Memorandum March 28, 2018

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Memorandum March 28, 2018"

Transcription

1 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 1 of 178 Memorandum March 28, 2018 This agenda is subject to revision up to 72 hours prior to the meeting. To: From: Subject: All Members, Technical Advisory Committee Jeanne Geiger, Deputy Director Meeting Notice and Agenda The next meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee is scheduled for Friday, April 6, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. at the TxDOT District Office, Building 2, Hearing Room located at 4615 NW Loop 410, San Antonio, Texas, Citizens to be Heard: Speakers will be allowed up to three (3) minutes each to address the Technical Advisory Committee under the Citizens to be Heard agenda item. All speakers must sign the register and state their names and any organizations they represent. Agenda: Items may be taken out of the order shown 1. Roll Call 2. Citizens to be Heard 3. Approval of the March 9, 2018 Meeting Minutes 4. Presentation on VIA Metropolitan Transit s Rapid Transit Corridor Study VIA 5. Discussion and Appropriate Action on the Transportation Improvement Program and Corresponding Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan MPO (Geiger) a. Action on VIA Metropolitan Transit s STP-MM Funding Request b. Action on the Transportation Improvement Program c. Action on Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan d. Discussion on Lessons Learned from the STP-MM Call for Projects in Development of the Transportation Improvement Program 6. Announcements MOU among MPOs, TxDOT and Public Transportation Operator(s) MPO meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. To arrange for special assistance or an interpreter, please call or TDD (Relay Texas) at least five working days in advance. Las reuniones son accesibles a personas con discapacidad. Si usted necesita asistencia especial o un intérprete, llame al (210) o al TDD (Relay Texas) con cinco días hábiles de anticipación. 825 South St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas (210) TDD 1 (800) Fax (210)

2 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 2 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee April 9, Roll Call Clay Smith, P.E. Tim Mulry Adv. Transportation District Stella Garcia Sean Scott Alamo Area Council of Govts Chris Trevino, P.E. Jesse Garcia, P.E. Alamo Reg. Mobility Authority Dave Wegmann, P.E. Jesse Garcia, P.E. Bexar County Garry Ford, PE, PTOE ** Vacant City of New Braunfels Marc Jacobson, P.E. Jillian Harris City of San Antonio Patricia Wallace, AICP Rebecca Pacini, AICP City of San Antonio Christina DeLaCruz, P.E. Greg Reininger City of San Antonio Joe Ramos, P.E. Ismael Segovia City of Seguin Tom Hornseth, P.E. David Vollbrecht, P.E. Comal County Kelly Kuenstler (LV) Rick Schroder (Helotes) Greater Bex Co. Council of Cities Allen Dunn, P.E. Vacant Guadalupe County Tobin Maples (FOR) Ron Emmons, P.E. (FOR) Kendall County Area Vacant Lydia Kelly MPO Bicycle Mobility Adv Comm Robert Hanley, AIA Daniel Ludwig MPO Ped Mobility Adv Comm Blake Partridge Vacant Northeast Partnership Nicholas Wingerter Vacant Private Transportation Providers Jonathan Bean, P.E. * Mark Mosley, P.E. Texas Dept. of Transportation Brian Buchanan Vacant VIA Metropolitan Transit * Chair ** Vice Chair

3 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 3 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee April 9, Citizens to be Heard 3. Approval of the March 9, 2018 Meeting Minutes Issue The March 9, 2018 meeting minutes are attached for your review. Action Requested A motion to approve the March 9, 2018 meeting minutes.

4 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 4 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes March 9, 2018 Voting Members Present: Clay Smith, P.E. Stella Garcia Christopher Trevino, P.E. Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE (Vice Chair) Bridell Miers Marc Jacobson, P.E. Christina DeLaCruz Patricia Wallace Joe Ramos, P.E. Tom Hornseth, P.E. Allen Dunn, P.E. Robert Hanley, AIA Blake Partridge Nicholas Wingerter Jonathan Bean Brian Buchanan Advanced Transportation District Alamo Area Council of Governments Alamo Regional Mobility Authority City of New Braunfels Bexar County City of San Antonio City of San Antonio City of San Antonio City of Seguin Comal County Guadalupe County MPO Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee Northeast Partnership Private Transportation Providers Texas Department of Transportation VIA Metropolitan Transit Voting Members Absent: Kelly Kuenstler Tobin Maples Cristian Sandoval Greater Bexar County Council of Cities Kendall County Area MPO Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee Others Present: Lily Lowder Annette Prosterman Sean Scott Linda Alvarado-Vela Alexandra Carroll Jeanne Geiger Zachary Graham Sid Martinez Travis Nedrich Lori Stewart Tabitha Villanueva Liana Puente Art Reinhardt Jennifer Ramos Shauna Weaver Nick Page Christina Bune Tim Mulry Alamo Area Council of Governments Alamo Area Council of Governments Alamo Area Council of Governments Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Brooks City-Base City of San Antonio Halff Associates Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. TxDOT VIA Metropolitan Transit VIA Metropolitan Transit Jonathan Bean called the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1

5 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 5 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee March 9, Roll Call Jeanne Geiger called roll. A quorum was present. 2. Citizens to be Heard There were none. 3. Approval of the January 5, 2018 Meeting Minutes Nicholas Wingerter motioned and Joe Ramos seconded the motion to approve the January 5, 2018 Meeting Minutes. The motion was unanimously approved. 4. Discussion and Appropriate Action on the Development of the Transportation Improvement Program a. Presentation of the Draft Transportation Improvement Program For information and discussion only. b. Action on an Initial Recommendation of STP-MM Funded Projects in Support of the Development of the Transportation Improvement Program Joe Ramos motioned to recommend funding of the following STP-MM Projects for a total just over $170M to the Executive Committee. Patricia Wallace seconded the motion. The motion was approved with Brian Buchanan and Clay Smith opposing. Project 3, Talley Road Project 4, FM 2696 (Blanco Road) Project 8, Zarzamora/Frio City RR Overpass Project 9, Mobility Corridor Planning Project 10, ITS Enhancements Project 11, Ped/Bike Improvements Project 18, Rudeloff Road Project 22, IH 410 Project 26, IH 410 Project 29, Smart Signal Upgrade Project 33, Loop 368 (Broadway) Project 34, FM 1560 Project 40, FM 3351 Project 43, SL 337 Project 45, SA Region Safety Service Patrol Project 46, FM 1518 Project 48, VIA Multi-Jurisdictional Adv. Project Dev. Study 2

6 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 6 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee March 9, Discussion and Appropriate Action on the on Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program Christina DeLaCruz motioned and Blake Partridge seconded the motion to approve the amendments as presented. The motion was unanimously approved. 6. Presentation on Employer Outreach for the Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program For information and discussion only. 7. Presentation on the Unified Transportation Program For information and discussion only. 8. Announcements There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 3:46 p.m. Jonathan Bean, P.E., Chair Technical Advisory Committee 3

7 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 7 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee April 9, Presentation on VIA Metropolitan Transit s Rapid Transit Corridor Study Purpose Issue The purpose of this agenda item is to receive a presentation on VIA Metropolitan Transit s Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis. The VIA Board of Trustees unanimously approved VIA s Vision 2040 Long Range Plan in December Vision 2040 identified key travel corridors where transit reliability improvements can improve the region s transportation choices. From VIA s project website at UNDERSTANDING THE NEED Our region is growing and will face significant travel challenges in the future. Vision 2040 identified a system of Rapid Transit Corridors as areas of opportunity where transit can play an increased role in supporting our transportation system. IDENTIFYING A RANGE OF SOLUTIONS The Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis will identify a range of transit solutions to serve our region s busiest and most vibrant areas of activity, employment and housing. The analysis will research various modes of transportation, and design alternatives to best meet the regional and neighborhood transportation needs. EVALUATING COMMUNITY OPTIONS By engaging the community, the Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis will work to evaluate all alternatives and identify a preferred option that meets the transit needs of today and tomorrow. The preferred recommendation could result in bus rapid transit, light rail transit, express bus services, or other innovative transportation solutions. DEFINING PROJECTS & PLANS One significant outcome of Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis will be a set of projects and plans to be added to the existing capital plan, VIA SmartMove. VIA s short-term investments will be consistent with the purpose and need identified throughout the process of the Vision 2040 Rapid Transit Corridor Analysis. Action Requested For information and discussion only.

8 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 8 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee April 9, Discussion and Appropriate Action on the Transportation Improvement Program and Corresponding Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan Purpose The purpose of this agenda item is four fold: a) take action on VIA s request for STP-MM funding, b) take action on the Transportation Improvement Program, c) take action on corresponding amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, and d) to identify lessons learned and potential improvements for the future. Issue a. Action on VIA Metropolitan Transit s STP-MM Funding Request For this call for projects, VIA Metropolitan Transit submitted a request for $15,000,000 for a Multi-Jurisdictional Advanced Project Development Study that would include the development of the NEPA document, identification of a dedicated transit lane in one of VIA s seven priority Rapid Transit Corridors, with sufficient information to submit an application request to the Federal Transit Administration for New Starts funding. See attachment. At their meeting on March 9 th, TAC recommended VIA be allocated $7,500,000 in STP-MM funding for their project. At their meeting on March 19 th, the Executive Committee pulled VIA s request and asked VIA to resubmit for an allocation from the $20,000,000 that has been dedicated for plans, projects and programs in the Austin-San Antonio Corridor. VIA has resubmitted their request, which is also attached. The planning study underway that leads to this effort is being presented in agenda item 4. Action Requested Discussion will determine action to be taken.

9 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 9 of 178

10 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 10 of 178

11 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 11 of 178

12 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 12 of 178

13 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 13 of 178 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Progam Surface Transportation Program - Metro Mobility Funding Project Submittal Form Please complete the shaded portions only and do not exceed the space provided: Submitting agency: VIA Metropolitan Transit Contact person name, e- Clay Smith, Clay.Smith@viainfo.net, ; mail and phone number: Timothy Mulry, Tim.Mulry@viainfo.net, Project/Roadway name: VIA Multi-Jurisdictional Advanced Project Development Study Limits from: VIA Service Boundary Limits to: VIA Service Boundary Description of work: Project length: Federal functional classification: Eligible project category: The Advanced Project Development will include the planning of dedicated transit lanes:1.in the NE Corridor that connect to the Randolph Park & Ride & will be a tie to future improvements to IH 35 between San Antonio-Austin & 2.Other rapid transit corridors that systematically connect to the NE Corridor and are strategically located to support the population growth of San Antonio & transportation connections for commuters in the IH 35 San Antonio-Austin corridor. This work will be performed in concert with the City of San Antonio's "Mobility Corridor Planning" project Miles 0 Feet Primarily 'Other Principal Arterial' and 'Minor Arterial' (corridors include but not limited to Broadway, San Pedro, Fredericksburg, Commerce, Roosevelt, Zarzamora, Bandera) Other, advanced project planning Project justification: The Multi-Jurisdictional Advanced Project Development Planning can potentially leverage FTA New Starts funding. The FAST Act specifies that proposed New Starts projects must be new fixed guideway projects for the exclusive use of public transportation. The FTA encourages project sponsors to perform work deemed necessary in advance in order to complete the New Starts Project Development phase. Agency overall priority: High Agency category priority: 1 10 Construction/Activity Cost Information Note: all project development costs and cost overruns are the implementing agency's responsibility Project construction/activity cost from itemized cost estimate: $25,000,000 Additional local contribution Percent: 68.0% $15,000,000 Project construction/activity cost minus additional contribution: $10,000,000 Federal Amount (80%): Local Match (20% required): Local match source: Bicycle component costs: What adopted plans and/or policies does this project help to implement? Add'l local contribution VIA Local Annual Budget source: n/a Pedestrian component costs: n/a $8,000,000 $2,000,000 VIA Vision 2040; SA Tomorrow (City of San Antonio); SA2020 goal to increase public transit use; Mobility 2040 (AAMPO); Transportation Conformity (AAMPO) Does the implementing agency have an adopted ADA Transition Plan? (for informational Yes purposes only) Has the implementing agency previously successfully completed an MPO project? Yes The advanced project planning will include identifying potential historic Known environmental issues: structures/sites, environmental justice concerns, and necessary right-ofway to complete a fixed guideway project The advanced project planing will additionally include an assessment of Known drainage and utility issues drainage concerns in older sections of the city, utility conflicts, as well as and requirements: pedestrian and ADA gaps. For construction projects: Please include a project location map with adjacent land uses shown, a typical cross section for the submitted project, an itemized project cost estimate, signed project understanding form, and commitment of local match (and additional local contribution, if appropriate) with this submittal form.

14 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 14 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee April 9, 2018 b. Action on the Transportation Improvement Program The draft Transportation Improvement Program is attached for review. This document is still subject to revision as necessary. The draft document includes: FY 2018 roadway projects that are not expected to let this fiscal year and will be carried over to Roadway projects in fiscal years 2019 and 2020 of the current FY TIP Roadway projects in fiscal years 2021 and 2022 of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan Transit projects for fiscal years Transit project detail for fiscal years Introduction that outlines the public outreach conducted for the TIP, the STP-MM project selection process and compliance with federal regulations Financial tables (placeholders until final action is taken) Required certifications and policies The STP-MM projects (new and previously programmed) have been distributed by fiscal year in the attached DRAFT spreadsheet. This spreadsheet shows the STP-MM projects financially constrained by year. Upon approval, these projects will be finalized into the TIP document. Action Requested A motion to recommend approval of the Transportation Improvement Program.

15 CSJ Roadway Const Cost Cat 7 Total Surface Transportation Program - Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) Projects Only Cat 12 STP-MM Reconciliation Other Funding Limits From To Description Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program (FY 2018) Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program (FY 2017) Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 Alamo Area MPO: in Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program () Austin Highway/Harry Wurzbach $17,177,000 $17,177,000 Harry Wurzbach at Austin Highway Construct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway Blanco Road $14,661,235 $13,631,235 $1,030,000 West Oak Estates Borgfeld Drive Expand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks,curbs and drainage Bulverde Road $8,097,480 $8,097,480 Marshall Road Wilderness Oak Reconstruct and widen to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction, and drainage improvements Citywide San Antonio Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000, E. Aviation Blvd $8,632,561 $7,444,174 $1,188,387 SH 218 (Pat Booker Road) Cibolo Creek Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, drainage, left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk Galm Road $7,323,351 $6,293,351 $1,030,000 FM 471 (Culebra Road) Government Canyon State Park Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities Intelligent Transportation Systems - Congestion Management $4,000,000 $4,000, TransGuide Upgrade (add project with funding from CSJ and ) ITS - Enhancements $1,500,000 $1,500, Upgrade traffic signal controllers (add project; funding taken from CSJ ) ITS - Enhancements $1,500,000 $1,500,000 - Reduce project cost from $4M to $1.5M April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 15 of Judson Road $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Independence IH 35 Construct sidewalks on the west side of Judson Road Leon Valley Hike & Bike Trail $933,000 $933,000 SH 16 - Bandera Road Crystal Hills Park Construction of a hike and bike trail along Huebner Creek MyLink Pedestrian Conn/ Safety $8,000,000 $7,200,000 $800,000 Varions Locations on the state roadway system - Construct curb ramps, landing pads, sidewalks and other pedestrian infrastructure; construct improvements to North Star Transit Center intersection for improved transit access Presa Street $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $1,000,000 West Boyer Street SE Military Drive Corridor enhancements (bike and ped) to create Complete Street environment to the extent that ROW allows Quintana Road $7,800,000 $7,800,000 Harmon Avenue McKenna Avenue Rehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements Watson Road $4,886,116 $4,886,116 FM Somerset 0.8 Mi East to Watson Road Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities $97,810,743 $92,762,356 $2,060,000 $2,988, UTP $43,420,000 $1,030,000 Plus Carryover $67,852,612 $1,030,000 Balance $18,510,256 FY Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100, Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program (FY 2020) FM 1535 (NW Military Highway) $6,500,000 $5,480,000 $1,020,000 Huebner Road Loop 1604 Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks FM 1535 (NW Military Highway) $7,500,000 $7,500,000 Loop mile north of Loop 1604 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Loop 368 (Broadway) $14,000,000 $9,000,000 $5,000,000 US 281 interchange Mulberry Street Construct separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities between US 281 and Cunningham and intersection improvements between Cunningham and Mulberry MyLink Pedestrian Conn/ Safety $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $500,000 Varions Locations on the state roadway system - Construct curb ramps, landing pads, sidewalks and other pedestrian infrastructure; construct improvements to North Star Transit Center intersection for improved transit access PA 1502 (Wurzbach Parkway) $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $1,000,000 Lockhill-Selma Lockhill-Selma & NW Military Highway Intersection and operational improvements Rocket Lane $5,430,481 $5,430,481 Bridge Loop 1604 Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lanes Safety Service Patrol $4,500,000 $4,500, Talley Road $20,917,924 $19,417,924 $1,500,000 Wiseman Blvd Tamaron Pass FY 2021 $71,948,405 $62,928,405 $1,020,000 $8,000, UTP $45,290,000 $1,020,000 Plus Carryover $18,510,256 Balance $871, Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100, Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program (FY 2021) CoSA Multimodal Corridor Study $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Multimodal Corridor Study FM 1518 $19,500,000 $8,480,000 $1,020,000 $10,000,000 IH 10 FM 78 Construct operational improvements FM 2252 $4,200,000 $4,200,000 at Evans Road - Construct operational improvements, including widening of Cibolo Creek bridge MyLink Pedestrian Conn/ Safety $4,000,000 $3,600,000 $400,000 Varions Locations on the state roadway system - Construct curb ramps, landing pads, sidewalks and other pedestrian infrastructure; construct improvements to North Star Transit Center intersection for improved transit access Safety Service Patrol $4,500,000 $4,500,000 SL 337 Overpass $10,400,000 $10,400, Rudeloff Road $6,316,658 $6,316,658 SH 46 Huber Road Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with center turn lane and bicycle and pedestian facilities $53,016,658 $41,596,658 $1,020,000 $10,400, UTP $45,870,000 $1,020,000 Plus Carryover $871,851 Balance $5,145,193 FY Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 CoSA Bike/Ped Improvements $3,000,000 $3,000,000 CoSA ITS $4,500,000 $4,500, Crestway Road $7,791,571 $7,791,571 Kitty Hawk Road Gibbs Sprawl Road Revise operational aspects of roadway to add a 6' sidewalk and 6' bike lanes in each direction FM 1560 $12,100,000 $10,580,000 $1,520,000 FM 471 Galm/Shaenfield Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks FM 725 $10,600,000 $10,600,000 County Line Road Zipp Road Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks and bicycle lanes Safety Service Patrol $4,500,000 $4,500,000 Smart Signal Upgrade $2,017,950 $2,017, Austin-San Antonio Corridor Projects $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Austin-San Antonio Corridor Projects. Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transporttaion solutions $48,609,521 $47,089,521 $1,520, UTP $46,490,000 Plus Carryover $5,145,193 Balance $4,545,672

16 CSJ Roadway Const Cost Cat 7 Total Cat 12 STP-MM Reconciliation Other Funding Limits From To Description April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 16 of 178 Surface Transportation Program - Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) Projects Only FY 2023 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100, Austin-San Antonio Corridor Projects $16,000,000 $16,000,000 Austin-San Antonio Corridor Projects. Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transporttaion solutions FM 1518 $25,280,000 $12,280,000 $13,000,000 FM 1560 $19,750,000 $14,750,000 $5,000,000 IH 410 $30,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 Blanco Road US 281 Operational Improvements Loop 368 (Broadway) $14,000,000 $10,000,000 $4,000,000 $105,130,000 $63,130, UTP $47,080,000 Plus Carryover $4,545,672 Balance $2,341,896 FY 2024 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 FM 3351 Bridge $11,900,000 $11,900,000 IH 410 $8,100,000 $8,100,000 Old Pearsall Road Valley Hi Rudeloff Road $12,000,000 $12,000,000 S. New Braunfels Extension $19,500,000 $9,500,000 $41,600, UTP $47,670,000 Plus Carryover $2,341,896 Balance $8,411,896 FY 2025 Alamo Area Commute Solutions $100,000 $100,000 FM 2696 Blanco Road $16,791,743 $16,791,743 Zarzamora/Frio City RR Overpass $19,500,000 $19,500,000 $36,391, UTP $48,210,000 Plus Carryover $8,411,896 Balance $20,230,153

17 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 17 of 178 DRAFT 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

18 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 18 of Transportation Improvement Program Opportunities for Public Comment Public Meeting Dates All meetings were similar in content and format and were held beginning at 6:00 p.m. Bexar County: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at VIA Metropolitan Transit, located at 1021 San Pedro, San Antonio, TX This meeting was also livestreamed via the MPO s website at for individuals who were not able to attend in person. Guadalupe County: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at the Seguin Public Library located at 313 W. Nolte Street, Seguin, TX Kendall County: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at Kronkosky Place located at 17 Old San Antonio Road, Boerne, TX Comal County: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at the New Braunfels Civic Center, 375 S. Castell Avenue, New Braunfels, TX Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Dates Presentation: Friday, March 9, 2018 Action: Friday, April 6, 2018 Transportation Policy Board Meeting Dates Presentation: Monday, March 26, 2018 Action: Monday April 23, 2018 ii

19 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 19 of Transportation Improvement Program Table of Contents Page I. Introduction... 1 II. Definition of Planning Area... 1 III. Public Involvement Process... 2 IV. Performance Measurement... 4 V. STP-MM Project Selection Process... 7 VI. Air Quality Issues... 8 VII. Americans with Disabilities Act... 9 VIII. Funding Categories IX. Progress from Previous Year X. Funded Highway Projects Fiscal Year 2019 Projects Fiscal Year 2020 Projects Fiscal Year 2021 Projects Fiscal Year 2022 Projects XI. Funded Transit Projects Fiscal Year 2019 Transit Projects Fiscal Year 2020 Transit Projects Fiscal Year 2021 Transit Projects Fiscal Year 2022 Transit Projects XII. Financial Plan Roadway Financial Summary Distribution of Category 2 Funding Transit Financial Summary Appendix A Certifications MPO Self-Certification... xx Project Selection Procedures... xx Appendix B Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects... xx Appendix C Grouped or Statewide CSJ Project Listing... xx Appendix D Environmental Clearance Projects... xx Appendix E. Transit Project Detail... xx Appendix F Policy 2: Public Participation Plan... xxx Appendix G Policy 3: Guidelines for Programming Projects in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program... xxx iii

20 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 20 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. iv

21 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 21 of Transportation Improvement Program I. Introduction Transportation is an important factor in all our lives. How well we get to and from work, school, hospitals, shopping centers and recreational facilities is important to us all. The ability to travel affects our socio-economic well-being. On a larger scale, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization s regional economy and environment depend heavily on the condition and efficient performance of our regional transportation system. Appropriate transportation planning, recognizing the mobility needs and identifying the available resources allow for the maintenance and improvement of our transportation system, therefore affecting our economy and quality of life. As part of the urban transportation planning process, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) addresses federal regulations administered by the United States Department of Transportation. It is required, as a condition of the receipt of federal capital or operating assistance, to maintain the transportation system covered by the continuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation planning process. Essentially, the TIP is developed to ensure that implementation of the transportation plan is done in an orderly manner. The TIP outlines a financially constrained program of federally assisted transportation projects that will be implemented over a four-year period. Projects not included in the approved TIP are ineligible to receive federal transportation assistance. The TIP consists of projects that are to be implemented over the next four fiscal years. Priorities are demonstrated by grouping projects into the one-to-four year time frame. Also included in this document are realistic estimates of project costs and revenues for the four-year time period. The construction and improvement of roadways and transportation facilities listed in the TIP will have a positive impact on safety, mobility, and connectivity throughout the region. Some improvements will affect conditions only within the area in which they are located, yet the impact of others will extend far beyond their immediate locations. These transportation improvement projects can be expected to decrease fatal and serious injury crashes, provide travel options, reduce congestion, improve air quality, conserve energy, enhance quality of life and maintain a transportation system beneficial to the entire region. II. Definition of Planning Area Figure 1 shows the study area which encompasses over 2,770 square miles and includes Bexar, Comal, and Guadalupe Counties and a portion of Kendall County. San Antonio is the major population and employment center in the region, the second largest city in Texas, and the third largest metropolitan area. Like many large urban areas, rapid growth and development have contributed to ever-increasing needs in transportation. 1

22 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 22 of 178 Figure 1. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Study Area Projects included in the TIP are consistent with the MPO s long range transportation plan Mobility 2040 and other planning efforts such as the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority s Strategic Plan, the City of San Antonio s SA Tomorrow Plan, VIA Metropolitan Transit s Vision 2040, and TxDOT s Unified Transportation Program. III. Public Involvement Process The MPO s Public Participation Plan provides for the proactive involvement of citizens, affected public agencies, transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties in the development and periodic update of the TIP. The MPO wholly supports early and continuous public involvement, reasonable public access to technical and other information, open public meetings, open access to the transportation planning and decision-making process, and effective involvement processes that are designed to be responsive to local conditions. All meetings of the MPO Transportation Policy Board and Technical Advisory Committee are subject to the Texas Open Meetings Act and are open to the public. Meeting notices are sent to the Texas Secretary of State, published in the Texas Register, and posted at the Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe and Kendall 2

23 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 23 of Transportation Improvement Program County Courthouses and at the MPO offices in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act. All MPO meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. The public was afforded the opportunity to comment on all projects proposed for inclusion in the TIP. Public comments were accepted during the MPO s Technical Advisory Committee meetings, which were held on March 9, 2018 and April 6, 2018, and the MPO Transportation Policy Board meetings, which were held on March 26, 2018 and April 23, Additionally, the MPO held four public meetings to allow citizens opportunities to comment on proposed projects and learn more about the transportation planning process. The public meeting dates, time and locations are provided below: Bexar County: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at VIA Metropolitan Transit, located at 1021 San Pedro, San Antonio, TX This meeting was also livestreamed for individuals who were not able to attend in person. Guadalupe County: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at the Seguin Public Library located at 313 W. Nolte Street, Seguin, TX Kendall County: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at Kronkosky Place located at 17 Old San Antonio Road, Boerne, TX Comal County: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at the New Braunfels Civic Center, 375 S. Castell Avenue, New Braunfels, TX All meetings began at 6:00 p.m. and were similar in content and format. Generally each meeting consisted of an overview presentation and an audience participation exercise to gather input on projects. To advertise the public meetings, newspaper ads were run in the San Antonio Express-News, La Prensa (local Spanish language newspaper), The Observer, the San Antonio Current, New Braunfels Herald, Seguin Gazette and Boerne Star. The public meetings were also advertised through the MPO s biweekly e-newsletter, Fast Track, on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. All public meeting handouts, displays, and surveys were posted on the MPO s website. For individuals not able to attend a public meeting in person, the MPO provided a virtual meeting process online at The online public input ran from Monday, February 19 through Wednesday, February 28. All materials were also provided in Spanish. Other public input methods during the TIP development process included comment cards at public meetings, the participation exercise, and s, letters and speaking opportunities at TAC and TPB meetings. The comment cards allowed for input on the transit and roadway project lists as well as the 3

24 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 24 of 178 effectiveness of the public involvement process itself. All input and other comments received were provided in writing to the Technical Advisory Committee, the Executive Committee and the Transportation Policy Board. MPO staff also visited English as a Second Language classes in late February to gather input specifically from non-english speaking participants. Projects in other funding categories were selected by the State (TxDOT) or the transit operator (VIA Metropolitan Transit). The Transportation Policy Board reviewed the projects and, by adoption of this document, concurred with the selection of those projects. MPO staff also provided opportunities for the public to review the roadway and transit project lists and supporting information on our website, at and comment on these items electronically at their convenience. IV. Performance Measurement The United States Department of Transportation recognizes that it is important to continuously monitor the performance of the nation s transportation improvements and programs to determine if the nation is achieving its national goals and objectives related to transportation. Monitoring progress towards achieving these goals and objectives is accomplished through the use of performance measures. Performance measurement provides various transportation agencies with a better ability to identify and mitigate issues with their respective transportation networks. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) On July 6, 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) transportation bill was signed into law, creating a streamlined, performance-based, multimodal program in an effort to address challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. In relation to performance management, MAP-21 aims to increase the accountability and transparency of Federal highway programs by improving transportation investment decision-making through performance-based planning and programming. Furthermore, the Act states: Performance management will transform the Federal-aid highway program and provide a means to the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds by refocusing on national transportation goals, increasing the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improving project decision-making through performance-based planning and programming As a result of MAP-21, performance measures to chart progress toward accomplishment of national goals established in MAP-21 include safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays as outlined below: 4

25 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 25 of Transportation Improvement Program 1. Safety - To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. 2. Infrastructure Condition - To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair. 3. Congestion Reduction - To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System (NHS). 4. System Reliability - To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system. 5. Freight Movement and Economic Vitality - To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development. 6. Environmental Sustainability - To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment. 7. Reduced Project Delivery Delays - To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices. Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act The Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act of 2015, or FAST Act, was signed into law on December 4, The FAST Act provides for new planning requirements such as providing for the development and integrated management of intermodal facilities that support intercity transportation; encouraging consultation with State agencies that plan for tourism and natural disaster risk reduction; planning for system resiliency and reliability and reducing storm-water impacts of surface transportation; and improving freight mobility. The FAST Act continues MAP-21 s overall performance approach, and ensures that State DOTs and MPOs invest in projects that collectively make progress toward the National Goals that were established by Congress. The FAST Act also allows MPOs serving a transportation management area to voluntarily develop a Congestion Management Plan that shall include regional goals to reduce vehicle miles traveled during peak commuting hours and improve transportation connections between areas with high job concentration and areas with high concentrations of low-income households. 5

26 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 26 of 178 Performance Measures and Targets Currently, under the FAST Act, State DOTs and MPOs are required to establish performance targets and report on the progress made toward achieving each of these performance targets for the following performance measures: Safety The Texas Department of Transportation has officially established targets based on five-year rolling averages for five Safety performance measures: Performance Measure Total number of traffic related fatalities on all public roads Rate of traffic related fatalities on all public roads per 100 million VMT 2018 Statewide Target (Expressed as Five-Year Average) 3, Total number of traffic related serious injuries on all public roads 17,565.4 Rate of traffic related serious injuries on all public roads per 100 million VMT Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads ,150.6 These targets were developed using a data-driven, collaborative process during the update of Texas Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The targets are aligned with the state s Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Plan and reflect a 2% reduction from the original trendline projection for When a trendline is decreasing, the target mirrors that projection. On January 22, 2018, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board adopted TxDOT s Safety targets within the Metropolitan Area Boundary. The Transportation Policy Board commits to supporting, planning and programming projects that contribute to the accomplishments of said targets and the MPO will monitor the established targets and report achievements to the Transportation Policy Board in Fall Numerous projects adopted in the Transportation Improvement Program support achieving the targets established for safety: stand-alone safe bicycle and pedestrian projects and Complete Streets projects; added capacity and operational projects that also include safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities; conversion of frontage roads from two-way to one-way; 6

27 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 27 of Transportation Improvement Program intersection improvements; grade separated overpasses; and Intelligent Transportation Systems projects. Transit State of Good Repair VIA Metropolitan Transit has adopted targets for four Transit Asset Management Performance measures for: 1. Equipment State of Good Repair: rehab or replace equipment based on the VIA Metropolitan Transit Board of Trustees approved capital plan to maintain an overall state of good repair rating of 3 or better 2. Rolling Stock State of Good Repair: by June 2018, replace 270 fixed route buses with an age of 14 years or greater 3. Infrastructure State of Good Repair: zero, no passenger rail infrastructure; and 4. Facilities State of Good Repair: rehab facilities based on the VIA Metropolitan Transit Board of Trustees approved capital plan to maintain an overall state of good repair rating of 3 or better On January 22, 2018, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board adopted VIA Metropolitan Transit s performance measurement targets. The Transportation Policy Board commits to supporting, planning and programming projects that contribute to the accomplishments of said targets. Numerous transit projects adopted in the Transportation Improvement Program support achieving the targets established for transit state of good repair, including the: purchase of maintenance tools and equipment; purchase of revenue vehicles; purchase of replacement components for revenue vehicles; new and upgrades to existing passenger facilities; and upgrades to the operational facilities. V. STP-MM Project Selection Process In support of the development of the Transportation Improvement Program, an agency call for Surface Transportation Program Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) funded projects was announced in March Presentations to the MPO s Committees on STP-MM project selection process occurred as follows: April 7, 2017: Technical Advisory Committee April 12, 2017: Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee April 19, 2017: Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee April 24, 2017: Transportation Policy Board 7

28 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 28 of 178 On May 22, 2017 the Transportation Policy Board took action on the TIP development process and schedule and the STP-MM Call for Projects began on June 1, On July 26, 2017 the MPO and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) jointly hosted two workshops (9:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.) that were similar in content and format. The purpose of the workshops was to provide information and support to agencies submitting projects for STP-MM funding consideration. Between June and November 2017 agency staff followed their internal project selection processes, developed projects and secured the commitment of local match and project development costs. The agency project submittals were due to the MPO on December 4, Throughout December and January 2018, MPO staff compiled information (i.e., crash rates, and current and future congestion levels) used to technically score projects. On January 10, 2018 a multi-agency work group met to score the stand alone bicycle and pedestrian projects and on January 19, 2018 a multi-agency work group met to score the added capacity and operational improvement projects. As noted above, in late February 2018, the MPO hosted four public meetings and provided online opportunities for persons to provide comments in lieu of attending the meetings. All public input was due to the MPO by midnight on February 28, On March 9, 2018 the MPO s Technical Advisory Committee met in an open meeting to develop an initial recommendation for funding projects submitted for STP-MM funding. The MPO s Executive Committee met on March 19, 2018 to review the Technical Advisory Committee s recommendation and forward a recommendation on for the full Board s consideration. The MPO Transportation Policy Board took action on the STP-MM list of funded transportation projects at their meeting on March 26, The Technical Advisory Committee made a favorable recommendation for adoption of the TIP at their meeting on April 6, The complete document was adopted at the April 23, 2018 Transportation Policy Board meeting. All of these meetings allowed additional opportunities for public comment on the document and project lists. The MPO s adopted project selection procedures state that any project listed in the first year of the approved TIP shall be considered in the first priority and may be implemented as soon as plans are completed and funds are appropriated. Should any projects not be implementable from the first priority, then any projects listed in the second, third or fourth years of the TIP may be accelerated to the first year of the TIP as soon as plans are complete, including right-of-way and utility adjustments, and funding is available. VI. Air Quality Issues The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) study area has three continuous air monitoring sites (CAMS). All of the sites, San Antonio Northwest (CAMS 23), Camp Bullis (CAMS 58), and Calaveras Lake (CAMS 59), are maintained by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and 8

29 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 29 of Transportation Improvement Program are regulatory CAMS. CPS Energy also maintains three monitoring sites during the ozone season: Heritage Middle School (CAMS 622), Pecan Valley (CAMS 678) and Government Canyon (CAMS 1610). In addition, the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) operates six ozone monitoring sites across the region during the ozone season. These are: Elm Creek Elementary (CAMS 501), Fair Oaks Ranch (CAMS 502), Bulverde Elementary (CAMS 503), New Braunfels Airport (CAMS 504), City of Garden Ridge (CAMS 505), and Seguin Outdoor Learning Center (Cams 506). The locations of ozone monitoring sites in the area are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. San Antonio Area Ozone Monitoring Sites Currently the San Antonio region is exceeding the ozone standard but formally remains in attainment for ozone. On October 1, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for groundlevel ozone from 75 parts per billion (ppb) to 70 ppb. Since observations at ozone regulatory monitors in the San Antonio area do not meet the current 70 ppb during that time period, the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA (or other local geography boundary deemed appropriate by the EPA) is at risk for a nonattainment designation. In December 2017, the EPA invited Texas to submit additional information on air quality within the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA. A final designation is expected and expects to promulgate a final designation in Summer

30 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 30 of 178 VII. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Many of the projects in the TIP include enhancements to make the various transportation amenities accessible to the disabled. All federally funded transportation projects will be developed in compliance with the ADA. VIII. Funding Categories The categories for funding state and federal transportation improvements are as follows: Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Category 6 Category 7 Category 8 Category 9 Category 10 Category 11 Category 12 Preventative Maintenance & Rehabilitation Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects Non-Traditional Funding Statewide Connectivity Corridor Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Structure Rehabilitation Metro Mobility (Surface Transportation Program Metro Mobility or STP-MM) Safety Transportation Enhancements Program Miscellaneous District Discretionary Strategic Priority Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 (Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5309 (Capital Grant Program, New Starts; Small Starts)) Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 (Elderly and Disabled Transportation Assistance Grant Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities Program) IX. Progress From Previous Year Roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian and other projects annually let to contract from FY 2004 through FY 2017 can be found on the MPO s website at This item will continue to be annually updated on the website. To request a copy please contact the MPO staff by telephone at , by fax at , by mail or in person at 825 S. St. Mary s Street, San Antonio, Texas 78205, or by to aampo@alamoareampo.org. 10

31 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 31 of Transportation Improvement Program Funded Highway Projects 11

32 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 32 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 12

33 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 33 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost 15 - San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: B,C,G,K NR AACOG Alamo Area MPO: In Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - 4/18 - agency change and reduce cost; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount $100,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $100,000 Construction Engineering Contingencies: Indirect Costs: Other Field Total Project Cost: $100,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $100,000 Type of Work: Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Other Other Other Totals $80,000 $20,000 $100, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar NR AAMPO $100,000 Alamo Area MPO: In Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY /18 - move from FY 2018 to (carryover project in FY TIP), agency change; 10/17 - move from 17 to 18; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $100,000 Construction Engineering Contingencies: Indirect Costs: Other Field Total Project Cost: $100,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $100,000 Type of Work: Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Other Other Other Totals $80,000 $20,000 $100, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Comal IH 35 C Other TxDOT Hays County Line 0.5 Mi S. of Hays County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Revise ramps and convert frontage roads from two way to one way operation 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 4/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 6/16 - Austin TxDOT District to develop, fund and let to contract in Hays County $1,200,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $58,800 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $1,200,000 Construction Engineering $76,560 Contingencies: $15,480 Indirect Costs: Other Field Total Project Cost: $69,360 $1,420,200 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,200,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 12 - Strategic Pri $1,080,000 $120,000 $1,200,000 Other Other Other Totals $1,080,000 $120,000 $1,200,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 13

34 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 34 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar IH 37 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: LP 13 Limits To: IH 410 Description: Project History: FY 2019 Construction of a partial frontage road, ramps, and intersection improvements 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 10/15 - add project Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $2,900,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $142,100 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $2,900,000 Construction Engineering $185,020 Contingencies: $37,410 Indirect Costs: $166,460 Other Field Total Project Cost: $167,620 $3,598,610 Cost of Approved Phases: $2,900,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 3 - BC Local $2,175,000 $2,175, Distr Discr $652,500 $72,500 $725,000 Other Other Totals $652,500 $72,500 $2,175,000 $2,900, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar VA C,E,R Other AAMPO $4,000,000 Austin-San Antonio Regional Corridor Project Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transportation solutions 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/17 - move from FY 17 to FY 18; 1/17 - rev limit,cost,agency and description; 4/15 - move from FY 16 to FY 17 and correct limits; 1/13 - move from FY 13 to FY 15; fixed amount; portion of $20M for Passenger Rail Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $196,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Construction Engineering $240,000 Contingencies: $280,000 Indirect Costs: $226,800 Other Field Total Project Cost: $4,942,800 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,000,000 Type of Work: Passenger Rail Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $3,200,000 $800,000 $4,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $3,200,000 $800,000 $4,000, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Bexar On Bulverde Road from Marshall Road Wilderness Oak CR C Other ARMA Last Revision Date: 7/2018 $8,097,480 Description: Reconstruct and widen to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction and drainage improvements Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 18 to FY 19; 1/17 - move from 17 to 18; 4/15 - move from 15 to 16 and update description; 1/14 - move from 14 to 15; 4/13- move from FY 13 to FY 14 and revise funding categories; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $396,777 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $8,097,480 Construction Engineering $401,635 Contingencies: $463,986 Indirect Costs: $554,677 Other Field Total Project Cost: $9,914,555 Cost of Approved Phases: $8,097,480 Type of Work: Maint/Rehab Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $6,477,984 $1,619,496 $8,097,480 Other Other Other Totals $6,477,984 $1,619,496 $8,097,480 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 14

35 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 35 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar CS C Leon Valley LV Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: FY 2019 Updated: DRAFT SH 16 - Bandera Road Crystal Hills Park Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Construction of a hike and bike trail along Huebner Creek 4/17 - move from FY 2017 to ; 10/15 - move from FY 2015 to FY 2017 and revise limits; 4/14 - revise limits and move from FY 2014 to FY 2015; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Year of Expenditure Cost $933,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $45,717 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $933,000 Construction Engineering $59,525 Contingencies: $65,963 Indirect Costs: $63,911 Other Field Total Project Cost: $1,168,116 Cost of Approved Phases: $933,000 Type of Work: Bike/Ped Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $746,400 $186,600 $933,000 Other Other Other Totals $746,400 $186,600 $933, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Bexar On Quintana Road from Harmon Avenue McKenna Avenue CS E,R,C San Antonio Port SA Last Revision Date: 7/2018 $7,800,000 Description: Rehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to Fy 2019; 1/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 1/16 - move from FY 16 to FY 17; 1/14 - included PE and ROW as funded phases; 4/12 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $353,200 ROW Purchase: $1,600,000 Construction Cost: $5,846,800 Construction Engineering $286,500 Contingencies: $267,200 Indirect Costs: $282,400 Other Field Total Project Cost: $8,636,100 Cost of Approved Phases: $5,846,800 Type of Work: Maint/Rehab Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $7,800,000 Other Other Other Totals $6,240,000 $670,800 $889,200 $7,800, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: B,C,G,K NR C Other AAMPO $100,000 Alamo Area MPO: In Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY /18 - move from FY 2018 to (carryover project), agency change and reduce cost; 10/15 - project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $100,000 Construction Engineering Contingencies: Indirect Costs: Other Field Total Project Cost: $100,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $100,000 Type of Work: Rideshare Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Other Other Other Totals $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 15

36 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 36 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar CS C Other BxCo Limits From: On Galm Road, from FM 471 (Culebra Road) Limits To: Government Canyon State Park Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 1/16 - revise funding; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $7,323,351 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $358,844 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $7,323,351 Construction Engineering $363,238 Contingencies: $145,735 Indirect Costs: $353,718 Other Field Total Project Cost: $273,893 $8,818,779 Cost of Approved Phases: $7,323,351 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $5,034,681 $1,258,670 $6,293,351 12S - STP-MM Rec $824,000 $206,000 $1,030,000 Other Other Totals $5,858,681 $1,464,670 $7,323, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar CS C San Antonio CoSA $17,177,000 Harry Wurzbach at Austin Highway Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Construct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway 4/18 - move from FY 18 to FY 19; 4/17 - rev limits and funding; 1/17 - move from 19 to 18 and rev funding distr; 4/16 - comb with new STP- MM project and rev match (EDCP project); 10/15 - rev funding; 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $842,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $17,177,000 Construction Engineering $852,000 Contingencies: $342,000 Indirect Costs: $986,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $642,000 $20,841,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $17,177,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $17,177,000 Other Other Other Totals $13,741,600 $1,477,222 $1,958,178 $17,177, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar CR C Other BxCo On Watson Road from FM 2790-Somerset 0.62 Mi East to Watson Road Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $4,886,116 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $239,420 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $4,886,116 Construction Engineering $195,445 Contingencies: $342,028 Indirect Costs: $97,722 Other Field Total Project Cost: $195,445 $5,956,175 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,886,116 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $3,908,893 $977,223 $4,886,116 Other Other Other Totals $3,908,893 $977,223 $4,886,116 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 16

37 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 37 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar CS C UC UC Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: FY 2019 Updated: DRAFT In Universal City, on E. Aviation Houston Drive to Aztec Way Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Widen to provide operational improvements, bike lanes, sidewalks and drainage 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 1/17 - revise limits and description; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Year of Expenditure Cost $8,632,561 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $422,995 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $8,632,561 Construction Engineering $428,175 Contingencies: $171,788 Indirect Costs: $495,509 Other Field Total Project Cost: $322,858 $10,473,886 Cost of Approved Phases: $8,632,561 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $5,955,339 $1,488,835 $7,444, LC $1,188,387 $1,188,387 Other Other Totals $5,955,339 $1,488,835 $1,188,387 $8,632, San Antonio Bexar VA C San Antonio CoSA Limits From: In City of San Antonio Limits To:. Last Revision Date: 11/2017 Description: Construct citywide pedestrian and bicycle improvements Project History: 10/17 - reduce project cost by $1M to fund ; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $2,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $98,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $2,000,000 Construction Engineering $99,000 Contingencies: $40,000 Indirect Costs: $115,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $75,000 $2,427,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $2,000,000 Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrain Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $1,600,000 $400,000 $2,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $1,600,000 $400,000 $2,000, San Antonio Bexar VA C San Antonio CoSA Limits From: In City of San Antonio Limits To:. Last Revision Date: 11/2017 Description: Intelligent Transportation System - Enhancements Project History: 10/17 - reduce cost from $4M to $1.5M and move from FY 2020 to ; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $1,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $73,500 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $1,500,000 Construction Engineering $90,000 Contingencies: $45,000 Indirect Costs: $75,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $90,000 $1,873,500 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,500,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Other Other Other Totals $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 17

38 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 38 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar CR C Other ARMA Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: FY 2019 Updated: DRAFT In Bexar County, on Blanco Rd From West Oak Estates to Borgfeld Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Expand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks, curbs and drainage 4/17 - revise funding; 1/17 - TIP: add project; MTP: move from FY 2023 to ; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Year of Expenditure Cost $14,661,235 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $718,401 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $14,661,235 Construction Engineering $727,197 Contingencies: $291,759 Indirect Costs: $841,555 Other Field Total Project Cost: $548,330 $17,788,477 Cost of Approved Phases: $14,661,235 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $10,904,988 $2,726,247 $13,631,235 12S - STP-MM Rec $824,000 $206,000 $1,030,000 Other Other Totals $11,728,988 $2,932,247 $14,661, San Antonio Bexar VA C Converse Converse Limits From: In Converse, from Converse Park N Limits To: to FM 78 Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Description: Construct multi use path Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 6/17 - add TA project $1,382,725 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $67,800 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $1,382,725 Construction Engineering $88,200 Contingencies: $17,800 Indirect Costs: $66,800 Other Field Total Project Cost: $79,900 $1,703,225 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,382,725 Type of Work: Bike/Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 9 - TA $1,092,352 $273,088 $1,365, LC $17,285 $17,285 Other Other Totals $1,092,352 $273,088 $17,285 $1,382, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar VA C San Antonio SARA in San Antonio, from Lombrano St Laredo St Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Extend the Alazan Creek section of the Greenway Trail System 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 6/17 - add TA project $6,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $294,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $6,000,000 Construction Engineering $382,800 Contingencies: $77,400 Indirect Costs: $289,800 Other Field Total Project Cost: $346,800 $7,390,800 Cost of Approved Phases: $6,000,000 Type of Work: Bike/Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 9 - TA $2,500,000 $625,000 $3,125, LC $2,875,000 $2,875,000 Other Other Totals $2,500,000 $625,000 $2,875,000 $6,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 18

39 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 39 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar VA C San Antonio CoSA Limits From: In City of San Antonio Limits To:. Description: Intelligent Transportation Systems - Enhancements - Upgrade Traffic Signal Controllers Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 1/18 - update project description; 10/17 - add project; created from FY 2019 Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $1,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $73,500 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $1,500,000 Construction Engineering $90,000 Contingencies: $45,000 Indirect Costs: $75,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $90,000 $1,873,500 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,500,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Other Other Other Totals $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar VA C San Antonio TxDOT In San Antonio at TransGuide Center Last Revision Date: 11/2017 Upgrade TransGuide Facility 10/17 - add project; created from ($3M) and ($1M) $4,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $196,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Construction Engineering $240,000 Contingencies: $120,000 Indirect Costs: $200,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $240,000 $4,996,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,000,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $3,200,000 $800,000 $4,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $3,200,000 $800,000 $4,000, San Antonio Bexar Limits From: In San Antonio on Judson Road Limits To: from Independence to IH 35 CS C San Antonio CoSA Description: Construct sidewalk along west side of Judson Road Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/17 - add project; configured from $1M from Last Revision Date: 7/2018 $1,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $49,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $1,000,000 Construction Engineering $60,000 Contingencies: $30,000 Indirect Costs: $50,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $60,000 $1,249,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,000,000 Type of Work: Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 19

40 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 40 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar CS C San Antonio CoSA FY 2019 Updated: DRAFT Limits From: in San Antonio on Presa Street Limits To: from W. Boyer to SE Military Drive - Lp 13 Last Revision Date: 11/2017 Description: Bike and Pedestrian Corridor enhancements to create Complete Streets Project History: 10/17 - add project per CoSA, funding is from ; 4/16 - revise match (EDCP project); 4/14 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Year of Expenditure Cost $10,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $490,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Construction Engineering $600,000 Contingencies: $300,000 Indirect Costs: $500,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $600,000 $12,490,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $10,000,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $7,200,000 $1,800,000 $9,000, LC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Other Other Totals $7,200,000 $1,800,000 $1,000,000 $10,000, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Guadalupe CS C Schertz Schertz in Schertz on Woodland Oaks Dr, Savannah Dr & Live Oak Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Construct sidewalks, bike lanes and off-road trail 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 6/17 - add TA project $1,158,266 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $56,800 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $1,158,266 Construction Engineering $73,900 Contingencies: $15,000 Indirect Costs: $56,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $67,000 $1,426,966 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,158,266 Type of Work: Bike/Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 9 - TA $926,613 $231,653 $1,158,266 Other Other Other Totals $926,613 $231,653 $1,158, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Comal CS C New Braunfels New Braunfels In New Braunfels on San Antonio St, Walnut, McQueeney, near Seele Elem Last Revision Date: 8/2017 Construct sidewalks, ramps & other pedestrian related infrastructure 6/17 - add TA project $1,516,711 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $74,300 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $1,516,711 Construction Engineering $96,800 Contingencies: $19,500 Indirect Costs: $73,300 Other Field Total Project Cost: $87,700 $1,868,311 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,516,711 Type of Work: Bike/Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 9 - TA $1,213,369 $303,342 $1,516,711 Other Other Other Totals $1,213,369 $303,342 $1,516,711 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 20

41 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 41 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Guadalupe VA C Seguin Seguin Limits From: in Seguin from Vaughan Bridge Limits To: to Max Starcke Park East Last Revision Date: 8/2017 Description: Extend Walnut Springs multi use trail, including retaining walls, hand and guard rails and below grade crossing Project History: 6/17 - add TA project Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $2,801,246 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $137,300 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $2,801,246 Construction Engineering $178,700 Contingencies: $36,100 Indirect Costs: $135,300 Other Field Total Project Cost: $162,000 $3,450,646 Cost of Approved Phases: $2,801,246 Type of Work: Bike/Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 9 - TA $2,218,587 $554,647 $2,773, LC $28,012 $28,012 Other Other Totals $2,218,587 $554,647 $28,012 $2,801, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Medina SH 211 C Other BxCo Bexar C/L, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471, N FM 471 (Culebra Rd) Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Construct two lane rural highway on new location 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/15 - move from FY 2015 to FY 2016; Pass through financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12 $4,400,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $233,193 ROW Purchase: $1,100,000 Construction Cost: $4,400,000 Construction Engineering $214,157 Contingencies: $309,338 Indirect Costs: $241,283 Other Field Total Project Cost: $6,497,971 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,400,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 3 - PTF $4,400,000 $4,400,000 Other Other Other Totals $4,400,000 $4,400, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar SH 211 C Other BxCo FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 MI Medina County Line Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Construct two lane rural highway on new location 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/15 - move from FY 2015 to FY 2016; Pass through financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12 $7,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $370,989 ROW Purchase: $1,780,000 Construction Cost: $7,000,000 Construction Engineering $340,704 Contingencies: $492,128 Indirect Costs: $383,860 Other Field Total Project Cost: $10,367,681 Cost of Approved Phases: $7,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 3 - PTF $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 21

42 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 42 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar SH 211 C Other BxCo FY 2019 Updated: DRAFT Limits From: Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 1957, N Limits To: Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471 Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/15 - move from FY 2015 to FY 2016; Pass through financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12 Year of Expenditure Cost $2,600,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $137,796 ROW Purchase: $700,000 Construction Cost: $2,600,000 Construction Engineering $126,547 Contingencies: $182,790 Indirect Costs: $142,577 Other Field Total Project Cost: $3,889,710 Cost of Approved Phases: $2,600,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 3 - PTF $2,600,000 $2,600,000 Other Other Other Totals $2,600,000 $2,600, San Antonio Medina SH 211 C Other BxCo Limits From: Bexar C/L, 2.9 MI N of FM 1957, N Limits To: Bexar C/L, 4.5 MI N of FM 1957 Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Description: Construct two lane rural highway on new location Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/17 - move from FY 2017 to FY 2018; 4/15 - move from FY 2015 to FY 2016; Pass through financing project to be reimbursed from Cat 12 $4,100,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $217,293 ROW Purchase: $1,000,000 Construction Cost: $4,100,000 Construction Engineering $199,555 Contingencies: $288,246 Indirect Costs: $224,832 Other Field Total Project Cost: $6,029,926 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,100,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 3 - PTF $4,100,000 $4,100,000 Other Other Other Totals $4,100,000 $4,100,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 22

43 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 43 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar FY 2020 SL 368 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: Burr Road Limits To: IH 35 Description: Roadway rehabilitation and complete streets improvements Project History: 4/17 - revise funding; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $14,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $686,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $14,000,000 Construction Engineering $694,400 Contingencies: $278,600 Indirect Costs: $803,600 Other Field Total Project Cost: $523,600 $16,986,200 Cost of Approved Phases: $14,000,000 Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $7,200,000 $1,800,000 $9,000, Prvnt Mnt/Rehab $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 Other Other Totals $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $14,000, San Antonio Bexar FM 1535 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: 1.0 Miles North of Lp 1604 Limits To: Lp 1604 Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Project History: 4/18 - move from FY 2021 to FY 2020; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $7,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $367,500 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $7,500,000 Construction Engineering $372,000 Contingencies: $149,250 Indirect Costs: $430,500 Other Field Total Project Cost: $280,500 $9,099,750 Cost of Approved Phases: $7,500,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $7,500,000 Other Other Other Totals $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $7,500, San Antonio Description: Project History: Bexar Limits From: Lp 1604 Limits To: Huebner Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process FM 1535 C San Antonio TxDOT Last Revision Date: 7/2016 $6,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $318,500 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $6,500,000 Construction Engineering $322,400 Contingencies: $129,350 Indirect Costs: $373,100 Other Field Total Project Cost: $243,100 $7,886,450 Cost of Approved Phases: $6,500,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $4,384,000 $1,096,000 $5,480,000 12S - STP-MM Rec $816,000 $204,000 $1,020,000 Other Other Totals $5,200,000 $1,300,000 $6,500,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 23

44 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 44 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar VA C,E,R Other AAMPO Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: FY 2020 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $16,000,000 Austin-San Antonio Regional Corridor Project Last Revision Date: 2/2017 Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transportation solutions 1/17 - rev limit,cost,agency, descr, and move from FY 2018 to FY 2020; 4/15 - move from FY 17 to FY 18 and correct limits; 1/13 - move from FY 14 to FY 16; fixed amount; portion of $20M for Passenger Rail Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $784,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $16,000,000 Construction Engineering $960,000 Contingencies: $1,120,000 Indirect Costs: $907,200 Other Field Total Project Cost: $19,771,200 Cost of Approved Phases: $16,000,000 Type of Work: Passenger Rail Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $12,800,000 $3,200,000 $16,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $12,800,000 $3,200,000 $16,000, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: B,C,G,K NR C Other AAMPO Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY /18 - agency change and reduce cost; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; fixed amount $100,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $100,000 Construction Engineering Contingencies: Indirect Costs: Other Field Total Project Cost: $100,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $100,000 Type of Work: Rideshare Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Other Other Other Totals $80,000 $20,000 $100, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar VA C Other TxDOT $4,000,000 Various locations in Bexar County on state system Last Revision Date: 2/2017 Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure 1/17 - revise description and reduce cost from $5M to $4M and move $1M to ; 3rd Qtr 16 - new project in FY TIP Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $196,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Construction Engineering $240,000 Contingencies: $280,000 Indirect Costs: $226,800 Other Field Total Project Cost: $149,600 $5,092,400 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,000,000 Type of Work: Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $2,800,000 $700,000 $3,500, LC $500,000 $500,000 Other Other Totals $2,800,000 $700,000 $500,000 $4,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 24

45 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 45 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY 2020 TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar CS C Other BxCo Limits From: In Bexar County on Talley Road Limits To: From Wiseman Blvd to Tamaron Pass Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Description: Widen to provide operational improvements including a continuous left turn lane; construct 10 ft. shared use path Project History: 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $10,931,172 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $535,627 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $10,931,172 Construction Engineering $542,186 Contingencies: $217,530 Indirect Costs: $627,449 Other Field Total Project Cost: $408,826 $13,262,790 Cost of Approved Phases: $10,931,172 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $7,544,938 $1,886,234 $9,431, LC $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Other Other Totals $7,544,938 $1,886,234 $1,500,000 $10,931, San Antonio Bexar CS C Converse Converse Limits From: On Rocket/Schaeffer, from E. Norris Limits To: Lp 1604 Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lanes Project History: 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $5,430,481 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $266,094 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $5,430,481 Construction Engineering $269,352 Contingencies: $108,067 Indirect Costs: $311,710 Other Field Total Project Cost: $203,100 $6,588,804 Cost of Approved Phases: $5,430,481 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $4,344,385 $1,086,096 $5,430,481 Other Other Other Totals $4,344,385 $1,086,096 $5,430, San Antonio Bexar CS C San Antonio CoSA Limits From: In San Antonio, on Zarzamora Limits To: From Fredericksburg Rd to Loop 13 Description: Construct sidewalks, remove unused utility poles, and implement pedestian detection ITS Project History: 6/17 - add TA project Last Revision Date: 8/2017 $5,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $245,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $5,000,000 Construction Engineering $319,000 Contingencies: $64,500 Indirect Costs: $241,500 Other Field Total Project Cost: $289,000 $6,159,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $5,000,000 Type of Work: Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 9 - TA $3,600,000 $900,000 $4,500, LC $500,000 $500,000 Other Other Totals $3,600,000 $900,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 25

46 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 46 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Comal FM 1103 C Other TxDOT Limits From: IH 35 Limits To: Guadalupe C/L Description: Project History: FY 2020 Expand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes 4/17 - move from to FY 2020; 1/17 - move from FY 2018 to ; 10/15 - add project Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $1,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $73,500 ROW Purchase: $870,000 Construction Cost: $1,500,000 Construction Engineering $74,400 Contingencies: $29,850 Indirect Costs: $86,100 Other Field Total Project Cost: $56,100 $2,689,950 Cost of Approved Phases: $1,500,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab $800,000 $200,000 $1,000, LC $500,000 $500,000 Other Other Totals $800,000 $200,000 $500,000 $1,500, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Guadalupe FM 1103 C Other TxDOT $22,500,000 Comal C/L Rodeo Way Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Expand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes 4/17 - move from to FY 2020 and revise funding; 1/17 - move from FY 2018 to and revise funding; 10/15 - add project Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,102,500 ROW Purchase: $3,285,000 Construction Cost: $22,500,000 Construction Engineering $1,116,000 Contingencies: $447,750 Indirect Costs: $1,291,500 Other Field Total Project Cost: $841,500 $30,584,250 Cost of Approved Phases: $22,500,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 1 - Prvnt Mnt/Rehab $7,307,482 $1,826,870 $9,134, Distr Discr $4,720,000 $1,180,000 $5,900, LC $7,465,648 $7,465,648 Other Totals $12,027,482 $3,006,870 $7,465,648 $22,500, San Antonio Bexar Limits From: SH 16 Limits To: US SL 1604 E,R,C San Antonio ARMA Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Description: Expand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes; including managed lane direct connectors at IH 10 Project History: 4/17 - revise limits, descr, cost (has $398.3M in Cat 2: '17-'24); 4/14 - rev year ('15 to '20), description and funding distribution; 7/13 - project had $53M in Category 2 funding (yrs ) $507,705,768 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $15,231,173 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $507,705,768 Construction Engineering $12,692,644 Contingencies: $17,769,702 Indirect Costs: $5,077,058 Other Field Total Project Cost: $50,770,577 $609,246,922 Cost of Approved Phases: $507,705,768 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $102,311,515 $25,577,879 $127,889, LC $379,816,374 $379,816,374 Other Other Totals $102,311,515 $25,577,879 $379,816,374 $507,705,768 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 26

47 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 47 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar SL 1604 E,R,C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: US 281 Limits To: Redland Road Description: Project History: FY 2020 Expand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes 4/17 - revise cost; 4/14 - rev limits, year ('15 to '20), description and funding distribution Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $47,808,839 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,434,266 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $47,808,839 Construction Engineering $1,195,221 Contingencies: $1,673,310 Indirect Costs: $478,088 Other Field Total Project Cost: $4,780,884 $57,370,607 Cost of Approved Phases: $47,808,839 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 3 - LC $47,808,839 $47,808,839 Other Other Other Totals $47,808,839 $47,808, San Antonio Bexar PA 1502 C San Antonio TxDOT $9,000,000 Limits From: Lockhill Selma Road Limits To: FM 1535 Last Revision Date: 2/2018 Description: Intersection and operational improvements Project History: 3/18 - revise CSJ from and decrease cost; 4/17 - move from FY 18 to FY 20, revise funding and limits; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $441,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $9,000,000 Construction Engineering $360,000 Contingencies: $630,000 Indirect Costs: $180,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $360,000 $10,971,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $9,000,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $6,400,000 $1,600,000 $8,000, Metro Corridor $800,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Other Other Totals $7,200,000 $1,800,000 $9,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 27

48 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 48 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY 2021 TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost 15 - San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Comal IH 35 C Other TxDOT $75,000,000 Guadalupe River Hays/Comal County Line Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Operational improvements including ramp revisions and intersection improvements - convert frontage road to one way 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 1/18 - move from FY 2022 to FY 2021 and increase cost from $50M to $75M in Cat 4; 4/17 - add project Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $3,675,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $75,000,000 Construction Engineering $3,000,000 Contingencies: $5,250,000 Indirect Costs: $1,500,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $3,000,000 $91,425,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $75,000,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 4 - Connectivity $67,500,000 $7,500,000 $75,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $67,500,000 $7,500,000 $75,000, San Antonio Bexar IH 10 C Other TxDOT $171,000,000 Limits From: Loop 1604 Limits To: Guadalupe/Bexar County Line Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Description: Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway Project History: 3/18 - move from FY 2029 to FY 2021 and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project to MTP with Prop 1/Prop 7; portion of project may have already been in the MTP Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $8,379,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $171,000,000 Construction Engineering $6,840,000 Contingencies: $11,970,000 Indirect Costs: $3,420,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $6,840,000 $208,449,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $171,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 12 - Strat Pri $153,900,000 $17,100,000 $171,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $153,900,000 $17,100,000 $171,000, San Antonio Description: Project History: Bexar Limits From: FM 78 Limits To: IH Intersection and operational improvements 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process FM 1518 C Other TxDOT Last Revision Date: 7/2016 $19,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $955,500 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $19,500,000 Construction Engineering $967,200 Contingencies: $388,050 Indirect Costs: $1,119,300 Other Field Total Project Cost: $729,300 $23,659,350 Cost of Approved Phases: $19,500,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $6,784,000 $1,696,000 $8,480, LC $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Other $816,000 $204,000 $1,020,000 Other Totals $7,600,000 $1,900,000 $10,000,000 $19,500,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 28

49 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 49 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: Ingram Rd Limits To: SH 151 Description: Expand from 8 to 10 lane expressway Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project FY 2021 Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $50,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $2,450,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $50,000,000 Construction Engineering $2,000,000 Contingencies: $3,500,000 Indirect Costs: $1,000,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $2,000,000 $60,950,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $50,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 12 - CL $40,000,000 $10,000,000 $50,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $40,000,000 $10,000,000 $50,000, San Antonio Bexar Limits From: at SH 151 Limits To: Description: Project History: Interchange Reconstruct interchange - Phase 2 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT Last Revision Date: 3/2018 $40,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,960,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $40,000,000 Construction Engineering $1,600,000 Contingencies: $2,800,000 Indirect Costs: $800,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $1,600,000 $48,760,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $40,000,000 Type of Work: Interchange Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 12 - Strat Pri $36,000,000 $4,000,000 $40,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $36,000,000 $4,000,000 $40,000, San Antonio Description: Project History: Bexar Limits From: SH 151 Limits To: US Expand from 6 lane to 8 lane expressway 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT Last Revision Date: 3/2018 $10,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $490,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $10,000,000 Construction Engineering $400,000 Contingencies: $7,000,000 Indirect Costs: $200,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $400,000 $12,190,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $10,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 12 - Strat Pri $9,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $9,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 29

50 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 50 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: at IH 10 E Limits To:. Description: Construct direct connectors: Phase 1 - Priority Connectors Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project FY 2021 Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $100,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $4,800,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $100,000,000 Construction Engineering $4,000,000 Contingencies: $7,000,000 Indirect Costs: $2,000,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $4,000,000 $121,900,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $100,000,000 Type of Work: Interchange Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $45,000,000 $5,000,000 $50,000, Connectivity $22,500,000 $2,500,000 $25,000, Strat Pri $22,500,000 $2,500,000 $25,000,000 Other Totals $90,000,000 $10,000,000 $100,000, San Antonio Bexar FM 1535 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: 1.0 Miles North of Lp 1604 Limits To: Lp 1604 Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Project History: 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $7,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $367,500 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $7,500,000 Construction Engineering $372,000 Contingencies: $149,250 Indirect Costs: $430,500 Other Field Total Project Cost: $280,500 $9,099,750 Cost of Approved Phases: $7,500,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $7,500,000 Other Other Other Totals $6,000,000 $1,500,000 $7,500, San Antonio Description: Project History: Bexar Limits From: Lp 1604 Limits To: Huebner FM 1535 C San Antonio TxDOT Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks 4/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2021; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Last Revision Date: 7/2018 $6,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $318,500 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $6,500,000 Construction Engineering $322,400 Contingencies: $129,350 Indirect Costs: $373,100 Other Field Total Project Cost: $243,100 $7,886,450 Cost of Approved Phases: $6,500,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $4,384,000 $1,096,000 $5,480,000 12S - STP-MM Rec $816,000 $204,000 $1,020,000 Other Other Totals $5,200,000 $1,300,000 $6,500,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 30

51 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 51 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio B,C,G,K NR C Other AAMPO Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: FY 2021 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY /18 - agency change and reduce cost; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; fixed amount $100,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $100,000 Construction Engineering Contingencies: Indirect Costs: Other Field Total Project Cost: $100,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $100,000 Type of Work: Rideshare Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Other Other Other Totals $80,000 $20,000 $100, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Bexar VA C Other TxDOT Various locations in Bexar County on state system Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $4,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $196,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Construction Engineering $198,400 Contingencies: $79,600 Indirect Costs: $229,600 Other Field Total Project Cost: $149,600 $4,853,200 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,000,000 Type of Work: Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $2,880,000 $720,000 $3,600, LC $400,000 $400,000 Other Other Totals $2,800,000 $720,000 $400,000 $4,000, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Guadalupe CS C Seguin Seguin In Seguin, on Rudeloff Rd. From SH 46 to Huber Road Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with center turn lane, bicycle and pedestian facilities 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $6,316,658 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $309,516 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $6,316,658 Construction Engineering $313,306 Contingencies: $125,701 Indirect Costs: $263,576 Other Field Total Project Cost: $236,243 $7,664,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $6,316,658 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $5,053,326 $1,263,332 $6,316,658 Other Other Other Totals $5,053,326 $1,263,332 $6,316,658 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 31

52 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 52 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY 2021 TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar FM 2252 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: Evans Road Limits To: Comal/Bexar County Line Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - move from FY 2027 to FY 2021 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $6,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $294,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $6,000,000 Construction Engineering $240,000 Contingencies: $420,000 Indirect Costs: $120,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $240,000 $7,314,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $6,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $6,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $4,800,000 $1,200,000 $6,000, San Antonio Bexar FM 2252 C Other TxDOT Limits From: at Evans Road Limits To:. Last Revision Date: 5/2017 Description: Construct intersection operational improvements, including widening of Cibolo Creek bridge Project History: 4/17 - move from to FY 2021 and revise funding; 1/17 - revise funding distribution; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $4,200,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $205,800 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $4,200,000 Construction Engineering $208,320 Contingencies: $83,580 Indirect Costs: $241,080 Other Field Total Project Cost: $157,080 $5,095,860 Cost of Approved Phases: $4,200,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $3,360,000 $840,000 $4,200,000 Other Other Other Totals $3,360,000 $840,000 $4,200, San Antonio Comal FM 2252 C Other TxDOT Limits From: Bexar/Comal County Line Limits To: FM 3009 Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalk Project History: 3/18 - reverse limits and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - move from FY 2023 to FY 2021; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP $19,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $931,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $19,000,000 Construction Engineering $760,000 Contingencies: $1,330,000 Indirect Costs: $380,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $760,000 $23,161,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $19,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $15,200,000 $3,800,000 $19,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $15,200,000 $3,800,000 $19,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 32

53 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 53 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY 2022 TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost 15 - San Antonio Description: Project History: Comal Limits From: US 281 Limits To: Bentwood Dr SH 46 C Other TxDOT Last Revision Date: 2/2018 $14,000,000 Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL 3/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022 and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise limits and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $686,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $14,000,000 Construction Engineering $560,000 Contingencies: $980,000 Indirect Costs: $280,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $560,000 $17,066,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $14,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 4 - Connectivity $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $14,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $14,000, San Antonio Comal SH 46 C Other TxDOT Limits From: Farhills Dr Limits To: US 281 Last Revision Date: 2/2018 Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL Project History: 3/18 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022 and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise limits and funding; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP $26,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,274,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $26,000,000 Construction Engineering $1,040,000 Contingencies: $1,820,000 Indirect Costs: $520,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $1,040,000 $31,694,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $26,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 4 - Connectivity $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $26,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $26,000, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: Guadalupe FM 725 C New Braunfels TxDOT Comal/Guadalupe County Line Zipp Rd Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks and bike lanes 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $10,600,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $519,400 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $10,600,000 Construction Engineering $525,760 Contingencies: $210,940 Indirect Costs: $608,440 Other Field Total Project Cost: $396,440 $12,860,980 Cost of Approved Phases: $10,600,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $8,480,000 $2,120,000 $10,600,000 Other Other Other Totals $8,480,000 $2,120,000 $10,600,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 33

54 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 54 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar IH 410 C San Antonio TxDOT FY 2022 Limits From: at US 281/San Pedro Limits To:. Description: Interchange improvements Project History: 3/18 - increase cost and revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $24,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,176,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $24,000,000 Construction Engineering $960,000 Contingencies: $1,680,000 Indirect Costs: $480,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $960,000 $29,256,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $24,000,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $19,200,000 $4,800,000 $24,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $19,200,000 $4,800,000 $24,000, San Antonio Bexar Limits From: Old FM 471 Limits To: Description: Project History: Medina County Line Expand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks 3/18 - revise funding distribution FM 471 C Other TxDOT Last Revision Date: 3/2018 $21,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,029,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $21,000,000 Construction Engineering $840,000 Contingencies: $1,470,000 Indirect Costs: $420,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $840,000 $25,599,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $21,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $8,400,000 $2,100,000 $10,500, LC $10,500,000 $10,500,000 Other Other Totals $8,400,000 $2,100,000 $10,500,000 $21,000, San Antonio Limits From: Limits To: Description: Project History: B,C,G,K NR C Other AAMPO Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County Last Revision Date: 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY /18 - agency change and reduce cost; 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process; project has $53,400 in TDCs which are not calculated in the funding total; fixed amount $100,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $100,000 Construction Engineering Contingencies: Indirect Costs: Other Field Total Project Cost: $100,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $100,000 Type of Work: Rideshare Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Other Other Other Totals $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 34

55 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 55 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY 2022 TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar VA C Other TxDOT Limits From: Various locations in Bexar County Limits To: on state system Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Description: Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure Project History: 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $8,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $392,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $8,000,000 Construction Engineering $396,800 Contingencies: $159,200 Indirect Costs: $459,200 Other Field Total Project Cost: $299,200 $9,706,400 Cost of Approved Phases: $8,000,000 Type of Work: Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $5,760,000 $1,440,000 $7,200, LC $800,000 $800,000 Other Other Totals $5,760,000 $1,440,000 $800,000 $8,000, San Antonio Bexar Limits From: In Bexar County, on Crestway Limits To: From Kitty Hawk Rd to FM 1976 Description: Widen to provide operational improvements including bike lanes; construct 6 ft. sidewalk Project History: 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process CS C Other BxCo Last Revision Date: 7/2016 $7,791,571 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $381,787 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $7,791,571 Construction Engineering $386,462 Contingencies: $155,052 Indirect Costs: $447,236 Other Field Total Project Cost: $291,405 $9,453,513 Cost of Approved Phases: $7,791,571 Type of Work: Bicycle/Pedestrian Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $6,233,257 $1,558,314 $7,791,571 Other Other Other Totals $6,233,257 $1,558,314 $7,791, San Antonio Description: Project History: Bexar Limits From: FM 78 Limits To: IH Expand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks 3/18 - revise fuding distribution; 4/17 - add project FM 1516 C Other TxDOT Last Revision Date: 3/2018 $23,500,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,151,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $23,500,000 Construction Engineering $940,000 Contingencies: $1,645,000 Indirect Costs: $470,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $940,000 $28,646,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $23,500,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $9,400,000 $2,350,000 $11,750, LC $11,750,000 $11,750,000 Other Other Totals $9,400,000 $2,350,000 $11,750,000 $23,500,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 35

56 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 56 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar SL 1604 C Other TxDOT Limits From: IH 35 S Limits To: 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 Last Revision Date: 3/2018 Description: Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided Project History: 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - add project; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP FY 2022 Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost $14,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $686,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $14,000,000 Construction Engineering $560,000 Contingencies: $980,000 Indirect Costs: $280,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $560,000 $17,066,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $14,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $14,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $11,200,000 $2,800,000 $14,000, San Antonio Bexar FM 1560 C Other TxDOT Limits From: Galm/Schaenfield Limits To: FM 471 Last Revision Date: 7/2016 Description: Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks Project History: 4/16 - funded through STP-MM project selection process $12,100,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $592,900 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $12,100,000 Construction Engineering $600,160 Contingencies: $240,790 Indirect Costs: $694,540 Other Field Total Project Cost: $452,540 $14,680,930 Cost of Approved Phases: $12,100,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 7 - STP-MM $8,464,000 $2,116,000 $10,580, LC $1,520,000 $1,520,000 Other Other Totals $8,464,000 $2,116,000 $1,520,000 $12,100, San Antonio Description: Project History: Bexar Limits From: 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 Limits To: US 90 W SL 1604 C Other TxDOT Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided 3/18 - revise funding distribution; 4/17 - revise project; added w/ 12/8/14 adoption of the MTP Last Revision Date: 3/2018 $26,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $1,274,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $26,000,000 Construction Engineering $1,040,000 Contingencies: $1,820,000 Indirect Costs: $520,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $1,040,000 $31,694,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $26,000,000 Type of Work: Added Capacity: Non - Toll Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $26,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $20,800,000 $5,200,000 $26,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 36

57 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 57 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No San Antonio Bexar SL 1604 C San Antonio TxDOT Limits From: at FM Blanco Road Limits To:. FY 2022 Last Revision Date: 2/2018 Updated: DRAFT Description: Intersection operational improvements Project History: 3/18 - increase cost from $30M; 10/17 - move from FY 2020 to FY 2022; 4/17 - TIP: add project; MTP - move from FY 2027 to FY 2020; 4/16 - funded through TIP Call for Projects (P1/P7); temporarily placed in FY 2027 Year of Expenditure Cost $43,000,000 Total Project Cost Information (TxDOT %): Preliminary Engineering $2,107,000 ROW Purchase: Construction Cost: $43,000,000 Construction Engineering $1,720,000 Contingencies: $3,010,000 Indirect Costs: $860,000 Other Field Total Project Cost: $1,720,000 $52,417,000 Cost of Approved Phases: $43,000,000 Type of Work: Operational Authorized Funding by Category/Share Funding Local Categories Federal State Local Contrib Total 2 - Metro Corridor $34,400,000 $8,600,000 $43,000,000 Other Other Other Totals $34,400,000 $8,600,000 $43,000,000 Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 37

58 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 58 of 178 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP PROJECTS ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY 2022 TxDOT District County CSJ Hwy Phase City Project Sponsor MPO Proj ID No. Updated: DRAFT Year of Expenditure Cost Phase: C=Construction, E=Engineering, R=ROW 38

59 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 59 of Transportation Improvement Program Funded Transit Projects 39

60 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 60 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 40

61 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 61 of 178 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $216,000 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $216,000 Total Project Cost: $216,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $6,035,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $6,035,000 Total Project Cost: $6,035,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $12,000,000 Project Description: Transit: Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $12,000,000 Total Project Cost: $12,000,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,450,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $2,450,000 Total Project Cost: $2,450,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 41

62 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 62 of 178 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,489,165 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $1,489,165 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $1,489,165 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $6,481,400 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $6,481,400 Total Project Cost: $6,481,400 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $500,000 Project Description: Transit: Joint Development Fiscal Year Cost: $500,000 Total Project Cost: $500,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: MPO Project Number: Apportionment Year: 2019 VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 Federal (FTA) Funds: $31,900,000 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $7,975,000 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $39,875,000 Total Project Cost: $39,875,000 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: Maintenance TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 42

63 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 63 of 178 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,100,000 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $1,100,000 Project Description: Transit: JARC Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $2,200,000 Total Project Cost: $2,200,000 VIA Job Access Reverse Commute Services TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $475,000 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $475,000 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $950,000 Total Project Cost: $950,000 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $4,400,000 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $16,993,273 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $4,155,410 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $25,548,683 Total Project Cost: $25,548,683 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: MPO Project Number: Apportionment Year: 2019 VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,600,000 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $400,000 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,000,000 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,000,000 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: Subrecipients TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 43

64 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 64 of 178 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $160,000 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: A Other Funds: Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $160,000 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $160,000 Program Administration TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $8,120,000 Apportionment Year: 2019 State Funds from TxDOT: $5,119,554 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,355,446 Project Description: Transit: Paratransit Facility Fiscal Year Cost: $14,595,000 Total Project Cost: $14,595,000 Paratransit Facility TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 44

65 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 65 of 178 FY 2020 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $377,000 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $377,000 Total Project Cost: $377,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $910,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $910,000 Total Project Cost: $910,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $24,000,000 Project Description: Transit: Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $24,000,000 Total Project Cost: $24,000,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $800,000 Project Description: Transit: Administrative Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $800,000 Total Project Cost: $800,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 45

66 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 66 of 178 FY 2020 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $882,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $882,000 Total Project Cost: $882,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,246,110 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $1,246,110 Revwnue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $1,246,110 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $2,610,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $2,610,000 Total Project Cost: $2,610,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $500,000 Project Description: Transit: Joint Development Fiscal Year Cost: $500,000 Total Project Cost: $500,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 46

67 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 67 of 178 FY 2020 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: MPO Project Number: Apportionment Year: 2020 VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 Federal (FTA) Funds: $33,495,000 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $8,373,750 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $41,868,750 Total Project Cost: $41,868,750 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: Maintenance TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,155,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $1,155,000 Project Description: Transit: JARC Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $2,310,000 Total Project Cost: $2,310,000 VIA Job Access Reverse Commute Services TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $498,750 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $498,750 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $997,500 Total Project Cost: $997,500 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,680,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $420,000 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,100,000 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,100,000 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: Subrecipients TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 47

68 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 68 of 178 FY 2020 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $168,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: A Other Funds: Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $168,000 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $168,000 Program Administration TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $6,326,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $796,673 Project Phase: C Other Funds: Project Description: Transit: Paratransit Facility Fiscal Year Cost: $7,122,673 Total Project Cost: $7,122,673 Paratransit Facility TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $2,074,000 Apportionment Year: 2020 State Funds from TxDOT: $2,780,268 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,983,685 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $6,837,953 Total Project Cost: $6,837,953 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 48

69 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 69 of 178 FY 2021 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $8,092,772 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $8,092,772 Total Project Cost: $8,092,772 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $324,000 Project Description: Transit: Service Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $324,000 Total Project Cost: $324,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: $460,268 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $966,640 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $1,426,908 Total Project Cost: $1,426,908 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $280,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $280,000 Total Project Cost: $280,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 49

70 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 70 of 178 FY 2021 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $22,000,000 Project Description: Transit: Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $22,000,000 Total Project Cost: $22,000,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $190,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $190,000 Total Project Cost: $190,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $947,902 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $947,902 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $947,902 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $692,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $692,000 Total Project Cost: $692,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 50

71 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 71 of 178 FY 2021 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $500,000 Project Description: Transit: Joint Development Fiscal Year Cost: $500,000 Total Project Cost: $500,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $35,169,750 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $8,792,438 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $43,962,188 Total Project Cost: $43,962,188 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: Maintenance TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $523,688 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $523,688 Project Description: Transit: JARC Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,047,376 Total Project Cost: $1,047,376 VIA Job Access Reverse Commute Services TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: MPO Project Number: Apportionment Year: 2021 VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 Federal (FTA) Funds: $523,688 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $523,688 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $1,047,376 Total Project Cost: $1,047,376 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 51

72 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 72 of 178 FY 2021 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: MPO Project Number: Apportionment Year: 2021 VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,764,000 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $441,000 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,205,000 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,205,000 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: Subrecipients TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $176,400 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: A Other Funds: Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $176,400 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $176,400 Program Administration TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $3,693,375 Apportionment Year: 2021 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $923,344 Project Description: Transit: Capital Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $4,616,719 Total Project Cost: $4,616,719 Paratransit / Operational Facilities TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 52

73 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 73 of 178 FY 2022 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: $394,515 Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,224,220 Project Description: Transit: Passenger Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $1,618,735 Total Project Cost: $1,618,735 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $43,500,000 Project Description: Transit: Rapid Transit Project Fiscal Year Cost: $43,500,000 Total Project Cost: $43,500,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $400,000 Project Description: Transit: Maintenance Tools and Equipment Fiscal Year Cost: $400,000 Total Project Cost: $400,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $880,000 Project Description: Transit: Replacement Components for Fiscal Year Cost: $880,000 Revenue Vehicles Total Project Cost: $880,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 53

74 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 74 of 178 FY 2022 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $1,185,000 Project Description: Transit: Computer Hardware/Software Fiscal Year Cost: $1,185,000 Total Project Cost: $1,185,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - None MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $500,000 Project Description: Transit: Joint Development Fiscal Year Cost: $500,000 Total Project Cost: $500,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $36,928,238 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $9,232,059 Project Description: Transit: Operating Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $46,160,297 Total Project Cost: $46,160,297 Capital Cost of Contracting, ADA, Preventive TDC Requested: Maintenance TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $549,872 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $549,872 Project Description: Transit: JARC Expenses Fiscal Year Cost: $1,099,744 Total Project Cost: $1,099,744 VIA Job Access Reverse Commute Services TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 54

75 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 75 of 178 FY 2022 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: MPO Project Number: Apportionment Year: 2022 VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5307 Federal (FTA) Funds: $549,872 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $549,872 Project Description: Transit: AACOG Operating Projects Fiscal Year Cost: $1,099,744 Total Project Cost: $1,099,744 Transportation Services for New Braunfels, TDC Requested: Cibolo, McQueeney, Marion, Schertz, etc TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,852,200 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: O Other Funds: $463,050 Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $2,315,250 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $2,315,250 Other Programs Pass through to TDC Requested: Subrecipients TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5310 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $185,220 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: A Other Funds: Project Description: Transit: Mobility of Seniors and Persons Fiscal Year Cost: $185,220 with Disabilities Total Project Cost: $185,220 Program Administration TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,894,044 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $6,094,305 Project Description: Transit: Revenue Vehicles Fiscal Year Cost: $7,988,349 Total Project Cost: $7,988,349 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 55

76 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 76 of 178 FY 2022 Transit Project Listing Alamo Area MPO Transportation Improvement Program San Antonio TxDOT District DRAFT - Scfheduled for Adoption on April 23, 2018 YOE=Year of Expenditure General Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor: VIA Metropolitan Transit Federal Funding Category: FTA - Section 5339 MPO Project Number: Federal (FTA) Funds: $1,984,000 Apportionment Year: 2022 State Funds from TxDOT: Project Phase: C Other Funds: $496,000 Project Description: Transit: Operational Facilities Fiscal Year Cost: $2,480,000 Total Project Cost: $2,480,000 See Appendix for Project Detail TDC Requested: TDC Awarded: Date TDC Awarded: N/A Section 5309 ID #: N/A Projects are sorted by Federal Funding Category and MPO Project Number. 56

77 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 77 of Transportation Improvement Program Financial Plan 57

78 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 78 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 56

79 Highway Financial Summary - Year of Expenditure Cost April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 79 of 178 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization - District Transportation Improvement Program Funding by Category Revised April 23, 2018 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total Category Description Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized 1 1 Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation 2M or 2U Urban Area (Non- TMA) Corridor Projects 3 Non-Traditionally Funded Transportation Project 4 Statewide Connectivity Corridor Projects 5 CMAQ 5 Flex Map21 Flex 6 1 Structures 7 (UTP) Metro Mobility & Rehab $43,420,000 $45,290,000 $45,870,000 $46,490,000 #VALUE! 7 Unspent Prev Yrs STP-MM pending #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 7 Total STP-MM Available #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 8 1 Safety 9 Enhancements 9 Flex TAP $3,180,000 $3,180,000 $3,180,000 $3,180,000 #VALUE! 9 Flex Unspent Prev Yr TAP pending #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 9 Flex Total TAP Available #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 10 Supplemental Transportation 11 1 District Discretionary 12 Strategic Priority 12C Strategic Priority RECON 12S Strategic Priority RECON SBPE Strategy Budget PE SB 102 Strategy 102 Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! Funding Participation Source Source FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total Notes: Federal 1 at TxDOT's direction, grouped project CSJs, primarily funded under these categories, State are not to be included in the financial summary. Local Match 2 Category 2 funding is shown per FHWA's direction CAT 3 - Local Contributions (incl SIB/TIFIA) The MPO's allocation of Category 2 funding is allocated for years 2019 through 2024 for the following projects in CAT 3 - Prop 12 (US 281) the amounts shown below: CAT 3 - Prop Loop 1604 from SH 16 to US 281 $398,300,000 Cat 3- Prop 14 SB CAT 3 - Texas Mobility Fund Total: $398,300,000 CAT 3 - Pass Thru Toll Revenue (SH 211) CAT 3 - Regional Toll Revenue (SH 130 Concn) CAT 3 - Other The Category 2 funding amount is shown for the 'let' year only and does not reflect payout over time. The table on the following page shows the tiered funding levels for years 2017 through Other - Strategy PE Budget Other - Strategy 102 Budget This table uses the FY 2018 UTP for Category 7 STP-MM and Category 9 TA funding levels. Total 59

80 All Figures in Year of Expenditure (YOE) Dollars Transit Financial Summary Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 80 of 178 Current as of 4/23/2018 FY 2020 FY 2021 Transit Program Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total 1 Sec Urbanized Formula >200K $37,875,000 $30,698,683 $68,573,683 $35,148,750 $10,027,500 $45,176,250 $36,217,126 $9,839,814 $46,056,940 2 Sec Urbanized Formula <200K 3 Sec Discretionary 4 Sec Elderly &Individuals w/disabilities $1,760,000 $400,000 $2,160,000 $1,848,000 $420,000 $2,268,000 $1,940,400 $441,000 $2,381,400 5 Sec Nonurbanized Formula 6 Sec JARC >200K 7 Sec JARC <200K 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanized 9 Sec New Freedom >200K 10 Sec New Freedom <200K 11 Sec New Freedom Nonurbanized 12 Other FTA $8,120,000 $6,475,000 $14,595,000 $8,400,000 $5,560,626 $13,960,626 $3,693,375 $923,344 $4,616, Regionally Significant or Other $29,171,565 $29,171,565 $31,325,110 $31,325,110 $14,653,582 $14,653,582 Total Funds $47,755,000 $66,745,248 $114,500,248 $45,396,750 $47,333,236 $92,729,986 $41,850,901 $25,857,740 $67,708,641 Transportation Development Credits Requested Awarded All Figures in Year of Expenditure (YOE) Dollars FY 2022 Total Transit Program Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total 1 Sec Urbanized Formula >200K $38,027,982 $10,331,803 $48,359,785 $147,268,858 $60,897,800 $208,166,658 2 Sec Urbanized Formula <200K $10,027,500 3 Sec Discretionary 4 Sec Elderly &Individuals w/disabilities $2,037,420 $463,050 $2,500,470 $7,585,820 $1,724,050 $9,309,870 5 Sec Nonurbanized Formula 6 Sec JARC >200K 7 Sec JARC <200K 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanized 9 Sec New Freedom >200K 10 Sec New Freedom <200K 11 Sec New Freedom Nonurbanized 12 Other FTA $3,878,044 $6,590,305 $10,468,349 $24,091,419 $19,549,275 $43,640, Regionally Significant or Other $48,083,735 $48,083,735 $123,233,992 $123,233,992 Total Funds $43,943,446 $65,468,893 $109,412,339 $178,946,097 $205,405,117 $384,351,214 Transportation Development Credits Requested $280,000 $280,000 Awarded 61

81 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 81 of Transportation Improvement Program APPENDIX A Certifications 63

82 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 82 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 64

83 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 83 of Transportation Improvement Program Self - Certification 65

84 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 84 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 66

85 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 85 of 178 MPO Self - Certification In accordance with 23 CFR Part , the Texas Department of Transportation, and the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization for the San Antonio urbanized area, hereby certify that the transportation planning process is addressing the major issues in the metropolitan planning area and is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements of: (1) 23 U. S. C. 134, 49 U.S.C. 5303, and 23 CFR 450 subpart C Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming; (2) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1), and 49 CFR part 21; (3) 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity; (4) Section 1101(b) of MAP-21 (Pub. L ) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects; (5) 23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts; (6) The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C et seq.) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38; (7) The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (8) Section 324 of title 23, U.S.C., regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and (9) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Witness these signatures this 23 rd day of April Texas Department of Transportation San Antonio District Alamo Area MPO Transportation Policy Board Mario Jorge, P. E. District Engineer Kevin Wolff Chair Witness Witness

86 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 86 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 68

87 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 87 of 178 Certification of Planning Process Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, mandates that the State and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) certify that the planning process is consistent with the requirements of 23 USC 134; and 49 USC 5303, and 23 CFR 450 subpart C Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming. The requirements of this certification and the actions(s) taken by the Alamo Area MPO to comply with those requirements are discussed in the following sections. Federal Regulations 23 CFR 450, 23 USC 134, and 49 USC 5303 Federal regulations require the urban transportation planning process to include activities to support the development and implementation of a long range transportation plan, Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and a short range transportation plan, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and subsequent project development activities. While all of the activities programmed in the MPO s Budget Document, the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), contribute to those requirements, the following lists some of the more recent efforts: Program Support Public Involvement Activities including social media, meeting hosting and facilitation, and development of outreach materiald Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach Geographic Information Systems Activities including transportation-related data collection and continued refinement of the MPO s online mapping application, imap Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities including the Bike Share Master Plan Study, Walk & Roll events and Walkable Community Program and Safe Routes to Schools workshops and activities Traffic Safety Planning and Crash Data Analysis Air Quality Planning Congestion Management System/Process to include the Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study Support for the Transportation Improvement Program including public outreach and document development Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan including development of demographics, travel demand modeling, public outreach and document development 23 CFR : Scope of the metropolitan planning process The MPO s metropolitan transportation planning process is continuous, cooperative and comprehensive and provides for the consideration and implementation of projects, strategies and services that address the adopted ten planning factors listed below: Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; 69

88 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 88 of 178 Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; Increase accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns; Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; Promote efficient system management and operation; Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system; and reduce or mitigate the stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and Enhance travel and tourism. 23 CFR : Funding for transportation planning and unified planning work programs The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is developed cooperatively with the State, the MPO, recipients of FTA Section 5307 funds (VIA Metropolitan Transit) and participating local governments. Currently, the UPWP is developed and maintained on a two-year cycle. 23 CFR : Metropolitan planning organization and redesignation The MPO, a Transportation Management Area, continues to be designated by the Governor with the concurrence of the State and local elected officials. The Transportation Policy Board (i.e., the MPO) consists of elected officials and staff of general purpose governments. The MPO was redesignated in April 2014 as a result of a boundary expansion and the assumption of transportation planning and programming activities in a portion of the San Marcos urbanized area located within Guadalupe County. 23 CFR : Metropolitan planning area boundaries The MPO boundary is in effect through an agreement between the MPO and the Governor. 23 CFR : Metropolitan planning agreements Responsibilities for transportation planning are cooperatively determined by the State, the MPO, VIA Metropolitan Transit and participating local governments. 23 CFR : Interested parties, participation and consultation The MPO utilizes a proactive public involvement process that provides complete information, timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and supports early and continuing involvement of the public in developing plans and TIPs. The MPO s public involvement process meets the necessary requirements and criteria. The MPO Public Participation Plan was updated in December 2017 to align with new federal requirements. 70

89 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 89 of CFR : Congestion management process in transportation management areas The MPO s transportation planning process incorporates a functioning congestion management process. 23 CFR : Development and content of the metropolitan transportation plan The year 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) was approved on December 8, The recommendations within the MTP were formulated in accordance with the planning requirements of 23 U.S.C Section 135 and 49 U.S.C. Section The 2040 MTP covers all of Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe counties and a portion of Kendall County. The MPO is on the process of developing the 2045 MTP. 23 CFR : Development and content of the transportation improvement program At least every two years, or as required by the State of Texas, the MPO has prepared and adopted a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which: covers a period of not less than four years; includes realistic estimates of costs and revenues consistent with estimated funding available; is submitted to the Governor for approval, and to the Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administrator through the State; provides required information for all projects, including total project cost and year of expenditure project construction cost. Section 134 of Title 23, U.S.C. and Section 5303 OF Title 49, U.S.C. These requirements are "...development of transportation systems embracing various modes of transportation in a manner which will efficiently maximize mobility of people and goods within and through urbanized areas and minimize transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution. To accomplish this objective, metropolitan planning organizations, in cooperation with the State, shall develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of the State. Such plans and programs shall provide for the development of transportation facilities (including pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) which will function as an intermodal transportation system for the state, the metropolitan areas, and the nation. The process for developing such plans and programs shall provide for consideration of all modes of transportation and shall be continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive to the degree appropriate, based on the complexity of the transportation problems". Long range land use plans and overall development objectives are a functional responsibility of local governments. As long range needs are evaluated, consideration is given to their relationship and impact on overall development objectives of local governments. (Geographic Information Systems Activities; 71

90 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 90 of 178 Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Public Involvement Activities; Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach) Social, economic, and environmental affects of transportation improvements are considered in environmental studies for individual projects. These factors were considered in the overall comparison of alternatives and the selection of projects in the MTP. (Air Quality Planning; Geographic Information Systems Activities; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Congestion Management System/Process; Public Involvement Activities; and Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach) System performance is considered both in the evaluation of alternatives in the development of the long range plan and in technical studies analyzing existing needs for highway, street, and/or transit improvements. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities; Congestion Management System/Process; Traffic Safety Planning Studies; and Transportation Data Collection and Management System, [imap]) Alternative transportation systems management strategies are considered as an integral part of short range planning efforts to address existing problems in both highway/street and transit. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Congestion Management System/Process; VIA Origin and Destination Survey; Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Studies and Activities; and Traffic Safety Planning Studies) Alternative investment strategies are considered in the economic/financial analysis of transportation improvements. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and Transportation Improvement Program Development) Plans are developed for modes utilizing travel forecasts based on the same demographic projections and the impact of modal recommendations on different modes is analyzed prior to a final recommendation being formulated. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; and Air Quality Planning) Transportation planning and the development of transportation plans and programs have been done on a continuous basis since the mid-1960s. (Program Support; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; Tansportation Improvement Program Development; Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; Public Involvement Activities; and Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach) The process maintains a cooperative relationship between the agencies in planning through agency interaction and review at the technical committee levels and direct staff contacts. (Program Support; Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and study oversight committees) The planning process is comprehensive through the use of local-government developed demographic forecasts and the consideration of their overall development objectives. (Support for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 72

91 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 91 of 178 Regional Thoroughfare Plan Study; VIA Corridor Planning; and Air Quality Planning) 42 U.S. Code 7504, 7506(c) and (d); The Clean Air Act, Section 174 and 176(c) and (d) The counties of Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe were designated as Nonattainment/deferred with an effective nonattainment date of September 30, This meant that these three counties were within an Early Action Compact area that does not meet the 8-hour ozone standard, yet which the Environmental Protection Agency as determined to have complied with the March 2004 Early Action Compact milestone for submitting State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to the State. The San Antonio region met all milestones associated with the Early Action Compact and, based on monitor readings for three years, was designated attainment for ozone effective April 15, As of April 2018, Bexar County is not meeting the 70 ppb threshold to be in compliance with the October 2015 ozone standards. Non-attainment designation for ozone has not yet occurred. Priority for project implementation is normally determined by funding restrictions and decisions by local officials. Should this area fail to meet national ambient air quality standards, the air quality impact of proposed projects in the TIP would be a determining factor by local elected officials in developing priorities for implementation. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI requires that programs supported by Federal assistance do not discriminate and Federal grant recipients must prepare and follow a program which effects such assurances. A Title VI program has been developed and is updated as required. Title VI Assurances Filed By State These assurances apply to highway project funding in the same manner as the above section applies to transit projects. The Alamo Area MPO complies with the requirements of Title VI through the Title VI Program and the requirement that all subrecipients contractually comply with the requirement of Title VI. Assurances are filed by the State. Section 1101(b) of MAP-21 (Pub. L ) This section deals with the requirement that, except to the extent the Secretary of Transportation determines otherwise, not less than 10 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated under other Titles of MAP-21 shall be expended with small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. To comply with this requirement, the MPO includes in all agreements with the agencies that receive funds from the MPO a clause requiring that Minority Business Enterprises have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds. The MPO has established an overall disadvantaged business enterprise participation goal of 25% in all of its third party contracting opportunities. The MPO regularly exceeds this 25% goal. In addition, VIA (a recipient of funds from the MPO) has an adopted 73

92 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 92 of 178 Minority Owned/Women Owned Business participation goal for all Federal funds received by them which they normally achieve and/or exceed. 49 CFR Parts 27, 37 and 38 (Americans with Disabilities Act) Part 27 requires compliance with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) including the regulations of the Department of Justice implementing Titles II and III of the ADA (28 CFR Parts 35 and 36) and the regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission implementing Title I of the ADA (29 CFR Part 1630). The Metropolitan Planning Organization meetings are held in accessible facilities and meeting notices contain the following: Meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. To arrange for special assistance or an interpreter, please call (210) OR TDD (Relay Texas) at least five working days in advance. Parts 37 and 38 require compliance with the accessible transportation and related provisions of Title II and III of the ADA. VIA Metropolitan Transit indicated full compliance with the ADA Paratransit Service Criteria in January 1995 (ADA Paratransit Plan - Third Annual Update). All of VIA's newly procured transit vehicles are accessible. 23 USC Section 324, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 794 and 49 CFR part 27), 42 USC 6101, and 49 USC 5332 The Metropolitan Planning Organization is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, sex, or disability. Conclusions and Recommendations The transportation planning process for the Alamo Area metropolitan area is consistent with all applicable Federal requirements. It is therefore recommended the Transportation Policy Board approve the attached MPO Self-Certification for submittal to the State of Texas, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. 74

93 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 93 of 178 Project Selection Procedure 75

94 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 94 of Transportation Improvement Program This page intentionally left blank. 76

95 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 95 of 178 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Selection Procedures - In accordance with Section 134(h)(2) of Title 23 U.S.C. as amended and Section 8(h)(2) of 49 U.S.C as amended, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transportation Policy Board hereby approves the following Project Selection Procedures: 1) The approved Transportation Improvement Program shall be utilized for programming projects within the metropolitan planning area. 2) Any project listed in the first year of the approved Transportation Improvement Program shall be considered in the first priority and may be implemented as soon as plans are completed and funds are appropriated. 3) Should any projects not be implementable from the first priority, then projects should be selected from the second, third or fourth years which shall be considered the second priority, and those projects may be implemented as plans are completed and funds are appropriated. 4) Any projects listed in the second, third or fourth year of the Transportation Improvement Program may be accelerated to the first year of the Transportation Improvement Program as soon as plans are complete, including right-of-way and utility adjustments, and funding is available. 5) Projects with statewide or grouped CSJs will be implemented as outlined in the MPO s Policy 6: Guidelines for Programming Projects in the Transportation Improvement Program. This procedure was developed cooperatively between the Texas Department of Transportation, VIA Metropolitan Transit and the MPO, signed this the 23 rd day of _April_2018. Kevin Wolff Chair MPO Transportation Policy Board Mario Jorge, P.E. San Antonio District Engineer Texas Department of Transportation Jeffrey Arndt President/CEO VIA Metropolitan Transit

96 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 96 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 78

97 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 97 of Transportation Improvement Program Appendix B Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects 79

98 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 98 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 80

99 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 99 of 178 Project Name Transportation Improvement Program - DRAFT Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects MPO Project Number TxDOT Project Number Limits From: Project Description To: ActionScheduled: April 23, 2018 Construction Cost Fiscal Year Responsible Agency Alamo Area Commute Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County $267,000 Solutions Program Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY AACOG 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County $267,000 Solutions Program Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY AACOG 7/2018 Alamo Area Commute Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County $267,000 Solutions Program Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm AACOG 7/2016 Alamo Area Commute Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County $267,000 Solutions Program Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2020 FY AACOG 7/2016 Alamo Area Commute Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County $267,000 Solutions Program Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2021 FY AACOG 7/2016 Alamo Area Commute Alamo Area MPO: Bexar, Comal Guadalupe & partial Kendall County $267,000 Solutions Program Alamo Area Commute Solutions Pgm - FY 2022 FY AACOG 7/2016 Alazan Creek Hike and Bike Lombrano Street Laredo Street $6,000,000 Trail Extend the Alazan Creek section of the Greenway Trail System SARA 7/2018 Blanco Road West Oak Estates Borgfeld Rd $14,661, / /2017 Expand from a 2 to 4 lane divided roadway with raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks, curbs and drainage BxCo Broadway Burr Road IH 35 $14,000,000 Roadway rehabilitation and complete streets improvements TxDOT Bulverde Road Marshall Road Wilderness Oak $8,097,480 Reconstruct and widen to 4 lanes with shoulder, pedestrian ramps, curb, bridge construction and drainage improvements ARMA 7/2018 Converse Greenway Park Converse Park North FM 78 $1,382, / /2016 Construct multi use path Converse Crestway Road Kitty Hawk Rd FM 1976 $7,791,571 Widen to provide operational improvements including bike lanes; construct 6 ft. sidewalk BxCo E. Aviation Blvd. Houston Drive Aztec Way $8,632, /2018 Widen to provide operational improvements, bike lanes, sidewalks and drainage UC FM 1103 IH 35 Guadalupe County Line $1,500, /2017 Expand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes TxDOT FY FY FY FY FY

100 Project Name Transportation Improvement Program - DRAFT Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects MPO Project Number TxDOT Project Number /2017 Limits From: Project Description To: ActionScheduled: April 23, 2018 Construction Cost Fiscal Year Responsible Agency FM 1103 Comal C/L Rodeo Way $22,500, /2018 Expand to 4 lanes with medians, turn lanes, sidewalk and bike lanes TxDOT FM 1516 FM 78 IH 10 $23,500, /2016 Expand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks TxDOT FM 1518 FM 78 IH 10 $19,500,000 Intersection and operational improvements TxDOT FM 1560 Galm/Schaenfield FM 471 $12,100,000 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and FY sidewalks TxDOT 7/2016 FM 2252 at Evans Road. $4,200, / /2017 Construct intersection operational improvements, including widening of Cibolo Creek FY bridge TxDOT FM 2252 Bexar/Comal County Line FM 3009 $19,000, /2017 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes FY and sidewalk TxDOT FM 2252 Evans Road Comal/Bexar County Line $6,000, /2018 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with raised median or continuous left turn lane, bike lanes FY and sidewalk TxDOT FM 471 Old FM 471 Medina County Line $21,000, /2016 Expand 2 to 4 lane divided with bike lanes and sidewalks TxDOT FM 725 Comal/Guadalupe County Line Zipp Rd $10,600,000 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with median, sidewalks and bike lanes TxDOT Galm Road Ph III Culebra Road Government Canyon State Park $7,323,351 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities BxCo 7/2018 Harry Wurzbach at Austin Highway. $17,177, /2018 Construct entrance and exit ramps between Harry Wurzbach and Austin Highway CoSA Huebner Creek Hike/Bike Trail SH 16 (Bandera Road) bridge Crystal Hills Park $933, /2017 Construction of a hike and bike trail along Huebner Creek LV IH 10 Loop 1604 Guadalupe/Bexar County Line $171,000, /2018 Expand from 4 lane to 6 lane expressway April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 100 of TxDOT IH 35 Guadalupe River Hays/Comal County Line $75,000,000 Operational improvements including ramp revisions and intersection improvements - FY convert frontage road to one way TxDOT 2/2018 FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

101 Project Name Transportation Improvement Program - DRAFT Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects MPO Project Number TxDOT Project Number /2018 Limits From: Project Description To: ActionScheduled: April 23, 2018 Construction Cost Fiscal Year Responsible Agency IH 35 Hays County Line 0.5 Mi S. of Hays County Line $1,200, /2018 Revise ramps and convert frontage roads from two way to one way operation TxDOT IH 37 LP 13 IH 410 $2,900, /2018 Construction of a partial frontage road, ramps, and intersection improvements TxDOT Judson Road Independence IH 35 $1,000, /2018 Construct sidewalk along west side of Judson Road CoSA Loop 1604 IH 35 S 0.7 Mi North of FM 2536 $14,000, /2018 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided TxDOT Loop Mi North of FM 2536 US 90 W $26,000, /2017 Expand from 2 lanes to 4 lane divided TxDOT Loop 1604 US 281 Redland Road $47,808,839 Expand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes TxDOT Loop 1604 SH 16 US 281 $507,705,768 Expand to 8 lane expressway - construct 4 new managed lanes; including managed lane FY direct connectors at IH 10 ARMA 5/2017 Loop 1604 at FM Blanco Road. $43,000, /2017 Intersection operational improvements TxDOT Loop 410 at IH 10 E. $100,000, /2017 Construct direct connectors: Phase 1 - Priority Connectors TxDOT Loop 410 SH 151 US 90 $10,000, /2017 Expand from 6 lane to 8 lane expressway TxDOT Loop 410 Ingram Rd SH 151 $50,000, /2018 Expand from 8 to 10 lane expressway TxDOT Loop 410 at US 281/San Pedro. $24,000, /2018 Interchange improvements TxDOT Loop 410 at SH 151 Interchange $40,000, /2017 Reconstruct interchange - Phase 2 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 101 of TxDOT New Braunfels Pedestrian On San Antonio Street, Walnut Avenue, and McQueeney Road and Seele Elementary $1,516,711 Connectivity Construct sidewalks, ramps & other pedestrian related infrastructure New Braunfels 8/2017 FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

102 Project Name Transportation Improvement Program - DRAFT Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects MPO Project Number TxDOT Project Number /2016 Limits From: Project Description To: ActionScheduled: April 23, 2018 Construction Cost Fiscal Year Responsible Agency NW Military Highway Lp 1604 Huebner $6,500, /2018 Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks TxDOT NW Military Highway Lp 1604 Huebner $6,500,000 Construct 2 way left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks TxDOT NW Military Highway 1.0 Miles North of Lp 1604 Lp 1604 $7,500,000 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and FY sidewalks TxDOT 7/2016 NW Military Highway 1.0 Miles North of Lp 1604 Lp 1604 $7,500,000 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median, or center turn lane, bike lanes and FY sidewalks TxDOT 7/2018 Presa Street West Boyer Street SE Military Drive (Loop 13) $10,000, / /2018 Bike and Pedestrian Corridor enhancements to create Complete Streets CoSA Quintana Road Harmon Avenue McKenna Avenue $7,800,000 Rehab and realign roadway, intersection and flood control improvements Port SA Rocket Lane E. Norris Drive Loop 1604 $5,430,481 Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane, sidewalks and bike FY lanes Converse 7/2016 Rudeloff Road SH 46 Huber Road $6,316, /2016 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes with center turn lane, bicycle and pedestian facilities Seguin Schertz Pedestrian and Bike Woodland Oaks Drive, Savannah Drive, a Live Oak Road and off road trail $1,158,266 Improvements Construct sidewalks, bike lanes and off-road trail Schertz 7/2018 SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) Bexar C/L, 2.9 MI N of FM 1957, N Bexar C/L, 4.5 MI N of FM 1957 $4,100, /2018 Construct two lane rural highway on new location BxCo SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) Bexar CL, 2.0 MI S of FM 471, N FM 471 (Culebra Rd) $4,400, /2018 Construct two lane rural highway on new location BxCo SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) Medina Co. Line, 4.5 Mi N of FM 1957, N Medina Co. Line, 2.0 Mi S of FM 471 $2,600, /2018 Construct two lane rural highway on new location BxCo SH 211 (TX Research Pkwy) FM 1957 (Potranco Rd), N 2.9 Mi Medina County Line $7,000, / /2017 Construct two lane rural highway on new location April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 102 of BxCo SH 46 US 281 Bentwood Dr $14,000,000 Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL TxDOT FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

103 Project Name Transportation Improvement Program - DRAFT Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects MPO Project Number TxDOT Project Number /2018 Limits From: Project Description To: ActionScheduled: April 23, 2018 Construction Cost Fiscal Year Responsible Agency SH 46 US 281 Bentwood Dr $14,000, /2017 Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL TxDOT SH 46 Farhills Dr US 281 $26,000, /2018 Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL TxDOT SH 46 Farhills Dr US 281 $26,000,000 Expand from 2 lanes to 6 lanes with raised median or CLTL TxDOT Talley Road Wiseman Blvd. Tamaron Pass $10,931,172 Widen to provide operational improvements including a continuous left turn lane; FY construct 10 ft. shared use path BxCo 7/2016 VA In City of San Antonio. $2,000, / /2017 Construct citywide pedestrian and bicycle improvements CoSA VA Various locations on the state roadway s. $4,000, /2016 Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure TxDOT VA Various locations on the state roadway s. $4,000,000 Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure TxDOT VA Various locations on the state roadway s. $8,000, /2016 Construct curb ramps, sidewalks and other pedestrian related infrastructure TxDOT VA In City of San Antonio. $1,500, /2017 Intelligent Transportation System - Enhancements CoSA VA In City of San Antonio. $1,500, /2018 Intelligent Transportation Systems - Enhancements - Upgrade Traffic Signal Controllers CoSA VA Austin-San Antonio Regional Corridor Project $4,000, /2018 Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transportation solutions AAMPO VA Austin-San Antonio Regional Corridor Project $16,000, /2017 Studies, plans and projects associated with multimodal transportation solutions AAMPO VA In San Antonio at TransGuide Center $4,000, /2017 Upgrade TransGuide Facility TxDOT Walnut Springs Trail Extension Project /2017 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 103 of 178 Vaughan Bridge Max Starcke Park East $2,801,246 Extend Walnut Springs multi use trail, including retaining walls, hand and guard rails and below grade crossing Seguin FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

104 Project Name Transportation Improvement Program - DRAFT Alphabetical Listing of Roadway, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Rideshare Projects MPO Project Number TxDOT Project Number Limits From: Project Description To: ActionScheduled: April 23, 2018 Construction Cost Fiscal Year Responsible Agency Watson Road FM 2790 (Somerset Road) 0.62 Miles East to Watson Road $4,886,116 Expand from 2 to 4 lanes, including drainage improvements, bike and pedestrian amenities BxCo 7/2016 Wurzbach Parkway Lockhill Selma Road FM 1535 $30,000, / /2018 Intersection and operational improvements TxDOT Wurzbach Parkway Lockhill Selma Road FM 1535 $9,000, /2017 Intersection and operational improvements April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 104 of TxDOT Zarzamora Street Fredericksburg Road Loop 13 $5,000,000 Construct sidewalks, remove unused utility poles, and implement pedestian detection ITS CoSA FY FY FY

105 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 105 of Transportation Improvement Program APPENDIX C Grouped or Statewide CSJ Project Listing In cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, the Texas Department of Transportation developed statewide programs identified by statewide CSJs to maximize the provisions for grouping projects that are not determined to be regionally significant in one line item, as allowed for in Title 23 USC Section 135 Statewide Planning. A table of the eligible funding categories and corresponding CSJs can be found in this section. The use of statewide CSJs for these categories provides a more efficient method of programming and letting projects and decreases the necessity for TIP/STIP revisions. By adopted policy, the Alamo Area MPO will not have any Category 2 Metro Corridor of Category 7 Surface Transportation Program Metropolitan Mobility projects listed in this section of the TIP. A listing of the grouped CSJ projects eligible to be let during the timeframe can be found in this section. Grouped CSJ projects are financially constrained at the state level. 87

106 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 106 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 88

107 Table 1 PROPOSED CSJ GROUPED PROJECT CATEGORY GROUPED PROJECT CSJs Definition of Grouped Projects for use in the STIP Revised August 4, 2015 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 107 of 178 DEFINITION PE-Preliminary Engineering Right of Way Acquistion Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Railroad Grade Separations Safety Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Preliminary Engineering for any project except added capacity projects in a nonattainment area. Includes activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as planning and research activities; grants for training; engineering to define the elements of a proposed action or alternatives so that social, economic, and environmental effects can be assessed. Right of Way acquisition for any project except added capacity projects in a nonattainment area. Includes relocation assistance, hardship acquisition and protective buying. Projects to include pavement repair to preserve existing pavement so that it may achieve its designed loading. Includes seal coats, overlays, resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation done with existing ROW. Also includes modernization of a highway by reconstruction, adding shoulders or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing, non-added capacity) or drainage improvements associated with rehabilitation. Projects to replace and/or rehabilitate functionally obsolete or structurally deficient bridges. Projects to construct or replace existing highway-railroad grade crossings and to rehabilitate and/or replace deficient railroad underpasses, resulting in no added capacity Projects to include the construction or replacement/rehabilitation of guard rails, median barriers, crash cushions, pavement markings, skid treatments, medians, lighting improvements, highway signs, curb ramps, railroad/highway crossing warning devices, fencing, intersection improvements (e.g., turn lanes), signalization projects and interchange modifications. Also includes projects funded via the Federal Hazard Elimination Program, Federal Railroad Signal Safety Program, or Access Managements projects, except those that result in added capacity. 1 of 2

108 Table 1 PROPOSED CSJ GROUPED PROJECT CATEGORY GROUPED PROJECT CSJs Definition of Grouped Projects for use in the STIP Revised August 4, 2015 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 108 of 178 DEFINITION Landscaping Intelligent Transportation System Deployment Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Rest Areas and Truck Weigh Stations Transit Improvements and Programs Project consisting of typical right-of-way landscape development, establishment and aesthetic improvements to include any associated erosion control and environmental mitigation activities. Highway traffic operation improvement projects including the installation of ramp metering control devices, variable message signs, traffic monitoring equipment and projects in the Federal ITS/IVHS programs. Construction or rehabilitation of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths and facilities. Construction and improvement of rest areas, and truck weigh stations. Projects include the construction and improvement of small passenger shelters and information kiosks. Also includes the construction and improvement of rail storage/maintenance facilities bus transfer facilities where minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users. Also includes transit operating assistance, acquisition of third-party transit services, and transit marketing, and mobility management/coordination. Note 1: Projects funded with Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Transportation Enhancement, and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funding require a Federal eligibility determination, and are not approved to be grouped. Note 2: Projects funded as part of the Recreational Trails Program (RTP) consistent with the revised grouped project category definitions may be grouped. RTP projects that are not consistent with the revised grouped project category definitions must be individually noted in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). 2 of 2

109 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 109 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County SL 368 at N. New Braunfels intersection - $649, Intersection Operational Improvements Bexar SL 368 at Casa Blanca - $218, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar SL 368 at Eleanor - $193, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar SL 368 at Salado Creek and Ira Lee Road. $609, Replace bridge and approaches FY 2022 Bexar SL 353 IH 35 SL 13 $5,700, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2021 Bexar IH 35 SL 353 (Nogalitos) McCullough Avanue $141, Wrong way driver advanced technologies Bexar IH Miles SW of IH Mi South of IH 410 $205, Wrong way driver advanced technologies FY 2020 Bexar IH Miles South of AT&T Center Parkway at UPRR $10,664, Replace NB and SB Bridges and Approaches FY 2020 Bexar US Miles West of Hunt Lane West Military - LP 13 $1,376, Overlay and pavement markings on EB frontage road FY 2021 Bexar US Miles East of IH Miles East of South Acme Road $2,752, Overlay and pavement markings on EB frontage road FY 2021 Bexar US 90 IH 410 SL 353 $8,200, Overlay and pavement markings on mainlanes FY 2021 Bexar SS 371 Billy Mitchell Road US 90 $2,090, Overlay and pavement markings Bexar IH 10 South Hackberry Street Loop 13 - WW White $7,596, Base repair, seal coat, overlay and pavement markings on FR FY 2020 Bexar IH 10.IH 10 Northbound FR at Cibolo Creek.. $1,800, Clean and paint steel truss, bridge repair, mill, overlay and pavement markings Bexar Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 1

110 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 110 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County FM 78 at Foster/Rittiman - $222, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar SL 345 IH 10 Callaghan Road $5,160, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2022 Bexar SL 345 at Cinnamon Creek Drive - $222, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar SL 345 IH 10 IH 410 $6,500, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2021 Bexar IH Mile East of Hildebrand IH 35 $6,159, Mill, seal coat, overlay and pavement markings Bexar IH Mile East of Hildebrand IH 35 $3,500, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2021 Bexar US 281 at FM 1937/Del Lago Parkway. $1,000, Intersection operational improvements Bexar US 181 at Old Corpus Christi Highway - $229, Improve traffic signals, interconnect signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar US 181 at Loop $474, Improve traffic signals, interconnect signals Bexar US 87 IH 10 Rigsby $2,867, Restore existing roadway Bexar US 87 at FM $218, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar SS 421 IH 410 Sunshine Drive $3,382, Surface and pavement markings Bexar SH 16 at Guilbeau Road - $240, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar SH 16 at Tezel Road - $218, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 2

111 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 111 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County SH 16 at Mainland Drive - $218, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar SH 16 at Cedar Trail. $660, Reconstruct existing culvert Bexar SS Miles West of Goodrich 0.1 Mile East of Hamilton $411, Install raised medians with actuated ped symbols Bexar FM 1518 FM 78 Schaeffer Road $1,642, Overlay and pavement markings on mainlanes Bexar SL 13 at Somerset Road. $218, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersections Bexar SL 13 SL 353 IH 35 $3,500, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2021 Bexar SL 13 US 90 Leon Creek $5,497, Base repair, mill, seal coat, overlay and pavement markings Bexar SL 13 Leon Creek SL 353 $3,500, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2021 Bexar IH 410 US 90 SH 151 $2,064, Overlay and pavement markings on frontage roads FY 2021 Bexar IH 410 SH 16 Pearsall Road $386, Seal coat and pavement markings on frontage roads Bexar SH 16 IH 410 Atascosa CL $1,061, Seal coat and pavement markings Bexar FM 1535 at Loop $394, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar FM 1535 at West Avenue - $227, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar FM 1535 at Lockhill Selma - $242, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 3

112 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 112 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County FM 1535 at Loop $394, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersections Bexar FM 471 at Heath Road - $214, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar FM 471 at SH 211. $3,996, Construct grade separation FY 2022 Bexar VA Various bridges on IH 35 in Bexar and Atascosa Counties $568, Replace bridge and approach railing or add safety end treatment or replace guardfence FY 2020 Bexar VA Various bridges on IH 10 in Bexar and Kendall Counties $757, Replace bridge and approach railing or add safety end treatment or replace guardfence FY 2020 Bexar CR Old Seguin Road at Salado Creek - $500, Replace bridge and approaches FY 2020 Bexar CS N. Walters Street at UPRR and Larry Street - $5,837, Rehab bridge and approaches FY 2020 Bexar VA Various bridges on IH 410 in Bexar County $1,717, Replace bridge and approach railing or add safety end treatment or replace guardfence FY 2020 Bexar VA Various bridges on IH 35 and US 281 in Bexar County $261, Replace bridge and approach railing or add safety end treatment or replace guardfence FY 2021 Bexar VA Various bridges on IH 37 and IH 410 in Bexar County $260, Replace bridge and approach railing or add safety end treatment or replace guardfence FY 2021 Bexar VA Government Canyon State Natural Area $102, Seal coat various roads, parking lots and campsite pullouts within the park FY 2020 Bexar CS Marbach Road at Horal Drive $222, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar CS On New Braunfels Avenus at Steves Avenue $209, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar CS On Wurzbach Road at Bluemel Road $222, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 4

113 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 113 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County CS On Pleasanton Road at Formosa $313, Improve traffic signal FY 2020 Bexar CS On Vance Jackson at La Manda Blvd $313, Improve traffic signal FY 2020 Bexar CS on Military Drive at Brownleaf $313, Improve traffic signals Bexar FM 2252 Evans Road Stahl Road $2,578, Overlay and pavement markings Bexar FM 1876 Woodlake Parkway Loop 1604 $18,973, Rehab and wide narrowroadway to add shoulders Bexar FM 1976 at Bentley Drive - $218, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar FM 1976 at Montgomery Road/Eaglecrest Blvd - $222, Improve traffic signals and safety lighting at intersection Bexar FM 1516 at FM $49, Improve traffic signals Bexar FM 1957 at Richland Hills - $222, Improve traffic signals Bexar IH 35 SL 337 FM 306 $5,200, Overlay and pavement markings on frontage roads FY 2021 Comal BI 35-H Gruene Road S. Peach Avenue $7,526, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2020 Comal FM Miles SW of Krueger Canyon IH 35 $138, Overlay and pavement markings Comal SH 46 at FM $63, Install flashing beacon and safety lighting at intersection Comal SH 46 at Cranes Mill - $63, Install flashing beacon and safety lighting at intersection Comal Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 5

114 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 114 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County BS 46-C SL 337/SH Miles West of W. San Antonio Street $1,376, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2022 Comal RM 32 at RM 484. $61, Install flashing beacon and safety illumiination at intersection Comal FM 1101 SH 46 Guadalupe CL $155, Profile edgeline and centerline markings Comal FM 1102 at Hunter Road - $63, Install flashing beacon and safety lighting at intersection Comal FM 1192 FM 2439/Watson Lane FM 306 $240, Seal coat and pavement markings Comal FM 311 US 281 SH 46 $177, Profile edgeline and centerline markings Comal FM 1044 IH 35 Guadalupe/Comal County Line $1,180, Overlay and pavement markings Comal FM 1044 at Schmidt Avenue - $63, Install flashing beacon and safety lighting at intersection Comal FM 2673 Satler Road, east intersection FM 306 $1,078, Overlay and pavement markings Comal FM 2673 RM 2722 FM 306 $137, Profile edgeline and centerline markings Comal FM 3351 Kendall/Comal CL Stephanie Way $900, Overlay and pavement markings FY 2022 Comal MH in New Braunfels on San Antonio Street at Comal River $4,493, Rehabilitate bridge and approaches Comal US 90A.at Saunders Street. $59, Overhead flashing beacon Guadalupe FM Miles East of Gembler Road 0.1 Miles West of Westgate Drive $4,963, Spot base repair, overlay and pavement markings Guadalupe Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 6

115 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 115 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County FM 78 FM 3009 West side of LP 539 $50, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 78 East side of LP 539 Santa Clara Creek $162, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 78 West side of LP 539 East side of LP 539 $39, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 725 Zipp Road FM 78 $3,800, Rehab and widen to provide operational improvements FY 2022 Guadalupe SH 46 CH Matthies Jr 0.7 Miles East of FM 467 $2,622, Mill, overlay and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 466 SH 123 FM 1117 $178, Overlay and pavement markings Guadalupe SH 80 IH 10 Gonzales County $138, Overlay and pavement markings Guadalupe SH 123 at US 90. $525, Improve traffic signals Guadalupe SH 123 at Dennis Drive. $59, Overhead flashing beacon Guadalupe BS 123B 0.2 Miles North of US 90 Guadalupe River Bridge $2,995, Mill, overlay and pavement markings Guadalupe BS 133B at Continental Drive. $61, Install intersection flashing beacon and safety lighting at intersectons Guadalupe BS 123B 0.4 Miles North of US Miles North of US 90 $1,090, Improve traffic signals Guadalupe FM 775 FM 2538 Guadalupe/Wilson CL $199, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 465 FM 78 IH 10 $101, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 7

116 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 116 of Transportation Improvement Program TxDOT Projects Sorted by County and TxDOT Project Number Project Name Project Limits From: and To: Construction Cost MPO Project Number Project Description Fiscal Year TxDOT Project Number County FM 775 IH 10 FM 2538 $222, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 1150 US 90A FM 1104 $106, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 1518 Maske Road FM 78 $1,501, Overlay and pavement markings Guadalupe FM 1979 at CR 244A - Lehmann Road. $59, Install intersection flashing beacon Guadalupe FM 1044 Comal/Guadalupe County Line 1.0 Miles North of Klein Road $1,020, Overlay and pavement markings on mainlanes Guadalupe FM 725 FM 78 FM 467 $187, Seal coat and pavement markings Guadalupe FM Miles Northwest of IH I0 IH 10 $861, Provide additional paved surface width Kendall US 87 at SH 46 - $49, Improve traffic signals Kendall US 87 Richter Avenue E. San Antonio Avenue $160, Landscape Development Kendall FM 3351 Winchester Road SH 46 $1,064, Overlay and pavement markings Kendall FM 3351 SH 46 Comal/Kendall CL $2,484, Overlay and pavement markings Kendall Note: These projects are not mapped. They will be listed in an appendix of the TIP document. 8

117 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 117 of Transportation Improvement Program APPENDIX D Environmental Clearance Projects 99

118 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 118 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 100

119 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 119 of Transportation Improvement Program Appendix D - Environmental Clearance Projects - PLACEHOLDER Project Name Limits From: Project Description Loop 1604 NE IH 35 North IH 10 East To: Expand to 4 lane expressway (construct 4 new managed lanes) Corridor added to Appendix D of the TIP on 4/23/07 Loop 1604 West US 90 SH 16 Expand to 6 and 8 lane expressway (construct 2 to 4 managed lanes) Corridor added to Appendix D of the TIP on 4/28/14 New Braunfels, South Lyster Road Loop 410 Construct extension of South New Braunfels, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, on new alignment Corridor added to Appendix D of the TIP on 4/25/16 Toepperwein Crossbow Peak FM 1976 Expand from 2 to 4 lane roadway with continuous center turn lane sidewalks and bike lanes) to align with South Seguin Road (FM 1516) Corridor added to Appendix D of the TIP on 4/25/16 Zarzamora/Frio City RR Crossing Overpass US 90 Walton Avenue Construct overpass on Zarzamora to go over RR tracks parallel to Frio City Road Corridor added to Appendix D of the TIP on 4/25/16 101

120 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 120 of Transportation Improvement Program APPENDIX E Transit Project Detail 105

121 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 121 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 106

122 VIA Metropolitan Transit 2019 Capital Spending Plan April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 122 of 178 MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals Service Vehicles Cars ,000 Trucks ,000 Total Service Vehicles 216, Passenger Facilities Robert Thompson Transit Center ,000,000 Brooks Transit Center ,775,000 IH10 Park & Ride ,531,500 SH 151 Park & Ride ,910,000 Northeast Park & Ride ,665,000 Naco Pass ,075,000 SW High-Capacity Transit Phase ,220,000 Bus Stop Improvements Additional ,410 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds ,773 Bus Stop Impr. Suburban Cities ,000 Randolph Park & Ride ,245,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 5 Points Intersection Reconstruction ,000 Total Passenger Facilities 25,548, Operational Facilities Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 Existing Paint Facility Upgrade ,600,000 Garage Floor Repair & Coating ,000 Purchase Artic Bus Repair Facility ,000 VMF-ERU Condensate Capture and Storage ,000 Bus Yard Concrete Repairs ,000 Madla Training Center Add Restrooms (SGR) ,000 VMC Office Remodel ,000 Office Furniture ,000 Improvements to Expanded Bus Yard ,000 Rework HU Yard Sump/Separator System ,000 Replace VMC Roof ,000 DAF Unit Replacement ,000 Maint Bldg HU Sump Fill In ,000 Insp Steamroom Renovations ,000 Heavy Unit Sky Light Replacement ,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks ,000 Total Operational Facilities 6,035, Rapid Transit Project High Capacity Transit Project ,000,000 Total Rapid Transit Project 12,000,000

123 VIA Metropolitan Transit 2019 Capital Spending Plan April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 123 of 178 MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals Maintenance Tools & Equipment Purchase New Equipment to Service Buses ,000 Mobile Bus Lifts ,000 Inground Brake Testor ,000 Tools & Equip. for New Paratransit Shop ,000,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 2,450, Replace Components for Rev. Vehicles Recondition Engines and Transmissions ,165 Hybrid Bus Batteries ,000 Electric Bus Batteries ,000 Diesel Particulate Filters ,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 1,489, Computer Hardware/Software Park -n-ride Network Upgrades ,000 New Computers for Police Cars ,000 Computing Devices ,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr ,000 Disks and Tape Drives for Backup ,000 P25 Radio System Upgrade/Replacement ,400,000 MS Office and Share Point Ugrades ,000 ERP System - BRP, Technical Specs ,000 ERP System ,838,400 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) ,000 VMC AV Replacement ,000 MAC for Graphic Designer/Illustrator ,000 Cloud Migration & Build Out Svcs ,000 Wireless Network ,000 Fiber Build Out (Grand, GCS, VMC) ,000 Digital Signage/Kiosks ,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 6,481, Misc. (Facilities, Equipment, Other) Joint Development ,000 Total Miscellaneous 500,000 GRAND TOTAL 54,720,248

124 VIA Metropolitan Transit 2020 Capital Spending Plan April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 124 of 178 MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals Service Vehicles Cars ,000 Trucks ,000 Total Service Vehicles 377, Passenger Facilities Robert Thompson Transit Center ,000,000 SH 151 Park & Ride ,000 Northeast Park & Ride ,000 Bus Stop Improvements Additional ,685 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds ,268 Bus Stop Impr. Suburban Cities ,000 MyLink (STP-MM) (TxDOT) ,000 MyLink (TAP) (CoSA) ,000 Randolph Park & Ride ,280,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 Northstar Refurbish ,000 Total Passenger Facilities 6,837, Operational Facilities Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 Bus Yard Concrete Repairs ,000 Madla Training Center Upgrades ,000 Office Furniture ,000 Garage Heater Replacement ,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks ,000 Total Operational Facilities 910, Rapid Transit Project High Capacity Transit Project ,000,000 Total Rapid Transit Project 24,000, Administrative Facilities Administration Bldg Backup Power Generation ,000 Total Administrative Facilities 800, Maintenance Tools & Equipment Purchase New Equipment to Service Buses ,000 Mobile Bus Lifts ,000 In Ground Chassis Dyno ,000 AC Recovery Machines ,000 Transmission Dyno ,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 882,000

125 VIA Metropolitan Transit 2020 Capital Spending Plan April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 125 of 178 MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals Replace Components for Rev. Vehicles Recondition Engines and Transmissions ,110 Hybrid Bus Batteries ,000 Diesel Particulate Filters ,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 1,246, Computer Hardware/Software Park -n-ride Network Upgrades ,000 Computing Devices ,000 ArcGIS for Engineering ,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr ,000 Replace Printers ,000 P25 Radio System Upgrade/Replacement ,400,000 Telephone System Upgrade/Replacement ,000 MS Office and Share Point Ugrades ,000 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) ,000 VMC AV Replacement ,000 Wireless Network ,000 Digital Signage/Kiosks ,000 IT Security/Network Security ,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 2,610, Misc. (Facilities, Equipment, Other) Joint Development ,000 Total Miscellaneous 500,000 GRAND TOTAL 38,163,063

126 VIA Metropolitan Transit 2021 Capital Spending Plan April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 126 of 178 MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals Revenue Vehicles Paratransit Vehicles ,092,772 Total Revenue Vehicles 8,092, Service Vehicles Cars ,000 Trucks ,000 Other Misc Serv Vehicles ,000 Total Service Vehicles 324, Passenger Facilities Bus Stop Improvements Additional ,300 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds ,268 Bus Stop Impr. Suburban Cities ,340 MyLink (STP-MM) (TxDOT) ,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 Total Passenger Facilities 1,426, Operational Facilities Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 Office Furniture ,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks ,000 Total Operational Facilities 280, Rapid Transit Project High Capacity Transit Project ,000,000 Total Rapid Transit Project 22,000, Maintenance Tools & Equipment Purchase New Equipment to Service Buses ,000 Mobile Bus Lifts ,000 Floor Scrubbers ,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 190, Replace Components for Rev. Vehicles Recondition Engines and Transmissions ,902 Hybrid Bus Batteries ,000 Diesel Particulate Filters ,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 947,902

127 VIA Metropolitan Transit 2021 Capital Spending Plan April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 127 of 178 MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals Computer Hardware/Software Park -n-ride Network Upgrades ,000 Computing Devices ,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr ,000 Replace Printers ,000 Maintenance Diagnostic Laptops Upgrade ,000 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) ,000 VMC AV Replacement ,000 Wireless Network ,000 Software Development Tools ,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 692, Misc. (Facilities, Equipment, Other) Joint Development ,000 Total Miscellaneous 500,000 GRAND TOTAL 34,453,582

128 VIA Metropolitan Transit 2022 Capital Spending Plan April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 128 of 178 MPO ID# Category Project No 2019 Totals Revenue Vehicles Paratransit Vehicles ,988,349 Total Revenue Vehicles 7,988, Passenger Facilities Bus Stop Improvements Additional ,220 Bus Stop Impr. Funded w/ TxDOT Funds ,515 MyLink (STP-MM) (TxDOT) ,000 Passenger Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 Total Passenger Facilities 1,618, Operational Facilities Facility Upgrade/Renovation ,000 Bus Yard Concrete Repairs ,000 Office Furniture ,000 Other & Tire Shop Pit Repair ,000,000 Storeroom Cabinets & Material Handling Trucks ,000 Total Operational Facilities 2,480, Rapid Transit Project High Capacity Transit Project ,500,000 Total Rapid Transit Project 43,500, Maintenance Tools & Equipment Purchase New Equipment to Service Buses ,000 Mobile Bus Lifts ,000 Replace Parts Washers, Pressure/Steam Cleaners ,000 Total Maintenance Tools & Equip. 400, Replace Components for Rev. Vehicles Recondition Engines and Transmissions ,000 Hybrid Bus Batteries ,000 Diesel Particulate Filters ,000 Total Replace Components for Rev. Veh. 880, Computer Hardware/Software Park -n-ride Network Upgrades ,000 Computing Devices ,000 Network Storage/Servers/Data Ctr ,000 Telephone System Upgrade/Replacement ,000 Security (Cameras, Doors, Network, Storage) ,000 Wireless Network ,000 Operating System Licenses ,000 Digital Signage/Kiosks ,000 Total Computer Hardware/Software 1,185, Misc. (Facilities, Equipment, Other) Joint Development ,000 Total Miscellaneous 500,000 GRAND TOTAL 58,552,084

129 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 129 of Transportation Improvement Program APPENDIX F Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 105

130 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 130 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 106

131 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 131 of 178 Policy 2: Public Participation Plan This text is the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization s (AAMPO) plan to involve the public. It is called a Public Participation Plan (PPP) and is required by law. People were able to comment on the plan for 45 days. This comment period took place prior to adoption of the plan. Purpose of the Public Participation Plan This plan provides a guide for how MPO staff can involve the public. It includes goals, procedures, and tools the MPO will use. It also includes metrics used to measure and evaluate plan performance. AAMPO s Commitment to Public Participation People should have a say in transportation decisions that affect their lives. To help make this possible, the AAMPO commits to: 1. Welcome all people into the planning process. 2. Identify people affected and involve them in the process. 3. Get people involved early and keep them involved throughout in the process. 4. Provide people with a variety of ways to participate. 5. Hold meetings at convenient dates, times, and locations. 6. Hold meetings at accessible places (see attachment 1). 7. Make meetings accessible for people with disabilities. 8. Provide interpreters (spoken or sign) if requested at least five (5) working days in advance of a meeting. 9. Use information and graphics that are easy to understand. 10. Talk to people and record their comments. 11. Consider comments in the planning process. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 1

132 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 132 of 178 Public Participation Goals Goal 1 The MPO will engage people in the transportation planning process. The MPO will do this according to the goals in this plan and applicable laws. Goal 2 The MPO will keep people informed of transportation news. Goal 3 The MPO will encourage the everyone in the study area to get involved. This includes those traditionally underserved. Goal 4 The MPO will strive to improve public participation. Goal 5 The MPO will work closely with other transportation agencies. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 2

133 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 133 of 178 Federal and State Requirements This plan reflects the AAMPO commitment to the public. It also outlines their role in the regional planning process. It follows the federal and local laws listed below. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Federal rules for metropolitan transportation planning (23 CFR ) and FHWA guidelines say that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) shall develop and use a documented participation plan. The plan defines a process for providing citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of transportation, representatives of users of public transportation, representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled, and other interested parties with reasonable opportunities to be involved in the metropolitan transportation planning process. AAMPO complies with the ten MPO requirements listed in 23 CFR Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) The current transportation bill is the Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. It was passed by Congress and signed by President Obama on December 4, The FAST Act authorizes $305 billion nationwide over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for transportation spending. It is the first law enacted in over ten years that provides long-term funding certainty for surface transportation. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) stipulates involving the community, particularly those with disabilities in the development and improvement of services. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits discrimination based on age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act prohibits recipients of Federal financial assistance from taking actions that result in denying or limiting services or otherwise discriminating based on age. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of Title VI states that No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefit of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Title VI serves as the legal foundation for what is today referred to as environmental justice. AAMPO adheres to Title VI and environmental justice principles. Executive Order Limited English Proficiency Executive Order was created to "... improve access to federally conducted and federally assisted programs and activities for persons who, as a result of national origin, are limited in their English proficiency..." Federal agencies were directed to provide guidance and technical Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 3

134 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 134 of 178 assistance to recipients of federal funds as to how they can provide meaningful access to limited English proficient users of federal programs. Consistent with Executive Order and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) guidance, AAMPO has developed a Limited English Proficiency Plan ) in order to ensure meaningful input opportunities for persons with limited English proficiency. The AAMPO LEP plan is available on the AAMPO website ( and calls for translations of vital documents, such as public notices, into Spanish. AAMPO may, at its discretion, translate documents into additional languages if the nature of the document and the character of the document s target audience justify additional translation. The LEP plan provides further guidance for serving limited English-speaking populations. Executive Order on Environmental Justice This order was signed by President Clinton in It reinforced the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that focused federal attention on the environmental and human health condition in minority and low-income communities: Each federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies and activities on minority populations and low-income populations. Executive Order Consultation and Coordination with Tribal Governments Executive Order states that in formulating or implementing policies that have tribal implications, agencies shall establish regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials to reduce the imposition of unfunded mandates upon Indian tribes. At least one American Indian tribe has expressed an interest in being notified of activities throughout the state of Texas. Though there are no tribal governments located in the Alamo Area MPO study area, the MPO will actively seek to keep tribal governments informed of major decisions affecting the region. The MPO will continue to communicate with Native American Indian tribal leaders on an ongoing basis to identify issues of common concern. Disclaimers In order to share appropriate requirements with the public related to various laws and regulations, the MPO regularly uses the following disclaimers. Their purpose and use is described below. American s with Disabilities Act Statement The following disclaimer will be included on public meeting notices as appropriate: All MPO meetings will be conducted in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and are accessible to persons with disabilities. Arrangements for special assistance or an interpreter can be made by calling the Metropolitan Planning Organization office at (210) , or Relay Texas at at least five (5) business days in advance. The meeting facilities will also be within a reasonable distance of a transit route in counties where transit service is readily available. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 4

135 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 135 of 178 Title VI and Environmental Justice Statement The following MPO Title VI and Environmental Justice Nondiscrimination Statement will be included in informational items and collateral materials as appropriate: The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), as a recipient of Federal funding and under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and related statutes, ensures that no person shall on the grounds of race, religion, color, national origin, sex, age or disability be excluded from participation in, denied benefits of, or otherwise discriminated against by any MPO program or activity. Report Language The following language shall be included in all reports published by the MPO: Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration. This language shall be displayed on the interior front cover page in a place of prominence in accordance with the contract between TxDOT and the Alamo Area MPO. Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 Language For newspaper ads in support of the development of the Transportation Improvement Program, by agreement with the transit provider, the language shown below must be included in the ad text itself: The TIP development process is being used to satisfy the public hearing requirements of FTA s Section 5307 program and this public notice of public involvement activities and time established for public review and comments on the TIP will satisfy the FTA Program of Projects requirements. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 5

136 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 136 of 178 Target Audiences The MPO takes great pride in working with people and other agencies. The AAMPO strongly believes that people should have a say in decisions that impact their lives. The AAMPO staff keeps a contact list on a continuous basis. People and groups that AAMPO targets are listed below. This list is not exclusive. The AAMPO also reaches out to the public at large. Target Audiences Airport operators Board and committee members Business and trade organizations Citizens expressing an interest in transportation planning City and academic libraries Civic and public interest groups Community-based associations Commuters Disabled populations Elected local, state and federal officials Emergency response agencies Environmental groups Faith-based organizations Freight shippers Higher education faculty, staff, and students Homeowner, neighborhood and resident associations Local media outlets Military Bases Natural disaster risk reduction agencies Private transportation organizations and employees Providers of freight transportation services Public agencies and staff Public health organizations Public ports Public transportation School districts Social service organizations Tourism industry Traditionally underserved populations (described in greater detail in the following section) Transportation advocates Tribal governments Users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities Users of ridesharing services such as Uber and Lyft Any other interested parties Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 6

137 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 137 of 178 Diversity and Inclusiveness AAMPO commits to engage traditionally underserved groups. These groups include low-income and minority populations. Federal laws protect more groups. The AAMPO also protects two more groups. All protected groups are listed here. Protected Categories Both Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI) and Executive Order (EO 12898) on Environmental Justice (EO 12898) are specific in the description of the populations they protect. Title VI prohibits discrimination based on race, color and national origin. EO protects minority and low income populations. Discrimination against persons based on gender, age, and disability are addressed by other nondiscrimination statutes. Collectively, these populations are often referred to as traditionally underserved in the transportation planning process. Minority Persons considered minorities are identified by the U.S. Census as people of African, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, or Alaskan Native origin. Executive Order and the DOT and FHWA Orders on Environmental Justice consider minority persons as persons belonging to any of the following groups: Black a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Hispanic a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Asian a person having origins in the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent. American Indian and Alaskan Native a person having origins in North America and who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition. Low Income A person whose household income (or in the case of a community or group, whose median household income) is at or below the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. The national poverty guidelines are issued annually by the Department of Health and Human Services and are available at Elderly Any persons over the age of 65. People with Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, a qualified individual with a disability is a person that 1) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; 2) has a record of such an impairment; or 3) is regarded as having such an impairment. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 7

138 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 138 of 178 Limited English Proficiency People who do not speak English as their primary language and have a limited ability to read, speak, write, or understand English may be considered limited English proficient. Additional Categories Additionally, AAMPO includes low-literacy populations and those without personal transportation as traditionally underserved populations, although they are not protected by either a federal act or an executive order. Low Literacy People who have difficulty using certain reading, writing, and computational skills considered necessary for functioning in everyday life may be considered to have low literacy. Persons with low literacy are generally defined as having less than fifth grade reading and comprehension skills. Zero Car Households Households without cars or access to one. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 8

139 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 139 of 178 Board and Committees The AAMPO board and committees provide one of the most regular and consistent ways for public involvement. Following is a list of committees supported by MPO staff. The table below identifies the day of the month, time, and location of their meetings. Committee Date/Time Location Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) * First Friday of the month at 1:30 p.m. TxDOT District Office Building 2 Hearing Room 4615 NW Loop 410 Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC) * Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC) * Transportation Policy Board (TPB) * Second Wednesday of the month at 9:00 a.m. Third Wednesday of the month at 3:30 p.m. Fourth Monday of the month at 1:30 p.m. San Antonio, TX MPO Conference Room B 825 South Saint Mary s Street San Antonio, TX MPO Conference Room B at 825 South Saint Mary s Street, San Antonio, TX VIA Metro Center Community Room 1021 San Pedro San Antonio, TX * Meeting dates and locations are subject to change. The BMAC and PMAC committees hold joint evening meetings several times a year. Some committees choose to cancel meetings in July and December. For the most current information, please visit MPO meetings are open to all. For special needs or translator, call You can also call TDD (Relay Texas). Please call at least five working days before the meeting. Meeting dates, times, and locations may change. You can call to confirm the meeting. The table below lists the timing of information on the website. Materials What is available on the web? When is it posted on the web? Meeting agendas and packets Transportation Policy Board One week prior to the meeting Technical Advisory Committee Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 9

140 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 140 of 178 Materials What is available on the web? When is it posted on the web? Meeting Information Board and committee meeting dates and times Online calendar is posted and updated throughout the year, along with board/committee web pages. Meeting information pages updated monthly. Livestreaming News releases Transportation Policy Board meetings only News and media items, published or broadcast Listen or watch the Transportation Policy Board meetings live or in a searchable archive available 24 hours after the event. Review news releases after sending to the media. Timing of the news release varies depending on the news item or event. Meeting Notices The Texas Open Meetings Act requires notice of any public meeting where a decision could be made or that may be attended by more than one elected official. The MPO regularly posts MPO Transportation Policy Board (TPB), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC) and Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC) meetings in the Texas Register, at the Bexar County Courthouse Bulletin Board, and with Comal and Guadalupe counties. Public Comments The MPO accepts public comments at every regular meeting of the board and committees. Comments can be spoken or in writing. Com Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 10

141 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 141 of 178 Public Participation Toolbox The MPO communicates with the public in a variety of ways. Information shared covers the MPO s programs, projects and studies. MPO information materials display the MPO logo and include contacts. This section describes some of the communication tools the MPO uses. Philosophy of External Communications Guiding principles for external communications include: Informative: The MPO will provide information. The MPO does not advocate on issues. Concise: The MPO will provide clear and concise information. Clear: The MPO will use easy to understand text and graphics. Engaging: The MPO will hold meetings that are fun, interactive, and meaningful. The MPO uses the Spectrum of Public Participation. It was developed by the International Association of Public Participation. The spectrum helps identify when to use tools in the process. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 11

142 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 142 of 178 The table shows different communication tools. The last column shows the level of participation. It corresponds to the Spectrum of Participation. Some strategies, such as outreach tools, are solely informational. Others can include multiple points on the spectrum. Meetings/Events/Speaking Engagements Type Description Level of Project Workshops/Open- Houses This type of public meeting is open and more informal. Team members interact with the public on a one-on-one basis. Short presentations may be given at these meetings. They will be followed by small group exercises or exhibits that people can visit on their own. Participation Inform Consult Involve Collaborate MPO Exhibit Tables MPO staff attend other agency events and man tables or booths. These include activities, maps, charts and informational brochures. Exhibit tables may also be used at malls or other public venues. Inform Consult Small Group Meetings Advisory committee meetings Transportation Policy Board During projects such as planning studies, meetings are held with small groups that have an interest in the project. Meetings could be with homeowners or neighborhood associations, civic groups, special interest groups, or other groups of affected or interested parties. The AAMPO staff supports four committees and several subcommittees. These groups provide input, advice and recommendations to the planning process. Committees work to build consensus on their recommendations before sending them to the board. The board is made up of elected officials and representatives from the various cities, counties, and public agencies within the MPO study area. It is the sole decision-making body within the MPO process. Inform Consult Involve Inform Consult Involve Collaborate Inform Consult Involve Collaborate Empower Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 12

143 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 143 of 178 Online/Electronic Tools Type Description Level of AAMPO Website The website was established in 1998 with basic information about the MPO process, members, meeting times and contact information. The site has been expanded to include information about specific projects undertaken by the MPO. Bicycle, pedestrian and trails information and event schedules are also included. Work products such as the UPWP, TIP and MTP are available from the website. The site provides many links to other transportation related sites from the local to national level. The site is continually maintained and updated by MPO staff and is used to promote regular and special meetings, planning studies, bicycle and pedestrian events, publications and work products. Participation Inform FastTrack E- Newsletter Social Media Project-specific Web Sites The MPO publishes an electronic newsletter on a biweekly basis and distributes it according to the database list. Citizens are added to the distribution list at their own request. Opportunities to be added to the list occur during public meetings hosted by the MPO, during public events attended by the MPO, on the MPO website, and when citizens contact MPO staff. Each issue of the newsletter includes staff contact information, upcoming meeting schedules, the MPO website address, project highlights, and current planning project status reports. Information regarding significant transportation issues, MPO awards, and other one-time activities are also included. The MPO will utilize appropriate social media avenues to post pertinent information and notices on a frequent basis. This also provides another opportunity for the public to provide public input to the MPO s on-going planning process. For individual projects, project-specific websites may be used. These sites are used when project information is too extensive to be included on the MPO site. Project websites can contain study area maps, meeting announcements, descriptions of alternatives, comment forms, user surveys and project team contact information. Links to project sites are provided from the MPO site. Inform Consult Inform Consult Involve Inform Consult Involve Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 13

144 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 144 of 178 Online/Electronic Tools Type Description Level of Crowdsourcing The MPO will utilize different online tools to solicit input, ideas, and suggestions from the public. This could be in the form of comments on a map or submitted via an online form. Participation Inform Consult Online meetings The MPO will provide online participation opportunities as appropriate. These opportunities will include webinar options for participation during the day or virtual public meetings. These will be advertised at the same time as the public meetings. Inform Consult Involve Public Notice Delivery Tools Type Description Level of US Postal Service Traditional mail service is used for formal public hearing notices, as well as to publicize public meetings/workshops. Participation Inform Location Placement Transit blasts are used in addition to traditional mailing to stakeholders and community members. Recipients have previously opted in to communications by providing their addresses. Meeting notices are posted in high-traffic gathering places, including but not limited to: schools, parks, libraries, community centers, and other such gathering places. Meeting flyers and related collateral material may also be available on buses, notifying riders of upcoming meetings. Inform Consult Inform Inform Print and Broadcast Media Tools Type Description Level of Display Ads These ads are used to promote meetings that are not regularly scheduled, such as corridor or subarea workshops, project specific meetings, open houses or Participation Inform Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 14

145 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 145 of 178 Print and Broadcast Media Tools Type Description Level of Participation hearings. They are published in local/regional newspapers that provide the best coverage at an economical price. Press Releases TV and Radio Public Affairs Shows Video and Audio Public Service Announcements Formal press releases are sent to local media (newspaper, TV and radio) to announce upcoming meetings and activities and to provide information on specific issues being considered by MPO committees. MPO staff will solicit radio and talk show appearances to provide information or to promote events and topics as appropriate. MPO staff will produce audio and video public service announcements for selected events and distribute them to the appropriate metro area radio, TV and cable stations. Inform Inform Inform Multimedia Tools Type Description Level of Printed Newsletter The MPO publishes a quarterly hardcopy newsletter that is mailed to the contact mailing list and ed to the electronic contact list. Included are feature stories about the transportation planning process as well as ongoing studies, projects and issues. A Spanish version is also available upon request. Participation Inform Project Newsletters Other Newsletters For individual projects, such as corridor or subarea studies, that are typically performed using consulting services, newsletters are often used to address specific project issues. These newsletters are mailed to targeted residents, businesses and property owners in the area affected by a particular study. Information regarding upcoming project meetings, alternatives being proposed in the area, and other project news is reported in these newsletters. When project-specific newsletters are not used, articles may be prepared for publication in other newsletters produced by municipalities, homeowner associations, Inform Inform Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 15

146 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 146 of 178 Multimedia Tools Type Description Level of Participation church groups, civic groups, or others that may have an interest in the project. These articles are subject to the publication dates and space restrictions of publishers. Video Blogs On a monthly basis, the MPO produces, in English and Spanish, a brief video blog called V-News. V-News highlights upcoming meetings of MPO standing committees, special project meetings or public events being undertaken by the MPO, and may include useful information related to various planning issues, such as air quality, safety, and transportation options. Inform Flyers, Posters and Fact Sheets Bus Placards Banners To provide summary information regarding MPO policy, programs and projects, flyers, posters and fact sheets may be distributed at public meetings, posted on the MPO web site, and displayed in public places such as libraries and community centers. Individuals and special interest groups can also request fact sheets directly from the MPO staff office. The MPO will use advertising space in VIA buses whenever possible as provided by VIA Metropolitan Transit for various MPO events. The MPO will consider using banner advertising such as physical street banners and internet page banners as appropriate for MPO events and activities. Inform Inform Inform Partner Agency Collaboration MPO staff will attend and participate in as many transportation partner public participation activities as is feasible to enhance public consideration of transportation issues, plans, and programs and to reduce redundancies and costs. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 16

147 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 147 of 178 Public Participation Procedures The MPO generates major planning documents that require public input and community consensus. As a result, they are made available for public comment using various outreach strategies. Members of the public can view all of the required documents, and any amendments, on the MPO website at or call to receive a copy. Following is a list of the major planning documents produced by the MPO. Metropolitan Transportation Plan, or long-range plan Transportation Improvement Program, or short-range plan Unified Planning Work Program Public Participation Plan Performance Measures Report Transportation Conformity Document (if/when needed) The Transportation Policy Board has set different approval processes depending on the item agendized for action. The two-step approval process is for new TIP, MTP and Transportation Conformity documents, as well as amendments to the TIP and MTP. The two-step process means that items will be presented to the Transportation Policy Board one month with action scheduled for the following month, allowing for an approximate public comment period of 30 days. The MPO also has a process for an expedited, or one-step process for TIP and MTP amendments, that allows the board to hear the item presented and take action within one meeting. Other items such as amendments to the Unified Planning Work Program, consultant contract awards and resolutions of support, as examples, are acted upon by the Transportation Policy Board in a one-step approval process. Below, please find a description of the two-step and expedited one-step processes. The following page identifies the planning steps required for each planning document produced by the MPO along with the minimum outreach strategies recommended for each. Whenever possible, the MPO will strive to go beyond the minimum outreach strategies. Two-Step Approval Process 1. Present, for informational purposes, the Proposed Action to the Technical Advisory Committee/Transportation Policy Board in month one 2. Present, for Action, to the Technical Advisory Committee/Transportation Policy Board in month two Expedited One-Step Approval Process (for TIP and MTP Amendments only) Transportation Policy Board hears a presentation and takes action at one meeting as opposed to two board meetings Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 17

148 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 148 of 178 Reserved for items requiring quick action due to impending federal or state requirements or deadlines (or for other reasons deemed in the community's best interest) Requires a 75% vote by the Transportation Policy Board to enter into a time certain public hearing and the Board will solicit input into the amendment(s) prior to taking action Approval Process Minimum Outreach Activities Two-Step Approval Process One-Step Approval Process Expedited One Step Process w/ 75% Board Vote for public hearing 30 Day Comment Period 45 Day Comment Period 60 Day Comment Period Partner Agency Coordination News release Newspaper Ads Social media E-newsletter Video Neighborhood presentations TIP/MTP Development Process & Adoption of the TIP/MTP Routine amendments to the TIP/MTP occurring between annual updates Expedited process, urgent amendments to the TIP/MTP Adoption of the Unified Planning Work Program Amendments to the Unified Planning Work Program Public Participation Plan Consultant Contract Award Performance Measures and Targets Transportation Conformity Note: this list is illustrative and may not reflect all the items the Transportation Policy Board may consider for action. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 18

149 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 149 of 178 Monitoring and Evaluation This PPP will be reviewed and adopted, with revisions if necessary, at least every three (3) years. The following performance measures will be recorded by staff on a continuous basis to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of participation strategies. Where appropriate, the Deputy Director and the Planning/Public Involvement Program Manager will set yearly targets. Adjustments to strategies will be made as needed to meet the public involvement plan goals. Goals Addressed Public Involvement Tool Evaluation Method Goals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Public Participation Plan To be reviewed every three years Goal 2 AAMPO Website Number of New Users Number of Returning users Page Views Sessions Goal 2 FastTrack E-Newsletter Number of Subscribers Number of s Accepted Unique/Total Views Goals 1, 2, and 3 Open Houses, Meetings, Workshops, and Public Hearings Number of Attendees Goals 1, 2, and 3 Newspaper Advertisements Sign-in sheets How did you hear about this meeting? Goals 1, 2, and 3 Direct Mailings Distribution Goals 1, 2, and 3 Press Releases Press Mentions Goals 1, 2, and 3 Surveys Number of Responses Goals 1, 2, and 3 Facebook Likes Total Daily Reach Total Daily Impressions Goals 1, 2, and 3 Twitter Followers Impressions Retweets Likes Goal 2 Instagram Followers Goal 2 YouTube No measure required Goals 1, 2, and 3 Webstreaming Number of people watching Goal 5 Attend Partner Agency Events Number of Events In addition to the measures listed above, the MPO will provide meeting evaluation forms at public meetings, workshops, and hearings to collect qualitative feedback from participants that can be used to improve meeting processes for future events. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 19

150 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 150 of 178 Revisions and Amendments This Public Participation Plan reflects the current policies of the Alamo Area MPO. At a minimum, these policies will be reviewed, revised if necessary and adopted every three (3) years. Administrative amendments to the PPP include changes to the public involvement tools and strategies, revision of references to applicable regulations, misspellings, omissions or typographical errors. Staff performs these updates, with no notification required. Amendments to the Participation Plan include any other changes that do not fit the administrative definition above. A two-step process and 45 days of public comment are required before adoption. If the document changes significantly due to public comments, an additional 45-day comment period is required. Development of a new Public Participation Plan follows a two-step process and requires a 45- day comment period. Enclosure 1: Sample Checklist for Planning an Accessible Meeting Enclosure 2: Limited English Proficiency Plan Enclosure 3: Social Media Plan Enclosure 4: Brand Standards Adopted: December 4, 2017 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy 2: Public Participation Plan 20

151 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 151 of Transportation Improvement Program APPENDIX G Policy 3: Guidelines for Programming Projects in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program 121

152 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 152 of 178 This page intentionally left blank. 122

153 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 153 of 178 Policy 3: Guidelines for Programming Projects in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program This document constitutes the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization s process for programming projects in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program. When considered for amendment, this document shall be subject to a public comment period of approximately 30 days prior to adoption by the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board. A. Purpose The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) develops a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that programs projects for a minimum of the following four (4) fiscal years. The TIP is forwarded to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for inclusion into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. The TIP project selection process begins with the long-range Metropolitan Transportation Plan process. The public is invited to fully participate in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan development process thus assisting in the selection and prioritization of transportation improvement projects. Implementing agencies which include the Alamo Area Council of Governments, Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, cities and counties within the MPO study area, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), and VIA Metropolitan Transit, participate in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan development process with one of the final products of the process being a prioritized list of transportation projects to be eventually considered for inclusion in the TIP. Projects in the TIP are either selected by the Transportation Policy Board in consultation with the State (TxDOT) and transit operator (VIA) or selected by the State (TxDOT) in cooperation with the MPO. Projects selected by the Transportation Policy Board are those that are to be funded with Surface Transportation Program - Metro Mobility (STP-MM), Transportation Alternatives (TA), Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ), and any other future U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) or TxDOT funds suballocated to the local level. B. Project Funding Categories Project funding categories in the TIP and MTP include but are not limited to: Category 1 Preventative Maintenance & Rehabilitation Category 2 Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects Category 3 Non-Traditional Funding Category 4 Statewide Connectivity Corridor Category 5 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) 1 Category 6 Structure Rehabilitation 1 The Alamo Area MPO does not currently receive this type of funding. 5

154 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 154 of 178 Category 7 Surface Transportation Program Metro Mobility or STP-MM Category 8 Safety Category 9 Transportation Alternatives Category 10 Miscellaneous Category 11 District Discretionary Category 12 Strategic Priority Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 (Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5309 (Capital Grant Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 (Elderly and Disabled Transportation Assistance Grant Program) Federal Transit Administration Section 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program) C. Use of Grouped Control Section Job (CSJ) Numbers A CSJ (Control Section Job number) is an identifying project number used by the Texas Department of Transportation. The MPO will use Grouped CSJs for the following types of projects: Preliminary Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Railroad Grade Separations Safety Landscaping Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Rest Areas and Truck Weigh Stations Transit Improvements Projects that fall within these categories will be listed in an appendix of the Transportation Improvement Program. Generally these Grouped CSJs will be used for projects funded under Category 1 (Preventive Maintenance & Rehabilitation), Category 6 (Structure Rehabilitation), Category 8 (Safety), and Category 10 (Miscellaneous). These projects are initially included in an Appendix of a new TIP and are revised or amended administratively as allowed in Section G Administrative Revisions. Grouped CSJs will not be used for wholly or partially funded Category 2 (Metropolitan and Urban Corridor), Category 5 (CMAQ, when allocated), Category 7 (STP-MM), or Category 9 (Transportation Alternatives) projects. 6

155 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 155 of 178 D. Use of Appendix D - Projects Undergoing Environmental Assessment The purpose of Appendix D is to identify projects that are undergoing preliminary engineering and environmental analysis (PE/EA) consistent with early project development. The Federal Highway Administration allows these projects to be referenced in the current Transportation Improvement Program in order to facilitate the feasibility and PE/EA phases. This Appendix contains projects that are scheduled for implementation beyond the four years of the TIP time frame, and it in no way implies that these projects are programmed in the TIP. Cost estimates are preliminary and do not represent any commitment of construction funding. Consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan will be verified as alternatives are examined in studies or environmental clearance efforts. Projects listed in Appendix D will include, at a minimum, MPO ID number, county, sponsoring entity, street name, project limits, project description, estimated let date and preliminary project cost. E. Quarterly Review of Projects Category 2 (Metropolitan and Urban Corridor) Projects The implementing agency will submit amendments to the Category 2 (Metropolitan and Urban Corridor) projects to the MPO in writing. For cost increases greater than 10%, the implementing agency will also submit to the MPO justification for the cost increase and the funding source of the additional amount. For new projects being amended into the TIP that are not part of the current Unified Transportation Program, the implementing agency will also submit to the MPO which other Category 2 projects are being amended to allow for the inclusion of the new project unless the new projects are funded using additional allocation. Category 7 (STP-MM) and Category 9 (TA) Projects Every three (3) months, a detailed review of Category 7 (STP-MM) and Category 9 (TA) funded projects in the TIP will be conducted. These projects will be reviewed for progress towards their letting (contract) dates, cost estimates, description and limits. If warranted by the detailed review, projects may be re-prioritized at the discretion of the Transportation Policy Board. If the quarterly review warrants amendment(s) to the TIP, such amendment(s) will be presented to the Transportation Policy Board for consideration in sufficient time to allow the amendment(s) to be incorporated into the next regularly scheduled quarterly amendment of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. 7

156 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 156 of 178 F. Amendment Process The following changes will require an amendment to the TIP and MTP: Adding or deleting project(s) Revising the project scope of work Revising the project cost Revising funding categories Revising the phase of work (ex: from P.E. to construction) Revising project limits Amendments to the TIP and MTP require a two-step process. To permit adequate public review and comment, amendments to the TIP and MTP will be presented at a Transportation Policy Board meeting with action on the amendment occurring at the following Transportation Policy Board meeting (approximately 30 days after initial presentation). TIP and MTP amendments are provided in the meeting package which is posted on the MPOs website a week prior to TAC and TPB meetings. Amendments to both the TIP and the MTP may be initiated concurrently. Amendments to the TIP or the MTP requiring quick action due to impending federal or state requirements or deadlines (or for other reasons deemed in the community's best interest) may be accomplished by a 75% vote of the TPB quorum present to waive the routine two-step process. In these cases, the Transportation Policy Board will hold a special public hearing within their normal meeting agenda to specifically solicit public comment on the proposed TIP or MTP amendment. These actions will be emphasized on the meeting agenda that is both mailed and e- mailed out ten (10) days prior to the Transportation Policy Board meeting. This will alert the public and permit special attendance to comment on the action prior to adoption by the Transportation Policy Board. Governing bodies of the sponsoring agencies will promptly notify the MPO in writing of any currently programmed projects that are proposed to be deleted from the TIP. The governing body of the sponsoring agency shall state its preference for project replacement in the written notification. The Transportation Policy Board will provide direction and/or may consider action at the next appropriate meeting with respect to amending the TIP. To the extent possible, any project amended outside the timeframe of the current TIP due to funding limitations will have priority consideration in being amended back into the TIP when additional funding becomes available. G. Administrative Revisions The MPO Director is authorized to approve certain administrative changes to the TIP with the notification of such to the appropriate transportation planning partners. The intent of this section is not to circumvent the public process for amending the TIP, but to allow for minor corrections to the TIP that do not materially change a project s function including minor revisions to project limits, scope or cost. 8

157 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 157 of 178 H. Category 7 (STP-MM) Projects Basic Requirements for STP-MM Projects All projects submitted for consideration for funding through normal Category 7 (STP-MM) program allocations will compete through a standard project call when a new TIP is being developed. The Transportation Policy Board will approve a schedule, parameters and project selection criteria prior to the formal project call. Submitted projects must meet the following basic requirements: 1. Projects will be submitted to the MPO through an implementing agency (Alamo Area Council of Governments, Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, Texas Department of Transportation, VIA Metropolitan Transit and cities and counties within the MPO Study Area) and appropriate commitments of local match shall be made. Approval of the commitment of the local match from the Texas Department of Transportation District Engineer or the policy body of the local agency submitting the project for consideration will be obtained and submitted to the MPO. An in-kind match is not allowed for construction projects. 2. All submitted projects shall be developed in accordance with minimum standards as defined by AASHTO and/or NACTO, as applicable. 3. Each implementing agency is encouraged to address Title VI and Environmental Justice considerations in submitting projects to the MPO for consideration. 4. Agencies should consider the transit service area when submitting projects. 5. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be included in all future transportation improvement projects. Any exceptions will need to be adequately justified by management of the implementing entity. Bicycle and pedestrian components included in a funded project may not be deleted from the project at a future date. 6. Funded STP-MM projects will also be included in the MTP. Note: Amendments to the MTP and the TIP are made through the amendment process at the discretion of the Transportation Policy Board. Amendments to the MTP and TIP, can be made simultaneously. 7. A roadway project submitted for consideration in the TIP must be on a functionally classified facility as defined by the MPO and approved by Federal Highway Administration through the State. Roadway projects on facilities classified as a local street or minor collector do NOT qualify for Federal funding. 8. All deadlines set by the MPO are firm. 9

158 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 158 of 178 STP-MM Call for Projects Process Prior to each STP-MM project call, MPO staff will develop the schedule, submittal form and call for projects process, to include workshop(s) jointly hosted by the MPO and TxDOT. These items will be reviewed and acted upon by the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC), Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC), and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with final action by the Transportation Policy Board. MPO staff will be responsible for assembling data for the technical scoring process. A subcommittee of BMAC and PMAC will score standalone bicycle and pedestrian projects. A subcommittee of TAC will score added capacity and operational projects. STP-MM Project Selection The TAC will review the technical scoring, public input, project readiness and agency priorities and make a recommendation to the MPO s Executive Committee on a slate of projects to be funded. The Executive Committee will make a recommendation to the Transportation Policy Board. The TAC may request presentations by implementing agencies. STP-MM Project Implementation 1. Unless allocated a fixed amount, each STP-MM project will have a cost figure in the approved TIP that is an estimate. This TIP Estimated Construction Bid shall include all construction costs at 100% and shall designate what percent match is required by the local agency. Estimated Construction Bid is defined as all anticipated bid item costs of the improvement project, other than for right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation or betterment, preliminary engineering, environmental analysis/clearance, contingency, change orders and construction engineering. The amount programmed as the Construction Cost in the TIP shall equal the Estimated Construction Bid. 2. Unless allocated a fixed amount, each selected STP-MM project may be adjusted when bids are approved. a. If bids are higher than the TIP Construction Cost, the TIP estimate shall become a fixed construction funding cap. b. If the Approved Construction Bid is lower than the TIP Construction Cost, the TIP shall be administratively revised by MPO staff to reflect the approved Construction bid (excludes any right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation or betterment, preliminary engineering, environmental analysis/clearance, contingency, and construction engineering) 10

159 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 159 of 178 c. Following the establishment of the project construction amount in items 2a and 2b above, the sponsoring entity is then eligible for up to 10% contingency of STP-MM project funding towards eligible change orders and up to 11% of STP-MM project funding towards eligible construction engineering and construction management costs. An under run in contingency cannot cover an over run in construction engineering/construction management and vice versa. As these eligible change orders and eligible construction engineering costs are potential costs, they are not specifically programmed in the TIP towards the STP- MM. These costs, if incurred, would impact future fiscal allocations and it must be acknowledged that this could require the delay and/or re-scoping of existing TIP projects to remain fiscally constrained by fiscal year. 3. Once a project is included in the TIP, TxDOT and the local governmental entity (implementing agency) shall execute a Funding Agreement. a. Prior to letting, the executed Funding Agreement will be based on the Estimated Construction Bid (identified as Construction Cost in the TIP) and reflect: Estimated Construction Bid + maximum 10% contingency of STP-MM project funding for eligible change orders + maximum 11% of STP-MM funding for eligible construction engineering and construction management costs. b. Post Letting, if the Approved Construction Bid (excluding any right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation or betterment, preliminary engineering, environmental analysis/clearance, contingency, and construction engineering) is lower than the TIP Construction Cost, the Funding Agreement will be amended and re-executed to reflect: Approved Construction Bid + maximum 10% contingency of STP-MM project funding for eligible change orders + maximum 11% of STP-MM funding for eligible construction engineering and construction management costs. 4. Owner requested change orders will be covered 100% by the local agency. Owner requested change orders are the result of changes requested by the local agency, not included in the original TPB approved scope of work. I. Category 9 (TA) Projects Basic Requirements for TA Projects The MPO will hold a competitive call for projects for TA funding. The Transportation Policy Board will approve a schedule, parameters and project selection criteria prior to the formal project call. Submitted projects must meet the following basic requirements: 11

160 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 160 of Projects will be submitted to the MPO through an implementing agency and appropriate commitments of local match shall be made. Approval of the commitment of the local match from the agency submitting the project for consideration will be obtained and submitted to the MPO. An in-kind match is not allowed for construction projects. 2. All submitted projects shall be developed in accordance with minimum standards as defined by AASHTO and/or NACTO, as applicable. 3. Each implementing agency is encouraged to address Title VI and Environmental Justice considerations in submitting projects to the MPO for consideration. 4. Agencies should consider the transit service area when submitting projects. 5. Funded TA projects will also be included in the MTP. Note: Amendments to the MTP and the TIP are made through the amendment process at the discretion of the Transportation Policy Board. Amendments to the MTP and TIP, can be made simultaneously. 6. All deadlines set by the MPO are firm. TA Call for Projects Process Prior to each TA project call, MPO staff will develop the schedule, submittal form and call for projects process. These items will be reviewed and acted upon by the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC), Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC), and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with final action by the Transportation Policy Board. MPO staff will be responsible for assembling data for the technical scoring process. A subcommittee of BMAC and PMAC will score TA projects. TA Project Selection BMAC and PMAC will review the technical scoring, public input, project readiness and agency priorities and make a recommendation to the Technical Advisory Committee on a slate of projects to be funded. The TAC may request project presentations by implementing agencies and will make a recommendation to the MPO s Executive or Transportation Policy Board, as directed by the approved call for projects process. 12

161 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 161 of 178 J. Public Involvement The MPO commits to a public involvement process that includes the provision of timely information, provides reasonable public access to technical and policy information, provides adequate public notice, seeks out and considers traditionally underserved populations, and documents significant comments. Please see the MPO Policy 2: Public Participation Plan for additional information on public involvement. Adopted: December 4,

162 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 162 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee April 9, 2018 c. Action on Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan In order to keep the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and TIP consistent, revisions to projects and new projects added to the TIP will also need to be made to the MTP. All new or revised roadway and transit projects considered under agenda items 5a and 5b will be incorporated into the TIP and MTP under this agenda item. Action Requested A motion to approve the projects approved in agenda items 5a and 5b into the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.

163 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 163 of 178 Technical Advisory Committee April 9, 2018 d. Discussion on Lessons Learned from the STP-MM Call for Projects in Development of the Transportation Improvement Program The MPO desires to continually improve its planning and programming processes. To improve the process for developing the FY TIP, TAC members should consider the processes used in the development of the TIP and provide recommendations to the MPO. The following information is attached: TIP development schedule Call for projects information Submittal form Technical scoring criteria Public outreach forms We will also revisit this item in the February-March 2019 timeframe. Action Requested Discussion will determine any action to be taken.

164 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 164 of 178 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program Agency Call for Surface Transportation Program Metro Mobility (STP-MM) Project Funding March 27, 2017: April 2017: May 22, 2017: June 1, 2017: July 26, 2017: June - November 2017: December 4, 2017: January 2018: February 2018: March 2018: April 2018: May 1, 2018: Announce at the Transportation Policy Board meeting that the MPO will hold an agency call for projects to be funded under the STP-MM Program Presentation to the MPO s Committees on the draft TIP process and schedule April 7, 2017: Technical Advisory Committee April 12, 2017: Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee April 19, 2017: Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee April 24, 2017: Transportation Policy Board Action by the Transportation Policy Board on the TIP process Agency call for projects begins Two workshops (9:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.) similar in content and format were held at the MPO Office to provide information and support to agencies submitting projects Agency project development and secure local match Agency project submittals and commitment of local match were due to the MPO Subcommittees of the Technical Advisory Committee, Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee and Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee scored submitted projects as appropriate MPO hosts public meetings/workshops/online input Review of the TIP March 9, 2018: Technical Advisory Committee March 26, 2018: Transportation Policy Board (action on STP- MM funded projects) Approval of the TIP April 6, 2018: Technical Advisory Committee April 23, 2018: Transportation Policy Board Deadline for transmittal of the TIP to TxDOT This information is subject to change. It is the submitting agency s responsibility to visit the MPO s website at for updated information.

165 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 165 of 178 DRAF DRA Memorandum June 1, 2017 To: From: Subject: Our Partners in Transportation Planning Isidro (Sid) Martinez, Director Notification of the Transportation Improvement Program Surface Transportation Program Metro Mobility Funding Call for Projects The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has issued a call for Surface Transportation Program Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) funded projects to implementing agencies in support of the development of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The MPO Transportation Policy Board selects the projects that will be funded under this source of funds. Program Overview STP-MM funding is a federal funding source allocated by formula to MPO s with a population greater than 200,000. This is not a grant program. The STP-MM funds are on a reimbursable basis only and all federal rules apply. The development of the TIP is a process by which federal transportation funds are allocated to major road, street, highway, bicycle, pedestrian, public transportation, and other projects. The Alamo Area MPO Study Area includes all of Bexar, Comal, and Guadalupe Counties and a portion of Kendall County. Contingent upon the availability of federal funding, the total amount of STP-MM funds available for this project call is estimated at $127,000,000. Eligible Transportation Projects Projects submitted for STP-MM funding consideration will be grouped into the following five (5) categories for evaluation purposes: Added Capacity roadway projects are projects which add through travel lanes for vehicles. These projects are to also include new or replacement bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 1

166 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 166 of 178 Operational projects are projects which improve the operational function of a facility without adding through travel lanes. Examples include, but are not limited to, improving intersections to add right or left turn lanes; adding a center turn lane; adding acceleration or deceleration lanes; constructing a roundabout; adding or improving intersection signalization; reconfiguring travel lanes for a multi-modal shift; constructing new or reversing highway entrance and exit ramps; converting frontage road from two way to one way; implementing Intelligent Transportation System projects; or constructing interchanges. Stand alone Bicycle projects are projects which construct, reconstruct or upgrade public bicycle facilities. Stand alone Pedestrian projects are projects which construct, reconstruct or upgrade public pedestrian facilities. Other projects do not fall into the categories listed above and examples include public transit projects, the Alamo Area Commute Solutions Program and major planning studies. Program Requirements 1. Transportation projects submitted for funding consideration must have a minimum construction cost of $1,000, Added capacity and operational projects on federally functionally classified roadways are eligible for federal funding. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities and multi-use paths, as examples, do not need to be on federally functionally classified roadways to be eligible for funding. 3. For infrastructure projects: only eligible items related to construction will be reimbursable; all project development costs (design, engineering, utility relocation and right of way acquisition, as examples) are the responsibility of the implementing agency. 4. A minimum 20% cash match on the project construction cost is required. An inkind match is not allowed. 5. Although the MPO makes all funding decisions associated with STP-MM funds, TxDOT is the federally designated pass-through agency for this funding source. Entities awarded funding will enter into agreement with TxDOT. TxDOT will require reimbursement of their costs for review and coordination of the project. 6. Implementing agencies (entities with which TxDOT is able to legally enter into a financial agreement such as cities, counties, regional mobility authorities, river authorities, and independent school districts) will be required to sign the project 2

167 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 167 of 178 understanding form and submit it along with the project submittal form and other supporting documents. 7. If an implementing agency submits more than one project, the MPO requires the implementing agency to prioritize their projects. TxDOT occasionally works with other entities to submit on-system projects within an entity such as a municipality. These projects will be grouped and prioritized by each individual entity. 8. The projects selected for funding will be placed in fiscal year 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, or 2024 of the TIP and / or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). 9. The implementing agency commits to developing and letting selected projects within one year of the year in which the projects are initially placed in the Transportation Improvement Program Project Submittal One project submittal form is required for each project being submitted. The project submittal form is an Excel spreadsheet and is intended to be one 8 ½ x 11 page only. Agencies should only include information within the allowed spreadsheet cells of the submittal form (in the shaded areas only) and should not overwrite any formulas. The project submittal package consisting of: Project submittal form Project location map showing adjacent land use Detailed cost estimate Typical cross sections for the submitted project Signed project understanding form Implementing agency resolution of support for the project and commitment of local match and overmatch (if applicable) of project Additional resolutions of support, if desired can be ed by the stated deadline to geiger@alamoareampo.org, delivered in person to the MPO Office located at 825 South St. Mary s Street, San Antonio, Texas, 78205, or mailed to the same address. Project Scoring Since the MPO is expecting more projects will be submitted than there is funding available, the project scoring procedure for STP-MM funds consists of the following steps: 3

168 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 168 of 178 Projects submitted will be evaluated and technically scored by work groups of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee (BMAC) and the Pedestrian Mobility Advisory Committee (PMAC), as appropriate, based on the adopted criteria. Each percentage category identified below may have its own range of points based on more detailed scoring criteria. The scoring system is based on a 1,000 point system with additional points being awarded for providing additional local contribution (beyond the required 20% local match) towards the construction cost of a project. Added Capacity Roadway Projects 40% Congestion (using existing or base year volume/capacity ratio, projected 2040 {or 2045} volume/capacity ratio, if the project is on the Congestion Management System) 20% Cost of project per 2040 {or 2045} vehicle miles of travel ($/VMT) 10% Considers safety 10% Supports the adopted long range plan growth scenario 10% Includes safe pedestrian facilities 10% Includes safe bicycle facilities +50 points for providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project, or +100 points for providing additional local contribution of more than 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project. Operational Improvement Projects 45% Operational/Multimodal improvement 15% Cost of project per vehicle miles of travel ($/VMT) 25% Considers safety 10% Supports the adopted long range plan growth scenario 5% Supports safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities +50 points for providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project, or +100 points for providing additional local contribution of more than 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project. 4

169 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 169 of 178 Stand Alone Bicycle Projects 40% Considers safety 60% Improves accessibility and mobility +50 points for providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project, or +100 points for providing additional local contribution of more than 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project. Stand Alone Pedestrian Projects 30% Considers safety 30% Serves high demand pedestrian generators 20% Completes a sidewalk or replaces a substandard sidewalk 10% Supported by a Walkable Community Workshop, existing adopted plan, or uses strategies outlined in the Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 10% Incorporates pedestrian design enhancements +50 points for providing additional local contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project, or +100 points for providing additional local contribution of more than 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project. Note: A multiuse path will be scored as both a stand alone bicycle project and a stand alone pedestrian project and the higher of the two scores will be used throughout the process. Other Projects Due to the nature of these projects, scoring criteria is not being specified and these projects will not be scored. 5

170 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 170 of 178 Public Involvement Process The MPO believes in the proactive involvement of citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties in the development and updates of transportation plans and programs. The MPO commits to public outreach that meets or exceeds its adopted Public Participation Plan. In addition to public meetings, an online public input opportunity will also be available. Project Selection Process The Technical Advisory Committee will develop an initial funding recommendation that will be considered by the MPO s Executive Committee. The Technical Advisory Committee will consider the implementing agency s priorities, project readiness, public input and technical score. When developing the funding recommendation, the Technical Advisory Committee may also set thresholds for technical scores, public support, implementing agency priorities and project readiness. In addition to the funding recommendation, all submitted projects will be presented to the Executive Committee and Transportation Policy Board and will include technical score, public comments, implementing agency priorities, and additional notations. The Executive Committee will forward a recommendation on to the Transportation Policy Board. The Transportation Policy Board will select the STP-MM funded projects for inclusion in the TIP and MTP. This information and other resource documents are also available on the MPO s website at It is the responsibility of the implementing agencies to visit the MPO s website regularly for any updated information on the project call. For additional assistance, please contact Jeanne Geiger at or at geiger@alamoareampo.org. 6

171 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 171 of 178 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Progam Surface Transportation Program - Metro Mobility Funding Project Submittal Form Please complete the shaded portions only and do not exceed the space provided: Submitting agency: Contact person name, e- mail and phone number: Project/Roadway name: Limits from: Description of work: Limits to: Project length: 0.00 Miles 0 Feet Federal functional classification: Eligible project category: Project justification: Agency overall priority: Agency category priority: Construction/Activity Cost Information Note: all project development costs and cost overruns are the implementing agency's responsibility Project construction/activity cost from itemized cost estimate: Additional local contribution Percent: #DIV/0! Project construction/activity cost minus additional contribution: Federal Amount (80%): Local Match (20% required): Local match source: Add'l local contribution source: Bicycle component costs: Pedestrian component costs: What adopted plans and/or policies does this project help to implement? Does the implementing agency have an adopted ADA Transition Plan? (for informational purposes only) 10 Has the implementing agency previously successfully completed an MPO project? Known environmental issues: Known drainage and utility issues and requirements: For construction projects: Please include a project location map with adjacent land uses shown, a typical cross section for the submitted project, an itemized project cost estimate, signed project understanding form, and commitment of local match (and additional local contribution, if appropriate) with this submittal form.

172 Added Capacity Projects April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 172 of % Congestion 400 points Year 2015 Base Year Volume/Capacity Ratio points Difference in Year 2040 Build and 2015 Base Year Volume/Capacity Ration higher numbers get - 50 higher scores - 25 Is the segment on the Congestion Management System? 100 points 100 points Yes 100 No 0 Other 50 20% Cost of project per Year 2040 "Build" Vehicle Miles of Travel 200 points 200 lower numbers get higher scores 10% Safety Benefit (crashes per million vehicle miles) 100 points Crash rates % Supports adopted plans, policies or projects 100 points Yes 100 No 0 10% Safe Bicycle Facilities 100 points Facility type Off-road paved facility 100 Protected bike lane 100 Buffered bicycle lane 75 Conventional bicycle lane 50 Improved shoulder >8' 50 Improved shoulder 4'-8' 25 Shared lane w/ signage & pavement markings 25 No bicycle facilities 0 Other: varies based on committee discussion Varies 10% Safe Pedestrian Facilities 100 points Total Facility type 100 Off Road Paved Facility 100 Buffered Sidewalk 75 Sidewalk 50 No pedestrian facilities points +50 points for providing additional contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project, or +100 points for providing additional contribution of more than 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project

173 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 173 of 178 Operational Improvement Projects 45% Type of Operational Improvement 450 points improvement provides regional benefits improvement provides corridor benefits improvement provides subarea benefits improvement provides local benefits % Supports adopted plans, policies or projects 100 points Yes 100 No 0 35% Safety benefit (crashes per million vehicle miles) 350 points Crash Rates Project supports safe bicycle/pedestrian facilities Yes 100 No 0 10% Year 2040 Volume/Capacity Ratio 100 points Systemwide Projects 100 higher numbers get higher scores Total 1000 points

174 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 174 of 178 Stand Alone Bicycle Projects Considers safety (40%) total of 400 points Total number of bicycle crashes over the past three years High Number 100 Low Number points Facility type <25 mph and <0.6 V/C mph and <0.6 V/C >35 mph and >0.6 V/C Facility type Off-road paved facility Protected bike lane Buffered bicycle lane Conventional bicycle lane Improved Shoulder Shared lane w/ signage and pavement markings No bicycle facilities Other: points vary based on committee discussion Varies Varies Varies 300 points Improves accessibility and mobility (6 total of 600 points Distance of the proposed project from transit service less than 1/4 miles 100 1/4 to 1/2 mile 75 1/2 mile to 1 mile 50 greater than 1 mile 25 Projects in Comal, Guadalupe and Kendall Counties 100 Building the network Supports agency plan, program or policy 100 AAMPO Walkable Community Workshop 75 Not suported by a plan 50 Connectivity to other existing bicycle facilities Yes 100 No points 100 points 100 points Does the project further the multi-modal function of the corridor? Completes it: (already has transit, sidewalks, auto) Increases it: (has some but not all components) points Reach of Project (Based on Strava data) High 100 Low 50 Is a school on the project route? Yes 100 No 50 Total 100 points 100 points 1000 points +50 points for providing additional contribution of 5% to 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the construction cost of a project +100 points for providing additional contribution of more than 10% beyond the required 20% local match towards the

175 April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 175 of 178 Stand Alone Pedestrian Projects 40% Improves pedestrian safety 400 points Posted speed limit 45+ mph mph 20 < 30 mph 10 Adjacent roadway width 6+ lane roadway 40 6 lane roadway lane roadway lane roadway 20 Existing proximity to moving traffic Directly adjacent 40 Any buffer available 20 Existing worn foot path Yes 40 Yes - on alternate parallel facility (for off-road trails) 30 No 20 Adjacent vehicle volumes High 40 Medium 20 Low 10 A school is on the project route Yes 100 No 50 Total number of pedestrian crashes over the last 3 years High 100 Low 50 30% Serves high demand pedestrian generators 300 points More than four types of active transportation generators 300 ex: parks, schools, libraries, Four types of active transportation generators 250 transit, subdivision/neighborhood, apartments, Three types of active transportation generators 200 office, restaurants, Two types of active transportaton generators 100 theaters, community Fewer than two types of active transporation generators 50 centers 20% Completes a sidewalk gap or replaces a substandard sidewalk 200 points Completes a sidewalk gap 100 Replaces a substandard sidewalk 100 Reduces gap 50 10% Consistency with Local and Regional Plans, Programs and Policies 100 points Yes 100 No 50 Total 1000 points

176 Pick your top four projects April 6, 2018 AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Package: Page 176 of 178 Name: Zip Code: Date: (Optional) A Project # Project Name B Project # Project Name How will this transportation project benefit the region? What problems would this project address for you? How will this transportation project benefit the region? What problems would this project address for you? General Comments:

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories This page left blank intentionally. Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E E 3 Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Highway Programs

More information

Memorandum June 1, 2017

Memorandum June 1, 2017 DRAF DRA Memandum June 1, 2017 To: From: Subject: Our Partners in Transptation Planning Isidro (Sid) Martinez, Direct Notification of the FY 2019-2022 Transptation Improvement Program Surface Transptation

More information

RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)

RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) TPC Agenda Item 6A Mailout 10/20/16 RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE 2017-2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) Amendment Summary Amendment

More information

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 SUMMARY OF THE ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) submitted the Generating Renewal, Opportunity, and Work with Accelerated Mobility, Efficiency,

More information

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2015-2018 Calvert County Planning Commission St. Mary s County Department of County Services Plaza

More information

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN 0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN GENERAL The City of Tyler currently serves as the fiscal agent for the Tyler Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which represents the Tyler Metropolitan Study Area.

More information

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects This document is available in accessible formats when requested five days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization and is prepared in cooperation

More information

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2019 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2019 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly. Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2019 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly. We will take questions after the presentation, however, you may enter questions

More information

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Regional Transportation Commission TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Contents 1.0 Purpose and Eligibility... 2 2.0 Process... 5 3.0 Implementation of Funded Projects... 5 Attachment

More information

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds

More information

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 University Park, Suite N. IH 35, Austin, Texas :00 p.m.

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 University Park, Suite N. IH 35, Austin, Texas :00 p.m. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 University Park, Suite 300 3300 N. IH 35, Austin, Texas 78705 2:00 p.m. AGENDA ACTION: 1. Certification of Quorum Quorum requirement is 13

More information

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

FFY Transportation Improvement Program Lawton Metropolitan Planning Organization DRAFT FFY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program Approved, 2017 The Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated

More information

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S T A T E W I D E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M S T I P 2 015201 8 YOAKUM DISTRICT 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 T I P T R A N S I T I n i t i a l

More information

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA Catherine McCreight, MBA Senior Transportation Planner Texas Department of Transportation - Houston District Houston-Galveston Area Council Bringing

More information

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region Connie Kozlak Metropolitan Transportation Services Mark Fuhrmann Metro Transit Ed Petrie Metro Transit Metropolitan Council

More information

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan (2018-2028) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION Halff Staff Matt Bucchin, AICP, LEED-GA Director of Planning Josh Donaldson, AICP Planner / Landscape Designer

More information

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program Overview of the 2017-2020 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Table of Contents What is the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)?... 1 What is the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)?... 1

More information

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects 2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects Regional Solicitation Workshop April 17 2018 Regional Solicitation Purpose To distribute federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP)

More information

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY AMARILLO DISTRICT. AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY AMARILLO DISTRICT. AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 AMARILLO DISTRICT AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions 8-01-2009 MINUTES AMARILLO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

More information

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources Appendix I. Funding Sources FUNDING SOURCES planning and related efforts can be funded through a variety of local, state, and federal sources. However, these revenues have many guidelines in terms of how

More information

OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FHWA Virginia Division/FTA Region III Review Documentation in support of the FHWA/FTA PLANNING FINDING and approval of the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT

More information

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly. Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly. We will take questions after the presentation, however, you may enter questions

More information

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs 5. Chapter Heading Appendix 5 Freight Programs Table of Contents 4.1 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG);... 5-1 4.2 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Discretionary Grant Program

More information

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding

More information

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011 Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011 What is a New or Small Start? New fixed guideways and extensions to existing systems Includes light rail, heavy rail, commuter

More information

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Title VI: Public Participation Plan Whatcom Council of Governments Public Participation Plan Adopted October 14, 2009 Updated November 12, 2014 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 East Champion Street Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 676 6974 Whatcom

More information

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program () for the Houston-Galveston Metropolitan Planning Area PUBLIC MEETING DATE OF THE 2017-2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT

More information

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon Every profession has its own acronyms and jargon. The shorthand wording makes it easier and quicker for professionals in any given field to communicate

More information

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY MOVE LV Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY Services PLANNING DATA + ANALYSIS EDUCATION PROJECTS + LAWS FUNDING Federal Government State Government Regional

More information

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan A Partnership Among the City of Coolidge, Town of Florence, and ADOT FINAL REPORT Kimley-Horn Kimley Kimley-Horn and and Associates, Associates, Inc. Inc.

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018 DATE: July 5, 2018 SUBJECT: Approval to Submit Applications to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the 2018 SMART SCALE Program

More information

Puget Sound Gateway Program

Puget Sound Gateway Program Puget Sound Gateway Program SR 167 Completion Project Tacoma Transportation Commission April 18, 2018 THOMAS SLIMAK, PE SR 167 ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER Agenda Puget Sound Gateway Program Overview Program

More information

Funding the plan. STBG - This program is designed to address specific issues

Funding the plan. STBG - This program is designed to address specific issues Iowa DNR Solid Waste Alternatives Program USDA Rural Development Solid Waste Grants Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Water Quality

More information

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT FY 2013-2016 STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT HIGHWAY May 2013 Approved 4/08/2013 FYs 2013-2016 TIP Amendment Project Description 1 2 3 4 5 6

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area FFY 2015-2016 Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area A Grant Program of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) U.S. Department of Transportation

More information

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 2017 Educational Series PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Federal and state law both require the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to support and promote public transportation

More information

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Amarillo District May FY 2010 Quarterly Revisions

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Amarillo District May FY 2010 Quarterly Revisions STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 Amarillo District May FY 2010 Quarterly Revisions 5-2010 MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2010 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PAGE: 1 OF 1 11:21:55

More information

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region The Prospectus Transportation Planning in the Denver Region TAC Draft (as of June 16, 2011) Approved December 2004 Revised November 2006 Revised August 2007 Revised March 2009 Revised 2011 Key revisions

More information

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects SMART SCALE is a statewide program that distributes funding based on a transparent and objective evaluation of projects that will determine how effectively they help the state achieve its transportation

More information

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act August 18, 2016 www.t4america.org @t4america Today s Presenter Joe McAndrew Policy Director Transportation for America joe.mcandrew@t4america.org 202-955-5543 x

More information

Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018

Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018 Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018 Adopted: June 29, 2017 Prepared by the Greater Dalton Metropolitan Planning Organization In cooperation with the Georgia Department of Transportation Federal Highway

More information

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS 9. REVENUE SOURCES This Chapter summarizes multimodal revenue sources and estimates that are applicable to the City of Coolidge and the Town of Florence, together with financial constraints and opportunities

More information

San Angelo Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Advisory Committee. San Angelo Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board

San Angelo Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Advisory Committee. San Angelo Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board San Angelo Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board *Brenda Gunter, Chairman City of San Angelo *Steve Floyd Tom Green County Daniel Valenzuela City of San Angelo John DeWitt TxDOT Mark Jones TxDOT

More information

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process 2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process Available Funding: (In Millions) CMAQ STP Preservation TOTAL 2021 2022 2021 2022 2021 2022 Regional $14.27 (project cap)$7.13 Countywide $2.41 (project cap)$1.2

More information

MEMORANDUM July 17, 2017

MEMORANDUM July 17, 2017 MEMORANDUM July 17, 2017 To: From: Subject: Proposers Jeanne Geiger, Deputy Director Request for Proposals The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is seeking proposals from qualified firms

More information

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017 2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017 What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)? Long-range transportation plan for the region Required under state and

More information

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region A Guide to Transportation Decision Making In the Kansas City region 2 Guide to Transportation Decision Making Table of Contents Purpose of guide...4 MARC s planning role...5 What is transportation decision

More information

LPA Programs How They Work

LPA Programs How They Work LPA Programs How They Work Ann Wills, P.E. Transportation Engineering Conference 2018 www.dotd.la.gov Requirements For ALL LPA Projects 1. Risk Assessment 2. Entity-State Agreement 3. Responsible Charge

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2013

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2013 Kankakee Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Committee Paul Schore, Chairman Mayor Village of Bourbonnais Nina Epstein, Vice-Chairman Mayor City of Kankakee Bruce Adams, Mayor Village of Bradley

More information

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002 TPB SR22-2017 May 5, 2017 RESOLUTION ON AN AMENDMENT TO THE FY 2017-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT

More information

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT Background As the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for Greater Kansas City, MARC is responsible for facilitating the development of long-range transportation

More information

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016 Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation September 2016 SMART SCALE Safety Factors Evaluation 1. Using Crash Modification Factors for SMART SCALE Safety Evaluation

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018 Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018 Introduction The Region 1 Planning Council, in its capacity as the Metropolitan Planning

More information

The CAMPO FY

The CAMPO FY The CAMPO FY 2008-2011 Transportation Improvement Program Adopted February 12, 2007 Amended October 8, 2007 Transportation Policy Board 1 Kirk Watson, Chair State Senator 2 Cynthia Long, Vice-Chair Williamson

More information

On May 21, the TPB approved

On May 21, the TPB approved TPBnews A Publication of the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Volume XXI, Issue 11 June 2014 Board Approves Transportation Alternatives Projects for Northern Virginia On May 21, the

More information

3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT

3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT Winchester-Frederick County MPO Policy Board Meeting Agenda Frederick County Administrative Offices - First Floor Conference Room 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, VA September 19, 2018-10:00 a.m. 1. ADMINISTRATIVE

More information

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by Development Services Transportation Division Adopted: Revisions Approved by: In cooperation with City Of Missoula County

More information

PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604

PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604 PUBLIC MEETING For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604 November 3, 2016 Welcome Thank you for participating in the Public Meeting for the proposed I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604 Project. The meeting is in an

More information

Summary Notes from the Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Full Summer Meeting

Summary Notes from the Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Full Summer Meeting Summary Notes from the Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Full Summer Meeting Residence Inn by Marriott Harlingen 109 Bass Pro Dr., Harlingen, TX 78552 Tuesday, July 18 WebEx Dial-in Number: 1-855-282-6330

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1 Article 19. Congestion Relief and Intermodal 21 st Century Transportation Fund. 136-250. Congestion Relief and Intermodal Transportation 21 st Century Fund. There is established in the State treasury the

More information

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County The transportation system serves Cambria County communities because people make decisions and take action toward the stated goals of the long-range transportation plan. Locally, these people include officials

More information

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018 Cass County Rural Task Force 2020-2023 Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018 The Southwest Michigan Planning Commission (SWMPC) is pleased to announce the Call for Projects for the Cass County

More information

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS 2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Background... 3 A. Policy Framework... 3 B. Development of the 2019-2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)..

More information

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES Revised and Approved May 25, 2017 Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study 806 CitiCenter 146 South High Street Akron, Ohio 44308 This document was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan

More information

TxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program

TxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program TxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program RANDY C. HOPMANN, P.E. DIRECTOR OF DISTRICT OPERATIONS TXAPA s 42nd Annual Meeting September 22, 2016 Highway Transportation in Texas: Today and Our Future

More information

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project ENTRANCE EXIT Registration & Handouts Comment Card Area Welcome Video Next Steps Project History Information Environmental Constraints & Study

More information

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities DATE: March 6, 2017 TO: FROM: ACTION TRANSMITTAL No. 2017-08 Transportation Advisory Board Technical Advisory Committee PREPARED

More information

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for 2012-2015 Part II: TIP Development and Project Selection Processes MPO Planning Process The NIRPC Board of Commissioners

More information

Contents. FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study

Contents. FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study KATS 5220 Lovers Lane, Suite 110 Portage, MI 49002 PHONE: (269) 343-0766 EMAIL: info@katsmpo.org WEB: www.katsmpo.org FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT FOR THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY December 2014 Contents

More information

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch THOMAS L. JOHNSON, Executive Vice President Texas Transportation Commission Meeting Highlights September 18 and 24, 2014 September 18 Commissioner

More information

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures Guidance Historical Studies Review Procedures This guidance document provides instructional material regarding how to review and process project activities in accordance with TxDOT s Section 106 of the

More information

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 ODESSA DISTRICT March 06 Out of Cycle Revisions 2009 Quarterly Revisions 3-03-2009 STIP REPORT: Transportation Improvement Program, Odessa District,

More information

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook 2018 Call for Projects Guidebook Project Selection for the NFRMPO CMAQ, STBG, and TA Programs in FY2022 and FY2023 October 8, 2018 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Section 1 - Call Overview... 2 1.1

More information

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY CITY OF "3 SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 11/29/16 ITEM: Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Barry Ng Jim Ortbal SUBJECT: 7652 - ST. JOHN STREET MULTI MODAL IMPROVEMENTS

More information

Sources of Funding Through MDOT Office of Economic Development

Sources of Funding Through MDOT Office of Economic Development Michael B. Kapp, Administrator Sources of Funding Through MDOT Office of Economic Development 2012 County Engineers Workshop February 15, 2012 OED Programs Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program Transportation

More information

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department 2 Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council 3 4 Transportation Improvement

More information

The Public Participation Plan in Transportation Decision Making

The Public Participation Plan in Transportation Decision Making The Public Participation Plan in Transportation Decision Making West Michigan Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program (WestPlan) Adopted: August 15, 2018 West Michigan Metropolitan Transportation

More information

Appendix B. Public Involvement

Appendix B. Public Involvement Appendix B. Public Involvement B-1 Overview The Pueblo Area Council of Governments (PACOG) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) was prepared through a process that relied on the participation of

More information

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0 Public Participation Plan By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)], from Wikimedia

More information

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

SMART SCALE Policy Guide What is SMART SCALE? Virginia s SMART SCALE ( 33.2 21.4) is about picking the right transportation projects for funding and ensuring the best use of limited tax dollars. It is the method of scoring planned

More information

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options Bicycle and pedestrian projects are broadly eligible for funding from nearly all major federal highway, transit, safety, and other programs. To be eligible

More information

Please complete your phone connection now:

Please complete your phone connection now: Today s seminar will begin shortly. Please complete your phone connection now: 1. Dial the toll free number: 1-866-275-3495. 2. Enter the meeting number *4671867* on your phone keypad. Enter the star (*)

More information

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20002-4290 (202) 962-3310 Fax: (202) 962-3202 Item #5 MEMORANDUM January 8, 2010 To: From:

More information

KANKAKEE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Public. Adopted by the Policy Committee June 24, 2009

KANKAKEE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Public. Adopted by the Policy Committee June 24, 2009 Kankakee Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Committee Paul Schore, Chairman Mayor Village of Bourbonnais Nina Epstein, Vice-Chairman Mayor City of Kankakee Bruce Adams, Mayor Village of Bradley

More information

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Environmental Services Solid Waste 4200 4200 06CON 4200 SWM01 Balance $13,753,504.00 Balance $4,631,754.00 Balance $2,738,918.00 ing Source Total: $21,124,176.00

More information

Transportation Improvement Program

Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Conformity Check List The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and all amendments must include a conformity report. The conformity report must address

More information

339 New Leicester Highway, Suite 140 Asheville. NC

339 New Leicester Highway, Suite 140 Asheville. NC WELCOME AND HOUSEKEEPING Chairman O Conner opened the meeting and introductions followed. CONSENT AGENDA Chairman O Conner indicated that the Consent Agenda included May minutes, the UPWP FY 2018- Amendment

More information

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Module 2 Planning and Programming Module 2 Planning and Programming Contents: Section 1 Overview... 2-2 Section 2 Coordination with MPO... 2-4 Section 3 Functional Classification... 2-6 Section 4 Minute Order for Designation as Access

More information

School Siting and Transportation

School Siting and Transportation School Siting and Transportation City of Denton and Denton ISD March 5, 2012 North Central Texas Council of Governments Common Goal All schools should provide a safe and healthy learning environment with

More information

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 2016 PRIORITY PROJECTS REPORT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION This document was produced in cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration

More information

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013 KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013 January 16, 2014 PROJECT TYPE: Multimodal (bicycle, pedestrian, roadway, transit) LOCATION: Kansas

More information

Arthur A. Mendonsa Hearing Room July 20, :15 p.m. MINUTES

Arthur A. Mendonsa Hearing Room July 20, :15 p.m. MINUTES July 20, 2010 Regular MPC Board Meeting Members Present: Shedrick Coleman, Chairman J. Adam Ragsdale, Vice-Chairman Jon Pannell, Secretary Lacy Manigault, Treasurer Tanya Milton Members Not Present: Ben

More information

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015 DCHC MPO ing Overview & Guidance draft January 2015 General Ratio APD Bond R CMAQ DP SHRP Appalachian Development Highway Revenue Bond Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Demonstration, Priority, and

More information

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016) Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year (July 1, 2015 June 30, ) APPROVED BY OTO BOARD OF DIRECTORS: April 16, 2015 APPROVED BY USDOT: April 22, 2015 AMENDMENT ONE APPROVED BY OTO BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

More information

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 (952) 496-8346 Fax: (952) 496-8365 www.co.scott.mn.us MITCHELL J. RASMUSSEN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER

More information

AGENDA. Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments

AGENDA. Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments AGENDA Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments 11:30 am Auto Occupancy Detection Technology Rewards Program and Tolled Managed Lanes Policy

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) partners with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

More information

MPO Policy Board Thursday, October 26, 2017 South Waco Community Center Large Conference Room 2815 Speight Avenue, Waco, Texas

MPO Policy Board Thursday, October 26, 2017 South Waco Community Center Large Conference Room 2815 Speight Avenue, Waco, Texas MPO Policy Board Thursday, October 26, 2017 South Waco Community Center Large Conference Room 2815 Speight Avenue, Waco, Texas Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Summary Notes DRAFT Members Present:

More information

The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects

The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transit Routes... 2 Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act)... 3 Transit Operators and Recipients of

More information

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Summary of Study Outreach Efforts... 3 Figure No. Description Page

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Summary of Study Outreach Efforts... 3 Figure No. Description Page Oak Ridge Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Program Public Involvement and Agency Coordination Summary T Table of Contents Introduction... 1 1.1 Overview of the Project... 1 1.2 Purpose of this Report...

More information