Overview No-cost

More information

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/16/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-05354, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-22-P]

More information

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type:Informational Report

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type:Informational Report Metro Board Report Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles, CA File #:2015-1743, File Type:Informational Report Agenda Number:56. PLANNING

More information

In developing the program, as directed by the Board (Attachment A), staff used the following framework:

In developing the program, as directed by the Board (Attachment A), staff used the following framework: _... ~ Los Angeles County ~ T~"'-"- Metro One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.200C metro. net 15 REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 SUBJECT: ACTION: OPEN STREETS

More information

TRB/AASHTO Environment & Energy Research Conference June 6-9, 2010 Session 47: Lessons Learned from P3 Public Involvement Initiatives

TRB/AASHTO Environment & Energy Research Conference June 6-9, 2010 Session 47: Lessons Learned from P3 Public Involvement Initiatives TRB/AASHTO Environment & Energy Research Conference June 6-9, 2010 Session 47: Lessons Learned from P3 Public Involvement Initiatives Lessons Learned from Virginia P3 Projects Dana C. Nifosi, Venable LLP

More information

Regional Transportation Activities Report. VTA Funding Measure

Regional Transportation Activities Report. VTA Funding Measure Regional Transportation Activities Report VTA Funding Measure Transportation and Environment Committee June 6, 2016 VTA Proposed Funding Measure Funding Category BART Phase II Bicycle/Pedestrian Program

More information

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN for Agency and Public Involvement

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN for Agency and Public Involvement STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN for Agency and Public Involvement Study Area 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project (75 th Street CIP) CREATE Projects EW2 / P2 / P3 / GS 19 Illinois Department of Transportation

More information

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage. 5 Implementation 5.1 Anticipated Caltrans Review Process... 2 5.1.1 Project Initiation Document and Project Report... 2 5.1.2 Environmental Review Process... 4 5.1.3 Right of Way Acquisition Process...

More information

8. Coordination and Consultation

8. Coordination and Consultation 8. Coordination and Consultation A Public Involvement Strategy was developed for this project. The strategy was prepared following interviews with 10 key stakeholders to assess information needs and appropriate

More information

Enhanced Discharge Planning Rights for Nursing Facility Residents under MDS 3.0 Section Q

Enhanced Discharge Planning Rights for Nursing Facility Residents under MDS 3.0 Section Q California s Protection & Advocacy System Toll-Free (800) 776-5746 Enhanced Discharge Planning Rights for Nursing Facility Residents under MDS 3.0 Section Q I. Background and Legal Authority April 2016,

More information

Project Budget and Schedule Status

Project Budget and Schedule Status Program Management Project Budget and Schedule Status Highway Program Planning & Programming Committee June 19, 2013 Highway Program Project Schedules EIR/EIS Construction Various project stages Engineering

More information

Tentative Project Schedule. Non-Discrimination i i Laws. Para Preguntas en español

Tentative Project Schedule. Non-Discrimination i i Laws. Para Preguntas en español Florida Department of Transportation, District Seven Project Newsletter Number 1 October 2012 The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is conducting a Project Development & Environment (PD&E) study

More information

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS 2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Background... 3 A. Policy Framework... 3 B. Development of the 2019-2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)..

More information

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions This paper provides an overview of the project delivery provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). It also briefly summarizes

More information

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20002-4290 (202) 962-3310 Fax: (202) 962-3202 Item #5 MEMORANDUM January 8, 2010 To: From:

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS PRINCESS PALM AVENUE, SUITE 120 TAMPA, FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS PRINCESS PALM AVENUE, SUITE 120 TAMPA, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 10117 PRINCESS PALM AVENUE, SUITE 120 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33610 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF December 18, 2012 Tampa Permits Section SAJ-2011-00551 (IP-TEH)

More information

FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS

FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS FTA GRANT CA-57-Xxxx MOU.NF FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS This Funding Agreement for Section 5317 New Freedom Program Funds (the Agreement ) is dated as of (the Effective

More information

MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA

MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Gilroy City Council Chambers 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA AGENDA 2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS: This portion

More information

Puget Sound Gateway Program

Puget Sound Gateway Program Puget Sound Gateway Program SR 167 Completion Project Tacoma Transportation Commission April 18, 2018 THOMAS SLIMAK, PE SR 167 ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER Agenda Puget Sound Gateway Program Overview Program

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922 Operations and Readiness Branch PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO ALTER A US ARMY CORPS

More information

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) For FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) and DRAFT GENERAL CONFORMITY DETERMINATION (GCD)

More information

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items A. Roll Call COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2016, 9:00 A.M. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NORTH CHAMBER 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, ROOM 310, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

More information

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation December 9, 2015 Planning has begun for an extension of METRO Orange Line south from Burnsville to the Kenrick Avenue park and ride in Lakeville.

More information

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon Every profession has its own acronyms and jargon. The shorthand wording makes it easier and quicker for professionals in any given field to communicate

More information

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018 Project Selection Policy Update Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018 Legislative Direction 2017 Laws of Minnesota, Chapter 3, Section 124 New Policy on Project Selection The commissioner of transportation must

More information

Livable and Sustainable Communities: The Federal Perspective. Federal Transit Administration

Livable and Sustainable Communities: The Federal Perspective. Federal Transit Administration Livable and Sustainable Communities: The Federal Perspective Federal Transit Administration Livability means being able to take your kids to school, go to work, see a doctor, drop by the grocery or post

More information

Annual Report on Funding Recommendations

Annual Report on Funding Recommendations Annual Report on Funding Recommendations Fiscal Year 2019 Capital Investment Grants Program Report of the Secretary of Transportation to the United States Congress Pursuant to 49 USC 5309(o)(1) and Section

More information

Our approach to project management education offers proven, results-focused learning.

Our approach to project management education offers proven, results-focused learning. From: To: Subject: Date: Project Management Academy FORA Board Project Management Master Certification (January 17-20, 2017: University of Southern California) Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:32:40 PM The

More information

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds

More information

I-15 Corridor System Master Plan San Diego, California to Utah/Idaho border

I-15 Corridor System Master Plan San Diego, California to Utah/Idaho border Breakout Group 3: Collaboration for Integrated Planning: Forming Effective Partnerships I-15 Corridor System Master Plan San Diego, California to Utah/Idaho border 1 The Beginning of the Partnership The

More information

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Program Update

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Program Update U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Program Update For California Marine Affairs and Navigation Conference Jeffrey A. McKee Chief, Navigation Branch US Army Corps of Engineers March 10, 2015 US Army

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Final July 21, 2017 SCH: #2016081041 City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan ENVIRONMENTAL

More information

COORDINATION PLAN. September 30, 2011

COORDINATION PLAN. September 30, 2011 COORDINATION PLAN September 30, 2011 TABLE 1: AGENCIES AND CONSULTING PARTIES Role Federal Agencies Virginia Agencies Local Agencies / Others Lead Agency Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Transportation

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/ 1 Transportation Alternatives Program Authorized

More information

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees:

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees: Meeting Minutes Project: Subject: DART D2 Stakeholder Work Group for D2 Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees: DART, 1401 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, TX Steve Salin, DART Ernie Martinez, DART

More information

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding

More information

August 9, Re: DBE Program Triennial Goal Concurrence - Recipient ID #1674. Dear Mr. Smith:

August 9, Re: DBE Program Triennial Goal Concurrence - Recipient ID #1674. Dear Mr. Smith: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration REGION IX Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Guam American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands 201 Mission Street Suite 1650 San Francisco,

More information

SECTION II. Collection and Analysis of Metro Contract Data

SECTION II. Collection and Analysis of Metro Contract Data SECTION II. Collection and Analysis of Metro Contract Data Section II describes the procurement areas and the relevant geographic market area defined for the Metro disparity study. BBC also identifies

More information

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Title 23 Refresher. FHWA Federal-Aid Program for Local Public Agencies

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Title 23 Refresher. FHWA Federal-Aid Program for Local Public Agencies American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Title 23 Refresher FHWA Federal-Aid Program for Local Public Agencies 1 ARRA Implementation for Local Public Agencies Provide an overview of the fundamental

More information

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs 9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs 9.1. Grant Funding Overview Grant funding continues to be a key factor for ports in meeting capital investment requirements. Grants can

More information

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011 Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011 What is a New or Small Start? New fixed guideways and extensions to existing systems Includes light rail, heavy rail, commuter

More information

Please complete your phone connection now:

Please complete your phone connection now: Today s seminar will begin shortly. Please complete your phone connection now: 1. Dial the toll free number: 1-866-275-3495. 2. Enter the meeting number *4671867* on your phone keypad. Enter the star (*)

More information

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009 In-Step, In Line, On Time Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009 I-69 Corridor 1 I-69 Corridor I-69 is expected to create more than 27,000 new jobs by 2025, resulting

More information

chapter 5 Action Plan

chapter 5 Action Plan 5 Action Plan Critical to the CBTP process is bridging the gap between planning and action. Implementation of the CBTP relies on multiple jurisdictions and agencies, each responsible for different strategies

More information

Metrolink Budget for FY /Additional Service on the Antelope Valley Line

Metrolink Budget for FY /Additional Service on the Antelope Valley Line 22 One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 912-2952 213-922.2 l metro. net PLAIG AD PROGRAMMIG COMMITTEE JULY 17, 213 SUBJECT: ACTIO: REGIOAL RAIL UPDATE RECEIVE AD FILE RECOMMEDATIO Receive and file the Regional

More information